denise clarkson, willem fourie, dobrila lopez, mike lopez, kirsten marais, manukau ... · 2012. 1....

24
Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau Institute of Technology

Upload: others

Post on 24-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Denise Clarkson,Willem Fourie,Dobrila Lopez,Mike Lopez,

Kirsten Marais,

Manukau Institute of Technology

Page 2: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

BackgroundOur studyMethodResults and DiscussionConclusionWhere to from hereQuestions

Page 3: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

A contrast of learners’ experience with peer assessment & self-assessment.

Peer assessment skills◦

“are needed by lifelong learners, not only in their continuing learning but also in contexts such as performance appraisal, team building, and so on, which need people who have become adept at assessing each other’s work and contributing fairly, sensitively and appropriately.” (Race, 2001)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Our study contrasts learners’ experience with peer assessment with that of self-assessment.
Page 4: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

In order for learners to become an active part of such a learning society they have to adopt a “learning approach to life” and develop the judgments they make about learning as well as learning tasks (Boud, 2000).

For learners to develop judgemental skills educators must;◦

go beyond immediate course-related goals

view assessment in wider terms

Assessment should have a purpose of preparing students for activities of learning throughout life in a learning society.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In order for learners to become an active part of such a learning society they have to adopt a “learning approach to life” and develop the judgments they make about learning as well as learning tasks (Boud 2000). To help learners develop their judgemental skill requires educators to go beyond immediate course-related goals and view assessment in wider terms. In particular assessment should have a purpose of preparing students for activities of learning throughout life in a learning society.
Page 5: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

There are many definitions of peer assessment:

An agreement in which individuals consider the amount, level, value, worth, quality, or success of products or outcomes of learning of peers of similar status.” (Topping, 1998)

An arrangement with students assessing the quality of their fellow students’ work & giving feedback to each other.” (Van Der Berg, Admiral and Pilot, 2006)

A skill that can be acquired through training. (Sluijsmans at al, 2004)

Page 6: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Acquisition of life long skills (Ballantyne et al 2002).Enhances employability skills (Cassidy 2006) by improving:◦

oral and written communication

reading◦

learning skills and strategies

problem solving, decision making◦

dependability, and responsibility

Setting assessment criteria contributes to student learning. (Sivan 2000) Enhances self assessment (Topping 2005)

Page 7: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Concern around validity & reliability of marks given by students due to:◦

lack of expertise

potential bias◦

discomfort with the extra responsibility

lack of formal training◦

perception that is the job of the tutor to do assessment. Cassidy (2006)

But, validity and reliability are only a concern if marks are used summatively.

Page 8: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Topping also states that peer assessment is more reliable than self-assessment but it still lacks objectivity.

It requires the active engagement of students.

Students must value both the goal of lifelong learning and the learning arising from the process of peer assessment as implemented in courses.

Page 9: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

We explored the student perspective

We asked these research questions:◦

Do students see value in self-assessment?◦

Does self and peer assessment help learning?◦

Do participants learn more from peer-assessment than self-assessment?◦

Should we do more self and peer assessment?◦

What are the barriers to wider use?

Page 10: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Non-experimental post-test only design Participants completed a questionnaireSurvey questions were formed into four scales;◦

value ◦

learning ◦

contrasting peer with self ◦

concerns

Additional questions captured basic demographics and conceptions of learning

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The study used a non-experimental post-test only design in which participants completed a questionnaire on their experiences with self-assessment and peer-assessment.
Page 11: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Non random convenience sample.Students enrolled in three degree courses with self and peer-assessment.Self and peer-assessment were used primarily for their believed contribution to learning.◦

Where marks were awarded, it was for quality of marking demonstrated.

Student marks were not used themselvesQuestionnaire administered to 92 students (64% of 143 enrolled) who chose to participate.Analysis was carried out after marks finalisation. (Teacher/Participant relationship)

Page 12: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

We formed questions into scales (DeVaus, 2002) for these reasons:◦

To get at the complexity of the concept◦

To help develop more valid measures◦

To increase reliability◦

For greater precision◦

To simplify analysis

On the following slides, we set out the questions used to build the scales as well as the scale results.

Page 13: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

D01 The ability to assess my own performance is important 97%

D03 The idea of self-assessment is a good one 89%

D04 Self-assessment would be a good idea if we didn’t have such a high workload

88%

We concluded that participants endorsed the value of self-assessment:

t(91)=9.3691; p<.0001CI.99 = (6.4232 ≤ Valued ≤ 7.5283).

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Valued scale Results are excluding neutral category From the perspective of lifelong learning, we believe, as practitioners, that assessment skills are needed throughout a learner’s life and that part of our job as educators is to help build this capability. However, we thought it prudent to ask our students whether they agreed. For this scale we asked participants whether professionals need to be able to judge their own work (D24), whether participants should be able to assess their own performance (D01) and whether self-assessment was a good idea (D03). Valued variable mean significantly (t(91)=9.3691; p<.0001) greater than 5 with a confidence interval of CI.99 = (6.4232 ≤ Valued ≤ 7.5283). We concluded that participants endorsed the value of self-assessment.
Page 14: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

D02 Self-assessment is more demanding that having someone else assess me 88%

D07 I found assessing my own work to be valuable 81%

D08** I found assessing another student’s work valuable 86%

D09 This exercise helped me make a realistic assessment of my own abilities 93%

D10 I had to consider my own learning progress more closely than usual 96%

D11 Having to justify my mark helped me focus on the value of the work done 94%

D12 This exercise made me more aware of what I need to know in this subject 97%

D13** I learnt from the other markers comments about my work 90%

We concluded that participants endorsed the value of self-assessment:◦

t(91)

=9.3691; p<.0001◦

CI.99

= (6.4232 ≤

Valued ≤

7.5283).

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The mean of the learning variable was significantly (t(91)=6.6994; p<.0001) greater than 5 with a confidence interval of CI.99 = (5.7427 ≤ Learning ≤ 6.6968). Because there were two components in the learning scale, we verified this with separate tests for each sub-scale. Both the direct subscale (t(91)=5.8321; p<.0001) and the indirect sub-scale (t(91)=5.6785; p<.0001) were also significantly greater than 5; the confidence intervals were CI.99 = (5.7469 ≤ Direct ≤ 6.9655) and CI.99 = (5.6396 ≤ Indirect ≤ 6.7357). We concluded that participants endorsed the belief that self and peer assessment helped their learning.
Page 15: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

D07 I found assessing my own work to be valuable 81%

D08** I found assessing another student’s work valuable 86%

D13** I learnt from the other markers comments about my work 90%

We concluded that participants endorsed this. ◦

t(91)

=5.0687; p<.0001 ◦

CI.99

= (5.7132 ≤

LearnedMorePeer ≤

7.2397).

Presenter
Presentation Notes
LearnedMorePeer variable was significantly (t(91)=5.0687; p<.0001) greater than 5 with a confidence interval of CI.99 = (5.7132 ≤ LearnedMorePeer ≤ 7.2397). We concluded that participants endorsed the belief that they learned more from peer assessment than from self-assessment. Although 90% of participants believed they learnt from the other markers comments about their work (D13) and 86% found assessing another student’s work valuable (D08), only 73% believed students should be more involved in assessing other students (D06). It should also be noted that 32% felt it was not right for other students to mark their work and 43% felt uncomfortable with the responsibility of marking others’ work
Page 16: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

D05** It’s not right for other students to mark my work 32%D06** Students should be more involved in assessing other students 73%D20** I did not feel comfortable with the responsibility of marking others’

work

43%

D21 I did not feel comfortable with the responsibility of marking my

own work

44%

D22 It’s the lecturer’s job to mark my work. 60%D23 We should have more opportunities for peer and self assessment 78%

D25 I don’t know enough to be able to judge whether work is good 65%

We concluded that participants did not clearly endorse the wider use of self and peer assessment. ◦

t(91)=1.3147; p=0.1887◦

(i.e. 18% chance of sampling error)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
DoMore scale was not significantly (t(91)=1.3147; p=0.1887) different from 5. We concluded that participants did not endorse the wider use of self and peer assessment. The endorsement is not strong enough for us to conclude that participants clearly support wider use. It is not clear “yes”. Confidence is 82% that they are endorsing it but it is not 99% confidence which we are aiming for .There is 18% chance that it is a sampling error. The response is overall favourable and positive but not strong enough to rule out sampling error.
Page 17: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

We concluded that participants:did not believe that we should reject self and peer assessment.14 of the 92 students (15%) were strongly opposed to the use.◦

t(91)=-5.3677; p<.0001

CI.99 = (3.0934 ≤

Reject ≤

4.3442)We concluded that changes were needed before wider use could be considered.◦

t(91)=3.6505; p=0.0005

CI.99 = (5.2112 ≤

Change ≤

6.2854)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The mean of the reject variable was significantly (t(91)=-5.3677; p<.0001) less than 5 with a confidence interval of CI.99 = (3.0934 ≤ Reject ≤ 4.3442). We concluded that participants did not believe that we should reject self and peer assessment. However 14 of the 92 students (15%) were strongly opposed to the use of self and peer-assessment reporting either that it was unfair, or that it was a waste of time. The mean of the change variable was significantly (t(91)=3.6505; p=0.0005) greater than 5 with a confidence interval of CI.99 = (5.2112 ≤ Change ≤ 6.2854). We concluded that participants felt that changes were needed before wider use of self and peer assessment could be considered.
Page 18: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

The under-21age group endorsed the need to change- older students did not.

Participants with work experience were more likely to: ◦

prefer deeper learning and a deeper approach to studying. ◦

value self-and peer assessment and to see consequent benefits to their learning.

endorse wider use of self and peer assessment and ◦

less likely to be opposed.

No significant associations between the study variables and◦

Gender,

English

as a first language ◦

or whether the study was taken in a student’s first semester

of study◦

the course

or the level of the course.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
To summarise the above results: Participants in the under-21 age group endorsed the need to change the approach whereas older students did not. Participants with workforce experience were more likely to express a preference for courses with opportunities for deeper learning and a preference for a deeper approach to studying. They were also more likely to see value in self-and peer assessment and to see consequent benefits to their learning. They were more likely to endorse wider use of self and peer assessment and less likely to be opposed to such wider use.
Page 19: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Learning and wider use◦

90% of participants believed they learnt from the other markers comments about their work (D13)

86% found assessing another student’s work valuable (D08),

But only 73% believed students should be more involved in assessing other students (D06).

32% felt it was not right for other students to mark their work (D05)

43% felt uncomfortable with the responsibility of marking others’ work (D20)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Before we can recommend wider use of self and peer assessment, we need to understand better why 15% of the participants were strongly opposed to its use and to find ways of changing these participants’ attitudes. We also need to find ways of changing the attitudes of those who, although not strongly opposed, nevertheless remain unconvinced of the benefits.
Page 20: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Before we can recommend wider use we need to:◦

understand better why 15% of the participants were strongly opposed to its use ◦

find ways of changing these participants’

attitudes

find ways of changing the attitudes of those who, although not strongly opposed, remain unconvinced of the benefits

Page 21: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

90% of participants believed they learnt from the other markers comments about their work (D13)

86% found assessing another student’s work valuable (D08),

73% believed students should be more involved in assessing other students (D06).

We need to find ways of satisfying the needs of this majority.

Page 22: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

We remain convinced of the value of including self and peer assessment activities in our courses

most of our students agree with us,

We have gained some insights into why a minority of students may be concerned and We have quantified the degree of change needed to overcome these barriers.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We remain convinced of the value of including self and peer assessment activities in our courses. Although the majority of our students agree with us, a minority remain unconvinced of the benefits or appropriateness of such activities. We are reluctant to recommend more widespread use until their concerns can be addressed. We have gained some insights into why students may be concerned and have quantified the degree of change needed to overcome these barriers. Our next step is to devise strategies to mitigate these concerns and to evaluate their effectiveness.
Page 23: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results

Our next step is to devise strategies to:◦

mitigate these concerns and ◦

evaluate their effectiveness.

Invitation: We would like to invite you to join us on this journey.Contact:

[email protected]

Page 24: Denise Clarkson, Willem Fourie, Dobrila Lopez, Mike Lopez, Kirsten Marais, Manukau ... · 2012. 1. 23. · Manukau Institute of Technology ` Background ` Our study ` Method ` Results