deparment of languages applied linguistics in english program
DESCRIPTION
DEPARMENT OF LANGUAGES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH PROGRAM. RESEARCH DISSERTATION. THEME: “INCIDENCE OF APPLYING TASK-BASED LEARNING GROUP WORK ON SPEAKING PRODUCTION FOR STUDENTS OF SEVENTH YEAR OF BASIC OF SAGRADOS CORAZONES DE RUMIPAMBA SCHOOL IN QUITO.”. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH DISSERTATION
THEME: “INCIDENCE OF APPLYING TASK-
BASED LEARNING GROUP WORK ON SPEAKING PRODUCTION FOR STUDENTS OF SEVENTH YEAR OF BASIC OF SAGRADOS CORAZONES DE RUMIPAMBA SCHOOL IN QUITO.”
-HAVING A STRONG KNOWLEDGE OF ENGLISH SPEAKING HELPS THE STUDENTS TO IMPROVE THEIR LANGUGE SKILLS.
-SPOKEN LANGUAGE IN REAL SITUATIONS.-TASK- BASED LEARNING DEVELOPS
COGNITIVE PROCESS, CREATIVE THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING.
- BY SENDING TASKS THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO USE LANGUAGE COMMUNICATIVELY.
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATIONTHERE WERE MANY CONVERSATIONS
ABOUT THE LOW PERFORMANCE IN SPEAKING PRODUCTION THEY DID NOT USE ENGLISH IN REAL SITUATIONS.
TEACHERS DON`T HAVE A CLEAR FRAMEWORK ABOUT MODELS AND TECHNIQUES OF SPEAKING PRODUCTION.
TASK- BASED LEARNING IS A RESULT OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING BASED ON ASSUMTIONS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM.
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATIONEffect 1.1
Effect 1.1Low motivation to generate
the language
Effect 2.1Not enough active techniques
applied
Effect 3.1Traditional method applied
Effect 1 Lack of real life
language situations
Effect 2Lack of direct contact with
the language
Effect 3Inadequate output production
Cause 3Low teacher’s profile
Cause 2Non-existence of laboratories
with Internet.
Cause 1Non-native environment
Cause 2.1Lack of authentic resources
Cause 2.1Lack of authentic resources
Cause 1.1Spanish speaking
environment
E. Cause 2.1Lack of authentic
resources
LOW SPEAKING SKILL DEVELOPMENT
PROBLEM SETTING
Main problem
How does the traditional method affect the speaking production in the classroom on the students attending the seventh year of Sagrados Corazones de Rumipamba school?
Secondary problemsHow does the lack of active techniques affect the
speaking skill affect the speaking skill to the students attending the seventh year of Basic of Sagrados Corazones de Rumipamba school?
How does the low teacher`s profile affect the speaking skill to the attending the seventh year of Basic of Sagrados Corazones de Rumipamba school?
How does the lack of autentic material influence the speaking skill on stuents attending the seventh year of Basic of Sagrados Corazones de Rumipamba school?
VARIABLES WORKING OUTIndependent variable
Task - based learning and group work
Dependent variable
English speaking production
OBJECTIVES
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
To determine the incidence of applying Task- based method in speaking production on the students attending the seventh grade at Sagrados Corazones de Rumipamba School during the scholar year 2011-2012
OBJECTIVES
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
To diagnose 3 problems in speaking ability on the students attending the seventh year of SSCC de Rumipamba school.
To examine the use of Task-Based learning to develop learner`s English speaking ability on the students attending the seventh year of SSCC de Rumipamba school.
JUSTIFICATIONUse an adequate educational
model to develop English speaking skill.
Task based learning method focuses on learners to used language naturally, share ideas.
Reinforce teacher`s profile with adequate methodology task- based learning,group work and speaking techniques.
TASK- BASED LEARNING SPEAKING PRODUCTION
Approaches of Task-based learning uses the 4 skills of the languages
Task cycle are methodological opinions or task performance.
Post tasked. Provides an opportunity to repeat the task, to encourage reflexion, and attention and engage learner`s attention
Componets of Task- based learning:Pre-task are strategies for inspiring learners, rules.
Interactive classroom activities.Teaching techniques.Oral interviews.Interaction tasks.Role-plays.Discussion.Re-telling.Picture description.Comparisons.Information gap.Jigsaw.Speaking zone.Conversation games.-Criteria levels for evaluating English communication.
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE DEPENDANT VARIABLE
Group Work. Are activities carried out by learners working in small groups.
Interactive Classroom Activities
The conversation game.Exa.markers English conversa
Speaking zone.Exa.make a line
Information Gap.Exa: Maps to find the way
Jigsaws. Exa. The text is cut and students put it in order
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
Speaking Production
Independent User
The Ideational FunctionExpress content and
communicate information
Uses of Spoken English
The Interpersonal FunctionSocial Relations
Common Reference Levels: global scale
Basic User
Proficient User C1
C2
B1
B2
A1
A2
Oral Production Activities
Examples of speaking activities include:• public address (information, instructions, etc.)• addressing audiences (speeches at public meetings, university lectures, sermons, entertainment, sports commentaries, sales presentations, etc.). They may involve, for example:• reading a written text aloud;• speaking from notes, or from a written text or visual aids (diagrams, pictures, charts, etc.);• acting out a rehearsed role;• speaking spontaneously;• singing.
Spoken Interaction
Examples of interactive activities include:• transactions• casual conversation• informal discussion• formal discussion• debate• interview• negotiation• co-planning• practical goal-oriented co-operation
RELATION BETWEEN INDEPENDANT AND DEPENDANT VARIABLES
Task-based learning (TBL) refers to a method of English teaching that requires learners to use authentic language through a communicative approach to achieve a desired outcome (Willis, 1998; Ellis, 2003). English speaking ability refers to the skill of communicating by sharing information fluently and accurately, including the choice and use of appropriate vocabulary and structure in all contexts. This performance can be measured using the rating scale adapted from Ribe and Vidal (1993), Council of Europe, (2001) and Nunan.
Regarding to competences, speaking production is a crucial one. Teachers need to provide their students the more appropriate techniques, so that their students can develop speaking competence. As a cooker selects different ingredients to make his dishes delicious and nutritive, teachers have to select teaching techniques from different approaches, such as Task Based, Cooperative Learning, Communicative Language Teaching, Natural Approach.
HYPOTHESIS SYSTEM WORKING HYPOTHESIS The Task-Based Learning Method and group work will improve
the speaking skill in the learning process on students attending the 7th year of Basic Education at Sagrados Corazones School during the scholar year 2011-2012.”
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESISTask-based learning as an active method will improve the speaking ability in the learning process on students attending the 7th year of Basic Education at Sagrados Corazones School during the scholar year 2011-2012.
NULL HYPOTHESISThe Task-Based Learning method and group work won’t improve the speaking skill in the learning process on students attending the 7th year of basic education at Sagrados Corazones School during the scholar year 2011-2012.
RESEARCH TYPE AND DESIGN It is a descriptive research because it includes many particular
research methodologies and procedures, such as observations, survey, self reports and test.
It is quasi-experimental design because it refers to determine whether two groups are different after the experiment.
POPULATION AND SAMPLE. SSCC has four sections the 2 grades selected were A and C with the
population of 36 students. Seventeen students of 7th N that is the experimental group and
nineteen students of 7th M that is the control group.FIELD WORK.The reseach was carried out in two seventh grades A and C of SS.CC.INSTRUMENTS FOR DATA COLLECTION.Qualitative and Quantitative. Six unit plans and an English Speaking
test.PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS.The task based method was applied in the experimental group for 3
months the participants were tested by coversations the test was scored over 20 with 4 paramethers. Fluency, accuracy gesture and pronunciation.
Results of the Pretests
Fluency
Accuracy
Gesture
Pronunciation
Results of the Posttests
Fluency
Accuracy
Gesture
Pronunciation
Pearson Correlation Coefficient will be applied to test the consistency of the results of the experimental group
As the correlation coefficient is 0,81, we can be confident that the measurement of the tests are reliable.
SEVENTH N -Experimental group
Pretest scores Posttest scores
x x2 y y2 xy
15 225 18 324 270
14 196 18 324 252
16 256 19 361 304
13 169 14 196 182
12 144 14 196 168
12 144 13 169 156
12 144 14 196 168
14 196 17 289 238
10 100 11 121 110
10 100 14 196 140
7 49 9 81 63
13 169 18 324 234
8 64 14 196 112
15 225 16 256 240
14 196 18 324 252
15 225 15 225 225
14 196 15 225 210
15 225 18 324 270
229 3023 275 4327 3594
t-test FORMULA
X = mean
= Standard DeviationN = number of students
t-testTo compare the difference between two means
STATISTICAL DECISIONThe necessary t for 34 degrees of freedom
at the significance level of 0,05 is 1,69, according to the table of Percentage points for upper probability of Student's t-distribution.
The t obtained from comparing the means of the control and experimental group for 34 degrees of freedom is higher than the t of the table of Percentage points for upper probability of Student's t-distribution. at significance level of 0,05.
Statistical Decision for Specific Hypothesis
Statistical Decision for Specific HypothesisAccording to the statistical results obtained the Null
Hypothesis is rejected, and the Hypothesis of this research is sustained: INCIDENCE OF APPLYING TASK-BASED LEARNING AND GROUP WORK ON SPEAKING PRODUCTION FOR STUDENTS ATTENDING THE SEVENTH YEAR OF BASIC SCHOOL AT SAGRADOS CORAZONES DE RUMIPAMBA SCHOOL IN QUITO WILL RESULT IN AN ENHACEMENT OF THEIR ORAL PRODUCTION
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUSIONS RECOMMMENDATIONSThe Pretest
The mean of both groups is similar and very low
The instrument used to measure allowed to measure different parameters and was not stressing for the students
Teachers should recognize that spoken production is a weakness in English program
Teachers should look for effective ways of evaluating and teaching oral production
The PosttestThe performance of the experimental
group was higher
Teachers should try different methodologies and test their progress statically
The techniquesThey really invited students to
talkCooperative working and
jigsawsSpeaking ZoneConversational Game
Teaches should use the means that are available, such as internet, in order to find ideas, techniques, methodologies that help in the teaching process.
The statistical resultA level of significance of 0,05The time
Institutions should encourage its teachers to make educational research
TEACHING TECHNIQUES FOR SPEAKING PRODUCTION
1.Task- based learning Approach 2.1 Theory 2.2 Principles 2.3 Techniques and Activities
2. Cooperative learning 3.1 Theory 3.2 Principles 3.3. Techniques and Activities
3. Interactive Classroom activities Information gap Jigsaws Techniques and Activities
4. Interactive Classroom activities Speaking zone Conversation game Techniques and Activities