department of the navy€¦ · e2/c2 aircrew training facility mh-60s hangar & airfield...

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

February 2007

Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 / FY 2009

BUDGET ESTIMATES

FY 2008 Program

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND

FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS

JUSTIFICATION DATASubmitted to Congress

Blank Page

Table of Contents

FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing ProgramDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

STATE LIST

INDEX OF LOCATIONS

INDEX OF LOCATIONS (NAVY)

INDEX OF LOCATIONS (MARINES)

MISSION STATUS INDEX

INSTALLATION INDEX

APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS

PROJECT JUSTIFICATIONS - INSIDE THE UNITED STATES

PROJECT JUSTIFICATIONS - OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES

PLANNING AND DESIGN

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION

FAMILY HOUSING

i

iii

ix

xv

xvii

xxi

xxiii

xxv

1

311

389

391

1

Blank Page

i

ALABAMA

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

FLORIDA

HAWAII

ILLINOIS

MARYLAND

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

TEXAS

VIRGINIA

WASHINGTON

9,560

33,720

224,109

21,440

203,231

26,871

90,429

247,490

37,652

14,290

119,329

230,660

Inside The United States

Subtotal 1,258,781

Summary of Locations

FY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program

Outside the United States

BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI

GUAM

JAPAN

35,500

7,150

22,390

278,818

8,750

Subtotal 352,608

Various Locations Various Locations 492,887

Subtotal 492,887

2,104,276


Total - FY 2008 Military Construction Program

9,560

33,720

224,109

21,440

203,231

10,221

38,360

237,430

37,652

14,290

119,329

143,670

1,093,012

35,500

7,150

22,390

278,818

343,858

372,720

372,720

1,809,590

State/CountryAppropRequest

AuthRequest

ii

Blank Page

iii

ALABAMA

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

NAS WHITING FLD MILTON FL

MCAS YUMA AZ

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETON

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON

SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA

MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMS

252

498

519

070

079

009

097

115

170

215

352

608

637

118

135

906

9,560

22,980

10,740

4,400

6,050

17,980

29,050

31,980

26,530

17,730

5,830

8,510

18,090

9,040

14,590

34,329

Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext., NOLF Evergreen

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Main Base

Tow Way "G"

Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS Pendleton

Tactical Support Van Pad Expansion

ISR Camp - Intel Battalion

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22 Area

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Headquarters Area

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Margarita(33)Area

MARSOC Supporting Facilities

Traffic Improvements

Fitness Center, Camp Pendleton

Infantry Squad Battle Course

Pier 5002 Sub Fender Installation

Magnetic Silencing Facility Modification

BEQ & POV Parking Structure

3

9

13

19

23

29

35

41

47

51

55

61

65

73

77

83

EVERGREEN, ALABAMA

YUMA, ARIZONA

CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA


SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA

Inside the United States


Index of Locations for Navy and Marine Corps

9,560

33,720

10,450

155,700

23,630

34,329

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Total - ALABAMA

Total - ARIZONA

Total - CALIFORNIA

9,560

33,720

224,109

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

9,560

22,980

10,740

4,400

6,050

17,980

29,050

31,980

26,530

17,730

5,830

8,510

18,090

9,040

14,590

34,329

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

AuthRequest Mission

Page No.

9,560

33,720

10,450

155,700

23,630

34,329

9,560

33,720

224,109

AppropRequest

iv

FLORIDA

HAWAII

ILLINOIS

MCLB ALBANY GA

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY

MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII

NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HI


NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES IL

003

388

749

587

173

748B

801

7,570

13,870

37,961

99,860

65,410

0

10,221

Maingate Improvements - Blount Island

Littoral Warfare Systems Facility

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters

Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning Point

Communication Center

RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc 3 of 3

Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer (SAMT)

89

95

103

109

115

123

127

JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA

KANEOHE, HAWAII

PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII

WAHIAWA, HAWAII

GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS




7,570

13,870

37,961

99,860

65,410

10,221

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Total - FLORIDA

Total - HAWAII

Total - ILLINOIS

21,440

203,231

10,221

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

7,570

13,870

37,961

99,860

65,410

16,650

10,221

Current

New

Current

New

New

Current

Current

AuthRequest Mission

Page No.

7,570

13,870

37,961

99,860

65,410

26,871

21,440

203,231

26,871

AppropRequest

v

MARYLAND

NORTH CAROLINA

NAS PATUXENT RIVER MD

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE

MCAS CHERRY POINT NC

NAS OCEANA VA

156

558

977

339A

002

1063

1087

1183

1185

1186

1187

137

634

651

670

828

122

809

689D

13,650

17,990

6,720

0

16,460

14,120

29,970

21,720

12,590

14,480

9,170

27,800

22,530

17,330

14,570

8,080

12,110

16,500

0

E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E Facility

Aircraft Prototype Facility

JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110 / 2122

National Maritime Intel Center Inc 2 of 3

Academic Instruction Facility, Camp Geiger

MOUT Enhancements

Bachelors Enlisted Quarters

MARSOC Special Ops Support Facilities

MARSOC Training Facilities

MARSOC Fitness Center/Training Pool

MARSOC Community Support Facilities

Bachelors Enlisted Quarters, French Creek

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New River

Aircraft Maint Hangar, New River Phase 2

Jet Engine Test Cell, New River

Field Medical Services School

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Storage/Maint Fac

Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades Navy F/A18E/F

Outlying Landing Field Facs, Land Acq Inc 5-7

133

137

143

151

157

161

167

171

175

179

183

187

191

195

199

203

209

215

223

PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND

SUITLAND, MARYLAND

CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA

CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA

PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA




38,360

0

208,820

28,610

0

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Total - MARYLAND

Total - NORTH CAROLINA

38,360

237,430

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

13,650

17,990

6,720

52,069

16,460

14,120

29,970

21,720

12,590

14,480

9,170

27,800

22,530

17,330

14,570

8,080

12,110

16,500

10,060

New

New

New

Current

Current

Current

New

New

New

New

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

New

AuthRequest Mission

Page No.

38,360

52,069

208,820

28,610

10,060

90,429

247,490

AppropRequest

vi

SOUTH CAROLINA

TEXAS

VIRGINIA

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORT

MCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SC

NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX

NAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VA

NAVSTA NORFOLK VA

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO

434

363

366

353

131

014

767

545

546

6,800

25,322

5,530

14,290

8,450

11,510

53,850

18,839

26,680

Structural Fire Station

Third Recruit Training BN Complex Phase 1

Motor Transport Facility

Aviation Trainer Facility

Mobile User Objective System Installation

E2/C2 Aircrew Training Facility

MH-60S Hangar & Airfield Improvements

MSGBN HQ & BEQ, Phase 1

Student Officer Quarters,TBS, Phase 2

231

237

243

249

255

261

265

273

277

BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA

PARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA




6,800

30,852

14,290

8,450

65,360

45,519

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Total - SOUTH CAROLINA

Total - TEXAS

Total - VIRGINIA

37,652

14,290

119,329

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

6,800

25,322

5,530

14,290

8,450

11,510

53,850

18,839

26,680

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

New

New

Current

Current

AuthRequest Mission

Page No.

6,800

30,852

14,290

8,450

65,360

45,519

37,652

14,290

119,329

AppropRequest

vii

WASHINGTONNAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA

NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA

305A

356

973C

978

193

0

91,070

0

28,690

23,910

BEQ Homeport Ashore Inc 2 of 2

CVN Maintenance Pier Replacement

Limited Area Prod & Strg Complex Inc 4 of 5

Missile Assembly Building 3

EA-18G Facility Improvements

285

289

295

299

305

BREMERTON, WASHINGTON

WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON


1,093,012Total - Inside The United States



BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI

BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI

925

158

906

908

914

Waterfront Development Phase 1

Wastewater Treatment Facility

FUEL FARM

Western Taxiway

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

35,500

7,150

4,000

2,900

15,490

313

321

327

331

335

NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN

NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IO

CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTI


35,500

7,150

22,390

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

119,760

23,910

Subtotal

Subtotal

Total - WASHINGTON 143,670

Total - BAHRAIN

Total - DIEGO GARCIA

Total - DJIBOUTI

35,500

7,150

22,390

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

47,240

91,070

39,750

28,690

23,910

Current

Current

Current

New

New

AuthRequest Mission

Page No.

206,750

23,910

230,660

1,258,781

35,500

7,150

4,000

2,900

15,490

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

35,500

7,150

22,390

35,500

7,150

22,390

AppropRequest

viii



GUAM

JAPAN

AGANA, GUAM

YOKOSUKA, JAPAN

262

494

502

530

532

998B

Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs & Upgrade

Harden Electrical System, Main Base

Kilo Wharf Extension

Fitness Center, Guam

Potable Water System Recap, Phase 1

Wharf Upgrades, Inc 3 of 3

40,870

59,420

101,828

45,250

31,450

0

341

347

351

357

361

367

NAVBASE GUAM

COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JA


343,858Total - Outside The United States

108

180

600

218

208

Grow the Force

Wharf Utilities Upgrades

Host Nation Infrastructure

Planning and Design

Unspecified Minor Construction

361,120

8,900

2,700

0

0

375

379

385

389

391

Grand Total 1,809,590

Total - Various Locations 372,720

278,818

0

Subtotal

Subtotal

Total - GUAM

Total - JAPAN

278,818

0

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

AuthRequest Mission

Page No.

40,870

59,420

101,828

45,250

31,450

8,750

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

New

278,818

8,750

278,818

8,750

352,608

361,120

8,900

2,700

110,167

10,000

New

New

Current

Current

Current

492,887

2,104,276

AppropRequest

Various Locations

ix

ALABAMA

CALIFORNIA

FLORIDA

HAWAII

ILLINOIS


SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA





252

118

135

388

587

173

748B

801

9,560

9,040

14,590

13,870

99,860

65,410

0

10,221

Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext., NOLF Evergreen


Magnetic Silencing Facility Modification





Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer (SAMT)

3

73

77

95

109

115

123

127

EVERGREEN, ALABAMA




WAHIAWA, HAWAII




Index of Locations for Navy


Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

9,560

23,630

13,870

99,860

65,410

10,221

Total - ALABAMA

Total - CALIFORNIA

Total - FLORIDA

Total - HAWAII

Total - ILLINOIS

9,560

23,630

13,870

165,270

10,221

AuthRequest

AppropRequest Mission

9,560

9,040

14,590

13,870

99,860

65,410

16,650

10,221

New

Current

New

New

New

New

Current

Current

9,560

23,630

13,870

99,860

65,410

26,871

9,560

23,630

13,870

165,270

26,871

Location ProjNo.

State/Cntry

Page No.

x

MARYLAND

NORTH CAROLINA

TEXAS

VIRGINIA



NAS OCEANA VA



NAVSTA NORFOLK VA

156

558

977

339A

689D

353

131

014

767

13,650

17,990

6,720

0

0

14,290

8,450

11,510

53,850

E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E Facility


JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110 / 2122

National Maritime Intel Center Inc 2 of 3

Outlying Landing Field Facs, Land Acq Inc 5-7


Mobile User Objective System Installation


MH-60S Hangar & Airfield Improvements

133

137

143

151

223

249

255

261

265


SUITLAND, MARYLAND




NORFOLK, VIRGINIA





Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

38,360

0

0

14,290

8,450

65,360

Total - MARYLAND


Total - TEXAS

Total - VIRGINIA

38,360

0

14,290

73,810

AuthRequest


13,650

17,990

6,720

52,069

10,060

14,290

8,450

11,510

53,850

New

New

New

Current

New

Current

New

New

New

38,360

52,069

10,060

14,290

8,450

65,360

90,429

10,060

14,290

73,810

Location ProjNo.

State/Cntry

Page No.

xi

WASHINGTON

NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA


305A

356

973C

978

193

0

91,070

0

28,690

23,910



Limited Area Prod & Strg Complex Inc 4 of 5



285

289

295

299

305




492,681Total - Inside The United States




Subtotal

Subtotal

119,760

23,910

Total - WASHINGTON 143,670

AuthRequest


47,240

91,070

39,750

28,690

23,910

Current

Current

Current

New

New

206,750

23,910

230,660

658,450

Location ProjNo.

State/Cntry

Page No.

xii

BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI

GUAM

JAPAN

BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI

AGANA, GUAM

YOKOSUKA, JAPAN

925

158

906

908

914

262

494

502

530

532

998B



FUEL FARM

Western Taxiway

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs & Upgrade

Harden Electrical System, Main Base





35,500

7,150

4,000

2,900

15,490

40,870

59,420

101,828

45,250

31,450

0

313

321

327

331

335

341

347

351

357

361

367

NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN



NAVBASE GUAM



343,858Total - Outside The United States




Total - BAHRAIN

Total - DIEGO GARCIA

Total - DJIBOUTI

Total - GUAM

Total - JAPAN

35,500

7,150

22,390

278,818

0

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

35,500

7,150

22,390

278,818

0

AuthRequest


Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

New

35,500

7,150

4,000

2,900

15,490

40,870

59,420

101,828

45,250

31,450

8,750

35,500

7,150

22,390

278,818

8,750

35,500

7,150

22,390

278,818

8,750

352,608

Location ProjNo.

State/Cntry

Page No.

xiii

108

180

600

218

208

Grow the Force



Planning and Design


361,120

8,900

2,700

0

0

375

379

385

389

391




Total - Various Locations 372,720

AuthRequest


361,120

8,900

2,700

110,167

10,000

New

New

Current

Current

Current

492,887

Various Locations

Location ProjNo.

State/Cntry

Page No.

xiv

Blank Page

xv

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

FLORIDA

HAWAII

MCAS YUMA AZ




MCLB ALBANY GA


498

519

070

079

009

097

115

170

215

352

608

637

906

003

749

22,980

10,740

4,400

6,050

17,980

29,050

31,980

26,530

17,730

5,830

8,510

18,090

34,329

7,570

37,961


Tow Way "G"





Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Headquarters Area







Maingate Improvements - Blount Island


9

13

19

23

29

35

41

47

51

55

61

65

83

89

103

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

PageNo.

YUMA, ARIZONA





KANEOHE, HAWAII


Index of Locations for Marines



Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

33,720

10,450

155,700

34,329

7,570

37,961

Total - ARIZONA

Total - CALIFORNIA

Total - FLORIDA

Total - HAWAII

33,720

200,479

7,570

37,961

MissionAppropRequest

AuthRequest

22,980

10,740

4,400

6,050

17,980

29,050

31,980

26,530

17,730

5,830

8,510

18,090

34,329

7,570

37,961

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

33,720

10,450

155,700

34,329

7,570

37,961

33,720

200,479

7,570

37,961

xvi

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA






002

1063

1087

1183

1185

1186

1187

137

634

651

670

828

122

809

434

363

366

545

546

16,460

14,120

29,970

21,720

12,590

14,480

9,170

27,800

22,530

17,330

14,570

8,080

12,110

16,500

6,800

25,322

5,530

18,839

26,680

Academic Instruction Facility, Camp Geiger

MOUT Enhancements


MARSOC Special Ops Support Facilities



MARSOC Community Support Facilities

Bachelors Enlisted Quarters, French Creek


Aircraft Maint Hangar, New River Phase 2



Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Storage/Maint Fac

Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades Navy F/A18E/F


Third Recruit Training BN Complex Phase 1




157

161

167

171

175

179

183

187

191

195

199

203

209

215

231

237

243

273

277

State/Cntry

ProjNo. Location

PageNo.





QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

600,331Total - Inside The United States


Index of Locations for Marines



Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

Subtotal

208,820

28,610

6,800

30,852

45,519


Total - SOUTH CAROLINA

Total - VIRGINIA

237,430

37,652

45,519

MissionAppropRequest

AuthRequest

16,460

14,120

29,970

21,720

12,590

14,480

9,170

27,800

22,530

17,330

14,570

8,080

12,110

16,500

6,800

25,322

5,530

18,839

26,680

Current

Current

New

New

New

New

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

208,820

28,610

6,800

30,852

45,519

237,430

37,652

45,519

600,331

xvii

ALABAMA

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

FLORIDA

HAWAII

Installation/Location ProjNo.

Cost ($000)

MissionStatus


MCAS YUMA AZ



SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA


MCLB ALBANY GA





EVERGREEN, ALABAMA

YUMA, ARIZONA







KANEOHE, HAWAII


WAHIAWA, HAWAII



Mission Status Index


Project Title

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

New

Current

New

New

252

498

519

070

079

009

097

115

170

215

352

608

637

118

135

906

003

388

749

587

173

Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext., NOLFEvergreen


Tow Way "G"





Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,Headquarters AreaBachelor Enlisted Quarters,Margarita(33)Area MARSOC Supporting Facilities





Magnetic Silencing FacilityModification


Maingate Improvements - BlountIsland





9,560

22,980

10,740

4,400

6,050

17,980

29,050

31,980

26,530

17,730

5,830

8,510

18,090

9,040

14,590

34,329

7,570

13,870

37,961

99,860

65,410

xviii

ILLINOIS

MARYLAND

NORTH CAROLINA


Cost ($000)

MissionStatus






NAS OCEANA VA



SUITLAND, MARYLAND








Project Title

Current

Current

New

New

New

Current

Current

Current

New

New

New

New

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

New

748B

801

156

558

977

339A

002

1063

1087

1183

1185

1186

1187

137

634

651

670

828

122

809

689D


Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer(SAMT)

E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&EFacilityAircraft Prototype Facility

JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110 /2122

National Maritime Intel Center Inc 2 of3

Academic Instruction Facility, CampGeigerMOUT Enhancements


MARSOC Special Ops SupportFacilitiesMARSOC Training Facilities


MARSOC Community SupportFacilitiesBachelors Enlisted Quarters, FrenchCreekBachelor Enlisted Quarters, New River

Aircraft Maint Hangar, New RiverPhase 2Jet Engine Test Cell, New River


Unmanned Aerial VehicleStorage/Maint FacHangar Renovation, Fac UpgradesNavy F/A18E/F

Outlying Landing Field Facs, Land AcqInc 5-7

16,650

10,221

13,650

17,990

6,720

52,069

16,460

14,120

29,970

21,720

12,590

14,480

9,170

27,800

22,530

17,330

14,570

8,080

12,110

16,500

10,060

xix

SOUTH CAROLINA

TEXAS

VIRGINIA

WASHINGTON


Cost ($000)

MissionStatus





NAVSTA NORFOLK VA








NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA



BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI

NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN



BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN

DIEGO GARCIA

DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI






Project Title

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

New

New

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

New

New

434

363

366

353

131

014

767

545

546

305A

356

973C

978

193


Third Recruit Training BN ComplexPhase 1Motor Transport Facility


Mobile User Objective SystemInstallation


MH-60S Hangar & AirfieldImprovements





Limited Area Prod & Strg Complex Inc4 of 5Missile Assembly Building 3


6,800

25,322

5,530

14,290

8,450

11,510

53,850

18,839

26,680

47,240

91,070

39,750

28,690

23,910

925

158

906

908

914



FUEL FARM

Western Taxiway

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

35,500

7,150

4,000

2,900

15,490

Current

Current

Current

Current

Current

xx


Cost ($000)

MissionStatus

GUAM

JAPAN

NAVBASE GUAM


AGANA, GUAM

YOKOSUKA, JAPAN


Various Locations

108

180

600

218

208

Grow the Force



Planning and Design


361,120

8,900

2,700

110,167

10,000

New

New

Current

Current

Current




Project Title

262

494

502

530

532

998B

Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs &UpgradeHarden Electrical System, Main Base





40,870

59,420

101,828

45,250

31,450

8,750

Current

Current

New

Current

Current

New

Various Location

Various Location

Various Location

Various Location

Various Location

VARIOUS LOCATIONS

xxi

Installation Location DD1390 PageNo.

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTNAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WA

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNEMARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONMARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETONMCAS CHERRY POINT NCNAVSUPPACT NORFOLK VANAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX



MCLB ALBANY GA


NAVSTA NORFOLK VA

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYMCRD/BEAUFORT PI, SCNAS PATUXENT RIVER MDNAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HINAS OCEANA VA


SUBASE SAN DIEGO CANAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH


NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HINAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WA

MCAS YUMA AZ

BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINABREMERTON, WASHINGTON

CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINACAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIACAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIACHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINACHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIACORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

EVERGREEN, ALABAMA



KANEOHE, HAWAII

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

PANAMA CITY, FLORIDAPARRIS ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINAPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLANDPEARL HARBOR, HAWAIIPLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIASUITLAND, MARYLAND


WAHIAWA, HAWAIIWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON

YUMA, ARIZONA

229283

1551727

207253247

1

121

87

101

259

93235131107221

271

71149

81

113303

7

B

C

E

G

J

K

N

P

Q

S

T

W

Y


Installation Index


xxii

Blank Page

xxiii


SECTION 1 - APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE

SECTION 2 - EXPLANATION OF LANGUAGE CHANGES

For acquisition, construction, installation, and equipment of temporary or permanent public works, navalinstallations, facilities, and real property for the Navy as currently authorized by law, including personnel in theNaval Facilities Engineering Command and other personal services necessary for the purposes of this appropriation,[$1,129,000,000] $2,104,276,000 to remain available until September 30, [2011] 2012. Provided, that of thisamount, not to exceed [$67,861,000] $110,167,000 shall be available for study, planning, design, architect andengineer services, as authorized by law, unless the Secretary of Defense determines that additional obligations arenecessary for such purposes and notifies the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress of hisdetermination and the reasons therefor.

1. Deletion of FY 2007 appropriations shown in brackets.

Appropriation Language


xxiv

Blank Page

xxv

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFY 2008 Military Construction and Family Housing Program

Special Program ConsiderationsPOLLUTION ABATEMENT:

ENERGY CONSERVATION:

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLANDS PROTECTION:

DESIGN FOR ACCESSIBILITY OF PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONNEL:

PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES:

PLANNING IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION:

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION:

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:

CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA MANUAL:

The military construction projects in this program will be designed to meet environmental standards. The Militaryconstruction projects proposed are primarily for the abatement of existing pollution problems at Naval and MarineCorps installations and have been reviewed to ensure that corrective design is accomplished in accordance withspecific standards and criteria.

The military construction projects proposed in this program will be designed for minimum energy consumption.

Proposed land acquisition, disposals, and installation construction projects have been planned to allow the propermanagement of floodplains and the protection of wetlands by avoiding long and short-term adverse impacts,reducing the risk of flood losses, and minimizing the loss or degradation of wetlands. Project planning is inaccordance with the requirements of Executive Order Numbers 11988 and 11990.

In accordance with Public Law 90-480, provisions for physically handicapped personnel will be provided for, whereappropriate, in the design of facilities included in this program.

Facilities included in this program do not directly or indirectly affect a district, site, building, structure, object orsetting listed in the National Register of Historic Places, except as noted on the DD Form 1391.

Projects located in the National Capital Region are submitted to the National Capital Planning Commission forbudgetary review and comment as part of the commission's annual review of the Future Years Defense Program(FYDP). Construction projects within the District of Columbia, with the exception of the Bolling/Anacostia area,are submitted to the Commission for approval prior to the start of construction.

In accordance with Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190), theenvironmental impact analysis process has been completed or is actively underway for all projects in the militaryconstruction program.

Economics are an inherent aspect of project development and design of military construction projects. Therefore, allprojects included in this program represent the most economical use of resources. Where alternatives could beevaluated, a primary economic analysis was prepared.

Project designs conform to Part II of Military Handbook 1190, "Facility Planning and Design Guide."

xxvi

Blank Page

Submitted to Congress

February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 11390

Scope

91110

Cost

($000)Start

Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext,

NOLF Evergreen

Complete

0 LS 9,560

Design Status

12/2005

8. Projects Requested In This Program

09/2007

A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..(440 Acres)

4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF

C. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ......................

D. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM .................

E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM .............

F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .....................

G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ....................................

H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 17,361

4,670

0

0

9,560

0

C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 117,727

9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:

TOTAL


EVERGREEN, ALABAMA

3. Installation and Location: N60508

9,560

B. Major Planned Next Three Years:

FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

0

10. Mission or Major Functions:

11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety Deficiencies ($000):

A. Pollution Abatement(*):

B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):

To maintain and operate facilities and provide services and material to

support operations of aviation activities and units of the Naval Air

Training Command and other activities and units as designated by the Chief

of Naval Operations. The Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) T-

6A Texas II aircraft began replacing the T-34C as the primary and

intermediate trainer aircraft in 2002.

31,591

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.82

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0

7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)

TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT

OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV

PERMANENT

1586

1701

1079

1113B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 311

369

118

118

0

0

0

0

0

0

28

44

50

57

0

0

Commander Navy

Installations Command


February 2007

DD Form


4. Command


EVERGREEN, ALABAMA


FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.82

5. Area Const

Cost IndexCommander Navy


Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form


This project will purchase land to construct 1000 feet of runway extensions

on two existing 4000 foot runways 10/28 and 1/19 at NOLF Evergreen,

Evergreen, Alabama, for a total of 5000 linear feet each.

PROJECT:

10. Description of Proposed Construction:

9. COST ESTIMATES

Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)

CLEARZONE ACQ. & RUNWAY EXT., NOLF

EVERGREEN

RUNWAY EXTENSION (340,000 SF)

LAND PURCHASE (ACQUISITION)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES

ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS

SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL

DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST

TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED

TOTAL REQUEST

LS

m2

AC

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

31,587

165

108.81

2,733.13

3,890

(3,440)

(450)

4,420

(410)

(970)

(2,440)

(80)

(520)

8,310

420

8,730

500

9,230

330

9,560

9,560

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date

4. Project Title

5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number

1. Component

8. Project Cost ($000)

05 FEB 2007

9,5600203576N 91110

Clearzone Acq. & Runway Ext.,

NOLF Evergreen

NAVY 2008FY

P252


EVERGREEN, ALABAMA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC:

11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 31,857

The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: NAS WHITING FLD

MILTON FL.

N60508(EV)

(NOLF EVERGREEN)

Extend runways at Navy Outlying Landing Field (NOLF) Evergreen 10/28 and

1/19 each 1000 linear feet, and purchase 165 acres of land. The project

includes removing and installing new fencing, clearing and grubbing,

excavating and installing new fill in low unstable areas, paved shoulders,

storm drainage, environmental mitigation for minor wetland areas,

relocation of two existing access roads, construction of two Runway Duty

Officer pads (RDO), replacement of existing airfield lighting systems, new

edge lights, threshold lighting, wind socks, distance markers, airfield

striping, minor demolition, and electrical utilities.


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 41391C

In addition to it's 6000 feet runways at North and South Fields, NAS

Whiting Field has two solo outlying landing fields, NOLF Brewton and NOLF

Choctaw (5000 and 8000 feet in length respectively), and three dual

outlying landing fields NOLF Barin, NOLF Evergreen and NOLF Saufley, which

are 4000 feet in length each. NAS Whiting Field conducts T-34C split field

operations at North Field and helicopter training and T-34C instrument

recovery at South Field. The increased runway length requirement of the T-

6A will not allow split field operations. The station is a joint-use

installation that provides sixty percent of the Navy's primary flight

training, thirteen percent for Air Force and nine and one half percent for

Coast Guard pilots. Trying to accommodate the T-6A at North & South fields

would increase traffic to a level jeopardizing the safety of all

inbound/outbound and recovery aircraft. NOLF's Brewton and Choctaw meet the

specified JPATS requirement with the exception of the crosswind at Choctaw,

but additional airfields are required to meet the flight training

throughput. NOLF Choctaw is primarily a joint-use runway occupied by the

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle detachment and encumbered by fleet and special

operations and other than trainer type aircraft. Extending the runways at

NOLF Evergreen will continue to allow dual operations at the other NOLF's,

provide future capacity for required solo operations that are safe and

efficient at Whiting Field's primary solo airport, and have less impact on

the environment and local community during construction.

There will be an insufficient number of solo airfields available when the

new T-6A trainer arrives at NAS Whiting Field in 2008, jeopardizing mission

readiness and flight training. Operations on runways with a Runway

The T-6A has been selected as the Joint Primary Aircraft Traing System

(JPATS) aircraft. The first T-6A will arrive at NASWF in 2008. The T-6A

will gradually replace the T-34C during the period years of FY-08 through

FY-15. The T-6A requires a minumum runway length of 4000 feet for dual

operations and 5000 feet for solo student operations for normal dry

operations at sea level up to 3500 feet pressure altitude. This is the

tested safe distance required under stated conditions and within this range

of altitudes. NOLF Evergreen is located at an elevation of 258.7 feet

thereby establishing within the constraints of this criteria, the minimum

runway length of 5000 feet. The weight of the T-6A exceeds the requirement

for the 4000 foot length. The T-6A aircraft engines do not have thrust

reversers to slow the aircraft upon landing. Wet runway conditions

significantly increases the stopping distance required.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,5600203576N 91110


NOLF Evergreen

NAVY 2008FY

P252


EVERGREEN, ALABAMA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60508(EV)

(NOLF EVERGREEN)


February 2007

DD Form


(F) Type of design contract Design Build

(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost

(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed

Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007

12. Supplemental Data:

Condition Recording of other than dry will significantly increase the

distance required to bring the T-6A to a safe and complete stop. Other than

NOLF Choctaw, NOLF Brewton is the only field available that meets the

minimum runway requirements. In order to meet the JPATS training schedule,

this project must be funded in FY 2008. If not, the Navy's training

mission at NAS Whiting will not be met with the arrival of the first T-6A's

in 2008.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,5600203576N 91110


NOLF Evergreen

NAVY 2008FY

P252


EVERGREEN, ALABAMA


B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from

other appropriations:

JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:

The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been considered for

joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This

Facility can be used by other components on an as available basis;

however, the scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.

Dave Garner, PWD NAS

Whiting Field, Milton, Fl.

850-623-7181 ext 46Activity POC: Phone No:

(D) Percent completed as of

(C) Date design completed

(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete

2. Basis:

(A) Standard or Definitive Design

(B) Where design was previously used

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

5. Construction start:

4. Contract award:

6. Construction complete:

A. Estimated Design Data:

1. Status:

(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started

No

$225

$150

$75

04/2008

01/2008

06/2009

12/2005

06/2007

09/2007

5%

15%

$75

$150

(E) Percent completed as of

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):

(A) Production of plans and specifications

(B) All other design costs

NONE

N60508(EV)

(NOLF EVERGREEN)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,5600203576N 91110


NOLF Evergreen

NAVY 2008FY

P252


EVERGREEN, ALABAMA


Blank Page

N60508(EV)

(NOLF EVERGREEN)


February 2007

DD Form


Scope

72124

11650

Cost

($000)Start

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters,

Main Base

Tow Way "G"

Complete

6439 m2

46000 m2

22,980

10,740

Design Status

09/2005

09/2005


09/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 1,527,933

46,947

17,930

76,423

33,720

147,147


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:17120 MAWTS-1 Applied Instruction Facility 4484 m2 17,930

TOTAL

TOTAL

MCAS YUMA AZ

YUMA, ARIZONA

3. Installation and Location: M62974

33,720


TOTAL

17,930

76,423


0






support operations of a Marine Aircraft Wing and other activities and units

as designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps in connection with the

Chief of Naval Operations.

1,850,100

21105

85110

72124

74043

17955

17135

276148 SF

LS

LS

0 LS

1 EA

LS

20,823

5,986

25,109

6,908

5,565

12,032

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Phase 1

South Entry Gate


Physical Fitness Center Addition

Water Survival Training Tank

Flight Simulator (JSF)

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.25

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

6707

5557

51

41B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 720

390

355

384

146

146

65

65

0

0

675

428

3809

3237

886

866

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form


4. Command

MCAS YUMA AZ

YUMA, ARIZONA



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.25

5. Area Const

Cost IndexCommandant of the

Marine Corps

Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form



9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, MAIN

BASE (69,309 SF)

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS

(68,620 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM (689

SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT

TECHNICAL OPERATING MANUALS

INFORMATION SYSTEMS

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE

PROTECTION


SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES


MECHANICAL UTILITIES


SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER

APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

6,439

6,375

64

2,410.32

4,598.6

17,110

(15,370)

(290)

(510)

(270)

(220)

(450)

2,870

(100)

(480)

(420)

(830)

(990)

(50)

19,980

1,000

20,980

1,200

22,180

800

22,980

22,980

(1,325)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,9800216496M 72124


Main Base

NAVY 2008FY

P498

MCAS YUMA AZYUMA, ARIZONA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M62974

The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MCAS YUMA AZ.

Construct a multi-story reinforced Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) building

with seismic upgrades, concrete foundation, reinforced concrete slab and

floors, and standing seam metal roofing, providing 150 rooms with semi-

private bathrooms in the standard 2X0 room configuration and 64 m2

telecommunications (NMCI) room. Built-In equipment includes an elevator.


February 2007

DD Form


This project supports the Marine Corps' goal of achieving the 2X0 standard

by 2012. This project is needed to provide billeting for enlisted

personnel at MCAS Yuma to support the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC)

goal to replace all inadequate bachelor quarters with the new 2x0

configured barracks that meet modern quality of life standards.

REQUIREMENT:

This project provides 300 man spaces (150 two-person rooms) for bachelor

enlisted personnel using the 2X0 room design Quality of Life (QOL)

standards for permanent party enlisted personnel at Marine Corps Air

Station (MCAS) Yuma.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,9800216496M 72124


Main Base

NAVY 2008FY

P498



11. Requirement:

36,295 2,125Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 46,644

Electrical systems include fire alarms, energy saving Electronic Monitoring

and Control System (EMCS), and information systems. Mechanical systems

include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and air

conditioning.

Supporting facilities work includes stormwater retention ponds, electrical

utilities (exterior lighting, electrical distribution including telephone,

local area network (LAN), and cable television, transformers and

substations), mechanical utilities (water, natural gas, sanitary, storm

sewer, manholes, and replacement of sanitary sewer main in Shaw Avenue),

paving and site improvements (concrete curb & gutters, sidewalks, new and

relocated street entrance drives, landscaping, basketball and volleyball

courts, sunshade structures, and site furnishings.) Site preparation

includes removal of unsuitable soils, removal of all existing concrete

foundations, concrete vehicle parking pads, existing sidewalk along Shaw

Avenue, and abandoned site utilities, plus excavation/grading and storm

water pollution best management measures. Demolition includes Bldg-876 a

CMU guardhouse, Bldg 868 a pre-engineered metal shed, chain link fencing

and light poles. Also included are Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection features. Sustainable principles will be

included into the design, development, and construction of the project in

accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.

Rooms: 150 two-person rooms.(2x0 configuration)

Maximum utilization: 300 E1-E3.

Intended Grade Mix: 226 E1-E3, 50 E-4, 24 E-5

Total: 300 persons.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


MCAS Yuma lacks safe, sufficient and adequate quarters for all grades of

enlisted personnel. The existing buildings are not in compliance with

life-safety/fire and seismic/structural requirements, and are classified as

inadequate facilities for personnel. The existing facilities are gang-head

configured.

If this project is not provided a shortfall of billeting quarters will

continue to exist. Personnel will continue to be billeted in inadequate,

unsafe buildings.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,9800216496M 72124


Main Base

NAVY 2008FY

P498



COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT

NMCI Connection

PMC

PMC

2008

2008

1,280

45



Equipment

Nomenclature




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


Yes

MCAS Yuma, AZ.

$300

$50

$250

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$250

$50


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp

or Requested Cost ($000)

2006 R&M Conducted ($000):2007 R&M Conducted ($000): 2,220

23,820

C. FY D. FY E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,9800216496M 72124


Main Base

NAVY 2008FY

P498




The Director Land Use and Military Construction Branch, Installations and

Logistics Department, Headquarters Marine Corps certifies that this

project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral

Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other

components on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is

based on Navy requirements.

Richard A. Samrah, AIA 928-269-3163Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 131391

PROJECT:


9. COST ESTIMATES


TOW WAY "G" (495,140 SF)

TOW WAY (495,140 SF)





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

46,000

46,000 88.78

4,080

(4,080)

5,260

(1,240)

(590)

(200)

(3,120)

(110)

9,340

470

9,810

560

10,370

370

10,740

10,740


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,7400216496M 11650

Tow Way "G"

NAVY 2008FY

P519



11. Requirement:

Adequate: Substandard:m2 46,000

This project constructs a 1880 meters by 24 meters (6,615 lineal foot by 80

feet) tow way to provide a safe and efficient route to tow aircraft from

aircraft parking areas to the newly constructed Combat Aircraft Loading

Apron (CALA) for ordnance loading. Special construction features includes

tow way shoulder, connection to taxiway, turnouts, and a paved security

road. Electrical Utilities includes tow way lighting , underground

electric conductors, ductbanks, manholes and handholes. Paving and Site

Improvements includes fencing, irrigation canal relocation, storm drainage

swatle and other storm sewer piping. Site preparations include clearing and

earthwork. During construction there will be scheduling restrictions and

Foreign Object Damage (FOD) control as the site is adjacent to a working

taxiway. Demolition costs are associated with the demolition and saw

cutting of existing asphalt pavement road, existing concrete headwalls, and

a portion of an existing concrete canal, demolition of existing slab on

grade, relocation of existing fencing and irrigation canal, hauling and

dump charges, and distributed general requirements.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


The inboard taxiway, Taxiway "E", is the only way for aircraft to be towed

to the new Combat Aircraft Loading Apron (CALA)for ordnance loading. Using

Taxiway "E" as both a taxiway and a tow way causes a bottleneck, slowing

traffic (See attachment 1). The speed limit for vehicles towing aircraft

is 5 mph (4.3 knots) and the taxiing speed is 15 mph (13 knots). Taxing

aircraft must wait for the slower towed vehicles causing unnecessary delays

in airfield operations. These delays cause unnecessary fuel consumption

and add the risk of heat stress to the pilots as they wait in the desert

sun.

Taxiway "E" on the Air Station will be used as both a taxiway and a tow

way. The dual use of the taxiway will cause delays and inefficiencies in

airfield operations. The addition of towed vehicles on the taxiway will

create an unsafe operational environment.

Air Station operations requires a facility adequate to tow aircraft to the

newly constructed CALA without delaying or interrupting normal airfield

operations. The construction of Tow Way "G" will provide a safe and

efficient solution to tow aircraft from the aircraft parking area to the

CALA without disrupting normal taxiing traffic on Taxiway "E".


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project will construct 1,880 lineal meters Tow Way "G". Tow Way "G"

will be constructed of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). Constructing Tow

Way "G" will provide a facility to tow aircraft from the aircraft parking

area to the new Combat Aircraft Loading Apron (CALA). The project includes

two (2) Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) turn outs connecting Tow Way "G" to

Taxiway "E", 9,300 square meters of asphalt concrete perimeter road, the

removal and replacement of 1310 lineal meters of chain link fence, 403

lineal meters of irrigation canal realignment, siphon relocation, edge

lighting, paint striping and signage.

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,7400216496M 11650

Tow Way "G"

NAVY 2008FY

P519







1. Status:

(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started 09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15% (E) Percent completed as of


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,7400216496M 11650

Tow Way "G"

NAVY 2008FY

P519












Ron Kruse 928-269-3523Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

$570

$0

$570

04/2008

01/2008

08/2009

$490

$80

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,7400216496M 11650

Tow Way "G"

NAVY 2008FY

P519



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 171390

Scope

21107

11665

Cost

($000)Start

Hangar 02 Additions

Tactical Support Van Pad

Expansion

Complete

1002 m2

3435 m2

4,400

6,050

Design Status

09/2005

09/2005


09/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 403,878

12,920

0

19,270

10,450

102,419


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLET



10,450


TOTAL 19,270


0





As a key component of the Commander, Marine Corps Air Bases, West, provides

airfield facilities and material to support operations of the Third Marine

Aircraft Wing Unit.

548,937

21110

21105

11210

43349 SF

LS

LS

5,744

10,026

3,500

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Modification

UAV Operations And Maintenance

Taxiway Addition

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.12

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

71

68

3

3B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 68

65

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 181390

4. Command

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLET




NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.12

5. Area Const


Marine Corps

Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 191391


9. COST ESTIMATES


HANGER 02 ADDITIONS-MCAS PENDLETON

(10,783 SF)

EXPAND HANGAR 2386 (3,265 SF)

EXPAND HANGAR 2396 (4,356 SF)

EXPAND HANGAR 2397W (3,162 SF)


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





DEMOLITION

COMMUNICATION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,001.78

303.33

404.69

293.76

2,824.84

2,868.41

2,916.38

3,680

(860)

(1,160)

(860)

(40)

(210)

(160)

(390)

150

(20)

(30)

(30)

(40)

(30)

3,830

190

4,020

230

4,250

150

4,400

4,400

(690)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,4000216496M 21107

Hanger 02 Additions-MCAS

Pendleton

NAVY 2008FY

P070

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CAMP PENDLETONCAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA


The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS AIR

STATION CAMP PENDLETON.

Constructs second-story squadron administrative spaces to hangars 2386,

2396 and 2397W on top of existing first floor additions. Second floor

additions are constructed of reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) with

concrete structural roof over metal deck, steel trusses and modified

bituminous roofing to support utilities installed on the roofs. Operation

and Maintenance Support Instruction (OMSI) manuals will be provided as part


February 2007

DD Form


Provide sufficient administrative space for squadron personnel co-located

near hangar administration and maintenance spaces. MCAS Camp Pendleton

supports Marine Aircraft Group (MAG)-39, which composes the entire West

Coast Active Helicopter Marine Light Attack (HMLA) community and 3 CH-46

squadrons. MAG-39 contains 104 AH-1W's, 56 UH-1N's and 36 Ch-46's for a

total of 196 aircraft. HMLA 775 from MAG-46 contains 11AH-1 and UH-1

aircraft. The HMLA community provides close air support, anti-armor,

reconnaissance, forward air control (airborne naval gunfire control),

airborne command post, small unit vertical insertion, light transport, air

search and rescue, medical evacuation, medium transport and aerial combat

troop transport missions to the Fleet Marine Force Pacific Command

(FMFPAC). These units are used for humanitarian assistance, forward

presence, deterrence, peace-keeping operations short of war, and warfare as

defined by the National Command Authority (NCA). Due to the

reconfiguration that combined UH-1 squadrons with AH-1 squadrons to form

HMLAs, the existing HMLA hangar space does not meet the Hangar 02 space

requirement for the additional personnel.

REQUIREMENT:

Construct second story additions to three aircraft hangars for HMLA

squadron additional administrative space requirements. Additions will be

constructed on top of recently completed first story additions. Second

story additions shall be built on top of load bearing foot print.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,4000216496M 21107


Pendleton

NAVY 2008FY

P070



11. Requirement:

1,703 792Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 3,303

of this project. Information systems include local area network wiring,

fiber optic wiring, telephone wiring, intrusion detection wiring, cable TV

and public address system wiring. Anti-terrorism/force protection measures

include blast resistant windows are included. Special cost features include

seismic adjustment. Electrical utilities include switchboards, internal

lighting, fire alarms and HVAC connections. Paving and site improvement

will include A/C perimeter damage patching. Demolition consists of

demolishing roof decks of lower story additions and some second story

exterior and interior walls. Communications consist of outside

communication lines. Sustainable features are included in the design,

development and construction of this project in accordance with executive

Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


When the Huey squadrons were split and added to the Cobra squadrons,

resulting in the HMLA squadrons, 150 personnel were added to each squadron.

The existing administrative offices for squadron personnel are located on

the second decks of Buildings 2386, 2396, and 2397 West. Administrative

responsibilities include correcting problems with paychecks, updating

identification card information for personnel and dependents, transfers,

etc. Some other departments in admin spaces are Operations, Safety,

Logistics, Intelligence, Commanding Officer, Executive Officer, Sergeant

Major, mail clerk, Key Wives, medical doctor, chaplain, etc. Personnel are

currently located in overcrowded spaces. Also due to the lack of space,

disparate functions share the same inadequate space. For example, in

Hangar 2386, the Safety Office and the Flight Equipment Section share the

same space. There is not enough space for either section to "house" all

their personal and required equipment. Some operational briefing rooms and

training spaces are also occupied by administrative personnel. This over

crowding impedes efficient pre-flight procedures such as briefs and de-

briefs and other military training requirements. Reconfiguration of

existing hangar spaces would not meet space requirements; expansion is the

only option. Existing administrative space "surplus" is not logistically

sited for use by the HMLA squadrons.

Continued current situation will impede squadrons from operating at their

optimal efficiency and effect overall MAG-39 operational readiness.

Privacy for counseling and personnel issues will remain nonexistent.

Administrative personnel will continue to occupy spaces allocated for

training and briefings, thus reducing flight readiness.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,4000216496M 21107


Pendleton

NAVY 2008FY

P070






2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

N/A

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,4000216496M 21107


Pendleton

NAVY 2008FY

P070



Office Furniture and Communications O&MMC 2009 690



Equipment

Nomenclature








Patt Reed DSN 361-0020Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$150

$50

$100

03/2008

12/2007

03/2009

$100

$50



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 231391


9. COST ESTIMATES


TACTICAL SUPPORT VAN PAD EXPANSION

(36,974 SF)

TACTICAL VAN PAD (MAINTENANCE)

(34,692 SF)

STORAGE SHED (398 SF)

UTILITY / PUBLIC RESTROOM

BUILDING (1,884 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT



PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS


SPECIAL FOUNDATION FEATURES




DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,435

3,223

37

175

527.97

1,620.98

3,021.27

2,990

(1,700)

(60)

(530)

(120)

(10)

(30)

(540)

2,270

(30)

(1,130)

(460)

(380)

(80)

(190)

5,260

260

5,520

310

5,830

210

6,040

6,050


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,0500216496M 11665


Expansion

NAVY 2008FY

P079




STATION CAMP PENDLETON.

PRIMARY FACILITY - Construct expansion of concrete van pad for a total of

160 vans (concrete slab with thickness suitable for the double stacks

configuration), with utilities connections, chain link fencing, and area

lighting. Provide road access for van delivery to Airfield area. Built in


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate, safe and secure van pad space with sufficient power;

infrastructure to house and support 160 mobile facilities vans used for the

avionics, calibration, and repair of tactical equipment supporting aircraft

maintenance.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Project constructs expansion of Tactical van pads (concrete pads on which

the vans sit), relocates utilities connections in existing van pads to

support additional vans, and provide manuever space for the Rugged All

Terrain Cargo Handler (RATCH) equipment.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,0500216496M 11665


Expansion

NAVY 2008FY

P079



11. Requirement:


equipment includes EMCS and central compressed air system. Technical

Operating Manuals will be required for this project. Special costs include

turnstile gates with card readers for pedestrian access, new utilities pop

ups, airfield dust control, ADA compliance of head and shower, expansion of

Women's Restroom at building 23126.

SUPPORTING FACILITIES - Electrical utilities include concrete encased

electrical ducts, provide a new 3000 KVA, 12KV-208/120V, 60HZ substation, a

350KVA, 400Hz frequency converter, service panels, lighting, grounding,

telephone, fiber optic, and fire alarm cabling. Upgrade existing unit

substation located in building 23126 (each transformer shall be rated at

2000KVA, 12.47KV-208/120V, 60HZ, and new 400HZ frequency converter) and

other asssociated devices. Convert existing "guard shack" (building 23127)

to "Communication Hub" and modify the existing communication/data cables

inside this building. Mechanical utilities include water lines, air

couplers, sewage lines, storm drain system, manholes, fire hydrants, and

gas lines. Paving and site improvements include trenching of existing pads

to relocate and increase utilities, restriping of pavement, curbs and

gutters, and sidewalks. Demolition includes removal of the existing fence,

pavement and edge of existing van pad. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection

measures include concrete block walls at locations accessible to vehicles

and upgrading the existing fencing, per UFC-4-010-01 DOD Minimum Anti-

Terrorism Standards for Buildings dated 8 OCT 2003. Sustainable features

are included in the design, development, and construction of the project in

accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Due to insufficient van pad space, vans are being stored outside the safety

perimeter of the Marine Aviation Logistic Squadron (MALS) compound, leaving

them vulnerable to damage. Vans are stored on asphalt surfaces not capable

of adequately supporting the weight of the vans, resulting in structural

damage to the vans and destruction of the asphalt paving that they sit on.

Consolidation of the existing vans into one operational area cannot be

accomplished in the existing space, forcing the stacking of vans in hangars

and on the flightline. Lack of sufficient aisle space between the vans

limit the use of Rugged All Terrain Cargo Handler (RATCH) equipment that

safely move the vans for operational deployment purposes. Futhermore,

existing electrical power distribution system is outdated, deteriorated,

and insufficient to support the quantity and type of new van

configurations. Frequent power outages occur and therefore, due to the

deficient and unreliable power distribution systems, emergency generators

are used to power most of the vans for normal daily operations.

Consolidation of the activity into one operational area will not be

possible and vans will continue to be exposed, possibly resulting in damage

to the equipment. Existing facilities will continue to not have adequate

space for the current equipment, as well as any additional equipment

procured in the future.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,0500216496M 11665


Expansion

NAVY 2008FY

P079






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

4. Contract award:


1. Status:


No

N/A

$280

$210

$70

01/2008

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$210

$70


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,0500216496M 11665


Expansion

NAVY 2008FY

P079












Pat Reed (760)763-0020Activity POC: Phone No:



04/2008

04/2009

NONE


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 271390

Scope

61073

72124

72111

72124

17950

73025

74044

17940

Cost

($000)Start


Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, 22

Area


Headquarters Area


Margarita(33)Area





Complete

4330 m2

8583 m2

12083 m2

8583 m2

0 LS

494 m2

2410 m2

0 LS

17,980

29,050

31,980

26,530

17,730

5,830

8,510

18,090

Design Status

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005


09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

07/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 6,070,086

192,916

175,510

7,554

155,700

570,936


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:72124

72112

85110

72124

72124

17945

72124

21820

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Pico (24) Area

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, San Mateo Area

Operations Access Points, Red Beach

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Del Mar (21) Area

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, San Mateo Area

Force Reconnaissance Tower


Regimental Maintenance Complex Phase 3

92387 SF

92387 SF

LS

0 LS

92387 SF

LS

96692 SF

72947 SF

26,970

26,590

9,210

27,900

30,420

5,820

25,170

23,430

TOTAL

TOTAL




155,700


TOTAL

175,510

7,554


7,172,702

73010 16759 SF 7,554Fire Station - HQ Area

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.12

5. Area Const

Cost Index


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

42372

44458

148

132B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1148

824

1527

1321

41

60

3333

6299

0

1

2435

2570

28874

29203

4866

4048

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 281390

4. Command





0





To provide housing, training facilities, logistical support, and certain

administrative support for Fleet Marine Force units and other activities

and units designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps. To conduct

specialized schools and other training as directed. To receive and process

students in order to conduct field training in basic combat skills.

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.12

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 291391


9. COST ESTIMATES


ISR CAMP - INTEL BATTALION (46,609

SF)

COMPANY - BATTERY HQ (41,444

SF)

ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY

(4,833 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS






DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,330.11

3,850.27

449

30.84

2,528.93

2,273.11

4,087.64

13,290

(9,740)

(1,020)

(130)

(530)

(60)

(350)

(570)

(890)

2,340

(50)

(600)

(300)

(690)

(410)

(150)

(140)

15,630

780

16,410

940

17,350

630

17,980

17,980

(673)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9800206496M 61073


NAVY 2008FY

P009




The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MARINE CORPS BASE

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form


PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9800206496M 61073


NAVY 2008FY

P009




11. Requirement:


CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)

Construct two (2) structures (two-story Company Headquarters building and a

single-story Academic Instruction Facility) reinforced integral-colored

concrete masonry unit (CMU) building with seismic upgrades, spread footing

foundations, reinforce concrete spread footing and slab on grade,

structural steel framing, steel truss and standing seam metal roof.

Project will provide facilities for the Intelligence Battalion in the Force

Intelligence Operations Center (FIOC). Project will provide facilities to

serve as the state-of-the art Force Intelligence Operations Center (FIOC)

Company Headquarters and Instruction Facility. Construction will include

Co Hq operational and administrative space, Intel Bn classroom space,

indoor storage and open storage, pollution prevention measure, HAZMAT

storage area, and pave parking. Special construction features include

seismic construction including anti-terrorism/force protection measures,

vault, and hazardous material storage area. Sustainable design principles

will be included into the construction of the project in accordance with

Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Built-in

equipment includes personnel/freight elevator and public address system.

Electrical systems include fire detection and protection, energy saving

electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and information systems.

Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire detection and protection system,

heating ventilation and air conditioning. Supporting facilities work

includes site and building utility connection (water, natural gas, sanitary

and storm sewers, electrical, pulling additional 900-pair telephone line,

Local Area Network (LAN), and satellite/cable television). Paving and site

improvements include exterior site and building lighting, paved parking,

sidewalks, ramps, permanent signs, concrete block screen walls for trash

and utilities, storm water management, earthwork, grading, landscaping, and

automatic irrigation system. Demolition of three existing buildings (13144,

13145, 1619) and existing asphalt, concrete drives and parking lots are

required. Enviromental mitigation will include asbestos removal and lead

based paint abatement as well as execution of a storm water prevention plan

(SWPP). Also included are Technical Operating Manuals and Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection features in accordance with UFC 4-010-01 dated

08 October 2003. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the

design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with

Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form


Intel Bn consists of four companies, which are located in 4 buildings in 4

different base areas. The intent is to consolidate the Battalion to one

area in order to enhance unit integrity, cohesion and teamwork. Interaction

between these Company HQ's and their working spaces is essential.

Currently, the lack of available space has forced 81 Marines to have to

"double up" sharing work/desk space. Consolidating the Company HQ's into a

seismically and electrically adequate structure that meets the BFR will

result in improved intelligence support to I MEF by generating focus of

efforts and unit cohesion.

Intelligence Battalion currently occupies three (3) buildings built in

1952, two (2) are inadequate. All existing structures require major

renovation if these facilities are to remain occupied for their existing

uses. The deteriorated structures create unhygienic conditions due to the

infestation of insects, rats, and other pests. The breakdown in supporting

electrical and mechanical systems in these structures has resulted in loss

of efficiency in operations and training of the Marines. The structures

are seismically unsafe. The lack of adequate electrical service cannot

support the daily operations of test equipment and computers.

If Radio, Intelligence and 9th Communications Battalions could not be co-

located in the Operations Center, the functional benefits of shared common

training, conference, shops, storage, and other areas would be eliminated.

Co-located, adequate and efficiently configured facilities are required for

the consolidation of shared activities and operations of Radio,

Intelligence and 9th Comms. Battalions. The ISR compound, when completed,

will enhance the interoperability between the three Battalions. This

project will fulfill phase two requirements for development of the ISR

compound.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project is the second of two phases, the first phase was P-009A of

FY05. This project, is the second of a series of three construction

projects (P-008, P009A/P009, P-003) for the synergistic co-location of

activities and operations between Radio, Intelligence and 9th

Communications Battalions. New Company administration space will be

provided for Intelligence Battalion as an addition to shared facilities

constructed by MCON P-008 and MCON P-009A.

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9800206496M 61073


NAVY 2008FY

P009



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


If the existing facilities occupied by Intel Bn were to continue in the

same locations, severe loss of efficiency, security and quality of life

will result. The Marines will continue to work in inefficient, outdated,

and unhealthy environments.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9800206496M 61073


NAVY 2008FY

P009




A/V equipment

Collateral Equipment

NMCI Connections

Physical security equipment

Telecommunications

PMC

PMC

PMC

PMC

O&MMC

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

12

600

45

6

10



Equipment

Nomenclature










2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$192

$45

$147

04/2008

12/2007

10/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$160

$32


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9800206496M 61073


NAVY 2008FY

P009





Bob Song (760) 725-5366Activity POC: Phone No:

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9800206496M 61073


NAVY 2008FY

P009




Blank Page

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 351391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, 22

AREA (92,387 SF)


COMPLEX E1/E4 (91,493 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

8,583

8,500

83

2,017.26

4,087.64

18,980

(17,150)

(340)

(290)

(160)

(260)

(500)

(280)

6,290

(390)

(2,440)

(1,930)

(1,260)

(160)

(110)

25,270

1,260

26,530

1,510

28,040

1,010

29,050

29,050

(1,319)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,0500216496M 72124


Area

NAVY 2008FY

P097





CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AE)

(CHAPPO AREA (22/24))

Construct a multi-story reinforced concrete masonry unit block (CMU)

building with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements, reinforced concrete

foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,0500216496M 72124


Area

NAVY 2008FY

P097



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AE)


200 rooms with private bathrooms in the standard 2x0 room configuration.

Community and service core areas will consist of laundry facilities,

multipurpose rooms, lounges, administrative offices, NMCI space,

housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Built-in equipment includes a

service elevator. Technical operating (OMSI) Manuals will be provided.

Information systems including telephone, LAN, and cable TV will be

provided. Anti-terrorism Force protection features will be provided in

accordance with UFC 4-010-01, Appendix B. Special costs include the

additional concrete & steel required for compliance with seismic codes.

Sustainable features will be included in the design, development, and

construction for the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and

other laws and Executive Orders.

Supporting Facilities - Include electrical systems such as fire alarms,

energy saving electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and

information systems. Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection,

heating & ventilation. Building utility connections and related site work

for water, natural gas, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone,

LAN, and cable television are included. Paving and site improvements

include paved parking, hardscape, sidewalks, outdoor recreation

facilities/courts, roadways access, bus shelter/turnouts, earthwork,

grading, landscaping, fencing, lighting, signage, area signs, constructed

seating, shade structures, landmarks, demolition of existing paving,

fencing, and lighting. Demolition includes existing paving and removal and

replacement of existing power poles and electrical distribution.

Environmental mitigation includes California Gnatcatcher (CAGN) surveys,

bio-monitoring, and coastal sage scrub. Sewer system improvements include

replacement of the existing Sewage Lift Station (SLS) 22188 with a higher

capacity Class 4, manholes as required, and conveyance pipelines. This

project will upgrade the infrastructure to a level that will allow the

sewage system to support the additional flow generated by the new BEQ. An

additional 600,000 gal Equalization Basin and associated valving for Sewage

Treatment Plant 3 (STP-3) is also included to insure that the wastewater is

properly and compliantly processed.

Rooms: 200 two-person rooms.


Intended Grade Mix: 166 E1-E3, 76 E-4, 41 E5.

Total: 283 persons.


February 2007

DD Form


Base-wide, bachelor Marines are currently overbilleted in crowded

conditions, many at 3 per room, due to the Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted

Housing deficit.

This overcrowding is a detriment to the quality of life and is far inferior

to the Marine Corps/DoD Billeting Standards of 2 Marines per room for all

enlisted personnel (E1-E3) and one Marine per room for all E4-E5 personnel.

The billeting situation is so critical that many personnel must be billeted

off base even after rooms are assigned at maximum capacity. Off-base

personnel incur substantial out of pocket expenses because the applicable


by 2012. Adequate and efficiently configured barracks facilities to

provide living quarters to reduce the MCB Camp Pendleton programmable

Bachelor Enlisted Housing deficit.

A primary objective of the Marine Corps is to provide new construction to

the 2X0 Standard, addressing all bachelor quarter space deficiencies.

Development in the 22-Area has exceeded the capacity of the existing

Wastewater infrastructure. Planned Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQs) will

add 789 Marines to this already overtaxed sanitary sewer system. The

wastewater system requires the following upgrades to accommodate new BEQ

facilities: increase in size and capacity of the conveyance lines,

increase in pumping capacity of Sewage Lift Station (SLS), increased

capacity of the Force Main (FM) to the main that supplies the STP-3

conveyance line, increase of containment time of STP-3, and three Manholes

that will allow for current and future connections to the system.

These upgrades are necessary to reduce the possibility of sewage overflows

from the 22 Area due the existing sewage treatment capacity deficiency.

Those overflows violate Order 96-04 of the Regional Water Quality Control

Board (RWQCB). MCB is currently under an EPA Notice of Violation (NOV)

(dtd 11 Jan 2000) to reduce sewage overflows. A Federal District Court

Consent Order No. 02-CV-0499 IEG (AJB) (dtd 07 Aug 2003) included sewage

overflow/spill reduction goals. This project improvement is critical to

ensure compliance with the Consent Order.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Provides 400 living spaces (200 two-person rooms) using the 2x0 standard

room design for permanent party bachelor enlisted personnel.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,0500216496M 72124


Area

NAVY 2008FY

P097




11. Requirement:


M00681(AE)



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


BAH rates are insufficient to cover the cost of housing and transportation

in the local community.

The current Sanitary Sewer system serving the 22 Area has insufficient

capacity for the existing conditions. Also, the receiving treatment plant,

STP-3, cannot process more influent due to a lack of containment time.

This containment time is limited by the flow conditions which occur in a

diurnal cycle and cannot be spread through out the 24-hour period due to

lack of holding capacity; which an EQ Basin would provide.

If this project is not provided, the Commandant of the Marine Corps' goal

to provide new construction addressing all adequate bachelor quarter space

deficiencies will not be achieved. Permanent party personnel will continue

to be billeted in overcrowded conditions with 3 Marines per room, E-1 to E-

5. They will endure a lower quality of life. Furthermore, personnel will

continue to be billeted off base, thereby costing the Marine Corps precious

BAH funds. The Marine Corps unit cohesion will be undermined.

If the SLS, conveyance lines, Force Main, and STP-3 Containment upgrades

are not provided, the 22 Area's infrastructure will not be able to support

the new BEQ and the 22 Area will continue to have a bachelor housing

deficit.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,0500216496M 72124


Area

NAVY 2008FY

P097







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


1. Status:


No

N/A

$300

$300

$0

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$150

$150


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



M00681(AE)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,0500216496M 72124


Area

NAVY 2008FY

P097




BEQ Furniture

NMCI Connections

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

1,262

57



Equipment

Nomenclature








Mr. Tim Busser 760-725-6073Activity POC: Phone No:


4. Contract award:


04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 15,6452007 R&M Conducted ($000): 17,202

108,980


M00681(AE)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,0500216496M 72124


Area

NAVY 2008FY

P097




Blank Page

M00681(AE)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 411391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS,

HEADQUARTERS AREA (130,060 SF)


(91,493 SF)


SF)

MAIL INSPECTION AND PROCESSING

CENTER (37,674 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

12,083

8,500

83

3,500

2,017.26

4,087.64

1,731.55

24,800

(17,150)

(340)

(6,060)

(130)

(160)

(340)

(520)

(100)

3,020

(750)

(330)

(1,220)

(340)

(10)

(340)

(30)

27,820

1,390

29,210

1,660

30,870

1,110

31,980

31,980

(3,036)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,9800216496M 72111


Headquarters Area

NAVY 2008FY

P115





M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,9800216496M 72111


Headquarters Area

NAVY 2008FY

P115




CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)

PRIMARY FACILITY - Construct a multi-story reinforced concrete masonry unit

block (CMU) building with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements,

reinforced concrete foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof.

Project will provide 200 rooms with private bathrooms in the standard 2x0

room configuration. Community and service core areas will consist of

laundry facilities, multipurpose rooms, lounges, administrative offices,

NMCI space, housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Built-in equipment

includes a service elevator. Project includes demolition of the existing

Mail Inspection and Processing Center in the Headquarters Area (Bldg. 1674)

and repair and improvement of building 22103 for the mail inspection and

processing requirement. Demolition of the existing facility includes

asbestos and lead based paint abatement. Renovation includes seismic

upgrades, new floors and walls, structural steel framing upgrades, steel

truss and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide facilities for

mail handling area, administrative and classroom space, truck loading and

unloading, and pre-inspection area for incoming mail. Built-in equipment

includes X-Ray and Bomb Sniffing, Irradiation and Biological equipment,

audiovisual, and intercom equipment. Special construction features include

electronic gates and posts, security lighting, wiring, and sensors.

Technical operating (OMSI) Manuals will be provided. Information systems

including telephone, LAN, and cable TV will be provided. Anti-terrorism

Force protection features will be provided in accordance with UFC 4-010-01,

Appendix B. Special costs include keyless lock sets and alcove. SUPPORTING

FACILITIES - Include Electrical systems such as fire alarms, energy saving


Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection, heating &

ventilation. Building utility connections and related site work for water,

natural gas, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, LAN, and

cable television are included. Paving and site improvements include paved

parking, sidewalks, outdoor recreation facilities/courts, roadways access,

bus shelter/turnouts, earthwork, grading, landscaping, demolition of

existing paving, fencing, and lighting. Demolition includes existing power

poles and relocation of existing electrical utilities. Environmental

mitigation includes California Gnatcatcher (CAGN) surveys, bio-monitoring,

and Coastal Sage Scrub restoration. Sustainable features will be included

in the design, development, and construction for the project in accordance

with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.

Rooms: 200 two-person rooms

Maximum utilization: 400 E1-E3

Intended Grade Mix: 164 E1-E3, 75 E-4, and 43 E5


February 2007

DD Form


Base-wide, bachelor Marines are currently overbilleted in crowded

conditions, many at 3 per room, due to the Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted

Housing deficit.

This overcrowding is a detriment to the quality of life and is far inferior

to the Marine Corps/DoD Billeting Standards of 2 Marines per room for all

enlisted personnel (E1-E3) and one Marine per room for all E4-E5 personnel.

The billeting situation is so critical that many personnel must be billeted

off base even after rooms are assigned at maximum capacity. Off-base

personnel incur substantial out of pocket expenses because the applicable

BAH rates are insufficient to cover the cost of housing and transportation

in the local community.

The existing Post Office, Building 1674, was constructed in 1943 as a SNCO

club. There have been few improvements to this wood structure over the

years. It is inadequately sized and the floor plan is configured

improperly for postal operations. Its inadequate size compromises security




Bachelor Enlisted Housing deficit. A primary objective of the Marine Corps

is to provide new construction to the 2X0 Standard, addressing all bachelor

quarter space deficiencies.

Adequate and efficiently configured facility to enable 1st Marine Logistics

Group (MLG), the United States Postal Service, and civilian postal workers

to serve bachelor enlisted personnel and all other customers on MCB Camp

Pendleton.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:


room design for permanent party bachelor enlisted personnel. Demos

existing inadequate mail facility and constructs a secure, state-of-the-art

Central Postal Facility.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,9800216496M 72111


Headquarters Area

NAVY 2008FY

P115




11. Requirement:

Adequate: Substandard:

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form


September 2006


when mail has to be stored in a classroom space, on the loading dock, or in

trucks outside of the building. The present loading dock cannot accommodate

military mail vehicles, vans or 3-ton trucks, causing extensive manual

handling of mail. The mail carts have destroyed the wood floors. Steel

plates have been installed over the damaged wood floors to prevent further

damage; however, this has resulted in excessive noise and highly

deteriorated working conditions. The non-functioning steam system is

forcing the use of uneconomical and non-energy efficient space heaters.

Maintenance of all utilities, sewage lines, etc. has become extensive and

costly. Public space is nonexistent and entry is from the loading dock.

All parking is very limited. There are fire and seismic violations plus

lead and asbestos hazards throughout the building. Building 1674 cannot be

renovated in its present condition. Security and anti terrorism needs and

setbacks are impossible for a wood structure.





5 and will continue to have a lower quality of life. Furthermore,

personnel will continue to be billeted off base, thereby costing the Marine

Corps precious BAH funds and well as unit cohesion potentially being

undermined.

The Central Post Office will continue to be located in an inadequte wood

building, threatening the safety, reliability, and continuity of mail

service to bachelor enlisted Marines and all other Camp Pendleton

customers. Mail will continue to be handled in a unsecure facility.

Structural, life safety, and environmental violations will continue to

exist for Camp Pendleton's central post office. Maintenance costs for this

wood structure and all of its environmental, electrical, plumbing, heating,

ventilating, sewage problems, and code violations will continue to drain

Camp Pendleton's FSRM funds.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,9800216496M 72111


Headquarters Area

NAVY 2008FY

P115








1. Status:


02/2006

09/2007

10%

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,9800216496M 72111


Headquarters Area

NAVY 2008FY

P115





COLLATERAL MAIL PROCESSIN/INSPECTION

EQUIP.

NMCI Connections

PMC

PMC

O&MMC

2009

2009

2009

1,262

1,714

60



Equipment

Nomenclature





Construction is recommended. This Facility can be used by other components

on an as available basis; however, the scope of the project is based on

Navy requirements.

Mr. Bob Song 760-725-5366Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

N/A

$580

$80

$500

04/2008

01/2008

12/2009

15%

$500

$80


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



108,980


M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,9800216496M 72111


Headquarters Area

NAVY 2008FY

P115




Blank Page

M00681(AB)

(HQ AREA)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 471391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS,

MARGARITA(33)AREA (92,387 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATION ROOM (893

SF)

BACHELOR ENLISTEDQUARTERS

(91,493 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

RELOCATE NBC BLDG TO 33 AREA

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

8,583

83

8,500

4,087.64

2,017.26

19,010

(340)

(17,150)

(280)

(160)

(360)

(510)

(210)

4,070

(520)

(640)

(240)

(1,800)

(70)

(110)

(690)

23,080

1,150

24,230

1,380

25,610

920

26,530

26,530

(1,170)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,5300216496M 72124


Margarita(33)Area

NAVY 2008FY

P170





CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AG)

(MARGARITA AREA (33))

Construct a multi-story reinforced concrete masonry unit block(CMU)

building with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements, reinforced concrete


February 2007

DD Form



room design for permanent party bachelor enlisted personnel.

PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,5300216496M 72124


Margarita(33)Area

NAVY 2008FY

P170




11. Requirement:


M00681(AG)


foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide

200 rooms with private bathrooms in the standard 2x0 room configuration.

Community and service core areas will consist of laundry facilities,

multipurpose rooms, lounges, administrative offices, NMCI space,

housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Built-in equipment includes a

service elevator. Technical operating (OMSI) Manuals will be provided.

Information systems including telephone, LAN, and cable TV will be

provided. Anti-terrorism Force protection features will be provided in

accordance with UFC 4-010-01, Appendix B. Special costs include the

additional concrete & steel required for compliance with seismic codes.




Supporting Facilities - Include electrical systems such as fire alarms,

energy saving electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS), and

information systems. Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection,

heating & ventilation. Building utility connections and related site work

for water, natural gas, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone,

LAN, and cable television are included. Relocation of the existing sewer

line for Bldg. 33610, a new sewer line connecting to the new BEQ, new man

holes as required, and connections to the existing sewage conveyance line

are included. Paving and site improvements include paved parking,

hardscape, sidewalks, outdoor recreation facilities/courts, roadways

access, bus shelter/turnouts, earthwork, grading, landscaping, fencing,

lighting, signage, area signs, constructed seating, shade structures,

landmarks, demolition of existing paving, fencing, and lighting.

Demolition also includes the existing Nuclear Biological Chemical (NBC)

training facility (Bldg. 33650) and existing asphalt paving. Supporting

facilities also include the construction of a new NBC replacement building

and paved parking lot.



Intended Grade Mix: 164 E1-E3, 75 E4, 43 E5.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Base-wide, bachelor Marines are currently forced to be overbilleted in

crowded conditions, many at 3 per room, due to the Camp Pendleton Bachelor

Enlisted Housing deficit. This overcrowding is a detriment to the quality

of life and is far inferior to the Marine Corps/DoD Billeting Standards of

2 Marines per room for all enlisted personnel (E1-E3) and one Marine per

room for all E4-E5 personnel. The billeting situation is so critical that

many personnel must be billeted off base even after rooms are assigned at

maximum capacity. Off-base personnel incur substantial out of pocket

expenses because the applicable BAH rates are insufficient to cover the

cost of housing and transportation in the local community.





5. They will endure a lower quality of life. Furthermore, personnel will

continue to be billeted off base, thereby costing the Marine Corps precious

BAH funds. The Marine Corps unit cohesion will be undermined.




Bachelor Enlisted Housing deficit. A primary objective of the Marine Corps

is to provide new construction to the 2X0 Standard, addressing all bachelor

quarter space deficiencies.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,5300216496M 72124


Margarita(33)Area

NAVY 2008FY

P170







2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

NA

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%


M00681(AG)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,5300216496M 72124


Margarita(33)Area

NAVY 2008FY

P170




BEQ Furniture

NMCI Connections

O&MMC

PMC

2009

2009

1,125

45



Equipment

Nomenclature








Mr. Phil Nguyen 760-725-6040Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$300

$300

$0

03/2008

12/2007

06/2009

$150

$150

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



108,980


M00681(AG)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 511391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MARSOC SUPPORTING FACILITIES

ARMORY (9,688 SF)

FIELD FIRE KD RANGE

HELO LANDING PAD (44,993 SF)

OBSERVATION TOWER (258 SF)

MOTOR - T (9,149 SF)

RANGE SUPPORT BUILDING (1,593

SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS






SITE PREPARATIONS



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



LS

m2

FP

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

900

15

4,180

24

850

148

2,412.38

11,485.61

203.4

14,168

2,125.03

1,807.68

6,370

(2,170)

(170)

(850)

(340)

(1,810)

(270)

(230)

(40)

(80)

(190)

(220)

9,050

(2,070)

(540)

(650)

(4,480)

(50)

(1,070)

(190)

15,420

770

16,190

920

17,110

620

17,730

17,730

(300)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,7300216496M 14341


NAVY 2008FY

P215



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AH)

(LAS FLORES AREA (41))


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate and efficiently configured facilities are required to store

weapons both personnel and crew served.

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a facility that supports requirements of Marine

Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC)as best defined at this time.

Project constructs a Motor T, Armory, Helicopter landing pad and converts

an existing range into a range that the MARSOC can utilize.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,7300216496M 14341


NAVY 2008FY

P215




11. Requirement:



CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AH)


Primary facilities to be constructed in support of MARSOC included in this

project are multi-story armory, vehicle maintenance facility (first and

second echelon maintenance), and helicopter landing pad sized to

accommodate two CH-53's. This project will convert an existing range (Field

Fire KD Range) to meet the requirements of the MARSOC. Construction will

consist of reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) with reinforced concrete

foundation and slab, structural steel framing, steel trusses and standing

seam metal roof. Built-in equipment includes Intrusion Detection System

(IDS) and exhaust system. Telecommunication systems include fiber optic

cabling, local area network (LAN) and telephone wiring. Technical

Operating Manuals, Information Systems and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection

features will be included. Special costs include seismic construction and

automated targets. Supporting facilities include utility infrastructure

improvements to accommodate these facilities (water, natural gas, sanitary

and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, Local Area Network (LAN), and

cable television). Special Construction Features includes a shoot house, a

breacher structure and an automatic target system. Electrical systems

include fire alarms, energy saving electronic monitoring and control system

(EMCS), and information systems. Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire

protection systems, heating, ventilation and air conditioning. Paving and

site improvements include security fencing, exterior site and building

lighting, paved parking and striping, sidewalks, storm water management,

earthwork, grading, landscaping, and automatic irrigation system. Also

includes necessary environmental mitigation. Construction will be in

Seismic Zone 4. Sustainable features will be included in the design,

development and, construction for the project in accordance with Executive

Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form



The Secretary of Defense directed the standup of a Marine Corps operational

component of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as a

counterpart to the existing Navy, Army and Air Force Special Operations

component commands. USSOCOM has been charged by the President and by the

Secretary of Defense with the lead on the Global War on Terrorism. Marine

Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) officially stood up on 24

February 2006 as the newest arm of USSOCOM without benefit of facilities to

specifically support any aspect of this highbred mission assignment for

personnel, equipment, headquarters, operational development, mission

emulation or component security. Obtaining adequate facilities are

paramount to fully develop this extremely complex and demanding MARSOC

capability.

The temporary structures and facilities for Det ONE during the proof of

concept phase are no longer adequate to support the MARSOC as it is

currently defined.

The MARSOC has unique training and operational requirements that are

exclusive of Marine Corps requirements. The MARSOC will require isolated

facilities for training and mission preparation. All operations will be

classified SECRET at minimum and the facilities and compound will have to

accommodate these requirements. Additionally, The Detachment will have

unique connectivity requirements that may not be tied to NMCI. Also, 3rd

echelon maintenance will be required for many non-USMC system end items.

No facilities exist to accommodate the MARSOC.

Facilities to maintain the MARSOC vehicle fleet including 7 ton trucks

(MTR).

Helicopter landing area to accomodate up to 2 CH-53's any one time. The

landing pad will be just outside the compound.

Field Fire KD Range with 1600m capability. Range will be capable of

utilizing power moving targets.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,7300216496M 14341


NAVY 2008FY

P215





1. Status:


M00681(AH)



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,7300216496M 14341


NAVY 2008FY

P215




Comm/Data/ AV

Furnishings

Special Equipment

PMC

PMC

PMC

2008

2008

2008

50

100

150



Equipment

Nomenclature








Ross Davis (760) 725-6034Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

N/A

$489

$74

$415

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$415

$74


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M00681(AH)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 551391


9. COST ESTIMATES


TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (5,320 SF)

SECURITY/ PASS & I. D. OFFICE

(5,000 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOMS (80

SF)

MAIN ENTRANCE GATE GUARD

HOUSES (3EA)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION





DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

494.23

464.52

7.41

22.3

2,370.84

4,087.64

5,065.81

1,410

(1,100)

(30)

(110)

(40)

(60)

(20)

(50)

3,670

(680)

(40)

(2,130)

(100)

(140)

(580)

5,080

250

5,330

300

5,630

200

5,830

5,830

(54)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,8300206496M 73025


NAVY 2008FY

P352





CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AN)

(MAIN GATE AREA (20))

The project includes the construction of one story building with steel

structure, masonry bearing walls, concrete slab and foundations, standing


February 2007

DD Form


The proposed work is required to provide the Commanding General the ability

to effectively control ingress/egress through this gate. This offers

important operational advantages for the conduct of AT/FP operations,

particularly under conditions of increased THREATCON. Camp Pendleton Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) Plan requires that the installation be

protected from unauthorized access through its perimeter and MCO 5530.14,

The Marine Corps Physical Security Manual, directs that Installation

REQUIREMENT:

Construct a new gate house facility including vehicle inspection lanes,

sentry inspection houses and related supporting facilities at the Main

Gate, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California. This project proposes

security improvements that provide or enhance anti-terrorism and force

protection features at the Main Gate, to protect our peace-time,

warfighting and training assets along with facilities and infrastructure.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,8300206496M 73025


NAVY 2008FY

P352




11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 494

M00681(AN)


seam metal roof and seismic zone 4 requirements in accordance with Camp

Pendleton design standards and the DOD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-

022-01 Entry Control Facilities/Access Control Points. Project also

includes inspection lanes, sentry guardhouses, technical operating manuals,

temporary traffic control during the construction, EMCS (energy

management), and incidental related work. Built-in equipment includes

alarms and wiring in support of Circuit Camera Systems. Utilities work

includes relocation of utilities as required, including water, sanitary and

storm sewer, gas service, electrical, LAN and telephone/comm; closed

circuit camera system, electrical pad-mounted transformer and power

distribution. Mechanical systems include HVAC. Site improvements include

minor grading work, drainage and filtration system, erosion control;

asphalt / concrete pavements, concrete curbs, concrete dividers, traffic

medians, crash barriers, masonry walls, driveways, sidewalks, parking

areas, traffic control devices (cat claws for traffic lanes), overhead

signs, traffic lights, road striping and traffic signs, flag poles, light

poles, bus lane, landscaping and irrigation, and asphalt pavement overlay.

(Demolition includes the existing gatehouse facility (Bldg. 20250) and

related asphalt /concrete pavement, concrete curbs and related supporting

facilities.) Environmental Requirements include mitigation, restoration

plan, and biological monitoring. Anti-terrorism force protection measures

include traffic control devices, cat claws, warning signs, blast resistant

windows and doors.


February 2007

DD Form


The Main Gate is located on the Western Boundary of the Base which contains

an approximate 20-Mile stretch of the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 5), the

busiest freeway in the United States. This gate, due to insufficient

deterrent measures is a source of substantial unauthorized entry. This

gate is the most recognizable and easily accessible of Camp Pendleton's six

gate-systems. Four of the Base's gate systems (San Luis Rey, San Onofre,

Del Mar, and Las Pulgas gate) were recently or are in the process to be

properly configured to control access/egress, conduct vehicle inspections,

provide reasonable shielding for the guard or safely process routine

traffic flow.

There were several documented cases of unauthorized access to the

installation through Camp Pendleton vehicular gates. In several cases,

Military Police Sentries sustained injury after being assaulted with

vehicles while manning their posts. On several occasions, car thieves

disregarded a Gate guard and drove onto the base in an attempt to avoid

apprehension.

.

Unauthorized personnel will continue to gain access to Camp Pendleton for

unlawful, and possibly terrorist purposes. The Base will not be able to

effectively respond to increased THREATCONS. Critical Base areas/assets,

tenant commands, housing, public schools, and billeting complexes will

Commanders must be able to effectively control installation access.

Additionally, a Joint Staff Integrated Vulnerability Assessment (JSIVA)

conducted at the Base (Jan 1999, Feb 2002) pointed out serious deficiencies

in the ability to control ingress/egress at the Base's perimeter gates.

This gate offers rapid access to potential operational targets such as the

Assault Amphibian School, MEF Operations and Command Center, Bachelors

Officer's Quarters, as well as symbolic and casualty producing targets such

as various officer housing areas and recreational beach facilities.

The project scope was derived from the AT/FP criteria DOD AT/FP

Construction Standards of 16 Dec 1999, the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC

4-022-01) Entry Control Facilities/Access Control Points, DOD Interim

Technical Guidance for Anti-Terrorist Force Protection, Physical Security

of Waterfront Facilities and Installations of June 2001, USPACOM OPORD

5050-01 Iterim Guidance, and Naval Facilities Engineering Services Center

Water Front Barrier Study of PACFLT Ports of May 2001.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,8300206496M 73025


NAVY 2008FY

P352



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AN)



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


remain at risk to terrorist attack. Compliance with the ATFP and the Marine

Corps Security Manual will not be complete. Sentries will be unnecessarily

vulnerable to vehicle attack and gunfire.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,8300206496M 73025


NAVY 2008FY

P352





NMCI Connections

O&MMC

PMC

2008

2008

30

24



Equipment

Nomenclature











2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$325

$45

$280

04/2008

01/2008

07/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$280

$45


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M00681(AN)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,8300206496M 73025


NAVY 2008FY

P352




Manuel Alvarez 760-725-6046Activity POC: Phone No:

M00681(AN)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,8300206496M 73025


NAVY 2008FY

P352




Blank Page

M00681(AN)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 611391


9. COST ESTIMATES


FITNESS CENTER, CAMP PENDLETON

(25,941 SF)

FITNESS CENTER (25,726 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,410

2,390

20

1,999.74

4,087.64

5,480

(4,780)

(80)

(90)

(50)

(80)

(170)

(230)

1,920

(180)

(430)

(780)

(460)

(40)

(30)

7,400

370

7,770

440

8,210

300

8,510

8,510

(400)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,5100216496M 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P608





CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AG)


Construct a single story concrete masonry unit (CMU) building with

reinforced concrete footings and slab on grade, structural steel framing,

standing seam metal roof, factory finished aluminum storefront, and steel


February 2007

DD Form


This project will construct a consolidated indoor fitness center in the

Margarita (33) Area, MCB Camp Pendleton.

PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,5100216496M 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P608




11. Requirement:


M00681(AG)


doors and frames with stainless steel hardware. Construction will include

integral colored or glazed concrete block, or finished gypsum board over

metal stud interior partitions; racquetball and basketball courts with wood

floors; telescoping bleachers; aerobics, weight and cardiovascular training

areas; rest rooms, lockers, showers, saunas, equipment storage, laundry and

administrative support areas; suspended acoustical ceiling system and

suspended acoustical sound attenuation panels. The building will be

designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Americans with

Disabilities Act. Built-in equipment includes an overhead roll-up safety

partition at the basketball court, a high bay motorized operable window

system, and mass notification address system. Also includes Technical

Operation Manuals. Information management systems that include wiring for

the energy monitoring and control system (EMCS), telephone, cable

television (CATV), and fiber optics cable (local area network (LAN).

Sustainable design will be integrated into the design, development, and

construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and

other directives. Special costs include a seismic locality factor for

seismic zone four (4), cardio/aerobics cushion flooring, and a floor to

ceiling safety mirror system. Electrical system and utilities include fire

alarm system and wiring, transformer, lighting, and connection of utility

systems to base wide energy monitoring system in the unity room at Bldg.

2249. Mechanical systems and utilities include HVAC, instrumentation and

automatic controls, plumbing, sewage collection and a pumping lift station,

fire protection system, and building site gas, water, sewer, and storm

sewer utility connections. Paving and site improvements include conversion

of existing basketball court into additional parking spaces, improved

access roads, pavement striping and repaving, site grading, directional

signs, concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighted parking, slope

maintenance, landscaping with automatic irrigation, and concrete block

screen walls for trash and utilities. Site preparations include clear and

grub of brush and grass, spread and compact imported fill, and fine grading

of site. Demolition includes existing concrete pavement, curbs and

gutters. Anti-terrorism protection will be per UFC-4-010-01 DOD Minimum

Anti-Terrorism Standards for building dated 8 Oct. 2003.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


The existing fitness center shares a 47 year old converted dining facility

with a lethal weapons training classroom. Building 33402 is located at the

southernmost end of the Margarita Area, or a distance of almost 3/4 of a

mile from billeting, and an inconvenient distance from messing and a

majority of the work spaces for the camp. The building is functionally

inadequate with respect to configuration, court size, lockers and showers,

as well as being seismically deficient, and is beyond economical repair.

Seismic zone, dated construction methods, and heavy construction materials

all contribute to a high risk for structural failure during a seismic

event. The restrooms are inadequate and existing load-bearing walls

prevent their expansion. The lethal weapons training classroom occupies

the former galley and separates the lockers and showers from the fitness

center, which occupies the former dining room. An outdated and inadequate

electrical system requires the use of extension cords to supply power to

cardiovascular equipment. There are no racquetball courts or indoor

gymnasiums in the Margarita (33) Area.

If not provided, the safety risks associated with seismic activity and

inadequate electrical systems will continue. Due to the geographical

location of the Margarita Area and the lack of private sector resources

available during the regular work day, some personnel will forego regular

exercise, negatively impacting unit readiness.

Adequate facilities and support services are required to meet the

individual physical fitness, training, skills development, recreation, and

intramural needs of over 2,300 military personnel in the Margarita Area.

When not being used for training, this facility also serves the fitness and

recreation needs of approximately 200 dependents, retirees and authorized

civilians after work hours and on weekends.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,5100216496M 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P608








1. Status:


01/2006

09/2007

10%


M00681(AG)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,5100216496M 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P608





NMCI Connection

O&MMC

PMC

2009

2009

355

45



Equipment

Nomenclature







Marine Corps requirements.

Bob Song 760-725-5641Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

N/A

$290

$0

$290

04/2008

01/2008

04/2009

$218

$72

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M00681(AG)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 651391

9. COST ESTIMATES


INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE

RANGE CONTROL TOWER 65FT HIGH

(258 SF)

OPERATION STORAGE FACILITY

(797 SF)

ENCLOSED BLEACHER (1,098 SF)

AMMUNITION BREAKDOWN BLDG (194

SF)

GENERAL INSTRUCTION BLDGS 2EA

(1,593 SF)

STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGETS

BZO TARGET PAD

FIRING POSITION STATION

FIRING BERM (FIRING POSITIONS)

HOSTILE FIRE EMPLACEMENTS

REINF.CONCRETE PAD (PORTABLE

TOILETS)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS



SITE IMPROVEMENTS

ELECTRICAL AND COMM.

FACILITIES

SITE PREPARATION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (2%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


LS

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

EA

m

EA

m3

EA

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

24

74

102

18

148

168

102

12

2,625

18

33

14,168

1,807.68

937.75

2,727.7

1,770.21

1,871.52

65.07

1,484.23

12.77

431.97

72.49

1,430

(340)

(130)

(100)

(50)

(260)

(310)

(10)

(20)

(30)

(10)

(10)

(10)

(10)

(10)

(10)

(120)

14,750

(3,450)

(3,400)

(470)

(7,430)

16,180

320

16,500

940

17,440

650


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,0900216496M 17940


NAVY 2008FY

P637



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AL)

(SAN MATEO AREA (62))


February 2007

DD Form




TOTAL REQUEST



18,090

18,090

(2,089)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,0900216496M 17940


NAVY 2008FY

P637





CAMP PENDLETON.

M00681(AL)


Construct a 12 firing lane Infantry Squad Battle Range to include control

tower/equipment with environmental control, operation/storage building,

enclosed bleacher facility, ammunition breakdown building, double size

general instruction building, BZO target pad, walk-in fire positions,

safety berms, hostile fire emplacements, concrete pad for portable toilets

and technical operating manuals. Built in equipment includes a public

address system. Infrastructure construction provides support for

installation of Remoted Target System (RETS) including buried electrical

wiring for all targets, installation of stationary targets, Battle Sight

Zero (BZO) targets, related target mechanisms and standing seam metal roof.

Electrical Systems include night training lights at initial position fire

line and lighted lateral limits signs, flag pole with light, electrical

power, transformer, telephone, fire alarm system, and public address

system. Site improvements and preparation includes removal of Unexploded

Ordinances (UXO), site preparation, walks/drainage. Project will included

technical operating manuals provided to the site user at construction

completion.

Range construction will require a balanced site grading, to keep lead

contaminated soil on site. This balanced grading and the steep surrounding

topography will require the construction of storm water retention basins, a

system of drainage channels, swales, underground piping, drop drain inlets,

and energy dissipater structures. Steep slopes will need protection by a

combination of jute netting, geo-textile fabrics, open web plastics, and

other such methods. Storm water pollution prevention (SWPPP) is a

sensitive issue to local government agencies. Extensive SWPPP and drainage

control measures need to be taken during construction and during post

construction re-vegetation work (lasting up to 6 years).

Significant environmental mitigation costs are anticipated including:

biological and cultural monitoring, toad exclusion fencing, wetland

restoration, grassland restoration, coastal sage scrub restoration, exotic

weed control, riparian Oak restoration, and cultural resources recoveries.

A detailed cost estimate is included in the attached documents.


February 2007

DD Form


The project will partially replace and modernize an antiquated range (Range

314) with a state-of-the-art Remoted Target Systems (RETS); designed to

conditions, tasks, and standards accommodating existing small arms weapons

and training requirements employed by the Marine Corps. Existing Range

314 is a multipurpose training facility. This project will modernize the

part of the existing Range 314 involving individual weapons and

light/medium machine guns. The range is required for infantry squad

offensive training, basic marksmanship training, familiarization with

various weapons and maintenance of proficiency in field firing techniques.

RETS equipment will provide immediate, automated feedback and scoring to

the student and instructor during live-firing and moving target

capabilities. Time spent to complete the course is greatly reduced

resulting in a greater ability to complete training on the few existing

training ranges at Camp Pendleton.

The facility is currently used 2 to 3 days per week during 48 weeks of the

year by the School of Infantry to conduct infantry common skills training

for 12,000 entry level Marines each year, prior to their attending their

primary Military Occupation Specialty (MOS) School. Shifts in

responsibility for common skills within the Marine Corps' entry level

pipeline could increase the use of this facility to 4-5 days per week for

the preponderance of the year. The 35,000 members of the IMEF could use

the range on an as available basis. It is designed to conditions, tasks

and standards accommodating weapons and training requirements employed by

the Marine Corps.

The RETS ranges, designed by the Army Corps of Engineers, offer the

flexibility to integrate the MILES 2000 training system through the use of

REQUIREMENT:

Construct an Infantry Squad Battle Course - Defensive Range. Cost derived

and adjusted from actual historical data and previous PCE data for similar

type projects.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,0900216496M 17940


NAVY 2008FY

P637




11. Requirement:


M00681(AL)




other directives.


February 2007

DD Form


The existing range is a stop-gap measure of portable targets, timber walls

and simulated foxholes constructed by SOI until P637 is constructed. The

existing range does not provide automated feedback, scoring and only

provides the opportunity to train to the minimum level of the training

standard. It is too small and is incapable of supporting the new more

powerful weapons in the Marine Corps inventory and can not accommodate the

Remoted Target System (RETS) without infrastructure and modernization

proposed by this project.

Entry level Marines receive formal instruction on weapons and techniques,

but can only partially and largely ineffectively simulate live-fire combat

drills on the existing antiquated Base ranges since the range has limited

training applications, fixed targets and provide no instantaneous,

automatic feedback to the instructors and students.

the MILES Target Interface Device (MTID). This instrumentation system

permits simulation of live-fire training scenarios approaching battle

tempo, and will allow significant savings in ammunition expenditure.

The Base currently has 21 adequate and 13 substandard ranges. Per the

Base's Land Training Area Requirements Study (LATAR) dated 1989 and HOMC

approved BFR, dated 28 August 1998, Pendleton should have 52 specialized

small arms ranges in order to effectively train Marines per Individual

Marine Training Standards (ITS). The Acquisition Objective (AO) for the

RETS ranges was based on a study of ITS, Tables of Organization/Equipment,

and Camp Pendleton's range capacity.

CG MCB Camp Pendleton, in a letter to the Marine Corps Combat Development

Command, ltr 1500 O&TTRMD dated 09 Nov 1998, reemphasized the need for

Remoted Target Sytem Ranges (RETS) at Base Pendleton. Additionally, letter

from CG MCB Camp Pendleton, ltr 1500 O&TTRMD dated 23 September 1999 to

COMMARFORPAC, requested Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton receive POM

procurement priority support for this range. Per section III (Equipment

Loading) of the Mar 2000 Facilities Support Requirement Document (FSR),

the RETS equipment for the Infantry Battle Course has been programmed.

Sustainable design features to be utilized in this project include the

following features: restoring site disturbance through native re-vegetation

efforts, using water efficient native vegetation, using energy efficient

equipment for heating and air conditioning, using renewable solar power for

range limit lights, and using daylights for indoor lighting.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,0900216496M 17940


NAVY 2008FY

P637



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00681(AL)



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton units will continue to train on the

inadequate local ranges which will erode their live-fire proficiency and

ultimately affect their readiness to perform effectively in combat.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,0900216496M 17940


NAVY 2008FY

P637




Collateral Equip Buildings

Target Mechanisms

O&MMC

PMC

124

1,965



Equipment

Nomenclature








Manuel Alvarez 760-725-6046Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$660

$0

$660

03/2008

12/2007

09/2009

09/2005

02/2006

07/2007

35%

50%

$300

$360


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M00681(AL)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,0900216496M 17940


NAVY 2008FY

P637




Blank Page

M00681(AL)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 711390

Scope

15120

15180

Cost

($000)Start

Pier 5002 Sub Fender

Installation

Magnetic Silencing Facility

Modification

Complete

0 LS

0 LS

9,040

14,590

Design Status

06/2006

06/2006


08/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 2,860,061

0

0

48,729

23,630

117,180


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL

SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA



23,630


TOTAL 48,729


0





Serves as homeport for operations attack submarines of the Pacific Fleet,

providing refit, maintenance, replenishment, training and ordnance support.

3,049,600

31710 109738 SF 48,729C4I System Integration Lab/Comm 3rd Fleet HQ

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.13

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

11463

11565

587

567B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 3251

2934

7057

7379

0

0

113

230

0

0

326

326

129

129

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 721390

4. Command

SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA




NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.13

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 731391


9. COST ESTIMATES


PIER 5002 SUB FENDER INSTALLATION

HYDROPNEUMATIC SUBMARINE

FENDERS

FOAM FILLED SHIP FENDERS

CONCRETE PILE FENDER REACTION

STATIONS

REPLACEMENT COMPOSITE FENDER

PILES

REPLACEMENT TIMBER WALE AND

RUBBER FENDER

PIER CORNER PROTECTION

NEW MOORING FITTINGS

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT





DEMOLITION

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

7,240

(2,670)

(1,230)

(1,720)

(830)

(260)

(300)

(50)

(130)

(50)

900

(340)

(10)

(460)

(90)

8,140

410

8,550

490

9,040

9,040

9,040


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,0400203176N 15120


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P118

SUBASE SAN DIEGO CASAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N63406

This project will modify the Submarine Maintenance Pier (Pier 5002). The

pier is approximately 353 meters (1155 LF) long and 38 meters (125 LF) wide

and includes the Submarine Squadron 11 Headquarters Building located

directly on the pier. The current north side berth fender system is only

able to accommodate large surface ships with relatively square hull shapes.

The new submarine fender system will allow direct access to submarines for

maintenance activities being provided by the shops, and personnel located

in the maintenance building and the floating dry-dock ARCO (ARDM-5), both


February 2007

DD Form


The Naval Submarine Base has three main piers. Presently only the two

northern piers (5000 & 5003) can moor submarines. The (north) Pier 5003 is

relatively short at 158M (520 FT) and has only two berths for SSNs. The

floating dry-dock ARCO, submarine maintenance shops, and Submarine Squadron

Eleven administrative and training functions are located on the (south)

Pier 5002. Due to the present fender system configuration, (south) Pier

5002 cannot moor any submarines. It is inefficient and difficult to

maintain submarines moored at Piers 5000 or 5003. Excessive time is

An adequate submarine fender system that will allow direct access to

submarines for maintenance activities. Mooring of submarines on pier 5002

is needed to permit work to continue during weapons loading on the other

piers. Currently, civilian contractors perform the majority of the

maintenance effort for the submarines. During weapons loading operations on

Piers 5000 and 5003, no civilian workers or equipment are permitted on the

piers. All maintenance work must be suspended until loading is completed.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project upgrades the fender systems to permit submarines requiring

maintenance to moor next to the maintenance building without the need for

packaging of materials or interruption from weapons loading activities.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,0400203176N 15120


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P118



11. Requirement:


of which are located directly on the pier. This modification will provide

vertical hydropnuematic fender stations to accommodate attack submarines

and visiting submarines on the north side of the pier. Supplemental foam-

filled fenders will be interspaced between the vertical submarine fenders

to accommodate surface ships.

Both types of fenders are backed by concrete reaction piles, which

distribute loads to the pier. Approximately 850-feet of the pier currently

has a timber fender pile system. Work will include replacing the timber

piles with composite (a combination of concrete, fiberglass or plastic)

piling which is impervious to marine borer decay and environmentally

preferred to chemically treated piling.

Power supply booms will be installed to route shore power to the submarines

moored at the pier. Extra phone lines will be provided. All other

utilities are already located on-site.


February 2007

DD Form


(F) Type of design contract Design Bid Build



Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


required to package and secure parts or equipment that must be transported

between piers and the maintenance shops. The transporting of equipment on

congested roads and through parking lots between the piers increases the

possibility of damage or loss during handling and transport.

If not provided, Maintenance Pier 5002 cannot be used to moor submarines.

The pier will often remain vacant while other piers are congested which

reduces their efficiency. Maintenance work will continue to be

accomplished at distant piers with material and equipment transported

between the facilities. The risk of material loss or damage and reduction

in efficiency of submarine repairs will continue. Weapons loading

activities at Piers 5000 and 5003 will continue to delay completion of

critical maintenance for submarines.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,0400203176N 15120


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P118










2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

NSB Pier 5000

$978

$612

$366

03/2008

01/2008

03/2009

06/2006

09/2006

08/2007

35%

55%

$734

$244


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,0400203176N 15120


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P118



joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. This Facility

can be used by other components on an as available basis; however, the

scope of the project is based on Navy requirements.

Robert W. Humphreys (619) 524-8515Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 771391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MAGNETIC SILENCING FACILITY

MODIFICATION

DEPERMING PIER STRUCTURAL

UPGRADES (98 FB)

DEPERMING BUILDING (3,409 SF)

SHIP TO SHORE ELECTRICAL

SERVICE (1,700 LF)


SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



LS

mB

m2

m

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

29.87

316.7

518.16

125,147.44

1,487.84

5,244.32

7,110

(3,740)

(470)

(2,720)

(100)

(80)

5,580

(100)

(4,390)

(110)

(30)

(860)

(50)

(40)

12,690

630

13,320

760

14,080

510

14,590

14,590

(22,130)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5900203176N 15180


Modification

NAVY 2008FY

P135



The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: SUBASE SAN DIEGO CA.

The proposed project includes structural and supporting electrical site

improvements to upgrade the existing deperming pier and building. Replace

timber pile mooring dolphin with two new concrete mooring platforms on

concrete piling, timber catwalks with handrails, and stainless steel

mooring bollards. Replace primary fendering system with foam fenders and


February 2007

DD Form


The Navy requires an adequate pier capable of serving the new LPD 17 class

amphibious transport dock ship and other PACFLT surface ships with Advanced

Degaussing Systems (ADS) for deperming.

Ships are depermed (demagnetized) when the magnetic field of the ship

exceeds magnetic signature limits established by the Navy as measured by

the U.S. Naval Degaussing Station in San Diego Bay or Pearl Harbor. Sensors

or magnetometers embedded in the harbor channel measure the magnetic field

of each passing ship. The data is analyzed at the site to determine if

corrective action is needed. New ships require deperming to stabilize their

magnetic properties and in-service ships may require deperming after

construction or rework. Deperming involves wrapping the ship with cables

and applying current to expose the ship to larger, counterbalancing

magnetic fields. A new degaussing system, termed Advanced Degaussing

System, will be installed on the new LPD-17 and later ship classes to

reduce magnetic signature. The implementation of these systems is in

response to an increased threat to sea mines in the littoral environment. A

significant increase in support will be required for ADS capable ships.

Besides the existing requirement for magnetic treatment, a new requirement

is needed to magnetically calibrate the ships every 1-2 years to maintain

REQUIREMENT:

Upgrade existing Magnetic Silencing Facility (MSF) to support ships with

advanced degaussing systems (ADS), including the new LPD 17 class

amphibious transport dock ship and other large Pacific Fleet (PACFLT) ships

(with the exception of CVN). Increase power supply from 4.4 MW to 8.3 MW

at 600VDC.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5900203176N 15180


Modification

NAVY 2008FY

P135



11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard:mB mB mB 30

concrete reaction piles, and wales. OMSI Technical Manuals will be

provided. Deperming building will be un-inhabited. Project includes

special cost for delays due to least tern nesting.

Demolition includes removal of the existing diesel generators, water

cooling system, Buildings 4, 6, 15, 46 and a portion of building 2 (total

m2 for all buildings: 205.87).

This project is in compliance with current seismic requirements.

Environmental mitigation includes eel grass surveys and removal of

contaminated soil.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


The existing deperming pier located at Naval Base Point Loma was built in

1987. A bank of four 60-year old ex-WWII submarine diesel generators

provides up to 4.4 MW of DC power required for the current deperming

process, which is not sufficient for the new ADS mission requirements. No

"hotel" power is available for ships currently berthed at this pier.

Without the stuctural upgrades proposed by this project, the current pier

cannot support the larger class of ships, including the LHD and new LPD-17.

The existing MSF and current power supply cannot support the ADS capable,

or larger class, ships. All new LPD class ships, T-AKE, CG-X, and DD-X will

have ADS. The basis of the new ADS is to significantly reduce a ship's

magnetic signature beyond current limits.

If this project is not provided San Diego Deperming Pier will not meet the

electrical and structural requirements to demagnetize larger classes of

ships and new ships with the ADS.

ships within the new OPNAV ship signature limits.

All PACFLT surface ships must be magnetically treated in San Diego. With

this project, the Point Loma MSF will be the single-site surface ship

treatment facility for the Pacific Fleet. MSF San Diego will be the only

PACFLT site with special test systems to support ADS shipboard systems.

The deperming pier must be structurally able to provide berthing for the

range of ships supporting SURFPAC fleet and be capable of providing both

legacy and advanced deperming treatment requirements.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5900203176N 15180


Modification

NAVY 2008FY

P135






2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

N/A

06/2006

09/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$320


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5900203176N 15180


Modification

NAVY 2008FY

P135



Boat Security Barrier (includes

moorings)

DC Power Supplies and LI Switches

Physical Security Equipment

Treatment Electronics

Y & Z Loop Calibration

Z Loop Sensors

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

1,528

3,787

15

5,700

8,500

2,600



Equipment

Nomenclature



joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is recommended. Mission

requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible

with use by other components.

Robert W. Humphreys (619) 524-8515Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$427

$350

$77

05/2008

01/2008

05/2009

$107 (B) All other design costs

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 811390

Scope

72124

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

36789 m2 34,329

Design Status

12/2007


05/2008


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 3,133,054

78,718

27,939

0

34,329

300,528


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:72124 Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 88360 SF 27,939

TOTAL

TOTAL




34,329


27,939


0





To provide housing, training facilities, logistical and administrative

support for Fleet Marine Force units and other organizations or activities

designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

To provide combined arms training for Fleet Marine Force units, both active

and reserve.

To provide formal school training for personnel in the field of

communications-electronics and conduct other schools and training as

directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

3,574,568

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.29

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

13096

13827

280

125B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1498

619

1454

647

5

10

1832

2502

0

1

464

648

7541

7742

22

1533

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 821390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.29

5. Area Const


Marine Corps

Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 831391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BEQ & POV PARKING STRUCTURE

(395,992 SF)

PARKING GARAGE (307,633 SF)


SF)


(87,920 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

COMMUNICATIONS AND DATA

OUTSIDE PLANT

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

36,788.88

28,580

40.88

8,168

121.91

4,708.09

2,545.54

26,810

(3,480)

(190)

(20,790)

(400)

(350)

(190)

(660)

(750)

3,050

(310)

(900)

(870)

(280)

(630)

(60)

29,860

1,490

31,350

1,790

33,140

1,190

34,330

34,329

(1,060)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

34,3290815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P906

MARINE CORPS BASE TWENTYNINE PALMSTWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA



TWENTYNINE PALMS.


February 2007

DD Form



by 2012. This project is needed to provide adequate billeting and a

centrally located BEQ parking garage for enlisted personnel at MCAGCC,

REQUIREMENT:

Provides 384 living spaces for bachelor-enlisted personnel (192 two-person

rooms) using the 2+0 Quality of Life (QOL) standard room design for

permanent party enlisted personnel. Provides 546 parking spaces in a

multi-level parking garage and 194 additional parking spaces on adjoining

parking lots for the existing and planned bachelor enlisted personnel.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

34,3290815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P906



11. Requirement:


Constructs a multistory reinforced concrete masonry Bachelor Enlisted

Quarters (BEQ) building with seismic zone 4 construction, concrete

foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roofing. Provides 192 rooms

in the 2+0 configuration. Building will be moment resisting steel frame

with marginally reinforced double wythe concrete masonry unit (CMU) in fill

walls (split faced block exterior), single wythe interior CMU walls,

concrete floor slab reinforcement run continuously through both faces of

the slab and into beams and columns and open web steel joist roof support.

Community and service core areas consist of laundry facilities, lounges,

administrative offices, multipurpose rooms, housekeeping areas and public

restrooms. Electrical systems include fire alarms, energy saving


Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating

ventilation and air conditioning. Supporting facilities work includes site

and building utility connections (water, sanitary sewers, electrical,

telephone, local area network and cable television). Provides a 650 ton

chiller, pumps and controls in Bldg 1461 and connects to a central chilled

water plant and high temperature hot water lines with secondary

distribution loops.

Constructs a multilevel parking garage for BEQ providing 546 parking

spaces, with seismic upgrades, reinforced concrete foundation, floors, and

columns with CMU walls and paved parking lots for 194 vehicles. Paving and

site improvements include sidewalks, outdoor recreation facilities /

courts, roadway access, earthwork, grading and landscaping. Also includes

OMSI manuals, anti-terrorism / force protection measures, the demolition of

Buildings 1425 and 1426 (13,260 SF) of inadequate facilities including

necessary asbestos and lead removal along with 10 light poles.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Current billeting requirements have exceeded maximum available capacity.

The buildings to be replaced were built in 1953 and although they have been

modified from open-bay barracks, they still retain the gang head and shower

configuration. These buildings are not in compliance with current

life/safety/fire/seismic and quality of life standards and do not meet

basic anti-terrorism/force protection standards of construction and set

back distances from adjacent roadways and parking. Available horizontal

space for parking is non-existent and requires vertical construction to

satisfy minimum requirements for new BEQ construction. Recent increases in

energy costs and the reduction of maintenance capabilities have made these

dated facilities costly to operate and maintain.

If this project is not provided, personnel will continue to be billeted in

crowded, inadequate, and unsafe buildings. They will endure a lower

quality of life to the detriment of morale and retention efforts. Higher-

ranking personnel will continue to be billeted in town, costing the Marine

Corps BAQ funds. Loss of trained Marines continues to deplete the Marine

Corps ranks of qualified personnel and operational dollars.

Twentynine Palms, to make up for a deficiency of BEQ billeting and

associated vehicle parking space. This project also supports the CMC goal

to replace all inadequate bachelor quarters with the new 2+0 configured

barracks.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

34,3290815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P906






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract


1. Status:


No

Marine Corps Base 29 Palms, CA

$491

$100

12/2007

02/2008

05/2008

0%

0%

$

$491


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

34,3290815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P906




NMCI Connections

O&MMC

PMC

2008

2008

1,005

55



Equipment

Nomenclature








Tony Martone (760)830-5188Activity POC: Phone No:

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$391

06/2008

12/2007

06/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 6002007 R&M Conducted ($000):

76,240



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 871390

Scope

73025

Cost

($000)Start

Security Improvements

Complete

285 m2 7,570

Design Status

09/2005


09/2007

A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..( Acres)

4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 0

5,840

2,600

14,278

7,570

55,534

C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 700

9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:16910 Slipway Barrier 1400 LF 2,600

TOTAL

TOTAL

MCLB ALBANY GA



7,570


TOTAL

2,600

14,278


0





To provide the organization and resources necessary to plan and conduct the

scheduled maintenance of Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) assets at both

the Blount Island facility and aboard MPF ships. Additionally, assets

associated with the Norway Air-Landed marine Expeditionary Brigade (NALMEB)

are rotated through BIC for planned maintenance. To oversee augmentation

of MPF efforts by Fleet Marine Forces personnel and to provide the

requisite coordination among the Command, the appropriate supported

commander, and supporting Navy, Army and Cost Guard personnel.

85,822

85240

11320

LS

LS

7,069

7,209

Lay Down Area

Hardstand Extension

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.91

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

102

104

8

4B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 94

100

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 881390

4. Command

MCLB ALBANY GA




NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.91

5. Area Const


Marine Corps

Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 891391

9. COST ESTIMATES


MAINGATE IMPROVEMENTS - BLOUNT

ISLAND (3,073 SF)

PASS & ID OFFICE (500 SF)

REAR ENTRANCE/SECURITY GATE

(161 SF)

MAIN ENTRANCE/SECURITY GATE

(161 SF)

CANOPIES FOR ENTRANCE/SECURITY

GATES (2,196 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST


m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

285.45

46.45

15

15

204

5

3,500

5,510

5,510

1,800

3,649.68

1,590

(160)

(80)

(80)

(370)

(20)

(820)

(30)

(10)

(20)

5,000

(10)

(1,430)

(370)

(1,010)

(240)

(400)

(30)

(1,510)

6,590

330

6,920

390

7,310

260

7,570

7,570

(33)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,5700702896M 73025

Maingate Improvements - Blount

Island

NAVY 2008FY

P003

MCLB ALBANY GA


3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67004(BI)

(BLOUNT ISLAND JAX FL)


February 2007

DD Form


The project upgrades the two vehicle entrances and traffic control points

to the Blount Island Command to meet current safety and security

requirements and installs security fencing and lighting.

PROJECT:




4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,5700702896M 73025


Island

NAVY 2008FY

P003

MCLB ALBANY GA



11. Requirement:


The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: BLOUNT ISL CMD

JACKSONVILLE FL.

M67004(BI)


This project constructs security improvements to the main and rear

entrances to the MC Blount Island Command that include hardened and non-

hardened security/ID checkpoints. Project provides a total of 3,073 SF

that includes at the main entrance a Pass/ID office, security gate,

security fencing, site lighting, sentry house and canopies and at the rear

entrance a security gate, security fencing, site lighting and sentry house.

Construction includes a covered POV entrance, covered truck inspection

station, additional traffic lanes, traffic control devices and

active/passive traffic barriers. Special construction features include a

protective canopy and raised concrete islands. Pass/ID office shall

consist of shallow foundation/slab on grade, split face exterior cavity

wall and standing seam metal roof. Pass/ID provides open office space,

control counter, visitors space and male/female restroom facilities off the

visitor's space. Electrical systems include duress alarms with remote

control, closed circuit television cameras, site communications and power,

and raceways/conduits for Government provided equipment. Emergency power

will be provided for critical equipment. Paving and site improvements

include additional lanes for traffic control, raised concrete curbing, lane

control signals, roadway striping, signage, and other controls. Storm

drain culverts, pipes and catch basins will be installed to accommodate

drainage from the new layout. AT/FP measures include vehicle barriers,

tire shredders, and security fencing/gates and security lighting on the

perimeter fencing and upgrading all perimeter fencing to meet AT/FP with

cable reinforcing and dead man anchors as required by UFC's and NAVFAC

Definitive Drawings. Technical Operating manuals are also included. This

project also includes the demolition of the existing guardhouse and

existing pavement and any necessary environmental protection requirements.


construction for the project in accordance with Executitve Order 13123 and

other laws and executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form





No

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


The current entrances to Blount Island Command are poorly configured and

provide no means of stopping traffic. It requires security personnel to

stand in the roadways to conduct security checks of inbound vehicles. This

situation is absolutely unsatisfactory since access control is a DOD

requirement. Currently there are no barriers (active or passive) in place

to stop unauthorized vehicles from entering or exiting the station. At

present the security personnel are not armed and the barriers are critical

for stopping unauthorized vehicles.

Blount Island will fail to meet current DOD/Marine Corps security

directives/requirements for station access. Security personnel will

continue to be placed in an unsafe environment with the inability to shut

down access to the installation should the security posture warrant it.

This project is needed to correct a number of security and safety

deficiencies found throughout Blount Island Command. The existing guard

station and traffic patterns entering Blount Island fail to comply with DOD

directives. In addition, security barriers (active and passive) are

required to stop unauthorized vehicles from entering the station during

increased threat conditions and security fencing and lighting needs to be

placed at strategic locations to comply with ATFP requirements.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,5700702896M 73025


Island

NAVY 2008FY

P003

MCLB ALBANY GA






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract


1. Status:


$540

$120

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$420

$120


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



M67004(BI)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,5700702896M 73025


Island

NAVY 2008FY

P003

MCLB ALBANY GA




NMCI Connections

MPMC

MPMC

2009

2009

8

25



Equipment

Nomenclature





Construction is recommended. This is an installation

utility/infrastructure project and does not qualify for joint use at this

location, however, all tenants on this installation are benefited by this

project.

Mr. Kim Weisenburger 904-696-5154Activity POC: Phone No:

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$420

04/2008

01/2008

07/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67004(BI)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 931390

Scope

31023

Cost

($000)Start

Littoral Warfare Systems

Facility

Complete

4193 m2 13,870

Design Status

10/2005


09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 302,654

9,678

0

21,436

13,870

38,599


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL




13,870


TOTAL 21,436


0





Train officer and enlisted personnel in diving, ship salvage, and submarine

rescue.

386,237

72114

31023

42250 SF

29999 SF

10,658

10,778


Expeditionary Warfare Systems Facility

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.82

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

2410

2728

129

145B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 738

821

1324

1346

0

0

0

140

0

0

39

47

180

229

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 941390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.82

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 951391


9. COST ESTIMATES


LITTORAL WARFARE SYSTEMS FACILITY

(45,135 SF)

LITTORAL WARFARE SYSTEMS

FACILITY (45,135 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

TEMORARY FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,193.16

4,193.16 2,020.03

9,560

(8,470)

(770)

(100)

(120)

(100)

2,510

(680)

(260)

(90)

(430)

(10)

(640)

(40)

(50)

(310)

12,070

600

12,670

720

13,390

480

13,870

13,870

(6,725)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,8700805376N 31023


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P388

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITYPANAMA CITY, FLORIDA


Construct a two-story building with pile foundation and grade beams,

structural steel and/or concrete frame, metal and/or built-up roofing, and

masonry/stucco exterior walls. The building includes an automatic fire

sprinkler system, technical operating manuals, intrusion alarm system,


February 2007

DD Form


The Navy initiated a rapid development program for a fast maneuverable,

shallow draft Littoral Combat Ship LCS). These ships are being designed to

be mission reconfigurable for Mine Warfare (MIW), Anti-Submarine Warfare

(ASW) and Surface Warfare (SUW) missions to start with. Funding for the

initial ship design concept began in FY2004, with the first Littoral Combat

Ship (Flight 0) scheduled for delivery in 2007. There will be a total of

four Flight 0 LCS ships between 2007 and 2009. Due to its rapid development

schedule, these first four Flight 0 ships will have stand-alone mission

modules with individual control systems hosted in a variety of computer

platforms. The remaining Flight 0 ships and the follow-on Flight 1 ships

will reflect design refinements resulting from the lessons learned from the

first four Flight 0 ships and will require fully integrated and certified

reconfigurable mission packages. There will be approximately 9 Flight 0

ships and 30 Flight 1 ships delivered beyond 2010.

The Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City (NSWC-PC) is the designated

Mission Package lead certification laboratory for the Littoral Combat Ship.

This project is required to support continuing Mission Package baseline

definition, integration and certification and follow-on technology spiral

development evolutions. Key functional areas include Mission Package

REQUIREMENT:

The project provides laboratory and support space for Littoral Combat

Systems Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), acquisition

support, command and control (C2) systems integration and fleet service

life cycle sustenance for the modular mission packages associated with the

new Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,8700805376N 31023


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P388



11. Requirement:


heating, ventilation and air conditioning, and an elevator. Special

features include exterior roll-up doors, high bays with overhead crane,

loading dock, forklift-rated floors, local area network wiring, 400 cycle

power, 220V power connections, raised flooring for the computer labs an

emergency generator, paving and site improvements. The building will be a

secure facility with limited access. The project will demolish buildings

(76, 79, 376, 404, 409, 412, 451, 491) approximately 3,136 m2 (33,763 SF)

of existing facilities. Temporary facilities (trailers) will accomodate

the relocated personnel from the demolished buildings of this project. The

project will conform to Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection standards and

incorporate sustainable features.


February 2007

DD Form


The RDT&E of the mission modules and associated systems selected for the

Littoral Combat Ship Spiral Alpha mission packages is currently performed

in buildings that are ill configured to meet the LCS objective of a fully

integrated yet interchangeable focused mission packages.

There is no available space to house and work on large-scale equipment,

modules, and components which is required to fully integrate and certify

Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Mission Packages. Program elements are scattered

accross the station in ten to twelve separate buildings at any one time.

Some laboratory tasks are being performed in office spaces, inhibiting

coordination and communication. A large portion of research is performed on

a space available basis.

There is no available high-bay area equipped with an overhead crane so

selected work on large-scale MCM modules and equipment must be performed

outside. Personnel working on these modules must rely on the intermittent

availability of the Public Works mobile crane to lift and move modules and

computer program engineering, lifetime software engineering support,

distance support (help desk), mission module engineering, mission systems

integration and Mission Packages certification. The prototyping and

definition of Mission Package configurations occuring in this facility

fully complements the physical assembly and issue of Mission Packages at

proposed LCS Support Facilities in fleet concentration areas.

The Program Executive Office, Littoral and Mine Warfare (PE0-LMW) has

assigned to the Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City (NSWC PC) the role

as Engineering Agent (EA) for the LCS Mine Countermeasures mission modules

and the Certification Agent (CA) for all LCS Mission Packages (MPs). This

function is critical to delivering certified ready-for-use focused combat

capability to the LCS ships and enable the program to meet the requirements

for the last 9 Flight 0 ships and the Flight 1 ships. Mission Packages

consist of a number of mission modules (including functions such as

sensors, Unmanned Aerial and Undersea Vehicles, weaponds and support

systems), which in total will fit into a 10-11 twenty foot equivalent unit

(TEU) ISO shipping containers.

NSWC PC requires an adequately configured and designed facility to support

the integration of the mission modules into Mission Packages (MPs),

certification of all focused MPs and to provide life cycle support to the

MPs. This facility will enable NSWC PC to fullfill its role as the LCS

Mission Module Engineering Agent.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,8700805376N 31023


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P388




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


equipment, a situation that will grow worse as this new mission progresses.

This compromises both security and safety and adds man-hours to these

tasks.

Without this project, development, integration, and certification of state-

of-the-art Littoral Combat Ship fully integrated mission packages will lag

LCS ship development and delivery. LCS mission module testing and Mission

Package integration and certification will have to be done shipboard. This

situation will not provide the necessary controls to certify results and

ensure repeatability, it will require to tie-up LCS platforms at pierside

for testing, and will consequently increase costs and delay the ship's IOC.

Delays in delivery of these critical mission packages for use on the new

ships will prolong an untenable situation regarding lack of adequate

capabilities in the littoral combat arena. Without the Mission Packages

slated to be supported in this proposed facility, the Navy will not be able

to utilize the new Littoral Combat Ship class as intended and must continue

to utilize and put at risk multi-million dollar large ships optimized for

deep water operations.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,8700805376N 31023


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P388






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$670

$160

$510

04/2008

12/2007

03/2009

10/2005

12/2006

09/2007

5%

35%

$510

$160


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,8700805376N 31023


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P388



15 Metric Ton Crane

Fiber optic cables and tranceiver

Intrusion Detection System

Mission Package Computing Equipment

Network Analyzer

Network Hub in rack

Tactical Consoles

OPN

OPN

OPN

RDT&E

OPN

OPN

RDT&E

2009

2009

2009

2009

2009

2009

2009

250

15

350

3,250

20

40

2,800



Equipment

Nomenclature






Leslie Lugo (850)235-5570Activity POC: Phone No:

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,8700805376N 31023


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P388



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1011390

Scope

72124

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

6375 m2 37,961

Design Status

09/2006


01/2008


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 3,119,879

15,200

13,850

63,393

37,961

327,246


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:15964 Waterfront Operations Facilities 1877 m2 13,850

TOTAL

TOTAL


KANEOHE, HAWAII


37,961


TOTAL

13,850

63,393


0






support operations of tenant Marine and Navy units and other activities and

units designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

To provide aviation support for Headquarters, Fleet Marine Force, Pacific.

3,577,529

72124

72124

44112

LS

LS

20010 SF

32,270

24,104

7,019



Equipment Maintenane & Storage Facility, PTA

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.74

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

13277

13506

303

58B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 940

437

456

514

0

3

199

66

0

0

1399

1779

8928

8381

1052

2268

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1021390

4. Command


KANEOHE, HAWAII



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.74

5. Area Const


Marine Corps

Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1031391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS (68,620

SF)

BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS

(67,931 SF)

TELECOMM ROOM (689 SF)


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

6,375

6,311

64

3,460.32

6,563.62

23,510

(21,840)

(420)

(270)

(300)

(680)

9,360

(2,730)

(920)

(560)

(840)

(2,480)

(1,730)

(100)

32,870

1,640

34,510

2,140

36,650

1,310

37,960

37,961

(1,621)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

37,9610206496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P749

MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAIIKANEOHE, HAWAII


Construct a multi-story building of reinforced concrete or masonry

construction matching adjacent existing BEQ buildings, and providing 150

rooms with semi-private baths in the standard 2x0 room configuration per

UFC 4-721-10, dated 31 July 2002. Community and service core areas consist

of laundry facilities, lounges, administrative offices, multipurpose

recreation rooms, housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Mechanical


February 2007

DD Form


PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

37,9610206496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P749



11. Requirement:


systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and

air conditioning. Electrical systems include fire alarm, energy saving

Electronic Monitoring and Control System (EMS). A telecommunications

infrastructure room will be provided on each floor, to house

communications, and security system infrastructure. This area is in

addition to the functional areas allowed for the facility. Technical

Operating manuals will be provided. Information systems include telephone,

data, and cable television (CATV). ATFP protection measures include the

required standoff distances to existing inhabited buildings in the area.

Project includes AT/FP building and site measures in compliance with

Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-010-01, dated 8 Oct 2003. Sustainable

principles will be integrated into the design, development, and



Supporting facilities work includes site and building utility connections

(water/fire, sanitary and storm sewers), electrical, communications voice

and data, Local Area network (LAN), and cable television (CATV). Paving

and site improvements includes paved parking, privately owned vehicle (POV)

parking, access roads/fire access lanes, sidewalks, outdoor recreation

facilities/courtyards/equipment and bike shelters, earthwork/fill/grading

and landscaping.

Demolition includes the demolition of the following existing inadequate

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters:

BUILDING NO. BUILDING SIZE PROPERTY RECORD NO.

225 1,467 M2, 84 MS 200223

226 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200224

227 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200225

228 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200226

229 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200227

230 1,480 M2, 84 MS 200228

A total of 6 buildings (8,867M2, 504MS) will be demolished to support the

construction of 6,375M2 (a 28% reduction in space). The buildings to be

demolished are assumed to contain lead paint and asbestos. Environmental

mitigation will be provided to protect the environment.


February 2007

DD Form



The BEQ facilities which will be replaced at MCBH Kaneohe Bay were built in

the late 1940's and early 1950's as open squad bay facilities. These

facilities were renovated into room configurated barracks in the 1970's.

Due to 50 years of aging and degradation, these BEQ facilities need

continuous repair and maintenance in order to maintain minimum

habitability. Per NAVFAC P-80, the OSD minimum billeting standard net

living area per person for E1 to E4 is 8.36 sq. m. The minimum net living

area for E5 is 12.54 sq.m. Accordingly, existing 3-man room BEQ's with

less than 25.08 sq.m of net living area should only house a maximum of 2

Marines or Sailors of E1 to E4 rank or only one of E5 rank.

Junior Enlisted personnel will continue to be housed in deteriorated, over-

crowded and inadequate barracks to the detriment of their morale, retention

and readiness. Training time will continue to be diverted for large scale

self-help projects to maintain minimum livability standards. An

inequitable amount of maintenance dollars will continue to be diverted from

training facilities to barracks, which will exacerbate growing readiness

problems, and will increase exponentially over time as existing buildings

deteriorate further.


by 2012. Sufficient and adequate housing at MCBH Kaneohe Bay is required

for 300 manspaces (E1 to E5 bachelor enlisted personnel).

As supported by the MCBH BEQ Requirements worksheet, and validated by HQMC,

MCBH currently has 3,824 adequate manspaces, against a requirement of

4,130.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Constructs a new permanent party Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) facility

sited at MCBH Kaneohe Bay for E1 to E5 personnel to support billeting

requirements of MCBH Kaneohe Bay, and moves toward the elimination of

inadequate BEQ spaces at MCBH. The end result will be the replacement of

high maintenance, 1940, 1950 and 1970 vintage BEQs at MCBH Kaneohe Bay with

modern lower cost facilities meeting the 8.36 sq m. net living area per

person standard for E1 to E5 personnel. The new facility will be built

with high degree of durability to resist the corrosive environment of

Kaneohe.

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

37,9610206496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P749




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

37,9610206496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P749




NMCI EQUIPMENT AND CONNECTION

O&MMC

OPN

2008

2008

1,558

63



Equipment

Nomenclature







Navy requirements.

LCDR Charlene Mowery 808-257-2171Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


Yes

N/A

$550

$500

$50

02/2008

12/2007

08/2009

09/2006

02/2007

11/2007

10%

15%

$350

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


2006 R&M Conducted ($000): 1,3462007 R&M Conducted ($000):

87,660



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1071390

Scope

15180

Cost

($000)Start

Sub Drive-In MSF, Beckoning

Point

Complete

3391 m2 99,860

Design Status

08/2006


09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 7,406,905

49,100

39,330

147,222

99,860

1,641,682

C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 1,586,316

9. Future Projects:


74044

Joint Forces Deployment Staging Area

Fitness Center, Pearl Harbor

10400 m2

6236 m2

5,310

34,020

TOTAL

TOTAL




99,860


TOTAL

39,330

147,222


0





Homeport for approximately 40 surface combatants and submarines. This

station operates and controls the harbor and maintains and operates shore-

based support faclities such as shore intermediate maintenance, housing,

recreation, and personnel assistance for afloat surface units and most of

the shore tenant activities in the Pearl Harbor area.

9,384,099

17110

61010

42172

15220

15310

10323 SF

103000 SF

27071 SF

LS

LS

13,067

53,626

20,621

37,118

22,790

Conference & Technology Learning Center

Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command

Missile Magazines (5), West Loch

Waterfront Upgrades Bravo 21

Dry Dock Ship Support Services

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.7

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

19555

18296

1688

1562B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 9751

8614

7472

7476

0

0

0

0

0

0

282

282

362

362

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1081390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.7

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1091391


9. COST ESTIMATES


SUB DRIVE-IN MSF, BECKONING POINT

(36,500 SF)

DEPERMING PIER (32,076 SF)

RECTIFIER BUILDIING (4,424 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS






DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,391

2,980

411

13,174

4,523

42,430

(39,260)

(1,860)

(850)

(420)

(40)

44,020

(20,620)

(4,180)

(50)

(16,110)

(3,060)

86,450

4,320

90,770

5,630

96,400

3,460

99,860

99,860

(19,700)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

99,8600203176N 15180

Sub Drive-in MSF, Beckoning

Point

NAVY 2008FY

P587

NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR HIPEARL HARBOR, HAWAII


The proposed project will construct a new 213-meter (700-foot) non-magnetic

concrete slip at Beckoning Point to support a drive-in solenoid structure.

The work will include demolition of the existing two-story wooden pier and

walkway bridge, and the existing marine rail with winch, shed and

compressor; construction of new piers with overhead trusses at 14.78 meters

(48.5 feet) above mean high water; construction of a pedestrian bridge;

construction for forklift accessibility; constructions of sewer connections

on pier and sewer piping from pier to holding tank on shore; construction

of a 411 square meter (4,425-square foot) Rectifier and Substation

Building. The deperming operation produces high-intensity magnetic fields

during the treatment of the submarine. The operation requires structures


February 2007

DD Form


A submarine is susceptible to detection by enemy sensor systems and

magnetic influence bottom and moored mines if its magnetic signature is not

controlled and managed within the limits specified. The magnetic signature

of a submarine is measured on a Magnetic Silencing Facility (MSF) sensor

range, and if the signature is out-of-specification, the submarine must be

treated or depermed (demagnetized) at a Magnetic Silencing Facility (MSF).

In PACFLT, there are two MSF sensor ranges, (located in San Diego CA, and

Yokosuka Japan) that are capable of measuring the magnetic signatures of

all classes of Submarines. None of the existing PACFLT MSF sensor ranges

are capable of measuring the electric signatures of the newer SSN-21 and

774 Class submarines. The MSF located in Pearl Harbor HI can only deperm

SSN-688 Class, and requires the hull of the submarine to be manually

wrapped with heavy high-current cables. This type of MSF is referred to as

a wrap facility, and takes approximately 3-days to complete the deperming

process. A drive-in facility does not require manual wrapping and because

of this the process can be completed in less than 24-hours. None of the

existing PACFLT MSFs are capable of deperming a SSN-21 or SSN-774 Class

submarine.

SSN-774 and SSN-21 class submarines contain on-board active magnetic and

electric signature silencing systems that require initial calibration and

periodic monitoring. Existing PACFLT facilities do not have the capability

to calibrate these advanced systems or measure their complex signatures.

In addition, the SSN-774 Class submarine cannot be depermed by the current

method of wrapping cables around the hull. Sensitive electronic equipment

installed in the submarine requires a ¿drive-in¿ MSF, where no physical

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a new non-magnetic concrete drive-in magnetic

silencing facility (deperming pier).

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

99,8600203176N 15180


Point

NAVY 2008FY

P587



11. Requirement:


to be constructed with materials that have a low magnetic permeability

property. Local common concrete aggregates were tested and were not

acceptable. Aggregates with low magnetic permeability property may have to

be imported from out of state. Other materials affected include concrete

rebars, fenders, mooring, cleats, cable supports and all steel hardware.

Construction dredging will be required to obtain a project depth of 14.0

+0.610 meter (46 +2 feet) and 12.8 +0.610 meter (42 +2 feet) for the pier

area and the approach area, respectively.


February 2007

DD Form



The current wrap MSF at Beckoning Point (Pearl Harbor) is a two story

wooden facility approximately 113 m (372 ft) long and 3 m (10 ft) wide, and

positioned about 27 m (90 ft) off shore. It is servicing ships that are

about 250 m (820 ft) long (more than double its berthing length). Cables

are brought from a shore side storage facility, placed on floats and are

staged at a predetermined location around the wharf. Due to the design of

the pier, the floats are used to move the cables to the side of the ship

where it is wrapped around the ship. It is extremely difficult work to

wrap the cables around the ship from the moving floats in the ocean. There

is no forklift accessibility to the existing pier, to lug heavy cables.

All heavy cable work is labor intensive and time consuming.

Due to the age of the existing wharf (constructed circa 1942) and being

subjected to wood-rot and marine borers, constant and expensive

repair/maintenance is required to replace the decayed structure in order to

insure a safe working environment for personnel handling the heavy cables

on the wharf.

SSN-774 Virginia Class submarines require a drive-in facility and can not

be depermed with the current method available at Beckoning Point. The

existing facility does not have the capability to calibrate on-board

signature silencing systems of the SSN 21 and SSN 774 Class Submarines.

These submarines will not have their magnetic signatures minimized. This

will have adverse impact on Fleet readiness, mission effectiveness,

increased susceptibility to mines and detection, and an increased risk to

the war fighters.

contact is made between the submarine and the high current cables.

Building a new single PACFLT Submarine drive-in MSF located at Pearl Harbor

to support SSN-688, SSBN-726, SSGN, SSN-21, and SSN-774 Class submarines,

is the best business solution for the Navy. Having a single PACFLT

Submarine drive-in MSF at Pearl Harbor that supports ALL classes of

submarines will allow closure of the existing submarine MSFs located in San

Diego CA, Pearl Harbor HI, and Bangor WA, resulting in cost savings.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

99,8600203176N 15180


Point

NAVY 2008FY

P587





February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

99,8600203176N 15180


Point

NAVY 2008FY

P587



Controls Between Rect/Sub Bldg & B54

Data Acquisition System

Deperm Control System and Sensors

Loop Power Rectifier and Y-Loop Supply

MTMS Sensor Array/Keel Row Magnetometer

NSWC/NUWC/NFESC Equip and Support

X-, Y-, and Z-Loop Cables and

Installation

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

2009

2010

2010

2008

2009

2010

2010

30

341

56

1,300

5,400

1,100

11,473



Equipment

Nomenclature


The Regional Commander or the Installation Management Claimant certifies

that this project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral

construction is recommended. Mission requirements, operational

considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other

components.

Mr. Stuart Hara 474-4254Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


1. Status:


Yes

King's Bay, GA

$2,910

$2,710

$200

05/2008

12/2007

05/2010

08/2006

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$2,710

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1131390

Scope

13115

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

6895 m2 65,410

Design Status

08/2006


09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 359,897

49,100

0

15,089

65,410

11,000

C. R&M Unfunded Requirement ($000): 1,586,316

9. Future Projects:


TOTAL


WAHIAWA, HAWAII


65,410


TOTAL 15,089


0





The Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Station Pacific

(NCTAMSPAC) provides operational direction and management to all Pacific

Naval Telecommunication System users. In addition to this function,

NCTAMSPAC manages, operates, and maintains Defense Communication System and

Naval Telecommunication System assets, and offers a full range of ADP and

Information Resource Services, Maintenance and Repair, and

Communication/Electronic and Defense Message System coordination to the

Navy and other DOD activities in the Pacific.

500,496

13115 70708 SF 15,089Consolidate Command Support Facilities

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.74

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

19555

18296

1688

1562B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 9751

8614

7472

7476

0

0

0

0

0

0

282

282

362

362

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1141390

4. Command


WAHIAWA, HAWAII



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.74

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1151391


9. COST ESTIMATES


COMMUNICATION CENTER (74,217 SF)

COMMUNICATION CENTER (70,008

SF)

TELECOMMUNICATION ROOM (700

SF)

NCTAMS SWITCHING STATIONS

(3,509 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

6,895

6,504

65

326

5,734.97

5,950

4,472

51,350

(37,300)

(390)

(1,460)

(11,150)

(390)

(280)

(380)

7,310

(4,080)

(240)

(2,850)

(140)

58,660

2,930

61,590

3,820

65,410

65,410

65,410

(77,704)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

65,4100301376N 13115


NAVY 2008FY

P173


WAHIAWA, HAWAII

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813(WW)

(WAHIAWA)

Construct a single-story, steel framed building with exterior concrete

paneling for the Communication Center at Naval Computer and

Telecommunications Area Master Station Pacific (NCTAMS PAC). Building

spaces will be equipped with raised floors, moveable interior walls, under-

floor fire suppression system, storage spaces, staging areas, conference

rooms, showers/toilets, access control system, climate control system,

emergency electrical power, uninterrupted power supply (UPS) all with


February 2007

DD Form


Current mission and operations - Safe, secure, efficient, and adaptable

facilities from which to provide reliable and enduring C4I and Information

Transfer (IT) services now and in the future to PACOM, DISA, COMPACFLT

Headquarters and its units afloat, shore facilities of Commander Navy

Region Hawaii, tactical units of all Service Components and transmission

continuity throughout the Pacific area of responsibility.

Mission Growth - NCTAMS PAC will become the Region Network Operations and

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a new consolidated, secure, state-of-the-art,

Command & Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I)

Service Center at NCTAMS PAC.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

65,4100301376N 13115


NAVY 2008FY

P173


WAHIAWA, HAWAII


11. Requirement:


N62813(WW)

(WAHIAWA)

reserve back up/surge capacity. Building roof will be constructed to

accommodate radio frequency antennas and an antenna distribution system.

This project will include adequate space for emergency generator, UPS, fire

protection, access control system, and air conditioning equipment. N+1

redundancy will be provided for main transformers serving the

communication center, generators, and air conditioning systems for

equipment room spaces. Supporting facilities work will include parking

lot, site improvements, sidewalks, landscaping, pavement work, electrical

and communication ducts, fencing, and security lighting.



other directives. The new facility will be designed to resist seismic and

wind forces as per IBC 2003. It will meet antiterrorism/force protection

(AT/FP) standards and will comply with security requirements as set forth

in OPNAV Instruction 5530.14. The project will provide greater than

minimum antiterrorism measures in its site planning, building location and

setbacks, and architectural/structural design. The entire building will

meet the requirements for the open storage of Secret material with specific

areas that meet Top Secret and SI requirements.


February 2007

DD Form


Presently, the main communications building and operational control center

is located in Building 261, built in 1959 and with portions renovated in

1998. In the past few years, frequent advances in transmission equipment

and computer technology have resulted in numerous new equipment

installations/replacements and manpower adjustments. These changes have

been accommodated by "make-do" methods of 1) placing equipment in vacant

spaces and modifying the spaces and utilities as needed, or 2) relocating

existing equipment and making extensive modifications in the space to

accommodate the new equipment. Although these methods of facilitating the

new equipment installs were made to work, they were generally costly and

time consuming. In many instances, the space available was generally

limited by the presence of permanent walls. It was not uncommon for

equipment and their operators to be located in different spaces - not an

efficient arrangement when "hands-on" operation of the equipment was

necessary.

Moreover, constant advances in technology and increasingly shortened life

cycles of communications equipment means that upgrades, modernizations, and

renovations to operating spaces will continually be required and, perhaps,

increase in frequency. These renovations and upgrades should strive to

configure equipment optimally to use available manpower efficiently and

effectively. Currently in B-261, this can seldom be achieved, even at

great expense and time.

If not constructed, NCTAMS PAC would be forced to maintain the status quo

and begin major renovations to the existing facility to meet current and

projected needs. The complex nature of conducting major renovations to

power and air handling equipment in an operational C4I facility may create

significant outages and negative impacts on daily operations. To allow the

facility to remain operational, renovations would be protracted over many

Security Center West (RNOSC West) - one of only two in the world - to

support the Joint Task Force Global Network Operations and NETWARCOM Global

Network Operations and Security Center (GNOSC). RNOSC West is scheduled

for Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in FY07 with a modest 3-5 person

staff, and increasing until Full Operational Capability (FOC) by FY-10 as

funding permits.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

65,4100301376N 13115


NAVY 2008FY

P173


WAHIAWA, HAWAII

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N62813(WW)

(WAHIAWA)


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


years. Operational support facilities and personnel will remain dispersed

throughout the base, impairing efficiency, maintaining (likely increasing)

leased terrestrial transmissions costs and the potential for damage from

manmade or natural disaster. Enclave security concept cannot be achieved

without a well-defined and protected perimeter well within the installation

boundary. Personnel and vehicle movement in and around vital operations

facility will remain difficult to control. C4I building with its

associated antennae, external auxiliary equipment, and personnel activities

remain in plain view of general public.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

65,4100301376N 13115


NAVY 2008FY

P173


WAHIAWA, HAWAII


Base Electronics System Engineering Plan

(BESEP)

C4I Equipment Installation Labor

C4I Equipment Installation Labor

C4I Equipment Procurement/Installation

Labor

OPN

OPN

OMN

OPN

2006

2010

2010

2009

1,927

197

7,108

10,783



Equipment

Nomenclature




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$2,600

$2,300

$300

01/2008

12/2007

01/2010

08/2006

01/2007

09/2007

5%

35%

$1,000

$1,600


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


N62813(WW)

(WAHIAWA)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

65,4100301376N 13115


NAVY 2008FY

P173


WAHIAWA, HAWAII


C4I Pre-Planning Coord/MILCON BESEP

C4I Systems

Engineering/Design/Procurement

C4I Equipment Procurement/Installation

Labor

C4I Systems Engineering/Design

C4I Systems

Engineering/Design/Procurement


IDS

Material Cost

NMCI Connection Costs

Physical Security System (Electronics)

Phase A

Physical Security System (Electronics)

Phase B

Under Floor IDS

OMN

OPN

OMN

OMN

OMN

OMN

OPN

OMN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

2005

2008

2009

2007

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2009

2008

240

16,611

22,052

2,777

7,580

658

825

5,083

136

725

500

501




Facility will be used to support joint commands. The scope of this

project includes equipment spaces to meet joint requirements.

Tim Dubois 808-653-0092Activity POC: Phone No:

N62813(WW)

(WAHIAWA)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

65,4100301376N 13115


NAVY 2008FY

P173


WAHIAWA, HAWAII


Blank Page

N62813(WW)

(WAHIAWA)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1211390

Scope

85110

17120

Cost

($000)Start

RTC Infrastructure Upgrades

Inc 3 of 3

Small Arms Markmanship Trainer

(SAMT)

Complete

2307 m2

3156 m2

16,650

10,200

Design Status

08/2003

08/2006


11/2005

10/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 3,838,606

167,750

63,360

4,181

26,850

259,187


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:72115 RTC Special Programs Barracks 19809 m2 63,360

TOTAL

TOTAL




26,850


TOTAL

63,360

4,181


0





Provide basic indoctrination (recruit training) for enlisted personnel;

primary, advanced, and specialized training for officer and enlisted

personnel at recruit Training Command Service School. Support commands

include the Naval hospital and Dental Center, the Navy Band, Public Works

and Seabee Construction Battalion Unit 401.

4,359,934

85120 711 SY 4,181Bridge S2 Replacement

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.27

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

15452

16873

778

762B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 4146

3739

1711

1711

0

0

6426

8270

0

0

756

756

1635

1635

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1221390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.27

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1231391


9. COST ESTIMATES


RTC INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES INC 3

OF 3 (24,838 SF)

VISITORS CENTER (24,154 SF)

NMCI SERVICE ROOM (12 SF)

GATE/SENTRY HOUSE (671 SF)


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION



DEMOLITION

SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IMPACT

FEE

SITE MECHANICAL UTILITIES

OTHER SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


LESS INCREMENT I & II FUNDING


TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,307.49

2,244

1.15

62.34

2,056

2,611.12

10,471.02

5,520

(4,610)

(10)

(650)

(70)

(50)

(130)

57,710

(20,810)

(750)

(21,240)

(1,980)

(12,710)

(220)

63,230

3,160

66,390

3,780

70,170

2,530

-56,041

16,659

16,650


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 16,650

Auth for Approp 16,650

0203576N 85110

RTC Infrastructure Upgrades Inc

3 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P748B

NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES ILGREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS


Relocate and upgrade existing infrastructure systems to support the

recapitalization of buildings and increase security at Recruit Training

Command. Includes roads, sidewalks, parking areas, parade fields,

landscaping, exterior lighting, security fence, potable water, fire mains,

storm and sanitary collection systems, electrical, telecommunications, site

signs, natural gas, and steam/condensate distributions systems. All

utility system pricing has been adjusted to reflect the increased cost of


February 2007

DD Form


Existing barracks and training facilities, with associated infrastructure

(roads and utility systems), are dispersed inefficiently throughout the RTC

campus. Vehicular traffic is not separated from pedestrian traffic and

marching time between facilities is excessive. The new base master plan

consolidates like facilities into separate zones and utilizes perimeter

roads and interior recruit sidewalks to separate vehicular and pedestrian

traffic. This master plan is currently being implemented through the

construction of previously authorized projects to replace recruit barracks

This project will provide roads and utility systems with adequate capacity

to support the recapitalization of RTC facilities. The Recruit Training

Command, Great Lakes is the Navy's sole recruit training base. It

processes approximately 50,000 to 55,000 recruits per year with peak loads

of 16,000 recruits during summer months. RTC is currently undergoing an

extensive multi-year recapitalization program of existing barracks, drill

halls, and other facilities. This recapitalization program will require

the demolition and reconstruction of much of the existing base

infrastructure. It will also include the relocation of the existing non-

Navy owned communication system to mitigate the impact of telephone and

cable TV rate increases to Navy customers. Also provides adequate parking

for visitors to recruit graduations, improves traffic flow, and improves

base security. The result of the recapitalization program and

infrastructure upgrades will be improved and more efficient recruit

training.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Relocates and upgrades existing roads, sidewalks and utility systems to

support the recapitalization of RTC Great Lakes facilities and provides

adequate parking facilities for staff and visitors.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 16,650


0203576N 85110


3 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P748B



11. Requirement:


contractors concurrently working on multiple systems in a congested

underground area, without disrupting operations to house, train and

graduate 50,000 recruits each year. Sustainable principles will be

integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in

accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.

Security improvements include Entry Control Facilities improvements at Gate

8 and Visitors Security Screening facilities. Demolition of Buildings #909

(100 M2), 1209 (100 M2), 929 (613 M2), 1212 (4602 M2), 912 (1115 M2).


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


and drill halls and provide a new physical training facility. Additional

projects will replace the remaining recruit barracks and provide a new

Battle Stations facility.

The recapitalization of RTC Great Lakes cannot be implemented in accordance

with the new base master plan without relocation and upgrade of

infrastructure. Separate berthing, training, and public areas cannot be

created and vehicular and pedestrian traffc cannot be separated. Recruit

training efficiency would not be improved. Utility systems would not have

adequate capacity for the new barracks. Parking for visitors to recruit

graduations will be insufficient.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 16,650


0203576N 85110


3 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P748B












2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$580

$580

$0

09/2006

06/2006

09/2010

08/2003

09/2005

11/2005

100%

100%

$500

$80


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 16,650


0203576N 85110


3 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P748B




Jeff Markey (847) 688-5395 x121Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1271391


9. COST ESTIMATES


SMALL ARMS MARKSMANSHIP TRAINER

(SAMT) (33,972 SF)

APPLIED INSTRUCTION BLDG

(33,972 SF)

SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FOR

FIRING RANGE


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

HAZMAT SITE MATERIAL

REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT

SITE UTILITIES

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,156.11

3,156.11 1,764.07

6,200

(5,570)

(230)

(70)

(110)

(110)

(110)

2,690

(560)

(560)

(210)

(100)

(860)

(160)

(240)

8,890

440

9,330

530

9,860

360

10,220

10,221

(3,495)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,2210805976N 17120

Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer

(SAMT)

NAVY 2008FY

P801



Construct one story structure consisting of concrete slab on grade floor,

masonry and steel wall framing system, sloped steel roof structural system,

brick and masonry exterior walls, sloped metal roofing system, insulated

metal windows and exterior doors, painted concrete block interior walls,


February 2007

DD Form


With more than 50,000 recruits passing through RTC each year it is

essential that an adequate Small Arms Marksmanship Trainer (SAMT) with the

required technology infrastructure and functional training spaces be

provided. The requirements for the SAMT are as follows: (1) SAMT should be

located adjacent to the Small Arms Range for increased staff and

operational efficiencies: (2) modernized SAMT training equipment must be

provided to properly train recruits; (3) a two division classroom is

necessary to adequately train the recruits: (4) a holster draw

instructional training area must be provided to teach recruits how to

properly and safely remove a weapon from the holster: (4) a barrel cleaning

instructional area must be provided to train recruits on knowing when a

barrel is clear and safe: (5) armory to house weapons is required: and (6)

adequate support spaces such as heads, maintenance support, administrative

and building services must be provided.

The electronic SAMT simulates the live-fire small arms range, but is more

economical, faster and safer. Thus the combination of the electronic SAMT

for the early stage of training followed by the live-fire range for the

final stage provides the most effective and efficient curriculum. SAMT not

only provides economic relief but also is critical in the training process.

The marksmanship trainer allows for compressed training time giving its

users immediate feedback while instilling proper shooting techniques

critical in effective war-fighting.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a building to house a Small Arms Training Simulator

that serves over 50,000 recruits annually at the Recruit Training Command,

Naval Station Great Lakes, IL.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,2210805976N 17120


(SAMT)

NAVY 2008FY

P801



11. Requirement:


vinyl composition flooring and acoustical ceilings. Includes site

improvements consisting of roads, parking area, sidewalks, site signs,

landscaping, storm water management improvements, exterior lighting, and

site utilities connections for sanitary collection system, potable water,

fire protection, steam and condensate, electrical power, data, voice, and

TV systems. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,

development, and construction of this project in accordance with Executive

Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders. The project includes the

demolition of one existing 1100 series Recruits Barracks.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


The current SAMT is inadequate in size and cannot train a two full

divisions at one time. With only 60 training stations versus the 88

stations and no designated training space for holster training and clearing

training to train two full divisions, the training schedule is interrupted

and each recruit is not given the proper attention and instruction time

necessary. The existing facility is located on the opposite side of the

Small Arms Range resulting in staff inefficiencies and increased travel

times. The SAMT should be sited adjacent to the Live Fire Range to improve

staff and training cost facilitate effective cross training, and

operational efficiencies. The SAMT is housed in an old warehouse built in

1943, which has outlived its useful life as a functional building. The

facility itself is lacking modern infrastructure (data, technology systems,

etc).

It is essential that SAMT be modernized and sized to properly train

recruit divisions within the 9.2 week boot camp time frame. If a new

facility is not constructed for the SAMT, then the training of recruits

will remain inefficient and costly in an undersized facility. Training

days will have to be extended for RTC due to live-fires inability to cover

the appropriate material required.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,2210805976N 17120


(SAMT)

NAVY 2008FY

P801






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


1. Status:


No

N/A

$110

$110

$0

03/2008

01/2008

08/2006

12/2006

10/2007

3%

5%

$100

$10


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

10,2210805976N 17120


(SAMT)

NAVY 2008FY

P801




New Fire Arms Trainer Equipment for New

Trainer


Relocation of Existing SAMT Equipment

OMN

OMN

OMN

OMN

2008

2008

2008

2008

450

2,500

45

500



Equipment

Nomenclature






David D. Lindsey 847 688 5395 x153Activity POC: Phone No:

6. Construction complete: 06/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1311390

Scope

31125

31125

31115

Cost

($000)Start

E-2 Advanced Hawkeye RDT&E

Facility


JPALS Addition To Building

2110/2122

Complete

3017 m2

2641 m2

1902 m2

13,650

17,990

6,720

Design Status

08/2006

10/2006

08/2006


09/2007

09/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 2,392,491

5,800

32,450

32,144

38,360

400,334


9. Future Projects:


31125


Aircraft Prototype Facility Phase 3

3165 m2

6766 m2

11,450

21,000

TOTAL

TOTAL



3. Installation and Location: N0428A

38,360


TOTAL

32,450

32,144


0





Supports the Navy by providing the warfighter with technologies that

deliver dominant combat effects and matchless capabilities. As the host,

NAS Patuxent River provides effective and affordable integrated warfare

systems and life cycle support by performing RDT&E, acquisition,

engineering and fleet support for manned and unmanned aircraft, engines,

avionics, aircraft support systems and ship/shore/air operations.

2,901,579

74044

61010

LS

32000 SF

24,404

7,740

Fitness Center Patuxent River

Cost Analysis Center

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.06

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

9706

9858

848

910B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 2102

2192

6648

6648

0

0

0

0

0

0

81

81

27

27

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1321390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.06

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1331391


9. COST ESTIMATES


E-2 ADVANCED HAWKEYE RDT&E

FACILITY (32,473 SF)

BUILDING (32,152 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,016.87

2,987

29.87

2,296.16

3,921.29

8,470

(6,860)

(120)

(1,030)

(140)

(80)

(240)

3,410

(620)

(800)

(40)

(620)

(340)

(870)

(120)

11,880

590

12,470

710

13,180

480

13,660

13,650

(850)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,6500805376N 31125


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P156

NAS PATUXENT RIVER MDPATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N0428A

Construct a multi-story secure facility with structural steel frame, pile

foundation with grade beams, slab on grade and elevated concrete slab,

insulated metal wall exterior panel system, built-up insulated roof on

metal decking with steel joist framing, including engineering workspace,

secure aircraft data laboratory, engineering analysis workstations,

elevator, and emergency power generation. Sustainable principles will be


February 2007

DD Form


Existing facilities that house the RDT&E teams supporting E-2 & C-2 are

spread throughout 16 different facilities including the use of MILVANS and

Leased Relocatables. Existing lab space is too small and does not allow

the required growth to support the E-2 Advanced Hawkeye mission. MILVANS

have been utilized as office space for over 20 years and the material

condition of these units is unacceptable for continued use. Existing rodent

and other wild animal infestations continue to make workplace conditions

unsafe and unhealthy.

If this project is not provided, the E-2 Advanced Hawkeye Integrated Test

Team will have inadequate facilities (including lab space) to conduct an

efficient test program resulting in delays to the overall program. The E-2

NCW team will have to continue to use Leased Relocatables for an extended

Adequate and efficiently configured facility that will provide RDT&E

support to the E-2 Advanced Hawkeye, E-2 Network Centric Warfare (NCW), E-2

Legacy Systems, and C-2 Legacy Systems missions. The E-2 Advanced Hawkeye

Initial Operational Capability (IOC) is in FY11 and Operational Evaluation

(OPEVAL) is in FY12. The facility will house the Advanced Hawkeye

Integrated Test Team and will provide consolidated infrastructure to allow

efficient and effective testing of the new radar technologies, modernized

communications and navigation systems, and improved surveillance system for

Navy's theater air missile defense. The NCW teams closely collaborate with

the flight test teams and the E-2 Systems Test & Evaluation Lab.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This recapitalization project will consolidate existing facilities by

constructing a new Advance Hawkeye Test and Evaluation facility for E-2 &

C-2 aircraft flight test operations, personnel, integration laboratories,

and equipment. It must be located in the vicinity of Hangar 306.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,6500805376N 31125


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P156



11. Requirement:


included into the design, development, and construction of the project. The

project will include the demolition of 7 buildings: 222, 310, 1729, 2044,

2071, 2072, and 2205 (2,971 m2); the disposal of 18 MILVAN units configured

to 7 groups of office spaces: 3003, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211, 3213, 3215 670

m2 (7,212 SF); and the termination and removal of 2 leased relocatable

units: LR-120 and 3165A at 816 m2 (8,783 SF).


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2007

January 2008


period of time. The long-term requirement for Leased Relocatables (NCW &

MILVAN replacement) will exceed the allowed time frame for sustained use of

relocatables.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,6500805376N 31125


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P156



ADT Wiring & Equipment

Fiber / Tlephone Equip. & Wiring

Furniture / Systems & Equipment

OPN

OPN

OMN

2008

2008

2008

250

100

500



Equipment

Nomenclature






Pete Mora 301-757-3302Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$1,227

$736

$491

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

08/2006

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$818

$409


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

13,6500805376N 31125


Facility

NAVY 2008FY

P156



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1371391


9. COST ESTIMATES


AIRCRAFT PROTOTYPE FACILITY

(28,431 SF)

AIRCRAFT PROTOTYPE FACILITY

(16,146 SF)

MAINTENANCE HANGAR TYPE I

(12,002 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN







SITE PREPARATIONS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,641.3

1,500

1,115

26.3

2,428.67

2,509.59

3,828.15

8,230

(3,640)

(2,800)

(100)

(1,420)

(90)

(70)

(80)

(30)

7,410

(80)

(480)

(1,350)

(420)

(3,890)

(610)

(580)

15,640

780

16,420

940

17,360

630

17,990

17,990

(2,500)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9900805376N 31125


NAVY 2008FY

P558



Construct a single-story modified Type I hangar module with adjacent two-


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate and efficiently configured facilities for use as a secure aircraft

prototyping facility to support critical mission requirements for

classified RDT&E, and rapidly transition new and specialized aircraft

systems, subsystems, and technologies to fleet tasking. RDT&E mission

requirements include Network Centric Warfare (NCW), the Unmanned Combat Air

Vehicle (UCAV), the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) and compartmentalized

REQUIREMENT:

This is Phase I of a three phase project to construct secure facilities to

augment and improve naval aviation research, development, and test and

evaluation (RDT&E) capabilities at the Naval Air Warfare Center, Air

Division, NAS Patuxent River, MD. This phase of the project provides a

secure hangar, machine shop, assembly area, and accredited work areas for

support of five or more classified projects annually. Subsequent phases of

the project (MILCON projects P-559 and P-561) shall construct additional

secure hangars, laboratories, and accredited work space to increase the

capacity of the facility to support up to fourteen classified programs

annually. The completed project shall deliver advantages that are

consistent with naval aviation goals to reduce costs and improve the

process cycle time required to deliver mission critical combat systems to

the Fleet.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9900805376N 31125


NAVY 2008FY

P558



11. Requirement:


story technical support area with structural steel frame, insulated metal

panel exterior wall system, concrete pile and grade beam foundations,

concrete slab on grade, elevated slab, roofing system over insulated

structural metal deck and steel joist roof framing, a technical service

laboratory (machine shop), assembly area, tool crib, a secure video

teleconference center, a security control center, secure project and

engineering workspaces for compartmentalized programs, and office and

administrative spaces for support personnel, Aqueous Film Forming Foam

(AFFF), freight elevator, information systems, computer flooring, heating,

ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), laboratory cooling units, fire

protection and alarm systems, plumbing, electrical power distribution,

lighting, sliding hangar doors, utility development, aircraft apron and

taxiway access, jet blast barriers, security fencing, access control,

surveillance and intrusion detection, vehicle parking, roadways, sidewalks,

and landscaping. Sustainable principals will be included into the design,

development, and construction of the project.


February 2007

DD Form


The Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) at Patuxent River is the

only location in the country that can provide the total RDT&E package for

reduced signature (LO/VLO) and other classified aircraft systems and

subsystems. No other location or facility in the country can offer direct

and immediate access to national level experts in survivability and related

materials technologies, prototype design and fabrication, and the full

range of required T&E resources, capabilities and services. National level

experts in all competencies necessary to demonstrate, validate and verify

new aircraft design concepts, materials and technologies, and improve the

survivability of Navy and Joint Service tactical aircraft and other air

vehicles, are currently consolidated under the MRTFB at NAS Patuxent River.

However, due to a shortage of adequate secure facilities capable of

supporting prototype development at Patuxent River, these experts must

deploy elsewhere and establish temporary remote detachments to complete

assigned Demonstration/Validation (DEM/VAL) tasks for classified programs.

These deployments impact program continuity, and add unnecessary time and

cost to already expensive programs. With up to 14 programs and projects

impacted annually, the costs associated with such deployments currently

exceed $7 Million per year.

and classified Survivability and Vulnerability (S&V) programs. Recurring

requirements for these facilities in FY09 and beyond include:

~ Multi-Spectral Operations Aircraft (Systems Integration and Developmental

Test and Evaluation & DT&E)

~ Airship Program (Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E)

~ Classified NCW Platforms (Systems Integration and DT&E)

~ Classified S&V Projects (Systems Integration and DT&E)

~ Multiple Classified GWOT Projects (Systems Integration and DT&E)

~ UCAV (Block Testing)

The facilities will be utilized on a space available basis to support

testing for JSF, the F18E/F and UH-1 and H1 helicopter upgrades, and other

RDT&E requirements for projects or special operations involving manned and

unmanned air vehicles that require special security provisions or access

restrictions. The facility shall also meet requirements for in-service

engineering support necessary to quickly trouble shoot fleet problems and

issues involving Low Observable/Very Low Observable (LO/VLO) technologies,

and to integrate specialized systems and subsystems onto Navy platforms for

Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) missions and special

operations.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9900805376N 31125


NAVY 2008FY

P558




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


This project supports Aircraft Division classified research, development,

and testing necessary to demonstrate, validate, and deliver critical combat

systems to the fleet. Deferral of this project will introduce unnecessary

complexities to already tight program budgets and schedules. Program costs

will increase to accommodate remote detachments at diverse locations to

complete RDT&E tasks that could otherwise be accomplished by Aircraft

Division Personnel at Patuxent River. Critical path milestones will be

impacted and costs will be added when delays are incurred because test

aircraft must be deployed to alternate, remote locations for classified

testing due to a shortage of secure hangar and support space for classified

test programs (the cost risk to major platform programs in the Engineering

and Manufacturing Development (E&MD) stage can easily exceed $1 Million per

day).


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9900805376N 31125


NAVY 2008FY

P558





Equipment




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


Yes

NA

$1,650

$990

$660

03/2008

12/2007

03/2010

08/2006

02/2007

09/2007

5%

15%

$1,100

$550


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring FY Approp


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9900805376N 31125


NAVY 2008FY

P558




LAB EQUIPMENT

OPN

OPN

2008

2008

1,500

1,000

Nomenclature



joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.

Teena Wettengel (301)757-4924Activity POC: Phone No:

Approp or Requested Cost ($000)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,9900805376N 31125


NAVY 2008FY

P558



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1431391


9. COST ESTIMATES


JPALS ADDITION TO BUILDIMG 2110 /

2122 (20,472 SF)

BUILDING (20,270 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,901.93

1,883.1

18.83

2,248.99

3,921.29

4,900

(4,240)

(70)

(420)

(70)

(50)

(50)

950

(330)

(90)

(210)

(250)

(70)

5,850

290

6,140

350

6,490

230

6,720

6,720

(1,379)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,7200805376N 31115

JPALS Addition to Buildimg 2110

/ 2122

NAVY 2008FY

P977



Construct a single-story addition to existing building 2110 with structural

steel frame, masonry exterior walls, reinforced concrete spread footings,

slab on grade, EPDM roofing system over insulated structural metal deck and

steel joist framing system,integration and repair labs, a Carrier Air

Traffic Control Center (CATCC) Mock-Up area, Flight Test Control area,

offices for technical personnel, a secured area, a conference room, a test

vehicle support area, receiving area,heating ventilation and air

conditioning, fire protection and alarm systems, plumbing, electrical power


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate, efficiently configured facilities are required to support JPALS

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) activities in

preparation for the system's initial operating capability (IOC), FY13.

After JPALS becomes operational these facilities will be used for fleet

support activities throughout the system's lifecycle and RDT&E activities

to incorporate JPALS into new aircraft types.

Shore based development flight test activities will be conducted using F-18

aircraft with JPALS developmental equipment. When the JSF (F35) is

delivered, development flight test activities will continue with this

aircraft. The JPALS IOC is planned to coincide with the F-35 (JSF) IOC.

The fleet support activities, currently being conducted in Buildings 2110

and 2122, supporting the Army/Navy Water Radar Navigation Aid 46, AN/SPN-46

(V) and Air Surveillance Precision approach Radar Control System (ASPARCS)

occupy all available space. This work must continue until the end of

AN/SPN-46's service life, 2024 or beyond. ASPARCS service life will end in

2030.

An F/A-18 test aircraft will be used to develop, test, and certify the

REQUIREMENT:

Construct an addition to Buildings 2110 and 2122 to provide space to

support new mission requirements for Joint Precision Approach and Landing

System (JPALS) testing, development, and fleet support activities.

Additionally, these spaces will support new mission requirements related to

usage of JPALS equipment in the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) (F-35), Joint

Unmanned Combat Air System (J-UCAS), and CVN-21 programs. The proposed

addition will provide workspaces for 60 fulltime employees.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,7200805376N 31115


/ 2122

NAVY 2008FY

P977



11. Requirement:


distribution, lighting, communication system, utility development, and site

improvements. Building addition to existing Building 2122 will be a

poured-in-place concrete vault type structure for electronic monitoring

equipment. Sustainable principals will be included into the design,

development, and construction of the project. Portions of exterior walls

of buildings 2110 and 2122 shall be demolished for connection of the new

additions. In addition an existing pre-engineered metal building will be

demolished; Building 2820 at 111.48 m2 (1,200 SF).


February 2007

DD Form


The AN/SPN-46 in Buildings 2110 and 2122 will be used during JPALS flight

tests as a baseline standard to test the suitability of precision

approaches using JPALS. There is insufficient space in B-2110/B-2122 to

support new mission tasking for JPALS, and no facilities are available in

the local area to support JPALS, JSF, J-UCAS, and CVN-21 flight-testing.

If P-977 is not funded, NAVAIR will evaluate various alternatives for

housing the support activities required to develop and deploy the Joint

Precision and Landing System (JPALS). The only viable alternative is

continuing to lease temporary facilities located near B-2110 at Patuxent

River, MD. Current plans include leasing two temporary facilities (LR-75

@3,024 and LR-101 @8,615 sq-ft) to house JPALS developmental test and

JPALS equipment for fleet operations. It must be flight tested under

conditions that replicate the shipboard environment as closely as possible.

The Landing System Test Facility (LSTF), Buildings 2110 and 2122, are

uniquely able to provide the mission essential replication of an over-water

approach to a runway similar to that experienced when landing aboard an

aircraft carrier. After the JPALS equipment is certified for operational

use, each aircraft type (fixed and rotary wing) will be tested and

qualified for shipboard JPALS precision approach and landing operations.

The LSTF is the Navy's only integrated shipboard landing system test

facility, conducting test and evaluation operations on runway 32. Runway 32

provides an over-water approach along with simulated carrier lighting. The

Navy's current landing systems are installed in the LSTF. It contains a

common real-time instrumentation system and Carrier (Variant) (CV)/CVN

visual landing aids and a night lighting package that is representative of

the shipboard environment.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,7200805376N 31115


/ 2122

NAVY 2008FY

P977




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


evaluation efforts until P-977 can be constructed. Additional facilities

will be required to accommodate engineers, technicians and lab space for

installation, support and maintenance of Low Rate Initial Productions

(LRIP) that are scheduled to begin in FY11.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,7200805376N 31115


/ 2122

NAVY 2008FY

P977



Collateral Equipment (Various)

Temp. Fac. (VSF) Vehicle Support Fac.

OPN

OPN

2008

2008

1,094

285



Equipment

Nomenclature




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$600

$360

$240

04/2008

01/2008

07/2009

08/2006

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$400

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,7200805376N 31115


/ 2122

NAVY 2008FY

P977






Mrs. Ann Combs (301) 995-6018Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,7200805376N 31115


/ 2122

NAVY 2008FY

P977



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1491390

Scope

61010

Cost

($000)Start

National Maritime Intel Center

Inc 2 of 3

Complete

47768 m2 52,070

Design Status

09/2003


06/2006


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 139,511

0

4,090

0

52,070

0


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:61010 National Maritime Intel Center Inc 3 of 3 47768 m2 4,090

TOTAL

TOTAL


SUITLAND, MARYLAND


52,070


4,090


0





The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) provides one-stop-shopping at the

National Maritime Intelligence Center (NMIC) for national level maritime

intelligence. NMIC hosts the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA), the

Coast Guard Intelligence Coordination Center (ICC) and the Naval

Information Warfare Activity (NIWA).

195,671

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.02

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

2305

3025

339

444B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 596

791

1370

1790

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1501390

4. Command


SUITLAND, MARYLAND



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.02

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1511391


9. COST ESTIMATES


NATIONAL MARITIME INTEL CENTER INC

2 OF 3 (514,170 SF)

NMCI INFRASTRUCTURE (1,539 SF)

GARAGE REPAIRS (121,632 SF)

NMIC ADDITION (198,465 SF)

NMIC RENOVATION (151,997 SF)

4TH FLOOR GARAGE ADDITION

(40,537 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


LESS INCREMENT 1 AND 3 FUNDING


TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

47,768

143

11,300

18,438

14,121

3,766

1,788.1

320.77

1,593.97

887.49

502.57

56,040

(260)

(3,620)

(29,390)

(12,530)

(1,890)

(2,740)

(310)

(1,170)

(4,130)

3,100

(10)

(1,560)

(1,220)

(190)

(90)

(30)

59,140

2,960

62,100

3,540

65,640

2,370

-15,941

52,069

52,069


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 52,069


0901376N 61010


Inc 2 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P339A


SUITLAND, MARYLAND

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N68469(MI)

(NMIC SUITLAND)

Design and construct an addition (another wing) to the existing National

Maritime Intelligence Center (NMIC). Renovations and construction will


February 2007

DD Form


The NMIC houses the Office of Naval Intelligence and its sub-tenants.

Continued expansion of ONI's mission to include its sub-tenants has

dramatically increased staffing and mission requirements. The NMIC is

Provide adequate secured facility to accommodate additional personnel in an

efficiently configured facility addition (wing) providing command support

for administrative functions, analytical areas, fitness center,

laboratories, conference center, security operations center, to support

mission processes related to the Office of Naval Intelligence and its sub-

tenants. This project will accommodate the additional 700 personnel. The

NMIC is currently located on 42 acres in Suitland, Maryland. The NMIC

currently consists of 600,000 square feet with an 870 space-parking garage.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Constructs a secure wing attached to the existing facility to house

additional personnel in support of increased mission of the Office of Naval

Intelligence and its sub-tenants, and renovates 14,190 m2 of space in the

existing NMIC facility.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 52,069


0901376N 61010


Inc 2 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P339A


SUITLAND, MARYLAND


11. Requirement:


N68469(MI)

(NMIC SUITLAND)

include new interior partitions, new elevators, cooling tower, heating,

ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) upgrades, electrical systems,

plumbing, fire protection systems, site utilities, paving, site

improvements, emergency generators, uninterruptible power supply (UPS),

laboratories, shielded spaces, conference rooms, state of the art

conference center, small storage areas, cafeteria, fitness center,

automatic data processing (ADP) center, security operations center,

repairs/upgrades to existing parking garage and/or additional parking and

landscaping. NMIC currently has emergency generators, UPS, cafeteria and

fitness center that potentially could service the addition. Built in

equipment includes elevators, raised floor, and galley equipment.

Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design, development, and



Anti-terrorism/Force Protection standards will be integrated into the


current standards.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


currently exceeding design constraints to include housing personnel in

common spaces and conference and huddle rooms. In addition, many of the

work-stations have been downsized in an effort to meet personnel increases.

Without an addition to the NMIC, operations and mission requirements will

not be met and ONI its sub-tenants will not be able to perform their unique

command mission. There will be a continued strain on the NMIC to house

personnel in over utilized spaces.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 52,069


0901376N 61010


Inc 2 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P339A


SUITLAND, MARYLAND







Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$580

$80

$500

08/2007

05/2007

06/2009

09/2003

02/2006

06/2006

3%

15%

$500

$80


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE

N68469(MI)

(NMIC SUITLAND)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 52,069


0901376N 61010


Inc 2 of 3

NAVY 2008FY

P339A


SUITLAND, MARYLAND


Blank Page

N68469(MI)

(NMIC SUITLAND)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1551390

Scope

17110

17945

72124

14345

17945

17955

73010

72124

72124

21105

21181

17120

Cost

($000)Start

Academic Instruction Facility,

Camp Geiger

MOUT Enhancements

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, AT

Battalion

MARSOC Special Operations

Support Facility


MARSOC Fitness Center/Training

Pool

MARSOC Community Support

Facilities


French Creek


New River

Aircraft Maint Hangar, New

River Phase 2

Jet Engine Test Cell, New

River


Complete

6827 m2

4613 m2

9090 m2

4262 m2

0 LS

3497 m2

1723 m2

9276 m2

7727 m2

4382 m2

850 m2

2569 m2

16,460

14,120

29,970

21,720

12,590

14,480

9,170

27,800

22,530

17,330

14,570

8,080

Design Status

09/2005

09/2005

08/2006

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

08/2006

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005

09/2005


09/2007

09/2007

03/2007

09/2007

09/2007

08/2007

08/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 5,934,091

190,348

167,920

0

208,820

563,784

9. Future Projects:


72124

72124

17940

Infantry Platoon Battle Course SR-1

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, French Creek

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Hadnot Point

Modifications of K-Ranges Phase 2

LS

103958 SF

100757 SF

LS

9,480

27,730

30,830

15,810

TOTAL




208,820


7,064,963

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.95

5. Area Const

Cost Index


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

44247

48348

149

110B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1007

608

1518

1628

37

127

5679

5493

0

21

3140

2746

29746

33610

2971

4005

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1561390

4. Command


74074

72124

11320

72210

72124

MARSOC Child Development Center

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Hadnot Point

Aircraft Parking Apron Expansion, New River

Enlisted Dining Facility, New River


27771 SF

96757 SF

38013 SY

31205 SF

99803 SF

10,170

26,870

6,100

13,300

27,630

TOTAL





167,920


0





MCB Camp Lejeune supports the combat readiness of expeditionary forces by

providing training, logistic, garrison support, mobilization and deployment

support and a wide range of quality of life services including housing,

safety and security, medical and dental care, family services, off-duty

education and recreation.

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.95

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1571391


9. COST ESTIMATES


ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY,

CAMP GEIGER (73,485 SF)


(72,764 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

6,827

6,760

67

1,594.53

3,503.5

11,730

(10,780)

(230)

(220)

(190)

(190)

(120)

2,580

(840)

(330)

(280)

(550)

(170)

(410)

14,310

720

15,030

860

15,890

570

16,460

16,460

(2,490)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,4600206496M 17110


Camp Geiger

NAVY 2008FY

P002



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(GA)

(CAMP GEIGER)

Construct a multi-story academic instruction facility with classrooms,

offices, restrooms, auditorium, storage spaces, and mechanical spaces.

Interior of the facility will be finished with a combination of tile,

carpet, painted CMU walls, suspended gypsum board, and acoustical tile

ceilings. Built in equipment includes an elevator. Information systems

include wiring for telephone and local area network (LAN). Anti-


February 2007

DD Form


The School of Infantry is required to train approximately 25,000 Marines

per year in the infantry skills necessary to operate and survive in a

combat environment; to provide advanced training in weapons and combat

skills necessary to lead Marines in combat while functioning as infantry

squad leaders or infantry platoon sergeants; and to enhance their

professional qualifications.

Infantry Training Battalion's current classrooms, headquarters, and

instructor office spaces are located in 6 substandard 50-60 year old

buildings that are functionally obsolete and supported by (1) head facility

that contains (1) toilet, (1) urinal, (1) sink, and (1) shower for

approximately (70) Marines per day. Classes are being held in open squad

Provide administrative and classroom instruction space for the School of

Infantry's staff, Headquarters and Service Battalion, Infantry Training

Battalion, and Advanced Infantry Training Company.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Construct a consolidated Academic Instruction Facility for the School of

Infantry (east) at Camp Geiger, MCB Camp Lejeune.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,4600206496M 17110


Camp Geiger

NAVY 2008FY

P002




11. Requirement:


M67001(GA)

(CAMP GEIGER)

Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features and Technical Operating Manuals

are included. Facility will be constructed with pile-supported concrete

slab on grade, reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) insulated cavity wall

with exterior brick veneer, and standing seam metal roofing system.

Electrical utilities include electrical distribution and an intrusion

detection system (IDS). Mechanical utilities include fire protection, heat

distribution, water distribution, and heating, ventilation, and air

conditioning. Paving and site improvements include security fencing,

asphalt roads, paved parking lot, exterior lighting, storm water pond,

sidewalks, landscaping, relocation of an entry flagpole and monument

plaques. Site preparations work includes site and building utility

connections (water, natural gas, sanitary and storm sewer, electrical,

telephone, and LAN). Demolition of the following buildings and structures,

as well as any required mitigation, is also included: TC704,TC705, TC706,

TC707, TC708, TC470, TC709, TC830, TC831, TC860, TC861, TC1026, TC752,

TC754, TC846, TC848. Sustainable features will be integrated into the




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


bays that are technologically inadequate with limited multi-media

capability. The climate control systems are constantly being repaired.

These classrooms are supported by (5) Port-a-Johns used by over 3000

students. The current facilities do not meet the standards set forth in

the Course Descriptive Data (CDD), requiring Programs of Instruction (POI)

to take place in climate controlled, multi-media capable, head-equipped

facilities.

If not provided, students will continue to be taught in inadequate

facilities without the climate control, technology, and head facilities

necessary to satisfy the requirements set forth in the Course Description

Data (CDD). The ineffciencies and ineffectiveness of training two commands

in the same disciplines from separate facilities will continue.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,4600206496M 17110


Camp Geiger

NAVY 2008FY

P002





NMCI Connections

O&MMC

PMC

2008

2008

2,390

100



Equipment

Nomenclature




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$492

$80

$412

04/2008

01/2008

12/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$412

$80


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(GA)

(CAMP GEIGER)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,4600206496M 17110


Camp Geiger

NAVY 2008FY

P002










Navy requirements.

Larry Brant (910) 451-3034Activity POC: Phone No:

M67001(GA)

(CAMP GEIGER)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1611391

9. COST ESTIMATES


MOUT ENHANCEMENTS (49,654 SF)

BLDG 20 ADDITION-RANGE CONTROL

TOWER AND HEAD (1,744 SF)

URBAN TRAINING AREA, MIDDLE

AND UPPER CLASS (7,998 SF)

OPEN MARKET TRAINING AREA

(4,994 SF)

RAILROAD STATION AND WAREHOUSE

TRAINING AREA (31,215 SF)

NATIONAL GUARD/HELICOPTER

COMPOUND TRAINING AREA (2,519 SF)

360 DEGREE SHOOT HOUSE

TRAINING AREA (1,012 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,613

162

743

464

2,900

234

94

16

1,973.12

1,338.12

806.1

875.96

1,735.79

1,377.75

3,467.2

8,830

(320)

(990)

(370)

(2,540)

(410)

(130)

(60)

(3,790)

(130)

(50)

(40)

3,450

(160)

(1,390)

(240)

(670)

(750)

(240)

12,280

610

12,890

730

13,620

490

14,110

14,120


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,1200216496M 17945

MOUT Enhancements

NAVY 2008FY

P1063



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


February 2007

DD Form


REQUIREMENT:

This project will enhance the existing Urban Training Area with 75

additional multi-story training structures of various sizes and shapes.

New structures will be designed to accommodate audio and video displays,

remotely controlled pop-up targets, and reconfigurable interior walls. The

new urban training area will be designed to allow tank access. Building 20

will be modified to provide two control rooms, an equipment support room

and male/female heads.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)




(916)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,1200216496M 17945

MOUT Enhancements

NAVY 2008FY

P1063




11. Requirement:



CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)

Construct an Urban Training Area and a multi-story addition to Building 20,

to serve as a range control tower and field service head. The training

facility includes Middle and Upper Class areas, an Open Air Market,

National Guard compound, a Train Station area, and a 360 Degree Shoot

House. Construct 75 buildings and structures of various sizes and shapes.

Construction shall be combination of CMU, concrete, and steel frame: roofs

shall be standing seam, concrete, or roofless; training areas will include

electrical and mechanical connections and controls for special effects used

in training exercises, such as lights, sound, and compressed air; utilities

will include water, sanitary, power, electrical, telecom, and HVAC;

permanent ten feet high walls; fixed permanent tables, seats, awnings;

interior and exterior lighting for entire training areas; shoot house to

include rubber and steel armor bullet entrapment walls; changeable and

movable modular wall partitions and panels; simulated kitchens and

bathrooms; roads and access areas. Information systems include telephone,

Local Area Network (LAN), voice and data communications systems. Paving

and site improvements include exterior site and building lighting, paved

parking and roadways, storm water management, environmental protection

measures, clearing and grubbing, earthwork, fill, grading, landscaping,

security fencing, and building and roadway signage. Also includes

technical operating manuals, antiterrorism/force protection, and necessary

environmental mitigation.


February 2007

DD Form


To incorporate lessons learned during the Marine Corps Warfighting

Laboratory (MCWL) experiments and from combat operations, Operation Iraq

Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). An increase in current

urban training facility capabilities must be developed. The urban training

complex must be designed to allow infantry and armor units to train in a

realistic environment as a task-organized combined arms team that

emphasizes all available aspects of our supporting arms doctrine.

Increasing the depth of the training area and restricting the visual sight

lines will reduce the Marine's ability to maintain orientation through the

use of horizonal landmarks. Doing so will force units of the combined arms

team to train with fielded technology such as Blue Force Trackers, GPS

location/targeting devices and current GIS mapping capabilities. The urban

area must contain two and three story buildings, non-linear roads and

broken lines of sight (roadway and vertical placement of buildings). In

order to provide this requirement, a specially configured MOUT training

area complete with special operations training facilities is required to

train Marines. In order to elevate the level of training, exterior

speakers and current technology simulators such as air cannons or air/smoke

blast nozzles will simulate live fire in the area. Remotely Engaged Target

Systems (RETS) or RETS like systems and Portable infantry Targets (pop-up

targets) placed in the area coupled with simulated live fire will place the

Marine in a training environment that more closely replicates a real world

urban area and significantly elevate the state of training. To eliminate

the sense of complacency that develops from repeated training with the

fixed training fixtures within existing urban training buildings, new

buildings are required that incorporate a capability to manipulate or

change the internal floor plan. This will provide Camp Lejeune with the

ability to offer a different, challenging training environment to the same

Marines over multiple training evolutions. The addition of power sub-

station, water treatment facility and septic system will provide much

needed local utilities not presently in this area. These facilities would

significantly prepare Marines for the Three Block War activities associated

with urban conflict not presently available at Camp Lejeune and increase

combat readiness of Marines to answer the current terrorist threat in the

United States and around the world. The latter capabilities will also

increase the difficulty of employing supporting arms (air/ground/sea-based

weapon systems) in a Three Block War scenario and thereby; increase the

training value for the combined arms force.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,1200216496M 17945

MOUT Enhancements

NAVY 2008FY

P1063




(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


February 2007

DD Form


The current MOUT facility (32 buildings) was developed in the early 1990's

to provide an environment for teaching small unit basic urban combat

tactics and techniques. The current MOUT is a series of fixed, single and

multi-story building with defined interiors. The layout of the structures

provides the Marine a small cityscape environment with open skyline.

Unfortunately, its lack of depth leads to easy familiarization with

landmarks both inside the MOUT and beyond. The current MOUT does not

contain sufficient visual obstacles to teach the Marine how to fight and

maneuver in an urban cityscape area. These negative features -- a small

training facility, structures with fixed interiors, and ease of orientation

- lead to a level of complacency within the Marines who have trained there

several times before. (And, since MOUT training is a perishable and highly

desired skill, almost all the infantry Marines at Camp Lejeune have trained

there many times before.) This problem of familiarization and Camp

Lejeune's inability to provide an urban canyon texture to the MOUT area is

not just limited to ground unit training; mechanized and air units are

limited as well by the small size, lack of canyon texture, and facility

sustainability concerns.

Based on training and experiments by the MCWL during Urban Warrior and

Project Metropolis, a Training Facilities Summary Report was generated for

the Marine Corps. Although in the draft stage, it identifies inadequacies

with the training facilities at Camp Lejeune. In that report, Camp

Lejeune's MOUT Facility is identified as inadequate for company sized

combined arms task force operations and the conduct of convoy operations.

It also provides little challenge for close air support, no chance for

surprise when conducting force-on-force operations against a live OPFOR.

Additionally, the MOUT provides little, if any, maneuver space for

mechanized/air support training, does not have "urban canyons", and has

little effect on communication and navigation skills. As an end result,

the existing urban area facilities inadvertently provide a "false dominion"

feeling for the Marines during training exercises by not providing all the

environmental challenges the Marines will later face in a true urban combat

situation.

Recent U.S. combat efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan reinforce our critical

need for upgrading our ability to conduct successful military operations in

urban areas. Without this project Marines will continue to train in

inadequate facilities necessary to meet the current terrorist threat on the

United States and around the world therefore increasing casualties in time

of conflicts.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,1200216496M 17945

MOUT Enhancements

NAVY 2008FY

P1063




(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,1200216496M 17945

MOUT Enhancements

NAVY 2008FY

P1063




Collaterial Equipment

NMCI Seats

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

894

22



Equipment

Nomenclature








Larry Brant 910-451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

NA

$600

$550

$50

12/2007

10/2007

10/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$350

$250


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,1200216496M 17945

MOUT Enhancements

NAVY 2008FY

P1063




Blank Page

M67001(KA)

(BASE WIDE-MISCEL)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1671391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS

(97,844 SF)


SF)

BEQ 1 (48,438 SF)

BEQ 2 (48,438 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

9,090

90

4,500

4,500

3,467.2

1,761.15

1,761.15

17,730

(310)

(7,930)

(7,930)

(620)

(270)

(220)

(450)

8,340

(1,090)

(310)

(2,600)

(3,520)

(540)

(280)

26,070

1,300

27,370

1,560

28,930

1,040

29,970

29,970

(3,669)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,9700216496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P1087





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

Construct two multi-story BEQs with interior and exterior reinforced

concrete masonry walls, brick masonry exterior veneer, reinforced concrete

slab and standing seam metal roof. Project will provide adequate billeting

facilities for Marines residing in the Hadnot Point area of MCB Camp


February 2007

DD Form


Hadnot Point currently has a total of 52 room-configured barracks, 33 of

which are the 3-2-1 configuration and 19 of which are 2x2 configuration.

Based upon current planning criteria, these barracks provide a total

inventory of 10,666 adequate manspaces. Military loading projections for

Hadnot Point equate to a billeting requirement of 13,662 manspaces. Total

This project supports the Commandant of the Marine Corps goal of achieving

the 2X0 standard by 2012 by providing adequate and efficiently configured

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQs) for our enlisted Marines.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Provide facility support infrastructure to those Enlisted Marines in the

Hadnot Point area of MCB Camp Lejeune. P1087 provides a barracks with all

associated utility, road and security upgrades.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,9700216496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P1087




11. Requirement:


M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)

Lejeune. Construction will consist of 200 two-person rooms with semi-

private bathrooms and walk-in closets. Special construction features

include pile foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Sustainable

features will be included in the design, development, and construction of

the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and

Executive Orders. Built in equipment includes a fire pump with generator

backup, and two ADA certified elevators. Electrical systems include fire

alarms, and area lighting. Mechanical systems include fire protection

systems, HVAC system, plumbing, sanitary sewer, and steam distribution.

Information systems include CATV, LAN, telephone, and data communication

systems. This project will require 5 NMCI seats. Supporting facilities

include site and utility connections. Paving and Site improvements include

road extension, bridging over wetlands, recreation areas, sidewalks,

parking and access driveways, signage, storm water management retention

pond, site fill to stabilize and improve site drainage and accessibility,

and landscaping. Also includes Technical Operating Manuals, Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection features m67001 and necessary environmental

mitigation.


Intended grade use: 272 E1s-E3s, 46 E-4s, 18 E5s.

Total: 336 Persons.

Maximum utilization: 400 E1s-E3s.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


area billeting deficiency for Hadnot Point equates to approximately 3,000

manspaces. Due to the above-mentioned billeting deficiencies, this Command

has no option other than to billet the AT battalion in three inadequate

barracks located in the French Creek area of Camp Lejeune (FC304, FC305,

and FC306). These facilities, which have previously been categorized as

"Emergency Troop Billeting," do not meet Minimum Standards of Adequacy

(MSA) as defined in the BEQ Campaign Plan of January 1999. These three

identical structures are all configured with four-man rooms and gangheads.

Use of these facilities to billet bachelor enlisted permanent party

personnel is inconsistent with goals to eliminate inadequate room

configured/ganghead barracks as outlined in the Marine Corps Bachelor

Housing Master Plan of 15 October 2002.

The Marine Corps Bachelor Housing Master Plan goal of eliminating all

inadequate room configured/ganghead barracks will not be achieved. Marines

in the Hadnot Point area will continue to be billeted in inadequate

barracks. Traffic circulation problems in the French Creek and Hadnot

Point areas will continue to cause safety concerns and delays in commute

time. Loss of facilities previously categorized as Emergency Troop Housing

will severely restrict the Base's ability to billet mobilized reserve

forces.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,9700216496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P1087







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


1. Status:


No

$450

$350

$100

08/2006

01/2007

03/2007

10%

15%

$250

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

29,9700216496M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P1087





NMCI Connection Cost

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

3,608

61



Equipment

Nomenclature








W. L. Brant 910-451-3034Activity POC: Phone No:


4. Contract award:


02/2008

11/2007

06/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



54,740


M67001(DA)

(HADNOT POINT)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1711391

9. COST ESTIMATES


MARSOC SPECIAL OPS SUPPORT

FACILITIES (45,876 SF)

ARMORY (22,744 SF)

WEAPONS CLEANING (4,306 SF)

MWD KENNEL (6,297 SF)

EOD FACILITY (5,866 SF)

STORAGE FACILITY (797 SF)

CLASSIFIED MATTER INCINERATOR

FACILITY (409 SF)

SMALL ARMS MAGAZINE (3,003 SF)

WATER DISTRIBUTION BUILDING

(2,002 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,262

2,113

400

585

545

74

38

279

186

42

1,584.36

954.65

1,543.17

1,918.46

1,081.54

1,753.58

2,646.26

1,459.39

3,467.2

7,570

(3,350)

(380)

(900)

(1,050)

(80)

(70)

(740)

(270)

(150)

(290)

(110)

(140)

(40)

11,320

(580)

(3,620)

(2,510)

(2,630)

(480)

(150)

(1,350)

18,890

940

19,830

1,130

20,960

760


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

21,7200216496M 14345

MARSOC Special Ops Support

Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1183



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate and efficiently configured EOD Operations and Training Facility

for conducting explosive ordnance operation and training requirements. This

facility will include administrative space, security area for document

REQUIREMENT:

This project will provide an armory, weapons cleaning area, military

working dog kennel, small arms magazine, explosive ordnance disposal

facilities, water distribution facility and small craft floating pier in

support of the newly established Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC)

that will be located aboard Camp Lejeune.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)



TOTAL REQUEST



21,720

21,720

(1,150)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

21,7200216496M 14345


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1183




11. Requirement:



CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)

This project constructs multi-story and single-story training facilities on

pile foundations with concrete floors, and concrete masonry unit (CMU)

walls with brick veneer. Built-in equipment includes standing seam metal

roof, a bullet trap and fire suppression systems. Information systems

include wiring for telephone and local area network (LAN). Technical

Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features are

also included. Supporting facilities work includes site and building

utility connections (water, sanitary and storm sewer, electrical,

telephone, and LAN). Special construction features include pile

foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Electrical systems include

electrical distribution, transformer, and area lighting. Mechanical systems

include plumbing, compressed air, vacuum system for lead particulate

removal, HVAC, wet pipe sprinkler system, and lightning protection. Paving

and site improvements include culverts, roads, parking lots, and building

and roadway signage. Site preparations include earthwork, security fencing

and gates, and environmental protection. Buildings RR238 and RR239 will be

demolished. Environmental mitigation will be included. Sustainable



executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form


September 2006













capability.

Facilities for the special operational support of MARSOC do not exist. The

MARSOC compound will be completly secure and self serving. Currently Camp

Lejeune can not adequatly accomodate the requirements of Special Operations

Command component.

If these MILCON requirements are not met Camp Lejeune will not be able to

support the mandate of the Secretary of Defense and the guidance of HQMC to

establish the MARSOC's standup at Camp Lejeune. The Marine Corps would have

to seek another location to base this command, or respond to the Secretary

of Defense that they are unable to meet the requirement to fully support

the stand-up MARSOC.

storage, workshop and maintenance area, equipment storage, personnel and

classroom spaces, an armory and weapons cleaning area to secure, preserve,

and maintain crew served weapons, small arms, optical/night vision

equipment, a dog kennel with food preparation area, work/treatment area,

duty room, storage, dog training areas, a classified matter incinerator for

document disposal, and a small arms magazine for ammunition storage during

training. The project will also construct a water distribution facility to

serve the compound and surrounding areas. Also a small water-craft

floating pier will be constructed to adequately serve the newly established

MARSOC.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

21,7200216496M 14345


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1183








1. Status:


02/2006

09/2007

10%

M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

21,7200216496M 14345


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1183





ISMT Targeting Systems

NMCI Seats

O&MMC

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

2009

830

250

70



Equipment

Nomenclature








W.L. Brant (910)451-5925Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

$550

$450

$100

04/2008

12/2007

12/2009

15%

$400

$150


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1751391

9. COST ESTIMATES


MARSOC TRAINING FACILITIES

INDOOR SMALL ARMS RANGE

SHOOTHOUSE (5,005 SF)

URBAN TRAINER (7,352 SF)

DECONTAMINATION FACILITY

(1,259 SF)

OBSTACLE COURSE

BREACHER FACILITY (1,475 SF)

QUICK REACTION RANGE

RELOCATE TARGET SHEDS (10,000

SF)

ISMT (2,885 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS RM (205 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


LS

EA

m2

m2

m2

EA

m2

EA

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,329

465

683

117

1

137

1

929

268

19

1,136.8

1,283.09

2,173.79

1,611.03

47,670.38

1,230.64

537,397.42

1,471.77

2,166.75

3,467.2

7,180

(1,510)

(600)

(1,480)

(190)

(50)

(170)

(540)

(1,370)

(580)

(70)

(450)

(110)

(50)

(10)

3,760

(270)

(1,080)

(340)

(1,460)

(230)

(70)

(210)

(100)

10,940

550

11,490

650

12,140

440


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,5900216496M 17150


NAVY 2008FY

P1185



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form


REQUIREMENT:

This project will provide an indoor small arms range, shoothouse, urban

trainer, decontamination facility, obstacle course, breacher facility,

quick reaction range, indoor simulation marksmanship trainer, and relocate

existing target sheds, in support of the newly established Marine Special

Operations Command (MARSOC) that will be located aboard Camp Lejeune.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)



TOTAL REQUEST



12,580

12,590

(146)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,5900216496M 17150


NAVY 2008FY

P1185




11. Requirement:



CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)

This project constructs multi-story and single-story training facilities on

pile foundations with concrete floors, and concrete masonry unit (CMU)

walls with brick veneer. Built-in equipment includes standing seam metal

roof, a bullet trap and fire suppression systems. Information systems

include wiring for telephone and local area network (LAN). Technical

Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features are

also included. Supporting facilities work includes site and building

utility connections (water, sanitary and storm sewer, electrical,

telephone, and LAN). Special construction features include pile

foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Electrical systems include

electrical distribution, transformer, and area lighting. Mechanical systems

include plumbing, compressed air, vacuum system for lead particulate

removal, HVAC, wet pipe sprinkler system, and lightning protection. Paving

and site improvements include culverts, roads, parking lots, and building

and roadway signage. Site preparations include earthwork, security fencing

and gates, and environmental protection. Buildings RR238 and RR239 will be

demolished. Environmental mitigation will be included. Sustainable



executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007













capability.

Existing facilities at Camp Lejeune can not handle the increased population

nor will they provide the secure compound needed to train MARSOC Marines.

Camp Lejeune training courses are near capacity at it is. The addition of

1900 MARSOC Marines will only cripple training standards and regimins if

additional training facilities are not constructed.

If these MILCON requirements are not met Camp Lejeune will not be able to

support the mandate of the Secretary of Defense and the guidance of HQMC to

establish the MARSOC standup at Camp Lejeune. The Marine Corps would have

to seek another location to base this command, or respond to the Secretary

of Defense that they are unable to meet the requirement to fully support

the stand-up MARSOC

Adequate and efficiently configured training facilities to support the

newly established MARSOC. MARSOC training requirements are intense in

nature and all facilities constructed have to adequatly meet mission

standards and needs.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,5900216496M 17150


NAVY 2008FY

P1185







2. Basis:


1. Status:


02/2006

09/2007

10%


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,5900216496M 17150


NAVY 2008FY

P1185





NMCI Seats

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

59

88



Equipment

Nomenclature








W.L. Brant (910)451-5925Activity POC: Phone No:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

$600

$450

$150

06/2008

02/2008

12/2009

$450

$150

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1791391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MARSOC FITNESS CENTER/TRAINING

POOL (37,642 SF)

FITNESS CENTER (24,542 SF)

COMBAT TRAINING POOL (13,000

SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,497.05

2,280

1,207.75

9.3

1,869.96

2,988.01

3,463.73

9,410

(4,260)

(3,610)

(30)

(1,220)

(120)

(90)

(80)

3,190

(450)

(1,100)

(410)

(570)

(370)

(220)

(30)

(40)

12,600

630

13,230

750

13,980

500

14,480

14,480

(1,037)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,4800216496M 74044


Pool

NAVY 2008FY

P1186





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate fitness facility and training pool in support of MARSOC personnel

working at the Stone Bay area of Camp Lejeune. Training will be of an

intense nature, typical of other Special Forces commands. Close proximity

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs an indoor fitness center and a training pool in

support of MARSOC military personnel to be stationed at Stone Bay.

Military Construction is required to support SecDef-mandated MARSOC

initiatives recently promulgated as a result of the Marine Corps ever

increasing role in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT).

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,4800216496M 74044


Pool

NAVY 2008FY

P1186




11. Requirement:


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)

Construct a Fitness Center and Training Pool with reinforced concrete

foundation and floors, structural steel framing, masonry walls, and

standing seam metal roof. Fitness Center will consist of a

basketball/volleyball court, spectator seating, fitness and aerobic areas,

racket ball and handball courts, multipurpose room, staff support spaces,

lockers for men and women, lobby, utility spaces and administrative space.

Training Pool will include an indoor pool, classrooms, administrative

space, storage rooms, filtration and mechanical spaces, male and female

locker rooms, and public bathrooms. Sustainable principles will be

integrated into the design, development and construction of the project in

accordance with Executive Order 13123. Built in equipment includes standing

seam roof, lockers, benches, sauna, bleachers, scoreboards, pool filters

and heater, basketball goals and overhead gantry crane. Information systems

will be included. Supporting facilities work includes site and building

utility connections (water, sanitary sewer, electrical, telephone, Local

Area Network, and Cable Television). Special Construction Features include

pile foundations. Electrical systems include fire alarms, exterior site

and building lighting and a mass notification system. Mechanical systems

include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating ventilation and air

conditioning. Paving and site improvements, and site preparations,

include improvements to access roads complete with pavement striping,

directional signage, concrete sidewalks, curbs and gutters, paved and

lighted parking, earthwork, grading, landscaping, and storm water

management. Also includes technical operating manuals, Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection features, and demolition of SRR57 Outdoor

Volleyball Court, RR56 General Storage, SRR58 Outdoor Combination Court,

RR8 Gymnasium, SRR59 Outdoor Handball Court, SRR101 Picnic Shelter, SRR53

Steam Valve House and associated asphalt, fencing, and concrete sidewalks.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007













capability.

There is currently no fitness center and training pool in the Stone Bay

area of Camp Lejeune. Fitness and under water training will be of great

importance to the MARSOC personnel. Under water training will be very

intense in nature and current training pools at Camp Lejeune are in high

demand by current tenants.

Without these facilities, Marines will have to travel off base or to other

areas of Camp Lejeune to get the needed physical fitness and water survival

training required for their special operation mission. This travel would

impair training effectiveness, supervision capabilities, and workforce

efficiency.

to the MARSOC compound will allow for an efficient training schedule and

better allow MARSOC personnel the intense training and education they

require.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,4800216496M 74044


Pool

NAVY 2008FY

P1186







2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

09/2005

01/2007

08/2007

10%


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,4800216496M 74044


Pool

NAVY 2008FY

P1186




Collateral Equipment Fitness Center

Collateral Equipment Pool

METS Device (Dunker)

NMCI workstations

O&MMC

O&MMC

PMC

OPN

2009

2009

2009

2009

167

50

750

70



Equipment

Nomenclature








W.L. Brant (910) 451-1833Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$550

$450

$100

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

$400

$150

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1831391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MARSOC COMMUNITY SUPPORT

FACILITIES (18,546 SF)

FIRE STATION (14,456 SF)

LOCATION EXCHANGE (3,498 SF)

TELECOMMUNTION ROOM (301 SF)

POST OFFICE (291 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






DEMOLITION



PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,723

1,343

325

28

27

1,844.21

1,332.05

3,467.2

1,427.52

3,640

(2,480)

(430)

(100)

(40)

(420)

(50)

(30)

(90)

4,330

(210)

(1,020)

(1,280)

(1,290)

(470)

(30)

(30)

7,970

400

8,370

480

8,850

320

9,170

9,170

(648)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,1700216496M 73083


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1187





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)

Construct single-story CMU buildings on pile foundations with structural


February 2007

DD Form





Efficiently configured community support facilities to include a location

exchange, post office, and a fire station are needed to support the newly

established MARSOC. Military Construction (MILCON) is required to support

the stand-up of this command.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

To construct community support facilities to include a location exchange,

post office, and fire station in support of the newly established Marine

Special Operations Command (MARSOC) that will be stationed aboard Camp

Lejeune.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,1700216496M 73083


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1187




11. Requirement:


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)

steel framing, reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete

foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roofs. Project will provide

community support facilities for the MARSOC to include a location exchange,

a post office, and a fire station. Special construction features include

pile foundations with reinforced concrete footings. Sustainable design



Executive Orders. Built-in equipment includes miscellaneous equipment, and

standing seam metal roof. Electrical systems include fire alarms and

energy saving electronic monitoring and control system (EMCS). Mechanical

systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, fire pump and Heating

Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Information Systems will include

telephone, Local Area Network (LAN), voice and data communication systems

and secure information systems. Project will require approximately 25 NMCI

seats. Project will include the demolition of five existing married

officers quarters RR39-43. Paving and site improvements include exterior

site and building lighting, paved parking and roadways, sidewalks, storm

water management, environmental protection measures, clearing and grubbing,

earthwork, fill, grading, landscaping, and building and roadway signage.

Also includes Technical Operating Manuals, Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection

features, and necessary environmental mitigation. Sustainable principles

will be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the

project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and

executive orders.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007










capability.

Adequate community support facilities do not currently exist at Camp

Lejeune to meet the MARSOC requirements for a fire station, and a location

exchange. The existing fire station at Stone Bay (RR6) and the existing

location exchange (RR10 - which includes an approximately 300 SF post

office) were both built in the 1940s and are inadequate to support this

additional 1900 + man command.

If these MILCON facilities requirements are not met, Camp Lejeune will not

be able to provide adequate community support facilities to include a

location exchange/post office, and a fire station for 1900 + additional

MARSOC personnel.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,1700216496M 73083


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1187







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

4. Contract award:


1. Status:


No

$550

$450

$100

12/2007

08/2006

01/2007

08/2007

10%

15%

$400

$150


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

9,1700216496M 73083


Facilities

NAVY 2008FY

P1187




Basewide Fire Alarm System Upgrade



O&MMC

O&MMC

OPN

2008

2008

2008

250

310

88



Equipment

Nomenclature








W. L. BRANT 910-451-5812 (DSN 751)Activity POC: Phone No:



06/2008

12/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(HA)

(RIFLE RANGE)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1871391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELORS ENLISTED QUARTERS,

FRENCH CREEK (99,846 SF)

BEQ BLDG 1 (48,438 SF)

BEQ BLDG 2 (48,438 SF)

WATER DISTRIBUTION BUILDING

(2,002 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

9,276

4,500

4,500

186

90

1,761.15

1,761.15

1,459.39

3,467.2

18,040

(7,930)

(7,930)

(270)

(310)

(630)

(280)

(220)

(470)

6,130

(1,070)

(1,620)

(1,950)

(750)

(610)

(50)

(80)

24,170

1,210

25,380

1,450

26,830

970

27,800

27,800

(1,339)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

27,8000216496M 72124

Bachelors Enlisted Quarters,

French Creek

NAVY 2008FY

P137





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


February 2007

DD Form



by 2012.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Construct two "2x0" bachelor enlisted quarters with a total of 200 rooms

for permanent party enlisted personnel working in the French Creek area of

Camp Lejeune.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

27,8000216496M 72124


French Creek

NAVY 2008FY

P137




11. Requirement:


M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)

Construct two multi-story BEQs with interior and exterior reinforced

concrete masonry walls, interior corridors, brick masonry exterior veneer,

reinforced concrete slab and standing seam metal roof. Construction will

consist of 200, two-person rooms with semi-private bath and built-in

closets. Sustainable features will be included in the design, development,

and construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123

and other laws and Executive Orders. Built-in equipment includes a fire

pump with generator backup, fully sprinkled building spaces, and two ADA

certified combination freight/passenger elevators, one per building.

Information systems include LAN, and data and voice communication systems.

Five NMCI service connections/seats per building are required for this

project. Special Construction Features include pile foundations. Electrical

utilities include area lighting, communication, fire alarms and a telephone

system. Mechanical utilities include heating, ventilating, and air

conditioning (HVAC), a wet pipe sprinkler system, underground steam,

sanitary sewer distribution, and an elevated water tank with water

distribution system. Paving and site improvements include recreation

areas, two lighted volleyball courts, two lighted basketball courts,

sidewalks, parking and access driveways, a traffic light, roadway

directional and operational signs, storm water management for overall site

drainage, site fill to stabilize and improve drainage, accessibility and

landscaping. Project also requires the demolition of existing sidewalks,

lighting, and trees occupying project site. Also included are Technical

Operating Manuals, Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features, and

environmental mitigation.

Rooms: 200 two-person rooms (100 rooms per building).

Intended grade use: 272 E1-E3, 46 E-4, 18 E5.

Total: 336 persons.



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Currently in the French Creek area there are a total of eighteen 3x2x1

room-configured barracks. Based on current planning criteria, these

barracks provide a total inventory of 3,278 manspaces of adequate

billeting. Military loading projections for the French Creek area equate to

a billeting requirement of 4,916 manspaces. Total area billeting

deficiency for French Creek equates to 1,638 manspaces. Due to current

billeting deficiencies, permanent party Marines in some cases are being

billeted without adherence to the Minimum Standards of Adequacy (MSA).

Marines are being overbilleted in the current barracks causing overcrowded

conditions and resulting in the fraying of morale among the occupants.

In addition to the manspace deficiency noted above, some existing barracks

require periodic renovations. In order to accomplish these renovations,

personnel must vacate the BEQs for months at a time, thus producing

additional overcrowded conditions. Assigning Marines of the same small unit

into rooms in one location cannot be accomplished. Unit cohesion below the

battalion level cannot be achieved due to the large deficiency of billeting

spaces that currently exists.

The Minimum Standards of Adequacy (MCO P11000.18) will not be achieved

without construction of this facility. Quality of life for the Marines of

Fleet Marine Force Units occupying the French Creek area will continue to

decline. Morale, retention, and esprit de corps will be greatly be

reduced. Existing BEQ facilities will continue to be heavily used with

little or no down time for scheduled/cyclic maintenance.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

27,8000216496M 72124


French Creek

NAVY 2008FY

P137







2. Basis:




1. Status:


Yes

Camp LeJeune MCB

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$250


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):


M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

27,8000216496M 72124


French Creek

NAVY 2008FY

P137





NMCI connection cost

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

1,279

61



Equipment

Nomenclature





Construction is recommended. Mission requirements, operational


components.

William Brant 910-451-3034Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$450

$350

$100

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009


Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



54,740


M67001(EA)

(FRENCH CREEK)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1911391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, NEW

RIVER (83,173 SF)

BEQ (82,344 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

7,727

7,650

77

1,785.33

3,467.2

15,010

(13,660)

(270)

(310)

(220)

(190)

(360)

4,590

(930)

(410)

(1,240)

(1,520)

(490)

19,600

980

20,580

1,170

21,750

780

22,530

22,530

(799)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,5300216496M 72124

Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, New

River

NAVY 2008FY

P634





STATION NEW RIVER.

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)

Construct one three-story building on pile foundation with reinforced

concrete slab,

structural steel framing, exterior brick and masonry veneer, interior

concrete masonry

unit (CMU) block walls and standing seam metal roof system to match

adjacent buildings.


February 2007

DD Form



by 2012. This project is needed to provide adequate billeting for enlisted

personnel assigned to MCAS New River, NC. This project also supports the

Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) goal to build out to 90% using the 2x0

configuration.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Provide 360 living spaces for bachelor enlisted personnel (180 2-person

rooms) using the 2x0 Quality of Life (QOL) standard room design for

permanent party personnel to house up to 360 enlisted personnel stationed

at MCAS New River, NC.

(Current Mission)

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,5300216496M 72124


River

NAVY 2008FY

P634




11. Requirement:


M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)

Provide 180 rooms with semi-private baths in the standard 2x0 room

configuration.

Community and service core areas consist of laundry facilities, lounges,

administrative

offices, housekeeping areas and public restrooms. Built in equipment

includes an elevator and fire booster pump. Also includes Technical

Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features. Electrical

systems include fire alarms, energy saving Electronic Monitoring and

Control System (EMCS), and information systems. Supporting facilities work

includes site and building utility connections (water, sanitary and storm

sewers, electrical, telephone, Local Area network (LAN), and cable

television CATV)). Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection

systems, heating ventilation and air conditioning. Paving and site

improvements include paved parking, sidewalks, multi-purpose rooms, outdoor

recreation facilities/courts, roadways access, privately owned vehicle

(POV) parking, earthwork, grading, and landscaping. Sustainable

principles will be included into the design, development, and construction

of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and

executive orders.

Rooms: 180 two-person rooms

Maximum Utilization: 180 E4-E5, or 360 E1-E3.

Intended Grade Mix: E4-E5.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


MCAS New River current BEQ's are filled to capacity, requiring the

continuous sending of personnel off base with BAH own right. New River is

843 manspaces short of meeting the "Build to 90%" requirement. After the

completion of replacement project FY05 MCON P630, MCAS New River will be

built out to 68%.

MCAS New River, which has a considerable deficiency of adequate Bachelor

Enlisted Quarters, currently has approximately 501 E1-E5 personnel living

off base on BAH own right. Without this project MCAS New River will

continue to be noncompliant with the FY-98 Quality of Life Requirement, and

will continue sending many E1-E5 off base.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,5300216496M 72124


River

NAVY 2008FY

P634





NMCI Equipment

O&MMC

OPN

2009

2009

744

55



Equipment

Nomenclature




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


Yes

FY2005 P630 BEQ New River

$450

$150

$300

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$200

$250


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



C. FY D. FY

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

22,5300216496M 72124


River

NAVY 2008FY

P634











David Turner 910-449-5401Activity POC: Phone No:

54,740 E. Future R&M Requirements ($000):

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1951391


9. COST ESTIMATES


AIRCRAFT MAINT HANGAR, NEW RIVER

PHASE 2 (47,167 SF)

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR

PHASE II (46,995 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,382

4,366

16

2,251.34

3,467.2

13,170

(9,830)

(60)

(2,870)

(180)

(110)

(120)

1,910

(400)

(110)

(60)

(820)

(100)

(380)

(40)

15,080

750

15,830

900

16,730

600

17,330

17,330

(35)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,3300216496M 21105


River Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P651





STATION NEW RIVER.

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)

Construct a multi-story aircraft maintenance hangar addition, to provide

hangar bay, shop space, flight line operations, and maintenance functions

in support of the V-22 aircraft squadrons. The hangar addition will join


February 2007

DD Form


Existing Aircraft Maintenence Hangar AS504 is scheduled to be demolished as

part of P526. This project (P-651) is the second phase of the replacement

of AS504. It includes construction of highbay space to house three fully

spread and one folded V-22 aircraft, crew and equipment spaces, and

administration spaces, which will provide VMMT 204 (V-22 Training Squadron)

with adequate space designed to accomplish their mission.

Provide adequate and efficiently configured facilities to accommodate one

MV-22 squadron with 12 aircraft to include hangar bay, crew and equipment

spaces, administration spaces, ready room, and maintenance shops.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project is Phase II and constructs an aircraft maintenance hangar

modified type I module to be added to Phase I, FY07 MCON P-526. This

hangar will provide maintenance, crew and equipment, and administration

spaces for one operational squadron.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,3300216496M 21105


River Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P651




11. Requirement:


M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)

the existing aircraft parking apron, and will include a multi-story

crew/equipment/admin area at the rear of the hangar bay. Primary facility

will be steel frame construction with suspended cantilever trusses

supporting the hangar bay roof. Roof will be a standing seam metal roof

over rigid insulation on steel deck supported by steel joists. Second

floor framing will be concrete on steel floor decking. Exterior walls will

be metal siding on the hangar bay and concrete masonry on the

operations/admin. area, with thermally efficient windows and doors. Ground

floor will be slab on grade with embedded grounding grid and floor drainage

system in the hangar bay. Sustainable features will be included in the

design, development, and construction of this project in accordance with

Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Electrical

systems will include fire protection (fire pump, sprinkler and AFFF),

electrical distribution, lighting, and communication features to include

NALCOMIS and weather vision systems. Mechanical utilities include water,

sewer, gas distribution, air conditioning, and connection to existing oil

water separator. Site preparations include excavation, grading, pavement,

access roadway,and storm water removal. Demolition of existing aircraft

paving in construction area is included. Site improvements include new

aircraft paving, flightline fencing and POV parking. Built-in equipment

includes an elevator and a 5 ton bridge crane. Pile foundations are also

needed for construction.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


Due to the demolition of the severely inadequate hangar AS504 and the size

and number of V-22s operating at MCAS New River, this Air Station will be

severely deficient in hangar space and will not be able to provide the

required hangar spaces to the permanently based helicopter squadrons.

Squadrons are currently hot-racking hangar bay spaces. When all squadrons

are present, one squadron will be left without hangar spaces to include

hangar bay, crew and equipment spaces, administration spaces, ready room,

and maintenance shops.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,3300216496M 21105


River Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P651




NMCI Connections PMC 2009 35



Equipment

Nomenclature









2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


N/A

$700

$550

$150

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$300

$400


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

17,3300216496M 21105


River Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P651






David Turner 910-449-5401Activity POC: Phone No:

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 1991391


9. COST ESTIMATES


JET ENGINE TEST CELL, NEW RIVER

(9,149 SF)

JET ENGINE TEST CELL (8,321

SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






DEMOLITION


INSPECTIONS, TESTING, AND

CERTIFICATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

850

773

77

12,411.42

3,649.68

10,980

(9,590)

(280)

(870)

(160)

(30)

(50)

1,690

(100)

(290)

(130)

(240)

(30)

(10)

(890)

12,670

630

13,300

760

14,060

510

14,570

14,570


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5700216496M 21181


NAVY 2008FY

P670





STATION NEW RIVER.

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)

Construct a Jet Engine Test Cell using steel reinforced masonry walls with

reinforced concrete slab on a pile-supported foundation and standing seam

metal roof system. The facility consists of four engine test cell

enclosures, four central control rooms with sound suppression, an engine


February 2007

DD Form


MCAS New River has an intermediate engine maintenance facility which

supports squadrons throughout the United States Marine Corps. MALS 26 and

MALS 29 operate expeditionary test cells located between the ramps and

hangars of the operating squadrons and the active runways. NAVAIR has

stated " weather limits the running of engines, especially at New River by

Adequate facilities to support post-maintenance, out-of-airframe testing of

turboshaft engines used by aircraft based at and serviced at MCAS New

River. An acoustically attenuated enclosure with an exhaust system is

required to abate noise and allow year round testing.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Provide one indoor facility which has the capability of testing, out-of-

airframe engines. There are four engine types required by MALS 26 and MALS

29 in their effort to meet fleet requirements (T58, T64, T400, T700).

Facility will also test Auxiliary Power Units.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5700216496M 21181


NAVY 2008FY

P670




11. Requirement:


M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)

prep/maintenance room with sound suppressing doors leading to the test cell

enclosures, two combination offices/tool rooms, ADA restrooms, and a lean-

to for APU tests. Built-in equipment includes the engine test support

items: engine air start, fuel supply system, facility instrumentation,

four 2-ton monorail cranes, 400 HZ power, lubrication skid containment,

electrical start system, control/communication system, and engine exhaust

system to abate noise. Fire protection includes: fire detection system, wet

sprinkler, and the special engine water spray extinguishing system.

Information systems include voice, data, and LAN communications. Special

Construction Features include sound reduction doors, soundproofing of

walls, grounding grid for lightning, lightning protection for building,

pile foundation, and test, evaluation, and operational certification of

cell. Supporting facilities include: LAN, water, sanitary sewer, sewer

lift station, industrial waste water collection system, 5,000 gallon fuel

tank, eyewash stations, bermed areas, and GOV parking. Electrical utilities

include primary and secondary electrical service, a 500 KVA transformer,

exterior lighting, and telephone service. Mechanical utilities include air

conditioning for the control room, offices, and maintenance room; all

remaining spaces have heating and ventilation. This project will demolish

buildings AS520 and AS 522. Sustainable features will be included in the

design, development, and construction for the project in accordance with



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


about 66% of the time."

The existing outdoor Jet Engine Test System is limited to operation only

during daylight hours with favorable weather and wind conditions. High

wind (10 knots +), high temperatures, rain, or weather cold enough to cause

icing severely limits MCAS New River's ability to perform outdoor testing.

NAVAIR has stated " weather limits the running of engines, especially at

New River by about 66% of the time." Currently periodic inspections often

reveal broken or deteriorated hardware, plumbing, and cabling due to

weather exposure that usually requires extensive repair and replacement of

parts that are no longer produced. The run cabs, fuel skid, lube skid, and

mounting trailers suffer from weather exposure resulting in corrosion and

contamination. In 2002 alone, New River had two lightning strikes on the

test cell pad that resulted in all of the test cells to be rendered

inoperative for 60-90 day periods after each occurance resulting in nearly

one half of a year that New River was without engine test capability.

Their operation is directly impacted by the weather and production can be

interrupted for weeks by lengthy periods of inclement weather. Air Station

orders also limit night testing from 2200 to 0700 hours, due to noise

complaints. Jet engines are maintained for each specific airframe and

spare engines are usually not available. Over 400 engines may be tested

annually.

Due to insufficient daytime conditions to test repaired engines, the number

of safe operational aircraft will continue to be reduced and mission

readiness will continue to suffer. Each squadron will continue to lose

approximately 60 plus days per year due to downtime associated with weather

and repairs. Additionally, the expeditionary cells and the operators are

at risk due to the weather. The cells have been struck by lightning seven

times in the past ten years resulting in thousands of dollars of destroyed

equipment and test cell downtime.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5700216496M 21181


NAVY 2008FY

P670







2. Basis:


1. Status:


02/2006

09/2007

10%


M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,5700216496M 21181


NAVY 2008FY

P670













David D. Turner 910-449-5401Activity POC: Phone No:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


Yes

N/A

$625

$500

$125

03/2008

12/2007

03/2009

$250

$375

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE

M67001(LA)

(MCAS NEW RIVER)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2031391


9. COST ESTIMATES


FIELD MEDICAL SERVICES SCHOOL

(27,652 SF)


(27,383 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,569

2,544

25

1,702.57

3,467.2

5,500

(4,330)

(90)

(910)

(80)

(60)

(30)

1,530

(150)

(270)

(220)

(460)

(370)

(60)

7,030

350

7,380

420

7,800

280

8,080

8,080

(277)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,0800206496M 17110


NAVY 2008FY

P828





CAMP LEJEUNE.

M67001(FA)

(MONTFORD POINT)

Construct a two-story Academic Instruction Facility of reinforced concrete

on a pile foundation, with concrete floors, exterior CMU walls with brick

veneer, and standing seam metal roof. Facility will consist of classrooms,

offices, a multi-media production suite, instructor workspace, library,


February 2007

DD Form


FMSS currently provides three separate courses of instruction: Field

Medical Service Technicians (FMST) Course, Field Medical Service Officers

(FMSO) Course, and the Chaplain and Religious Program Specialist

Expeditionary Skills Training (CREST) course. The School operates out of

ten badly deteriorated wood frame buildings located at Camp Johnson. These

60-year old structures have exceeded their functional life expectancy and

Provide an adequate and efficiently configured Academic Instruction

Facility for FMSS. The School's mission is to train Navy medical personnel

in field medical techniques, Navy religious ministry personnel in field

ministry techniques, and all personnel in the combat survival skills

necessary to support Marine Forces during military operations. FMSS is one

of eleven formal schools operating under the control of Training and

Education Command (TECOM). The combined annual student throughput of these

three courses is approximately 2,200 students per year.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs an Academic Instruction Facility for the Field

Medical Service School (FMSS) to train and prepare Navy medical, dental,

and religious personnel for service in support of Marines forces.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,0800206496M 17110


NAVY 2008FY

P828




11. Requirement:

0 1,313Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 17,178

M67001(FA)

(MONTFORD POINT)

instructor lounge, student break area, rest rooms, and staff locker room.

Interior will be finished with a combination of tile, carpet, painted CMU

walls, suspended gypsum board and acoustical tile ceilings. Built-in

equipment includes lockers, floor drains and accordion doors in classrooms.

Information systems include LAN, telephone, data communication and voice

communication systems. This project requires 13 NMCI seats. Special

construction features include pile foundation with reinforced concrete

footings. Electrical Utilities include primary and secondary electrical

distribution systems, a pad mounted transformer, and a fire alarm site

connection. Mechanical Utilities include plumbing, HVAC, and wet pipe

sprinkler system. Paving and site improvements include storm water

management, paved and lighted parking lot, concrete sidewalks, landscaping,

relocation of existing outdoor classroom and obstacle course, signage, and

all utility connections. Project also includes technical operating manuals

and environmental mitigation. Sustainable features will be included in the




February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


can no longer be economically maintained. The buildings exhibit structural

damage to include differential settling, termite damage, and rotting

timbers. Shingle repairs performed on the roofs' unsound plywood

underlayment have resulted in frequent leaks, leading to numerous class

disruptions. The buildings are poorly insulated and lack adequate heating,

ventilation, and air conditioning. The lack of sufficient head facilities

requires excessively long breaks in instruction time to allow students the

time necessary to cycle through the limited facilities. Structural

restrictions will not allow us to wire the existing facilities to support

modern training technology. Having to function out of ten dispersed and

inadequately configured facilities results in excessive

operations/maintenance costs, and negatively impacts the School's training

schedule due to the wasted time marching students to and from the various

events.

FMSS will continue to operate out of inadequate facilities. Buildings will

continue to deteriorate to a point that their structural stability makes

them totally unserviceable for occupancy. The Base will continue to

experience excessive maintenance, cooling and heating costs. The FMSS

training schedule will continue to suffer due to inadequate heads and the

need to rotate students between an excessive number of buildings. Failure

to consolidate the school classroom and administrative facilities into a

single complex will result in continued low morale, frustration and

negatively impact on the mission to provide Marine operational forces with

trained and qualified medical, dental, and religious professionals.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,0800206496M 17110


NAVY 2008FY

P828







2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):

M67001(FA)

(MONTFORD POINT)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,0800206496M 17110


NAVY 2008FY

P828






O&MMC

OPN

2010

2009

251

26



Equipment

Nomenclature








W. L. BRANT (910)451-3034 DSN 751-

3034


(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$600

$450

$150

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

$350

$250



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M67001(FA)

(MONTFORD POINT)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2071390

Scope

21105

21105

Cost

($000)Start

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Storage/Maint Fac

Hangar Renovation, Fac

Upgrades Navy F/A18E/F

Complete

2541 m2

12844 m2

12,110

16,500

Design Status

09/2005

09/2005


09/2007

05/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 2,628,191

29,147

23,000

103,164

28,610

241,940

9. Future Projects:


61010

Missile And HE Magazine

Engineering Product Support Facility

1082 m2

3320 m2

9,130

13,870

TOTAL

TOTAL




28,610


TOTAL

23,000

103,164


3,054,052

72124

11665

21210

61071

14345

21103

21451

21451

61070

73010

21196

21860

21121

83141

21196

80396 SF

LS

17288 SF

12122 SF

24768 SF

1600 SF

23541 SF

21323 SF

49837 SF

14090 SF

LS

LS

LS

24050 SF

37997 SF

24,124

3,013

3,977

2,109

2,712

10,026

7,530

7,369

15,762

3,030

3,509

4,011

5,815

6,367

3,810

*


Electronics Van Pad

Guided Missiles Integration Facility

Magazine Administration Addition

Armory

Corrosion Control Hangar

MACS2 Operations & Maintenance Facility

Motor Transport and Communications Shop

Administrative Facility Consolidation

EMS/Fire Vehicle Facility

Dehumidified Storage

Ground Support Equipment Shop

MWSS Facility

Hazardous Waste Storage & Transfer Facility

Protected Aircraft Maintenance Storage Fac

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.95

5. Area Const

Cost Index


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

13584

16496

73

77B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 549

507

935

806

40

28

344

459

0

0

750

998

6724

7355

4169

6266

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2081390

4. Command






0





Maintain and operate facilities and provide services and materials to

support the operations of a Marine Aircraft Wing, or units thereof, and

other activities and units as designated by the Commandant of the Marine

Corps in coordination with the Chief of Naval Operations.

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.95

5. Area Const

Cost Index

6,367

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2091391

9. COST ESTIMATES


UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE

STORAGE/MAINT FAC (27,351 SF)

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR

(17,911 SF)

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP,

WHEELED (6,727 SF)

ORGANIC ASSET WAREHOUSE (1,001

SF)

ELECNX/COMMS MAINT SHOP (1,550

SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,541

1,664

625

93

144

15

2,290.34

1,554.01

975.08

1,994.8

3,467.2

5,940

(3,810)

(970)

(90)

(290)

(50)

(520)

(90)

(60)

(60)

4,590

(370)

(1,370)

(680)

(1,590)

(380)

(110)

(90)

10,530

530

11,060

630

11,690

420

12,110

12,110

(40)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,1100206496M 21105


Storage/Maint Fac

NAVY 2008FY

P122

MCAS CHERRY POINT NCCHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA



February 2007

DD Form


Provide adequate facilities to accommodate UAV maintenance and storage

requirements at MCAS Cherry Point. The VMU-2 mission is to operate and

maintain a UAV system to provide unmanned aerial reconnaissance support to

REQUIREMENT:

This project provides the facilities required to adequately support UAV

operations at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,1100206496M 21105


Storage/Maint Fac

NAVY 2008FY

P122



11. Requirement:


Construct a single-story Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) building on slab on

grade foundation with concrete spread footings, structural steel framing,

standing seam metal roof, and brick veneer exterior. Project provides a new

maintenance and storage facility for the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

squadron at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point. Construction

includes interior CMU partitions throughout the hangar bay, shops, and

vehicle maintenance/storage areas and gypsum wallboard over metal studs at

office and support areas. Facility will include an aircraft parking apron,

tow zones, hangar storage and maintenance space for 8 UAVs and maintenance

space for four each 7-Ton trucks as well as shop, administrative, and

support spaces. Sustainable principles will be included into the design,

development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive

Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Special construction

features include: a Communication Control Link Station (an elevated area

[Minimum Height: 25 ft above existing site grade] for clear, line-of-site

control from a High-Mobility-Multi-Wheeled-Vehicle (HMMWV) mounted Tracking

and Control Unit); an aircraft washrack; fire pump; and a power check pad.

Built-in equipment includes one emergency generator. Supporting facilities

include site and building utility connections (water, electrical,

telephone, sanitary and storm sewers, and Local Area Network (LAN).

Electrical utilities include electrical distribution, transformer

substation, fire alarm, exterior site and building lighting, information

systems, telephone, and energy saving electronic monitoring and control

system (EMCS). Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection system,

heating, ventilation and air-conditioning, runoff oil/water separator, and

sanitary sewer pump station. Paving and site improvements include aircraft

tow way, organizational and private vehicle parking, roads, storm water

drainage, earthwork, grading, landscaping, and the demolition of numerous

existing structures. Project also includes Technical Operating Manuals,

Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features and environmental mitigation.


February 2007

DD Form


The existing facilities do not adequately accommodate the UAVs and have

numerous safety and code violations. Upon completion of the new

facilities, the existing facilities will be demolished with the exception

of Building 1795. The existing VMU-2 facilities are located in a

relatively remote area northeast of the developed Base core. The VMU-2

unit currently contains 176 personnel in two buildings, and is part of the

Marine Air Control Group 28. The VMU-2 fenced compound consists of a small

training building, an administration building, a motor vehicle maintenance

building, two aircraft maintenance structures with an apron/parking area

and a paved area leading to an aircraft taxi strip connected to the main

runways. Building 249 is a cinder block structure built in 1954. It has

approximately 1,540 square feet and has been rated as inadequate. It is

within a 1,250 ft radius Explosive Safety Quantity Distance (ESQD) Arc for

the Ordnance Staging Area (OSA). The OSA is out of use until demolition of

Building 249. The motor vehicle maintenance building (248) is a metal

structure built in 1954. It has approximately 4,000 square feet but, due

to its configuration, it can house only two HMMWVs or one 7-ton MTVR truck.

The building has inadequate ventilation and operating space and, as a

result, most maintenance is performed outside in the parking area or in a

grass area adjacent to the building.

The aircraft maintenance buildings (1372 & 3405) are sheet metal, and are

approximately 40' x 40', with three sides and an overhead clearance of

approximately 16 feet. One of the structures is used for material and

hazardous material storage. The other structure could contain three UAVs,

but the lack of weather protection makes the structures inadequate for

maintenance and storage. These facilities also have generator sheds (3540

& 3345) associated with them which provided stand-by generator power but

have not been in use for many years.

If this project is not provided, the mission readiness of VMU-2 will

continue to be compromised. The existing facilities are wholly inadequate

for meeting garrison mission requirements and do not provide the support

required to effectively conduct UAV maintenance and support operations.

Secure storage of components is provided in another building requiring the

repair technicians to constantly travel between buildings for parts and

classified repair manuals as no available storage is provided in Bldg 248

for this function. Organic Air/Ground storage for VMU-2 will continue to

the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF). Facilities are required for

maintenance of the aircraft, as well as for supporting equipment and

vehicles.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,1100206496M 21105


Storage/Maint Fac

NAVY 2008FY

P122




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


be improperly stored in insufficient and unsecure 3-sided metal shelters,

exposing the contents to the elements. There have been reported incidents

of theft as a result of no existing lockable storage areas for the gear.

Both metal shelters have leaking roofs and the electrical and lighting

systems in both shelters are inadequate as well. Aircraft maintenance on

the Pioneer will continue to be performed in one of the 2 existing 3-sided

metal shelters. The shelters are not equipped to perform aircraft

maintenance and repair. The existing electrical and lighting systems are

outdated and inadequate for the work being performed on the aircraft. The

roof leaks in these shelters. There is no heat in the building and the

shelters cannot be closed off during the winter months. Insufficient room

is available for the assembly and required periodic Preventative

Maintenance and operational checks required for the aircraft - currently,

only 1 to 2 aircraft in lieu of 4 to 5 aircraft systems can be assembled

for these maintenance and operational checks. The tool room, avionics, and

optics functions are located in another building requiring the aircraft

maintenance & repair technicians to travel to another building to check out

gear and spare parts.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,1100206496M 21105


Storage/Maint Fac

NAVY 2008FY

P122







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$550

$350

$200

04/2008

02/2008

08/2009

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$350

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,1100206496M 21105


Storage/Maint Fac

NAVY 2008FY

P122



NMCI Connections PMC 2008 40


Equipment

Nomenclature








Mr. Rudy Smith DSN 582-4769Activity POC: Phone No:

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp

or Requested

Cost ($000)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

12,1100206496M 21105


Storage/Maint Fac

NAVY 2008FY

P122



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2151391

9. COST ESTIMATES


HANGAR RENOVATION, FAC UPGRADES

NAVY F/A18E/F (138,250 SF)

TACTICAL OPS FLIGHT TRAINER

(3,897 SF)

HIGH EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINE, TYPE

E (5,823 SF)

RENOVATE HANGAR 130 (123,925

SF)

ORDNANCE OPERATIONS BUILDING

(4,004 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTER (601

SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


FLIGHTLINE ELECTRICAL

DISTIBUTION SYSTEM (FLEDS)

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST


m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

12,843.8

362

541

11,513

372

55.8

2,507.6

2,390.09

419.51

1,992.8

3,649.68

8,450

(910)

(1,290)

(4,830)

(740)

(200)

(100)

(20)

(330)

(30)

5,900

(980)

(360)

(560)

(1,230)

(320)

(100)

(2,350)

14,350

720

15,070

860

15,930

570

16,500

16,500

(13,005)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,5000703676N 21105

Hangar Renovation, Fac Upgrades

Navy F/A18E/F

NAVY 2008FY

P809




February 2007

DD Form


PROJECT:




4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,5000703676N 21105


Navy F/A18E/F

NAVY 2008FY

P809



11. Requirement:

0 11,512Adequate: Substandard:m2 m2 m2 12,843

Renovate Hangar 130 to accommodate two F/A-18 E/F squadrons. Renovations

include reconfiguration of spaces to house maintenance, training, and

administrative functions. The renovation will provide a sensitive

compartmented information facility (SCIF), a classified vault, restricted

access, fire sprinkler system renovation, AFFF fire suppression system

installation, refurbishment of fire main water distribution system,

electrical distribution upgrades, secret Internet protocol routing network

(SIPRNET), NMCI inside and outside infrastructure, plumbing and bathroom

renovations, compressed air distribution upgrades, hangar floor resurfacing

and coating, installation of bird netting, interior and exterior finishes,

recoating of the roof, anti-terrorism measures and site improvements,

including replacement of deteriorated aircraft pavements immediately

adjacent to the hangar.

Aircraft parking apron upgrades to accommodate the F/A-18E will include

installation of Flight Line Electrical Distribution System (FLEDS) with ten

point-of-use 400 Hertz frequency converters and related site work,

including a unit substation transformer, and underground secondary power

distribution to the converters. Existing air-starting system service boxes

and associated compressors and storage tanks will be demolished. The

parking apron will be restriped to accomodate twenty parking spaces for

F/A-18 E/F aircraft.

The project also constructs a single-story operational trainer building of

362 square meters (3,997 sf), to include classroom, raised flooring, high

bay space, sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), classified

vault, restricted access, fire sprinkler system, electrical distribution,

secret internet protocol routing network (SIPRNET), NMCI inside and outside

infrastructure, mechanical systems, HVAC, sidewalks, anti-terrorism

measures, UPS, and site improvements.

Construct one reinforced concrete box Type 'E', standard earth-covered

magazine of 541 square meters (5,823 sf) with utilities and support

facilities.


February 2007

DD Form


Hangar 130 was constructed in 1942 and has documented deficiencies in power

distribution, deteriorated and lead-based paint, asbestos, failed exterior

aircraft pavement, no AFFF fire suppression system, no SCIF, insufficient

water main supply for AFFF, and inadequate sprinklers.

MCAS Cherry Point has no fixed-point utility systems available to support

F/A-18E/F aircraft on the parking apron. Each F/A-18E/F requires at its

Provide adequate facilities and infrastructure to support the homebasing

and operation of the new F/A-18 E/F (Super Hornet). Two Navy F/A-18E

operational squadrons will be located at MCAS Cherry Point, as documented

in the "East Coast Basing of the Navy F/A 18 E/F" Environmental Impact

Statement.

Each squadron requires a hangar module adequately and efficiently

configured for particular aircraft squadron functions in which to perform

maintenance, training and administrative functions. Reconfiguration of

administrative spaces to provide a vaulted secure area required for aircrew

briefing/debriefing, loading/unloading the aircraft Memory Unit (MU) with

specific mission data prior to and after each tactics training flight is

required.

Adequate 400 Hertz electrical power is required on the aircraft parking

apron in order to support avionics maintenance checks.

There will be two training simulators (TOFT and DRT)sited at MCAS Cherry

Point to support the Navy F/A-18E operational squadrons. The simulators

provide training in F/A-18 E/F operations, which cannot be safely

accomplished in the aircraft. For those operations that could be

accomplished in the aircraft, the simulators will allow pilots and crew to

spend more time in trainers and less time flying.

A Type "E" magazine is required for storing non-combat munitions required

for Super Hornet pilot training.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Hangar 130 will be renovated to accommodate two F/A-18E squadrons. A

Flight Line Distribution System (FLEDS), a trainer building, one "E"

magazine and an ordnance maintenance facility to store/test "smart" weapons

for F18 aircraft will be built.

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,5000703676N 21105


Navy F/A18E/F

NAVY 2008FY

P809




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


parking apron space, for maintenance of the avionics systems. Four

abandoned Wells Air Start units require demolition to clear the space for

parking F/A-18E/Fs.

MCAS Cherry Point has no spare magazine capacity to support Navy Super

Hornet ordnance storage requirements.

There is no facility at MCAS Cherry Point that is capable of housing the

F/A-18 E/F TOFT and DRT.

MCAS Chery Point has no facility available to for storage and testing of

F/A-18 "smart" munitions that utilize the CMBRE test and maintenance

interface.

F/A-18E squadrons will be operationally constrained in maintenance,

training, and administrative functions due to the lack of required support

facilities.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,5000703676N 21105


Navy F/A18E/F

NAVY 2008FY

P809








2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

Magazine only - P075, Ch. Pt.

$700

$600

$100

04/2008

01/2008

11/2009

09/2005

01/2006

05/2007

5%

15%

$500

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,5000703676N 21105


Navy F/A18E/F

NAVY 2008FY

P809



Deployable Readiness Trainer

Magazine IDS

NMCI Connectivity

Tactiacl Operational Flight Trainer

APN

PMC

OMN

APN

2007

2007

2007

2007

4,200

80

125

8,600

Equipment

Nomenclature






Mr. Jim Woods 252-466-4769Activity POC: Phone No:

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp

or Requested

Cost ($000)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

16,5000703676N 21105


Navy F/A18E/F

NAVY 2008FY

P809



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2211390

Scope

11110

Cost

($000)Start

Outlying Landing Field Facs &

Land Acq 5 of 7

Complete

0 LS 10,060

Design Status

08/2002


11/2006


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 0

24,450

75,800

61,898

10,060

122,394


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:11110 Outlying Landing Field Facs & Land Acq 6 of 7 LS 75,800

TOTAL

TOTAL

NAS OCEANA VA



10,060


TOTAL

75,800

61,898


0





Provide logistics and support functions for east coast tactical aircraft

training operations.

294,602

11110 LS 61,898Outlying Landing Field Facs & Land Acq 7 of 7

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.84

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

0

0

0

0B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2221390

4. Command

NAS OCEANA VA




NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.84

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2231391

9. COST ESTIMATES


OUTLYING LANDING FIELD FACS, LAND

ACQ INC 5-7

RUNWAY AND LIGHTING

SIMULATED CARRIER DECK

LAND (AIRFIELD)

LAND (BUFFER)

NAVIGATIONAL AIDS (452 SF)

AIRCRAFT ARRESTING GEAR

INSTALLATION

FUEL PUMP HOUSE/QC LAB (2,476

SF)

OPS/FIRE RESCUE/AIR TRAFFIC

CONTROL (17,384 SF)

FIRE TRAINING AREA

ANTENNA TOWERS

SHOPS/FUELER/GUARDSHACK/CANOPY

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL

LESS FY 04-07 FUNDING POST

RECISSION

LS

LS

LS

AC

AC

m2

EA

m2

m2

LS

EA

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,000

30,000

42

2

230

1,615

2

5,056.6

3,326.67

1,420.01

209,829.9

1,045

2,359

40,000

144,450

(21,140)

(1,210)

(15,170)

(99,800)

(60)

(420)

(240)

(3,810)

(280)

(80)

(390)

(200)

(300)

(50)

(1,300)

29,740

(7,260)

(3,970)

(2,960)

(15,550)

174,190

8,710

182,900

10,430

193,330

-26,426


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,060


0203176N 11110

Outlying Landing Field Facs,

Land Acq Inc 5-7

NAVY 2008FY

P689D

NAS OCEANA VA


3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60191(WA)

(WASHINGTON COUNTY, NC)


February 2007

DD Form



LESS FY 09 & FUTURE FUNDING


TOTAL REQUEST



LS -156,834

10,070

10,060

(7,625)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,060


0203176N 11110


Land Acq Inc 5-7

NAVY 2008FY

P689D

NAS OCEANA VA


3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N60191(WA)


The project funding profile is:

FY 04 funding after recission $ 3,610,000

FY 05 funding after recission $ 14,890,000

FY 06 funding, none received $ 0

FY 07 funding $ 7,926,000

FY 08 funding $ 10,000,000

FY 09 & future funding $156,834,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $193,260,000

Description of Proposed Construction:

Acquire interests in approximately 3,000 acres of land for a new outlying

landing field (OLF), acquire interests in approximately 30,000 acres of

land for protective buffer and provide relocation assistance. Project also

includes construction of a 2,440 m runway with appropriate clear zones, an

aircraft parking apron, taxiway, runway and approach lights, runway

overruns, simulated carrier deck lighting at each end of the runway,

earthwork; clearing and grubbing; landscaping, construction of a

consolidated Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Station, Air

Operations Facility and Aircraft Traffic Control (ATC) Tower; two aircraft

refueling hydrants and one vehicle refueling station with environmental

protection measures, associated fuel storage, piping and dispensing

equipment; a Fuel Pump house with Quality Control Laboratory; a Field

Maintenance Building; a tactical air navigation (TACAN) Navigational Aid

Building with integral antenna support tower; two 10 m2 (110 SF) Landing

Signal Officer (LSO) shacks; a 15 m2 (160 SF) shed for aircraft refueling

personnel; a 8 m2 (85 SF) guard shack at the complex entry control point; a

35 m2 (375 SF) fire pump shelter; a 15 m2 (160 SF) domestic water well

pumphouse; a fire training area with environmental protection measures;

airfield/flightline security fencing and hardened gates; underground

domestic water and fire protection water distribution systems; an elevated

water storage tank for fire protection; underground sanitary sewage

collection, piping, septic tank(s) and drain field(s); roads, parking and

sidewalk paving; electrical power distribution and site lighting;


February 2007

DD Form


The Navy will site eight fleet squadrons and the fleet replacement squadron

at Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana and two fleet squadrons at Marine Corps

Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point, with an Outlying Landing Field (OLF) to be

built in Washington County, NC. A new OLF is required to provide

operational flexibility, improve the quality of life for Navy personnel and

civilians, and most importantly, to meet surge requirements in support of

the President's National Defense Strategy. The first Super Hornet Squadron

should stand up at NAS Oceana in 2004 with the entire beddown complete by

2010.

In any basing scenario involving NAS Oceana and/or MCAS Cherry Point,

failure to construct an OLF would adversely impact the Navy's ability to

mobilize carrier-based forces quickly, safely, and efficiently in response

to world situations. Without construction of the OLF, extensive and costly

measures are required to ensure all aircrew are properly trained in the

The OLF will provide facilities and functions to support training and

operation of the new F/A-18 E/F (Super Hornet). This includes required

repetitive flight operations to support the Atlantic Fleet. One of the

more important characteristics of an OLF training facility is for field

carrier landing practice. This OLF will allow operations to be conducted

away from the home facility thus improving flexibility of operations,

improved quality of life and quality of service, and noise/population

encroachment mitigation.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Acquire land interests and construct an outlying landing field (OLF).

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,060


0203176N 11110


Land Acq Inc 5-7

NAVY 2008FY

P689D

NAS OCEANA VA



11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard:AC AC AC 33,000

N60191(WA)


communication system distribution; two antenna support towers; earthwork,

storm drainage, and installation of two sets of bi-directional arresting

gear (government furnished contractor installed - GFCI), signage, drainage,

and fencing. Built-in Equipment includes two TACAN towers. Special

Construction Features include foundation piling for buildings, fuel

distribution and storage and environmental mitigation. Anti-

terrorism/force protection features to meet current standards will be

included. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,


Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


event of a surge requirement. These measures include increased operations

and noise at existing airfields. Flying detachments to other airfields

results in slower attainment of training requirements, additional temporary

assigned duty (TAD) and fuel costs, and increased time away from home for

service members. Operations at existing facilities are also interrupted by

FCLP training.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,060


0203176N 11110


Land Acq Inc 5-7

NAVY 2008FY

P689D

NAS OCEANA VA



ARFF Apparatus (vehicles)

ARFF Station Communications

ATC Communications Systems

IFLOLS Landing Systems (2)

Intrusion Dection/CCTV

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

2006

2006

2006

2006

2006

2,375

400

3,500

1,000

350



Equipment

Nomenclature






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$3,050

$2,250

$800

09/2004

04/2004

11/2010

08/2002

09/2004

11/2006

80%

100%

$1,600

$1,450


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


N60191(WA)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,060


0203176N 11110


Land Acq Inc 5-7

NAVY 2008FY

P689D

NAS OCEANA VA






Mr. Andrew Porter 757-433-2226Activity POC: Phone No:

N60191(WA)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,060


0203176N 11110


Land Acq Inc 5-7

NAVY 2008FY

P689D

NAS OCEANA VA



Blank Page

N60191(WA)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2291390

Scope

73010

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

1938 m2 6,800

Design Status

09/2005


09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 1,298,195

20,660

4,580

35,373

6,800

52,746


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:14320 EOD/Ordnance Operations Building 1251 m2 4,580

TOTAL

TOTAL




6,800


TOTAL

4,580

35,373


0





To administer assigned personnel, maintain and operate facilities, and

provide services and material to support operations of a Marine Aircraft

Group and other activities and units designated by the Commandant of the

Marine Corps in coordination with the Chief of Naval Operations.

1,418,354

74044

17110

91110

0 LS

5232 SF

590 AC

10,847

6,046

18,480

Physical Fitness Center

Nuclear/Biological/Chemical Facility

Land Acquisition Phase 2

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.03

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

4984

4867

48

41B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 442

342

236

285

0

2

18

30

0

16

362

388

3237

3092

641

671

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2301390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.03

5. Area Const


Marine Corps

Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2311391


9. COST ESTIMATES


STRUCTURAL FIRE STATION (20,860

SF)

STRUCTURAL FIRE STATION

(20,656 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,938

1,919

19

1,954.27

3,759.17

4,450

(3,750)

(70)

(370)

(60)

(140)

(60)

1,460

(270)

(150)

(170)

(420)

(230)

(220)

5,910

300

6,210

350

6,560

240

6,800

6,800

(215)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,8000206496M 73010


NAVY 2008FY

P434

MARINE CORPS AIR STATION BEAUFORTBEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA



STATION BEAUFORT.

Construct a single story, high truck bay split-face concrete masonry unit

building with slab on grade floors supported by piles, interior wall

construction of gypsum wall board on metal studs, and standing seam metal

roof. Facility also includes Emergency Command Center, conference and


February 2007

DD Form


The existing facility was constructed in 1959 for a smaller equipment

requirement and less restrictive building codes. The facility lacks

adequate storage for rolling equipment, fire fighting equipment and

Adequate and efficiently configured facilities to support a Structural Fire

Fighting mission in support of approximately 3000 buildings and structures

and 4477 Marines, sailors and civilians and 7600 military dependents.

Structural Fire Fighting mission also backs up Aircraft Rescue including

protecting airfield assets including ten aircraft maintenance hangars and

high value aircraft training devices and buildings.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a new Structural Fire Fighting Building away from

the flight line, located closer to the majority of emergency calls coming

from the enlisted barracks, family housing and the child development

center.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,8000206496M 73010


NAVY 2008FY

P434



11. Requirement:


training room, physical fitness room, restrooms with showers and lockers

for male and female personnel, sleeping area for male and female personnel,

dispatch room, kitchen and break room, administrative space, hazardous

materials response unit space, incident command trailer parking area, and

truck fire fighting water fill apparatus. Anti-terrorism/Force Protection

(AT/FP) measures and Technical Operating Manuals will be included.

Information systems include a mass-notification system and wiring for

telephone and local area network (LAN). Built in equipment includes

emergency equipment storage lockers and a vehicle exhaust system for the

trucks in the fire equipment bays. Special foundation features include

piles. Electrical utilities include exterior flood lighting and emergency

diesel back-up generator and connections. Mechanical utilities include

utilities extensions for communications, electrical, power, water and

sewer, air conditioning, and storm water management system. Paving and site

improvements include landscaping, sidewalks, and vehicle and equipment wash

rack. Demolition of Building #595 is included. Sustainable features have

been included in the design, development, and construction of this project

in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive

orders.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


hazardous materials. As a result, some items are being stored outside,

exposed to the elements. The emergency Hazardous Rolling Response Module,

Rescue Boat and Incidence Command Trailer cannot be stored under cover. The

facility has experienced four renovations and additions in an attempt to

stay current with life safety and building codes and fire fighting support

requirements. Truck bays have been added twice and are now too small to

adequately support modern equipment. Bunkrooms, locker rooms and rest rooms

do not adequately accommodate male and female personnel. There are egress

code violations from the bunk area and other parts of the building. The

facility exterior walls are unreinforced concrete masonry and uninsulated.

The building is subject to a 100 percent structural collapse in a seismic

event as determined by SODIVNAVFACENGCOM Seismic Study conducted in 1985.

The roof is minimally insulated and experiences frequent replacements due

to its nearly flat construction. Air conditioning and heating supply is

substandard. Building layout is inefficient to support operations

efficiently.

Loss of function and ability to respond after a seismic event or high wind

event. Contiuned operation of a facility that currently operates with

seismic, space and codes deficiencies. The building will continue to

decline as the building continues to decay from age and lack of

modernization efforts. Response time will not be improved without a

facility closer to the majority of emergency calls.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,8000206496M 73010


NAVY 2008FY

P434






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract


1. Status:


No

$189

$47

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$142

$47


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

6,8000206496M 73010


NAVY 2008FY

P434



COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT LIST

IDS

NMCI CONNECTION FEE

OPN

OPN

OPN

2008

2008

2008

189

6

20



Equipment

Nomenclature





Construction is recommended. This is an installation

utility/infrastructure project and does not qualify for joint use at this

location, however, all tenants on this installation are benefited by this

project.

William Snead 843-228-7390Activity POC: Phone No:

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$142

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2351390

Scope

72115

21420

Cost

($000)Start

Third Recruit Training BN

Complex Phase 1

Motor Transportation Complex

Complete

8312 m2

1941 m2

24,820

5,530

Design Status

09/2005

09/2005


09/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 995,026

3,080

34,970

64,783

30,350

93,611


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:72115 Third Recruit Training Battalion Phase 2 13918 m2 34,970

TOTAL

TOTAL




30,350


TOTAL

34,970

64,783




To provide reception, processing and recruit training for enlisted

personnel upon their entry into the Marine Corps; to provide recruits with

battle skills training; to provide schools to train enlisted personnel in

the administrative duities of first sergeant, sergeant major and

administrative chief, drill instructors, and drum and bugle corps members,

and conduct other schools as directed; to conduct reserve training as

directed; to conduct rifle marksmanship training for Marine officers and

enlisted personnel in the southeastern area, and for personnel of other

services, as requested.

1,221,820

72115

72112

72210

44111

LS

91493 SF

0 LS

58685 SF

22,130

17,586

18,048

7,019

Recruit Barracks 3rd Battalion Phase 3


Enlisted Dining Facility Consolidation

Supply And Services Consolidation

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.03

5. Area Const

Cost Index


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

1

1

1

1B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2361390

4. Command





0



1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.03

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2371391


9. COST ESTIMATES


THIRD RECRUIT TRAINING BN COMPLEX

PHASE 1 (89,470 SF)

RECRUIT TRAINING BARRACK

(72,204 SF)

COMPANY HEADQUARTERS (2,702

SF)

BATTALION OPERATION CENTER

(10,000 SF)

CENTRAL MECHANICAL PLANT

(4,133 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION







PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

8,312

6,708

251

929

384

40

1,932.91

2,359.85

2,282.04

1,421.6

3,211.72

17,430

(12,970)

(590)

(2,120)

(550)

(130)

(400)

(270)

(30)

(370)

4,600

(1,160)

(570)

(1,920)

(930)

(20)

22,030

1,100

23,130

1,320

24,450

880

25,330

25,322

(1,161)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

25,3220805796M 72115


Complex Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P363



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

25,3220805796M 72115


Complex Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P363




(PARRIS ISLAND)

Construct Phase I of a three phase program for construction of a new Third

Recruit Training Battalion Complex. Phase II (P367) is a proposed FY09

project and Phase III (P371) is a proposed FY10 project and are briefly

described under the Scope section. Phase I primary facilities shall

include a single story Battalion Operations Center, Central Mechanical

Plant sized for the entire complex, Telecommunications Room spaces to

contain all NMCI computer equipment and special HVAC systems, and one three

story recruit barrack with squad bays, head facilities, showers, Drill

Instructor (DI) spaces with locker rooms, storage, squad laundry

facilities, and company headquarter offices all totaling 89,470 square feet

(SF). The project scope shall provide for the following: (1) One three-

story recruit barrack with integral company headquarter offices, a central

mechanical plant building, and a single story Battalion Operations Center;

(2) reinforced concrete frame buildings on pile-supported foundations with

a pier-supported, elevated first floor with crawl space, brick veneer faced

reinforced concrete masonry unit exterior walls that comply with current

seismic requirements and FEMA flood elevation requirements; (3) 22 gauge

standing seam metal roof on steel truss system over concrete decking; (4)

insulated walls and ceilings (5) central heating and air-conditioning; (6)

fire protection; (7) utility connections for sewer, including an area pump

station, water, below-ground steam system, storm water, electrical power,

and communications, data/information systems, LAN (local area network)

connectivity and equipment spaces; (8) site work to include roads, parking,

ATFP construction features, recruit walkways, and storm water filtration

system; and (9) OMSI manuals. No demolition is required.

Special Features: The structures will be fully fire sprinkled in

accordance with the International Building Code (IBC). Central heating and

air-conditioning shall include steam to hot water conversion, an expandable

chiller plant with water-cooled chillers and cooling towers, chilled and

hot water piping, and full direct digital controls. Air conditioning shall

provide an effective humidity control strategy and outside air pre-

conditioning with energy recovery. Steam utilities to the site will be

below-ground, prefabricated, pre-insulated pipe with some pipe trenches.

Interior partitions in DI spaces, recruit areas of the Battalion Ops

Center, and company offices shall be of durable impact resistant systems.

Floors and walls in all shower areas will be ceramic tile. Other toilet

areas will have ceramic tile floors and six feet high wainscot. Toilet

partitions shall be structural glazed tile. Interior squad bay walls will

have six-foot high wainscot of structural glazed tile. Ceilings in the

head and shower areas shall be suspended portland cement plaster.



February 2007

DD Form


REQUIREMENT:

The project is designed to provide one Recruit Training Barrack, a Central

Mechanical Plant sized for the entire complex, a Battalion Operations

Center, and other items to permit the Marine Corps to effectively achieve

its training goals and objectives. The project scope shall provide the

following: (1) reinforced concrete frame buildings on pile foundation with

a crawl space, brick veneer faced reinforced concrete masonry exterior

walls, compliance with seismic criteria and FEMA flood elevation

requirements (2) 22 gauge standing seam metal roof on steel truss system

over concrete decking (3) insulated walls and ceilings (4) central heating

and air-conditioning (5) fire protection (6) utility connections for sewer,

water, steam, electrical power, and communications wiring and equipment

space, and (7) site work to include roads, parking, and AT/FP features.

Multi: All structures will be fully fire sprinkled in accordance with

International Building Code (IBC). The building will have a chiller plant

as opposed to a direct expansion system. Steam utilities to the site must

be underground with some trenches to avoid encumbering an open

drilling/training area. Floor finishes throughout barracks open bay areas

will be epoxy coated concrete. Floors and walls in the shower areas will

be ceramic tile. Other toilet areas will have ceramic tile floors and six

feet high wainscot. Wall hung plumbing fixtures shall be securely mounted

with structural hangars within the wall structure.




PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

25,3220805796M 72115


Complex Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P363




11. Requirement:


M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)


other laws and executive orders. Special construction feature includes a

pile foundation with crawl space.


February 2007

DD Form


The Third Recruit Training Battalion resides in the oldest and smallest

barracks on the Depot. The Third Battalion barracks, constructed in 1960,

were originally designed to berth 60 recruits in each squad bay based on

planning criteria of that time. During peak summertime periods, Third

Battalion currently berths 72 recruits per open bay with special waivers to

hold 75 recruits in certain cases. During peak periods (June through

September), the minimum allowable net living space per recruit provided by

current P-80 planning criteria is exceeded. There is an immediate

requirement to provide new facilities to berth 86 recruits per open bay.

The existing space limitation imposes an additional resource strain on the

other two Battalions. The limited functionality of the Third Battalion

Barracks is also a deterrent to training as squad bays and bathroom

facilities are too small and recruit loading frequently exceeds minimum

square footages. Drill Instructor areas are inadequate and not functional

for the high numbers of recruits and speed of throughput.

Additionally, the high demand on the Third Battalion Barracks results in

maximizing efforts by maintenance personnel and shortens the expected life

of the facility. Already, the Third Battalion Barracks are deficient in

more than just recruit loading and square footage requirements. The

barracks are in an overall poor state and this degraded condition has been

referenced in GAO audit 02-786 of June 2002. Specific issues include:

1. Recent inspections have determined that mold and mildew have completely

infiltrated the ceiling to the extent that replacement of those areas is

the only remedy.

The Marine Corps recruit training process is directly limited by the amount

of available recruit barracks space. Each platoon resides in an open bay

configured space. The long-term goal is to provide a complete training

complex of adequate size to hold 86 recruits per platoon squad bay. Eighty-

six (86) recruits per platoon is the average number of recruits during the

peak loading months of June through September. These numbers were based on

recruiting projections to meet force end-strength, dated December 2002.

This project, Phase I, will provide one Company (516 recruits) of the total

Battalion requirement of four Companies (2,064 recruits) with associated

support space for Battalion Headquarters, Company Commanders, and Drill

Instructor operation areas.

A new Battalion Operations Center is required in the near vicinity of the

new recruit training barracks. This facility shall house the Battalion

staff that perform the administrative and command functions for the

Battalion.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

25,3220805796M 72115


Complex Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P363




(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


2. The structural integrity of the barracks is questionable and they are

not built to current seismic criteria.

3. Plumbing and air-conditioning systems are in failing condition.

4. Moisture infiltration from exterior to the interior results in failing

brickwork, not to mention acerbating the mold and mildew problems.

5. Drill instructor huts are crowded and poorly designed for efficient

drill instructor utilization.

6. Recruit central bathroom facilities are inadequate in size and interior

walls and finishes are damaged in numerous locations.

The existing Third Battalion Operations Center is housed in a building that

also has exceeded its life expectancy and the building infrastructure is in

generally in poor condition, comparable to the condition encountered in the

existing barracks.

If not provided, the current situation will worsen and decline. Training

will continue to slow and adversely affect the recruit-training pipeline,

while also diminishing over-all training efficiencies of staff personnel.

Health and Safety issues will persist and be of prime concern. Recruits

assigned to berth in these barracks have a significantly higher incidence

of medical sick call cases. The buildings will further degrade, resulting

in continued costly maintenance and repair expenditures.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

25,3220805796M 72115


Complex Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P363







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract


1. Status:


No

na

$800

$700

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$650

$150


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

25,3220805796M 72115


Complex Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P363





IDS

NMCI Connection

O&MMC

OPN

OPN

1,100

6

55



Equipment

Nomenclature








Gregory D. Smith 843-228-2570Activity POC: Phone No:

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$100

04/2008

01/2008

04/2010

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


2006 R&M Conducted ($000):2007 R&M Conducted ($000):


M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2431391

9. COST ESTIMATES


MOTOR TRANSPORT FACILITY (20,893

SF)

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE (10,473

SF)

VEHICLE HOLDING SHED (4,198

SF)

VEHICLE WASH/REPAIR PLATFORM

(3,918 SF)

VEHICLE GREASE RACK (1,475

SF)

REFUELING VEHICLE SHELTER (721

SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

1,941

973

390

364

137

67

10

1,640.68

1,917.69

1,323.21

1,137.81

639.79

3,211.72

3,570

(1,600)

(750)

(480)

(160)

(40)

(30)

(450)

(30)

(20)

(10)

1,240

(170)

(120)

(220)

(420)

(190)

(80)

(40)

4,810

240

5,050

290

5,340

190

5,530

5,530


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,5300805796M 21420


NAVY 2008FY

P366




(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form


The project constructs a Motor Transport Facility to include a Maintenance

Facility, Holding Shed, Vehicle Wash/Repair Platform, Automated Vehicle

Wash, Refueling Vehicle Shelter, and Grease Racks. The project locates the

motor transportation function near the Depot Fuel Facility and Facility

Maintenance for more efficient operation. Facility Maintenance is the

largest user of motor vehicles on the Depot.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)




(80)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,5300805796M 21420


NAVY 2008FY

P366




11. Requirement:


The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: MCRD/BEAUFORT PI,

SC.

M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)

Construct a Motor Transport Facility to include; a Maintenance Facility,

Holding Shed, Refueling Vehicle Shelter, Vehicle Wash/Repair Platforms, and

Grease Racks. The Vehicle Maintenance Facility shall be a one story, high

bay steel frame structure on pile foundations with CMU infill and brick

veneer. The maintenance facility shall meet FEMA finish floor elevation

requirements and have vehicle lifts, maintenance and repair bays,

administrative area (including dispatch), tool room, and driver training

area. The shop areas shall be heated and ventilated and shall contain

vehicle exhaust extraction ventilation. Administrative and operational

areas shall be heated and air-conditioned. The roof shall be 22 guage

standing seam metal roofing. Building shall have paved approaches,

parking, and exterior maintenance area. The shop areas and driver areas

shall contain waiting areas and tiled restroom facilities. The Vehicle

Holding Shed and Wash/Repair Platforms shall be covered protected sheds

with brick end walls and metal standing seam roofing. Automated wash racks

and grease racks shall be for large commercial vehicles, buses and

passenger cars. Asphalt paving shall be pervious and the site will have a

storm water sand filtration system. Included shall be all associated

sitework, steam piping, utilities, exterior lighting, roads, parking,

fencing, and compound paving. Demolition includes demo of existing

buildings 176, 156A and 157. Sustainable features will be included in the


Executive Order 13123 and other laws and executive orders. Energy

conservation and use of renewable resources considerations shall also be

implemented.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


The existing facilities date back to the 1940's and 1950's. The facilities

were built when vehicles were smaller and before the advent of current

safety standards for shop and maintenance facilities. Damage occurs when

vehicles fail to negotiate tight turns and spaces, creating a danger to the

workers and the vehicles. Facilities have outlived their useful life, and

have unsatisfactory Life/Safety features. Proper vehicle maintenance can

not occur or has to be sent out to off-base facilities. Facilities are

contaminated with lead based paint and asbestos containing coatings.

Structures are not designed to current wind and seismic standards.

Dispatch functions work out of an undersized, cramped facility located in a

dangerous intersection of the vehicle path into and out of the strorage

facility. The storage facility is in the 100 year flood zone and will

require moving all vehicles in the event of a major storm.

Motor transport operations will continue to operate in inadequate spaces

with poor visibility to entering pedestrians and motor traffic. Shops will

continue to function in unsafe and outdated facilities. Storage of

expensive vehicles will continue in structurally inadequate buildings.

The Depot requires adequate maintenance, storage and administration areas

to conduct Motor Transport Operations. The Depot maintains a fleet of

Buses, Trucks, Vans, Automobiles, Tractors and Specialized Vehicles. The

facility also houses the dispatch and driver training facilities for

vehicles requiring special use and licensing.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,5300805796M 21420


NAVY 2008FY

P366







2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$350


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):


M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

5,5300805796M 21420


NAVY 2008FY

P366




Collateral equipment OPN 80



Equipment

Nomenclature








Philip Pearl DSN 335-4831Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$450

$350

$100

04/2008

01/2008

04/2009


Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


M00263(BA)

(PARRIS ISLAND)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2471390

Scope

17135

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

4836 m2 14,290

Design Status

11/2005


09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 1,660,778

5,400

0

58,290

14,290

74,935


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL




14,290


TOTAL 58,290


0





Maintain and operate facilities and provide service and material to support

operations of aviation facilities and units of the Naval Air Training

Command and other tenant activities and units.

1,813,693

17120

73025

61010

11320

74044

96854 SF

4553 SF

LS

111422 SY

LS

21,543

3,058

6,437

9,244

18,008

Squadron Operations Facility

Main Gate Security Improvement

CNATRA Headquarters

Parking Apron Recapitalization

Fitness Center Corpus Christi

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.9

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

3714

3520

1152

1117B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1639

1480

784

784

0

0

0

0

0

0

47

47

92

92

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2481390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.9

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2491391


9. COST ESTIMATES


AVIATION TRAINER FACILITY (52,052

SF)

AVIATION TRAINER FACILITY

(51,796 SF)

GENERATOR BUILDING (256 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION







SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

TEMPORARY FACILITIES

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,835.79

4,812

23.79

2,022.1

2,751.47

10,500

(9,730)

(70)

(370)

(100)

(130)

(100)

1,930

(100)

(120)

(260)

(200)

(400)

(100)

(300)

(450)

12,430

620

13,050

740

13,790

500

14,290

14,290

(12,725)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,2900805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P353

NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TXCORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS


Construct a single story steel frame building with a structural slab, pile

foundation, tilt-up concrete wall facing, standing seam metal roof on

insulated metal deck over steel trusses, and high bay simulator trainer

areas (T44, TC12 and T6 simulators). The facility includes spaces for

brief/de-brief, instructors, simulator maintenance, administrative support,


February 2007

DD Form


Training Wing Four simulator Flight Training Devices (FTDs) are currently

located in two separate facilities, Buildings 1824 and 89. Building 1824

houses two (2) TC-12 Operational Flight Trainers (OFTs) and one cockpit

orientation trainer. In FY 2008, the number of FTDs in Building 1824 will

increase to three trainers with the addition of one Instrument Flight

Trainer (IFT). Building 89 which houses both the T-34C and T-44A FTDs was

constructed in 1942 and is being used at its maximum capacity. Both of

these facilities will be inadequately sized to meet the proposed

requirement for the T-44 visual modifications trainer and the upgrade to

the TC-12 simulators. Both of these trainers are significantly larger and

require additional height and clearance which does not currently exist in

these buildings. A new facility is required.

Adequately and efficiently configured facilities to provide for

consolidated simulator functions for ground training. Naval Air Station

Corpus Christi is the home of Training Air Wing Four (TW4), whose mission

is to provide primary and advanced multi-engine pilot training for Navy,

Air Force, Marine, Coast Guard and Allied Foreign Military. This requires

an efficient flightline training facility capable of supporting the

approximately 230 flight instructor pilots and 50 contract simulator

instructors who instruct an average of 1014 students per year by FY08.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project constructs a flight operational trainer and centralizes all

flight training functions into one location.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,2900805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P353



11. Requirement:


computer support, mechanical rooms, and two each 1 1/2 ton bridge cranes.

The facility includes fire protection, environmentally controlled HVAC

system, electrical and mechanical utilities, emergency power back-up,

telephone/LAN system, parking lot and site improvements. The project will

demolish buildings 1822 (8,080sf), 1842 (4,000sf), and 1843 (4,000sf). The

project will relocate/reconstruct storage buildings 365 (600 sf), 366 (1200

sf), aircraft washracks, C-12 simulators from Building 1824, T-44

simulators from Building 89, and provide temporary facilities for the

displaced Squadron Operations personnel after demolishion. The building

will conform to Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection standards and incorporate

sustainable features.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


Visual modifications to upgrade the five existing T-44 simulators are

planned and this will increase their footprint and height requirements.

Building 89 can accommodate some of these modifications with additional

facility modifications, but can not meet the new clear height requirement

and there is only adequate space to handle four of the five simulators

planned for upgrade. A separate location will be required to house this

fifth trainer and there are no suitable buildings available on the air

station. This new facility will dictate flight simulator training in three

locations, further negatively impacting the training syllabus and possibly

delaying the production of qualified aviators. The potential for loss of

training equipment will continue due to deteriorating and aging utilities

in Building 89 built in 1942, and will not be able to meet the demands of

the new trainers.

If no new facilities are provided, NAS Corpus will not be able to

accomodate the new T-6 trainers. Personnel will continue to operate

inefficiently within the spaces, and will not be able to meet the new

aircraft's training mission.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,2900805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P353






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


1. Status:


No

$250

$200

$50

11/2005

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$200

$50


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

14,2900805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P353



Bridge Cranes

Furniture

NMCI

Simulators

OPN

OMN

OPN

OPN

2009

2009

2009

2009

150

500

75

12,000



Equipment

Nomenclature






Sharon Hill 361-961-3984Activity POC: Phone No:


4. Contract award:


04/2008

01/2008

12/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2531390

Scope

13122

Cost

($000)Start

Mobile User Objective System

Installation

Complete

8,450

Design Status

06/2006


01/2008


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 194,956

2,260

0

0

8,450

46,170


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL




8,450



0





Commanding Officer, NAVSUPPACT, Norfolk serves as the Installation

Commander for what was once known as the Atlantic Fleet Compound. This

installation is home to Commander, United States Joint Forces Command,

Commander in Chief, U.S. Atlantic Fleet, Headquarters, Supreme Allied

Commander Atlantic, Type Commanders for Atlantic Fleet surface ships and

submarines, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic and for the Lafayette River

Compound, home to Commander, Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic. The installation

is also host to over 35 Admirals and Generals and their respective

headquarter¿s staffs. Program Manager, Regional Support Services, serves

as Program Manager for all quality of life programs onboard seven different

installations in the Mid-Atlantic region. These regional programs include,

Morale, Welfare and Recreation (over 350 programs); Food Services (seven

Navy Galleys); Family Housing (over 4,000 houses); Bachelor Housing (over

15,000 rooms); Navy Family Service Center; and the Family Advocacy Program.

These programs support over 81,000 active duty personnel, 150,000 family

members and approximately 35,000 retirees within the Mid-Atlantic region.

251,836

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.94

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

4317

4051

1144

1158B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 2007

1727

1166

1166

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2541390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.94

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2551391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM

INSTALLATION

UHF/VHF COMMUNICATION FACILITY






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

()

7,350

(180)

(4,150)

(520)

(2,200)

(210)

(50)

(40)

7,350

370

7,720

440

8,160

290

8,450

8,450

(60,000)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,4500301376N 13122


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P131



3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: N57095(NW)

(NORTHWEST CHESAPKE VA)

This project will provide the initial site preparation, utility work, and

supporting facilities for the Mobile User Objective System (MOUS) to be

located at Satellite Communications Detachment (SATCOMFAC) Northwest,

Chesapeake, Virginia.

Site improvements will include reinforced concrete foundations and support

structures on which the new antennas and support equipment will be mounted,

paved walkways between the new antennas and equipment shelter space,

roadways to each antenna, parking, fencing, and security lighting for the

entire compound with motor operated gate and push button control.

Utilities will include sewer, water, power and telecommunications. Provide

trenching, concrete duct banks, and conduit for communication fiber. A

recertification of the facility is required after new HEMP penetration has

been provided. Provide transformers, one voltage regulator, and a enclosed


February 2007

DD Form


The SATCOM facility located at Building #352 at Satellite Communication

Detachment Northwest does not have adequate space to accomodate the new

operation and equipment. Adequate open land north of Building #352 is

available to accommodate the proposed MOUS operations to include three

Earth Terminals, two Radio Access Facilities, a Switching Facility/Network

Management Facility, and an Operations Facility. Existing utilities and

infrastructure will require increased capacity to support these operations.

The existing Narrow band SATCOM system is nearing the end of its useful

life. The planned replacement Narrow band SATCOM constellation will be the

Mobile User Objective System. The Navy's Communications Satellite

Acquisition Program office, at the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command

Adequate and efficiently configured facilities are required to provide

ground facilities support and operational space for the MUOS. MUOS will

provided real time narrow band satelite communications for military

operations to all branches of the armed services world wide. The MUOS

system will enable warfighters to communicate with command and control

element real time anywhere in the world. Ground facilities are

strategically located across the globe to provide continuous cover for

communications uplink, down-link, satellite control, and connections to

Teleport and terrestial communication networks.

The existing Narrow band SATCOM constellation is UHF Follow-On (UFO). The

planned replacement Narrow band SATCOM constellation will be the Mobile

User Objective System. The first satellite is scheduled for launch in

September 2009.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

The project will install a Mobile Users Objective System (MUOS) ground site

and supporting facilities at Satellite Communications Detachment Northwest,

Chesapeake, Virginia. The ground site consists of a two Radio Access

Facilities (RAFs), three 60-foot (18.4 M) diameter Earth Terminals, a

Switching Facility/Network Management, and an Operations Facility.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,4500301376N 13122


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P131




11. Requirement:


N57095(NW)


diesel generator with a fuel tank capable of supporting a single generator

for 14 days of operation. Provide automatic transfer switching between two

utility sources/emergency source of power, and ET automatic fire

suppression systems.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


(SPAWAR) has conducted a global study to determine the the most suitable

locations for the MUOS receiver stations. These locations are

strategically located around the globe to provide optimum coverage of

passing satellites and efficient/effective use of exiting communications

infrastructure and terrestrial communications network connections.

If this project is not provided in FY 08, significant delays to full

capability to the satellite system will result.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,4500301376N 13122


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P131




Earth Trminals/ Support Equipment

Network Routing/Management Equip

Transmitter/Receiver

UPS & Support Equipment

RDT&E

RDT&E

RDT&E

RDT&E

2007

2007

2007

2007

30,000

10,000

15,000

5,000



Equipment

Nomenclature


The Installation Management Claimant certifies that this project has been




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$400

$240

$160

02/2008

01/2008

09/2009

06/2006

12/2006

02/2008

5%

15%

$160

$240


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp


N57095(NW)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,4500301376N 13122


Installation

NAVY 2008FY

P131




considered for joint use potential. Joint Use is recommended.

Forrest Garland 757-836-1995Activity POC: Phone No:

N57095(NW)



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2591390

Scope

17135

21105

Cost

($000)Start

E2/C2 Aircrew Training

Facility

MH-60S Hangar & Airfield

Improvements

Complete

2804 m2

10563 m2

11,510

53,850

Design Status

10/2006

10/2006


03/2008

06/2008


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 4,190,659

293,650

45,550

211,521

65,360

730,528


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:16510 Norfolk Harbor Channel Dredging 4146946 m3 45,550

TOTAL

TOTAL

NAVSTA NORFOLK VA

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA


65,360


TOTAL

45,550

211,521



Naval Station, Norfolk functions as the primary operating base of the

Atlantic Fleet. It provides port and airfield services, extensive

facilities to support the many functions performed on the base, and the

full range of services needed to enhance the quality of service and quality

of life of military personnel and their families. Naval Station, Norfolk

is homeport to over 63 ships, including five aircraft carriers, surface

escorts and other combatants, logistics support ships, and attack

submarines. It also maintains 15 fixed-wing and helicopter squadrons, a

contract Fleet Readiness Squadron (FRS) for C-12, and air cargo and air

passenger terminals. In addition, the airfield hosts transport aircraft

5,537,268

21105

15120

12430

61010

39364 SF

LS

LS

53809 SF

22,533

171,743

3,509

13,736

MH-60S Aircraft Maintenance Hangar

Pier 15

Piped Refueling Facility And Birdbath

Consolidated NCIS Regional Field Office

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.93

5. Area Const

Cost Index


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

63378

56570

4691

4389B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 48602

42254

9073

8915

0

0

1

1

0

0

320

320

691

691

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2601390

4. Command

NAVSTA NORFOLK VA

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA



0




(C-9, C-5, C-130, B-757, DC-8, DC-5, L1011).

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

.93

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2611391


9. COST ESTIMATES


E2/C2 AIRCREW TRAINING FACILITY

(30,182 SF)

OPERATIONAL TRAINER FACILITY

(29,881 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

2,804

2,776

28

1,910.22

3,500.57

6,680

(5,300)

(100)

(840)

(230)

(90)

(120)

3,330

(430)

(930)

(640)

(1,070)

(70)

(190)

10,010

500

10,510

600

11,110

400

11,510

11,510

(116,165)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

11,5100805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P014

NAVSTA NORFOLK VANORFOLK, VIRGINIA


This project will construct a multi-story operational training facility.

The building will include one high bay trainer, two weapons system

trainers, sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), debrief

spaces, classrooms, auditorium, administrative spaces and required support

spaces. This project will include a pile foundation, hydraulic pump room,

fire pump room, fire protection system, raised flooring system, exterior


February 2007

DD Form


A new version of the E-2 (E-2D or Advanced Hawkeye) is being introduced.

The requirement for this project is to provide adequate facilities to

support training of pilots and aircrew assigned to the E-2D aircraft.

VAW-120 is responsible for training the pilots and aircrew for the carrier

airborne early warning squadrons and the Fleet logistics support squadrons.

In 1994, NS Norfolk became the sole training site for all E-2C and C-2A

aircrew. The E-2D has now been added to VAW-120's training requirment.

The nature of this mission requires them to be collocated with E-2 trainers

and classrooms, and have access to secure storage.

CNO guidance for 2004 directed the development of "A Fleet Aviation

Simulator Training (FAST) Plan that maximizes the utility of simulator

effectiveness." This plan increases use of simulators rather than aircraft

flight hours. Funding for flight hours has been reduced as a part of this

plan.

REQUIREMENT:

This project will construct a new facility for two Weapons Systems Trainers

(WST), a full motion operational flight trainer (OFT), and all of the

support, training, instruction and administrative facilities required by

the training mission.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

11,5100805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P014



11. Requirement:


doors adequate to allow installation and maintenance of high bay trainer,

windows that meet anti terrorism/force protection (AT/FP) requirements,

electrical distribution, mechanical system, heating, ventilation and air

conditioning (HVAC) systems. Building to include secret Internet protocol

routing network (SIPRNET), non-secure Internet routing network (NIPRNET),

uninterrupted power supply, electronic security system (ESS), Air Combat

Online (ACOL), and card reader/controlled access system. Project site

requirements to include demolition of trees, water main, storm drain, and

installation of new water main, hydrants, storm drains, additional vehicle

parking with lighting and various pavement and road repairs.





February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


There are currently three pilot trainers and two Naval Flight Officer (NFO)

simulators at NS Norfolk. The Fleet Replacement Squadron (VAW-120) has two

classified Tactics Trainers (TT). However, all of these trainers meet the

requirements of existing E-2C aircraft only - not the E-2D. Training is

still required for E-2C (Group 0), E-2C (Group II) and E-2C (Hawkeye 2000).

The Group II aircraft is being phased out, but will be in service through

2017. There are no plans to phase out the Hawkeye 2000 aircraft. All of

the training facilities for these aircraft must remain in place.

The E-2D training mission is a new requirement, and no facilities are

available to accommodate it.

Training cannot be completed in the aircraft instead of simulators. Cost

and risk would be increased to the point where aircrew training

requirements for E-2D aircraft cannot be met, reducing aircraft available

to the Fleet.

Trainers worth $115 million will arrive in FY10 with nowhere to house them.

If this project is not completed, trainer delivery must be delayed, or

trainers must be stored until facility is complete.

One Operational Flight Trainer (OFT) and one Weapons Systems Trainer (WST)

are scheduled for delivery in FY10. Building setup/prep time (projected at

six months by activity) is required prior to installation of the equipment,

so construction must start NLT March 2008 to allow for an 18-month

construction period followed by the six-month setup period and three-month

shakedown.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

11,5100805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P014






2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

10/2006

02/2007

09/2007

5%



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

11,5100805976N 17135


NAVY 2008FY

P014



Computer/office Equipment

Operational Flight Trainer #1

Weapons System Trainer #3

Weapons System Trainer #4

OPN

APN

APN

APN

2010

2007

2007

2012

965

27,200

46,700

41,300



Equipment

Nomenclature






Jack Cox, P.E (757) 444-4155 ext. 3013Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$350

$225

$125

03/2008

12/2007

09/2009

$250

$100

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2651391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MH-60S HANGAR & AIRFIELD

IMPROVEMENTS (113,699 SF)

HANGAR (78,340 SF)

TELECOMM ROOM (377 SF)

CONTROL TOWER (4,984 SF)

STORAGE BUILDING (29,999 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

10,563

7,278

35

463

2,787

2,213.06

3,500

9,047.87

934.33

26,000

(16,110)

(120)

(4,190)

(2,600)

(2,590)

(50)

(230)

(110)

20,840

(1,340)

(1,710)

(2,190)

(10,370)

(70)

(5,060)

(100)

46,840

2,340

49,180

2,800

51,980

1,870

53,850

53,850

(1,450)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

53,8500703676N 21105


Improvements

NAVY 2008FY

P767



This project constructs one two-module, Type I hangar on reinforced

concrete pile foundation. Construction features will include reinforced

concrete floors, steel frame, and insulated metal panel walls, header-truss

steel roof framing, built-up roofing, wet-pipe fire sprinkler system in


February 2007

DD Form


The Fleet is undergoing a transition which will replaces two of the four

predominant Navy helicopter airframes with the MH-60S Knighthawk. The MH-

60S requirement includes one Fleet replacement squadron (FRS), three

expeditionary squadrons (EXP) and five carrier based (CV) squadrons. Naval

Station will then have 136 helicopters and 3,650 personnel associated with

REQUIREMENT:

This project will construct one hangar with two Type I modules in the LF

area of Chambers Field for the third and fourth squadrons of carrier-based

(CV) MH-60S helicopters.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

53,8500703676N 21105


Improvements

NAVY 2008FY

P767



11. Requirement:


administrative areas and hangar overhead supplemented by floor mounted

aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) sprinklers nozzles in the hangar bay, a

200,000 liter underground storage tank for AFFF discharge containment,

oil/water separator, and built-in equipment/rails for two 4.5 metric ton

bridge cranes.

Work necessary to make the hangar complete and usable includes construction

of a seven-story, 463 m2, four-position air traffic control tower with

elevator.

Demolition and relocation work includes the demolition of Buildings #LF34

(33,558 SF) and #LAG110 (obsolete tower 2,011 SF,)relocation of the Public

Works equipment yard to the SP area and a new storage building east of

Building #LF53 to accommodate the requirement in Building #LF34.

Horizontal work necessary to make the hangar complete and usable includes

demolition of old apron, construction of new parking apron and striping,

two helicopter maintenance pads, new access taxiway to helicopter landing

pads with lighting, taxiway guidance signs, one wash rack adjacent to

hangar with associated detergent mixing, metering and storage, aircraft

taxi-through, deluge rinse facility and apron restoration for 35 parked

aircraft with airfield pavement striping, tie-down pad eyes, grounding

points; access apron in front of hangar and parking for 210 vehicles plus

210 vehicles displaced by hangar.


construction of the project.


February 2007

DD Form


Chambers Field has three airfields: the LF, SP and LP areas. Currently,

the Navy operates four types/models of helicopter at Chambers Field. The

Helicopter Concept of Operations Plan derived from the Navy's Master

Helicopter Plan, (CONOPS) calls for the replacement of two older models

with the new, multi-purpose MH-60S Knighthawk. NAVSTA Norfolk was chosen

to be the home base for all MH-60S helicopters on the East Coast. The

transition to this new airframe has already commenced, and the number of

helicopters and squadrons at Chambers Field is expected to nearly double in

the next decade. The new helicopters bring new missions, equipment and

training requirements.

The CONOPS will bring six additional squadrons to Chambers Field. P767 is

the second of three hangar projects required to meet this requirement.

Implementation of the CONOPS also requires a two-module hangar for the

first two CV squadrons (P699 - FY06), and a single module hangar for the

fifth squadron (P747 - FY10.)

Naval Station Norfolk recently finished a major hangar recapitalization

plan, and all five hangars prescribed in the plan are complete. However,

these hangars are required for existing squadrons, and none are available

for MH-60 Helicopters. The FRS and two expeditionary squadrons are not new

squadrons. They had existing aircraft replaced with MH-60S helos and

remain in their current hangars. The third expeditionary squadron is a new

this program. The FRS and two expeditionary squadrons will replace

existing squadrons at Chambers Field, while one expeditionary squadron and

five CV squadrons will be new stand-up units at Chambers Field. The new CV

squadrons will have eight aircraft assigned, requiring a Type I hangar

module for each. The new expeditionary squadrons will have 10 aircraft but

will use existing hangars.

The current control tower, LAG 110, does not have line of sight to both

airfields. This is a major safety concern with the increased operations.

It is projected that rotary-wing components will add 29,568 operations

annually by 2015. This is a 26% increase over the 111,665 total operations

documented in 2000.

Aircraft for Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron Seven (HSC-7) are scheduled to

arrive in the first quarter of FY11, followed by HSC-11 in the third

quarter of the same year. HSC-7 will require set-up time in the hangar

prior to arrival of the aircraft. With an anticipated project contract

schedule of at least 24 months, this project is a must-fund in FY08.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

53,8500703676N 21105


Improvements

NAVY 2008FY

P767




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


stand-up will be assigned to a hangar in the LP area upon the departure of

Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 56 (VR-56). The five new CV Squadrons

will require one new hangar module each, for a total of five.

If this hangar is not constructed, Chambers Field will experience the

following serious impacts:

- No facilities will be available for new aircraft with a total value of

approximately $288 million.

- Introduction of new, required capabilities to the Fleet will be delayed.

- New squadrons cannot stand up without maintenance, shop and

administrative facilities.

- With increased aircraft loading, safety will be compromised due to

inadequate tower facilities.

- Flight operations will be reduced below the level required to meet

training requirements.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

53,8500703676N 21105


Improvements

NAVY 2008FY

P767







2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$1,400

$300

$1,100

06/2008

02/2008

03/2010

10/2006

01/2007

07/2007

5%

15%

$1,000

$400


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

53,8500703676N 21105


Improvements

NAVY 2008FY

P767



Furniture

Overhead Cranes (2)

Ready Service Lockers (4)

UPS & B/U Generator for Tower

Electronics

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

2010

2010

2010

2009

800

300

200

150


Equipment

Nomenclature






Jack Cox, Planner (Regional

Facilities Ops)

(757) 444-4155 Ex 3013Activity POC: Phone No:

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp

or Requested

Cost ($000)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

53,8500703676N 21105


Improvements

NAVY 2008FY

P767



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2711390

Scope

72124

72411

Cost

($000)Start

MSGBN Headquarters & BEQ Phase

1

Student Officer Quarters, TBS

Phase 2

Complete

6004 m2

8661 m2

18,839

26,680

Design Status

05/2006

09/2005


03/2008

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 2,038,041

116,332

76,070

0

45,519

198,938


9. Future Projects:


72411

17120

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Type II

Student Barracks, The Basic School Phase 3

Instruction Facility, The Basic School, PH 1

60558 SF

95433 SF

61882 SF

25,460

25,410

25,200

TOTAL

TOTAL


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA


45,519


76,070





The installation mission is to maintain and operate facilities and provide

services and material to support the Marine Corps Combat Development

Command, the Marine Corps Air Facility Quantico, and other activities and

units designated by the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

The mission of the Marine Corps Combat Development Command is to develop

Marine Corps warfighting concepts and to determine associated required

capabilities in the areas of doctrine, organization, training and

education, equipment, and support facilities to enable the Marine Corps to

field combat-ready forces; and to participate in and support other major

processes of the Combat Development System.

2,474,900

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.02

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

13862

19072

147

104B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 1187

638

906

813

1033

718

350

1402

1508

1876

1283

2652

2781

2402

4667

8467

Commandant of the

Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2721390

4. Command


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA



0 B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.02

5. Area Const


Marine Corps


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2731391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MSGBN HQ & BEQ, PHASE 1 (64,627

SF)

BACH ENLS QTRS-MARINES CLASS A

STUDENTS (64,045 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS






SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

6,004

5,950

54

1,978.36

3,722.68

12,990

(11,770)

(200)

(110)

(110)

(270)

(260)

(270)

3,390

(130)

(690)

(780)

(1,310)

(440)

(40)

16,380

820

17,200

980

18,180

660

18,840

18,839

(2,055)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,8390815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P545

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICOQUANTICO, VIRGINIA



QUANTICO.

This Project is Phase 1 of 3. Project constructs a secure multi-story

brick-faced, cast stone detailed Georgian-style BEQ providing 140 rooms or


February 2007

DD Form


REQUIREMENT:

Provides 280 living spaces for bachelor enlisted personnel (140, 2 person

rooms) using the 2+0 Quality of Life (QOL) standard room design for student

enlisted personnel attached to Marine Security Guard Battalion (MSG Bn).

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,8390815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P545



11. Requirement:


280 manspaces (MS) in the standard 2+0 room configuration (70 modules) with

semi-private bathrooms and walk-in closets. Built-in equipment includes

freight elevator. Community and service core areas consist of laundry

facilities, lounges, administrative offices, housekeeping areas and public

restrooms. Electrical systems include fire alarms, energy saving


Mechanical systems include plumbing, fire protection systems, heating

ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), and interior as well as exterior

lighting systems. Supporting facilities work includes site and building

utility connections (water, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical,

telephone, local area network (LAN), and cable television (CATV). Paving

and site improvements include paved parking for 250 cars, sidewalks,

roadway access and landscaping. Also includes OMSI manuals, fencing,

telephone, water, sewer, electrical utilities, and storm water management.

Project will match the Base Exterior Architecture Plan (BEAP).

Antiterrorism/Force Protection classifies this facility as a "Primary

Gathering Building-Billeting" in context to a controlled perimeter. AT/FP

measures will include blast resistant glazing, public announcement system,

HVAC intakes located at least 1 m above finished grade, surveillance CATV

monitoring, fenced site perimeter, and controlled site access. Sustainable

principles will be included into the design, development, and construction

of the project and will include low water usage landscaping, storm water

management, room occupancy sensors, electrical monitoring with Direct

Digital Controls, task lighting, LED exit signs, light switching to

segregate banks of lights, day lighting where possible, and use of

recyclable regional and non-toxic construction materials.

Rooms: 140 two person rooms.


Intended Grade mix: 164 E1-E4, 18 E5, 20 E6/E9.

Total 202 persons.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Enlisted Marines attending training at MSGBN are currently billeted and

trained in Building 2007 circa 1931. The current BEQ violates AICUZ by

being in the flight path of MCAF. The facility HVAC system utilizes a

temporary chiller every summer to pickup the load from the existing

inadequate outdated chillers. Additionally, the facility is inadequate due

to the physical condition of the Roof and mechanical systems.

Deferral of this project will result in the continued use of an inadequate

and dangerous facility to house and train enlisted Marines. Lack of proper

facilities will negatively affect training. Proper training is crucial in

the wake of increased threats of terrorism. This will seriously affect the

morale of the enlisted Marines and make it more difficult for the Marine

Corps to motivate and retain these specially selected, highly skilled, and

experienced leaders. It will also impact their ability to complete their

mission of guarding United States Embassies throughout the world.


by 2012. Adequate billeting that meets Quality of Life standards for

enlisted personnel attached to MSGBn at MCB Quantico, VA. This project

also provides state of the art facilities that replicate existing equipment

and facilities to allow for realistic training.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,8390815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P545






2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

4. Contract award:


1. Status:


Yes

MCB Quantico

$0

$0

$0

01/2008

05/2006

12/2007

03/2008

5%

15%

$

$


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

18,8390815796M 72124


NAVY 2008FY

P545



BEQ Collateral Equipment

NMCI Connections

PMC

PMC

2008

2008

2,000

55



Equipment

Nomenclature








Richard A Reisch (703) 784-5490Activity POC: Phone No:



04/2008

05/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



55,990



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2771391


9. COST ESTIMATES


STUDENT OFFICER QUARTERS,TBS,

PHASE 2 (93,226 SF)

PRIMARY FACILITY (88,802 SF)

COMPANY ADMIN (3,466 SF)


SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION





DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

8,661

8,250

322

89

1,896.86

2,878.46

3,748.66

21,130

(15,650)

(930)

(330)

(2,640)

(400)

(430)

(750)

2,070

(150)

(60)

(660)

(1,100)

(100)

23,200

1,160

24,360

1,390

25,750

930

26,680

26,680

(8,055)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,6800815796M 72411

Student Officer Quarters,TBS,

Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P546


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA



QUANTICO.

M00264(AB)

(CAMP BARRETT)

Phase 2 of a 8-Phase building replacement plan that will construct a

multistory reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) building with concrete

pile foundation and floors, Georgian style cast stone and brick veneer, and

standing seam metal roof over structural steel framing. Building provides


February 2007

DD Form


All Marine officers, regardless of accession source, are trained at The

Basic School. Each year, TBS conducts six (6) Basic Officer Courses (BOC)

consisting of 250 lieutenants each, and one (1) Warrant Officer (WO)

Company of 250 officers. In addition to the six BOC's and one WO course,

TBS billets and trains Naval Academy Midshipmen, Infantry Officer students,

and Reserve Officers each year. Average on Board (AOB) student loading is

1,415 with max loading by schedule method of 1,650 students.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Provide adequate housing for 250 officers undergoing initial training at

The Basic School (TBS), Quantico, Virginia.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,6800815796M 72411


Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P546


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA


11. Requirement:


M00264(AB)

(CAMP BARRETT)

250 rooms in the 1+1 E room configuration (125 modules) with semi-private

bathrooms and walk-in closets. Community and service core areas consist of

laundry facilities, lounges, Company Administrative offices, housekeeping

areas and public restrooms. Built in equipment includes a service elevator

and closet organization system. Information Systems include wiring for

local area network (LAN), cable and television (CATV), and telephone.

Electrical systems include fire alarms and energy saving electronic

monitoring and control system (EMCS). Mechanical systems include plumbing,

fire protection systems, and heating ventilation and air conditioning

(HVAC). Supporting facilities work includes site and building utility

connections (water, sanitary and storm sewers, electrical, telephone, LAN,

CATV). Paving and site improvements include paved parking, sidewalks,

roadway access and landscaping. Sustainable design will be integrated into

the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with

Executive Order 13123 and other directives. Also includes Technical

Operating Manuals and Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features consisting

of 8-inch R-CMU exterior walls, 25psi exterior doors, 1-inch blast

resistant polycarbonate windows, and 6-inch RC floors, ceilings, and roof.

Demolition of existing barracks wing, F-wing of B-24165 (3,840 m2), as well

as lead paint and asbestos abatement is included. Project will match

existing 2000 series barracks on base per the Base Exterior Architecture

Plan (BEAP). Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,


Order 13123 and other laws and Executive Orders.


February 2007

DD Form


P546, Phase II of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125

Modules) in the 1x1 Marine Officer configuration to replace current

billeting in O'Bannon Hall and demolishes F-Wing of O'Bannon Hall.

P547, Phase III of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125


billeting in O'Bannon Hall and demolishes A-Wing of O'Bannon Hall.

P565, Phase IV of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125


billeting in O'Bannon Hall and demolishes B-Wing of O'Bannon Hall.

P566, Phase V of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125


billeting in O'Bannon hall.

P567, Phase VI of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 250 rooms (125


billeting in O'Bannon Hall.

P562, Phase VII of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 150 rooms (75


billeting in O'Bannon Hall.

P563, Phase VIII of VIII, constructs a multistory BEQ with 150 rooms (75


billeting to O'Bannon Hall.

O'Bannon Hall has major problems with plumbing, electrical, HAVC, and

structural problems due to settling of the building.

Currently, there is not enough living space for all of the students

enrolled in The Basic School. On average, TBS billets approximately 1,200

students per day resulting in an overcrowded situation. Normally three (3)

officers are billeted in a space (O'Bannon Hall) designed for two; and two

(2) officers in a space (Graves Hall) designed for one. During surge

periods, three months out of the year, an additional officer is billeted in

each room. Which does not meet the Minimum Standards of Adequacy set forth

in Marine Corps Order P11000.22. Sleeping/Living Area per module is 46

square meters (SM) or 23SM per person. Existing module in O'Bannon Hall is

42SM, which is below current standard for two persons. With three persons

assigned this provides 13SM per person vice the required 23SM.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,6800815796M 72411


Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P546


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: M00264(AB)

(CAMP BARRETT)


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


Deferral of this project will cause overcrowding to continue, adversely

impacting on morale and the Marine Corps' ability to attract and retain

highly qualified officers. The Minimum Standards of Adequacy (MCO

P11000.22) will never be achieved without the construction of this

facility.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,6800815796M 72411


Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P546


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA


Colateral Equipment

NMCI Connection

O&MMC

PMC

2008

2008

8,000

55



Equipment

Nomenclature








2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$450

$350

$100

02/2008

11/2007

02/2010

09/2005

02/2006

09/2007

10%

15%

$250

$200


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



55,990


M00264(AB)

(CAMP BARRETT)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,6800815796M 72411


Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P546


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA





Richard A. Reisch 703-784-5490Activity POC: Phone No:

M00264(AB)

(CAMP BARRETT)


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

26,6800815796M 72411


Phase 2

NAVY 2008FY

P546


QUANTICO, VIRGINIA


Blank Page

M00264(AB)

(CAMP BARRETT)


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2831390

Scope

72111

15250

21650

21250

Cost

($000)Start


CVN Maintenance Pier

Replacement

Limited Area Production/Strg

Cmplx Inc 4 of 5


Complete

63162 m2

15352 m2

16000 m2

3243 m2

47,240

91,070

39,750

28,690

Design Status

08/2002

06/2006

08/2002

06/2006


01/2007

09/2007

06/2006

08/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 5,786,927

6,814,920

50,700

315,701

206,750

1,568,480


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:21650 Limited Area Production/Strg Cmplx Inc 5 of 5 16000 m2 50,700

TOTAL

TOTAL




206,750


TOTAL

50,700

315,701



The Mission of Naval Base Kitsap is to serve as the host command for the

14,743,478

81159

14347

21410

16910

14347

87210

15210

15120

21365

21220

85230

LS

9500 SF

8170 SF

2 EA

4600 SF

10499 LF

40746 SY

5241 SY

17911 SF

6964 SF

3000 SY

12,282

6,237

4,879

7,383

4,688

8,309

211,243

35,152

7,169

3,319

15,040

Waterfront Restricted Area Emergency Power

EHW Security Force Facility

Armored Vehicle Support Facility

WRA Land/Water Interface

Reaction Force Facility Addition

Waterfront Security Barriers

Explosives Handling Wharf #2

Escort Support Facilities (OSVs)

NRMD Blast Hardening And Facility Modern

Equipment Maintenance Building Addition

Upgrade EHW Trestles For KDT Upgrade

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.18

5. Area Const

Cost Index


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

17516

17088

462

422B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 4450

4062

10217

10217

0

0

0

0

0

0

375

375

2012

2012

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2841390

4. Command





0




Navy's fleet throughout West Puget Sound and to provide base operating

services, including support for both surface ships and submarines

homeported at Bremerton and Bangor. NB Kitsap also provides world-class

service, programs, and facilities that meet the needs of their hosted

warfighting commands, tenant activities, crew, and employees. NB Kitsap is

the largest naval organization in Navy Region Northwest and is composed of

installations in Bremerton, Bangor and Keyport.

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.18

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2851391


9. COST ESTIMATES


BEQ HOMEPORT ASHORE INC 2 OF 2

(679,870 SF)

PARKING GARAGE (530,682 SF)

BEQ (149,188 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


LESS INCREMENT I FUNDING FY 2005


TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

63,162

49,302

13,860

388.23

1,985.34

56,720

(19,140)

(27,520)

(1,720)

(520)

(460)

(2,460)

(4,900)

14,040

(5,400)

(2,390)

(1,420)

(1,560)

(50)

(3,220)

70,760

3,540

74,300

4,240

78,540

2,830

-34,125

47,245

47,240

(5,082)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 47,240


0203276N 72111


NAVY 2008FY

P305A

NAVAL BASE KITSAP BREMERTON WABREMERTON, WASHINGTON


Project constructs 198 "1+1 Enhanced" modules with two private

sleeping/living room areas, a shared bathroom and kitchenette, with a

stacked washer/dryer in the common area. Market style housing units are an


February 2007

DD Form


PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 47,240


0203276N 72111


NAVY 2008FY

P305A



11. Requirement:


alternative strategy to the "1+1 Enhanced" modules.

Intended Utilization: E1-E3 - 396 pn

Maximum Utilization: E1-E3 - 396 pn

The construction will include a multi-story reinforced concrete structure

with concrete masonry unit (CMU) centerline walls; metal stud partition

walls with brick veneer exterior; concrete foundations and floors; standing

seam metal roof; and double glazed, insulated, aluminum framed windows.

The building will contain a lobby, communal areas, and vending area.

Provide elevators, utilities, and fire protection system. A heating,

ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system will be installed to include

air conditioning, continuous exhaust, and conditioned make up air. Finally

the building will contain cable TV, computer modem and telephone hook ups.

Technical operating manuals will be provided.

Anti-terrorism/Force Protection standards will be integrated into the


current standards.



other directives.

Special costs include energy adjustment, brick exterior walls, a sloping

metal roof, and a pedestrian bridge. Built-in equipment includes room and

parking access control systems and elevators. Information systems include

local area network (LAN), telephone and fiber optic wiring. Special

constuction features include contractor coordination, seismic construction,

traffic mitigation, and the use of tower cranes during construction.

This project will also construct an additional 1,494 automobile parking

spaces onto an existing multi-level parking garage, that was designed and

started by the first BEQ project. This is the second Bachelor Enlisted

Quarters (BEQ) of a planned complex of multiple BEQs and a shared parking

garage.


February 2007

DD Form



(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost Yes

September 2006

January 2007


The Bremerton Naval Complex currently has a housing deficit for 945

enlisted Sailors. To ease the shortage, the Bremerton Naval Complex has

leased rooms at various hotels and motels within a 50-mile radius of the

Bremerton Naval Complex. In addition, transportation must be provided from

these extended sites located in the Cities of Tacoma and Fife. A

comprehensive Bachelor Housing Plan was prepared for the Bremerton Naval

Complex.

The Bremerton Naval Complex's homeports one Attack Carrier Nuclear (CVN)

and four Fast Combat Support Ships (AOEs). The Chief of Naval Operations

(CNO) initiative to house single Sailors on shore vice onboard ship further

exacerbates an already critical shortfall in available berthing spaces and

cannot be met with the resources currently available.

The Bremerton Naval Complex will continue to have a shortage of BEQ space

available for the permanent party E1-E3 currently stationed onboard

homeported ships at Bremerton. The lack of facilities providing the

required living conditions essential to morale, quality of life, and

retention of trained personnel will be inadequate to meet the present and

future needs of Fleet personnel. With the current resources available the

Bremerton Naval Complex will be unable to comply with the CNO initiative to

house single Sailors on shore vice onboard ship.

Sufficient adequate and efficiently configured housing is required for

enlisted personnel attached to ships homeported at Naval Station Bremerton.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project provides Bachelor Enlisted Quarters for 396 E1-E3 and

associated parking structure.

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 47,240


0203276N 72111


NAVY 2008FY

P305A







1. Status:


09/2004

08/2007

3%



February 2007

DD Form


(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed Yes


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 47,240


0203276N 72111


NAVY 2008FY

P305A




NMCI Seats


O&MNR

APN

OPN

2008

2008

2008

3,130

22

1,930



Equipment

Nomenclature






Joseph Tomko (360) 396-5059Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

N/A

$200

$100

$100

01/2008

09/2007

07/2009

$100

$100

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



1,322



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2891391


9. COST ESTIMATES


CVN MAINTENANCE PIER REPLACEMENT

(165,248 SF)

NEW SHIP REPAIR WHARF (165,248

SF)


INFORMATION SYSTEMS



SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

UPLAND CRANE RAILS

PORTAL CRANE RAILS

REPLACE QUAY WALL

STRENGTHEN SHEET PILE WALL

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

15,352

15,352 3,214.29

49,720

(49,350)

(90)

(280)

29,480

(1,340)

(990)

(3,320)

(740)

(2,950)

(5,260)

(11,190)

(3,690)

79,200

3,960

83,160

4,740

87,900

3,170

91,070

91,070

(250)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

91,0700203176N 15250


Replacement

NAVY 2008FY

P356



The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: PSNS & IMF BREMERTON

WA.

Construct a one-level concrete deck ship repair wharf (38 m x 404 m)

supported by concrete piles and concrete pile caps; precast concrete fender

piles with ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene wear strips;

bollards, cleats, and cathodic protection. Wharf design shall meet cold-

iron utilities for ship service, industrial support, and support craft per

Navy criteria.


February 2007

DD Form


REQUIREMENT:

This project demolishes the existing Pier B and constructs a new ship

repair wharf, providing additional service and laydown area, contiguous

with Dry Dock 6, by decking over the space between Pier B and the west mole

of Dry Dock 6, supporting two Nimitz class carriers (4160 Volts), one at

Dry Dock 6 and one at Pier B, with full cold-iron upkeep and maintenance

requirements per applicable ship maintenance criteria.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

91,0700203176N 15250


Replacement

NAVY 2008FY

P356



11. Requirement:


Project also provides high pressure (5,000 psig) and low pressure (125

psig) compressed air, oily waste collection system, minimum 50 gallons per

minute de-ionized pure water, and approximately 1,750 lineal feet of portal

crane rail, track switch, and supporting structures including approximately

2,650 lineal feet of crane beam, pony bents, and additional piles at bents.

Project also provides replacement of approximately 300 lineal feet of quay

wall (Structure 729) and strengthening the sheet pile wall west of the Dry

Dock 6 mole.

Project also includes fire alarm, industrial and physical security

lighting, storm water collection and transfer with oil water separation,

voice and data communications, CCTV and alarms, utility risers, new upland

primary electrical distribution and other upland utility distribution

capacity for services such as steam/condensate return, compressed air, and

sanitary sewer services. Special Construction features include electrical

upgrades and other utility reconfigurations to support two Nimitz class

carriers (4160 Volts), one at Dry Dock 6 and one at Pier B; recessed

utility trenches with removeable covers within the wharf deck to improve

traffic flow, safety and support for temporary structures; Realigns the

Controlled Industrial Area (CIA) fence and Wyckoff Avenue gate to

incorporate new Pier B within the CIA.

Digital technical operating manuals and record drawings are to be

delivered.

Demolishes 378 meters of inadequate berth, existing Pier B (Facility 722),

and Substation #78 concrete pad (Facility 749).


February 2007

DD Form


Adequate and efficiently configured facilities for upkeep, maintenance and

repair for CVN Class vessels associated with Docking Planned Incremental

Availabilities (DPIAs), which are vital to the CNO-directed Regional

Maintenance Center (RMC) ship repair mission at the Puget Sound Naval

Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF). PSNS & IMF is

the primary West Coast maintenance and ship repair site for nuclear

aircraft carriers, having the only Dry Dock in the Pacific area of

responsibility capable of docking a NIMITZ Class (CVN 68) aircraft carrier.

This project modernizes ship maintenance capability for NIMITZ-Class

nuclear aircraft carriers providing in-water maintenance capability

contiguous with Dry Dock 6, prior to or following drydocking. The pier-

side/in-water maintenance phase typically begins one week to two months

prior to docking, depending on the ship's planned work package to

accomplish Early Start work. Early Start work normally consists of systems

layup, establishment of temporary services, internal access cuts, reactor

and propulsion plant preparations, and reactor plant cooldown, to be ready

for docking and work start on the first day of the dry docking.

Following a typical ten and one half (10 1/2) month drydocking (DPIA), for

approximately three months, the ship will complete its maintenance period

pier-side and perform propulsion plant and reactor plant criticality

testing, which must be done waterborne to allow normal intake and discharge

of seawater heat exchange cooling. A typical non-docking PIA requires

approximately six months pierside.

PSNS & IMF is responsible to the Commander, Fleet Forces Command, and to

Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command (COMNAVSEASYSCOM), Mission/Enterprise

Claimant, for providing logistic support for assigned CVN (NIMITZ Class)

ships and for performing authorized work in connection with ship

conversion, overhaul, repair, alteration, dry docking, and outfitting of

ships and craft, and for providing services and material support to other

Naval vessels. PSNS & IMF is home to approximately 9,518 permanent

employees and 912 military personnel.

This project creates the Pacific Fleet's first integrated NIMITZ Class (CVN

68) consolidated nuclear aircraft carrier maintenance complex capable of

both pier-side/in-water maintenance Planned Incremental Availabilities

(PIAs), and Dry Dock maintenance (Docking Planned Incremental Availability

(DPIA)) necessary for more complex maintenance involving hull penetration,

including propulsion maintenance, hull painting, rudder and propeller


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

91,0700203176N 15250


Replacement

NAVY 2008FY

P356




February 2007

DD Form


Pier B was constructed in 1946 as a berthing pier for inactive USS ESSEX

Class, conventionally-powered aircraft carriers (40,600 tons full load) and

subsequently used for homeported ships. It is inadequate for the current

use as a repair pier. Pier B is currently designated as a ship repair pier

for USS NIMITZ Class nuclear aircraft carriers (98,500 tons full load).

Dry Dock 6, adjacent to Pier B, is the Navy's largest Dry Dock in the

Pacific AOR and is the only Dry Dock on the West Coast capable of

supporting CVN DPIAs.

Following a dry docking, the aircraft carrier is moved to Pier B to

complete the DPIA. Cold iron services at this pier are limited for current

and future ship maintenance requirements, and crane service is limited to

light-capacity mobile cranes or floating cranes due to size and weight

limitations of the pier structure. These conditions severely limit the

amount of repair and maintenance work that can be performed.

Utility systems located below the pier deck are submerged during high tides

and are constantly being damaged by salt water corrosion and floating

debris. Utilities above the pier deck are exposed to both personnel and

vehicle traffic. In both cases, utility systems experience frequent

damage. The 60 foot width of Pier B, further restricted by surface-mounted

utilities to only 40 feet in width, restricts

safe movement of equipment, pedestrian traffic, and material/vehicle

movement while the ship is in pier-side overhaul/availability, upkeep or

homeport.

Pier B relies on creosote-impregnated fender piles. The State of

Washington Department of Ecology will not issue hydraulic permit

applications to replace damaged creosote fender piles due to toxicity of

creosote to marine life. PSNS & IMF currently has only one repair pier

(Pier 3) providing full cold iron utility and portal crane services, which

is one mile from Dry Dock 6.

Full service overlapping pier-side (Pier B) and drydocking (Dry Dock 6)

availabilities of two CVNs is not currently possible with the existing Pier

repairs. Creation of this consolidated CVN maintenance 'Hub' reduces

mobilization and demobilization of project management and production

resources and infrastructure currently necessary where in-water and

drydocking evolutions are necessary for an availability or maintenance

period.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

91,0700203176N 15250


Replacement

NAVY 2008FY

P356




February 2007

DD Form


B repair capabilities.

This project must be programmed for funding in FY 2008 or PSNS & IMF will

be unable to perform the drydocking (Dry Dock 6) maintenance availability

of the USS NIMITZ scheduled for 2010 and subsequent docking availability at

Pier B. Delaying this project will force deferral of planned, CNO-directed

CVN maintenance periods. Commencing in November 2010 PSNS & IMF is

scheduled to begin a Super Docking Planned Incremental Availability (Super

DPIA) for USS NIMITZ in Drydock 6 adjacent to Pier B. Construction must be

substantially complete providing shore power to Drydock 6 and minimizing

construction impact by Pier B, affecting the west side of Drydock 6.

Delaying this project to FY2009 jeopardizes the scheduled 2010 USS NIMITZ

availability and subsequent docking availabilities currently scheduled in

2012 and 2013. Drydock 6 is the only dry dock in the Pacific AOR capable of

docking a NIMITZ-Class aircraft carrier.

Inefficiencies will continue to persist due to repetitive relocation of the

CVN maintenance team, with minimal flexibility to respond to ship

maintenance surge capacity required by the CNO's Fleet Response Plan. A

logistic and pedestrian bottleneck through the narrow traffic way at the

head of Pier B will continue to create personnel safety and productivity

inefficiencies between in-water PIAs at Pier B and drydocking (DPIA)

phases.

The CVN project team, consisting of approximately 4,500 project management

and production workers, will continue to be plagued by inefficiencies due

to repetitive mobilization and demobilization, and relocation of PIA and

DPIA production sites, between Dry Dock 6, Pier B and Pier 3, costing each

availability approximately five work days and impacting approximately 4,500

Shipyard production, contractor, ship's force, and specialty service

personnel during each relocation. Dry Dock 6 and Pier 3, currently the only

full-service in-water CVN maintenance site, are separated by approximately

1 mile travel distance. A typical CVN availability typically consists of

500,000 man-days of workload and is valued at approximately $500,000,000.

The risk of losing critical ship maintenance infrastructure will increase

in the event of potential structural failure of the aging Pier B, which is

essential to continuing CVN maintenance availabilities. The limited Pier B

functionality will continue to degrade and PSNS & IMF will be unable to

support the CNO's Fleet Response Plan, which potentially requires

scheduling of overlapping CVN availabilities. Savings per availability of

8,271 man-days and CVN Maintenance Hub efficiencies (logistic and Ship's

Force Quality of Life) will not be realized.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

91,0700203176N 15250


Replacement

NAVY 2008FY

P356




February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

91,0700203176N 15250


Replacement

NAVY 2008FY

P356



Physical Security Equipment OPN 2008 250



Equipment

Nomenclature






Kevin T. Gross, PE (360) 476-7986Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$800

$700

$100

12/2008

01/2008

09/2010

06/2006

11/2006

09/2007

2%

5%

$700

$100


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2951391


9. COST ESTIMATES


LIMITED AREA PROD & STRG COMPLEX

INC 4 OF 5 (172,223 SF)

PRODUCTION/STORAGE COMPLEX

(172,223 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS






DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL

LESS FUTURE YEAR FUNDING

LESS INCREMENT I, II, III FUNDING


TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

16,000

16,000 4,265

114,000

(68,240)

(1,470)

(1,180)

(1,770)

(340)

(41,000)

54,130

(34,600)

(2,160)

(40)

(15,410)

(120)

(1,800)

168,130

8,410

176,540

10,060

186,600

-50,519

-96,331

39,750

39,750

(11,939)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 39,750


0203476N 21650

Limited Area Prod & Strg

Complex Inc 4 of 5

NAVY 2008FY

P973C



Construct a reinforced concrete, underground, multi-level re-entry body

processing and storage facility. This facility includes a reinforced

concrete foundation, hardened floors, and hardened load-bearing walls and


February 2007

DD Form


The Limited Area Production and Storage Complex is required for the

receipt/shipment, inspection, assembly, checkout, and maintenance and

storage of TRIDENT II tactical and instrumented re-entry bodies. The

construction of this facility is proposed for FY2005 in support of TRIDENT

REQUIREMENT:

This project provides a Limited Area Production and Storage Complex

(LAPSC).

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 39,750


0203476N 21650


Complex Inc 4 of 5

NAVY 2008FY

P973C



11. Requirement:


roof. The existing Limited Area (LA) perimeter security zone and patrol

roads will be expanded to encompass the new LAPSC. Portions of the

existing LA perimeter will be demolished to provide new access roads. New

security guard towers will be constructed. Work will be conducted in the

very high security Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific (SWFPAC) Limited

Area. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features are included.

Built-in equipment includes adjustable dock levelers, seven 2-ton bridge

crane supports and three elevators. Special costs include seismic

construction, structural excavation, special foundations and blast

features, earth cover, lightweight concrete weapons isolation component

separation wall storage areas and a thick slab-on-grade above the

underground structure.

Supporting facilities include special foundations, underground electrical

and mechanical systems, emergency generator in a hardened shelter,

lightning protection and communications. Special construction features

include the requirement to pass through security screening prior to

entrance and exit, the requirement to furnish escorts, the loss of time due

to security and operational drills, the need to construct temporary enclave

fencing, the requirement to keep the existing Limited Area in operation

during construction, and sustainable development features. Sustainable

principles will be intregated into the design, development, and



Demolition includes 2,630 m2 of existing inadequate re-entry buildings

(buildings 6007 and 6595) and 5,450 m2 of existing inadequate re-entry body

magazines (buildings 6200 through 6220 inclusive, 21 magazines total).


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


A TRIDENT II re-entry body receipt, shipping, processing, and storage

capability does not currently exist to meet projected deliveries and

processing requirements.

Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific will be incapable of providing adequate

re-entry body receipt, shipping, processing, and storage in support of the

Strategic Weapons Facility production operations. A single underground

protected structure provides the most robust protection for fulfilling this

mission against all threats.

II missile production.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 39,750


0203476N 21650


Complex Inc 4 of 5

NAVY 2008FY

P973C



MAINTENANCE WORKSTATIONS

SECURITY SYSTEMS, SENSORS, TOOLS,

WPN

OMN

2005

2006

2,884

5,056



Equipment

Nomenclature




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$9,423

$5,889

$3,534

07/2007

04/2006

12/2010

08/2002

01/2004

01/2006

100%

100%

$7,067

$2,356


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 39,750


0203476N 21650


Complex Inc 4 of 5

NAVY 2008FY

P973C



TESTING EQUIP

SECURITY SYSTEMS, WEAPONS, INTRUSION

DETECTION SYS

OPN 2007 4,000






Mel Rivera (703) 601-9244Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 2991391


9. COST ESTIMATES


MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING 3

(34,910 SF)

MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING

(34,802 SF)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ROOM

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION

SPECIAL COSTS





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,243.21

3,233.21

10

4,382.91

3,719.15

15,540

(14,170)

(40)

(850)

(240)

(90)

(80)

(70)

10,310

(1,020)

(710)

(1,670)

(6,900)

(10)

25,850

1,290

27,140

1,550

28,690

28,690

28,690

(5,450)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

28,6900703676N 21250


NAVY 2008FY

P978



This project consists of a TRIDENT II D5-LE missile processing facility of

multi-height configuration, concrete foundation and floor, insulated walls

of concrete masonry units and metal siding, and sloped metal roof.

Supporting facilities include special foundations, underground electrical

distribution, lightning protection, cableway for checkout cables,

communications, security protection systems, access roads and aprons,

barricades, and storm drainage. Building provides space for missile

section buildup, horizontal assembly/disassembly, and checkout of the


February 2007

DD Form



MAB-1 is the only facility at SWFPAC capable of performing missile build up

and checkout. The maximum production rate of MAB-1 is 24 missiles per

year. It is a single point failure facility for which all missile

production and fleet support is dependent. The facility has limited

capability to absorb unplanned work or equipment down time without

adversely impacting planned production rate and fleet support.

The Navy will not be able to support the technical program and fleet

requirements as a TRIDENT II D5-LE Missile Assembly Facility in support of

the Pacific Fleet deployment schedule. This would result in SSBNs deployed

with empty tubes starting in FY11 without the production capability

provided by the proposed project, MAB-3.

Adequate processing facilities are essential to maintain the required rate

for horizontal missile assembly/disassembly, section buildup and checkout

of TRIDENT II D5-LE missiles. The volume will increase from 24 to 27

missiles per year starting in FY11 and then again to 31 in FY12. The

activities include missile section buildup, missile assembly/disassembly,

nose fairing mate/demate, missile transfer to/from facility transporter,

missile systems testing, post-mate checkout, and final missile inspection.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Constructs a facility for the assembly and build-up of TRIDENT II, D5

missiles from components from missile sub-contractors. The assembled

missiles support the Pacific D5 SLBM deployments.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

28,6900703676N 21250


NAVY 2008FY

P978



11. Requirement:



TRIDENT II D5-LE missile, including equipment section buildup/missile

backshop processes and checkout/repair of missile motors. Additional space

is provided for offices and mechanical equipment room for building support

and environmental control equipment.



other directives.


February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

28,6900703676N 21250


NAVY 2008FY

P978



Bridge Cranes (5 Ton & 10 Ton)

NMCI Workstations-10 Seats

Non-technical Collateral Equipment


Technical Collateral Equipment

OPN

OPN

OMN

APN

OMN

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

500

20

84

500

4,346



Equipment

Nomenclature


The Installation Management Claimant certifies that this project has been

considered for joint use potential. Unilateral Construction is

recommended. Mission requirements, operational considerations, and

location are incompatible with use by other components.

Mel Rivera (703) 601-9244Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


1. Status:


No

N/A

$2,325

$2,092

$233

03/2008

11/2007

03/2009

06/2006

09/2006

08/2007

35%

55%

$1,395

$930


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

28,6900703676N 21250


NAVY 2008FY

P978



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3031390

Scope

21107

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

11030 m2 23,910

Design Status

06/2006


09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 1,456,495

14,550

0

27,725

23,910

259,902


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL




23,910


TOTAL 27,725


0





Maintain and operate facilities and provide services and material to

support operations of aviation activities of the Pacific Fleets. Homeport

to all of the Navy's electronic countermeasures aircraft, the EA-6B

Prowler, which are vital to our nation's defense. Also located at Whidbey

are the P-3C Orion patrol aircraft, the EP-3E Aries II fleet air

reconnaissance aircraft, and a Search and Rescue Unit flying the UH-3H

helicopter and the UC-12B aircraft for fleet logistic support.

1,782,582

74044

91110

83636 SF

48 AC

24,446

3,279

Fitness Center Whidbey

AICUZ Land Acquisition - Ault Field

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.27

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

9405

8699

1232

1217B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 7576

6729

291

291

0

0

150

150

0

0

54

108

102

204

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3041390

4. Command





NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.27

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3051391


9. COST ESTIMATES


EA-18G FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS

(65,921 SF)

UPGRADE VAULT & SQUADRON

SPACES HANGAR 8 (52,800 SF)

UPGRADE MECH/ELEC HANGAR 8

UPGRADE MECH/ELEC POD BLDG

2818 (9,009 SF)

UPGRADE MECH/ELEC TECH

TRAINING BLDG 976 (1,356 SF)

UPGRADE SIMULATOR BLDG 2593

FOR TOFT 3 (2,476 SF)

UPGRADE SECURITY IN SUPPLY

BLDG 369 (280 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



m2

m2

LS

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

6,124.3

4,905.3

837

126

230

26

217.18

676.5

1,384.61

965

1,422.66

6,220

(1,070)

(3,870)

(570)

(170)

(220)

(40)

(10)

(40)

(160)

(70)

14,580

(280)

(11,380)

(50)

(1,880)

(990)

20,800

1,040

21,840

1,240

23,080

830

23,910

23,910

(22,294)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

23,9100703676N 21107


NAVY 2008FY

P193

NAS WHIDBEY ISLAND WAWHIDBEY ISLAND NAS, WASHINGTON



February 2007

DD Form


REQUIREMENT:

This project upgrades vault (secure) space; upgrades mechanical and

electrical utilities within Hangar 8 and other buildings; provides a new

flightline electrical distribution system (FLEDS) and other site

improvements required to support the new EA-18G aircraft, expected to begin

arriving at NAS Whidbey Island (the single U.S. Navy site) in 2008.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

23,9100703676N 21107


NAVY 2008FY

P193



11. Requirement:


This project upgrades existing facilities and provides limited new

construction necessary to support the EA-18G aircraft, expected to begin


Existing space (4,600 SF) will be upgraded for a vault (secure) within

Hangar 8 (#2642) . Vault space will be used for administration and mission

planning space, a classified storage room and brief/debrief spaces. This

vault upgrade will require significant renovations throughout the existing

shop and admin spaces (52,800 SF).

Mechanical, electrical, and communication upgrades will be provided for

Hangar 8 (52,800 SF); POD Repair Building (#2818); and for the Maintenance

Training Building (#976) occupied by a Center for Naval Aviation Technical

Training Unit (CNATTU), which will be providing EA-18G unique maintenance

training.

The Flight Simulator Building (#2593) will be upgraded to support the

Tactical Operational Flight Trainer (TOFT 3). The Supply Building (#369)

will require upgrades to store EA-18G radar equipment.

Supporting facilities include Special Construction Features (Flightline

Traffic and FOD Controls), Electrical Utilities [a Flightline Electrical

Distribution System (FLEDS) and Low Pressure (LP) Air], and Paving and Site

Improvements [Pavement Striping, PADEYE Installation and Parking Apron

(Compass Rose)]. Contaminated soil removal will be required for FLEDS and

utility line improvements. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Measures include

Mass Notification and HVAC Shutoff for Hangar 8.

Demolish the 30 inadequate fixed point utility systems (FPUS) located at

the current aircraft parking spots.


February 2007

DD Form


None of the following facilities have the capacity or capability within

their existing mechanical, electrical, or communications infrastructure to

support the state-of-the-art requirements of this new electronic attack

warfare aircraft: Hangar 8; POD Repair (2818); and Technical Training

(976).

The existing Supply Building does not provide secured storage space for the

sensitive and highly classified EA-18G radar equipment.

In order to properly train Naval aviators on the new EA-18G aircraft,

flight simulator training is required. EA-18G flight simulators will be

arriving in the next few years at NAS Whidbey Island. Upgrades to the

existing Flight Simulator Building (2593) are required to accommodate these

new EA-18G Tactical Operational Flight Trainers.

Adequate facilities are required to support nine EA-18G squadrons, each

with five aircraft, and one Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) with 14

aircraft. The first EA-18G aircraft is expected to begin arriving at NAS

Whidbey Island (the single U.S. Navy site) in 2008.

Three Tactical Operational Flight Trainers (TOFTs) are required to meet

Naval aviator training requirements for the new EA-18G aircraft.

Installation of the first two TOFTs are expected to be funded through Navy

Region Northwest in order to have them operational during FY 2007 and early

FY 2008. The third TOFT is expected to arrive after the first two and is

thus included in this project.

A new 400-Hz Flightline Electrical Distribution System (FLEDS) with Low

Pressure (LP) Air is required to support the onboard aircraft equipment in

this new electronic attack warfare aircraft. Commander Naval Air Force

(CNAF) determined FLEDS are required in order to allow maintenance of

aircraft without the need to turn on the aircraft auxillary power units

which conserves fuel, minimizes wear and tear on the auxillary power units,

reduces air pollution, and reduces noise.

To improve operations support for the new EA-18G aircraft, a new flightline

parking layout will be established, with new aircraft tie-downs (PADEYES)

meeting pull out strength and grounding requirements. The parking layout

will be coordinated with the new FLEDS locations to optimize operations.

Additionally, parking apron (compass rose) will be constructed to permit

calibration of aircraft compasses.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

23,9100703676N 21107


NAVY 2008FY

P193




February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


The existing Fixed Point Utility Systems do not meet the voltage and

frequency standards necessary to provide 400 Hertz power for the Aircraft

Electrical Power Monitor in the new EA-18G aircraft.

Existing tie-downs do not meet the pull-out strength and grounding

requirements of this new aircraft. Existing apron area cannot be used to

calibrate EA-18G compasses due to metal within the concrete, therefore a

new "compass rose" calibration area is required.

The Navy will not be able to support the new EA-18G aircraft, which begin


Inadequate vault (secure) space would compromise EA-18G aircrew mission

data. Maintenance operations to support the new EA-18G aircraft would be

constrained or impossible without essential upgrades to existing

facilities. Training of Naval aviators on the new EA-18G aircraft would be

significantly degraded without installation of Tactical Operational Flight

Trainers (TOFTs). Without a Flightline Electrical Distribution System

(FLEDS), the new EA-18G aircraft would be restricted to either inefficient

use of limited Ground Support Equipment (GSE) or unnecessary wear and tear

upon aircraft electronic components. Additional operational

inefficiencies, including poor aircraft compass calibration, would occur

without necessary site improvements to various airfield pavements.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

23,9100703676N 21107


NAVY 2008FY

P193






2. Basis:




1. Status:


No

06/2006

09/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$1,500

$500


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):




February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

23,9100703676N 21107


NAVY 2008FY

P193





Trainer TOFT 3 (TOFT 201)

OPN

OPN

APN

2008

2008

2010

228

66

22,000



Equipment

Nomenclature






Mr. Steve Rothboeck 360-257-1001Activity POC: Phone No:

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


$2,000

$500

$1,500

03/2008

12/2007

12/2009

Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

23,9100703676N 21107


NAVY 2008FY

P193



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3111390

Scope

14320

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

3821 m2 35,500

Design Status

12/2005


04/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 269,189

18,030

38,360

30,721

35,500

89,938


9. Future Projects:

A. Included In The Following Program:14320 Waterfront Development Phase 2 0 LS 38,360

TOTAL

TOTAL

NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN

BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN


35,500


TOTAL

38,360

30,721





This unit is under the Commander, U. S. Naval Forces Central Command

(COMUSNAVCENT) who provides overall command and operational control of

naval forces assigned to the Commander, U. S. Central Command and

coordinates with naval forces operating in support of U. S. Central

Command's naval component. Its mission is to maintain and operate

facilities and to provide support for visiting units of the operating

forces, Department of Defense Dependent School, and to personnel, including

dependents, from commands and U.S. Department of Defense activities in the

Bahrain area. There are fifty full-time tenants that are supported in

addition to the DoD School and visiting operating forces. Also responsible

for operating and maintaining a communications facility to support the

Defense Communication System and Fleet requirements in the Persian Gulf to

include a message center.

481,738

61010 148004 m2 30,721Operations And Support Facilities

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.1

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

3235

3046

306

321B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 2185

1984

176

173

0

0

0

0

0

0

84

84

484

484

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3121390

4. Command

NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN

BAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN



0 B. Occupational Safety and Health(OSH)(#):

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.1

5. Area Const




February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3131391


9. COST ESTIMATES


WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1

(41,129 SF)

OPERATIONS BUILDING (3,584 SF)

HARBOR PATROL BUILDING (23,681

SF)

ENTRY CONTROL POINT (603 SF)

SMALL ARMS RANGE (13,261 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION






SITE PREPARATIONS


PROTECTION

OTHER SITE UTILITIES

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.5%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

3,821

333

2,200

56

1,232

4,186.21

1,980.34

4,393.14

2,116.01

9,330

(1,390)

(4,360)

(250)

(2,610)

(310)

(60)

(80)

(270)

22,420

(1,350)

(7,250)

(5,280)

(3,070)

(10)

(1,320)

(4,140)

31,750

1,590

33,340

2,170

35,510

35,510

35,500


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

35,5000203176N 14320


NAVY 2008FY

P925

NAVSUPPACT BAHRAINBAHRAIN IS, BAHRAIN


The Using Activity for this project is planned to be: NAVSUPPACT BAHRAIN.

This project provides the 65 acre leased site with Perimeter Security, Base

Utilities, Small Arms Range, Harbor Patrol Building, and Port Control and

Operations Facility.

Perimeter Security cosists of a CENTCOM-compliant Force Protection


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

35,5000203176N 14320


NAVY 2008FY

P925



11. Requirement: Adequate: Substandard:m2 3,821

perimeter, including lighting, fencing, intrusion detection systems (IDS),

and vehicle and personnel Entry Control Points (ECP's).

Base utility infrastructure consists of a Main Switching Station, Reverse

Osmosis Water Plant, Pump House and Central Power/Chiller Plant and an

adjacent elevated water tank. A utility distribution system will be

provided and must allow for future expansion. Fuel Storage and Dispensing

will be provided. Sewer and communications will be provided pier side

(Existing Quay Wall) to support fleet operations which will reduce

significant fleet costs.

Small Arms Range provides a 16 firing point indoor small arms range for

rifle, pistol, and shotgun training and qualifications.

Harbor Patrol Building accomodates the Security Harbor Patrol Unit (HPU)

personnel and equipment to include an internal Armory. Facility is multi-

story and includes passenger/freight elevators.

Port Control and Operations (PCO) Facility housing the Port Control Office,

Ship Repair Unit, and Mine Countermeasures Unit. Facility is multi-story

and includes passenger/freight elevators. Operational facilities require

internal armories.

The Small Arms Range, Harbor Patrol Building, and PCO Facility require the

following: secure communications connected to Naval Support Activity

Bahrain by way of existing conduits, air conditioning, fire protection,

IDS, communications and computer links, personnel alert systems, and ATFP

features. These structures will be heavily reinforced concrete structures

on pile foundations. Hardening of structures is required due to Anti-

Terrorism/Force Protection (ATFP) requirements. Site challenges include a

high water table aproximately 3 meter's below grade.

Limited dredging and a small craft ramp will be constructed to provide

access for the small craft. Other site improvements include guard posts,

roads, sidewalks, and parking.

This project provides infrastructure capacity and support for SOCOM's FY08

P-926 MILCON which is located at this new site.


February 2007

DD Form


The current Mina Sulman pier has been jointly-used by the US Navy, as well

as Bahrain Government and Bahrain commercial interests. The current pier

and port site condition has deteriorated significantly beyond economic

repair and is to be demolished and converted by the Government of Bahrain.

Structural repairs completed in 2003 were intended to last only 5 years.

The pier is mission-critical for the Fifth Fleet.

The security forces for the port are currently not located at Mina Sulman

where US Navy vessels berth; they are approximately one nautical mile away

by boat. The USS Cole attack has shown terrorist group's ability to

effectively strike US warships in port. Potentially over one thousand

sailors could be on the pier at any one time.

The port supports over 80 small craft, including Spec War Mark Five boats,

of which, half are deployed and half are in port. US Navy operational

forces, other service branches and the US Coast Guard do not have force-

protected areas to operate or to launch their vessels. Their total space

requirement to perform essential functions is grossly inadequate.

Facilities for SEALs, Mine Counter Measures, Port Control, and MARMC are

scattered on the NSA base. Most of these facilities are near or on the

perimeter of the base and consist of light construction. Other

scattered/not-consolidated functions are currently in relocatable

facilities. Relocatables are extremely vulnerable to terrorist attacks due

A US dedicated safe harbor for US Navy vessels in addition to various

tenants requiring waterfront facilities in Bahrain. These waterfront

facilities directly support US Navy's war fighting capability in CENTCOM

AOR for missions such as Operation Enduring Freedom. Pier space that can

handle Naval Vessels up to but not including Carriers. Support for the new

Littoral Class Ships. Rectify numerous CENTCOM AT/FP violations. Increase

security by co-locating waterfront functions. Provide installation support

for security personnel, Ship Repair 9MARMC), and utilities for FY08 MCON

P926 NSWU-3.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project is the initial development of a 65 acre leased site into a

Waterfront Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) facility for and adjacent to

the US Naval Support Activity in Bahrain. Includes perimeter security,

access control points, installation utility facilities and distribution,

small arms range, and a waterfront operations facility.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

35,5000203176N 14320


NAVY 2008FY

P925




February 2007

DD Form


to their lightweight construction. Neither renovation nor modernization

would alter the location or safety of the existing facilities.

The Mine Counter Measure (MCM) mission has no waterfront facilities which

is inconsistent with their duties.

Small Arms training is conducted in a portable 3 firing-point facility that

cannot accommodate the required number of personnel resulting in a high

percentage of armed personnel not able to maintain required qualification

standards.

Personnel: Military and civilian workforce are located in non-force

protected, non-consolidated, cramped, and unsafe temporary facilities.

Designated Site: In late 2007, the Kingdom of Bahrain (KOB) is relocating

their port container-operations facilities to a newly developed modern port

complex and will vacate the proposed site currently used as a container

port. This is an opportunity for the US Navy to obtain a waterfront site

adjacent to its existing base. The lease will be with a ministry of the KOB

and will be the same type lease as the three leases for the current NSA

site on which more than $175M of MCON has been invested. Coordination of

this lease is currently underway. The site provides approximately 600

meters of quay wall. Only limited utilities and no substantial structures

occupy the site. Development of this site is the US Navy's only means of

sustaining waterfront operations. This new US Navy waterfront site is

separated from the existing primary Navy base by a newly constructed public

highway. NSA Bahrain coordinated with the Bahrain government to install

conduit under the new highway before construction of the highway.

SOCOM has an FY08 P-926 MILCON that relys on the utilities and security

provided by this project.

No alternative sites currently exist for Fifth Fleet mission requirements.

If these new facilities are not provided, COMUSNAVCENT / COMFIFTHFLT/NSA

Bahrain will continue to operate out of their temporary on-base trailers

and off-base with inadequate force protection, insufficient power, space,

and communications to properly manage the myriad of operations taking place

in the area of responsibility. In addition, resources and time will

continue to be required to compensate for the lack of suitable facilities

to accommodate this forward-deployed command. The Port Security Forces

will continue to operate one nautical mile away from the vessels that they

are supposed to protect in port reducing reaction time. The lack of a



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

35,5000203176N 14320


NAVY 2008FY

P925




February 2007

DD Form





No

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


range continues to significantly degrade mission readiness of NSA Security

Department, embarked security teams and other operational units in Bahrain.

Furthermore, the potential disruption of mission support due to terrorist

activity will continue to be a threat to the current facilities. Without

this project, utilities will not be available to support SOCCOM's FY08 P-

926 MILCON.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

35,5000203176N 14320


NAVY 2008FY

P925






LCDR John Bennett, NRSWA Regional Engineer, certifies that this project

has been considered for joint use potential. The infrastructure of this

project supports joint use, however, only buildings for US Navy use are

being constructed in this project. Therefore, unilateral construction is

recommended.

LCDR John Bennett DSN 318-439-4100Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$3,588

$588

$3,000

01/2008

12/2007

07/2010

12/2005

06/2006

04/2007

40%

50%

$2,588

$1,000


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

35,5000203176N 14320


NAVY 2008FY

P925



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3191390

Scope

83110

Cost

($000)Start


Complete

0 LS 7,150

Design Status

06/2007


03/2008


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 2,544,439

0

0

11,962

7,150

0


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL


DIEGO GARCIA


7,150


TOTAL 11,962


7,500





Provides waterfront, personnel and logistics support functions and

facilities for forward deployed Naval forces including surface combatants,

submarines and logistics ships. Will provide support to SSGN guided

missile submarines.

2,563,551

*

89050

21360

LS

LS

4,462

7,500#

Provide Scada System

Paint And Blasting Shop, Harbor Operations

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

2.56

5. Area Const

Cost Index

7,150


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

1100

1162

65

70B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 415

472

55

55

0

0

0

0

0

0

193

193

372

372

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3201390

4. Command


DIEGO GARCIA



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

2.56

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3211391

PROJECT:


9. COST ESTIMATES


WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

SEWAGE LAGOON (320' W X 360' L

X 10' D)

INLET / OUTLET STRUCTURES AND

MANHOLES

INSTALLATION OF PIPES ON

TRENCH

MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION




SITE PREPARATIONS

COMMUNICATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,220

(3,330)

(200)

(150)

(540)

1,970

(220)

(870)

(150)

(730)

6,190

310

6,500

400

6,900

250

7,150

7,150


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,1500702776N 83110


NAVY 2008FY

P158

NAVSUPPFAC DIEGO GARCIA IODIEGO GARCIA


11. Requirement:


Construct a lined earthen sewage treatment cell, approximately 320-ft wide

x 360-ft long x 10-ft overall depth adjacent to the existing two-cell

sewage treatment lagoon located at the Air Operations Area. The proposed

project is complete with compacted coral fill and gravel bedding, liner

system, piping system, inlet/outlet box structures, and transition

manholes. Project includes clearing and grubbing, removal of existing

chain link fence, new perimeter fencing, new access road, re-routing and

re-installation of underground electrical cables and construction of new

manholes, removal and re-routing of concrete-lined drainage ditch, re-

routing of existing underground fiber optic cables, and all related

mechanical and electrical works.


February 2007

DD Form


Two existing facultative lagoon treatment systems provide centralized

wastewater treatment for Diego Garcia: the Air Ops and R-Site sewage

lagoons. The Air Ops sewage lagoon services the area extending from the

Seabreeze Village, a housing area, to Point Marianne (Tent City). The R-

site sewage lagoon services the area extending from the Cantonment to

another housing area and the Palmsville Village. The effluent from these

treatment plants is discharged into the Indian Ocean through ocean

outfalls. Chapter 4, Wastewater, of the Final Governing Standards (FGS)

for Diego Garcia require that existing sources of pollutants meet the

standard limits for five-day Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Total

Suspended Solids (TSS) among other parameters. The 30-day average

discharge limitation for BOD and TSS is 45 mg/l. Both plants are in

compliance with the FGS except for TSS, which has a recorded average

reading exceeding the specified limit; the highest recorded reading was 56

mg/l.

The current treatment process at the Air Ops Two-Cell Sewage Lagoon is

maximized. As a short-term solution, surface aerators (4 each/cell) were

installed to increase the rate of treatment and reduce the detention time

needed to treat higher wastewater loads while still meeting the regulations

set forth in the FGS for Diego Garcia.

This project will provide a long-term solution to the current sewage

treatment problem in Diego Garcia brought about by the increased

operational tempo in the region by constructing a third sewage treatment

cell at the Air Ops Area. The expanded treatment plant will have adequate

capacity to support an additional military personnel loading of 2,500 at

the Tent City. The anticipated increase will generate a buffer of

An adequately sized and configured additional sewage treatment cell for

increased military personnel is required. The proposed project will be a

complementary back-up cell and will allow required repair and maintenance

to the other sewage treatment cells without compromising the treatment

process and regulatory compliance during normal periods; that is when there

is no unusual deployment of military contingents at the Tent City. The

current treatment lagoons cannot accommodate the anticipated contingency.

Therefore, the proposed additional sewage treatment cell is required.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

The proposed project will construct a third sewage treatment cell with

adequate capacity for additional military personnel loading of 2,500 at the

Tent City. (Current Mission)

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,1500702776N 83110


NAVY 2008FY

P158




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


approximately 7,500 gallons per day.

NAVSUPPFAC, Diego Garcia is the only military activity that provides

services and materials in support of shore activities and fleet operations

in Diego Garcia.

Existing sewage lagoon at the Air Ops Area will continue to be used and

will result in violation of the Final Governing Standards for Diego Garcia.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,1500702776N 83110


NAVY 2008FY

P158






The Regional Commander or the Installation Management Claimant certifies

that this project has been considered for joint use potential. Unilateral

construction is recommended. Mission requirements, operational


components.

Butch Capili DSN 315-370-4513Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$240

$100

$140

04/2008

03/2008

08/2009

06/2007

01/2008

03/2008

5%

15%

$100

$140


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

7,1500702776N 83110


NAVY 2008FY

P158



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3251390

Scope

41120

11210

11210

Cost

($000)Start

Fuel Farm

Western Taxiway

Full Length Taxiway

Complete

0 LS

5110 m2

44000 m2

4,000

2,900

15,490

Design Status

01/2005

01/2005

01/2005


07/2005

07/2005

07/2005

A. TOTAL ACREAGE ..( Acres)

4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 0

0

31,410

5,180

22,390

0


9. Future Projects:


11210

13140

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar

Aircraft Parking Apron

Telcom Facility

2150 m2

30839 m2

200 m2

12,830

15,270

3,310

TOTAL

TOTAL


DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI


22,390


TOTAL

31,410

5,180


0





Command center for the Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa (CJTF-

HOA). The task force conducts operations and training to help host nations

establish a secure environment while enabling regional stability. The

primary purpose of the camp is to support CTF-HOA's anti-terrorism

operations in the Horn of Africa.

58,980

85110

85110

33824 SY

33332 SY

2,580

2,600

Pave External Roads

Interior Paved Roads Phase A

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

0

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3261390

4. Command


DJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

0

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3271391

Fuel farm is required to safely transfer and store the fuel for aircraft

operations, electrical generation, and tactical vehicle operations. The

transfer station outside the camp is located at a distance to provide

REQUIREMENT:

Project constructs a series of fuel tanks and fuel tanker transfer pads

with all associated pumps, piping, and environmental protection.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


FUEL FARM

FUEL TANKAGE (790 CY)

DISTRIBUTION PIPING (2,953 LF)

TRUCK FILL STAND



SITE PREPARATIONS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

m3

m

EA

LS

LS

604

900

2

1,677.88

1,010.72

493,033.58

2,910

(1,010)

(910)

(990)

550

(410)

(140)

3,460

170

3,630

230

3,860

140

4,000

4,000


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,0000703976N 41120

FUEL FARM

NAVY 2008FY

P906

CAMP LEMONIER DJIBOUTIDJIBOUTI, DJIBOUTI


11. Requirement:

Adequate: Substandard:m3 604

Project constructs a permanent fuel tank farm. This facility includes four

prefabricated 40,000 gallon steel fuel tanks, with an additional area for

four more similar sized tanks. Two of the proposed tanks will contain

aviation fuel and two will contain diesel fuel. Each tank includes

foundations, earthwork berms capable of containing potential spills,

appropriate pumps, double walled piping and valves, and security fencing

around the exterior of the tank berms. A transfer facility for offloading

supply tanker trucks located outside the security fencing of the camp is

included. An additional transfer pad located within the camp adjacent to

the tank farm is included to load out tank trucks for aircraft refueling.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


The current mission is supported entirely through tanker truck deliveries

directly to aircraft and to an existing vehicular fueling station with an

underground storage tank of unknown condition.

Personnel and aircraft will remain vulnerable to quality of fuel provided

directly to aircraft. With little storage capacity, the quantity of fuel

arriving at the camp is directly proportional to operations, possibly

compromising operational security. Fuel trucks will continue to transit on

interior camp roads endangering personnel.

maximum protection to personnel and to prevent the need for fully loaded

tankers traversing on interior camp roads. This project provides two tanks

for each product. One will serve as a working tank and the other will

serve as a receiving tank allowing the appropriate fuel settling and

testing times.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,0000703976N 41120

FUEL FARM

NAVY 2008FY

P906










2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$240

$40

$200

08/2008

01/2008

09/2009

01/2006

05/2006

07/2006

5%

15%

$200

$40


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,0000703976N 41120

FUEL FARM

NAVY 2008FY

P906




project has been considered for joint use potential. Joint Use is

recommended.

LCDR Jake Ellwood DSN 318-824-4064Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

4,0000703976N 41120

FUEL FARM

NAVY 2008FY

P906



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3311391

The airfield has one runway to conduct air operations. Currently, aircraft

on the runway and aircraft exiting the refueling area must use the western

portion of the active runway in order to proceed to the parking apron.

Using the active runway for taxiing causes a delay in accommodating

arriving and departing aircraft. When the Operation Tempo (OPTEMPO) is

Provide an intermediate taxiway for egress from the runway to the aircraft

parking apron and a connection to the western end of the runway.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Construct a asphalt taxiway with all required stripage and airfield

lighting.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


WESTERN TAXIWAY (55,004 SF)

CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY (55,004 SF)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

LS

5,110

5,110 436.82

2,510

(2,230)

(280)

2,510

130

2,640

160

2,800

100

2,900

2,900


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,9000203176N 11210

Western Taxiway

NAVY 2008FY

P908



11. Requirement:


Construct a asphalt taxiway to provide egress from runway and refueling

area to apron area. Special costs include permanent airfield markings,

temporary airfield perimeter lighting, box drainage culvert for drainage

under the new taxiway, and phased work at the taxiway and runway

intersection. Electrical utilities include taxiway edge and centerline

lights for the proposed taxiway as well as the existing taxiway to the

apron. Paving and site improvements include foreign object damage (FOD)

cleanup. Site preparations include site excavation.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


high, aircraft must exit the runway as soon as possible to ensure the

taxiway is available for operations. During these periods, some aircraft

are directed to taxi across dirt areas to the parking apron. This is a

major safety hazard, as the aircraft are at risk of foreign object damage

(FOD) because of rocks and other loose debris in the grass and drainage

areas.

If not provided, aircraft will continue to be at risk of foreign object

damage (FOD) as they are forced to transit over unimproved runway and apron

areas.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,9000203176N 11210

Western Taxiway

NAVY 2008FY

P908









recommended.




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$549

$349

$200

07/2008

01/2008

10/2009

01/2006

05/2006

07/2006

5%

15%

$410

$139


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,9000203176N 11210

Western Taxiway

NAVY 2008FY

P908





February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,9000203176N 11210

Western Taxiway

NAVY 2008FY

P908



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3351391

The airfield has one runway to conduct air operations. Currently, aircraft

on the runway and aircraft exiting the refueling area must use the eastern

portion of the active runway in order to proceed to the parking apron.

Using the active runway for taxiing causes a delay in accommodating

arriving and departing aircraft. When the Operation Tempo (OPTEMPO) is

Provide an intermediate taxiway for egress from the runway to the new

aircraft parking apron and proposed maintenance hanger.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Construct a asphalt taxiway with all required stripage and airfield

lighting.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY (473,612 SF)

CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY (473,612 SF)




SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

m2

m2

LS

LS

44,000

44,000 260.1

11,440

(11,440)

1,970

(1,350)

(620)

13,410

670

14,080

870

14,950

540

15,490

15,490


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

15,4900203176N 11210

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

NAVY 2008FY

P914



11. Requirement:


Construct a asphalt taxiway (1.861 m running length) to provide egress from

runway to exsiting and proposed apron areas. Special construction costs

include permanent airfield markings, temporary airfield perimeter lighting

and modified asphalt. Electrical utilities include taxiway edge and

centerline lights for the proposed taxiway.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


high, aircraft must exit the runway as soon as possible to ensure the

taxiway is available for operations. During these periods, some aircraft

are directed to taxi across dirt areas to the parking apron. This is a

major safety hazard, as the aircraft are at risk of foreign object damage

(FOD) because of rocks and other loose debris in the grass and drainage

areas.

If not provided, aircraft will continue to be at risk of foreign object

damage (FOD) as they are forced to transit over unimproved runway and apron

areas.

This project is in agreement with the master plan to build a maintenance

hanger in the expansion area.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

15,4900203176N 11210

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

NAVY 2008FY

P914












2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

N/A

$549

$349

$200

07/2008

01/2008

10/2009

01/2006

05/2006

07/2006

5%

15%

$410

$139


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

15,4900203176N 11210

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

NAVY 2008FY

P914



recommended.



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

15,4900203176N 11210

FULL LENGTH TAXIWAY

NAVY 2008FY

P914



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3391390

Scope

83109

81230

15210

74044

84110

Cost

($000)Start

Wastewater Treatment Plant

Repairs & Upgrade

Harden Electrical System Phase

1



Potable Water System Recap

Phase 1

Complete

0 LS

0 LS

0 LS

0 LS

0 LS

40,870

59,420

101,828

45,250

31,450

Design Status

08/2006

08/2006

02/2006

08/2006

08/2006


09/2007

09/2007

05/2007

09/2007

09/2007


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 5,283,711

55,473

88,430

0

278,818

1,014,151


9. Future Projects:


83210


Wstewtr Collection Sys Repairs & Upgr Phase 2

10044 m2

0 LS

62,360

26,070

TOTAL

TOTAL

NAVBASE GUAM

AGANA, GUAM


278,818


88,430


0





Provide shoreside logistics and maintenance support to Pacific Fleet and

other U.S. and allied shipping. Homeport for submarine tender supporting

submarines operating in the western pacific and for Military Sealift

Command ships.

6,720,583

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

2.64

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

5343

4847

494

469B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 3717

3241

517

522

0

0

0

0

0

0

71

71

544

544

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3401390

4. Command

NAVBASE GUAM

AGANA, GUAM



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

2.64

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3411391


9. COST ESTIMATES


WASTE WTR TREATMENT PLANT RPRS &

UPGRADE

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT

PROCESS REPAIR


PROCESS UPGRADE


FACILITIES REPAIR


FACILITIES MAINTENANCE


FACILITIES ALTERATIONS


EQULIZATION BASIN & HDWRK


INFLUENT WETWELL REPAIR

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLT SEWER

LIFT STATION




SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

30,330

(4,490)

(3,700)

(980)

(140)

(10)

(17,070)

(960)

(2,980)

5,050

(3,690)

(1,360)

35,380

1,770

37,150

2,300

39,450

1,420

40,870

40,870


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

40,8700702776N 83109

Waste Wtr Treatment Plant Rprs

& Upgrade

NAVY 2008FY

P262

NAVBASE GUAMAGANA, GUAM


This project will involve repairs and replacement of equipment and process

components of the existing Apra Harbor Wastewater Treatment Plant

facilities (headworks, control building, pre-aeration tank/grit chambers,

primary clarifier pump station, secondary clarifiers, sludge thickener,

biotowers and biotowers pump stations, digesters and digester

control/solids contactor buildings, chlorination and dechlorination


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

40,8700702776N 83109


& Upgrade

NAVY 2008FY

P262



buildings and chlorine contact tanks, odor control building, and sludge

drying beds). Old, corroding and failing components such as influent and

effluent pumps, sludge and scum pumps, motors and motor controllers,

comminutors, defective grit conveyors, bypass valves, airlift and aerator

piping, section of sludge piping, sluice gates, sludge grinder, clarifier

mechanisms, sludge thickener rakes, sludge skimmer and troughs, flow meter

and odor control media of odor control facility will be replaced. The top

media layer of the biotowers will be cleaned.

The project will also involve replacement of valves and piping for the

digester control buildings. Drying bed space frame supports for tear away

plastic covers and covered drying bed ventilation fans will be provided for

sludge drying beds. Four new concrete pad-mounted blowers will be installed

for the biotowers. A plant-wide supervisory control and data acquisition

(SCADA) system will also be installed. Chlorine residual sensors and a

chlorine feedback loop control system will be provided for the chlorinator

buildings. Sulfur dioxide residual sensors and a sulfonator feedback loop

control system will also be provided for the dechlorinator building.

Generator quick connections for buildings 1794 (control building), 1806

(biotower control building), 1819 (blower building) and 1814 (secondary

clarifier control building) will be installed.

The project also involves replacement of the existing headworks with a new

inlet structure, 4.5MG equalization basin to address surge flows from

inflow and infiltration and ship surge and bypass piping. The headworks

shall include new flow measurement devices that meet the requirements of

the NPDES discharge permit and separately measure influent and plant return

flows, provide for upstream grit removal, solids collection and removal

area for large debris, and provide structural repairs, repair concrete,

valve system and provide liner for the influent wetwell.

Miscellaneous (structural, mechanical and electrical) repair and

maintenance works and minor alterations for the above facilities will also

be provided. Building walls, wall cracks and spalls will be repaired, and

structural anchor bolts will be replaced. Old and frequently

malfunctioning air conditioning and ventilating systems will be replaced as

a whole or in part. Old wiring, failing and corroded interior/exterior and

exit lighting fixtures, and corroded or defective electrical convenience

outlets will be replaced. Transient voltage suppressors will be provided

for surge protection of the electrical motors and other equipment to

prolong their life. Corrosion control and painting of the electrical

transformer enclosure will be performed. Walls and ceilings of these


February 2007

DD Form


This project is required to restore the wastewater treatment plant to its

original design capacity and operational capability, upgrade the process

components and equipment to provide reliability and efficiency of operation

for the entire plant in handling current load, current Enviromental

Protection Agency (EPA) wastewater treatment requirements, and to replace

SLS 16.

The wastewater treatment plant is a facility for treating Navy-generated

wastewater to an acceptable quality prior to discharging it into the sea

through an outfall. SLS 16 is a pumping facility for moving sewage from

the wharf, shipyard and maintenance areas of the base to the WWTP.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project will provide miscellaneous repairs, maintenance and some

upgrade for the wastewater treatment plant facilities and process equipment

and replacement of SLS 16.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

40,8700702776N 83109


& Upgrade

NAVY 2008FY

P262



11. Requirement:


facilities as welll as selected piping will be repainted. New explosion-

proof exit and area lighting will be provided. Lighting circuits for

selected buildings will be connected to standby generator, and new medium

voltages wiring in conduits will be installed for connection of existing

switchgear to transformer.

In addition, a 15 ft CMU wall facing Marine Drive Corps will be provided

around the wastewater treatment plant complex, with a perimeter berm

constructed of dredged material on the remaining three (3) sides of the

back Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) complex.

The project also involves replacement of Sewer Lift Station (SLS) 16.

Replacement includes installation of a larger wetwell and three 15HP

submersible type pumps. Replace the comminutors and bar screen and install

in new configuration. Utilize existing hardened structure to locate

controls and valves. Install new 100 HP generator in hardened structure.

Install Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system connected

to base station at Apra Harbor Waste Water Treatment Plant (AHWWTP).


February 2007

DD Form


Bypass valves for the primary clarifier and secondary clarifiers, influent

and effluent valves and pumps for the control building wet well, and pumps

for bio-tower are already old, badly corroded and can no longer be operated

efficiently because of frequent failures. The spacing of screws for the

conveyors used for grit removal are too wide, allowing removed grit to fall

back into the treated effluent, rendering the conveyors ineffective. In

addition, these conveyors are also corroded. The sluice gates for the

headwords are already corroded, with deteriorated seals, and because of the

location of these sluice gates, it becomes dangerous for a personnel to

operate the gates when the influent raw sewage flow exceeds the capacity of

a single channel. The biotower filter media have significant algae growth

and the biotower fans frequently break down. The center column of the

dissolved air flotation thickener, rakes and skimmers are badly corroded

and are inoperable. The aerators of pre-aeration facilities are also badly

corroded. A sludge grinder will be replaced to minimize clogging of pumps

due to re-entanglement of fibrous material and a new flow meter to be

installed to assist process control. The existing odor control media

(impregnated wood chip media) for the odor control facility is

progressively decreasing in effectiveness because of prolonged use.

Replacement of the odor control media is now several years overdue.

Controls for primary clarifier pumps do not automatically operate the pumps

as required. Automatic control system for the raw water pumps is broken or

not connected to the plant control system. Chlorination feed rate does not

automatically adjust to the amount of wastewater flow requirements,

resulting in potential waste of chemicals and excess discharge permit

limits. Controls for various pumps, dissolved air flotation and polymer

feed system are already ineffective and unreliable. Monitoring equipment

for the primary and secondary digesters are already old and remain un-

calibrated. The motor control centers for various process pumps are already

old, corroded and obsolete, with parts difficult to obtain. Exposed

electrical equipment, underground metallic piping and above-ground metal

structures of the wastewater treatment plant are already corroding because

of the corrosive island enviroment. Interior areas of some of these

facilities are not adequately lighted and lighting for some areas uses old

and inefficient lighting fixtures that are not connected to standby power

source. Existing number of sludge drying beds are frequently filled with

rainwater, rendering them marginally useful during rainy seasons. The

influent flow measurement device has only about 1/3 of the required

upstream straight-line flow required for reliable influent flow data, the

concrete for the flume and channel is severely spalled and cracked, and as

currently designed the headworks receives plant return flows upstream of

the flow measurement device which is a NPDES permit violation of the plant.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

40,8700702776N 83109


& Upgrade

NAVY 2008FY

P262




February 2007

DD Form


The existing headworks is incapable of handling surge flows that occur

during a large storm event or ship surge, resulting in submerging of the

headworks and sewage backing up into the sewer system until it is

discharged untreated into the ocean. The existing protective lining has

worn off of much of the interior of the influent wetwell and the concrete

is severely spalled, allowing for significant inflow from surrounding

groundwater. Because the influent wetwell makes up half of the basement of

B1794, the building will not be stable or safe if the wetwell is

structurally unsound.

The existing chain link fence surrounding the wastewater treatment plant

complex does not provide sufficient protection from airborne debris during

typhoons.

Sewer lift station 16 is critically located, collecting all of the sewage

from the wharf areas, COMNAVMAR HQ, Supply, Supply, the USGC and the Orote

Power Plant. The station currently has two 10HP pumps which are frequently

both needed to pump down the wetwell. It is designed for 15HP pumps. Both

existing pumps are old, corroded and suffer from reduced flow rate and

power output well below the pumps and motors rating. The wetwell is pumped

down very quickly during high flow conditions, leading to short circuiting

and reduced life of the pumps. A third pump is needed to provide system

redundancy and allow for a pump to be off-line for maintenance and repair.

A larger wetwell is needed to prevent short-circuiting of pump run times.

Failure to provide the necessary repairs will result in unreliable

operation of the wastewater treatment plant because of continued unchecked

deterioration of water treatment plant components to the point where plant

components are beyond economical repair and eventual failure of the

wastewater treatment plant. Without the necessary repairs and upgrade,

efficient operation and maintenance of the wastewater treatment plant will

not be achieved and bypassing process components for maintenance or repair

without significantly affecting wastewater treatment process will also be

impossible. Acceptable level of treatment of sewage will also be

difficult, resulting in Environmental Protection Agency Notice of

Violations (NOVs) and fines being levied on the Navy. Without the new

equalization tank, there will be no temporary holding tank to contain

unexpected surges of sewage flowing into the wastewater treatment plant.

Without the proposed CMU fence and berm, wastewater treatment plant

facilities will be continually exposed to the debris that can be blown by

strong winds normally spawned by frequent super typhoons that lash Guam



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

40,8700702776N 83109


& Upgrade

NAVY 2008FY

P262




February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


periodically. The propose fence will provide aesthetics to the wastewater

treatment plant. . Failure to replace SLS 16 will result in station

breakdown that will cause sewage to back up into the main upstream of the

station and to discharge into Apra Harbor.


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

40,8700702776N 83109


& Upgrade

NAVY 2008FY

P262










Brian Hess (671) 339-7084Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


Yes

$858

$780

$78

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

08/2006

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$343

$515


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3471391


9. COST ESTIMATES


HARDEN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, MAIN

BASE

MAIN BASE

DISTRIBUTION/SUBSTATION

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS



DEMOLITION

SITE IMPROVEMENTS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

16,650

(10,070)

(5,870)

(260)

(450)

34,790

(33,160)

(1,120)

(510)

51,440

2,570

54,010

3,350

57,360

2,060

59,420

59,420


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

59,4200702776N 81230

Harden Electrical System, Main

Base

NAVY 2008FY

P494



Project will harden the primary electrical distribution system components

serving the critical operational facilities on the main base to mitigate

damage caused by frequent typhoons. It will also improve the main power

substation on the base to handle the future loads due to increased

facilities for the 2010 ship and personnel base loading projections. The

project is the first of five projects intended to harden all of the Navy's

electrical systems under the cognizance of COMNAVMARIANAS. Other projects

will harden primary electrical distribution systems supporting fuel wharves

and storage, ordnance facilities, medical facilities, housing, and northern

area facilities.

Replace selected main base overhead 13.8kV primary electrical distribution

systems with underground 13.8kV primary electrical distribution systems to

include the removal of concrete and wood utility poles and associated

overhead electrical lines transformers and switchgear. Install underground

concrete encased duct lines, manholes, pad mounted transformers and


February 2007

DD Form


Existing Naval facilities, utilities, support systems, and other structures

were damaged by Supertyphoon Pongsona, which had sustained winds of 150 mph

and gusts over 180 mph. The extremely high winds caused roofing, siding,

exterior lights, A/C units, and roof insulation to be blown away and become

airborne. Flying debris hurled by the gale force wind bombards the

overhead lines and poles like projectiles. This results in downed lines

and fallen poles that in turn causes, in a domino effect, additional downed

lines and fallen poles. The resulting power failures have severely impacted

To provide the Navy with a reliable electrical distribution system that

will mitigate future storm effects and to accommodate programmed electrical

load increases.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project is the first of five and will harden the Navy's electrical

distribution system to withstand the effects of future supertyphoons by

placing the primary overhead distribution systems underground and increase

its capacity by replacing the Orote Substation.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

59,4200702776N 81230


Base

NAVY 2008FY

P494



11. Requirement:


switchgear, 15kV cables and miscellaneous pavement and landscaping repairs

at areas that are disturbed by the construction. Replace overhead

secondary electrical service to selected facilities with underground

electrical service with concrete encased duct lines. Construct a concrete

enclosure to house two 25/30/40 mVA transformers, 34.5 kV and 13.8 kV

switchgear. Construct two remote switching stations (SS) with concrete

enclosures, to replace the deteriorated Cold Storage and SRF Substations.

Construct underground tie feeders from the Orote Substation to the remote

switching stations. Underground tie feeders will require 3x4 duct lines

and associated manholes. Tie feeders will be installed between the new SRF

SS and the Orote Substation, and between the new Cold Storage SS and Orote

Substation. Built-in equipment consists of the 34.5 kV and 13.8 kV

switchgear installed at Orote Substation, and 13.8 kV switchgear at Cold

Storage and SRF switching stations.


February 2007

DD Form


September 2006

January 2007


mission critical facilities such as communications, port operations, and

utility systems such as the water treatment plant, wastewater treatment

plant as well as quality of life facilities such as housing and schools. A

lack of switching stations and long feeders on the main base, result in

widespread power outages to many facilities when short-circuits occur on a

primary feeder. This inflexibility is caused by the lack of sufficient

isolation switches and circuiting to operate the system during an

emergency. What emergency back-up capabilities there are, are done by

physically connecting the feeders at high labor costs. Supertyphoon

Pongsona was the most recent in a series of supertyphoons that have struck

Guam. Each typhoon has caused some form of electrical failure primarily

due to the exposed electrical system. The down time of the electrical

system has also impeded the recovery efforts. The base electrical system

capacity is 40 mVA. Base load is expected to exceed this capacity by 50%

in 2010 because of increases in load by programmed projects and by the

increase of ship berthing requirements.

Without this project, the Navy's electrical distribution system on Guam

will remain highly vulnerable to damage from future supertyphoons. This

will severely hamper the Navy's ability to perform its assigned missions.

Electrical outages caused by typhoons will continue, which in turn will

cause daily functions and operations to cease or to be conducted

inefficiently in unsafe and unhealthy work environments. Deferral of this

project will result in rapid and severe deterioration of facilities,

support systems, and mission accomplishment. The existing Orote Substation

will become extremely overloaded and will not be able to support mission

loads. In its current configuration the 40 mVA Orote Substation does not

have sufficient capacity to support additional electrical loads for support

of ships at the Kilo, Romeo, Sierra, Tango, Victor, and X-Ray Wharves based

on the 2010 Berthing Plan. Expected loading in 2010 will be between 60 and

70 mVA. This project will pave the way for all future electrical

improvement projects to be functional and reliable, as well as to

accommodate the future growth of the Naval base.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

59,4200702776N 81230


Base

NAVY 2008FY

P494







1. Status:


12/2006

09/2007

5%



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

59,4200702776N 81230


Base

NAVY 2008FY

P494







joint use potential. Unilateral construction is recommended. This

facility can be used by other components on an as available basis,


CAPT Kenneth W. Branch (671) 339-5100Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


Yes

NA

$858

$780

$78

03/2008

12/2007

03/2010

$343

$515

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3511391


9. COST ESTIMATES


KILO WHARF EXTENSION

KILO WHARF

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS




DEMOLITION


DREDGING

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST



LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

65,580

(64,980)

(160)

(390)

(50)

25,740

(2,820)

(10,820)

(2,880)

(4,920)

(4,300)

91,320

4,570

95,890

5,950

101,840

101,840

101,828

(2,050)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

101,8280203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P502



1) Provide a new 121.92-meter (400 ft) extension to the west of existing

Kilo Wharf and perform all necessary dredging and miscellaneous demolition

within the harbor to enable the construction;

2) Provide 243.84 m (800 ft) reinforced concrete crane girders, cable

trenches, and supports at existing wharf and wharf extension.

3) Provide new asphalt concrete pavement and a reinforced concrete deck

for the existing Kilo Wharf and wharf extension;

4) Provide new primary and secondary electrical power to Kilo Wharf,

including new electrical generator and substation buildings.

Provide shore power outlet (2 each 4000 ampere)and industrial power outlet

assemblies at the wharf extension to support the T-AKE class ammunition


February 2007

DD Form


The mission of Commander U.S. Naval Forces, Marianas (COMNAVMARIANAS) is to

provide operational, fuel re-supply and ordnance, and other logistic

support to fleet units of the Pacific Region and operational forces of the

REQUIREMENT:

Provide a new 121.92 meter (400 ft) extension to the existing Kilo Wharf

and perform all necessary dredging and miscellaneous demolition within the

harbor to enable the construction.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

101,8280203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P502



11. Requirement:

0 0Adequate: Substandard: 0

ship including a double ended substation with related switchgear, housed in

the new substation building, underground secondary conductors and controls.

5) Extend the shore utilities infrastructure from the existing wharf to

the Kilo Wharf extension, including the providing of a fire protection

system, piping and piping supports (for potable freshwater, Bilge Oily

Water Treatment System (BOWTS) force main, sewer and fire protection) and

fire alarm systems, as well as upgrade and/or add lighting,

telecommunications systems, and lightning protection and grounding, as

necessary, along the existing wharf plus the extension to meet current

criteria and operational requirements. Provide potable freshwater, sewer

and BOWTS force main shore utility connections and piping for ship service

on the Kilo Wharf extension. Provide a new BOWT plant.

6) Lighting: Provide area lighting for the new wharf extensions to

support wharf work activities.

7) Use existing mooring islands, and temporary mooring islands, if

required, to enable berthing of ships during construction phasing.

8) Environmental Mitigation: Perform environmental mitigation, which may

include work at off-base locations, to improve the existing environment in

the area.


February 2007

DD Form


Kilo Wharf has been, and continues to be, a critical infrastructure for the

berthing of ordnance supply ships in the Western Pacific Region making port

visits to Guam.

Ordnance is received on Guam at Kilo Wharf in the Outer Apra Harbor.

Historically, approximately 55 ships per year are on-loaded / off-loaded

with ordnance at the Kilo Wharf. Presently, most of the ships are Military

Sealift Command (MSC) TAE vessels.

PACFLT ordnance operating tempo (OPTEMPO) requires ordnance ships to remain

Fifth (5th) and Seventh (7th) Fleets. This project is required to improve

COMNAVMARIANAS ability to accomplish this mission.

COMNAVMARIANAS Guam is the primary and most strategically important

ordnance activity within the Pacific Fleet Area of Operations (PACFLT AOR).

The receipt and storage of ordnance at COMNAVMARIANAS Guam is essential to

the Navy's mission in the Western Pacific Region and Kilo Wharf is a vital

ammunition wharf that provides waterfront support services to the

COMNAVMARIANAS Ordnance Department. The COMNAVMARIANAS Ordnance Department

also supports the Air Force operations at Andersen Air Force Base (AAFB) by

providing for the loading and off-loading of ordnance materials at Kilo

Wharf and the necessary hauling of the materials between the wharf and

AAFB. An adequate ammunition wharf is essential to support the mission of

COMNAVMARIANAS, as well as that of AAFB.

The Kilo Wharf extension will support the new T-Class Combat Logistics

Force (CLF) ships (T-AKE) by increasing the available length of the Kilo

Wharf. The T-AKE is a new CLF Underway Replenishment Naval vessel intended

to replace the current capability of the Kilauea-Class (T-AE 26) Ammunition

Ship, Mars-Class (T-AFS 1) Combat Stores Ships and, when operating in

concert with a Henry J. Kaiser-Class (T-AO 187) Oiler ship, the Sacramento-

Class (AOE 1) Fast Combat Support Ship. The T-AKE Program is expected to

consist of twelve (12) ships. The first of these ships to is expected to

arrive in Guam in early 2010.

CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

101,8280203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P502




February 2007

DD Form





Yes

No

September 2006

January 2007


berthed at the Kilo Wharf for only a short period of time (approx. 4- 5

days per visit). Ships must be off-loaded / on-loaded quickly, but safely

as to do so otherwise would jeopardize the overall Fleet ordnance

readiness.

Kilo Wharf is currently considered substandard for several reasons,

including its current length and ordnance handling area. Kilo Wharf is

currently only 121.92 meters (400 feet) in length. Kilo Wharf is limited

in capacity for conducting ship containerization ordnance operations and

staging due to the existing amount of available wharf area.

Due to the insufficient length of the Kilo Wharf at present, it will be

unable to provide proper support of the new T-AKE vessel. In order to

provide that support, it is necessary to extend the existing Kilo Wharf

structure and shore utilities infrastructure along the Kilo Wharf

extension.

If this project is not executed, the activity will fail to effectively

support the new T-AKE ship. The Navy will continue to be burdened with the

high costs of inefficient manpower and equipment operations, resulting in

longer ship-in-port times, and added labor and equipment costs to the Navy.

Consequently, the ability to sustain readiness of the fleet units of the

Pacific Region and to support shore activities, including those of Andersen

Air Force Base, may be seriously compromised.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

101,8280203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P502







1. Status:


07/2006

05/2007

60%



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

101,8280203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P502



CCTV

FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

WHARF FENDERS

OPN

OMN

OPN

2009

2009

2008

50

10

1,990



Equipment

Nomenclature






Rey Valdez 339-8457Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


Yes

NOT APPLICABLE

$4,048

$3,680

$368

01/2008

12/2007

02/2010

$3,680

$368

3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

101,8280203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P502



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3571391


9. COST ESTIMATES


FITNESS CENTER, GUAM

INDOOR FITNESS CENTER (52,689

SF)

LIGHTED SYNTHETIC FIELD

OUTDOOR TRACK

OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL 50 M 10

LANES

MODIFICATIONS TO BLDG 1980


INFORMATION SYSTEMS


PROTECTION





SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION


PROTECTION

OUTSIDE COMMUNICATION LINES

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



LS

m2

EA

EA

EA

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

4,895

1

1

1

1,980.89

7,920,000

5,296,024.8

4,015,943.7

35,710

(9,700)

(7,920)

(5,300)

(4,020)

(7,920)

(350)

(250)

(250)

3,460

(340)

(150)

(1,610)

(10)

(70)

(1,230)

(50)

39,170

1,960

41,130

2,550

43,680

1,570

45,250

45,250

(3,000)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

45,2500805176N 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P530



Project constructs a new consolidated indoor fitness facility, an outdoor

50-meter 10-lane swimming pool with change house, a lighted outdoor


February 2007

DD Form


An adequately sized and configured fitness facility is required to conduct

comprehensive and balanced programs for physical fitness. The new Naval

Based Fitness Center will provide mission support to permanent and

transient party personnel. that comprises of 786 officers and 5,733

enlisted personnel. Personnel requires safe fitness programs, including

aerobics, health and wellness training, nutritional programs, and indoor

recreational athletic activities at this remote overseas base. This

fitness center is the primary indoor physical recreation facility on Main

Naval Base and is within walking distance of the majority of housing and

barracks facilities and transient ships. The outdoor swimming pool shall

provide support training mission for COMNAVMARIANAS. Existing pool and

playing field are also substandard and will be replaced with this project.

REQUIREMENT:

This project will construct a consolidated fitness center, a 50-meter 10

lane outdoor swimming pool with change house, an outdoor synthetic playing

field, and new outdoor running/jogging track at the Naval Base, Guam.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

45,2500805176N 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P530



11. Requirement:


synthetic playing field, and an outdoor running/jogging track. This

project also modifies the existing Charles King gymnasium (functional

rearrangements) and improves the existing electrical and mechanical

systems. The fitness facility will include: 1) lobby/reception; 2)

basketball/volleyball courts with spectator seating; 3) fitness equipment

spaces/group exercise area; 4) locker rooms; 5) support spaces to include

laundry, storage, and heads; 6) administrative spaces; and 7) activity

spaces to include snack/vending machines and a multipurpose room. The

construction of the consolidated fitness facility will consist of

reinforced concrete foundation, concrete floor slab, masonry walls and roof

system.

Sustainable design principles will be integrated into the design,

development and construction of this project in accordance with Executive

Order 13123 and other directives.

The existing Camp Covington Indoor Fitness Facility (Building No. 523) will

be converted to a Training Center by another project. Facility No. 2016,

Outdoor Swimming Pool shall be demolished due to its deteriorated

structural conditions that leads to loss of water and chemicals.


February 2007

DD Form



The existing gymnasium facility is a cramped and dilapidated facility.

Originally constructed in 1973, the facility is deteriorated, with marginal

conditions in floor, wall, and ceiling materials in the toilets, locker

rooms, and sauna. There is no space for warm-up of stretching exercises in

the facility; corridors are narrow and not code compliant, locker and

shower rooms are inadequate, and mechanical and electrical systems are

unreliable and cannot support modern exercise equipment. The existing

building structure limits development and expansion of exercise and health

and wellness programs.

The existing outdoor swimming pool has limited use during thunder storms,

which occur quite frequently during the typhoon season. Also the existing

condition of the facility is deteriorated that leads to loss of water and

chemicals. The outdoor track and field is substandard and will also be

replaced with this project.

If a new facility is not provided, sports and fitness programs will

continue to be critically hampered by the lack of adequate facilities. The

existing gymnasium will continue to deteriorate associated with a high

maintenance cost. If a new facility is not provided, quality of life of

the military personnel will be impacted. Military personnel will have to

seek other forms of recreation impacting their morale, retention,

readiness, and productivity to support the military mission in Guam.

The 50-meters 10 lane outdoor swimming pool will provide support training

for EOD personnel in conducting high risk MK 16 Underwater Breathing

Apparatus(UBA) emergency procedures, second class swimmer qualification and

EOD screening test and an individual or group physicall well fitness

training. Additionally, the 50-meter 10 lane outdoor swimming pool will

provide support for the training mission of Naval Special Warfare Unit One

(NSWU-1). The NSWU-1 will conduct Close Circuit Diving training, Open

Circuit Diving training, 1st/2nd/3rd class swimmer training, screen test

for Basic Underwater Demolition and Seals School(BUDSS) and Special Warfare

Combatant Crewman(SWCC) training.

The 50 meters outdoor swimming pool will be divided into three separate

areas and may be used simultaneously for recreational swimming, lap

swimmimg for fitnees training and other instructional training.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

45,2500805176N 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P530




1. Status:



February 2007

DD Form





Yes

Yes

September 2006

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

45,2500805176N 74044


NAVY 2008FY

P530



Fitness Equipment OMN 2008 3,000



Equipment

Nomenclature





however, the scope of the project is based on Navy Requirements.

CDR Gary Wick DSN 339-3340Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

No

$858

$780

$78

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$343

$515


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3611391


9. COST ESTIMATES


POTABLE WATER SYSTEM RECAP, PHASE

1

WATER SUPPLY, TRANSMISSSION,

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

FENA LAKE PUMP STATION BLDG

FENA LAKE GENERATOR BLDG

OROTE WATER STORAGE TANK

RESERVOIR

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

27,230

(21,000)

(1,640)

(280)

(4,310)

27,230

1,360

28,590

1,770

30,360

1,090

31,450

31,450


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,4500702776N 84110

Potable Water System Recap,

Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P532



Provide new (or replace and upgrade existing) water transmission lines:

1) from Fena Water Pump Station (WPS) to Fena Water Treatment Plan (WTP)

and between the existing auxiliary waterline in water pipeline tunnel to

the suction manifold of Fena Pump Station;

2) along Harbor Road (PWC Maintenance Complex);

3) from Marine Drive to X-Ray Wharf and NAVFAC MAR complex:

4) along Romeo and Sierra Wharves;

5) at Camp Convington

6) from Almagosa Spring and Bona Spring, respectively, to Fena Water

Treatment Plant and upgrade the pump station;

Provide:

7) a water line connection between the Tupo water supply main and Apra View

Housing;

8) a pressure reducing valve (PRV) station for the water lines feeding the

Sasa Valley, X-Ray Wharf, and Polaris Point;

9) a concrete building enclosure for the generator for Fena Lake Raw Water

Pump Station

10) zone meters on water lines in the Apra Heights and Tupo Reservoir

areas;


February 2007

DD Form


Most of the existing water main and distribution lines are old, having been

installed in the 1950s, and are not sufficiently sized to accommodate

present requirements at some locations.

Raw Water Supply Main floor, Fena Reservoir to Fena Water Treatment Plant

(WTP) is the only U.S. Main Source of Water to supply to the Fena Water

Treatment Plant (WTP). Up to 13.5 million gallons of water from the

reservoir is processed daily for drinking water through Fena WTP. Source

A reliable and adequate water supply system is required to provide

sufficient amounts of potable water for domestic, operational flows, ship

service and fire protection requirements for the U.S. Navy main base.

This project aims to satisfy present and future Navy water supply

requirements for housing, shore facilities and ship services.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

This project will replace existing water lines with larger size lines,

provide miscellaneous water mains and line connections, construction of a

concrete enclosure for the Fena Lake Pump Station standby generator,

installation of zone meters for water reservoirs, replacement of vertical

pumps and the suction and discharge valves with upgrade to 500 HP of motors

equipped with variable frequency drives for the Fena Lake Pump Station, and

installation of pressure reducing valves for water lines feeding the Sasa

Valley, X-Ray Wharf and Polaris Point.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,4500702776N 84110


Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P532



11. Requirement:


Replace:

11) the four (4) existing vertical pumps of the Fena Lake Pump Station and

upgrade to 500 HP motors with variable frequency drives (VFDs);

12) the suction and discharge valves of 4 vertical pumps (24-inch gate, 12-

inch gate and 12-inch swing check, respectively, for each pump) of the Fena

Lake Pump Station.

Provide a one (1) million gallon water storage tank reservoir, complete

with a booster pump station, at Orote Peninsula. Reservoir shall include

valving and siting to allow the reservoir to be expandable for the future

construction of an additional one (1) million gallon cell or cells.


February 2007

DD Form


water from the Fena reservoir passes through the intake tunnel, and then

funnels into a single 600 mm pipeline. The 600 mm pipeline supplies four

3,500 gpm water pumps at Fena Water Pump Station for conveyance through a

600 mm transmission pipe to the Fena WTP.

The existing 600 mm transmission pipe is 50 years old and nearing its

service life expectancy. Constructed of cast iron, the pipeline exhibits

advanced stages of internal and external corrosion, increasing the risk of

catastrophic structural damage from metal corrosion, hydraulic surge

pressures, and natural causes such as earthquake tremors. There is no other

pipeline that can serve as a conduit of raw water to the treatment plant if

the existing main transmission lines fail.

There have been instances when water main failure or faulty meter operation

have caused the water supply to the housing area from Maanot Reservoir to

be secured and the Apra Heights Reservoir auxiliary supply main was opened

to provide back up service. During these occasions, water supply service

falls substantially below 20 psi.

Currently, the 400 mm water mains located along Marine Drive and Sumay

Drive flank the PWC Maintenance Complex. Two 200 mm mains located north and

south of the Complex tap off of the 400 mm mains to provide water to PWC

Maintenance facilities. The current configuration of the water system is

not adequate for fire protection.

The Fena Lake Pump Station has a 1,750 KVA diesel engine-generator that

provides emergency power for the three (3) 450 Hp raw water pumps during

power outages. The generator is not protected from typhoon winds and the

harsh environment in the area. A hardened concrete enclosure is required to

protect/preserve the engine-generator set from harsh environment and

typhoons and provide a reliable emergency power for the raw water pumps.

Failure to provide the necessary replacement and upgrades to the potable

water system will result in inadequate water supply to some areas because

of old, corroding and insufficiently sized pumps, piping and water pressure

that is too high. With frequent super typhoons on Guam, exposure of the

generator to typhoon generated winds may unexpectedly render the generator

incapable of providing standby power for the Fena Water Pump Station, which

provides the main source of water for the Navy¿s main base and vicinity.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,4500702776N 84110


Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P532




February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

31,4500702776N 84110


Phase 1

NAVY 2008FY

P532










Brian Hess (671) 339-7084Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


Yes

$850

$50

$800

04/2008

01/2008

10/2009

08/2006

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$800

$50


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3651390

Scope

15210

Cost

($000)Start

Wharf Upgrades Inc 3 of 3

Complete

0 LS 8,750

Design Status

02/2004


05/2006


4. Command

Cat

Code Project Title

B. INVENTORY AS OF






H. GRAND TOTAL .............................................

............................30 SEP 2006 4,219,912

8,310

0

0

8,750

74,420


9. Future Projects:


TOTAL


YOKOSUKA, JAPAN


8,750



0





Maintain and operate base facilities for the logistic, recreational,

administrative support and service of the U.S. Naval Forces Japan, U.S.

SEVENTH Fleet and other operating forces assigned in the Western Pacific.

4,311,392

1. Component

NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.43

5. Area Const

Cost Index

0


TOTAL6. Personnel

Strength:

STUDENTS SUPPORT


PERMANENT

11086

10024

976

933B. End FY 2011A. As Of 09-30-06 8178

8163

420

478

0

0

0

0

0

0

143

119

1369

331

0

0

Commander Navy



February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3661390

4. Command


YOKOSUKA, JAPAN



NAVY

2. Date

05 FEB 2007

1.43

5. Area Const



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3671391


9. COST ESTIMATES


WHARF UPGRADES, INC 3 OF 3

PRODUCTION FACILITY (5,167 SF)

DISTRIBUTION FACILITY

FIRE ALARM

WHARF UPGRADES

60 HZ ELECTRICAL GENERATING

PLANT

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS







SITE PREPARATIONS

DEMOLITION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.5%)

SUBTOTAL

FY06 APPROPRIATION

FY07 APPROPRIATION

LESS FORECASTED ESPC COST

AVOIDANCE


TOTAL REQUEST



LS

m2

LS

LS

LS

kw

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

480

30,000

3,390

1,154.32

50,740

(1,630)

(1,140)

(120)

(2,330)

(34,630)

(2,510)

(7,150)

(600)

(630)

23,490

(360)

(6,240)

(8,260)

(5,900)

(1,140)

(340)

(1,250)

74,230

3,710

77,940

5,070

83,010

-13,907

-44,360

-15,993

8,750

8,750

(7,250)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B

COMFLEACT YOKOSUKA JAYOKOSUKA, JAPAN



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B



This project proposes to upgrade the existing structural and utilities

infrastructure at the U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka waterfront area to

support a Forward Deployed Naval Force (FDNF) nuclear powered aircraft

carrier (CVN) and its supporting workshop and supply barges. The project

includes the following waterfront related items of work.

1) To allow the USS George Washington to berth at the carrier pier, the

floating pier must be removed. A Host Nation funded project will remove

the existing floating pier (Berths 10 and 11) for submarines and dredge

Yokosuka Bay. This Military Construction project will reconstruct Berth 13

to provide a replacement submarine berth, including the fendering system.

Reconstruction includes providing the required utilities, installation of

piles to support the fendering system, and the installation of bollards and

cleats.

2) Structurally upgrade the seawall area adjacent to Berth 12 by providing

a concrete deck and beams supported by piles and barge mooring structures &

appurtenances.

3) Upgrade the existing waterfront seawater, steam, potable (also including

fire protection) water, and wastewater systems.

For the seawater system, provide a 5,700 liter/min (1,500 gpm) pump in Bldg

J-186, modify the manifold & distribution system piping to accept seawater

from the new pump, and provide an automatic digital control system that

interfaces with the existing control system.

For the steam system, replace the 200 mm (8 in) steam distribution line,

from the boiler plant Bldg A-43 to the steam manifold located in power

plant Bldg 1938, with a 250 mm (10 in) steam distribution line.

For the potable system, provide distribution laterals, backflow preventers,

water flow meters, and ship outlet connections.

For the wastewater system, provide additional wastewater collection lines

and lift stations.

4) Provide new utility systems, including a high quality water (HQW)

facility, high & low pressure compressed air systems, with associated

piping distribution systems, emergency generator backup, digital controls,

and waterfront outlets.


February 2007

DD Form


PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B



11. Requirement:


Demolish the hill and prepare the site for a one-story pre-engineered steel

HQW facility structure on a reinforced concrete foundation containing the

following major pieces of built-in equipment: stainless steel tanks &

piping, pumps, a reverse osmosis unit, a degasifier unit, and digital

controls. In addition, the low and high pressure air compressors and the

emergency generator for the low pressure freeze seal air compressors will

be located in this HQW production and storage facility.

5) Demolish buildings (B-49 and B-52), as required, and provide a new 60

Hertz (Hz) generating plant, consisting of a generating plant building;

multiple electrical power generating and/or frequency converting units with

a total capacity of 30 megawatts (mW); a Supervisory Control & Data

Acquisition (SCADA) system; all supporting utilities, including potable

water, sanitary sewer, and fire protection/hydrant water lines; a fire

protection/suppression system, including a radio alarm signal transmitting

system and fire hydrants; information system infrastructure for local area

network (LAN) and telephone; sidewalks, landscaping, and signs.

6) In addition to the waterfront related items of work, this project will

provide a new Command Center that can function as an Emergency Control

Center (ECC), with the required information systems infrastructure to allow

direct communication between the Command Center and the waterfront workshop

and support barges.

7) This project will also provide a security fence to enclose the

controlled industrial enclave and a security office building and gate to

facilitate the safeguarding of NOFORN Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information

(NNPI).

Anti-terrorism / Force Protection criteria are not applicable to these

uninhabited structures per Paragraph 1-6.7 of UFC 04-010-01.





February 2007

DD Form


Berthing. P-80 defines the spacing requirement between ships and berths.

Because the existing floating pier (Berths 10 and 11) encroaches into the

slip area identified for the USS George Washington (CVN 73) berthing, a

separate Host Nation project will remove the floating pier. This project

proposes to build a replacement submarine berth at Berth 13.

The supply and workshop barges supporting the USS George Washington need to

be located in the general vicinity of Berth 12. Since the seawall area is

ideally situated for this purpose, structural upgrades to the seawall area

are required to convert that area into satisfactory berthing for the

barges.

High Quality Water (HQW). Yokosuka Main Base does not have any facilities

to produce, store, and distribute the high quality water, which is a

requirement for supporting the maintenance and repair activities associated

with the forward deployed CVN. A HQW production, storage, and distribution

system is a prerequisite to forward deploying the CVN to Yokosuka.

Electricity. The NAVFAC Pacific Utility Study provided the following

information. The FY2004 Yokosuka waterfront 60 Hz connected load was

48,054 kVA. Applying a 0.75 coincident (i.e., diversity) factor resulted

in an electrical power requirement of 36,041 kVA. In FY2008, with the

planned change out of naval vessels, the connected load and electrical

power requirement are expected to grow to 67,225 kVA and 50,419 kVA,

respectively. Adding a 25% allowance (per UFC 4-150-02) for future growth,

results in a FY2008 electrical power requirement of 63,023 kVA. The

current Yokosuka Main Base 60 Hz generating capacity is 25,500 kVA. Thus

there is a deficit of 37,523 kVA; assuming an 80% power factor, this

corresponds to a 30,019 kW, (30,000 kW = 30 mW , rounded) deficit for 60 Hz

power.

REQUIREMENT:

This project provides: 1) waterfront structural upgrades; 2) new utility

systems, including high quality water (HQW) production, storage, and

distribution systems, high & low pressure compressed air systems, and a 30

mW 60 Hz electrical generating plant and electrical distribution system; 3)

upgrades to the existing electrical power distribution, seawater, steam,

potable (also fire protection) water, and wastewater utilities systems to

support active and repair berthing of FDNF vessels, including the USS

George Washington; and 4) a Command Center that could function as an

Emergency Control Center. (CURRENT AND NEW MISSION)

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B




February 2007

DD Form


Steam. Yokosuka Main Base Boiler Plant A-43 has sufficient capacity to

provide the clean steam requirements of the waterfront, including the steam

requirements of the CVN. However, during times of peak consumption, the

200 mm (8 in) steam distribution line between the boiler plant and the

manifold header in Bldg 1938 becomes a bottleneck and reduces steam

pressure to less than the 10.55 kg/sq cm (= 150 psi) at Berth 12. To

remove the bottleneck, the 200 mm (8 in) line will be replaced with a 250

mm (10 in) line to interface with the 250 mm (10 in) line that goes from

Bldg 1938 to Berth 12.

Seawater. The NAVFAC Pacific Utility Study provided the following

information. The current Yokosuka waterfront seawater system is comprised

of five (5) pumps, each with a capacity of 11,400 liter/min (3,000 gpm).

Therefore the total capacity of that system is 57,000 liter/min (15,000

gpm). With the replacement of the current USS Kitty Hawk (CV63) with the

USS George Washington (CVN 73), the seawater demand will grow to 63,600

liter/min (16,800 gpm). Adding on a 10% future growth allowance, the

seawater demand will be 70,000 liter/min (63,600 gpm) and the deficit in

seawater production capacity will be 13,000 liter/min (3,400 gpm). Because

the Yokosuka seawater distribution system is a looped system which, at

times, operates at very low consumption rates, to avoid over pressurizing

the distribution system lines, the NAVFAC Pacific Utility Study recommended

installing a sixth pump with a capacity of 5,700 liter/min (1,500 gpm), as

opposed to the 13,000 liter/min (3,400 gpm) pump capacity required to

supply the full waterfront seawater requirement.

Compressed Air. The quality of the existing Yokosuka low pressure

compressed air system is not of sufficient quality to support active and

repair berthing of the CVN. In addition Yokosuka Main Base does not have a

high pressure compressed air system. Therefore, this project proposes to

provide both new high and low pressure compressed air systems, including

compressors, distribution system piping, filter dryers, unfired pressure

vessels (UPV), outlets, and other ancillary system components, which are

required to support the forward deployed CVN repair and maintenance

activities

Potable Water. The existing Yokosuka Main Base potable water system has

the capacity to support the projected FY2008 potable water demand at the

waterfront. Other than the piping, fittings, and valves, required to

connect the existing potable water system to the HQW production facility

and potable water outlets at Berths 12, 13, and the seawall, there are no


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B




February 2007

DD Form


September 2006


Existing facilities and utilities system infrastructure are non-existent,

or are of insufficient quality and/or capacity to support the active repair

and berthing requirements of the USS George Washington and other FDNF

vessels assigned to U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka.

Without the new facilities and improvements to existing facilities to be

provided by this project, U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka will not be able

to provide shore side facilities and required utilities to support the

active berthing and repair of the a CVN and other FDNF vessels assigned to

Yokosuka. The USS George Washington and other FDNF vessels will then be

required to utilize other (non-forward operating) locations to obtain the

necessary shore side support. The result will be an overall significantly

higher life cycle cost to the U.S. Government. Moreover, the USS George

Washington and other FDNF vessels, while in port at Yokosuka, will not be

able to shut down their shipboard operating systems and conduct the routine

repair and maintenance to those shipboard systems. The result will be an

associated decrease in shipboard systems state of mission readiness.

additional potable water requirements for this project.

Wastewater. The existing Yokosuka Main Base wastewater processing system

has the capacity to support the projected FY2008 wastewater load at the

waterfront. Therefore this project proposes to provide the infrastructure

required to accommodate the increased wastewater discharge pressure and

volume from the USS George Washington by providing additional piping. A

follow-on Host Nation funded project will be programmed to provide the

additional necessary lift stations.

Command Center. The facilities and infrastructure to conduct emergency

response operations are limitted at Yokosuka Main Base. This project

proposes to provide the facilities and information systems infrastructure

to support maintenance and emergency response operations.


CURRENT SITUATION:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B







1. Status:


04/2005

05/2006

2%


February 2007

DD Form


(F) Type of design contract Other



Yes

Yes

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B



Command Center

Hoses and Assemblies

Ship Support Equipment

Waterfront Support Equipment

OMN

OMN

OPN

OPN

2006

2006

2006

2006

1,600

250

3,100

2,300



Equipment

Nomenclature






Andre Lee 011-81-6160-43-9247Activity POC: Phone No:

2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:


No

N/A

$6,000

$3,800

$2,200

07/2006

05/2006

04/2008

10%

$4,000

$2,000


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 8,750


0203176N 15210


NAVY 2008FY

P998B



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3751391

The Commandant of the Marine Corps has articulated the importance of being

able to adapt to broad strategic conditions and wide-ranging threats. To

meet the demands of the Long War and remain prepared for the inevitable

contingencies that will arise, our Corps must be sufficiently manned,

This project begins the construction efforts required to support the

increased end strength of 202k necessary for the Marine Corps to shape the

operational forces ability to fight the Long War. The low density, high

demand (LD/HD) capabilities that are consistently requested for Operation

Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) employment are also

those capabilities that the joint force will need to support future Global

War on Terror (GWOT) requirements in other combatant command areas of

responsibilities (AORs). For the Marine Corps, Military Construction

(MILCON) projects will support the increase in critical intelligence,

reconnaissance, military police, engineer, aviation, ground mobility, and

infantry facility and training range requirements. Military construction

would include operational and training facilities, maintenance facilities,

bachelor housing facilities, community facilities, and utilities and ground

improvements.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Grow the Force.

PROJECT:

(New Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


GROW THE FORCE

GROW THE FORCE

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (0%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (0%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

361,120

(361,120)

361,120

0

361,120

0

361,120

361,120

361,120


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

361,12061010

Grow the Force

NAVY 2008FY

P108

VARIOUS LOCATIONSWORLDWIDE

3. Installation(SA)& Location/UIC: NC1002

11. Requirement:

Included in the P&D 1391 is $21,792,000.00 to support Grow the Force.


February 2007

DD Form


(F) Type of design contract



September 2006

January 2007


effectively trained, and properly equipped. Like the Cold War, the Long War

is a continuing struggle that will not be measured by the number of near-

term deployments or rotations. The Corps' personnel policies,

organizational construct, and training must be correctly sized and

resourced for three main reasons. First, to alleviate strain on the

individual by ensuring our structure supports adequate homestation dwell

time for our Marines. Second, to alleviate strain on units by allowing

adequate time for training and maintenance. Third, to ensure Marine Air

Ground Task Forces are prepared to support Combatant Commanders' efforts to

fight both irregular and conventional future threats.

The Marine Corps will continue to grow over the next five years. Failure

to provide these much needed projects will result in a shortage of training

ranges and inability to provide appropriate "Quality of Life" support to

the growing force. Also, operational facilities will not be properly

configured to accomodate expanded staffs and mission.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

361,12061010

Grow the Force

NAVY 2008FY

P108









2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$0

04/2008

01/2008

04/2010


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

361,12061010

Grow the Force

NAVY 2008FY

P108



The (CERTIFYING OFFICIAL) certifies that this project has been considered

for joint use potential. (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED)is recommended.

(UNILATERAL STATEMENT, if Unilateral Construction is selected)

LtCol Scalise (703)695-8202Activity POC: Phone No:


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

361,12061010

Grow the Force

NAVY 2008FY

P108



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3791391


9. COST ESTIMATES


WHARF UTILITIES UPGRADES

POTABLE WATER UPGRADES

SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

UPGRADES

STEAM PLANT

OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT


INFORMATION SYSTEMS




PROTECTION

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (6.2%)

SUBTOTAL



TOTAL REQUEST



LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

7,460

(3,150)

(2,550)

(530)

(840)

(50)

(340)

240

(210)

(30)

7,700

390

8,090

500

8,590

310

8,900

8,900

(3,687)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,9000203176N 15220


NAVY 2008FY

P180



The project will improve the wharf and provide facilities to support the

relocation of the medium size surface ship due to closure of the current

ship homeport. This is the first of three projects to provide facilities

in three phases to support the ship at its new location in a timely manner.

The second project is P-181, Wharf Upgrades and Warehouse. The third

project is P-182, Wharf Upgrades and Recreation Facility.

The project provides minimum utilities to accommodate the ship in a normal

mooring position parallel to the wharf. Med-mooring provisions will be

provided in Phase III. Upon completion of this project, the medium size

ship will be able to accommodate one SSGN and one SSN outboard of the ship

for repair. The medium size ship will be berthed at Berth B, while it is

deployed to this new location.


February 2007

DD Form


This project constructs the minimum number of facilities to support the

relocation of the medium size surface ship from its current homeport to the

new deployed location. This project will improve the berthing and mooring

capabilities at the wharf to immediately accommodate the ship.

WHARF IMPROVEMENTS:

The wharf utilities modifications will accommodate berthing of the medium

size ship adjacent to the wharf in a position parallel to the wharf. The

medium size ship will have at most, an SSGN and an SSN alongside for

repair.

UTILITIES:

Utilities at the wharf will be upgraded to accommodate the ship and

personnel loading. All personnel on the medium size ship and the boats

under repair will live aboard their respective ships, thereby requiring

upgrades to the electrical system, sewer systems, and water systems serving

the wharf. Fly away teams of repair personnel will also live aboard the

medium size ship unless space available BQ rooms ashore can accommodate

them.

PROJECT:


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,9000203176N 15220


NAVY 2008FY

P180



11. Requirement:


SHORE SUPPORT FACILITIES:

Project will construct several new provisions at the wharf for utilities to

support the medium size ship. These provision include but are not limited

to: potable water treatment upgrades and connections, sewage treatment

upgrades and connections, a steam plant, and oily wastewater collection and

treatment. Site preparation will include clearing and grading. Site

improvements will include new concrete paving for access to the wharf where

necessary for efficient operation.

A water treatment plant addition for treating trihalomethanes in the well

water pumped for potable water and a demineralization plant will be

constructed as part of the project. The existing potable water

distribution system will continue to be used, but connections will need to

be provided at the wharf.


February 2007

DD Form


The receiving base has one general purpose deep draft wharf that serves the

island. The wharf is 2,000 FT long and 150 FT wide. Currently, a T-AKR

brings supplies to the base once a month and berths at the wharf for about

a week at a time. A new mission to support an SSGN for a 21-day period two

to three times a year has been assigned to the base. MILCON project P-160,

Wharf Improvements and SSGN Support Facilities, will be mainly upgrading

one-half of the wharf, Berth B, for the SSGN while the other half, Berth A,

will still accommodate the T-AKR. In order for the wharf to be able to

support the deployed medium size ship, upgrades to the wharf and utilities

systems are needed.

Structural Systems - The existing wharf was constructed in 1983, and is the

only general berthing facility for ships at the base. The original timber

fender system was replaced with a foam-filled fender system in 1995. The

existing fender system does not address the berthing requirements of the

medium size ship or other associated vessels. The fender system is

suitable for the support of surface ships only. Additional fenders will be

provided to accommodate the berthing of SSN and SSGN submarines by an

earlier MILCON project. This project will provide provisions for mooring

the medium size surface ship alongside the wharf in a position parallel to

the wharf.

The mission of the receiving base is support of the strategic interests of

the United States in that area of the world. As such, the base supports

Navy, Marines, Air Force and Army personnel operating in the area.

The closure of the existing homeport location of the medium size surface

ship requires the relocation of the support provided by the ship. The

receiving base has been selected as a forward deployed location for the

ship. The medium size ship must move by 2008 due to the closure. Adequate

wharf accommodations, storage facilities for equipment and supplies, and

parking for servicing vehicles are required to support these operations.

The receiving base requires facility improvements to the wharf and

utilities systems in order to meet current and future fleet berthing

requirements, and to support regional logistics demands. This project

provides the minimum upgrades to the wharf and utilities systems to support

the immediate deployment of the medium size surface ship to the new

location.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(New Mission)


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,9000203176N 15220


NAVY 2008FY

P180




February 2007

DD Form


Electrical Power System - The electrical utility system provides electrical

service to the western half of the island where most of the U.S. Forces are

accommodated. The electrical system consists of two main power plants,

North (NPP) and South (SPP), two 13.8 kV switching stations and a 13.8 kV

distribution system, which consists of overhead lines and underground

cables. The existing switchgear in the switching stations and power plants

are old and obsolete. The normal electrical capacity provided by the two

power plants is 15,000 kW. With the addition of the SSGN to the island,

the electrical load for the island is estimated to be 24,800 kW. This

project will provide minimum electrical improvements to be able to

expeditiously accommodate the medium size ship at its new deployed

location. Phase II (P-181) will provide additional generating capacity to

support the load required by the medium size ship servicing up to six boats

and other combatants.

Other utilities systems - The water system that provides water for the

whole base currently provides a potable water supply that is contaminated

with trihalomethanes (THMs). Drinking water for residents and visitors is

currently treated further by a nanofiltration plant. This project will

provide an addition to the nanofiltration drinking water treatment system

and connections to provide the necessary treatment capacity to service the

medium size ship. The sewage lagoon that services the island is marginally

treating the sewage from the existing island population and functions.

MILCON Project P-158 will add an additional lagoon and aerators to increase

the capacity of treatment for the existing sewage load. A previous MILCON

project must be accomplished to adequately support the existing loads on

the island. The loads from the medium size ship and boats under repair

will need to be treated by an addition to the sewage treatment system.

Summary - The existing facilities are barely adequate to support the

current mission requirements with the SSGN, and thus cannot support this

new mission without improvements and upgrades.

If this project is not provided, the Navy will not be able to move the

medium size ship out of its current homeport to the new location in a

timely manner. It will also not meet the mission to service boats and

surface ships in the new area.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,9000203176N 15220


NAVY 2008FY

P180




February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,9000203176N 15220


NAVY 2008FY

P180



Bilge and Sewage Hoses

Hydro-Pneumatic Fenders

Mobile Utilities - Deminerlized Water

Mobile Utilities - LP & HP Air, HP

Nitrogen

Mobile Utilities - Potable Water

Shore Power Cables

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

OPN

2007

2007

2007

2007

2007

2007

73

2,789

248

256

248

73



Equipment

Nomenclature






Richard Soriano 011-246-370-4521Activity POC: Phone No:




2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

$3,000

$2,500

$500

04/2008

12/2007

04/2010

08/2006

12/2006

09/2007

5%

15%

$1,000

$2,000


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



Procuring

Approp

FY Approp



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

8,9000203176N 15220


NAVY 2008FY

P180



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3851391

The Host Nation Infrastructure Support (HNIS) program provides a source of

U.S. funds for each NATO-funded project to pay host nation costs. This

authority is not used to increase the scope of a facility for U.S.

functions, such work is included through conjunctive funding in separate

MILCON projects.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Execute role as host nation and construction agent for NATO project,

Construct Addition to HQ SACT in Norfolk, Va, by upgrading electrical

utilities, specifically power supply, in accordance with DOD Directive.

The addition includes 4930.7 square meters of additional office and support

space to building NH-31, 492 square meters of support space to building NH-

31A, the construction of a new facility to replace NH-31B and the

construction of 3045 square meters of seperate office space to accomodate

the National Liasons Representatives (NLR).

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES




SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (0%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (0%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

LS

2,700

(2,700)

2,700

0

2,700

0

2,700

2,700

2,700


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,7000901376N 61010


NAVY 2008FY

P600



11. Requirement:

This project provides upgrades to the existing electrical utilities in

support of NATO project 9HQ25004-0, Construct Additions to Supreme Allied

Commander Transformation (SACT) Headquarters, Norfolk. This is in

accordance with DoD Directive 2010.5. This directive states that funds

will be used to cover non-NATO eligible expenses such as host nation costs,

life safety, functional utility/livability, energy, administrative

expenses, design support, joint formal acceptance inspection, audit, and

currency fluctuation losses.


February 2007

DD Form





No

No

September 2006

January 2007


Navy is the construction agent for NATO Infrastructure projects at

locations where the United States is host nation. HNIS responsibilities

involve funding certain program costs, such as, land acquisition, source

utilities, roads and parking, administrative expenses, design support,

joint formal acceptance inspections (JFAI), audits, and currency

fluctuation losses. NATO eligibility criteria stipulates only Minimum

Military Requirement (MMR) for wartime occupancy and does not include

peacetime related features such as fire protection or energy conservation.

This request is based on approved NATO infrastructure projects.

Currently the electrical utilties are not adequate to sustain the building

upgrade projected for the SACT Headquarters.

Timely U.S. funding for the work will not be possible. Delays in executing

these projects for lack of HNIS funding will deprive operating units of

sorely needed facilities and may be a source of embarrassment for the U.S.



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,7000901376N 61010


NAVY 2008FY

P600









2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


No

NA

$500

$500

$0

04/2009

01/2008

04/2010

05/2006

10/2006

05/2007

15%

35%

$350

$150


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,7000901376N 61010


NAVY 2008FY

P600



The (CERTIFYING OFFICIAL) certifies that this project has been considered

for joint use potential. (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED)is recommended.

(UNILATERAL STATEMENT, if Unilateral Construction is selected)



February 2007

DD Form



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

2,7000901376N 61010


NAVY 2008FY

P600



Blank Page


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3891391


N/A

N/A

All projects in a military construction program presented for approval must

be based on sound engineering and the best cost data available. For this

reason, design is initiated to establish project estimates in advance of

program submittal to the Congress. Based on this preliminary design, final

plans and specifications are then prepared. These costs for architectural

and engineering services and construction design are not provided for in

the construction project cost estimates except in those where Design/Build

contracting method is used.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Planning and design funds.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES


PLANNING AND DESIGN

DESIGN COSTS

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (0%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (0%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

110,170

(110,170)

110,170

0

110,170

0

110,170

110,170

110,167


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 110,167


Planning and Design

NAVY 2008FY

P218

PLANNING /DESIGNWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


11. Requirement:

Funds to be utilized under Title 10 USC 2807 for architectural and

engineering services and construction design in connection with military

construction projects including regular program projects, unspecified minor

construction, emergency construction, land appraisals, and special projects

as directed. Engineering investigations, such as field surveys and

foundation exploration, will be undertaken as necessary.


February 2007

DD Form





September 2006

January 2007


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 110,167


Planning and Design

NAVY 2008FY

P218

PLANNING /DESIGNWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA





N/A





2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$0


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE


February 2007

DD Form

1 Dec 76Page No. 3911391

N/A

N/A

Title 10 USC 2805 provides authority to the Secretary of Defense and the

Secretaries of the Military Departments to acquire, construct, extend,

alter or install permanent facilities having an approved cost of $1,500,000

or less not otherwise authorized by law. Included are those items required

for which a need cannot reasonably be foreseen nor justified in time to be

included in an annual military construction program, but are so urgently

required that financing cannot be deferred until legislation in support of

a new program is enacted.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

Unspecified Minor Construction.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)


9. COST ESTIMATES




SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (0%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (0%)

SUBTOTAL


TOTAL REQUEST

LS

LS

10,000

(10,000)

10,000

0

10,000

0

10,000

10,000

10,000


4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,000



NAVY 2008FY

P208

MINOR CONSTRUCTIONWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


11. Requirement:

Projects authorized by Title 10 USC 2805 not otherwise authorized by law

having an approved cost of $1,500,000 or less, including construction,

alteration, or conversion of permanent or temporary facilities. Projects

intended solely to correct a deficiency that is life-threatening, health-

threatening, or safety-threatening, may have an approved cost equal to or

less than $3,000,000. Total request includes funds for supervision,

inspection, and overhead.


February 2007

DD Form





September 2006

January 2007



4. Project Title


1. Component


05 FEB 2007

Auth 0

Approp 10,000



NAVY 2008FY

P208

MINOR CONSTRUCTIONWASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA





N/A





2. Basis:



(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house


4. Contract award:



1. Status:


$0


3. Total Cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):



NONE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2008

BUDGET ESTIMATES

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS

JUSTIFICATION DATA SUBMITTED TO

CONGRESS

FEBRUARY 2007

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY/MARINE CORPS MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET SUBMISSION FISCAL YEAR 2008

INDEX Page INDEX 1 SUMMARY PART Exhibit 3 DoN Program Summary 5 Navy Inadequate Unit Elimination Exhibits (FH-7/8) 7 Marine Corps Inadequate Unit Elimination Exhibits (FH-7/8) 17 LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE 27 NEW CONSTRUCTION DoN New Construction Summary 29 Guam, NAVBASE Guam DD Form 1390 31 DD Form 1391 (H-481) 33 DD Form 1523 36 POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION DoN Post-Acquisition Construction Summary 37 Navy Post-Acquisition Construction 39 Marine Corps Post-Acquisition Construction 53 ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN DoN Advance Planning and Design Summary 63 INVENTORY AND FUNDING SUMMARY DoN Operations and Maintenance Summary 65 DoN O&M Reprogramming Report 67 Navy Reprogramming & Proposed Realignment (FH-10) 71 Marine Corps Reprogramming & Proposed Realignment (FH-10) 72 DoN Inventory Summary (FH-2) 73 Navy Inventory Summary (FH-2) 75 Marine Corps Inventory Summary (FH-2) 79 OPERATIONS Navy Operations Exhibits (OP-5) 83 Marine Corps Operations Exhibits (OP-5) 89 UTILITIES Navy Utilities Exhibit (OP-5) 99 Marine Corps Utilities Exhibit (OP-5) 101

1

MAINTENANCE Navy Maintenance Exhibit (OP-5) 103 Marine Corps Maintenance Exhibit (OP-5) 105 GFOQ MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER $35K DoN GFOQ M&R Over $35K Exhibit (FH-5) 107 GFOQ OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE OVER $35K Navy GFOQ O&M Over $35K Exhibit 113 Navy GFOQ Greater Than 6,000 NSF Exhibit 114 Marine Corps GFOQ O&M Over $35K Exhibit 115 Marine Corps GFOQ Greater Than 6,000 NSF Exhibit 116 REIMBURSABLES Navy Reimbursables Exhibit (OP-5) 117 Marine Corps Reimburseables Exhibit (OP-5) 119 LEASING DoN Leasing Summary 121 Navy Leasing Summary & Exhibits (FH-4) 123 Marine Corps Leasing Summary & Exhibits (FH-4) 129 PRIVATIZATION DON PPV Summary 133 Navy PPV Narrative & Detailed Summary (FH-6) 135 Navy Awarded Projects Summary 139 Navy Privatization Exhibit (OP-5) 141 Marine Corps PPV Narrative & Detailed Summary (FH-6) 143 Marine Corps Awarded Projects Summary 147 Marine Corps Privatization Exhibit (OP-5) 149 DEBT PAYMENT/FOREIGN CURRENCY Navy Debt Payment Summary 151 Marine Corps Debt Payment Summary 153 Navy Foreign Currency Exchange Data (PB-18) 155 Marine Corps Foreign Currency Exchange Data (PB-18) 157

2

PROGRAM View Assessment Details

Defense Housing DoD's housing program provides housing to military service members and their families. DoD does this in two ways -- by providing Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) to service members (who find housing in the community or in privatized housing) or by providing members DoD-owned housing.

RATING What This Rating Means

The purpose of the program is clearly defined - - to provide quality housing for our service members.

The program has clear and ambitious goals. At the end of 2006, DoD had eliminated over 145,000 inadequate units, fewer than projected. At the end of 2006, DoD owned approximately 35,000 inadequate housing units, higher than was projected. DoD continues to address the unique challenges of bringing private and public sectors together to meet the goals of the program.

DoD should reduce the federal role by privatizing more government-owned housing. DoD has reduced the federal role in housing by increasing allowances - - by eliminating service member's average out-of-pocket expenses for housing.

PERFORMING Moderately Effective

IMPROVEMENT PLAN

About Improvement Plans

We are taking the following actions to improve the performance of the program:

Working toward meeting yearly targets so that DoD can eliminate all inadequate housing in the U.S. by 2007.

Privatizing government-owned housing, where feasible, so that military service members and their families can live in quality housing and reduce the role of government in housing.

LEARN MORE View Similar Programs.

How all Federal programs are assessed.

Learn more about Defense Housing.

PROGRAM ASSESSMENT

gov: Defense Housin

3

BLANK PAGE

4

FY 2008 Program $669,733FY 2007 Program* $814,197

Purpose and Scope

Program Summary

Authorization is requested for:

(1) The performance of certain construction summarized hereafter; and

(2) The appropriation of $669,733

(a) to fund this construction; and

A summary of the funding program for Fiscal Year 2008 follows ($000):

Marine DONProgram Navy Corps Total

Construction

Appropriation Request 97,731 200,598 298,329Reimbursements 0 0 0

Total Program 97,731 200,598 298,329

Operations, Utilities, PPV Support,Maintenance, Leasing, and Debt Payment

Appropriation Request 332,401 39,003 371,404Reimbursements 8,000 1,000 9,000

Total Program 340,401 40,003 380,404

Total

Appropriation Request 430,132 239,601 669,733Reimbursements 8,000 1,000 9,000

Total Program 438,132 240,601 678,733

* This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $716,739.

(b) to fund partially certain other functions already authorized in existing legislation.

This program provides for the support of military family housing functions within the Department of the Navy.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET SUMMARY

PROGRAM SUMMARY

(In Thousands)

5

BLANK PAGE

6

FY 2

002

FY 2

003

FY 2

004

FY 2

005

FY 2

006

FY 2

007

FY 2

008

FY 2

009

FY 2

010

Beg

inni

ng F

isca

l Yea

r Inv

ento

ry57

,005

54,3

9148

,266

44,6

4130

,304

21,3

899,

987

9,98

710

,122

Ade

quat

e In

vent

ory

34,6

9934

,647

32,4

5031

,274

21,7

0116

,152

9,98

79,

987

10,1

22In

adeq

uate

Inve

ntor

y22

,306

19,7

4415

,816

13,3

678,

603

5,23

70

00

Per

cent

Inad

equa

te39

%36

%33

%30

%28

%24

%0%

0%0%

Bud

get I

mpa

ct*

2,86

35,

608

3,64

214

,695

9,22

611

,635

00

0In

adeq

uate

s R

educ

ed2,

562

3,92

82,

449

4,76

43,

366

5,23

70

00

M

ilcon

/O&

M1,

283

659

190

6952

224

90

00

P

PV

(Inc

lude

s D

emol

ition

)97

81,

670

1,40

34,

454

2,06

14,

786

00

0

Dem

oliti

on/D

ives

titur

e30

11,

599

823

266

1,15

530

00

00

Ade

quat

e U

nits

PP

V30

11,

680

1,19

39,

931

5,86

06,

398

00

0M

ILC

ON

Def

icit

Red

uctio

n16

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

Inve

ntor

y G

ains

/Los

ses

(1,0

34)

(69)

561

314

161

820

135

179

Est

imat

ed E

OY

Inad

equa

te In

vent

ory

19,7

4415

,816

13,3

678,

603

5,23

70

00

0E

stim

ated

EO

Y T

otal

Inve

ntor

y54

,391

48,2

6644

,641

30,3

0421

,389

9,98

79,

987

10,1

2210

,301

Not

e: I

nven

tory

adj

ustm

ents

are

bas

ed o

n es

timat

ed d

ate

the

units

are

priv

atiz

ed (N

o lo

nger

requ

iring

FH

O&

M fu

nds)

or y

ear i

n w

hich

bu

dget

ed fo

r tra

ditio

nal f

amily

hou

sing

con

stru

ctio

n.Sum

mar

y of

Inad

equa

te U

nit E

limin

atio

nFa

mily

Hou

sing

, Nav

y

Exh

ibit

FH-7

Sum

mar

y of

Inad

equa

te U

nit E

limin

atio

n

7

Total Inventory

TotalInadequateInventory

Total InadequateAddressed

Units at beginning of FY 2002 57,005 22,306

FY 2002 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 1,283H-02-98-3; Annapolis, MD 177 42H-1-01-2; Barking Sands, HI 69 69H-12-99; Sasebo, Japan 52 52H-13-95-4; Yokosuka, Japan 532 96H-03-98-2; Yokosuka, Japan 532 78H-13-95-5; Yokosuka, Japan 532 96H-8-98-2; Guam, Marianas Is. 1,532 44H-1-02; Keflavik, Iceland 793 95H-1-01-2; Keflavik, Iceland 793 65H-2-95-2; London, England 150 70H-1-95-2; London, England 150 80H-1-99-2; Meridian, MS 294 118H-02-02; Hampton Roads, VA 547 12H-1-95; Hampton Roads, VA 547 25H-01-04; Patuxent River, MD 686 28H-5-99; Pensacola, FL 139 36H-7-99; Pensacola, FL 139 14H-1-02; Wallops Island, VA 28 28H-1-97; Whiting Field, FL 452 155H-377; Pearl Harbor, HI 3,859 70H-588; Sigonella, Italy 10 10

FY 2002 Privatization Projects 1,279 978South Texas 781 680 680New Orleans, LA 498 299 298

Units Demolished/Divested 301 301Guam, Marianas Is. 106 1,532 106Jacksonville, FL 5 530 5Key West, FL 83 994 83Lakehurst, NJ 24 134 24Whiting Field, FL 83 452 83

MILCON Deficit Reduction 160 0 0H-595; Gulfport/Pascagoula, MS 160

Other Inventory Gains/Losses* (1,034) 0 0

Units at end of FY 2002 54,391 19,744 2,562

Inadequate Family Housing Units Eliminated in FY 2002

Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Navy

* Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary & permanent diversions, conversions, adds from previously approved construction projects, etc. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Navy-owned Inventory.

Exhibit FH-8 Inadequate Family Housing Elimination

8

Total Inventory




FY 2003 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 659H-643; Lemoore, CA 368 178H-669; Brunswick, ME 26 26H-01-99-5; Ventura, CA 546 215H-08-03; Washington, DC 1 1H-03-03; New Orleans, LA 1 1H-01-01; Thurmont, MD 1 1H-01-02; Fallon, NV 1 1H-61-97; Hampton Roads, VA 510 1H-65-97; Hampton Roads, VA 510 1H-66-97; Hampton Roads, VA 510 1H-01-03; Keflavik, Iceland 633 1H-01-97; Naples, Italy 1 1H-03-98-3; Yokosuka, Japan 262 129H-08-98-02; Guam, Marianas Is. 1,382 102

FY 2003 Privatization Projects 3,350 1,670Beaufort, SC 53 53 53San Diego, CA 3,297 1,734 1,617

Units Demolished/Divested 2,706 1,599Annapolis, MD 43 135 0Earle, NJ 258 24 12East Sound, WA 3 0 0Great Lakes, IL 3 682 3Guam, Marianas Is. 64 1,382 64Hampton Roads, VA 6 510 6Jacksonville, FL 6 525 6Key West, FL 234 911 233Lakehurst, NJ 12 110 12Memphis, TN 54 512 0New London, CT 7 1,606 0Pearl Harbor, HI 2,016 3,789 1,263

MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0 0

Other Inventory Gains/Losses (69) 0 0

Units at end of FY 2003 48,266 15,816 3,928




9

Total Inventory




FY 2004 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 190H-671; Lemoore, CA 190 187H-1-05; Lemoore, CA 190 3

FY 2004 Privatization Projects 2,596 1,403Monterey, CA 593 252 252Hawaii Region (PH I) 2,003 2,526 1,151

Units Demolished/Divested 1,590 823Earle, NJ 11 12 11Fallon, NV 8 0 0Great Lakes, IL 50 679 50Guam, Marianas Is. 418 1,216 418Hampton Roads, VA 10 501 10Indian Head, MD 2 161 2Mayport, FL 16 0 0Meridian, MS 19 176 19Newport, RI 78 269 0Pearl Harbor, HI 2 2,526 0Roosevelt Roads, PR 974 313 313Yokosuka, Japan 2 133 0


Other Inventory Gains/Losses 561 0 33

Units at end of FY 2004 44,641 13,367 2,449




10

Total Inventory




FY 2005 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 69H-03-98-4; Yokosuka, Japan 0 133 69

FY 2005 Privatization Projects 14,385 4,454NE (East) 5,593 2,303 2,303NW (PH I) 3,098 708 708Mid-Atlantic 5,694 1,443 1,443

Units Demolished/Divested 266 241Atlanta, GA 10 0 0Crane, IN 1 0 0Earle, NJ 5 1 1Great Lakes, IL 8 629 4Guam, Marianas Is. 124 798 124Pearl Harbor, HI 57 1,375 56Portsmouth, NH 5 32 0Keflavik, Iceland 56 632 56



Units at end of FY 2005 30,304 8,603 4,764




11

Total Inventory




FY 2006 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 522H-04-97; Atsugi, Japan 114 114H-649; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 126H-06-92; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 132H-12-00; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 22H-12-98; Guam, Marianas Is. 674 67H-03-98-5; Yokosuka, Japan 64 61

FY 2006 Privatization Projects 7,921 2,061Midwest Region 2,764 625 625San Diego, CA (PH III) 2,668 117 117Hawaii Region (PH II) 2,489 1,319 1,319

Units Demolished/Divested 1,155 783Guam, Marianas Is. 106 674 81Mid-South, TN 126 512 126Pearl Harbor, HI 34 1,319 0Keflavik, Iceland* 889 576 576



Units at end of FY 2006 21,389 5,237 3,366




12

Total Inventory




FY 2007 traditional projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 249H-662; Guam, Marianas Is. 246 134H-15-00; Guam, Marianas Is. 246 4H-663; Guam, Marianas Is. 246 108H-16-01; Yokosuka, Japan 3 1H-14-01; Yokosuka, Japan 3 1H-15-01; Yokosuka, Japan 3 1

FY 2007 Privatization Projects 11,184 4,786SW Region 3,654 331 331SE Region 7,041 4,173 4,173Midwest Region PH II (Mid-South, TN) 489 386 282

Units Demolished/Divested 300 202El Centro, CA 8 0 0Mayport, FL 1 0 0Pensacola, FL 6 89 0Whiting Field, FL 1 214 0Kings Bay, GA 5 631 4Meridian, MS 12 157 0Fallon, NV 69 0 0Charleston, SC 94 94 94Mid-South, TN 104 386 104


Other Inventory Gains/Losses 82 0 0Seal Beach, CA 2 0 0Key West, FL 57 0 0Sasebo, Japan 8 0 0Yokosuka, Japan 15 0 0

Units at end of FY 2007 9,987 0 5,237




13

Total Inventory



Units at beginning of FY 2008 9,987 0

FY 2008 Traditional MILCON Recapitalization Projects 0 0 0H-481; Guam, Marianas Is. 0H-06-92-2; Guam, Marianas Is. 0H-01-03; Guam, Marianas Is. 0HRC-13-03; Atsugi, Japan 0H-14-02-1; Sasebo, Japan 0H-01-02; Chinhae, Korea 0H-08-02; Rota, Spain 0

FY 2008 Privatization Projects 0 0 0

Units Demolished/Divested 0 0 0



Units at end of FY 2008 9,987 0 0




14

Total Inventory




FY 2009 Traditional MILCON Recapitalization Projects 0 0 0H-541; Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 0H-543; Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 0H-544; Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 0H-02-03; Guam, Marianas Is. 0HD-16-02; Sasebo, Japan 0H-15-02-1; Sasebo, Japan 0H-2-02; Sasebo, Japan 0




Other Inventory Gains/Losses 135 0 0Sasebo, Japan 135 0 0





15

Total Inventory




FY 2010 Traditional MILCON Recapitalization Projects 0 0 0TBD; Atsugi, Japan 0TBD; Guam, Marianas Is. 0




Other Inventory Gains/Losses 179 0 0Sasebo, Japan 179 0 0





16

Fam

ily H

ousi

ng U

nite

d St

ates

Mar

ine

Cor

ps

Sum

mar

y of

Inad

equa

te U

nit E

limin

atio

n

FY 2

002

FY 2

003

FY 2

004

FY 2

005

FY 2

006

FY 2

007

FY 2

008

FY 2

009

FY 2

010

Beg

inni

ng F

isca

l Yea

r Inv

ento

ry23

,197

22,9

8716

,645

16,0

3710

,000

4,86

891

781

681

6A

dequ

ate

Inve

ntor

y6,

788

7,01

17,

542

8,68

55,

972

2,18

991

781

681

6In

adeq

uate

Inve

ntor

y16

,409

15,9

769,

103

7,35

24,

028

2,67

90

00

Perc

ent I

nade

quat

e71

%70

%55

%46

%40

%55

%0%

0%0%

Bud

get I

mpa

ct*

539

7,27

71,

751

6,33

45,

152

4,00

30

00

Inad

equa

tes R

educ

ed53

96,

902

1,75

13,

333

1,60

02,

679

00

0

Milc

on/O

&M

244

943

957

00

175

00

0

Priv

atiz

atio

n0

5,75

90

3,31

11,

582

2,49

10

00

D

emol

ition

/Dis

vest

iture

295

200

794

2218

130

00

Ade

quat

e un

its P

rivat

ized

037

50

3,00

13,

552

1,32

40

00

MIL

CO

N D

efic

it R

educ

tion

06

018

00

00

0O

ther

Inve

ntor

y G

ains

/Los

ses

35-1

419

127

920

-123

-101

00

Add

ition

al In

adeq

uate

Uni

ts Id

entif

ied

106

290

925

10

00

0

Estim

ated

EO

Y In

adeq

uate

Inve

ntor

y15

,976

9,10

37,

352

4,02

82,

679

00

00

Estim

ated

EO

Y T

otal

Inve

ntor

y22

,987

16,6

4516

,037

10,0

004,

868

917

816

816

816

Not

e: I

nven

tory

adj

ustm

ents

are

bas

ed o

n es

timat

ed d

ate

the

units

are

priv

atiz

ed (N

o lo

nger

requ

iring

FH O

&M

fund

s) o

r yea

r in

whi

ch b

udge

ted

for t

radi

tiona

l fam

ily h

ousi

ng c

onst

ruct

ion. E

xhib

it FH

-7 S

umm

ary

of In

adeq

uate

Uni

t Elim

inat

ion

17

Total Inventory

Total Inadequate Inventory

Total Inadequate Addressed

Total Units at beginning of FY 2002 23,197 16,409

FY 2002 total traditional military construction (Milcon) projects to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 242

H-635/MCAS Yuma, AZ 772 599 51H-546/MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,608 1,148 74H-571/MCB Hawaii, HI ** 2,202 1,786 **PE-H-0522A-M2/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA 6,164 2,978 40EI-H-0201-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 5 1EI-H-0202-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 5 1EI-H-0402-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 5 1LE-H-9906-R2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC * 4,246 2,803 *LE-H-0202-M2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC ** 4,246 2,803 **LE-H-0301-M2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,246 2,803 30IW-H-0301-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 666 176 44

FY 2002 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 0 0

Phase II/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA * 6,164 2,943 *

FY 2002 total units demolished/divested or otherwise permanently removed from family housing inventory 295 295

MCLB Barstow, CA 363 289 11MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,664 2,392 75MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,246 2,803 114MCAS Beaufort, SC 1,276 1,276 1MCB Quantico, VA 1,508 1,411 94

Projects added by Congress 0 2H-557/MCB Quantico, VA * 1,411 *EI-H-0501-R2/MARBRKS 8th&I Washington, DC 5 2CH-H-0001-R2/Westover ARB, Chicopee, MA ** 279 **

Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2002 4 -106MCB Camp Pendleton, CA 2,978 -5MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,148 -1MCB Hawaii, HI 4 1,786 -4MCB Quantico, VA 1,411 -96

MILCON Deficit Reduction 46MCAS Iwakuni, JA (JFIP Construction) 46

Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 35MCAS Cherry Point, NC (units on-/off line) -141MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) 60MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA (units on-/off line) 114MCAS Yuma, AZ (units on-/off line) -2MCB Hawaii, HI (units on-/off line) 4

Total Units at end of FY 2002 22,987 15,976 433* Project used as seed funding for PPV in future Fiscal Year** Project executed in future Fiscal Year


Annual Inadequate Family Housing Units Elimination

Department of the NavyFamily Housing, Marine Corps

## Other Inventory Gains/Losses refers to actions such as temporary and permanent diversions, conversions, add from previously approved construction projects. They do not address the backlog of inadequate units and simply impact the total Marine Corps-owned inventory.

18

Total Inventory



Total Units at beginning of FY 2003 22,987 15,976 433


H-547/MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,722 1,075 76H-563/MCB Hawaii, HI # 2,210 1,790 10H-613/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,192 2,659 317YU-H-0124-M2/MCAS Yuma, AZ 770 548 96IW-H-0302-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 712 132 44IW-H-0304-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 712 132 44CH-H-0001-R2/Westover JARB, Chicopee, MA * 279 279 124LE-H-0202-M2/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC * & # 4,192 2,659 60H-571/MCB Hawaii, HI * 2,210 1,790 172

FY 2003 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing 6,134 5,759

Phase II/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA ** 6,164 2,943 2,939MCAS Beaufort, SC/MCRD Parris Island, SC ** 1,506 1,505 1,505H-620/MCB Quantico, VA ** 1,414 1,413 1,310MCRD San Diego, CA 5 5 5


MCLB Barstow, CA 352 352 74MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,448 2,317 0MCSA Kansas City, MO 240 240 6MCB Quantico, VA 1,414 1,413 103MCB Camp Pendleton, CA (MWTC Bridgeport) 6,164 2,943 1MCB Camp Pendleton, CA 6,164 2,943 2Westover JARB, Chicopee, MA 279 279 14

Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2003 1 -29MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,075 -28MCLB Barstow, CA (Single Family Unit Converted to Duplex) 1 -1

MILCON Deficit Reduction 6JFIP/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 6

Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## -14MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) 136MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA (units on-/off line) -125MCAS Yuma, AZ (units on-/off-line) 51MCB Hawaii, HI (units on-/off-line) -76

Total Units at end of FY 2003 16,645 9,103 6,873* Project Authorized in previous Fiscal Year, executed in this Fiscal Year** Includes Prior Year PPV seed funding# Project partialy executed in future Fiscal Year





19

Total Inventory





H-608/MCAS Cherry Point 2,447 2,317 339H-614/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,328 2,282 358H-656/MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,328 2,282 161IW-H-0303-R2/MCAS Iwakuni, JA 718 44 44H-563/MCB Hawaii, HI * 2,134 1,608 55



Westover ARB, Chicopee, MA 265 141 133MCLB Albany, GA 669 419 419MCLB Barstow, CA 279 278 103MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,447 2,317 0MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,328 2,282 2MCB Hawaii, HI 2,134 1,068 0MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 1,597 1,027 136MCLB Barstow, CA (Duplex Converted to Single Family Unit) 279 1

Projects added by Congress 0 0

Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2004 0 0

MILCON Deficit Reduction 0 0

Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 191 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC (units on-/off line) 140 0MCB Hawaii, HI 137 0MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) -194 0MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA 108

Total Units at end of FY 2004 16,037 7,352 1,751* Project Authorized in previous Fiscal Year, partially executed in this fiscal year





20

Total Inventory






MCAS Yuma, AZ PPV ** 821 452 452Phase III/MCB Camp Pendleton, CA ** 2,848 1 0H-609/MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,585 1,978 400MCSA Kansas City, MO PPV 234 234 234MCB Camp Lejeune, NC PPV ** 4,132 1,761 1,035Stewart Army Subpost, New Windsor, NY 299 299 299MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA PPV 1,567 891 891


MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 4,132 1,761 22


Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2005 0 -9MCB Hawaii, HI 2,335 1,553 -9

MILCON Deficit Reduction 18 0JFIP MCAS Iwakuni, JA 18 0

Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 279 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC (units on-/off-line) 0MCB Camp Lejeune, NC (units on-/off line) 214MCB Hawaii, HI 65

Total Units at end of FY 2005 10,000 4,028 3,324** Includes Prior Year PPV seed funding





21

Total Inventory






MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,030 1,578 800MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI PPV 2,335 1,562 614MCB Camp Lejeune, NC PPV 1,600 704 167MCB Camp Pendleton, CA PPV 2,772 1 1


Westover JARB Chicopee, MA 132 8 8MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 1,600 704 5MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI 2,355 1,562 5


Additional inadequate units identified during FY 2006 0 -251MCLB Albany, GA PPV 250 0 -250MCAS Cherry Point, NC 2,030 1,578 -1


Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 20 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC 20

Total Units at end of FY 2006 4,868 2,679 1,349





22

Total Inventory





H-654/MCLB Barstow, CA 175 175 175


MCLB Albany, GA PPV 250 250 250MCAS Cherry Point, NC PPV 1,214 779 779MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI PPV 1,155 943 930MCB Camp Lejeune, NC PPV 1,207 532 532Westover JARB Chicopee, MA 124 0 0


MCB Hawaii Kaneohe Bay, HI 1,155 943 13




Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## -123 0MCAS Cherry Point, NC -122MCB Camp Pendleton, CA -1 0 0

Total Units at end of FY 2007 917 0 2,679





23

Total Inventory



Units at beginning of FY 2008 917 0







Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## -101 0MCLB Barstow, CA -101 0

Total Units at end of FY 2008 816 0 0





24

Total Inventory





FY 2009 total units privatized (no longer required FH O&M) to eliminate inadequate housing units 0 0





Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 0 00






25

Total Inventory










Other Inventory Gains/Losses ## 0 0






26

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FISCAL YEAR 2008

FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE COPRS

For expenses of family housing for the Navy and Marine Corps for construction, including acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion, and extension and alteration, as authorized by law, [$305,071,000] $298,329,000 to remain available until September 30, [2011] 2012. FAMILY HOUSING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY AND MARINE

CORPS

For expenses of family housing for the Navy and Marine Corps for operation and maintenance, including debt payment, leasing, minor construction, principal and interest charges, and insurance premiums, as authorized by law, [$509,126,000]* $371,404,000. * Prior Year amount for FH O&M (shown in brackets) reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $499,986,000.

27

BLANK PAGE

28

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE

CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $ 57,167 FY 2007 Program $ 126,025* Purpose and Scope This program provides for land acquisition, site preparation, acquisition and construction, and initial outfitting with fixtures and integral equipment of new and replacement family housing units and associated facilities such as roads, driveways, walks, and utility systems. Program Summary Authorization is requested for:

(1) Construction of 73 replacement homes; and, (2) Appropriation of $57,167,000 to fund this construction program.

No. of Activity Mission Homes Amount NAVY NAVBASE Guam Current 73 $ 57,167 TOTAL 73 $ 57,167 * This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $37,707.

29

BLANK PAGE

30

1

711 Family Housing 73 57,167 Turnkey

ScopeCost

($000) Start CompleteDesign Status

8. Projects Requested In This Program:


a. TOTAL ACREAGE ....... ( Acres) .....................

NAVY 2008

NAVBASE GUAM

GUAM, GUAM 2.64

09/30/06

2011

1,090

FY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. Installation and Location 4. Command 5. Area Const.

Cost Index

2. Date

Category

Code Project Title

6. Personnel

Strength:

PERMANENT SUPPORT

a.As Of

b.End FY

1. Component

b. INVENTORY TOTAL AS OF

c. AUTHORIZATION NOT YET IN INVENTORY ........................

d. AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM ...................

e. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM ...............

f. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE PROGRAM YEARS .......................

g. REMAINING DEFICIENCY ......................................

h. GRAND TOTAL ..............................................

STUDENTS TOTAL

494

469

3,7173,241

517

522

0

0

0

0

0

0

71

71

544

544

0

0

5,343

4,847

OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN OFFICER OFFICERENLISTED ENLISTED CIVILIANCIVILIAN

.....................30 Sep 06 922,232

98,174

57,167

0

0

0

1,077,573

9. Future Projects:

a. Included in the following program

b. Major planned next three years

c. Family housing revitalization backlog

(replacement, improvements, major repairs)

0

0

$0

Replacement Homes

Replacement Homes

M

10. Mission or Major Functions:To provide infrastructure, services, and support to Naval Forces, tenant

activities and other customers. U.S. Naval Forces Marianas oversees the

U.S. Navy's largest and most strategic island base located in the

Western Pacific. 160,000 residents and more than 12,000 military

members and their families. Guam is the most populated island in the

geographical area known as Micronesia. U.S. Naval Forces Marianas

serves as the representative to Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet. They

coordinate all shore-based Naval personnel and shore activities in Guam

as well as the Navy's representative to the Guam community.

03 JAN 2007

DD FORM 1390 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED

INTERNALLY UNTIL EXHAUSTED

PAGE NO.

31

BLANK PAGE

32

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2.Date

4. Project Title

5.Program Element 6.Category Code 7. Project Number

1.Component


DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391

03 JAN 2007

711

REPLACE 73 UNITS AT OLD APRA PHASE II

OF II

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location:

NAVBASE GUAM

GUAM, GUAM

H-4810808741N

$57,167APPR:

$57,167AUTH:

Page 1

9. COST ESTIMATES


FA

GSM

73

12,868

437,562

2,482

Family Housing:

Buildings

Supporting Costs:

Lot Costs

Site Improvements

Utility Mains

Streets

Landscaping

Recreation

Environmental

Demolition

Other Site Work

Land Purchase

Subtotal

Contingency (5%)

Total Contract Cost

SIOH (6.2%)

DESIGN BUILD- DESIGN COSTS 4%

Project Cost

31,942

17,464

49,406

2,470

51,876

3,216

2,075

57,167

(31,942)

(1,418)

(2,928)

(7,463)

(1,425)

(909)

(1,057)

(1,426)

(0)

(838)

(0)

Single and duplex family housing units constructed of reinforced concrete footings,

floor slabs, walls, columns and roof slabs. Insulation will be at under side of roof

slabs. Each unit will include a single garage for enlisted and a dual garage for

officers, driveway, covered patio, privacy fencing, exterior storage and a trash bin

enclosure. Building features will include plumbing, air conditioning, electrical

lighting fixtures and power receptacles, telephone and internet outlets, cable TV pull

boxes, and radon mitigation systems. Units will include fire protection systems as

required by UFC 3-600-01. Special construction criteria will include provision for

withstanding typhoon wind speed of 170 MPH and Zone 4 seismic loading. Supporting

facilities will include new underground power, telephone, cable TV, potable water and

wastewater utilities; also, site improvements, drainage facilities, asphalt paved

roads, concrete sidewalks, covered bus stops, mail box kiosks and landscaping.

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

33


4. Project Title


1.Component


DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391

03 JAN 2007

C

711


OF II

NAVY2008FY


NAVBASE GUAM

GUAM, GUAM

H-4810808741N

$57,167APPR:

$57,167AUTH:

Page 2

Recreation facilities will include common open spaces, jogging/ biking trails, playing

courts, playing fields, picnic shelter and tot lots. Project includes installation of

perforated conduit in gravel bed under floor slabs (and capped with electrical outlet

for blower for future radon testing). The actual square foot area of these dwellings

will be based on local market standards and may exceed those indicated herein below.

Contracting vehicle is intended to be design-build.

E1-E6

W1-O3

W1-O3

O4-O5

3

3

4

4

1,315

1,500

1,734

1,863

1,631

1,860

2,150

2,310

151

172

200

215

2.746

2.746

2.746

2.746

$904

$904

$904

$904

34

12

9

18

12,744

5,124

4,468

9,606

Paygrade Bedrooms NSF GSF GSM Project

Factor

Cost

Per GSM

No.

Units

($000)

Total

111,850 138,704 12,868 73 31,942Total Project Size:

11. REQUIREMENT

PROJECT:

This project constructs 73 replacement family housing units at Old Apra "Apra View",

for junior enlisted and officers supported by COMNAVMARIANAS, Guam. This project is

the second of two phases (Phase I was requested in FY07). Phase I included funds to

demolish all 134 Inadequate Units (in accordance with OSD Goal) and build back 68

units, based on requirements justification (DD 1523). Since then, revised

requirements justification shows that the remaining inventory, not previously planned

for replacement is now needed. In addtion, seven units from PH I were dropped from

the scope of the project, based on revised construction estimates, and will need to be

picked up in this project as well.

(Current Mission)

Adequate family housing is necessary for married junior enlisted personnel and Navy

officers and their families on Guam. Adequate community recreational facilities are

also required for Navy personnel and members of their families, including dependents

of various ages. Design and construction shall comply with current Navy policies as

outlined in NAVFACINST 11101.85H.1; MIL-HDBK 1003/3 Heating, Ventilating, Air

Conditioning, and Dehumidifying Systems; the Marianas Regional Architectural and

Construction Standards; UFC 3-600-01, Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities, and

current industry building codes. Special attention shall be directed toward energy

performance and sustainability requirements. ADA ramps will be incorporated in

pedestrian lanes. Five percent of housing units will be ADA compliant.

REQUIREMENT:

34


4. Project Title


1.Component


DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391

03 JAN 2007

C

711


OF II

NAVY2008FY


NAVBASE GUAM

GUAM, GUAM

H-4810808741N

$57,167APPR:

$57,167AUTH:

Page 3

Old Apra, "Apra View", was developed in the mid 1950's as an off the main base

military family housing complex. Existing junior enlisted and officer family housing

units have been in service for more than 49 years. Four bedroom officer family housing

units have been in service for more than 28 years. Built with 1950's and 1970's space

criteria, these housing units are inadequate and outmoded in design and construction.

Existing buildings would require major and expensive structural modification to

achieve the new space and privacy criteria for military family housing units. In

addition, design options to provide structurally sound family housing units are

limited and constrained by the footprint of existing buildings. Because of age, the

buildings require a higher degree of maintenance than newer units. They are not fully

designed and built for the harsh tropical climate of the western Pacific region and

most sustain damage during each typhoon. Above-ground utilities also require

repetitive repair from damage sustained during typhoons. This project supports the

base wide initiative of placing all utilities underground. The current Guam

divestiture plan supports this project, calling for the retention of all 134 housing

units in Old Apra during a two phase reconstruction effort.

If this project were not implemented, some military officers and enlisted personnel

will be forced to choose between involuntary separation from their families or

accepting housing that is unsuitable while serving on Guam. Either choice will

understandably lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Navy way of life.

Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Secondly, the cost of

sustaining the housing units that have deteriorated with age will progressively

increase.

JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: The Regional Commander certifies that this project has been

considered for joint use potential. This facility will be available for use by other

federal agency personnel.


CURRENT SITUATION:

35

MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION 1. DATE OF REPORT (YYMMDD) 060510

2. FISCAL YEAR 2008

REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL DD-A&L(AR)1716

3. DOD COMPONENT NAVY 4. REPORTING INSTALLATION

5. DATA AS OF

MARCH 2006

a. NAME PG

GUAM NAVBASE COMNAVMARIANAS

b. LOCATION

GUAM

ANALYSIS OF

REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS

CURRENT (FY06) PROJECTED (to 2011)

OFFICER (a)

E9-E7 (b)

E6-E1 (c)

Total (d)

OFFICER (e)

E9-E7 (f)

E6-E1 (g)

Total (h)

6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH 722 499 3762 4983 697 391 3394 4482

7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL 651 444 3273 4368 626 336 2905 3867

8. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 441 392 1531 2364 429 312 1335 2076

9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c) 143 146 612 901

a. INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED 0 0 0 0

b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE DISPOSED/REPLACED 0 0 0 0

c. UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED IN COMMUNITY 143 146 612 901

10. VOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS 19 27 110 156 16 23 93 132

11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 422 365 1421 2208 413 289 1242 1944

12. ADEQUATE ASSETS (a + b) 327 288 1301 1916 366 299 1254 1919

a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL 268 229 1114 1611 268 229 1008 1505

(1) Housed in Existing DOD Owned/Controlled 220 160 622 1002 268 229 1008 1505

(2) Under Contract/Approved 0 0 0 0

(3) Vacant 48 35 137 220

(4) Inactive 0 34 355 389

b. PRIVATE HOUSING 59 59 187 305 98 70 246 414

(1) Acceptably Housed 59 59 187 305

(2) Vacant Rental Housing

13. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT (11-12) 95 77 120 292 47 -10 -12 25

14. PROPOSED PROJECT 0 0 0 0

15. REMARKS:

Programming decisions are to be based on projected data line 13 columns (e) through (h) only. Line 12.a. columns (e) through (h) reflect the planned divestiture of 106 units. Line 12.b. data is based on the results of the November 2005 Housing Requirements Market Analysis, as updated for baseloading.

DD Form 1523, NOV90 VERS: HQFINAL

36


POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION

(In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $ 237,990 FY 2007 Program $ 176,446* Purpose and Scope This program provides for improvements and/or major repairs to revitalize Navy family housing and the supporting neighborhood sites and facilities. This program is the primary vehicle for the Navy to ensure that our aging inventory of homes are kept suitable for occupancy; as such, this program has a major role in maintaining a high quality of life for Navy families. This program funds projects that will increase the useful life and livability of homes and neighborhoods, bring them up to Department of Defense standards, and make them more energy efficient and less costly to maintain. Program Summary Authorization is requested for: (1) Various improvements and/or major repairs to revitalize existing family housing; and (2) Appropriation of $237,990,000 ($37,543,000 for the Navy and $200,447,000 for the Marine Corps) to fund these revitalization projects. (3) We are continuing our emphasis on revitalization through whole-house projects, which will accomplish all required improvements and repairs at one time. This program also includes repair projects considered to be a major investment. (4) A separate DD 1391 is attached for all projects exceeding $50,000 per unit as adjusted by the area cost factor. * This represents the FY 2007 PB request, which is the same as the FY 2007 annualized CR amount.

37

DD FORM 1391 PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS, FAMILY HOUSING POST ACQUISITION VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNITED STATES CONSTRUCTION 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST

($000) IMPROVEMENTS 711 VARIES AUTH: $ 237,990

APPR: $ 237,990 9. COST ESTIMATES

UNIT COST ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000)

POST ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION

AUTHORIZATION REQUEST L/S --- --- 237,990 TOTAL REQUEST 237,990

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Provides for the revitalization of family housing and neighborhood support facilities and infrastructure. Revitalization consists of alterations, additions, expansions, modernization, and major repairs. Typical work includes the revitalization of kitchens and bathrooms; upgrades and repairs to structural, electrical, and mechanical systems; repairs/replacements involving utility systems, streets and side walks, and other infrastructure; removal of hazardous materials; and enhancements to neighborhood support systems including landscaping and recreation. _______________________________________________________________________________ 11. REQUIREMENT: Major investments to the Navy’s family housing inventory are needed to achieve current DoD standards, extend the life of the homes by arresting and correcting deterioration, reduce maintenance and utility expenses, make the homes and surrounding neighborhoods quality places to live. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The Navy will have a large segment of the family housing inventory and supporting neighborhoods which fall below Department of Defense and Navy standards for quality housing, therefore creating a negative and adverse impact on the families who live in our homes. The Navy will miss a prime opportunity to reduce maintenance and utility costs and meet DoD standards in a more cost effective approach than replacing the existing homes and neighborhoods.

38


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION

($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE

INSIDE THE UNITED STATES

OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES GUAM NAVBASE Guam 9,475 (H-06-92-2)

This project provides wholehouse improvements to 33 homes in the S. Finegayan neighborhood of Guam. Work includes construction of new covered patios, exterior storage, trash enclosures, conversion of carports to garages, reconfiguration of laundry/utility rooms, relocation and replacement of air conditioning units, repairs to kitchens and bathrooms, exterior and interior doors, windows, walls and ceilings, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, smoke detectors, telephone, and cable TV repairs. (See separate DD Form 1391)

NAVBASE Guam 242 (H-01-03)

This project provides repairs and improvements features to the GFOQ located at #4 Flag Circle, in the Nimitz Hill neighborhood of Guam. Improvement work will reconfigure the interior spaces to provide interconnecting interior hallways between bedrooms and other floor areas, upgrade AC/duct systems, lighting/power and fire alarm system, and construct new concrete roof above existing patio and new concrete walkway in front of lanai. (See separate DD Form 1391)

JAPAN NAF Atsugi 13,563 (HRC-13-03)

This project will revitalize 72 townhomes including the following work: restore bathrooms, replace floor tiles and all fixtures, widening of stairways, expand kitchens to include new and additional shelving, sinks, garbage disposals, dishwashers, and original flooring will be replaced, roofs, gutters, and downspouts will be replaced, patios will be replaced, and new concrete storage units will be built. (See separate DD Form 1391)

39


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION

($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE

OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES

JAPAN CFA Sasebo 3,808 (H-14-02-1)

This project will revitalize 21 townhomes. Work involves complete replacement and expansion of kitchens, renovation of bathrooms, replacement of the electrical system, removal of sheet rock wall siding/ceiling that contains asbestos and replacement of wall siding/ceiling board with thick glass wool insulation in order to maintain room temperature and greatly increase efficiency of A/C and Heating systems. (See separate DD Form 1391)

KOREA CFA Chinhae 8,971 (H-01-02)

This project revitalizes all 50 units at CFA Chinhae, including architectural, mechanical, and electrical work. It will also remove the existing metal storage sheds and replace with a new concrete masonry unit to match housing unit. (See separate DD Form 1391)

SPAIN NS Rota 1,484 (H-08-02)

This project will convert 28 two-bedroom duplexes into 14 4BR single-family homes. Work will include a new hallway/front entrance, connecting rear patios, and modifying fencing to encompass both existing structures. Additionally, this project will convert 10 three-bedroom duplexes into five four-bedroom duplexes. Work will include combining the kitchen areas to include a breakfast area, including a bathroom in the master bedroom, larger closets and storage areas, a larger yard, and wall-to-wall carpeting throughout the house. (See separate DD Form 1391)

40

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391Page 1

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. Date

4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$9,475711

WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, SO. FINEGAYAN

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: NAVBASE GUAM

GUAM, GUAM

H-06-92-20808742N

9. COST ESTIMATES


This project will provide repairs and improvements to 33 enlisted and officer housing

units at South Finegayan, Guam. Work entails the following:

a. Improvements include conversion of carports to garages, exterior storage, trash

enclosure, concrete roof slabs over new front and rear patios with light fixtures and

textured concrete floor, mirrored closet doors, ceramic floor tiles, separate switches

for bathroom lights and exhaust fans, ceiling fans with concealed wiring, additional

electrical outlets, computer data port/telephone, and upgraded cable TV jacks,

electrical generator connection , re-configuration of existing laundry/utility room,

refurbishing and removal/ replacement of existing concrete walk and restore ground

cover.

b. Repairs will replace worn-out architectural finishes, exterior and interior doors

and hardware, windows, closet doors and shelves, bathroom floor and wall finishes,

kitchen countertops, plumbing fixtures and accessories, hot and cold water piping,

waste and vent piping, toilet accessories, garbage disposals, range hoods, exhaust

fans, door chimes, power panels, wiring devices, light fixture and smoke detectors.

c. Additional scope of work includes painting, removal and disposal of hazardous

material, on-site encapsulation of chlordane-contaminated soils, clean-up, and related

miscellaneous work. Whole site improvement includes landscaping and cluster mail

boxes.


11. REQUIREMENT:

PROJECT:

Area Cost Factor: 2.64

947528733EAWHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT

41

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391 CPage 2


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$9,475711

WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, SO. FINEGAYAN

NAVY2008FY


GUAM, GUAM

H-06-92-20808742N

This project will provide wholehouse repair and improvement to 33 enlisted and officer

housing units in South Finegayan, Guam. These 33 units are dropped scope from H-06-

92-1, which was funded in FY06. These units were dropped due to an unexpected

increase in the Area Cost Factor at Guam from (from 2.02 to 2.64 or 31%) and the

corresponding increase in construction costs. FY08 was the soonest Fiscal Year that

these funds could be requested.

The units were built in 1972 and 1974, components are outdated and require

repairs/replacement, and have met their useful life. Interior and exterior improvement

includes; adding storage, providing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant

requirement, and providing windows and doors to withstand 170 mph wind speed. Plumbing

fixtures are corroded, mechanical and electrical components are deteriorated and have

met their useful life.

Housing units will continue to deteriorate and incur high operating and maintenance

costs as a result of age and deterioration. The proposed project will enhance and

bring the units up to modern day standards.

This project is required to correct deficiencies, upgrade the existing homes, and

bring them to current standards.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)

42

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391Page 1


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$242711

RECONFIGURE INTERIOR - #4 FLAG CIRCLE

NAVY2008FY


GUAM, GUAM

H-01-030808742N

9. COST ESTIMATES


This project will provide repairs and improvement features to the GFOQ located at #4

Flag Circle, in the Nimitz Hill neighborhood. Improvement work will reconfigure the

interior spaces to provide inter-connecting interior hallways between bedrooms and

other floor areas. Work includes installing new glass doors, windows and glass blocks

at existing arch openings; installing new glass blocks at existing window openings;

installing new paver tiles and new drop ceiling at enclosed hallways; installing new

landscaping and resilient cushioned seamless flooring system at courtyard; upgrading

air-conditioning/duct systems, lighting/power and fire alarm system; painting all

affected areas and repair related incidental work; constructing new concrete roof

above existing patio to stabilize the structure during strong winds and reduce water

seepage into the house; new concrete walkway in front of lanai; replacing kitchen

cabinets, sink, faucet, garbage disposal, dishwasher and range hood; and installing

weather seals at windows/doors and exterior lights. Work includes restoration of

affected areas, clean-up, removal and disposal of debris; and restoration and

replacement of disturbed grounds and plants.


11. REQUIREMENT:

This project proposes to reconfigure the existing housing unit at #4 Flag Circle,

Nimitz Hill.

PROJECT:

Reconfigure the existing house so that the living area and the sleeping area are not

separated by an outdoor courtyard. Upgrade the mechanical, electrical and fire alarm

systems to meet the current building code. New walls, glass blocks, doors and windows

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)


2422421EAIMPROVEMENT

43

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391 CPage 2


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$242711

RECONFIGURE INTERIOR - #4 FLAG CIRCLE

NAVY2008FY


GUAM, GUAM

H-01-030808742N

The existing housing layout does not have direct connection between the bedrooms and

other floor areas. Housing residents must walk through a non-air-conditioned courtyard

from the bedrooms to the other living areas. The existing kitchen cabinets are old

and due for replacement. The weatherseals at existing doors and windows are

deteriorated and falling out. Construction of walkway will allow residents and guests

to walk from the house to the patio.

Failure to address stated deficiencies will result in failure to provide quality homes

for the Installation Commander and his family. The living quarters will continue to be

dysfunctional by separating the bedrooms from the other living areas in the house.

shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Marianas Region Architectural and

Construction Standards and shall be able to withstand typhoon wind speed of 170 mph.

Provide housing unit that is safe and secured, including protection from weather

elements. This project is required to bring the installation command quarters to the

commonly accepted American standard of comfort and convenience and to restore the

aesthetic and functional use of the housing unit.


CURRENT SITUATION:

44

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391Page 1


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$13,563711

REVITALIZATION OF FAMILY HOUSING

TOWNHOUSES

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: NAVAL AIR FACILITY

ATSUGI, JAPAN

HRC-13-030808742N

9. COST ESTIMATES


This project will revitalize 62 three bedroom and 10 four bedroom townhouse units,

including buildings 900-13 and 915-18. This revitalization will restore bathrooms

(tubs, showers, lavatories, etc.), replace floor tiles, and all fixtures. The current

stairways will be widened, kitchens will be expanded to include new and additional

shelving, sinks, and garbage disposals. Dishwashers and original flooring will be

replaced. Special attention will be focused on replacing the built up roofs, gutters,

and downspouts. The roofs were originally built in 1972 and have never been replaced.

The current condition has caused water leaks, damage to walls and supporting beams.

Concrete foundations will be repaired and exterior and interior walls will be

reconditioned. Patios will be replaced and new concrete storage units will be built.

New electrical panels and smoke detectors will be installed. Civil engineering efforts

include new sanitary aqueducts, hot and cold water lines, new sidewalks and storm

drains.


11. REQUIREMENT:

This project provides wholehouse revitalization of 62 three bedroom and 10 four

bedroom townhouse units.

PROJECT:

It is important to note that these homes were built in 1972. Japanese construction

criteria was not at the current standard that Navy families in Japan currently enjoy

today. The structual integrity and supporting infrastructure of these units have not

been revitalized since their original build.

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)



45

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391 CPage 2


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$13,563711

REVITALIZATION OF FAMILY HOUSING

TOWNHOUSES

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: NAVAL AIR FACILITY

ATSUGI, JAPAN

HRC-13-030808742N

Wood exterior siding is weather worn and cracked; there are no ground fault circuit

interrupters; CFGI receptacles around sinks and kitchens are undersized; roof erosion

has caused interior leakings and deteriorated walls from rebar erosion; existing

built-up roof surfaces show signs of blistering; the existing stairways are narrow and

binding; kitchen cabinets and countertops have severely deteriorated; and site utility

and sanitary lines have not been replaced in 32 years.

Failure to address stated deciciencies will result in the failure to provide these

quality homes for the service members and their families. Continued occupancy of

these units will accelerate deterioration and maintenance backlog costs.


CURRENT SITUATION:

46

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391Page 1


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$3,808711

WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, DRAGON VALE

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: COMMANDER FLEET ACTIVITIES

SASEBO, JAPAN

H-14-02-10808742N

9. COST ESTIMATES


This project will revitalize 16 2BR enlisted housing townhouse units (Bldg. 520, 538,

539, 541) and 5 4BR Senior Officer housing townhouse units (Bldg. 524, 540 and 542).

Work involves complete replacement and expansion of kitchens including replacement of

kitchen flooring, cabinets, countertops, sinks, gas stoves (with electrical stoves),

dishwashers, as well as expanding kitchen to accommodate additional cabinets;

renovation of bathrooms in 4BR units, to include bathtubs, shower sets, lavatories and

associated fittings; renovation of unit structure and complete replacement of the

electrical system. Sheet rock wall siding/ceiling that contains asbestos in the

kitchen and bathrooms will be replaced with non-asbestos wall board. This

revitalization also includes replacement of wall siding/ceiling board with thick glass

wool insulation and aluminum sliding windows and window frames in order to maintain

room temperature that will greatly increase the energy efficiency of the A/C and

heating systems.


11. REQUIREMENT:

This project revitalizes 16 2BR and 5 4BR townhouse units in the Dragon Vale

neighborhood at CFA Sasebo.

PROJECT:

This project is required to correct stated deficiencies, provide energy-efficient

components, and improve the functionality of the kitchens and bathrooms. The work

required, once accomplished, will extend the useful life of the units for another 20

years.

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)



47

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391 CPage 2


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$3,808711

WHOLE HOUSE REVITALIZATION, DRAGON VALE

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: COMMANDER FLEET ACTIVITIES

SASEBO, JAPAN

H-14-02-10808742N

These townhouse units were built in 1968 and 1969. The units are two and four bedroom

units and are designated for occupancy by enlisted and senior officer personnel.

Components within the kitchens and baths are deteriorating with wear and tear and have

exceeded their life expectancy. There have been no major improvements to these homes

in the last 37 years.

These homes will continue to fall further and further away from DoD construction

standards, resulting in a significantly reduced quality of life and satisfaction for

our Navy families.


CURRENT SITUATION:

48

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391Page 1


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$8,971711

WHOLEHOUSE REVITALIZATION, CHINHAE

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: COMMANDER FLEET ACTIVITY

CHINHAE, SOUTH KOREA

H-01-020808742N

9. COST ESTIMATES


Revitalize existing 50 housing units including architectural, mechanical, and

electrical work. Also remove & dispose of existing metal storage sheds & install new

12x14 concrete masonry unit structure to match housing unit.


11. REQUIREMENT:

Whole house revitalization of all 50 housing units to include architectural,

mechanical, electrical, plumbing work, replace storage sheds, and build a retaining

wall.

PROJECT:

There has been no revitalization on these units since 1959/1962. Interior improvements

are needed to create master bedroom suites with bathroom. Interior water, drain, and

fuel oil lines are too old and need to be replaced. The metal storage sheds are

unsightly and poorly located in front or side yard of housing units. Interior

electrical improvements include more electrical outlets, telephone outlets, cable

lines, and new electrical wires.

Housing interior will continue to be in poor condition and inefficient. Maintenance

and repair costs will continue to escalate requiring more extensive repairs.

Each family housing unit requires revitalization in accordance with the proposed

Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This revitalization will affect the overall quality

of life of the residents of these housing units.


CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)



49

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391Page 1


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$1,484711

DUPLEX CONVERSION

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: NAVAL STATION

ROTA, SPAIN

H-08-020808742N

9. COST ESTIMATES


This project will convert 28 2BR duplexes into 14 4BR Single Family Homes. One of the

duplexes will be converted to the bedroom area with one master bedroom, three bedrooms

and a full bathroom. The other duplex will be converted to the living space with a

larger kitchen, formal dining room, family room/den and bathroom. A new hallway/front

entrance will connect the two sides of the duplex to create a single family dwelling.

The rear patios will be connected and the fencing modified to encompass both existing

yards. This project will also convert 10 3BR enlisted duplexes into 5 4BR enlisted

duplexes. The central wall between the two units will be opened and structurally

braced. The combined kitchen will be modified to include a breakfast table area. The

master bedroom will include a private bath. The new unit will include larger

bedrooms, additional closets and storage areas, a larger yard, and wall-to-wall

carpeting throughout the house.


11. REQUIREMENT:

This project converts 38 2 & 3BR homes into 19 4BR homes to alleviate wait list times

at NS Rota.

PROJECT:

This project is required to decrease the existing four bedroom enlisted and officer

waiting lists from 12 months to 3 months.

CURRENT SITUATION:

REQUIREMENT:

(Current Mission)



50

DD Form

1 Dec 76

1391 CPage 2


4. Project Title


1. Component


03 JAN 2007

$1,484711

DUPLEX CONVERSION

NAVY2008FY

3. Installation and Location: NAVAL STATION

ROTA, SPAIN

H-08-020808742N

There are existing, vacant two bedroom enlisted and officer units in the Las Palmeras

Housing area and a shortage of four bedroom units. All four bedroom enlisted units

are currently in the Las Flores Housing area.

The enlisted and officer unit 2 bedroom surplus will remain and the Four Bedroom

waiting lists will continue to grow.


51

BLANK PAGE

52


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION ($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE


CALIFORNIA MCB Camp Pendleton 25,175 (PE-H-0801) Funds for this project will support the construction of 151 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. (See Separate DD Form 1391).

MCB Camp Pendleton 25,000 (PE-H-0802) Funds for this project will support the construction of 150 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. (See Separate DD Form 1391).

MCAGCC Twentynine Palms 50,000 (TP-H-0801) Funds for this project will support the construction of 279 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Twentynine Palms. (See Separate DD Form 1391).

53


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS, VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER FAMILY HOUSING POST-ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION ($000) INSTALLATION/LOCATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION CURRENT WORKING ESTIMATE


NORTH CAROLINA

MCB Camp Lejeune 87,951 (LE-H-0801) Funds for this project will support the construction of 451 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Lejeune, NC resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces and a school. 204 of the deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Lejeune. (See Separate DD Form 1391).


JAPAN MCAS Iwakuni 12,321 (IW-H-0602) This project revitalizes 96 enlisted family housing units located in the Monzen Housing Area at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. Sustainment work includes repairing and painting/tiling all interior walls and ceilings, repairing cracked and broken areas of interior concrete sub-base, and replacing: deteriorating roofing and flashing; service court metal roof, drain and gutters; disfigured window and door screens; closet shelving; kitchen and bathroom cabinets, fixtures and hardware; all vinyl composition tile and sheet vinyl flooring; interior sewage/domestic drain piping; interior cold and hot water piping; interior sewage/domestic vent piping and associated hardware; exterior light fixtures and switches; all interior doors and hardware; all interior lighting fixtures, electrical outlets, switches and wiring to meet Electric Safety Code; and interior TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. Also includes replacing and upgrading existing direct buried CATV cable with new CATV cable and flexible duct in the Monzen Housing Area. Modernization work includes providing patio covers and additional lighting fixtures, electrical outlets and TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. No improvements or major repairs were accomplished on these units in the past three years, nor are any planned for the following three years. (See Separate DD Form 1391).

54

DD FORM 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY PAGE NO. UNTIL EXHAUSTED

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE CAMP PENDLETON, CA PHASE 6 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0808742 711 PE-H-0801 $25,175 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Total Project EA 151 166,722 25,175 Area Cost Factor 1.12 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 151 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents the sixth phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Camp Pendleton, CA family housing. This project phase will construct an additional 151 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 151 new units at Camp Pendleton. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 1,574 adequate housing units exists. All housing at Camp Pendleton has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.

55


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE CAMP PENDLETON, CA PHASE 6A 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0808742 711 PE-H-0802 $25,000 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Total Project EA 150 166,667 25,000 Area Cost Factor 1.12 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 150 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Pendleton. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents an augmentation to the sixth phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Camp Pendleton, CA family housing. This project will construct an additional 150 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 151 new units at Camp Pendleton. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 1,574 adequate housing units exists. All housing at Camp Pendleton has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.

56


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS AIR GROUND COMBAT TWENTYNINE PALMS PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE CENTER, TWENTYNING PALMS, CA PHASE 2 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0808742 711 TP-H-0801 $50,000 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Total Project EA 279 179,211 50,000 Area Cost Factor 1.29 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 279 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Twentynine Palms. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents the second phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Twentynine Palms, CA family housing. This project phase will construct an additional 279 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. The deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the “Grow the Force” end-strength increase in support of the Global War on Terror. Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 279 new units at Camp Pendleton. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 91 adequate housing units exists. Deficit will increase as a result of projected increases in base loading. All housing at Twentynine Palms has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.

57


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE, NC CAMP LEJEUNE PUBLIC PRIVATE VENTURE PHASE 4 WITH SCHOOL 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0808742 711 LE-H-0801 $87,951 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) WHOLEHOUSE IMPROVEMENT EA 451 146,233 65,951 SCHOOL SM 10,560 2,083 22,000 TOTAL 87,951 Area Cost Factor 0.95 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Funds for this project will support the construction of 451 deficit reduction homes through privatization at MCB Camp Lejeune, NC resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces and a school. In accordance with 10 United States Code, Section 2883, these funds will be transferred to the DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) for use at Camp Lejeune. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project represents the fourth phase of a Public Private Venture (PPV) initiative that privatized all Camp Lejeune, NC family housing. This project phase will construct an additional 451 deficit reduction units resulting in the operation and maintenance and future recapitalization of these privatized units and will also construct a school. 204 of the deficit reduction units address additional housing requirements generated by the standup of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC). Additional phases are planned to complete deficit reduction. REQUIREMENT: Adequate family housing is needed for married personnel and their families. This project constructs 451 new units at Camp Lejeune. This project also provides neighborhood amenities and community recreational facilities, and expanded common open spaces and a school. Recreational facilities include tot lots, jogging paths, and playing courts/fields. CURRENT SITUATION: A current deficit of 2,830 adequate housing units exists. All housing at Camp Lejeune has been privatized. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Military members will be forced to choose between involuntary separations from their families, or accepting housing that is unsuitable. Either choice will likely lead to poor morale and dissatisfaction with the Marine Corps. Retention of quality personnel will be adversely impacted. Necessary coordination with the school district is in progress.

58


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TILE MARINE CORPS AIR STATION IWAKUNI, JA REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES PHASE I 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0808742 711 IW-H-0602-R2 $12,321 9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) Family Housing Improvement EA 96 126,344 12,129 Sustainment EA 96 122,417 (11,752) Modernization EA 96 3,927 (377) Supporting Costs 192 Sustainment (192) Modernization (0) Total 12,321 Yen Exchange Rate 114.7781 Yen = $1 Area Cost Factor 1.40 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: This project revitalizes 96 enlisted family housing units located in the Monzen Housing Area at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. Sustainment work includes repairing and painting/tiling all interior walls and ceilings, repairing cracked and broken areas of interior concrete sub-base, and replacing: deteriorating roofing and flashing; service court metal roof, drain and gutters; disfigured window and door screens; closet shelving; kitchen and bathroom cabinets, fixtures and hardware; all vinyl composition tile and sheet vinyl flooring; interior sewage/domestic drain piping; interior cold and hot water piping; interior sewage/domestic vent piping and associated hardware; exterior light fixtures and switches; all interior doors and hardware; all interior lighting fixtures, electrical outlets, switches and wiring to meet Electric Safety Code; and interior TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. Also includes replacing and upgrading existing direct buried CATV cable with new CATV cable and flexible duct in the Monzen Housing Area. Modernization work includes providing patio covers and additional lighting fixtures, electrical outlets and TV, telephone and internet access receptacles and wiring. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: This project provides the revitalization of 96 enlisted family homes and will removes, replaces and upgraded the existing direct-buried CATV cable with new CATV cable and flexible duct in the Monzen Housing Area, Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni. REQUIREMENT: The Phase 1 Monzen enlisted family homes consist of 24 two-bedroom units, 56 three-bedroom units and 16 four-bedroom units. Repair of the existing facilities is required to correct building code deficiencies and replace deteriorated and old, outdated equipment and fixtures, to modernize the interior design and enhance the quality of the facilities for the current generation of tenants, and extend the useful life of this facility another 20+ years. Improve quality of life for the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area by providing a high-quality CATV signal.

59


1. COMPONENT 2. DATE MARINE CORPS FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION MARINE CORPS AIR STATION IWAKUNI, JAPAN 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT

NUMBER REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I IW-H-0602-R2 CURRENT SITUATION: Constructed in 1982 thru 1985, the Monzen enlisted family housing units are showing their age and require extensive repairs to continue providing comfortable living quarters to its overseas tenants. When this project is awarded, the facilities will be 23 to 26 years into their 60-year life expectancy. To date, the only major improvement within these facilities is a Government of Japan (GOJ) Central Heating and Cooling System project completed in Dec. 2004. No other major improvements or repairs have been completed since its original construction. Most of the built-in furnishings, fixtures, hardware, piping, flooring and other items in the facility are either damaged or deteriorated beyond the point of being economically repaired and are in need of replacement. The Architectural requirements of this project are as follows:

The roof of each facility must be replaced since it is deteriorated beyond economical repair. The life expectancy of similar roofing systems is estimated at 10 years.

The exterior must be repainted at the time of this project, as it will be approximately 10 years since it was last painted. Ten years is the normal life expectancy of the exterior paint in this seaside and industrial environment. The paint has rapidly deteriorated and is peeling, fading and cracking.

Provide patio covers to protect the occupants from the weather when exiting and entering the facility. All the interior doors and associated hardware, including closet doors and shelving show considerable

damage from frequent turnover over the past 23 to 26 years of use and must be replaced. The interior must be completely repainted after the damaged and unsightly walls/ceilings are repaired

and replaced with new wall tile and other wall and ceiling materials. The new interior wall and ceiling surfaces paint will create a new and rejuvenated environment that will greatly appeal to its tenants.

The flooring materials in all areas of the building must be removed and replaced after 23 to 26 years of severe wear. Much of the existing flooring is cracked or broken, deteriorated or worn out, stained and spotted. The cracked concrete sub-surface must also be repaired. Color enhancing materials must be used to rejuvenate the appearance of the facility and create a warm and inviting living environment.

The substandard and outdated kitchen and bathroom cabinets must be replaced, due to 23 to 26 years of heavy use and already undergo continual repair. Due to their age, it is also more difficult to find matching replacement parts for built-in furnishings. The existing kitchen counter-tops are made of stainless steel and severely scarred from frequent use of cutting utensils. Extensive permanent rust stains are also common. The range hoods must be replaced, as they no longer adequately or effectively exhaust the air from the cooking area. The inadequate bathroom vanities and sinks are too small for modern toiletry essentials and must be replaced with more practical fixtures.

60



NUMBER REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I IW-H-0602-R2 CURRENT SITUATION: (Continued)

The Mechanical requirements of this project are as follows:

The roof top scuppers and drains must be replaced, as they are severely corroded and no longer functioning properly.

The exhaust and ventilation systems located in both the kitchen and bathroom areas must be replaced, as they are no longer effectively recycle the air at the required volume.

The existing toilet fixtures, bathtubs, showers, lavatories and kitchen sinks have not been replaced since the facility were constructed in 1982 thru 1985, and have exceeded their life expectancy. They are inefficient and in frequent need of repair due to their age.

All sewage and domestic drain piping, cold and hot water piping, heating and cooling piping, sewage and domestic vent piping must be replaced. Frequent service calls to unclog drains and stop leaks have indicated that the existing piping throughout the building is extremely corroded and deteriorating rapidly. The expected durable life of such piping is normally between 14 and 18 years.

The Electrical requirements of this project are as follows:

The existing lighting fixtures and switches must be replaced with new energy efficient lighting that will not only save on energy consumption, but provide better illumination of the interior spaces and enhance the overall aesthetics of the interior design.

The existing electrical outlets and wiring must be replaced to meet today’s equipment needs. The current outlets in the kitchen and bathroom areas are in violation of the Electrical Safety Code since none have Ground Fault protection.

The existing circuit breakers must be replaced, as they are no longer adequate for the building service needs.

Additional lighting must be provided since many areas within the individual housing units have no lighting. In areas where fixed lighting is provided, the lighting levels do not meet illumination standards.

The existing TV, Telephone and Internet Access receptacles and wiring must be replaced, since the current configuration does not provide adequate service or capacity to all the required areas of the facility.

Additional TV, Telephone and Internet Access receptacles and wiring is required to meet the current and future demand of family’s, appliances and personal computer devices.

Existing direct-buried CATV is the only means to get Armed Forces Network television programming and station information to the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area. The existing direct-buried CATV cable has become degraded from water and debris causing CATV signal loss for programming and station information to the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area.

61



NUMBER REVITALIZE MONZEN TOWNHOUSES, PHASE I IW-H-0602-R2 IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this project is not provided, family housing units will continue to fall short of DOD construction standards. Military personnel and their families will continue to live in an old facility that violates safety code requirements and contains deteriorated or damaged furnishings and equipment that requires continuous repairs. The Air Station’s Housing Division will continue to perform minor maintenance while furnishings, equipment and building problems continue to escalate. Quality of life and comfort of living standards will continue to degrade and compromise the Air Stations vision of being the “Assignment of Choice”. Degradation of the existing direct buried CATV cable will continue with potential loss of all CATV signal to the occupants in the Monzen Housing Area. WORK ACCOMPLISHED PREVIOUS THREE YEARS: None. WORK PROGRAMMED FOR NEXT THREE YEARS: None. ADDITIONAL: An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of replacement, improvement, direct compensation and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, improvement was found to be the only viable alternative to satisfy the requirement. The life cycle cost to improve these units is greater than for replacement; but, the initial cost to improve these units, at 64% of the replacement cost, does not exceed the 70 percent of replacement threshold. In addition, these facilities were built by the Government of Japan and have a life expectancy of 60 years and when this project is awarded these facilities will be 24 to 25 years old. This project is not eligible for Host Nation Funding. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the development, design and construction of this project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other applicable laws and executive orders. No anti-terrorism/force protection or physical security measures are required.

62


ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN (In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $ 3,172 FY 2007 Program $ 2,600* Purpose and Scope This program provides for working drawings, specifications and estimates, project planning reports, and final design drawings for construction projects (authorized or not yet authorized). This includes the use of architectural and engineering services in connection with any family housing new construction or construction improvements. Program Summary The amount requested will enable full execution of the construction program. Authorization is requested for the appropriation of $3,172,000 ($3,021,000 for Navy and $151,000 for Marine Corps) to fund New Construction and Improvements design requirements. * This represents the FY 2007 PB request, which is the same as the FY 2007 annualized CR amount.

63

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NAVY FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 10 Jan 2007 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS FAMILY HOUSING ADVANCE PLANNING VARLOCS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNITED STATES AND DESIGN 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST

VARIES VARIES VARIES $3,172

9. COST ESTIMATES UNIT COST

ITEM U/M QUANTITY COST ($000) ADVANCE PLANNING AND DESIGN --- --- NEW CONSTRUCTION L/S --- --- (1,115) IMPROVEMENTS L/S --- --- (2,057) TOTAL REQUEST $3,172 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: 10 USC 2807 authorizes funding for architectural and engineering services and construction design of military family housing new construction and construction improvement projects. _____________________________________________________________________________ 11. REQUIREMENT: VARIES All project estimates are based on sound engineering and the best cost data available. Design is initiated to establish project estimates authorized or not yet authorized in advance of program submittal to the Congress. At the preliminary design, final plans and specifications are then prepared. The request includes costs for architectural and engineering services, turnkey evaluation, and construction design. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Project execution schedules for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010 will not be met. This will result in costly change orders.

64

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ($000) FY 2008 Program $200,659 FY 2007 Program* $361,581 Purpose and Scope a. Operation. This portion of the program provides for expenses in the following sub-accounts: Management. Includes direct and indirect expenses incident to the administration of the family housing program such as housing office personnel and operations, administrative support, training, travel, programming and studies, and community liaison. All housing referral costs are also included, although the housing referral program assists personnel in locating housing in the private community, and is not related to the operation or management of military family housing units. Services. Includes direct and indirect expenses incident to providing basic support services such as refuse collection and disposal, fire and police protection, pest control, custodial services for common areas, snow removal and street cleaning. Furnishings. Includes the procurement for initial issue or replacement of household equipment (primarily stoves and refrigerators) and, in limited circumstances, furniture; the control, moving and handling of furnishings inventories; and the maintenance and repair of such items. Miscellaneous. Includes work or services performed for the benefit of family housing occupants, including mobile home hook-ups and disconnections, for which reimbursement will be received; payments to the U. S. Coast Guard for Navy occupancy of Coast Guard housing; and United Kingdom accommodation charges. b. Utilities. Includes all utility services provided to family housing, such as electricity, gas, fuel oil, water and sewage. Excludes telephone services. c. Maintenance. This portion of the program supports the upkeep of family housing real property, as follows: Maintenance/Repair of Dwelling. Includes service calls, change of occupancy rehabilitation, routine maintenance, preventative maintenance, and interior and exterior painting. Exterior Utilities. Includes maintenance, repair and replacement of electrical, gas, water, sewage and other utility distribution systems located within family housing areas, and the portion of activity utility rates attributable to distribution system maintenance when separately identified. Other Real Property. Includes maintenance and repair of any other family housing real property, such as grounds, surfaced areas and family housing community facilities.

65

Alterations and Additions. Includes major repairs and minor incidental improvements to dwellings or other real property performed under the authority of 10 USC 2805. Larger scope or higher dollar value items are funded in the construction program. Reimbursable Collections. This program includes collections received from rental of DoN family housing to foreign national, civilian and Coast Guard personnel; collections for rental of mobile home spaces; collections for burden sharing by the Government of Japan, and collections for occupant-caused damages. Program Summary Authorization is requested for an appropriation of $200,659,000. This amount, together with estimated reimbursements of $9,000,000, will fund the Fiscal Year 2008 program of $209,659,000. A summary of the funding program for Fiscal Year 2008 follows (in thousands): Appropriation Request Reimburse- Total Operations Utilities Maintenance Total ments Program Navy $ 80,475 39,337 66,649 186,461 8,000 194,461 Marine Corps $ 7,704 2,465 4,029 14,198 1,000 15,198 Total DoN $ 88,179 41,802 70,678 200,659 9,000 209,659 JUSTIFICATION: The Department of Navy family housing budget requests the minimum essential resources needed to provide military families with adequate housing either through the private community or in government quarters. Navy and Marine Corps installations are generally located in the high cost, coastal areas. Accordingly, the over-inflated cost of adequate housing in these areas cause many of our military families to reside in facilities that lack even the minimal amenities expected in a home. Therefore, emphasis is placed on the proper funding of the family housing Operations and Maintenance program. The Fiscal Year 2008 estimated program was formulated utilizing the Office of Management and Budget's published inflationary factors and foreign currency exchange rates. * This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $352,441 for Total Direct O&M and $143,831 for Maintenance.

66

FY 2006 Funds Percent FY 2006Appropriation* Reprogrammed Reprogrammed End of Year

Utilities 96,887,000 2,632,647 2.7% 99,519,647

Operations 141,096,000 (8,993,225) -6.4% 132,102,775Management 76,126,000 (3,534,933) -4.6% 72,591,067Services 44,978,000 (3,456,405) -7.7% 41,521,595Furnishings 19,992,000 (2,001,887) -10.0% 17,990,113Miscellaneous 0 0 0.0% 0

Leasing 142,388,000 (16,310,978) -11.5% 126,077,022

Maintenance 184,594,400 206,647,762Hurricane Supplemental** 48,915,000 48,915,000

Total Maintenance 233,509,400 22,053,362 9.4% 255,562,762

Interest/Debt 55,000 (2,000) -3.6% 53,000

Privatization Support 17,753,000 620,194 3.5% 18,373,194

Total 631,688,400 0 0.0% 631,688,400

Department of the NavyFamily Housing Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming Actions

Fiscal Year 2006

** Additional funding in the amount of $48.9M was added to cover costs associated with hurricane damage in the Southeast.

* Initial Appropriation Request of $588,660,000 (excluding Hurricane Supplemental funds) was reduced 1% or $5,886,600 in accordance with P.L. 109-148.

22,053,362 9.4%

67

FY 2006 Funds Percent FY 2006Appropriation Reprogrammed Reprogrammed End of Year

Utilities 70,615,000 7,131,623 10.1% 77,746,623

Operations 118,488,000 (8,564,630) -7.2% 109,923,370Management 63,098,000 (3,066,730) -4.9% 60,031,270Services 37,191,000 (3,390,980) -9.1% 33,800,020Furnishings 18,199,000 (2,106,920) -11.6% 16,092,080Miscellaneous 0 0 0.0% 0

Leasing 132,244,000 (18,615,752) -14.1% 113,628,248

Maintenance 140,842,400 160,891,159Hurricane Supplemental 48,915,000 48,915,000


Interest/Debt 53,000 0 0.0% 53,000

Privatization Support 11,176,000 0 0.0% 11,176,000

Total 522,333,400 0 0.0% 522,333,400

Department of the NavyNavy Family Housing Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming Actions

Fiscal Year 2006

20,048,759 10.6%

68

FY 2006 Funds Percent FY 2006Appropriation Reprogrammed Reprogrammed End of Year

Utilities 26,272,000 (4,498,976) -17.1% 21,773,024

Operations 22,608,000 (428,595) -1.9% 22,179,405Management 13,028,000 (468,203) -3.6% 12,559,797Services 7,787,000 (65,425) -0.8% 7,721,575Furnishings 1,793,000 105,033 5.9% 1,898,033Miscellaneous 0 0 0.0% 0

Leasing 10,144,000 2,304,774 22.7% 12,448,774

Maintenance 43,752,000 2,004,603 4.6% 45,756,603Hurricane Supplemental 0 0 0.0% 0


Interest/Debt 2,000 (2,000) 0.0% 0

Privatization Support 6,577,000 620,194 9.4% 7,197,194

Total 109,355,000 0 0.0% 109,355,000

Department of the NavyMarine Corps Family Housing Operations and Maintenance Reprogramming Actions

Fiscal Year 2006

69

BLANK PAGE

70

Account/Subaccount

FY 2007

FY 2008

Reason Action Taken/Proposed

Management

$0.0

$0.0

FY07 = None Anticipated


Services

$0.0

$0.0



Furnishings

$0.0

$0.0



Misc.

$0.0

$0.0



Utilities

$0.0

$0.0



Leasing

$0.0

$0.0



Maintenance

$0.0

$0.0



PPV Support

$0.0

$0.0



Totals

$0.0

$0.0

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY

FY 2008

REPROGRAMMING AND PROPOSED FUNDING ALIGNMENT

($000)

FH-10

71

Account/Subaccount

FY 2007

FY 2008

Reason Action Taken/Proposed

Management

$0.0

$0.0



Services

$0.0

$0.0



Furnishings

$0.0

$0.0



Utilities

$0.0

$0.0



Leasing

$0.0

$0.0



Maintenance

$0.0

$0.0



PPV Support

$0.0

$0.0



Totals

$0.0

$0.0

FAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS

FY 2008

REPROGRAMMING AND PROPOSED FUNDING ALIGNMENT

($000)

FH-10

72

A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide

Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit($000) Cost ($000) Cost ($000) Cost

B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 71,084 2,139 75,085 2,851 59,422 5,475 (2) Services 41,317 1,244 34,123 1,296 13,155 1,212 (3) Furnishings 16,464 496 18,036 685 14,962 1,378 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 595 23 640 59 Subtotal Direct Obligations 128,865 3,879 127,839 4,854 88,179 8,124 Anticipated Reimbursements 6,414 193 3,535 134 3,700 341 Estimated Gross Obligations 135,279 4,072 131,374 4,989 91,879 8,465 2. UTILITIES 98,775 2,973 80,751 3,066 41,802 3,851 Anticipated Reimbursements 7,416 223 5,377 204 1,200 111 Estimated Gross Obligations 106,191 3,196 86,128 3,270 43,002 3,962 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 166,741 5,019 131,896 5,008 51,201 4,717 b. Exterior Utilities 787 24 651 25 359 33 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 1,662 50 1,252 48 1,049 97 d. Alterations and Additions 84,879 2,555 19,192 729 18,070 1,665 Subtotal Direct Obligations 254,069 7,647 152,991 5,809 70,678 6,512 Anticipated Reimbursements 1,380 42 7,588 288 4,100 378 Estimated Gross Obligations 255,449 7,688 160,579 6,098 74,778 6,889 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 481,709 14,498 361,581 13,730 200,659 18,487 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 15,210 458 16,500 627 9,000 8296. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 496,919 14,956 378,081 14,357 209,659 19,316

FY 2006 FY 2007* FY 2008

10,90440,304 26,25710,80310,854

19,541

573 222 69

16,444

26,25733,225

10,904

10,854

2,1071,5056,394

33,225

2,6607,231

* This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $352,441 for Grand Total, O&M Direct Obligations and $143,831 for Subtotal Direct Obligations Maintenance.

GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)

26,335

26,335

7,2427,290

Exhibit FH-2

73

BLANK PAGE

74

A. INVENTORY DATA Units in Beginning of Year Units at End of Year Average Inventory for Year** a. Average Historic Inventory for Year Requiring O&M Funding a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign d. Worldwide


B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 58,549 2,521 63,180 2,935 53,387 5,346 (2) Services 33,605 1,447 29,587 1,374 12,275 1,229 (3) Furnishings 14,569 627 17,153 797 14,173 1,419 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 595 28 640 64 Subtotal Direct Obligations 106,723 4,594 110,515 5,134 80,475 8,058 Anticipated Reimbursements 5,814 250 3,135 146 3,500 350 Estimated Gross Obligations 112,537 4,845 113,650 5,279 83,975 8,408 2. UTILITIES 77,006 3,315 67,153 3,119 39,337 3,939 Anticipated Reimbursements 6,816 293 4,877 227 1,000 100 Estimated Gross Obligations 83,822 3,608 72,030 3,346 40,337 4,039 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 123,213 5,304 103,335 4,800 47,384 4,745 b. Exterior Utilities 350 15 350 16 311 31 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 350 15 350 16 932 93 d. Alterations and Additions 84,441 3,635 18,892 878 18,022 1,805 Subtotal Direct Obligations 208,354 8,970 122,927 5,710 66,649 6,674 Anticipated Reimbursements 580 25 6,988 325 3,500 350 Estimated Gross Obligations 208,934 8,995 129,915 6,035 70,149 7,024 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 392,083 16,879 300,595 13,964 186,461 18,670 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 13,210 569 15,000 697 8,000 8016. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 405,293 17,448 315,595 14,660 194,461 19,471

FY 2006 FY 2007* FY 2008

9,98730,304 21,3899,9879,987

12,616

481 180 63

13,527

21,38923,229

9,987

6,5549,987

1,9761,5054,059

23,229

1,5056,495

* This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $293,538 for Grand Total, O&M Direct Obligations and $115,850 for Subtotal Direct Obligations Maintenance.

** In order to accurately compare FY to FY, the "Average Inventory for Year" (which drives the Cost Per Unit metric) has not been changed from the PB06 and PB07 submissions (respectively) in order to maintain consistency with respect to calculating Per Unit Costs. However, BOY and EOY Inventories have been adjusted to accurately reflect the current state of inventory to match the FH-7 &


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, NAVY


21,527

21,527

6,506

Exhibit FH-2

75



B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 44,720 3,545 49,089 3,629 38,106 19,284 (2) Services 10,846 860 13,187 975 1,545 782 (3) Furnishings 1,393 110 2,830 209 393 199 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 595 44 640 324 Subtotal Direct Obligations 56,959 4,515 65,701 4,857 40,684 20,589 Anticipated Reimbursements 4,242 336 2,250 166 1,000 506 Estimated Gross Obligations 61,201 4,851 67,951 5,023 41,684 21,095 2. UTILITIES 37,190 2,948 34,253 2,532 6,490 3,284 Anticipated Reimbursements 5,557 440 0 0 0 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 42,747 3,388 34,253 2,532 6,490 3,284 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 63,476 5,031 63,246 4,676 9,671 4,894 b. Exterior Utilities 350 28 350 26 183 93 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 350 28 350 26 16 8 d. Alterations and Additions 56,962 4,515 1,662 123 1,707 864 Subtotal Direct Obligations 121,138 9,602 65,608 4,850 11,577 5,859 Anticipated Reimbursements 0 0 4,508 333 1,000 506 Estimated Gross Obligations 121,138 9,602 70,116 5,183 12,577 6,365 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 215,287 17,065 165,562 12,239 58,751 29,732 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 9,799 777 6,758 500 2,000 1,0126. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 225,086 17,841 172,320 12,739 60,751 30,744

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

0 0 0

0 0 0

213

0 0

1,976

0

180 63

12,616 13,527

12,616

18,828 13,401 1,97613,401 1,976 1,976

13,527 1,976

GEOGRAPHIC - CONUS

FY 2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCEFAMILY HOUSING, NAVY


(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)

Exhibit FH-2

76



B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 3,200 788 2,939 1,953 2,614 1,737 (2) Services 11,154 2,748 3,313 2,201 2,718 1,806 (3) Furnishings 2,496 615 1,871 1,243 1,891 1,256 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 16,850 4,151 8,123 5,397 7,223 4,799 Anticipated Reimbursements 170 42 753 500 1,000 664 Estimated Gross Obligations 17,020 4,193 8,876 5,898 8,223 5,464 2. UTILITIES 17,541 4,321 9,815 6,522 10,071 6,692 Anticipated Reimbursements 628 155 490 326 500 332 Estimated Gross Obligations 18,168 4,476 10,305 6,847 10,571 7,024 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 30,288 7,462 11,647 7,739 12,135 8,063 b. Exterior Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 0 0 0 0 143 95 d. Alterations and Additions 14,635 3,605 8,258 5,487 3,199 2,126 Subtotal Direct Obligations 44,923 11,068 19,905 13,226 15,477 10,284 Anticipated Reimbursements 561 138 2,480 1,648 1,000 664 Estimated Gross Obligations 45,484 11,206 22,385 14,874 16,477 10,948 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 79,313 19,540 37,843 25,145 32,771 21,775 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 1,359 335 3,723 2,474 2,500 1,6616. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 80,673 19,875 41,566 27,619 35,271 23,436

0 0

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

1,5054,134 1,505

0

1,505

0

4,059 1,505 1,50500 0

0 0

1,505

268 0 04,0591,505 1,505

1,505

GEOGRAPHIC - US OVERSEAS



Exhibit FH-2

77



B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management 10,629 1,622 11,152 1,717 12,667 1,947 (2) Services 11,605 1,771 13,087 2,015 8,012 1,231 (3) Furnishings 10,680 1,630 12,452 1,917 11,889 1,827 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 32,915 5,022 36,691 5,649 32,568 5,006 Anticipated Reimbursements 1,402 214 132 20 1,500 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 34,316 5,236 36,823 5,669 34,068 5,236 2. UTILITIES 22,276 3,399 23,085 3,554 22,776 3,501 Anticipated Reimbursements 631 96 4,387 675 500 77 Estimated Gross Obligations 22,907 3,495 27,472 4,230 23,276 3,578 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 29,449 4,493 28,442 4,379 25,578 3,931 b. Exterior Utilities 0 0 0 0 128 20 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 0 0 0 0 773 119 d. Alterations and Additions 12,844 1,960 8,972 1,381 13,116 2,016 Subtotal Direct Obligations 42,293 6,453 37,414 5,760 39,595 6,086 Anticipated Reimbursements 19 3 0 0 1,500 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 42,312 6,456 37,414 5,760 41,095 6,316 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligations 97,483 14,874 97,190 14,964 94,939 14,593 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 2,051 313 4,519 696 3,500 5386. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 99,535 15,187 101,709 15,660 98,439 15,130

0

0 00

6,4950

6,554

00

0

06,506

0

6,506

6,5060 0

6,554 6,4956,506 6,5066,483

GEOGRAPHIC - FOREIGNFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

6,4837,342



Exhibit FH-2

78

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS


GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDEFY 2006 FY 2007 ** FY 2008



B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management* 12,535 1,254 11,905 2,476 6,035 6,961 (2) Services 7,712 772 4,536 943 880 1,015 (3) Furnishings 1,895 190 883 184 789 910 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 22,142 2,215 17,324 3,603 7,704 8,886 Anticipated Reimbursements 600 60 400 83 200 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 23,205 2,321 17,724 3,686 7,904 9,116 2. UTILITIES 21,769 2,178 13,598 2,828 2,465 2,843 Anticipated Reimbursements 600 60 500 104 200 231 Estimated Gross Obligations 22,369 2,238 14,098 2,932 2,665 3,074 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 43,528 4,355 28,561 5,940 3,817 4,402 b. Exterior Utilities 437 44 301 63 48 55 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 1,312 131 902 188 117 134 d. Alterations and Additions 439 44 300 62 48 55 Subtotal Direct Obligations 45,715 4,573 30,064 6,253 4,029 4,647 Anticipated Reimbursements 800 80 600 125 600 692 Estimated Gross Obligations 44,545 4,456 30,664 6,378 4,629 5,339 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 89,626 8,966 60,986 12,684 14,198 16,376 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 2,000 200 1,500 312 1,000 1,1536. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 91,626 9,166 62,486 12,996 15,198 17,529

917816867

6,925

92 42 6

2,917

10,0004,8689,996

4,868917

4,808

13102,335

9,996

1,155736

4,808

** This column reflects the FY 2007 Presidents Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $58,903 for Grand Total, O&M Direct Obligations and $27,981 for Subtotal Direct Obligations Maintenance.

* Actual Per Unit Cost for Management in FY08 is 2,077 vice 6,961. The 6,035 cost includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 4,234 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.

736736867

79


FY2008 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE(EXCLUDES LEASED UNITS AND COSTS)

GEOGRAPHIC - CONUSFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008



B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management* 8,497 1,227 7,262 2,490 4,061 30,998 (2) Services 5,731 828 2,767 949 196 1,496 (3) Furnishings 1,064 154 246 84 51 389 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 15,292 2,208 10,275 3,522 4,308 32,883 Anticipated Reimbursements 530 77 330 113 105 802 Estimated Gross Obligations 16,285 2,352 10,605 3,635 4,413 33,685 2. UTILITIES 14,326 2,069 8,295 2,844 584 4,458 Anticipated Reimbursements 600 87 500 171 180 1,374 Estimated Gross Obligations 14,926 2,155 8,795 3,015 764 5,832 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 31,169 4,501 17,422 5,973 680 5,188 b. Exterior Utilities 301 43 183 63 15 113 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 905 131 550 189 17 133 d. Alterations and Additions 303 44 183 63 15 113 Subtotal Direct Obligations 32,678 4,719 18,339 6,287 727 5,548 Anticipated Reimbursements 716 103 526 180 570 4,351 Estimated Gross Obligations 31,424 4,538 18,865 6,467 1,297 9,899 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 62,297 8,996 36,908 12,653 5,618 42,889 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 1,846 267 1,356 465 855 6,5276. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 64,143 9,262 38,264 13,118 6,473 49,416

6,925

0 0 0

0 0 00 0 0

2,917 131

61 11 6

* Actual Per Unit Cost for Management in FY08 is 1,412 vice 30,998. The 4,061 cost includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 3,876 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.

6,929 2,977 1812,977 181 80

2,917 131

6,925

80



GEOGRAPHIC - US OVERSEASFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008



B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses

(1) Management 3,126 1,339 2,857 2,474 151 0 (2) Services 1,436 615 1,089 943 0 0 (3) Furnishings 705 302 505 437 350 0 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 5,267 2,256 4,451 3,854 501 0 Anticipated Reimbursements 45 19 45 39 45 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 5,312 2,275 4,496 3,893 546 0 2. UTILITIES 5,604 2,400 3,264 2,826 0 0 Anticipated Reimbursements 0 0 0 0 0 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 5,604 2,400 3,264 2,826 0 0 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 9,450 4,047 6,855 5,935 0 0 b. Exterior Utilities 105 45 72 62 0 0 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 315 135 216 187 0 0 d. Alterations and Additions 105 45 72 62 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 9,975 4,272 7,215 6,247 0 0 Anticipated Reimbursements 40 17 40 35 0 0 Estimated Gross Obligations 10,015 4,289 7,255 6,282 0 0 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 20,846 8,928 14,930 12,926 501 0 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 85 36 85 74 45 06. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 20,931 8,964 15,015 13,000 546 0

0 0 0

2,335 1,155 00 0 0

0 0 0

31 31 0

* The Management cost of 151 in FY08 includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 151 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.

00

2,335

2,3351,155

1,1550

1,155 0

81






B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. OPERATIONS a. Operating Expenses (1) Management* 912 1,239 1,786 2,426 1,823 2,477 (2) Services 545 741 680 924 684 929 (3) Furnishings 126 171 132 180 388 527 (4) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Direct Obligations 1,582 2,150 2,599 3,531 2,895 3,934 Anticipated Reimbursements 25 34 25 34 50 68 Estimated Gross Obligations 1,607 2,184 2,624 3,565 2,945 4,002 2. UTILITIES 1,839 2,498 2,040 2,772 1,881 2,556 Anticipated Reimbursements 0 0 0 0 20 27 Estimated Gross Obligations 1,839 2,498 2,040 2,772 1,901 2,583 3. MAINTENANCE a. Maintenance & Repair of Dwellings 2,909 3,953 4,284 5,821 3,137 4,262 b. Exterior Utilities 31 42 45 61 33 45 c. Maintenance & Repair of Other Real Property 92 125 135 184 99 135 d. Alterations and Additions 31 42 45 61 33 45 Subtotal Direct Obligations 3,062 4,161 4,510 6,127 3,302 4,487 Anticipated Reimbursements 44 60 34 46 30 41 Estimated Gross Obligations 3,106 4,220 4,544 6,173 3,332 4,528 4. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Direct Obligation 6,483 8,809 9,148 12,430 8,078 10,976 5. GRAND TOTAL - Anticipated Reimbursements 69 94 59 80 100 1366. GRAND TOTAL, O&M - Gross Obligations 6,552 8,903 9,207 12,510 8,178 11,112

736736736

73600

0736

07360

736736736736

* Actual Per Unit Cost for Management in FY08 is 2,196 vice 2,477. The 1,823 cost includes program costs not associated with unit property management such as community housing referral, relocation assistance and housing market analyses which equate to 207 in non-unit management costs. See OP-5s for additional detail.

736736

0 0 0

0

0 00

82

Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases

1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 63,1802. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 63,1803. FY 2007 Current Estimate 63,1804. Price Growth: 1,719

a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 1,101b. Inflation 584c. Working Capital Fund 34

5. Program Decreases (12,772)a. Program Efficiencies - PPV (1,366)b. Transfer of 110 FTEs to PPV Support (9,495)c. Reduction in Contractor Support (1,911)

6. Program Increases 1,260a. Execution Adjustment - Foreign 1,260

7. FY 2008 Budget Request 53,387

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT

CALCULATIONS4a. 36,702 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 1,101 (Civilian Personnel Compensation)4b. 25,376 (Travel, Training, IT, Consulting, Programs & Studies, etc.) x .023 (inflation rate) = 584 (Inflation)4c. 1,102 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 34 (Working Capital Fund)5a. Decreases at PPV locations associated with reduced requirements due to PPV.5b. Costs associated with the transfer of 110 FTEs to the PPV Support account (Avg. per FTE = $86K).5c. Navy-wide initiative to reduce contract support, while still providing the same level of service.6a. Increases at Foreign Locations are based on FY06 Actuals at Foreign Locations.

FY07Total Cost

PricingAdjustment Inc/Dec

FY08Total Cost

CONUS 49,089 1,384 (12,367) 38,106US OVERSEAS 2,939 80 (405) 2,614FOREIGN 11,152 255 1,260 12,667

FH-2 to OP-5 Crosswalk

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES

JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

OPERATING EXPENSES

IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Management account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Housing personnel reductions and associated administrative support reductions have been identified as property management functions will no longer be performed post-privatization. While Installations will continue to provide community housing referral services and waiting list management services (for Navy-owned units), beginning in FY08, all PPV-related functions will be paid out of the PPV Support account.

Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Management account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. Program Decreases are for a reduction in staff and costs associated with the reduced requirements at PPV locations, as well as a transfer of 110 FTEs at CONUS and US Overseas locations from the Management account to the PPV Support account to more accurately account for costs associated with the Navy's Privatization initiatives. Program Increases are based on FY06 Actuals at foreign locations.

(Dollars in Thousands)

The FY 2008 estimated program represents the Navy Family Housing requirements using Office of Management and Budget inflation factors and foreign currency exchange rates. Reconciliation of estimates is provided for each program element as follows:

MANAGEMENT

Exhibit OP-5

83

A. POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign

B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 20,000 89 18,054 85 11,457 54 (2) Administrative Support 5,851 26 5,509 26 3,129 15 (3) Housing Referral 19,078 85 21,670 102 22,740 107 (4) Programs & Studies 10,965 49 15,304 72 16,061 75 (5) PPV 2,655 12 2,643 12 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 58,549 261 63,180 296 53,387 250

A. POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year

B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 13,202 76 11,184 68 4,274 26 (2) Administrative Support 4,471 26 4,105 25 1,569 9 (3) Housing Referral 13,502 78 15,853 96 16,202 98 (4) Programs & Studies 10,965 63 15,304 93 16,061 97 (5) PPV 2,580 15 2,643 16 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 44,720 257 49,089 297 38,106 231


B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 2,191 160 2,022 155 1,677 129 (2) Administrative Support 346 25 316 24 323 25 (3) Housing Referral 588 43 601 46 614 47 (4) Programs & Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 75 5 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 3,200 233 2,939 225 2,614 200


B. FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (1) Welcome Center 4,607 125 4,848 139 5,506 157 (2) Administrative Support 1,034 28 1,088 31 1,237 35 (3) Housing Referral 4,988 136 5,216 149 5,924 169 (4) Programs & Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MANAGEMENT FUNDING 10,629 289 11,152 319 12,667 362

36,774 34,990 34,990

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

165,313 165,31313,715 13,050 13,050

36,774 34,990 34,990


Additional Justification for Management Account(Amended FH-2 Exhibit by Cost Per Family vice Cost Per Unit)

13,715 13,050 13,050

GEOGRAPHIC - US OVERSEAS

173,742 165,313 165,313



GEOGRAPHIC - CONUS

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY

224,231 213,353 213,353FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

173,742

84

Region FY06FTEs

FY07FTEs

FY08FTEs

FY09FTEs

FY10FTEs

FY11FTEs

FY12FTEs

FY13FTEs

CNIC HQ 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22- Unadjusted PPV FTE Reductions/Transfers* 0 33 137 145 145 145 145 145

Mid-Atlantic** 54 75 57 57 57 57 57 57Midwest 13 13 9 9 9 9 9 9NDW 27 25 23 23 23 23 23 23Northeast** 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Northwest 27 27 20 20 20 20 20 20Southeast 85 84 41 33 33 33 33 33Southwest 69 69 21 21 21 21 21 21CONUS Totals 330 348 330 330 330 330 330 330

Hawaii 22 17 14 14 14 14 14 14Guam 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6US Overseas Totals 28 23 20 20 20 20 20 20

Europe 99 101 101 101 101 101 101 101Japan 71 74 74 74 74 74 74 74Korea 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Southeast (Guantanamo Bay) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4SW Asia 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8Foreign Totals 184 189 189 189 189 189 189 189

Management Account Totals 542 560 539 539 539 539 539 539

** Effective FY07, Northeast Region has been consolidated with Mid-Atlantic Region.

Navy Family Housing Management Civilian Personnel Breakdown (FY06-13)

* The totals reflected above match the official Department of the Navy targets reported in other DoN appropriation exhibits. Although funding has been reduced due to the effects of Privatization and funding for 110 FTEs has already been transferred to the Privatization Support Account (See Management and PPV Support OP-5s), the reduction/movement of these FTEs has yet to be reflected in official figures. For tracking purposes, all of these Regional reductions/movements are consolidated under CNIC HQ. This update will occur during the next budget cycle. Accordingly, the actual FTEs funded in the FY08 request is 402 (539 - 137 = 402).

85


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 29,5872. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 29,5873. FY 2007 Current Estimate 29,5874. Price Growth: 681

a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 2b. Inflation 582c. Working Capital Fund 97

5. Program Decreases (17,993)a. Inventory Reduction (8,057)b. Program Decrease - Fire Support (9,936)


RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE SERVICES ACCOUNT

CALCULATIONS4a. 53 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 2 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 25,291 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 582 (Inflation)4c. 4,243 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 97 (Working Capital Fund)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:

Avg. UnitsReduction

FundingReduction

Per Unit($000)

Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (354) $724Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (5,063) $719Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (2,465) $675Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (175) $726

5b. Reduction is based on removal of the majority of Fire Costs from the FH,N appropriation.

FY07Total Cost


FY08Total Cost

CONUS 13,187 304 (11,946) 1,545US OVERSEAS 3,313 76 (671) 2,718FOREIGN 13,087 301 (5,376) 8,012



Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Services account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. The Program Decrease reflects those units being pulled offline primarily due to PPV execution and demolition and a reduction based on the Navy's decision to centrally-fund Fire Costs, vice fair-share out of the Family Housing Appropriation.IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Services account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects on this account.

FY07CarryoverReduction

SERVICES


JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

Exhibit OP-5

86


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 17,1532. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 17,1533. FY 2007 Current Estimate 17,1534. Price Growth: 395

a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 16b. Inflation 315c. Working Capital Fund 64

5. Program Decreases (3,375)a. Inventory Reduction (2,507)b. Execution Adjustment - Foreign (368)c. LaMaddalena - Base Closure (500)


RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT

CALCULATIONS4a. 548 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 16 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 13,683 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 315 (Inflation)4c. 2,922 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 64 (WCF)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:

Avg. UnitsReduction

FundingReduction

Per Unit($000)

Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (105) $215Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (1,554) $221Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (788) $216Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (60) $249

5b. Reduction is based on FY05 Actuals and FY06 Projected Furn. costs in Foreign Locations (primarily Japan).5c. Costs associated with the base closure of LaMaddalena, IT. Minor costs for closeout remain in FY08.

FY07Total Cost


FY08Total Cost

CONUS 2,830 70 (2,507) 393US OVERSEAS 1,871 20 0 1,891FOREIGN 12,452 305 (868) 11,889



JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

FURNISHINGS


Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Furnishings Account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. The Program Decreases reflects those units being pulled offline primarily due to PPV execution and demolition, as well as base closure savings at LaMaddalena, IT, and execution adjustments for foreign locations (primarily Japan).IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Furnishings account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects on this account.


Exhibit OP-5

87


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 595 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 595 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 5954. Price Growth 14

a. Inflation 145. Program Increases 31

b. Additional Coast Guard Reimbursement 316. FY 2008 Budget Request 640

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNTPricing adjustments are proposed in the Miscellaneous Account for Inflation and an additional increase associated with personnel staying in Coast Guard housing in Adak, Alaska.

MISCELLANEOUS



JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

Exhibit OP-5

88

FY2007 FY 2008$11,905,000 $6,035,000

Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases Dollars in Thousands

1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 11,9052. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 11,9054. Price Growth 157 a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 97 b. Inflation 60 5. Program Decreases (6,027) a. Inventory Reduction (1,867) b. Reduction in Electronic Housing System (ENH) (143) c. Privatization Support Labor Realignment (4,017)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 6,035

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT.

The management account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing units and the community housing referral program. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized. A reduction in the management account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Housing personnel reductions and associated administrative support reductions have been identified, as property management functions will no longer be performed post privatization. The reduction in ENH costs is a result of fewer users. Installations will continue to provide community housing referral services. The management account was further decreased as a result of realignment of labor costs associated with privatization liason and support functions from the management account to the privatization support account. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.

The management account provides for direct and indirect expenses in managing the family housing program and community housing referral program. Included in this account are costs associated with housing office and community referral office personnel payroll; civilian pay increases; community liaison, training and travel of housing personnel, vehicle leasing, costs associated with Electronic Navy Housing (ENH) and Navy and Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI); and administrative support provided to housing by other base offices such as human resources services, purchasing, contracting, facilities management departments, public affairs, and field headquarters offices. Also included in the management account are costs associated with environmental compliance studies and housing requirements determination market analyses.

MANAGEMENT


OPERATING EXPENSES

JUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS

Exhibit OP-5 89

CALCULATIONS

FY07 Request: 11,9055a. (1,867)

Housing Office labor and Admin Support (1,815)Travel/Training reduction @ 26 people (direct) * $2.0K per person (52)

5b. Program Reductions - (4160)ENH Reduction - Level of effort reduction - fewer users (143)Labor realignment to PPV Support 59 FTEs (4,017)

4a. Pay Raise 973,249 (CIVPERS estimate) X .03 (pay raise rate) = 97 97

4b. Inflation 6011905 (Estimate) - 1867 (Inventory Reductions 60- 144 (ENH Reduction) - 4017 (Labor Realignment) = 5878 (Adjusted Baseline)5878 - 3249 (Labor) = 2629 (non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 60 (inflation increase)

FY08 Request 6,035

Reduction breakdown from FY07 level:

Albany, Camp Lejeune, Cherry Point, Hawaii, Westover total reduction of 3951 units.3951 units require full service required FY07. Property management component not required post-PPV (30 Sep 07). Functions retained include community referral, PPV liaison, wait list management for full year.

Exhibit OP-5 90



GEOGRAPHIC - WORLDWIDEFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) ($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 5,922 592 5,132 1,067 1,801 2,077

B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year a. Conterminous U.S. b. U.S. Overseas c. Foreign FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (2) Administrative Support 494 9 623 12 412 8 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 4,507 83 4,357 80 3,216 59 (4) Programs and Studies 581 11 702 13 419 8 (5) PPV 795 15 857 16 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 236 4 234 4 187 3Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 6,613 122 6,773 125 4,234 78Total Management Costs 12,535 11,905 6,035

*Average Total Personnel for Year Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per

($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 4,707 36 4,357 33 3,216 24



GEOGRAPHIC - CONUSFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year

Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit

FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 2,182 315 1,056 362 185 1,412B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year

Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family

FUNDING REQUIREMENT 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) (2) Administrative Support 406 8 552 12 335 7 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 4,348 91 3,981 83 2,985 62 (4) Programs and Studies 571 12 702 15 419 9 (5) PPV 795 17 786 16 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 195 4 185 4 137 3Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 6,315 132 6,206 130 3,876 81Total Management Costs 8,497 7,262 4,061


($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 4,548 40 3,981 35 2,985 26

132,372

736 736 736

2,1522,152

47,7934,2084,208 4,208

2,335 1,155 02,9174,808

54,15347,793 47,79354,153

867

54,153

9,9966,925 131

Additional Justification for Management AccountAmended FH-2 Exhibit (Cost Per Family/Personnel vice Cost Per Unit)

115,030

2,917

47,79347,793

131

47,793

6,925

2,152

91



GEOGRAPHIC - OVERSEASFY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) ($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 3,028 1,297 2,493 2,158 0 0B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (2) Administrative Support 88 21 71 17 77 18 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 0 0 214 51 66 16 (4) Programs and Studies 10 2 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 0 0 71 17 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 0 0 8 2 8 2Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 98 23 364 87 151 36Total Management Costs 3,126 2,857 151


($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 0 0 214 20 66 6




A. INVENTORY DATA Average Inventory for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs applicable to Inventory/Units) ($000) Unit ($000) Unit ($000) Unit (1) Welcome Center/Housing Office 712 967 1,583 2,151 1,616 2,196B. FAMILY POPULATION DATA Average Families for Year FUNDING REQUIREMENT Total Cost Per Total Cost Per Total Cost Per 1. MANAGEMENT (Costs Applicable to Families vs. Units) ($000) Family ($000) Family ($000) Family (2) Administrative Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3) Housing Referral * (See Footnote Below) 159 74 162 75 165 77 (4) Programs and Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5) PPV 0 0 0 0 0 0 (6) Training and Travel 41 19 41 19 42 19Subtotal Management Costs Applicable to Families 200 93 203 94 207 96Total Management Costs 912 1,786 1,823


($000) Person ($000) Person ($000) Person (3) Housing Referral 159 24 162 24 165 25

1,155

4,2084,208

0

4,208

2,335

Additional Justification for Management AccountAmended FH-2 Exhibit (Cost Per Family/Personnel vice Cost Per Unit)

6,675

736

2,1522,152

736

2,152

736

10,667

92

MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CIVILIAN PERSONNEL BREAKDOWN (FY'S 06-13)FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S FTE'S

Albany BP11 Management 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2Subtotal 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Barstow BP11 Management 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Subtotal 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3

Kansas City BP11 Management 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2Subtotal 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

29 Palms BP11 Management 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4Subtotal 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

Quantico BP11 Management 10 10 4 4 4 4 4 4BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6Subtotal 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Beaufort BP11 Management 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4Subtotal 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6

Parris Island BP11 Management 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1Subtotal 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3

MARFORRES BP11 Management 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3Subtotal 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5

93


8th&I BP11 Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iwakuni BP11 Management 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Subtotal 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Cherry Point BP11 Management 23 21 2 2 2 2 2 2BP12 Furnishings 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 54 32 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6Subtotal 80 55 8 8 8 8 8 8

Camp Lejeune BP11 Management 27 23 13 13 13 13 13 13BP12 Furnishings 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 11Subtotal 74 24 24 24 24 24 24 24

Camp Pendleton BP11 Management 34 24 13 13 13 13 13 13BP12 Furnishings 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 11Subtotal 121 24 24 24 24 24 24 24

Hawaii BP11 Management 23 15 1 1 1 1 1 1BP12 Furnishings 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4BP13 Services 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5Subtotal 48 29 10 10 10 10 10 10

Yuma BP11 Management 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1BP12 Furnishings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP13 Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP21 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4Subtotal 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5


Totals BP11 Management 162 138 54 54 54 54 54 54BP12 Furnishings 11 7 4 4 4 4 4 4BP13 Services 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 0BP15 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BP16 Leasing 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4BP21 Maintenance 171 40 1 1 1 1 1 1BP30 Privatization Support 0 0 59 59 59 59 59 59Totals 382 191 122 122 122 122 122 122

Direct 282 176 122 122 122 122 122 122Reimbursable 100 15 0 0 0 0 0 0

94

FY2007 FY 2008$883,000 $789,000


1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 8832. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 8834. Price Growth 15 a. Civilian Pay Raise 7 b. Inflation 8 5. Program Decreases (109) a. Inventory Reduction (287)6. Program Increases a. Iwakuni Loaner Furniture Replacement 1787. FY2008 President's Budget Request 789

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT. Furnishings subaccount includes the procurement of initial issue or replacement of household equipment(primarily stoves and refrigerators) and, in limited circumstances, furniture; the control, movingand handling of equipment and furnishings inventories; and the maintenance and repair of equipment and furnishings.



FURNISHINGS

The furnishings account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing and new units and the overseas loaner furnishings program. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized. A reduction in the furnishings account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. The increase in the program is a result to fund loaner furniture replacement at Iwakuni. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.

OPERATING EXPENSES

Exhibit OP-5

95

CALCULATIONS

FY07 Request: 883

5a. Inventory Reductions - 3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07 (287)Albany 250 units x .14 (price per unit) (35)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X .037 (price per unit) (45)Cherry Point 1214 units X .035 (price per unit) (42)Hawaii 1155 units X .141 (price per unit) (163)Westover 124 units X .016 (price per unit) (2)Reductions include costs for in-house and contracted effort

4b. Inflation 8883 (Estimate) - 287 (Inventory Reductions) = 596 (Adjusted Baseline) 596 (Adjusted Baseline) - 232 (Labor) = 364 (non labor)364 (non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 8 ( inflation increase)

4a. Civilian Pay Raise 7232 (CIVPERS estimate) x .03 (pay raise rate) = 7 7

6a. Program Increases-Other 178

Iwakuni Loaner Furniture Replacement

FY08 Request 789

Exhibit OP-5

96

FY2007 FY 2008$4,536,000 $880,000


1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 4,5362. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 4,5364. Price Growth 22 a. Inflation 22 5. Program Decreases (3,678) a. Inventory Reduction (3,678)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 880

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE SERVICES ACCOUNT. Includes direct and indirect expenses incident to providing basic support servicessuch as refuse collection and disposal, fire and police protection, pest control, custodial services,snow removal, street cleaning and entomological services.

CALCULATIONS

FY07 Request: 4,536

5a. Inventory Reductions - 3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07 (3,676)Albany 250 units X .824 (price per unit) (206)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X 1.062 (price per unit) (1,282)Cherry Point 1214 units X .849 (price per unit) (1,031)Hawaii 1155 units X .946 (price per unit) (1,093)Westover 124 units X .516 (price per unit) (64)Reductions include costs for in-house and contracted efforts

4a. Inflation 204536 (Estimate) - 3676 (Inventory Reductions) = 860 (Adjusted Baseline) 860 (Non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 20 Inflation

FY08 Request 880

The services account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing units. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized. A reduction in the services account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Detailed calculations used to determine the requirement are provided below.


OPERATING EXPENSES

SERVICES

FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATESJUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS

Exhibit OP-5

97

BLANK PAGE

98


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 67,1532. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 67,1533. FY 2007 Current Estimate 67,1534. Price Growth 1,475

a. Inflation 750b. Working Capital Fund 725

5. Program Decreases (29,291)a. Inventory Reduction (28,475)b. Execution Adjustment - Foreign (816)


RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE UTILITIES ACCOUNT

CALCULATIONS4a. 32,621 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 750 (Inflation)4b. 34,532 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 725 (WCF)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:

Avg. UnitsReduction

FundingReduction

Per Unit($000)

Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (1,132) $2,315Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (17,769) $2,524Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (8,970) $2,455Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (604) $2,506

5b. Reduction is based on FY06 Actuals in Foreign Locations (primarily Japan).

FY07Total Cost


FY08Total Cost

CONUS 34,253 712 (28,475) 6,490US OVERSEAS 9,815 256 0 10,071FOREIGN 23,085 507 (816) 22,776




JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

UTILITIES

Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Utilities account for Inflation and Working Capital Fund. Program Decreases reflect those units being pulled offline primarily due to PPV execution and demolition, as well as an execution adjustment for foreign locations (primarily Japan) based on prior year execution.


IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Utilities account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects on this account.

Exhibit OP-5

99

BLANK PAGE

100

FY2007 FY 2008$13,598,000 $2,465,000


1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 13,5982. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 13,5984. Price Growth 55 a. Inflation 55 5. Program Decreases (11,188) a. Inventory Reduction (11,188)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 2,465

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE UTILITIES ACCOUNT.

CALCULATIONS

FY07 Request: 13,598

5 Program Decreases (11,188)5a. Inventory Reductions- 3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07

Albany 250 units X 1.472 (price per unit) (368)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X 2.674 (price per unit) (3,227)Cherry Point 1214 units X 3.042 (price per unit) (3,693)Hawaii 1155 units X 2.826 (price per unit) (3,264)Westover 124 units X 5.129 (price per unit) (636)

4a. Inflation 5513598 (Estimate) - 11188 (Inventory Reduc.) = 2410 (Adjusted Baseline) 2410 (Adjusted Baseline) x Inflation Rate = 55 (Inflation Increase)

FY08 Request 2,465

The utilities account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing and new units. Prescribed inflation rates were utilized. Previous program decreases reflected reduced consumption in accordance with Executive Order 12902 of 30% by 2004 and energy conservation. A reduction in the utilities account request for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.


UTILITIES

Utilities account includes all utility services provided to family housing, such as electricity, gas, fuel oil, water and sewage, excluding telephone service.

FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATESJUSTIFICATIONMARINE CORPS

OPERATING EXPENSES

Exhibit OP-5

101

BLANK PAGE

102


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 122,9272. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 122,9273. FY 2007 Current Estimate 122,9274. Pricing Adjustments 2,909

a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 119b. Inflation 2,608c. Working Capital Fund 182

5. Program Decreases (63,376)a. Inventory Reduction (55,511)b. Execution Adjustment - Foreign (2,806)c. Major Repair Reductions - US Overseas (5,059)

6. Program Increases 4,189a. Major Repair Increases - CONUS and Foreign 4,189


RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT

CALCULATIONS4a. 3,961 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 119 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 113,406 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 2,608 (Inflation)4c. 5,560 (WCF Costs) x various pricing factors = 182 (Working Capital Fund)5a. Inventory Reductions by Location/Region:

Avg. UnitsReduction

FundingReduction

Per Unit($000)

Mid-South PPV (Sep '07) (489) (2,467) $5,045Southeast Region PPV (Sep '07) (7,041) (34,023) $4,832Southwest Region PPV (Sep '07) (3,654) (17,787) $4,868Pre-PPV Inventory Reductions (241) (1,234) $5,120

5b. Reduction is based on FY05 Actuals and FY06 Projected Maint. costs in Foreign Locations (primarily Japan).

FY07Total Cost


FY08Total Cost

CONUS 65,608 1,435 (55,463) 11,580US OVERSEAS 19,905 631 (5,059) 15,477FOREIGN 37,414 843 1,338 39,595

MAINTENANCE


JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

* This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $115,850.


Pricing adjustments are proposed in the Maintenance account for Civilian Personnel Compensation, Inflation, and Working Capital Fund. The Program Decreases reflects those units being pulled offline due to PPV execution and reductions in the Major Repair account, as well as execution adjustments for foreign locations (primarily Japan).


5c. The Program Decrease for Major Repair Reductions is the net reduction on the FH-2 exhibit for the "Alterations and Additions" line for US Overseas Locations.

IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION: A reduction in the Maintenance account request for FY08 is included, based on the privatization of roughly 11,000 homes in FY07. Detailed calculations below show the impact of these projects impact this account.


6a. The Program Increase for Major Repair Reductions is the net increase on the FH-2 exhibit for the "Alterations and Additions" line for CONUS and Foreign locations.

Exhibit OP-5

103

BLANK PAGE

104

FY2007* FY 2008$30,064,000 $4,029,000


1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 30,0642. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 30,0644. Price Growth 92 a. Civilian Pay Raise 5 b. Inflation 87 5. Program Decreases (26,127) a. Inventory Reduction (26,127)6. FY2008 President's Budget Request 4,029

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT.

Maintenance Subaccount includes the following areas:

Maintenance/Repair of Dwellings. Includes service calls, change of occupancy rehabilitation, routine maintenance, preventive maintenance, interior and exterior painting, and major repairswhen dollars associated with major repairs may be in alterations and additions.

Exterior Utilities. Includes maintenance, repair and replacement of electricity, gas, water, sewage and other utility distribution systems located within family housing areas, and the portionof activity utility rates attributable to distribution system maintenance when separately identified.

Other Real Property. Includes maintenance and repair of any other family housing realproperty, such as grounds, surfaced areas, and community facilities.

Alterations and Additions. Includes minor incidental improvements to dwellings or other realproperty performed with operation and maintenance funds under the authority of 10 USC 2805.

OPERATING EXPENSES

* This column reflects the FY 2007 President's Budget Request. The FY 2007 Annualized Continuing Resolution level is $27,981,000.


The maintenance account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing units and to prevent increases in the backlog of maintenance and repair. This funding profile is necessary to prevent deterioration of the housing assets, which could result in the degradation of quality of life for military personnel and their families, the closure of units or greater financial outlays in the out years. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay rates were utilized. A reduction in the maintenance account requested for FY08 is driven by the privatization of roughly 4000 homes at the end of FY07. Detailed calculations used to determine the FY08 requirement are provided below.

FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES

MAINTENANCE


Exhibit OP-5

105

CALCULATIONS

FY07 Request: 30,064

5a. Inventory Reductions -3951 homes as detailed below privatized as of 30 Sep 07 (26,127)Albany 250 units X 6.156 (price per unit) (1,539)Camp Lejeune 1207 units X 6.594 (price per unit) (7,836)Cherry Point 1214 units X 6.040 (price per unit) (7,333)Hawaii 1155 units X 6.247 (price per unit) (7,215)Westover 124 units X 17.774 (price per unit) (2,204)Reductions include costs for in-house and contracted effortsRepair projects reduction requirements reduced

4a. Pay Raise 5150 (CIVPERS estimate) x .03 (pay raise rate) = 5 (pay raise increase)

4b. Inflation 8730064 (Estimate) - 26127 (Inventory Reductions) = 3937 (Adjusted Baseline) - 150 (labor) =3787 (non labor)3787 (non labor) x .023 (inflation rate) = 87 (inflation increase)

4,029FY08 Request

Exhibit OP-5

106

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2008 BUDGET

GENERAL/FLAG OFFICERS QUARTERS (GFOQs) WHERE ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

WILL EXCEED $35,000 PER UNIT

This information is provided in accordance with the reporting requirement established by Section 124 of the Fiscal Year 2006 Military Construction Appropriation Act, Public Law 109-114. The information provides the details for those GFOQs where the maintenance and repair obligations in FY 2008 are expected to exceed $35,000 per unit. Operations include the prorated costs for management of family housing, services such as fire and police protection, refuse collection, entomology, snow removal, and furnishings. Utilities include applicable costs for energy (electricity, gas, fuel oil, steam, and geothermal), water and sewerage. Maintenance and repairs include recurring work such as service calls, preventive maintenance, routine change of occupancy work, and major repairs. This includes all operation and maintenance costs to the dwelling unit, appurtenant structures and other related area and facilities intended for the use of the general or flag officer. In those quarters designated as historical, major work is coordinated with the appropriate State Historic Preservation office. These quarters are identified as National Historic Register (NHR) or National Historic Landmark (NHL) or eligible to be on the National Historic Register (ELIG) or are in an Historical Thematic District (HTD).

107

1. COMPONENT NAVY/MARINE CORPS

FY 2008 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 4. PROJECT TITLE GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS

5. PROJECT NUMBER

STATE/ INSTALLATION

QTRS ID

OPS

UTIL

MAINT & RPR

HIST PRES

TOTAL

IMPROVS



DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NSA Washington DC

A-NAC 30,500 8,900 35,100 0 74,500 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1922; NSF: 4,260; ELIG) NSA Washington DC

A Tingey House

28,500 24,900 50,400 0 103,800 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1804; NSF: 8.940; NHL) NSA Washington DC

AA Potomac Annex

34,200 8,600 48,400 0 91,200 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1910; NSF: 5,425; HTD) NSA Washington DC

B-NOBSY 27,500 5,600 70,700 0 103,800 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include replacing the roof. (Year built: 1897; NSF: 2,333; NHL) NSA Washington DC

B-WNY 28,400 17,600 47,300 0 93,300 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairing interior walls, cleaning the ducts and miscellaneous minor repairs. (Year built: 1802; NSF: 4,459; NHL) NSA Washington DC

BB Potomac Annex

30,000 6,400 50,100 0 86,500 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes duct cleaning, repairing interior walls and miscellaneous minor repairs. (Year built: 1910; NSF: 3,949; HTD)

108




5. PROJECT NUMBER

STATE/ INSTALLATION

QTRS ID

OPS

UTIL

MAINT & RPR

HIST PRES

TOTAL

IMPROVS


NSA Washington DC

C-NOBSY 27,500 8,700 69,400 0 105,600 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include replacing the roof. (Year built: 1897; NSF: 1,844; NHL) NSA Washington DC

C-WNY 36,100 6,000 198,900 0 241,000 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairing interior walls, replacing the carpet on the second floor, cleaning the ducts and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include exterior painting with lead-based paint mitigation and repairs, repairs to the kitchen, interior painting, refinishing the hardwood floors, repairing the banister, repairing the fence, replacing the fire alarm system and replacing the front entry steps and handrail. (Year built: 1879; NSF: 3,200; NHL) NSA Washington DC

CC Potomac Annex

39,400 8,200 294,800 0 342,400 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include replacing the roof, gutters and downspouts, mitigating exterior lead-based paint on the wood trim, replacing the windows, repairs to the kitchen and bathrooms, interior painting, refinishing the hardwood floors, repairing the sidewalks and patio, repairs to the garage, repairs to the deck, correcting the drainage and replacing the fences. (Year built: 1910; NSF: 5,252; HTD) NSA Washington DC

D-WNY 39,300 8,000 251,700 0 299,000 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, replacing the carpet on the second floor, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include exterior painting and repairs, replacing the roof, repairs to the kitchen, repairs to the foundation, replacing the fire alarm system, replacing the front entry steps and handrail, refinishing the hardwood floors, complete interior painting and repairing the fence. (Year built: 1879; NSF: 3,220; NHL) NSA Washington DC

E-NNMC 25,700 5,700 133,000 0 164,400 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning, complete interior painting and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include repairs to the sidewalks and driveway, repairing the garage and shed, repairs to the kitchen and bathrooms, replacing the roof, exterior painting with lead-based paint mitigation and replacing the awnings. (Year built: 1941; NSF: 3,549; HTD)

109




5. PROJECT NUMBER

STATE/ INSTALLATION

QTRS ID

OPS

UTIL

MAINT & RPR

HIST PRES

TOTAL

IMPROVS


NSA Washington DC

F-WNY 32,700 7,100 113,700 0 153,500 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include a complete interior painting, refinishing the hardwood floors, repairs to the sidewalk, repairs to the fence, repairs to the bathrooms, refinishing doors and frames, replacing the furnace and replacing the front steps. (Year built: 1880; NSF: 3,880; NHL) NSA Washington DC

H-WNY 25,200 9,400 175,300 0 209,900 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include a complete interior painting, replacing the roof, gutters and downspouts, exterior painting with lead-based paint mitigation, refinishing the hardwood floors, replacing the carpet on the second floor, repairing the sidewalk and driveway, repairs to the garage and shed and replacing the fence. (Year built: 1880; NSF: 4,030; NHL) NSA Washington DC

L-WNY 25,200 5,000 36,000 0 66,200 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, replacing the carpet, duct cleaning, miscellaneous minor repairs and interior painting. (Year built: 1868; NSF: 2,410; NHL) NSA Washington DC

L-1-WNY 28,600 6,800 36,400 0 71,800 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, replacing the carpet, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. (Year built: 1868; NSF: 2,320; NHL) NSA Washington DC

R-WNY 28,100 7,300 38,200 0 73,600 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include replacing the roof on the guest house. (Year built: 1857; NSF: 2,945; NHL)

110




5. PROJECT NUMBER

STATE/ INSTALLATION

QTRS ID

OPS

UTIL

MAINT & RPR

HIST PRES

TOTAL

IMPROVS


NSA Washington DC

U-WNY 25,700 8,100 150,600 0 184,400 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, partial replacement of the carpet, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include interior painting, repairs to the kitchen, replacing the fence, replacing the flat roofs, replacing the fire alarm system, refinishing the hardwood floors and repairing the sidewalk and patio. (Year built: 1937; NSF: 5,373) NSA Washington DC

V-WNY 29,600 4,800 58,100 0 92,500 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Change of occupancy maintenance includes repairs to the interior walls, repair the banister, duct cleaning and miscellaneous minor repairs. Major repairs include a complete interior painting and replacing the fire alarm system. (Year built: 1901; NSF: 3,020; NHL) MARYLAND USNA Annapolis 1 Buchanan 118,400 14,100 321,200 0 453,700 0 Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance. Major repairs include awning maintenance, replacing the roof and gutter system, painting the exterior, waterproofing the foundation, interior wall repairs and refinishing the hardwood floors. (Year built: 1906; NSF: 13,048; NHL) SOUTH CAROLINA MCRD Parris Island, SC

Qtrs. 1 12,200 5,700 42,200 0 60,100 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1889; NSF: 5,929; NHR)


ITALY NSA Naples Villa Nike 22,800 66,000 52,900 0 141,700 0 Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1949; NSF: 11,322)

111




5. PROJECT NUMBER

STATE/ INSTALLATION

QTRS ID

OPS

UTIL

MAINT & RPR

HIST PRES

TOTAL

IMPROVS


JAPAN COMNAVFOR Japan

11 Nimitz 12,700 4,500 37,800 0 55,000 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1992; NSF: 2,259) COMNAVFOR Japan

16 Halsey 13,600 9,700 51,200 0 74,500 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1940; NSF: 3,223) COMNAVFOR Japan

17 Halsey 29,600 6,300 89,800 0 125,700 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include a complete exterior and interior painting. (Year built: 1948; NSF: 4,140) COMNAVFOR Japan

18 Halsey 22,600 10,000 92,700 0 125,300 0

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. Major repairs include a complete exterior and interior painting. (Year built: 1948; NSF: 4,216) MARIANAS ISLAND COMNAVFOR Guam

4 Flag Circle 9,200 13,600 42,000 0 64,800 242,000

Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls, grounds maintenance and exterior painting. Improvement project includes reconfiguring the interior of the home to provide access from the sleeping areas to the rest of the dwelling. (Year built: 1945; NSF: 3,448) UNITED KINGDOM COMNAVACTUK Romany House 24,500 24,900 82,300 0 131,700 0 Operations consist of management, services and furnishings. Maintenance and repairs include routine, recurring maintenance, service calls and grounds maintenance. (Year built: 1932, NSF: 6,000)

112

Stat

e/C

ount

ryIn

stal

latio

nQ

uart

ers

IDYe

arB

uilt

Size

NSF

Ops

Cos

tM

aint

.C

ost

Rep

air

Cos

tTo

tal O

&M

> $3

5K C

ost

Util

ityC

ost

Leas

ing

Cos

tH

ist.

Pres

.C

ost

Tota

l FH

O&

M C

ost

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

Was

hing

ton

DC

10-A

SC

1930

1,56

4$2

6.4

$29.

4$0

.0$5

5.8

$5.5

$0.0

$0.0

$61.

3A

-NN

MC

1941

3,06

4$2

7.5

$26.

0$0

.0$5

3.5

$7.8

$0.0

$0.0

$61.

3A

-NA

C19

224,

260

$30.

5$3

5.1

$0.0

$65.

6$8

.9$0

.0$0

.0$7

4.5

A T

inge

y H

ouse

1801

8,94

0$2

8.5

$50.

4$0

.0$7

8.9

$24.

9$0

.0$0

.0$1

03.8

AA

Pot

omac

Ann

ex19

105,

425

$34.

2$4

8.4

$0.0

$82.

6$8

.6$0

.0$0

.0$9

1.2

B-N

NM

C19

413,

805

$27.

5$2

5.7

$0.0

$53.

2$4

.4$0

.0$0

.0$5

7.6

B-N

OB

SY

1897

2,33

3$2

7.5

$25.

7$4

5.0

$98.

2$5

.6$0

.0$0

.0$1

03.8

B-W

NY

1802

4,45

9$2

8.4

$47.

3$0

.0$7

5.7

$17.

6$0

.0$0

.0$9

3.3

BB

Pot

omac

Ann

ex19

103,

949

$30.

0$5

0.1

$0.0

$80.

1$6

.4$0

.0$0

.0$8

6.5

C-N

OB

SY

1897

1,84

4$2

7.5

$24.

4$4

5.0

$96.

9$8

.7$0

.0$0

.0$1

05.6

C-W

NY

1879

3,20

0$3

6.1

$37.

1$1

61.8

$235

.0$6

.0$0

.0$0

.0$2

41.0

CC

Pot

omac

Ann

ex19

105,

252

$39.

4$3

4.3

$260

.5$3

34.2

$8.2

$0.0

$0.0

$342

.4D

-NO

BS

Y19

002,

450

$25.

2$3

2.2

$0.0

$57.

4$4

.2$0

.0$0

.0$6

1.6

D-W

NY

1879

3,22

0$3

9.3

$38.

4$2

13.3

$291

.0$8

.0$0

.0$0

.0$2

99.0

DD

Ana

cost

ia19

233,

825

$29.

8$3

1.6

$0.0

$61.

4$6

.3$0

.0$0

.0$6

7.7

E-N

NM

C19

413,

549

$25.

7$4

1.4

$91.

6$1

58.7

$5.7

$0.0

$0.0

$164

.4E

-WN

Y18

804,

130

$27.

8$2

7.0

$0.0

$54.

8$8

.5$0

.0$0

.0$6

3.3

F-N

OB

SY

1946

2,10

0$2

5.2

$27.

4$0

.0$5

2.6

$7.0

$0.0

$0.0

$59.

6F-

WN

Y18

803,

880

$32.

7$3

4.8

$78.

9$1

46.4

$7.1

$0.0

$0.0

$153

.5G

-WN

Y18

803,

690

$27.

4$2

7.6

$0.0

$55.

0$7

.2$0

.0$0

.0$6

2.2

H-W

NY

1880

4,03

0$2

5.2

$36.

8$1

38.5

$200

.5$9

.4$0

.0$0

.0$2

09.9

L-W

NY

1868

2,41

0$2

5.2

$33.

8$2

.2$6

1.2

$5.0

$0.0

$0.0

$66.

2L-

1-W

NY

1868

2,32

0$2

8.6

$31.

1$5

.3$6

5.0

$6.8

$0.0

$0.0

$71.

8M

-1-W

NY

1868

3,16

0$2

5.2

$24.

0$0

.0$4

9.2

$10.

0$0

.0$0

.0$5

9.2

M-W

NY

1868

2,32

0$2

5.2

$26.

7$0

.0$5

1.9

$6.7

$0.0

$0.0

$58.

6N

-WN

Y18

682,

720

$25.

2$2

4.5

$0.0

$49.

7$5

.2$0

.0$0

.0$5

4.9

O-W

NY

1866

2,68

0$2

5.2

$24.

2$0

.0$4

9.4

$6.0

$0.0

$0.0

$55.

4R

-WN

Y18

572,

945

$28.

1$3

2.6

$5.6

$66.

3$7

.3$0

.0$0

.0$7

3.6

U-W

NY

1937

5,37

3$2

5.7

$43.

6$1

07.0

$176

.3$8

.1$0

.0$0

.0$1

84.4

V-W

NY

1901

3,02

0$2

9.6

$34.

1$2

4.0

$87.

7$4

.8$0

.0$0

.0$9

2.5

Loui

sian

aN

ew O

rlean

sD

1907

3,20

5$1

0.7

$26.

8$0

.0$3

7.5

$5.9

$0.0

$0.0

$43.

4

Mar

ylan

dA

nnap

olis

1 B

ucha

nan

1906

13,0

48$1

18.4

$63.

5$2

57.7

$439

.6$1

4.1

$0.0

$0.0

$453

.7

Texa

sC

orpu

s C

hris

tiS

OQ

119

414,

584

$21.

6$3

2.0

$0.0

$53.

6$6

.9$0

.0$0

.0$6

0.5

SO

Q 1

119

363,

353

$22.

6$2

7.6

$0.0

$50.

2$5

.6$0

.0$0

.0$5

5.8

Cub

aG

uant

anam

o B

ayM

101

1941

4,70

4$1

8.7

$18.

3$0

.0$3

7.0

$22.

9$0

.0$0

.0$5

9.9

Italy

Nap

les

Vill

a N

ike

1949

11,3

22$2

2.8

$52.

9$0

.0$7

5.7

$66.

0$0

.0$0

.0$1

41.7

Japa

nY

okos

uka

11 N

imitz

1992

2,25

9$1

2.7

$37.

8$0

.0$5

0.5

$4.5

$0.0

$0.0

$55.

016

Hal

sey

1940

3,22

3$1

3.6

$51.

2$0

.0$6

4.8

$9.7

$0.0

$0.0

$74.

517

Hal

sey

1948

4,14

0$2

9.6

$52.

2$3

7.6

$119

.4$6

.3$0

.0$0

.0$1

25.7

18 H

alse

y19

484,

216

$22.

6$4

7.3

$45.

4$1

15.3

$10.

0$0

.0$0

.0$1

25.3

Mar

iana

Isla

nds

Gua

m4

Flag

Circ

le19

453,

448

$9.2

$42.

0$0

.0$5

1.2

$13.

6$0

.0$0

.0$6

4.8

Uni

ted

Kin

gdom

Lond

onR

oman

y19

326,

000

$24.

5$8

2.3

$0.0

$106

.8$2

4.9

$0.0

$0.0

$131

.7

Tota

ls G

FOQ

Uni

ts42

$1,1

86.8

$1,5

39.6

$1,5

19.4

$4,2

45.8

$426

.3$0

.0$0

.0$4

,672

.1

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Nav

yN

avy

Gen

eral

and

Fla

g O

ffice

rs' Q

uart

ers

Ant

icip

ated

Ope

ratio

ns a

nd M

aint

enan

ce E

xpen

ditu

res

Exce

edin

g $3

5K p

er U

nit f

or F

isca

l Yea

r 200

8(D

olla

rs in

Tho

usan

ds)

113

Stat

e/C

ount

ryIn

stal

latio

nQ

uart

ers

IDYe

arB

uilt

Size

NSF

Tota

l FH

O&

M C

ost*

Alte

rnat

ive

Use

Cos

t to

Con

vert

Uni

t

If O

&M

or

Con

str.

> $1

00K

Dem

olis

h &

Reb

uild

Cos

tD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aN

DW

Ting

ey H

ouse

1804

8,94

0$1

03.8

Pre

viou

sly

cons

ider

ed a

nd re

ject

ed1

N/A

N/A

Loui

sian

aN

ew O

rlean

sA

1844

6,48

3$3

9.5

Not

con

side

red2

N/A

N/A

Mar

ylan

dA

nnap

olis

Buc

hana

n H

ouse

1906

13,0

48$4

53.7

Not

con

side

red3

N/A

N/A

Italy

Nap

les

Vill

a N

ike

1949

11,3

22$1

41.7

Not

con

side

red4

N/A

N/A

Uni

ted

Kin

gdom

Lond

onR

oman

y19

326,

000

$131

.7N

ot c

onsi

dere

d5N

/AN

/A

TOTA

L:

5 G

FOQ

Uni

ts$8

70.4

$.$.

* O

&M

cos

ts in

clud

es U

tiliti

es.

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Nav

y - N

avy

Gen

eral

and

Fla

g O

ffice

rs' Q

uart

ers

6,00

0NSF

Uni

ts fo

r Fis

cal Y

ear 2

008

(Dol

lars

in T

hous

ands

)

4 Vill

a N

ike

is h

ome

to th

e fo

ur-s

tar b

illet

, Com

man

der,

US

NA

VE

UR

/JFC

. Th

e go

vern

men

t of I

taly

tech

nica

lly o

wns

this

qua

rters

, alth

ough

the

agre

emen

t with

the

gove

rnm

ent o

f Ita

ly is

that

th

e U

S w

ill o

ccup

y an

d m

aint

ain

the

quar

ters

with

Nav

y FH

,N.

Con

sequ

ently

, alte

rnat

ive

uses

or d

emol

ition

are

not

opt

ions

. W

hen

ther

e ce

ases

to b

e a

need

to h

ouse

a fo

ur-s

tar F

lag

or

Gen

eral

Offi

cer i

n a

secu

re lo

catio

n in

Nap

les,

the

US

can

vac

ate

the

hous

e an

d re

turn

it to

Ital

y.

4 Rom

any

Hou

se, l

ocat

ed in

a s

ecur

e, s

ubur

ban

area

out

side

of L

ondo

n, is

cur

rent

ly b

eing

util

ized

by

the

Def

ense

Inte

llige

nce

Age

ncy.

An

Inte

r Ser

vice

Sup

port

Agr

eem

ent i

s be

ing

wor

ked

out b

y w

hich

DIA

will

reim

burs

e th

e N

avy

for t

he c

osts

to m

aint

ain

Rom

any

Hou

se.

Dem

oliti

on o

r alte

rnat

ive

uses

are

not

app

ropr

iate

for t

his

quar

ters

. Th

e N

avy

owns

the

hous

e an

d co

uld

cons

ider

sel

ling

it, s

houl

d it

be d

eter

min

ed th

at th

ere

will

be

no fu

rther

nee

d to

hou

se a

Fla

g or

NA

TO o

ffice

r in

the

Lond

on a

rea.

1 A re

cent

eva

luat

ion

of T

inge

y H

ouse

reve

aled

no

alte

rnat

ive

uses

for i

t on

the

Was

hing

ton

Nav

y Y

ard.

The

re is

a re

cent

ly-c

onst

ruct

ed c

onfe

renc

e ce

nter

on

the

base

and

tran

sfer

ring

the

quar

ters

to th

e ba

se m

erel

y sh

ifts

the

burd

en o

f its

sup

port

from

FH

,N to

O&

M,N

. D

emol

ition

was

con

side

red

and

reje

cted

due

to it

s lis

ting

as a

Nat

iona

l His

toric

Lan

dmar

k an

d lo

catio

n in

the

mid

dle

of a

Nat

iona

l His

toric

Dis

trict

. Th

e qu

arte

rs is

cur

rent

ly b

eing

ser

ious

ly c

onsi

dere

d fo

r inc

lusi

on in

the

seco

nd p

hase

of t

he C

NR

MA

PP

V d

eal;

disc

ussi

ons

are

unde

rway

with

the

PP

V

cont

ract

or.

2 Thi

s qu

arte

rs is

loca

ted

on N

SA

New

Orle

ans,

whi

ch is

cur

rent

ly s

ched

uled

to c

lose

und

er B

RA

C.

How

ever

, the

re e

xist

s a

poss

ibili

ty th

at a

Fed

eral

City

com

plex

will

be

deve

lope

d th

ere,

in

whi

ch c

ase,

the

four

Fla

g qu

arte

rs o

n N

SA

will

mos

t lik

ely

cont

inue

to b

e ut

ilize

d. I

f the

Fed

eral

City

com

plex

doe

s no

t hap

pen,

the

Nav

y w

ill c

onsi

der d

emol

ishi

ng a

ll fo

ur F

lag

quar

ters

(onl

y A

is

his

toric

) bec

ause

the

BR

AC

incl

udes

the

cons

truct

ion

of tw

o ne

w F

lag

quar

ters

on

the

NA

S N

ew O

rlean

s, th

e re

ceiv

ing

base

. A

t thi

s po

int i

n tim

e, d

emol

ition

or a

ltern

ativ

e us

es is

pr

emat

ure.

3 Buc

hana

n al

so is

a N

atio

nal H

isto

ric L

andm

ark.

For

that

reas

on, d

emol

ition

has

not

bee

n co

nsid

ered

. Li

ke T

inge

y H

ouse

, the

Nav

y is

in d

iscu

ssio

ns w

ith th

e P

PV

par

tner

to a

scer

tain

the

viab

ility

of i

nclu

ding

this

qua

rters

in th

e se

cond

pha

se o

f the

CN

RM

A P

PV

dea

l.

114

Stat

e/C

ount

ryIn

stal

latio

nQ

uart

ers

IDYe

arB

uilt

Size

NSF

Ops

Cos

tM

aint

.C

ost

Rep

air

Cos

tTo

tal O

&M

> $3

5K C

ost

Util

ityC

ost

Leas

ing

Cos

tH

ist.

Pres

.C

ost

Tota

l FH

O&

M C

ost

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Par

ris Is

land

118

895,

929

$12.

2$4

2.2

$54.

4$5

.7$6

0.1

TOTA

L:

$12.

2$4

2.2

$54.

4$5

.7$6

0.1

TOTA

L G

OVT

-OW

NED

GO

Q IN

VEN

TOR

Y IS

5

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Nav

yM

arin

e C

orps

Gen

eral

and

Fla

g O

ffice

rs' Q

uart

ers

Ant

icip

ated

Ope

ratio

ns a

nd M

aint

enan

ce E

xpen

ditu

res

Exce

edin

g $3

5K p

er U

nit f

or fo

r Fis

cal Y

ear 2

008

(Dol

lars

in T

hous

ands

)

115

Stat

e/C

ount

ryIn

stal

latio

nQ

uart

ers

IDYe

arB

uilt

Size

NSF

Tota

l FH

O&

M C

ost*

Alte

rnat

ive

Use

Cos

t to

Con

vert

Uni

t

If O

&M

or

Con

str.

> $1

00K

Dem

olis

h &

Reb

uild

Cos

tD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a8t

h &

I S

treet

s1

1908

7,37

6$4

1.3

Con

side

red

and

reje

cted

1N

/AN

/A

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

8th

& I

Stre

ets

219

086,

084

$41.

3C

onsi

dere

d an

d re

ject

ed1

N/A

N/A

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

8th

& I

Stre

ets

419

086,

084

$31.

3C

onsi

dere

d an

d re

ject

ed1

N/A

N/A

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

8th

& I

Stre

ets

618

1015

,605

$60.

Con

side

red

and

reje

cted

1N

/AN

/A

TOTA

L:

4 G

FOQ

Uni

ts$1

73.8

$.$.

* O

&M

cos

ts in

clud

es U

tiliti

es.

1 Eva

luat

ion

of th

e fo

ur fa

mily

hou

sing

qua

rters

reve

al n

o al

tern

ativ

e us

es o

n th

e M

arin

e B

arra

cks.

Tra

nsfe

rrin

g th

e qu

arte

rs to

the

base

mer

ely

shift

s th

e bu

rden

of i

ts s

uppo

rt fro

m F

H,N

&M

C

to O

&M

,MC

. As

prev

ious

ly re

porte

d to

Con

gres

s, th

ere

is a

sho

rtage

of G

ener

al O

ffice

rs Q

uarte

rs fo

r the

Mar

ine

Cor

ps in

the

Nat

iona

l Cap

ital R

egio

n. W

ithou

t pur

chas

e of

add

ition

al la

nd

repl

acem

ent o

f the

exi

stin

g un

its c

ould

not

be

cons

truct

ed w

ithou

t the

dem

oliti

on o

f the

exi

stin

g un

its.

Dem

oliti

on is

reje

cted

due

to: t

he re

cent

ext

ensi

ve re

nova

tions

to a

ll fo

ur q

uarte

rs; t

he

listin

g of

all

four

hom

es, i

nclu

ding

the

Hom

e of

the

Com

man

dant

s, o

n th

e N

atio

nal R

egis

ter o

f His

toric

Pla

ces;

the

hom

es fo

rmin

g tw

o si

des

of th

e Q

uadr

angl

e th

at is

a N

atio

nal H

isto

ric

Land

mar

k; a

nd th

e H

ome

of th

e C

omm

anda

nt's

als

o be

ing

a N

atio

nal H

isto

ric L

andm

ark.

Priv

atiz

atio

n w

as c

onsi

dere

d an

d re

ject

ed d

ue to

: the

cos

t to

oper

ate,

mai

ntai

n an

d su

stai

n th

e ho

mes

due

to th

eir s

ize

and

hist

oric

nat

ure.

The

up-

front

see

d-pr

ivat

izat

ion

fund

ing

cost

was

det

erm

ined

at $

9 m

illio

n an

d th

e pr

ojec

t had

neg

ativ

e lif

e cy

cle

savi

ngs

of $

5 m

illio

n.

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Nav

y - M

arin

e C

orps

Gen

eral

and

Fla

g O

ffice

rs' Q

uart

ers

6,00

0NSF

Uni

ts fo

r Fis

cal Y

ear 2

008

(Dol

lars

in T

hous

ands

)

116


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 15,000 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 15,000 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 15,000 4. Program Decreases (7,000)

a. Inventory Reduction (7,000)5. FY 2008 Budget Request 8,000



JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

REIMBURSABLE AUTHORITY

Exhibit OP-5

117

BLANK PAGE

118

FY2007 FY 2008$1,500,000 $1,000,000


1. FY2007 President's Budget Request 1,5002. FY2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY2007 Current Estimate 1,5004. FY2008 President's Budget Request 1,000

RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT.Includes collections received from rental of Marine Corps Family Housing to civilians, foreign nationals and Coast Guard personnel; collection for rental of mobile home parkspaces, and collections for occupant-caused damages. The Fiscal Year 2008 estimate reflects estimated collections for damages and rent.

OPERATING EXPENSES

REIMBURSEMENTS



Exhibit OP-5

119

BLANK PAGE

120


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY LEASING

(In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $141,757 FY 2007 Program $132,282 Purpose and Scope This program provides payment for the costs incurred in leasing family housing units for assignment as public quarters. Program Summary

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000)

Domestic 3,208 390 6,509 3,208 476 8,250 3,208 456 7,980

Navy 3,208 390 6,509 3,208 476 8,250 3,208 456 7,980

801 5,347 3,014 46,323 5,347 3,014 48,657 5,347 2,789 48,267

Navy 4,747 2,414 37,054 4,747 2,414 38,962 4,747 2,189 36,797

MarCps 600 600 9,269 600 600 9,695 600 600 11,470

802 276 276 872 276 276 906 276 276 1,303

MarCps 276 276 872 276 276 906 276 276 1,303

Foreign 4,229 2,289 69,887 4,229 2,323 74,469 4,346 2,556 84,207

Navy 4,229 2,289 69,887 4,229 2,323 74,469 4,346 2,556 84,207

DoN Total 13,060 5,969 123,591 13,060 6,089 132,282 13,177 6,077 141,757 JUSTIFICATION Domestic Leasing Program Summary: The domestic leasing program is authorized in 10 USC 2828 as amended, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation. This program consists of leasing on an interim basis until Section 801, military construction (MILCON) units, and homes undergoing revitalization come on-line. Section 801 of the FY 1984 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115) authorized the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. This authorization was considered a test and would have expired upon execution of contracts no later than 1 October 1985. The Navy sites chosen for testing Section 801 were Norfolk, Virginia, and Earle, New Jersey. The Section 801 program was made permanent and codified as Section 2835 of Title 10, United States Code, in FY 1992. The Navy has awarded contracts for Section 801 projects at Norfolk, VA (300 units), Earle, NJ (300 units), Mayport, FL (200 units), Staten Island, NY (1,000 units), Washington, DC-Woodbridge (600 units), Washington, DC-Summerfield (414 units), Port Hueneme/Point Mugu, CA (300 units), Pensacola, FL (300 units), and Twentynine Palms, CA (600 Units). The Staten Island, NY (1,000 units) project was terminated due to base closure. Section 802 of the FY84 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115, 10 U.S.C. 2821 note) authorizes the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military

121

installations within the United States. The Department of the Army awarded this project in 1992 under U.S. Army Garrison, Hawaii (USAG-HI). The authority transferred to the Marine Corps on 1 Oct 1998. The Marine Corps took over a Section 802 contract at MCB Hawaii for 276 units. Foreign Leasing: Leasing in foreign countries is authorized in 10 USC 2828, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation.

122


NAVY LEASING

(In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $128,984 FY 2007 Program $121,681 Purpose and Scope This program provides payment for the costs incurred in leasing family housing units for assignment as public quarters. Program Summary

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Auth Avg Cost Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000) Units Units ($000)

Domestic 3,208 390 6,509 3,208 476 8,250 3,208 456 7,980

801 4,747 2,414 37,054 4,747 2,414 38,962 4,747 2,189 36,797

Foreign 4,229 2,289 69,887 4,229 2,323 74,469 4,346 2,556 84,207

Navy Total 12,184 5,093 113,450 12,184 5,213 121,681 12,301 5,201 128,984 JUSTIFICATION Domestic Leasing Program Summary: The domestic leasing program is authorized in 10 USC 2828 as amended, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation. This program consists of leasing on an interim basis until Section 801, military construction (MILCON) units, and homes undergoing revitalization come on-line. Section 801 of the FY 1984 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115) authorized the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. This authorization was considered a test and would have expired upon execution of contracts no later than 1 October 1985. The Navy sites chosen for testing Section 801 were Norfolk, Virginia, and Earle, New Jersey. The Section 801 program was made permanent and codified as Section 2835 of Title 10, United States Code, in FY 1992. The Navy has awarded contracts for Section 801 projects at Norfolk, VA (300 units), Earle, NJ (300 units), Mayport, FL (200 units), Staten Island, NY (1,000 units), Washington, DC-Woodbridge (600 units), Washington, DC-Summerfield (414 units), Port Hueneme/Point Mugu, CA (300 units), and Pensacola, FL (300 units). The Staten Island, NY (1,000 units) project was terminated due to base closure. Domestic Leasing Fiscal Year Summary: FY 2006 – The Domestic Lease Program consists of 2,804 units requiring funding of $43.563 million. Funding of $37.054 million provides full funding for Section 801 projects at Earle, Norfolk, Mayport, Washington, DC, Pensacola, and Port Hueneme. The remaining $6.509 million is required to support 390 leases for recruiters at high-cost locations not supported by a military installation. FY 2007 – The Domestic Lease Program consists of 2,890 units requiring funding of $47.212 million. Funding in the amount of $38.962 million provides

123

full funding for Section 801 projects at Earle, Norfolk, Mayport, Washington, DC, Pensacola, and Port Hueneme. The remaining $8.250 million is required to support a domestic lease in Everett, WA ($0.022 million) and 475 leases for recruiters at high-cost locations not supported by a military installation ($8.228 million). FY 2008 – The Domestic Lease Program consists of 2,645 units requiring funding of $44.777 million. Funding in the amount of $36.797 million provides full funding for Section 801 projects at Earle, Norfolk, Mayport, Washington, DC, Pensacola, and Port Hueneme. The Norfolk 801 project will terminate in early FY08. The remaining $7.980 million is required to 456 leases for recruiters at high-cost locations not supported by a military installation.

Foreign Leasing: Leasing in foreign countries is authorized in 10 USC 2828, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum cost limitation. The FY 2006 unit authorization consists of 4,229 units and funding for 2,289 of those units. The authorization difference of 1,940 is for different cost limits to support lease initiatives at Naples, and Sigonella, IT. The FY 2007 unit authorization consists of 4,229 units and funding for 2,323 of those units. The authorization difference of 1,906 is for different cost limits to support lease initiatives at Naples, and Sigonella, IT. Increased cost per unit at Naples, IT is due to the interim lease construct lease payment. Decrease costs at Sigonella are the result of recapitalization of 205 units where a lease payment will not be due until the units come back online, as well as a decrease associated with the Navy withdrawing from LaMaddalena, IT. The FY 2008 unit authorization consists of 4,346 units and funding for 2,556 of those units. The authorization difference of 1,790 is for different cost limits to support lease initiatives at Naples, and Sigonella, IT as well as other potential foreign countries the Navy may be entering. Cost increases are for Air Force transfer of all leased units at Singapore and minor unit increases at various locations (primarily Sigonella and Naples, IT).

Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases: 1. FY 2007 President’s Budget Request 121,681 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 121,681 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 121,681 4. Price Growth 2,818

a. Civilian Personnel Comp 143 b. Working Capital Fund 72

c. Inflation 2,603 5. Program Decreases (3,605) a. Section 801 (Norfolk) (3,605) 6. Program Increases 8,090

a. Transfer of Leases at Singapore from Air Force 3,627 b. Minor Increases at Various Locations 4,463


124

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

Location

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

NS Everett, WA

10

00

10

12

22

10

00

Recruiters, Var Locs

700

4,680

6,509

700

5,700

8,228

700

5,472

7,980

Total Domestic Leases

710

4,680

6,509

710

5,712

8,250

710

5,472

7,980

FAMILY HOUSING - NAVY

(Other than Section 801 and Section 802 Units)

FY 2008

Domestic Leasing

FH-4 Analysis of Leased Units

125

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

Location

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Norfolk, VA1

300

3,600

4,091

300

3,600

4,342

300

900

737

Washington, DC2

1,014

12,168

16,717

1,014

12,168

17,553

1,014

12,168

17,543

Earle, NJ3

300

3,600

4,378

300

3,600

5,540

300

3,600

6,318

Pensacola, FL4

300

3,600

4,079

300

3,600

3,531

300

3,600

3,970

Mayport, FL5

200

2,400

1,945

200

2,400

2,518

200

2,400

2,100

Pt. Hueneme, CA6

300

3,600

5,844

300

3,600

5,478

300

3,600

6,129

Total 801 Leases

2,414

28,968

37,054

2,414

28,968

38,962

2,414

26,268

36,797

* Reflects all Operations & Maintenance Costs associated with the 801 Units

1 Norfolk 801 lease agreeement expires on 7 Dec 2007

2 Washington 801 lease agreements expire on 30 Sep 2011 (600 Units) and 25 Sep 2015 (414 Units)

3 Earle 801 lease agreeement expires on 30 Apr 2010

4 Pensacola 801 lease agreeement expires on 11 Oct 2013

5 Mayport 801 lease agreeement expires on 14 Feb 2009

6 Ventura 801 lease agreeement expires on 1 Feb 2014


Section 801 Units*

FY 2008


126

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

Location

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Units

Authorized

Lease

Months

Cost

($000)

Bahrain

336

703

224

304

224

249

Cairo

30

228

800

30

228

800

30

276

990

Cambodia

112

57

112

59

10

0

Dubai

112

62

112

65

112

67

Gaeta

95

00

96

00

94

00

Hong Kong

336

390

336

365

448

498

Jakarta

14

96

540

14

72

463

14

156

1,025

LaMaddalena

484

2,076

5,022

484

00

484

00

Larissa

91

12

272

91

12

260

91

12

266

Lima

896

411

896

419

896

428

Lisbon

112

177

112

154

112

157

Laos

224

52

224

55

224

56

London

20

00

00

00

0

Malaysia

112

28

112

29

112

30

Manila

448

200

448

220

448

225

Naples

1,982

12,732

27,367

1,984

15,252

35,832

1,984

16,104

39,080

New Delhi

548

200

548

260

536

200

Oslo

112

43

112

42

112

43

Singapore

00

00

00

118

1,416

3,627

Sigonella

1,496

11,940

33,322

1,496

11,940

34,924

1,496

12,360

37,087

Souda Bay

112

157

112

127

112

130

Turkey

112

41

112

43

10

0

Vietnam

312

43

312

48

312

49

Total Foreign Leases

4,229

27,468

69,887

4,229

27,876

74,469

4,346

30,672

84,207

Foreign Leasing


(Other than Section 801 and Section 802 Units)

FY 2008


127

BLANK PAGE

128

DEPARTMENT OF NAVY Family Housing, Marine Corps

FY 2008 BUDGET

LEASING (In Thousands)

FY 2008 Program $ 12,773 FY 2007 Program $ 10,601

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This program provides payment for the costs incurred in leasing family housing units for assignment as public quarters. PROGRAM SUMMARY FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Yr End

Units Costs ($000)

Auth Units

Costs ($000)

Auth Units

Costs ($000)

Domestic 0 0 0 0 0 0

Section 801 600 9,269 600 9,695 600 11,470Section 802 276 872 276 906 276 1,303

Foreign 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 876 10,141 876 10,601 876 12,773

JUSTIFICATION: Domestic Leasing Program Summary: The domestic leasing program is authorized in 10 USC 2828 as amended, which limits the number of units authorized at any one time and specifies the maximum costs limitation. This program consists of leasing on an interim basis until Section 801 and/or military construction (MILCON) units come on line. USMC has no domestic leases. Section 801 of the FY84 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115) authorizes the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. This authorization was granted in FY86. The Marine Corps awarded a Section 801 contract at MCAGCC, Twentynine Palms, CA, for 600 units. The costs for FY 2007 through FY 2009 include the lease and operation and maintenance costs for these units. Marine Corps intends to continue to lease these 801 units through the end of the lease term of 2013. Planned Military Housing Privatization Initiative Project at Twenty-nine Palms CA assumes Marine Corps will continue to utilize these homes. Section 802 of the FY84 Military Construction Authorization Act (PL 98-115, 10 U.S.C. 2821 note) authorizes the Department of Defense to enter into agreements for the leasing of Military Family Housing units on or near military installations within the United States. The Department of the Army awarded this project in 1992 under U.S. Army Garrison, Hawaii (USAG-HI). The authority transferred to the Marine Corps on 1 Oct 1998. The Marine Corps took over a Section 802 contract at MCB Hawaii for 276 units. The costs for FY 2006 through 2008 include the operations of these units. Marine Corps intends to continue to lease these 802 units through the end of the lease

129

term of 2017. Planned Military Housing Privatization Initiative Project at MCB Hawaii assumes Marine Corps will continue to utilize these homes. Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases: Increase due to inflation, civilian pay-raise adjustment and program growth due to increase in maintenance contract cost at Twentynine Palms and utility costs in Hawaii. 1. FY 2007 Budget Request 10,601 2. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 0 3. FY 2007 Current Estimate 10,601 4. Pricing Adjustment 2,172 a. Inflation 337 b. Civilian Pay Raise 7 c. Maintenance Contract Cost Increase 1,466 d. Utility Cost Increase 362 5. FY 2008 Budget Request 12,773

130

FAM

ILY

HO

USI

NG

- M

AR

INE

CO

RPS

Ana

lysi

s of

Lea

sed

Uni

ts *

FY 2

008

FY 2

006

FY 2

007

FY 2

008

Loca

tion

Uni

tsA

utho

rized

Leas

eM

onth

sC

osts

($00

0)U

nits

Aut

horiz

edLe

ase

Mon

ths

Cos

ts($

000)

Uni

tsA

utho

rized

Leas

eM

onth

sC

osts

($00

0)

Sect

ion

801

Leas

es

MC

AG

CC

Tw

enty

nine

Pla

ms,

CA

**

600

7,20

09,

269

600

7,20

09,

695

600

7,20

011

,470

Tota

l Sec

tion

801

Leas

es60

07,

200

9,26

960

07,

200

9,69

560

07,

200

11,4

70

Sect

ion

802

Leas

es

MC

B H

awai

i, H

I ***

276

3,31

287

227

63,

312

906

276

3,31

21,

303

Tota

l Sec

tion

802

Leas

es27

63,

312

872

276

3,31

290

627

63,

312

1,30

3

Tota

l Sec

tion

801

& 8

02 L

ease

s87

610

,512

10,1

4187

610

,512

10,6

0187

610

,512

12,7

73

*

Ref

lect

s al

l Ope

ratio

ns &

Mai

nten

ance

Cos

ts a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

e S

ectio

n 80

1 U

nits

, and

all

Ope

ratio

ns C

osts

Ass

ocia

ted

with

Sec

tion

802

units

.**

Aw

arde

d 09

/91;

Dat

e of

Ful

l Occ

upan

cy 0

9/94

***

Aw

arde

d 11

/92;

Dat

e of

Ful

l Occ

upan

cy 1

1/92

Exh

ibit

FH-4

Ana

lysi

s of L

ease

d un

its

131

BLANK PAGE

132

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY – FY 2008

DEPARTMENT OF NAVY PRIVATIZATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY ($000)

FY 2008 Program $28,988 FY 2007 Program $15,261

Purpose and Scope The Fiscal Year 1996 Military Housing Privatization Initiative (MHPI) included in Public Law 104-106 is an essential tool used by the Department of the Navy (DON) to meet its goal of eliminating inadequate housing by 2007. The purpose of the Privatization Initiative is to permit the Navy to enter into business agreements with the private sector to utilize private sector resources, leveraged by Navy assets (inventory, land, and funding), to improve, replace, and build family housing faster than could otherwise be accomplished through the traditional military construction approach. Private business entities will own, operate and maintain housing on behalf of the Navy and lease quality homes to military personnel and their families at affordable rates. Program Summary To date the Department of Navy has awarded 24 Public Private Venture (PPV) projects. The Department of the Navy (DON) took a deliberate, measured approach in evaluating which blend of authorities would provide the desired leverage of resources with sufficient protection of the Government’s resources and interests over the long-term. These 24 projects have been awarded through 2006, totaling 50,358 homes. This number reflects privatized housing end states. Total Department of Navy projects awarded are: FY 1996 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville I) 404 homes

FY 1997 Everett, WA (Everett I) 0 homes* FY 2001 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville II) 150 homes

Everett, WA (Everett II) 288 homes San Diego I 3,248 homes Camp Pendleton I 712 homes

FY 2002 New Orleans 941 homes South Texas 585 homes

FY 2003 San Diego II 3,217 homes Beaufort/Parris Island 1,718 homes Camp Pendleton II/Quantico 4,534 homes FY 2004 Hawaii I 1,948 homes FY 2005 Northeast Region 4,264 homes

Northwest Region 2,985 homes Mid-Atlantic Region 5,839 homes Camp Pendleton III/Yuma 897 homes Camp Lejeune/Cherry Pt./Stewart 3,405 homes Twentynine Palms/Kansas City 1,488 homes

FY 2006 Midwest Region 1,658 homes San Diego III 4,268 homes Hawaii II (Navy) 2,518 homes Hawaii II (Marine Corps) 1,175 homes

Camp Lejeune/Cherry Pt./Stewart II 954 homes Camp Pendleton IV 3,162 homes

* Project originally 185 homes, however all homes have since been sold.

133

BLANK PAGE

134

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY – FY 2008

NAVY PRIVATIZATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY ($000)

FY 2008 Program $16,956 FY 2007 Program $10,146

Purpose and Scope The Fiscal Year 1996 Military Housing Privatization Initiative (MHPI) included in Public Law 104-106 is an essential tool used by the Department of the Navy (DON) to meet its goal of eliminating inadequate housing by 2007. The purpose of the Privatization Initiative is to permit the Navy to enter into business agreements with the private sector to utilize private sector resources, leveraged by Navy assets (inventory, land, and funding), to improve, replace, and build family housing faster than could otherwise be accomplished through the traditional military construction approach. Private business entities will own, operate and maintain housing on behalf of the Navy and lease quality homes to military personnel and their families at affordable rates. Program Summary The Navy successfully awarded the first two Public Private Venture (PPV) projects in 1996 and 1997 at Corpus Christi/Ingleside/Kingsville, Texas, and Everett, Washington, respectively, under 1995 Limited Partnership legislative authority available only to the Navy. The Navy subsequently modified both projects to pay differential lease payments to reduce the rents paid by military members, eliminating out-of-pocket expenses. The Department of the Navy (DON) took a deliberate, measured approach in evaluating which blend of authorities would provide the desired leverage of resources with sufficient protection of the Government’s resources and interests over the long-term. With this approach in place, Navy has awarded thirteen additional projects, three in fiscal year 2001, two in fiscal year 2002, one in fiscal year 2003, one in fiscal year 2004, three in fiscal year 2005, and three in fiscal year 2006 for an overall total of 32,312 homes. This number reflects privatized housing end states. Total Navy projects awarded are: FY 1996 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville I) 404 homes FY 1997 Everett, WA (Everett I) 0 homes*

FY 2001 Kingsville, TX (Kingsville II) 150 homes Everett, WA (Everett II) 288 homes San Diego I 3,248 homes

FY 2002 New Orleans 941 homes South Texas 585 homes

FY 2003 San Diego II 3,217 homes FY 2004 Hawaii I 1,948 homes FY 2005 Northeast Region 4,264 homes

Northwest Region 2,985 homes Mid-Atlantic Region 5,839 homes

FY 2006 Midwest Region 1,658 homes San Diego III 4,268 homes Hawaii III 2,517 homes

* Project originally 185 homes, however all homes have since been sold.

135

There are an additional three Navy projects that are in procurement. Two are regional projects that include multiple locations and states within the project and one is for a single base. All three projects will award in fiscal year 2007. Details for all projects are included in the tables that follow. There are an additional 643 Navy homes that were privatized within another Service’s project, not included in the tables. There is an Army RCI project that includes the privatization of 593 Navy homes at Monterey, CA and a Marine Corps project that includes the privatization of 53 Navy homes at Beaufort, SC.

PPV is one of the approaches to eliminate inadequate homes. We are utilizing a three-pronged approach for eliminating inadequate homes including reliance on Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH), PPVs, and traditional construction funding.

136

FY 2

008

Bud

get E

stim

ate

Mili

tary

Hou

sing

Priv

atiz

atio

n In

itiat

ive

Am

ount

($M

)B

udge

t Yea

rTy

peP

roje

ct9.

500

FY96

FHIF

PL

104-

321.

800

FY95

FHN

CH

291

CM

P P

endl

eton

6.70

0FY

96FH

NC

H31

4 P

WC

San

Die

go3.

000

FY96

FHN

CH

314

PW

C S

an D

iego

2.90

0FY

97FH

NC

H31

5 P

WC

San

Die

go2.

600

FY99

PL

105-

237

6.20

0FY

97FH

NC

H40

0 N

AS

Kin

gsvi

lle

12.2

00FY

97FH

NC

H50

8 N

S P

uget

Sou

nd2.

800

FY97

FHN

CH

508

NS

Pug

et S

ound

3.40

0FY

99P

L 10

5-23

7 0.

500

FY99

FHIF

H37

9 N

PW

C P

earl

Har

bor

11.9

00FY

98FH

NC

H-5

71 P

WC

San

Die

go9.

000

FY99

PL

100-

202

6.20

0FY

97H

-365

FY

97 M

CA

S B

eauf

ort

11.9

00FY

98FH

NC

H-3

89 N

AS

JR

BA

SE

New

Orle

ans

5.00

0FY

01FH

NC

H-5

35 N

SA

New

Orle

ans

22.3

00FY

98FH

NC

H-5

81 N

AS

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

7.10

0N

/AFH

IFH

-365

FY

97 M

CA

S B

eauf

ort

24.7

42FY

03FH

IMP

H-1

-03

- Pea

rl H

arbo

r PP

V S

eed

0.25

8FY

03D

esig

n

10.1

12FY

01D

esig

n5.

762

FY02

FHIM

PH

-1-0

1-03

- S

an D

iego

, CA

24.0

79FY

03FH

NC

H-6

42 -

New

Lon

don,

CT

25.0

537

#2, #

4 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1, 2

882

(c)

May

-04

Haw

aii R

egio

n P

H I

Oah

u, H

I1,

948

498

#2, #

3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1

May

-03

San

Die

go P

H II

San

Die

go, C

A3,

217

0.0

#2, #

3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1

Feb-

02S

outh

Tex

asC

orpu

s C

hris

ti, T

X; K

ings

ville

, TX

585

Aug

-01

San

Die

go P

H I

San

Die

go, C

A3,

248

2,66

0

Sep

-99

Eve

rett

IE

vere

tt, W

A0

(Cur

rent

)18

5 (O

rigin

al)

8.5

#3 &

10

US

C 2

837

Nov

-00

Kin

gsvi

lle II

Kin

gsvi

lle, T

X

29.4

Nov

-04

Nor

thea

st R

egio

nal

Lake

hurs

t, N

J; N

ew L

ondo

n, C

T; N

ewpo

rt, R

I; P

orts

mou

th, N

H; S

arat

oga

Spr

ings

, NY

; M

itche

l, N

Y; B

runs

wic

k, M

E; E

arle

, NJ

4,26

40.

0#3

, #4

& 1

0 U

SC

28

72(a

), 28

80, 2

881,

28

82 (c

)

Jan-

06#3

, #4

& 1

0 U

SC

28

72(a

), 28

80, 2

881,

28

82 (c

)

0.0

150

20.9

#2, #

4 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1

Oct

-01

New

Orle

ans,

LA

941

23.1

#2, #

3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1

Sep

-99

Kin

gsvi

lle I

Kin

gsvi

lle, T

X40

418

.0

#2, #

3 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1D

ec-0

0E

vere

tt II

Eve

rett,

WA

288

18.9

Priv

atiz

atio

n D

ate

Inst

alla

tion/

Proj

ect

End-

Stat

e U

nits

Sc

ored

Cos

t ($

M)

Con

veye

dU

nits

Aut

horit

ies

(Use

key

bel

ow)

#3 &

10

US

C 2

837

6.2

#1, #

2, #

4 &

10

US

C

2880

, 288

1

Expe

cted

Sou

rce

of F

unds

Mid

wes

t Reg

iona

l PH

IG

reat

Lak

es, I

L; C

rane

, IN

1,65

824

.1

#3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2872

(a),

2880

, 288

1,

2882

(c)

#3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2872

(a),

2880

, 288

1,

2882

(c)

5,69

4A

ug-0

5

Mid

-Atla

ntic

Reg

iona

lH

ampt

on R

oads

, VA

; Sug

ar G

rove

, WV

; D

ahlg

ren,

VA

; Pax

Riv

er, M

D; I

ndia

n H

ead,

M

D; A

nnap

olis

, MD

5,83

9

Feb-

05N

orth

wes

t Reg

iona

l PH

IE

vere

tt, W

A; W

hidb

ey Is

land

, WA

; Ban

gor/

Bre

mer

ton,

WA

2,98

515

.9

Sep

-06

Haw

aii R

egio

n P

H II

IO

ahu,

HI;

Kau

ai, H

I2,

517

0.0

#3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2872

(a),

2880

, 288

1,

2882

(c)

#3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2872

(a),

2880

, 288

1,

2882

(c)

May

-06

San

Die

go P

H II

IS

an D

iego

, CA

4,26

80.

0

0 0 244 0

3,30

2

2,00

3

5,59

3

3,09

8

2,76

4

2,66

7

2,48

9

Exh

ibit

FH-6

137

FY 2

008

Bud

get E

stim

ate

Mili

tary

Hou

sing

Priv

atiz

atio

n In

itiat

ive

Am

ount

($M

)B

udge

t Yea

rTy

peP

roje

ctPr

ivat

izat

ion

Dat

eIn

stal

latio

n/Pr

ojec

tEn

d-St

ate

Uni

ts

Scor

ed C

ost

($M

)C

onve

yed

Uni

tsA

utho

ritie

s(U

se k

ey b

elow

)Ex

pect

ed S

ourc

e of

Fun

ds

16.9

81FY

03FH

IMP

H-1

-97-

1 - C

harle

ston

, SC

3.87

4FY

03D

esig

n5.

059

FY06

FHIM

PH

-04-

97 -

Ats

ugi,

Japa

n6.

306

FY06

FHIM

PH

-06-

92 -

Gua

m, G

uam

19.9

00FY

07FH

IMP

H-0

1-07

- S

outh

east

Reg

ion

PP

V S

eed

7.86

7FY

03FH

NC

H-6

43 -

Lem

oore

, CA

0.88

8FY

03FH

NC

H-5

95 -

Pas

cago

ula,

MS

1.01

4FY

03D

esig

n12

.231

FY06

FHIM

PH

-04-

97 -

Ats

ugi,

Japa

n

Sep

-07

Sou

thea

st R

egio

nJa

ckso

nvill

e, F

L; K

ey W

est,

FL; M

aypo

rt, F

L;

Pan

ama

City

, FL;

Pen

saco

la, F

L; W

hitin

g Fi

eld,

FL;

Kin

gs B

ay, G

A; G

ulfp

ort,

MS

; M

erid

ian,

MS

; Cha

rlest

on, S

C;

Fort

Wor

th, T

X

5,50

152

.1#3

, #4

& 1

0 U

SC

28

72(a

), 28

80, 2

881,

28

82 (c

)

4) 2

878

"Con

veya

nce

or L

ease

of E

xist

ing

Pro

perty

and

Fac

ilitie

s"*

Aut

horit

ies

may

be

subj

ect t

o ch

ange

as

proj

ect i

s de

fined

2) 2

875

"Inve

stm

ents

in N

ongo

vern

men

tal E

ntiti

es"

Aut

horit

ies

1) 2

873

"Dire

ct L

oans

and

Loa

n G

uara

ntee

s"

3) 2

877

"Diff

eren

tial L

ease

Pay

men

ts"

#3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2872

(a),

2880

, 288

1,

2882

(c)

Sep

-07

San

Die

go P

H IV

Ven

tura

Cou

nty,

CA

; El C

entro

, CA

; S

eal B

each

, CA

; Chi

na L

ake,

CA

; Le

moo

re, C

A: F

allo

n, N

V

3,25

40.

03,

654

7,04

1

22.0

#3, #

4 &

10

US

C

2872

(a),

2880

, 288

1,

2882

(c)

Sep

-07

Mid

wes

t Reg

iona

l PH

IIM

emph

is, T

N48

932

6

Exh

ibit

FH-6

138

INST

AL

LA

TIO

NA

WA

RD

D

AT

ET

YPE

OF

FIN

AN

CIN

G

AM

OU

NT

USE

D P

ER

T

YPE

OF

FIN

AN

CIN

G

TE

RM

OF

TH

E

DE

AL

TO

TA

L N

UM

BE

R O

F U

NIT

S C

ON

VE

YE

DT

OT

AL

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

NO

VA

TE

DT

OT

AL

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

PLA

CE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

NE

W /A

DD

ED

U

NIT

SPr

ivat

e D

ebt

Diff

eren

tial

$18.

4M

Lea

se P

aym

ent

$8.5

MN

avy

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

$9.5

MPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$12.

8MD

iffer

entia

l

Le

ase

Paym

ent

$2.6

MN

avy

Equi

ty I

nves

tmen

tPr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

tPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$3.3

M15

Yrs

Dire

ct L

oan

$1.9

MN

avy

Equi

ty(w

/15

yr I

nves

tmen

top

tion)

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

$4.1

MPr

ivat

e D

ebt

Diff

eren

tial

$27.

8M

Lea

se P

aym

ent

$6.7

MN

avy

Equi

ty I

nves

tmen

t$1

2.2M

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

$1.8

MPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$235

.0M

Nav

y Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

Priv

ate

Deb

t$5

4.0M

Nav

y Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

Priv

ate

Deb

t$3

9.3M

Nav

y Eq

uity

In

vest

men

tPr

ivat

e Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

48

DE

PAR

TM

EN

T O

F T

HE

NA

VY

N

AV

Y F

AM

ILY

HO

USI

NG

PR

IVA

TIZ

AT

ION

PR

OJE

CT

S A

WA

RD

ED

Sout

h Te

xas

Feb-

0250

yrs

537

1442

2

588

New

Orle

ans,

LAO

ct-0

150

yrs

498

216

8244

3

015

00

1,05

881

2

Ever

ett I

IEv

eret

t, W

AD

ec-0

030

Yrs

Kin

gsvi

lle II

Kin

gsvi

lle, T

XN

ov-0

0

San

Die

go I

San

Die

go, C

AA

ug-0

150

yrs

2,66

0

$5.0

M

00

185

00

288

0 0 244 0

404

Kin

gsvi

lle I

Cor

pus C

hris

ti, T

X; K

ings

ville

, TX

Ju

l-96

15 Y

rs0

0

Ever

ett I

Ever

ett,

WA

Mar

-97

10 Y

rs

$5.9

M

$5.8

M

$4.3

M

$20.

9M

$23.

1M

$2.0

M

$29.

4M

$3.0

M

139

INST

AL

LA

TIO

NA

WA

RD

D

AT

ET

YPE

OF

FIN

AN

CIN

G

AM

OU

NT

USE

D P

ER

T

YPE

OF

FIN

AN

CIN

G

TE

RM

OF

TH

E

DE

AL

TO

TA

L N

UM

BE

R O

F U

NIT

S C

ON

VE

YE

DT

OT

AL

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

NO

VA

TE

DT

OT

AL

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

PLA

CE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

NE

W /A

DD

ED

U

NIT

S

DE

PAR

TM

EN

T O

F T

HE

NA

VY

N

AV

Y F

AM

ILY

HO

USI

NG

PR

IVA

TIZ

AT

ION

PR

OJE

CT

S A

WA

RD

ED

Priv

ate

Deb

t$3

80.0

MN

avy

Equi

ty I

nves

tmen

tPr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

tPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$289

.0M

Nav

y Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

Priv

ate

Deb

t$4

64.1

MN

avy

Equi

ty I

nves

tmen

tPr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

tPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$226

.0M

Nav

y Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

Priv

ate

Deb

t$5

37.0

MN

avy

Equi

ty I

nves

tmen

tPr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

tPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$138

.9M

Nav

y Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

Priv

ate

Deb

t$8

19.5

MN

avy

Equi

ty I

nves

tmen

tPr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

tPr

ivat

e D

ebt

$510

.4M

Nav

y Eq

uity

Inv

estm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

$0.0

M

$2.5

M

949

824

0H

awai

i III

Pear

l Har

bor,

HI;

Kau

ai, H

ISe

p-06

48 y

rs2,

489

$0.0

M

$3.6

M

846

873

414

Mid

-Atla

ntic

Reg

iona

l H

ampt

on R

oads

, VA

; Dah

lgre

n, V

A;

Suga

r Gro

ve, W

V; P

ax R

iver

, MD

; In

dian

Hea

d, M

D; A

nnap

olis

, MD

Aug

-05

50 y

rs5,

694

190

906

0M

ay-0

4H

awai

i IPe

arl H

arbo

r, H

I50

yrs

2,00

3

1,07

246

00

San

Die

go II

San

Die

go, C

AM

ay-0

348

.5 y

rs3,

302

$0.0

M

$5.0

M

$25.

0M

$3.8

MN

orth

east

Reg

iona

lLa

kehu

rst,

NJ;

New

Lon

don,

CT;

N

ewpo

rt, R

I; Po

rtsm

outh

, NH

; Sa

rato

ga S

prin

gs, N

Y; M

itche

l, N

Y;

Bru

nsw

ick,

ME;

Ear

le, N

J

Nov

-04

50 y

rs5,

593

$0.0

M

$10.

6M

1,07

11,

251

0

Nor

thw

est R

egio

nal

Ever

ett,

WA

; Whi

dbey

Isla

nd, W

A;

Ban

gor/B

rem

erto

n, W

A

Feb-

0550

yrs

3,09

8

$15.

9M

$5.5

M

1,63

957

315

4

Mid

wes

t Reg

iona

l G

reat

Lak

es, I

L; C

rane

, IN

Jan-

0650

yrs

2,76

431

750

0

$24.

1M

$2.4

13M

San

Die

go II

ISa

n D

iego

, CA

M

ay-0

645

yrs

2,66

70

123

1,60

1

$0.0

M

$3.0

M

140


1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 10,1462. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 10,1463. FY 2007 Current Estimate 10,1464. Price Growth 238

a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 19b. Inflation 219

5. Program Decreases (2,923)a. Program Reduction (2,923)

6. Program Increases 9,495a. Transfer of 110 FTEs to PPV Support 9,495


RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT ACCOUNT

CALCULATIONS4a. 620 (CIVPERS estimate) x .030 (Civilian inflation rate) = 19 (Civilian Personnel Compensation) 4b. 9,526 (Non-WCF Costs) x .023 (inflation rate) = 219 (Inflation)5a. Reflects the delta between the (FY07 Estimate +/- Adjustments 4a, b) and revised HQ/Region requirement.6a. Costs associated with the transfer of 110 FTEs to the PPV Support account (Avg. per FTE = $86K).

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS


This program includes all costs related to the development, evaluation, and oversight of family housing privatization projects. The request reflects estimated costs associated with both in-house and contractor support of housing privatization efforts within the Navy. The Program Reduction refers to the decrease in workload at Region and CNIC HQs associated with the eventual completion of all planned PPV projects. Program Increase is associated with the transfer of 110 FTEs at CONUS and US Overseas locations from the Management account to the PPV Support account to more accurately account for costs associated with the Navy's Privatization Initiatives.


JUSTIFICATIONNAVY

Exhibit OP-5

141

BLANK PAGE

142

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING – FY 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATE

MARINE CORPS PRIVATIZATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY (In Thousands) FY 2008 Program $12,032 FY 2007 Program $5,115 Purpose and Scope The Fiscal Year 1996 Military Housing Privatization Initiative (MHPI) included in Public Law 104-106 is an essential tool used by the Department of the Navy (DON) to meet its goal of eliminating inadequate housing by 2007 and to reduce the shortfall of adequate and affordable private sector housing in the local community available for military members and their families. The purpose of the Privatization Initiative is to permit DON to enter into business agreements with the private sector to utilize private sector resources, leveraged by DON assets (inventory, land and funding), to improve, replace, and build family housing faster than could otherwise be accomplished through the traditional military construction approach. Private business entities will own, operate and maintain housing and lease quality homes to military personnel and their families at affordable rates. Accomplishments The Marine Corps initially took a deliberate, measured approach in evaluating which blend of authorities would provide the desired leverage of resources with sufficient protection of the Government’s resources and interests over the long term. With the Marine Corps subsequent aggressive pursuit of privatization, 80 percent of the Marine Corps housing inventory has now been privatized through the award of nine public-private venture projects:

- MCB Camp Pendleton, CA I (712 Units) Awarded Nov 01 - MCAS Beaufort, SC/MCRD Parris Island, SC/NH Beaufort, SC (1,718

Units) Awarded Mar 03 - MCB Camp Pendleton II/MCRD San Diego, CA/MWTC Bridgeport (Coleville

Housing), CA/MCB Quantico, VA (4,534 Units) Awarded Sep 03 - MCAS Yuma, AZ/MCB Camp Pendleton III (897 Units) Awarded Oct 04 - MCB Camp Lejeune, NC/MCAS New River, NC/MCAS Cherry Point,

NC/Stewart, NY (3,405 Units) Awarded Sep 05 - MCAGCC Twentynine Palms, CA/MOBCOM Kansas City, MO (1,488 Units)

Awarded Sep 05 - MCB Camp Lejeune, NC/MCAS Cherry Point, NC/Stewart, NY Phase II (954

Units) Awarded Sep 06 - MCB Camp Pendleton Phase III (3,162 Units) Awarded Sep 06 - Hawaii Regional Phase 2 (MCB Hawaii, Kaneohe Bay Phase 1) (1,175

Units) Awarded Sep 06

The Marine Corps’ has seven additional projects, totaling over 4,200 homes, under solicitation or in development with the following planned awards: Three in fiscal year 2007 and four in fiscal year 2008. When awarded, approximately 97 percent of Marine Corps’ worldwide inventory (99.7 percent of the Marine Corps’ United States inventory) will be privatized. Details for these projects are addressed in the tables that follow.

143

Progress The Marine Corps has continuously incorporated lessons learned from the expanding portfolio of Department of Navy awarded projects to refines its’ Privatization Program. Current plans include the expanded use and combination of legislative authorities to maximize project cost effectiveness. Projects are developed to ensure rents and reasonable utilities do not exceed a service member’s basic allowance for housing rate. Personnel from installations, including senior enlisted personnel, continue to be actively engaged in development of Public-Private Venture (PPV) projects which are structured to ensure sufficient cash flow exists to adequately operate, maintain and revitalize the inventory over the life of the 50-year business agreement. Feedback from residents of existing privatized housing continues to be positive in areas relating to quality of services and responsiveness of property management. The residents are pleased with the turnaround time on maintenance trouble calls and change of occupancy. For Camp Pendleton Phase I, the first newly constructed homes were occupied during October 2001 and initial construction was completed in February 2004. For Beaufort/Parris Island the first newly constructed units were occupied in February 2004. Initial construction is projected to be complete in May 2007. For Camp Pendleton Phase II/Quantico, the first newly constructed units were occupied in July 2004. The construction quality of the new and renovated units is excellent. At Camp Pendleton, renovations were completed at the San Luis Rey and South Mesa I neighborhoods. Initial construction is projected to be complete in April 2008. For MCAS Yuma, the first newly constructed units were occupied in December 2005 and initial construction to be completed in March 2007. Construction has commenced on the Camp Lejeune, Cherry Point, Stewart Phase I and the Twentynine Palms, Kansas City projects awarded in September 2005. For Twentynine Palms, the first newly constructed unit was occupied in June 2006, and the Initial Development Period is projected to be complete in September 2009. With the successful execution of our planned Privatization Program and selected Military Construction projects, the Marine Corps will have contracts in place by the end of Fiscal Year 2007 to eliminate all our remaining inadequate family housing.

144

FY 2

008

Bud

get E

stim

ate

Mili

tary

Hou

sing

Priv

atiz

atio

n In

itiat

ive

Am

ount

($M

)B

udge

t Yea

rTy

peP

roje

ct (S

ourc

e of

Fun

ds)

20FY

96C

onst

ruct

ion

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on

14FY

97C

onst

ruct

ion

MC

AS

Bea

ufor

t0.

2FY

02Im

prov

emen

tM

CA

S B

eauf

ort

7.88

6FY

02Im

prov

emen

tM

CR

D P

arris

Isla

nd4.

41FY

01C

onst

ruct

ion

Pea

rl H

arbo

r

0.62

1FY

00Im

prov

emen

tM

CA

S B

eauf

ort

0.88

5FY

00C

onst

ruct

ion

NP

WC

Pea

rl H

arbo

r0.

061

FY01

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AS

Bea

ufor

t0.

307

FY01

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on0.

332

FY01

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AS

Che

rry

Poi

nt2.

72FY

01Im

prov

emen

tM

CA

S Iw

akun

i, JA

0.32

7FY

01Im

prov

emen

tM

CR

D P

arris

Isla

nd1.

014

FY01

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AG

CC

Tw

enty

nine

Pal

ms

6.92

1FY

02C

onst

ruct

ion

MC

B Q

uant

ico

14.5

71FY

02Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

41.5

15FY

03C

onst

ruct

ion

MC

B Q

uant

ico

1.38

8FH

IFC

onst

ruct

ion

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on0.

728

FY01

Des

ign

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on0.

96FY

01D

esig

nM

CB

Qua

ntic

o0.

728

FY02

Des

ign

MC

B Q

uant

ico

2.53

7FY

02D

esig

nM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e0.

143

FY02

Impr

ovem

ent

NA

S P

ensa

cola

0.90

4FY

03D

esig

nM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e12

.654

FY04

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AS

Yum

a27

.002

FY05

Con

stru

ctio

nM

CA

S C

herr

y P

oint

56.1

65FY

05Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e

25.7

02FY

05Im

prov

emen

tM

CA

GC

C T

wen

tyni

ne P

alm

s20

.238

FY05

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

RS

C K

ansa

s C

ity, M

O

65.1

24FY

06Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Haw

aii

37.3

03FY

06Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e0.

25FY

03D

esig

nM

CA

S C

herr

y P

oint

0.37

7FY

06Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Haw

aii

512

1,55

8

4,63

1

897

Sep

-06

MC

B C

amp

Leje

une,

NC

MC

AS

Che

rry

Poi

nt, N

C(s

ee N

ote

2)95

437

.91,

188

2,4

Sep

-05

MC

AG

CC

Tw

enty

nine

Pal

ms,

CA

MO

BC

OM

Kan

sas

City

, MO

1,48

8

1,17

5

1,80

1

Sep

-06

MC

B H

awai

i, H

I1,

175

65.1

Sep

-05

MC

B C

amp

Leje

une,

NC

MC

AS

Che

rry

Poi

nt, N

CS

tew

art,

NY

3,42

683

.23,

614

45.9

2,4

2,4

897

18.7

2,4

Sep

-03

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A M

CB

Qua

ntic

o, V

AM

CR

D S

an D

iego

, CA

4,53

4

Oct

-04

MC

AS

Yum

a, A

ZM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

, CA

Expe

cted

Sou

rce

of F

und s

70.7

1,4

Scor

ed C

ost

($M

)A

utho

ritie

s(U

se k

ey b

elow

)

26.5

2,4

19.4

2,4

Priv

atiz

atio

n D

ate

Inst

alla

tion/

Stat

eEn

d-St

ate

Uni

ts

Mar

-03

MC

AS

Bea

ufor

t, S

CM

CR

D P

arris

Isla

nd, S

CN

H B

eauf

ort,

SC

(see

Not

e 1)

1,71

8

Nov

-00

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A71

2

Con

veye

d U

nits

Sep

-06

MC

B C

amp

Leje

une,

NC

(MC

AS

New

Riv

er, N

C)

(see

Not

e 2)

0-2

10.

02,

4

2,4

Exhi

bit F

H-6

: Fa

mily

Hou

sing

Priv

atiz

atio

n

145

FY 2

008

Bud

get E

stim

ate

Mili

tary

Hou

sing

Priv

atiz

atio

n In

itiat

ive

Am

ount

($M

)B

udge

t Yea

rTy

peP

roje

ct (S

ourc

e of

Fun

ds)

Expe

cted

Sou

rce

of F

unds

Scor

ed C

ost

($M

)A

utho

ritie

s(U

se k

ey b

elow

)Pr

ivat

izat

ion

Dat

eIn

stal

latio

n/St

ate

End-

Stat

e U

nits

C

onve

yed

Uni

ts0.

069

FY03

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AS

Yum

a0.

695

FY03

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AS

Iwak

uni,

JA21

.724

FY03

Con

stru

ctio

nN

AS

Lem

oore

0.08

4FY

06Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Haw

aii

8.31

6FY

06Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

56.0

52FY

07Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Haw

aii

78.9

51FY

07Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e

19.5

64FY

07Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

1.77

7FY

04C

onst

ruct

ion

MC

AS

Che

rry

Poi

nt0.

724

FY04

Impr

ovem

ent

MC

AS

Iwak

uni,

JA1.

666

FY04

Des

ign

87.9

51FY

08Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e

50.1

75FY

08Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

50.0

00FY

08Im

prov

emen

tM

CA

GC

C T

wen

tyni

ne P

alm

s

59.4

87FY

09Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e

50.0

00FY

09Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

14.9

23FY

10Im

prov

emen

tM

CB

Cam

p P

endl

eton

Sep

-08

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A0

301

56.1

2,4

Sep

-07

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A

MC

LB A

lban

y, G

A25

0up

to 2

94 u

nits

23.7

2,4

79.0

2,4

30.9

2,4

Sep

-07

MC

B H

awai

i, H

I (P

hase

2)

Sep

-06

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A(s

ee N

ote

3)2,

771

3,16

2

1,14

291

7

Aut

horit

ies

1) 2

873

"Dire

ct L

oans

and

Loa

n G

uara

ntee

s"2)

287

5 " I

nves

tmen

ts in

Non

gove

rnm

enta

l Ent

ities

"

Not

e 3:

Pha

ses

2 an

d 4

for C

amp

Pend

leto

n as

mod

ified

by

25 J

ul 2

006

Not

ifica

tion

Lette

r; c

onve

rts

641

Pend

leto

n (P

hase

2) r

emov

atio

n/m

inor

wor

k un

its to

repl

acem

ent u

nits

. N

ote

2: P

hase

s 1

and

2 fo

r MC

B C

amp

Leje

une

and

MC

AS

Che

rry

Poin

t as

mod

ified

by

25 J

ul 0

6 Ph

ase

2 N

otifi

catio

n Le

tter

Not

e 1:

Incl

udes

53

Nav

y U

nits

(Nav

al H

ospi

tal B

eauf

ort)

3) 2

877

"Diff

eren

tial L

ease

Pay

men

ts"

4) 2

878

" Con

veya

nce

or L

ease

of E

xist

ing

Pro

perty

and

Fac

ilitie

s"*

Aut

horit

ies

may

be

subj

ect t

o ch

ange

as

proj

ect i

s de

fined

086

039

4S

ep-0

9M

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e, N

C

Sep

-10

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A

2,4

50.2

2,4

14.9

2,4

Sep

-08

MC

B C

amp

Leje

une,

NC

045

1

Sep

-07

MC

B C

amp

Leje

une,

NC

MC

AS

Che

rry

Poi

nt, N

CW

esto

ver J

AR

B, C

hico

pee,

MA

2,42

31,

985

Sep

-06

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A(s

ee N

ote

3)0

0(s

ee N

ote

3)

030

0

0.0

2,4

88.0

2,4

59.5

50.0

2,4

Sep

-08

MC

AG

CC

Tw

enty

nine

Pal

ms,

CA

027

950

.02,

4

Sep

-09

MC

B C

amp

Pen

dlet

on, C

A

Exhi

bit F

H-6

: Fa

mily

Hou

sing

Priv

atiz

atio

n

146

D

EPA

RT

ME

NT

OF

TH

E N

AV

Y -

USM

C

FAM

ILY

HO

USI

NG

PR

IVA

TIZ

AT

ION

– P

RO

JEC

TS

AW

AR

DE

D

INST

AL

LA

TIO

N

A

WA

RD

D

AT

E

T

YPE

OF

FIN

AN

CIN

G

AM

OU

NT

U

SED

PE

R

TY

PE O

F FI

NA

NC

ING

TE

RM

O

F T

HE

D

EA

L

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

O

F U

NIT

S C

ON

VE

YE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

NO

VA

TE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

PLA

CE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

NE

W /A

DD

ED

U

NIT

S

MC

B C

amp

Pend

leto

n C

A

N

ov 0

0

Priv

ate

Deb

t*

DoN

Dire

ct L

oan

$54.

6M

$29.

4M L

oan

($19

.4M

Sc

ored

A

mou

nt)

50

Yrs

51

2

20

0

31

2

20

0 M

CA

S B

eauf

ort,

MC

RD

Par

ris Is

land

, an

d N

H B

eauf

ort,

SC

M

ar 0

3

Priv

ate

Deb

t**

DO

N E

quity

Inve

stm

ent

Priv

ate

Equi

ty

Inve

stm

ent

$111

.8M

$2

6.5M

$3

.3M

50

Yrs

1,

558*

**

1,

227

33

1*

16

0 M

CB

Cam

p Pe

ndle

ton,

CA

; MC

B

Qua

ntic

o, V

A a

nd M

CR

D S

an D

iego

, CA

Se

p 03

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

on E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$478

.0M

$7

0.7M

$1

0.7M

50

Yrs

4,

631

2,

535

1,

820

79

MC

AS

Yum

a, M

CB

Cam

p Pe

ndle

ton,

CA

O

ct 0

4

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$79.

5M

$18.

7M

$1.2

5M

49

Yrs

89

7

25

7

25

3

0 M

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e, N

C; M

CA

S C

herr

y Po

int,

NC

; Ste

war

t, N

Y

Se

p 05

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$285

.5M

$8

3.2M

$7

.5M

50

Yrs

3,

614

1,

626

1,

288

0 M

CA

GC

C T

wen

tyni

ne P

alm

s, C

A;

MO

BC

OM

Kan

sas C

ity, M

O

Se

p 05

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$66.

4M

$45.

9M

$1.2

M

48

Yrs

1,

801

63

6

17

6

0

147

DE

PAR

TM

EN

T O

F T

HE

NA

VY

- U

SMC

FA

MIL

Y H

OU

SIN

G P

RIV

AT

IZA

TIO

N –

PR

OJE

CT

S A

WA

RD

ED

IN

STA

LL

AT

ION

AW

AR

D

DA

TE

T

YPE

OF

FIN

AN

CIN

G

AM

OU

NT

U

SED

PE

R

TY

PE O

F FI

NA

NC

ING

TE

RM

O

F T

HE

D

EA

L

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

O

F U

NIT

S C

ON

VE

YE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

NO

VA

TE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

UN

ITS

RE

PLA

CE

D

TO

TA

L

NU

MB

ER

OF

NE

W /A

DD

ED

U

NIT

S

MC

B C

amp

Leje

une,

NC

; MC

AS

Che

rry

Poin

t, N

C

Se

p 06

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$90.

0M

$37.

9M

$2.5

M

49

Yrs

1,

188

62

8

10

5

0 M

CB

Cam

p Le

jeun

e, N

C

(MC

AS

New

Riv

er, N

C)

Se

p 06

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

Fina

ncin

g in

form

atio

n in

clud

ed in

th

e pr

ojec

t ab

ove.

49

Yrs

0

-1

10

89

0 M

CB

Cam

p Pe

ndle

ton,

CA

Se

p 06

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$382

.0M

$3

0.9M

$5

.0M

47

Yrs

2,

771

30

0

0

39

1 M

CB

Cam

p Pe

ndle

ton,

CA

Se

p 06

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

Fina

ncin

g in

form

atio

n in

clud

ed in

th

e pr

ojec

t ab

ove.

47

Yrs

0

-6

41

64

1

0 M

CB

Haw

aii,

HI

Se

p 06

Priv

ate

Deb

t D

oN E

quity

In

vest

men

t Pr

ivat

e Eq

uity

In

vest

men

t

$233

.5M

$6

5.1M

$1

.0M

48

Yrs

1,

175

53

8

53

7

0 *

T

here

was

add

ition

al d

ebt i

ssue

d in

the

amou

nts o

f $5M

in M

ay o

f 200

2 an

d $1

0M in

Dec

embe

r of

200

4.

** T

here

was

a r

efin

ance

of t

he B

eauf

ort p

roje

ct in

Aug

ust o

f 200

5. T

otal

deb

t iss

ued

was

$15

7.5M

. T

his r

esul

ted

in a

n in

crea

se o

f $45

.7 m

illio

n ov

er th

e or

igin

al d

ebt a

mou

nt.

**

* In

clud

es 5

3 N

avy

Uni

ts (N

aval

Hos

pita

l Bea

ufor

t)

148

FY2007 FY2008

$5,115,000 $12,032,000Reconciliation of Increases and Decreases (Dollars in Thousands)

1. FY 2007 President's Budget Request 5,1152. FY 2007 Appropriated Amount 03. FY 2007 Current Estimate 5,1154. Price Growth 324

a. Civilian Personnel Compensation 232b. Inflation 92

5. Program Adjustments 6,593a. Increased Level of Privatization Effort 2,576b. Privatization Support Labor Realignment from Management 4,017


RATIONALE FOR CHANGES IN THE PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT ACCOUNT. Privatization Support Costs:

(4) Privatization Support Labor Realignment. The privatization support account was increased as a result of the realignment of labor costs associated with privatization liason and support functions from the management account to the privatization support account.

(2) Project Costs. Includes all costs for contracts, labor, materials, supplies, services or travel required in direct support of the family housing privatization program for project development and execution. This includes costs associated with feasibility studies, concept development, consultant support, solicitation, procurement, contracting, execution, transition, construction management (supervision, inspection and overhead), and post award management/monitoring.


PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS

FAMILY HOUSING - 2008 BUDGET ESTIMATES

MARINE CORPS JUSTIFICATION

OPERATING EXPENSES

(3) Administrative Costs. Includes all costs for contracts, labor, materials, supplies, services or travel required in direct support of the family housing privatization program administration and portfolio

t

Includes the costs that the government incurs in direct support of the family housing privatization program under the authorities of 10 U.S.C., Chapter 169, Subchapter IV (Alternative Authority for Acquisition and Improvement of Military Housing) with the exception of those costs that will be included as part of the privatization project. These costs include all administrative, planning, development, solicitation, award, transition, construction oversight, and portfolio management activities associated with military housing privatization and specifically for:

(1) Site Assessment Costs. Includes all costs for contracts, labor, materials, supplies, services or travel required in direct support of family housing privatization program efforts for environmental baseline surveys, environmental impact statements, environmental assessments, and any efforts required to be accomplished by the government prior to privatization for, environmental mitigation, site surveys, or real estate costs.

The privatization support account funding adjustments reflect pricing and program changes associated with existing and new public-private venture initiatives. Prescribed inflation rates and civilian pay raise rates were utilized.

Exhibit OP-5

149

CALCULATIONSFY07 Request: 5,115

4a. Civilian Pay Raise 2322,670 (CIVPERS estimate) + 4,017 (CIVPERS transfer) = 6,698 (adjusted baseline)6698 (adjusted baseline) + 1,022 CIVPERS (program increase) = 7,709 (Revised estimate)7,709 (revised estimate) x .03 (pay raise rate) = 232

4b. Inflation 925,115 (estimate) - 2,670 (labor) + 1,574 (non-labor program increase) = 4000 (non-labor) 4,000 (Non-labor Costs) X .023 (inflation) = 92

5a. Program Adjustments 2,576Reflects the delta between the FY07 Estimate plus adjustments 4a, b, 5b and revised requirement

Account FY07 FY08Residual Consultants 1,325 1,558Privatization Consultants 1,120 2,533EFD Stage Costs 1,758 2,886HQ/EFD Fixed Costs 912 917Installation costs 0 4,138Totals 5,115 12,032

Reflects costs for 12 ongoing and 3 new initiatives. New initiatives include exclusive negotiationsfor projects to be awarded by end of FY08 (3 locations) which includes required environmental studies.

Ongoing Projects in FY08: Level of Effort/Status: Camp Pendleton I Portfolio Management/Monitoring only Beaufort/Parris Island Portfolio Management/Monitoring only Camp Pendleton II/Quantico/San Diego Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Yuma/Pendleton III Portfolio Management/Monitoring only Camp Lejeune/Cherry Point/Stewart I Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Twentynine Palms/Kansas City Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Kaneohe Bay I Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Lejeune/Cherry Point II Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Pendleton 4 Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Lejuene/Cherry Point/Westover 3 Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Kaneohe Bay II Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring Camp Pendleton 5/Albany Limited Construction Oversight, Portfolio Management/Monitoring

New Projects to be executed in FY08: Camp Lejuene 4 Agreement Execution/Negotiation/Environmental Studies Camp Pendleton 6 & 6A Agreement Execution/Negotiation/Environmental Studies Twentynine Palms 2 Agreement Execution/Negotiation/Environmental Studies

5b. Privatization Support Labor Realignment (+59 FTEs) from Management 4,017

FY08 Request 12,032

Exhibit OP-5

150

DEPARTMENT OF NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY FY 2008 BUDGET DEBT PAYMENT (Thousands of Dollars) _________________________________________________________ FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 NAVY NAVY NAVY _________________________________________________________ TOA INTEREST & OTHER EXPENSES: SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS 0 0 0 TOTAL OBLIGATING AUTHORITY 53 0 0 BUDGET AUTHORITY 53 0 0

151

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY FY 2008 BUDGET SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS In accordance with authority contained in Section 222 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended, this program provides for the payment of premiums due on mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration for mortgages on housing purchased by military personnel on active duty and for continuing payments in those cases where a serviceman dies while on active duty and leaves a surviving widow as owner of the property. In the latter case, payments extend for a period of two years beyond the date of the serviceman's death or until the date the widow disposes of the property, whichever occurs first. With the discontinuance of Section 222 Mortgages as of 31 March 1980, the Department of Housing and Urban Development stopped processing applications for SMIP. No payments were made in FY 2006; therefore no funding for FY 2008 is requested. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 NAVY NAVY NAVY Number of Mortgages 0 0 0 Average Payment $0 $0 $0 Total Payment $0 $0 $0

152

DEPARTMENT OF NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS FY 2008 BUDGET DEBT PAYMENT (Thousands of Dollars) _________________________________________________________ FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 MC MC MC _________________________________________________________ TOA INTEREST & OTHER EXPENSES: SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS 2 2 0 TOTAL OBLIGATING AUTHORITY 2 2 0 BUDGET AUTHORITY 2 2 0

153

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FAMILY HOUSING, MARINE CORPS FY 2008 BUDGET SERVICEMEN'S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS In accordance with authority contained in Section 222 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended, this program provides for the payment of premiums due on mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration for mortgages on housing purchased by military personnel on active duty and for continuing payments in those cases where a serviceman dies while on active duty and leaves a surviving widow as owner of the property. In the latter case, payments extend for a period of two years beyond the date of the serviceman's death or until the date the widow disposes of the property, whichever occurs first. With the discontinuance of Section 222 Mortgages as of 31 March 1980, the Department of Housing and Urban Development stopped processing applications for SMIP. No payments were made in FY 2006; therefore no funding for FY 2008 is requested. FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 MC MC MC Number of Mortgages 0 0 0 Average Payment $0 $0 $0 Total Payment $0 $0 $0

154

U.S. $

Budget

U.S. $

Budget

U.S. $

Budget

Requiring

Exchange

Requiring

Exchange

Requiring

Exchange

Country

Conversion

Rate Used

Conversion

Rate Used

Conversion

Rate Used

Bahrain (Dinar)

1,059.9

0.3770

465.4

0.3771

249.0

0.3769

Cambodia (Riel)

57.0

4,002.7000

59.0

3,995.5000

0.0

N/A

Egypt (Pound)

800.0

5.9754

800.0

5.7086

990.0

5.7684

Greece (Euro)*

1,081.7

0.8785

1,057.5

0.8530

1,130.7

0.8259

Hong Kong (Dollar)

390.0

7.7965

365.0

7.7560

498.0

7.7556

Iceland (Krona)*

11,867.2

82.1990

0.0

N/A

0.0

N/A

India (Rupee)

200.0

43.7500

260.0

44.1100

200.0

45.8761

Indonesia (Rupiah)

540.0

9,287.8000

463.0

9,417.0400

1,025.0

9311.8300

Italy (Euro)*

93,999.2

0.8785

82,638.1

0.8530

89,586.8

0.8259

Japan (Yen)*

69,564.3

115.0000

55,668.9

113.3000

61,511.9

114.7781

Laos (Kip)

52.0

8,224.3000

55.0

10,125.9500

56.0

10164.3500

Malaysia (Ringgits)

28.0

3.6435

29.0

3.6435

30.0

3.6435

Norway (Krone)*

43.0

6.7510

42.0

6.7680

43.0

6.5827

Peru (Nuevo Sol)

411.0

3.2690

419.0

3.3511

428.0

3.2672

Philippines (Peso)

200.0

56.3250

220.0

52.5500

225.0

52.8797

Portugal (Euro)*

341.8

0.8785

334.2

0.8530

314.2

0.8259

South Korea (Won)*

488.3

1,205.2000

1,231.2

1,151.0000

9,502.2

1025.6971

Singapore (Dollar)*

0.0

N/A

0.0

N/A

3,627.0

1.6202

Spain (Euro)*

11,490.3

0.8785

11,059.6

0.8530

17,416.7

0.8259

Turkey (Lira)*

41.0

1.5144

43.0

1.4918

0.0

N/A

United Arab Emirates (Dirham)

62.0

3.6727

65.0

3.6709

67.0

3.6725

United Kingdom (Pound)*

3,081.8

0.5930

3,109.7

0.5750

3,379.3

0.5528

Vietnam (Dong)

43.0

15,780.0000

48.0

15,786.5000

49.0

15,970.0000

TOTAL

195,841.5

158,432.6

190,328.8

* = Countries in the Foreign Currency Account.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE DATA

($000)

Appropriation: Family Housing, Navy (Includes Family Housing, Construction)

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

FY 2008 BUDGET SUBMISSION

155

BLANK PAGE

156

FY 2006

FY 2007

FY 2008

U.S. $

Budget

U.S. $

Budget

U.S. $

Budget

Requiring

Exchange

Requiring

Exchange

Requiring

Exchange

Country

Conversion

Rate Used

Conversion

Rate Used

Conversion

Rate Used

Japan (Yen)*

6,483.0

115.0000

9,149.0

113.3000

20,550.0

114.7781

TOTAL

6,483.0

9,149.0

20,550.0

* = Countries in the Foreign Currency Account.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE DATA

FY 2008 BUDGET SUBMISSION

($000)

Appropriation: Family Housing, Marine Corps (Includes Family Housing Construction)

Exh

ibit

PB-1

8 Fo

reig

n C

urre

ncy

Exc

hang

e D

ata

157

BLANK PAGE

158

department of the navy€¦ · e2/c2 aircrew training facility mh-60s hangar & airfield...

Documents