des 606: watershed modeling with hec-hms

24
DES 606: Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Watershed Subdivision Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 6 OCT 11

Upload: blaine

Post on 08-Feb-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

DESCRIPTION

DES 606: Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS. Watershed Subdivision Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 6 OCT 11. Watershed Subdivision. Example illustrates taking a working model, then subdividing as guided by drainage features. Base Model. Use the Woodland’s Ditch C as an example. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

DES 606: Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Watershed Subdivision

Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E.

6 OCT 11

Page 2: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Watershed Subdivision

• Example illustrates taking a working model, then subdividing as guided by drainage features.

Page 3: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Base Model

• Use the Woodland’s Ditch C as an example.– Area is 159.3 acres.– Slope is 0.0049

• Build a HMS model and calibrate using a historical event.

Page 4: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Base Model

• For this example I choose to Kerby-Kirpich method to estimate Tc– Small watershed

Page 5: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Base Model

• For this example I choose to Kerby-Kirpich method to estimate Tc– Kerby for Overland Portion– Kirpich for Channel Portion

Page 6: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

• Length Estimate– Magenta line is about

3725 feet.– 0-4696 report

suggests overland component be limited to 500 ft.

Page 7: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

• Time estimate– Estimate the channel

portion.– Estimate the overland

flow portion.

• Sum of these two times is estimate of Tc for the area.

• We will use this value as the estimate for Lag time in SCS-DUH

Page 8: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

• Loss Model– For this example, lets use SCS CN. – Watershed is located in Woodlands, Texas.

• Predominant pine forest• Lissie Sands formation• Hydrologic Soil Group B or C.• CN ~ 55-70 is appropriate• Developed portion is about 20%

Page 9: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

• Observed rainfall and runoff– Have a 60 hour event

in a database – stored as elapsed time.

– Invent (or use actual) calendar dates

Page 10: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 11: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 12: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 13: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 14: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 15: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Lumped Model

Page 16: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Subdivide

• Use Grogans Mill road as guide – water would flow in swale along the road

• Flow to drainage ditch from 3 areas

Page 17: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Divide the Watershed

• Use Grogans Mill road as guide– South of Grogans

Mill direct to outlet.– North and West of

the large pond routes to outlet

– East of large pond routes to outlet

Page 18: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Areas, Routing etc.

Route 1064 ft along swale, under road

Route 1596 ft into ditch, under roadto outlet.

23.1 acres17.7 acres

118.6 acres

Page 19: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Parameter Estimates

• Lag Time– Upper Watershed = 58 min.– Lower Watershed = 27 min.– East Watershed = 47 min.

• Routing Lag Times– Upper To Outlet = 18 min.– East To Outlet = 13 min.

Page 20: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 21: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

HEC-HMS Model

Page 22: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Summary

• Lumped model– Entire area is a

single sub-basin

Page 23: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Summary

• Subdivided model– Selected portions of

the area are linked– Joined by routing

elements

Page 24: DES 606:  Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS

Summary

• The two different models work about the same in this example (as compared to the observed data)

• Used lag routing, but data suggest substantial storage

• The large pond suggest a storage element too