design and analysis of experiments
DESCRIPTION
Design and Analysis of Experiments. Dr. Tai- Yue Wang Department of Industrial and Information Management National Cheng Kung University Tainan, TAIWAN, ROC. Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs. Dr. Tai- Yue Wang Department of Industrial and Information Management - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Design and Analysis of Experiments
Dr. Tai-Yue Wang Department of Industrial and Information Management
National Cheng Kung UniversityTainan, TAIWAN, ROC
1/33
![Page 2: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs
Dr. Tai-Yue Wang Department of Industrial and Information Management
National Cheng Kung UniversityTainan, TAIWAN, ROC
2/33
![Page 3: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline Introduction The One-Half Fraction of the 2k factorial Design The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k factorial
Design The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design Alias Structures in Fractional Factorials and Other
Designs Resolution III Designs Resolution IV and V Designs Supersaturated Designs
![Page 4: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction(1/5) As the number of factors in 2k factorial design
increases, the number of runs required for a complete replicate of the design outgrows the resources of most experimenters.
In 26 factorial design, 64 runs for one replicate. Among them, 6 df for main effects, 15 df for
two-factor interaction. That is, only 21 of them are majorly interested
in.
![Page 5: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction(2/5) The remaining 42 df are for three of higher
interactions. If the experimenter can reasonably assume that
certain high-order interactions are negligible, information on the main effects and low-order interactions may be obtained by running only a fraction of the complete factorial design.
![Page 6: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction(3/5) The Fractional Factorial Designs are among
the most widely used types of designs for product and process design and process improvement.
A major use of fraction factorials is in screening experiments.
![Page 7: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Introduction(4/5) Three key ideas that fractional factorial can be
used effectively: The sparsity of effects principle – When there are
several variables, the system or process is likely to be driven primarily by some of the main effects an lower-order interactions.
The projection property -- Fractional factorials can be projected into stronger designs in the subset of significant factors.
![Page 8: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Introduction Sequential experimentation – It is possible to
combine the runs of two or more fractional factorials to assemble sequentially a larger design to estimate the factor effects and interactions interested.
![Page 9: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
Consider a 23 factorial design but an experimenter cannot afford to run all (8) the treatment combinations but only 4 runs.
This suggests a one-half fraction of a 23 design.
Because the design contains 23-1=4 treatment combinations, a one-half fraction of the 23 design is often called a 23-1 design.
![Page 10: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
Consider a 23 factorial
![Page 11: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
We can have tow options: One is the “+” sign in column ABC and the
other is the “-” sign in column ABC.
![Page 12: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
For the “+” in column ABC, effects a, b, c, and abc are selected.
For the “-” in column ABC, effects ab, ac, bc, and (1) are selected.
Since we use ABC to determine which half to be used, ABC is called generator.
![Page 13: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
We look further to see if the “+” sign half is used, the sign in column I is identical to the one we used.
We call I=ABC is the defining relation in our design.
Note: C=AB is factor relation. C=AB I=ABC
![Page 14: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
In general, the defining relation for a fractional factorials will always be the set of all columns that are equal to the identity column I.
If one examines the main effects:[A]=1/2(a-b-c+abc)[B]= 1/2(-a+b-c+abc)[C]= 1/2(-a-b+c+abc)
![Page 15: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
The two-factor interactions effects:[BC]=1/2(a-b-c+abc)[AC]= 1/2(-a+b-c+abc)[AB]= 1/2(-a-b+c+abc)
Thus, A = BC, B = AC, C = AB
![Page 16: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
So[A] A+BC [B] B+AC [C] C+AB
The alias structure can be found by using the defining relation I=ABC.
AI = A(ABC) = A2BC = BC
BI =B(ABC) = AC
CI = C(ABC) = AB
![Page 17: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
The contrast for estimating the main effect A is exactly the same as the contrast used for estimating the BC interaction.
In fact, when estimating A, we are estimating A+BC.
This phenomena is called aliasing and it occurs in all fractional designs.
Aliases can be found directly from the columns in the table of + and – signs.
![Page 18: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
This one-half fraction, with I=ABC, is usually called the principal fraction.
That is, we could choose the other half of the factorial design from Table.
This alternate, or complementary, one-half fraction (consisting the runs (1), ab, ac, and bc) must be chosen on purpose.
The defining relation of this design isI=-ABC
![Page 19: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
So[A]’ A-BC [B]’ B-AC [C]’ C-AB
The alias structure can be found by using the defining relation I=-ABC.
AI = A(-ABC) = A2BC = -BC
BI =B(-ABC) = -AC
CI = C(-ABC) = -AB
![Page 20: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Definitions and Basic Principles
In practice, it does not matter which fraction is actually used.
Both fractions belong to the same family. Two of them form a complete 23 design. The two groups of runs can be combined to
form a full factorial – an example of sequential experimentation
![Page 21: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Design Resolution
The 23-1 design is called a resolution III design.
In this design, main effects are aliased with two-factor interactions.
In general, a design is of resolution R if no p factor effect is aliased with another effect containing less than R-p factors.
For a 23-1 design, no one (p) factor effect is aliased with one (less than 3(R) – 1(p)) factor effect.
![Page 22: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Design Resolution
Resolution III designs – These are designs in which no main effects are aliased with any other main effect. But main effects are aliased with two-factor interactions and some two-factor interactions maybe aliased with each other.
The 23-1 design is a resolution III design. Noted as 132
III
![Page 23: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Design Resolution
Resolution IV designs – These are designs in which no main effects are aliased with any other main effect or with any two-factor interaction. But two-factor interaction are aliased with each other.
The 24-1 design with I=ABCD is a resolution IV design.
Noted as 142 IV
![Page 24: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Design Resolution
Resolution V designs – These are designs in which no main effects or two-factor interaction is aliased with any other main effect or with any two-factor interaction. But two-factor interaction are aliased with three-factor interaction.
The 25-1 design with I=ABCDE is a resolution V design.
Noted as 152 IV
![Page 25: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
Example: C I=C ABC=AB‧ ‧
132 III
![Page 26: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
The one-half fraction of the 2k design of the highest resolution may be constructed by writing down a basic design consisting of the runs for a full 2k-1 factorial and then adding the kth factor by identifying its plus and minus levels with the plus and minus signs of the highest order interaction ABC..(K-1).
![Page 27: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
Note: Any interaction effect could be used to generate the column for the kth factor.
However, use any effect other than ABC…(K-1) will not product a design of the highest possible resolution.
![Page 28: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
Any fractional factorial design of resolution R contains complete factorial designs (possibly replicated factorials) in any subset of R-1 factors. Important and useful !!!
Example, if an experiment has several factors of potential interest but believes that only R-1 of them have important effects, the a fractional factorial design of resolution R is the appropriate choice of design.
![Page 29: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Because the maximum possible resolution of a one-half fraction of the 2k design is R=k, every 2k-1 design will project into a full factorial in any (k-1) of the original k factors.
the 2k-1 design may be projected into two replicates of a full factorial in any subset of k-2 factors., four replicates of a full factorial in any subset of k-3 factors, and so on.
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
![Page 30: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (1--1/7)
Y=filtration rate Fours factors: A, B, C, and D. Use 24-1 with I=ABCD
![Page 31: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (1--2/7)
Fractional Factorial Design Factors: 4 Base Design: 4, 8 Resolution: IVRuns: 8 Replicates: 1 Fraction: 1/2Blocks: 1 Center pts (total): 0
Design Generators: D = ABC
Alias StructureI + ABCD A + BCD B + ACD C + ABD D + ABCAB + CD AC + BD AD + BC
STAT > DOE > Factorial > Create Factorial Design Number of factors 4 Design ½ fraction OK Factors Fill names for each factor
![Page 32: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (1--3/7)
![Page 33: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example(1--4/7)
![Page 34: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (1--5/7)
Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Filtration (coded units)
Term Effect CoefConstant 70.750Temperature 19.000 9.500Pressure 1.500 0.750Conc. 14.000 7.000Stir Rate 16.500 8.250Temperature*Pressure -1.000 -0.500Temperature*Conc. -18.500 -9.250Temperature*Stir Rate 19.000 9.500
After collecting data STAT > DOE > Factorial > Analyze Factorial Design Response Filtration OK
![Page 35: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (1--6/7)
Obviously, no effect is significant B is less important Try A, C, and D projection 23 with A, C, D
![Page 36: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (1--7/7)
Prediction equation:
Coded variable :
Factorial Fit: Filtration versus Temperature, Conc., Stir Rate
Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Filtration (coded units)
Term Effect Coef SE Coef T PConstant 70.750 0.7500 94.33 0.007Temperature 19.000 9.500 0.7500 12.67 0.050Conc. 14.000 7.000 0.7500 9.33 0.068Stir Rate 16.500 8.250 0.7500 11.00 0.058Temperature*Conc. -18.500 -9.250 0.7500 -12.33 0.052Temperature*Stir Rate 19.000 9.500 0.7500 12.67 0.050Conc.*Stir Rate -1.000 -0.500 0.7500 -0.67 0.626
S = 2.12132 PRESS = 288R-Sq = 99.85% R-Sq(pred) = 90.62% R-Sq(adj) = 98.97%
4131431 5.925.925.875.975.70 xxxxxxxy
}1,1{ ix
![Page 37: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2—1/8)
5 Factors 25-1 design Response: Yield
![Page 38: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--2/8)
![Page 39: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--3/8)
![Page 40: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--4/8)Factorial Fit: Yield versus Aperture, Exposure, Develop, Mask, Etch Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Yield (coded units)Term Effect CoefConstant 30.3125Aperture 11.1250 5.5625Exposure 33.8750 16.9375Develop 10.8750 5.4375Mask -0.8750 -0.4375Etch 0.6250 0.3125Aperture*Exposure 6.8750 3.4375Aperture*Develop 0.3750 0.1875Aperture*Mask 1.1250 0.5625Aperture*Etch 1.1250 0.5625Exposure*Develop 0.6250 0.3125Exposure*Mask -0.1250 -0.0625Exposure*Etch -0.1250 -0.0625Develop*Mask 0.8750 0.4375Develop*Etch 0.3750 0.1875Mask*Etch -1.3750 -0.6875
S = * PRESS = *Analysis of Variance for Yield (coded units)Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F PMain Effects 5 5562.8 5562.8 1112.56 * *2-Way Interactions 10 212.6 212.6 21.26 * *Residual Error 0 * * *Total 15 5775.4
![Page 41: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--5/8)
Reduced to A, B, C, AB
![Page 42: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--6/8)
Factorial Fit: Yield versus Aperture, Exposure, Develop Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Yield (coded units)Term Effect Coef SE Coef T PConstant 30.313 0.4002 75.74 0.000Aperture 11.125 5.562 0.4002 13.90 0.000Exposure 33.875 16.937 0.4002 42.32 0.000Develop 10.875 5.437 0.4002 13.59 0.000Aperture*Exposure 6.875 3.438 0.4002 8.59 0.000
S = 1.60078 PRESS = 59.6364R-Sq = 99.51% R-Sq(pred) = 98.97% R-Sq(adj) = 99.33%
Analysis of Variance for Yield (coded units)Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F PMain Effects 3 5558.19 5558.19 1852.73 723.02 0.0002-Way Interactions 1 189.06 189.06 189.06 73.78 0.000Residual Error 11 28.19 28.19 2.56 Lack of Fit 3 9.69 9.69 3.23 1.40 0.313 Pure Error 8 18.50 18.50 2.31Total 15 5775.44
![Page 43: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--7/8)
![Page 44: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (2--8/8)
Collapse into two replicate of a 23 design
![Page 45: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
Using fractional factorial designs often leads to greater economy and efficiency in experimentation. Particularly if the runs can be made sequentially.
For example, suppose that we are investigating k=4 factors (24=16 runs). It is almost always preferable to run 24-1
IV fractional design (four runs), analyze the results, and then decide on the best set of runs to perform next.
![Page 46: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
If it is necessary to resolve ambiguities, we can always run the alternate fraction and complete the 24 design.
When this method is used to complete the design, both one-half fractions represent blocks of the complete design with the highest order interaction (ABCD) confounded with blocks.
Sequential experimentation has the result of losing only the highest order interaction.
![Page 47: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Possible Strategies for
Follow-Up Experimentation
Following a Fractional
Factorial Design
![Page 48: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (3—1/4)
From Example 1, 24-1IV design
Use I=-ABCD STAT>DOE>Factorial>Create Factorial Design Create base design first 2-level factorial(specify generators) Number of factors 3 Design Full factorial Generators D=-ABC OK
![Page 49: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (3—2/4)
![Page 50: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (3—3/4)
![Page 51: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – example (3—4/4)
Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Filtration (coded units)Term Effect CoefConstant 69.375Temperature 24.250 12.125Pressure 4.750 2.375Conc. 5.750 2.875Stir Rate 12.750 6.375Temperature*Pressure 1.250 0.625Temperature*Conc. -17.750 -8.875Temperature*Stir Rate 14.250 7.125
S = * PRESS = *
Analysis of Variance for Filtration (coded units)Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F PMain Effects 4 1612 1612 403.1 * *2-Way Interactions 3 1039 1039 346.5 * *Residual Error 0 * * *Total 7 2652
![Page 52: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
The One-Half Fraction of the 2k Design – Construction and analysis of the one-half fraction
Adding the alternate fraction to the principal fraction may be thought of as a type of confirmation experiment that will allow us to strengthen our initial conclusions about the two-factor interaction effects.
A simple confirmation experiment is to compare the results from regression and actual runs.
![Page 53: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
For a moderately large number of factors, smaller fractions of the 2k design are frequently useful.
One-quarter fraction of the 2k design 2k-2 runs called 2k-2 fractional factorial
![Page 54: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
Constructed by writing down a basic design consisting of runs associated with a full factorial in k-2 factors and then associating the two additional columns with appropriately chosen interactions involving the first k-2 factors.
Thus, two generators are needed. I=P and I=Q are called generating relations for
the design.
![Page 55: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
The signs of P and Q determine which one of the one-quarter fractions is produced.
All four fractions associated with the choice of generators ±P or ±Q are members of the same family.
+P and +Q are principal fraction. I=P=Q=PQ P, Q, and PQ are defining relation words
![Page 56: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
Example: P=ABCE, Q=BCDF, PQ=ADEF Thus A=BCE=ABCDF=DEF When estimating A, one is really estimating
A+BCE+DEF+ABCDF
262 IV
![Page 57: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Complete defining relation: I = ABCE = BCDF = ADEF
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
![Page 58: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
![Page 59: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
Factor relations: E=ABC, F=BCD
I=ABCE=BCDF=ADEF
262 IV
![Page 60: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
STAT>DOE>Factorial>Create factorial Design
Design Full factorialOKOK
![Page 61: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
![Page 62: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
Alternate fractions of 26-2 design P=ABCE, -Q=-BCDF
-P=-ABCE, Q=BCDF-P=-ABCE, -Q=-BCDF
[A] A+BCE-DEF-ABCDF
![Page 63: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
A 26-2 design will project into a single replicate of a 24 design in any subset of fours factors that is not a word in the defining relation.
It also collapses to a replicated one-half fraction of a 24 in any subset of four factors that is a word in the defining relation.
![Page 64: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
Projection of the design into subsets of the original six variables
Any subset of the original six variables that is not a word in the complete defining relation will result in a full factorial design Consider ABCD (full factorial) Consider ABCE (replicated half fraction) Consider ABCF (full factorial)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
![Page 65: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design
In general, any 2k-2 fractional factorial design can be collapsed into either a full factorial or a fractional factorial in some subset of r k-2 ≦of the original factors.
Those subset of variables that form full factorials are not words in the complete defining relation.
![Page 66: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—1/10)
Injection molding process Response: Shrinkage Factors: Mold temp, screw speed, holding
time, cycle time, gate size, holding pressure. Each at two levels To run a 26-2 design, 16 runs
![Page 67: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—2/10)
![Page 68: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—3/10) Full model
![Page 69: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—4/10)
Factorial Fit: Shrinkage versus Temperature, Screw, ... Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Shrinkage (coded units)
Term Effect CoefConstant 27.313Temperature 13.875 6.937Screw 35.625 17.812Hold Time -0.875 -0.437Cycle Time 1.375 0.688Gate 0.375 0.187Pressure 0.375 0.187Temperature*Screw 11.875 5.938Temperature*Hold Time -1.625 -0.813Temperature*Cycle Time -5.375 -2.688Temperature*Gate -1.875 -0.937Temperature*Pressure 0.625 0.313Screw*Cycle Time -0.125 -0.062Screw*Pressure -0.125 -0.063Temperature*Screw*Cycle Time 0.125 0.062Temperature*Hold Time*Cycle Time -4.875 -2.437
![Page 70: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—5/10) Reduced model
![Page 71: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—6/10) Reduced model
Factorial Fit: Shrinkage versus Temperature, Screw Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Shrinkage (coded units)Term Effect Coef SE Coef T PConstant 27.313 1.138 24.00 0.000Temperature 13.875 6.937 1.138 6.09 0.000Screw 35.625 17.812 1.138 15.65 0.000Temperature*Screw 11.875 5.938 1.138 5.22 0.000
S = 4.55293 PRESS = 442.222R-Sq = 96.26% R-Sq(pred) = 93.36% R-Sq(adj) = 95.33%
Analysis of Variance for Shrinkage (coded units)Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F PMain Effects 2 5846.6 5846.6 2923.31 141.02 0.0002-Way Interactions 1 564.1 564.1 564.06 27.21 0.000Residual Error 12 248.7 248.7 20.73 Pure Error 12 248.8 248.8 20.73Total 15 6659.4
![Page 72: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—7/10)
Reduced model Normal plot
![Page 73: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—8/10)
Reduced model Residuals vs
Hold time Less scatter in
low hold time than it is high
![Page 74: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—9/10)
F*C is large
)()(ln 2
2*
iSiSFi
![Page 75: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
The One-Quarter Fraction of the 2k Design— example(4—10/10)
![Page 76: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – choose a design
2k-1 = one-half fraction, 2k-2 = one-quarter fraction, 2k-3 = one-eighth fraction, …, 2k-p = 1/ 2p fraction
Add p columns to the basic design; select p independent generators
The defining relation for the design consists of the p generators initially chosen and their 2p-p-1 generalized interactions.
![Page 77: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – choose a design
Important to select generators so as to maximize resolution
For example, the 26-2IV design, generators:
E=ABC, F=BCD, producing IV design. maximum resolution
If E=ABC, F=ABCD is chosen, I=ABCE=ABCDF=DEF, resolution III.
![Page 78: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – choose a design
Sometimes resolution alone is insufficient to distinguish between designs.
For 27-2IV design, all of the design are
resolution IV but with different alias structures.
Design A has more extensive two-factor aliasing and design C the least. Choose design C
![Page 79: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – choose a design
![Page 80: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – choose a design
The next table shows the suggested generators for better designs.
![Page 81: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – choose a design
![Page 82: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(5—1/4)
7 factors are interested. Two-factor interactions are to be explored. Resolution IV is assumed be appropriate. Two choices: 27-2
IV (32 runs) and 27-3IV (16
runs)
![Page 83: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(5—2/4)
27-3IV (16 runs)
Fractional Factorial Design Factors: 7 Base Design: 7, 32 Resolution: IVRuns: 32 Replicates: 1 Fraction: 1/4Blocks: 1 Center pts (total): 0
Design Generators: F = ABCD, G = ABDE
Alias StructureI + CEFG + ABCDF + ABDEG
A + BCDF + BDEG + ACEFG B + ACDF + ADEG + BCEFG C + EFG + ABDF + ABCDEGD + ABCF + ABEG + CDEFG E + CFG + ABDG + ABCDEF F + CEG + ABCD + ABDEFGG + CEF + ABDE + ABCDFG AB + CDF + DEG + ABCEFG AC + BDF + AEFG + BCDEGAD + BCF + BEG + ACDEFG AE + BDG + ACFG + BCDEF AF + BCD + ACEG + BDEFGAG + BDE + ACEF + BCDFG BC + ADF + BEFG + ACDEG BD + ACF + AEG + BCDEFGBE + ADG + BCFG + ACDEF BF + ACD + BCEG + ADEFG BG + ADE + BCEF + ACDFGCD + ABF + DEFG + ABCEG CE + FG + ABCDG + ABDEF CF + EG + ABD + ABCDEFGCG + EF + ABCDE + ABDFG DE + ABG + CDFG + ABCEF DF + ABC + CDEG + ABEFGDG + ABE + CDEF + ABCFG ACE + AFG + BCDG + BDEF ACG + AEF + BCDE + BDFGBCE + BFG + ACDG + ADEF BCG + BEF + ACDE + ADFG CDE + DFG + ABCG + ABEFCDG + DEF + ABCE + ABFG
![Page 84: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(5—3/4)
27-3IV (16 runs)
Fractional Factorial Design Factors: 7 Base Design: 7, 16 Resolution: IVRuns: 16 Replicates: 1 Fraction: 1/8Blocks: 1 Center pts (total): 0
Design Generators: E = ABC, F = BCD, G = ACD
Alias StructureI + ABCE + ABFG + ACDG + ADEF + BCDF + BDEG + CEFG
A + BCE + BFG + CDG + DEF + ABCDF + ABDEG + ACEFG B + ACE + AFG + CDF + DEG + ABCDG + ABDEF + BCEFGC + ABE + ADG + BDF + EFG + ABCFG + ACDEF + BCDEG D + ACG + AEF + BCF + BEG + ABCDE + ABDFG + CDEFGE + ABC + ADF + BDG + CFG + ABEFG + ACDEG + BCDEF F + ABG + ADE + BCD + CEG + ABCEF + ACDFG + BDEFGG + ABF + ACD + BDE + CEF + ABCEG + ADEFG + BCDFG AB + CE + FG + ACDF + ADEG + BCDG + BDEF + ABCEFGAC + BE + DG + ABDF + AEFG + BCFG + CDEF + ABCDEG AD + CG + EF + ABCF + ABEG + BCDE + BDFG + ACDEFGAE + BC + DF + ABDG + ACFG + BEFG + CDEG + ABCDEF AF + BG + DE + ABCD + ACEG + BCEF + CDFG + ABDEFGAG + BF + CD + ABDE + ACEF + BCEG + DEFG + ABCDFG BD + CF + EG + ABCG + ABEF + ACDE + ADFG + BCDEFGABD + ACF + AEG + BCG + BEF + CDE + DFG + ABCDEFG
![Page 85: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(5—4/4)
Choose better design among costs, information and resolution.
Appendix X provides a good reference for choosing “better” design
Do not choose a design according to one single criterion unless is “order” by your boss.
![Page 86: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Analysis
Use computer soft wares.
Projection – a design of resolution R contains full factorials in any R – 1 of the factors
27-3IV design
![Page 87: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Analysis
It will project into a full factorial in any four of the original seven factors that is not a word in the defining relation
C(7, 5)=35 subsets of four factors. 7 of them (ABCE, BCDF, ACDG, ADEF, BDEG, ABFG, and CEFG) appeared in defining relations.
The rest of 28 four-factor subset would form 24 designs.
![Page 88: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Analysis
Obviously, A, B, C, D are one of them. Consider the following situation: If the 4 of 7 factors are more important than
the rest of 3 factors, we would assign the more important four factors to A, B, C, D and the less important 3 factors to E, F, and G.
![Page 89: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Blocking
Sometimes the runs needed in fraction factorial can not be made under homogeneous conditions.
We confound the fractional factorial with blocks.
Appendix X contain recommended blocking arrangements for fractional factorial designs.
![Page 90: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Blocking
For example, 26-2IV
According to the suggestion in Appendix X(f), ABD and its aliases to be confounded with block.
STAT>DOE>Create Factorial Design
![Page 91: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Blocking
Design Full factorial Generators:
OK
![Page 92: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Blocking
![Page 93: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design – Blocking
bc
![Page 94: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
5 axes CNC machine Response=profile deviation 8 factors are interested. Four spindles are treated as blocks Assumed tree factor and higher interactions
are negligible From Appendix X, 28-4
IV (16 runs)and 28-3IV
(32 runs) are feasible.
![Page 95: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
However, if 28-4IV (16 runs) is used, two-factor
effects will confound with blocks If EH interaction is unlikely, 28-3
IV (32 runs) is chosen.
STAT>DOE>Create Factorial Design Choose 2 level factorial (default generators) Number of factors 8, number of blocks 4 OK
![Page 96: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
Fractional Factorial Design
Factors: 8 Base Design: 8, 32 Resolution with blocks: IIIRuns: 32 Replicates: 1 Fraction: 1/8Blocks: 4 Center pts (total): 0
* NOTE * Blocks are confounded with two-way interactions.
Design Generators: F = ABC, G = ABD, H = BCDE
Block Generators: EH, ABE
![Page 97: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
![Page 98: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
![Page 99: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
Analyze Design A*D + B*G + E*F*H
Inseparable If prior knowledge
implies that AD is possible, one can use reduced model
![Page 100: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
Reduced model: A, B, D, and AD
![Page 101: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
Reduced model: A, B, D, and ADFactorial Fit: ln(std_dev) versus Block, A, B, D Estimated Effects and Coefficients for ln(std_dev) (coded units)Term Effect Coef SE Coef T PConstant 1.2801 0.02310 55.41 0.000Block 1 -0.0053 0.04001 -0.13 0.896Block 2 -0.0280 0.04001 -0.70 0.491Block 3 0.0406 0.04001 1.02 0.320A 0.2903 0.1451 0.02310 6.28 0.000B -0.2005 -0.1003 0.02310 -4.34 0.000D 0.1081 0.0541 0.02310 2.34 0.028A*D -0.3741 -0.1871 0.02310 -8.10 0.000
S = 0.130680 PRESS = 0.728635R-Sq = 84.47% R-Sq(pred) = 72.39% R-Sq(adj) = 79.94%
Analysis of Variance for ln(std_dev) (coded units)
Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F PBlocks 3 0.02014 0.02014 0.00671 0.39 0.759Main Effects 3 1.08929 1.08929 0.36310 21.26 0.0002-Way Interactions 1 1.11970 1.11970 1.11970 65.57 0.000Residual Error 24 0.40986 0.40986 0.01708Total 31 2.63899
![Page 102: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)
Reduced model: A, B, D, and AD Estimated equation
41421 1871.00541.01003.01451.0 xxxxxy
![Page 103: Design and Analysis of Experiments](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051317/568164c6550346895dd6dcf9/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
The General 2k-p Fractional Factorial Design— example(6—1/4)