design evaluation methods - me 2110: creative decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · first level...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Design Evaluation Methods
Chr i stopher Sa ldana , Ph .D.W o o d r u f f S c h o o l o f M e c h a n i c a l E n g i n e e r i n gG e o r g i a I n s t i t u t e o f Te c h n o l o g yA t l a n t a , G e o r g i a U S A
![Page 2: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Understand the importance of evaluation in the design process
Identify criteria for evaluation
Utilize three levels of evaluation matrices for product development through concept screening and scoring
Strategies for Visual/Descriptive Communication of Designs
Learning Objectives
![Page 3: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Design Tools – Current Progress
House of Quality Specification Sheet Function Tree
Morphological ChartConcept Generation
Place Masson Target
Moveto
Target
Navigateto
Target
Brake onTarget
GeneratePower
TransmitPower
HitTarget
Generate Power
Transmit Power
Brake on Target
Move to Target
Navigate to Target
Gravity Mouse Traps
Car Hit by Trap Rip Cord Effect Ramp Catapult
Friction String Break Anchor Rubber Stopper Weighted Skid
Equal Size Wheels Larger Front Wheels
Rolling Sliding Projectile Launch
Problem Understanding
Design Alternatives
3
![Page 4: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Customer Wants1. Dose metering accuracy2. Portability3. Durability4. Ease of handling5. Readability of settings6. Ease of use7. Ease of manufacture
Example: Insulin PenRedesigning the Insulin Pen
4
![Page 5: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Example: Insulin PenRedesigning the Insulin Pen
5
![Page 6: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Example: Insulin PenRedesigning the Insulin Pen
6
![Page 7: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Benefits• Customer-focused product, competitive design• Better product-process coordination, faster product introduction• Effective group decision-making• Documentation of design process
Challenge• Need to make informed decisions despite lack of information• Selection requires estimation, analysis, prototyping• Identify bad concepts versus picking optimal ones
Structured Evaluation
![Page 8: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
How do we evaluate each of these designs?
What criteria do we use for evaluation?
What is the best design?
Structured Evaluation
![Page 9: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Multi-voting: team members vote independently, work together to resolve differences and/or average results
Strengths/Weaknesses: list strengths and weaknesses of design concepts, use this to evaluate based on specific opinions
Prototype and Test: build or simulate, use empirical or simulated test data!
Concept Selection Strategies
![Page 10: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Concept Selection Process
![Page 11: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Concept screening
• First-level evaluation matrix
Concept scoring
• Second-level evaluation matrix
• Third-level evaluation matrix
Stages and Types of Concept Selection
![Page 12: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
1. Identify the criteria for comparison. 2. Select the alternatives to be compared.
• Alternatives are developed during concept generation. • All concepts should be compared at e same level of abstraction.
3. Generate scores. • Use a design concept as datum, with all the other being compared to it • Evaluate each alternative as better (+), same (S), or worse (-) relative to datum.
4. Compute the total score • Sum the total number of (+)’s, (-)’s, (S)’s • Compute overall score with +1 for (+)’s, -1 for (-)’s, 0 for (S)’s
5. Note: other variations on scoring in the first-level evaluation• Optional scale: +3 if extremely better than datum +2, +1, 0, -1, -2, -3
First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix)
![Page 13: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
+ = better than datum; - = worse than datum; S = same as datum
First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix)
![Page 14: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
First Level Evaluation Matrix (example)
+ = better than datum; - = worse than datum; S = same as datum
![Page 15: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
• Ranking depends on choice of datum
• Does not factor in how much better a specific alternative is compared to others
• Some criteria may be more important
• Consider: (i) no datum, (ii) numerical rating, (iii) criteria weighting• Second-level evaluation matrix – (i), (ii)
• Third-level evaluation matrix – (i), (ii) and (iii)
First-Level Evaluation Matrix
![Page 16: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Second Level Evaluation Matrix Common Scale:4 = very good (ideal)3 = good2 = adequate1 = just tolerable0 = unsatisfactory
Alternate Scale:10 = ideal solution9 = solution exceeds requirement8 = very good solution7 = good solution6 = good solution with drawbacks5 = satisfactory solution4 = adequate solution3 = tolerable solution2 = weak solution1 = very inadequate solution0 = useless solution
![Page 17: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Second Level Evaluation Matrix
![Page 18: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Third Level Evaluation Matrix
![Page 19: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Third Level Evaluation Matrix
![Page 20: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Summary - Evaluation MatrixElements• Designs rated relative to customer
requirements in HOQ
• Level 1: sum +/-/S relative to datum
• Level 2: numerical rating
• Level 3: weighted sum of num. rating
Describing this figure in text• Which design performed best? Why?
• Which performed worst? Why?
• Use numerical information from figure
![Page 21: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
• Not doing it • Running with the first idea • Forgetting the customer • Evaluation matrix doesn't correspond to HOQ • Letting an "experienced" designer make the choices • Going by gut feel • Letting a manager decide • Not buying into the process as a team • Ignoring cost
Concept Selection Pitfalls
![Page 22: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Design Tools – Complete Process
House of Quality Specification Sheet Function Tree
Morphological Chart Evaluation MatricesConcept Generation Concept Selection
Place Masson Target
Moveto
Target
Navigateto
Target
Brake onTarget
GeneratePower
TransmitPower
HitTarget
Generate Power
Transmit Power
Brake on Target
Move to Target
Navigate to Target
Gravity Mouse Traps
Car Hit by Trap Rip Cord Effect Ramp Catapult
Friction String Break Anchor Rubber Stopper Weighted Skid
Equal Size Wheels Larger Front Wheels
Rolling Sliding Projectile Launch
Problem Understanding
Design Alts. Final Design
![Page 23: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Detailed Design - Communication23
General organization• Primary systems and subsystems
• Mechanisms, operation/sequencing, construction and materials
• Performance relative to specificationsClarity in written descriptions• Be clear in describing design features. Match
words in the body to label text in figures.• Avoid describing things that are not shown with
evidence or detail. Don’t rely on the reader’s imagination.
223
![Page 24: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Detailed Design - CAD24
Important CAD elements:
Labels match text explanations
Mechatronics (see ME2110 website)
Common COTS components (fasteners, etc.)
Detail views
Dimensions
Formatting (text, resolution, annotations)
24
![Page 25: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Understand the importance of evaluation in the design process
Identify criteria for evaluation
Utilize three levels of evaluation matrices for product development (First-level, Second-level, Third-level)
Strategies for Visual/Descriptive Communication of Designs
Evaluation Tools Summary
![Page 26: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Introductory Project Report
Goal: design a delivery system capable of launching an object onto a target that can be placed between 20-25’ from a specified position. The object of interest is a plastic sphere 1.5” in diameter and 0.095 oz. in weight.
Design tools: HOQ, specification sheet, function tree, morphological chart, alternative generation, concept selection
Detailed design: labels, triggering, mechanisms, sequencing, materials
Constrained design (materials, ...)
![Page 27: Design Evaluation Methods - ME 2110: Creative Decisions and … · 2019. 9. 3. · First Level Evaluation (Pugh Matrix) 14 First Level Evaluation Matrix (example) + = better than](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071215/6045c4d81d783659131309a3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
• Cover Page: See book for example cover page. • Abstract: One-paragraph summary with key findings/results. • Introduction: Restatement of the problem, goal and inherent design challenges in
achieving this goal. • Problem Understanding: Important customer needs, engineering specifications to
address needs, tradeoffs and synergies, functions and concept generation. • Design Overview: Presentation of the preferred alternative, detailed description of
the design including quality figures that shows its parts and how it operates.• Alternative Designs: Presentation of non-selected alternatives and brief description
of how they operate. Discussion of quantitative concept selection results.• Conclusions: Summary with key results and potential next steps and final thoughts.• Appendix: Figures and tables.
Introductory Project Report - Layout