design, integration and testing small satellites

25
Design, Integration and Testing Small Satellites Muhammad Rizwan Mughal Institute of Space Technology Islamabad, Pakistan Summer School Thailand 1 1 November 2016

Upload: others

Post on 19-Mar-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Design, Integration and Testing

Small Satellites

Muhammad Rizwan Mughal

Institute of Space Technology

Islamabad, Pakistan

Summer School Thailand 1 1 November 2016

Outline

Small Satellite Classification

AraMiS architecture:

Concept of Tiles and Modules

Smart Harness:

Module Life cycle

Spacecraft configurations

Conclusion

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 2

3

Typical Classification of Small Satellites

Mass (kg) Altitude (km)

Orb period

Project

lifetime

Total

Cost

(M$)

Cost/Mass

(k$/kg)

Mini 100 - 500 1000 – 5000

(2 – 3 hrs) 4 - 7 yrs 10-150 200

Micro 10 – 100 500 – 2000 (1.6 - 2 hrs)

2 - 5 yrs 1-30 400

Nano 1 - 10 300 – 800

(1.4 – 1.7 hrs) 2 - 3 yrs 0.1-10 800

Pico 0.1 – 1 200 - 400

(1.4 – 1.5 hrs) 1 - 2 yrs 0.05-2 1600

Femto < 100 g 200 – 400

(1.4 – 1.5 hrs) 1 yrs < 0.05 3200

1 – Indicative values

1 1

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand

CubeSat Standard

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 4

ARAMIS Approach

ARAMIS (Modular Architecture for Satellites) is an innovative modular architecture for flexible and more demanding satellite configurations.

Panel bodies or tiles

Different size and technology

Power and data standardized interfaces

Modularity

Mechanical, electronic and testing level

Low cost

Design, qualification and test cost shared among multiple modules

The size of the satellite varies based on payload demands

Summer School Thailand 5 1 November 2016

Hardware Architecture of Tile (1)

Single-size Al: 16.5x16.5 cm2 tile, a 1.6mm thick monolithic Aluminum structure, for cheaper and smaller configurations

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 6

Hardware Architecture of Tile (2)

CubeSat standard: (8.25 x 9.8cm2 ) tile,

with all electronic components integrated

and compatible with CubeSat dimensions.

All structure on PCB only

All the subsystems integrated on each tile

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 7

Hardware Architecture of Tile (2)

Boost

Converter

Tile

Processor Module

Magnetometer

Gyroscope Bidirectional

Load Switch

5 pins I2C

Connector

J-Tag

3.3V Switching Regulator 5V Switching Regulator

3V Linear Regulator

3.3V Linear Regulator

Temperature

Sensor Current Sensor

Calibration

Memory

Magnetorquer Driver

15 pins analog

connector

4 pins power

connector

15 pins digital

connector

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 8

Hardware Architecture of Tile (3)

Honeycomb Structure: 16.5x33 cm2 tile,

with 10mm thick honeycomb structure

for more rigid and larger structures

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 9

MOCKUP

Smart Harness: Block Diagram

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 10

TILE PROCESSOR

Physical

Connector

Logical

Connector

Quadruple Module Double Module Single Module

Magnetometer Bus InterfaceRF Communication

Module

Module

BatteriesAOCSMagnetic Torque

Actuator

Buck/Boost

Convertor

Digital Solar

Panel

Internal

Subsystem1

Internal

Subsystem n

POWER & REF

14V,3.3V,5V,

REF

POWER DISTRIBUTION BUS

3.3V

Optional

Subsystem

A B C D E F

G

H

n

G H

F

11/19

AraMiS “AraModules” and “Tiles”

An AraModule is a small P&P subsystem

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand

12/19

AraMiS “AraModules” and “Tiles”

Inside an AraModule.

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand

AraModule: Electrical Interface

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 13

AraMiS P&P – Step 1 a) select processor from a library

b) add to “virtual board”

BOARD

PROC

AraModules

Summer School Thailand

AraMiS P&P – Step 2 a) select power supply from a library

b) add to “virtual board”

BOARD

PROC

PS

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand

AraMiS P&P – Step 3 a) select AOCS sensors and actuators…

b) add to “virtual board”

BOARD

PROC

PS

S&A

Summer School Thailand

AraMiS P&P – Step 4 select and add: a) RF module(s) b) antenna(s) c) Other sensors d) On-board

modules e) Payload support f) Any other…

BOARD

PROC

PS

S&A

RF ANT

MOD1 MOD2

Summer School Thailand

AraMiS P&P – Step 5 (proto) a) take corresponding proto modules

b) assemble to proto system

Motherboard

Module

PEM Spacer Connector

Single Module

Double Module QuadrupleModule

PROTO BOARD

Summer School Thailand

Smart Harness: Spacecraft Configurations

Design the new subsystems either on single, double or quadruple module configuration.

Test the subsystems on ground using development board.

Integrate each physical module in a physical module based satellite configuration.

Embed the logical modules in the main tile for a Satellite on demand configuration.

The Satellite on demand configuration can be altered very easily for Reusable design configuration

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 19

Physical Module Based Configuration

Develop standard tiles hosting multiple connectors

Physical daughter boards connected to the tile via

pluggable connectors

The subsystem module only plugged if mission needs it.

High level of design flexibility, testability and

upgradability

Testing of modules, tiles and whole satellite is needed

For teaching/research purposes

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 20

Satellite on demand Configuration

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 21

Already tested modules integrated inside the PCB.

Reusability of physical subsystem modules

Permanent configuration

Testing of modules: not required

Testing of tiles and mission is required only

CubeSat standard tile built

using this approach

Satellite on demand Configuration - Aramis C1

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 22

Reusable design configuration

Optimised spacecraft configuration based on mission

requirements

Reuse of the satellite on demand configuration

Minor addition or removal of subsystems on customer

demands

Follows the Cheaper-Faster-Better philosophy

Module and tile testing: not required

Only mission testing is needed for this configuration

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 23

Conclusion

The design technique achieves simple-

faster-better design philosophy

The modularity, flexibility and testability

has been achieved at mechanical,

electrical, protocol and testing level.

Multiple spacecraft configurations

possible with very short development

times.

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 24

1 November 2016 Summer School Thailand 25

Thank You !!!