design of engineering experiments – the blocking principle
TRANSCRIPT
Design of Engineering Experiments
– The Blocking Principle
• Text Reference, Chapter 4
• Blocking and nuisance factors
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
1
• The randomized complete block design or the RCBD
• Extension of the ANOVA to the RCBD
• Other blocking scenarios…Latin square designs
The Blocking Principle• Blocking is a technique for dealing with nuisance factors
• A nuisance factor is a factor that probably has some effect on the response, but it’s of no interest to the experimenter…however, the variability it transmits to the response needs to be minimized
• Typical nuisance factors include batches of raw material, operators,
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
2
• Typical nuisance factors include batches of raw material, operators, pieces of test equipment, time (shifts, days, etc.), different experimental units
• Many industrial experiments involve blocking (or should)
• Failure to block is a common flaw in designing an experiment (consequences?)
The Blocking Principle
• If the nuisance variable is known and controllable, we use blocking
• If the nuisance factor is known and uncontrollable, sometimes we can use the analysis of covariance (see Chapter 15) to remove the effect of the nuisance factor from the analysis
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
3
• If the nuisance factor is unknown and uncontrollable (a “lurking” variable), we hope that randomization balances out its impact across the experiment
• Sometimes several sources of variability are combined in a block, so the block becomes an aggregate variable
The Hardness Testing Example
• Text reference, pg 139, 140
• We wish to determine whether 4 different tips produce different (mean) hardness reading on a Rockwell hardness tester
• Gauge & measurement systems capability studies are frequent areas for applying DOX
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
4
• Assignment of the tips to an experimental unit; that is, a test coupon
• Structure of a completely randomized experiment
• The test coupons are a source of nuisance variability
• Alternatively, the experimenter may want to test the tips across coupons of various hardness levels
• The need for blocking
The Hardness Testing Example
• To conduct this experiment as a RCBD, assign all 4 tips to each coupon– Complete: each block contains all treatments
• Each coupon is called a “block”; that is, it’s a more homogenous experimental unit on which to test the tips
• Variability between blocks can be large, variability within a block should be
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
5
• Variability between blocks can be large, variability within a block should be relatively small
• In general, a block is a specific level of the nuisance factor
• A complete replicate of the basic experiment is conducted in each block
• A block represents a restriction on randomization
• All runs within a block are randomized
The Hardness Testing Example
• Suppose that we use b = 4 blocks:
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
6
• Notice the two-way structure of the experiment
• Once again, we are interested in testing the equality of treatment means, but now we have to remove the variability associated with the nuisance factor (the blocks)
Extension of the ANOVA to the RCBD
• Suppose that there are a treatments (factor levels)
and b blocks
• A statistical model (effects model) for the RCBD
is 1,2,...,i a
y µ τ β ε=
= + + +
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
7
• The relevant (fixed effects) hypotheses are
1,2,...,
1, 2,...,ij i j ij
i ay
j bµ τ β ε
== + + +
=
0 1 2 1: where (1/ ) ( )
b
a i i j ijH bµ µ µ µ µ τ β µ τ
== = = = + + = +∑L
Extension of the ANOVA to the RCBD
ANOVA partitioning of total variability:
2
.. . .. . ..
1 1 1 1
2
. . ..
( ) [( ) ( )
( )]
a b a b
ij i j
i j i j
ij i j
y y y y y y
y y y y
= = = =
− = − + −
+ − − +
∑∑ ∑∑
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
8
. . ..
2 2
. .. . ..
1 1
2
. . ..
1 1
( ) ( )
( )
ij i j
a b
i j
i j
a b
ij i j
i j
T Treatments Blocks E
b y y a y y
y y y y
SS SS SS SS
= =
= =
= − + −
+ − − +
= + +
∑ ∑
∑∑
The degrees of freedom for the sums of squares in
are as follows:
T Treatments Blocks ESS SS SS SS= + +
Extension of the ANOVA to the RCBD
1 1 1 ( 1)( 1)ab a b a b− = − + − + − −
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
9
Therefore, ratios of sums of squares to their degrees of freedom result in mean squares and the ratio of the mean square for treatments to the error mean square is an Fstatistic that can be used to test the hypothesis of equal treatment means
1 1 1 ( 1)( 1)ab a b a b− = − + − + − −
ANOVA Display for the RCBD
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
10
Manual computing (ugh!)…see Equations (4-9) – (4-12),
page 144
Use software to analyze the RCBD (Design-Expert, JMP)
Manual computing:
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
11
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
12
Vascular Graft Example (pg. 145)
• To conduct this experiment as a RCBD, assign all 4 pressures to each of the 6 batches of resin
• Each batch of resin is called a “block”; that is, it’s a more homogenous experimental unit on which to test the extrusion pressures
• The order in which the extrusion pressures are tested within each block is random.
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
13
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
14
Vascular Graft Example Design-Expert Output
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
15
Residual Analysis for the
Vascular Graft Example
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
16
Residual Analysis for the
Vascular Graft Example
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
17
Residual Analysis for the
Vascular Graft Example
• Basic residual plots indicate that normality,
constant variance assumptions are satisfied
• No obvious problems with randomization
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
18
• No patterns in the residuals vs. block
• Can also plot residuals versus the pressure
(residuals by factor)
• These plots provide more information about the
constant variance assumption, possible outliers
Multiple Comparisons for the Vascular Graft Example –
Which Pressure is Different?
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
19
Use LSD with:
-Replace (n) with (b)
-Replace error dof with (a-1)(b-1)
Other Aspects of the RCBD
See Text, Section 4.1.3, pg. 132
• The RCBD utilizes an additive model – no interaction between treatments and blocks
• Treatments and/or blocks as random effects
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
20
• Missing values
• What are the consequences of not blocking if we should have?
• Sample sizing in the RCBD? The OC curve approach can be used to determine the number of blocks to run..see page 153
Random Blocks and/or Treatments
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
21
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
22
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
23
The Latin Square Design• Text reference, Section 4.2, pg. 158
• These designs are used to simultaneously control (or eliminate) two sources of nuisance variability
• A significant assumption is that the three factors (treatments, nuisance
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
24
• A significant assumption is that the three factors (treatments, nuisance factors) do not interact
• If this assumption is violated, the Latin square design will not produce valid results
• Latin squares are not used as much as the RCBD in industrial experimentation
The Rocket Propellant Problem –
A Latin Square Design
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
25
• This is a
• Page 159 shows some other Latin squares
• Table 4-13 (page 162) contains properties of Latin squares
• Statistical analysis?
5 5 Latin square design×
Statistical Analysis of the
Latin Square Design
• The statistical (effects) model is
1,2,...,
1, 2,...,
1, 2,...,
ijk i j k ijk
i p
y j p
k p
µ α τ β ε
=
= + + + + = =
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
26
• The statistical analysis (ANOVA) is much like the analysis for the RCBD.
• See the ANOVA table, page 160 (Table 4.10)
• The analysis for the rocket propellant example follows
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
27
Example
• suppose that an experimenter is studying the effects of five
different formulations of a rocket propellant used in
aircrew escape systems on the observed burning rate. Each
formulation is mixed from a batch of raw material that is
only large enough for five formulations to be tested.only large enough for five formulations to be tested.
Furthermore, the formulations are prepared by several
operators, and there may be substantial differences in the
skills and experience of the operators.
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
28
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
29
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
30
Other Topics
• Missing values in blocked designs
– RCBD
– Latin square
Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
31
• Replication of Latin Squares
• Crossover designs
• Graeco-Latin Squares
• Incomplete block designs
Project Proposal
• Due: Monday, October 26 2015
• Select a process of your interest and state
the followingthe following
– The objective of your study
– Brief description of the process
– Factors to be considered
– Place to run the experiments.
• Two page document is sufficient. Chapter 4 Design & Analysis of Experiments
8E 2012 Montgomery
32