design of tall buildings
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
1/55
EAS 454 - Tall Building 4
Rigid-Frame Structures
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Taksiah A. Majid
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
2/55
- Comprises parallel or orthogonally arranged bents consisting
o co umns an g r ers w momen res s an o n s.
The advantages of rigid frame are simplicity and convenienceof its rectan ular form. Its unobstructed arran ement, clear
of bracing members and structural walls, allows freedom
internally for the layout and externally for the fenestration.g rames are cons ere econom ca or u ngs o up
to about 25 stories, above which their drift resistance iscostly to control.
If it is combined with shear wall or cores, the structurespotential height may extend up to 50 stories or more.
slabs replacing the girders.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
3/55
Ri id-Frame Structures As highly redundant structures, rigid frames are designed initially
on the basis of approximate analyses, after which more rigorousana yses an c ec s can e ma e. e proce ure may yp ca y
include the following stages:
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
4/55
Rigid-Frame Behavior The horizontal stiffness of a rigid frame is governed mainly
by the bending resistance of the girders, the columns,connec ons an e ax a r g y o e co umns.
The accumulated horizontal shear above any story of a rigidframe is resisted b shear in the columns of the stor .
The shear cause the story-height columns to bend in double
curvature with point of contra-flexure at approximately mid-- .
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
5/55
Rigid-Frame Behavior The overall deflected shape of the rigid frame structure dueto racking has a shear configuration with concavity upwind, a
,
inclination at the top.
The overall moment of the external horizontal load is
resisted in each story level by the couple resulting from the
axial tensile and compressive forces in the columns onopposite si e o t e structure.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
6/55
- Because of the accumulative rotation up the height, the story drift
ue to overa en ing increases wit eig t, w i e t at ue to
racking tends to decrease.
The res onse of a ri id frame to ravit loadin differ from a
simply connected frame in the continuous behavior of the girders.
Negative moments are induced adjacent to the columns andpositive moments of usually lesser magnitude occur in the mid-
span regions.
The continuit also causes the maximum irder moments to be
sensitive to the pattern of live loading. This must be considered
when estimating the worst moment conditions.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
7/55
- For example, the gravity load maximum hogging moment adjacent
span and alternate other spans, as for A in the Fig. 7.3a. The maximum hogging moments adjacent to an interior column
to the column, as for B in Fig. 7.3b.
The maximum mid-span sagging moment occurs when live loadacts on the s an under consideration and alternate other s ans asfor spans AB and CD in Fig. 7.3a.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
8/55
- The dependence of a rigid frame on the moment capacity of
the columns for resisting horizontal loading usually causes
the columns of a rigid frame to be larger than those of the
.
On the other hand, while girders in braced frames are
desi ned for their mid-s an sa in moment, irders in ri idframes are designed for the end-of-span resultant hogging
moments, which may be of lesser value.
Consequent y, gir ers in a rigi rame may e sma er t an inthe corresponding braced frame.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
9/55
- Such reductions in size allow economy through the lower
cost of the girders and possible reductions in story height.
These benefits may be offset, however, by the higher cost of
.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
10/55
Approximate Determinate of Member
orce ause y rav y oa n
accurate analysis can be made only after the member sizes areassigned.
ere ore, mem er sizes are eci e on t e asis oapproximate forces estimated either by conservative formulas
of b sim lified methods of anal sis that are inde endent ofmember properties.
Three approaches for estimating girder forces due to gravity
1. Girder Forces Code RecommendedValues
2. Two C cle Moment Distribution
3. Column Forces
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
11/55
.
In rigid frames with two or more spans in which the longer
of any two adjacent spans does not exceed the shorter by
more than 20% and where the uniformly distributed design
,
girder moment and shear may be estimated fromTable 7.1.
This summarizes the recommendations iven in the UniformBuilding Code.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
12/55
1.Girder Forces Code Recommended Values
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
13/55
. It is for estimating girder moment in a continuous multi-bay
span an more accura e an e ormu as n a e .
especially for cases of unequal spans and unequal loading indifferent spans.
Assumption for the analysis:
1. A counterclockwise restraining moment on the end of ag r er s pos ve an a c oc w se momen s nega ve.
2. The ends of the columns at the floors above and below theconsidered irder are fixed.
3. In the absence of known member sizes, distribution factorsat each joint are taken equal to 1/n, where n is the
.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
14/55
wo yc e oment str ut on - or e examp e
A four-span girder AE from a rigid-frame bent is shown with its
loading.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
15/55
-
The fixed-end moments in each span are calculated for dead
oa ing an tota oa ing using t e ormu as given in ig. . .
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
16/55
TwoCycle Moment Distribution - Worked example Example calculation of fixed-end moment for span AB.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
17/55
-
The moments for all spans are summarized as follows:
DE
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
18/55
-
The purpose of the moment distribution is to estimate for
each support the maximum girder moments that can occur as
a result of dead loading and pattern live loading.
maximum moment at each support, and a distribution made
for each combination.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
19/55
TwoCycle Moment Distribution - Worked example
The moment distribution of each support are presented
separately as follows:
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
20/55
TwoCycle Moment Distribution - Worked example
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
21/55
wo yc e omen s r u on - or e examp e
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
22/55
-
The complete set of operations can be combined as below:
1
4
6
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
23/55
TwoCycle Moment Distribution - Worked example
Maximum Mid-Span Moments
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
24/55
-
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
25/55
. The gravity load axial force in a column is estimated from the
accumu a e r u ary ea an ve oor oa ng a ove a
level, with reductions in live loading as permitted by thelocal Code of Practice.
The gravity load maximum column moment is estimated bytaking the maximum difference of the end moments in the
column ends just above and below the joint.
To this should be added any unbalanced moment due to
eccentricity of the girder connections from the centroid ofthe column, also allocated equally between the column endsabove and below the oint.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
26/55
Approximate Analysis of Member
orces ause y or zon a oa n
.
First step is to estimate the allocation of the externalhorizontal force to each bent.
It is usual to assume that the floor slabs are rigid in plane and
therefore, constrain the horizontal displacements of all the
translations and rotation of the floor slab.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
27/55
Approximate Analysis of Member
orces ause y or zon a oa n Symmetric Plan Structure Subjected to Symmetric Loading
The structure translate but does not twist.
From the assumption of slab rigidity, the bents translate
.
The total external shear at a level will be distributed between
the bents in proportion to their shear rigidities (GA) at thatlevel.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
28/55
Approximate Analysis of Member
orces ause y or zon a oa n Asymmetric Plan Structures
The effect of lateral loading on a structure having an
asymmetric plan is to cause a horizontal plane torque in
additional to transverse shear. Therefore the structure will
twist as well as translate.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
29/55
Approximate Analysis of Member
Referring to the asymmetric structure, and defining the
ocation o t e center o t e s ear rigi ity o t e set o para e
bents in story i, relative to an arbitrary origin 0, as given by
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
30/55
Approximate Analysis of Member
orces ause y or zon a oa n
2. Member Force Anal sis b Portal Method
The portal method allows an approximate hand analysis forrigid frames without having to specify member size and
very useful for a preliminary analysis.
Most appropriate to rigid frames that deflectpre om nan y y rac ng.
Suitable for structures of moderate slenderness and height,
up to 25 stories in height with a height-to-width ratio not
greater than 4:1.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
31/55
Its name is derived from the analogy between a set of single-ay por a rames an a s ng e s ory o a mu - ay r g
frame. When each of the se arate ortals carries a share of the
horizontal shear, tension occurs in the windward columnsand compression in the leeward columns.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
32/55
If these are superposed to simulate the multi-bay frame, theax a orces o e n er or co umns are e m na e , eav ng an
axial forces only in the extreme windward and leewardcolumns.
The reduction of the highly redundant multistory frame toallow a simple analysis is achieved by making the following
1. Horizontal loading on the frame causes double curvaturebending of all the columns and girders, with points of
contraflexural at the mid-height of columns and mid-spanof girders.
-.the columns in proportion to the width of aisle each
column supports.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
33/55
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
34/55
Procedures are as follows:
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
35/55
Member Force Analysis by Portal Method
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
36/55
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
37/55
em er orce na ys s y or a e o The bending moment are recorded on the girders above the
left-hand end and below the right-hand end, and similarly on
the columns as viewed from the right.
beams at the mid-heights and mid-spans, respectively.
The bendin moment dia ram is drawn here on the tensionside of the member.
If member forces are required only at a particular level in the
structure, it can be analyzed separately by the aboveprocedure without having to start the analysis at the top (Fig.
.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
38/55
em er orce na ys s y or a e o The simplicity of the portal method and the advantage that it
allows a direct analysis of member forces at a intermediate
levels make it the most useful of the approximate method for- .
If, however, the frame is taller and more slender, so that
overall bendin of the structure b axial deformations of thecolumns becomes significant, it may be more appropriate to
analyze it by the cantilever method.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
39/55
e erm ne e mem er orces n e -s ory rame o g.
7.8.
m.
The bents are spaced at 7.0 m. The intensity of the wind loading is 1.5 kN/m throughout the
height.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
40/55
Solution:
Wind load per floor
s r u ng s s ear e ween e op-s ory co umns n
proportion to the widths of aisle supported:
Similarly for columns C and D.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
41/55
Starting with the top-left module A20 (Fig. 7.9a) and
consi ering its ree- o y equi i rium:
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
42/55
Because of the mid-length point of contraflexure, the
moment at the right end of the girder has the same value as
at the left end.
,
story are equal.
The si n convention for numerical values of the bendinmoment is that an anticlockwise moment applied by a joint
to the end of a member is taken as positive.
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
43/55
Continuing with the next module to the right, B20, in Fig.
7.9b:
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
44/55
For the direct analysis of forces at an intermediate level,
consider floor level 8 (Fig. 7.8).
From moment equilibrium of the joint, moment at end of
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
45/55
A i t A l i f M b
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
46/55
Approximate Analysis of Member
orces ause y or zon a oa n3. Approximate Analysis by Cantilever Method
This method is based on the concept that a tall rigid frame
subjected to horizontal loading deflects as a flexural
. . .
Suitable for the analysis of structures of up to 35 stories
hi h with hei ht-to-width ratios of u to 5:1.
It is similar to the portal method in considering the
equilibrium of joint modules in sequence.
It differs, however, in starting by assuming values for theaxial forces, rather than the shear in the columns.
A i t A l i b C til
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
47/55
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
e o It is less versatile than the portal method in not allowing a
direct analysis of intermediate stories.
The assumption for cantilever method are as follows:
1. orizonta oa ing on t e rame causes ou e curvature
bending of all the columns and girders with points of
contraflexure at the mid-hei hts of columns and mid-s ansof girders.
2. The axial stress in a column in proportional to its distance
from the centroid of the column areas.
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
48/55
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
e o The procedure for analysis is as follows:
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
49/55
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
e o
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
50/55
Approximate Analysis by Cantilever
e o
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
51/55
Analysis of the same 20-story, 70 m height frame considered
in the portal analysis.
Referring to Fig. 7.10, external moment due to wind are:
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
52/55
Cantilever Method Worked Example
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
53/55
Cantilever Method Worked Example
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
54/55
an ever e o or e xamp e From moment equilibrium of joint, moment at top of
column
-
7/30/2019 Design of Tall Buildings
55/55
Thank You.