design space and control strategy - gally.ch · pdf filedesign space and control strategy ......
TRANSCRIPT
1
Design Space and Control Strategy
Fritz ErniGlobal Quality Operations
Novartis Basel
SAQOlten 2006
Fritz Erni2
OutlineICH Q8, Q9 and Q10 – The Vision of the desired stateQ8 is a Door Opener for
Describing Quality by DesignIncluding more Science and Risk ManagementIncluding PATInclude Design Space
Introduces the concept of Design SpaceDescribes how to define what is criticalRedefines what is a ChangeQuality Risk Management supports the Control StrategySummary
Fritz Erni3
Global Challenges
• Rising Global Regulatory Bar• Consent decrees and enormous fines from
manufacturing compliance deficiencies• Higher safety hurdles for marketing
approval• Challenge of Sustaining Product Pipeline &
Flow• Biotech contribution less than expected• Government price control• Challenge of Earning Stakeholders Trust
Ref: Fred Hassan – CEO Schering-Plough
Fritz Erni4
FDA’s 21st Century Quality Initiative
• Goals
1. Encourage the early adoption of new technological advances by the industry
2. Facilitate industry application of modern quality management techniques, including implementation of quality systems approaches, to all aspects of pharmaceutical production and quality assurance
3. Encourage implementation of risk-based approachesthat focus both industry and FDA attention on critical areas
•Woodcock, FDA
Fritz Erni5
FromFrom‘‘blind complianceblind compliance’’
to to ‘‘science and risk science and risk
based compliancebased compliance’’Ajaz Hussain, FDAAjaz Hussain, FDA
The Paradigm ChangeThe Paradigm Change
Fritz Erni6
ICH agreed Desired State
• Product quality and performance achieved and assured by design of effective and efficient manufacturing processes
• Product specifications based on mechanisticunderstanding of how formulation and process factors impact product performance
• An ability to effect Continuous Improvement and Continuous "real time" assurance of quality
Fritz Erni7
2004 20052006
FDA PAT guideline
FDA DraftQuality Systems
FDA : Innovation and ContinuousImprovement in
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
FDA Pharmaceutical cGMP for the 21st Century –a Risk based Approach
GMP and Regulatory Actions
Expert Working Groups (EWG)ICH
Q8Pharmaceutical Development
Q9Risk Management
Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System
Update Q6A/B ?
Fritz Erni8
Process Analytical Technology : PAT
•FDA‘s Vision :
Paradigm Change: Quality by design replaces Testing to Document Quality
Product and Process specifications based on mechanistic understanding of how factors affect product performanceProcess understanding leading to
Real Time Quality assuranceContinous Improvement
Regulatory policies tailored to scienceRisk based approaches
Fritz Erni12
Challenges to Analytical Science
The need for increased Process understanding is a massive Boost for Analytical Science
Fritz Erni16
Global Harmonisation (ICH+GCG)
Expert Working Groups (EWG)
WHO
Global Cooperation Group
APEC : Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
ASEAN : Assoc. South East Asian Nations
GCC : Gulf Cooperation Council
PANDRH : Pan American Network for Drug Reg. Harm.
SADC : South African Dev. Community
Fritz Erni17
What is Q8 be!
• Guideline for the description what is in P2
• Describes the minimal Standard for P2
• Opens door to get closer to the ‘Desired State’
• Science based• Includes Risk Management• Continuous improvement• Real Time Release
ICH Q8Door opener for
Quality by Design
Fritz Erni18
What is Quality by Design
Elements of a QbD
• Systematic Development Approach• Formulation Understanding• Process Understanding• Packaging Understanding• Application of Quality Risk Management• Advanced Control Strategy
Fritz Erni19
Quality by Design
Extended PAT tools replacing the need for end product testing
Limited and simple IPC
Focus on formulation and process robustness – understanding and controlling variability
Focus on process reproducibility – often avoiding or ignoring variability
Flexible process within design space, allowing continuous improvement
Process is fixed, disallowing changes
Quality assured by well understood product and process, moving controls upstream without relying on end-product testing as much as possible
Quality assured by end-product testing and inspection
A systematic approachMainly empirical approachQuality by Design(ideal)Conventional PD
Fritz Erni20
1. Drug substance– Key physicochemical characteristics– Compatibility
2. Excipients3. Drug product
– Rationale for type of product– Formulation development– Overages– Physicochemical and biological properties– Performance testing
4. Manufacturing Development5. Container closure system (and delivery devices)6. Microbiological attributes7. Compatibility
P2 Content per CTD-Q
Where to put information in on Quality by designScienceRisk ManagementContinous improvementReal Time Release
When to update the document
Fritz Erni21
Where do we stand?
• Q8 Step 4 signed by 6 ICH partners and observers
• Confirmed main Strategic issues
• Clarifying ‘baseline’ and ‘optional’expectations
• Outlined areas of potential regulatory flexibility that could be expected when presenting ‘optional’ information
Fritz Erni22
Q8 – General ConceptsQbD and Risk Management
• The Pharmaceutical Development section provides an opportunity to present the knowledge gained through the application of scientific approachesand quality risk management to the development of a product and its manufacturing process.
Fritz Erni23
Q8 – General ConceptsQbD and Risk Management
• The aim of pharmaceutical development is to design a quality product and its manufacturing process to consistently deliver the intended performance of the product. The information and knowledge gained from pharmaceutical development studies and manufacturing experience provide scientific understanding to support the establishment of the design space, specifications, and manufacturing controls.
Fritz Erni24
Q8 – General ConceptsWhat is minimal requirement
At a minimum, those aspects of drug substances, excipients, container closure systems, and manufacturing processes that are critical to product quality should be determined and control strategies justified.
Fritz Erni25
Q8 – General ConceptsWhat is critical?
Critical formulation attributes and process parameters are generally identified through an assessment of the extent to which their variation can have impact on the quality of the drug product.
Fritz Erni26
Q8 – General ConceptsOptional process understanding
In addition, the applicant can choose to conduct pharmaceutical development studies that can lead to an enhanced knowledge of product performance over a wider range of material attributes, processing options and process parameters.
Fritz Erni27
Q8 – General ConceptsWhat we get in return
This scientific understanding facilitates establishment of an expanded design space. In these situations, opportunities exist to develop more flexible regulatory approaches, for example, to facilitate:
• risk-based regulatory decisions (reviews and inspections);• manufacturing process improvements, within the approved
design space described in the dossier, without further regulatory review;
• reduction of post-approval submissions;• real-time quality control, leading to a reduction of end-
product release testing.
Fritz Erni28
Possible Regulatory Flexibility– Continuous Improvement
– Real time release– Reduced or elimination of routine end product testing
– Expanded design space– Independence on scale– Independent of equipment– Independent of site– Independent from drug substance manufacturing if within spec
– Process Validation– Process validation replaced by Concurrent Process Verification using validated methods
(qualified controls)
– Stability Testing– Reduced confirmation stability studies for any changes within the design space– Reduced annual stability batches
Fritz Erni29
Q8 – General ConceptsReview - Inspection
The Pharmaceutical Development section is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the product and manufacturing process for reviewers and inspectors.
Fritz Erni30
Q8 – Strategic Questions :Submissions and Post Approvals
It is first produced for the original marketing application and can be updated to support new knowledge gained over the lifecycle of a product
Fritz Erni32
Q8 – Strategic Questions :
What is the Design Space?
Will be the Base for Continuous Improvement!
33
Design Space• Is Key for claiming Process Understanding
• Process understanding is Key forQuality Risk Management
• QRM is the base for any Control Strategy
Fritz Erni34
Design Space
The multidimensional combination and interactionof input variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality. Working within the design space is not considered as a change. Movement out of the design space is considered to be a change and would normally initiate a regulatory post approval change process. Design space is proposed by the applicant and is subject to regulatory assessment and approval.
36EFPIA PAT Team
EFPIA PAT Topic Group
Chris Potter AstraZeneca: ChairmanRafael Beerbohm Boehringer-IngelheimAlastair Coupe PfizerFritz Erni NovartisGerd Fischer Sanofi-AventisStaffan Folestad AstraZenecaGordon Muirhead GSKStephan Roenninger F Hoffmann-La RocheAlistair Swanson Pfizer
Fritz Erni37
An Industry View of QbD in Dossier: Key Scientific Elements and ‘Flow’
TargetTargetProductProduct
ProfileProfile
ControlControlStrategyStrategy
PriorPriorKnowledgeKnowledge
Product/Product/ProcessProcessDev.Dev.
Product/Product/ProcessProcessDesignDesignSpace Space
Definition of Product Intended Use and pre-definition of Qualitytargets (wrt clinical relevance, efficacy and safety)
Summary of Scientific Understanding of Product andProcess.Justification and description of Multi-dimensional Space that Assures Quality(interrelation-ships and boundaries of Clinical Relevance).
Definition ofControl Strategybased on Design Space leading to Control of Quality and Quality Risk Mgmt.(Process Robustness)
Overview ofQuality by Design key actions and decisions taken to develop New Scientific Knowledge, e.g. DoE, PAT, Risk Assessmentand Risk Control
Summary ofPrior Scientific Knowledge(drug substance, excipients; similar formulations and processes). Initial Risk Assessment
RegulatoryRegulatoryFlexibilityFlexibility
Proposal of Regulatory Flexibility based on Product and Process Scientific Knowledgeand Quality Risk Mgmt.(Materials, Site, Scale etc)
Fritz Erni38
Design Space (ICH Q8)
The multidimensional combination and interactionof input variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality. Working within the design space is not considered as a change. Movement out of the design space is considered to be a change and would normally initiate a regulatory post approval change process. Design space is proposed by the applicant and is subject to regulatory assessment and approval.
39
Design Space• Is Key for claiming Process Understanding
• Process understanding is Key forQuality Risk Management
• QRM is the base for any Control Strategy
40EFPIA PAT Team
Dissolution profiles of examplain hydrochloride tablets - effect of lubrication level pH 6.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 45
Time (minutes)
Mea
n %
dis
solu
tion
1% Mg St2% Mg St3% Mg St
41EFPIA PAT Team
Design of Experiments (DoE)
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Degradation and fines
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Degradation and fines
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Degradation and fines
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Fines
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Degradation
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Fines
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Fines
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Degradation
Air flow
Inle
t tem
pera
ture
Degradation
Effect of inlet temperature and air flow on degradation and generation of fines
42EFPIA PAT Team
Examplain Design Space –Graphical Description
Known edge of failure due to fines
% H2O
2.0%1.5%
18.5%
Drying time
Known edge of failure due to degradation
Regions of uncertainty17.5%
Trajectories describing the boundaries of the design space where product quality is assured
Known edge of failure due to fines
% H2O
2.0%1.5%
18.5%
Drying time
Known edge of failure due to degradation
Regions of uncertainty17.5%
Trajectories describing the boundaries of the design space where product quality is assured
43EFPIA PAT Team
PAT Development ApproachTarget Product Profile
Drug substance and Excipient properties; prior knowledge
Proposed formulation and manufacturing processInitial Risk Identification
Determination of Cause – Effect relationships
Risk-based classification (Risk Evaluation)
Proposed Parameters to investigate (e.g. by DOE)(Risk Reduction)
FORMULATION FORMULATION DESIGN SPACEDESIGN SPACE
PROCESS DESIGN PROCESS DESIGN SPACE BY UNIT SPACE BY UNIT
OPERATIONOPERATIONCONTROL STRATEGYCONTROL STRATEGY
Form
ulat
ion
unde
rsta
ndin
gFo
rmul
atio
n un
ders
tand
ing
Proc
ess
unde
rsta
ndin
gPr
oces
s un
ders
tand
ing
QUALITY RISK QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT
44
Real-Time MonitoringReal-Time Monitoring
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3
t[1]
T i m e / M a tu r i ty ($ T i m e )
B a t c h F in g e r p r in t /G o ld e n B a t c h - P r e d ic t e d s c o r e s f o r t [1 ]
3 s td . d e v . A v e r a g e B a tc h - 3 s td . d e v . 1 0 0 3 4 1 2
M1
S I M C A -B a t c h O n -L in e V ie w 2 . 1 - 7 / 2 9 / 2 0 0 5 1 2 : 4 8 : 5 6 P M
45
Plot For One VariablePlot For One Variable
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
MVD1
-MS:L
N_DY
A520
0963
6_AIR
VOL
Time/Maturity ($Time)
520096_DR_A - MVD1-MS:LN_DYA52009636_AIRVOL 3 std. dev.Average Batch-3 std. dev.666022_D
M1
SIMCA-Batch On-Line View 2.1 - 5/24/2005 7:57:47 AM
46
Assay – Training Set & Test SetAssay – Training Set & Test Set
90.091.092.093.094.095.096.097.098.099.0
100.0101.0102.0103.0104.0105.0106.0107.0108.0109.0110.0
90.0 91.0 92.0 93.0 94.0 95.0 96.0 97.0 98.0 99.0 100.0 101.0 102.0 103.0 104.0 105.0 106.0 107.0 108.0 109.0 110.0
Y O
bser
eved
- A
ssay
Y Predicted - Assay
Observed vs. Predicted - Assay - Training Set & Test Set
RMSEP = 0.502927
WorksetTest Set
y=0.983*x+1.7R2=0.9268
SIMCA-P+ 10.5 - 8/8/2005 10:57:20 AM
47
MVBA ResultsMVBA Results
9 09 19 29 39 49 59 69 79 89 9
1 0 01 0 11 0 21 0 31 0 41 0 51 0 61 0 71 0 81 0 91 1 0
9 0 9 1 9 2 9 3 9 4 9 5 9 6 9 7 9 8 9 9 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 7 1 0 8 1 0 9 1 1 0
Y O
bser
ved
Y P r e d i c te d
O b s e r v e d v s P r e d ic t e d - C o n t e n t U n if o r m it y
R M S E E = 0 . 1 0 5 0 2 5
y = 1 .0 0 1 * x -0 .0 9 6 5 8R 2 = 0 .9 7 7 3
S I M C A - P + 1 1 - 7 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 5 3 : 4 6 : 4 0 P M
48
MVBA ResultsMVBA Results
9 09 19 29 39 49 59 69 79 89 9
1 0 01 0 11 0 21 0 31 0 41 0 51 0 61 0 71 0 81 0 91 1 0
9 0 9 1 9 2 9 3 9 4 9 5 9 6 9 7 9 8 9 9 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 7 1 0 8 1 0 9 1 1 0
Y O
bser
ved
Y P r e d i c te d
O b s e r v e d v s P r e d ic t e d - D is s o lu t io n
R M S E E = 0 .3 1 6 8 0 3
y = 1 .0 0 4 * x -0 .3 9 9R 2 = 0 .9 8 0 6
S I M C A - P + 1 1 - 7 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 5 3 : 4 7 : 3 9 P M
Fritz Erni49
ICH Q8 : Important points for Industry
Open the door for submitting Quality by Design dataNo escalation of requirement
Defines BaselineDefines optional opportunities
Optional Update of P2 for adding knowledge for PACDefines : What is a critical parameterDesign Space: What is/is not a changeRegulatory Flexibility
Continuous improvementReal time release
Fritz Erni50
Q8 Next steps
• June 2006 ICH EWG Japan– Q8 addendum for specific dosage forms– Q8 for API’s ?
• Q8 Implementation– Learn to use concepts
• Design space• Critical Parameters• Regulatory flexibility
Fritz Erni52
The Quality Risk Management Process
Risk Review
Ris
k C
omm
unic
atio
n
Risk Assessment
Risk Evaluationunacceptable
Risk Control
Risk Analysis
Risk Reduction
Risk Identification
Review Events
Risk Acceptance
InitiateQuality Risk Management Process
Output / Result of theQuality Risk Management Process
Risk M
anagement tools
Fritz Erni53
WaterContent
Drying
Granulation
RawMaterials
Compressing
PlantFactors
Operator
Temp/RH
Precompressing
Main Compressing
Feeder Speed
Press Speed
Punch PenetrationDepth
Temp
RH
Air Flow
Shock Cycle
DrugSubstance
P.S.Process Conditions
LOD
Diluents
P.S.LOD
Other
Lubricant
Disintegrant
Binder
Water
Binder
Temp
Spray Rate
Spray Pattern
P.S.
Scrape Down
Chopper Speed
Mixer Speed
Endpoint
PowerTime
Age
Tooling
Operator
Training
Analytical
Method
Sampling
FeedFrame
Cause and Effect Process
Fritz Erni54
QRM Tools:Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Risk Assessment
Sub-Step Event(Failure mode) Effect
Seve
rity
(S)
[1<2
<3]
Prob
abili
ty (P
)[1
<2<3
<4]
Det
ecta
bilit
y (D
)[1
<2<3
]
Ris
k fa
ctor
(S
*P*D
)
Granulation Drying water content not meet specification of degradation 2 3 1 6
Risk Reduction
Actions:Risk reduction strategy
Sev
erity
(S)
[1<2
<3]
Pro
babi
lity
(P)
[1<2
<3<4
]
Det
ecta
bilit
y (D
)[1
<2<3
]
Ris
k fa
ctor
(S
*P*D
)
Ris
k re
duct
ion
Comments
introduce online NIR 2 1 1 2 4 indirect measurment
introduce IPC analytic 2 2 1 4 2 direct measurement; time consuming
humidity measurement in the exausting air 2 1 2 4 2 indirect measurment;
unspecifoc
Fritz Erni55
Risk Management processQ
ualit
y A
ttrib
utes
Unit operation
Granulation Drying Blending TabletingDispensation
Dissolution
Disintegration
Hardness
Assay
ContentUniformity
Degradation
Stability
Appearance
Identification
Water
Microbiology
ControlStrategy
Formulation and Process
understanding
Prior knowledge
Significant influence
Initialassessment
First & Second review cycle
Thirdreview cycle
Fritz Erni56
QRM QRM –– Design Space Design Space –– Control StrategyControl Strategy
Initial QRM Final QRM
Control Strategy
QRM
DoE DoE
Design Space
Design Space
QRM
P2 Document
Continuous Improvement
Real Time Release
Quality Risk Management
DoE
DesignSpace
DoE
Design Space
Fritz Erni57
Control Strategy
Unit OperationsAttributesControls
Content Uniformity NIR
Water Content – NIRParticle size – FBRM
Dispensation
Blending
Fluidized Bed Dryer
Packaging
Tableting
Identity-NIR
Blend Homogeneity -NIR
Granulation
Extent of Wet Massing - Power
Consumption
Air
Scale
Multivariate Model (predictsDisintegration)
Raw Materials
Fritz Erni58
Control Strategy• Justification of necessary controls
– Raw Materials Control– In-Process Controls– End Product Controls (if necessary)
• Based on Process and Formulation Understanding
• Drives the Process in the Design Space• Based on Quality Risk Management• To ensure conforming Quality according
Specifications
Fritz Erni59
SummaryQ8 describes content of Section P2 of the Q-CTDQ8 is a Door Opener for
Describing Quality by DesignIncluding more Science and Risk ManagementIncluding PATInclude Design Space
Introduces the concept of Design SpaceDescribes how to define what is criticalRedefines what is a ChangeQuality Risk Management supports the Control Strategy