designing and evaluating nature of science activities for teacher education fanny seroglou &...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Designing and evaluating nature of science activities for teacher education
Fanny Seroglou & Agustin Aduriz-Bravo
Aristotle University Universidad de
of Thessaloniki Buenos Aires
Greece Argentina
teacher educators
help and encourage
prospective and in-service teachers
traditional scientific
science literacy
education for all
cognitive dimension
science as a set of models
the broader social contexts
nature ofscience contents
nature ofscience contexts
meta-cognitive dimension
what science is
how science changes
in history
how science relates
to society and culture
synthetic nature of
science as a product
nature of the evolution
and methodologies
of science
nature of the
interrelations of
science and society
emotional dimension
attitudes
values
nature of attitudes
expressed through science
nature of values
fostered by science
cognitive history of science
scientific contentsandthe contexts oftheir emergence productively
informedby discussions of
the history ofscientific ideas
meta-cognitive philosophy of science
“how do we know
what we know?”
philosophical
“key-ideas” set in
historical events
warned by
sociological
contributions
against dogmatism
and elitism
emotional sociology of science
attitudes expressed
through science
and values fostered
by science
ideas from recent sociology of science and science studies
may illuminate
the contribution
of science
in the formation of educated people
GNOSISdimension NOS meta-science
cognitive nature of science contents
nature of science contextshistory
of science
meta-cognitive
synthetic nature of science
as a product
nature of the evolution and
methodologies of science
nature of the interrelations
of science and society
philosophy
of science
emotional nature of attitudes expressed
through science
nature of values fostered
by science
sociology
of science
the GNOSIS framework functions as
a set of structural guidelines to design
teacher education courses
an evaluation tool for NOS applications
two “parallel” examples
Thessaloniki Buenos Aires
GNOSIS structural guidelines
narratives for teaching NOS
GNOSIS : cognitive dimension
a historical review of the relations betweencreator and creation in science andtechnology
ethical issues arising from scientific creation
a variety of scientific contents(cloning, eugenics, euthanasia)
GNOSIS : meta-cognitive dimension
the kind of answers science is seeking concerning creation
the philosophical questions that intriguethis quest
the demands of society that favor different strands of scientific research
the way scientific results reform and reshapesocial and cultural structures
GNOSIS : emotional dimension
attitudes and values concerning…
responsibility in scientific creation
aims and motives for creating
“independence” of creation from creator
a shift of roles
teachers functioning as “audience”
of the communicated stories, they feel
detached and safely at a distance
from the target contents that are debated
narratives
resource for meaningful science teaching
films, legendary tales, poems,
newspaper articles
provide background and raise issues
touching, intriguing, memorable stories
in the past…
were communicated through story-telling
today…
are powerfully presented through films
applicationsa fiction film
Blade Runner
Replicants of theBlade Runner
watch fragments of the film discuss and debate
Thessaloniki
a Jewish legendGolem
The giant of Balvanera
legend reconstruction a poem by J. L. Borges
a newspaper clip
Buenos Aires
In Thessaloniki, after watching fragments of
the film, perspective teachers were asked to
discuss and debate about:
the scientific and the philosophical
questions raised in the film and the
interrelations between these two
nature of science contents
Can science help us solve problems of
our life that seem impossible to solve?
nature of the evolution and methodologies of science
What are the limits of science?
What parameters define those limits?
synthetic nature of science as a product
As scientific questions meet philosophical questions, what are the boarders of such an interaction?
nature of the interrelations ofscience and society
How should genetics develop and be dealt with in order to benefit contemporary and future societies?
nature of attitudes expressed through science
Should the aims of science
(and especially genetics) be
immortality, youth, race perfection etc.
or a better quality of life for all?
nature of values fostered by science
Should we take advantage of
the maximum of potentials of science
(and especially genetics)
and the scientific creations
driven only by profit?