designing systems to address outstanding issues in climate change betsy weatherhead
TRANSCRIPT
Designing Systems to Designing Systems to Address Outstanding Address Outstanding
Issues in Climate ChangeIssues in Climate Change
Betsy WeatherheadBetsy Weatherhead
SPM 1a
Variations of the Earth’s surface temperature for the past 140 years
M.S.U. Channel 2
Trends in Surface and Trends in Surface and Tropospheric TemperatureTropospheric Temperature
Existing Satellite and Surface Existing Satellite and Surface Measurements are not in agreement.Measurements are not in agreement.
Satellites have a difficult time Satellites have a difficult time measuring low in the atmosphere.measuring low in the atmosphere.
Interpretation of satellite Interpretation of satellite measurements requires assumptions measurements requires assumptions about the vertical and chemical about the vertical and chemical structure of the atmosphere.structure of the atmosphere.
NOME FED BLDG OME -165.4 64.5
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
POINT BARROW BRW -156.78 71.3
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
NAKNEK AKN -156.65 58.68
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
LANDER LND -108.72 42.8
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
GRAND JUNCTION GJT -108.53 39.12
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
EL PASO ELP -106.4 31.82
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
DAYTON/WRIGHT PATT DAY -84.12 39.87
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
HUNTINGTON HTS -82.55 38.37
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
PITTSBURGH/PITTSBG PIT -80.22 40.5
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
Sonde Temperature Trends (C/decade) at 12 Z
Weatherhead Thu Nov 8 13:09:45 2001
NOME FED BLDG OME -165.4 64.5
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
POINT BARROW BRW -156.78 71.3
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
NAKNEK AKN -156.65 58.68
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
LANDER LND -108.72 42.8
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
GRAND JUNCTION GJT -108.53 39.12
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
EL PASO ELP -106.4 31.82
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
DAYTON/WRIGHT PATT DAY -84.12 39.87
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
HUNTINGTON HTS -82.55 38.37
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
PITTSBURGH/PITTSBG PIT -80.22 40.5
Trend
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
10
-0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6
1000
800
600
400
200
Sonde Temperature Trends (C/decade) at 12 Z
Weatherhead Thu Nov 8 13:07:41 2001
Future Temperature TrendsFuture Temperature Trends
Temperature trends Temperature trends are predicted by a are predicted by a number of different number of different models.models.
Can we identify Can we identify more accurate more accurate models?models?
Detection of TrendsDetection of Trends
Fundamentally: a signal to noise problem.Fundamentally: a signal to noise problem.• We don’t control the signal.We don’t control the signal.• We don’t control the noise.We don’t control the noise.
Equator
year
Te
mp
era
ture
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
-4
-2
0
2
4
San Francisco
year
Te
mp
era
ture
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
-4
-2
0
2
4
MSU Channel 2
Weatherhead Tue Dec 11 20:36:28 2001
1000 mb Hadley B2
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
AVAILABLE TEMPERATURE SONDE TRENDS AT 0Z
-150 -100 -50 0
02
04
06
08
0
ABQ
ACC
ACK
ACM
ACY
ADK
ADQ
AHN
AKN
ALB
AMA
ANC
ANN
AQQAYS
BDI
BET
BIS
BLB
BNA
BOI
BRO
BRWBTI
BUF
BVE
CAR
CDB
CGU
CHH
CHSCKL
COU DAYDDC
DEN
DRA
DRTELP
ELY
EYW
FAI
FFR
FNT
FWH
GEG
GGG
GGW
GJT
GRB
GSO
GTF
GTL
GYM
HAT
HTG
HTS IAD
IGP
IKF
ILW
INL
INW
ITO
JANJAX
JSJKCRKJP
KPP
LCH
LIH
LIT
LND
MAF
MCG
MCVMDY
MEX
MFR
MGM
MIA
MID
MTY
MZTNQX
NSINTD
OAKOKC
OMA
OMEOTZ
OUN
PBI
PIA PIT
PWMRAP
SAN
SDQ
SEPSHV
SLC
SLE
SLO
SNP
SSMSTC
SWA
TBW
TUS
UCC
UGM
UIL
UMNVBG
VCT
VER
VPS
WMC
WOS
WSE
XKF
XMR
YAK
YAR
YBK
YCBYCO
YCY
YEU
YEV
YGM
YIC
YJT
YLT
YMD
YMO
YMW
YNI
YPH
YQD
YRB
YSA
YSM
YSY
YTL
YUX
YVP
YVQ
YVR
YXS
YXYYYE YYQ
YYR
YYT
YZS
YZT YZV
Weatherhead Thu Nov 8 12:43:10 2001
We can control only four aspects of We can control only four aspects of monitoring to detect trendsmonitoring to detect trends
Where we monitorWhere we monitor
What frequencyWhat frequency
What accuracyWhat accuracy
What we monitorWhat we monitor
Where do we monitor?Where do we monitor?
Some places are inherently better for Some places are inherently better for detecting trends than others.detecting trends than others.
Monitoring by satellite involves Monitoring by satellite involves averaging over height, longitude and averaging over height, longitude and latitude.latitude.• Measurement smoothing can damage Measurement smoothing can damage
our ability to detect trendsour ability to detect trends
MSU Channel 4Correlation with lat=0 and long=0
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
MSU Channel 4Correlation with lat=0 and long=0
-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0
MSU Channel 4Correlation with S.F.
-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0
MSU Channel 2Correlation with lat=0 and long=0
-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0
MSU Channel 2Correlation with S.F.
-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0
How does spatial How does spatial redundancy affect our redundancy affect our
ability to detect trends?ability to detect trends?
82 Station Subset of HCN Network(1.75º “Distance” Factor)
225 Station Subset of HCN Network225 Station Subset of HCN Network
Where do we monitor: global Where do we monitor: global coveragecoverage
Interpretation of raw signals can be Interpretation of raw signals can be difficult.difficult.
Inversion methods can be dependent Inversion methods can be dependent on all other parameters not on all other parameters not changing.changing.
Footprint size as well as vertical Footprint size as well as vertical resolution are critical to detection of resolution are critical to detection of trends.trends.
MSU - 2 Weighting Function
0.0 0.002 0.004 0.006
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Where do we monitor: global coverage
deseasonalized data with predicted trend addedsurface
goodx
de
gre
es
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
-10
-5
0
5
10
-10
-5
0
5
10
deseasonalized data with predicted trend added400mb
goodx
de
gre
es
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
-10
-5
0
5
10
-10
-5
0
5
10
Topeka
Formula offers 45 and 25 years respectively Weatherhead Wed Aug 14 15:08:42 2002
Years Saved by Monitoring Free Troposphere 0Z
-180 -160 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60
20
40
60
80
5
10
15
20
25
Weatherhead Wed Aug 14 11:20:30 2002 True Range of Data: (3 to 36)
Where we monitorWhere we monitor
Well designed in situ measurements Well designed in situ measurements can offercan offer• Monitoring in critical, unmonitored Monitoring in critical, unmonitored
areas;areas;• Unprecedented accuracy;Unprecedented accuracy;• Critical information on climate Critical information on climate
processes.processes.
We can control only four aspects of We can control only four aspects of monitoring to detect trendsmonitoring to detect trends
Where we monitorWhere we monitor
What frequencyWhat frequency
What accuracyWhat accuracy
What we monitorWhat we monitor
What frequency?What frequency?
Inherent memory in environmental Inherent memory in environmental data results in redundancy of data results in redundancy of measurements.measurements.
Daily data may be more than Daily data may be more than needed.needed.
Less than daily measurements may Less than daily measurements may obscure diurnal trendsobscure diurnal trends
STERLING(WASH DULL 0 Z tempLat. = 38.98 Long. = -77.47
Surf.
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
1960 1970 1980 1990
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
Weatherhead Wed Mar 13 13:30:52 2002
STERLING(WASH DULL 0 ZLat. = 38.98 Long. = -77.47
Surf.
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
1960 1970 1980 1990
-4
-2
0
2
4
Weatherhead Wed Mar 13 13:36:18 2002
How do the trends change How do the trends change when we take data less when we take data less
frequently than every day?frequently than every day?
500 mb Temperature Trend, Dulles
Measurements per Month
Tre
nd
(d
eg
ree
s p
er
de
cad
e)
5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Weatherhead Wed Jun 5 12:52:10 2002
How long will it take to How long will it take to detect trends?detect trends?
Years to Detect 0.2 degrees per DecadeDulles 0Z 500 mb
measurements per month
yea
rs
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
30
40
50
60
Weatherhead Wed Jun 5 12:45:30 2002
Decreasing the data frequencyDecreasing the data frequency
We can optimize data collection We can optimize data collection frequency to assure efficiency.frequency to assure efficiency.
Decreasing the data frequency can Decreasing the data frequency can reduce our ability to:reduce our ability to:• Detect extreme eventsDetect extreme events• Detect diurnal (or perhaps seasonal) Detect diurnal (or perhaps seasonal)
signalssignals
We can control only four aspects of We can control only four aspects of monitoring to detect trendsmonitoring to detect trends
Where we monitorWhere we monitor
What frequencyWhat frequency
What accuracyWhat accuracy
What we monitorWhat we monitor
What accuracy?What accuracy?
Relative accuracy is all that’s needed Relative accuracy is all that’s needed for trend detection.for trend detection.
Relative accuracy is extremely hard Relative accuracy is extremely hard to maintain for decades without to maintain for decades without absolute accuracy.absolute accuracy.
Improved accuracy may save Improved accuracy may save decades in monitor or may be decades in monitor or may be irrelevant.irrelevant.
Case Example
• Uncertainty: ±2% ; Trend: 4% per decade
• Result: – First ten years of data are still unsubstantial
• Improving Accuracy to ±1% saves five years of monitoring
years
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-8
-4
0
4
8
Measurement Uncertainty is Not Measurement Uncertainty is Not Generally RandomGenerally Random
Trends generally require decades to Trends generally require decades to detectdetect
Reference instruments and Reference instruments and calibration mechanisms often change calibration mechanisms often change over the period of several decadesover the period of several decades
Most materials for both Most materials for both instrumentation and calibration drift instrumentation and calibration drift or shift preferentially in one directionor shift preferentially in one direction
GSFC Predictions - without climate change
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
350360370380390400410
GSFC Predictions with SBUV Lowess Residuals
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
350360370380390400410
with +-1% error plus +-1% drift
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
350
360
370
380
390
400
Weatherhead Fri Nov 2 11:53:23 2001
GSFC 2d Predictions with SBUV Residuals of Total Col. Ozone (d.u.) 40N
Accuracy directly influences our Accuracy directly influences our ability to detect trendsability to detect trends
In some cases, our measurement In some cases, our measurement uncertainty is considerably larger uncertainty is considerably larger than the signal we want to detect.than the signal we want to detect.
Estimating appropriate measurement Estimating appropriate measurement uncertainty over decades of uncertainty over decades of monitoring is extremely difficult. monitoring is extremely difficult.
We can control only four aspects of We can control only four aspects of monitoring to detect trendsmonitoring to detect trends
Where we monitorWhere we monitor
What frequencyWhat frequency
What accuracyWhat accuracy
What we monitorWhat we monitor
What we monitorWhat we monitor
Changes are predicted for a large Changes are predicted for a large variety of parameters:variety of parameters:• Temperature, humidity, cloud cover, Temperature, humidity, cloud cover,
tropopause height, precipitation, tropopause height, precipitation, mesopause height, sea ice, snow cover mesopause height, sea ice, snow cover extent, extrememe events, ENSO, extent, extrememe events, ENSO, tropical cyclones.tropical cyclones.
Is there a canary parameter?Is there a canary parameter?
Proposed CanariesProposed Canaries
The Arctic – change may be greatestThe Arctic – change may be greatest
The subtropics – small changes are easy to The subtropics – small changes are easy to detectdetect
The stratosphere – very responsiveThe stratosphere – very responsive
The tropopause height – integrative responseThe tropopause height – integrative response
The ionosphere – changes can be very largeThe ionosphere – changes can be very large
Is there a canary parameter?Is there a canary parameter?
What is meant by this?What is meant by this?A parameter where the signal is A parameter where the signal is considerably larger than the variability.*considerably larger than the variability.*
A parameter where change can only imply A parameter where change can only imply anthropogenic influenceanthropogenic influence- - this requires considerably understanding over this requires considerably understanding over long time scales.long time scales.
A parameter where a change can imply A parameter where a change can imply significant changes at the Earth’s surface.significant changes at the Earth’s surface.
* and measurement uncertainty?* and measurement uncertainty?
What we monitorWhat we monitor
Tropospheric parameters, particularly Tropospheric parameters, particularly temperature are canary parameters.temperature are canary parameters.
Free troposphere is considerably Free troposphere is considerably better for detecting trends than the better for detecting trends than the surface.surface.
Explanatory variables can offer Explanatory variables can offer insight to mechanisms.insight to mechanisms.
IntegrationIntegration
We make choices about all four of the We make choices about all four of the parameters we control.parameters we control.
These choices have direct impact on how These choices have direct impact on how long we will likely need to monitor in order long we will likely need to monitor in order to detect trends.to detect trends.
Optimal choices exist.Optimal choices exist. All choices will affect our ability to detect All choices will affect our ability to detect
trends and the scientific questions we may trends and the scientific questions we may ask of the emerging data.ask of the emerging data.
ConclusionConclusion1.1. Trends are difficult to detect:Trends are difficult to detect:
• Predicted trends are smallPredicted trends are small• natural variability is largenatural variability is large• Measurement uncertainty can be largeMeasurement uncertainty can be large
2.2. We can control only four aspects to We can control only four aspects to detect trends:detect trends:
• What we monitor; Where we monitor; What we monitor; Where we monitor; • What frequency; What accuracyWhat frequency; What accuracy
3.3. We can optimize systems to detect trends We can optimize systems to detect trends most efficiently with the following most efficiently with the following benefits:benefits:
• Answering scientific questions earlierAnswering scientific questions earlier• Confirming, improving modelsConfirming, improving models• Allowing for earliest policy decisionsAllowing for earliest policy decisions• Maintaining prudent use of available fundsMaintaining prudent use of available funds
Understanding the climate system Understanding the climate system is more important than detecting is more important than detecting
trends.trends.
Next StepsNext Steps
We can work to identify true canaries.We can work to identify true canaries. We can examine existing networks for We can examine existing networks for
efficiency.efficiency. We can determine savings due to:We can determine savings due to:
• Improved accuracyImproved accuracy• Improved spatial informationImproved spatial information• Improved temporal informationImproved temporal information
Optimization of existing networks can Optimization of existing networks can allow scientific, environmental and policy allow scientific, environmental and policy relevant results earlier.relevant results earlier.
New networks can be established in a New networks can be established in a defensible, efficient manner.defensible, efficient manner.
Visual ExampleVisual Example
How many years does it take to How many years does it take to detect a trend in ozone?detect a trend in ozone?
Use our understanding of variability;Use our understanding of variability; Use our understanding of the Use our understanding of the
predicted trendspredicted trends Estimate visually how long it will take Estimate visually how long it will take
to detect a trend.to detect a trend.
Original Monthly Averaged Data
80 82 84 86 88 90
280
300
320
340
360
380
Weatherhead Fri Nov 2 11:38:10 2001
SBUV OZONE TOTAL COLUMN OZONE - 40N
Original Monthly Averaged Data
80 82 84 86 88 90
280
300
320
340
360
380
Weatherhead Fri Nov 2 11:48:50 2001
SBUV OZONE TOTAL COLUMN OZONE - 40N
Monthly Means Removed, Lowess Line Fit Superimposed
80 82 84 86 88 90
-20
-10
0
10
20
Original Monthly Averaged Data
80 82 84 86 88 90
280
300
320
340
360
380
Weatherhead Fri Nov 2 11:48:50 2001
SBUV OZONE TOTAL COLUMN OZONE - 40N
Monthly Means Removed, Lowess Line Fit Superimposed
80 82 84 86 88 90
-20
-10
0
10
20
Original Monthly Averaged Data
80 82 84 86 88 90
280
300
320
340
360
380
Weatherhead Fri Nov 2 11:48:50 2001
SBUV OZONE TOTAL COLUMN OZONE - 40N
Monthly Means Removed, Lowess Line Fit Superimposed
80 82 84 86 88 90
-20
-10
0
10
20
Residuals From Lowess Line Fit
80 82 84 86 88 90
-20
-10
0
10
20
GSFC Predictions - without climate change
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
350360370380390400410
GSFC Predictions - without climate change
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
350360370380390400410
GSFC Predictions with SBUV Lowess Residuals
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
350360370380390400410
Changing local observation time leads to aliasing of diurnal signal into long term trends
Corrected Global Time Series Uncorrected Global Time Series
Difference (expanded scale): 0.15K over 20 years
Courtesy Frank Wertz
Effect of Diurnal Correction on MSU Channel 2Effect of Diurnal Correction on MSU Channel 2
Years to Detect at the Surface 0Z
-180 -160 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60
20
40
60
80
30
35
40
45
50
Weatherhead Wed Aug 14 11:27:03 2002 True Range of Data: (27 to 60)