desn200dc1objectsemanticsfall2012red

36
Design Challenge One Object Semantics

Upload: design-degree

Post on 29-Mar-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

Design Challenge One Object Semantics

Page 2: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 3: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

• We think with the objects we love; we love the objects we think with. Studies of scientists, humanists, artists, and designers teach us the power of everyday things. Objects are emotional and intellectual companions that anchor our memory, sustain our relationships and provoke new ideas. A focus on everday riches-- an apple, a datebook, a laptop computer--show us how objects bring philosophy down to earth. Objects carry both ideas and passions. Sherry Turkle (2007), Evocative Objects.

Page 4: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

• “In Evocative Objects, Turkle collects writings by scientists, humanists, artists, and designers that trace the power of everyday things. These essays reveal objects as emotional and intellectual companions that anchor memory, sustain relationships, and provoke new ideas.These days, scholars show new interest in the importance of the concrete. This volume's special contribution is its focus on everyday riches: the simplest of objects--an apple, a datebook, a laptop computer--are shown to bring philosophy down to earth. The poet contends, "No ideas but in things." The notion of evocative objects goes further: objects carry both ideas and passions. In our relations to things, thought and feeling are inseparable.Whether it's a student's beloved 1964 Ford Falcon (left behind for a station wagon and motherhood), or a cello that inspires a meditation on fatherhood, the intimate objects in this collection are used to reflect on larger themes--the role of objects in design and play, discipline and desire, history and exchange, mourning and memory, transition and passage, meditation and new vision.In the interest of enriching these connections, Turkle pairs each autobiographical essay with a text from philosophy, history, literature, or theory, creating juxtapositions at once playful and profound.

Page 5: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

• So we have Howard Gardner's keyboards and Lev Vygotsky's hobbyhorses; William Mitchell's Melbourne train and Roland Barthes' pleasures of text; Joseph Cevetello's glucometer and Donna Haraway's cyborgs. Each essay is framed by images that are themselves evocative. Essays by Turkle begin and end the collection, inviting us to look more closely at the everyday objects of our lives, the familiar objects that drive our routines, hold our affections, and open out our world in unexpected ways.” Helene Day Fraser, 2011

Page 6: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

As an object of Transition and Passage The Melbourne Train is a rich discussion of language as a liminal object, standing outside and

within the self, as a vehicle for bringing what is outside within. In the interpretation to follow we see the headphones as a metaphor for the travelling environment and the learning that the author engaged with

in observing both the interior and exterior landscapes of a specific time and place in the authorʼs life; one in which he learns to read.

Page 7: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 8: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 9: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

Learn about Team 200Celeste Martin (01), Deb Shackleton (02),

Helene Day Fraser (03),Jill Anholt (04) + 06) and Christian Blyt (05)

Mike Culverwell 07

Page 10: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

• Things have beauty... not because they are ‘well-designed’, or because they are universally recognized as beautiful, or as transcendent of the messy social actuality of life... the sociality of the object is it’s value or the direct connection to this actuality of context... (Csikszentmihalyi, 1991:34 paraphrase)

Page 11: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red

Design Challenge One Object Semantics - Personal

Significance

Page 12: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 13: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 14: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 15: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 16: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 17: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 18: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 19: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 20: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 21: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 22: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 23: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 24: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 25: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 26: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 27: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 28: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 29: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 30: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 31: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 32: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 33: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 34: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 35: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red
Page 36: DESN200DC1ObjectSemanticsFall2012red