detailed design review

62
Detailed Design Review Tethered Glider P14462 12/10/2013 14462

Upload: sirius

Post on 23-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Detailed Design Review. Tethered Glider P14462. 12/10/201314462. Outline. Engineering Requirements Glider Status Tether Design Base Station Design DAQ System Bill of Materials DOE ANOVA Analysis Test Plan MSD II Plan Work Breakdown Risk Assessment. 12/10/201314462. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Detailed Design Review

Detailed Design Review

Tethered GliderP14462

12/10/2013 14462

Page 2: Detailed Design Review

Outline• Engineering Requirements• Glider Status• Tether Design• Base Station Design• DAQ System• Bill of Materials• DOE ANOVA Analysis• Test Plan• MSD II Plan• Work Breakdown• Risk Assessment

12/10/2013 14462

Page 3: Detailed Design Review

Engineering Requirements

12/10/2013 14462

Page 4: Detailed Design Review

Glider Status

• Art’s Planeo Suffered Multiple

Crasheso Totalled

• 1st Bixlero Few flights on first

dayo Missing in swamp

• 2nd Bixlero On order

12/10/2013 14462

Page 5: Detailed Design Review

1st Bixler

• Learned how to glue glider and set up receiver

• Needed to be modified due to poor manufacturingo Drilled out interfering

plastic/wood

• Bixler was tail heavy

12/10/2013 14462

Page 6: Detailed Design Review

Tether Design

• DynaGlide Throw Lineo Material: Dyneema with Vinyl Coatingo Vendor: WesSpuro Diameter: 1.8mmo Tensile Strength: 1000 lbo Highly Visibleo Price: $39.00 for 200 feet

http://www.wesspur.com/throw-line/zing-it-throw-line.html12/10/2013 14462

Page 7: Detailed Design Review

Tether Drag

• Numerical Approximation

• Calculates:o Tether Drago Tension Changeo Tether Angle

Change

Rajani, Ashok, Rajkumar Pant, and K. Sudhakar. "Dynamic Stability Analysis of a Tethered Aerostat." Journal of Aircraft 47.5 (2010): 1531-538. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Web. 7 Dec. 2013. <http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/1.47010>.

12/10/2013 14462

Page 8: Detailed Design Review

Tether Drag

Total tether drag of DynaGlide tether: 27.063 NNegligible force compared to the lift and drag

12/10/2013 14462

Page 9: Detailed Design Review

Tether-Wing Attachment Setup

12/10/2013 14462

Page 10: Detailed Design Review

Tether-Wing Attachment

• Tether may rip EPO foam if attached directly

• Design plate to rest on top of wingo Distributes loado Foam is minimally

damaged

• Tethered over carbon fiber spars

• Material: Polycarbonate12/10/2013 14462

Page 11: Detailed Design Review

Tether-Wing Attachment Setup

12/10/2013 14462

Page 12: Detailed Design Review

Tether-Wing Attachment Stress Analysis

Plate material: PolycarbonateMax stress: 38.4 GPaMax allowable: 55 GPa

12/10/2013 14462

Page 13: Detailed Design Review

Tether-Wing Attachment Displacement Analysis

Plate material: PolycarbonateMax deflection: 0.002 in

12/10/2013 14462

Page 14: Detailed Design Review

Bridle Setup

• 3 point bridle with extra support line• Use crimps for permanent attachments• Adjustable fuselage tether to change bridle angle

12/10/2013 14462

Page 15: Detailed Design Review

Bridle Setup

12/10/2013 14462

Page 16: Detailed Design Review

Base Station - Week 6 Concept

● Concept from week 6, selected by week 9

● Consists of 2 potentiometers and 1 load cell

12/10/2013 14462

Page 17: Detailed Design Review

Base Station - Detailed Design

12/10/2013 14462

Page 18: Detailed Design Review

Base Station - Detailed Design

12/10/2013 14462

Page 19: Detailed Design Review

Exploded View of Upper Portion

12/10/2013 14462

Page 20: Detailed Design Review

Design Focus - Upper Portion

• Wanted minimal flexing on the shaft in order to prevent bearing seizure

• Wanted to prevent screw pullout

• Wanted minimal plywood flexing

• Ensure top bolt did not tear through plywood due to loading

12/10/2013 14462

Page 21: Detailed Design Review

Shaft Selection

T=1200 lbf

RR=600 lbfRL=600 lbf

x

y

● Wanted to minimize deflection, bending stress, and moment of inertia of shaft

● Utilized Excel and varied L and R and calculated corresponding deflections and max stress

12/10/2013 14462

Page 22: Detailed Design Review

Shaft Selection Continued

¾” x 7’’ AISI 1566 Steel shaft

● Only 4” of the shaft will be between the bearings, which is the length used for deflection and stress calculations.

● With these values the shaft will deflect 0.0036” under the max loading of 1200 lbs

● The thicker shaft allows for tapping in order to connect the load cell

Selection:

12/10/2013 14462

Page 23: Detailed Design Review

Pillow Block Screw Pullout T=300 lbf

x

y

Selection:

4 #12-10 machine screws¾” C-D grade plywood

http://www.grabberman.eu/Media/TechnicalData/452.pdf

12/10/2013 14462

Page 24: Detailed Design Review

Plywood Flexing

● Modeled as an isotropic material, although wood is anisotropic

● Showed max deflection of 0.503E-05 inches

12/10/2013 14462

Page 25: Detailed Design Review

Bolt Tear Through

● Wanted to prevent the bolt from tearing through the plywood

● A 3 inch washer was added to distribute the loading on the face of the plywood

1200 lbf

170 psi

Without Washer: Compressive stress on the plywood of 8692 psi. The maximum allowable compressive stress for loading perpendicular to the face grain is between ~ 900 – 1500 psi

With Washer: Compressive stress on plywood of 170 psi, within the allowable stress

1200 lbf

8692 psi

12/10/2013 14462

Source: www.buildgp.com/DocumentViewer.aspx?repository=bp&elementid

Page 26: Detailed Design Review

Pillow Block Bearings

Selection:

● Shaft will insert and then be screwed down with set screws

● Do not need to be thrust bearings, as platform will rotate

¾” Stamped-Steel Mounted Ball Bearings—ABEC-1

12/10/2013 14462

Page 27: Detailed Design Review

Exploded View of Lower Portion

12/10/2013 14462

Page 28: Detailed Design Review

Design Focus - Lower Portion

• Wanted to ensure sleeve bearing did not deform under worst-case scenario loading

• Wanted to prevent screw pullout

• Ensure sheet metal flexed minimally under applied load

12/10/2013 14462

Page 29: Detailed Design Review

Sleeve Bearing

T=1200 lbf

hsb

H

RL

RR

Selection:

0.752” x 1” Ultra Tough Oil Lubricated Bronze Flanged Sleeve Bearing

● Utilized Excel to calculate various reaction forces for different hsb, and compared versus the max allowable force on the inner walls of the bearing

● For worst case scenario chosen bearing will see 5100 lbs and it is capable of handling 6016 lbs.

12/10/2013 14462

Page 30: Detailed Design Review

Angle Iron Pullout and Shear

F=300 lbf

F=300 lbf

F=200 lbf Selection:

1”x1”x1/8” angle iron with #12 screws

6 vertical screws, and 4 horizontal

¾” C-D grade plywood

http://www.grabberman.eu/Media/TechnicalData/452.pdf

12/10/2013 14462

Page 31: Detailed Design Review

Sheet Metal Plate• Max deflection of ~ 0.003 inches

Page 32: Detailed Design Review

Base Station – Cross Section View

12/10/2013 14462

Page 33: Detailed Design Review

Base Station AnimationBase Station Animation

12/10/2013 14462

Page 34: Detailed Design Review

NI USB-6210

16 bit Resolution = 10/(2^16) = 0.000153

12/10/2013 14462

Page 35: Detailed Design Review

3140_0 S Type Load Cell (100-500kg)

12/10/2013 14462

Page 36: Detailed Design Review

1046_0 PhidgetBridge 4-Input

Resolution = 5/(2^24) = 0.000000298

12/10/2013 14462

Page 37: Detailed Design Review

Potentiometers

• 2 pots required.• 1 turn ~ 270 degrees• Between 1K-10K Resistance• Linear• Bourns brand• Potentiometers from Gomes still need to be spec out

12/10/2013 14462

Page 38: Detailed Design Review

DAQ Operational Flowchart

Page 39: Detailed Design Review

DAQ Programming Flowchart

Page 40: Detailed Design Review

Wiring Schematic for DAQ

12/10/2013 14462

Page 41: Detailed Design Review

Bill of Materials - Full

Page 42: Detailed Design Review

Bill of Materials – Already Have

Page 43: Detailed Design Review

Bill of Materials – Need to Buy

Page 44: Detailed Design Review

Bill of Materials - Possible Savings

Page 45: Detailed Design Review

Glider Configuration for Experiments

Total configurations: 2590

Range: Beta = 90-98 [deg] Wind Speed = 4-10 [m/s] Tether Length = 20-30 [m] Flight Radius = 10-18 [m]

Force [lbs] Wind Speed [m/s]

Radius [m]

Beta [deg]

Tether Length [m]

334.3693 7 15 92 30

309.5235 7 16 92 30

349.0444 7 18 93 30

Filtered: Force = 300-350 [lbs] Wind Speed = 7 [m/s] Tether Length = 30 [m]

12/10/2013 14462

Page 46: Detailed Design Review

Regression Analysis including Wind

Force = -1523.83 + 44.6977 WindSpeed - 22.0839 Radius + 16.3528 Beta +11.4661 TethLen

Analysis of VarianceSource DF Seq SS F PRegression 4 14445969 580.40 0WindSpeed 1 6413421 2006.60 0Radius 1 2623543 887.44 0Beta 1 2732563 524.19 0TethLen 1 2676441 430.13 0Error 2583 16072377Total 2587 30518346

12/10/2013 14462

Page 47: Detailed Design Review

Why the high error ?

12/10/2013 14462

2000-200-400

99.99

9990

50

101

0.01

Residual

Perc

ent

500400300200100

200

0

-200

Fitted Value

Resi

dual

140700-70-140-210-280

160

120

80

40

0

Residual

Freq

uenc

y

2400

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

1200

10008006004002001

200

0

-200

Observation Order

Resi

dual

Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits

Histogram Versus Order

Residual Plots for Force

Page 48: Detailed Design Review

DOE ANOVA Analysis

Analysis is based off of above equationExperiment was run using the following

Factor Type Levels ValuesRadius fixed 9 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Beta fixed 8 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98TethLen fixed 11 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Analysis of Variance for Force for TestsSource Seq SSRadius 1074979Beta 1039829TethLen 772033Radius*Beta 383755Radius*TethLen 263954Beta*TethLen 312236Radius*Beta*TethLen 818325Error 25853236Total 30518346

12/10/2013 14462

Page 49: Detailed Design Review

Interaction plots for Tension

12/10/2013 14462

Page 50: Detailed Design Review

Main effects on tension

12/10/2013 14462

Page 51: Detailed Design Review

Graphical Sensitivity (contour plots) of each factor

12/10/2013 14462

Page 52: Detailed Design Review

Graphical Surface plots

12/10/2013 14462

Page 53: Detailed Design Review

Test Plan

12/10/2013 14462

Page 54: Detailed Design Review

Test Plan

• Varied wind speed: Dependent on environment• Varied glider mass would be an additional test if time

allows

Component/System Tested Specification Tested

Responsibility Completion Date

Experimental Proof of Theoretical Model

Tension Team 02/28/2014

Varied Tether Length Model Sensitivity Team 03/14/2014

Varied Wind Speed Model Sensitivity Team 03/28/2014

Varied Beta Angle Model Sensitivity Team 04/04/2014

Varied Flight Path Radius Model Sensitivity Team 04/11/2014

Varied Glider Mass Tension Team 04/18/2014

12/10/2013 14462

Page 55: Detailed Design Review

Risk Assessment - Full

12/10/2013 14462

Page 56: Detailed Design Review

Risk Assessment - High Priority/New

12/10/2013 14462

Page 57: Detailed Design Review

Project Plan

12/10/2013 14462

Page 58: Detailed Design Review

MSD II Plan

12/10/2013 14462

Page 59: Detailed Design Review

MSD II Plan (Continued)

12/10/2013 14462

Page 60: Detailed Design Review

Work Breakdown Matt – Building glider, attaching bridal, flying tethered

glider Paul - Building glider, attaching bridal, flying tethered

glider Jon – Machine parts, assemble base station Kyle - Machine parts, assemble base station Bill – Create LabVIEW code, test DAQ equipment, Saj- Update project timeline, develop more detailed test

plans from DOE, maintain transparency between team and customer/guides

All – Assist in base station build

12/10/2013 14462

Page 61: Detailed Design Review

Summary• Engineering Requirements• Glider Status• Tether Design• Base Station Design• DAQ System• Bill of Materials• DOE ANOVA Analysis• Test Plan• MSD II Plan• Work Breakdown• Risk Assessment

12/10/2013 14462

Page 62: Detailed Design Review

Questions?

12/10/2013 14462