detailed project report on tarang …slnaiwmpassam.gov.in/xfiles/kokrajhar(iii)-2009-10-tarang...
TRANSCRIPT
1
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
ON
TARANG INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT
KOKRAJHAR
UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCES
MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI
PREPARED & SUBMITTED
TO STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY
INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
BY
BS CONSULTANTS 128, RAJGARH ROAD, 2ND FLOOR
GUWAHATI-781 007
2
PROJECT AT A GLANCE 1. Name of Project : Tarang Integrated Watershed Management
Project Code No. 3A1E7/IIa (Kokrajhar -III).
2. Name of the State : Assam (Code No. 18)
3. Name of the State Level Nodal Agency
: Department of Soil Conservation, Government of Assam
4. Name of the District : Kokrajhar District
5. Name of the Development Block
: Titaguri Development Block
6. Name of Village Council Development Committee (VCDC)
: Amguri, Kalugaon, Deborgaon, Titaguri Bhatipara, Gendabill.
7. Numbers of villages covered : 35 Nos.
8. Name of Micro Watershed with Code
: 1. Nadlajan MWS, 2. Burhadia MWS
9. Total Geographical area of the Project
: 8506 ha.
10. Area proposed to be treated : 3000 ha (Approved Project area sanctioned for preparation of DPR vide letter no: SLNA/7/09-10/965-988 dated 15th December 2009)
11. Total Project Cost : Rs. 360.00 Lakh
12. Name & Address of Project Manager
: Divisional Officer, Kokrajhar Soil Conservation Division, Kokrajhar.
13. Name & Address of PIA : Divisional Officer, Kokrajhar Soil Conservation Division, Kokrajhar.
3
CONTENTS
Sl. No.
Chapter Particulars Page No.
1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2-3 3 CHAPTER –I GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 4-10 Introduction 4 Climate & Soil 4 Physiography & Drainage 4 Demographic profile 5 Vegetation 5 Land use & Land Holdings 6 IWM projects in the District 7 Proposed IWMP in the District Table M(SP) 2 8 Prioritized list of Project Table DPR-1 8 Vision & Strategy 9 4 CHAPTER –II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TARANG IWM
PROJECT AREA 11-14
Location 11 Climate 11 Rainfall with Table: DPR -2 12 Seasonal distribution of Rainfall Table: DPR-3 13 Soil 14 Physiography, Relief & Drainage 14 5 CHAPTER-III PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA 15-27 Objectives 15-16 Present Land Use & Land Cover, Table: DPR 4 17 Details of Areas of Micro Watersheds Table: M (SP) 2 17 Details of Types of Areas Covered under IWMP, Table (SP)
3 18
Details of Physiography Relief of the Project Table: M (SP) 4 19 Agro-Climatic Zone, Soil types, Average Rainfall & Major
Crops., Table M (SP) 5 19
Details of Flood & Drought in Project Area., Table M (SP) 6 20 Details of Soil Erosion, Table M (SP) 7. 21 Details of Infrastructure, Table M (SP)8 22 Details of Land Holdings pattern, Table M (SP) 9 23 Details of Common Property Resources Table M (SP)10 24 Details of Kharif Crop Area, Table M(PO) C1 25 Details of Rabi Crops Area, Table M (PO) C2 25
4
Details of Zaid Crop Area, Table M (PO) C3 26 Details of Fund Flow of Watershed Committee Account,
Table M(FM) 4 26
Details of Pending UGs, Table M(FM) 5 27 6. CHAPTER-IV PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN 28-53 Resource potentials, problems & constraints 28-31 Strategy 31-36 Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table M(PA) A1 37 Other Activities of Preparatory Phase Table M (PA)-A2 38 Phasing of Livelihood activities Table: DPR-5 39-40 Activities related to Surface water resources Table M (PA)B1 41 Activities related to ground water resources Table M (PA)B2 42 Activities proposed for users group in the project areaTable
No. M (PS)B3 Activities related to livelihood by Self Help Groups Table M(PA)B4
43
44-47 Other activities of watershed work phase Table M (PA)B5 48 Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed works Table
M(PA)B6 49
Details of activities connected with vegetative cover Table M(PA)B7
50
Details of other allied activities Table M(PA)B8 51 Livelihood proposed to be created for Asset less people
Table M(PA) B9 52
Livelihood proposed to be created for farmer Table M(PA)B10
53
7 CHAPTER-V PLANNING- 54-65 Proposed Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table DPR 6 54 Year wise phasing of project activities, Table DPR 7 55 Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 8 56-58 Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 9 59-62 Village wise GPS Points Table DPR 10 63-65 8 CHAPTER-VI INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE 66 Details of Self Help groups (SHG) M(IS)9 66 Details of User Groups (UGs) in project area Table
M(IS)10 66
9 CHAPTER-VII CAPACITY BUILDING 67 Capacity building activities for the year 2010-11, Table
M(CB)2 67
Information, Education & Communication (IEC) Table M(CB)3
67
10 MAPS Location Map of Tarang IWM Project. Present Land Use Map of Tarang Watershed Area.
5
Watershed map of Tarang IWM project showing Micro Watersheds, villages, drainage, relief etc.
Treatment map of Tarrang IWMP
6
INTRODUCTION
Soil-Water-Plant resources are nature’s gift to mankind. These three resources are the
most important and vital natural resources for the existence of man and animals. Soil,
water and plant are so interdependent that one cannot be managed efficiently without the
other two. But due to high rate of population growth-both human and livestock, there is
indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources for meeting the ever-increasing demand
for food, fodder, fuel, fibers and fertilizers. Thus developed, continuous degradation of
production base and imbalance in land-water-plant and human-animal system, leads to
ecological imbalance and economic insecurity. As a result there is threat to the quality of
our life and cultivation. Therefore it is highly felt that the natural resources are to be
managed efficiently, collectively and simultaneously one has to look and find out the
suitable under “unit of management”. Of the three resources soil, water and vegetation or
plants “soil and vegetation subjected themselves to and easier manipulation whereas
water is the climatic parameter that need to be disciplined once it comes in contact with
vegetation and the soil. However, water can be managed conveniently and efficiently
only if watershed is taken as an unit. Since soil, plant and water are interdependent
resources, “watershed” is considered to be the ideal unit for most effective and gainful
management of these resources.
Watershed is defined as a unit of an area, which covers all land and water area that
contribute runoff to a common point. It is a complete dynamic unit, which invariably
response to any change that may be brought about within its extent. The soil and water
must therefore be considered planned and managed on watershed basics for effective
results.
7
Watershed approach has conventionally aimed at treating degraded land with the help of
low cost and locally accessed technologies such as in-situ soil and moisture conservation
measures, afforestation etc. through a participatory approach that seek to secure close
involvement of the user communities. The broad objectives were the promotion of the
overall economic development and improvement of socio-economic conditions of the
resources poor section of the people in-habiting the programme areas. With this aim, the
Govt. of India has launched the “Integrated Watershed Management Programme
(IWMP).
METHODOLOGY
In general the common guidelines for watershed development projects (2008) of the
Department of Land Resources (DOLR) Government of India were followed in
preparation of the Detailed Project Report (DPR).
The methodology of planning, according to the guidelines, envisages participatory
planning involving directly the villagers (Beneficiaries) of the project area with active co-
operation & participation from the gram Panchyats VCDC. The Participatory Rural
Appraisal (PRA) was carried out in all the villages in the projects area. Participatory
work sheet for assessment of needs and priorities including details of activities were
prepared. The socio economic survey was conducted covering each and every house hold.
The data collected house wise and village wise were generated and analyzed.
The Comprehensive District Agricultural Plan was also referred to and the prescriptions
suggested in C-DAP were adhered to in finalizing the work phase.
Basic information on watershed including rainfall, temperature, topography,
hydrogeology, soil forests etc. were collected from various published and unpublished
records reports etc. of various Central and State Government Organization including
remote sensing data/maps of NRSO, soil toposheets, soil maps, Climatic maps, hydro-
8
ecological maps prepared and published by the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land
Use Planning. Land use Land cover maps were supplied by the SLNA and the present
Land use Land cover was analyzed and interpreted from these maps with ground truth
verification as well as data available with the revenue authority.
The treatment measures were taken up for compiling and preparing the work phase in the
DPR as detailed in the common guidelines and as prescribed by the SLNA. The cost
analysis design and drawing etc. of different activities were also designed and supplied
by the SLNA and accordingly used in project planning.
The GPS points were taken for all village level proposed project sites and were
transferred in GIS layers.
The draft plan (both soft copy as well as hard copy) were prepared and placed for review,
modify and seek approval of the SLNA. On scrutiny of the draft plan by the SLNA as
well as by the concerned Project Manager Final Detailed Project Reports have been
prepared.
9
CHAPTER-I
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
INTRODUCTION
The Kokrajhar district located on the north bank of river Brahmaputra shares the
international boundary with Bhutan in the north and interstate boundary with West
Bengal in the west. The territorial council of BTAD headquartered is in the district. The
district consists of 3 Sub-divisions, 5 Revenue circles, 8 Community Development
blocks, 88 VCDCs and 2091 Revenue villages.
CLIMATE & SOIL
The climate of the district is hot summer followed by monsoon of heavy rainfall and
relatively cool winter with scanty rainfall. The average annual rainfall is about 3127 mm
per annum and the maximum and minimum temperature varies from 33-380C and 8-
100C, respectively.
The soils are predominantly sandy loam to clay loam in texture and acidic to neutral in
reaction. The general fertility status of soils of the district is poor with low organic
carbon, low available N, P and K status.
PHYSIOGRAPHY & DRAINAGE
The district is characterized by almost plain topography being flanked by foothills of
Bhutan in the upper strip of north and high plain in the middle to lower strip towards the
southern side with a gradation from north to south. The southern part however, has hills
and hillocks also.
A large number of rivers and tributaries viz., Sankosh, Gongia, Gaurang, Champa, Hel,
Tarang, Saralbhanga, Longa etc. flow from north (mostly originating from Bhutan) to
south of the district and meet the mighty river Brahmaputra. Though a number of rivers
and tributaries are flowing over the district at a distance of 6-8 km interval, the scenario
10
of flow irrigation is very poor due to poor planning. Nevertheless, the district being in the
foot hill of Bhutan, the northern side of it gets the benefit of natural flow irrigation by
dong (channel) for a period of 6-7 months offering the scope for growing two crops in a
year in the said area. Barring flash flood, the district can be said a flood free district. The
entire northern belt of the district called Bhabar tract is characterized by low water table
and deep boulder deposit with underlying layers of gravelly sand with varying degree of
thickness of overlying sandy loam with hums varying from almost zero to 30 cm.
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
The district is demographically dominated by tribal and non-tribal communities namely
Bodo, Rava, Koch Rajbangshi, Santhal, Orang, Muslim, Nepali, Bengali etc. The district
has a total population of 9.3 lakhs, 93% of which are village dwellers. The district is
dominated by ST and SC population (44.87%). The population density per square
kilometer is 294 with sex ratio of 945 pre 1000 males. Population of male is 51.40% and
female is 48.60%. The literacy rate of the district is 52.55%. As per 2001 census the total
population of the district is 8, 43,108 out of which 4,28,613 are male and 4,14,495 are
female. The total population of Schedule tribe is 3,32,730 (39.46%) and of schedule caste
is 25614 (3%). The population is expected to rise to 11.06 lakh and 13.21 lakhs by 2011-
12 and 2024-25, respectively, exerting pressure on land and food.
VEGETATION
The district is very rich in forest trees; it has a forest area of 174124 ha with three forest
divisions. Sal, (Shorea robusta) Teak (Tectona Grandis), Gomari (Gamelina arborea),
Sisoo (Dalbargia sisoo), Bamboo (Bambusa spp.), Chap (Maicalia champaca), Koroi
(Albizzia procera), Simul (Salmalia malbaricum) Neem (Azadirachta indica) etc. are
different forest trees that are commonly found in the district. A large number of
herbaceous plants found in cultivated fields, roadsides and wasteland. Some of these
plants are Lantana Camara, Empereta cylindrical, Mimosa species, Eupatorium
odoratum, Cynodon dactylon etc.
11
LAND USE & LAND HOLDINGS
The total geographical area of the district is 3,98,635 ha. As per data available in the
Comprehensive District Agriculture Plan (CDAP) for Kokrajhar district 38.05% is
cultivable, 0.7% cultivable wasteland, 0.9% current fallow, 54.94% forest, 5.78%
pasture, 9.1% under non–agricultural use and 1.75% under miscellaneous plantation. The
net sown area of Kokrajhar is 89,784 ha which is 28.33% of the total area of the district.
There are 55,908 operational holdings and the average size of land holding is 1.20 ha.
The marginal farmers constitute 40.77% of farm families with 17.91% of land under their
possession and the small farmer is 33.39% occupying 30.54% of land. 19.52% of farm
families represent semi-medium farmers possessing 31.99% of land while medium
farmers constitute 6.27% of farm families with 19.07% of land. The large farmer in the
district is only less than 1% of total farm families.
The district has been divided in to three Agro-Ecological situations (AES) based on
physiography, hydrology, soil, climate and cropping patterns viz. (1) Plain zone (II) Hill
and Hillock zone (III) Foothill area. Plain zone is the largest zone covering 56.7 % of
total area while hill and hillock zone is the smallest zone with 12% of area in the south.
The foothill zone enshrines 31.3 % area in the district.
Agriculture is the main occupation of Kokrajhar district and contributes a major part in
the district economy. Agriculture development is the prime consideration for making
radical changes in the district through the Marginal, Small and Landless farmers. The
average size of operational land holdings in the district is 1.20 ha. Rice is the main crop,
which covers about 80% of the Gross Cropped Area. The Gross Cropped Area of the
district is 1, 77,394 ha as against the Net Cropped Area of 1, 08,167 ha with a cropping
intensity of 164.20%. In the district, double cropping is a regular practice in major parts
of the cultivable land and triple cropping is also undertaken in certain pockets having
assured irrigation facility
12
The major field crops grow in the district are Ahu paddy, Sali paddy, Jute, Mesta, Black
gram, Sesame during Kharif season and Boro paddy, Wheat, Toria, Niger, Linseed,
Lentil, Pea, Buckwheat during Rabi season. Under Horticultural crops, vegetables like
Cucurbits, Cabbage, Cauliflower, Knolkhol, Radish, Brinjal, Tomato, etc., fruit trees viz.
Banana, Pineapple, Citrus, Jackfruit etc., Chilli Ginger, Turmeric, Black pepper etc. as
spices, Tuber crops like Potato, Tapioca, Colocasia etc. and plantation crops viz. areca
nut, Coconut etc. are commonly cultivated in the district. In case of fishes, different
indigenous and exotic breeds like Katla, Rahu, Mirika, Calbasu, Bata, Bhangan, Puthi,
Borali, Chitol, Kandhuli, Silgharia, Prawn etc. are grown. In animal Husbandry sector,
different indigenous and cross breeds are reared by the farmers of the Kokrajhar district.
Eri, Muga and mulberry silk are of common interest amongst SC and ST population.
IWMP IN THE DISTRICT
The district has proposed four numbers of IWMP projects that are indicated below along
with the salient features.
13
MIS TABLE M (SP)-2 PROPOSED INTRAGATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECTS IN THE DISTRICT
Sl. No.
Name of District
Total Micro Watershed in the
District
Micro Watershed covered so far Net Watershed to be covered Department of
Land Resources Other Ministries/
Department Total
Watershed Covered
No. Area (Ha.)
No. Area (Ha.)
No. Area (Ha.)
No. Area (Ha.)
No. Area (Ha.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1. Kokrajhar 26 129613 9 58559 5 2500 14 61059 12 68554
TABLE –DPR: 1 PRIORITIZED LIST OF PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR SANCTION DURING THE FINANCIAL
YEAR 2009-10.
Sl.
No
Dis
tric
t
Name of the Projects No of micro
watersheds
proposed to be
covered
Proposed
project area
(Ha.)
Type of area (Hilly/
Desert/ Other)
Proposed cost
(Rupees in Lakh.)
Remarks
1
Kok
rajh
ar
Elengmari IWMP 2 6975 Plain area with
moderately sloped
360 Area to be treated
during XI th Plan
2 Saralbhanga IWMP 2 6913 Moderately sloped 360 -do-
3 Bumnoi-Mornoi
(Sankosh) IWMP
2 5165 -do- 360 -do-
4 Tarang IWMP 2 6913 -do- 360 -do-
14
VISION AND STRATEGY
The district of Kokrajhar needs major rejuvenation and reconstruction in all the sectors of
development as it has been running through more than a decade of movement and social
unrest for creation of the Bodoland Territorial Autonomous Council (BAC). Agriculture
in the district is of subsistence type.
The productivity of almost all major crops in the district as reflected in the
Comprehensive District Agriculture Plan, has remain below the State’s average. The
average yield of the most important food crops of rice (1162 ka/ha.) is lower than that in
the State and even then that of the neighboring district of Dhubri. Similarly yields of
pulses and spices are also lower. Yields of oil seeds, vegetables and tuber crops are
higher than those of the States average.
Under the circumstances critical issues relating to the development of agriculture and
allied sectors vis-à-vis in-situ conservation of soil & moisture, that need to be eddies are
as follows:
1. Increase productivity and income through in-situ conservation of soil & moisture, up-
gradation and utilization of natural endowments like land, water, plant, and human
resources in harmonious and integrated manner. This will aim at perpetual availability of
food, fodder, fuel, fiber, timber and biomass for rural and cottage industry to meet the
growing demands of human and livestock population through diversification and
intensification in existing farming system.
2. Introducing land use technologies, which improve production and productivity and will
enable the farmers to make use of land according to capability.
15
3. Farmers Organization Formation: promotion and empowering of Users Groups, Shelf
Help Groups covering marginal and landless farmers providing facilities of integrated
development of the watershed with effective participation of the people of the project
area.
4. Sustainability of production and farm income. The high rainfall and light soil condition
need attention for efficient natural resources management including judicious water
management, rain water harvesting proper drainage line treatment, rejuvenation of
degraded vegetative cover to tackle the problems of soil erosion, soil acidity, loss of
vegetative cover and bio-diversity.
5. Generation of employment by optimum development of natural and human resources
of villages through creating general awareness on scientific farming and market
information as well as human resources through adequate time-to-time training.
16
CHAPTER-II
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TARANG
IWM PROJECT AREA
LOCATION
The Tarang IWMP area is located in the northeastern side of the district HQ, Kokrajhar
town. It lies between 900 16/ E to 90025/ E latitudes and 26024/ N to 26032/N longitude.
CLIMATE
The Climate is warm and humid with hot summer followed by monsoon of heavy rainfall
and relatively cool and dry winter. Min Temperature 8-100 and Max Temperature is
33.380. Relative Humidity is Min 72.75% and Max 75.50%.
RAINFALL
The average annual rainfall is 3202.40 mm. Based on the actual rainfall received during
the period from 2005 to 2009 as per data from the Indian Metrological Department. Out
of the total rainfall about 70 to 80 percent is received during the monsoon, June to
September. The normal rainfall, actual rainfall and deviation in percentage for the period
from January 2005 to October 2009 are given in the following tables.
17
TABLE-DPR: 2 THE RAINFALL DATA FOR THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2009.
Month Rainfall during 2005 (mm)
Rainfall during 2006 (mm)
Rainfall during 2007(mm)
Rainfall during 2008 (mm)
Rainfall during 2009(mm)
Nor
mal
Act
ual
Dev
iatio
n
Nor
mal
Act
ual
Dev
iatio
n
Nor
mal
Act
ual
Dev
iatio
n
Nor
mal
Act
ual
Dev
iatio
n
Nor
mal
Act
ual
Dev
iatio
n
Jan 9.5 16 68% 15.1 0.0 -100%
15.1 0.00 -100%
15.1 48.0 69% 1.4 15.1 91%
Feb 20.2 6 -70% 34.9 35.4 1% 16,3 0.0 -100%
16,3 3.80 -77% 0 16.3 100%
Mar 46.5 128.8 177% 77.7 11.6 -85% 77.7 34.6 -55% 77.7 135.4 74.% 73.2 77.7 6% Apr 178.9 295.9 65% 223.3 130.9 -41% 223.3 0.0 -
100% 223.3 315.4 41% 152.4 223.3 32%
May 398.6 428.9 8% 671.0 845.6 26% 525.1 407.4 -22% 336.8 525.1 36% 587.2 525.1 -12% June 621.3 811.3 31% 668.2 804.2 20% 668.2 666.0 0% 481.0 668.2 28% 452.4 668.2 32% July 752.4 796.3 6% 600.4 537.2 -11% 600.4 666.0 11% 517.2 600.4 14% 312.3 600.4 48% Aug 403.2 581.7 44% 369.4 287.6 -22% 369.4 374.4 1% 1202.1 369.4 -
225% 949.6 380.2 -
150% Sept. 379.2 159.6 -58% 413.0 566.0 37% 413.0 359.2 -13% 503.9 413.0 -22% 124.2 402.2 69% Oct. 144.7 522.6 261% 155.6 12.0 -92% 27.0 28.5 0% 232.4 155.6 -49% - - - Nov. 13.5 26.6 97% 28.5 0.0 -
100% 28.5 0.0 -
100% 0.0 28.5 -
100% - - -
Dec. 0.0 12.5 100% 9.8 0.0 100% 9.8 1.0 -90% 0.0 9.8 90% - - -
18
TABLE-DPR: 3 SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL DURING 2007.
District and
Agro-Climatic Zone
Season Rainfall in mm. Normal Actual Deviation
Kokrajhar Lower Brahmaputra
valley
Winter (Jan, Feb) 31.3 0.0 -31.3 Summer (March, April & May) 826.1 442.4 -383.7 Monsoon (June to September) 2051.0 2065.6 +14.6 Post Monsoon (October to December) 193.9 199.0 +5.1
Total: 3102.3 2707 -395.3 (Source: Statistical Handbook, Assam, 2008)
19
Now from the analysis of the tables given above it is seen that out of the total rainfall of
2707.0 mm during the year 2007 a total of 2263.6 mm i.e. 83.62% rainfall had occurred
during the months from June to October. On the other hand there was no rainfall at all
during the months of January, February, April, November and there was only 1 mm
rainfall during the month of December; as such there was no rainfall at all during five
months of the year. This is a clear indication that for five months of the year the land
suffers moisture stress while during the rainy season i.e from June to October more than
4/5th of the total annual rainfall (83.62%) had occurred during the season; on account of
which the area suffers periodic inundation as well as soil erosion due to high intensity of
rainfall.
Similarly, during the year 2008 out of total rainfall of 3776.0 mm a total of 2704.2 mm
i.e. more than 71% rainfall has occurred during the months of June to September, while
only 1.37% rainfall occurred during period from November to February.
SOIL
The Soil is predominantly very deep, well drained, course loamy occurring on very
gently slopping lower piedmont plain having sandy surface with moderate erosion;
(Coarse loamy Dystric Eutrochrepts) associated with deep, imperfectly drained, fine
loamy soil occurring on nearly level subdued piedmont plain with slight flooding (Fine
loamy, Aeric Haplaquepts) and acidity to neutral in reaction, as per soil survey map
prepared by national bureau of soils survey and land use planning (ICAR) (Regional
Center, Jorhat). Ground water potential is10 to 20 liters per second yield Aquifers with
Secondary Intergrannular porosity and Fractures.
PHYSIOGRAPHY RELIEF AND DRAINAGE
The area is very gently sloping characterized by almost plain topography mostly less than
10 meters per km. gradient towards south. The lowest elevation recorded in the project
area is 45mts and the highest elevation is 70 meters.
20
CHAPTER-III.
PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA:
Objectives:
The specific objectives of the project are as follows:
i. Conservation up-gradation and utilization of natural endowments like land, water
plant, animal and human resources in harmonious and integrated manner. This will aim
at perpetual availability of food, fodder, fuel, fiber, timber and biomass for rural and
cottage industries to meet the growing demands of human and livestock population
through diversification use pattern.
ii. Introducing land use technologies, which improve production and productivity of
crops in the project areas.
iii. Introducing measures, which will enable the farmers to make use of land according
to its capability.
iv. Generation of employment during project period and regular employment after
completion of the project.
v. Securing stability and growth of agricultural production.
vi. Optimization of available resources such as soil, water and land within the micro
watershed.
vii. Creating a general awareness among the local farmers about adopting scientific
farming.
viii. Providing facilities of integrated development and production of the watershed
with effective participation of the people of the project area.
21
ix. In addition to food, fodder and fuel, the project will endeavor to enhance cash
flow to the farmers and landless agricultural labourer through increase casual
employment, marketing of marketable surplus of various produce with the help
of forming various self help groups (SHG).
x. Generation of employment by optimum development of natural and human
resources of villages in order to promote income generation activities and to
encourage savings.
22
TABLE-DPR: 4 LAND USE PATTERN OF TARANG IWMP.
PRESENT LAND USE
The present land use pattern of the project area as interpreted from the remote sensing map supplied by the SLNA is as follows:
Name of project
Built-up(ha)
Kharif (ha)
Rabi (ha)
Zaid Double crop(ha)
Agril. Plantatio
n (ha)
Deci .Forest (dense)
Deci Forest (open)
Scrub Grass (ha)
Marshy (ha)
River/ Waterbod
y (ha)
Riv.Sand
Gully
Tarang Nil 4686 Nil Nil 624 3227 4 Nil 457 27 57 22 26 Nil
TABLE-M (SP) 2: DETAILS OF AREAS OF MICRO-WATERSHEDS COVERED UNDER THE WATERSHED PROGRAMME (HA) OF DOLR IN THE STATE (A) PRE-IWMP, (B) UNDER IWMP, (C ) UNDER OTHER MINISTRIES AND (D) TOTAL AREA (HA) COVERED UNDER THE WATERSHED PROGRAMME OF DOLR: STATE-WISE *
1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No.
Name of State
Name of District
Total micro-watersheds in
the District
Micro-watersheds# covered so far
Net watersheds to be covered
Dept. of Land Resources Other Ministries/ Depts.
Total watersheds
covered Pre-IWMP projects IWMP projects
Any other watershed
project
No. Area (ha.) No. Area
(ha.)
No. Area (ha.) No. Area
(ha.) No. Area (ha.) No. Area
(ha.)
1 Assam Kokrajhar 26 1,29,613 9 58,559 - - 5 2,500 14 61,059 12 68,554
23
TABLE-M (SP) 3: DETAILS OF THE TYPES OF AREAS COVERED UNDER THE IWMP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sl. No.
Name of
State
Name of District
Name of
project
Year of sanction
Project duration (dd/mm/ yyyy) Area of
the projects (To be
treated)
Type of terrain Hilly (H)/ Desert (D)/ Others (O)
Project cost (Rs. In lakh)
Names of micro watersheds and
Code Nos.# (as per DoLR’s unique
codification)
1 Assam Kokrajhar Tarang 2009 2009 2014 3000 ha. Others 360.00 3A1E7
11 12
Cultivated and wasteland area of the project Area details (ha) (Falling within the projects)
Cultivated rain fed
area
Cultivated irrigated
area
Uncultivated wasteland Pvt. Agri. Land Forest
Land Community
land
Others (River & river sand
etc.)
Total area (ha) a) Temporary
Fallow b)
Permanent
5850 624 556 232 Gen. SC ST OBC Total 467 767 138 8506 1836 525 4408 493 7262
24
TABLE-M(SP)4: DETAILS OF PHYSIOGRAPHY AND RELIEF OF THE PROJECT AREAS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istri
ct
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Elev
atio
n (m
eter
s)
Slop
e ra
nge
(%)
Ord
er o
f w
ater
shed
Su
b/m
icro
-w
ater
shed
M
ajor
st
ream
s
Top sequence (Soil series)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
50-7
5 m
.
3 –
5 %
1.
Upp
er T
aran
g 2.
K
hurs
akat
i
Tara
ng
Deep, imperfectly drain, fine loamy soils occurring on level to nearly level plain having loamy surface with moderate flooding, (Fine Loamy Typic Haplaquents) asociated with deep moderately well drain, kind silty soils (Fine silty Aeric Fluvaquents)
TABLE-M (SP) 5: AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONE, SOIL TYPES, AVERAGE RAINFALL AND MAJOR CROPS IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sl. No.
Name of State
Name of the Agro-climatic
zone
Area in ha
Name of
the district
Name of the
project
Major soil types Average rainfall in mm
(preceding 5 years’ average)
Major crops
a) Type b) Area (ha)
a) Name b) Area (ha)
1. Assam
Lower Brahmaputra
Agro-Climatic Zone No.-4
8506 Kokrajhar Tarang
Fine Loamy Typic
Haplaquents 5100
3206.6
Paddy, 2780
Oil seed, 250
Fine Silty Aeric Fluvaquents 3406
Jute 150
25
TABLE-M (SP) 6: DETAILS OF FLOOD AND DROUGHT IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sl
. No.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istri
ct
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Particulars Villages
Periodicity Not
affected Annual Any other (please specify)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
ajha
r
Tara
ng
Flood
No. of villages: 15 Nos.
Occasional flash flood occurs during high rainfall in upper catchment in Bhutan, causing heavy loses to standing crops and slit/sand deposition takes place on cultivable land on river banks. As bank erosion and setting of river courses are common phenomenon in the project are and scarcity and uneven rainfall caused draught during monsoon season.
20 Nos.
Drought No. of
villages: 35 Nos.
Nil. In an interval of 10 to 12 years drought like situation occurs in the entire State when Monsoon starts late.
Nil.
26
TABLE-M (SP) 7: DETAILS OF SOIL EROSION IN THE PROJECT AREAS.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No.
Name of State
Name of District
Names of project Cause Type of
erosion
Area affected
(ha)
Run off (mm/ year)
Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year)
1. Assam Kokajhar Tarang Water erosion a. Sheet 3402 176.18 41.48 b. Rill 3063 117.88 c. Gully 2041 137.78 Sub-Total: 8506
Wind erosion - NA - Total for project 8506
(Source: Soil Conservation Deptt. Assam – Data as reflected in PPR)
27
TABLE-M (SP) 8: DETAILS OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Sl
. No.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istr
ict
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Parameters Status
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
(i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an all-weather road
35
(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 35 (iii) No. of households without access to drinking water Nil
(iv) No. of educational institutions : Primary (P)/ Secondary (S)/ Higher Secondary (HS)/ vocational institution (VI)
(P) 25
(S) 4
(HS) 1
(VI) 0
(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Center The project area is very much near the District HQ. So, medical facilities are available to the villagers.
(vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary The project area is very much near the District HQ. So, Vety. facilities are available to the villagers.
(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 2 Sub Post offices (viii) No. of villages with access to Banks The project area is very much near the
District HQ. So, banking facilities are available to the villagers.
(ix) No. of villages with access to Markets / mandis 35 Nos. (x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries The project area is near the district HQ. (xi) Total quantity of surplus milk Nil (xii) No. of milk collection centers
(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Private agency(PA)/ others (O))
(U) Nil.
(S) Nil.
(PA) 5
(O) Nil.
(xiii) No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Center 35 Nos. (xiv) Any other facilities with no. of villages
(please specify) 1 No. Govt. Sericulture Farm.
28
TABLE-M (SP) 9: DETAILS OF LAND HOLDING PATTERN IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sl. No.
Name of
State
Name of District
Name of the
project
Type of Farmer No. of households
No. of BPL households
Land holding (ha)
Irrigated Rainfed Total
1 Assam Kokrajhar Tarang
(i) Large farmer 3 0 10 25 35
(ii) Small farmer 1535 0 295 2007 2302
(iii) Marginal farmer 2559 159 319 3408 3727
(iv) Landless person 1025 632 - 410 410
Total: 5122 791 624 5850 6474
29
TABLE-M (SP) 10: DETAILS OF COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES OF THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sl. No.
Name of State
Name of District
Name of project
CPR
Particulars
Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha) Area owned / In possession of Pvt.
persons Govt. PRI Any other
(Pl. Specify)
Pvt. persons
Govt. PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)
(Specify deptt.)
1. Assam Kokrajhar Tarang
(i) Wasteland / degraded land 556 232 Nil Nil 490 Nil Nil Nil (ii) Pastures Nil. Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (iii) Orchards 3222 15 Nil Nil 425 Nil Nil Nil (iv) Village Woodlot Nil Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (v) Forest Nil 467 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (vi) Village Ponds/ Tanks 35 Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (vii) Community Buildings 12 40 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (viii) Weekly Markets Nil. 12 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (ix) Permanent markets Nil. 5 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (x) Temples / Places of worship
15 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
(xi) Others (Pl. specify) Nil. Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
30
TABLE-M (PO) C1: DETAILS OF KHARIF CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sl. No. Name of State
Name of the District
Name of Project
Name of crops
Pre - project
Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl)
per ha. Total Production (Qtl) Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf.
1. Assam Kokrajhar Tarang Paddy 624 5560 25 14 15600 77840 Pulses - 85 - 6 510 Oil seed - 70 - 6 - 420 Jute - 135 - 16 - 2160
Total for the project area: 624 5850 - - 15600 80930
TABLE-M(PO)C2: DETAILS OF RABI CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sl. N
o.
Nam
e o
f Sta
te
Nam
e of
Dis
tric
t
Nam
e of
Pro
ject
Name of crops
Pre-project Mid-term Post-project
Area (ha)
Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.
Total Production (Qtl)
Area (ha)
Average Yield per ha (qtl)
Total production (qtl)
Area (ha)
Average Yield per ha (qtl)
Total production (qtl)
Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf.
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Black gram
- 87 - 5 - 435 15 87 7 6 105 522 55 97 9 8 495 776
Green gram
- 55 - 4 - 220 13 65 6 5 78 325 57 65 7 6 399 1200
Vegetables
320 50 40 30 9600 1500 365 75 60 45 21900 3375 576 125 60 50 34560 6250
Total for the Project: 320 192 - - 9600 2155 393 227 - - 22083 4222 688 287 - - 35454 8226
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts; from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no. of crops;
from column no.6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the Table. Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed
31
TABLE-M(PO)C3: DETAILS OF ZAID CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sl. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect
Name of crops
Pre-project Mid-term Post-project
Area (ha)
Average Yield (Qtl)
per ha.
Total Production
(Qtl)
Area (ha)
Average Yield per ha (qtl)
Total production
(qtl)
Area (ha)
Average Yield per ha (qtl)
Total production
(qtl) Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf.
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Winter rice
200 - 22
- 4400 - 225 - 25 - 5625 - 265 - 27 - 7155 -
Banana - 45 - 5 - 225 - 67 - 6 - 402 - 79 - 7 - 553
Areca nut - 85 - 175 14875 - 115 - 200 - 23000 - 135 - 235 - 31725
Pine apple - 13 - 350 - 4550 3 29 520 500 1560 14500 9 55 525 700 4725 38500
Total for the project: 200 143 22 530 4400 19650 228 211 545 706 7185 37902 274 269 552 942 11880 70778
* From column no. 2, total number of States, from column no. 3, total no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no. of crops; from column no. 6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the Table. Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed
TABLE-M(FM)4: DETAILS OF FUND FLOW OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE ACCOUNTS IN THE
COUNTRY: STATE-WISE* (Amount in Rs.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sl. No.
Name Of
State
Name of District
Name of Project
Name of watershed committee
Opening Balance
Deposit Withdrawal
Interest accrued
Closing balance
DRDA/ ZP cheque
No./date
Amount / Date of
deposit in WC Account
Total amount available in
WC Account
Amount withdrawn by Cash/ Cheque
Date of with-
drawal
Purpose of
withdrawal
1 Assam Kokrajhar Tarang
Upper Tarang &
Khursakati To be maintained with the progress of execution. Total for Project
32
TABLE-M(FM)5: DETAILS OF PENDING UCS.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sl. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Project Instal-ment no.
Financial year of release of
fund
Amount released
(Rs. in lakh)
Amount utilized
(Rs.in lakhs)
Submission of UC@ Date of
Submission of UC
Reasons for not
submitting/
delayed submission of UC
Pending UCs
Due date
Amount (Rs. In lakhs) Date
Amount (Rs. In lakhs)
Period Amount (Rs. in lakhs)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
1. Aie Teklai 6 2001-07 617.91 615.56 Aug’ 09
615.56 Aug’ 09 615.56
2. Jakati Kaora 3 2003-04 263.87 251.26 Aug’ 09
251.26 Aug’ 09 251.26
3. Hel Longa 3 2004-04 221.77 215.97 Aug’ 09
215.97 Aug’ 09 215.97
4. Gaurang Tarang 2 2005-06 159.62 155.04 Aug’ 09
155.04 Aug’ 09 155.04
5. Bhur river 2 2006-07 152.69 120.13 Aug’ 09
120.13 Aug’ 09 120.13
6. Jonali Majati 2 2006-07 151.12 92.35 Aug’ 09
92.35 Aug’ 09 94.35
7. Haraputa darma 2 2006-07 151.12 94.11 Aug’ 09
94.11 Aug’ 09 94.11
8. Garufela Gongia 2 2006-07 151.12 94.11 Aug’ 09
94.11 Aug’ 09 94.11
9. Bhur Down Stream 2 2006-07 151.12 119.21 Aug’ 09
119.21 Aug’ 09 119.21
33
CHAPTER IV
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN
RESOURCE POTENTIALS, PROBLEMS AND CONSTRAINTS
Resource Potentials
The favourable climate and altitude, the high rainfall and humidity and the ecology make
the area a distinct and unique. The favourable climate for growth, the soil types, the water
resources, the diversity of crops etc. makes the area endowed with rich potentials.
Crop diversity- The project area has good potentialities for growing a wide diversity of
crops because of favourable climate, rainfall and other factors. Food crops such as
cereals, pulses and oilseeds are grown in the project area although rice is by far the most
important crop. Other cereals grown in the area are maize, wheat, millet etc. the pulses
grown include black gram, green gram, lathyrus (khesari), peas, pegion pea (arahar) and
lentil. Among the oilseeds are mustard, sesame and ground nut. Cash crops include jute,
mesta cotton, potatoes and sugarcane. Horticultural crops include pineapple, banana,
orange and other citrus fruits, guava coconut, mango, jackfruit, litchi, plums, papaya etc.
The spice crops such as zinger, turmeric and tuber crops like tapioca, sweet potato etc.
are grown. Plantation crops like tea, rubber, black pepper, betel nut and betelvine, etc. are
common in the project area. All common vegetable are also grown in the project area.
Medicinal and aromatic crops as well as timber trees, bamboo and cane are also grown.
Grasses are more important in flush seasons, but tree leaves, shrubs and weeds have an
important role to play in feeding domestic livestock during lean season.
Genetic diversity- The entire North Eastern Region of India is considered to be the home
of origin of many crops such as rice, cucumber, brinjal, phaseolus beans, amaranth,
mandarin orange and other citrus fruits including assam lemon, jambara etc. The wide
variability in the germplasm of the region is a major sources for improving productivity
34
of crops, enhancing quality and for imparting resistance to pests, diseases as well as
various other stress conditions. Agro industrial potentialities are rather vast in the entire
region. However, these potentialities for agro-based industries have not been utilized
fully mainly because of infrastructural deficiencies, lack of awareness and other socio
economic bottlenecks.
Water resources- There is abundant resources of water in the area because of heavy
rainfall. There are also large numbers of tributaries emanating from the hills and flowing
through the project area in to the river Brahmaputra. With proper planning, harvesting
and management water resources potentials can be effectively utilized for production
purposes. Rain water from the major sources as well as natural lakes, ponds, springs;
beels, marshy lands and ground water etc. from other sources of water. The ground water
potentials of the area is also high.
Institutional base- Institutions concerned with development, education, research and
training in agriculture and allied sectors are vitally linked with improvement of
agriculture. The development departments of the Govt. of Assam like Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation, Animal Husbandry, Fishery, Sericulture, and Forestry are
proposed to facilitate coordinating in proper implementation of the management plan.
Technological and capacity building supports are proposed from the National Institute of
Rural Development (NIRD) (NER), Assam Remote Sensing Application Centre
(ARSAC), Assam Agriculture University (AAU) including Veterinary and Fishery
Colleges and Krishi Vikash Kendras (KVK) as well as other Research Centers including
ICAR research Complex at Borapani, Meghalaya etc.
35
Constraints and Problems:
Despite having so much of potentialities agriculture in the region has remained under
developed. It is primarily because there are also a number of constraints and problems
which are responsible for the present state of agricultural production. These constraints
can be grouped under five broad heads. These are (1) Climatic Constraints, (2)
Infrastructural Constraints, (3) Bio-physical Constraints, (4) Constraints of Management
and (5) Socio-economic Constraints.
Constraints of Climate include heavy rainfall with high intensity and periodic distribution
and humidity, low temperature during winter, low light intensity and radiation, recurrent
floods as well as drought conditions. The high rainfall and the humidity not only create
favourable environment for the prevalence of wide range of pests, diseases and weeds,
the rainfall also create problems not only of floods but also in drying, storage and hay
making etc. It needs to be mentioned however that there are also positive aspects of high
rainfall and humidity resulting in adequacy of water as well as favourable climate for
growth of crops.
Infrastructural Constraints include geographic isolation, lack of road, transport and
communication facilities, inadequacy of irrigated areas and lack of post harvest facilities
and marketing etc. Transport and communication system is absolutely poor in the entire
North Eastern Region. Similarly, the cost of transport to and fro out- side the region is
also very costly and time consuming. Such a situation hampers not only in transfer of
technology, supply of input in time but also leads to higher cot in transportation; and thus
creating disadvantage in competitive market outside. The scope for increased production
utilizing modern technology, modern tools and higher rate of fertilizers is limited due to
lack of assured irrigation. Similarly, facilities for post harvest operations such as drying,
threshing, storage and processing have practically not been developed.
36
The acidic soil, in accessible areas, the varied undulating topography, soil erosion and
degradation, ecological imbalance, recurring floods, abundance of weeds, insects, pests,
and diseases and low level technology are some of the important bio-physical constraints
limiting agricultural production.
There are also a large number of problems connected with management of agricultural
production. Some important ones are the gap in extension, poor motivation and
awareness, inadequacy of training, lack of incentive for the farmers including non
assurance of support price; non availability of improved inputs in time, lack of credit
facilities and market, dearth of qualified manpower in many cases, weak linkage between
research and development and above all in effective coordination of all concerned.
STRATEGY-
The new approach envisages a broader vision of hydrological units (watershed)
comprising of clusters of micro watersheds. There would be a multi tier ridge to valley-
sequenced approach, which has proposed to be adopted towards implementation of
Watershed Development Project.
Keeping in mind the guiding principles of watershed management the major thrust will
be to immediately increase the vegetative cover in the project area and to restore
degraded ecosystem, which is at a critical stage. It is also equally stressed to conserve
rainwater through increasing time of concentration by way of decreasing the velocity of
runoff water, encouraging ground water recharge through surface water storage,
harvesting and distribution of rainwater striving to provide alternative and self sustaining
occupation to the people with enhanced livelihood opportunities and improvements in
productivity and income.
An Integrated Watershed Management Project with due emphasis on protective
afforestation pasture development, scientific agriculture through various soil conservation
measures, harvesting of rainwater and runoff water, distribution of water to agriculture
37
field, horticulture, pisciculture, sericulture, piggery development, poultry development,
dairy development etc.
Emphasis should also be given adequately at imparting training and environmental
motivation programme to all users group and shelf help groups as such it is proposed to
make the people conscious and develop skill specially among womenfolk who are
traditionally an important constituent of the society particularly in respect of economic
activity and thereby improving access of the poor, specially women to the benefits and
ensuring access to usufructs right from common property resources for the resource poor.
The schemes proposed in the project area are basically on the basis on the participatory
rural appraisal (PRA) exercises conducted in the project area. The needs of the villagers
are taken into consideration and based on the availability of funds and magnitude of the
requirement of the villagers the scheme have been proposed.
Entry Point Activities: With a view to establish credibility of the project implementing
agency as well as watershed development team and to create a rapport with the village
community some important entry point activities have been proposed as envisaged in the
guidelines of the Govt. of India. The schemes/projects are selected and proposed by the
PIA/Project Manager in consultation with the beneficiaries, the gram panchayats, the
watershed committee as well as the watershed development team.
A. Agricultural Strategy proposed:
Production of rice will have to be raised through improving productivity of winter and
summer rice through use of quality seeds, high yielding varieties, hybrid inputs and
irrigation potential. Area under rice with very poor productivity should be diverted to
summer rice with creation of irrigation potential.
The district is in an advantageous position thus in BTC area as it has the Zonal Research
Station (RARS) within. However there is need to bridge the gap between research and
38
extension for which the Watershed Committee, Project Implementing Agency, The
District Agricultural Machinery as well as District Watershed Development Unit should
Co-ordinate; not only to increase agricultural production but also on agri processing,
input availability, and marketing as well as overall transfer of technology from lab to
land.
More over it is proposed that one no. of Central Nursery with different suitable
horticultural species be raised under entry point activities so as to enable to distribute
seedlings to the people to supplement in their home stead garden and orchards.
B. Protective Afforestation:
Forest are important natural resources and they influence climate, soil conditions
particularly soil and water balance, erosion, floods, maintenance of bio-sphere, ecology
as well as wild flora and fauna etc. In this project it is proposed to create additional forest
coverage of 51.16 ha. in tarang with suitable species. In areas with sandy soils in reverine
environment Khair Sisso and Simul etc. should be planted while in other areas plantation
of bamboo to be stressed as it is not only poor man’s timber but are also needed for paper
industries.
Moreover, it is proposed that one no. of central nursery with around 3.00 lakhs planting
stock be raised with important forest species suitable for the locality under entry point
activity so that seedlings can be given to the people within the project area as well as
planting can be undertaken in road sides river bank and institutional campus.
39
C. Development of Pasture and Animal Husbandry:
The project area has good potential for development of animal husbandry, which needs
special attention. The rural people rear livestock and poultry as important source of
income.
Grasess like Gunea, Napier, Para and other locally available grass species may be
considered for raising in the proposed area. It is proposed that 2 hectares of area with
podder grass be raised in the project area under entry point activity and output to be sold
to or may be distributed to the beneficiaries as the watershed committee /District
Watershed Development Unit feel proper.
As many as 165 units of Shelf Help Groups (SHGs) are selected in the project area to
take up schemes of rearing of milch cow, poultry, piggery and duckery, beekeeping etc.
D. Pisciculture:-
Pisciculture is one of the important developmental schemes, which helps in improving
life style of the people. In one hand creation of water bodies helps in recharging of
ground water level and improves in soil moisture regime. On the other hand pisciculture
in water bodies like Farm Pond, fisheries etc. gives additional income to the farmers. In
general this would meet the nutrient requirement of the people in the project area and
others.
E. Soil and Water Conservation Activities:
In situ-conservation, utilization of soil and water within the Project is the prime criteria
for sustaining agricultural and horticultural production in the cultivated land for which
40
proper soil and water conservation activities are to be taken on priority basis. Therefore
considering the necessity for comprehensive in situ soil and water conservation measures
in the project area the following soil conservation engineering measures are
recommended as detailed in the work plan.
1. Water harvesting structures - To store run off water and to check gully erosion
as well as sheet and rill erosion construction of 1 nos. R.C.C. check dams or drop spill
ways, farm ponds, earthen embankments etc. are proposed in the project area which will
give benefit to arrest soil loss, improve soil moisture regime and increase production of
crops of kharif as well as rabi crops in the project area 8 nos. of water distribution canal
are proposed to be constructed in the project area. Further by using water pumps kharif
crops can also be cultivated in nearby areas.
2. Land Development:- To protect the land from erosion as well as to arrest the run
off water in the project area 7 nos, (involving 4115 Rm.) of earthen bunds with core wall
with 1 no field bund involving 2500rm are proposed to be constructed in the project area
to give benefit in 200 hectares of cultivated field.
These earthen bunds will also protect the paddy fields from inundation by the floodwater
of the adjoining Tarang river and to give strength to the dykes boulder pitching is also
proposed in areas where it is felt needed.
3. Surface Water Storage / Ground Water Recharge:
To create facility for storage of run off water and to facilitate rearing of fish construction
of RCC check dams, farm ponds, fishery ponds as well as reclamation of marshy lands
are also proposed in the project area. The water from the farms dug out ponds and ring
wells in agricultural fields and homestead garden will recharge the ground water level
41
about 3 mts. And can be utilize by in paddy fields, orchards including vegetables gardens
can be utilized by using water pumps.
Moreover 30 nos. of tube wells are also proposed under entry point activity in the project
area to recharge ground water level as well as for meeting up requirement of drinking
water of the people of the project area.
For effective implementation of the project activities in the project area all concerned
must share the overall responsibilities from the District Water Shed Development Unit
(DWDU) level to the Users Groups (UG) and Self Help Group (SHG) Level. For proper
and fruitful implementation of the Project the responsibility of the Project Implementing
Agency and that of the Watershed committee is maximum. The watershed Development
Team must co-ordinate with the watershed committee and Project Implementing Agency
for effective implantation of the water shed works. Proper Training to the Users Groups
(UG) and Self Help Groups (SHG) is most required for effective implementation of the
project activities.
42
CHAPTER IV - PROJECT ACTIVITIES
IV. A. Preparatory phase Table-M(PA)A1: Entry point activities (EPA).
(All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ects
Amount earmarked
for EPA Entry Point Activities planned Estimated
cost Expected outcome
Name of
Agency
Expected Months and Year of Completion (mm / yyy)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
14.40 Central Horticulture Nursery (1 ha)
3.50 35,000 polypot seedlings to be
distributed PIA 2009-10
Works and estimated cost as proposed by PIA/
Project Manager. The detailed plan & estimates
are to be prepared and sanctioned by
DWDU/SLNA.
Central Afforestation Nursery (1 ha.) at Taranguri kahibari village.
3.00 50,000 polypot seedlings to be
distributed -do- Tube wells (30 Nos.) 3.00 For drinking
purpose. -do- Const. of boundary fencing in School campus/public building (1 no.)
2.30 To protect public
property. -do- Improvement of road. 1.30 For public
utility -do- Earthen bund along the Approach road.
1.30 -do- -do-
Grand Total: 14.40
43
TABLE-M(PA)A2: OTHER ACTIVITIES OF PREPARATORY PHASE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Sl. No. State District/ Name
of project Item
Initiation of village
level institution
Capacity building
IEC activities
Baseline survey
Hydro-geological
survey
Identifying technical support agencies
Resource agreements
Preparation of DPR
Evaluation of Project
1 Assam Kokrajhar /
Tarang
IWMP
Estimated Cost 0.7596 13.8816 3.3588 Completed Completed NIRD, (NER), SIRD,
ARSAC, Krishi Vikash Kendra,
Gossaigaon
Under Process
3.60 0.36 Status of Activity
Going on Completed Under Process
Expected month & Year of
Completion
April 2010
August 2010
44
TABLE-DPR: 5 PHASING OF LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Name of District : Kokrajhar Name of Project : Tarang Treatable Area : 3000 ha. Financial Target 82.80 lakhs
(Rs. in Lakhs) Name of Scheme Physical
Target Unit cost
Year wise Phasing 2nd year (4%) 3rd year (3%) 4th year (3%) Total
Livelihood Activities (Asset less) Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Livestock Development Works by S.H.G. (1 unit to each SHG Group)
A. Piggery – Breaded 2 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 nil 0.00 2.40 B. Duck Rearing 12 nos 0.12 1 nos 0.12 6 nos 0.72 5 nos 0.60 1.44 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 1.20 4 nos 4.80 3 nos 3.60 3 nos 3.60 12.00 Other Activities 0.00 A. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.40 4 nos 1.60 1 nos 0.40 2 nos 0.80 2.80 B. Handloom 8 nos 0.50 3 nos 1.50 2 nos 1.00 3 nos 1.50 4.00 C.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.44 nil 1 nos 0.44 1 nos 0.44 0.88 D. Fruit Processing 4 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2.00 E. Carpenter 5 nos 0.24 2 nos 0.48 2 nos 0.48 1 no. 0.24 1.20 F. Mobile Repairing 1 no. 0.30 1 nos 0.30 nil 0.00 0.00 0.30 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.00 I. Vermi Compost 3 nos 0.225 2 nos 0.45 1 nos 0.225 nil 0.00 0.68 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 5 nos 0.60 1 no 0.60 0.00 0.00 4 nos 2.40 3.00 K. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.55 1 no 0.55 1 nos 0.55 1.10 L. Wood Craft 1 nos 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.40 2 nos 0.80 0.80 N. Jaru Making 1 nos 0.30 1 nos 0.30 0.30 O. Tarja Making 3 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.50 P. Bee-Keeping 3 nos 0.20 1 no 0.20 1 nos 0.20 1 nos 0.20 0.60
Total: 73 nos 29 nos. 14.40 24 nos. 10.77 24 nos. 10.83 36.00
(Cont..d)
45
Name of Scheme Physical
Target Unit cost
Year wise Phasing 2nd year (5%) 3rd year (4%) 4th year (4%) Total
Livelihood Activities (Asset less) Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Production System & Micro Enterprises A. Piggery – Breaded 3 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 3.60 B. Duck Rearing 8 nos 0.12 2 nos. 0.24 3 nos 0.36 3 nos 0.36 0.96 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 1.20 5 nos 6.00 3 nos 3.60 2 nos 2.40 12.00 D. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.40 3 nos 1.20 1 nos 0.40 3 nos 1.20 2.80 E. Handloom 14 nos 0.50 6 nos 3.00 4 nos 2.00 4 nos 2.00 7.00 F.Pottary Making 3 nos 0.44 2 nos 0.88 1 nos 0.44 1.32 G. Fruit Processing 8 nos 0.50 4 nos 2.00 2 nos 1.00 2 nos 1.00 4.00 H. Carpenter 8 nos 0.24 3 nos 0.72 3 nos 0.72 2 nos 0.48 1.92 I. Mobile Repairing 2 nos 0.30 2 nos 0.60 nil 0.00 nil 0.00 0.60 J. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.00 K. Vermi Compost 4 nos 0.225 0.00 0.00 1 nos 0.225 3 nos 0.675 0.90 L. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 7 nos 0.60 2 nos 1.20 2 nos 1.20 3 nos 1.80 4.20 O. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.55 1 no 0.55 nil 0.00 1 nos 0.55 1.10 P. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.55 nil 0.00 2 nos 1.10 1.10 R. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.40 2 nos. 0.80 nil 0.00 nil 0.00 0.80 S. Jaru Making 0 0.30 nil 0.00 nil 0.00 0.00 T. Tarja Making 5 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 2 nos 1.00 2.50 U. Bee-Keeping 5 nos 0.20 4 nos 0.80 1 nos 0.20 1.00
Total: 92 Nos. 18.01 14.39 14.41 46.80
46
IV. B. WATERSHED WORKS PHASE
TABLE-M(PA)B1: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SURFACE WATER RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT AREAS. ( Rs. in lakh )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S. N
o.
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
Nam
es o
f MW
S.
Type of structures
Pre-project Proposed target
No. Area Bene-
fitted (ha)
Storage capacity
Augmentation/ repair of existing structures Construction of new structures Total target
No.
Area to be benef-
itted (ha)
Storage capacity
Estd. cost No./Vol.
Area to be bene-
fitted(ha)
Storage capacity Estd. cost
Area to be bene-
fited (ha)
Storage capacity Estd. cost
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Upp
er T
aran
g M
WS
Excavated pond in m3 2 40 1200 m3 - - - - 5/41333 m3
681 35564 m3 23.56 681 35564m3 23.56
RCC Check dam m2 2 60 1500 m3 - - - - 1/20 m2 200 11096 m3 7.10 200 11096m3 7.10 Irrigation Channel (Brick) - - - - - - - 3/2198
Rm 310.72 12385 m3 10.33 310.72 12385m3 10.33
E/Embankment - - - - - - - 5/6000 Rm
340 19040 m3 12.00 340 19040 m3 12.00
Water dist. Canal in Rm. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Boulder revetment in Rm - - - - - - - 5/1491
Rm 140 7840 m3 30.18 140 7840 m3 30.18
Field bund in Rm. - - - - - - - 1/2500 Rm
10 560 m3 3.00 10 560 m3 3.00
Subtotal: - - - - - - - 1681.72 86.17 1681.72
Khu
rsak
ati M
WS
Excavated pond - - - - - - - 7/64660 m3
685 38120 m3 36.85 685 38120 m3 36.85
RCC Check dam - - - - - - - - - - - - - Irrigation Channel (Brick) - - - - - - - 3/5162
Rm 349.62 50250 m3 24.26 349.62 50250 m3 24.26
E/Embankment - - - - - - - 1/4115 Rm
200 11200 m3 8.23 200 11200 m3 8.23
Water dist. Canal in Rm. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Boulder revetment in Rm - - - - - - - 2/217 Rm 18 1008 m3 4.40 18 1008 m3 4.40 Field bund in Rm. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 1252.62 - 73.74 1252.62 - 73.74 Grand Total: 4 100 2700 m3 - - - 33 2934.34 - 159.91 2934.34 - 159.91
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts, from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column nos. 6 to 10 grand totals, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table. @ Information on private & public/ community assets may be shown separately.
47
(Contd.)
TABLE- M(PA)B2: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO RECHARGING GROUND WATER RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. No.
Nam
e of
Sta
te
Nam
e of
Dis
tric
t
Nam
e of
pro
ject
Typ
e of
stru
ctur
e Pre-project Proposed target Achievement due to project
Change in
irrigated
area (Col. 8-6) (ha)
No.
Area
Irrigated
(ha)
Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging
structures
Construction of new recharging structures
Total target Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging
structures
Construction of new recharging structures Total achieve-ment
No. Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
No. Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost No.
Area irrigated
(ha)
Exp. incurred No.
Area irri-
gated (ha)
Exp. incurre
d
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Exp. To be
incurred
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Tube wells 9 - - - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA
- - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA For drinkin
g purpose
(iii)Any others (Pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total for the project: 9 - - - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA
- - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA For drinkin
g purpose
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts; from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column nos. 6 to 9 grand totals, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table. @ Information on private & public/ community assets may be shown separately
48
TABLE M(PS)B3: ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR USERS GROUPS (UGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA. (Rs. in lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Sl. N
o.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istr
ict
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Nam
e of
M
WS
Major Activities of the UGs-targets Nos. of UGs
proposed
Estimated Cost
Amount of WDF to be collected
Structure /Activity proposed Type No. Treatment
(ha.)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
Upp
er T
aran
g M
WS
Excavated pond 5/41333 m3 681 5 23.56 1.18 RCC Check dam 1/20 m2 200 1 7.10 0.36 Irrigation Channel (Brick) 3/2198 Rm 310.72 3 10.33 0.52 E/Embankment 5/6000 Rm 340 5 12.00 0.60 Water dist. Canal in Rm. - - - - - Boulder revetment in Rm 5/1491 Rm 140 5 30.18 1.51 Field bund in Rm. 1/2500 Rm 10 1 3.00 0.15 Protective afforestation in ha. 7/24.32 ha. 24.32 7 6.64 0.33 Horticulture demonstration in ha. 1/0.50 0.50 1 0.24 0.01 Road side plantation -/2 - 2 1.5 0.08 Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 6/6 ha. 6 6 0.7 0.04 Ring wells in No. -/2 - 2 0.9 0.05
Sub Total: 1712.54 38 96.15 4.81
Khu
rsak
ati M
WS
Excavated pond 7/64660 m3 685 7 36.85 1.84 RCC Check dam - - - - 0.00 Irrigation Channel (Brick) 3/5162 Rm 349.62 3 24.26 1.21 E/Embankment 1/4115 Rm 200 1 8.23 0.41 Water dist. Canal in Rm. - - - - - Boulder revetment in Rm 2/217 Rm 18 2 4.40 0.22 Field bund in Rm. - - - - - Protective afforestation in ha. 10/26.84 26.84 10 7.62 0.38 Horticulture demonstration in ha. 0 0 0 0 0.00 Road side plantation -/1 - 1 1 0.05 Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 6/6 ha 6 6 0.35 0.02 Crop demo (veg) in ha. 1/1 ha. 1 1 0.9 0.05 Ring wells in No. 1/1 no. - 1 0.24 0.01
Sub Total: 1287.46 25 83.85 4.19 Grand Total: 3000 63 180.00 9.00
49
TABLE- M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUP (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA (Rs. in lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5
S. No. Name of the State
Name of the District
Name of project
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs
involved
Average annual income
from activity per SHG
1 Assam Kokrajhar Tarang
A. Piggery – Breaded 2 nos 0.50 B. Duck Rearing 12 nos 0.50 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 0.50 A. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.50 B. Handloom 8 nos 0.50 C.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.50 D. Fruit Processing 4 nos 0.50 E. Carpenter 5 nos 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing 1 no. 0.50 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 3 nos 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 5 nos 0.50 K. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.50 L. Wood Craft 1 nos 0.50 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.50 N. Jaru Making 1 nos 0.50 O. Tarja Making 3 nos 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 3 nos 0.50
Total: 73Nos.
* From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, and from column no. 5 to 12, category-wise totals SHG for the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.
50
TABLE-M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA..
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
No. of SHGs given training
Total assistance received by the SHG (Amount in Rs.) Total annual
Income generated (Rs.)
Total Annual
Savings (Rs.)
No. of SHGs Graded as
Total Amount of loan
sanctioned by the bank (s)
No. of SHGs federated
Loan from revolving fund Training Material Others
(pl.specify) I II III
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.50 0.30 Not graded Not yet processed
2 nos
12 nos 1.20 1.00 0.72 - 4.72 1.80 -do- -do- 12 nos
10 nos 1.00 1.00 15.00 - 19.00 2.00 -do- -do- 10 nos
7 nos 0.70 0.70 3.50 - 6.30 1.40 -do- -do- 7 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 4.00 - 7.20 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.60 - 1.40 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
4 nos 0.40 0.40 2.00 - 3.60 0.80 -do- -do- 4 nos
5 nos 0.50 0.50 2.50 - 4.50 1.00 -do- -do- 5 nos
1 no. 0.10 0.10 0.40 - 0.80 0.20 -do- -do- 1 no.
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.80 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.90 - 2.10 0.60 -do- -do- 3 nos
5 nos 0.50 0.50 7.50 - 10.50 2.00 -do- -do- 5 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.60 - 1.60 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
1 nos 0.10 0.10 0.50 - 0.90 0.20 -do- -do- 1 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.60 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
1 nos 0.10 0.10 0.20 - 0.60 0.20 -do- -do- 1 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.60 - 1.50 0.30 -do- -do- 3 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.60 - 1.50
0.30 -do- -do- 3 nos
73Nos. 7.30 7.10 42.02 - 71.12 14.70 73Nos.
51
TABLE- M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO PRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO ENTERPRISES IN THE PROJECT AREA (Rs. in lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5
S. No. Name of the State
Name of the District
Name of project
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs involved
Average annual income
from activity per SHG
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
A. Piggery – Breaded 3 nos 0.50 B. Duck Rearing 8 nos 0.50 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 0.50 A. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.50 B. Handloom 14 nos 0.50 C.Pottary Making 3 nos 0.50 D. Fruit Processing 8 nos 0.50 E. Carpenter 8 nos 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing 2 nos 0.50 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 4 nos 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2
7 nos 0.50
K. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.50 L. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.50 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.50 N. Jaru Making 0 0 O. Tarja Making 5 nos 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 5 nos 0.50
Total: 92 Nos.
* From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, and from column no. 5 to 12, category-wise totals SHG for the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.
52
TABLE-M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA.
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 No. of SHGs
given training Total assistance received by the SHG
(Amount in Rs.) Total annual
Income generated (Rs.)
Total Annual
Savings (Rs.)
No. of SHGs Graded as
Total Amount of loan
sanctioned by the bank (s)
No. of SHGs federated
Loan from revolving fund
Training Material Others (pl.specify)
I II III
3 nos 0.30 0.30 1.20 - 2.25 0.45 Not graded Not yet processed 3 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 0.84 - 4.04 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
10 nos 1.00 1.00 20.00 - 24.00 2.00 -do- -do- 10 nos
7 nos 0.70 0.70 3.50 - 6.30 1.40 -do- -do- 7 nos
14 nos 1.40 1.40 7.00 - 12.60 2.80 -do- -do- 14 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.90 - 2.10 0.60 -do- -do- 3 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 4.00 - 7.20 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 4.00 - 7.20 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.60 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.80 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
4 nos 0.40 0.40 1.20 - 2.80 0.80 -do- -do- 4 nos
7 nos 0.70 0.70 10.5 - 14.70 2.80 -do- -do- 7 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.60 - 1.60 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 1.00 - 1.80 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.60 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0
5 nos 0.50 0.50 1.00 - 2.50 0.50 -do- -do- 5 nos
5 nos 0.0.50 0.0.50 1.00 - 1.50 0.50 -do- -do- 5 nos
92 Nos. 8.70 8.70 59.14 95.59 19.05 92 Nos.
53
TABLE-M(PA)B5: OTHER ACTIVITIES OF WATERSHED WORKS PHASE* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
S. No. St
ate
Dis
tric
t
Nam
e of
pro
ject
Rid
ge a
rea
trea
tmen
t
Dra
inag
e lin
e tr
eatm
ent
Nur
sery
ra
isin
g
Lan
d de
v.
Cro
p de
mon
Past
ure
dev.
Vet
erin
ary
serv
ices
Fish
ery
dev.
Non
-con
v.
ener
gy
Any
oth
er
(ple
ase
spec
ify) Total
cost incurred (Rs. In lakhs)
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
star
ted
-
Not
rele
vant
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 5 to 14 categorywise totals, from column no. 15, total cost incurred, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table #One of the following may be entered in column (a) of 5 to 14
(i) Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started (v) not relevant (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)
54
TABLE-M(PA)B6: DETAILS OF ENGINEERING STRUCTURES IN WATERSHED WORKS
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
MW
S
Name of Structures
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency (i) UG
(ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)
Target
(i) R
idge
are
a (R
)
(ii) D
rain
age
line
(D)
(iii)
Lan
d de
v. (L
)
(i) P
riva
te
(ii) C
omm
unity
(iii)
Oth
ers (
pl. s
peci
fy)
No. of units (No./ cu.m./
Rmt)
Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected
month & year of completion (mm/yyyy)
M W O T
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar U
pper
Tar
ang
Excavated pond Y Y UG 5/41333 m3 4.71 18.85 0 23.56 1ST,2ND, & 3RD year
RCC Check dam Y Y UG 1/20 m2 4.26 2.48 0.36 7.1 2nd year
Irrigation Channel (Brick) Y Y UG 3/2198 Rm 4.65 5.16 0.52 10.33 1st & 2nd year
E/Embankment Y Y UG 5/6000 Rm 2.4 9.6 0 12 1st ,2nd 3rd & 4th year
Boulder revetment in Rm Y Y UG 5/1491 Rm 21.13 7.54 1.51 30.18 2nd 3rd & 4th year
Field bund in Rm. Y Y UG 1/2500 Rm 0.6 2.4 3 4th year
Sub total: 37.75 46.03 2.39 86.17
Khu
rsak
ati M
WS
Excavated pond Y Y UG 7/64660 m3 7.37 29.48 0 36.85 1st ,2nd 3rd & 4th year Irrigation Channel (Brick)
Y Y UG 3/5162 Rm 10.92 12.13
1.21 24.26
1st, 2nd 3rd & 4th year E/Embankment Y Y UG 1/4115 Rm 1.65 6.58 0 8.23 4th year Boulder revetment in Rm
Y Y
UG 2/217 Rm 3.08 1.1
0.22 4.4 2nd & 3rd year Sub total: 23.02 49.29 1.43 73.74
Grand total: 60.77 95.32 3.82 159.91
55
TABLE-M(PA)B7: DETAILS OF ACTIVITIES CONNECTED WITH VEGETATIVE COVER IN WATERSHED WORKS* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect Name of
structure/ work
Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target
(i) Ridge area (R)
(ii) Drainage
line (D)
(iii) Land dev. (L)
(i) Private
(ii) Community
(iii) Others (pl. specify)
(i) UG (ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
Area (ha) No. of plants
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected month & year of
completion (mm/ yyyy)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Protective afforestation in ha.
Y - - - Comm. - UG 24.32 24320 6.64 1st & 4th year
Horticulture demonstration in ha.
Y - - Pvt. - - UG 0.5 500 0.24 3rd year
Road side plantation - - - - - Road side UG 2500 No. 2500 No. 1.50 4th year Ring wells in No. - - - - Comm. Drinking
purpose UG 2 - 0.70 4th year
Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. - - Y - - Demonstration UG 6 - 0.90 2nd year
Sub Total: 30.82 ha. 9.98
Khu
rsak
ati
Protective afforestation in ha.
Y - - - Comm. - UG 26.84 ha 26840 7.62
1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th year
Road side plantation - - - - - Road side UG 1000 Nos. 1000 1.00 3rd year Ring wells in No. -- - - - Comm. Drinking
purpose UG 1 No. - 0.35 4th year
Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. - - Y - - Demonstration UG 6 ha. - 0.90 2nd year Crop demo. (veg.) in ha - - Y - - -do- UG 1 ha. - 0.24 2nd year
Sub Total - - - - - - - - 3484 ha - 10.11 Grand Total - - - - - - - - 65.66 ha - 20.09
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 6, treatment-wise totals, from column no. 7, category-wise totals, from coulmn no. 8, agencywise totals, from column no. 9, total area, total no. of plants, total estimated cost, from column no. 10, total area, total no. of plants, total expenditure incurred, structure-wise no. of completed works, from column no. 11, itemwise totals, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table # in case two or more activities are executed over same area, the figures in area treated should be accounted only once and should reflect only the actual watershed area treated.
56
TABLE-M(PA)B8: DETAILS OF ALLIED / OTHER ACTIVITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect
Name of activity@
Type of land Executing agency Target
(i) Private
(ii) Community
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
(i) UG (ii)SHG
(iii) Others (pl. specify)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected month & year of completion
(mm/yyyy)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
No schemes/activities have proposed under these activities.
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 5, activity-wise totals, from column no. 6, type-wise totals, from coulmn no. 7, agency-wise totals, from column no. 8, total estimated cost, from column no. 9, total expenditure incurred, structure-wise no. of completed works, from column no. 10, item-wise totals, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table @The activities given in this column are merely indicative and States are free to choose any other activity suited to the project area.
57
TABLE-M(PA)B9: LIVELIHOOD PROPOSED TO BE CREATED FOR ASSET LESS PEOPLE
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect
Mic
ro W
S Name of activity No. of HH by social group Pre-Project Income (Avg./
HH) in Rs.
Cost per Unit
(In Rs.)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected income
per unit (BC
Ratio)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
Tara
ng &
Khu
rsak
ati M
WSs
SC ST Others Total SC ST Others A. Piggery – Breaded
10 10 10 30 - - - 1.20 3.60
0.50
B. Duck Rearing 20 40 20 80 - - - 0.12 0.96 0.50 C. Milch Cow 30 30 40 100 - - - 1.20 12.00 0.50 A. Bicycle Repairing
30 30 10 70 - - - 0.40 2.80
0.50
B. Handloom 40 40 60 140 - - - 0.50 7.00 0.50 C.Pottary Making 10 10 10 30 - - - 0.44 1.32 0.50 D. Fruit Processing
20 20 40 8 0 - - - 0.50 4.00
0.50
E. Carpenter 20 20 40 80 - - - 0.24 1.92 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing
0 10 10 2 0 - - - 0.30 0.60
0.50
G. Bike Repairing 10 10 0 2 0 - - - 0.50 1.00 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 10 20 10 4 0 - - - 0.225 0.90 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2
20 20 30 7 0 - - - 0.60
4.20
0.50
K. Bamboo Craft 0 10 10 20 - - - 0.55 1.10 0.50 L. Wood Craft 0 10 10 2 0 - - - 0.55 1.10 0.50 M. Blacksmith 10 0 10 2 0 - - - 0.40 0.80 0.50 N. Jaru Making 0 0 0 00 - - - 0.30 0.00 0.50 O. Tarja Making 10 20 20 5 0 - - - 0.50 2.50 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 20 10 20 5 0 - - - 0.20 1.00 0.50
Total: 260 310 350 920 46.80
58
TABLE-M(PA)B10: LIVELIHOOD PROPOSED TO BE CREATED FOR FARMERS
Sl. No. State District Project Micro
WS Name of activity
No. of Land owning
HH
No. of HH by social group
Pre-Project Income (Avg./
HH) in Rs
Cost per Unit (Rs,)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected income
per unit (BC
Ratio) MF SF LF SC ST Others MF SF LF
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
Tara
ng
Fruit Processing 20 20 40 20 20 40 - - - 0.50 4.00 100%
Vermi Composting 10 20 10 10 20 10 - - - 0.225 0.90 100%
Apiculture (Bee keeping)
20 10 20 20 10 20 - - - 0.20 1.00 100%
Milch caw 30 30 40 30 30 40 - - - 1.20 12.00 1:2 80 80 110 80 80 110 2.125 17.90
59
CHAPTER- V PLANNING TABLE –DPR: 6 PROPOSED PHASING OF WORKS UNDER ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES Name of Project –Tarang Name of District – Kokrajhar
Treatable Area – 3000 Ha Approved Outlay – Rs. 14.40 Lakhs
(All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect Amount
earmarked for EPA
Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost
Expected outcome
Name of
Agency
Expected Months and Year of Completion (mm / yyy)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
14.40
Central Horticulture Nursery (1 ha)
3.50 35,000 polypot seedlings to be
distributed PIA 2009-10
Works and estimated cost as proposed by PIA/
Project Manager. The detailed plan & estimates
are to be prepared and sanctioned by
DWDU/SLNA.
Central Afforestation Nursery (1 ha.) at Taranguri kahibari village.
3.00 50,000 polypot seedlings to be
distributed -do- Tube wells (30 Nos.) 3.00 For drinking
purpose. -do- Const. of boundary fencing in School campus/public building (1 no.)
2.30 To protect public
property. -do- Improvement of road. 1.30 For public
utility -do- Earthen bund along the 1 No. Approach road.
1.30 -do- -do-
Grand Total: 14.40
60
TABLE –DPR: 7 YEAR WISE PHASING OF IWMP PROJECTFOR 5 (FIVE) YEARS PLAN
Name of District: Kokrajhar Name of Watershed: Tarang Treatable area: 3000 ha. Total Project Cost: 360.00 Lakhs.
(Rs. in lakhs)
Component 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year Total amount 20% Amount 26% Amount 24% Amount 22.90% Amount 7.10% Amount 100% Amount
Administrative 2.50 9.00 2.00 7.20 2.00 7.20 2.00 7.20 1.50 5.40 10.00 36.00
Monitoring 0.10 0.36 0.30 1.08 0.30 1.08 0.30 1.08 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.60
Evaluation 0.40 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 2.16 1.00 3.60
Entry Point Activities 4.00 14.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 14.40 Institution & Capacity Biulding 2.00 7.20 1.00 3.60 1.00 3.60 1.00 3.60 0.00 0.00 5.00 18.00
Detail Project Report (DPR) 1.00 3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.60 Watershed development Works 10.00 36.00 13.70 49.32 13.70 49.32 12.60 45.36 0.00 0.00 50.00 180.00
Livelihood Activities (Asset-less) Production system
0.00 0.00 4.00 14.40 3.00 10.80 3.00 10.80 0.00 0.00 10.00 36.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 18.00 4.00 14.40 4.00 14.40 0.00 0.00 13.00 46.80
Consolidation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 18.00 5.00 18.00
Total: 20.00 72.00 26.00 93.60 24.00 86.40 22.90 82.44 7.10 25.56 100.00 360.00
61
TABLE-DPR: 8 YEARWISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET UNDER WATERSHED WORK PHASE Name of district:- Kokrajhar; Name of watershed:- Tarang Name of MWS:- Upper Tarang & Khursakati Total project area:- 6850 ha. Treatable area:- 3000 ha. Project cost:- 360.00 Lakhs.
(Rs. in Lakhs) Sl
No. Name of village Name of Schemes Physical
target Unit cost Year wise financial target
1st year
2nd year
3rd year
4th year
5th year Total
10% 13.7% 13.7% 12.6% (Consolidat-
ion) 5%
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UPPER TARANG MWS
1 Toronguri Protective afforestation 12 ha 27300 3.28 3.28
Boulder Revetment along the River Tarrang
742 rm 2024 15.00 0 15.00
Excavated farm pond 10000 m3 57 5.70 0 5.70
Earthen Embankment in Rm 1500 rm 200 3.00 0 3.00
Const. of irrigation canal (Brick) 1000m 470 4.70 0 4.70
2 Titaguri Pt-I Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) 1000 rm 470 4.70 0 4.70
3 Kahibari Excavated pond 5350 m3 57 3.05 0 3.05
Earthen embankment 1000 rm 200 2.00 0 2.00
4 Titaguri Pt-II Ring well 2 Nos. 35000 0.70 0.70
Horticulture demonstration 0.5 ha. 48000 0.24 0 0.24
5 Dimalgaon Earthen embankment 3000 rm 200 3.00 0 3.00
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
6 Choutaki Roadside plantation 1000 Nos. 100 1.00 0 1.00
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
7 Kargaon Const. of Irrigation channel (Brick) 20 rm 470 0.94 0 0.94
Protective Afforestation 2 ha 27300 0.55 0 0.55
62
8 Bhumki Part-I Boulder revetment 143 rm 2024 2.89 0 2.89
Protective Afforestation 0.8 ha 27300 0.22 0 0.22
9 Debargaon Protective afforestation 1 ha 27300 0.27 0 0.27
Excavated pond 15000 m3 57 8.55 0 8.55
10 Choutaki Pt-II Boulder revetment 40 rm 2024 0.8 0 0.8
Excavated pond 4000 m3 57 2.28 0 2.28
11 Shyamgaon Excavated pond 10105 m3 57 5.76 0 5.76
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
12 Bamunigaon pt-I
Protective Afforestation 0.5 ha 27300 0.14 0 0.14
Earthen embankment 1000 rm 200 2.00 0 2.00
13 Bamunigaon Pt-II
Field bundh 1000 Rm 120 1.20 0 1.20
Road side plantation 500 Nos. 100 0.5 0 0.5
14 Dobgaon Earthen embankment 1000 rm 200 2.00 0 2.00
Boulder revetment 368 Rm 2024 7.46 0 7.46
15 Choutaki pt-I Boulder revetment 200 rm 2024 4.04 0 4.04
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
16 Phukgaon RCC check dam 20 m2 35500 7.10 0 7.10
17 Boro Bathamari Protective Afforestation 2 ha 27300 0.54 0 0.54
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
18 Chandia gaon Protective afforestation 6 ha 27300 1.64 0 1.64
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
Sub Total: 23.94 30.6 22.09 19.48 96.15 KHURSAKATI MWS
19 Chedamari Pt- I Protective afforestation 6 ha 27300 1.64 0 1.64
Excavated farm pond 10000 M3 57 5.70 0 5.70
20 Chedamari Pt-II Water distribution cannal (Brick) 800 Rm. 470 3.76 0 3.76
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
21 Kuanibhasa Ujanpara
Protective afforestation 4 ha 27300 1.09 0 1.09
Excavated pond 10000 m3 57 5.70 0 5.70
22 Betagaon Protective afforestation 4 ha 27300 1.09 0 1.09
63
Excavated pond 10000 m3 57 5.7 0 5.70
Boulder revetment in ha. 100 rm 2024 2.02 0 2.02
23 Dologaon Boulder revetment 100 rm 2024 2.02 0 2.02
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
24 Kaunibhasa Maspara
Excavated pond 18561 m3 57 10.58 0 10.58
25 Bandarchera Protective afforestation 6 ha 27300 1.66 0 1.66
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
Crop demonstration (vegetables) in ha.
1 ha. 24000 0.24 0 0.24
26 Simlaguri Protective afforestation 1 ha 27700 0.55 0 0.55
Excavated pond 3000 m3 57 1.71 0 1.71
27 Kaunibhasa Bhati para
Excavated pond 12825 m3 57 7.31 0 7.31
28 Khudra Basugaon
Protective afforestation 1 ha 27300 0.27 0 0.27
Excavated pond 10000 m3 57 5.70 0 5.70
29 Joregaon Earthen embankment 4115 rm 200 8.23 0 8.23
Protective afforestation 1 ha 27300 0.27 0 0.27
30 Harigaon Protective Afforestation 0.80 ha 27300 0.22 0 0.22
Ring well 1 No. 35000 0.35 0 0.35
31 Laltari Road side plantation 1000 Nos. 100 1.00 0 1.00
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
32 Benibari Protective Afforestation 2 ha 27300 0.55 0 0.55
Fodder plantation in ha. 1 Ha. 16200 0.162 0 0.162
33 Kusakati pt-I Const. of irrigation channel (Brick) 1000 rm 470 4.70 4.7 0 9.4
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
34 Kusakati pt-II Protective Afforestation 1.04 ha 27300 0.28 0 0.28
35 Kusakati Lokhoraj
Const. of Irrigation channel (Brick)) 1225 rm 470 5.75 0 5.75
Crop demonstration (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0 0.15
Sub Total: 12.06 18.68 27.23 25.88 83.85 Grand Total: 36.00 49.32 49.32 45.36 180.00
64
TABLE DPR:9 YEARWISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET Name of Watershed: Tarang A- First Financial Year: 2009-10 Financial Target: 36.00 Lakhs.
Sl. No.
Name of Micro
Watershed
Name of Villages
Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost (Rs.)
Area to be benefitted
Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary
No. of Mandays.
M W O T
1 Upper Tarang MWS
1 Toronguri Protective afforestation in ha 12 27300 12 1.32 1.96 0 3.28 30 1960 2 Kahibari Excavated pond in m3 5350 57 31 0.61 2.44 0 3.05 265 2440 3 Dimalgaon Earthen embankment in Rm 3000 200 80 0.60 2.40 0 3.00 130 2400 4 Deborgaon Excavated pond in m3 15000 57 250 1.71 6.84 0 8.55 330 6840 5 Chowtaki pt-II Excavated pond in m3 4000 57 80 0.46 1.82 0 2.28 200 1820 6 Bamunigaon pt-I Protactive afforestation in ha. 0.5 27300 0.5 0.06 0.08 0 0.14 2 80 7 Dob gaon Earthen embankment in Rm 1000 200 80 0.40 1.60 0 2.00 80 1600 8 Chandiagaon Protective afforestation in ha 6 27300 6 0.66 0.98 0 1.64 15 980
Sub Total: 539.5 5.82 18.12 0 23.94 1052 18120
2
Khursakati MWS
9 Chedamari pt-I Excavated farm pond in m3. 10088 57 70 1.14 4.56 0 5.70 25 4560
10 Banderchera Protective afforestation in ha. 6 27300 6 0.67 0.99 0 1.66 15 990 11 Kusakati pt-I Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) in Rm 1000 470 100 2.11 2.35 0.24 4.70 265 2350
Sub Total: 176 3.92 7.90 0.24 12.06 305 7900
1st Year Total: 715.5 9.74 26.02 0.24 36.00 1357 26020
65
Name of Watershed: Tarang B 2nd year Financial Year: 2010-11 Financial Target: 49.32 Lakhs.
Sl. No.
Name of MWS
Name of Villages Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost (Rs.)
Area to be benefitted
Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary
No. of Mandays.
M W O T
1 Upper Tarang MWS
1 Toronguri Boulder revetment along the Tarang river in Rm
742 2024 300 10.5 3.75 0.75 15.00 251 3750
Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) in Rm 1000 470 140 2.11 2.35 0.24 4.70 260 2350
2 Dimalgaon Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90
3 Choutaki Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90
4 Khargaon Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) in Rm 20 470 25 0.42 0.47 0.05 0.94 60 470
5 Shyamgaon Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90
6 Bamunigaon pt-I Earthen Embankment/bund in Rm 1000 200 100 0.40 1.60 0 2.00 200 1600
7 Choutaki pt-I Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90
8 Phukagaon RCC check dam in M2 20 35500 237.36 4.26 2.48 0.36 7.10 485 2480
9 Boro Bhatamari Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90
10 Chandiagaon Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90
Sub Total: 808.36 18.05 11.19 1.40 30.64 1262 11190
2
Khursakati MWS
11 Chedamari pt-I Protective afforestation 6 27300 6 0.66 0.98 0 1.64 10 980
12 Chedamari pt-II Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 2 90 13 Dologaon Boulder revetment in Rm 100 2024 50 1.41 0.51 0.10 2.02 5 510
Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 2 90 14 Banderchera Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 2 90
Crop demo (veg.) in ha. 1 24000 1 0.10 0.14 0 0.24 3 140 15 Simlaguri Excavated pond in m3 3000 57 60 0.35 1.36 0 1.71 150 1360 16 Kaunibasa
Bhatipara Excavated pond in m3 13088 57 100 1.50 5.96 0 7.46 260 5960
17 Laltari Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 2 90 18 Benibari Fodder plantation in ha 1 16200 1 0.09 0.072 0 0.162 2 72 19 Kusakati pt-I Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) in Rm 1000 470 150 2.11 2.35 0.24 4.70 260 2350
Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 2 90 20 Kushakati
Lokhoraj Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 2 90
Sub Total: 374 6.58 11.912 0.34 18.83 702 11912
2nd Year Total: 1182.36 24.63 23.102 1.74 49.47 1964 23102
66
Name of Watershed: Tarang C- 3rd year Financial Year: 2011-12 Financial Target: 49.32 Lakhs.
Sl. No.
Name of Micro
Watershed
Name of Villages Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost (Rs.)
Area to be
benefitted
Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary
No. of Mandays.
M W O T
1 Upper Tarang MWS
1 Toranguri Excavated farm pond in M3 1000 57 20 1.14 4.56 0 5.70 20 4560
2 Titaguri Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) in Rm 1000 470 150 2.11 2.35 0.24 4.70 260 2350
3 Kahibari Earthen Embankment/bund in Rm 1000 200 80 0.40 1.60 0 2.00 200 1600
4 Titaguri Pt-II
Horticulture demonstration in ha. 0.5 48000 0.5 0.09 0.15 0 0.24 2 150
5 Bhumki pt-Ii Boulder revetment in Rm 143 2024 50 2.02 0.72 0.15 2.89 130 720 6 Choutaki pt-II Boulder revetment in Rm 40 2024 10 0.56 0.2 0.04 0.8 25 200 7 Shyamgaon Excavted pond in M3 10105 57 20 1.16 4.6 0 5.76 50 4600
Sub Total: 330.5 7.48 14.18 0.43 22.09 687 14180
2
Khursakati MWS
8 Kaunibasa Ujanpara
Protective afforestation in ha. 4 27300 4 0.43 0.66 0 1.09 10 660 Excavated pond in M3 10000 57 10 1.14 4.56 0 5.70 20 4560
9 Betagaon Excavated pond in M3 10000 57 10 1.14 4.56 0 5.70 25 4560 Boulder revetment in Rm 100 2024 50 1.41 0.51 0.10 2.02 1 510
10 Khudra Basugaon Excavated pond in M3 10000 57 10 1.14 4.56 0 5.70 25 4560
11 Joregaon Protective afforestation in ha. 1 27300 1 0.1 0.17 0 0.27 2 170 12 Laltari Road side plantation in Nos. 1000 100 10 0.40 0.60 0 1.00 26 600 13 Kusakati
Lokhoraj Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) in Rm 1225 470 150 2.58 2.87 0.3 5.75 300 2870
Sub total:- 245 8.34 18.49 0.40 27.23 409 18490 3rd Year Total:- 575.5 15.82 32.67 0.73 49.32 1096 32670
67
Name of Watershed: Tarang D: 4th Year Financial year: 2012-13 Financial Target: 45.36 lakhs.
Sl. No.
Name of Micro
Watershed
Name of Villages
Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost (Rs.)
Area to be
benefitted
Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary
No. of Mandays.
M W O T
1 Upper Tarang MWS
1 Toranguri Earthen field bund in Rm 1500 200 20 0.6 2.4 0 3 15 2400 2 Titaguri Pt-II Ring well in nos. 2 35000 0 0.49 0.21 0.00 0.70 30 210
3 Choutaki Road side plantation in Nos. 1000 100 20 0.40 0.60 0 1.00 20 600 4 Khargaon Protective afforestation in ha. 2 27300 2 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.55 5 330
5 Bhumki pt-I Protective afforestation in ha. 0.8 27300 0.8 0.09 0.13 0.00 0.22 1 130
6 Deborgaon Protective afforestation in ha. 1 27300 1 0.1 0.17 0 0.27 2 170
7 Bamunigaon pt-II
Field bund in Rm 100 120 5 0.24 0.96 0.00 1.20 10 960
Road side plantation in Nos. 500 50 5 0.20 0.30 0 0.50 10 300
8 Dobgaon Boulder revetment in Rm 368 2024 20 5.22 1.86 0.38 7.46 50 1860
9 Choutaki pt-I Boulder revetment in Rm 200 2024 10 2.82 1.01 0.21 4.04 25 1010
10 Boro Bathomari
Protective afforestation in ha. 2 27300 2 0.22 0.32 0.00 0.54 5 320
Sub Total 85.8 10.60 8.29 0.59 19.48 173 8290
2
Khursakati MWS
11 Chedamari pt-II
Water distribution canal (Brick) in Rm
800 470 150 1.7 1.88 0.18 3.76 200 1880
12 Betagaon Protective afforestation in ha. 4 27300 4 0.43 0.66 0 1.09 10 660 13 Kaunibhasa
Maspara Excavated pond in M3 18561 57 25 2.11 8.47 0 10.58 50 8470
14 Simlaguri Protective afforestation in ha. 2 27300 2 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.55 5 330
15 Khudro Basugaon
Protective affoirestation in ha. 1 27300 1 0.1 0.17 0 0.27 3 170
16 Joregaon Earthen embankment in Rm 4115 200 250 1.65 6.58 0 8.23 250 6580 17 Harigaon Protective afforestation in ha. 0.8 27300 0.8 0.09 0.13 0.00 0.22 1 130
Ring well in nos. 1 35000 5 0.24 0.11 0 0.35 5 110
18 Benibari Protective afforestation in ha. 2 27300 2 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.55 5 330
19 Kusakati pt-II Protective afforestation in ha. 1.04 27300 1.04 0.12 0.16 0 0.28 3 160
20 Sub Total 440.84 6.88 18.82 0.18 25.88 532 18820
4th Year total 526.64 17.48 27.11 0.77 45.36 705 27110
Grand Total for the Project 3000 67.67 108.90 3.48 180.15 5122 108902
68
TABLE-DPR: 10 VILLAGE WISE GPS POINT FOR THE SCHEME
DISTRICT: KOKRAJHAR PROJECT: TARANG IWMP Sl
No. Name of village Name of Schemes Physical
Target GPS STATIONS
2 3 4 5 6 7 UPPER TARANG MWS LATITUDE LONGITUDE ALTITUDE
1 Toronguri
1. Protective afforestation 12 ha 2. Boulder Revetment along the River Tarrang 742 rm 26028/35.5// 90020/26.5// 39 mt. 3. Excavated farm pond 10000 m3 4. Earthen Field bund 1500 rm 5. Const. of irrigation canal (Brick) 1000m
2 Titaguri Pt-I 1. Const. of Irrigation canal (Brick) 1000 rm 26026/58.5// 90016/51.5// 40 mt.
3 Kahibari 1. Excavated pond 5350 m3 26029/36.9// 90019/10.1// 39 mt. 2. Earthen embankment 1000 rm
4 Titaguri Pt-II 1. Ring well 2 Nos. 2. Horticulture demonstration 0.5 ha. 26026/18.7// 90016/36.1// 36 mt.
5 Dimalgaon 1. Earthen embankment 3000 rm 26025/37.3// 90016/37.7// 39 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
6 Choutaki 1. Roadside plantation 1000 Nos. 26028/50.7// 90021/30.1// 45 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
7 Kargaon 1. Const. of Irrigation channel (Brick) 20 rm 26025/8.7// 90017/27.9// 40 mt. 2.Protective Afforestation 2 ha
8 Bhumki Pt-I 1. Boulder revetment 143 rm 26027/41.3// 90020/26.6// 42 mt. 2. Protective Afforestation 0.8 ha
9 Debargaon 1. Protective afforestation 1 ha 2. Excavated pond 15000 m3 26028/38.4// 90018/2.9// 37 mt.
69
10 Choutaki Pt-II 1. Boulder revetment 40 rm 26027/50.6// 90021/5.1// 39 mt. 2. Excavated pond 4000 m3
11 Shyamgaon 1. Excavated pond 10105 m3 26027/7.0// 90018/9.3// 36 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
12 Bamunigaon Pt-I
1. Protective Afforestation 0.5 ha 2. Earthen embankment 1000 rm 26026/18.5// 90020/25.4// 41 mt.
13 Bamunigaon Pt-II
1. Field bundh 1000 Rm 26025/57.8// 90019/45.7// 40 mt. 2. Road side plantation 500 Nos.
14 Dobgaon 1. Earthen embankment 1000 rm 2. Boulder revetment 368 Rm 26025/21.1// 90018/27.8// 37 mt.
15 Choutaki Pt-I 1. Boulder revetment 200 rm 26026/48.6// 90020/28.4// 30 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
16 Phukgaon 1.RCC check dam 20 m2 26027/4.8// 90022/43.9// 33 mt.
17 Boro Bathamari 1. Protective Afforestation 2 ha 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
18 Chandia gaon 1. Protective afforestation 6 ha 26027/12.0// 90021/41.4// 38 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
KHURSAKATI MWS
19 Chedamari Pt- I 1. Protective afforestation 6 ha 2. Excavated farm pond 10000 m3 26011/12.1// 90045/16.8// 43 mt.
20 Chedamari Pt-II 1. Water distribution cannal (Brick) 800 Rm. 26030/32.4// 90021/38.9// 41 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
21 Kuanibhasa Ujanpara
1. Protective afforestation 4 ha 2. Excavated pond 10000 m3 26030/46.4// 90023/4.7// 40 mt.
22 Betagaon 1. Protective afforestation 4 ha 2. Excavated pond 10000 m3
70
3. Boulder revetment 100 rm
23 Dologaon 1. Boulder revetment 100 rm 26026/48.2// 90023/20.6// 40 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
24 Kaunibhasa Maspara
1. Excavated pond 18561 m3 26030/25.2// 90023/12.6// 35 mt.
25 Bandarchera
1. Protective afforestation 6 ha 26027/1.9// 90023/42.6// 38 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha. 3. Crop demonstration (vegetables) 1 ha.
26 Simlaguri 1. Protective afforestation 1 ha 2. Excavated pond 3000 m3 26011/12.1// 91045/16.8// 35 mt.
27 Kaunibhasa Bhati para
1. Excavated pond 13088 m3 26029/46.5// 90023/17.1// 33 mt.
28 Khudra Basugaon
1. Protective afforestation 1 ha 2. Excavated pond 10000 m3 26011/12.1// 90045/16.8// 34 mt.
29 Joregaon 1. Earthen embankment 4115 rm 26029/2.5// 90022/41.5// 30 mt. 2. Protective afforestation 1 ha
30 Harigaon 1. Protective Afforestation 0.80 ha 26028/27.4// 90022/17.8// 31 mt. 2. Ring well 1 No.
31 Laltari 1. Road side plantation 1000 Nos. 26028/21.9// 90021/29.6// 35 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
32 Benibari 1. Protective Afforestation 2 ha 26027/51.4// 90021/37.7// 33 mt. 2. Fodder plantation 1 Ha.
33 Kusakati Pt-I 1. Const. of irrigation channel (Brick) 1000 rm 26028/6.1// 90023/1// 30 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
34 Kusakati Pt-II 1. Protective Afforestation 1.04 ha 26027/42.0// 90023/41.1// 35 mt.
35 Kusakati Lokhoraj
1. Const. of Irrigation channel (Brick)) 1225 rm 26028/11.9// 90023/31.6// 40 mt. 2. Crop demonstration (paddy) 1 ha.
71
CHAPTER VI - INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES
TABLE-M(IS)9: DETAILS OF SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S. No.
Names of the States
Names of the
Districts
Names of projects
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members (Proposed New SHG)
No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Tota
l
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
Under process
(i) Landless 450 300 750 360 240 600 450 300 750 (ii) SF 450 250 700 200 120 320 125 80 225 (iii) MF 140 60 200 80 48 128 - - -
(iv) LF - - - - - - - - -
Total 1040 610 1650 640 408 1048 575 380 975 (M – Male, F – Female) * From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, from column 5 to 8, category-wise grand totals, may be given for the entire country at the end of the table. TABLE-M(IS)10: DETAILS OF UGS IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S. No.
Names of State
Names of District
Names of
Project
Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
- - 63 Nos.
63 Nos.
(i) Landless 140 65 205 115 49 164 - - 205 (ii) SF 250 154 404 225 98 323 - - 160
(iii) MF 205 100 305 283 122 404 - - -
(iv) LF 4 2 6 4 2 6 - - -
Total 599 321 920 627 271 897 365 (M – Male, F – Female) * From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, from columns 5 to 8, category-wise grand totals, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table.
72
CHAPTER VIII - CAPACITY BUILDING
TABLE-M(CB)2: CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No. State Project
Stakeholders Total no. of
persons No. of persons trained so far
No. of persons to be trained during current financial
year
No. of persons trained during
current financial year
Sources of funding for training
Funds utilized
a) DoLR b)Any other (pl. specify) a) DoLR b)Any other
(pl. specify)
1 Assam
SLNA - - - - - - - - DRDA/ZP cell - - - - - - - - PIAs 15 Nil. 15 Nil DoLR - Nil - WDTs 5 Nil 5 Nil DoLR - Nil - UGs 630 Nil 153 Nil DoLR - Nil - SHGs 1650 Nil 393 Nil DoLR - Nil - WCs 12 Nil 12 Nil DoLR - Nil VCDCs 12 Nil 12 Nil DoLR - Nil - Community - - - - - - - - Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -
Total: 2324 590 * From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4 to 7, Stakeholder-wise totals may be given at the end of the table for the entire country TABLE-M(CB)3: INFORMATION, EDUCATION & COMMUNICATION (IEC) ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2010-11.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S.
No. State/Dist/Proj Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.)
Expenditure incurred (Rs.)
Outcome (may quantify, wherever possible)
1 Assam Kokrajhar Tarang
1. Awareness campaign 2. Capacity building
PIA PIA
32,400 48,600
Nil Nil
- -
81,000 * From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4, total no. of agencies, from column no. 5 & 6, totals may be given at the end of the table for the entire country
=00=
73
74
75
76