determinants of corporate social ... › html5boilerplatemkt › uploads › 2016 › ...2016/02/15...
TRANSCRIPT
D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013 (Published in December, 2015)
DETERMINANTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY OF BANKING INDUSTRY LISTED IN
THE DHAKA STOCK EXCHANGE LIMITED
Saud Ahmed1
Moriom Akter2
Abstract: The purpose of the study is to identify the impact of determinants
of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of banking industry listed in
Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). The data set consists of 30 banks over 5
years (2008 - 2012) of observation formed a completely balanced panel
data set. Here OLS model with fixed effect has been conducted for
regression panel. CSR expenditure has been taken as a dependent variable
and total investment, total asset, promotional expenditure interest income,
total deposit, no. of branch, number of employees as the independent
variables in this model. Admittedly, promotional expenditure and number of
branch are statistically significant at 5% significance level in determining
the level of CSR expenditures of the respective banks in Bangladesh.
Subsequently, the beta coefficient of both promotional expenditure and
number of branch are positive, it indicates that larger the amount of
promotional expenditure and larger the size of the bank, higher will be the
level of CSR expenditure.
Key Words: Corporate Social Responsibility, Banking Industry.
INTRODUCTION
In this modern competitive business world profit is not considered as the ultimate
factor of success. The concept of business has converted from profit making
activities to social welfare activities where businesses are not only responsible to
its shareholders but also to all of its stakeholders. Apart from the generous social
services by the business firms, the new concept of corporate social responsibility
(CSR) is an emerging one. CSR is a form of corporate self-regulations integrated
into a business model. It is said that CSR is a concept whereby financial
institutions not only consider their profitability and growth, but also the interest
of society and the environment by taking responsibility for the impact of their
activities on stakeholders, employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers and
civil society.
Now-a-days CSR in Bangladesh is a vibrant issue and all the institutions are
trying to maintain this responsibility along with other responsibilities. Banking
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Dhaka,
Bangladesh. 2 Financial Analyst, Chevron Bangladesh.
246 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
sector of this country has a glorious history of getting engaged themselves in
different kinds of social activities like donations to different organizations,
country beautification, patronizing cultural activities etc. CSR is always enthused
by Bangladesh Bank (BB). Subsequently it has set up a dedicated department on
"Green Banking & CSR" in April 2013 perhaps first time by any country‟s
Central Bank. Accordingly, BB has guideline for banks on CSR in place,
however, now it is more systematized to drive the entire banking sector to
involve in CSR activities in a more structured way.
Studies on CSR in various industries across the world mainly focused on the
impact of CSR on company‟s financial performance. However, very little work
has been done on the opposite phenomenon i.e. the impact of financial and non –
financial performance in determining the level of CSR. This study has conducted
to bridge this research gap by identifying the impact of firm specific determinants
of CSR expenditure.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Different researchers have worked on CSR in different time with different
variables. But very little work has been done on the firm specific determinants of
CSR of the banking Industry of Bangladesh. Studies on CSR across the world
mainly focus on the impact of CSR on a firm‟s financial performance. However,
there are hardly enough empirical evidences on the firm‟s specific determinants
of CSR expenditure.
Mamun et al. (2013) conducted an analysis with panel data of Bangladeshi
banking industry over a period of 2002-2011 augmented the financial
determinants of CSR expenditures. The results from panel ARDL model for 30
private commercial banks confirm that several financial determinants including
total investment, no. of branch, and no. of employees have significant long run
impact on the level of bank‟s CSR expenditure. More precisely, Samina
(2012)tried to find out whether the Islamic Banks of Bangladesh are adhering to
the prescribed forms of the CSR activities or not. The research found compliance
to the mandatory forms by the 6 fully fledged sample Islamic banks and found a
strong positive correlation between CSR expenditure and sample banks‟ deposit,
loan and profitability. Quazi et al. (2007)considered the CSR practices of a small
sample of 17 multinational corporations (MNCs) and local firms in Bangladesh.
Of the investigated 17 firms, 10 had implemented CSR for discretionary reasons,
nine for ethical reasons, and one firm implemented for legal reasons. Five of the
17 firms were observed to implement different types of CSR initiatives for
different strategic reasons. It is found that firms use their CSR records to create
the image of socially responsible firms and thereby influence consumer buying
decisions in favor of the goods and services marketed by them.
From another view point, Islam (2012) examines the relationship between
financial performance and CSR initiatives of banks in Bangladesh. Out of 47
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 247
banks, data were collected from 37 (78.72%) for four years from 2007 to 2010.
Panel data Generalized Least Square Regression Model was used for data
analysis. Four major financial performance indicators- Size of business, Return
on Equity (ROE) and Asset Quality (AstQt) and Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR)-
were used for the study. Variance Inflation Factor for multicolinearity, White test
for heteroskedasticity and Wooldridge test for serial correlation were used for
data processing. The study finds that CSR initiatives represented by CSR
expenditure of banks are positively connected with the Size of business, ROE
and AstQt, and negatively with CAR. The policy implication of the study
recommends that better regulatory requirements will foster more CSR initiatives.
Another distinctive study by Shubiri et al. (2012)identified the financial and non-
financial determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Jordan .The
annual reports of 60 industrial companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange
for a period from 2006 to 2010 in Jordan were used as a basis for the study. The
results of the analysis imply that companies that are expected to be large in firm
size, age of firm, maintaining growth and are highly leveraged are more likely to
voluntary disclose social responsibility information.
Harikkala (2010)identified the key determinants of CSR, the sphere of CSR and
the available guidelines to practice CSR. The study compared the found theory of
CSR with empirical findings from the Finnish banking industry. It evaluated how
banks utilize available information in their CSR strategies and communication.
Finally, it shows that the banking industry definitely follows guidelines and
provisions, but the extent to which it is a choice made by individual banks is
questionable. It is also revealed that while viable reports are published, the
implementation of reported measures is not disclosed either in writing or in
empirical findings. Ahmed et al. (2012)conducted a questionnaire survey on the
twenty domestic private banks of Bangladesh in order to show the relationship
between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial
performance (CFP). The results of the study revealed that the average return on
asset ratios of the banks having high CSP is higher compared to that of the banks
having low CSP. In all cases of absolute comparison between ROA, EPS and P/E
ratio it was found that CSR banks outperformed the Non-CSR banks. Masud
(2011)conducted a descriptive research purely based on the information from
secondary data of annual reports for the year 2009-2010 of top five private
commercial banks listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). It is found in the
study that all banks contribute a little amount of profits to CSR. From the study it
is clear that participation of different areas of CSR activities of different banks is
limited. Another think noticed from the study that every bank has good attention
and consideration to education and health areas. Every bank of the study
contributed highest amount in education and the next area is health. Another
important matter, banks are very concern to contribute natural disaster and
disaster management specially cyclones (Aila), flood affected areas etc.
Moreover, Rouf (2011) designed an exploratory study to investigate the extent
248 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
and nature of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) in corporate
annual reports (CAR) of listed companies in Bangladesh. The result shows that a
higher proportion of independent non-executive directors on a board are
positively related to the level of corporate social responsibility disclosure but the
extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure is negatively related for
company‟s size. Another study investigates the data from Hong-Kong banking
industry collected through a questionnaire and identified four factors related to
CSR expenditure. It also concluded that management of a banking organization
should put in place an appropriate policy for establishing positive organizational
culture and socially responsible approach amongst the staff members. If
commitment for becoming a socially responsible banking organization among
board members, management and staffs is present while corporate accountability
and creditability can be demonstrated through effective and efficient internal
audit, customers and the community will be benefited with reduced risks and
enhanced quality(Shirley, 2011).
To sum up, studies on association between financial factors and CSR themes are
very infrequent in Bangladesh. Mostly, CSR are still an unexplored area in
Bangladesh, which creates notable scope for extensive and appealing research.
OBJECTIVES
The broad objective of this study is to identify the firm specific determinants of
CSR expenditure in the banking industry of Bangladesh. Consequently the
paper‟s aim is to understand the current state of CSR activities in this sector
under the guideline of Bangladesh Bank. Being part of the service industry,
banks have little impact on environment and are less concerned by challenges
related to human rights. But on the other hand, by considering the financial
power of this sector and its major role in the global economy, there is a necessity
to analyze different aspects of CSR activities of this industry.
METHODOLOGY
There are 35 private commercial banks (PCBs), 4 nationalized commercial banks
(NCBs), 9 foreign banks, and 4 developments banks in Bangladesh. Additional to
these numbers, recently another six banks have got license to commence in the
Bangladeshi market. Among them 30 local private commercial banks listed in
DSE are chosen randomly as the sample for this study. The sample excludes
public commercial banks, foreign banks and investment banks. This is due to
their different nature of ownership, operating guidelines and other regulatory
differences. The data set consists of 30 banks over 5 years (2008 - 2012) of
observation formed a completely balanced panel data set. Size differences in the
value of the observations across cross section and over time period has been
normalized with logarithmic transformation. Years before 2008 have not
cogitated because CSR activities are steering in a more systematized way from
the year 2008 after the circulation of BB guideline regarding this. Necessary data
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 249
for this study are collected from different secondary sources, as - bank‟s annual
reports, different organizations such as Dhaka Stock Exchage (DSE) and
Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission (BSEC), websites of the banks
and different publications of BB and DSE.
To examine the effect of firm specific characteristics of the banks on their CSR
expenditure the following cross sectional regression has been estimated:
Csrexpit = α + β ́ firm specific characteristicsit + εit …….. (i)
Thus, the functional form for financial characteristicsit is,
firm specific characteristicsit = ƒ (invit , assit , promexpit , intincit , totaldepit,
branchit, empit)
Here, CSR expenditure (logcsrexp) is dependent variable and total investment
(loginv), total asset (logass), promotional expenditure (logpromexp), interest
income (logintinc), total deposit (logtotaldep), no. of branch (logbranch), number
of employees (logemp) are used as the independent variables.
The model used the amount of CSR expenditure as dependent variable as it
characterizes firm‟s investment to social performance (Kitzmueller and
Shimshack, 2010). Moreover, by exercising CSR programs, firms can signal to
consumers that they are reliable, honest and will produce better products.
Accordingly, CSR is a form of product differentiation, a form of advertising to
establish or sustain brand loyalty (Siegel and Vitaliano, 2007). So, promotional
expenditure has been considered as one of the independent variable of this study.
Here total asset has been used as a proxy of firm size. Several authors used
natural logarithm form of total assets as a proxy of firm size rather than absolute
value (Lee & Song, 2013; Padgett & Galan, 2010; Brammer & Millington, 2008).
Besides, a content study (Singh and Aggarwal, 2011) refers that there is a
significant difference in community welfare and environment and rural
development when banks are compared with respect to number of employees.
Furthermore, it is an important step to understanding the effect of number of
branches on CSR as higher number branches is able to attract more deposits, a
reduction in costs through economies of scale. It also diversifies risks through
geographic expansion (Kuehn, 2014). Finally, total deposit, total investment and
interest income have been included in this study as these issues are important for
any banking operation (Hossain et al., 2013; Ogunbiyi and Ihejirika , 2014).
Finally, the regression equation is as below:
logCSRexp= α + β1 logInv + β2logAss + β3logProm Exp + β4logInt Inc +
β5logTotal Dep + β6logBranch# + β7logEmp# + ε …….(ii)
As it is a panel data set, for stationary testing Harris-Tzavalis z-statistics Test has
been used which is described by Harris and Tzavalis (1999). This has a null of
unit root versus an alternative with a single stationary value. It‟s designed to be
applied to data sets, which are relatively short in T. In order to provide relatively
250 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
exact corrections for small values, they very tightly restrict the model to exclude
the augmenting lags. Thus if the original panel is balanced (which they require),
it will remain so. The test assumes a homogeneous variance. It has large N, fixed
T asymptotic, again, with the centered and rescaled test statistic being N (0, 1).
Secondly, Hausman Specification Test has been done for choosing between two
panel OLS model: fixed and random effect. Finally, for regression panel OLS
model with fixed effect has been conducted in this study.
CSR IN BANKING INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH AND REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK
Corporate social responsibility is “the responsibility of enterprises for their
impacts on society”. To fully meet their social responsibility, enterprises “should
have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical human rights
and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close
collaboration with their stakeholders”(European Commission, 2011).Moral and
ethics are some of the drivers, while the values (both financial and ethical) and
culture of each individual company also have a great effect. The economic
incentives for CSR include demand for environmental/ethical products, public
image and material and energy efficiency. Bangladesh has a long history of
involvement in benevolent activities like providing donations to different
charitable organizations, poor people and religious institutions, city beautification
projects and patronizing art & culture, sports and education etc. These activities
constitute the primary basis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) for banking
industry in Bangladesh. Moreover, over the last decade banks have gradually
organized their involvements in more structured CSR initiatives with guidelines
of BB especially from the year of 2008.
Figure 1: CSR Expenditure by Bangladesh Banks over the 5 Year
Source: Review of CSR initiatives of banks by Bangladesh Bank- 2012
It is therefore encouraging that CSR activities of banks in Bangladesh have now
increased In 2012, the aggregate CSR expenditure of all the scheduled banks
totaled Tk. 3046.69 million, an eight-fold increase compared to the CSR
expenditure of 2008. The trend of sectoral patterns of CSR expenditure by
Bangladeshi banks for the year 2008 to 2012 are given below:
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 251
Table 1: The Trend of Sectoral Patterns of CSR Expenditure
for the Year 2008 to 2012
Sectors Taka in million
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount %
Humanitarian
& disaster
relief
58.6 14.27 125.1 22.59 460.41 19.76 188.03 8.59 788.37 25.88
Education 30.5 7.43 94.8 17.12 400.79 17.20 612.48 27.99 983.69 32.29
Health 112.1 27.29 245.5 44.33 689.07 29.58 520.42 23.78 435.43 14.29
Sports 49.8 12.13 1.2 0.22 265.23 11.38 359.07 16.41 183.85 6.03
Art & culture 0.8 0.19 0.3 0.05 328.91 14.12 171.52 7.84 213.31 7.00
Environment - - - - 59.78 2.57 138.07 6.31 140.23 4.60
Others 158.9 38.69 86.9 15.69 125.58 5.39 198.73 9.08 301.81 9.91
Total 410.7 100.00 553.8 100.00 2329.77 100.00 2188.32 100.00 3046.69 100.00
Source: Review of CSR initiatives of banks by Bangladesh Bank- 2012
However, 16 PCBs, 3 SCBs and 1 FCB have formed separate Foundations or
Trustsas non-profitable institutions solely devoted to the cause of charity, social
welfare and other benevolent activities towards the promotion of CSR objectives.
45 out of 47 banks (2 SCBs, 4 SDBs, 30 PCBs and 9 FCBs) have taken steps for
adoption of socially and environmentally responsible practices in their own
internal operations in 2012. 2 SCBs, 2 SDBs, 28 PCBs and 6 FCBs reported have
taken actions towards providing a healthy and safe workplace and creating an
environment conducive to learning and development. Certainly, all banks have
embraced CSR in 2012 with decision at the highest corporate level. This is
shown in the table below:
Table 2: Number of Banks Ingraining CSR Practices within Own
Establishment and in their Client Businesses
CSR Objectives SCBs SDBs PCBs FCBs
Adopting Socially and environmentally responsible practices in own internal operations
2 4 30 9
Providing a modern, healthy and safe workplace and creating a learning and development environment
2 2 28 6
Reduce the bank’s environmental impact as a result of its operation and business activity
2 2 27 7
Fostering CSR in their client businesses 1 2 23 6
252 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
CSR Objectives SCBs SDBs PCBs FCBs
assessing the social and environmental impacts of the projects seeking finance
Ensuring compliance of regulatory environmental and social requirements
3 3 25 6
Engaging with clients in assessing project’s social and environmental impacts beyond the regulatory requirements
0 0 9 3
Source: Review of CSR initiatives of banks by Bangladesh Bank- 2012
Regulatory Framework
National Board of Revenue (NBR) of Bangladesh issued Statutory Regulatory
Order (SRO) by providing tax exemption on the expenditure made by corporates
for CSR activities in 2011. The regulations stated in that SRO were further
amended in 2012 and the area of CSR applicable for tax exemption was
enhanced. The exemption facility is aimed at encouraging private companies to
be involved more in CSR conduct. In June 2008, Bangladesh Bank issued a
comprehensive circular titled „Mainstreaming Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) in banks and financial institutions in Bangladesh‟. In that circular, CSR
was defined as (a) considering the economic, social and environmental
consequences of a business, (b) mitigating the negative impacts and bolstering
the benign effects, (c) initiating action programs and community investments to
trim down social exclusion and inequality as well as to address the core
sustainable development challenges (fulfilling the requirements of the current
generation without cramping the capacity of future generations is a generally
agreed meaning of „sustainable development‟).
Bangladesh Bank has started guiding the banking sector to become more
environmentally responsive (e.g. via refinancing new loan products on solar
energy, bio-gas, effluent treatment plant etc.). All the commercial banks are
asked to formulate their own CSR policy with the annual outlay for CSR
programs and include the CSR programs in their mainstream banking activities
instead of short-term social works like providing grants, aids and donations. In
December 2010, Bangladesh Bank instructed the banks to establish separate CSR
desk to pay special attention on this issue. Reporting of the CSR initiatives by
banks was suggested as appendage to regular annual financial reports.
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 253
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
According to Pesaran and Pesaran (1997) if the variables are non-stationary then
it will generate spurious result. Nelson and Plosser (1982)led a large volume of
literature investigating possible non-stationarity of financial time series data.
Thus before proceeding with regression model, the test for the stationarity status
of the variables have been performed in order to determine the respective order
of integration of the variables under consideration. For this purpose Harris-
Tzavalis z-statistics has been conducted as it is the most suitable method for this
data set which has fixed time periods and finite panels. The result has been
shown in table 3:
Table 3: Result from Panel Unit Root Test
Variables Assumes common unit root process
Harris-Tzavalis z-statistics
Rho z-value Decision
Logcsrexp 0.1182** -2.6695** Stationary
Loginv 0.8720 4.4708 Unit Root
Logass 0.9157 4.8843 Unit Root
Logpromexp 0.4051 0.0480 Unit Root
Logintinc 1.1370 6.9806 Unit Root
Logtotaldep 0.8979 4.7161 Unit Root
Logbranch 0.7381 3.2020 Unit Root
Logemp 0.8220 3.9969 Unit Root
(**Indicates stationary at 5% significance level)
This test assumes that the number of panels tends to finite or infinite while the
number of time periods is fixed. The null hypothesis of the test is that the series
contains a unit root, and the alternative is that the series is stationary. It assumes
a common autoregressive parameter for all panels. Small sample adjustment to T
is applied. The result reveals that the CSR expenditure is statistically significant
because p-value of the z-statistics is less than 5% significance level. It means the
CSR expenditure accepts the alternative hypothesis of stationarity. All the other
variables such as investment, total asset, promotional expenditure, investment
income, total deposit, number of branch and number of employees are not
statistically significant because p-value of the z-statistics is greater than 5%
significance level. Hence, all the variables have unit root except CSR
expenditure.
254 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
As the data contains unit root, first difference has been used to remove the trend
of the data. Then panel unit root test is done on the first difference. The result of
the panel unit root test under first difference by removing cross sectional means
and using lag 0 is in table 4:
Table 4: Result from Panel Unit Root Test (With Individual Intercept and
No Trend under First Difference)
Variables Assumes common unit root process
Harris-Tzavalis z-statistics
Rho z-value Decision
Logcsrexp -0.542** -8.9255** Stationary
Loginv -0.175** -5.4477** Stationary
Logass -0.975** -13.020** Stationary
Logpromexp -0.330** -6.9168** Stationary
Logintinc -1.344** -16.515** Stationary
Logtotaldep -0.451** -8.0599** Stationary
Logbranch -0.238** -6.0419** Stationary
Logemp -0.569** -9.1771** Stationary
(**Indicates stationary at 5% significance level)
From the above result, it can be inferred that according to Harris-Tzavalis z-
statistics all the variables such as CSR expenditure, inv, ass, promexp, intinc,
totaldep, no. of branch and no. of employees are statistically significant because
p-value of the z-statistics is less than 5% significance level. It means all the
variables accept the alternative hypothesis and the data set is stationary under
first difference. So, the panel regression model can be applied to the data set.
For balanced panel data set two types of panel regression model are pertinent:
fixed effect and random effect. The regression result of fixed effect and random
effect has been provided below:
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 255
Table 5: Results of the Regression Model
Variables Fixed effect Random Effect
Long run coefficient
logInv -.580605 .1789295
logAss 2.503281 -.413178
logProm Exp .4714189** .4241064**
logInt Inc -.822357 -.6635923
logTotal Dep -.8911443 2.225402***
logBranch# 2.179088** .2285695
logEmp# -.4852537 -.1863485
Α -10.03072** -14.00831**
F-test 14.49*
LM test 31.79**
Hausman test 30.03**
R-square 0.1438
Rho .808707
Cross-section random 0.5353(.6909)
Period random 0.4093(.4574)
Idiosyncratic random 0.4852(.7525)
Values in the bracket represent standard deviation
(*,** and *** indicate significant at 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively)
To measure the effectiveness of both the model Hausman test has been
conducted. Hausman test examines whether the random effects estimate is
insignificantly different from the unbiased fixed effect estimate. If the null
hypothesis of no correlation is rejected, then the individual effects are
significantly correlated with at least one regressors in the model and it shows the
random effect model problematic. Therefore, the fixed effect model is better
rather than the random effect model. In this study, value of Hausman test is 30.03
(prob>chi2 = 0.000) the null hypothesis is rejected. So, there is a significant
difference between the fixed and random effect models. Thus the fixed effect
model is effective than the random effect model.
The result of fixed effect model (Appendix: Table – A1) represents the long run
coefficient of the panel regression showing the time-fixed effects. The regression
equation is:
logCSRexp = - 10.03 – 0.58 logInv +2.50 logAss + 0.47logpromExp – 0.822
logIntInc – 0.89 logTotalDep + 2.18 logBranch – 0.485 logEmp + ε ………. (iii)
256 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
The result shows that promotional expenditure and no. of branch have p-value
less than 5% significance level. Thus, the variables are statistically significant at
5% significance level in determining the level of long-term CSR expenditures by
the respective banks in Bangladesh. Since the beta coefficient of both
promotional expenditure and no. of branch are positive, it indicates that larger
the amount of promotional expenditure and larger the size of the bank in respect
to geographical outreach represented by number of branches, higher will be the
level of CSR expenditure. The result from the fixed effect model also suggests
that 80.88% variation in CSR expenditure is accounted for the cross sectional
difference as measured by the rho i.e. the interclass differences. The analysis of
variance (ANOVA) shows that the model‟s value of F-ratio at 5% significance
level with 7 and 113 degrees of freedom is F0.05 =2.09. The large F-ratio and its
small p-value (0.000) show the regression model is statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
Based on the above analysis, amongst all the determinants considered in the
study only two variables (promotional expenditure and number of branches) are
statistically significant. Compare to our total size of economy we have huge
number of banks. Therefore, banking industry is facing tremendous competition
from domestic as well as foreign banks. Hence, the banks expend huge amount of
money for promotional expenditure. Apparently they consider CSR activities as
their promotional activities.
On the other hand total number of branches has a great impact on CSR
expenditure. A bank with significant number of branches indicates its size. In
general big power begets big responsibility. For that reason, a bank with greater
size has to expend huge amount as CSR activities.
Day by day CSR is becoming more and more pronounced in the business sector
of Bangladesh. Banking industry is no exception. But the overall status of CSR in
Bangladesh is still very meager. Lack of Good Governance, absence of strong
labor unions or consumer rights groups, and inability of the business community
to perceive CSR as a survival pre-condition in the local market constitute some
of elements undermining the evolution of CSR practices. Consequently, the
message from the government is that CSR shall be applied both „inside‟ and
„outside‟ the company, but emphasis should be given to the environment, the
society and the workers.
Additionally, by leveraging Bangladesh Bank‟s policies in the fields of
consumption, investment and public procurement it is possible to promote market
reward for responsible business conduct by the banks. Furthermore, better
alignment between BB‟s approaches and global approaches to CSR can be
achieved by improving company disclosure of CSR information through a new
legislative proposal on this issue, monitoring the Corporate Governance system
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 257
in the industry, building and supporting a strong labor union, consumer rights
group, environmental right groups and human right group.
All in all, banks should identify their prioritize responsibilities towards the
society other than financial attainment. Through which they will be able to solve
societal problems which is impossible individually.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, S. U., Islam, M. Z. and Hasan, I. (2012). “Corporate Social Responsibility and
Financial Performance Linkage‐ Evidence from the Banking Sector of
Bangladesh”, Journal of Organizational Management, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Brammer, S. and Millington, A. (2008). “Does It Pay to be Different? An Analysis of the
Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance”, Strategic
Management Journal, Vol. 29, pp.1325-1343.
European Commission (2011). “A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social
Responsibility”, Brussels, 25.10.2011 COM(2011) 681.
Harris, R. D. F. and Tzavalis, E. (1999). “Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels
where the Time Dimension is Fixed”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 91,pp.201-
226.
Harikkala, R. (2010). “CSR in the Finnish Banking Industry”, Thesis Paper,
<https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/22323/Harikkala_Riikka.pdf?sequ
ence=1>.
Hossain, M. B., Bhuiyan, M. A. H. and Rahman, H. (2013). “Deposit Behavior and Its
Impact on Loan: A Case Study on Rajshahi Krishi Unnayan Bank (RAKUB),
Bangladesh”, Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, pp.34, 4, 47-60.
Islam, M. T. (2012). “Linking Financial Performance to Corporate Social Responsibility
Initiatives of Banks in Bangladesh: A Panel Data Analysis”, European Journal of
Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 4.
Kitzmueller, M. and Shimshack, J. (2010). “Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social
Responsibility”, <http://econ.tulane.edu/shimshack/post_CSR.pdf>
Kuehn, J. (2014). “Spillovers from Entry: The Impact of Bank Branch Network
Expansion”, <http://www.econ.ucla.edu/jobmarket/2014/KuehnPaper.pdf>
Masud, A. K. (2011). “CSR practices of private commercial banks in Bangladesh: A
comparative study on Five PCBs”, MPRA Paper No. 35496.
Mamun, M. A., Sohog, K. and Akhter, A. (2013). “A Dynamic Panel Analysis of the
Financial Determinants of CSR in Bangladeshi Banking Industry”, Asian Economic
and Financial Review, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp.560-578.
Nelson, C. and Plosser, C. (1982). “Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time
series”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 10, pp.139-162.
Ogunbiyi, S. S. and Ihejirika, P. O. (2014). “Interest Rates and Deposit Money Banks‟
Profitability Nexus: The Nigerian Experience”, Arabian Journal of Business and
Management Review Vol. 3, No.11, (OMAN Chapter).
258 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
Padgett, R. C. and Galan, J. I. (2010). “The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social
Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 93, pp.407-418.
Pesaran, M. H. and Pesaran, B. (1997). “Microfit 4.0: Interactive econometric analysis”,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siegel, D. and Vitaliano, D. (2007). “An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of
Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,
Vol. 16, No. 3.
Singh, R. and Aggarwal, S. (2011). “CSR Orientation of Indian Banks and Stakeholder
Relationship Marketing Orientation: An Empirical Analysis”, Working Paper
Series No. 683, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta.
Rouf, M. A. (2011). “The Corporate Social responsibility Disclosure: A Study of Listed
Companies in Bangladesh”, Business and Economics Research Journal, Vol. 2, No.
3, pp.19-32.
Samina, Q. S. (2012). “Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility in Islamic Banks of
Bangladesh”, World Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp.1-13.
Shirley, Y. (2011). “The Role of Banks in Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of
Applied Economics and Business Research, Vol. 1, No. 2,pp.103-115.
Shubiri, F. N. A., Al-abedallat, A.Z. and Orabi, M. M. A. (2012). “Financial and Non-
Financial Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Knowledge
Management, Economics and Information Technology, Issue 5, October.
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility of Banking Industry 259
APPENDICES
Table A-1: Fixed effect model
Table A-2: Random Effect model
.
F test that all u_i=0: F(29, 113) = 5.28 Prob > F = 0.0000 rho .80870749 (fraction of variance due to u_i) sigma_e .75255349 sigma_u 1.5473342 _cons -10.03072 4.596083 -2.18 0.031 -19.13639 -.9250491 emp -.4852537 .7319378 -0.66 0.509 -1.935354 .964847 branch 2.179088 .7768018 2.81 0.006 .6401039 3.718073 totaldep -.8911443 1.389127 -0.64 0.522 -3.643255 1.860966 intinc -.822357 .6109096 -1.35 0.181 -2.032679 .3879651 promexp .4714189 .2114497 2.23 0.028 .0524989 .8903388 ass 2.503281 1.56577 1.60 0.113 -.5987912 5.605354 inv -.580605 .4723867 -1.23 0.222 -1.516488 .3552782 csrexp Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.6304 Prob > F = 0.0000 F(7,113) = 14.49
overall = 0.1438 max = 5 between = 0.0820 avg = 5.0R-sq: within = 0.4730 Obs per group: min = 5
Group variable: id Number of groups = 30Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 150
. xtreg csrexp inv ass promexp intinc totaldep branch emp, fe
.
rho .45740668 (fraction of variance due to u_i) sigma_e .75255349 sigma_u .6909576 _cons -14.00831 3.71583 -3.77 0.000 -21.2912 -6.725414 emp -.1863485 .3940044 -0.47 0.636 -.9585828 .5858859 branch .2285695 .4083177 0.56 0.576 -.5717185 1.028858 totaldep 2.225402 1.248944 1.78 0.075 -.2224829 4.673286 intinc -.6635923 .5705683 -1.16 0.245 -1.781886 .454701 promexp .4241064 .1653471 2.56 0.010 .100032 .7481807 ass -.413178 1.263809 -0.33 0.744 -2.890198 2.063842 inv .1789295 .1973761 0.91 0.365 -.2079205 .5657796 csrexp Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(7) = 110.51
overall = 0.4852 max = 5 between = 0.5353 avg = 5.0R-sq: within = 0.4093 Obs per group: min = 5
Group variable: id Number of groups = 30Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 150
. xtreg csrexp inv ass promexp intinc totaldep branch emp, re
260 D.U. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, June 2013
Table A-3: Hausman Specification test
Prob>chi2 = 0.0001 = 30.03 chi2(7) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)
Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic
B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg emp -.4852537 -.1863485 -.2989053 .6168415 branch 2.179088 .2285695 1.950519 .6608311 totaldep -.8911443 2.225402 -3.116546 .6081221 intinc -.822357 -.6635923 -.1587647 .2183171 promexp .4714189 .4241064 .0473125 .1318003 ass 2.503281 -.413178 2.916459 .9243498 inv -.580605 .1789295 -.7595345 .4291758 fixed random Difference S.E. (b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) Coefficients
. hausman fixed random