developing an early childhood and school readiness business plan
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Developing an Early Childhood and School Readiness Business Plan
October 17, 2008
Centers of Excellence Workshop
United Way of Central Iowa
Charles Bruner, DirectorChild & Family Policy Center
Des Moines, Iowa
Why a Business Plan?
Appeals to non-Human Service Audience Uses language of business leaders
Emphasizes Specific Investment/Accountability Features Not Adequately Employed/Effectively Conveyed in Human Service Programs Measurable Results Return on Investment Management and Continuous
Learning/Adaptation Can Deal with Large Investment Needs
Business Plans and Early Childhood/ School Readiness and Success
Rensselaerville Institute Outcome Funding application to human services in 1980s
United Way of Allegheny County “Early Childhood Initiative” Business Plan in 1996
United Way of Central Iowa Early Childhood Business Case, 1998-2008
A Business Plan vs. a Proposal
Proposal Business Plan
Needs Statement vs. Market Analysis
Program Descriptions vs. Product Lines
Goals and Objectives vs. Quantifiable Benefits/Returns
Operational Plan Job Descriptions Linear GANTT Chart Summative Evaluation
vs. Management System Management Team Continuous Learning Structure Benchmarks, Real Time Feedback
Summary of Differences
Proposal
Spending on Programs
Business Plan
Investing in Solutions
Market Analysis Product Lines Quantifiable Benefits/Returns
Business Plan for Early Childhood/ School Readiness and Success:
NATIONAL RESOURCES
source: Child Trends analysis of ECLS-K, base year public-use data for 1998-1999
Cognitive
Health
Social and Emotional
13.2%
7.6%15.5%
8.1%
5.0%
6.4%
5.0%
Child Trends Analysis of ECKS-1 Data – More than half of children start school behind on one or more dimensions of school readiness, one in four start school behind on more than one.
Market Analysis: Children not starting school ready for success
Product Lines: Programs/services that can improve children’s readiness for school
Health: 20% Preschool and Other
Early Care and Education: 30%
Family and Community: 40%
Special Needs: 10%
Early Learning
Health, Mental
Health and Nutrition
Family Support
Special Needs/ Early
Intervention
source: Early Childhood Systems Working Group
Alliance for Early Childhood Finance http://www.earlychildhoodfinance.org
The Build Initiative http://www.buildinitiative.org
The Children’s Project http://www.thechildrensproject.org
Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) http://www.clasp.org/publications.php?id=3
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) http://www.ccsso.org/earlychildhood
National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP) http://www.nccp.org
National Child Care Information Center (NCCIC) http://nccic.acf.hhs.gov
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)http://www.ncsl.org/programs/cyf/cc.htm
National Governors Association Center for Best Practiceshttp://www.nga.org/center
Smart Start National Technical Assistance Center http://www.nationalsmartstart.org/
State Early Childhood Policy Technical Assistance Network (SECPTAN) http://www.finebynine.org
ZERO TO THREEhttp://www.zerotothree.org
Early Childhood Systems Working Group
Short-Term Long-Term
Reduced Grade Retention Reduced Special Education
Use Reduced Disruptive
Classroom Behavior (including absenteeism and suspensions)
(Improved Workforce Productivity of Parents)
Reduced Delinquency Reduced School Drop-Out Reduced Adolescent Parenting Reduced Welfare Dependency Improved Earnings and
Productivity Reduced Criminal Justice
Involvement
Quantifiable Benefits/Returns: Gains from children starting school ready
Returns on Investment from Selected Sentinel Programs
$3.27
$1.58$2.44
$0.92 $4.66
$2.91
$2.51
$5.95
$1.57
$0.16
$0.82
Chicago Parent-ChildCenters $7.10 Total
Perry Preschool $8.74 Total
Elmira PEIP $6.92 Total
Abecedarian Project $4.01 Total
Government/Taxpayer
Society
Participant
source: Early Learning Left Out: Closing the Investment Gap for America’s Youngest Children, 2nd Edition. Voices for America’s Children and the Child & Family Policy Center. April 2005.
Current Public Early Childhood Investments
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
Infants and Toddlers(0-2)
Pre-schoolers (3-5) School-age Children(6-18)
College-age Youth(19-23)
State and LocalFederal
$708.63
$1,683.30
$7,889.15
$4,113.30
Per Child Composite Investments inEducation and Development by Child Age
Composite of Nine States & District of Columbia Assessments (2003)
source: Early Learning Left Out: Closing the Investment Gap for America’s Youngest Children, 2nd Edition. Voices for America’s Children and the Child & Family Policy Center. April 2005.
United Way of Central IowaBusiness Plan for
Early Childhood/ School Readiness
Direction from Leadership (United Way of Central Iowa, Greater Des Moines Community Partnership, and the Des Moines Community Foundation)
Universal focus: Address all children (what all children need, not just poor children).
Be results-focused. Draw upon best data and research for projections
(McGladrey & Pullen).
Report Format and Structure: Overview
Market Analysis
Children Starting School Not Fully Ready for School [1/2 of all Polk children, 20% significantly behind and requiring intensive intervention to try to catch up]
Product Lines
Home visiting and family support [competent parenting]
Comprehensive and preventive health services [health and nutrition]
Child care quality, affordability, and availability [constant, stable, appropriate supervision]
Enriched preschool [guidance and instruction]
Quantifiable Benefits/Returns
Current public expenditures on short-term and long-term opportunity areas [$150+ million annually in state, federal, and local resources expended]
Individual Product Line Assessment
Specific Product Line
Description of products, their features, and the evidence related to their anticipated benefits
Market Analysis
A. Estimate of number of children who can benefit and will participate in market line
B. Estimate of product cost per child
C. Estimate of current investment in product line
Potential Returns on Investment
A. Estimate of potential return, based upon evidence from exemplary programs (both local and national)
B. Identification of early ways to assess likelihood of producing benefits
Example of Product Line Assessment:Enriched Preschool
Product Line
Preschool Program: (1) for three- and four-year-olds; (2) at least ½-day in duration; (3) with skilled teacher and curriculum/intentional learning environment; (4) with ratio of child to teacher/aide of 1-8 or less; and (5) with ability to address other family needs through referrals
Market Analysis
Number of 3- and 4-year-olds below 130% / 185% of poverty who could be enlisted to participate – (2) those currently participating in Head Start, Shared Visions, Part B preschools, or another high quality programs
Potential Returns on Investment
Perry Pre-School/Chicago Parent-Child Center potential returns, with specific short-term reductions in special education use in early elementary grades
Preschool Investment Opportunity
source: Polk County Early Childhood and School Readiness Business Case Update. Child & Family Policy Center. May 2005.
Would Decline20.0%
Shared Visions/Emp
19.0%
Could Be Served23.5%
Head Start37.5%
380 Children
750 Children
400 Children
470 Children
3- and 4-Year-Olds130% of Poverty or Below
2,000 ChildrenWould Decline20.0%
Shared Visions/Emp
13.8%
Could Be Served40.9%
Head Start25.3%
440 Children
810 Children
640 Children
1,310 Children
3- and 4-Year-Olds185% of Poverty or Below
3,200 Children
Investment Opportunity:
470 preschoolers x $4,500 = $2,115,000
Expanded Investment Opportunity:
1,310 preschoolers x $4,500 = $5,895,000
Overall Investment Opportunities in Relation to Potential Returns
Product LineProduct Line
Home Visiting/Family SupportHealth ServicesEarly Care and EducationEnriched PreschoolOther
Total
Total per Young Child
Current InvestmentCurrent Investment
$ 4,375,000$ 4,544,000$ 7,164,000$ 9,282,000$ 1,080,000
$ 26,445,000
$ 793.34
Investment OpportunityInvestment Opportunity
$ 2,048,000$ 1,844,000$ 18,800,000$ 2,115,000 *
$ 24,807,000
$ 744.20
Comparison: $150 Million per year in public spending (remediation, public protection and welfare services)
source: presentation to United Way of Central Iowa’s Board on the Polk County Early Childhood and School Readiness Business Case Update. Child & Family Policy Center. December 2005.
* based on 130% of Poverty or Below
Lessons Learned from Polk County Business Plan Experience
“Good enough” data available to do sound ballpark estimates (credibility is based upon the process and vetting of information – refining estimates will require real-world experience, in any event).
Return on investment/avoided cost analysis can help with “sticker shock” regarding size of overall investment gap (data also can be used as an educational tool regarding expectations for community-wide change).
Plan can be used as a long-term strategic investment tool (framework also can be used to strengthen ability to develop performance measures for continuous learning and accountability for investments).
Lessons Learned from Polk County Business Plan: Part Two
Additional emphasis needs to be provided on intersection of different product lines (effective referrals and partnerships).
Straight-line results accountability does not do justice to interactive impacts in a multi-causal and multi-consequential world.
Additional emphasis needs to be given to neighborhood approaches to school readiness.
Resources from CFPC/SECPTAN
Early Learning Left Out, 2nd Edition Many Happy Returns: Three Economic Models that
Make the Case for School Readiness Village Building and School Readiness: Closing
Opportunity Gaps in a Diverse Society Beyond the Usual Suspects: Developing New Allies
to Invest in School Readiness The Healthy Child Story Book – Federal Policy
Opportunities to Improve Children’s Healthy Development: Within and Beyond SCHIP Reauthorization
Next Steps: Individual and Group Work
Adapting the Business Plan and its Lessons Learned to Current local United Way Planning Developing an early childhood/school readiness or
other business plan Developing aspects of a plan – focusing upon a
particular product line Using some of the methodologies and approaches in
developing performance measures and impacts for current or future investments
Developing additional marketing and public education materials supporting investments in early childhood and school readiness or other area
... continued
Next Steps: Individual and Group Work, continued
Identifying the Next Steps to Take in this Process, including: Specific market, product line, or return-on-
investment analysis to be conducted Key stakeholders to involve in planning and
development/management structure Expectations for work/quantifiable benefits in
a broad context
Resources and Information
Charles Bruner, DirectorChild & Family Policy Center
218 6th Avenue, Suite 1021Des Moines, IA 50309
www.finebynine.orgState Early Childhood Policy Technical Assistance Network
www.gettingready.orgSchool Readiness Indicators Initiative
www.cfpciowa.orgChild & Family Policy Center