developing an effective governance modelis your governance structure effective? transparency in...
TRANSCRIPT
Developing an Effective
Governance Model
NAEH Conference February 20, 2015
Suzanne Wagner [email protected]
Framing Concepts Ending Homelessness requires communities to make tough decisions and bold changes in their homeless systems
Governance structure must enable and support these efforts: Set the tone for a “systems” focus as opposed to
“programmatic”
Bring together providers and other key stake holders
Manage and measure performance
Evaluate investments and re-align to achieve systems goals
2
What is Governance? Governance is not the whole CoC
It is: Agreed upon processes and designated body(ies) Make decisions for the CoC With participation from range of CoC members May include Board, Steering Committee, Sub-Committees,
and/or Task Forces Ensure compliance with conflict of interest rules LEADERSHIP
3
Is your governance structure effective? Transparency in decision-making processes Decisions get made Effective communication and member education Conflicts of interest are addressed Systems and program performance outcomes improve (e.g., numbers and length of stay , exits to PH Resources are strategically invested (efficient and effective) Resources are used (underspending is irresponsible)
4
Good Governance is NOT Charter or by-laws alone No conflict That everyone has to be involved in every decision That constituent groups and members of the CoC can be completely “iced out”
5
Structuring Your Local Governance Key Considerations: Leadership – Champion, CoC, Staff
Who to include?
How to structure roles that are appropriate
Board versus Staff Role
How to structure participation without a million committees and spending all day in meetings
6
Challenges to Good Governance No leadership/leaders not engaged or feeling legitimate in making decisions
Only CoC funded agencies participate and difficulty getting non-grantees to the table
No resources for staff or support or staff have been decision-makers
How to decide how to be organized
Concerns about liability
There is no local government or they are not involved
Government is overly involved
Resistance to change
Many communities – must revamp structure
7
Membership State /Local government Advocacy
Organizations/ Advocates
Intermediary Organizations
CoC Support Organizations
Foundations Academia
Homeless/Housing Provider
Organizations
Business Community
Housing Developers/
Owners
8
Sample Governance
CoC Board
Program Development
System Performance Monitoring
Program Evaluation & Monitoring
Planning and Funding Priorities
Backbone Support Agency
9
Info flows from Board to committees and vv. Comms. make recs and Board adopts. Staff in support role
Sample Governance
TYP or Community Leadership Committee
CoC Board
Subcommittees
10
CoC Board comprised of Chairs of Subcommittees and designees from TYP Leadership. Committees make recs and Board adopts. TYP Leadership Group is final approval
CoC Board Examples CT Balance of State (BOS) CoC:
◦ State agencies – Mental Health, Housing, Education, Housing Finance Agency, Children’s Services
◦ VA, CT Coalition to End Homelessness, CSH,
◦ Sub CoC Representatives
NYC Coalition on the COC: ◦ 8 government, 8 provider coalitions, 8 consumer and at large members
Washtenaw County MI (Ann Arbor) and Houston, TX: ◦ Shift from Board of Homeless/Housing Coalition to new CoC Entity
11
CoC Board Representation State/Local Government
Mainstream Service Systems – MH, Social Services, Child Welfare, TANF Agency, Housing/Community Development, ESG Recipients etc
Providers – homeless service and housing, outreach, shelter, TH
Housing Developers
People who are/have been Homeless
Advocates
Veterans Administration
Law Enforcement/Corrections
Chamber of Commerce/Business Community
Intermediaries
Faith Based Service Providers
Private and Family Foundations
Academics/Researchers
12
Tips Board - large enough to be representative but not too large to get stuff done
Backbone support agencies are not the Board; advice and guidance
No constituency has more than 30-35% of seats
Clarity about authority, roles and responsibilities
Subcommittees make recommendations to Board for acceptance/adoption (or not)
Have at least one member who understands Robert’s Rules of Order and use them.
Develop structure and adjust
13