developing coherence in assessment. relationship to the new c- qem report* coherence in the course...

26
Developing coherence in assessment

Upload: sydni-tufford

Post on 01-Apr-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Developing coherence in assessment

Page 2: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Relationship to the new C-QEM report*

Coherence in the course and assessment

*Course quality enhancement and monitoring report

Page 4: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

How do we take a course level view of assessment?

Page 5: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Assessment Patterns that Fail• Too much summative assessment• Trivial assignments make low

intellectual standards• Feedback that does not feed forward• Too much variety in forms of

assessment• Over-reliance on documentation to

clarify goals and standards

Source: TESTA (www.testa.ac.uk)

Page 6: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Adopting a coherent approach.......how?

Page 7: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

A coherent approach1. Take an outcomes based approach to

assessment and consider course level outcomes to use to map knowledge, skills and attributes across the course.

2. Schedule assessments at a Course Level.

Page 8: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

A coherent approach

3. Dealing with the assessment diversity – ‘routes’ through the course.

4. Increasing the use and effectiveness of feedback.

5. Consider integrated assignments

Page 10: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

The student journey........

Page 11: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Language and discourse

The student journey

To Graduateprofessional

From student

Skills Skills Skills

Capabilities

Knowledge

Page 12: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

2. Schedule Assessments

• Consider the student experience at a course level

• Conduct an audit of the number of summative , formative and the variety of assessments.

• Avoid bunching• Look at the balance and workload at a

course level

Page 13: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

3. Creating “routes” through

• Too much variety in forms of assessment causes:– Confusion about demands– Lack of progression in standard over time– Feedback not feeding forward– The whole being less than the sum of the part.

• Make the link between similar assessments within and across semesters and years

• Feedforward assessments13

Page 14: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

For feedback to be effective, students need to read it, understand it and use it to improve what they do next

4. Increasing the use and effectiveness of feedback

Page 15: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Active engagement with feedback

Explicit Criteria

Completion and submission of work

Students Active engagement with criteria

Engaging students at each stage of the assessment process

Students need Motive, Opportunity and Means with feedback

Page 16: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Getting the balance right...

Quick and dirty

Detailed and lengthy

Detailed comments

individual

summative

Brief succinct comments

Generic /group

Formative feedback

Page 17: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Feed forward Assessments

• Improves the balance between assessment for and assessment of learning

• Convert feedback into feed-forward – feedback from one task feeds another.

Strategies:

Link between assessments

greater use of formative feedback rather than summative

Active use of feedback (123 guides)

Page 18: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Making feedback work (ideas from ASKe )

Page 19: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

5. Consider Integrated assessment

Page 20: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Example of a six week integrated activity led -learning activity

• Level 1 activity: 6 activities and associated resources formed the first 6 week experience for Mechanical and Automotive Engineering students

• Example of activity of week 1 project to design and build a lightweight cart and bridge to transport a 2 kg mass.

20

Page 21: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

21

Page 22: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

22

Page 23: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Key features of the activity and assessment:

23

• New task every Monday • Students timetabled for 18 hours of core task (30 hours

including other activities) • Lead academic gives key note lectures and leads

assessment• Supporting facilitator provides supervision and support• Students work in small groups of 2 or 3 • Students keep individual logbook • Assessment by poster presentation / brief report / video • Assessment, feedback and result all in final Friday

session

Page 24: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Skills and attributes developed

24

Wilson-Medhurst, S. and Green, P. (2012) Researching the effectiveness of Activity Led learning as a pedagogy for engagement with professional development in engineering. Case study. Available [online]: http://www.hestem.ac.uk/sites/default/files/case_study_-_researching_the_effectiveness_of_activity_led_learning_0.pdf

Page 25: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Module 1: Ecommerce

• Phase test to test core knowledge

Module 2: Business

Methods & Decision-making

• Phase test to test core knowledge

Module 3: Supply Chain

• Phase test to test core knowledge

Integrative assessmentProject on the car Industry:

Individual written project + group video

Integrated assessment in a Business Course at Coventry

Page 26: Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring

Criteria for assessment patterns that work...

• Enough student effort distributed reasonably evenly across all important topics

• The effort they put in at a high intellectual• Students clear and about ‘goals and standards’ and

orient their effort appropriately• Feedback is effective: students read it, understand it

and use it to improve what they do next.• Progression over time so that students become more

sophisticated in the way that they tackle similar tasks

Source: http://www.testa.ac.uk/resources/best-practice-guides