development and evaluation of photocatalytic linear ... · stephanie gora doctor of philosophy...
TRANSCRIPT
Development and Evaluation of Photocatalytic Linear Engineered Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for the Removal of Disinfection
Byproduct Precursors from Drinking Water
by
Stephanie Gora
A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto
© Copyright by Stephanie Gora 2017
ii
Development and Evaluation of Photocatalytic Linear Engineered
Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for the Removal of Disinfection
Byproduct Precursors from Drinking Water
Stephanie Gora
Doctor of Philosophy
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Toronto
2017
Abstract
Photocatalysis has long been touted as a potential drinking water treatment technology but has
proven difficult to implement at full scale. This project aimed to address two of the perennial
challenges preventing the use of photocatalysis for drinking water treatment: the need to safely
remove the photocatalyst from the water after treatment and the danger that incomplete
mineralization of contaminants will lead to the formation of intermediate compounds that are
more reactive or toxic than their parent compounds. A suite of titanium dioxide-based linear
engineered nanomaterials (LENs) was synthesized and compared to standard commercial
titanium dioxide nanoparticles in terms of filterability, settleability, surface characteristics,
crystal phase structure, available surface area, photonic efficiency, and propensity to form
hydroxyl radicals. The LENs were also evaluated in terms of their ability to remove disinfection
byproduct (DBP) precursors from two natural surface water matrices via adsorption and
photocatalysis. DBPs, which form when naturally occurring organic precursor compounds
interact with chemical disinfectants used in drinking water treatment, are suspected carcinogens
and are widely regulated throughout the world. In this study, photocatalysis increased the DBP
iii
formation potential of both water matrices at short irradiation times. Longer treatment times
resulted in decreased in DBP formation potential. Adsorption removed DBP precursors from the
water without transforming them. The surface area and crystal phase structure of the
nanomaterials were identified as important drivers of photocatalytic treatment effectiveness and
regenerability. Adsorption efficacy was mainly impacted by surface area, agglomeration, and
charge interactions. The effects of both adsorption and photocatalysis on DBP formation
potential were strongly influenced by the composition of the water matrix being treated. The
results of this project have informed the conceptual design of two titanium dioxide-based water
treatment processes for DBP precursor removal: a single step photocatalytic system and a two-
step adsorption and regeneration system.
iv
Acknowledgments
This thesis is dedicated to my grandmother, Simone Francoeur, who was my first teacher, best
friend, and greatest supporter. Although she passed away during the early stages of this project, I
know that she would have been proud of my achievements as a researcher, mentor, and teacher.
This project was funded through scholarships provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Ontario Ministry of Training, and Engineers Canada
and Manulife.
The last five years have been the most challenging and rewarding of my life so far. My
supervisor, Professor Susan Andrews, has been a constant source of support throughout the
process and I would like to thank her for her patience and her insightful feedback over the past
five years. I would also like to acknowledge my other committee members, Professor Robert
Andrews, Professor Ron Hofmann, Professor Elodie Passeport, and Professor Benoit Barbeau,
who have provided helpful commentary throughout my project. This project wouldn’t have been
possible without the assistance and good company provided by our summer students and interns,
including Tassia Brito Andrade, Adrielle Costa Souza, Leonardo Furtado, Yijun (Jessie) Gai,
Michelli Park, Wan-Ying (Jenny) Yue, Chuqiao (Kaya) Yuan, Kennedy Santos, Katherine
Dritsas, and Jingyi Han. The various members of the Drinking Water Research Group, in
particular Aleksandra (Ola) Sokolowski and Jim Wang, have also been of great help.
Although they were not directly involved in this project, Pasquale Cirone, Margaret Walsh, and
the members of the Process Engineering Department at CBCL Limited in Halifax have all made
important contributions to my growth as a scientist and an engineer and I am thankful for the
efforts that they have made on my behalf over the years. I would also like to thank my family
and friends, including my parents, John and Sandra Gora, my sister, Jill Gora, along with Jen
Hill, Katherine Perrott, Sarah Jane Payne, and Seamus for their time, love, and patience as well
as the plants, animals, and caretakers of High Park in Toronto, which has been my refuge and
inspiration during my time in Toronto.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge the love and support of my partner, Andrew Sinclair, who
has been an excellent companion throughout this adventure and who will no doubt be very
pleased to see me graduate!
v
Table of Contents
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iv
Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................v
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xiii
List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. xvii
Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................. xxvi
Introduction .................................................................................................................................1
Background ..........................................................................................................................1
1.1.1 Light Sources ...........................................................................................................2
1.1.2 Formation of Undesirable Intermediates or Byproducts ..........................................2
1.1.3 Removal of Nanomaterials After Treatment............................................................3
Specific Research Objectives ...............................................................................................3
Associated Publications .......................................................................................................6
References ............................................................................................................................7
Background Literature Review ...................................................................................................9
Heterogeneous Photocatalysis .............................................................................................9
2.1.1 Photocatalysts ..........................................................................................................9
2.1.2 Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Contaminants in Aqueous Media ............10
Titanium Dioxide ...............................................................................................................12
2.2.1 TiO2 Structure, Polymorphs, and Behaviour .........................................................12
2.2.2 Probing the Behaviour of TiO2 Photocatalysts ......................................................13
2.2.3 Effects of TiO2 Nanomaterials on Human and Environmental Health ..................15
2.2.4 TiO2 Photocatalysis for Drinking Water Treatment ..............................................17
vi
Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials ........................................................................................19
2.3.1 Linear Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials (LENs) ....................................................20
2.3.2 Alkaline Hydrothermal Synthesis of LENs ...........................................................20
2.3.3 Effects of Synthesis Parameters on Nanomaterial Properties ................................23
Natural Organic Matter ......................................................................................................23
2.4.1 Health, Operational, and Aesthetic Effects of Natural Organic Matter .................23
2.4.2 NOM Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Plants ............................................24
2.4.3 Photocatalytic Degradation of Natural Organic Matter .........................................25
Adsorption..........................................................................................................................27
2.5.1 Adsorption Theory .................................................................................................27
2.5.2 Adsorption of NOM to TiO2 ..................................................................................30
2.5.3 Nanoparticle Agglomeration ..................................................................................32
References ..........................................................................................................................35
Materials and Methods ..............................................................................................................50
Synthesis and Characterization of Linear Engineered Nanomaterials ...............................50
3.1.1 Alkaline Hydrothermal Synthesis Procedure .........................................................50
3.1.2 Characterization of LENs ......................................................................................52
Water Matrices ...................................................................................................................54
Experimental Apparatus.....................................................................................................57
3.3.1 Light Sources .........................................................................................................57
3.3.2 Additional Apparatus .............................................................................................57
Sample Preparation and Experimental Design ..................................................................57
3.4.1 Photocatalysis Tests ...............................................................................................57
3.4.2 Adsorption Tests ....................................................................................................58
3.4.3 Nanomaterial Regeneration ...................................................................................58
3.4.4 Settling Tests ..........................................................................................................58
vii
3.4.5 Filtration Tests .......................................................................................................59
Sample Analysis.................................................................................................................60
3.5.1 Dyes .......................................................................................................................60
3.5.2 Disinfection Byproduct Surrogates ........................................................................60
3.5.3 Disinfection Byproduct Formation and Analysis ..................................................60
3.5.4 Other Analyses .......................................................................................................61
Quality Control ..................................................................................................................61
References ..........................................................................................................................62
Preliminary Experimental Findings and Concept Development ...............................................64
Methods and Materials .......................................................................................................65
4.1.1 Experimental Design ..............................................................................................65
4.1.2 Materials ................................................................................................................66
4.1.3 Light Sources .........................................................................................................67
4.1.4 LEN Synthesis .......................................................................................................68
Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................69
4.2.1 Effect of Time, TiO2 Dose, Water Type, and Light Source on NOM
Adsorption and Degradation ..................................................................................69
4.2.2 Solar Photocatalysis with LENs for NOM Removal .............................................82
4.2.3 LENs for Dye Removal .........................................................................................91
Summary, Conclusions, and Implications for Future Experiments ...................................94
4.3.1 Light Source ...........................................................................................................94
4.3.2 Selection of Optimal LENs ....................................................................................96
4.3.3 Natural vs. Synthetic Water Matrices ....................................................................96
References ..........................................................................................................................97
Adsorption of Natural Organic Matter and Disinfection Byproduct Precursors from
Surface Water onto TiO2 Nanoparticles: pH Effects, Isotherm Modeling, and Implications
for the Use of TiO2 for Drinking Water Treatment.................................................................100
viii
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................100
Introduction ......................................................................................................................101
5.1.1 Titanium Dioxide for Drinking Water Treatment ................................................101
5.1.2 Natural Organic Matter ........................................................................................102
5.1.3 Adsorption of NOM to TiO2 ................................................................................102
5.1.4 Adsorption Models...............................................................................................103
5.1.5 Potential Risks and Opportunities Associated with the Use of TiO2
Nanoparticles for Water Treatment .....................................................................104
Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................105
5.2.1 Materials ..............................................................................................................105
5.2.2 Analytical Methods ..............................................................................................106
5.2.3 Sample Preparation ..............................................................................................107
Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................108
5.3.1 Disinfection Byproduct Formation During Photocatalysis ..................................108
5.3.2 NOM Removal via Adsorption – Time Series Experiments ...............................109
5.3.3 Effects of pH and TiO2 Dose on Adsorption ........................................................110
5.3.4 Modeling of Adsorption Isotherms ......................................................................113
5.3.5 Adsorption of DBP Precursors.............................................................................116
5.3.6 Effect of pH on Adsorption of LC-OCD Fractions .............................................118
Conclusions ......................................................................................................................119
References ........................................................................................................................121
Supplementary Material for Chapter 5 ............................................................................125
Development of Settleable Engineered Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for the Safe
Removal of Disinfection Byproduct Precursors from Drinking Water ..................................132
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................132
Introduction ......................................................................................................................132
Experimental ....................................................................................................................136
ix
6.2.1 Materials ..............................................................................................................136
6.2.2 Synthesis of Nanostructured Materials ................................................................137
6.2.3 Characterization of Nanomaterials ......................................................................138
6.2.4 Settling Tests ........................................................................................................139
6.2.5 Formation of ·OH Radicals ..................................................................................140
6.2.6 Characterization of NOM ....................................................................................140
6.2.7 Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation Under UVA Light ..........................140
6.2.8 Electrical Energy per Order Calculations ............................................................141
Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................142
6.3.1 Nanomaterial Characterization ............................................................................142
6.3.2 Hydroxyl Radical Formation ...............................................................................149
6.3.3 Settling Experiments and Modeling.....................................................................149
6.3.4 Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye Over Time .........................156
6.3.5 Removal of DBP Precursor Surrogates via Adsorption and Photocatalysis ........159
6.3.6 Electrical Energy per Order .................................................................................162
6.3.7 Comparison of Reaction Rate Constants and Implications for Degradation
Pathways ..............................................................................................................164
Conclusions ......................................................................................................................165
References ........................................................................................................................167
Supplementary Material ...............................................................................................................172
Photocatalysis with Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials to Prevent the Formation of
Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water ...........................................................................180
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................180
Introduction ......................................................................................................................181
Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................184
7.2.1 Materials ..............................................................................................................184
7.2.2 Apparatus .............................................................................................................185
x
7.2.3 Synthesis and Characterization of Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials ...................186
7.2.4 Settling and Filtration ..........................................................................................187
7.2.5 NOM and Dye Degradation Experiments ............................................................188
7.2.6 Calculations..........................................................................................................188
Results ..............................................................................................................................189
7.3.1 Characterization of Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials ..........................................189
7.3.2 Filtration and Settling ..........................................................................................193
7.3.3 Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye ...................................................................196
7.3.4 Degradation of Natural Organic Matter (Dissolved Organic Carbon and
UV254) ................................................................................................................197
7.3.5 Removal and Degradation of Disinfection Byproduct Precursors .......................201
7.3.6 Alternative Measures of System Efficiency: Applied UV Dose and Power per
Volume .................................................................................................................207
7.3.7 Correlation Between Methylene Blue Degradation, NOM Degradation, and
DBPfp ..................................................................................................................209
Summary and Conclusions ..............................................................................................211
References ........................................................................................................................213
Supplementary Material for Chapter 7 ............................................................................218
Removal of NOM and Disinfection Byproducts from Drinking Water Using Regenerable
Nanoscale Engineered TiO2 Adsorbents .................................................................................219
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................219
Introduction ......................................................................................................................220
Methods and Materials .....................................................................................................222
8.2.1 Materials ..............................................................................................................222
8.2.2 Raw Water Quality ..............................................................................................223
8.2.3 Synthesis and Characterization of Engineered Nanomaterials ............................225
8.2.4 Adsorption Experiments ......................................................................................225
8.2.5 Regeneration Experiments ...................................................................................226
xi
8.2.6 Filtration and Settling Tests .................................................................................227
8.2.7 Analysis of AO24, DOC, UV Absorbance, and DBP Formation Potential .........228
8.2.8 Isotherm Modeling and Other Statistical Analyses .............................................228
Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................229
8.3.1 Characterization of Engineered Nanomaterials ...................................................229
8.3.2 Acid Orange 24 Adsorption to TiO2 ....................................................................230
8.3.3 NOM Adsorption to TiO2 Nanomaterials ............................................................233
8.3.4 Regeneration of Engineered Nanomaterials After NOM Adsorption ..................244
8.3.5 Removal of Nanomaterials from Treated Water ..................................................246
Conclusions ......................................................................................................................252
References ........................................................................................................................253
Supplementary Material for Chapter 8 ............................................................................259
Summary, Conclusions, Engineering Significance, and Implications of Research ................265
Summary of Findings .......................................................................................................265
Overall Conclusions .........................................................................................................269
9.2.1 TiO2 Removes Disinfection Byproduct Precursors via Adsorption and
Degradation ..........................................................................................................269
9.2.2 Material Synthesis Conditions Determine the NOM Adsorption and
Degradation Behaviour of LENs .........................................................................270
9.2.3 Filtration is the Most Practical Option for Nanomaterial Removal .....................270
Engineering Significance of Findings ..............................................................................271
Implications for Future Research .....................................................................................272
References ........................................................................................................................274
Appendix A: Effects of Synthesis Conditions on LEN Characteristics......................................276
Appendix B: Matrix Impacts on Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of NOM by
TiO2 .........................................................................................................................................280
Appendix C: Calibration Curves ................................................................................................284
xii
Appendix D: Quality Control .....................................................................................................291
Appendix E: Proposed TiO2-based Treatment Systems .............................................................294
Appendix F: Cost Comparison of Proposed TiO2-based Treatment Systems to Existing
Water Treatment Processes .....................................................................................................297
Appendix G: Irradiance Considerations .....................................................................................313
Appendix H: Sedimentation Analysis ........................................................................................317
Appendix I: Statistical Analysis of Regeneration Results ..........................................................329
Appendix J: Evaluating and Modeling System Performance .....................................................331
xiii
List of Tables
Table 3.1 Precursor materials and temperature setpoints employed during the alkaline
hydrothermal synthesis of LENs in this project .................................................... 52
Table 3.2 Characteristics of four water sources (in lab measurements, variable n, error
values represent standard deviation from the mean) ............................................. 54
Table 3.3 Percentages of different LC-OCD fractions present in raw water matrices used in
this study (n = 2) ................................................................................................... 55
Table 3.4 Additional water quality data for three natural water matrices used in this study
(DWSP 2010-2012) .............................................................................................. 56
Table 4.1 Experimental conditions used in previous studies ................................................ 65
Table 4.2 Summary of synthetic water quality ..................................................................... 67
Table 4.3 Light sources used for preliminary photocatalysis experiments ........................... 68
Table 4.4 Summary of synthesis parameters for first generation LENs ............................... 68
Table 4.5 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and fits for DOC and UV254 removal
from synthetic river water by different doses of TiO2 P25 nanoparticles irradiated
by simulated solar light ......................................................................................... 73
Table 4.6 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and fits for DOC and UV254 removal
from Otonabee River water by different doses of TiO2 P25 nanoparticles
irradiated by simulated solar light......................................................................... 78
Table 4.7 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and fits for DOC and UV254 removal
from synthetic water by 0.15 g/L of TiO2 P25 nanoparticles irradiated by
simulated solar light or high intensity UVA light ................................................. 81
Table 4.8 Summary of percent removal and kinetic parameters - DOC ............................... 86
Table 4.9 Summary of percent removal and kinetic parameters – UV254 ........................... 87
xiv
Table 4.10 Summary of characteristics of UVA light sources ............................................... 94
Table 4.11 Second generation LENs synthesis conditions ..................................................... 96
Table 5.1 Summary of isotherm parameters for the adsorption of NOM from Otonabee
River water onto P25 TiO2 nanoparticles at pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8. Error values
represent the 95% confidence interval on the mean. .......................................... 114
Table 5.S.1 Raw water quality ............................................................................................... 125
Table 5.S.2 Freundlich isotherm parameters for DOC ........................................................... 125
Table 6.1 Summary of raw water quality ............................................................................ 136
Table 6.2 Summary of nanomaterial synthesis conditions and percent degradation of
methylene blue dye during quality control tests ................................................. 138
Table 6.3 Characteristics of P25 and four linear engineered nanomaterials ...................... 143
Table 6.4 Removal, reaction rate constants, and R2 values for the pseudo-first-order
degradation of methylene blue dye by UV light, P25 nanoparticles, and four LENs
(error values represent the 95% confidence interval) ......................................... 158
Table 6.5 Reaction rate constants and R2 values for the pseudo-first-order degradation of
DOC by UV light, P25 nanoparticles, and four LENs (error values represent the
95% confidence interval of the rate constant) ..................................................... 161
Table 6.6 EEO values provided by Collins and Bolton (2016) for methylene blue
degradation by UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 and EEO values for the degradation of
methylene blue by P25 and second generation LENs irradiated by UVA LEDs 162
Table 6.S.1 Terminal settling velocities for sand particles and alum flocs (Crittenden et al.,
2012) ................................................................................................................... 174
Table 6.S.2 Predicted terminal settling velocities for nanomaterials in distilled water ......... 175
Table 6.S.3 Predicted terminal settling velocities for nanomaterials in a river water ............ 176
xv
Table 6.S.4 Predicted and actual settling time for nanomaterial suspensions prepared in
distilled water ...................................................................................................... 177
Table 6.S.5 Predicted and actual settling time for nanomaterial suspensions prepared in river
water .................................................................................................................... 177
Table 6.S.6 Predicted effective density of agglomerates formed by four nanomaterials in
distilled water and river water............................................................................. 178
Table 6.S.7 Fit of linear correlation between hydroxyl radical formation rate constants and
NOM degradation rate constants ........................................................................ 179
Table 7.1 Summary of raw water quality ........................................................................... 185
Table 7.2 Shape, size, and surface characteristics of LENs ............................................... 190
Table 7.S.1 NOM adsorption normalized to available surface area ...................................... 218
Table 8.1 Summary of raw water quality ........................................................................... 224
Table 8.2 Isotherm parameters for the adsorption of AO24 by P25 and two LENs ........... 231
Table 8.3 Modified Freundlich model isotherm parameters for the removal of DOC, UV254,
THM precursors, and HAA precursors from Otonabee River (OTB) and Ottawa
River (OTW) water by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs .................................. 240
Table A.1 Summary of LEN synthesis studies .................................................................... 276
Table A.2 Summary of the effects of LEN synthesis conditions on LEN characteristics ... 278
Table B.1 Matrix effects on NOM adsorption onto TiO2 surface ....................................... 280
Table B.2 Matrix effects on the photocatalytic degradation of NOM by TiO2 ................... 282
Table C.1 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (THMs) .............................................. 286
Table C.2 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (HAAs) .............................................. 287
Table C.3 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (TiO2 vs. turbidity) ............................ 288
xvi
Table C.4 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (TiO2 vs. UV375) .............................. 289
Table F.1 Recent capital costs for small water treatment systems in Canada ..................... 298
Table F.2 Cost of commercially available TiO2 LENs ....................................................... 299
Table F.3 Assumptions for energy cost analysis – single step treatment process ............... 299
Table F.4 Assumptions for material cost analysis – two-step treatment process ................ 305
Table F.5 Assumptions for energy cost analysis – two-step process .................................. 307
Table G.1 Irradiance of LED 1 ............................................................................................ 315
Table G.2 Irradiance of LED 2 ............................................................................................ 315
Table G.3 Irradiance of LED 3 ............................................................................................ 316
Table H.1 Settling time required for P25 and two LENs in MilliQ water ........................... 318
Table H.2 Predicted and actual time required to remove 10%, 50%, and 90% of TiO2 from
various water matrices ........................................................................................ 322
Table H.3 Effects of nanomaterial addition, time, and pH adjustment on the pH of MilliQ
water .................................................................................................................... 325
Table I.2 Statistical analysis of regeneration data – NOM (UV254) experiments............. 330
Table J.1 EEO values provided by Collins and Bolton (2016) for methylene blue
degradation by UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 and EEO values for the degradation of
methylene blue by P25 and second and third generation LENs irradiated by UVA
LEDs ................................................................................................................... 333
Table J.2 Cost to reduce the THMfp and HAAfp of OTW water via photocatalysis with P25
and NB 700 ......................................................................................................... 339
xvii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Organizational framework of research project ....................................................... 6
Figure 2.1 Alkaline hydrothermal synthesis method as described by Kasuga et al. (1999),
Wong et al. (2011), Liang (2014), and others ....................................................... 21
Figure 4.1 DOC of synthetic water matrix after adsorption by different doses of P25
nanoparticles ......................................................................................................... 69
Figure 4.2 Change in DOC content of synthetic water treated different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles and irradiated by simulated solar light ........................................... 70
Figure 4.3 Change in the UV254 of synthetic river water treated with different doses of P25
TiO2 nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light ......................................... 72
Figure 4.4 Removal of DOC from Lake Ontario water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light .................................................. 75
Figure 4.5 Removal of UV254 from Lake Ontario water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light .................................................. 75
Figure 4.6 Removal of DOC from Otonabee River water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light .................................................. 76
Figure 4.7 Removal of UV254 from Otonabee River water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light .................................................. 77
Figure 4.8 Removal of NOM from Otonabee River water by 0.15 g/L of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light or high intensity UVA light as a
function of irradiation time ................................................................................... 80
Figure 4.9 Removal of NOM from Otonabee River water by 0.15 g/L of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light and high intensity UVA light as a
function of UVA dose ........................................................................................... 81
Figure 4.10 SEM images of nanobelts (NBs)........................................................................... 83
xviii
Figure 4.11 SEM images of nanowires (NW) and nanotubes (NT) ......................................... 84
Figure 4.12 XRD results for (a) nanobelts, (b) nanowires, and (c) nanotubes ......................... 85
Figure 4.13 Distribution of NOM fractions in Otonabee River water samples dosed with 0.1
g/L of P25, NB, NW, or NT and mixed in the dark for 1 minute ......................... 88
Figure 4.14 Effect of 60 minutes of photocatalysis with four LENs irradiated with simulated
solar light on the distribution of NOM fractions in the sample ............................ 89
Figure 4.15 Adsorption and decolourization of methylene blue dye by 0.1 g/L of P25
nanoparticles or one of three LENs after 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of
irradiation with simulated solar light .................................................................... 92
Figure 4.16 Adsorption and decolourization of AO24 by 0.1 g/L of P25 nanoparticles or one
of three LENs after 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of irradiation with simulated
solar light .............................................................................................................. 93
Figure 5.1 THMfp and HAAfp of Otonabee River water treated with 0.25 g/L and irradiated
by high intensity UVA LED light ....................................................................... 108
Figure 5.2 Adsorption of DOC from raw unchlorinated water from Otonabee River water (A)
and Lake Ontario water (B) adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 and mixed with 0.5
g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles for four hours ..................................................... 111
Figure 5.3 Size distribution of agglomerates of P25 nanoparticles in Otonabee River water
adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 ........................................................................ 113
Figure 5.4 DOC data from Otonabee River water tests (A) and Lake Ontario water tests (B)
fitted to the modified Freundlich model ............................................................. 115
Figure 5.5 THMfp (A) and HAAfp (B) of Otonabee River water treated with increasing
concentrations of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles at pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 ................... 117
Figure 5.6 LC-OCD fractions present in raw unchlorinated Otonabee River water and water
adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 and mixed with 0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles for four hours ................................................................................ 119
xix
Figure 5.S.1 DOC of Otonabee River water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) dosed with 0.5 g/L
of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and allowed to mix in the dark for between 0 and 480
minutes ................................................................................................................ 126
Figure 5.S.2 UV254 of Otonabee River water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) dosed with 0.5
g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and allowed to mix in the dark for between 0 and
480 minutes ......................................................................................................... 127
Figure 5.S.3 SUVA of Otonabee River water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) dosed with 0.5
g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and allowed to mix in the dark for between 0 and
480 minutes ......................................................................................................... 128
Figure S.5.4 Adsorption of UV254 from raw unchlorinated water from Otonabee River water
(A) and Lake Ontario water (B) adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 and mixed with
0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles for four hours ............................................... 129
Fig. 5.S.5 DOC data from Otonabee River water tests (A) and Lake Ontario water tests (B)
fitted to the Freundlich isotherm model .............................................................. 130
Figure S.5.6 THMfp (A) and HAAfp (B) data from Otonabee River water tests fitted to the
linearized modified Freundlich model ................................................................ 131
Figure 6.1 TEM images of A: NB 130/550, B: NB 130/700, C: NB 240/550, and D: NB
240/700 ............................................................................................................... 144
Figure 6.2 TEM images with SAED indexed regions (yellow) and HRTEM images with
corresponding FT image of LEN samples (figure created by Robert Liang at the
University of Waterloo using results obtained at McMaster University) ........... 146
Figure 6.3 Determination of isoelectric point of NB 130/550 (A), NB 130/700 (B), NB
240/550 (C), NB 240/700 (D), and P25 nanoparticles (E) using zeta potential at
various pH conditions ......................................................................................... 148
Figure 6.4 Settling of P25 nanoparticles and four engineered nanomaterials in purified water
and raw Otonabee River water (n = 3, error bars represent the standard deviation
from the mean) .................................................................................................... 151
xx
Figure 6.5 Photographs of P25 (A), NB 130/550 (B), NB 130/700 (C), NB 240/550 (D), and
NB 240/700 (E) settling in purified water .......................................................... 152
Figure 6.6 Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye by P25 nanoparticles and four
LENs (error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean) .................... 157
Figure 6.7 Photocatalytic degradation of DOC by P25 nanoparticles and four LENs ......... 160
Figure 6.8 Removal of UV254 by photocatalysis with P25 nanoparticles and four LENs .. 160
Figure 6.9 EEO values for DOC removal from synthetic water via UV/H2O2 treatment with a
low pressure UV lamp (Yen and Yen, 2015) and DOC removal from raw surface
water via UV/TiO2 treatment with P25 and four lab synthesized LENs irradiated
with UVA LEDs ................................................................................................. 163
Figure 6.S.1 HTPA / ·OH radical formation by P25 and four linear engineered nanomaterials
irradiated with UVA LED light (n = 3, error bars represent standard deviation
from the mean) .................................................................................................... 172
Figure 6.S.2 Particle size distribution for P25 nanoparticles, NB 130/550, NB 240/550, and NB
240/700 suspended in distilled water .................................................................. 173
Figure 6.S.3 Particle size distribution for P25 nanoparticles, NB 130/550, NB 240/550, and NB
240/700 suspended in river water ....................................................................... 173
Figure 6.S.4 Linear correlation between normalized DOC and UV254 degradation rate
constants and HTPA/hydroxyl radical formation rate constants for four linear
engineered nanomaterials.................................................................................... 178
Figure 7.1 Characterization of NB 550 (A) and NB 700 (B) via TEM and SAED. Figure
created by Robert Liang from the University of Waterloo using results obtained at
McMaster University .......................................................................................... 191
Figure 7.2 Hydroxyl radical (·OH) radical production by P25, NB 550, and NB 700. Error
bars represent the standard deviation from the mean (n = 3). ............................. 193
xxi
Figure 7.3 Filtration indexes of three TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in purified (MQ) water,
Otonabee River (OTB) water, and Ottawa River (OTW) water ......................... 194
Figure 7.4 Average settling rates of TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in MilliQ (MQ) water,
Otonabee River (OTB) water, and Ottawa River water (OTW) ......................... 195
Figure 7.5 Degradation of methylene blue dye by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs ......... 196
Figure 7.6 Degradation of DOC and UV254 from (A) Otonabee River water and (B) Ottawa
River water (B) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs ......................................... 198
Figure 7.7 Reduction in the formation of trihalomethanes in two water matrices after
treatment by (A) P25 in OTB water, (B) NB 550 in OTB water, (C) NB 700 in
OTB water, (D) P25 in OTW water, (E) NB 550 in OTW water, (F) NB 700 in
OTW water. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval of the mean. ..... 202
Figure 7.8 Reduction in the formation of haloacetic acids in two water matrices after
treatment by (A) P25 in OTB water, (B) NB 550 in OTB water, (C) NB 700 in
OTB water, (D) P25 in OTW water, (E) NB 550 in OTW water, (F) NB 700 in
OTW water. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval of the mean ...... 206
Figure 7.9 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water via photocatalysis by 0.25 g/L of
NB 700 irradiated with UVA LEDs (365 nm) as a function of irradiation time
(min), UV dose (J/cm2), and power per treated volume (kWh/m3) .................... 209
Figure 8.1 TEM images of (A) NB 550 and (B) NB 700 ..................................................... 230
Figure 8.2 AO24 adsorption data fitted to the Freundlich isotherm model ......................... 232
Figure 8.3 AO24 adsorption by virgin and regenerated NB 550 and NB 700. All samples
were prepared in duplicate and error bars represent the 95% confidence interval
on the mean. Legend numbers correspond to the number of regeneration cycles.
............................................................................................................................. 233
xxii
Figure 8.4 Adsorption of DOC from Otonabee River water (OTB) and Ottawa River water
(OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs. Error bars represent the 95%
confidence interval on the mean. ........................................................................ 235
Figure 8.5 Adsorption of UV254 from Otonabee River water (OTB) and Ottawa River water
(OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs nanomaterials. Error bars represent
the 95% confidence interval on the mean. .......................................................... 236
Figure 8.6 Adsorption of THM precursors from Otonabee River water (OTB) and Ottawa
River water (OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs. Error bars represent the
95% confidence interval on the mean. ................................................................ 237
Figure 8.7 Adsorption of HAA precursors from Otonabee River water (OTB) and Ottawa
River water (OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs. Error bars represent the
95% confidence interval on the mean. ................................................................ 238
Figure 8.8 DOC adsorption data sets from experiments conducted in (A) Otonabee River
(OTB) water and (B) Ottawa River (OTW) water fitted to a modified Freundlich
isotherm model.................................................................................................... 239
Figure 8.9 THMfp adsorption data sets from experiments conducted in (A) Otonabee River
(OTB) water and (B) Ottawa River (OTW) water fitted to a modified Freundlich
isotherm model.................................................................................................... 242
Figure 8.10 Adsorption of aromatic NOM (UV254 absorbing NOM) by virgin and
regenerated NB 550 and NB 700. Error bars represent the 95% confidence
interval on the mean and legend numbers correspond to the number of
regeneration cycles.............................................................................................. 245
Figure 8.11 Filtration indexes of raw water and three TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in MilliQ
water at pH 6 and pH 8 and two raw surface water samples .............................. 247
Figure 8.12 Percent removal of turbidity via sedimentation for three TiO2 nanomaterials
suspended in two raw surface water samples ..................................................... 249
xxiii
Figure 8.13 Zeta potential of P25 nanoparticles and two LENs in two natural water matrices
250
Figure 8.S.1 Zeta potential as a function of pH for two TiO2 LENs ....................................... 259
Figure 8.S.2 Time series data for AO24 removal by P25 nanoparticles and LENs ................. 260
Figure 8.S.3 Time series data for DOC removal by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs from
Otonabee River (OTB) and Ottawa River water (OTW) .................................... 260
Figure 8.S.4 UV254 isotherms in (A) OTB water and OTW water ........................................ 261
Figure 8.S.5 HAAfp isotherms in OTB water and OTW water .............................................. 262
Figure 8.S.6 Concentration of AO24 in water treated with virgin and regenerated LENs ..... 263
Figure 8.S.7 UV254 of OTB and OTW water treated with virgin and regenerated LENs ..... 263
Figure 8.S.8 Ratio of TCM to BDCM in surface water treated with TiO2 .............................. 264
Figure 8.S.9 Ratio of DCAA to TCAA in surface water treated with of TiO2........................ 264
Figure 9.1 Framework for the development of a prototype of a two-step adsorption and
photocatalytic process for drinking water treatment ........................................... 273
Figure C.1 Representative calibration curve for methylene blue dye ................................... 284
Figure C.2 Representative calibration curve for Acid Orange 24 ......................................... 285
Figure C.3 Representative calibration curve for TOC .......................................................... 285
Figure C.4 Calibration curves for four THMs (Summer 2016) ............................................ 286
Figure C.5 Calibration for nine HAA species (Summer 2016) ............................................. 287
Figure C.7 Calibration curves for P25 and LENs vs. UV absorbance at 375 nm ................. 289
Figure C.8 Calibration curves for HTPA vs. fluorescence (Ex: 315 nm, Em: 425 nm) ....... 290
Figure D.1 Quality control results for batches of second generation LENs ......................... 291
xxiv
Figure D.2 Quality control results for batches of third generation LENs ............................. 291
Figure D.3 Quality control chart for TOC/DOC ................................................................... 292
Figure D.4 QC chart for TCM Figure D.5 QC chart for BDCM ........................................ 293
Figure D.6 QC chart for DCAA Figure D.7 QC chart for TCAA ....................................... 293
Figure E.1 Single step photocatalytic system with membrane filtration for separation ....... 294
Figure E.2 Two-step adsorption and regeneration system with membrane filtration ........... 295
Figure E.3 Two-step adsorption and regeneration system with sedimentation .................... 296
Figure F.1 Estimated annual energy cost for the single step treatment process option as a
function of plant capacity.................................................................................... 300
Figure F.2 Number of reuses required for the single tank system to be competitive with
existing water treatment systems as a standalone option .................................... 302
Table F.4 Assumptions for material cost analysis – two-step treatment process ................ 305
Figure F.3 Effects of TiO2 LEN dose and plant capacity on estimated energy costs ........... 306
Figure F.4 Effects of TiO2 LEN unit cost and plant capacity on estimated annual materials
cost ...................................................................................................................... 306
Figure F.5 O&M costs as a function of plant capacity for existing water treatment processes
used for NOM removal at large or small scale ................................................... 308
Figure G.1 Absorbance at 365 nm and average irradiance through the volume of the sample
for 50 mL samples of distilled water dosed with varying concentrations of P25
TiO2 nanoparticles ............................................................................................... 314
Figure G.2 Average irradiance through different volumes of sample at different doses of P25
TiO2 nanoparticles in MilliQ distilled water ....................................................... 314
Figure H.1 Effect of particle/agglomerate size on time required to settle ............................ 318
xxv
Figure H.2 Particle size distributions for P25 nanoparticles (A), NB 550 (B), and NB 700 (C)
in MilliQ water (natural pH) and two natural water matrices. ............................ 320
Figure H.3 Time required to settle as a function of particle/agglomerate size and
particle/agglomerate density ............................................................................... 321
Figure H.4 Percent removal of turbidity over time via settling in real water matrices ......... 324
Figure H.5 Filtration indexes of raw water and three TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in MilliQ
water at pH 6 and pH 8 and two raw surface water samples .............................. 325
Figure H.6 Percent removal of turbidity from suspensions made with TiO2 nanomaterials in
MilliQ water at pH 6 and pH 8 ........................................................................... 327
Figure J.1 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water matrices via photocatalysis by NB
700....................................................................................................................... 331
Figure J.2 Comparison of EEOs for DOC and THM precursor degradation by UV/H2O2 and
UV/TiO2 with P25 and third generation LENs ................................................... 334
Figure J.3 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water matrices via photocatalysis with
NB 700 ................................................................................................................ 335
Figure J.4 Power required to remove 90% of DOC and THMfp from different water matrices
using UV/TiO2-based treatment processes ......................................................... 337
Figure J.5 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water via photocatalysis with NB 700 as
a function of UV dose (fluence) .......................................................................... 341
Figure J.6 Transmittance of light through 10 mg/L methylene blue solution and the two raw
water matrices used in this project ...................................................................... 344
Figure J.7 Absorbance of UV and visible light by 0.05 g/L and 0.1 g/L of P25 nanoparticles
and 0.1 g/L of NB 550 and NB 700 suspended in MilliQ water ........................ 345
Figure J.8 Simplified model describing the degradation of an organic contaminant via TiO2
photocatalysis ...................................................................................................... 351
xxvi
Nomenclature
AO24 Acid Orange 24
AOP Advanced oxidation process
BDCAA Bromodichloroacetic acid
BDCM Bromodichloromethane
BET Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
CCC Critical coagulation concentration
CDBM Chlorodibromomethane
DBAA Dibromoacetic acid
DBP Disinfection byproduct
DBPfp Disinfection byproduct formation potential
DCAA Dichloroacetic acid
DOC Dissolved organic carbon
DWRG Drinking Water Research Group
DWSP Drinking Water Surveillance Program
EDL Electrical double layer
GAC Granular activated carbon
HAA Haloacetic acid
HAAfp Haloacetic acid formation potential
GC Gas chromatography
HRTEM High resolution transmission electron microscope
IEP Isoelectric point
IHSS International Humic Substances Society
LC-OCD Liquid chromatography with organic carbon detection
xxvii
LED Light emitting diode
LEN Linear engineered nanomaterial
LP Low pressure
MB Methylene blue
MBAA Monobromoacetic acid
MCAA Monochloroacetic acid
MF Microfiltration
MilliQ Ultrapure water produced by a Millipore water purification system
MP Medium pressure UV lamp
NB Nanobelt
NB 130/550 Second generation nanobelt synthesized at 130oC and calcined at 550oC
NB 130/700 Second generation nanobelt synthesized at 130oC and calcined at 700oC
NB 240/550 Second generation nanobelt synthesized at 240oC and calcined at 550oC
NB 240/700 Second generation nanobelt synthesized at 240oC and calcined at 700oC
NB 550 Third generation nanobelt calcined at 550oC
NB 700 Third generation nanobelt calcined at 700oC
NOM Natural organic matter
NT Nanotube
NW Nanowire
OTB Otonabee River
OTW Ottawa River
P25 Standard TiO2 nanoparticle manufactured by Evonik Degussa
PAC Powdered activated carbon
PES Polyethersulfone
xxviii
QC Quality control
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SAED Selected area electron diffraction
SEM Scanning electron microscope
SRNOM Suwannee River NOM
SUVA Specific UV254 absorbance
TBAA Tribromoacetic acid
TBM Tribromomethane (bromoform)
TC Calcination temperature
TCAA Trichloroacetic acid
TCM Trichloromethane (chloroform)
TEM Transmission electron microscope
TH Hydrothermal synthesis temperature
THAAfp Total haloacetic formation potential
THM Trihalomethane
THMfp Trihalomethane formation potential
TiO2 Titanium dioxide
TOC Total organic carbon
TTHMfp Total trihalomethane formation potential
UV Ultraviolet
UV254 Ultraviolet light absorbance at 245 nm
UVA Ultraviolet light between 315 nm and 400 nm
WTP Water treatment plant
XRD X-ray diffraction
1
Introduction
Background
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a semiconductor photocatalyst that has occasionally been employed
for water and wastewater treatment but has yet to be widely adopted for these purposes.
Photocatalysts, like other catalysts, are materials that participate in chemical reactions without
being consumed by them. Unlike other catalysts, however, photocatalysts are only active when
irradiated with light of the proper wavelength. TiO2 is activated by light at or below 385 nm,
which is within the UVA light spectrum. In aqueous media and in the presence of oxygen the
irradiation of TiO2 with UV light results in the formation of photoinduced electrons and electron
holes on the surface of the photocatalyst. These active species can interact directly with
contaminants or react with water and oxygen to form reactive oxygen species (ROS). The
following chemical equation describes the simplified oxidative organic degradation pathway in
photocatalytic water treatment systems:
𝑂𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡 + 𝑂2ℎ𝑣>𝐸𝑏,𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟→ 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑠 (𝑒. 𝑔. 𝐶𝑂2, 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑠) (1.1)
Depending on the original form of the organic species under consideration, intermediate
compounds can be formed during the reaction between the parent compound and the
photoinduced oxidative holes and/or various ROS formed upon irradiation (Malato et al., 2009).
Most research on drinking water treatment with TiO2 has focused on its use as an advanced
oxidation process (AOP). Like other AOPs, TiO2 photocatalysis involves the addition of a
relatively inert chemical to the water. The added chemical is then activated via a second force, in
this case UVA light. Unlike other AOPs such as UV/H2O2, the original material is a nanosized
solid that is not consumed during the oxidation process.
The three main challenges that prevent the use of TiO2 for drinking water treatment are:
1. How do we provide light of the appropriate wavelength (<385 nm) and intensity in a
reliable and energy efficient manner?
2. How do we avoid the formation of potentially dangerous intermediate compounds?
3. How do we remove the photocatalyst from the water after treatment?
2
The goal of this research was to address these challenges and lay the groundwork for the
eventual development of a TiO2-based drinking water treatment system. The following
subsections provide a quick introduction to the current body of knowledge about TiO2
photocatalysis for drinking water treatment.
1.1.1 Light Sources
TiO2 is only activated by light with wavelengths at or below 385 nm, which is in the UVA range.
The vast majority of TiO2 photocatalysis studies have made use of high intensity UVA lamps,
usually with a maximum irradiance at 365 nm. These lamps are widely available, emit light in
the required range and come in a variety of configurations, making it easy to adapt them to
bench-scale apparatus. The sun emits a wide spectrum of irradiation, some of which passes
through the Earth’s atmosphere to the surface, including small amounts in the UVA and UVB
ranges. Efforts have been made to harness this light to drive photocatalytic processes, however,
the low UV intensity and unpredictability of solar irradiation have limited the use of these
processes for drinking water treatment. The low pressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) UV
lamps commonly used for drinking water disinfection also emit light below 385 nm and are
therefore able to activate TiO2. These lamps require substantial energy input and can only be
used in a limited number of configurations but they can potentially provide concurrent
disinfection. UVA light emitting diodes (LEDs) are an attractive alternative to existing light
sources because they are inexpensive, long lasting, and less energy intensive than the other UV
lamps. They are also small and easy to integrate into different reactor configurations. UVA LEDs
with a maximum irradiance at 365 nm were used for the majority of the photocatalytic
degradation and regeneration experiments in this project.
1.1.2 Formation of Undesirable Intermediates or Byproducts
The degradation of complex organic molecules, including natural organic matter (NOM), via
TiO2 photocatalysis is a multistep process and full mineralization may not be achieved within an
acceptable treatment time frame. For example, other researchers, including Liu et al. (2008),
Huang et al. (2008), and Gerrity et al. (2010) have observed that at short treatment times
photocatalysis can increase the overall disinfection byproduct formation potential (DBPfp) of
3
water by breaking down large NOM molecules into smaller ones that are more reactive towards
disinfectants such as chlorine.
TiO2 has both adsorptive and oxidative abilities and in this project it was hypothesized that the
risk of increased DBPfp after photocatalysis could be avoided by instead removing DBP
precursors via adsorption to TiO2. Adsorption is a well established water treatment process used
to remove organic contaminants, including disinfection DBP precursors. Existing adsorbents
such as powdered activated carbon (PAC) are effective but difficult to regenerate. In theory, a
photocatalytic TiO2 adsorbent could be regenerated via photocatalysis and reused for adsorption
indefinitely, or at least multiple times.
1.1.3 Removal of Nanomaterials After Treatment
Systems that employ TiO2 are challenging to operate in part because it can be difficult to
separate the suspended particles or nanoparticles from the water after treatment (Ochiai and
Fujishima, 2013). Much research has been conducted to engineer TiO2 materials that are
immobilized on solid supports but which maintain their photocatalytic properties and a few
researchers have had success with magnetic TiO2 nanomaterials (Ng et al., 2014) and TiO2-
covered zeolites (Liu et al., 2014). An alternative to immobilization may be the development of
engineered TiO2 nanomaterials that are large, heavy, or buoyant enough to be removed via
common clarification processes such as filtration, sedimentation, and flotation.
Specific Research Objectives
The overall objective of this research project was to develop a conceptual treatment methodology
that would address some or all of the three main challenges preventing the adoption of TiO2 for
drinking water treatment. Conceptual schematics of the two potential treatment processes are
provided in Appendix E. The first conceptual treatment system (single step process) uses
photocatalysis for DBP precursor degradation. In the second treatment concept (two-step
process) TiO2 is used to remove DBP precursors via adsorption and then regenerated via
photocatalysis. Both concepts rely on the existence of a TiO2 material that is small enough to
maintain the desirable photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles but large enough to be
4
removed via sedimentation or filtration. Four specific research objectives were developed to
guide the project. They are summarized in the subsections that follow as well as in Figure 1.2,
which presents a visual framework for the overall research project.
1. Explore the use of standard TiO2 nanoparticles for NOM and DBP precursor removal via
adsorption and photocatalytic degradation.
The use of TiO2 photocatalysis for DBP precursor removal has been studied by researchers such
as Liu et al. (2008), Huang et al. (2008), and Gerrity et al. (2010), all of whom raised concerns
that while photocatalysis is effective for DBP precursor degradation at longer treatment times, it
can actually increase DBP formation potential at shorter treatment times. Although only a few
researchers have proposed the use of NOM adsorption to TiO2 for water treatment (Liu et al.,
2014; Ng et al., 2015), the phenomenon has been explored by numerous materials science and
environmental chemistry researchers in a contaminant fate and transport context (Liu et al.,
2013; Mwaanga et al., 2014; Erhayem and Sohn, 2015). These studies have consistently shown
that TiO2 adsorbs NOM, particularly large and aromatic fractions, and that the extent of NOM
adsorption is impacted by the pH, ionic strength, and calcium content of the water matrix.
Preliminary experiments relating the removal of DBP precursor surrogates such as DOC and
UV254 by commercial P25 TiO2 nanoparticles to process parameters such as TiO2 dose,
adsorption time, irradiation time, and light source are described in Chapter 4. A more in-depth
exploration of the use of P25 nanoparticles for DBP precursor removal via photocatalytic
degradation and adsorption at different pH levels is described in Chapter 5.
2. Develop engineered nanomaterials that are easy to remove from the water via conventional
water treatment clarification processes but retain the adsorptive and photocatalytic properties of
standard TiO2 nanoparticles.
Linear engineered nanomaterials (LENs), which are nanosized in at least one dimension but
larger than commercial nanoparticles, retain many of the properties of smaller nanomaterials but
promise to be easier to remove from water after treatment due to their relatively larger size. In
this study, three sets, or generations, of LENs were synthesized using a simple hydrothermal
method originally proposed by Kasuga et al. (1999). The size, shape, crystallinity, and surface
characteristics of the LENs were manipulated by varying the precursor materials and
5
temperatures used at different points in the synthesis procedure. The development of the first
generation of LENs, which is described in Chapter 4, was based on modifications to the standard
hydrothermal method suggested by Yuan and Su (2004). The results of these experiments
informed the design of the second generation of LENs, which underwent extensive materials
characterization and were evaluated in terms of their ability to degrade methylene blue dye and
DBP precursor surrogates when irradiated with UVA light as well as their recoverability from
the water via sedimentation. The results and implications of these experiments are described in
Chapter 6.
3. Evaluate the use of the linear engineered nanomaterials for DBP precursor removal from real
water matrices via photocatalytic degradation.
Although TiO2 photocatalysis is a promising technology for the degradation of organic
contaminants, including NOM, its effects on overall DBPfp are dependent on treatment time (Liu
et al., 2008) and others have suggested that water matrix characteristics such as ionic strength
and NOM content and character can also influence the extent of NOM degradation and the
resulting DBPfp of the treated water. Chapter 7 describes a study in which the third generation
LENs, which represent a subtly modified subset of the second generation of LENs, were
characterized and evaluated in terms of their effects on the DBPfp of two real surface water
matrices via photocatalysis upon irradiation with UVA light.
4. Evaluate the use of the linear engineered nanomaterials for DBP precursor removal from real
water matrices via adsorption.
Adsorption may prove to be a safer way to incorporate TiO2 into drinking water treatment
because it avoids the risk of increasing the DBPfp of the water. Chapter 8 presents an in-depth
study of the adsorption of an indicator dye and DBP precursors by commercial nanoparticles and
the third generation LENs. Adsorption isotherms were used to characterize and compare the
removal of an DOC, UV254, THM precursors, and HAA precursors from two water matrices
that differed in terms of ionic content and NOM content and character. The LENs were also
evaluated in terms of their removability via sedimentation and filtration at TiO2 doses relevant to
adsorption and their reusability after regeneration under UVA light.
6
Figure 1.1 Organizational framework of research project
Associated Publications
The following publications are associated with this project:
Gora, S. and Andrews, S. (2017) Adsorption of natural organic matter and disinfection byproduct
precursors from surface water onto TiO2 nanoparticles: pH effects, isotherm modelling and
implications for using TiO2 for drinking water treatment, Chemosphere, 174, 363-370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.125
Gora, S., Liang, R., Zhou, Y.N., Andrews, S. (2017) Settleable engineered titanium dioxide
nanomaterials for the removal of natural organic matter from drinking water (in review –
Chemical Engineering Journal)
Gora, S., Liang, R., Zhou, Y.N., Andrews, S. (2017) Photocatalysis with engineered TiO2
nanomaterials to prevent the formation of disinfection byproducts in drinking water (drafted)
7
Gora, S. and Andrews, S. (2017) Removal of NOM and disinfection byproduct precursors from
drinking water using regenerable nanoscale engineered TiO2 adsorbents (drafted)
References
Bavykin, D.V. and Walsh, F.C. (2009) Titanate and Titania Nanotubes: Synthesis, Preparation,
and Application, RSC Publishing
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. (2014) Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, pp. 249-257
Gerrity, D., Mayer, B., Ryu, H., Crittenden, J., and Abbaszadegan, M. (2009) A comparison of
pilot-scale photocatalysis and enhanced coagulation for disinfection byproduct mitigation, Water
Research, 43, pp. 1597-1610
Huang, X., Leal, M., and Li, Q. (2008) Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2
photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research,
pp. 1142-1150
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. (1999) Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), pp. 1307-1311
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R. (2008A) TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., and Amal, R. (2010) Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research, 44, pp. 2525-2532
Liu, S., Lim, M., and Amal, R. (2014) TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption
and effective photocatalytic regeneration, Chemical Engineering Science, 105 pp. 46-52
8
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. (2013) Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects, 434, pp 319-328
Malato, S., Fernandez-Ibanez, P., Maldonado, M.I., Blanco, J., and Gernjak, W. (2009)
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends,
Catalysis Today, 147, 1-59
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E.R., and Schlautman, M.A. (2014) Preferential sorption of some
natural organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: influence of pH and ionic
strength, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, pp. 8833-8844
Ng, M., Kho, E.T., Liu, S., Lim, M., and Amal, R. (2014) Highly adsorptive and regenerative
magnetic TiO2 for natural organic matter (NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 246, pp. 196-203
Philippe, K.K., Hans, C., MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., Parsons, S.A. (2010B)
Photocatalytic oxidation of natural organic matter surrogates and the impact on trihalomethane
formation potential, Chemosphere, 81, 1509-1516
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L (2004) Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 241, pp. 173-183
9
Background Literature Review
Heterogeneous Photocatalysis
2.1.1 Photocatalysts
Heterogeneous photocatalysis is the process of using light to activate a solid photocatalytic
semiconductor material such that it can drive desirable oxidation and reduction reactions.
Photocatalytic semiconductors have electronic structures characterized by a filled valence band
and an empty conduction band. The gap between these two bands is called the band gap and the
energy required to promote an electron from the valence band to the conduction band is the band
gap energy (Eb). The limiting wavelength is directly related to the width of the band gap:
Ephoton = hc/ (2.1)
Where h is Planck’s constant (6.626 x 10-34 m2.k/s), c is the speed of light (299,792,458 m/s),
and is the wavelength in meters (Malato et al., 2009). Activation will only occur if the photons
that reach the photocatalyst surface are sufficiently energetic to bridge the band gap. The specific
formulation of the catalyst will have an effect on the band gap energy and thus on the range of
wavelengths that can be used to excite it. For example, TiO2 has an Eb value between 3 eV and
3.2 eV depending on the types and proportions of semiconductor phases present and thus can
only be activated by wavelengths below 385 nm (UVA light) whereas CdS has an Eh of 2.5 eV
and a corresponding maximum activation wavelength of 497 nm, which is within the visible light
spectrum.
When a photon with energy equal to or greater than the bandgap energy is absorbed by the
catalyst, an electron/hole pair is formed.
𝑃ℎ𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑡 + ℎ𝑣 → 𝑒− + ℎ+ (2.2)
The photogenerated hole and electron then undergo one of the following (Liang, 2014):
1. Recombination resulting in the release of heat
2. Stabilization (trapping) by metastable surface states
3. Reaction with species adsorbed to the photocatalyst surface
10
2.1.2 Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Contaminants in Aqueous Media
Photocatalysts are like other catalysts in that their interactions with other chemical species follow
the following five steps:
1. Transfer of reactants from the bulk matrix to the surface of the catalyst
2. Adsorption of reactants onto catalyst surface
3. Reaction of adsorbed species at the surface
4. Desorption of reaction products from the surface
5. Transfer of reaction products back to the bulk matrix
Unlike standard catalysts, however, photocatalysts are activated by light instead of temperature
(Hermann, 2010). Further complicating matters is the fact that in aqueous media the
photocatalyst will interact not only with contaminants but also with water and oxygen. Water
adsorbed to the surface of the photocatalyst is oxidized by the photogenerated hole to form H2O2
while oxygen is reduced by the coexisting electron, forming the superoxide radical. These
processes and the subsequent reactions eventually result in the formation of the highly oxidative
•OH, or hydroxide, radical (Nosaka and Nosaka, 2013). Many researchers also assume that the
photogenerated holes can interact with H2O in a single electron transfer reaction to directly
produce •OH along with a hydrogen ion (Jenks et al.,2013; Hermann et al., 2012; Malato et al.,
2009), but this process has not been experimentally confirmed and may only occur within certain
pH ranges (Nosaka and Nosaka, 2013). The hydroxide radical may remain adsorbed to the
catalyst surface (•OH(a)) or be present in the bulk solution surrounding the catalyst (Murakami
et al., 2007). The hole itself as well as the other reactive oxygen species (ROS) present can also
react directly with chemical species adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst.
The •OH radical, which may be adsorbed to the catalyst surface (•OH(a)) or even present in the
bulk solution surrounding the catalyst (Murakami et al., 2007), is a non-specific oxidant that is
able to degrade most organic compounds, including the components of cell walls and cell
membranes. The oxidative capacity of the different ROS varies, but recent studies suggest that in
some systems, their role may be as or more important than that of •OH (Nosaka and Nosaka,
2013). The dominant oxidation mechanism (hole, •OH, or other ROS) will vary depending on the
characteristics of the target molecule (Henderson, 2011) and the characteristics of the
11
photocatalyst and will affect the distribution of intermediate products formed upon oxidation
(Jenks et al., 2013) as well as the optimum conditions for the photocatalytic process.
The following chemical equation describes the simplified oxidative organic degradation pathway
in photocatalytic water treatment systems:
𝑂𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡 + 𝑂2ℎ𝑣>𝐸𝑏,𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟→ 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑠 (𝑒𝑔. 𝐶𝑂2, 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑠) (2.3)
Depending on the original form of the organic species under consideration, a variety of
intermediates can be formed during the reaction between it and the photoinduced oxidative holes
and the various ROS species formed upon irradiation (Malato et al., 2009). Eventually, these
intermediates are degraded first to carboxylic acids and later to CO2 and water.
Photocatalytic degradation is usually modeled using either pseudo-first-order kinetics or the
Langmuir-Hinshelwood model. Pseudo-first-order kinetics imply that the reaction rate (r) is
equal to the rate of disappearance of one of the reactants:
𝑟 =−𝑑𝐶
𝑑𝑡= −𝑘𝑟𝐶 (2.4)
The reaction constant, kr, can be determined by plotting ln C vs. t.
In reality, however, heterogeneous catalytic reactions consist of two steps, adsorption of the
reactants to the catalyst and a catalyzed reaction. The first is assumed to be quick, while the rate
of the second is slower and will vary depending on reaction conditions (Ollis, 2013).
𝐴 + 𝑆 𝑘1→𝐴𝑆
𝑘−1→ 𝐴 + 𝑆 (2.5)
𝐴𝑆𝑘𝑟→ 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑠 (2.6)
The Langmuir-Hinshelwood model, which accounts for both of these steps suggests that the
photocatalytic reaction rate (r) is proportional to the fraction of surface coverage by the organic
contaminant (), the reaction rate constant (kr), the concentration of the contaminant (C), and the
Langmuir adsorption constant (K):
rdC
dtkr
krKC
1KC (2.7)
12
The Langmuir-Hinshelwood model can often be simplified to the pseudo-first order model when
operating at low contaminant concentrations because adsorption is less likely to have an impact
on overall removal rates under these conditions (Huang et al., 2008). The rate constants for
reactions between •OH radicals and most organic compounds have been found to be on the order
of 106 1/M.s to 109 1/M.s (Malato et al., 2009).
The initial concentrations of the reactant(s), the mass of catalyst added, the wavelength of light
applied, the characteristics of the water matrix, pH, temperature, irradiance (i.e. radiant flux), and
oxygen levels affect the rate of photocatalytic degradation (Malato et al., 2009; Herrmann,
2012). pH is also important as it impacts the zero point charge of the catalyst surface and the
target compounds, which in turn affects adsorption efficiency and thus reaction rate (Malato et
al., 2009).
Titanium Dioxide
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a widely studied semiconductor that has become the default catalyst
used in solar and UV photocatalytic water treatment applications because it can be used
repeatedly, is chemically and thermally stable, and has strong mechanical properties (Malato et
al., 2009). Fine and nanosize TiO2 particles are also widely used in industries ranging from
personal care products to industrial coatings to textiles (Yang and Westerhoff, 2014). The
behaviour of TiO2 nanomaterials in these and other applications is determined by their size and
crystal structure as well as the medium in which they are suspended.
2.2.1 TiO2 Structure, Polymorphs, and Behaviour
TiO2 naturally occurs in three phases, also referred to as crystal structures or polymorphs,
anatase, brookite, and rutile. Anatase and rutile are the most common and best characterized
polymorphs. Despite its higher band gap energy, anatase is widely held to be the more
photoactive form of TiO2. Luttrell et al. (2014) summarized the most widely accepted reasons for
this phenomenon:
13
1. Anatase’s higher band gap energy results in a higher valence band that may be above the
redox potential of adsorbed molecules. This facilitates electron transfer and overall
reactivity.
2. The crystalline structures of the different polymorphs might influence the chemical and
physical characteristics of the nanoparticle surface and thus its ability to adsorb
molecules and trap photogenerated holes and electrons.
3. Anatase has an indirect band gap that is smaller than its direct band gap and the direct
and indirect band gaps of rutile. This makes it easier for anatase to maintain charge
separation, thus increasing the change of reaction between charge carriers and adsorbed
species.
4. The anatase structure is more conducive to the transport of charge carriers than that of
rutile, so charge carriers are more likely to diffuse from the bulk of the particle to the
surface before recombination.
Luttrell et al.’s own results support the hypothesis that charge carriers (“excitons”) generated
within the bulk of anatase particles are able to travel to the surface more easily than those
generated within the bulk of rutile particles because the crystalline structure of the former
facilitates exciton transport. Mixed phase materials such as the ubiquitous P25 nanoparticles
contain multiple TiO2 polymorphs. The ratio of anatase to rutile in P25 has been reported to
range from 70:30 to 80:20. Many researchers believe that the coexistence of the two polymorphs
results in synergistic increases in overall reactivity, but others, notably Ohtani et al. (2010), have
denied the existence of this synergistic effect. Zheng et al. (2010) synthesized mixed phase linear
TiO2 nanomaterials (see Section 2.2.3) containing anatase and TiO2(B), a metastable polymorph
of TiO2, and found that these were more photocatalytically active than pure anatase or pure
TiO2(B) materials.
2.2.2 Probing the Behaviour of TiO2 Photocatalysts
Photocatalysts vary in terms of photoactivity and degradation ability based on their structure and
component atoms and probe compounds, including dyes and simple organic compounds, are
widely applied to evaluate the photoactive and degradative characteristics of novel
photocatalysts (Jenks, 2013). Methylene blue dye is by far the most common probe compound
used to assess the activity of TiO2 nanomaterials (Mills and MacFarlane, 2007), though stearic
14
acid and azo dyes are also popular. Indeed, the degradation of methylene blue dye forms the
basis of the ISO methodology Determination of photocatalytic activity of surfaces in an aqueous
medium by degradation of methylene blue (ISO 10678:2010), which is described in detail by
Mills (2012). Unfortunately, this test does not differentiate between different dye degradation
mechanisms and its results cannot be used to quantify the extent of •OH radical formation in a
photocatalytic system.
Until recently, the •OH radical has been assumed to be the dominant active species in TiO2
photocatalysis (Nosaka and Nosaka, 2013), and many researchers have proposed alternative,
hydroxyl radical-specific, testing methods for TiO2 nanomaterials. These include a method
proposed by Sun and Bolton (1996) in which the degradation of methanol to formaldehyde is
tracked using high pressure liquid chromatography and compared to the delivered UV dose,
determined using a UV-Vis analyzer equipped with an integrating sphere, to determine a
quantum yield relating the number of photons added to the system to the extent of formation of
hydroxyl radicals. Other methods that have been developed for the detection of •OH radicals
include electron paramagnetic (spin) resonance, p-chlorobenzoic acid degradation and detection
of the resulting compounds with LC-MS/MS, laser induced fluorescence with emission
monitoring at 310 nm, or degradation of terephthalic acid with fluorescence monitoring (Han et
al., 2002; Nosaka and Nosaka, 2013). Recent studies have suggested that •OH radicals are not in
fact the dominant oxidative species in many photocatalytic systems (Nosaka and Nosaka, 2013)
and as such the methods discussed above, which focus specifically on the •OH radical, are
unlikely to be sufficient to characterize the behaviour of TiO2 photocatalytic systems because
they do not account for the presence and activity of other ROS (e.g. superoxide radical) or
surface phenomena.
Unlike other advanced oxidation processes, which rely on one or a small set of active ROS
species generated in situ, photocatalytic systems are complicated by their reliance on two surface
phenomena: Adsorption and the presence and formation of highly oxidative electron holes when
the material is irradiated with light of the proper wavelength. Adsorption, which must take place
before a contaminant or probe compound can be degraded, can result in apparent reduction of the
reactant even in the absence of light. Electron holes further complicate analysis because, like
ROS, they are highly oxidative and contribute to the overall degradation of organic contaminants
in solution. Different degradation mechanisms can lead to the formation of different intermediate
15
products and the relative contributions of •OH radicals, other ROS, and surface phenomena can
be elucidated with careful experimentation (Jenks, 2013). This process is necessarily complex
and rarely attempted except in detailed mechanistic studies. In applied studies, where the focus is
on the development of useable materials and the pathway(s) contributing to degradation are of
secondary interest, dyes and other simple probes provide a reasonable estimate of photocatalytic
activity and a point of comparison to the work of other researchers (Mills and MacFarlane,
2007). These simplified methods, however, can be complicated by photolytic degradation of the
probe molecule and/or non-oxidative contributions to probe molecule transformation (Jenks,
2013) and should therefore be viewed as starting points rather than endpoints.
2.2.3 Effects of TiO2 Nanomaterials on Human and Environmental Health
Recent studies have raised concerns that photocatalytic nanomaterials, including TiO2
nanoparticles, have potential negative human health and environmental impacts. The anatase
crystal phase, which is highly photoactive and therefore has a higher oxidizing potential, has
been identified as the most dangerous form of TiO2 (Love et al., 2012). The oxidative properties
of TiO2 are not the only source of concern, however, as nanosize material present a risk based
simply on their small size (Shi et al., 2013), which impacts their transport through both the
environment and the human body as well as their reactivity in both situations.
TiO2 is widely used in food, medicine, and commercial products and there are therefore
numerous routes through which humans can be exposed to TiO2 nanomaterials. A thorough
review by Love et al. (2012) identified four routes of human exposure to TiO2 nanomaterials:
Ingestion
Inhalation
Transdermal delivery
Injection
Of these, inhalation is currently the route of exposure of greatest concern, though this is still up
for debate because of conflicting results in animal studies (Shi et al., 2013). Particles with
aerodynamic diameters of approximately 0.1 m are the least likely to be deposited in the human
respiratory tract, but smaller particles can travel to the trachea, bronchial tubes, and alveoli
(Kuempel et al., 2015). The likelihood of deposition, clearing, and negative human health
16
impacts is also affected by the shape of the particles. Fibrous particles with diameters below 1 to
3 m and aspect ratios equal to or greater than 3:1 are of particular concern (WHO, 1999; CDC,
2005), though the actual human health implications of nanosized spherical and fibrous particles
are still being explored (Kuempel et al., 2015). Although ingestion has not been linked to any
lethal health effects, a recent study identified sub-lethal impacts of TiO2 nanoparticles on
intestinal cells, suggesting that this route of exposure may lead to chronic health effects
(Koeneman et al., 2014) and dermal exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles has been linked to chronic
sub-lethal health effects in animal models (Wu et al., 2009).
TiO2 nanoparticles enter the municipal wastewater system when people wash off or dispose of
body care products that contain TiO2 (e.g. sunscreen, toothpaste) and when they wash textiles
impregnated with TiO2 (Yang and Westerhoff, 2014). Although the majority of TiO2 materials
that enter wastewater treatment plants are removed by the treatment processes and eventually
disposed along with other residual solids (Kiser et al., 2009), a substantial portion can also end
up in the plant’s effluent and eventually in the receiving water body (Yang and Westerhoff,
2014), where they may be ingested or otherwise interact with aquatic organisms. For example,
TiO2 nanoparticles have been shown to accumulate in the internal organs of rainbow trout after
ingestion (Ramsden et al., 2009), though the authors of this study noted that the resulting effects
on the health of the trout were comparable to those caused by other potentially toxic metals.
Once TiO2 nanomaterials have entered the aquatic environment, water matrix components such
as ions (e.g. calcium) and natural organic matter (NOM) can affect their eventual transport and
toxicity (Hotze et al., 2010). A comprehensive study by Liu et al. (2013) demonstrated that
agglomeration was always favoured when the pH was close to the isoelectric point (IEP) of the
nanomaterial in question, that the presence of calcium ions increased the likelihood of
nanoparticle agglomeration and subsequent settling by compressing the electrical double layer
surrounding the nanoparticles, that NOM decreased agglomeration and settling by increasing the
energy barrier preventing nanoparticle aggregation. Liu et al. also demonstrated that LENs and
nanoparticles behaved differently under similar environmental conditions, specifically that high
concentrations of calcium could actually stabilize LEN suspensions by shifting the apparent IEP
of the LENs. Seitz et al. (2016) found that NOM, particularly aromatic NOM, decreased the
toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles towards Daphnia magna, a common indicator organism. The study
of the toxicity of nanomaterials (nanotoxicity) is a field that is still in its infancy, and the lack of
17
definitive evidence on the health and environmental effects of nanomaterials, including TiO2
nanoparticles, should not be taken as proof that these materials do not pose a risk to humans or
other organisms.
Given the potential negative impacts of TiO2 nanomaterials on human and environmental health,
it is imperative that any novel process employing such materials for water or wastewater
treatment ensure the complete removal of the materials from the treated water before it is sent to
the drinking water distribution system or returned to the environment. Treatment facilities and
personal safety equipment will also need to be designed to prevent operators from being exposed
to potentially toxic levels of nanoparticles via inhalation in the treatment plant.
2.2.4 TiO2 Photocatalysis for Drinking Water Treatment
To-date, most research into the use of TiO2 photocatalysis in water and wastewater treatment has
been for disinfection and the degradation of organic compounds such as dyes, pesticides,
pharmaceuticals, and other trace organics. Full-scale application of the technology remains
vanishingly rare, however, for the reasons outlined in Chapter 1 of this document.
2.2.4.1 Existing TiO2-based Water Treatment Systems
TiO2-based water and wastewater treatment systems have been installed in various parts of the
world, though almost exclusively at small scale. One of these, the Photo-Cat Water Purification
System by Purifics, was developed in Ontario and has been studied by numerous research groups
in North America including Gerrity et al. (2009), who explored its use for DBP precursor
destruction, and Benotti et al. (2009), who evaluated its ability to remove pharmaceuticals and
estrogenic activity from water. The process consists of a photocatalytic reactor illuminated by a
low pressure mercury UV lamp and a ceramic ultrafiltration membrane to separate the
photocatalyst from the treated water. Purifics currently has at least two small (0.1 – 1.9 MLD),
self contained Photo-Cat installations in the Southern United States for chromium IV removal or
1,4 dioxane removal from groundwater and have also been awarded contracts for leachate
treatment systems in Southern Ontario and Europe (Purifics, n.d).
A few manufacturers have also developed TiO2-based adsorbents. These are primarily applied
for heavy metals removal and, to the author’s knowledge, none make use of TiO2’s
18
photocatalytic properties. These include the AdsorbsiaTM from DOW and MetSorbTM from
Graver Technologies. Both are formulated to work in a pressurized packed bed configuration and
most of the installations listed on their websites are for small communities, schools, and
commercial operations (Dow, n.d.; Graver Technologies, 2015).
The Plataforma Solar de Almeria, a pilot testing facility for solar-based energy and water and
wastewater technologies in Spain, has been operating since the 1980s. Dozens, if not hundreds,
of studies have been published based on the findings of solar photocatalysis-based projects
completed at the facility but to the author’s knowledge, none of these technologies have been
commercialized for point of use, small, or full-scale drinking water treatment.
2.2.4.2 Hybrid TiO2 Water Treatment Systems
Photocatalytic technologies can provide concurrent disinfection and NOM reduction, and as
such, may make excellent pre- or post-treatment options for existing water treatment processes
such as biologically active carbon filtration (BAC), enhanced coagulation, chlorine disinfection,
or membrane filtration. The oxidation of NOM via photocatalysis results in the formation of
smaller compounds, some of which may be more or less biodegradable (Toor and Mohseni,
2007; Philippe et al., 2010A; Metz et al., 2012), more or less adsorbable by activated carbon,
(Philippe et al., 2010A), more or less likely to cause membrane fouling (Huang et al., 2008), or
more or less reactive towards chlorine (Wisznioski et al., 2002; Toor and Mohseni, 2007; Bond
et al., 2009; Gerrity et al., 2009; Philippe et al., 2010B; Liu et al., 2010) than the original
compounds.
2.2.4.3 Reactor Design
The central role of surface reactions in photocatalytic degradation means that the reactor
configuration will necessarily be determined by the configuration and placement of the light
source and the characteristics of the photocatalyst itself. TiO2 is usually applied to water as
nanoparticles because their high surface area/mass ratio (specific surface area) maximizes the
total surface area available for photon and reactant adsorption (Nakata and Fujishima, 2012).
Systems that employ TiO2 can be challenging to operate because the nanoparticles can prevent
the passage of light through the suspension and also because it can be difficult to separate the
suspended particles or nanoparticles from the water after treatment (Ochiai and Fujishima, 2013).
19
Separation is usually achieved using membrane filtration after photocatalytic treatment (Malato
et al., 2009) and commercially available TiO2 nanoparticles (e.g. Evonik Degussa P25
nanoparticles), which usually have diameters in the tens of nanometers, can plug the membrane
filters by depositing in the membrane pores, which restricts the flow of water through the
membrane (Zhang et al., 2009).
The immobilization of TiO2 on solid supports, including magnetic particles (Ng et al., 2014),
zeolites (Liu et al., 2014), solid and hollow glass beads (Daneshvar et al., 2015; Wang et al.,
2013; Denny et al., 2008; Kim and Lee, 2005), the internal surface of tubular borosilicate glass
reactors (Alousan et al., 2012) and many other surfaces as described by Robert et al. (2013), has
been widely reported over the past two decades, however, only a few of these have been scaled
up to pilot or full-scale. In immobilized TiO2 designs the main driver, irrespective of light
source, is the need to minimize mass transfer resistance by maximizing the illuminated surface
area and decreasing the thickness of the water layer washing over that surface. Proposed full-
scale reactor designs that have been built at the bench- or pilot-scale include the rotating disk
photocatalytic reactor, the annular flow photoreactor, the packed bed photoreactor, and the fixed
bed sloping filter (as described in Dionysiou et al., 2000). All of these aimed to achieve
maximum contact between contaminants in the water and the catalyst surface while allowing for
adequate illumination. Another important challenge has been the ever present risk of TiO2
becoming detached from the support and traveling into the treated water (Robert et al., 2013).
An alternative to immobilization may be the development of engineered TiO2 nanomaterials that
are large, heavy, or buoyant enough to be removed via common clarification processes such as
filtration, sedimentation, and flotation. Such materials can be engineered using different
synthesis processes including various hydrothermal methods, electrochemical/anodic deposition,
and a variety of template-based methods (Bavykin and Walsh, 2009).
Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials
Engineered nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes have been a mainstay of the nanotechnology
industry for many years. TiO2-based engineered nanomaterials including nanotubes, nanowires,
and nanospheres, though less well known, have been synthesized and characterized by research
20
groups around the world in recent years and hold promise for numerous applications including
sensors and solar cells (Bavykin and Walsh, 2010).
2.3.1 Linear Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials (LENs)
The foundational paper on linear engineered TiO2 nanomaterials (LENs) was published by
Kasuga et al. in 1998. In this paper, the authors describe the synthesis of TiO2 nanotubes using a
two-step hydrothermal method. Since this paper was published, researchers throughout the world
have developed numerous other LENs including nanobelts (large, flatter nanotubes), nanowires
(longer, thinner nanotubes), and nanorods (solid, cylindrical nanotubes).
Like nanoparticles, LENs have a high specific surface area but, unlike nanoparticles, they may
be large enough to remove via filtration and/or sedimentation. At least one research group has
coupled LENs with membrane filtration for water treatment and found that the LENs were less
likely to restrict the flow of water through the membrane over time (Zhang et al., 2009). LENs
can also be further engineered to form mats or membranes that are more easily incorporated into
environmental applications (Nakata and Fujishima, 2012). For example, Liu et al. (2012)
constructed a TiO2 nanofibre membrane for drinking water disinfection that was able to remove
bacteria through a combination of dead-end filtration and cell oxidation. Hu et al. (2011)
developed nanowire membranes (NWMs) with a nominal pore size of 100 nm, which is
comparable to that of a MF membrane. The NWMs lacked mechanical strength but were able to
degrade a selection of pharmaceutical products in batch mode under UV irradiation. A more
recent paper by Hu et al. (2013) reported on the development of more complex 3-D membrane
structures constructed of TiO2 nanobelts overlaid with TiO2 nanoparticles. LENs can also be
“grown” on solid surfaces via electrochemical/anodic deposition, avoiding the complications of
immobilizing nanoparticles onto a solid support (Bavykin and Walsh, 2009).
2.3.2 Alkaline Hydrothermal Synthesis of LENs
The alkaline hydrothermal method for TiO2 LEN synthesis is well established, does not require
highly specialized laboratory equipment or expensive reagents, and is easily manipulated to yield
nanosize materials with different morphological and chemical characteristics (Bavykin and
Walsh, 2010). The three main steps of this method are depicted in Figure 2.3 and summarized in
the subsections that follow.
21
Figure 2.1 Alkaline hydrothermal synthesis method as described by Kasuga et al.
(1999), Wong et al. (2011), Liang (2014), and others
2.3.2.1 Step 1: Hydrothermal Synthesis
LENs can be synthesized from many different TiO2 precursors, but anatase powders and
commercial P25 nanoparticles are the most commonly used. The precursor is added to a Teflon-
lined container along with a small volume of strong alkaline solution, usually 10 M NaOH. The
container is secured inside a steel reactor, heated to between 100oC and 250oC, and allowed to
react for times ranging from 20 h to multiple days. The overall reaction that occurs during the
hydrothermal synthesis step can be summarized as shown below:
2 𝑇𝑖𝑂2 + 3 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 → 𝑁𝑎2𝑇𝑖3𝑂7 + 𝐻2𝑂 (2.8)
Essentially, the hydrothermal step breaks the existing Ti-O-Ti bonds and replaces them with Ti-
O-Na bonds and Ti-O-OH bonds (Kasuga et al., 1999).
22
2.3.2.2 Step 2: Ion Exchange
The products of the hydrothermal process are removed from the autoclave reactor and rinsed
numerous times with purified water. This rinsing process cause Na+ ions to be exchanged for H+
ions, resulting in the formation of Ti-O-H bonds (Kasuga et al., 1999). Rinsing continues until a
predetermined point (pH ~ 7, conductivity = 70 S/cm, 1.2 L of water, etc.). The rinsed materials
are then immersed in 0.1 N HCl and the H+ ions released by HCl dehydrate the Ti-OH bonds,
resulting in the reformation of Ti-O-Ti or Ti-O-H-O-Ti bonds. After one hour the materials are
removed from the acid bath via filtration or centrifugation and then rinsed again to remove any
remaining Na+ ions.
The ion exchange process is summarized in the following chemical equation:
𝑁𝑎2𝑇𝑖3𝑂7 + 2 𝐻𝐶𝑙 → 𝐻2𝑇𝑖3𝑂7 + 𝑁𝑎𝐶𝑙 (2.9)
Some debate remains as the importance of rinsing and ion exchange as well as the mechanisms
underlying the gradual formation of LENs during these steps (Wong, 2009). More recent studies
have suggested that sheet formation occurs during the hydrothermal step, partially explaining the
dependence of LEN length on the conditions of the hydrothermal step, while the substitution of
H+ for Na+ ions occurs during the ion exchange step (Liang, 2014).
2.3.2.3 Step 3: Calcination
Calcination is the process of heating the materials to temperatures above 300oC to modify their
crystal phase structure. The rinsed and dried materials are crushed to increase the overall surface
area available for reaction and then placed in a furnace capable of reaching temperatures between
300oC and 1,000oC. Depending on the temperature chosen and the crystalline structures
remaining after ion exchange and rinsing, the LENs will be converted to various titanate
structures, TiO2(B) (a metastable form of TiO2), anatase, rutile, or some combination thereof
upon calcination. For example, the conversion of trititanate to anatase occurs at 700oC as shown
in the equation below:
𝐻2𝑇𝑖3𝑂7 700𝑜𝐶→ 3 𝑇𝑖𝑂2 + 𝐻2𝑂 (2.10)
23
2.3.3 Effects of Synthesis Parameters on Nanomaterial Properties
Survey studies by Yuan and Su (2004), Wong et al. (2011), Qamar et al. (2008), and others have
established that the precursor materials, hydrothermal synthesis temperature, extent and method
of post synthesis cleaning and ion exchange, and calcination temperature have important effects
on the final products. The choice of precursor materials and hydrothermal temperature affects the
overall size and aspect ratio of the linear nanomaterials, with higher temperatures generally
resulting in larger materials (Yuan and Su, 2004). The washing, ion exchange, and calcination
steps affect the surface and crystalline structures of the materials, and thus their photocatalytic
properties (Qamar et al., 2008; Ali et al., 2016). Appendix A of this documents contains a
detailed review of the effects of these different parameters on the characteristics of TiO2 LENs.
Natural Organic Matter
2.4.1 Health, Operational, and Aesthetic Effects of Natural Organic Matter
The term NOM refers to a heterogenous mix of compounds formed during the degradation of
plants and other detritus within the watershed. It is ubiquitous in natural surface water and one of
the main targets of modern water treatment systems. Although NOM does not present any risk to
human health in its natural form, some NOM compounds can react with chlorine and other
oxidants used to disinfect and purify drinking water to yield disinfection byproducts (DBPs).
Studies conducted the 1970s established that halogenated compounds were formed when NOM
present in treated water came into contact with chlorine used for disinfection (Rook et al., 1974;
Bellar et al., 1974) and numerous studies since then have identified potential human health risks
related to these DBPs based on in vitro and animal experiments (Richardson et al., 2007). Recent
re-evaluation of these studies in light of data collected in the intervening decades has cast some
doubt on the well accepted theory that regulated DBPs such as THMs and HAAs present a risk to
human health at the levels commonly detected in drinking water (Hrudey, 2009). Nonetheless,
some unregulated DBPs have been shown to be highly genotoxic (Richardson et al., 2007;
Krasner et al., 2009) and these can be formed under the same conditions that encourage the
formation of regulated DBPs (Zheng et al., 2015; McKie et al., 2015). DBPs are also widely
24
regulated across the world, and as a result, much effort is expended in designing and operating
water treatment plants to remove NOM ahead of disinfection.
There are also non-health related concerns related to NOM in drinking water, including
operational effects on water treatment unit processes. Membrane filters are easily fouled by
NOM, which reduces their permeability and increases the frequency of backwashing and
chemical cleaning and the attendant power and chemical costs. NOM also interferes with
primary disinfection processes such as germicidal UV and chlorination by decreasing the UV
transmittance of the water and exerting a chlorine demand. It also exerts an oxidant demand
during ozonation and other oxidation-based processes used for contaminant degradation. Finally,
NOM frequently imparts a brown or yellow colour to the water that is an aesthetic concern for
drinking water consumers.
2.4.2 NOM Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Plants
NOM can be removed from drinking water via coagulation (with or without pH control),
adsorption onto activated carbon, and in some cases, via size exclusion using high pressure
membrane filters. It can also be transformed via oxidation processes into compounds that are
more easily removed by downstream processes like biofiltration or less likely to form DBPs
upon chlorination. Coagulation usually removes between 10 and 70 percent of NOM from raw
surface water (White et al., 1997) and the extent of removal is strongly impacted by the
characteristics of the overall water matrix including NOM type and concentration (Jacangelo et
al., 1995; White et al., 1997; Marhaba and Pipida, 2000; Wassink et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2015)
as well as the operational parameters of the treatment process including pH and alkalinity
adjustment, coagulant dose, and mixing time (Jacangelo et al., 1995; Edzwald and Tobiason,
1999). The residual metal salts used for coagulation can be recycled within the plant (Tobiason et
al., 1999; Gottfried et al., 2008), however, in practice they are usually disposed of after only a
single use. Activated carbon in granular (GAC) form has also been used for NOM removal for
many decades in North America, though PAC has also been explored as a NOM removal option.
GAC is used in fixed bed reactors while PAC is applied to the water before or during coagulation
(Chowdhury et al., 2013). Both processes can achieve high percent removals of NOM, including
DBP precursors, under some conditions (Jacangelo et al., 1995), however, GAC’s ability to
remove NOM declines over time and high PAC doses are often required to achieve treatment
25
objectives (Chowdhury et al., 2013). Nanofiltration, a high pressure, energy intensive membrane
filtration process, can achieve nearly complete removal of NOM via size exclusion (Jacangelo et
al., 1995; Itoh et al., 2001; de la Rubia et al., 2008) and has been successfully coupled to
ultrafiltration membranes and employed for DBP precursor removal in small systems in Canada
(Lamsal et al., 2012) and the United States (Lozier et al., 1997). Oxidation via ozonation or one
of the more recently developed advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) can enhance DBP
precursor removal across existing biologically active filters (Toor and Mohseni, 2007) and AOPs
such as UV/H2O2 and UV/O3 can also be used on their own for DBP precursor removal (Lamsal
et al., 2011). There is, however, some concern that under some conditions incomplete
mineralization during AOP treatment could result in an overall increase in DBPfp (Toor and
Mohseni, 2007; Bond et al., 2009). All of these methods have attendant challenges, mostly
related to high chemical or energy costs, and there is demand for alternative NOM removal
processes, for both small and large communities, that minimize these costs while still providing
adequate treatment.
2.4.3 Photocatalytic Degradation of Natural Organic Matter
Like other organic compounds, NOM is vulnerable to oxidation by ROS. Rate constants ranging
from 1 to 5 x 108 M-1s-1 have been observed between •OH radicals and NOM isolates. Although
it is often assumed that NOM removal is exclusively due to photocatalytic degradation by ROS
in TiO2-based systems, many researchers have observed additional removal in the absence of
light. This suggests that adsorption of NOM onto the photocatalyst is another important removal
mechanism in these systems (Wiszniowski et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2008). Adsorbed compounds
are then degraded upon illumination of the catalyst.
A study by Liu et al. (2008) determined that pH of the solution and the irradiation time have
important roles in the degradation of large molecules into smaller ones, with higher reductions
observed at higher pHs and longer irradiation times. Other matrix components also affect
degradation rates. For example, the presence of bicarbonate has been shown to reduce the rate of
NOM degradation. This reduction has been attributed to •OH radical scavenging as observed in
other AOP studies (Liao et al., 2001) or, alternatively, to an increase in particle agglomeration
leading to an overall reduction in available surface area for reaction (Autin et al., 2014). The
presence of Fe(III) and Cu(II) has been linked to increases in the degradation rates of model
26
compounds in some photocatalytic systems, though these effects were concentration and pH
dependent (Butler and Davis, 1993). Indeed, other researchers have observed catalyst fouling in
systems containing iron and manganese (Burns et al., 1999). Other ions, including phosphate,
nitrate, and chloride have also been found to inhibit the degradation of model organic
compounds by TiO2 photocatalysis (Chen et al., 1997; Burns et al., 1999). A table describing the
effects of common matrix components on the degradation of organic contaminants by TiO2 is
provided in Appendix B.
Liu et al. (2008B) investigated the effect of UVA/TiO2 treatment on the size and characteristics
of humic acids using high pressure size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) and resin
fractionation. Their results suggested that UV/TiO2 treatment degraded large humic acid
molecules into smaller ones. Other researchers, including Huang et al. (2008) and Philippe et al.
(2010A) have also found that UV/TiO2 breaks large molecular weight compounds down to
smaller ones. Results from Huang et al. (2008) and Liu et al. (2008B) suggest that the resulting
intermediate(s) are more resistant to degradation than their parent compounds. In the latter study,
the concentration of charged and neutral hydrophilic compounds increased with increasing
irradiation time, suggesting that the hydrophobic compounds were being broken down to
hydrophilic intermediates by the photocatalytic process. The concentration of charged
hydrophilic acids eventually decreased, indicating that some portion of the original humic acid
content was fully mineralized. A 2010 study by the same research group (Liu et al., 2010)
employed a different fractionation method (LC-OCD) but found similar results.
In the Liu et al. study (2010) the researchers also observed that the DBPfp of the water initially
increased at shorter irradiation times (< 60 min) before decreasing at longer irradiation times,
suggesting that incomplete mineralization of larger or more recalcitrant NOM compounds at
shorter treatment times was causing a temporary overall increase in the concentration of DBP
precursors present in solution. The increase in DBPfp was only observed in one water source,
suggesting that this effect was matrix dependent. Other researchers have also observed this
increase in the overall DBPfp at short UV/TiO2 treatment times (Gerrity et al., 2009),
highlighting the risk of using photocatalysis for water treatment. Many of the researchers cited
above observed some degree of NOM removal via adsorption to TiO2 in their experiments. In
some cases, this removal was substantial (e.g. Huang et al., 2008), suggesting that adsorption
might be a viable alternative to photocatalysis for removal of NOM, including DBP precursors,
27
by TiO2. In such a system it might theoretically also be possible to harness the photocatalytic
properties of TiO2 to regenerate the adsorbent, resulting in a multi-use product that could be a
viable alternative to existing NOM and DBP precursor removal technologies.
Adsorption
2.5.1 Adsorption Theory
Adsorption is a process whereby one species becomes associated with a solid surface via
chemical or physical interactions. Çeçen and Aktaş (2011) describe the adsorption of aqueous
species, including NOM, as being controlled by two driving forces. The first is the affinity of the
target species toward water. Hydrophobic species are more likely to adsorb to a solid substrate in
water than hydrophilic species because they are seeking to get away from water molecules. The
other driving force is related to the chemical characteristics of the adsorbate and the adsorbent.
Adsorption has often been described using the following reversible chemical equation:
𝐴 + 𝑆𝑘↔𝐴𝑆 (2.11)
Where A represents the species being adsorbed (adsorbate) and S represents an adsorption site on
the solid surface (adsorbent).
The amount of adsorbate taken up by the adsorbent and rate at which the two become associated
are functions of the diffusion of the adsorbate from the bulk water through the hydrodynamic
layer and to the surface of the adsorbent (external mass transfer) and the actual adsorption
(physical or chemical) of the adsorbate to the surface of the adsorbate (Fogler, 2002). When the
adsorbent is porous, internal mass transfer must also be considered. In the case of TiO2
nanoparticles, which are not porous, internal mass transfer is not an important factor in
adsorption. More complex TiO2 nanostructures such as nanobelts and nanospheres are often
porous, however, so internal mass transfer is likely to affect the overall adsorption kinetics.
Depending on the characteristics of the system being investigated, any of these three processes
can be rate limiting. External mass transfer resistance can be minimized by mixing, and most
28
preliminary adsorption experiments are carried out in batch reactors mixed constantly at a
consistent rate to minimize the overall resistance to adsorption and make it easier to observe the
surface adsorption kinetics (Chowdhury et al., 2013).
Over time, the overall adsorption process tends towards a steady state known as the point of
equilibrium. Adsorption at the point at and beyond equilibrium is quantified using the parameter
qe, which is the mass of adsorbate adsorbed per unit of adsorbent (mg/g or mg/mg). qe is
calculated as follows:
𝑞𝑒 =𝐶𝑜−𝐶𝑒
𝐷 (2.12)
Where Co is the original concentration of the adsorbate in solution (mg/L), Ce is the
concentration of adsorbate in solution once the system has achieved equilibrium (mg/L), and D is
the dose of adsorbent added to the system (mg or g).
Adsorption processes are usually evaluated in the laboratory using adsorption isotherm models
developed theoretically based on the principles described above or empirically. The most
common adsorption models are the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.
2.5.1.1 Langmuir Isotherm
The Langmuir isotherm is a well understood and accepted empirical adsorption model that is
widely used in water treatment applications. It can be written as follows:
𝑞𝑒 =𝑏𝐶𝑒𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥
1+𝐶𝑒𝑏 (2.13)
Where qe is the mass ratio of adsorbed adsorbate to adsorbent at equilibrium (mg/g), qmax is the
maximum possible mass of adsorbate that can be adsorbed (mg/g), Ce is the concentration of the
adsorbate in the treated water (mg/L), and b (L/mg) is a constant related to the energy of
adsorption (Shahbeig et al., 2013). Higher values of b and qmax imply better adsorption.
As shown below, a plot of 1/qe vs. 1/Ce will be linear and have a slope of 1/KLqmax and a y
intercept of 1/qmax.
1
𝑞𝑒=
1
𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥+
1
𝑏𝑞𝑚𝑎𝑥
1
𝐶𝑒 (2.14)
29
Assumptions of the Langmuir isotherm (Shahbeig et al., 2013) include monolayer adsorption,
irreversible adsorption, a homogeneous adsorbent interacting with homogeneous adsorption
sites, an adsorbent with a finite adsorption capacity for the adsorbate, and no interaction between
molecules adsorbed to neighbouring sites.
2.5.1.2 Freundlich Isotherm
A common alternative to the Langmuir isotherm is the Freundlich isotherm. The Freundlich
isotherm often fits well to empirical data and is often used to model heterogeneous systems such
as the adsorption of organic molecules to activated carbon (Summers et al., 1988; Çeçen and
Aktaş, 2011). Unlike the Langmuir isotherm, it can be used to describe multilayer adsorption,
reversible adsorption, and adsorbents with non-uniform adsorption sites (Shahbeig et al., 2013).
𝑞𝑒 = 𝐾𝐹𝐶𝑒1/𝑛
(2.15)
Where KF is the Freundlich adsorption constant ([mg/g]/[mg/L]1/n) and 1/n is the Freundlich
slope, an empirical parameter that describes the shape of the adsorption curve (Chowdhury et al.,
2013). The linearized form of the Freundlich isotherm is shown below.
log 𝑞𝑒 = log𝐾𝐹 +1
𝑛log 𝐶𝑒 (2.16)
To evaluate the fit of the Freundlich isotherm, log qe is plotted against log Ce. 1/n is the slope of
a line fitted to the data and KF is calculated from the y intercept of that line. When 1/n is constant
or nearly so, KF can be used as an indicator of adsorption capacity, with higher KF indicating
greater adsorption capacity (Chowdhury et al., 2013).
2.5.1.3 Modification of the Freundlich Isotherm Model to Account for a Fixed NOM Concentration
The adsorption behaviour of natural organic matter (NOM) onto drinking water adsorbents has
proven difficult to characterize because it is a dilute heterogenous mixture made up of polymeric
molecules of varying molecular weights and chemical characteristics. The composition of this
mixture varies based on source water characteristics and seasonal changes, making it difficult to
establish a representative Co value. Additionally, it is difficult to concentrate or dilute natural
water matrices without also modifying the concentrations of other water components, which
30
complicates the execution of standard adsorption experiments, which are usually conducted
using a constant adsorbent dose and changing initial concentration of adsorbate.
Summers and Roberts (1988) conducted a series of experiments to determine whether the
adsorption of NOM to activated carbon could be characterized if the NOM concentration was
held constant and the dose of activated carbon was varied. They found that a modified version of
the Freundlich isotherm could be used to describe the adsorption of NOM to activated carbon
when experiments were conducted with a constant initial concentration of NOM and changing
doses (D) of activated carbon. They developed the following equation to express this
relationship:
𝑞𝑒 = 𝐾𝐹(𝐶𝑒/𝐷)1/𝑛 (2.17)
Where D has units mg/L or g/L. This model can be linearized as follows:
log 𝑞𝑒 = log𝐾𝐹 +1
𝑛log(𝐶𝑒/𝐷) (2.18)
The modified Freundlich isotherm was developed to analyze the adsorption of NOM to activated
carbon, and assumes that the adsorbent interacts with a heterogeneous mixture of potential
adsorbates. It has been used to model the removal of NOM from drinking water by activated
carbon (e.g. Karanfil and Kitis 1999; Li et al., 2002), as well as nanoscale carbon adsorbents
(Hyung and Kim, 2008).
2.5.2 Adsorption of NOM to TiO2
TiO2 photocatalysis, particularly with standard P25 nanoparticles, is a well-studied phenomenon
but the adsorption of NOM to TiO2 materials is less well understood, particularly in terms of its
utility as a treatment technology. Most of the studies that have explored NOM adsorption to
TiO2, including those by Wiszniowski et al. (2002), Erhayem and Sohn (2014), Liu et al. (2013),
Thio et al. (2011), Domingos et al. (2009) and Mwaanga et al. (2014) have been conducted by
environmental chemistry researchers whose main concern was the transport of nanoparticles
through the natural environment.
31
2.5.2.1 Adsorption Time Studies
Many researchers operating in both the contaminant fate and transport context and the treatment
context have conducted kinetics studies to establish the amount of time required to reach
adsorption equilibrium. For example, Mwaanga et al. (2014) and Erhayem and Sohn (2014), who
were exploring the effects of NOM on nanparticle transport in the environment, both found that
adsorption initially occurred quickly but also noted a very small amount desorption occurring as
time went on. Both studies used UV254 as their response parameter. As a result, their adsorption
isotherm experiments were run for 48 h (Erhayem and Sohn, 2014) or 72 h (Mwaanga et al.,
2014). Other researchers, particularly those exploring the use of TiO2 for NOM removal from
drinking water, have come to different conclusions regarding the time to equilibrium. For
example, Huang et al. (2008) used a five minute adsorption period, which they chose based on
time to adsorption studies while Ng et al. (2014) allowed for 15 to 30 minutes of adsorption and
Liu et al. (2014) allowed for a full 24 hours of adsorption.
2.5.2.2 Adsorption Isotherm Fitting
Adsorption isotherms are widely used to describe and predict the adsorption of NOM to activated
carbon and other adsorbents used in drinking water treatment as well as to explain the
interactions between NOM and various adsorbing media present in the natural environment. A
subset of the TiO2 researchers cited in this thesis made efforts to fit their findings to common
adsorption isotherm models. The overall photocatalytic reaction between TiO2 and organic
contaminants under irradiation is usually modeled using the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model,
which assumes that adsorption precedes degradation and that the former occurs according to the
Langmuir model (Malato et al., 2009), at least during photocatalysis. Dark adsorption
(adsorption in the absence of photocatalysis) of NOM by TiO2 has also been successfully
modeled using the Langmuir isotherm by Liu et al. (2014). Results presented by Mwaanga et al.
(2014) were analyzed as part of this study and also determined to be a good fit to the Langmuir
isotherm model. Given the heterogeneity of NOM, other models, including the Freundlich
isotherm model and the modified Freundlich model, might also be appropriate. The results of Liu
et al. (2013) were equally well described by the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, those of
Sun and Lee (2012) were best described by the combined Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm model,
32
and Erhayem and Sohn (2014) successfully fitted their data to the modified Freundlich isotherm
model described in Section 2.5.1.3.
2.5.2.3 Matrix Effects on Adsorption
Studies by Mwaanga et al. (2014) and Erhayem and Sohn (2014) established that pH and ionic
strength had effects on adsorption and noted that larger, more aromatic NOM compounds were
adsorbed preferentially. In Mwaanga’s study the pH of the solution had an impact on the amount
of adsorption as well as the fit of the model. Erhayem (2013) observed a similar relationship
between pH and the mass of NOM adsorbed from the water and also noted that phosphate,
nitrate, and bicarbonate inhibited adsorption. At high pH, divalent ions (Mg2+, Ca2+) encouraged
more adsorption than monovalent ions. Agglomeration reduces the overall surface area available
for adsorption in the system and thus more of the adsorbate is likely to remain in solution when
the materials are agglomerated than if they are fully dispersed. Numerous researchers including
Liu et al. (2013), Loosli et al., (2015), Domingos et al. (2009), and Thio et al. (2011), have
explored the agglomeration of TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous media and its effects and
dependence on NOM adsorption. A summary of the known effects of different matrix
components on the adsorption of NOM by TiO2 is provided in Table A.1 in Appendix A.
2.5.3 Nanoparticle Agglomeration
Nanoparticles agglomerate quickly when added to aqueous media, though the rate and extent of
agglomeration is impacted by ionic strength and pH (French et al., 2009) as well as the presence
of NOM and the size and shape of the nanomaterials themselves (Hotze et al., 2010). The
majority of the studies that have been conducted on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration in natural
or simulated natural water matrices have been motivated by the need to characterize the fate and
transport of these materials within the aquatic environment. Researchers have been particularly
keen to elucidate the mechanisms underlying nanoparticle sedimentation in order to predict the
likelihood that nanoparticles released into the environment will travel far enough to negatively
impact sensitive ecosystems.
Researchers including Liu et al., (2013) and Zhou et al. (2013) have attempted to explain their
agglomeration results in terms of Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeak theory (DVLO theory),
which posits that particles in suspension interact via two main forces: charge interactions
33
between the electrical double layers (EDLs) of particles (repulsive) and van der Waals forces
(attractive). The distance between the individual particles governs which of these forces will
dominate and thus the likelihood that they will be attracted to or repelled by one another
(Crittenden et al., 2012). Compression of the EDL by ions in the aqueous medium reduces the
repulsive forces between individual nanoparticles, allowing van der Waal’s attractive forces to
dominate. This results in agglomeration and decreased available surface area, which can lead to
sedimentation or reductions in adsorption capacity and photocatalytic activity.
DVLO theory has gradually been extended to account for other forces that can affect particle
interactions (XDVLO theory):
Magnetic attraction
Hydrophobic interactions
Osmotic repulsion
Elastic-steric repulsion
Bridging attraction
As described by Hotze et al. (2013), DVLO and XDVLO assume that the bulk sizes of the
particles are much greater than those of their surfaces thus that the various interactions occur
between two flat surfaces. This assumption does not always hold for nanoparticles. The small
size of nanoparticles also has impacts on their surface charge and surface interactions because
more of their electrons exist on the surface rather that within the bulk. The concepts underlying
DVLO and XDVLO nonetheless provide a useful framework for evaluating the behavior of
nanoparticles.
As mentioned previously, most researchers who have studied TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration
have done so in the interest of characterizing sedimentation behavior of various TiO2
nanomaterials under different water quality conditions. The rate at which a particle settles in
aqueous media is determined by three forces: buoyancy, drag, and gravity. All three forces are
affected by the diameter of the particle or agglomerate and the gravitational force is also
impacted by the density of the particle or agglomerate. The magnitudes of all three forces are
also impacted by the shape of the particle or agglomerate as this will impact its projected area
and volume (Crittenden et al., 2012). The effective density of a nanomaterial agglomerate can be
well below the density of that of the actual material (e.g. 4.26 g/cm3 for TiO2) because the
34
agglomerate contains entrapped media (Deloid et al., 2014). It can be inferred based on the sizes
of the agglomerate and the original nanomaterial along with the density of the original
nanoparticle and that of the suspending media using the Sterling equations (see Appendix H) or
determined empirically using a method proposed by Deloid et al. (2014). The shape and structure
of a nanomaterial can affect the shape and effective density of its agglomerates, and therefore its
sedimentation efficacy, as well as the concentration of ions required to induce agglomeration
(Hotze et al., 2010). In a treatment context, the shape and size of the agglomerates also affects
the likelihood that the material will be removed via other drinking water clarification processes
such as membrane filtration (Zhang et al., 2009).
Nanoparticle agglomeration and its effect on surface area can also contribute to the changes in
adsorption efficiency and photocatalytic degradation observed at different pHs and in the
presence of ions and NOM. As a rule, agglomeration and subsequent sedimentation are most
likely to occur when the pH is near the isoelectric point/point of zero charge of the material in
question because at this pH repulsive forces between individual particles are at a minimum (Liu
et al., 2013). Liu et al. (2013) reported that three types of TiO2 nanomaterials were more likely to
agglomerate under high ionic strength conditions than at low ionic strength conditions. This
finding is corroborated by those of Erhayem and Sohn (2014). The type of ions present in
solution may also have an effect – Liu et al. (2013) observed much greater increases in
agglomerate size when Ca2+ was added to the water rather than Na+. They hypothesized that this
was due to the greater ability of Ca2+ to compress the electrical double layer surrounding the
nanomaterials relative to Na+. Greater compression of the electrical double layer results in less
repulsion between individual nanoparticles and thus, greater agglomeration. Numerous
researchers have observed that the presence of natural organic matter increases the stability of
nanomaterials in solution, though this effect is less pronounced in the presence of ions such as
calcium (Zhang et al. 2009; Thio et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013) and at high NOM concentrations
(Erhayem and Sohn, 2014). According to Zhang et al. (2009), NOM inhibits agglomeration by
increasing the overall negative charge of the particles and thus increasing the repulsive forces
that keep them dispersed in solution. Other researchers have come to different conclusion. For
example, Domingos et al. (2009) attributed NOM’s ability to stabilize nanomaterial suspensions
to increased steric repulsion. Thio et al. (2011) suggested that stabilization was due to both steric
repulsion and changes in electrostatic interactions and that in matrices that contain both NOM
35
and calcium, calcium ions can provide bridging of NOM-coated nanoparticles. The latter
hypothesis was also put forward by Liu et al. (2013).
References
Ali, S., Granbohm, H., Ge, Y., and Singh, V.K. 2016. Crystal structure and photocatalytic
properties of titanate nanotubes prepared by chemical processing and subsequent annealing,
Journal of Materials Science, 51, 7322-7335
Alrousan, D.M.A., Dunlop, P.S.M., McMurray, T.A., and Byrne, J.A. (2009) Photocatalytic
inactivation of E. coli in surface water using immobilized nanoparticle TiO2 films, Water
Research, 43, pp. 47-54
Alrousan, D.M.A., Polo-López, M.I., Dunlop, P.S.M., Fernández-Ibánez, Byrne, J.A. (2012)
Solar photocatalytic disinfection of water with immobilized titanium dioxide in re-circulating
flow CPC reactors, Applied Catalysis B, 128, 126-134
American Public Health Association (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 21st ed., Washington D.C., APHA
Autin, O., Hart, J., Jarvis, P., MacAdam, J., Parsons, S.A., Jefferson, B. (2013) The impact of
background organic matter and alkalinity on the degradation of the pesticide metaldehyde by two
advanced oxidation processes: UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2, Water Research, 47, 2041-2049
Bavykin, D.V. and Walsh, F.C. (2009) Titanate and Titania Nanotubes: Synthesis, Preparation,
and Application, RSC Publishing
Bellar, T.A., Lichtenberg, J.J., and Kroner, R.C. (1974) The occurrence of organohalides in
chlorinated drinking waters, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 66 (12), 703-
706
Benotti, M.J., Stanford, B.D., Wert, E.C., Snyder, S.A. (2009) Evaluation of a photocatalytic
reactor membrane pilot system for the removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting
compounds from water, Water Research, 43, 1513-1522
36
Bickley, R.I., Gonzalez-Carreno, T., Lees, J.S., Palmisano, L. and Tilley, R.J.D. (1991) A
structural investigation of titanium dioxide photocatalysts, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 92,
p. 178
Bolton, J.R. and Cotton, C.A. (2008) Ultraviolet Disinfection Handbook, American Water Works
Association, Colorado, USA
Bond, T., Goslan, E.H., Jefferson, B., Roddick, F., Fan, L., Parsons, S.A. (2009) Chemical and
biological oxidation of NOM surrogates and effect on HAA formation, Water Research, 43, pp.
2615-2622
Burns, R.A., Crittenden, J.C., Hand, D.W., Selzer, V.H., Sutter, L.L., Salman, S.R. (1999) Effect
of inorganic ions in heterogeneous photocatalysis of TCE, Journal of Environmental
Engineering, 125 (1), 77-85
Butler, E.C. and Davis, A.P. (1993) Photocatalytic oxidation in aqueous titanium dioxide
suspensions: The influence of dissolved transition metals, Journal of Photochemistry and
Photobiology: Chemistry, 70, 273-283
Çeçen and Aktaş (2011) Activated Carbon for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Weinheim,
Germany, Wiley-VCH Verlag and Co.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2006) Occupational Exposure to
Refractory Ceramic Fibers, Criteria for a Recommended Standard, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication
No. 2006-123
Chen, B., Lee, W., Westerhoff, P., Krasner, S., and Herckes, P. (2010) Solar photocatalysis
kinetics of disinfection byproducts, Water Research, 44 (11), pp. 3401-3409
Chen, D. and Ray, A.K. (2001) Removal of toxic metal ions from wastewater by semiconductor
photocatalysis, Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 1561-1570
Chen, H.Y., Zahraa, O., Bouchy, M. (1997) Inhibition of the adsorption and photocatalytic
degradation of an organic contaminant in an aqueous suspension of TiO2 by inorganic ions,
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 108, 37-44
37
Chen, V., Mansouri, J. and Charlton, T. (2010) Biofouling in Membrane Systems, in:
Membranes for Water Treatment, Eds. Peinemann, K-V and Nunes, S.P., Wiley-VCH
Chen, W., Qian, C., Liu, X-Y, and Yu, H-Q (2014) Two-dimensional correlation spectroscopic
analysis on the interaction between humic acids and TiO2 nanoparticles, Environmental Science
and Technology, 48, pp 11118-11126
Cho, M., Chung, H., Choi, W., and Yoon, J. (2004) Linear correlation between inactivation of
E.coli and OH radical concentration in TiO2 photocatalytic disinfection, Water Research, 38, pp.
1069-1077
Chong, M.N., Jin, B., Chow, C.W.K., and Saint, C. (2010) Recent developments in
photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review, Water Research, 44 pp. 2997-3027
Chow, A., Leech, D., Boyer, T., and Singer, P. (2008) Impact of simulated solar irradiation on
disinfection byproduct precursors, Environmental Science and Technology, 42 (15), pp. 5586-
5593
Chowdhury, Z.K., Summers, R.S., Westerhoff, G.P., Leto, B.J., Nowack, K.O., and Corwin, C.J.
(2013) Activated Carbon: Solutions for Improving Water Quality, Passantino, L.B. (Ed.),
Denver, USA, American Water Works Association
Crittenden, J., Trussell, R., Hand, D., Howe, K., and Tchobanoglous (2012) MWH’s Water
Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ
Daneshvear, N., Salari, D., Niaei, A, Rasoulifard, M.H., (2005) Immobilization of TiO2
nanopowder on glass beads for the photocatalytic decolourization of an azo dye C.I. Direct Red
23, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 40, 1605-1617
De la Rubia, Á, Rodríguez, M., Léon, V.M., Prats, D. (2008) Removal of natural organic matter
and THM formation potential by ultra- and nanofiltration of surface water, Water Research, 42,
714-722, doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.049
Deloid, G., Cohen, J.M., Darrah, T., Derk, R., Rojanasakul, L., Pyrgiotakis, G., Wohlleben, W.,
Demokritou, P. (2014) Estimating the effective density of engineered nanomaterials for in vitro
dosimetry, Nature Communications, 5, 3514 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4514
38
Deng, D., Martin, S.T., and Ramanathan, S. (2011) Synthesis of hollow porous nanospheres of
hydroxyl titanium oxalate and their topotactic conversion to anatase titania, Journal of Materials
Research, 26 (12), pp. 1545-1551
Denny, F., Scott, J., Pareek, V., Peng, G.D., Amal, R. (2009) CFD modelling for a TiO2-coated
glass-bead photoreactor irradiated by optical fibres: Photocatalytic degradation of oxalic acid,
Chemical Engineering Science, 64, 1695-1706
Domingos R.F., Tufenkji, N., and Wilkinson, K.J. (2009) Aggreation of titanium dioxide
nanoparticles: Role of fulvic acid, Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 5, 1282-1286,
doi: 10.1021/es8023594
DOW (2012) AdsorbsiaTM As600 Titanium Based Media, Accessed May 5, 2017:
http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_08d7/0901b803808d75bc.pdf?fil
epath=liquidseps/pdfs/noreg/177-02512.pdf&fromPage=GetDoc
Edzwald, J.K., Becker, W.C., and Wattier, K.L. (1985) Surrogate parameters for monitoring
organic matter and THM precursors, Journal AWWA, 77 (4), pp. 122-132
Edzwald, J.K. and Tobiason (1999) Enhanced coagulation: US requirements and a broader view,
Water Science and Technology, 40 (9), 63-70
Erhayem, M. (2013) Effect of naturally occurring organic matter (NOOM) type and source on
NOOM adsorption onto titanium dioxide nanoparticles under varying environmental conditions,
Thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, USA
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. (2014) Effect of humic acid source on humic acid adsorption onto
titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Science of the Total Environment, 470-471, pp.92-98
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. (2014) Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, pp. 249-257
Field, R. (2010) Fundamentals of Fouling, in: Membranes for Water Treatment, Eds. Peinemann,
K-V and Nunes, S.P., Wiley-VCH
39
Fogler, H.S. (2002) Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, New Jersey, USA, Prentice
Hall
French, R.A., Jacobson, A.R., Kim, B., Isley, S.L., Penn, R.L., Baveye, P.C. (2009) Influence of
ionic strength, pH, and cation valence on aggregation kinetics of titanium dioxide nanoparticles,
Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 1354-1359
Gerrity, D., Mayer, B., Ryu, H., Crittenden, J., and Abbaszadegan, M. (2009) A comparison of
pilot-scale photocatalysis and enhanced coagulation for disinfection byproduct mitigation, Water
Research, 43, pp. 1597-1610
Gottfried, A., Shepard, A.D., Hardiman, K., Walsh, M.E. (2008) Impact of recycling filter
backwash water on organic removal in coagulation-sedimentation processes, Water Research,
42, 4683-4691
Graver Technologies (2015) MetSorb from Graver Technologies, Accessed May 5, 2017:
http://www.gravertech.com/PDF/MetSorb/lit/metsorb.pdf
Han, S-K, Nam, S-N, Kang, J-W (2002) OH radical monitoring technologies for AOP advanced
oxidation process, Water Science and Technology, 46 (11-12), 7-12,
Hashimoto, K., Irie, H., and Fujishima, A. (2005) TiO2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and
future prospects, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 44 (12), pp. 8269-8285
Henderson, M. (2011) A surface science perspective on TiO2 photocatalysis, Surface Science
Reports, 66 (6-7), pp. 185-297
Herrmann, J-M. (2010) Photocatalysis fundamentals revisited to avoid several misconceptions,
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 99, pp. 461-468
Hotze, E.M., Phenrat, T., and Lowry, G.V. (2010) Nanoparticle aggregation: Challenges to
understanding transport and reactivity in the environment, Journal of Environmental Quality, 39,
1909-1924, doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0462
Hrudey, S. (2009) Chlorination disinfection by-product, public health risk tradeoffs, and me,
Water Research, 43, 2057-2092
40
Hu, A., Liang, R., Zhang, X., Kurdi, S., Luong, D., Huang, H., Peng, P, Marzbanrad, E., Oakes,
K., Zhou, Y., and Servos, M. (2013) Enhanced photocatalystic degradation of dyes by TiO2
nanobelts with hierarchical structures, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A:
Chemistry, 256, pp. 7-15
Hua, G. and Reckhow, D.A. (2007) Characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors based
on hydrophobicity and molecular size, Environmental Science and Technology, 41 (9), pp. 3309-
3315
Huang, X., Leal, M., and Li, Q. (2008) Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2
photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research,
pp. 1142-1150
Hyung, H. and Kim, J-H (2008) Natural organic matter (NOM) adsorption to multi-walled
carbon nanotubes: Effect of NOM characteristics and water quality parameters, Environmental
Science and Technology, 42, 4416-4421
Itoh, M., Kunikane, S., Magara, Y. (2001) Evaluation of nanofiltration for disinfection by-
products control in drinking water treatment, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 1
(5), 233-243
Jacangelo, J.G., DeMarco, J., Owen, D.M., and Randtke, S.J. (1995) Selected processes for
removing NOM: An overview, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 87 (1), 64-77
Jenks, W.S. (2013) Photocatalytic reaction pathways: Effects of molecular structure, catalyst,
and wavelength, In: Photocatalysis and Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent
Applications, Ed. Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co.
Karanfil, T. and Kitis, M. (1999) Role of granular activated carbon surface chemistry on the
adsorption of organic compounds. 2. Natural organic matter, Environmental Science and
Technology, 33, 3225-3233
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. (1999) Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), pp. 1307-1311
41
Kim, S-C and Lee, D-K (2005) Preparation of TiO2-coated hollow glass beads and their
application to the control of algal growth in eutrophic water, Microchemical Journal, 80, pp.
227-232
Kim, S-H and Shon, H.K. (2007) Adsorption characterization for multi-component organic
matters by titanium oxide (TiO2) in wastewater, Separation Science and Technology, 42, pp.
1775-1792
Kiser, M.A., Westerhoff, P., Benn, T., Wang, Y., Pérez-Rivera, Hristovski, K. (2009) Titanium
nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants, Environmental Science and
Technology, 43, 6757-6763 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081239
Koeneman, B.A., Zhang, Y., Westerhoff, P., Chen, Y., Crittenden, J.C., and Capco, D.G. (2014)
Toxicity and cellular responses of intestinal cells exposed to titanium dioxide, Cell Biology and
Toxicology, 26, 225-238
Krasner, S.W. (2009) The formation and control of emerging disinfection by-products of health
concern, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 367, 4077-4095
Kuempel, E.D., Sweeney, L.M., Morris, J.B., Jarabek, A.M. (2015) Advances in inhalation
dosimetry models and methods for occupational risk assessment and exposure limit derivation,
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 12, S18-S40
Lamsal..R., Walsh, M.E., Gagnon, G.A. (2011) Comparison of advanced oxidation processes for
the removal of natural organic matter, Water Research, 45, 3263-3269
Lamsal, R., Montreuil, K.R., Kent, F.C., Walsh, M.E., Gagnon, G. (2012) Characterization and
removal of natural organic matter by an integrated membrane system, Desalination, 303, 12-16,
doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.06.025
Lee, K. and Choo, K. (2013) Hybridization of TiO2 photocatalysis with coagulation and
flocculation for 1,4-dioxane removal in drinking water treatment, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 231, 227-235
42
Li, F., Yuasa, A., Ebie, K., Azuma, Y., Hagishita, T., Matsui, Y. (2002) Factors affective the
adsorption capacity of dissolved organic matter onto activated carbon: modified isotherm
analysis, Water Research, 36, 4592-4604
Liao, C-H, Kang, S-F, Wu, F-A (2001) Hydroxyl radical scavenging role of chloride and
bicarbonate ions in the H2O2/UV process, Chemosphere, 44, 1193-1200
Liang, R., Hu, A., Hatat-Fraile, M., Zhou, Y.N. (2014) Development of TiO2 nanowires for
membrane filtration applications, in: Nanotechnology for Water Treatment and Purification, Eds.
Hu, A. and Apblett, A., Springer International, Switzerland
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R. (2008A) TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Chiang, K., Drikas, M., and Amal, R. (2008B) Removal
of humic acid using TiO2 photocatalytic process – Fractionation and molecular weight
characterisation studies, Chemosphere, 72, pp. 263-271
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., and Amal, R. (2010) Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research, 44, pp. 2525-2532
Liu, S., Lim, M., and Amal, R. (2014) TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption
and effective photocatalytic regeneration, Chemical Engineering Science, 105 pp. 46-52
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. (2013) Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects, 434, pp 319-328
Loosli, F., Vitorazi, L., Berret, J-F, and Stoll, S. (2015) Towards a better understanding on
agglomeration mechanisms and thermodynamic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles interacting with
natural organic matter, Water Research, 80, pp. 139-148
43
Love, S.A., Maurer-Jones, M.A., Thompson, J.W., Lin, Y-S, Haynes, C.L. (2012) Assessing
nanoparticle toxicity, Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 5, 181-205, doi: 10.1146/annurev-
anchem-062011-143134
Lozier, J.C., Jones, G., Bellamy, W. (1997) Integrated membrane treatment in Alaska, Journal of
the American Water Works Association, 89 (10), 50-64
Luttrell, T., Halpegamage, S., Tao, J., Kramer, A., Sutter, E., and Batzill, M. (2014) Why is
anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films, Scientific
Reports (www.nature.com), 4, p. 4031
Luck, A. (2007) UV/TiO2 for drinking water treatment: Concurrent degradation of 1,4-dioxane
and removal of iron and manganese, MASc Thesis, University of Toronto
Marhaba, T.F. and Pipada, N.S. (2000) Coagulation: Effectiveness in removing dissolved
organic matter fractions, Environmental Engineering Science, 17 (2), 107-115
Malato, S., Fernandez-Ibanez, P., Maldonado, M.I., Blanco, J., and Gernjak, W. (2009)
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends,
Catalysis Today, 147, 1-59
McKie, M.J., Taylor-Edmonds, L., Andrews, S.A., Andrews, R.C. (2015) Engineered
biofiltration for the removal of disinfection by-product precursors and genotoxicity, Water
Research, 81, 196-207
Mills, A. and McFarlane, M. (2007) Current and possible future methods of assessing the
activities of photocatalyst films, Catalysis Today, 129, 22-28, doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.046
Mills, A. (2012), An overview of the methylene blue ISO test for assessing the activities of
photocatalytic films, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 128, pp. 144-149
Munla, L., Peldszus, S., and Huck, P.M. (2012) Reversible and irreversible fouling of ceramic
membranes by model solutions, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 104, pp.
E540-E554
44
Murakami, Y., Endo, K., Ohta, I., Nosaka, A., and Nosaka, Y. (2007) Can OH radicals diffuse
from the UV-irradiated photocatalytic surfaces? Laser-induced fluorescence study, Journal of
Physical Chemistry, 111, 11339-11346
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E.R., and Schlautman, M.A. (2014) Preferential sorption of some
natural organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: influence of pH and ionic
strength, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, pp. 8833-8844
Nakata, K. and Fujishima, A. (2012) TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications, Journal of
Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, 13 (3), pp. 169-189
Nosaka, Y. and Nosaka, A.Y. (2013) Identification and roles of the active species generated on
various catalysts, in: Photocatalysis and Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent
Applications, Ed. Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co.
Ng, M., Kho, E.T., Liu, S., Lim, M., and Amal, R. (2014) Highly adsorptive and regenerative
magnetic TiO2 for natural organic matter (NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 246, pp. 196-203
Ohtani, B., Prieto-Mahaney, O.O., Li, D., and Abe, R. (2010) What is Degussa (Evonik) P25?
Crystalline composition analysis, reconstruction from isolated pure particles and photocatalytic
activity test, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 216, pp. 179-182
Ochiai, T. and Fujishima, A. (2013) Design and Optimization of Photocatalytic Water
Purification Reactors, in: Photocatalysis and Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent
Applications, Ed. Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co.
Ollis, D. (2013) Photocatalytic treatment of water: Irradiance influences, in: Photocatalysis and
Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent Applications, Ed. Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH and Co.
Philippe, K.K., Hans, C., MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., and Parsons, S.A. (2010A)
Photocatalytic oxidation, GAC, and biotreatment combinations: an alternative to the coagulation
of hydrophilic rich waters?, Environmental Technology, 31 (13), pp. 1423-1434
45
Philippe, K.K., Hans, C., MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., Parsons, S.A. (2010B)
Photocatalytic oxidation of natural organic matter surrogates and the impact on trihalomethane
formation potential, Chemosphere, 81, 1509-1516
Pifer, A.D. and Fairey, J.L. (2014) Suitability of organic matter surrogates to predict
trihalomethane formation in drinking water sources, Environmental Engineering Science, 31 (3),
pp. 117-126
Purifics (n.d.) Case History: Photo-Cat Chromium (Cr6) Removal to < 1 ppb, Accessed May 5,
2017: http://www.purifics.com/lwdcms/doc-
view.php?module=documents&module_id=468&doc_name=doc
Purifics (n.d.) Chemical Free Case History: 1,4-Dioxane Groundwater Purification for Lockheed
Martin, Accessed May 5, 2017: http://www.purifics.com/lwdcms/doc-
view.php?module=documents&module_id=379&doc_name=doc
Qamar, M., Yoon, C.R., Oh, H.J., Lee, N.H., Park, K., Kim, D.H., Lee, K., Lee, W.J., and Kim,
S.J. 2008. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanotubes obtained from titanium dioxide,
Catalysis Today, 131, 3-14
Ramsden, C.S., Smith, T.J., Shaw, B.J., and Handy, R.D. (2009) Dietary exposure to titanium
dioxide nanoparticles in rainbow trout (Oncorhyndchus mykiss): No effect on growth but subtle
biochemical disturbances in the brain, Ecotoxicology, 18, 939-951
Richardson, S.D., Plewa, M.J., Wagner, E.D., Schoeny, R., and DeMarini, D.M. (2007)
Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-
products in drinking water: A review and roadmap for research, Mutation Research, 636, 178-
242
Robert, D., Keller, V., Keller, N. (2013) Immobilization of a semiconductor photocatalyst on
solid supports: Methods, materials, and applications, in Photocatalysis and Water Purification,
Ed., Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA
Rook, J.J. (1974) Formation of haloforms during chlorination of natural waters, Journal of Water
Treatment Examination, 23, 234-243
46
Seitz, F., Rosenfeldt, R.R., Müller, M., Lüderwald, S., Schulz, R., Bundschuh, M. (2016)
Quantity and quality of natural organic matter influence the ecotoxicity of titanium dioxide
nanoparticels, Nanotoxicology, 10 (10), 1415-1421, DOI:10.1080/17435390.2016.1222458
Seo, M-H, Yuasa, M., Kida, T., Huh, J-S, Shimanoe, K., Yamazoe, N. (2009) Gas sensing
characteristics and porosity control of nanostructured films composed of TiO2 nanotubes,
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 137, 513-520
Shahbeig, H., Bagheri, N., Ghorbanian, S., Hallajisani, A., and Poorkarimi, S. (2013) A new
adsorption isotherm model of aqueous solutions on granular activated carbon, World Journal of
Modelling and Simulation, 9 (4), pp. 243-254
Shon, H.K., Vigneswaran, S., Ngo, H.H., and Kim, J-H (2005) Chemical coupling of
photocatalysis with flocculation and adsorption in the removal of natural organic matter, Water
Research, 39 (12), pp. 2549-2558
Sohn, J., Amy, G., and Yoon, Y. (2007) Process-train profiles of NOM through a drinking water
treatment plant, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 99 (6), pp. 145-153
Sterling, M.C., Bonner, J.S., Ernest, A.N.S., Page, C.A., Autenrieth, R.L. (2005) Application of
fractal flocculation and vertical transport model to aquatic sol-sediment systems, Water
Research, 39, 1818-1830
Summers, R. and Roberts, P. (1988) Activated Carbon Adsorption of Humic Substances:
Heterodisperse Mixtures and Desorption, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 122 (2), pp.
367-381
Summers, R.S., Hooper, S.M., Shukairy, H.M., Solarik, G., and Owen, D. (1996) Assessing DBP
yield: Uniform formation conditions, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 88 (6),
pp. 80-93
Sun, D.D. and Lee, P.F. (2012) TiO2 microsphere for the removal of humic acid from water:
Complex adsorption mechanisms, Separation and Purification Technology, 91, pp. 30-37
47
Sun, L. and Bolton, J. (1996) Determination of the quantum yield for the photochemical
generation of hydroxyl radicals in TiO2 suspensions, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100, pp.
4127-4134
Thio, B.J.R., Zhou, D., Keller, A. (2011) Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation
and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 556-563
Tobiason, J.E., Edzwald, J.K., Levesque, B.R., Kaminski, G.K., Dunn, H.J., Galant, P.B. (2003)
Full-scale assessment of waste filter backwash recycle, Journal of the American Water Works
Association, 95 (7), 80-93
Valencia, S., Marin, J., Velasquez, J., Restropo, G., Frimmel, F.H. (2012) Study of pH effects on
the evolution of properties of brown-water natural organic matter as revealed by size-exclusion
chromatography during photocatalytic degradation, Water Research, 46, 1198-1206
Toor, R. and Mohseni, M. (2007) UV-H2O2 based AOP and its integration with biological
activated carbon treatment for DBP reduction in drinking water, Chemosphere, 66, pp. 2087-
2095
Uyguner, C., Bekbolet, M., and Selcuk, H. (2007) A comparative approach to the application of
a physico-chemical and advanced oxidation combined system to natural water samples,
Separation Science and Technology, 42 (7), pp. 1405-1419
Wang, M-Q, Yan, J., Cui, H-P, Du, S-G (2013) Low temperature preparation and
characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles coated glass beads by heterogeneous nucleation method,
Materials Characterization, 76, 39-47
Wassink, J.D., Andrews, R.C., Peiris, R.H., and Legge, R.L. (2011) Evaluation of fluorescence
excitation-emission and LC-OCD as methods of detecting removal of NOM and DBP precursors
by enhanced coagulation, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 11 (5), p. 621
Watanabe, T., Nakajima, A., Wang, R., Minabe, M., Koizumi, S., Fujishima, A., Hashimoto, K.
(1999) Photocatalytic activity and photoinduced hydrophilicity of titanium dioxide coated glass,
Thin Solid Films, 351, 260-263
48
White, M.C., Thompson, J.D., Harrington, G.W., Singer, P.C. (1997) Evaluating criteria for
enhanced coagulation compliance, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 89 (5), 64-
77
Wisznioski et al. (2002) Photocatalytic decomposition of humic acids on TiO2 part 1: Discussion
of adsorption and mechanism, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 152,
pp. 267-273
Wong, C.L., Tan, Y.N., and Mohamed, A.R. (2011) A review on the formation of titania
nanotube photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment, Journal of Environmental Management, 92,
1669-1680
World Health Organization (1999) Hazard prevention and control in the work environment,
WHO/SDE/OEH/99.14, Geneva
Wray, H.E., Andrews, R.C., and Bérubé, P.R. (2013) Surface shear stress and membrane fouling
when considering natural water matrices, Desalination, 330, pp. 22-27
Wu, J., Liu, W., Xue, C., Zhou, S., Lan, F., Bi, L., Xu, H., Yang, X., and Zeng, F-D (2009)
Toxicity and penetration of TiO2 nanoparticles in hairless mice and porcine skin after subchronic
dermal exposure, Toxicology Letters, 191, 1-8, doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.020
Xing, Z., Zhou, W., Du, F., Qu, Y., Tian, G., Pan, K., Tian, C., and Fu, H. (2014) A floating
macro/mesoporous crystalline anatase TiO2 ceramic with enhanced photocatalytic performance
for recalcitrant wastewater degradation, Dalton Transactions, 43, p. 790
Yang, Y. and Westerhoff, P. (2014) Presence in and release of nanomaterials from consumer
products in: Nanomaterial, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 811, eds. Capco,
D.G. and Chen, Y., Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-
8739-0_1
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L (2004) Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 241, pp. 173-183
Zeng, H.C. (2011) Preparation and integration of nanostructured titanium dioxide, Current
Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 1, pp. 11-17
49
Zhang, H., Du, G., Lu, W., Cheng, L., Zhu, X., and Jiao, Z. (2012) Porous TiO2 hollow
nanospheres: Synthesis, characterization, and enhanced photocatalytic properties,
CrystEngComm, 14, pp. 3793-3801
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Westerhoff, P., and Crittenden, J. (2009) Impact of natural organic matter
and divalent cations on the stability of aqueous nanoparticles, Water Research, 43, pp. 4249-
4257
Zhang, X., Pan, J.H., Du, A.J., Fu, W., Sun, D.D., and Leckie, J.O. (2009). Combination of one-
dimensional TiO2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment,
Water Research, 43, 1179-1186
Zheng, Z., Liu, H., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Waclawik, E.R., and Zhu, H. (2010) Structure and
contribution to photocatalytic activity of the interfaces in nanofibers with mixed anatase and
TiO2(B) phases, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 316, 75-82
Zheng, D., Andrews, R.C., Andrews, S.A., Taylor-Edmonds, L. (2015) Effects of coagulation on
the removal of natural organic matter, genotoxicity, and precursors to halogenated furanones,
Water Research, 70, 118-129
Zhou, D., Ji, Z., Jiang, X., Dunphy, D.R., Brinker, J., Keller, A.A. (2013) Influence of material
properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration, PLOS One, 8, 11, e81239, doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0081239
50
Materials and Methods
Synthesis and Characterization of Linear Engineered Nanomaterials
3.1.1 Alkaline Hydrothermal Synthesis Procedure
The linear engineered nanomaterials (LENs) were synthesized according to the simple alkaline
hydrothermal method initially introduced by Kasuga et al. (1999) and subsequently modified by
Yuan and Su (2004), Qamar et al. (2008), Zheng et al. (2010), and many other researchers (see
Appendix A). The following equipment was used during the synthesis process:
Mass balance (OHAUS Analytical Plus)
Sonicator (Fritsch Ultrasonic Cleaner Laborette 17)
Acid digester (Parr Instrument Company)
Drying oven (VWR Model 1305 U)
Muffle furnace (Thermolyne Sybron Furnatrol I)
50 mL centrifuge tubes (8)
Centrifuge (Sorvall RC 5C Plus)
Funnel
Erlenmyer flask
Filtering paper (Whatman 1, 185 mm)
Mortar and pestle
A schematic depicting the basic steps of this process is provided in Figure 2.3 in Chapter 2 of
this document. Briefly, 2 g of Aeroxide P25 TiO2 nanoparticles (Evonik Degussa) was measured
out using a mass balance located in a fume hood, added to 60 mL of 10 M NaOH, and stirred
vigorously with a glass stir stick to fully disperse the nanoparticles throughout the NaOH
solution. The mixture was placed in a Teflon-lined container and secured inside an acid digester.
The digester was placed in the muffle furnace set to the desired hydrothermal temperature
setpoint. After 24 hours, the muffle furnace was turned off and allowed to cool to room
temperature. The acid digester was then removed from the furnace and the leftover NaOH was
decanted into a waste container. The remaining material was transferred to a series of eight 50
51
mL centrifuge tubes, which were then topped up with MilliQ water. The tubes were shaken
vigorously and sonicated for two minutes to encourage greater dispersion and contact between
the water and the TiO2 surface. The sonicated centrifuge tubes were placed in the centrifuge and
centrifuged for 30 minutes at 3,500 rpm. After centrifugation, the tubes were removed, the water
was decanted, and then the tubes were refilled with MilliQ water, resonicated, and recentrifuged.
This process was repeated a total of four times. After the final centrifugation step, the material
was immersed in 400 mL of 0.1 N HCl, mixed, and placed in the sonicator for 1 hour. At this
point, the acidic suspension was redistributed into the centrifuge tubes and the
sonication/centrifuge/decant process was repeated twice as described previously. A glass funnel
was lined with a paper filter and placed atop an Erlenmeyer flask to create a simple filtration
apparatus. The final suspension was carefully poured into the funnel and rinsed with an
additional 1 L of water. The filter and filtered material were dried overnight at approximately
70oC in a drying oven. The dried material was then crushed using a mortar and pestle and
calcined at the desired calcination temperature for 4 hours.
As described in Chapter 4, many iterations of the LENs were developed over the course of this
project as impacts of the different steps of the method became better understood. In all three
“generations” of materials were developed as shown in Table 3.1. Precursor materials and
temperature setpoints were originally chosen based on the findings of Yuan and Su (2004) and
later adjusted to encourage the formation of larger, more reactive materials.
An additional rinsing step was added to the basic synthesis procedure for the third generation
LENs to improve the uniformity and settleability of the final products. Essentially, the calcined
materials were immersed in MilliQ water to form a 5 g/L solution, sonicated for five minutes,
and allowed to settle for 24 hours. At that point, all but approximately 100 mL of the water was
removed from the container and the remaining material was resuspended and allowed to settle
for an additional four hours. All but 100 mL of the water was removed from the container and
the materials were removed from the remaining water via filtration with a 0.45 m PES filter
attached to a standard laboratory filtration apparatus and dried overnight at approximately 70oC
in the drying oven.
52
Table 3.1 Precursor materials and temperature setpoints employed during the alkaline
hydrothermal synthesis of LENs in this project
Material Precursors Hydrothermal
Temperature (TH)
Calcination Temperature
(TC)
First Generation
Nanobelts P25 / NaOH 190oC 700oC
Nanowires P25 / KOH 190oC 550oC
Nanotubes P25 / NaOH 130oC 550oC
Second Generation
NB 130/550 P25 / NaOH 130oC 550oC
NB 130/700 P25 / NaOH 130oC 700oC
NB 240/550 P25 / NaOH 240oC 550oC
NB 240/700 P25 / NaOH 240oC 700oC
Third Generation
NB 550 P25 / NaOH 240oC 550oC
NB 700 P25 / NaOH 240oC 700oC
3.1.2 Characterization of LENs
The LENs synthesized in this study were characterized in terms of size and surface
characteristics (SEM and HRTEM), crystal phase structure (XRD or HRTEM/SAED), specific
surface area (BET), photocatalytic activity (methylene blue degradation), and isoelectric point.
The equipment and conditions used for these tests are summarized in the subsections that follow.
3.1.2.1 Scanning Electron Microscopy
A JEOL 6610LV Scanning Electron Microscope operated by the Department of Earth Sciences
at the University of Toronto was used to observe the shapes and sizes of the first generation
LENs.
53
3.1.2.2 X-Ray Diffraction
A Philips X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) system was used to identify the crystal phase structures
present in the first generation LENs. The XRD instrument is owned by the Department of Earth
Sciences at the University of Toronto.
3.1.2.3 HRTEM / SAED
The crystal phase structures present in the second and third generation LENs were identified
using high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and selected area electron
diffraction (SAED) The measurements were conducted using a JEOL 2010F TEM/STEM at the
Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). TEM samples were
prepared by drop casting the dispersions onto holey carbon grids. The images were processed
using Gatan Microscopy Suite: Digial MicrographTM and SAED and FFT images were indexed
using CrysTBox – diffractGUI according to Klinger and Jäger (2015).
3.1.2.4 Surface Area Determination
The specific surface area of each of the second and third generation LENs were determined using
the Brunaeur-Emmett-Teller (BET) method for surface area analysis. N2 adsorption isotherms
were measured with a Quantachrome AUTOSORB-1. The samples were outgassed at 200oC
under vacuum for 12 h before the measurement. Surface area was determined by BET method in
a relative pressure range of 0.05 to 0.25.
3.1.2.5 Photocatalytic Activity
The photocatalytic activity of the LENs was assessed using a modified version of ISO method
10678:2010, Determination of photocatalytic activity of surfaces in an aqueous medium by
degradation of methylene blue, as described by Mills (2012). The ISO method is specific to
immobilized TiO2 films, and as such it was necessary to modify the test such that the
photocatalytic activity of the materials could be compared to one another in suspension. Tests
were conducted with a starting methylene blue concentration of 10 mg/L, a TiO2 dose of 0.1 g/L
(100 mg/L), and 30 minutes of irradiation with UVA light. Under these conditions, all of the
second and third generation LENs and P25 nanoparticles achieved between 30% and 90%
54
decolourization of the methylene blue solution, indicating that these experimental conditions
provided measurable changes in analyte concentration and so were appropriate for the evaluation
and comparison of these materials to one another.
3.1.2.6 Isoelectric Point
The IEP of the LENs was determined by measuring their zeta potentials at pH values ranging
from 3 to 9. Zeta potential was measured using a Horiba Zeta Analyzer and all samples were
prepared by additing 0.1 g/L of TiO2 in MilliQ water buffered with 10 mM NaCl before being
adjusted to various pH values using 0.1 M NaOH or HCl. Two aliquots were analyzed from each
sample and the machine measured each aliquot four times.
Water Matrices
Three surface water matrices were used over the course of this project. All water samples were
gathered from the inlet of the WTPs ahead of chlorination and quickly shipped to the DWRG.
Upon arrival, the water samples were stored in a fridge. The DOC, UV254, SUVA, pH, and
alkalinity of the raw water samples were measured periodically throughout the project. The
results of these measurements are summarized in Table 3.2. Preliminary experiments also made
use of a synthetic river water matrix made according to a recipe provided by Linden et al. (2004)
that included Suwannee River NOM isolate obtained from the International Humic Substances
Society (see Chapter 4 for details).
Table 3.2 Characteristics of four water sources (in lab measurements, variable n, error
values represent standard deviation from the mean)
Parameter Units Otonabee River Ottawa River Lake Ontario
DOC mg/L 3.8 – 5.2 4.8 - 6.8 1.6 – 2.0
UV254 1/cm 0.09 – 0.15 0.16 – 0.24 0.02 – 0.03
SUVA L/mg.m 2.0 – 3.3 2.9 – 4.0 0.8 – 1.5
pH 7.8 – 8.2 6.9 – 7.5 7.8 – 8.0
Alkalinity mg as CaCO3/L 83 – 86 26 – 28 89 – 92
55
The water quality data provided in Table 3.2 indicate that the Ottawa River (OTW) water
samples contained more NOM and more aromatic NOM than those obtained from the other two
water matrices. It was also much lower in alkalinity and had a slightly lower pH than the other
water sources. The Otonabee River (OTB) water contained more NOM than the two lake water
samples but was similar to them in terms of alkalinity and pH.
Early in this project, liquid chromatography with organic carbon detection (LC-OCD) was used
to elucidate the effects of adsorption and photocatalytic degradation on different types of NOM
present in the raw water. Additional LC-OCD data has been gathered from published papers,
theses produced by DWRG alumni, and unpublished datasets from this project and others in
order to compare the four water matrices used in this study in terms of LC-OCD fractions. This
data is summarized in Table 3.3 and confirms that the Ottawa River contained a higher
proportion of humic, aromatic substances than did the other water matrices used at different
points in this project
Table 3.3 Percentages of different LC-OCD fractions present in raw water matrices
used in this study (n = 2)
Fraction Otonabee River Ottawa River Lake Ontario
Biopolymers 6% 3 - 9% 12% - 16%
Humic Substances 56% - 58% 62% - 73% 47%
Building Blocks 18% - 20% 12% - 16% 18% - 24%
Low Molecular Weight
Acids
5% 4% - 9% 5% - 12%
Low Molecular Weight
Neutrals
13% 3% - 10% 6% - 13%
Source(s) Gora and Andrews
(2017)
Zheng (2015);
Unpublished data1
Diemert (2012),
Nemani et al. (2016)
1Taylor-Edmonds, L., personal communication, April 25, 2017
The Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change monitors the quality of the influent
and effluent water at all municipal drinking water treatment plants across the province as part of
the Drinking Water Surveillance Program (DWSP). The frequency of sampling varies from plant
to plant, but all systems are sampled at least once a year. The results of the DWSP are publicly
56
available on the ministry’s website. Raw/inlet water quality data from 2010 to 2012 (most recent
data available as of May 2017) was obtained for the three water sources used in this study and is
summarized in Table 3.4. The DOC, pH, and alkalinity data obtained from the DWSP was a
close match to that measured in the DWRG laboratory throughout this project. The two river
water samples contained more NOM (DOC) than the lake water sample while the lake water
sample had higher levels of all parameters associated with ionic content including alkalinity
(carbonate/bicarbonate), hardness (divalent ions), and conductivity and total dissolved solids,
two semi-quantitative measures of ionic strength. It also had higher levels of specific ions such
as sulphate. The Ottawa River water matrix had the lowest pH, alkalinity, hardness, and calcium
content of the three water sources but also had higher levels of turbidity and metals such as
copper, iron, and manganese.
Table 3.4 Additional water quality data for three natural water matrices used in this
study (DWSP 2010-2012)
Parameter Units Otonabee
River Ottawa River Lake Ontario Lake Simcoe
pH 7.9 - 8.5 7.4 – 7.9 8.1 – 8.3 7.9 – 8.5
DOC mg/L 4.7 – 6.0 6.3 – 7.4 1.8 – 2.1 3.8 – 4.5
Turbidity NTU 0.4 – 1.1 2.2 – 4.9 0.2 - 0.4 0.2 – 1.5
Alkalinity mg as CaCO3/L 77 – 100 20 – 41 90 – 94 110 – 120
Hardness mg as CaCO3/L 88 – 103 23 – 38 115 – 119 137 – 140
Chloride mg/L 10 – 13 2 – 5 23 – 26 42 – 45
Calcium mg/L 30 – 35 6 – 10 32 – 33 42 – 43
Magnesium mg/L 3 2 – 3 9 8
Sodium mg/L 6 – 7 2 – 5 13 – 14 24 – 25
Phosphate mg/L 0.001 – 0.005 0.001 – 0.012 0.001 – 0.005 0.001 – 0.008
Sulphate mg/L 5 – 7 5 – 7 25 – 28 18 – 19
Conductivity S/cm 188 – 244 61 -112 300 – 315 378 – 408
Dissolved Solids mg/L n.d. 33 – 52 161 -168 211 – 212
Copper ug/L 0 – 7 107 – 260 1 – 28 2 – 10
Iron ug/L 0 – 30 140 – 290 0 – 20 n.d.
Manganese ug/L 0 – 20 8 – 24 0 – 4 1 – 4
57
Experimental Apparatus
3.3.1 Light Sources
Preliminary experiments were conducted under simulated solar light (Photo Emission Tech,
SS150AA) and a high intensity UVA lamp (Blak-Ray, B100-AP). Detailed descriptions of these
light sources are provided in Chapter 4 (Section 4.1.2). The majority of the experiments
presented in this thesis were conducted using a custom-made UVA LED reactor constructed in-
house according to instructions provided by Robert Liang at the University of Waterloo. The
system consisted of four UVA lamps secured to a stand above a multiple location stir plate that
was able to accommodate four beakers at once. The UVA LED bulbs (LZ1 UV 365 nm Gen2
Emitter, LED Engin Inc.) had a maximum irradiance at 365 nm. The average irradiance across
the surface of the sample was calculated using a spreadsheet developed by Bolton and Linden
(2003) and was determined to be 4.9 mW/cm2. The irradiance of each lamp was confirmed
before each test using a radiometer (International Light, ILT1400) equipped with a sensor
optimized to measure light at 365 nm (International Light, XRL140B).
3.3.2 Additional Apparatus
All adsorption experiments were conducted using an end over end box mixer constructed in-
house at the Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering at the University of Toronto. Amber
bottles were used as batch reactors used for the adsorption experiments to minimize the
likelihood of the sample being exposed to light. Additional information about other apparatus
used for sample preparation and analysis is provided in later sections of this chapter and in the
relevant materials and methods sections in other chapters.
Sample Preparation and Experimental Design
3.4.1 Photocatalysis Tests
All of the dye and NOM degradation experiments included triplicate or quadruplicate samples
prepared by dosing 50 mL samples of raw OTB or OTW with P25 nanoparticles or one of the
LENs and exposing them to 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of UVA irradiation. All samples
58
were allowed to mix in the dark for 1 minute before irradiation. Mixing was provided by
magnetic stir bars and UVA irradiation was provided by the UVA LED reactor described in
Section 3.3.1. Dye degradation experiments were conducted with TiO2 doses of 0.1 g/L or 0.25
g/L while the NOM degradation experiments were conducted with a TiO2 dose of 0.25 g/L to
ensure sufficient NOM degradation for subsequent modeling. Samples were analyzed for DOC
and UV light absorbance at 254 nm. The results were evaluated against a pseudo-first-order
model for photocatalytic degradation and also normalized to nanomaterial surface area. Specific
details for each experiment are provided as required in later chapters of this document.
3.4.2 Adsorption Tests
The time required to reach adsorption equilibrium and the effect of increasing TiO2 dose on the
removal of Acid Orange 24 dye, DOC, UV254, THM precursors, and HAA precursors by P25
and the two optimized (a.k.a. third generation) LENs were investigated in a series of adsorption
experiments. In all cases, mixing was provided by an end over end box mixer.
3.4.3 Nanomaterial Regeneration
Regeneration experiments were conducted to determine whether the third generation could be
reused multiple times to remove AO24 and DBP precursor surrogates. Duplicate vials containing
25 mL of 10 mg/L dye solution or raw surface water were dosed with 0.5 g/L of NB 550 or NB
700 and mixed end over end in a box mixer. After 30 minutes the TiO2 was removed from the
samples via filtration and resuspended in 25 mL of millQ purified water. The new suspensions
were mixed with a stir plate and stir bar and regenerated via exposure to UVA light (365 nm)
with an average irradiance of 4.9 mW/cm2 for one hour. The regenerated TiO2 was removed
from the purified water via filtration and then resuspended in a fresh water or dye sample and
mixed for 30 minutes in the box mixer. This process was repeated five times for each LEN.
3.4.4 Settling Tests
3.4.4.1 Settling Tests for Low TiO2 Doses
Low dose settling tests were inspired by the work of Liu et al. (2013) and Erhayem and Sohn
(2014). Both groups studied the effects of water matrix conditions on TiO2 sedimentation. Their
59
tests were conducted using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The DWRG’s UV-Vis
spectrophotometer was unable to accurately measure suspensions of some of the LENs at
concentrations above 0.1 g/L, however, so the settling tests for this project were took place in a
Hach 2100 N turbidimeter operating in NTU mode with ratio on, which allowed the turbidimeter
to measure in the 0 to 4000 NTU range and accurately characterize LEN suspensions containing
up to 0.3 g/L of material.
Aliquots of a 10 g/L TiO2 stock solution were dispensed into an appropriate amount of MilliQ
water to create triplicate samples for the settling tests (100 mg/L, 200 mg/L, or 250 mg/L) and
duplicate calibration standards (10 mg/L, 50 mg/L, 100 mg/L, 200 mg/L, and 300 mg/L). Each
calibration standard was sonicated for 5 minutes and then analyzed for turbidity. The turbidity
results were graphed against concentration to develop a calibration curve for each material (see
Appendix C). The relationship between turbidity and concentration was linear within the range
studied for all five materials. For the settling tests, samples were dispensed into the turbidimeter
cuvette, sonicated for 5 minutes, and placed in the turbidimeter for a total of 2 or 3 hours. The
turbidity at the midpoint of the cuvette was recorded at the beginning of the test and at ten
minute intervals thereafter.
3.4.4.2 Settling Tests for High TiO2 Doses
TiO2 doses above 0.3 g/L (300 mg/L) resulted in turbidity and UV-Vis signals well above the
operating ranges of the instruments available in the DWRG laboratory, therefore it was necessary
to adopt an alternative methodology in order to accurately assess the settling behaviour of the 1
g/L TiO2 suspensions used in the final adsorption experiments (Chapter 8). 600 mL of water was
dosed with 1 g/L of TiO2, sonicated for five minutes, and then mixed in the box mixer. After one
hour, the water was distributed into two sets of five tall 60 mL vials and the remaining volume
was reserved as a control. 30 mL aliquots were removed after 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes and
diluted to one tenth their original concentration. The diluted samples were analyzed using a
HACH turbidimeter.
3.4.5 Filtration Tests
The Time to Filter test in Standard Methods (2710 H) was used to evaluate the filterability of
P25 and the third generation LENs. Essentially, the time to filter a set volume of sample
60
containing the nanomaterials was normalized to the amount of time required to filter pure MilliQ
water through the filter under identical filtration conditions to yield a unitless value, the filtration
index. A high filtration index implies that the suspension is resistant to filtration while a value
close to 1 indicates that the suspension has the same resistance to filtration as pure water.
Sample Analysis
3.5.1 Dyes
The concentration of methylene blue and Acid Orange 24 in the raw and treated water was
determined by measuring the absorbance of the solution at 665 nm for methylene blue and 430
nm for AO24 using an Agilent 8453 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Sample calibration curves for
the two dyes are provided in Appendix C.
3.5.2 Disinfection Byproduct Surrogates
Raw and treated water samples were filtered through a 0.45 m polyethersulfone (PES)
laboratory filter before analysis. Natural organic matter was quantified as dissolved organic
carbon (DOC) or based on UV absorbance at 254 nm (UV254). DOC was measured on an O/I
Analytical Aurora 1030 TOC analyzer and UV254 was measured using an Agilent 8453 UV-Vis
spectrophotometer. Size exclusion liquid chromatography with organic carbon detection (LC-
OCD) as described by Huber et al. (2011) was conducted at the University of Waterloo on
selection of samples from this project. The results of the analyses were processed using
proprietary software (ChromCalc, DOC-LABOR, Karlsruhe, Germany). Fluorescence
measurements were made on a Varian (now Agilent) Cary Eclipse fluorescence
spectrophotometer.
3.5.3 Disinfection Byproduct Formation and Analysis
The uniform formation conditions (UFC) method as described by Summers et al. (1996) was
used to assess the chlorine demand and DBPfp of the raw water and the water that had been
treated with TiO2. Samples were buffered with a borate solution and adjusted to pH 8 with 1 N
HCl or 1 N NaOH, dosed with chlorine, and stored in the dark at 20oC for 24 hours, after which
61
the free chlorine residual was measured on a Hach DR 2700 according to the DPD Colorimetric
Method (Standard Method 4500-CI G). (APHA 2005). The trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids
formed during the UFC tests were extracted according to Standard Method 6232 B and Standard
Method 6251 B (APHA, 2005) and analyzed on a Agilent 7890B GC-ECD. Standard Method
6232 B and Standard Method 6251 B (APHA, 2005).
3.5.4 Other Analyses
pH was measured throughout this project using a Thermo Scientific Orion Star A111 equipped
with an Orion 9157BNMB pH/ATC probe. Alkalinity was determined using Standard Method
2320 (APHA, 2005).
Quality Control
Each batch of second or third generation LENs was tested before use to ensure that it was
consistent with previous batches using the methylene blue degradation test described in Section
3.1.2.5. Figures D.1 and D.2 in Appendix D show the percent decolourization of methylene blue
dye achieved by each batch of second and third generation LENs, respectively. Quality control
charts for TOC, five THMs, and nine HAAs are provided in Appendix D. TOC standards were
prepared at 3 mg/L and analyzed after each ten samples along with blank samples at the
beginning and end of the run. DBP blanks and 20 g/L check standards were analyzed after
every ten samples.
All water samples were gathered from the inlet of the WTPs ahead of chlorination and quickly
shipped to the DWRG. Upon arrival, the water samples were stored in a fridge. Raw and treated
samples (DOC, UV254, DBPs, etc.) were analyzed as quickly as possible and/or stored in a
fridge between preparation and analysis.
62
References
American Public Health Association (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 21st ed., Washington D.C., APHA
Bolton, J.R. and Linden, K.G. (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose)
determination in bench-scale UV experiments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129, 209-
215
Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (2013) Drinking Water Surveillance
Program, Accessed May 24, 2016: https://www.ontario.ca/data/drinking-water-surveillance-
program
Diemert, S. and Andrews, R.C. (2012) The impact of alum coagulation on pharmaceutically
active compounds, endocrine disrupting compounds, and natural organic matter, Water Science
and Technology: Water Supply, 13 (5), 1348-1357
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. (2014) Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, pp. 249-257
Gora, S. and Andrews, S. (2017) Adsorption of natural organic matter and disinfection byproduct
precursors from surface water onto TiO2 nanoparticles: pH effects, isotherm modelling and
implications for using TiO2 for drinking water treatment, Chemosphere, 174, 363-370
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. (1999) Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), pp. 1307-1311
Klinger, M. and Jäger, A. (2015) Crystallographic Tool Box (CrysTBox): automated tools for
transmission electron microscopists and crystallographers. Journal of Applied Crystallography
48 doi:10.1107/S1600576715017252.
Linden, K.G., Sharpless, C.M., Andrews, S.A., Atasi, K.Z., Korategere, V., Stefan, M., Mel
Suffet, I.H. (2004) Innovative UV Technologies to Oxidize Organic and Organoleptic
Chemicals. Awwa Research Foundation, Denver, CO, USA.
63
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. (2013) Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects, 434, pp 319-328
Mills, A. (2012), An overview of the methylene blue ISO test for assessing the activities of
photocatalytic films, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 128, pp. 144-149
Nemani, V., Taylor-Edmonds, L., Peleato, N.M., Andrews, R.C. (2016) Impact of operational
parameters on biofiltration performance: Organic carbon removal and effluent turbidity, Water
Science and Technology: Water Supply, 16 (6), 1683-1692, DOI: 10.2166/ws.2016.093
Qamar, M., Yoon, C.R., Oh, H.J., Lee, N.H., Park, K., Kim, D.H., Lee, K., Lee, W.J., and Kim,
S.J. 2008. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanotubes obtained from titanium dioxide,
Catalysis Today, 131, 3-14
Summers, R.S., Hooper, S.M., Shukairy, H.M., Solarik, G., and Owen, D. (1996) Assessing DBP
yield: Uniform formation conditions, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 88 (6),
pp. 80-93
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L (2004) Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 241, pp. 173-183
Zheng, Z., Liu, H., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Waclawik, E.R., and Zhu, H. (2010) Structure and
contribution to photocatalytic activity of the interfaces in nanofibers with mixed anatase and
TiO2(B) phases, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 316, 75-82
Zheng, D. (2015) Effects of coagulation on the removal of natural organic matter, genotoxicity,
and precursors to halogenated furanones, MASc Thesis, University of Toronto
64
Preliminary Experimental Findings and Concept Development
The project that was initially proposed in early 2013 was part of an NSERC Strategic Project
Grant built around a photocatalytic engineered TiO2 membrane. I was to investigate the
disinfection and fouling reduction abilities of this membrane, which was to be prepared by
researchers at the University of Waterloo. Unfortunately, their work was delayed numerous times
and they were unable to present us with useable membranes until late 2014. In the interim, I
began to develop a new concept and a new project based on the linear engineered nanomaterials
(LENs) that served as precursor materials for the membranes: LENs for the removal of natural
organic matter and disinfection byproduct precursors. The initial results of the experiments
conducted with the three original LENs (first generation LENs) were so promising that a
decision was made to abandon the membrane-based project in favour of the new project.
Preliminary experiments were conducted throughout 2014 to determine the effectiveness of TiO2
adsorption and photocatalysis for NOM removal and to refine the LEN synthesis method adapted
from Kasuga et al. (1999) and Yuan and Su (2004). The work presented in this chapter was, for
the most part, exploratory and not deemed fit for publication for a number of reasons, including
lack of novelty and insufficient replication. It did, however, inform the design and execution of
later experiments, and as such is still relevant to the project. Some of the avenues that were
explored early in the project may also be worth revisiting and eventually lead to interesting
research projects in their own right. Many of the results presented here were presented at various
conferences and symposia in 2014 and 2015.
65
Methods and Materials
4.1.1 Experimental Design
Experimental parameters were chosen after a review of the methods and findings of other
researchers. The light sources, TiO2 doses, irradiation times, and water matrices employed in six
studies focused on the removal of NOM and DBP precursors from surface water or synthetic
water matrices containing commercially available NOM isolates such as Suwannee River NOM
(SRNOM) via TiO2 photocatalysis are presented in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 Experimental conditions used in previous studies
Study Light Source TiO2 Dose(s) Irradiation Time(s) Water Matrices
Liu et al. (2008) UVA 0.1 g/L 0 min, 30 min, 60 min,
90 min, 120 min, 150
min, 180 min, 210 min,
240 min
Two Australian
surface water
sources
Liu et al. (2010) UVA 0.1 g/L 0 min, 30 min, 60 min,
90 min, 120 min, 150
min
Two Australian
surface water
sources
Gerrity et al. (2009) UV
(wavelengths
not specified)
0.1 g/L, 0.4
g/L, 1 g/L
Researchers measured
energy use by pilot scale
UV/TiO2 system instead
of time
Two Arizona
surface water
sources
Philippe et al.
(2010)
MP UV 1 g/L 0 min, 1 min, 5 min, 10
min
NOM surrogate
solutions
Huang et al. (2008) LP UV 0.1 g/L, 0.3
g/L, 0.5 g/L,
1.0 g/L
0 min, 20 min, 40 min,
60 min, 80 min, 100 min,
120 min
SRNOM
SRNOM + ions
Valencia et al.
(2013)
Simulated
Solar
0.6 g/L 0 min, 30 min, 60 min,
90 min, 120 min, 150
min, 180 min, 210 min,
240 min
Humic acid and
fulvic acid
isolates
66
Based on this literature review, the following experimental conditions were adopted for the
preliminary experiments:
Light sources: Simulated solar and high intensity UVA
TiO2 doses: 0.005 g/L to 1 g/L
Irradiation times: 0 to 60 minutes in increments of 5 or 15 minutes
Water sources: Synthetic river water (SRW, Linden et al., 2014), Lake Ontario water
(LO), and Otonabee River water (OTB)
In all cases, samples were independent of one another, that is, individual samples were prepared
and irradiated for different amounts of time instead of removing aliquots from one large sample
over the course of the experiment. The preparation of independent samples resulted in a more
statistically rigorous dataset and ensured that the height of water in all of the samples was equal
so that they were all exposed to the same dose of light.
4.1.2 Materials
All of the preliminary experiments were conducted in duplicate or triplicate in small batch
reactors mixed using stir bars and stir plates. The mixing rate was controlled to ensure that the
samples were fully mixed without any whirlpool effects, thus ensuring a flat water surface. The
batch reactors had an internal diameter of 6.5 cm and a height of 5 cm. All of the experiments
described in this chapter used 50 mL of sample, thus the height of water in the batch reactors was
1.5 cm. The external walls of the batch reactors were covered to prevent any loss of light.
P25 TiO2 nanoparticles from Evonik Degussa were used for all preliminary method development
experiments, as a precursor material for the LENs, and as a standard point of comparison in the
LENs experiments. Crystalline methylene blue dye and Acid Orange 24 (AO24) were purchased
from Sigma Aldrich. 1,000 mg/L stock solutions of each dye were prepared and stored until
required, at which point they were used to make 10 mg/L working solutions for the experiments.
Three water matrices were used for the preliminary experiments: SRW, LO, and OTB. The
characteristics of the SRW matrix are provided in Table 4.2. All parameters were measured in
67
the laboratory unless indicated. Additional water quality data for LO water and OTB water is
provided in Chapter 3.
Table 4.2 Summary of synthetic water quality
Parameter Units Synthetic
River Water
pH 8.21
Alkalinity mg as CaCO3/L 1171
Hardness mg as CaCO3/L 1141
DOC mg/L 2.9
UV254 0.043
SUVA 1.48
Chloride mg/L 40.02
Calcium mg/L 29.12
Magnesium mg/L 10.02
Sodium mg/L 36.22
Nitrate/Nitrite mg/L 0.672
Sulphate mg/L 55.02
1From: Sokolowski, 2014
2Calculated based on synthetic water recipe from Linden et al., 2014
4.1.3 Light Sources
The majority of the preliminary experiments presented in this chapter were conducted using
simulated solar light. High intensity UVA (“black”) light was used for a small subset of
experiments. The specifications of the two light sources are provided in Table 4.3.
The irradiance of the high intensity lamp was measured using a radiometer from International
Light (ILT1400) equipped with a UVA sensor with maximum sensitivity between 360 and 370
nm (XRL140B). The total irradiance of the portion of light in the 300 to 400 nm range provided
by the solar simulator was provided by a representative from the manufacturer (Sokolowski,
2014). The dose of light provided to each sample was calculated by multiplying the irradiance at
the surface of the sample by the time of exposure.
68
Table 4.3 Light sources used for preliminary photocatalysis experiments
Parameters Solar Simulator Blak-Ray High UVA Lamp
Manufacturer Photo Emission Tech UVP
Product ID SS150AAA B100-AP
Range 300 – 1000 nm n/a
Wavelength of Maximum
Intensity
n/a 365 nm
Average Irradiance 108 mW/cm2 overall
8.27 mW/cm2 UVA (300 – 399
nm)
21.7 mW/cm2 at 2 inches
8.9 mW/cm2 at 10 inches
12 mW/cm2 in experiment
Wattage 1,000 W 100 W
Voltage 220 V 115 V
4.1.4 LEN Synthesis
The three LENs used in the preliminary experiments were synthesized in the laboratory using a
hydrothermal method followed by calcination as described in Section 2.3.2 and Section 3.1. The
basic method was modified using information from a paper published by Yuan and Su in 2004 to
make nanotubes (NTs) and nanowires (NWs) in addition to the basic nanobelts (NBs). A
summary of the conditions used to synthesize the first generation of LENs used in this project is
provided in Table 4.4.
Table 4.4 Summary of synthesis parameters for first generation LENs
Parameter P25 NB NW NT
Precursors -- P25/NaOH P25/KOH P25/NaOH
Hydrothermal Temperature -- 190oC 190oC 130oC
Calcination Temperature -- 700oC 550oC 550oC
Notes Standard material
69
Results and Discussion
4.2.1 Effect of Time, TiO2 Dose, Water Type, and Light Source on NOM Adsorption and Degradation
Preliminary experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of time, TiO2 dose, water type,
and light source on the adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of NOM, measured as DOC
and UV254, by P25 nanoparticles. The results were generally comparable to those obtained by
other researchers.
4.2.1.1 Adsorption Time
Synthetic river water containing SRNOM was dosed with 0.005 g/L, 0.05 g/L, and 0.5 g/L of
P25 nanoparticles and mixed in the dark for times ranging from one to 30 minutes. The amount
of DOC remaining in the water after adsorption by different doses of TiO2 is presented in Figure
4.1.
Figure 4.1 DOC of synthetic water matrix after adsorption by different doses of P25
nanoparticles
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
DO
C (
mg/L
)
Adsorption Time (min)
0.005 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.5 g/L
70
The results indicate that the adsorption of DOC to the nanoparticles occurred quickly, likely in
less than one minute. Some researchers have also observed fast adsorption kinetics for NOM and
TiO2 (Ng et al., 2014) but others have reported small increases in overall adsorption over time
periods ranging from hours to days (Mwaanga et al., 2014; Erhayem and Sohn, 2014). The very
fast adsorption observed in this experiment was challenged by the findings of later experiments
(see Chapter 5 and Chapter 8), however, it was repeated for Lake Ontario water and Otonabee
River water in this set of experiments (data not shown) so later experiments proceeded with a
one minute adsorption period.
4.2.1.2 TiO2 Dose
The dose of TiO2 added to the water affected not only adsorption but also the extent and rate of
photocatalytic degradation. Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3 show the change in DOC and UV254 as a
function of time in synthetic water dosed with P25 nanoparticles and irradiated with simulated
solar light.
Figure 4.2 Change in DOC content of synthetic water treated different doses of P25
TiO2 nanoparticles and irradiated by simulated solar light
As was observed in the initial adsorption experiment, adsorption increased as a function of TiO2
dose, ranging from approximately 20% at 0.005 g/L of TiO2 to nearly 80% at 0.5 g/L of TiO2.
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ch
an
ge
in D
OC
Irradiation Time (min)
0.005 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.1 g/L 0.2 g/L 0.5 g/L
71
Note that adsorption of NOM to TiO2 occurs both before irradiation (dark adsorption) and
dynamically during photocatalysis. In this project, the term adsorption almost always refers to
dark adsorption. One of the most interesting findings of this set of experiments was the repeated
observation of an initial increase in overall DOC upon irradiation of the sample. This slight
increase has been observed by others (Huang et al., 2008; Gerrity et al., 2009), who attributed to
the desorption of intermediate compounds following the degradation of the molecules originally
adsorbed to the TiO2 surface. Another possible explanation is the light induced desorption of
adsorbed NOM molecules upon irradiation of the samples. The photoactivation of TiO2 has
profound effects on its surface characteristics, including its hydrophobicity. Watanabe et al.
(1999) demonstrated that both anatase and rutile forms of TiO2 become more hydrophilic upon
irradiation with UVA light. The change in hydrophilicity began immediately upon irradiation but
proceeded gradually over the course of an hour, but even this initial change may have induced
some highly hydrophobic NOM molecules to desorb from the TiO2 surface.
After 60 minutes, overall DOC removal ranged from approximately 10% at 0.005 g/L TiO2, 40%
at TiO2 concentrations ranging from 0.05 g/L to 0.2 g/L, and 60% at 0.5 g/L TiO2. This is
comparable to results obtained by Huang et al. (2008) with SRNOM and by Liu in their 2008
study with an unidentified water source but below what they achieved in their later studies (Liu
et al., 2010a; Liu et al., 2010b). It should be noted that any decrease in DOC observed after
adsorption represents full mineralization of NOM.
A similar pattern was apparent when UV254 was used as the response parameter. The apparent
increase in UV254 may be related to TiO2 passage through the filter, which would result in the
presence of nanoparticulates that might interfere with absorption measurements. This is more
likely to occur in water matrices that promote nanoparticle stability/disaggregation as described
in Table B.1 in Appendix B.
72
Figure 4.3 Change in the UV254 of synthetic river water treated with different doses of
P25 TiO2 nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
UV254 was removed more quickly and more completely than DOC, particularly at higher
concentrations of TiO2. Liu et al. (2010a) and others have shown that P25 nanoparticles have an
affinity for large aromatic NOM molecules and are more likely to degrade them than smaller,
more hydrophilic NOM compounds. Additionally, UV254 is “removed” when the aromatic
structures in the molecules are broken but before full mineralization (which may include many
steps) is complete, so it is not surprising that it decreased more quickly than DOC. As with DOC,
there was a slight increase in UV254 at short irradiation times followed by a gradual decrease.
The initial increase may be related to the release of aromatic intermediates after photocatalytic
oxidation of the original adsorbed molecules or due to the desorption of these adsorbed
molecules due to changes in the hydrophilicity of the TiO2 surface upon irradiation.
When the effects of initial dark adsorption and light induced desorption were excluded from the
analysis, the DOC and UV254 degradation results of the experiments conducted with TiO2 doses
above 0.05 g/L were a good fit to a pseudo-first order degradation model. The model parameters
as well as the inflection point at which degradation became the dominant phenomenon are
summarized in Table 4.5.
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ch
an
ge
in U
V2
54
Irradiation Time (min)
0.005 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.1 g/L 0.2 g/L 0.5 g/L
73
Table 4.5 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and fits for DOC and UV254
removal from synthetic river water by different doses of TiO2 P25
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
TiO2 Dose DOC UV254
k (min-1) R2 Inflection (min) n k (min-1) R2 Inflection (min) n
0.005 g/L n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0.05 g/L -0.0082 0.95 15 6 -0.0263 0.98 10 8
0.1 g/L -0.0073 0.97 15 6 -0.0319 0.99 0.5 16
0.2 g/L -0.0079 0.97 15 6 -0.0337 0.97 0.5 16
0.5 g/L -0.0107 0.78 10 8 -0.0339 0.97 5 8
The DOC degradation rate constants were comparable to those reported by Huang et al. (2008),
who used a low pressure UV lamp for irradiation, and Valencia et al. (2013) who used simulated
solar light. Increasing the TiO2 dose from 0.05 g/L to 0.2 g/L had no appreciable effect on k but
increasing it further to 0.5 g/L resulted in a higher rate of DOC removal, though in this case the
data was a poorer fit to the pseudo-first order model than at lower TiO2 doses. In contrast, the
UV254 degradation rate constant increased with TiO2 dose until 0.2 g/L, at which point it
became steady. The UV254 rate constants obtained in this study were higher than those achieved
by Valencia et al., who used HA and FA isolates rather than SRNOM for their experiments. It
may be that SRNOM is more amenable to degradation than the HA and FA isolates prepared by
Valencia et al. or, alternatively, that some other property of the synthetic water matrix promoted
more effective degradation of aromatic NOM.
Overall, the results of this experiment suggest that increasing the dose of TiO2 has a strong effect
on adsorption but less of an effect on degradation rate, particularly above 0.2 g/L. These findings
influenced the choice of TiO2 doses used in the subsequent experiments as well as those used in
the experiments detailed in chapters 5 to 8.
4.2.1.3 Water Type
Real water matrices are impacted by numerous natural and anthropogenic inputs and subject to
seasonal variations, and as such, are more complex than the synthetic water matrices that are
74
used in many laboratory experiments. This can result in confusion and disappointment when a
promising technology is less effective in real water than was originally suggested by experiments
conducted with NOM isolates or surrogate compounds. There are, of course, good reasons to use
synthetic water matrices, including greater control over raw water composition and consistency
and the ability to vary the levels of different matrix components to isolate their effects on the
treatment.
In the case of TiO2 photocatalysis, many researchers including those that have been cited in
earlier sections have explored its effects on NOM isolates (e.g. SRNOM) and NOM surrogates
such as amino acids, carbohydrates, and phenolic compounds. Studies by Liu et al. (2008, 2010a,
2010b) and other members of the Amal research group at the University of New South Wales are
some of the few to employ real water matrices, and their findings suggest that water matrix
components can have strong and conflicting effects on NOM adsorption and degradation by
TiO2. Two water matrices, Lake Ontario water and Otonabee River water, were employed in the
preliminary stages of this project to explore the effectiveness of TiO2 adsorption and
photocatalysis on NOM in real water.
Figure 4.4 shows the effects of adsorption and degradation on the DOC content of Lake Ontario
water. As was observed with the synthetic water, higher TiO2 doses removed more DOC from
the water via adsorption than lower TiO2 doses. Irradiation had little effect on overall DOC
content but did remove 52% of the UV254 in the water at a TiO2 dose of 0.05 g/L and 66% at a
TiO2 dose of 0.5 g/L after 60 minutes of irradiation. It seems likely that photocatalytic
degradation of NOM simply occurred more slowly in the Lake Ontario water than it did in the
synthetic water. The two water matrices contained similar levels of bicarbonate (alkalinity) and
chloride, which are known ROS scavengers (Liao et al., 2001), so overall scavenging potential is
unlikely to explain the discrepancy. Instead, it seems that photocatalytic degradation of NOM
occurred more slowly in the Lake Ontario water than in the synthetic water due to the character
of the NOM present in each matrix. The UV254 absorbance of the synthetic water was nearly
twice that of the Lake Ontario water and SRNOM is known to be highly aromatic. Liu et al.
(2008) showed that aromatic NOM is preferentially degraded by TiO2 photocatalysis.
75
Figure 4.4 Removal of DOC from Lake Ontario water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
Figure 4.5 Removal of UV254 from Lake Ontario water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ch
an
ge
in D
OC
Irradiation Time (min)
0.005 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.5 g/L
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ch
an
ge
in D
OC
Irradiation Time (min)
0.005 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.5 g/L
76
The Lake Ontario DOC data did not fit a pseudo-first order decay model because of the strong
influence of adsorption before irradiation and desorption (likely of intermediate products) upon
irradiation. The UV254 data (Figure 4.5) was a reasonable fit to the pseudo-first order decay
model at higher TiO2 doses (R2 = 0.83-0.86). The reaction rate constant at 0.05 g/L was 0.0051
min-1, which is only slightly lower than that at 0.5 g/L (0.0056 min-1), suggesting that increased
TiO2 dose did not have a strong effect on reaction rate within this dose range and in this water
matrix.
NOM degradation tests were also conducted using water from the Otonabee River, which
supplies the drinking water treatment plant in Peterborough, Ontario. Graphs depicting the
effects of irradiation on DOC and UV254 are provided in Figure 4.6 and Figure 4.7 below.
Figure 4.6 Removal of DOC from Otonabee River water by different doses of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
As was observed in the tests conducted with synthetic water and Lake Ontario water, an increase
in the TiO2 dose resulted in increased adsorption of DOC from the Otonabee River water. The
extent of adsorption observed at each dose was lower than in the synthetic water experiments.
This may be due to the intrinsic properties of the NOM compounds present in each water matrix
or due to interference by ions or other components of the Otonabee River water matrix. For
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DO
C C
han
ge
Irradiation Time (min)
0.01 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.1 g/L 0.5 g/L
77
example, as presented in Table B.1 in Appendix B, inorganic ions and metals can compete with
NOM for adsorption sites on the TiO2 surface. Some of these compounds were not present in the
synthetic water matrix but were present in the two real water matrices.
The DOC content of the samples exposed to simulated solar light indicates that NOM was
gradually mineralized over time when the TiO2 dose was at and above 0.05 g/L. At a dose of
0.01 g/L, DOC actually increased upon irradiation, suggesting that smaller, more easily detected
organic compounds were being formed during the initial stages of treatment. This supports the
hypothesis that intermediate products, rather than unreacted parent compounds, desorbed from
the TiO2 surface after irradiation. The rate and extent of DOC degradation was once again less
than that observed with the synthetic water, likely due to the presence of interferents and the
characteristics of the NOM in each water source.
Figure 4.7 Removal of UV254 from Otonabee River water by different doses of P25
TiO2 nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
The effect of TiO2 dose was more straightforward when UV254 was used as the response
parameter. As shown in Figure 4.6, at 0.5 g/L, the P25 nanoparticles were able to remove
approximately 40% of the UV254 in the raw water through adsorption alone and nearly 80%
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ch
an
ge
in U
V254
Irradiation Time (min)
0.01 g/L 0.05 g/L 0.1 g/L 0.5 g/L
78
after 60 minutes of simulated solar irradiation. Little or no UV254 removal occurred via
adsorption at lower TiO2 doses but removal did occur upon irradiation.
As shown in Table 4.6, the rates of both DOC and UV254 removal increased steadily with
increasing TiO2 dose. The degradation rate constants obtained in the Otonabee River water
experiments were well below those from the synthetic water experiments but compared
favourably with those reported by Valencia et al. (2013) for fulvic and humic acid isolates. The
Otonabee River UV254 degradation rate constants were within the same range as those from the
Lake Ontario experiments.
Table 4.6 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and fits for DOC and UV254
removal from Otonabee River water by different doses of TiO2 P25
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light
TiO2 Dose DOC UV254
k (min-1) R2 n k (min-1) R2 n
0.01 g/L 0.0006 0.84 10 -0.0025 0.96 10
0.05 g/L -0.0006 0.57 10 -0.0042 0.97 10
0.1 g/L -0.0010 0.80 10 -0.0059 0.99 10
0.5 g/L -0.0020 0.93 8 -0.0072 0.99 8
The findings of these experiments clearly indicate that the removal of NOM by P25
nanoparticles via both adsorption and photocatalysis was strongly impacted by the composition
of the water matrix. Any new TiO2-based treatment system must be able to operate in real water
matrices, and the results presented here suggest that experiments conducted solely with synthetic
water and/or SRNOM would not adequately predict the effectiveness of either adsorption or
photocatalysis in a real drinking water treatment system.
79
4.2.1.4 Light Source
TiO2 can be photoactivated by any light source that provides irradiation at wavelengths at or
below 385 nm, but in practice, the majority of the studies exploring the use of TiO2
photocatalysis for drinking water treatment have relied on high intensity UVA or germicidal UV
lamps to provide the irradiation required to activate the photocatalyst. Throughout the initial
stages of this project, experiments were conducted using both simulated solar light and UVA
light. The original idea was to eventually compare the effectiveness of the two light sources in
terms of their ability to activate pure TiO2 materials as well as modified TiO2 materials prepared
by our partners at the University of Waterloo, which were designed to take advantage of
wavelengths above 385 nm. Eventually, the project evolved such that a UVA LED light source
was the preferred option, but the results of these early experiments are nonetheless interesting
and may point the way towards areas of future study. Figure 4.8 shows the degradation of DOC
and UV254 as a function of time and light source while Figure 4.9 shows the same data plotted
as a function of UVA light dose. Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and model fits based
on time and light dose are provided in Table 4.6. All experiments were conducted with Otonabee
River water dosed with 0.15 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles.
When the data was plotted as a function of time NOM degradation was more effective under
UVA light than simulated solar light. Under the experimental conditions employed in these
experiments, the UVA lamp provided approximately 12 mW/cm2 of UVA light with a maximum
irradiance at 365 nm whereas the solar simulator provided 8.27 mW/cm2 of light between 300
nm and 400 nm. This discrepancy almost certainly explains why more NOM was removed in the
UVA/TiO2 experiments than in the solar/TiO2 experiments.
80
Figure 4.8 Removal of NOM from Otonabee River water by 0.15 g/L of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light or high intensity UVA light
as a function of irradiation time
When the data was instead plotted as a function of UVA dose, the two systems performed
similarly in terms of UV254 removal but UVA/TiO2 was more effective than solar/TiO2 for
DOC degradation. It may be that the simulated solar light, which included wavelengths ranging
from 300 nm to 1,100 nm, was able to photodegrade some portion of the aromatic structures in
the NOM compounds on its own (Winter et al. 2007) or through photo-assisted chemical
reactions with matrix components such as iron (Wu et al., 2005), leading to a reduction of
UV254 but not of DOC. Alternatively or additionally, the 8.27 mW/cm2 irradiance estimate cited
by Sokolowski (2014) includes all wavelengths between 300 nm and 400 nm, but TiO2 is only
activated by wavelengths below 385 nm, so the actual useable irradiance provided by the solar
simulator may have been below 8.27 mW/cm2.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
NO
M R
emo
va
l
Irradiation Time (min)
DOC - UVA DOC - Solar UV254 - UVA UV254 - Solar
81
Figure 4.9 Removal of NOM from Otonabee River water by 0.15 g/L of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles irradiated by simulated solar light and high intensity UVA
light as a function of UVA dose
The pseudo-first order rate constants shown in Table 4.7 confirm that DOC reduction proceeded
more quickly under high intensity UVA light than under simulated solar light. The degradation
rate constants for UV254 removal were essentially equal under both light sources when
degradation was evaluated as a function of time but solar/TiO2 came out ahead when degradation
was evaluated as a function of UVA dose.
Table 4.7 Pseudo-first order reaction rate constants and fits for DOC and UV254
removal from synthetic water by 0.15 g/L of TiO2 P25 nanoparticles
irradiated by simulated solar light or high intensity UVA light
DOC UV254
Time k (min-1) R2 n k (min-1) R2 n
Solar -0.0010 0.93 8 -0.0059 0.99 8
UVA -0.0030 0.93 10 -0.0062 0.96 10
UVA Dose k (cm2/mJ) R2 n k (cm2/mJ) R2
Solar -0.0020 0.93 8 -0.0119 0.99 8
UVA -0.0041 0.93 10 -0.0086 0.96 10
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100
NO
M R
emo
va
l
UVA Dose (mJ/cm2)
DOC - UVA DOC - Solar UV254 - UVA UV254 - Solar
82
4.2.1.5 Summary of Findings
The main findings of the preliminary NOM adsorption and photocatalytic degradation
experiments can be summarized as follows:
TiO2 dose affected both NOM adsorption and NOM degradation
Adsorption was highly effective for NOM removal from the synthetic river water but less
so in the real water matrices
NOM was degraded more slowly in the two real water matrices than in the synthetic
water matrix
The rate of UV254 removal was higher in OTB water than LO water
High intensity UVA light was more effective for DOC degradation than simulated solar
light even after the irradiance of each lamp was taken into account
Simulated solar irradiation was more effective than high intensity UVA light for UV254
reduction
4.2.2 Solar Photocatalysis with LENs for NOM Removal
The decision to explore the use of LENs for NOM removal came about gradually. At first, it was
simply an effort to characterize the precursor materials of the TiO2 membranes being prepared at
the University of Waterloo. The initial success of the materials in terms of NOM and dye
removal was promising, but it was an observation made in the summer of 2014 that finally
convinced me to commit to pursuing the LENs as a water treatment option in their own right.
The summer students at that time were responsible for preparing the treated samples for analysis
by filtering them through a 0.45 micron PES filter. They complained to me that the samples
containing P25 took a much longer time to filter than those containing nanobelts (NB), which
were the first LENs I learned to synthesize. Later, we observed that the NBs also settled out of
the water more readily than P25. These early observations suggested that the LENs might be a
good alternative to P25 because they were easy to remove from the water – a perennial challenge
for photocatalysis researchers.
83
4.2.2.1 Synthesis and Characterization of LENs
Three LENs were synthesized, characterized, and compared to standard P25 nanoparticles in
terms of their ability to degrade NOM through photocatalysis. Of the four materials prepared and
tested, only the NBs were easy to photograph using the SEM in Earth Sciences. These
photographs, shown in Figure 4.10 suggest that the NBs are less than 250 nm (0.25 m) in
diameter and 2000 to 5000 nm (2 to 5 m) in length.
Figure 4.10 SEM images of nanobelts (NBs)
Yuan and Su used high resolution TEM to obtain images of their materials. They determined that
the NTs and NWs were approximately 5 to 10 nm (0.005 to 0.010 m) in diameter and over a
micron in length. Unfortunately, the SEM that we had access to did not have high enough
resolution to accurately characterize such small materials, but the pictures I did get weren’t a
total failure, as demonstrated in Figure 4.11. Both pictures show evidence of some longer
nanostructures and the surfaces of the NW and NT agglomerates are wavy and fibrous-seeming,
suggesting that they are made up of many long, skinny linear units.
84
Figure 4.11 SEM images of nanowires (NW) and nanotubes (NT)
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the crystal structure of the TiO2 in each of the
first generation LENs (Figure 4.12). It is well-established that anatase is the most
photocatalytically active TiO2 crystal structure (Luttrell et al., 2014) and that P25 NPs are made
up of approximately 75% anatase and 25% rutile (Bickley et al., 1991; Ohtani et al., 2010).
The NBs and NTs were predominantly made up of the anatase fraction, though the wider peaks
found in the NT spectra suggest that these also contained other TiO2 structures. Findings
presented in Chapter 6, which were obtained using a more complex crystal analysis method
(HRTEM and SAED), suggest that the NTs likely contained both anatase and TiO2(B), a less
photocatalytically active form of TiO2. The chromatogram for the NWs was similar to that of the
NTs but also contains peaks not found in the other two chromatograms. These peaks were not
indexed by the XRD instrument available in Earth Sciences, however, the peak just before 2θ =
30 corresponds to peaks that have been alternately identified as rutile, TiO2(B), K2Ti18O17, or
K2Ti6O13 (Yuan and Su, 2004; Zheng et al., 2010). Thus, although the NWs did contain anatase
and, quite likely TiO2(B), they also contained other as of yet unidentified TiO2 crystal structures.
85
Figure 4.12 XRD results for (a) nanobelts (NB), (b) nanowires (NW), and (c) nanotubes
(NT)
4.2.2.2 NOM Removal via Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation
The three LENs were compared to P25 in terms of their ability to remove DOC and UV254. The
differences in NOM removal ability between the different nanomaterials were often difficult to
explain with the small amount of information available at this stage of the project, so many of the
hypotheses presented here are speculative and informed by my later work, which is presented in
chapters 5 to 8 of this document.
Table 4.8 presents the percent removal of DOC from Otonabee River water achieved by 0.1 g/L
of each nanomaterial via adsorption and after 60 minutes of irradiation with simulated solar light.
P25 removed approximately 11% of the total DOC in the water via adsorption and approximately
22% after 60 minutes of irradiation. This is in line with the findings presented earlier in this
chapter (e.g. Figure 4.6) and in later chapters. The NBs removed very little DOC via adsorption
and approximately 11% after irradiation. The NB dataset was a particularly good fit to the
pseudo-first order degradation model, suggesting that photocatalytic degradation was the primary
mechanism of NOM removal for this material. This fits with the finding that the NBs contained
primarily anatase, the most photoactive form of TiO2. The NBs were also much larger than any
86
of the other nanomaterials, which means that they have less overall surface area available for
adsorption. This likely explains why they adsorbed so little DOC compared to the other three
materials.
Table 4.8 Summary of percent removal and kinetic parameters - DOC
Nanomaterial Adsorption Only Irradiation (60 min) k (min-1) R2
P25 11 ± 4 % 22 ± 3 % 0.0011 0.83
NB 3 ± 0 % 11 ± 1 % 0.0005 0.94
NW 16 ± 1 % 25 ± 2 % 0.0010 0.87
NT 16 ± 2 % 19 ± 2 % 0.0002 0.41
The NTs removed 16% of the overall DOC via adsorption and only slightly more than that after
60 minutes of irradiation. The low k value obtained for NTs as well as the poor fit of the pseudo-
first order model to the NT DOC removal dataset relative to those of the other materials suggest
that adsorption, rather than irradiation, was the main force driving NOM removal by this
material. The assumed small size of the NTs relative to larger materials such as the NBs may
have resulted in a higher overall surface area in the former case and thus more available
adsorption sites. The poor degradation observed for the NTs may be a function of their crystal
structure – TiO2(B) is known to be less photocatalytically active than anatase and the NTs likely
contained more TiO2(B) than the P25 nanoparticles and NBs. Other materials such as P25 and
NW were effective for both adsorption and degradation.
The UV254 show a similar pattern in terms of adsorption: The NW and NT, both of which likely
had relatively high available surface areas, were the most effective for NOM adsorption and the
NBs were the least effective. In fact, the NBs actually increased the UV254 signal of the sample
after dark adsorption, although this is quite likely due to passage of the material through the 0.45
m filter during sample preparation. This is somewhat counter-intuitive – if the NBs were in fact
the largest of the nanomaterials, they should also have been the least likely to pass through the
filter. In fact, however, most nanomaterials exist as agglomerates in solution, and the size of the
agglomerates depends on the geometry of the nanomaterials (Zhou et al., 2013) as well as their
charge characteristics and the properties of the water matrix (Hotze et al., 2010). These
phenomena, which are discussed in greater detail later in later chapters, may have driven the P25,
NT, and NW materials to form larger agglomerates than those formed by the NBs under similar
conditions. It should also be noted that later iterations of the NB material (see Chapter 7 and
87
Chapter 8) were modified such that they were much less likely to pass through the filters used for
sample preparation.
P25 and NT were the most effective for UV254 removal via photocatalytic degradation as
demonstrated by their higher percent removal after 60 minutes as well as their higher k values
relative to the other two materials (Table 4.9). All four datasets conformed very well to the
pseudo-first order degradation model. It is worth keeping in mind that a reduction in UV254
represents the oxidation of aromatic structures within the NOM molecules rather than their full
mineralization.
Table 4.9 Summary of percent removal and kinetic parameters – UV254
Material Adsorption Only Irradiation (60 min) k (min-1) R2
P25 11 ± 5 % 61 ± 2 % 0.0059 0.99
NB -10 ± 1 %1 43 ± 1 % 0.0045 0.97
NW 14 ± 0 % 48 ± 1 % 0.0036 0.99
NT 13 ± 1 % 63 ± 1 % 0.0062 0.99
1Negative percent removal due to TiO2 passage and subsequent interference in UV-Vis measurement
Some materials, due to either morphology, photoactivity, or other surface characteristics, appear
to have had a particular preference for degrading aromatic NOM (as measured by UV254) over
other types of NOM. The NTs were the most obvious example of this: They had the lowest
reaction rate constant for DOC degradation but the highest one for UV254 reduction. Others,
such as the NWs, showed less preference for aromatic NOM. The reasons for these phenomena
were not explored in detail when the experiments were being conducted or later in the project,
but might make for an interesting side project or MASc project in the future.
The effects of TiO2 adsorption and photocatalysis on NOM quantity and character were further
explored using LC-OCD. The data presented in Figure 4.13 and Figure 4.14 below was obtained
during experiments conducted with Otonabee River water dosed with 0.1 g/L of P25, NBs, NWs,
or NTs and irradiated with simulated solar light.
88
Figure 4.13 Distribution of NOM fractions in Otonabee River water samples dosed with
0.1 g/L of P25, NB, NW, or NT and mixed in the dark for 1 minute
At first glance, it appears that all four nanomaterials were capable of removing at least some
small part of the total concentration of NOM in the raw water through adsorption. P25 and NWs
appear to have been the most effective overall. The biopolymer and humic substances fractions
are the only ones that appear to have been adsorbed to any great degree.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Control P25 NB NW NT
DO
C (
mg
/L)
LMW Neutrals
LMW Acids
Building Blocks
Humics
Biopolymers
89
Figure 4.14 Effect of 60 minutes of photocatalysis with four LENs irradiated with
simulated solar light on the distribution of NOM fractions in the sample
The P25 nanoparticles removed NOM through both adsorption and photocatalytic degradation.
Adsorption predominantly affected the biopolymers and humic substances fractions. Degradation
appears to have targeted these fractions along with the building blocks fraction. The only fraction
to increase after irradiation was the LMW acid fraction, suggesting that some of the NOM
compounds from the other fractions were degraded to form LMW acids. Some were also,
presumably, mineralized, resulting in an overall decrease in the concentration of DOC in the
water.
Reductions in total DOC and individual fractions were more modest when NBs were used as the
photocatalyst. Very little NOM appears to have been removed through adsorption alone.
Photocatalytic degradation did reduce the biopolymers and humic substances fractions and
increased the size of the building blocks fraction. There was some overall DOC reduction after
60 minutes, suggesting that at least some NOM was mineralized.
Unlike the NBs, the NWs were quite adept at adsorbing NOM, though this was mostly limited to
the biopolymers and humic substances fractions. Interestingly, upon irradiation there was no
change in the concentration of these two fractions, but the building blocks fraction was
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Control P25 NB NW NT
DO
C (
mg
/L)
LMW Neutrals
LMW Acids
Building Blocks
Humics
Biopolymers
90
decreased, suggesting that the NOM compounds in this fraction were targeted by photocatalytic
degradation by NWs.
Like the other nanomaterials, the NTs predominantly adsorbed compounds from the biopolymers
and humic substances fractions. After 60 minutes of irradiation the humic substances fraction
decreased while the building blocks, LMW acids, and LWM neutrals fractions all increased. This
suggests that, unlike the other nanomaterials, the NTs create a wide spectrum of intermediate
compounds.
The overall DOC reductions achieved by the various nanomaterials were not impressive. It
should be noted that the DOC values obtained through the LC-OCD analysis were not exactly
the same as those obtained using the DWRG TOC analyzer because the former represent the sum
of the five individual fractions while the latter included all organic matter present in the sample.
No matter what, however, the results indicate that P25 and NTs were the most effective for the
overall reduction of DOC.
Different nanomaterials appear to have had different adsorption affinities for biopolymers and
humic substances. For example, P25 adsorbed approximately 50% of the biopolymers and 20%
of the humic substances in the water whereas the NBs adsorbed only 15% of the biopolymers
and 5% of the humic substances. The NWs were particularly adept at adsorbing biopolymers
(~65%) but less so at adsorbing humic substances (~18%). The NTs adsorbed approximately
45% of the biopolymers and 15% of the humic substances. These differences may be explained
by differences in available surface area but may also be related to differences in charge.
The nanomaterials also varied in their ability to degrade different NOM fractions. The best
reduction of biopolymers after 60 minutes of solar irradiation (85%) was achieved by P25. The
next best materials for biopolymer reduction was the NBs (surprising given the lack of
adsorption) at approximately 70%. The NTs reduced the biopolymer fraction by a respectable
60% after 60 minutes of irradiation. It is difficult to tell how well the nanowires worked because
of the large discrepancy between the two replicate samples.
The results seem to suggest that some LENs worked mainly through adsorption (NWs) while
others worked mainly through photocatalysis (NBs). This was fraction dependent. The results
also suggest that different nanomaterials produce different intermediates during degradation or,
91
alternatively, the different nanomaterials simply work at different rates and with different
contributions from adsorption and photocatalytic degradation.
4.2.2.3 Summary of Findings
The results of the experiments conducted with the first generation LENs can be summarized as
follows:
LENs synthesized at 190oC were larger than those synthesized at 130oC
LENs calcined at 550oC adsorbed NOM more effectively than NBs calcined at 700oC
The DOC, UV254, and LC-OCD results indicate that all of the materials showed a
marked preference for humic substances and other aromatic NOM compounds
4.2.3 LENs for Dye Removal
Indicator dyes, in particular methylene blue dye, are widely used to quickly evaluate the
photocatalytic properties of novel nanomaterials. In these experiments, centrifugation (10,000
rpm for 30 minutes) was used to remove the nanomaterials from the treated solution instead of
filtration because the PES lab filters were found to adsorb some 10% of the overall methylene
blue dye present in solution. Centrifugation was not as effective at removing the materials
because of the propensity of the materials to become resuspended as the dye solution was
decanted out of the centrifugation tubes, which may account for the higher standard deviations
observed among the replicates.
The results of methylene blue degradation tests conducted with P25 nanoparticles and the three
LENs are provided in Figure 4.15. Methylene blue has a pKa of 3.8 and the dye solution had a
pH 5.6 ± 0.2, so the molecules should have had a slightly negative charge. At this pH, the P25
nanoparticles, which have an IEP between 6 and 6.5 would be expected to be electrostatically
neutral or slightly positively charged. It is surprising then that there was no appreciable
adsorption of methylene blue to the surface of the P25 nanoparticles. In this case it seems likely
that factors other than charge interactions predominated in the adsorption (or rather, lack of
adsorption) of methylene blue to P25. The NBs and NTs were also unable to adsorb any
methylene blue dye, but the NWs adsorbed nearly 20%. Whether this was related to charge
effects, surface area, or crystal structure was unclear because these parameters were never
92
definitively elucidated for this material. Other researchers (Xiong et al., 2010) have also
managed to synthesize LENs that adsorb methylene blue dye using a hydrothermal method
similar, but not identical, to that used to synthesize the NWs. Their LENs were multiwalled tubes
with diameters of approximately 10 nm. Based on the XRD pattern of their LENs, which was
similar but not identical to that obtained in this study for the NWs, they hypothesized that they
contained predominantly titanate, a TiO2 structure with limited photocatalytic ability.
P25 and the NBs were the most effective of the four nanomaterials at decolourizing methylene
blue dye. P25’s small size results in a high available surface area, which may explain its superior
degradation behaviour. Despite its lower overall available surface area, NB was also highly
effective, likely because it contained only anatase, which is particularly photoactive. The other
two materials, which contained unidentified non-anatase/non-rutile TiO2 structures, were less
effective for methylene blue decolourization.
Figure 4.15 Adsorption and decolourization of methylene blue dye by 0.1 g/L of P25
nanoparticles or one of three LENs after 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of
irradiation with simulated solar light
Acid orange dyes, a subset of azo dyes, contain the azo structure (R-N≡N-R’) and have pKa
values ranging from 9 to 11 (Pérez-Urquiza and Beltrán, 2001). This results in charge
characteristics very different from those of methylene blue dye. AO24 is a sulfonated diazo dye
that is used in the textile industry and is highly recalcitrant to treatment (Chacón et al., 2005). It
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
P25 NB NW NT
Met
hyle
ne
Blu
e D
ecolo
uri
zati
on
0 min 15 min
93
has previously been used to evaluate the effectiveness of solar photocatalytic disinfection
systems (Bandala et al., 2011). In this project, AO24 was selected mainly because it had been
used in previous photocatalytic experiments at the DWRG. The results of adsorption and
photocatalytic degradation tests conducted with P25 nanoparticles and the three LENs and AO24
dye are presented in Figure 4.16.
Figure 4.16 Adsorption and decolourization of AO24 by 0.1 g/L of P25 nanoparticles or
one of three LENs after 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of irradiation with
simulated solar light
One notable finding was that P25 nanoparticles adsorbed more AO24 than they did methylene
blue. Once again, however, this was not easily explained by charge interactions. The AO24 test
solution had an average pH of 6.0 ± 0.3, and at this pH the nanoparticles were neither positively
or negatively charged. None of the LENs adsorbed AO24 in these experiments, though later
generations of LENs did adsorb it effectively (see Chapter 8).
AO24 was more amenable to photocatalytic degradation by all four materials than methylene
blue was. After only 15 minutes of irradiation P25 was able to break down nearly 100% of the
AO24 in solution. The LENs lagged behind P25 but only slightly. Light only control samples
irradiated for 60 minutes did not show evidence of photodecolourization.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
P25 NB NW NT
AO
24
Dec
olo
uriz
ati
on
0 min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min
94
Summary, Conclusions, and Implications for Future Experiments
4.3.1 Light Source
A decision was made in early 2015 to switch from using simulated solar irradiation to UVA
irradiation. The reasoning underlying this decision was based in part on the preliminary results
presented in Section 4.2.1.4 and in part on the literature review and analysis that took place
during my comprehensive exam. A summary of the characteristics, advantages, and
disadvantages of various UVA light options is presented in Table 4.10.
Table 4.10 Summary of characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of UVA light
sources
Parameter Solar UVA Lamp Germicidal UV UVA LEDs
Light Source Sun UVA lamp LP or MP UV lamps UVA LEDs
Light Intensity (UVA) Max 30 W/m2
(3 mW/cm2)
Variable Variable Variable
Wavelengths 300 – 1100 nm 365 nm LP: 254 nm
MP: Polychromatic
365 nm
Light Intensity Control Passive Active Active Active
Location Outdoor Indoor Indoor Indoor
Energy Requirements Low High High Low
Lamp Cost None Moderate High Low
Reactor Configuration High surface
area / flow
High surface
area / flow
Tubular Flexible
Concurrent
disinfection
Some (SODIS) No Yes No
By definition, solar/TiO2 processes are designed to operate outdoors or, at the very least in view
of the sun. Although this means that they are at the mercy of global tilt and weather conditions, it
also means that small-scale solar/TiO2 systems can be installed in areas where the construction of
a full-scale building is not feasible. The dependence of solar/TiO2 systems on direct access to
solar light can complicate system operation and design in other ways, however. Most
importantly, even in sunny locations full sun conditions occur for only part of the day. The use of
CPC light collectors can extend this to some degree (Malato et al., 2009) but nightfall is
inevitable and will bring system operation to a halt. This limited operating window means that
95
the daily water demand of the plant must be satisfied over the course of only a few hours. This
translates to high flows through the plant and correspondingly large associated unit processes
able to provide adequate treatment for such high flows. UV/TiO2 processes, by contrast, are
operated indoors. This greatly increases the operational flexibility and allows for the design of
smaller equipment because it can be operated non-stop and in all weather conditions. This, in
theory, makes UV/TiO2 easier to incorporate into existing water treatment trains designed to
provide the daily water demand over an 18 or 24 hour operating cycle.
The vast majority of TiO2 photocatalysis studies make use of high intensity UVA lamps, usually
with a maximum irradiance at 365 nm. These lamps are widely available, emit light in the
required range and come in a variety of configurations, making it easy to adapt them to bench-
scale apparatus. Unlike solar light, they do not provide substantial concurrent disinfection.
Although UVA light is the most common option for TiO2 photocatalysis, the photocatalyst can
be activated by all wavelengths below 385 nm. This means that the low pressure (LP) and
medium pressure (MP) UV lamps commonly used for drinking water disinfection are able to
activate the photocatalyst. These lamps require substantial energy input and can only be used in a
limited number of configurations, however, they can potentially provide concurrent disinfection.
UVA light emitting diodes (LEDs) are an attractive alternative to the other light sources
presented here. They are inexpensive, long lasting, and are less energy intensive than the other
UV lamps. They are also small and easy to integrate into different reactor configurations. Robert
Liang from the University of Waterloo developed a UVA LED batch testing apparatus in 2015
for experiments being conducted at his university and he was willing to help us build one of our
own. This was completed in the summer of 2015 and used for all subsequent experiments. The
irradiance at the centre of the beam of each of the four LED lamps has remained constant (6.25
mW/cm2) for nearly two years. Note that this value corresponds to the irradiance measured at the
centre of the sample at the surface of the water. Despite the installation of collimating cylinders,
the irradiance reaching the samples was not constant but rather dropped off as a function of
distance from the centre of the light beam. A spreadsheet developed by Bolton and Linden
(2003) was used to calculate the average irradiance across the surface of the sample, which
turned out to be approximately 4.9 mW/cm2.
96
4.3.2 Selection of Optimal LENs
A decision was made to carry two of the first generation LENs, NB and NT, forward for future
experiments. The NBs were chosen because they were the largest material, made of nearly pure
anatase, and appeared relatively uniformly sized in the SEM images. The NTs were chosen
because their synthesis procedure was nearly identical to that of the NBs with the exception of
the hydrothermal and calcination temperatures. Based on the results of other researchers (Yuan
and Su, 2004) and the preliminary results in Section 4.2.2.1, it was hypothesized that the
hydrothermal temperature predicted the size of the LENs and the calcination temperature
predicted their crystalline composition (anatase vs. TiO2(B) vs. rutile). Two additional materials
were added to the suite as shown in Table 4.11 in order to help elucidate these effects. A decision
was also made to change from four days of hydrothermal reaction at 190oC to one day of
hydrothermal reaction at 240oC. This change had no apparent effect on the size or reactivity of
the LENs.
Table 4.11 Second generation LENs synthesis conditions
Material Basic Solution Hydrothermal
Temperature (TH)
Calcination
Temperature (TC)
NB 130/550 (NT) NaOH 130oC 550oC
NB 130/700 NaOH 130oC 700oC
NB 240/550 NaOH 240oC 550oC
NB 240/700 (NB) NaOH 240oC 700oC
4.3.3 Natural vs. Synthetic Water Matrices
Finally, a decision was made to use real water matrices rather than synthetic water matrices for
the majority of future experiments. The adsorption and degradation of SRNOM and other NOM
isolates by TiO2 has been explored by numerous researchers including Mwaanga et al. (2014),
Erhayem and Sohn (2014), Huang et al. (2008), and Valencia et al. (2013). Studies by Sanly Liu
(Liu et al., 2008, Liu et al., 2010a; Liu et al. 2010b) and others at the University of New South
Wales in Australia such as Ng et al. (2014) have demonstrated that real water matrices can be
more difficult to treat than synthetic ones but also that TiO2 photocatalysis is nonetheless a
97
competitive option for NOM removal from real water. The decision to use real water matrices for
experiments, most often raw water from the Otonabee River and the Ottawa River, was inspired
by the findings of the researchers cited above as well as a desire to test any resulting new
technology under worst case conditions.
References
Bandala, E.R., González, L., de la Hoz, F., Pelaez, M.A., Dionysiou, D., Dunlop, P.S.M., Byrne,
J.A., and Sanchez, J.L. (2011) Application of azo dyes as dosimetric indicators for enhanced
photocatalytic solar disinfection, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry,
218, 185-191
Bolton, J.R. and Linden, K.G. (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose)
determination in bench-scale UV experiments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129, 209-
215
Chacón, J.M., Leal, M.T., Sánchez, M., and Bandala, E.R. (2006) Solar photocatalytic
degradation of azo-dyes by photo-Fenton process, Dyes and Pigments, 69, 144-150
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. (2014) Effect of humic acid source on humic acid adsorption onto
titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Science of the Total Environment, 470-471, pp.92-98
Gerrity, D., Mayer, B., Ryu, H., Crittenden, J., Abbaszadegan, M., 2009. A comparison of pilot-
scale photocatalysis and enhanced coagulation for disinfection byproduct mitigation. Water
Research, 43, 1597–1610
Huang, X., Leal, M., and Li, Q. (2008) Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2
photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research,
pp. 1142-1150
Hotze, E.M., Phenrat, T., and Lowry, G.V. 2010, Nanoparticle aggregation: Challenges to
understanding transport and reactivity, Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 1909-1924
98
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. (1999) Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), pp. 1307-1311
Linden, K.G., Sharpless, C.M., Andrews, S.A., Atasi, K.Z., Korategere, V., Stefan, M., Mel
Suffet, I.H., 2004. Innovative UV Technologies to Oxidize Organic and Organoleptic Chemicals.
Awwa Research Foundation, Denver, CO, USA.
Liao, C-H, Kang, S-F, and Wu, F-A 2001. Hydroxyl radical scavenging role of chloride and
bicarbonate ions in the H2O2/UV process, Chemosphere, 44, 1193-1200
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Chiang, K., Drikas, M., and Amal, R. (2008) Removal of
humic acid using TiO2 photocatalytic process – Fractionation and molecular weight
characterisation studies, Chemosphere, 72, pp. 263-271
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., and Amal, R. (2010) Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research, 44, pp. 2525-2532
Mills, A. (2012), An overview of the methylene blue ISO test for assessing the activities of
photocatalytic films, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 128, pp. 144-149
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E.R., and Schlautman, M.A. (2014) Preferential sorption of some
natural organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: influence of pH and ionic
strength, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, pp. 8833-8844
M. Ng, E.T. Kho, S. Liu, M. Lim, R. Amal, Highly adsorptive and regenerative magnetic TiO2
for natural organic matter (NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering Journal, 246 (2014)
196-203
Pérez-Urquiza, M. and Beltrán, J.L. (2001) Determination of the dissociation constants of
sulfonated azo dyes by capillary zone electrophoresis and spectrophotometry methods, Journal
of Chromatography A, 917, 331-336
Philippe, K.K., Hans, C., MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., and Parsons, S.A. (2010)
Photocatalytic oxidation of natural organic matter surrogates and the impact on trihalomethane
formation potential, Chemosphere, 81, 1509-1516
99
Sokolowski, A. (2014) Effects of Nanostructured TiO2 Photocatalysis on Disinfection By-
product Formation, Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Valencia, S., Marin, J.M., Restrepo, G., and Frimmel, F.H. (2013) Evaluations of the
TiO2/simulated solar UV degradations of XAD fractions of the natural organic matter from a bog
lake using size-exclusion chromatography, Water Research, 47, 5130-5138
Wassink, J.D., Andrews, R.C., Peiris, R.H., and Legge, R.L. (2011) Evaluation of fluorescence
excitation-emission and LC-OCD as methods of detecting removal of NOM and DBP precursors
by enhanced coagulation, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 11 (5), p. 621
Watanabe, T., Nakajima, A., Wang, R., Minabe, M., Koizumi, S., Fujishima, A., and Hashimoto,
K. (1999) Photocatalytic activity and photoinduced hydrophilicity of titanium dioxide coated
glass, Thin Solid Films, 351, 260-263
Winter, A.R., Fish, T.A.E., Playle, R.C., Smith, D.S., and Curtis, P.J. (2007) Photodegradation of
natural organic matter from diverse freshwater sources, Aquatic Toxicology, 84, 215-222
Wu, F.C, Mills, R.B., Cai, Y.R., Evans, R.D., and Dillon, P.J. (2005) Photodegradation-induced
changes in dissolved organic matter in acidic waters, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences, 62 (5), 1019
Xiong, L., Yang, Y., Mai, J., Sun, W., Zhang, C., Wei, D., Chen, Q., and Ni, J. (2010)
Adsorption behaviour of methylene blue onto titanate nanotubes, Chemical Engineering Journal,
156, 313-320
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L (2004) Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 241, pp. 173-183
Zheng, Z., Liu, H., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Waclawik, E.R., and Zhu, H. (2010) Structure and
contribution to photocatalytic activity of the interfaces in nanofibers with mixed anatase and
TiO2(B) phases, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 316, 75-82
Zhou, D., Ji, Z., Jiang, X., Dunphy, D.R., Brinker, J., Keller, A.A. (2013) Influence of material
properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration, PLOS One 8 e81239
100
Adsorption of Natural Organic Matter and Disinfection Byproduct Precursors from Surface Water onto TiO2
Nanoparticles: pH Effects, Isotherm Modeling, and Implications for the Use of TiO2 for Drinking Water Treatment
The contents of this chapter were published as:
Gora, S. and Andrews, S. (2017) Adsorption of natural organic matter and disinfection byproduct
precursors from surface water onto TiO2 nanoparticles: pH effects, isotherm modelling and
implications for using TiO2 for drinking water treatment, Chemosphere, 174, 363-370
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.125
Permission has been obtained from Elsevier to reprint this material in this thesis (license number
416391009421).
The supplementary material associated with this paper is provided in Section 5.6.
Abstract
Titanium dioxide is a photocatalyst that can remove organic contaminants of interest to the
drinking water treatment industry, including natural organic matter (NOM) and disinfection
byproduct precursors. The photocatalytic reaction occurs in two steps: Adsorption of the
contaminant followed by degradation of the adsorbed contaminant upon irradiation with UV
light. The second part of this process can lead to the formation of reactive intermediates and
negative impacts on treated water quality such as increased DBP formation potential (DBPfp).
Adsorption alone does not result in the formation of reactive intermediates and so may prove to
be a safe way to incorporate TiO2 into drinking water treatment processes. The goal of this study
was to expand on the current understanding of NOM adsorption to TiO2 and examine it in a
drinking water context by observing NOM adsorption from real water sources and evaluating the
effects of the resulting reductions on the DBPfp of the treated water. Bottle point isotherm tests
were conducted with raw water from two Canadian water treatment plants adjusted to pH 4, pH
6, and pH 8 and dosed with TiO2 nanoparticles. The DOC results were a good fit to a modified
Freundlich isotherm. DBP precursors and LC-OCD NOM fractions associated with DBP
formation were removed to some extent at all pHs but most effectively at pH 4.
101
Introduction
Nanomaterials, defined as materials with any dimension in the nanoscale or having internal or
surface structure in the nanoscale (ISO, 2010), are increasingly being used in the fields of
electronics, computing, and medicine. Some nanomaterials, including TiO2 nanoparticles, may
also prove to be useful in environmental applications, including the treatment of drinking water
and wastewater.
5.1.1 Titanium Dioxide for Drinking Water Treatment
The use of TiO2 for water purification has been explored by many researchers and at least two
companies have developed small-scale systems based on TiO2 photocatalysis, but it has yet to be
widely applied for municipal drinking water treatment. Photocatalytic degradation of aqueous
contaminants by TiO2 is generally thought to occur in two steps: Adsorption and degradation.
The first step, adsorption, can occur in the absence of light, but degradation only occurs when
TiO2 is irradiated. Upon irradiation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), including the hydroxyl
radical, and oxidative and reducing centres on the surface of the nanoparticle degrade
contaminants that have been adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst. This two step reaction
is often described using the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism (Malato et al., 2009). The two
stage nature of photocatalytic degradation differentiates it from other advanced oxidation
processes such as UV/H2O2 and O3/H2O2. Like other AOPs, however, many of the ROS formed
when TiO2 is irradiated with UVA light are non-specific oxidants, so TiO2 photocatalysis has the
potential to provide concurrent disinfection and degradation of organic drinking water
contaminants, including taste and odour compounds and cyanotoxins (Fotiou et al., 2015),
various pharmaceuticals (Avisar et al., 2013; Kanakaraju et al., 2014), and disinfection
byproduct precursors such as natural organic matter (NOM) (Liu et al., 2008, Huang et al., 2007,
Philippe et al., 2010). The photocatalytic degradation process preferentially targets large
aromatic NOM compounds, breaking them down into smaller ones (Huang et al., 2007; Philippe
et al., 2010). This can result in decreased membrane fouling (Huang et al., 2007) and changes in
disinfection byproduct formation potential (DBPfp). The latter is of particular concern because
although some of the degradation products of photocatalysis may be more likely to form DBPs
than the original compounds, others may have an equal or greater DBPfp, particularly at shorter
102
treatment times (Liu et al., 2008). As a result, an adsorption-based process may prove to be a
safer and more effective option for NOM removal from drinking water using TiO2.
5.1.2 Natural Organic Matter
The removal of NOM, a heterogenous mixture of organic compounds found in most surface
water sources, is an important goal in drinking water treatment due to its aesthetic, operational,
and health effects. The latter are primarily linked to the role of NOM as a precursor to the
formation of both regulated and unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Operational
concerns related to NOM include membrane fouling, competitive adsorption to adsorbent
materials intended for the removal of taste and odour compounds, interference with UV
disinfection, and consumption of chlorine during disinfection.
NOM is commonly quantified as total organic carbon (TOC) or dissolved organic carbon (DOC),
bulk parameters that measure the total mass of organic carbon compounds present in a water
sample without differentiating them from one another. UV-Vis absorbance at 254 nm (UV254)
and fluorescence are also used to characterize NOM, though these methods are specific to NOM
compounds containing aromatic chromophores or fluorophores. More complex methods such as
liquid chromatography with organic carbon detection (LC-OCD) have been developed that allow
researchers to separate NOM into different fractions based on size or chemical characteristics.
The resulting fractions are then quantified using DOC or UV254. LC-OCD separates NOM into
five fractions based on size and/or chemical characteristics as follows: Biopolymers, associated
with membrane fouling (Wray et al., 2013); humic substances, which have been linked to DBP
formation (Wassink et al., 2011); building blocks; low molecular weight acids (LMWA); and
low molecular weight neutrals (LMWN) (Huber et al., 2011). A given NOM sample’s potential
to form regulated and unregulated DBPs can also be assessed more directly by measuring its
DBPfp by chlorinating water samples and measuring the DBPs formed under standardized
conditions.
5.1.3 Adsorption of NOM to TiO2
Studies by Mwaanga et al. (2014), Erhayem and Sohn (2014), and Kim and Shon (2007) have
established that pH and ionic strength have effects on the adsorption of NOM to TiO2 and have
103
noted that larger, more aromatic NOM compounds are adsorbed preferentially. The presence of
bicarbonate, phosphate, and nitrate have all been shown to decrease NOM adsorption to TiO2
while the presence of magnesium and calcium increase the likelihood of NOM adsorption
(Erhayem and Sohn, 2014; Sun and Lee, 2012).
Other studies have described the effects of individual ions on the agglomeration of TiO2
nanomaterials. Agglomeration decreases the overall surface area available for adsorption and as
such is likely to have an impact on the ability of TiO2 nanomaterials to adsorb NOM. Liu et al.
(2013) reported that three types of TiO2 nanomaterials were more likely to agglomerate under
high ionic strength conditions than at low ionic strength conditions. This finding is corroborated
by those of Erhayem and Sohn (2014). The type of ions present in solution may also have an
effect – Liu et al. (2013) observed greater increases in agglomerate size when calcium was added
to the water rather than sodium. They hypothesized that this was due to the greater ability of Ca2+
to compress the electrical double layer surrounding the nanomaterials relative to Na+. Greater
compression of the electrical double layer results in less repulsion between individual
nanoparticles and thus, greater agglomeration.
It has also been observed that the presence of natural organic matter increases the stability of
nanomaterials in solution, though this effect is less pronounced in the presence of ions such as
calcium (Liu et al., 2013; Zhang et al. 2009) and at high NOM concentrations (Erhayem and
Sohn, 2014). According to Zhang et al. (2009), NOM inhibits agglomeration by increasing the
overall negative charge of the particles and thus increasing the repulsive forces that keep them
dispersed in solution.
5.1.4 Adsorption Models
Adsorption processes are usually evaluated in the laboratory using adsorption isotherm models.
The Freundlich isotherm often fits well to empirical data and can be used to model
heterogeneous systems such as the adsorption of organic molecules to activated carbon
(Summers et al., 1988). It can be used to describe multilayer adsorption, reversible adsorption,
and adsorbents with non-uniform adsorption sites (Shahbeig et al., 2013).
Summers and Roberts (1988) found that a modified version of the Freundlich isotherm could be
used to describe the adsorption of NOM to activated carbon when experiments were conducted
104
with a constant initial concentration of NOM and changing doses (D) of activated carbon. They
developed the following equation (referred to in this paper as the SR model) to express this
relationship:
𝑞𝑒 = 𝐾𝑆𝑅 (𝐶𝑒
𝐷)
1
𝑛𝑆𝑅 (5.1)
Where D has units of mg L-1 or g L-1. The SR model has been used and extended upon by
numerous researchers including Karanfil et al. (1999), Li et al. (2002), Hyung and Kim (2008),
and Qi et al. (2008) to characterize the adsorption of NOM to activated carbon as well as carbon
nanotubes. Erhayem and Sohn (2014) modeled the adsorption of Suwannee River humic acids,
fulvic acids, and NOM to P25 TiO2 nanoparticles using the SR isotherm model. They noted that
the SR adsorption constant (and thus the extent of adsorption) increased at lower pH and at
higher ionic strength.
5.1.5 Potential Risks and Opportunities Associated with the Use of TiO2 Nanoparticles
for Water Treatment
Conventional water treatment technologies such as coagulation and activated carbon are
effective for NOM removal but, like all treatment technologies, have limitations. In North
America, coagulation is widely used to remove NOM and turbidity from drinking water but it
does not remove some recalcitrant organics. It also creates a substantial amount of waste, often
referred to as coagulation residuals. Activated carbon readily removes NOM and other organic
compounds but eventually becomes exhausted, and must undergo an expensive and energy
intensive regeneration process if it is to be reused. Although TiO2 is more well known for its
photocatalytic properties, it also adsorbs NOM as part of that process, and is potentially
regenerable onsite (Liu et al., 2014). As such, it might prove to be a useful alternative to existing
treatment options.
TiO2 nanoparticles are not without health and environmental concerns. Inhalation is the route of
exposure of greatest concern for human health (Shi et al., 2013), but the transport of
nanoparticles through the environment is coming under increasing scrutiny (Yang and
Westerhoff, 2014). The adsorption of various water components, including natural organic
matter (NOM), to TiO2 can facilitate the latter’s transport through water systems. Most of the
105
studies that have been conducted to-date on the interactions between NOM and TiO2 have aimed
to elucidate these effects in an effort to predict and minimize the impact of nanomaterials on the
natural environment. Examples include papers by Mwaanga et al. (2014), Erhayem and Sohn
(2014), Kim and Shon (2007), and Liu et al. (2013).
This study aims to expand upon existing research into the adsorption of NOM by TiO2, most of
which has been conducted in a contaminant transport context. It explores the potential
application of TiO2 as an adsorbent in drinking water treatment by studying its behaviour in
natural surface water sources and measuring its ability to remove DOC, UV254, and disinfection
byproduct precursors.
Materials and Methods
5.2.1 Materials
Evonik Aeroxide P25 TiO2 nanoparticles were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Canada) and used
without further modification. THM and HAA standards were also purchased from Sigma
Aldrich. DOC standards were made by dissolving potassium hydrogen phthalate into MilliQ
water to create a 1,000 mg/L stock solution, which was then diluted as required. Raw water was
obtained from the inlets of two water treatment plants (WTPs) in Ontario, Canada, both of which
use surface water supplies. The Peterborough WTP is supplied by the Otonabee River while the
R.C. Harris WTP in Toronto draws its water from Lake Ontario, one of the largest lakes in North
America, which provides water to over 9 million people in Canada and the United States. All
water samples were obtained ahead of any pre-chlorination point at the WTP and characterized
upon return to the laboratory. Measured ranges for five relevant water parameters are provided in
Table 5.S.1 in the supplemental file. The water sources varied primarily in terms of their NOM
content and aromaticity. The DOC of the Otonabee River water was approximately 3 to 4 times
higher than that of the Lake Ontario water while its UV254 was approximately 5 times higher.
The SUVA of the Otonabee River water ranged from 2.0 to 2.4 L/mg.m while that of the Lake
Ontario water ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 L/mg.m, indicating that the NOM in the former is more
aromatic than that in the latter.
106
5.2.2 Analytical Methods
Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was determined using an O.I. Analytical Aurora 1030W TOC
analyzer operating in persulfate oxidation mode and UV absorption at 254 nm (UV254) was
analyzed on an Agilent 8453 UV-Vis analyzer. SUVA was calculated by normalizing UV254 by
DOC. Alkalinity was measured using Standard Method 2320 (APHA, 2005).
Duplicate raw and treated water samples were analyzed using size exclusion liquid
chromatography with organic carbon detection (LC-OCD) as described by Huber et al. (2011).
The results of the analyses were processed using proprietary software (ChromCalc, DOC-
LABOR, Karlsruhe, Germany).
The isoelectric point of the nanoparticles was determined by measuring the zeta potential of the
nanoparticles at different pH values. A series of samples containing 0.1 g/L TiO2 in 10 mM NaCl
were adjusted to pHs ranging from 2 to 9 using 0.1 N HCl or 0.1 N NaOH as per the method
outlined by the Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory (2009). The zeta potential of the
samples was measured using a Horiba Scientific Nanopartica SZ-100 Nanoparticle Analyzer.
The size of the nanoparticle agglomerates formed at different pHs was determined using a
Malvern MasterSizer 3000.
The uniform formation conditions (UFC) method as described by Summers et al. (1996) was
used to assess the chlorine demand and DBPfp of the raw water and the water that had been
treated with TiO2. The UFC test was designed to mimic the conditions commonly found in
distribution systems in North America. The chlorine demand and DBPfp tests were conducted on
samples buffered with a borate solution and adjusted to pH 8 with 1 N HCl or 1 N NaOH.
Samples were stored in the dark at 20oC for 24 hours, after which the free chlorine residual was
measured using Standard Method 4,500-G (APHA 2005). The DBPfp samples were dosed with
sufficient sodium hypochlorite to ensure that they would have a chlorine residual of 1 ± 0.4 mg/L
after the 24 hour holding time. After 24 hours the trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids formed
during the UFC tests were extracted according to Standard Method 6232 B and Standard Method
6251 B (APHA, 2005) and analyzed on a Agilent 7890B GC-ECD. Standard Method 6232 B and
Standard Method 6251 B (APHA, 2005). Blanks and 20 g/L check standards were analyzed
after every 10 samples.
107
All statistical analyses, including Tukey’s method for multiple comparisons to establish a point
of practical equilibrium and linear regression of the adsorption data to determine KF and KSR,
were conducted at the 95% confidence level. Reported error values represent half of the
calculated confidence interval unless otherwise specified.
5.2.3 Sample Preparation
NOM degradation studies were conducted in a high intensity UV reactor equipped with UV LED
lamps emitting UVA light at 365 cm with an average irradiance of 4.9 mW/cm2 at the surface of
the sample. Unchlorinated raw water from the Peterborough Water Treatment Plant (Otonabee
River water) was dispensed into three 50 mL batch reactors, dosed with 0.25 g/L of P25
nanoparticles, allowed to mix in the dark for one minute, and then exposed to the LED light for
times ranging from 0 to 60 minutes. The treated samples were chlorinated according to the UFC
method and analyzed for THMfp and HAAfp as described in Section 2.2.
The time required to reach a stable adsorption equilibrium between NOM and TiO2 nanoparticles
was determined by adding 75 mL of raw unchlorinated water to duplicate 125 mL amber bottles
and, when necessary, adjusting the pH to 4, 6, or 8 with 1 N HCl or 1N NaOH. The bottles were
dosed with 0.5 g/L of Evonik P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and mixed end-over-end in a box mixer for
times ranging from one to eight hours. This time range was chosen because previous experiments
(results not shown) had indicated that most NOM adsorption occurred within 5 minutes and that
equilibrium likely occurred between one and four hours.
For the bottle point isotherm tests, eight 250 mL amber bottles were filled with 150 mL of raw
water; adjusted to pH 4, 6, or 8; dosed with 0, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, or 1 g/L of Evonik
P25 TiO2 nanoparticles; and then mixed continuously in the dark for four hours in an end-over-
end box mixer. All experiments were run in triplicate. All replicate samples were analyzed for
DOC, UV254, and SUVA. The samples from one replicate experiment were used to establish
chlorine demand and the remaining samples were analyzed for THMfp and HAAfp. The DOC,
THMfp, and HAAfp results of the bottle point isotherm tests were evaluated for fit against the
linearized Freundlich and SR models.
108
All raw and treated samples were filtered through a 0.45 m polyethersulfone (Pall) laboratory
filter in a standard vacuum filtration apparatus to remove particulate matter and TiO2 ahead of
DOC, UV254, DBPfp, and LC-OCD analysis.
Results and Discussion
5.3.1 Disinfection Byproduct Formation During Photocatalysis
During the irradiation tests the THMfp and HAAfp of the raw Otonabee River water were
modestly reduced by adsorption alone (15% and 10%) but both increased upon irradiation
(Figure 5.1). The impact on THMfp was particularly dramatic: After only 5 minutes of
irradiation THMfp increased by 61% relative to the control. After 30 minutes, THMfp began to
decrease and after 60 minutes the THMfp of the treated water matched that of the control. The
increase in HAAfp upon irradiation was smaller than that of THMfp and was reversed after 30
minutes of irradiation. After 60 minutes of irradiation HAAfp was reduced by 35% relative to the
control.
Figure 5.1 THMfp and HAAfp of Otonabee River water treated with 0.25 g/L and
irradiated by high intensity UVA LED light
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Control 0 5 15 30 45 60
DB
Pfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
THMfp
HAAfp
109
These results, which are similar to those obtained by Liu et al. (2008) and Philippe et al. (2009),
illustrate the risk associated with the use of photocatalysis for NOM and DBPfp reduction.
Although both THMfp and HAAfp were eventually reduced by the treatment, both increased at
treatment times between 0 and 15 minutes. Shorter treatment times are desirable as they
minimize the amount of space and energy required at full-scale. The modest reductions of
THMfp and HAAfp via adsorption, however, suggest an alternative treatment option – could
higher concentrations of TiO2 adsorb a sufficient amount of DBP precursors to provide a viable
reduction in overall DBPfp and do certain water quality conditions (e.g. pH) favour the
adsorption of DBP precursors to TiO2?
5.3.2 NOM Removal via Adsorption – Time Series Experiments
The practical adsorption equilibrium, defined as the point at which the 95% confidence of
neighbouring means began to overlap and the slope of the line of mean concentration vs. time
could no longer be distinguished from zero, was determined based on the results of the DOC and
UV254 time series experiments conducted in each water source. Irrespective of the water type
used or the parameter observed, the results indicated that the majority of NOM adsorption to the
P25 TiO2 particles occurred within minutes and that a practical adsorption equilibrium was
reached within one hour (see Figure 5.S.1, Figure 5.S.2, and Figure 5.S.3 in the supplementary
material at the end of the chapter). This is similar to results obtained by some researchers
working with TiO2 materials, including P25 nanoparticles (Kim and Shon, 2007; Ng et al.,
2014), though others have suggested that a longer period of time might be required to reach full
equilibrium (Mwaanga et al., 2014; Erhayem, 2013).
Based on the results of the time series experiments conducted in this study, all subsequent
equilibrium experiments were conducted with a four hour adsorption period to ensure that all
data was gathered at a point well beyond the practical point of equilibrium. The results of the
time series experiments also indicated that adsorption was most effective at pH 4 and that
UV254 and SUVA were more strongly affected by the treatment than DOC, hinting that
aromatic NOM may have been preferentially adsorbed by the nanoparticles. The latter effect was
more apparent in the Otonabee River water, likely because it had an initial raw water SUVA that
was two times that of the Lake Ontario water.
110
5.3.3 Effects of pH and TiO2 Dose on Adsorption
Bottle point isotherm tests were conducted to further characterize the adsorption behaviour of the
nanoparticles at the three pH conditions as the dose of TiO2 was varied from 0.01 g/L to 1 g/L.
As shown in Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.S.4 in the supplemental material at the end of the chapter, at
equilibrium, the DOC and UV254 removals observed in the Otonabee River and Lake Ontario
samples were found to be pH dependent and in all cases, more NOM was removed at pH 4 than
at pH 6 and pH 8. Irrespective of pH, increasing the dose of TiO2 added to the water resulted in a
decrease in the amount of DOC remaining in the treated water. In both the Otonabee River
(Figure 5.2A) and Lake Ontario water trials (Figure 5.2B), DOC removal increased quickly as
the TiO2 dose was increased from 0.01 g/L up to 0.25 g/L, but slowed thereafter, though no
definitive plateau was reached at any pH, suggesting that further increases in TiO2 dose beyond
the maximum applied in this study (1 g L-1) may have improved DOC removal even further. At
pH 4 and 1 g/L of TiO2 the DOC of the Otonabee River water was reduced from 4.69 ± 0.12
mg/L to 1.10 ± 0.12 mg/L whereas that of the Lake Ontario water was reduced from 1.64 ± 0.05
mg/Lto 0.69 ± 0.04 mg/L. DOC removal from both water sources was statistically significantly
lower at pH 6 and pH 8 compared to at pH 4.
111
Figure 5.2 Adsorption of DOC from raw unchlorinated water from Otonabee River
water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 and
mixed with 0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles for four hours
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
DO
C (
mg /
L)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
A
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
DO
C (
mg/L
)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
B
112
The UV254 results followed similar trends as DOC and are shown in Figure 5.4. UV254 was
removed more effectively than DOC, particularly from the Otonabee River water, where UV254
was reduced from 0.112 ± 0.002 cm-1 to 0.013 ± 0.002 cm-1, approximately 88%, by a 1 g/L dose
of P25 nanoparticles at pH 4. UV254 is a measure of the aromaticity of the NOM present in
water, so the results presented here suggest that aromatic NOM was preferentially removed over
non-aromatic NOM during the adsorption process.
As has been suggested by other researchers (Mwaanga et al., 2014) this pH dependence may be
partially explained through charge interactions. Zeta potential measurements conducted on the
P25 nanoparticles indicated that they had an isoelectic point (IEP) between pH 6 and pH 6.5,
consistent with the literature (Kosmulski, 2009). Thus, at pH 4 they were positively charged, at
pH 8 they were negatively charged, and at pH 6 they were electrostatically neutral. At pH 4 most
NOM compounds would have been neutral or slightly negatively charged and both charge and
hydrophobic interactions likely contributed to adsorption. At pH 6 hydrophobic interactions
between NOM compounds were likely the main contributors to adsorption. At pH 8, both the
nanoparticles and the NOM were negatively charged and thus charge interactions would result in
repulsion, rather than attraction, and any adsorption that took place would have been attributable
to hydrophobic interactions.
Nanoparticle agglomeration and its effect on surface area may also have contributed to the
changes in adsorption efficiency observed at different pHs. Agglomeration is most likely to
occur when the pH is near the isoelectric point/point of zero charge of the material in question
because at this pH repulsive forces between individual particles are at a minimum (Liu et al.,
2013). P25 has an IEP of approximately 6.5, which means that the nanoparticles were more
likely to agglomerate at pH 6 than at pH 4 or pH 8. Indeed, the particle size distributions
presented in Figure 5.3 indicate that the agglomerates formed by the nanoparticles were larger in
Otonabee River water adjusted to pH 6 than in Otonabee River water adjusted to pH 4 or pH 8.
In this study, better adsorption was observed at pH 4 than at pH 6. Agglomeration and the
subsequent reduction in available surface area at pH 6 versus at pH 4 may have contributed to
the poorer adsorption observed at pH 6 whereas charge repulsion between NOM and the TiO2
nanoparticles was more of a driver at pH 8.
113
Figure 5.3 Size distribution of agglomerates of P25 nanoparticles in Otonabee River
water adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8
5.3.4 Modeling of Adsorption Isotherms
The DOC results of the bottle point isotherm tests were modeled using the linearized forms of
the Freundlich and modified Freundlich models, as shown in Figure 5.4 (modified Freundlich
model) and Figure 5.S.5 of the supplement (Freundlich model). The isotherm parameters are
summarized in Table 5.1 and Table 5.S.2 in the supplemental file.
At all pHs and in both water sources, the modified Freundlich model was a better fit to the data,
defined as a higher R2 value, than the Freundlich model. The modified Freundlich model is
generally thought to provide a more accurate fit for data from highly heterodisperse systems and
when the isotherms are developed using variable doses of adsorbent, so this result was not
surprising.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20
Per
cen
t
Diameter (m)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
114
Table 5.1 Summary of isotherm parameters for the adsorption of NOM from Otonabee
River water onto P25 TiO2 nanoparticles at pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8. Error
values represent the 95% confidence interval on the mean.
Parameter Otonabee River Lake Ontario
pH 4 pH 6 pH 8 pH 4 pH 6 pH 8
DOC
1/nFM 0.4 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1
KFM (mg DOC/g TiO2)1-1/n 3.7 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1
R2 0.98 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.95 0.90
THMfp
1/nFM 0.4 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.2 -a - -
KFM (g THMfp/g TiO2)1-1/n 27 ± 17 13 ± 9 8 ± 14 - - -
R2 0.91 0.90 0.71 - - -
HAAfp
1/nFM 0.4 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.3 - - -
KFM (g HAAfp/g TiO2)1-1/n 8 ± 7 4 ± 6 1 ± 2 - - -
R2 0.81 0.76 0.76 - - -
aPreliminary experiments indicated that TCM and BDCM removal from the LO water at 1 g/L of TiO2
and pH 4 was below the minimum detection limits (TCM = 5.5 g/L, BDCM = 2.9 g/L) and the
formation of DCAA and TCAA in the raw LO water when it was chlorinated according to UFC conditions
was near the minimum detection limit (DCAA = 1.4 g/L, TCAA =1.7 g/L) and unaffected by TiO2
adsorption treatment. As a result, DBPfp isotherms were not developed for the LO water.
Other researchers have observed that aromatic NOM and humic acids are preferentially adsorbed
to P25 nanoparticles over other types of NOM (Erhayem and Sohn, 2014). Given that the two
water sources differ mainly in terms of their NOM concentration and aromaticity, it is not
surprising that the KFM values obtained from the Lake Ontario tests were lower than those
obtained from the Otonabee River tests. The higher 1/nFM values in the Lake Ontario tests also
indicate that adsorption was less favourable in this water than in the Otonabee River water.
115
Figure 5.4 DOC data from Otonabee River water tests (A) and Lake Ontario water tests
(B) fitted to the modified Freundlich model
Within each water source, 1/nFM for DOC was nearly always constant irrespective of pH and KFM
was larger at pH 4 than at pH 6 and pH 8, which further confirms that the adsorption of NOM to
P25 TiO2 nanoparticles was more effective at pH 4 than at pH 6 or pH 8 in both water sources.
The pH 6 and pH 8 confidence intervals for KFM overlapped with one another in the OTB water
source, perhaps suggesting that pH became less of a driver of adsorption capacity when the pH
of the water was equal to or higher than the IEP.
1
10
100
1 10 100 1000
qe
(mg
DO
C/g
TiO
2)
Ce/D (mg DOC/g TiO2)
A
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
0
1
10
100
0 1 10 100
qe
(mg D
OC
/gT
iO2)
Ce/D (mg DOC/g TiO2)
B
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
116
These findings are in agreement with those of other researchers (Mwaanga et al., 2014; Erhayem
and Sohn, 2014; Sun and Lee, 2012), which have demonstrated that NOM adsorption to P25
TiO2 nanomaterials occurs more readily at low pH than at high pH. They are also in agreement
with studies that have demonstrated that NOM adsorption to TiO2 can be modeled using the
Freundlich (Wiszniowski et al., 2002) and modified Freundich models (Erhayem and Sohn,
2014). The KFM values reported in the latter study were higher but within the same order of
magnitude as those observed in the current study and the reported 1/nFM values were higher and
more strongly impacted by pH than those observed in the current study. It should be noted that
the Erhayem and Sohn made use of standardized NOM or humic acid isolates (e.g. IHSS) in
synthetic water matrices rather than natural water sources.
The KFM and 1/nFM results of this study and those of other TiO2 researchers are lower than those
achieved by other groups working with activated carbon and nanoscale carbon adsorbents, but
not dramatically so. In their original study, which was conducted with four NOM isolates and
GAC doses similar to the TiO2 doses used in this study, Summers and Roberts (1988) observed
KFM values ranging from 4.22 to 11.4 (mg C/g GAC)1-1/n and 1/nFM values ranging from 0.254 to
0.347. Karanfil et al. (1999) evaluated the adsorption of commercially available NOM isolates
and NOM from natural water onto a series of commercially available and modified activated
carbons. They observed KSR values ranging from 1.754 to 10.695 (mg C/g GAC)1-1/n in the
natural water matrices. Hyung and Kim calculated KFM values ranging from 5.471 to 13.088 (mg
C/g MWNT)1-1/n and 1/nFM values ranging from 0.212 to 0.384 when they evaluated the
adsorption of commercially available NOM isolates onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes.
5.3.5 Adsorption of DBP Precursors
Only a limited amount of THMs and HAAs were formed in the raw Lake Ontario water when it
was chlorinated according to the UFC method (< 50 g/L and < 40 g/L, respectively), so the
adsorption of DBP precursors to the P25 nanoparticles was not explored for this water source.
The raw water and treated samples prepared during the Otonabee River adsorption tests were
analyzed for THMfp and HAAfp and the results are shown in Figure 5.5.
As observed with DOC and UV254 removal, THMfp reduction via adsorption was pH
dependent. Maximum THMfp reduction, 147 ± 16 g/L to 38 ± 16 g/L (74% reduction), was
117
achieved at pH 4 and a TiO2 dose of 1 g/L. Less removal was achieved at this dose at pH 6 (153
± 11 g/L to 75 ± 11 g/L, 51% reduction) and pH 8 (154 ± 15 g/L to 104 ± 15 g/L, 34%
reduction).
Figure 5.5 THMfp (A) and HAAfp (B) of Otonabee River water treated with increasing
concentrations of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles at pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8
HAA precursors were also removed through adsorption and this removal was pH dependent,
though less so than for THM precursors. Figure 5.5B shows that at the highest concentration of
TiO2 (1 g/L) HAAfp was reduced from 39 ± 7 g/L to 19 ± 5 g/L (50% reduction) at pH 4 and
from 36 ± 2 g/L to 23 ± 3 g/L (40% reduction) at pH 6. HAAfp reduction at pH 8 was not
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
A
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Dose TiO2 (g/L)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
B
118
statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Some of the variability in the HAA results
can be explained by the fact that the UFC test, which was used to evaluate the THMfp and
HAAfp of the raw and TiO2-treated samples in this study, is conducted at pH 8, which does not
favour the formation of HAAs. As a result, all of the raw and TiO2-treated samples had low
HAAfp, making it difficult to isolate the effects of TiO2 adsorption on HAAfp removal,
particularly at pH 8.
The agreement between the THMfp and HAAfp datasets and the modified Freundlich model are
illustrated in Figure 5.S.6 and the isotherm parameters are summarized in Table 5.1. Although
the R2 values of the THMfp and HAAfp isotherms were lower than those of the DOC isotherms,
the general trends indicate that, with the exception of HAAfp at pH 8, TiO2 was able to remove
significant amounts of THM and HAA precursors from Otonabee River water via adsorption and
that this adsorption could be modeled using the modified Freundlich isotherm model.
Nonetheless, as a whole the isotherm parameters for the two classes of DBPs should be
approached with caution because they were developed using a small dataset that contained
substantial variation at low TiO2 doses. Additional experiments at higher TiO2 doses, using
water sources with higher concentrations of DBP precursors, and/or employing chlorination
regimes more likely to result in THM and HAA formation may help to clarify the how well the
SR model is able to predict the removal of DBP precursors from drinking water by TiO2 as well
as the suitability of the model at different pHs.
5.3.6 Effect of pH on Adsorption of LC-OCD Fractions
A selection of raw and TiO2-treated water samples from the Otonabee River experiment was
analyzed using LC-OCD to determine whether any specific fractions were being removed during
adsorption and whether pH impacted the fractions adsorbed. As shown in Figure 5.6, the
biopolymers and humic substances fractions were targeted for adsorption at all pHs but most
effectively removed at pH 4. The building blocks fraction was also removed to some degree at
pH 4 but was essentially unaffected at pH 6 and pH 8. The low molecular weight acid (LMWA)
and low molecular weight neutral fractions (LMWN) were not adsorbed at any pH. These results
indicate that, consistent with the findings of other researchers (Erhayem and Sohn, 2014), large
and aromatic NOM compounds were preferentially adsorbed by TiO2 nanoparticles and help to
119
explain why U254, which is associated with the humic substances fraction, was sometimes
removed more effectively than overall DOC.
Figure 5.6 LC-OCD fractions present in raw unchlorinated Otonabee River water and
water adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 and mixed with 0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2
nanoparticles for four hours
Conclusions
The results of this study show that during adsorption aromatic NOM (as measured by UV254) is
preferentially removed over non-aromatic NOM and that the efficiency of NOM adsorption to
TiO2 can vary by water source. They also demonstrate that TiO2 nanoparticles preferentially
adsorb larger NOM molecules including the biopolymers and humic substances fractions. pH
was shown to have a strong impact on the removal of NOM, including DBP precursors, from
surface water by TiO2 nanoparticles. Specifically, more adsorption occurred at low pH than at
higher pH. The poorer adsorption observed at pH 6 and pH 8 may be related to both
agglomeration and charge repulsion at higher pH, with the former dominating at pH 6 and the
latter at pH 8.
0
1
2
3
4
5
Raw Water pH 4 pH 6 pH 8
DO
C (
mg
/L) LMWN
LMWA
Building Blocks
Humic Substances
Biopolymers
120
A modified version of the Freundlich isotherm model was found to provide an excellent fit to the
DOC data gathered in this study. The resulting isotherm parameters were within but at the low
end of the range usually observed during NOM adsorption to GAC and carbon nanomaterials,
indicating that, particularly at neutral pH, the TiO2 nanoparticles were less effective than the
adsorbents currently used in drinking water plants. Unlike TiO2, however, GAC is generally
expensive and energy intensive to regenerate and the regeneration must usually be conducted
offsite, whereas TiO2 is potentially regenerable and reusable in place. The THMfp and HAAfp
datasets were also fitted to the modified Freundlich model, with generally positive results. The
results presented in this paper show that TiO2 adsorption is a viable way to remove NOM and
DBP precursors from drinking water and that this removal can be modeled using simple isotherm
models. The results also suggest that researchers hoping to design adsorption-based TiO2
processes should keep in mind that pH adjustment might be required to optimize performance.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the training provided by Jim Wang, the laboratory
assistance provided by Yijun (Jessie) Gai and Michelli Park, and the support of the Drinking
Water Research Group at the University of Toronto. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Monica
Tudorancea and Dr. Sigrid Peldzsus (University of Waterloo) for performing LC-OCD analyses.
Funding was provided by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and
the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities.
121
References
American Public Health Association, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 21st ed., Washington D.C., APHA
Avisar, D., Horovitz, I., Lozzi, L., Ruggieri, F., Baker, M., Abel, M-L, Mamane, H., 2013.
Impact of water quality on removal of carbamazepine in natural waters by N-doped TiO2 photo-
catalytic thin film surfaces, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 244-245, 463-471
Chowdhury, Z.K., Summers, R.S., Westerhoff, G.P., Leto, B.J., Nowack, K.O., Corwin, C.J.,
2013. Activated Carbon: Solutions for Improving Water Quality, Passantino, L.B. (Ed.), Denver,
USA, American Water Works Association
Erhayem, M., 2013. Effect of naturally occurring organic matter (NOOM) type and source on
NOOM adsorption onto titanium dioxide nanoparticles under varying environmental conditions,
Thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, USA
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M., 2014. Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, pp. 249-257
Fotiou, T., Triantis, T.M., Kaloudis, T., Hiskia, A., 2015. Evaluation of the photocatalytic
activity of TiO2 based catalysts for the degradation and mineralization of cyanobacterial toxins
and water off-odor compounds under UV-A, solar, and visible light, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 261, 17-26
Huang, X., Leal, M., Li, Q., 2008. Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2 photocatalytic
oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research, 42, 1142-1150
Huber, S.A., Balz, A., Abert, M., Pronk, W., 2011. Characterisation of aquatic humic and non-
humic matter with size-exclusion chromatography-organic carbon detection and organic nitrogen
detection (LC-OCD-OND), Water Research, 45, 879-888
122
Hyung, H., Kim, J-H, 2008. Natural organic matter (NOM) adsorption to multi-walled carbon
nanotubes: Effect of NOM characteristics and water quality parameters, Environmental Science
and Technology, 42, 4416-4421
International Organization for Standardization, 2010. Nanotechnologies – Methodology for the
classification and categorization of nanomaterials, ISO/TR 11360:2010(E)
Kanakaraju, D., Glass, B.D., Oelgemoller, M., 2014. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis for
pharmaceutical wastewater treatment, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 12, 27-47
Karanfil, T., Kitis, M., Kilduff, J.E., Wigton, A., 1999. Role of granular activated carbon surface
chemistry on the adsorption of organic compounds 2, Environmental Science and Technology,
33, 3225-3233
Li, F., Yuasa, A., Ebie, K., Azuma, Y., Hagishita, T., Matsui, Y., 2002. Factors affecting the
adsorption capacity of dissolved organic matter onto activated carbon: Modified isotherm
analysis, Water Research, 36, 4994-4604
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R., 2008. TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Liu, S., Lim, M., and Amal, R. 2014. TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption
and effective photocatalytic regeneration, Chemical Engineering Science, 105, 46-52
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J., 2013. Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects, 434, 319-328
Loosli, F., Vitorazi, L., Berret, J-F, and Stoll, S., 2015. Towards a better understanding on
agglomeration mechanisms and thermodynamic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles interacting with
natural organic matter, Water Research, 80, 139-148
123
Kim, S-H and Shon, H.K., 2007. Adsorption characterization for multi-component organic
matters by titanium oxide (TiO2) in wastewater, Separation Science and Technology, 42, 1775-
1792
Kosmulski, M., 2009. Compilation of PZC and IEP of sparingly soluble metal oxides and
hydroxides from literature, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 152, 14-25
Malato, S., Fernandez-Ibanez, P., Maldonado, M.I., Blanco, J., Gernjak, W., 2009.
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends,
Catalysis Today, 147, 1-59
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E.R., Schlautman, M.A., 2014. Preferential sorption of some natural
organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: influence of pH and ionic strength,
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 8833-8844
Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, 2009. NCL Method PCC-2: Measuring Zeta
Potential of Nanomaterials, National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health
Ng, M., Kho, E.T., Liu, S., Lim, M., Amal, R., 2014. Highly adsorptive and regenerative
magnetic TiO2 for natural organic matter (NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 246, 196-203
Philippe, K.K. Hans, C. MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., and Parsons, S.A., 2010.
Photocatalytic oxidation, GAC, and biotreatment combinations: An alternative for the
coagulation of hydrophilic rich waters?, Environmental Technology, 31, 1423-1434
Qi, S. Schideman, L.C., 2008. An overall isotherm for activated carbon adsorption of dissolved
organic matter in water, Water Research, 42, 3353-3360
Shahbeig, H., Bagheri, N., Ghorbanian, S., Hallajisani, A., Poorkarimi, S., 2013. A new
adsorption isotherm model of aqueous solutions on granular activated carbon, World Journal of
Modelling and Simulation, 9, 243-254
Shi, H., Magaye, R., Castranova, V., and Zhao, J., 2013. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: A
review of current toxicological data, Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 10:15
124
Summers, R. and Roberts, P., 1988. Activated Carbon Adsorption of Humic Substances:
Heterodisperse Mixtures and Desorption, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 122, 367-381
Summers, R.S., Hooper, S.M., Shukairy, H.M., Solarik, G., Owen, D., 1996. Assessing DBP
yield: Uniform formation conditions, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 88, 80-
93
Sun, D.D. and Lee, P.F., 2012. TiO2 microsphere for the removal of humic acid from water:
Complex adsorption mechanisms, Separation and Purification Technology, 91, 30-37
Wassink, J.D., Andrews, R.C., Peiris, R.H., Legge, R.L., 2011. Evaluation of fluorescence
excitation-emission and LC-OCD as methods of detecting removal of NOM and DBP precursors
by enhanced coagulation, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 11, 621
Wiszniowski, J., Robert, D., Surmacz-Gorska, J., Miksch, K., and Weber, J-V, 2002.
Photocatalytic decomposition of humic acids on TiO2, Part I: Discussion of adsorption and
mechanism, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 153, 267-273
Wray, H.E., Andrews, R.C., Bérubé, P.R., 2013. Surface shear stress and membrane fouling
when considering natural water matrices, Desalination, 330, 22-27
Yang, Y. and Westerhoff, P., 2014. Presence in, and Release of, Nanomaterials from Consumer
Products, Nanomaterials, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 811 (Capco, D.G.
and Chen, Y., editors), Springer Science + Business Media, Berlin
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Westerhoff, P., and Crittenden, J., 2009. Impact of natural organic matter
and divalent cations on the stability of aqueous nanoparticles, Water Research, 43, 4249-4257
125
Supplementary Material for Chapter 5
Table 5.S.1 Raw water quality
Parameter Units Otonabee River Lake Ontario
DOC mg L-1 3.8 – 4.9 1.6 – 2.0
UV254 cm-1 0.09 – 0.14 0.02 – 0.03
SUVA L mg-1 m-1 2.0 – 2.4 0.8 – 1.0
pH 7.8 – 8.4 7.8 – 8.0
Alkalinity mg CaCO3 L-1 85 – 91 90 – 93
Table 5.S.2 Freundlich isotherm parameters for DOC
Parameter Otonabee River Lake Ontario
pH 4 pH 6 pH 8 pH 4 pH 6 pH 8
1/nF 1.3 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.8 5.3 ± 0.9 3.3 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 1.1 7.1 ± 2.4
KF (mg DOC/g TiO2)1/n 3.1 ± 0.5 0.1 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.8 5.2 ± 0.8 1.1 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.2
R2 0.96 0.85 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.72
126
Time Series Experiments
Figure 5.S.1 DOC of Otonabee River water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) dosed with
0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and allowed to mix in the dark for between
0 and 480 minutes
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 100 200 300 400 500
DO
C
(mg
/L)
Time (min)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
A
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 100 200 300 400 500
DO
C (
mg/L
)
Time (min)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
B
A
127
Figure 5.S.2 UV254 of Otonabee River water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) dosed with
0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and allowed to mix in the dark for between
0 and 480 minutes
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0 100 200 300 400 500
UV
25
4 (
cm-1
)
Time (min)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0 100 200 300 400 500
UV
254 (
cm-1
)
Time (min)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
B
A
128
Figure 5.S.3 SUVA of Otonabee River water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) dosed with
0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles and allowed to mix in the dark for between
0 and 480 minutes
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 100 200 300 400 500
SU
VA
(L
/mg
. m
)
Time (min)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
0
1
2
3
0 100 200 300 400 500
SU
VA
(L
/mg
.m
)
Time (min)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
A
B
129
UV254 Removal
Figure S.5.4 Adsorption of UV254 from raw unchlorinated water from Otonabee River
water (A) and Lake Ontario water (B) adjusted to pH 4, pH 6, and pH 8 and
mixed with 0.5 g/L of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles for four hours
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
UV
25
4 (
cm-1
)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
UV
254 (
cm-1
)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
B
A
130
Freundlich Isotherm Graphs
Fig. 5.S.5 DOC data from Otonabee River water tests (A) and Lake Ontario water tests
(B) fitted to the Freundlich isotherm model
1
10
100
1 10
qe
(mg
DO
C/g
TiO
2)
Ce (mg DOC/L)
A
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
0.2
2
20
0.2 2
qe
(mg D
OC
/g T
iO2)
Ce (mg DOC/L)
B
pH 4
pH 6
pH 8
131
Linearized Modified Freundlich Model Isotherms for THMfp and HAAfp
Figure S.5.6 THMfp (A) and HAAfp (B) data from Otonabee River water tests fitted to
the linearized modified Freundlich model
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 1000 10000 100000
qe
(g
TH
Mfp
/g T
iO2)
Ce/D (g THMfp/g TiO2)
A
pH 4
Model - pH 4
pH 6
Model - pH 6
pH 8
Model - pH 8
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000 10000
qe
(g H
AA
fp/g
TiO
2)
Ce/D (g HAAfp/g TiO2)
B
pH 4
Model - pH 4
pH 6
Model - pH 6
pH 8
Model - pH 8
132
Development of Settleable Engineered Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for the Safe Removal of Disinfection Byproduct Precursors from Drinking Water
Abstract
Four types of linear engineered TiO2 nanomaterials (LENs) were synthesized using a simple
alkaline hydrothermal method and evaluated in terms of their propensity to settle out of water
and their ability to remove natural organic matter (NOM) from river water as measured by two
common disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursor surrogates, DOC and UV254, via adsorption in
the absence of irradiation (dark adsorption) and photocatalytic degradation under UVA LED
irradiation. The size, surface characteristics, and crystallinity of the LENs were manipulated by
varying the temperatures used during the hydrothermal and calcination steps of the synthesis
procedure. All four types of LENs settled out of purified water more effectively than standard
Degussa Evonik Aeroxide P25 nanoparticles but their settling behaviour in the river water
sample was impacted by surface charge effects and interactions with NOM and ionic species
present in the bulk water matrix. The total observed reduction of DBP precursor surrogates by
the LENs ranged from 20 to 50% removal of DOC and from 65 to 90% reduction of UV254 after
60 minutes of irradiation. The electrical energy per order required to remove DOC and UV254
from the water was calculated and found to range from 8 to 36 times higher than that required for
UV/H2O2 treatment but comparable to results reported by other researchers using UV/TiO2 for
NOM removal. The results of this study suggest that a subset of the nanomaterials evaluated in
this study may prove to be a viable alternative to standard TiO2 nanoparticles for the removal of
DBP precursors from drinking water, but also that the characteristics of the water matrix have
important effects on settling efficiency and will require site-specific evaluation.
Introduction
Oxidation processes such as ozonation have become a mainstay of modern drinking water
treatment because they can degrade contaminants that are hazardous and/or recalcitrant to
removal via more traditional methods. In recent decades various advanced oxidation processes
(AOPs) that combine two or more existing treatment technologies to enhance the removal of
133
these recalcitrant compounds have become more popular. In the laboratory, TiO2 photocatalysis
has been used to destroy numerous water contaminants including various types of bacteria
(Rincon and Pulgarin, 2004), taste and odour compounds (Fotiou, 2015), natural organic matter
(Liu et al., 2008; Philippe et al., 2010), and various anthropogenic contaminants (Avisar et al.,
2013, Kanakaraju, 2014).
TiO2 photocatalysis combines a nanoscale semiconductor photocatalyst with UVA light and is an
emerging AOP that may one day prove to be a useful addition to the existing suite of oxidation
processes. When irradiated with UV light at or below 385 nm TiO2 catalyzes the formation of
reactive oxygen species (ROS). The ROS are highly oxidative, and will degrade organic
contaminants adsorbed to the surface of the TiO2 nanoparticle. Adsorbed organic contaminants
can also be oxidized by the electron hole formed when the photocatalyst is activated (Nosaka and
Nosaka, 2013).
Despite the promise that TiO2 holds for drinking water and wastewater treatment, it has yet to be
widely adopted for these purposes, mostly because it has proven difficult to design a reactor that
is simultaneously capable of ensuring adequate treatment efficiency while also working within
the practical confines of a water treatment plant. The need to remove the TiO2 from the water
after treatment is also a major concern because TiO2 nanomaterials are themselves potentially
hazardous to human health (Shi et al., 2013) and the environment (Yang and Westerhoff, 2014).
Some researchers have attempted to address this by immobilizing TiO2 on solid supports.
Examples include nanoparticles attached to or integrated into magnetized particles Leshuk et al.,
2013; Ng et al., 2014), glass beads (Kim and Lee, 2005; Daneshvar et al., 2005), and zeolites
(Liu et al., 2014). Alternatively, other researchers have engineered multidimensional TiO2
materials for water remediation. For example, Xing et al. (2014) engineered a floating
macro/mesoporous TiO2 material and demonstrated its ability to degrade two simple organic
compounds while Hu et al. (2011) developed a freestanding enmeshed TiO2 nanowire membrane
for the removal of pharmaceutical compounds. In this study, we have investigated the use of
settleable LENs synthesized from the most commonly available form of laboratory grade TiO2,
P25 nanoparticles from Evonik Degussa, for the treatment of drinking water.
The alkaline hydrothermal method used to synthesize these materials was first described by
Kasuga et al. (1999) and is by now so widely known that it can be found in the public domain. A
134
precursor compound (usually P25 nanoparticles or anatase nanoparticles) is suspended in
alkaline solution and heated above 100oC for a period of time ranging from 20 hours to 4 days.
The resulting material, which consists of sodium disodium trititanate (Na2Ti3O7), is then washed
with acid and water to remove the Na+ ions and then calcined at temperatures ranging from
300oC to 900oC to yield a final product consisting of H2Ti3O7, TiO2 (anatase or rutile), or other
crystalline structures depending on the temperature used. The linear materials formed at the end
of this process are tubular or belt like with diameters in the nanoscale range and lengths in the
nanoscale or microscale range.
Although many researchers have employed some version of this process to yield linear
nanomaterials, their results are difficult to compare to one another because the studies have
generally employed different synthesis regimes and there remains some debate as to the
individual impacts of the many steps of the procedure on the final product (Wong et al., 2011).
Yuan and Su (2004) synthesized linear nanomaterials with varying precursor materials,
hydrothermal temperatures, and different types and concentration of alkaline solution and found
that all three factors impacted the size, shape, and reactivity of the end products. For example,
higher hydrothermal temperatures resulted in the formation of large, flat materials (nanoribbons
or nanobelts) while lower temperatures yielded smaller nanotubes. Qamar et al. (2008) focused
more specifically on the washing and calcination procedures following hydrothermal synthesis
and found that both steps impacted the chemical structure, shape, morphology, and
photocatalytic activity of the final products. In the present study, we employed a set of synthesis
regimes informed by the findings of Yuan and Su (2004) and Qamar et al. (2008) that we
predicted would enhance the photoactivity and settleability of the nanomaterials.
Natural organic matter (NOM) is a blanket term that encompasses an array of organic carbon
compounds that are formed through the degradation of organisms and their detritus. It is
commonly quantified as total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), or based
on its ability to absorb UV light at various wavelengths, including 254 nm (UV254). NOM has a
number of undesirable aesthetic, operational, and health effects on drinking water, and its
removal is one of the primary goals in many water treatment plants. Most importantly, the
interaction of NOM with chemical treatment processes can result in the formation of undesirable
reaction products, including disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Certain classes of DBPs, usually
trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs), are regulated in most jurisdictions in
135
North America. These two classes of DBPs were originally thought to be carcinogenic but more
recent research has revealed that negative health effects are unlikely to occur in humans exposed
to the concentrations of THMs and HAAs commonly found in drinking water (Hrudey, 2009).
Nonetheless, they continue to be regulated, partly because they represent only a small subset of
the DBPs formed when NOM reacts with chemical disinfectants such as chlorine and
monochloramine. Almost all of these are currently unregulated but there is evidence that some
may be more toxic than the DBPs that are currently regulated (Krasner, 2009). For example, the
formation of halogenated furanones such as Mutagen X (MX), a highly genotoxic DBP, has been
shown to be correlated to the formation of HAAs (Zheng et al., 2015). DOC and UV254 are
widely used as surrogate parameters for DBP precursors because they are simple to measure and
well correlated with THM and HAA (van Leeuwen et al., 2005; Pifer and Fairey, 2014]. They
have also been shown to be correlated to MX formation in some water sources (Zheng et al.,
2015).
NOM, including the precursors of regulated and unregulated DBPs, can be removed using
existing water treatment processes such as coagulation but there is demand for alternative NOM
removal processes that are less chemically intensive and produce less waste. The aim of this
research was to evaluate the impact of different steps of the hydrothermal synthesis method on
the settleability of potentially reuseable photocatalytic TiO2 nanomaterials and their ability to
adsorb and photocatalytically degrade NOM and DBP precursors as quantified using DOC and
UV254.
Dyes, which are inexpensive, widely available, and simple to quantify, are often used to track the
progress of oxidation processes, including TiO2 photocatalysis. Oxidation of methylene blue dye
during photocatalysis breaks the compound’s conjugated bonds, resulting in a colour change
from blue to colourless, and as such, methylene blue degradation is widely used to evaluate new
photocatalytic materials. In this study, methylene blue dye was used to assess the overall
photocatalytic activity of four LENs and provided our group with a simple way to compare our
materials to those developed by other researchers.
136
Experimental
6.2.1 Materials
Aeroxide P25 TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used as the precursor
material for the four LENs. They were also used in unmodified form as a reference material
during the degradation experiments and the settling tests. Raw water was obtained from the inlet
of the Peterborough water treatment plant in Ontario, Canada, which treats water from the
Otonabee River. The Otonabee River is typical of many smaller surface water sources in
southern Ontario in that it has moderate levels of NOM and alkalinity, low turbidity, and pH
above neutral. Table 6.1 contains a summary of relevant water quality parameters in the raw
water.
Table 6.1 Summary of raw water quality
Parameter Units Value
DOC mg/L 4.6 ± 0.31
UV254 1/cm 0.12 ± 0.011
SUVA m/mg.L 2.7 ± 0.21
pH 8.2 ± 0.22
Turbidity NTU 0.6 ± 0.22
Alkalinity mg/L as CaCO3 87 ± 72
Hardness mg/L as CaCO3 95 ± 112
Calcium mg/L 32.8 ± 3.72
Magnesium mg/L 3.2 ± 0.32
Sodium mg/L 6.5 ± 0.82
Chloride mg/L 11.5 ± 1.32
Conductivity S/cm 214 ± 192
1Average and standard deviation of samples analyzed in DWRG laboratory
2Average and standard deviation of values obtained from Ontario Drinking Water Surveillance Program
2010-2012
137
6.2.2 Synthesis of Nanostructured Materials
Four LENs were synthesized via a basic hydrothermal method as described by numerous
researchers (Kasuga et al., 1999; Qamar et al., 2008; Yuan and Su, 2004; Liu et al., 2013] to
create tubular or belt-like LENs. Two grams of P25 nanoparticles from Evonik were added to a
Teflon-lined reactor along with 60 mL of a 10 N NaOH and mixed vigorously using a glass rod.
The Teflon-lined reactor was placed in a muffle furnace and heated to 130oC or 240oC. These
temperatures represent the lower and upper limits used by other researchers in the studies that
were reviewed early in this project (e.g. Liu et al., 2013; Seo et al., 2009). Additional
considerations included the fact that Yuan and Su (2004) reported low yields at temperatures
below 150oC, so it seemed prudent to operate at temperatures above this, and the oven originally
used for the hydrothermal step of the synthesis process had an upper limit of 250oC. The
temperature was maintained at this set point for approximately 24 hours and then the muffle
furnace was turned off and the furnace and autoclave were allowed to cool for an additional 24
hours. The contents of the autoclave were washed with 1.2 L of MilliQ water and then placed
into a sonicated acid bath (0.1 N HCl) for one hour. After acidification, the materials were
washed with MilliQ water until they reached the natural pH of the MilliQ water (5.5 to 6). The
washed nanomaterials were dried in an oven at 70oC for 12 hours and then calcined in a muffle
furnace for four hours at 550oC or 700oC. These two temperatures were chosen because studies
conducted by others suggested that they would result in the formation of dissimilar TiO2
polymorphs, specifically TiO2(B) at 550oC and anatase at 700oC (Zheng et al., 2009). The
synthesis conditions of the four nanomaterials used in this study are summarized in Table 6.2.
The temperatures used in the hydrothermal synthesis step and the calcination step were chosen
based on the work of Yuan and Su (2004), who observed that at a set reaction time and NaOH
concentration (10 M) the hydrothermal temperature determined the size and shape of the
products while the calcination temperature determined the crystal structure of the material. They
observed that hydrothermal temperatures ranging from 100oC to 180oC resulted in the formation
of cylindrical nanotubes while hydrothermal temperatures ranging from 180oC to 250oC yielded
flatter nanoribbons/nanobelts. They also observed that materials calcined at 540oC consisted
primarily of TiO2(B), a metastable form of TiO2 while those calcined at temperatures above
700oC for a short time consisted mainly of anatase.
138
Multiple batches of each nanomaterial were synthesized throughout this study. Before being used
for experiments, each batch was evaluated for consistency based on its ability to degrade
methylene blue dye. Quadruplicate samples containing 50 mL of 0.03 mM methylene blue
solution dosed with 0.1 g/L of TiO2 were stirred and exposed to UVA light (365 nm) with an
average irradiance of 4.9 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes (average UV dose of 11.25 J/cm2). The
average results of these simple quality control tests are also presented in Table 6.2.
Table 6.2 Summary of nanomaterial synthesis conditions and percent degradation of
methylene blue dye during quality control tests
Nanomaterial Hydrothermal
Temperature (TH)
Calcination
Temperature (TC)
Average Degradation
of Methylene Blue
NB 130/550 130 oC 550 oC 37 ± 6%
NB 130/700 130 oC 700 oC 54 ± 1 %
NB 240/550 240 oC 550 oC 41 ± 5%
NB 240/700 240 oC 700 oC 83 ± 1%
6.2.3 Characterization of Nanomaterials
The lab synthesized TiO2 nanomaterials were characterized using transmission electron
microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), available surface area (Brunauer–
Emmett–Teller adsorption method), isoelectric point (IEP), and agglomerate size in MilliQ
purified water and pre-filtered Otonabee River water.
TEM and SAED observation was conducted using a JEOL 2010F TEM/STEM at the Canadian
Centre for Electron Microscopy (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). TEM samples were prepared by
drop casting the dispersions onto holey carbon grids. The images were processed using Gatan
Microscopy Suite: Digial MicrographTM and SAED and FFT images were indexed using
CrysTBox – diffractGUI (Klinger and Jäger, 2015). N2 adsorption isotherms were measured with
a Quantachrome AUTOSORB-1. The samples were outgassed at 200oC under vacuum for 12 h
before the measurement. Surface area was determined by BET method in a relative pressure
range of 0.05 to 0.25.
139
The IEP of each LEN was determined by measuring its zeta potential at pH values ranging from
3 to 9. Zeta potential was measured using a Horiba Zeta Analyzer and all zeta potential
experiments were conducted with 0.1 g/L of TiO2 in MilliQ water buffered with 10 mM NaCl
adjusted to various pH values using 0.1 M NaOH or HCl. Two aliquots were analyzed from each
sample.
A Malvern MasterSizer 3000 was used to evaluate the size distribution of the nanomaterial
particles when prepared in MilliQ purified water and Otonabee River water. The latter was
filtered through a 0.45 m filter ahead of TiO2 addition and measurement to avoid interference
by natural particulate matter in the raw water. The background of each water matrix was
evaluated before nanomaterial addition. Sufficient TiO2 was then added to the water to achieve a
15% obscuration value. For all but one material, this obscuration value occurred at a TiO2
concentration of approximately 0.03 to 0.06 g/L. NB 130/700 could not be analyzed under the
same conditions as the other materials because its optical properties made it impossible to
achieve the required obscuration at a concentration comparable to those used for the other
materials. As a result, the size distribution data collected for NB 130/700 has not been included
in this paper. Each sample was measured 10 times and the results were averaged and graphed as
a volume distribution.
6.2.4 Settling Tests
Calibration curves were prepared for each material to relate turbidity to the concentration of TiO2
in the water. For each material, aliquots of a 10 g/L TiO2 stock solution were dispensed into an
appropriate amount of MilliQ water to create duplicate calibration standards (0.01 g/L, 0.05 g/L,
0.1 g/L, 0.2 g/L, and 0.3 g/L). Each calibration standard was sonicated for 5 minutes and then
analyzed for turbidity on a Hach 2100 N turbidimeter operating in NTU mode with ratio on,
which allowed the turbidimeter to measure in the 0 to 4000 NTU range. The resulting turbidity
results were graphed against concentration to develop a calibration curve for each material. The
relationship between turbidity and concentration was linear within the range studied for all five
materials. For the settling tests, samples with a starting concentration of 0.25 g/L of TiO2 were
dispensed into the turbidimeter cuvette, sonicated for 5 minutes, and placed in the turbidimeter
for a total of 3 hours. The turbidity at midpoint of the cuvette was recorded at the beginning of
the test and at ten minute intervals thereafter.
140
6.2.5 Formation of ·OH Radicals
The formation of hydroxyl radicals by each of the nanomaterials was confirmed and quantified
using the same experimental apparatus described in Section 2.6 and a method adapted from
Arlos et al. (2016). Distilled water was spiked with terephthalic acid (TPA), a probe compound
that yields a fluorescent product (2-hydroxyterephthalic acid, HTPA) upon reaction with
hydroxyl radicals. 50 mL samples containing 0.5 mM TPA dissolved in 6 mM NaOH were dosed
with 0.02 g/L of TiO2 and irradiated with UVA LED light for times ranging from 30 seconds to
15 minutes. The fluorescence of the samples was measured at an excitation wavelength of 315
nm and an emission wavelength of 425 nm. Dark controls (no irradiation) and light only (no
TiO2) controls were also prepared. In all cases no hydroxyl radical formation was observed in the
control samples.
6.2.6 Characterization of NOM
Raw and treated water samples were filtered through a 0.45 m polyethersulfone (PES)
laboratory filter before analysis. Natural organic matter was quantified as dissolved organic
carbon (DOC) or based on UV absorbance at 254 nm (UV254). DOC was measured on an O/I
Analytical Aurora 1030 TOC analyzer and UV254 was measured using an Agilent 8453 UV-Vis
spectrophotometer.
6.2.7 Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation Under UVA Light
All of the degradation experiments were conducted in quadruplicate at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60
minutes of irradiation. Samples were prepared in 75 mL batch reactors filled with 50 mL of 0.03
mM methylene blue dye or unchlorinated raw river water obtained from a water treatment plant
in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. The batch reactors were mixed using magnetic stir bars and
irradiated with UV LEDs (LZ1 UV 365 nm Gen2 Emitter, LED Engin Inc.) with a maximum
irradiance at 365 nm and an average irradiance of 4.9 mW/cm2 at the surface of the sample. The
irradiance of each lamp was confirmed before each test using a radiometer (International Light)
optimized to measure light at 365 nm. The methylene blue degradation experiments were
conducted with a TiO2 dose of 0.1 g/L while the NOM degradation experiments were conducted
with a TiO2 dose of 0.25 g/L to ensure sufficient NOM degradation for subsequent modeling.
Samples were analyzed for DOC and UV light absorbance at 254 nm. The results were evaluated
141
against a pseudo-first-order model for photocatalytic degradation and also normalized to
nanomaterial surface area.
6.2.8 Electrical Energy per Order Calculations
The electrical energy per order (EEO) concept is currently listed as a “figure of merit” for the
evaluation of advanced oxidation processes by IUPAC. Collins and Bolton (2016) define EEO
as:
“…the electrical energy in kilowatt hours (kWh) required to bring about the degradation
of a contaminant C by one order of magnitude in 1 m3 of contaminated water or air.”
The EEO of a given process can be calculated using Equation 6.1, where P is the power
dissipated by the treatment process (kW), V is the volume of water treated in the experiment (L),
Ci is the original concentration of the contaminant, Cf is the final concentration of the
contaminant, and t is the time required to achieve Cf (min).
𝐸𝐸𝑂 =1000 𝑃 𝑡
𝑉 log (𝐶𝑖𝐶𝑓)
(6.1)
For batch experiments, the EEO should be calculated from the electrical energy dose (EED),
which is the electrical energy consumed per unit volume and can be calculated as follows:
𝐸𝐸𝐷 =1000𝑃𝑡
60𝑉 (6.2)
𝐸𝐸𝑂 =𝐸𝐸𝐷
log (𝐶𝑖𝐶𝑓)
(6.3)
In this study, the EEO values calculated using Equation 6.1 were equal to that calculated using
equations 6.2 and 6.3.
142
Results and Discussion
6.3.1 Nanomaterial Characterization
A summary of the physical and surface characteristics of the five nanomaterials employed in this
study is provided in Table 6.3. As described in the subsequent subsections, the nanomaterials
synthesized at 240oC were larger and had fewer surface defects than those synthesized at 130oC
while the linear nanomaterials calcined at 550oC contained both anatase and had higher IEPs and
surface area than those calcined at 700oC. The nanomaterials calcined at 700oC were more
photocatalytically active and produced more hydroxyl radicals than those calcined at 550oC.
6.3.1.1 TEM
TEM images of the four LENs revealed differences in the shape and size of the nanomaterials
formed under the different synthesis conditions (Figure 6.1). As has been observed by others
(Yuan and Su., 2004), the nanomaterials formed at the lower hydrothermal temperature (130oC)
were smaller in both length and width than those formed when the hydrothermal temperature was
set at 240oC. The materials calcined at 550oC had rough, irregular surfaces while those calcined
at 700oC, irrespective of their geometry, appeared to have smooth but segmented surfaces. The
former were similar to materials prepared by Zheng et al. (2010), which were synthesized using a
similar, though not identical method, and calcined at temperatures ranging from 550oC to 650oC.
The authors attributed the irregular surfaces of their materials to the presence of TiO2(B).
Although the three dimensional shapes of the four nanomaterials were difficult to determine
from the images, NB 240/550 appeared to be flat or belt-like, matching the description of
materials synthesized by Yuan and Su (2004) under similar conditions. Individual particles of
NB 240/700 also appeared flat, but were irregularly shaped and occasionally segmented, perhaps
indicating that particles that were originally rectangular in shape were in the process of being
broken down during the high temperature calcination process.
143
Table 6.3 Characteristics of P25 and four linear engineered nanomaterials
Nanomaterial Crystal Phase(s)
BET Surface
Area
(m2/g)
IEP
·OH Production Rate
Constant
(M/min)
Normalized ·OH Production
Rate Constant
(M/min/m2)
R2
P25 Anatase, Rutile 57 6.0 - 6.1 0.620 ± 0.029 0.870 ± 0.040 0.99
NB 130/550 Anatase, TiO2(B) 99 6 .0 - 6.1 0.127 ± 0.011 0.102 ± 0.009 0.97
NB 130/700 Anatase 30 4.2 0.312 ± 0.154 0.832 ± 0.412 0.97
NB 240/550 Anatase, TiO2(B) 55 6.5 0.104 ± 0.009 0.151 ± 0.013 0.97
NB 240/700 Anatase 19 5.0 0.739 ± 0.058 3.110 ± 0.242 0.98
144
Figure 6.1 TEM images of A: NB 130/550, B: NB 130/700, C: NB 240/550, and
D: NB 240/700
The images of NB 130/550 and NB 130/700 revealed that both samples included a large amount
of smaller nanoparticulate matter in addition to larger linear structures similar to those found in
the samples synthesized at 240oC. As will be described later, the characteristics and behaviour of
these two materials differed in many notable ways from one another and from the P25 precursor
material, suggesting that they may represent nanoparticles that have been modified to some
extent by the synthesis process. Alternatively, they may also or instead be the remnants of larger
tubular or belt-like structures that were broken down into smaller nanoparticles during the
calcination step of the process. A similar phenomenon was observed by Qamar et al. (2008) with
nanotubes synthesized at 150oC.
6.3.1.2 SAED and HRTEM
SAED and HRTEM images are shown in Figure 6.2. In all cases, crystal phase differed based on
the temperature used in the calcination step. The crystalline structure of NB 130/550 belonged to
the TiO2(B) monoclinic system as indicated by the indexed SAED pattern (Figure 6.2a1) with
lattice parameters a = 1.216 nm, b = 0.374 nm, c = 0.651 nm, and 𝛽 = 107.29o in the space group
C2/m. The HRTEM image of NB 130/550 (Figure 6.2a2) contained irregular nanocrystalline
grains with d-spacings of 0.35 nm and 0.38 nm, corresponding to the (110) and (003) planes of
TiO2(B). When the calcination temperature was increased to 700oC as in NB 130/700, the crystal
A B C D
145
phase changed from TiO2(B) to an anatase tetragonal system with lattice parameters a = 0.379
nm and c = 0.951 nm) in Figure 6.2b1. The HRTEM image of NB 130/700 (Figure 6.2b2) depicts
more continuous grains with higher crystallinity compared to NB 130/550 with d-spacings of
0.37 nm and 0.49 nm, corresponding to the (101) and (002) planes of anatase.
At the higher hydrothermal synthesis temperature of 240oC, the SAED and HRTEM images of
NB 240/ 550 (Figure 6.2c) and NB 240/700 (Figure 6.2d) exhibited more continuous grains with
fewer visible surface defects when compared with NB 130/550 and NB 130/700. In Figure 6.2c1,
the SAED image of NB 240/550 was indexed as predominantly TiO2(B) The HRTEM images
(Figure 6.2c2) indicate that TiO2(B) crystalline grains are present with d-spacing of 0.66 nm and
0.35 nm corresponding to the (200) and (011) planes, respectively. There were also anatase
grains present with d-spacings of 0.34 nm and 0.46 nm, corresponding to the (101) and (002)
planes. As with the samples hydrothermally synthesized at 130oC, the samples hydrothermally
synthesized at 240oC exhibited the conversion of TiO2(B) to anatase when increasing the
calcination temperature from 550oC to 700oC as observed in Figure 2d. The d-spacings of NB
240/700 (Figure 6.2d2) were 0.37 nm and 0.47 nm, which match the (101) and (002) planes of
anatase.
146
Figure 6.2 TEM images with SAED indexed regions (yellow) and HRTEM images with
corresponding FT image of LEN samples (figure created by Robert Liang at
the University of Waterloo using results obtained at McMaster University)
147
6.3.1.3 Surface Area
The results of surface area testing (Table 6.3) show that hydrothermal temperature and
calcination temperature both had effects on the BET surface area and pore volumes of the LENs.
Surface area can impact adsorption efficiency and photocatalytic activity, though the latter is not
a simple linear relationship (Qamar et al., 2008). In this study, lower temperatures during the
hydrothermal and calcination steps were associated with higher BET surface area. Thus, NB
130/550 was found to have the highest surface area, the only one above that of P25 and at least
double that of the other LENs, and NB 240/700 had the lowest. The surface area results for NB
130/550 and NB 130/700 presented in Table 6.3 compare favourably with results obtained by
Qamar et al. (2008) and Ali et al. (2016) for materials prepared under similar conditions.
6.3.1.4 Isoelectric Point
The isoelectric point of a substance can be determined by identifying the pH at which the zeta
potential of a particle or colloid is zero. The zeta potential of the four LENs and that of P25
nanoparticles are shown in Figure 6.3. Each point represents the average of four measurements
made on a single aliquot by the zeta potential analyzer. The error bars represent the standard
deviation of these four measurements. The estimated isoelectric point of each nanomaterial
based on the results presented in Figure 6.3 are summarized in Table 6.3.The results indicate that
calcination at 550oC had no or only a small effect on the IEP of the LENs relative to their
precursor material (P25) but calcination at 700oC decreased the IEP substantially, particularly for
NB 130/700. These changes may have had an impact on the interactions between the LENs and
the target contaminants in the raw water, particularly in terms of adsorption behaviour. The IEPs
of the different materials would also be expected to have an effect on their agglomeration and
settling behaviour in different water matrices because particles are generally more likely to
agglomerate and settle when the pH of the water matrix is close to their IEP.
148
Figure 6.3 Determination of isoelectric point of NB 130/550 (A), NB 130/700 (B), NB
240/550 (C), NB 240/700 (D), and P25 nanoparticles (E) using zeta potential
at various pH conditions
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zet
a P
ote
nti
al (m
V)
pH
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zet
a P
ote
nti
al (m
V)
pH -60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zet
a P
ote
nia
l (m
V)
pH
A
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zet
a P
ote
nti
al (m
V)
pH
B
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zet
a P
ote
nti
al (m
V)
pH
C D
E
149
6.3.2 Hydroxyl Radical Formation
Figure 6.S.1 in the supplementary material shows the formation of HTPA via the reaction of
TPA with hydroxyl radicals over time by P25 nanoparticles and the four LENs. Although it
cannot be assumed that there was a one to one relationship between ·OH and HTPA formation –
other researchers have assumed that only 80% of the ·OH formed during photocatalysis interact
with TPA to form HTPA (Ishibashi et al., 2010) – it can be assumed that the number of moles of
·OH formed was at least equal to the number of moles of HTPA formed. The materials calcined
at 700oC, which consisted primarily of anatase, produced far more HTPA, and thus ·OH radicals,
than those calcined at 550oC, which contained both anatase and TiO2(B). As shown in Table 6.3,
the rate of HTPA formation was an excellent fit (R2 = 0.97 to 0.99) to a zero order reaction
model. The rate of HTPA formation ranged from 0.104 ± 0.009 M/min for NB 240/550 to 0.739
± 0.058 M/min for NB 240/700. When the reaction rate constants were normalized to the
available surface area it was even more apparent that NB 240/700, which had a normalized
reaction rate constant of 3.110 ± 0.242 M/min/m2, was far superior to the other materials, which
had normalized reaction rate constants ranging from 0.102 ± 0.009 M/min/m2 for NB 130/550 to
0.870 ± 0.040 M/min/m2 for P25, in terms of ·OH radical formation.
6.3.3 Settling Experiments and Modeling
6.3.3.1 Results of Settling Tests
Conventional settling tanks in full scale water treatment plants are usually rectangular in shape,
operate in a continuous flow through manner, and have detention times ranging from 1.5 to 4
hours (Crittenden et al. 2012). The standard bench-scale tests used to evaluate settling in water
treatment applications, which require a relatively large volume of water, were not feasible for
this study because of materials availability limitations. The simplified settling tests that were
conducted instead clearly showed that the four engineered nanomaterials invariably settled more
quickly than P25 (Figure 6.4) in distilled water. NB 240/700 settled most quickly, followed by
NB 130/550 and NB 240/550. The differences between these three materials were most apparent
between 20 and 100 minutes. NB 130/700 was the slowest to settle and showed more variation
between replicates than the other three engineered nanomaterials. An additional settling test was
150
conducted to provide a qualitative visual counterpart to the data presented in Figure 4.
Photographs were taken of the materials at time zero and after 60 minutes and 24 hours of
settling (Figure 6.5). The photographs clearly illustrate the superior settleability of the
engineered nanomaterials compared to P25 nanoparticles in distilled water.
Nanomaterial synthesis conditions had a strong effect on settling efficiency. In general, the
materials that appeared larger in the TEM pictures (NB 240/550 and NB 240/700) settled more
effectively than the smaller materials. The particle size distributions of all of the materials except
NB 130/700 are shown in Figure 6.S.2 and Figure 6.S.3 in the supplementary material. The
majority of the “particles” measured by the particle sizer were almost certainly agglomerates
because although discrete P25 nanoparticles are known to have a diameter between 20 and 30
nm, the particles detected by the particle sizer were between 10 and 100 times larger than this.
The particle size distribution of NB 240/550 indicates that the solutions made with this material
in both distilled water matrix and the river water matrix contained more large particles than the
suspensions made with the other engineered nanomaterials. The P25 particle size distribution
skewed toward much smaller particle sizes than those of any of the engineered nanomaterials.
All of the materials tested also varied in terms of their uniformity as indicated by the shape of
their particle size distribution. The NB 240/550 particles were the least uniform while those
formed by P25 were the most uniform.
151
Figure 6.4 Settling of P25 nanoparticles and four engineered nanomaterials in purified
water and raw Otonabee River water (n = 3, error bars represent the
standard deviation from the mean)
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rem
oval
of
Tu
rbid
ity
Time (min)
P25 NB 130/550 NB 130/700 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rem
oval
of
Tu
rbid
ity
Time (min)
P25 NB 130/550 NB 130/700 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
A
B
152
Figure 6.5 Photographs of P25 (A), NB 130/550 (B), NB 130/700 (C), NB 240/550 (D),
and NB 240/700 (E) settling in purified water
0 min
60 min
24 h
A B C D E
153
At first glance, the results of the particle size tests did not support the hypothesis that
agglomerate size alone drove settling behaviour. The largest agglomerates were formed by NB
240/550, but it settled more slowly than NB 130/550 or NB 240/700, both of which had size
distributions that skewed toward smaller particle sizes. This result may have been related to the
conditions of the particle sizing test, which was only able to measure dilute solutions of the
materials (approximately 0.05 g/L) and the behaviour of the materials at this concentration may
not accurately predict their behaviour at higher concentrations. In our study, the larger materials
did, for the most part, settle more quickly than the smaller materials. Other researchers have
noted that the density of nanoparticle agglomerates is often lower than that of the constituent
nanoparticles (Deloid et al., 2014). For example, Liu et al. (2013) determined that the effective
density of the agglomerates formed by their linear engineered TiO2 nanomaterials was 1.2 g/cm3.
Numerous factors can impact the effective density of the agglomerates formed by nanomaterials
in solution including individual particle size, shape, and surface area (Liu et al., 2013; Hotze et
al., 2010). For example, for linear TiO2 nanomaterials, higher surface area has been linked to
greater stabilization of nanomaterial suspensions. NB 240/550, which had a surface area of 55
m2/g, did indeed settle more slowly than NB 240/700, which had a surface area of 19 m2/g. The
surface charge on the particles may also have impacted their settling efficiency because particles
are more likely to agglomerate when the pH of the matrix is close to their IEP. The distilled
water used in this study had a pH between 5.5 and 6. At this pH NB 130/550, NB 240/550, and
NB 240/700 were all neutrally charged but NB 130/700 was negatively charged, making it more
likely to remain dispersed in water. These phenomena alone do not explain the settling behaviour
of NB 130/550, however, indicating that other forces may also have affected the agglomeration
and settling of this nanomaterial in distilled water.
The settling tests were repeated in the Otonabee River water as shown in Figure 4B. In this case,
P25 nanoparticles actually settled more quickly than any of the engineered nanomaterials. This
surprising finding may indicate the agglomerates formed by the P25 nanoparticles in this water
matrix were larger or denser than those formed in the distilled water matrix (see analysis in
supplemental material). In contrast, the settling of the larger LENs (NB 240/550 and NB
240/700) appears to have been hindered in the river water matrix. This effect was less
pronounced for the smaller LENs (NB 130/550 and NB 240/700). The settling behaviour
observed in the river water was likely influenced by various components of the water matrix,
154
particularly pH, NOM, and ions such as calcium, as well as the characteristics of the
nanomaterials themselves. As described in the previous paragraph, pH can influence the surface
charge of the nanomaterial and thus its propensity to agglomerate. The pH of the river water was
approximately 8, which is above the IEPs of all five nanomaterials used in this study. At this pH,
the materials should all be less likely to agglomerate than at pH values closer to their IEPS (pH 4
to 6.5). Increasing levels of ions can minimize the repulsive electrostatic forces that keep
particles from coming together, allowing van der Waals forces to dominate and encouraging
greater agglomeration (Hotze et al., 2010). Additionally, the presence of calcium ions in the
water matrix has been shown to increase the apparent IEP of TiO2 nanomaterials as well as the
size of their agglomerates and sedimentation efficiency (Liu et al., 2013; Hotze et al., 2010),
while humic acid (a major component of NOM) has been shown to have the opposite effects (Liu
et al., 2013; Thio et al., 2011). The size and shape of the nanomaterials can also impact their
sedimentation efficiency because these material characteristics can influence the size and shape
of the resulting agglomerates and the interactions of the materials with water matrix components
(Hotze et al., 2010). For example, Liu et al. (2013) showed that humic acid had a strong
stabilizing effect on suspensions of linear TiO2 nanomaterials but that the effect of ionic strength
was dependent on the constituent ions and their concentration – in some cases, the addition of
calcium actually stabilized the suspensions. Some or all of these phenomena were likely at play
during the settling experiments presented in this study.
6.3.3.2 Modeling of Settling Results
Stokes’ Law is commonly used to model the settling of discrete particles through a liquid
medium. For a hard spherical particle, Stokes’ Law can be simplified to:
𝑣𝑠 =𝑔(𝜌𝑝−𝜌𝑤)𝑑𝑝
2
18𝜇 (6.4)
Where vs is the terminal settling velocity of the particle (m/s), g is the acceleration due to gravity
(9.81 m/s2), ρp is the density of the particle (kg/m3), ρw is the density of the water (kg/m3), dp is
the diameter of the particle (m), and is the viscosity of the water (kg/m.s).
The settling velocity predicted by Stokes’ Law for P25 nanoparticles settling independently in
solution was approximately six orders of magnitude slower than typical settling velocities for
155
small and medium sized alum flocs as listed by Crittenden et al. (2012) (see supplementary
material). The settling velocities predicted for the LENs, which were calculated under the
unrealistic assumption that the LENs or their agglomerates would behave as hard spheres, ranged
from one to two orders of magnitude slower than typical values for alum flocs. If instead it was
assumed that the various nanomaterials formed spherical agglomerates with hydrodynamic
diameters equal to the D50 values obtained during the particle sizing tests, that the density of
these agglomerates was equal to TiO2’s material density (4.26 g/cm3), and that the agglomerates
settled independently of one another, the settling velocities predicted for the four linear
engineered nanomaterials ranged from 5.8 x 10-5 m/s for NB 130/550 in the river water matrix to
9.2 x 10-4 m/s for NB 240/550 in the distilled water matrix. The latter is within the range of
typical settling velocities for small alum flocs provided by Crittenden et al. (2012). Finally, if the
effective density of the agglomerates was assumed to be equal to that reported by Liu et al.
(2013) for their LENs (1.2 g/cm3), the settling velocities of the nanomaterials decreased by
approximately one order of magnitude.
When it was assumed that individual (non-agglomerated) particles settled independently of one
another and that these particles had a density equal to the material density of TiO2 (4.26 g/cm3),
some of the settling behaviour observed in distilled water was a reasonable match to that
predicted by Stokes’ Law. For example, Stokes’ Law predicted that it would take 56 minutes for
50% of the original mass of NB 130/550 to settle out of water, and 50% removal was indeed
achieved in both water matrices within this time interval. In contrast, Stokes’ Law predicted that
50% of the NB 240/550 would settle out of the distilled water matrix within 9 minutes, but it
took approximately an hour to achieve 50% removal of this nanomaterial in the distilled water
matrix and 50% removal was not achieved in the river water matrix within the two hour
timeframe of the test. These assumptions are, however, somewhat unrealistic, as the
nanoparticles and LENs undoubtedly formed agglomerates under most, if not all conditions. The
more likely explanation is that the nanomaterials formed agglomerates with effective densities
below the material density of TiO2 and that this, in combination with the overall size of the
agglomerates, drove their settling behaviour.
As shown in the supplemental file, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the effect of
effective density on nanomaterial settling according to Stokes’ Law. Based on this analysis, it
was determined that agglomerates of NB 130/550, NB 240/550, and NB 240/700 would have to
156
have effective densities of 1.37 g/cm3, 1.02 g/cm3, and 1.21 g/cm3, respectively, to conform to
Stokes’ Law in the distilled water and 1.44 g/cm3, < 1.06 g/cm3, and 1.16 g/cm3 in the river
water matrix. When these values were inputted into the Stokes’ Law equation, the resulting
predicted settling velocities ranged from 3.25 x 10-6 m/s for NB 240/550 in river water to 1.33 x
10-5 m/s for NB 240/700 in distilled water, which are approximately two orders of magnitude
lower than typical values for alum flocs (Crittenden et al. 2012). The same analysis suggested
that P25 nanoparticles formed agglomerates in the river water matrix that were smaller in size
but had a higher greater effective density (3.50 g/cm3) than those formed by the LENs. This
likely explains why the nanoparticles settled more quickly than the LENs in this water matrix.
Overall, this analysis suggests that the settling behaviour of the agglomerates of the P25
nanoparticles and the LENs could, to some extent, be modeled using Stokes’ Law but also that
the LENs settled more slowly than the particles formed during other common water treatment
processes such as coagulation. The practical implication of this is that more and/or larger
sedimentation tanks would be required for a system based around the LENs compared to one
employing coagulation.
The calculations and results presented above are predicated on numerous assumptions, some of
them better supported than others. In order to fully characterize the settling behaviour of the
nanomaterials used in this study it would be necessary to know both the size and the effective
density of the agglomerates formed by each material in the two water matrices. This was beyond
the scope of this proof of concept study, however, it would be a necessary exercise if
sedimentation were selected as the separation mechanism of choice in a TiO2-based water
treatment system.
6.3.4 Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye Over Time
Methylene blue degradation has been used by many researchers as a measure of the effectiveness
of photocatalytic systems (Mills, 2012). In this study, P25 and NB 240/700 were nearly equal in
terms of their ability to degrade methylene blue (Figure 6.6), achieving 86 ± 4 % and 80 ± 2 %
removal, respectively, after 30 minutes, suggesting that they were equally photocatalytically
active under the experimental conditions despite the fact that NB 240/700 had a substantially
smaller available surface area than the P25 nanoparticles (19 m2/g vs. 57 m2/g), likely because
157
NB 240/700 contained predominantly anatase whereas P25 contains both the rutile and the
anatase phases of TiO2 . NB 130/700, which also consisted predominantly of anatase, was
slightly less effective for methylene blue degradation than NB 240/700, achieving 58 ± 5%
removal after 30 minutes, despite its higher surface area, possibly owing to the larger number of
surface defects on this material relative to NB 240/700. The two LENs that were calcined at
550oC were less photocatalytically active than P25 or the materials calcined at 700oC, achieving
33 ± 4% (NB 130/550) and 40 ± 5% (NB 240/550).
Figure 6.6 Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye by P25 nanoparticles and
four LENs (error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean)
As shown in Table 6.4, In most cases, methylene blue degradation by the LENs was a good fit to
a first order degradation model (R2 > 0.9). This is in line with the findings of other researchers
(Ali et al., 2016; Mills and McFarlane, 2007). The only material where this relationship did not
have a R2 above 0.90 was NB 240/700, which was a result of the very fast degradation observed
between 0 and 5 minutes. The reaction rate constants in Table 6.4 confirm that the LENs
calcined at 700oC, which consisted primarily of anatase, were more effective than those calcined
at 550oC, which consisted primarily of TiO2(B). A small amount of decolourization was
observed in the absence of TiO2 at longer irradiation times. Although methylene blue only
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Met
hyle
ne
Blu
e D
egra
dati
on
Irradiation Time (min)
Light Only P25 NB 130/550 NB 130/700 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
158
absorbs a small amount of light at 365 nm, it can nonetheless cause photobleaching due to a
combination of photoreductive and photooxidative reactions (Mills, 2012).
Table 6.4 Removal, reaction rate constants, and R2 values for the pseudo-first-order
degradation of methylene blue dye by UV light, P25 nanoparticles, and four
LENs (error values represent the 95% confidence interval)
Material
Fit of First Order
Degradation Model
(R2)
Reaction Rate
Constant, k (1/min)
Normalized Rate
Constant, knorm
(1/(min*m2))
Light Only 0.52 -0.001 ± 0.000 n/a
P25 0.94 -0.021 ± 0.002 -0.075 ± 0.009
NB 130/550 0.90 -0.010 ± 0.001 -0.020 ± 0.003
NB 130/700 0.95 -0.012 ± 0.001 -0.078 ± 0.008
NB 240/550 0.96 -0.007 ± 0.001 -0.024 ± 0.002
NB 240/700 0.78 -0.012 ± 0.003 -0.130 ± 0.03
The relationship between crystallinity and reactivity was further elucidated by normalizing the
reaction rate constants to the available surface area (TiO2 dose multiplied by the BET surface
area and the volume of the sample). The differences between the unmodified reaction rate
constants and the normalized ones indicate that the overall effectiveness of each material is a
function of both surface area and crystallinity. For example, the normalized rate constant for NB
240/700 was over twice that of P25 and NB 130/700, indicating that it was by far the most
photocatalytically active of the materials tested in this study. This is likely because it had fewer
defects and higher crystallinity as indicated by the more resolved lattice spacings in the HRTEM
images. In contrast, NB 130/550 was the least photocatalytically active of the materials tested.
The HRTEM analysis for this material indicated that it was predominantly TiO2(B), a less
photocatalytically active form of TiO2, and that it contained a large number of surface defects,
which likely further impaired its reactivity. It nonetheless had an unmodified reaction rate
constant nearly equal to that of NB 130/700, which was primarily made up of anatase. However,
the large surface area of NB 130/550 (99 m2/g) relative to the other materials allowed it to
remove a comparable amount of dye despite its relatively low reactivity.
159
6.3.5 Removal of DBP Precursor Surrogates via Adsorption and Photocatalysis
Under the experimental conditions used in this study, P25 nanoparticles removed 20% of the
DOC (Figure 6.7) and 31% of the UV254 (Figure 6.8) present in the raw water through
adsorption alone (i.e. at 0 minutes of irradiation). This is a substantial amount of removal given
the relatively low concentration of TiO2 employed in this study. The four LENs were less
effective that P25 for DOC adsorption but all four nonetheless adsorbed at least a small amount.
NB 130/550 and NB 240/550 were more adsorptive than the two materials calcined at 700oC,
likely owing to their greater surface area. Electrostatic attraction and repulsion effects may also
have contributed to adsorption to some extent. Most NOM compounds are negatively charged
above pH 4, thus in Otonabee River water, which has a pH of approximately 8, NOM would be
negatively charged and the TiO2 nanomaterials would either be electrostatically neutral or
negatively charged (NB 130/700 and NB 240/700). Electrostatic repulsion between negatively
charged materials and negatively charged NOM may have prevented some adsorption that would
otherwise take place due to other forces. This would explain why the materials calcined at
700oC, which have lower IEPs and are negatively charged at ambient pH were less likely to
adsorb NOM than P25 or the two materials calcined at 550oC.
All four LENs were able to degrade DOC and UV254 to some extent as shown in Figure 6.7 and
Figure 6.8. No removal of either parameter was observed in the light only controls (results not
shown). P25 and NB 130/550 were the most effective for both DOC and UV254 removal,
followed closely by NB 240/700. NB 240/550 and NB 130/700 were less effective but
nonetheless removed over 25% of the DOC and approximately 70% of the UV254 in the raw
water upon irradiation with UVA light.
.
160
Figure 6.7 Photocatalytic degradation of DOC by P25 nanoparticles and four LENs
Figure 6.8 Removal of UV254 by photocatalysis with P25 nanoparticles and four LENs
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0 15 30 45 60
DO
C R
emo
va
l
Irradiation Time (min)
P25 NB 130/500 NB 130/700 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0 15 30 45 60
UV
254 R
emoval
Irradiation Time (min)
P25 NB 130/500 NB 130/700 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
161
For the most part, the degradation of DOC by P25 and the LENs fit a pseudo-first-order
degradation model. The reaction rate constants (Table 6.5) followed the same trend as the
removal values shown in Figure 6.7 and Figure 6.8, however, when the rate constants were
normalized to the available surface area, a different pattern emerged. The materials calcined at
700oC consistently had higher (1.5-3 times higher) normalized reaction rate constants than P25
and the two materials calcined at 550oC, likely because the former consisted mainly of anatase
and thus were more photocatalytically active and also because they produced more hydroxyl
radicals upon irradiation. P25 and NB 130/550 nonetheless achieved good DOC and UV254
removal owing to their high surface area.
Table 6.5 Reaction rate constants and R2 values for the pseudo-first-order degradation
of DOC by UV light, P25 nanoparticles, and four LENs (error values
represent the 95% confidence interval of the rate constant)
Material DOC UV254
R2 Rate constant, k
(1/min)
Normalized rate
constant, knorm
(1/(min*m2))
R2 Rate constant,
k (1/min)
Normalized rate
constant, knorm
(1/(min*m2))
P25 0.93 -0.003 ± 0.000 -0.005 ± 0.001 0.96 -0.015 ± 0.001 -0.021 ± 0.002
NB 130/550 0.97 -0.004 ± 0.000 -0.003 ± 0.000 0.98 -0.019 ± 0.001 -0.015 ± 0.001
NB 130/700 0.93 -0.002 ± 0.000 -0.005 ± 0.001 0.99 -0.014 ± 0.001 -0.038 ± 0.002
NB 240/550 0.80 -0.001 ± 0.000 -0.001 ± 0.000 0.95 -0.008 ± 0.001 -0.011 ± 0.001
NB 240/700 0.97 -0.003 ± 0.000 -0.013 ± 0.001 0.96 -0.016 ± 0.002 -0.065 ± 0.006
Our previous work (Gora and Andrews, 2017) and that of other researchers (Liu et al.,2008),
though limited to P25 nanoparticles, has demonstrated that UV/TiO2 photocatalysis degrades
larger, more aromatic NOM compounds into smaller, less aromatic ones. This process has been
linked to the formation of intermediate compounds that are more reactive with chlorine (and thus
more likely to form DBPs when chlorine is added for disinfection) after short UV/TiO2 treatment
times followed by the gradual degradation of these intermediates at longer treatment times, with
a resulting decrease in the overall DBPfp of the water (Gora and Andrews, 2017; Liu et al.,
2010). The higher DOC and UV254 degradation rates observed for some of the LENs, especially
after normalization, suggests that these materials may be even more effective than P25 for
162
DBPfp reduction. Specifically, NB 240/700 may prove to react more quickly with DBP
precursors and thus require less time to reach a point where overall DBPfp is decreasing, rather
than increasing, and is the subject of ongoing research.
6.3.6 Electrical Energy per Order
The EEO concept is useful for comparing different types of light-driven systems and processes.
For example, Collins and Bolton (2016) compared EEOs for methylene blue degradation to show
that UV/H2O2 was far more efficient than UV/TiO2 for dye decolourization (EEOUVH2O2 = 0.63
kWh/order/m3 vs. EEOUVTiO2 = 16.4 kWh/order/m3). The EEO for UV/TiO2 reported by Collins
et al. is lower than those calculated for P25 and the various LENs in the current study (Table
6.6). It should be noted, however, that the authors used a much lower starting concentration of
methylene blue (0.32 mg/L), did not report the experimental conditions (UV source, UV
irradiance, H2O2 or TiO2 dose, etc.).
Table 6.6 EEO values provided by Collins and Bolton (2016) for methylene blue
degradation by UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 and EEO values for the degradation
of methylene blue by P25 and second generation LENs irradiated by UVA
LEDs
Process Dose Lamp Type Lamp Power Average Irradiance EEO
g/L W mW/cm2 kWh/order/m3
UV/H2O21 --2 UV3 --2 --2 0.63
UV/TiO21 --2 UV3 --2 --2 16.4
Light Only -- UVA LED 2.7 4.9 1,121
P25 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 42
NB 130/550 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 95
NB 130//700 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 81
NB 240/550 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 133
NB 240/700 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 69
1From Collins and Bolton (2016)
2Not reported
3Power (W) not specified
163
The EEO values for methylene blue decolourization using P25 and lab synthesized LENs shown
in Table 6.6 follow a similar trend to the reaction rate constants for methylene blue
decolourization in Table 6.5. That is, P25 had the lowest EEO value, implying that it was the
most efficient material. It was followed by NB 240/700 and NB 130/700, the two materials that
were primarily composed of anatase. Finally, the two materials that contained both anatase and
TiO2 had the highest EEOs, implying that a system employing one these nanomaterials would be
less efficient than one employing P25 or one of the nanomaterials calcined at 700oC.
A study by Yen and Yen (2015) explored the use of UV/H2O2 for DOC and THMfp removal
from a synthetic water matrix made with commercial humic acids. Their experiments were
conducted using a 9 W low pressure UV lamp (maximum irradiance at 254 nm) and three doses
of H2O2. EEO values for the removal of DOC and THMfp by P25 and the second generation
LENs are compared to those reported by Yen and Yen (2015) for UV/H2O2 treatment in Figure
6.9.
Figure 6.9 EEO values for DOC removal from synthetic water via UV/H2O2 treatment
with a low pressure UV lamp (Yen and Yen, 2015) and DOC removal from
raw surface water via UV/TiO2 treatment with P25 and four lab synthesized
LENs irradiated with UVA LEDs
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
EE
O (
kW
h/o
rder
/m3)
UV/TiO2UV/H2O2
164
Yen and Yen achieved much lower EEO values for the degradation of DOC using UV/H2O2 than
were obtained in the current study of UV/TiO2 treatment with P25 and lab synthesized LENs
irradiated with UVA LEDs. This may be related to the type of NOM employed in each study
(commercial humic acids vs. real surface water NOM), the absence of ROS scavengers in their
synthetic water matrix, or due to other experimental factors. It may also be that UV/H2O2 is
simply a more effective treatment for NOM removal than UV/TiO2, but this cannot be claimed
with confidence without evidence from parallel experiments run on the same water matrix under
UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 experimental conditions that are comparable in terms of energy
utilization and/or materials cost. It is also unclear whether this trend will be hold true for DBP
precursor removal.
6.3.7 Comparison of Reaction Rate Constants and Implications for Degradation Pathways
The degradation rate constants and normalized degradation rate constants for DOC and UV254
were graphed against the formation rate constants for HTPA, a measure of ·OH radical formation
(see Table 6.S.7 in the supplementary material). There was no obvious correlation between the
DOC or UV254 degradation rates and ·OH radical production rates, suggesting that not all of
nanomaterials reduced these parameters via ·OH radical mediated reactions alone. There was a
moderate correlation between the normalized DOC and UV254 degradation rates and ·OH
radical production as predicted by HTPA formation. The correlation was much stronger if P25
removed from the analysis (see Figure 6.S.4). This indicates that the normalized DOC and
UV254 degradation rates were good proxies for ·OH radical-related photocatalytic NOM
degradation by the LENs but not for its photocatalytic degradation by P25. The fact that the
correlation only existed when the NOM degradation rates were normalized to surface area
suggests any additional NOM degradation observed for the LENs was related to surface
phenomena such as oxidation by photo-generated electron holes. NOM degradation by P25
appears to have been more complex, possibly due to the formation of other ROS (e.g.
superoxide) upon irradiation.
The most interesting ramification of these correlations is that different materials
photocatalytically degraded NOM through different oxidative pathways and that for the LENs,
these pathways were, to some extent, determined by the calcination temperature used during
165
synthesis. For example, NB 240/700 and NB 130/550 achieved 86 ± 1% 92 ± 1% reduction in
UV254 after 60 minutes of irradiation. As indicated by the results in Figure S.1 and Table 3,
however, NB 240/700 produced over 5 times as much HTPA, and thus ·OH radicals, as NB
130/550. The fact that NB 130/550 was nonetheless equally capable of reducing the UV254 of
the water indicates that other phenomena contributed to NOM removal by this material and the
discrepancy between the normalized and non-normalized degradation rate constants suggest that
these phenomena were likely surface related (e.g. NOM oxidation via photo-generated holes).
The practical implications of these differences on DBP precursor removal are as of yet unclear,
however, one of them might be that some LENs will be more likely than others to be negatively
impacted by water matrix components such as ROS scavengers, which consume ·OH radicals
and thus slow the overall rate of removal of target contaminants (Liao et al., 2010), or species
that compete with NOM for adsorption sites on the TiO2 surface, which may decrease the
effectiveness of LENs that operate primarily via surface mediated degradation reactions.
Research to further characterize the mechanisms underlying NOM degradation by the different
LENs is ongoing.
Conclusions
Four LENs were successfully synthesized using a simple hydrothermal method. The LENs
differed from one another and from industry standard nanoparticles in terms of size, BET surface
area, and other physical and chemical characteristics. The materials were all able to degrade
substantial amounts of natural organic matter after less than an hour of irradiation with high
intensity UVA LED light at 365 nm.
The materials varied substantially in terms of their ability to degrade two disinfection byproduct
precursor surrogates, DOC concentration and UV254 absorbance, but greater removals were
consistently observed for materials calcined at the higher temperature of 700oC, particularly
when the results were normalized to surface area. The variation was related to surface area,
charge, propensity to agglomerate, crystal phase, and the presence of defects within the crystal
structure. The reaction rates were particularly influenced by the surface area and crystallinity of
the materials. A simple fluorescence-based test was used to compare the nanomaterials in terms
of their propensity to generate hydroxyl radicals when illuminated with UVA LED light. The
166
results suggest that the predominantly anatase materials interacted with NOM primarily via
hydroxyl radical mediated degradation reactions whereas the mixed phased nanomaterials
removed NOM through a combination of adsorption and degradation reactions with photo-
generated holes or ROS other than the ·OH radical.
All four engineered nanomaterials settled out from distilled water more quickly than standard
P25 nanoparticles, likely due to their size and effective density of their agglomerates relative to
those of P25 in this matrix. The results were reversed in a real river water sample – P25 settled
out quickly, possibly due to the presence of agglomeration-inducing ions such as calcium in this
water matrix, but the settling of the larger LENs was slightly hindered, likely due to the presence
of NOM in the river water. Based on their ability to remove NOM their propensity to settle out
of water, a subset of these engineered nanomaterials may be a viable alternative to P25 for
drinking water treatment, though their effectiveness may be limited in water matrices containing
elevated levels of ROS scavengers.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Leonardo Furtado, Jim Wang, Tassia
Brito, Adrielle Costa, Wan-Ying (Jenny) Yue, Nathan Moore, Alireza Mahdavi, and Jeffrey
Siegel to this project. Funding for this study was provided through Canada’s Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council’s Strategic Project Grant program [STPGP 430654-12] and
Canada Graduate Scholarship program as well as through the Ontario Graduate Scholarship
program.
167
References
Ali, S., Granbohm, H., Ge, Y., Singh, V.K. (2016) Crystal structure and photocatalytic properties
of titanate nanotubes prepared by chemical processing and subsequent annealing, Journal of
Materials Science, 51, 7322-7335
Arlos, M., Liang, R., Hatat-Fraile, M., Bragg, L., Zhou, Y-N, Servos, M., Andrews, S. (2016)
Photocatalytic decomposition of selected estrogens and their estrogenic activity by UV-LED
irradiated TiO2 immobilized on porous titanium sheets via thermal-chemical oxidation, Journal
of Hazardous Materials, 318, 541-550
Avisar, D., Horovitz, I., Lozzi, L., Ruggieri, F., Baker, M., Abel, M-L, Mamane, H. (2013)
Impact of water quality on removal of carbamazepine in natural waters by N-doped TiO2 photo-
catalytic thin film surfaces, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 244-245, 463-471
Bolton, J.R. and Linden, K.G. (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose)
determination in bench-scale UV experiments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129, 209-
215
Collins, J. and Bolton, J.R. (2016) The Advanced Oxidation Handbook, American Water Works
Association, Denver, CO
Crittenden, J.C., Trussell, R.R., Hand, D.W., Howe, K.J., Tchobanoglous, G. (2012) MWH’s
Water Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons
Daneshvar, N., Salari, D., Niaei, A., Rasoulifard, M.H., Khataee, A.R. (2005) Immobilization of
TiO2 nanopowder on glass beads for the photocatalytic decolorization of an azo dye C.I. Direct
Red 23, Journal of Environmental Science and Health 40, 1605-1617
Fotiou, T., Triantis, T.M., Kaloudis, T., Hiskia, A. (2015) Evaluation of the photocatalytic
activity of TiO2 based catalysts for the degradation and mineralization of cyanobacterial toxins
and water off-odor compounds under UV-A, solar, and visible light, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 261, 17-26
168
Gora, S. and Andrews, S. (2017) Adsorption of natural organic matter and disinfection byproduct
precursors from surface water onto TiO2 nanoparticles: pH effects, isotherm modelling and
implications for using TiO2 for drinking water treatment, Chemosphere, 174, 363-370
Hrudey,S. (2009) Chlorination disinfection by-products, public health risk tradeoffs, and me,
Water Research 43 (2009) 2057-2092
Hu, A., Zhang, X., Oakes, K.D., Peng, P.N., Zhou, Y., Servos, M. (2011) Hydrothermal growth
of free standing TiO2 nanowire membranes for the photocatalytic degradation of
pharmaceuticals, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 278-285
Ishibashi, K, Fujishima, A., Watanabe, T., Hashimoto, K. (2000) Quantum yields of active
oxidative species formed on TiO2 photocatalyst, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A:
Chemistry, 134, 139-142
Kanakaraju, D., Glass, B.D., Oelgemoller, M. (2014) Titanium dioxide photocatalysis for
pharmaceutical wastewater treatment, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 12, 27-47
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A. Sekino, T., Niihara, K. (1999) Titania nanotubes prepared
by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11, 1307-1311
Kim, S-C and Lee, D-K (2005) Preparation of TiO2-coated hollow glass beads and their
application to the control of algal growth in eutrophic water, Microchemical Journal 80, 227-232
Klinger, M. and Jäger, A (2015) Crystallographic Tool Box (CrysTBox): automated tools for
transmission electron microscopists and crystallographers. Journal of Applied Crystallography
48 (2015) doi:10.1107/S1600576715017252.
Krasner, S. (2009) The formation and control of emerging disinfection by-products of health
concern, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 367, 4077-4095
Leshuk, T., Everett, P., Krishnakumar, Wong, H.K., Linley, S., Gu, F., (2013) Mesoporous
magnetically recyclable photocatalysts for water treatment, Journal of Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology, 13, 3127-3132
169
Liao, C-H, Kang, S-F, Wu, F-A (2010) Hydroxyl radical scavenging role of chloride and
bicarbonate ions in the H2O2/UV process, Chemosphere, 44, 1193-1200
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Chiang, K., Drikas, M., Amal, R. (2008) Removal of
humic acid using TiO2 photocatalytic process – Fractionation and molecular weight
characterisation studies, Chemosphere, 72, 263-271
Liu, S, Lim, M., Amal, R. (2014) TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption and
effective photocatalytic regeneration, Chemical Engineering Science 105 (2014) 46-52
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C.W.K., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., Amal, R. (2010) Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research 44, 2525-2532
Liu, W., Sun, W, Borthwick, A.G.L., Ni, J. (2013) Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide, titanate nanotubes, and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng.
Aspects 434, 319-328
Mills, A. and McFarlane, M. (2007) Current and possible future methods of assessing the
activities of photocatalyst films, Catalysis Today, 129, 22-28
Mills, A. (2012) An overview of the methylene blue ISO test for assessing the activities of
photocatalytic films, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 128, 144-149
Ng, M., Kho, E.T., Liu, S., Lim, M., Amal, R. (2014) Highly adsorptive and regenerative
magnetic TiO2 for natural organic matter (NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 246, 196-203
Nosaka, Y. and Nosaka, A.Y. (2013) Identification and roles of the active species generated on
various catalysts, in: Photocatalysis and Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent
Applications, Ed. Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co., pp. 1-24
Philippe, K.K., Hans, C., MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., Parsons, S.A. (2010)
Photocatalytic oxidation, GAC, and biotreatment combinations: An alternative for the
coagulation of hydrophilic rich waters?, Environmental Technology, 31, 1423-1434
170
Pifer, A.D. and Fairey, J.L. (2014) Suitability of organic matter surrogates to predict
trihalomethane formation in drinking water sources, Environmental Engineering Science, 31,
117-126
Qamar, M., Yoon, C.R., Oh, H.J., Lee, N.H., Park, K., Kim, D.H., Lee, K., Lee, W.J., Kim, S.J.,
(2008) Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanotubes obtained from titanium dioxide,
Catalysis Today, 131, 3-14
Rincón, A-G and Pulgarin, C. (2004) Bactericidal action of illuminated TiO2 on pure Escherichia
coli and natural bacterial consortia: post irradiation events in the dark and assessment of the
effective disinfection time, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 49, 99-112
Seo, M-H, Yuasa, M., Kida, T., Huh, J-S, Shimanoe, K., Yamazoe, N. (2009) Gas sensing
characteristics and porosity control of nanostructured films composed of TiO2 nanotubes,
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 137, 513-520
Shi, H., Magaye, R., Castranova, V., Zhao, J. (2013) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: A review
of current toxicological data, Particle and Fibre Toxicology 10:15
Turolla, A, Piazzoli, A., Budarz, J., Wiesner, M., Antonellia, M. (2015) Experimental
measurement and modelling of reactive species generation in TiO2 nanoparticle photocatalysis,
Chemical Engineering Journal, 271, 260-268
van Leeuwen, J., Daly, R., Holmes, R. (2005) Modeling the treatment of drinking water to
maximize dissolved organic matter removal and minimize disinfection by-product formation,
Desalination, 176, 81-89
Wong, C.L., Tan, Y.N., Mohamed, A.R. (2011) A review on the formation of titania nanotube
photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1669-
1680
Xing, Z., Zhou, W., Du, F., Qu, Y., Tian, G., Pan, K., Tian, C., Fu, H. (2014) A floating
macro/mesoporous crystalline anatase TiO2 ceramic with enhanced photocatalytic performance
for recalcitrant wastewater degradation, Dalton Transactions, 43, 790
171
Yang, Y. and Westerhoff, P. (2014) Presence in, and Release of, Nanomaterials from Consumer
Products, Nanomaterials, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 811 (Capco, D.G.
and Chen, Y., editors), Springer Science + Business Media, Berlin
Yen, H.Y. and Yen, L. S. (2015) Reducing THMfp by H2O2/UV oxidation for humic acid of
small molecular weight, Environmental Technology, 36 (4), 417-423
Yuan, Z-Y and Su, B-L (2004) Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 241, 173-183
Zheng, D., Andrews, R.C., Andrews, S.A., Taylor-Edmonds, L. (2015) Effects of coagulation on
the removal of natural organic matter, genotoxicity, and precursors to halogenated furanones,
Water Research, 70, 118-129
Zhou, D., Ji, Z., Jiang, X., Dunphy, D.R., Brinker, J., Keller, A.A. (2013) Influence of material
properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration, PLOS One, 8, e81239
172
Supplementary Material
Figure 6.S.1 HTPA / ·OH radical formation by P25 and four linear engineered
nanomaterials irradiated with UVA LED light (n = 3, error bars represent
standard deviation from the mean)
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 2 4 6 8 10
HT
PA
(u
M)
Irradiation Time (min)
NB 130/550 NB 130/700 NB 240/550 NB 240/700 P25
173
Figure 6.S.2 Particle size distribution for P25 nanoparticles, NB 130/550, NB 240/550, and
NB 240/700 suspended in distilled water
Figure 6.S.3 Particle size distribution for P25 nanoparticles, NB 130/550, NB 240/550, and
NB 240/700 suspended in river water
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Per
cen
t
Diameter (m)
P25 NB 130/550 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Per
cen
t
Diameter (m)
P25 NB 130/550 NB 240/550 NB 240/700
0
2
4
6
8
0 10 20 30 40 50
Per
cen
t
Diameter (m)
A
0
2
4
6
8
0 10 20 30 40 50
Per
cen
t
Diameter (m)
B
174
Settling Calculations and Analysis
Terminal Settling Velocities
For a hard spherical particle, Stokes’ Law can be simplified to:
𝑣𝑠 =𝑔(𝜌𝑝−𝜌𝑤)𝑑𝑝
2
18𝜇 (6.S.1)
Where vs is the terminal settling velocity of the particle (m/s), g is the acceleration due to gravity
(9.81 m/s2), ρp is the density of the particle (kg/m3), ρw is the density of the water (kg/m3), dp is
the diameter of the particle (m), and is the viscosity of the water (kg/m.s).
Crittenden et al. (2012) list the following terminal settling velocities for sand particles and alum
flocs. Note that alum flocs usually settle according to Type II settling rather than Type I settling,
however, the comparison remains illuminating.
Table 6.S.1 Terminal settling velocities for sand particles and alum flocs (Crittenden et
al., 2012)
Particle Type Approximate Diameter (mm) Terminal Settling Velocity (m/s)
Sand (ρ = 2.56 g/cm3) 1 (1,000,000 nm) 1.38 x 10-1
Sand (ρ = 2.56 g/cm3) 0.2 (200,000 nm) 2.20 x 10-2
Sand (ρ = 2.56 g/cm3) 0.06 (60,000 nm) 2.50 x 10-3
Small Alum Floc n/a 5.56 x 10-4 to 1.25 x 10-3
Medium Alum Floc n/a 8.33 x 10-4 to 1.39 x 10-3
Large Alum Floc n/a 1.11 x 10-3 to 1.53 x 10-3
175
The terminal settling velocities of the various nanomaterials used in this study were predicted
using Stokes’ law under three conditions:
1. Density equal to material density, hydraulic diameter equal to particle diameter or length.
2. Agglomerate density equal to material density, hydraulic diameter of agglomerate equal
to D50 from particle size distribution.
3. Agglomerate density equal to effective density of linear engineered nanomaterial
effective density provided by Liu et al. (2013), hydraulic diameter of agglomerate equal
to D50 from particle size distribution.
Table 6.S.2 Predicted terminal settling velocities for nanomaterials in distilled water
Nanomaterial Predicted Terminal Settling Velocity (m/s)
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = dparticle
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = d50
ρ = 1.20 g/cm3
dh = d50
P25 7.10 x 10-10 1.25 x 10-5 7.59 x 10-7
NB 130/550 7.10 x 10-6 7.75 x 10-5 4.80 x 10-6
NB 130/700 7.10 x 10-6 -- --
NB 240/550 4.44 x 10-5 9.16 x 10-4 5.67 x 10-5
NB 240/700 2.84 x 10-5 2.05 x 10-4 1.27 x 10-5
176
Table 6.S.3 Predicted terminal settling velocities for nanomaterials in a river water
Nanomaterial Predicted Terminal Settling Velocity (m/s)
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = dparticle
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = d50
ρ = 1.20 g/cm3
dh = d50
P25 7.10 x 10-10 1.75 x 10-5 1.08 x 10-6
NB 130/550 7.10 x 10-6 5.80 x 10-5 3.59 x 10-6
NB 130/700 7.10 x 10-6 -- --
NB 240/550 4.44 x 10-5 1.87 x 10-4 1.16 x 10-5
NB 240/700 2.84 x 10-5 7.82 x 10-5 4.84 x 10-6
Settling Time
The time required for a particle to settle a given distance can be calculated using the following
equation:
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 (𝑚𝑖𝑛) =𝑆𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 (
𝑚
𝑠) × 1,000(
𝑚𝑚
𝑚)× 60(
𝑠
𝑚𝑖𝑛)
𝑆𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 (𝑚𝑚) (6.S.2)
The predicted settling time required to achieve 50% removal of the various nanomaterials via
settling was calculated for suspensions in distilled water and river water and compared to the
observed amount of time required to achieve 50% removal of turbidity the various suspensions.
177
Table 6.S.4 Predicted and actual settling time for nanomaterial suspensions prepared in
distilled water
Nanomaterial Time to 50%
(min)
Predicted Time to 50%
(min)
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = dparticle
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = d50
ρ = 1.20 g/cm3
dh = d50
P25 n/a > 500,000 40 648
NB 130/550 45 56 5 83
NB 130/700 n/a 56
NB 240/550 60 9.0 0.43 7.0
NB 240/700 30 14 0.48 7.8
Table 6.S.5 Predicted and actual settling time for nanomaterial suspensions prepared in
river water
Nanomaterial Time to 50%
(min)
Predicted Time to 50%
(min)
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = dparticle
ρ = 4.26 g/cm3
dh = d50
ρ = 1.20 g/cm3
dh = d50
P25 30 > 500,000 23 366
NB 130/550 50 56 6.8 110
NB 130/700 > 120 56
NB 240/550 > 120 9 2.1 34
NB 240/700 105 14 1.3 82
The effective density of the agglomerates of the nanomaterials formed in the two water matrices
was predicted using an iterative method.
178
Table 6.S.6 Predicted effective density of agglomerates formed by four nanomaterials in
distilled water and river water
Nanomaterial Predicted Effective Density of Agglomerates (g/cm3)
Distilled Water River Water
P25 n/a 3.50
NB 130/550 1.37 1.44
NB 240/550 1.022 < 1.055
NB 240/700 1.21 1.155
Correlations Between Reaction Rate Constants
Figure 6.S.4 Linear correlation between normalized DOC and UV254 degradation rate
constants and HTPA/hydroxyl radical formation rate constants for four
linear engineered nanomaterials
-1.0E-01
-8.0E-02
-6.0E-02
-4.0E-02
-2.0E-02
0.0E+00
0.0E+00 2.0E-01 4.0E-01 6.0E-01 8.0E-01
Norm
ali
zed
Deg
rad
ati
on
Rate
Con
stan
t
(1/m
in)
Hydroxyl Radical Formation Rate Constant (M/min)
DOC UV254
179
Table 6.S.7 Fit of linear correlation between hydroxyl radical formation rate constants
and NOM degradation rate constants
Parameter Normalized to Surface Area? P25 Included? Fit of Linear Regression
kDOC No Yes 0.20
No No 0.10
Yes Yes 0.70
Yes No 0.98
kUV254 No Yes 0.07
No No 0.07
Yes Yes 0.54
Yes No 0.97
180
Photocatalysis with Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials to Prevent the Formation of Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water
Abstract
Two photocatalytic linear engineered TiO2 nanomaterials (LENs) were synthesized and
evaluated against commercial standard P25 TiO2 nanoparticles in terms of their effects on
common parameters used to measure and characterize natural organic matter (NOM) and
disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors in drinking water. DBPs, some of which have been
linked to cancer and other negative human health outcomes, are regulated in most jurisdictions in
North America and Europe as well as parts of Asia, Africa, and South America, and the removal
of DBP precursors is a central goal of conventional drinking water treatment plants. All three of
the nanomaterials evaluated in this study were capable of degrading NOM, including DBP
precursors, when irradiated with UVA LED light. The materials differed in terms of crystal
phase structure, surface morphology, and available surface area. These differences impacted the
predominant NOM removal processes occurring in each case and consequently the overall
treatment efficacy of the two materials in the two different water sources. One of the LENs
evaluated in this study, designated NB 700, reduced the DBP formation potential of one of the
water sources by 90%. This nanomaterial was more effective for NOM degradation than
commercial nanoparticles (P25) and was also readily removed from the water via filtration. As
such, it may be a good candidate for future integration in a UVA/TiO2 photocatalytic water
treatment system. Irrespective of the nanomaterial employed, DBP precursor degradation was
faster in the water source with higher NOM and lower alkalinity and hardness. The electrical
energy per order (EEO) required to degrade DOC and THM precursors in one of the water
sources was comparable to reported values for the degradation of these compounds with another
advanced oxidation process (AOP), UV/H2O2. The results of this study underscore the need for
site specific evaluation of novel photocatalytic oxidation processes for drinking water treatment.
181
Introduction
The removal of natural organic matter (NOM) removal is one of the primary goals of modern
drinking water treatment plants because it can interfere with many standard drinking water
treatment processes and reacts with chlorine and other chemical disinfectants to form an array of
regulated and unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Recent research suggests that
although commonly regulated classes of DBPs such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic
acids (HAAs) are less of a concern for human health than unregulated DBPs (Krasner, 2009),
their presence after chlorination has nonetheless been shown to be a good predictor of DBP
formation in general (Zheng et al, 2015). Preventing the formation of DBPs by removing their
precursor compounds (i.e. NOM) ahead of chlorination has become a common practice in
drinking water treatment plants. Coagulation with metal salts has traditionally been the primary
treatment method used for NOM removal in conventional water treatment plants. More recently,
adsorption, high pressure membrane filtration, and various oxidative strategies such as ozonation
and advanced oxidation processes, have also been employed for the removal of DBP precursors.
In this study, we evaluated photocatalysis with linear engineered titanium dioxide (TiO2)
nanomaterials illuminated by UVA LEDs as an alternative to these existing processes.
TiO2 is a photocatalyst that has occasionally been employed for water and wastewater treatment
but has yet to be widely adopted for these purposes. It has been established that TiO2
photocatalysis degrades NOM and that it preferentially targets large and aromatic NOM
compounds (Liu et al., 2008; Gora and Andrews, 2017). The effect of TiO2 photocatalysis on
DBP formation is less clear cut – a few studies have noted decreases in DBP formation potential
(DBPfp), but others have observed increased DBPfp as larger molecules are broken down into
smaller, more reactive ones (Liu et al., 2008; Kent et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2008; Liu et al.,
2010; Philippe et al., 2010). Increases in DBPfp appear to be related to experimental design, in
particular, irradiation time or UV dose (fluence). Studies focusing on short irradiation times have
often noted increases in DBPfp (Philippe et al., 2010) whereas those employing longer
irradiation have usually reported decreases (Liu et al., 2008).
The characteristics of the background water matrix are known to affect the degradation rates of
target compounds. NOM itself is frequently cited as the most important inhibitor of degradation
in studies focused on the photocatalytic removal of more common organic indicators and
182
pollutants (Autin et al., 2013). Many inorganic components of natural water also have effects,
both positive and negative, on the adsorption and degradation of target compounds by TiO2.
Turbidity, which disperses light, and some organic compounds that absorb UVA wavelengths
can reduce the amount of useable light that reaches the photocatalyst. Chloride and bicarbonate
are known scavengers of hydroxyl radicals (Liao et al., 2001), one of the main reactive oxygen
species (ROS) formed during photocatalysis, while other ions such as phosphate and sulphate
can bind to adsorption sites on the surface of the photocatalyst (Abdullah et al., 1990; Chen et
al., 1997). Higher ion levels can lead to a reduction in the electrostatic repulsive forces between
individual nanoparticles, resulting in agglomeration (Hotze et al. 2010), and a decrease in
available surface area, which is likely to affect the extent of adsorption and photocatalysis. The
effects of some inorganic parameters are more complex. For example, although the presence of
calcium ions increases NOM adsorption to TiO2 (Erhayem and Sohn, 2014; Liu et al., 2013), it
also encourages TiO2 nanomaterials to agglomerate (Zhang et al., 2009), and as such may
indirectly slow degradation by decreasing the total available surface area. Iron readily adsorbs to
TiO2 (Chen and Ray, 2001) and both copper and iron can promote faster reactions between TiO2
and organic contaminants (Butler and Davis, 1993; Franch et al., 2005). Many of the effects
described above are pH dependent and some parameters can interact with one another as well as
with NOM and TiO2, making it difficult to predict the overall effect of a given matrix on the rate
of photocatalytic degradation.
Common issues preventing the use of suspended TiO2 in an aqueous medium include the
provision of adequate mixing, the distribution of light within the medium, and the removal of the
photocatalyst after treatment. Much research has been conducted to engineer TiO2 materials that
are easier to remove from water, usually by immobilizing standard anatase or P25 nanoparticles
on solid supports. This has proven challenging, though a few researchers have had success with
magnetic TiO2 nanomaterials (Ng et al., 2014) and TiO2-covered zeolites (Liu et al., 2014).
TiO2-based linear engineered nanomaterials (LENs) including nanotubes, nanowires, and
nanobelts have been synthesized and characterized by research groups around the world in recent
years. These materials are mainly used in sensors and solar cells (Bavykin and Walsh, 2010), but
may also prove to be useful in drinking water applications. Specifically, other researchers have
demonstrated that TiO2 -based LENs can adsorb and degrade NOM (Liu et al., 2013; Zhang et
183
al., 2009), and their large size relative to standard nanoparticles may make them easier to remove
via common drinking water clarification processes such as filtration or sedimentation.
LENs can be synthesized via alkaline hydrothermal, anodic, or template-guided sol-gel methods.
The alkaline hydrothermal method is well established, does not require highly specialized
laboratory equipment or expensive reagents, and is easily manipulated to yield nanosize
materials with different morphological and chemical characteristics (Bavykin and Walsh, 2010).
Survey studies have established that the precursor materials, hydrothermal synthesis temperature,
extent and method of post synthesis cleaning and ion exchange, and calcination temperature have
important effects on the final products of the synthesis process (Yuan and Su, 2004; Wong et al.,
2011; Qamar et al., 2008; Zheng et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2016). The choice of precursor materials
and hydrothermal temperature affects the overall size and aspect ratio of the LENs, with higher
temperatures generally resulting in larger materials (Yuan and Su, 2004). The washing, ion
exchange, and calcination steps affect the surface and crystalline structures of the materials, and
thus their photocatalytic properties (Qamar et al., 2008; Zheng et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2016).
The photocatalytic bleaching of methylene blue under UVA light has become the de facto
standard method to evaluate the photocatalytic properties of novel TiO2 nanomaterials because
methylene blue is easy to monitor, relatively stable and non-toxic, and the bleaching of
methylene blue is a good indicator of a material’s ability to photocatalytically oxidize other
organic pollutants (Mills, 2012). Previous work by our research group has demonstrated that the
ability of standard TiO2 nanoparticles and lab synthesized LENs to degrade NOM (as measured
by DOC or UV254) when illuminated by UVA light can be predicted based on its ability to
photocatalytically bleach methylene blue dye under similar experimental conditions (Gora and
Andrews, 2015).
This study evaluated the photocatalytic degradation of NOM in two Canadian surface waters by
three TiO2 nanomaterials: P25 nanoparticles and two LENs synthesized in our laboratory. The
calcination temperature used in the final step of the LEN synthesis process was varied in order to
manipulate the crystal phase structure and surface properties of the LENs. The main objective of
the study was to evaluate the effects of these LEN properties on the eventual formation of DBPs
after photocatalytic treatment and subsequent chlorination. To the authors’ knowledge, no other
184
research groups have conducted work linking the synthesis conditions of LENs to the
degradation of DBP precursors in drinking water.
Materials and Methods
7.2.1 Materials
Evonik Degussa P25 TiO2 nanoparticles were used as the reference material for all experiments
and as the precursor material for the two LENs. All remaining reagents were obtained from
Sigma Aldrich. Raw water was obtained from two Canadian water treatment plants (WTPs)
supplied by river water sources. The Otonabee River (OTB), located in Southern Ontario,
supplies the City of Peterborough while the Ottawa River (OTW) supplies the Britannia WTP,
one of the two major WTPs that serve the City of Ottawa. Raw water samples were gathered at
the inlet of each water treatment plant ahead of prechlorination and used without further
modification. A water quality summary is provided in Table 7.1. Both water sources had
historical pH values near 8 and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) levels ranging from
approximately 4 to 6 mg/L. The UV absorbance at 254 nm (UV254), an indicator of the amount
of aromatic carbon present in a water sample, was nearly twice as high in the OTW water as in
the OTB water. The OTW water’s specific UV absorbance (SUVA) value, an indicator of the
overall aromaticity of the NOM present in the water, was 3.7 ± 0.3 m/mg.L compared to 2.6 ±
0.4 m/mg.L in the OTB water, indicating that the NOM in the OTW water was more aromatic in
character than that in the OTB water. The water sources also differed in terms of turbidity,
alkalinity, calcium content, and conductivity (an indicator of ionic strength), many of which can
affect degradation rates (Liao et al., 2001; Abdullah et al. 1990; Chen et al., 1997). NOM
adsorption to TiO2 (Mwaanga et al. 2014; Erhayem and Sohn, 2014; Liu et al., 2013), and/or the
stability of nanomaterial suspensions. (Liu et al., 2013; French et al., 2009; Loosli et al, 2015; Li
et al., 2016). The OTB water had higher alkalinity, a higher overall concentration of ions, and
approximately four times as much calcium as the OTW water while the OTW water contained
higher concentrations of iron and copper relative to the OTB water.
185
Table 7.1 Summary of raw water quality
Parameter Units Otonabee River (OTB) Ottawa River (OTW)
DOC1 mg/L 4.7 ± 0.2 6.2 ± 0.5
UV2541 1/cm 0.120 ± 0.015 0.234 ± 0.030
SUVA1 m/mg.L 2.6 ± 0.4 3.7 ± 0.3
pH2 8.2 ± 0.2 7.7 ± 0.2
Turbidity2 NTU 0.6 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 1.0
Alkalinity2 mg/L as CaCO3 87 ± 7 28 ± 6
Hardness2 mg/L as CaCO3 95 ± 11 30 ± 6
Calcium2 mg/L 32.8 ± 3.7 8.3 ± 1.5
Magnesium2 mg/L 3.2 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.4
Sodium2 mg/L 6.5 ± 0.8 3.4 ± 0.8
Chloride2 mg/L 11.5 ± 1.3 3.3 ± 0.9
Conductivity2 S/cm 214 ± 19 81 ± 13
Aluminum g/L 3.9 ± 1.8 165 ± 47
Copper g/L 0.7 ± 0.1 27 ± 10
Iron2 g/L 19 ± 9 217 ± 42
Manganese2 g/L 10 ± 6 11 ± 4
1Average and standard deviation of samples analyzed in DWRG laboratory
2Average and standard deviation of values obtained from Ontario Drinking Water Surveillance Program
2010-2012
7.2.2 Apparatus
The UVA LED apparatus used in this study consisted of four UVA lamps secured to a stand
above a multiple location stir plate that was able to accommodate four beakers at once. The UVA
LEDs (LZ1 UV 365 nm Gen2 Emitter, LED Engin Inc.) had a maximum irradiance at 365 nm.
The average irradiance across the surface of the sample was calculated using a spreadsheet
developed by Bolton and Linden (2003) and was determined to be 4.9 mW/cm2. The irradiance
of each lamp was confirmed before each test using a radiometer (International Light, ILT1400)
equipped with a sensor optimized to measure light at 365 nm (International Light, XRL140B).
186
7.2.3 Synthesis and Characterization of Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials
Two linear TiO2 nanomaterials were synthesized from P25 nanoparticles according to a simple
hydrothermal method first used by Kasuga et al. (1999) and later modified by others including
Yuan and Su (2004). Both materials were synthesized at 240oC and then calcined at 550oC (NB
550) or 700oC (NB 700). They were then rinsed twice with distilled water to remove unreacted
material and/or smaller linear particles, thus insuring a more consistent final product.
Each batch of LENs was evaluated using a quality control test to assess batch to batch
consistency. Triplicate samples containing 50 mL of 0.03 M methylene blue solutions dosed with
0.1 g/L of TiO2 were irradiated with UVA light (365 nm) with an average irradiance of 4.9
mW/cm2 for 30 minutes. After irradiation, the TiO2 was removed from the samples via
centrifugation and the absorbance of the remaining solution at 665 nm was analyzed and used to
calculate the concentration of methylene blue remaining in solution. On average, NB 550
achieved 53% methylene blue removal and NB 700 achieved 89% methylene blue removal.
Batches that came within 5% of the average methylene blue removal were kept and used for
experiments.
The LENs were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to observe shape
and surface characteristics, selected area electron diffraction (SAED) to determine crystal phase,
zeta potential at different pH values to identify the isoelectric point, and N2 adsorption isotherms
to obtain surface area. TEM and SAED observation was conducted using a JEOL 2010F
TEM/STEM at the Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). TEM
samples were prepared by drop casting the dispersions onto holey carbon grids. The images were
processed using Gatan Microscopy Suite: Digial MicrographTM and SAED and FFT images were
indexed using CrysTBox – diffractGUI (Klinger and Jäger, 2015). N2 adsorption isotherms were
measured with a Quantachrome AUTOSORB-1. The samples were outgassed at 200oC under
vacuum for 12 h before the measurement. Surface area was determined by applying Brunauer–
Emmett–Teller (BET) adsorption method on N2 adsorption isotherms in a relative pressure range
of 0.05-0.25.
The isolectric point (IEP) of the LENs was determined by measuring the zeta potential of 0.1 g/L
TiO2 solutions prepared in 10 mM NaCl and adjusted to pHs ranging from 3 to 9. The pH at
187
which the zeta potential reached 0 was designated the IEP of the material. All samples were
prepared in triplicate and the zeta analyzer made four measurements of each sample.
The formation of hydroxyl radicals by P25 and the two LENs was investigated using a simple
fluorescence-based method as described by Arlos et al. (2016). Briefly, hydroxyl radicals convert
TPA to hydroxyterephthalic acid (HTPA), which fluoresces at approximately 425 nm when
excited by wavelengths between 310 and 320 nm. Thus, the presence of HTPA after
photocatalytic treatment implies that hydroxyl radicals were formed during photocatalysis.
Triplicate 50 mL samples of 0.5 mM TPA in 6 mM of NaOH were dosed with 0.02 g/L of TiO2
and exposed to UVA LED light for 0, 1, 2, 5, and 10 minutes, corresponding to UV doses
(fluence) of 0, 0.4, 0.6, 1.5, 2.9, and 4.4 J/cm2. The treated samples were filtered through a 0.45
micron polyethersulfone (PES) filter to remove the TiO2 from solution and analyzed for the
presence of HTPA. Previous research has suggested that approximately 80% of the total
hydroxyl radicals present in solution will react with TPA to form HTPA (Ishibashi, 2000), and
thus the concentration of HTPA in the treated solution can be assumed to be a conservative low
estimate of the total number of hydroxyl radicals formed during the photocatalytic treatment.
7.2.4 Settling and Filtration
A standard bench top filtration apparatus equipped with a PES lab filter with a pore size of 0.8
m was used to test the filterability of the three nanomaterials using a modified version of the
time to filter test (Standard Methods 2710-H). The apparatus was connected to a vacuum pump
set to provide 34 kPa (4.9 psi) of pressure on the permeate side of the filter. Each PES filter was
flushed with 100 mL of purified water before being used to filter a 50 mL sample. The flux of
purified water under these conditions was 6.8 m/h, which is within the 5 to 15 m/h range
expected for granular media filters in drinking water treatment plants (MWH, 2012). Filtration
samples were prepared with 0.25 g/L of TiO2 and mixed in the dark for 1 minute ahead of
filtration. The time required to filter each sample was recorded and normalized to the amount of
time required to filter 50 mL of purified (MilliQ) water through the apparatus to yield a filtration
index value. The flux of water through the filter was also calculated based on the volume of
water filtered and the exposed surface area of the membrane (7.1 x 10-4 m2). All filtration
experiments were conducted in triplicate.
188
The settling characteristics of P25 and the two LENs were evaluated in MilliQ water and the two
raw river water samples. A 10 g/L stock solution of each material was prepared and sonicated for
five minutes. Aliquots of the stock solution were added to 40 mL of the chosen water matrix and
placed in a Hach turbidimeter. The initial turbidity of the sample was recorded at the beginning
of the text and every ten minutes for two hours. The turbidity results were converted to TiO2
concentration using material-specific calibration curves prepared with standards ranging from 10
mg/L to 3,000 mg/L of TiO2.
The results of these simplified separation and filtration tests cannot be used to predict the long
term behavior of full-scale sedimentation basins or membrane filters, however, they do provide
some indication of the relative settleability and filterability of the LENs used in this study.
7.2.5 NOM and Dye Degradation Experiments
All degradation experiments were conducted in 75 mL continuously mixed batch reactors filled
with 50 mL of 10 mg/L methylene blue dye or raw OTB or OTW water. The reactors were dosed
with 0.25 g/L of TiO2 and exposed to UVA LEDs with an average irradiance of 6.25 mW/cm2
for 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes, corresponding to approximate UV doses (fluence) of 0, 1.5,
4.4, 8.8, 13.2, and 17.6 J/cm2. The treated river water samples were filtered through a 0.45 m
PES filter to remove the TiO2 nanomaterials and analyzed for UV254, DOC, chlorine demand,
THMfp, and HAAfp. Chlorine demand, THM formation potential (THMfp), and haloacetic acid
formation potential (HAAfp) were assessed at uniform formation conditions (UFC) as described
by Summers et al. (1996). The THMs and HAAs formed during this process were extracted
according to Standard Method 6232 B and Standard Method 6251 B (APHA, 2005) and analyzed
using an Agilent 7890B GC-ECD. The treated methylene blue samples were centrifuged to
remove the TiO2 nanomaterials and then analyzed for absorbance at 665 nm to determine the
concentration of methylene blue remaining in solution. All NOM removal experiments were
conducted in quadruplicate with one replicate being used for chlorine demand and three being
used for DBPfp determination.
7.2.6 Calculations
The average settling rate was calculated using the following equation:
189
Settling Rate (mg
min) =
Co-C
t (7.1)
In an effort to elucidate the effects of surface area and the crystallinity of the nanomaterials the
reaction rate constants were normalized to the available surface area using the following
equation:
𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚 =𝑘
𝑆𝐴 × 𝐷𝑇𝑖𝑂2 × 𝑉𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 (7.2)
where SA is the BET surface area of the nanomaterial (m2/g), DTiO2 is the dose of TiO2 added
(g/L), and Vsample is the volume of the sample (L).
Electrical energy per order (EEO) is currently listed as a “figure of merit” for the evaluation of
advanced oxidation processes by IUPAC (Collins and Bolton, 2016). The EEO of a given
process can be calculated using Equation 7.3, where P is the power dissipated by the treatment
process (kW), V is the volume of water treated in the experiment (L), Ci is the original
concentration of the contaminant, Cf is the final concentration of the contaminant, and t is the
time required to achieve Cf (min).
𝐸𝐸𝑂 =1000 𝑃 𝑡
𝑉 log (𝐶𝑖𝐶𝑓)
(7.3)
All statistical analyses were conducted at the 95% confidence level.
Results
7.3.1 Characterization of Engineered TiO2 Nanomaterials
The LENs in this study were characterized in terms of size (TEM), crystal phase structure
(SAED), isoelectric point (zeta potential), surface area (BET isotherm testing), and hydroxyl
radical production. The results are summarized in Table 7.2. The temperature setpoints used
during the LEN synthesis process had important effects on many of these parameters. These have
been discussed in in the context of previous research on TiO2-based LENs.
190
Table 7.2 Shape, size, and surface characteristics of LENs
Material P25 NB 550 NB 700
Shape Spherical Linear Linear
Diameter 21 nm1 -- --
Length -- 0.5 – 2 m 0.5 – 2 m
Width -- 20 – 200 nm 20 – 200 nm
Surface Characteristics -- Speckled Smooth
Predominant Crystal Phase 75% Anatase, 25% Rutile2 Anatase and TiO2 (B) Anatase
BET Surface Area 57 m2/g 30 m2/g 18 m2/g
Isoelectric Point (IEP) pH 6 to 6.5 pH 4 to 4.5 pH 4 to 4.5
k·OH 0.62 ± 0.03 mM/min 0.10 ± 0.01 mM/min 0.74 ± 0.06 mM/min
k·OH (normalized) 10.9 ± 0.5 mM/min/m2 3.5 ± 0.3 mM/min/m2 41.4 ± 3.2 mM/min/m2
1Sigma Aldrich
2Ohtani et al., 2010
Survey studies by Yuan and Su (2004), Wong et al. (2011), Qamar et al. (2008), and others have
established that the precursor materials, hydrothermal synthesis temperature, extent and method
of post synthesis cleaning and ion exchange, and calcination temperature have important effects
on the final products. The choice of precursor materials and hydrothermal temperature affects the
overall size and aspect ratio of the linear nanomaterials, with higher temperatures generally
resulting in larger materials (Yuan and Su, 2004). The washing, ion exchange, and calcination
steps affect the surface and crystalline structures of the materials, and thus their photocatalytic
properties (Qamar et al., 2008; Ali et al., 2016).
The TEM images of the LENs in Figure 7.1 show that both nanomaterials were roughly
rectangular or belt-like in shape. Individual belts ranged from 20 nm to 200 nm in width and
from 500 nm to multiple microns in length. The LENs differed in terms of their surface
topography. The NB 700 particles were smooth and the edges appeared rounded while the NB
550 particles appeared speckled with raised bumps and had sharply defined edges. Zheng et al.
(2010) reported similar surface characteristics for LENs calcined at similar temperatures and
attributed them to the presence of different phases of TiO2, namely anatase and TiO2(B).
191
Figure 7.1 Characterization of NB 550 (A) and NB 700 (B) via TEM and SAED. Figure
created by Robert Liang from the University of Waterloo using results
obtained at McMaster University
Anatase is widely held to be the most photoactive form of TiO2 but some researchers have,
however, reported that mixed phase anatase/TiO2(B) LENs can be even more effective than pure
anatase materials (Zheng et al., 2010). The predominant crystal phases present in the two LENs
in the current study were determined using SAED and TEM analysis. The SAED images of NB
550 (Figure 7.1A1) reveal that NB 550 contained predominantly anatase, however, the TEM
image (Figure 7.1A2) indicated that TiO2(B) crystalline grains were also present with d-spacing
of 0.36 nm and 0.57 nm corresponding to the (011) and (10-1) planes, respectively. The anatase
grains indicate d-spacings for 0.34 nm and 0.38 nm, corresponding to the (101) and (003) planes
of anatase. The interface between anatase and TiO2(B) phases had similar lattice parameters. The
A1: NB 550
B1: NB 700
A2: NB 550
B2: NB 700
192
(101) planes in anatase and (011) planes in TiO2(B) also matched closely. When the calcination
temperature increased to 700oC, the TiO2(B) was converted to anatase as shown in Figure 7.1B.
The d-spacings of NB 700 (Figure 7.1B2) were 0.35 nm and 0.45 nm, which match the (101) and
(002) planes of anatase.
BET isotherm analysis showed that both LENs had less surface area than P25 nanoparticles (30
m2/g and 18 m2/g vs. 57 m2/g). The higher surface area observed for the LENs calcined at 550oC
compared to those calcined at 700oC is consistent with previous studies (Qamar et al., 2008;
Zheng et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2016). In theory, nanomaterials with higher surface area should be
more effective for contaminant adsorption.
The isoelectric points (IEPs) of the LENs occurred at pH values between 4 and 4.5, which is
below that of P25 (6 to 6.5). Previous work has established that the pH of the water has a strong
effect on NOM adsorption to P25 and that adsorption is favoured when pH of the water is below
the IEP the nanomaterial (Mwaanga et al., 2014; Gora and Andrews, 2017). The implication of
this finding is that the LENs will be negatively charged within the pH range commonly found in
natural surface water sources (6.5 to 8.5) and thus may repel negatively charged water
constituents, thus slowing or preventing their degradation. The IEPs of the nanomaterials may
also have had an impact on the degree to which they agglomerated in each water source.
Nanoparticle agglomeration and its effect on surface area can also contribute to the changes in
adsorption efficiency and photocatalytic degradation observed at different pHs and in the
presence of ions and NOM. Nanomaterial agglomeration and subsequent decrease in the overall
available surface area is most likely to occur when the pH is near the isoelectric point/point of
zero charge because at this pH repulsive forces between individual particles are at a minimum
(Liu et al., 2013).
P25 and the two LENs were also evaluated in terms of hydroxyl radical production. As shown in
Figure 7.2, P25 and NB 700 produced more hydroxyl radicals and photogenerated holes than NB
550. This was also reflected in the k·OH values for each material, which are summarized in Table
7.2. The k·OH for NB 700 was 0.74 ± 0.06 mM/min, which was slightly but significantly higher
than that of P25, which was 0.62 ± 0.03 mM/min, at the 95% confidence level. NB 550 lagged
behind the other two materials with a k·OH of only 0.10 ± 0.01 mM/min. NB 700’s superior
hydroxyl radical formation ability relative to P25and NB 550 was further confirmed by the
193
normalized reaction rate constants for the three materials, which are also shown in Table 7.2. The
normalized k·OH for NB 700 was 41.4 ± 3.2 mM/min/m2 while that of P25 was 10.9 ± 0.5
mM/min/m2, indicating that NB 700 produced nearly four times as many moles of HTPA per
unit area as P25. This suggests that NB 700 was more effective at harnessing the available light
energy to drive the formation of hydroxyl radicals.
Figure 7.2 Hydroxyl radical (·OH) radical production by P25, NB 550, and NB 700.
Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean (n = 3).
7.3.2 Filtration and Settling
Filtration is commonly used to separate TiO2 from water in bench-scale experiments and is a
promising separation option for full-scale water treatment with TiO2 nanomaterials. Filtration
tests were performed with P25 and the new LENs as described in Section 7.2.4. Figure 7.3
shows the filtration index of each raw water and water containing 0.25 g/L of the three
nanomaterials. The filtration indexes of the two raw river water samples were nearly equal to 1,
indicating that they did not present a significant barrier to filtration relative to MilliQ water. The
OTW water had a slightly higher filtration index (1.22 ± 0.07) than the OTB water (1.11 ± 0.04),
likely owing to its higher turbidity and organic content. The raw water flux values for OTB and
OTW water were 6.1 m/h and 5.5 m/h respectively, which is within the accepted range for
granular media filtration but well above that achieved by microfiltration membranes (MWH,
2012).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
P25 NB 550 NB 700
·OH
(u
M)
0 min
1 min
2 min
5 min
10 min
15 min
194
Figure 7.3 Filtration indexes of three TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in purified (MQ)
water, Otonabee River (OTB) water, and Ottawa River (OTW) water
Irrespective of the water matrix used, water flowed through the lab filter more quickly when the
water contained NB 550 or NB 700 rather than P25 nanoparticles. In fact, in the tests conducted
with the two natural water samples there was no statistical difference at the 95% confidence level
between the filtration indexes of the raw water samples and those of the water samples
containing NB 550 or NB 700. The LENs were larger than the membrane pores in at least one
dimension, and as such, may have been more likely to be retained on the surface of the
membrane during filtration than the much smaller P25 nanoparticles, which may have been more
likely to enter and clog the pores of the membrane. Indeed, the samples containing P25 had
filtration indexes three to six times greater than those containing the LENs. This is in agreement
with the findings of Zhang et al. (2009), who used membrane filtration to separate P25
nanoparticles and two LENs from water. Based on the results of membrane fouling tests and
SEM imaging, they hypothesized that the P25 nanoparticles were becoming lodged in the pores
of the membrane during filtration, constricting them and increasing the resistance to flow while
the LENs formed a looser, more porous cake on the membrane surface that had less of an effect
on flow. The experimental results of the current study suggest that similar phenomena were at
play here and clearly demonstrate the superior filterability of the LENs relative to standard P25
nanoparticles in purified water and both surface water matrices. In addition, there was also likely
some degree of nanoparticle agglomeration, a complex phenomenon that is influenced by the pH,
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MQ OTB OTW
Fil
tra
tio
n I
nd
ex
Raw Water
P25
NB 550
NB 700
195
ionic strength, and organic content of the matrix as well as by the chemical and physical
properties of the nanomaterial in question (French et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Loosli et al.,
2015; Li et al., 2016) and which was not explored in detail in this study (see Appendix H).
Nonetheless, the experimental results clearly demonstrate the superior filterability of the LENs
relative to P25 nanoparticles.
Sedimentation is potentially a more economical alternative to filtration for solids removal, so the
settleability of the LENs was evaluated using simple settling tests. The tests were performed over
a two hour period but in all cases the majority of the observed settling occurred within the first
thirty minutes of the test. The average rate of settling over the first thirty minutes of each test are
presented in Figure 7.4. The rate of settling was influenced by both the characteristics of the
nanomaterials and the water matrices. P25 settled more slowly than the two LENs in MilliQ
water and OTW water, but its settling rate was statistically indistinguishable from theirs in OTB
water. This surprising finding may indicate the agglomerates formed by the P25 nanoparticles in
this water matrix were larger or denser than those formed in the other water samples.
Figure 7.4 Average settling rates of TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in MilliQ (MQ)
water, Otonabee River (OTB) water, and Ottawa River water (OTW)
All three materials settled fastest in the OTB water, which contained higher levels of Ca2+ and
more ions overall than the MilliQ or OTW water whereas the soft, NOM laden OTW hindered
the settling of all three materials. As observed in the tests conducted in MilliQ water, in the
0
1
2
3
4
MQ OTB OTW
Set
tlin
g R
ate
(m
g T
iO2/m
in)
P25
NB 550
NB 700
196
absence of NOM and divalent ions, the materials settled out roughly based on nanoparticle size.
The conductivity of the OTB water was nearly three times that of the OTW water, indicating that
it contained a higher concentration of ions. DVLO theory predicts that increasing levels of ions
can minimize the repulsive electrostatic forces that keep particles from coming together,
allowing van der Waals forces to dominate and encouraging greater agglomeration (Hotze et al.,
2010). Additionally, the presence of calcium ions in the water matrix has been shown to increase
the apparent IEP of TiO2 nanomaterials (Liu et al., 2013) as well as the size of their agglomerates
(French et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2009), while humic acid (a major component of NOM) has
been shown to have the opposite effects (Thio et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016). Some
or all of these phenomena were likely at play during the experiments presented in this study.
7.3.3 Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye
The P25 nanoparticles and the two LENs readily degraded methylene blue dye when exposed to
UVA light. P25 and NB 700 achieved over 95% dye decolorization within 30 minutes whereas
NB 550 achieved an average of only 83% degradation after a full hour of irradiation (Figure 7.5).
Figure 7.5 Degradation of methylene blue dye by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs
The degradation data fit well to a pseudo-first-order degradation reaction model for all three
materials as shown in Table 7.3. As others have pointed out (Mills, 2012), the underlying
reaction mechanisms governing the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and other large
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
log (
C/C
o)
Irradiation Time (min)
P25 NB 550 NB 700
197
organic molecules are likely to be complex despite their apparent fit to a first order degradation
model or the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model. Given the excellent fits obtained under the
conditions used in this study, the rate constants calculated from the apparent first order model
provided a convenient point of comparison between the materials. NB 700 had the fastest
degradation rate followed by P25 nanoparticles and finally by NB 550. This is reflected in the
first order reaction rate constants for the different materials, which ranged from 0.013 min-1 for
NB 550 to 0.060 min-1 for NB 700.
Table 7.3 Reaction parameters for first order degradation of methylene blue dye by
P25 nanoparticles and LENs
k knorm R2
min-1 min-1m-2
P251 -0.047 ± 0.004 -0.066 ± 0.006 0.98
NB 550 -0.013 ± 0.002 -0.033 ± 0.004 0.94
NB 7001 -0.060 ± 0.008 -0.267 ± 0.017 0.95
1Does not include t = 60 min
The normalized reaction rate constants show even more definitively that the superior dye
removal ability of NB 700 relative to P25 is due to its photocatalytic activity, which is a function
of its crystallinity. NB 700 is 100% anatase, the most photocatalytically active form of TiO2,
whereas P25 is only 70 to 85% anatase (Ohtani et al., 2010)
7.3.4 Degradation of Natural Organic Matter (Dissolved Organic Carbon and UV254)
Natural organic matter (measured as DOC and UV254) was adsorbed and degraded by all three
TiO2 nanomaterials under similar conditions as for MB. Results are shown in Figure 7.6. During
the photocatalytic portion of the treatment UV254 decreased more quickly than DOC regardless
of the TiO2 material used. This discrepancy may indicate some preference for aromatic NOM but
is also a function of the parameters themselves: DOC captures all of the original NOM
compounds along with the intermediate organic products of their degradation whereas UV254
measures only that portion of NOM that contains aromatic structures. These aromatic structures,
along with other unsaturated bonds, are easier for ROS to disrupt and as such are the first to be
broken, leading to an overall decrease in UV254.
198
Figure 7.6 Degradation of DOC and UV254 from (A) Otonabee River water and (B)
Ottawa River water (B) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs
-2
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60lo
g (
C/C
o)
Irradiation Time (min) A
P25 - DOC 550 - DOC 700 - DOC
P25 - UV254 550 - UV254 700 - UV254
-2
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
log (
C/C
o)
Irradiation Time (min) B
P25 - DOC 550 - DOC 700 - DOC
P25 - UV254 550 - UV254 700 - UV254
199
NB 550 was less effective for DOC and UV254 removal than P25 nanoparticles or NB 700. The
NB 700 was particularly effective and achieved 100% removal of both UV254 and DOC from
the OTW water within 60 minutes of irradiation, indicating that all of the oxidizable NOM
present in the sample had been mineralized. Decreases in both DOC and UV254 occurred more
slowly in the OTB water than in the OTW water, likely because the former contained higher
levels of known ROS scavengers including chloride (11.5 ± 1.3 mg/L vs. 3.3 ± 0.9 mg/L) and
bicarbonate (87 ± 7 mg/L as CaCO3 vs. 28 ± 6 mg/L as CaCO3). Alternatively or additionally, the
presence of higher concentrations of Ca2+ and other ions in the OTB water compared to the OTW
water (e.g. conductivity of OTB water = 214 ± 19 S/cm, conductivity of OTW water = 81 ± 13
S/cm) may have led to an increased degree of aggregation accompanied by an overall decrease
in available surface area in this water source. Finally, as suggested by its higher SUVA value
(3.7 ± 0.3 L/m.mg vs. 2.6 ± 0.4 L/m.mg), the OTW NOM was more aromatic in nature than the
OTB NOM and as such may have been more vulnerable to oxidation, as has been observed by
other researchers (Liu et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010).
Adsorption played a minor but notable role in NOM removal in this study. P25 removed 14 ± 5%
of the DOC and 30 ± 2% of the UV254 from the OTB water and 17 ± 6% of the DOC and 20 ±
3% of the UV254 from the OTW water. The LENs adsorbed less NOM; both removed
approximately 6% of DOC and 10% of UV254 from both water sources. The superior adsorptive
ability of the P25 nanoparticles is partly explained by available surface area: The BET surface
area of the P25 nanoparticles was 57 m2/g while those of NB 550 and NB 700 were 30 m2/g and
18 m2/g, respectively. Indeed, when DOC removal was normalized to surface area both P25 and
NB 700 removed 0.08 mg DOC/m2 from OTW water via adsorption (see Table 7.S.1 in the
supplementary material). Water matrix effects also appear to have played a role in adsorption,
particularly with respect to P25 nanoparticles, which removed UV254 from the OTB water more
effectively than from the OTW water. Researchers such as Mwaanga et al. (2014), Erhayem and
Sohn (2014), Sun and Lee (2012), and Liu et al. (2013) have explored the effects of various ions
on the adsorption of NOM by TiO2 nanomaterials and have found that the presence of divalent
ions, in particular calcium, can encourage NOM adsorption to TiO2. OTB water contains more
calcium than OTW water, which may explain why the P25 nanoparticles were able to remove
more UV254 from the former. A more detailed assessment of adsorption effects was beyond the
scope of this study but it is worth further investigation.
200
As was observed with methylene blue degradation, the degradation of both DOC and UV254
was a good fit to a simple pseudo-first order degradation model. The reaction rate constants
shown in Table 7.4 confirm that DOC degradation by P25 and NB 700 proceeded more quickly
for NB 550, and occurred more slowly in the OTB water than in the OTW water. The normalized
reaction rate constants, which are also shown in Table 7.4, show even more definitively that the
superior NOM degradation ability of NB 700 relative to P25 was due to its ability to harness
light to generate ROS and photogenerated holes, which is a function of its crystallinity, rather
than its surface area.
Table 7.4 First order reaction rate constants and normalized reaction rate constants
for DOC and UV254 removal
DOC UV254
k k norm R2 k k norm R2
min-1 min-1m-2 min-1 min-1m-2
OTB
P25 -0.004 ± 0.000 -0.005 ± 0.001 0.94 -0.018 ± 0.001 -0.026 ± 0.002 0.96
NB 550 -0.002 ± 0.000 -0.004 ± 0.001 0.88 -0.005 ± 0.000 -0.013 ± 0.001 0.96
NB 700 -0.005 ± 0.001 -0.024 ± 0.002 0.97 -0.018 ± 0.002 -0.080 ± 0.008 0.97
OTW
P25 -0.008 ± 0.001 -0.011 ± 0.001 0.93 -0.022 ± 0.001 -0.031 ± 0.002 0.98
NB 550 -0.002 ± 0.000 -0.004 ± 0.001 0.88 -0.012 ± 0.001 -0.032 ± 0.004 0.94
NB 700 -0.017 ± 0.003 -0.074 ± 0.015 0.93 -0.027 ± 0.002 -0.120 ± 0.008 0.97
In this study, the main energy input to the experimental apparatus was the UVA LEDs used to
illuminate the samples. Each LED had a rated power demand of 2.7 W. This, along with the
sample volume (50 mL), the time of irradiation (60 minutes), and the concentration of DOC
measured in the raw and treated samples, was inputted into Equation 7.3 (see Section 7.2.6) to
determine the EEO of each material. EEO values for DOC removal by the three nanomaterials
ranged from 37 kWh/order/m3 for NB 700 in OTW water to over 500 kWh/order/m3 for NB 550
in both water matrices. EEO values were higher in OTB, which contained a higher concentration
of ROS scavengers, than OTW water. Yen and Yen (2015) reported an EEO of 30 kWh/order/m3
for DOC degradation by a UV/H2O2 system employing a low pressure UV lamp (maximum
irradiance at 254 nm) and a 10 mg/L dose of H2O2. This is close to the EEO value calculated for
201
NB 700 in the OTW water, suggesting that a UV/TiO2 system employing NB 700 and UVA
LED light might prove to be competitive with UV/H2O2 under certain experimental conditions
and in some water matrices.
7.3.5 Removal and Degradation of Disinfection Byproduct Precursors
In this study, the total THMfp of both the OTB water and the OTW water initially increased
when the samples were exposed to the UVA LED lights irrespective of the TiO2 nanomaterial
used before eventually decreasing at longer irradiation times (Figure 7.7). The rate and extent of
this increase was not constant: THMfp peaked between 5 and 15 minutes of irradiation
depending on the nanomaterial and water matrix used. However, after 60 minutes of irradiation,
the THMfp of the treated water was well below that observed at shorter treatment times. Both
P25 nanoparticles and NB 700 reduced the THMfp of the raw water by over 80% within sixty
minutes of irradiation.
All of the nanomaterials tested exhibited the initial peak followed by eventual THMfp reduction,
but the rates and end points of the THMfp increases and decreases were different, suggesting that
the three materials may have interacted with different components or to different extents with the
raw water NOM. The initial increase in THMfp observed upon irradiation was likely related to
the formation of reactive intermediates during the photocatalytic degradation process (Gora and
Andrews, 2017; Liu et al., 2010). As irradiation time was increased, these reactive intermediates
would themselves have been broken down by the photocatalytic degradation process, resulting in
decreased THMfp. Liu et al. (2010) noted a similar trend in one of the two Australian surface
waters they treated with commercial P25 nanoparticles and UV light. They hypothesized that at
short irradiation times larger NOM molecules were partially broken down such that more
reactive sites became available for chlorine attack, resulting in increased THM formation upon
chlorination. This phenomenon may also have contributed to increased THMfp at short
irradiation times in the current study.
202
Figure 7.7 Reduction in the formation of trihalomethanes in two water matrices after
treatment by (A) P25 in OTB water, (B) NB 550 in OTB water, (C) NB 700 in OTB water,
(D) P25 in OTW water, (E) NB 550 in OTW water, (F) NB 700 in OTW water. Error bars
represent the 95% confidence interval of the mean.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
A
B
C
D
E
F
Otonabee River Ottawa River
Total THMfp TCMfp BDCMfp
203
In this work, THMfp refers to the sum of four trihalomethane species commonly formed when
NOM from surface water interacts with chlorine. Trichloromethane (TCM) and
bromodichloromethane (BDCM) were the predominant THMs formed upon chlorination of the
raw and treated water samples. Figure 7.7 shows how the relative concentrations of TCM and
BDCM changed over time in the treated samples. In general, the concentration of TCM
decreased continuously with increasing irradiation time but at shorter irradiation times this
reduction was accompanied by a gradual increase in BDCM. As the treatment proceeded, the
BDCM precursors were eventually degraded, contributing to the reduction of overall THMfp.
This is similar to results presented by Gerrity et al. (2009), who explored the degradation of
THM precursors in real surface water sources using a pilot scale UV/TiO2 system. Bromine is
more likely to interact with smaller and more hydrophilic NOM compounds (Kitis and Karanfil,
2002; Liang and Singer, 2003), and previous studies have found that TiO2 photocatalysis can
degrade large hydrophobic NOM compounds into smaller, more hydrophilic ones (Gora and
Andrews, 2017; Liu et al., 2010), which may have been more likely to interact with both chlorine
and bromine upon chlorination to form BDCM.
The composition of the water matrix also had important effects on the degradation of THM
precursors. All three TiO2 nanomaterials reduced the THMfp of OTW water more effectively
than that of the OTB water. As was noted for DOC and UV254, factors that may explain this
discrepancy include the presence of ROS scavengers in the OTB water; reduction in available
surface area due to higher levels of agglomeration driven by a decrease in electrostatic repulsion
in the ion-rich OTB water; increased NOM oxidation in the OTW water related to the presence
of higher concentrations of iron and copper in this matrix (see Table 7.1); and the characteristics
of the NOM, including THM precursors, in each water source. Specifically, the effectiveness of
NB 700 was strongly impacted by the water matrix: it was far more effective for THM precursor
removal in the OTW water matrix than in the OTB water matrix. The former had much lower
alkalinity, a measure of bicarbonate, which is a hydroxyl radical scavenger. As demonstrated in
the hydroxyl radical experiments described in Section 7.3.1 and Figure 7.2, NB 700 was
particularly effective for hydroxyl radical production. As such, its oxidative efficacy may have
been more likely to be impacted by the presence of hydroxyl radical scavengers than that of the
other nanomaterials, which removed NOM predominantly via other oxidative or, in some cases,
adsorptive pathways.
204
Adsorption was less effective for THM precursor removal than it was for DOC and UV254
removal. Adsorption with P25 nanoparticles reduced the THMfp of the OTW water by 28 ± 9%
while adsorption with NB 550 reduced the THMfp of the OTB water by 9 ± 6%. None of the
other material / water matrix combinations resulted in statistically significant removal of THM
precursors via adsorption.
The EEO concept assumes first order degradation kinetics and in most cases in this study,
THMfp removal did not follow a first order reaction model. The exceptions were P25 and NB
700 in the OTW water, and this only after the peak that occurred between 5 and 15 minutes of
irradiation. The EEO value for THMfp reduction by UVA/TiO2 treatment with NB 700 in the
OTW water (51 kWh/order/m3) was comparable to those UV/H2O2 treatment with 10 mg/L of
H2O2 (44 kWh/order/m3) as described by Yen and Yen (2015), indicating that under some
conditions and with some TiO2 materials UV/TiO2 may prove to be competitive with UV/H2O2
for THMfp reduction. This should be confirmed by comparing the two processes under a variety
of experimental conditions and in the same water matrices.
For the most part, the HAAfp results, shown in Figure 7.8, followed the same trends as the
THMfp results. Like THMfp, the term HAAfp refers to the likelihood that a water sample will
form a suite of haloacetic acids. In this study, only dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) and
trichloroacetic acid (TCAA) were formed at levels above 5 g/L upon chlorination. For all three
materials, the overall HAAfp of both water sources decreased slightly during the dark adsorption
step, increased at short irradiation times, and eventually decreased as irradiation time increased.
There were, however, important differences in HAA precursor removal between the two water
matrices and the three materials.
In the OTB experiments (Figure 7.8 A-C), P25 reduced the overall HAAfp of the water from
74.9 ± 9.0 g/L to 45.5 ± 6.4 g/L after 60 minutes of irradiation. When NB 550 and NB 700
were used, the overall HAAfp of the water after 60 minutes of irradiation was equal to that of the
untreated raw water. This surprising finding does not adequately account for the effects of these
nanomaterials on the overall HAAfp of the water at shorter treatment times. In both cases, the
overall HAAfp of the water increased between 0 and 15 minutes of irradiation but decreased
thereafter. The increases in overall HAAfp can be attributed to the initial increase in both
205
DCAAfp and TCAAfp between 0 and 15 minutes. This was followed by a gradual reduction in
TCAAfp over time as TCAA precursors were degraded by further treatment.
Photocatalytic degradation of HAA precursors occurred more readily in the OTW water matrix
(Figure 7.8 D-F), particularly when NB 700 was employed as the photocatalyst. After 60 minutes
of irradiation the HAAfp of the water treated with NB 700 was reduced from 112.9 ± 7.1 g/L to
12.1 ± 7.1 g/L. P25 was nearly as effective as NB 700 in this water matrix, reducing the HAAfp
of the water from 110.4 ± 12.5 g/L to 30.1 ± 12.5 g/L after 60 minutes of irradiation. In both
cases, the DCAAfp of the water increased at shorter irradiation times before decreasing at longer
irradiation times. TCAAfp reduction occurred more quickly than DCAAfp reduction, and for
both P25 and NB 700 the TCAAfp of the water was reduced to below the detection limit after 60
minutes of irradiation, indicating that the photocatalytic treatment was particularly effective for
the removal of TCAA precursors. TCAA precursors are more hydrophobic than DCAA
precursors (Liang and Singer, 2003), and, as shown in earlier work (Gora and Andrews, 2017;
Liu et al., 2010), hydrophobic and aromatic NOM is preferentially degraded by TiO2
photocatalysis. Other researchers have also observed preferential removal of TCAA precursors
over DCAA precursors in AOP systems. These include Toor and Mohseni (2008); who linked
increased DCAAfp in water treated with UV/H2O2 to the formation of aldehydes, known DCAA
precursors, as a result of the partial degradation of NOM; and Bond et al. (2009), who attributed
the increase in DCAAfp to the transformation of hydrophilic NOM compounds (amino acids)
into DCAA precursors via oxidation.
206
Figure 7.8 Reduction in the formation of haloacetic acids in two water matrices after
treatment by (A) P25 in OTB water, (B) NB 550 in OTB water, (C) NB 700 in
OTB water, (D) P25 in OTW water, (E) NB 550 in OTW water, (F) NB 700 in
OTW water. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval of the mean
Total HAAfp DCAAfp TCAAfp
0
20
40
60
80
100
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
20
40
60
80
100
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
20
40
60
80
100
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
50
100
150
200
250
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
50
100
150
200
250
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
0
50
100
150
200
250
C 0 5 15 30 45 60
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
A
B
C
D
E
F
Otonabee River Ottawa River
207
The effect of the treatment on the formation of individual HAA species was not only
nanomaterial specific but also matrix specific. In the experiments conducted with OTW water,
all three nanomaterials initially increased the amount of DCAA and TCAA precursors in the
water upon irradiation but eventually began to degrade them, resulting in nearly concurrent
reduction of DCAAfp and TCAAfp at longer irradiation times. When P25 and NB 700 were
added to the OTB water and irradiated DCAAfp initially increased or remained constant but this
was not followed by the eventual decrease observed in the OTW experiments. These results
suggest that the two water matrices contain different types of DCAA precursors or that the
degradation of DCAA precursors was in some way inhibited in the OTB water matrix. As was
observed previously for THMfp, NB 700 was more strongly impacted by the presence of
hydroxyl radical scavengers such as bicarbonate (alkalinity) than the other two nanomaterials.
This may be because NOM oxidation by UV/TiO2 treatment with this material proceeded
primarily via hydroxyl radical mediated reactions, which were more likely to be inhibited in the
higher alkalinity water matrix (OTB) than in the lower alkalinity water matrix (OTW).
With the exception of P25 in OTB water, the HAAfp of the adsorption only samples were
statistically indistinguishable from the controls at the 95% confidence level, an indication that
none of the nanomaterials used in this study were reliably able to remove HAA precursors via
adsorption alone at this dose of TiO2. This is in line with previous studies conducted with P25 in
this water source (Gora and Andrews, 2017).
7.3.6 Alternative Measures of System Efficiency: Applied UV Dose and Power per Volume
Another way to track the progress of photocatalytic treatment processes is based on the UV dose,
or fluence, applied to the sample. Ideally, the UV dose would be calculated based on the incident
light throughout the sample, however, as described in Appendix G of this thesis, in the current
study it is unlikely that the UVA LED light applied to the samples penetrated deeply into them.
As a result, it was assumed that the UV dose could be calculated based on the average irradiance
at the surface of the sample. This was calculated to be 4.9 mW/cm2 using a spreadsheet prepared
by Bolton and Linden (2003) as described in Appendix G. This value was multiplied by the
elapsed time (s) to determine the UV dose or fluence (mJ/cm2) at the surface of the sample as
shown in Equation 7.4.
208
UV Dose (mJ/cm2) = Irradiance (mW 𝑐𝑚2⁄ ) × Time (min) × 60 (s 𝑚𝑖𝑛⁄ ) (7.4)
UV dose is less specific to experimental set-up than time and as a result can more easily be
compared to the results of other researchers. It can also be a useful parameter when comparing
different light-based water treatment processes. For example, Autin et al. (2013) demonstrated
that the UV dose (254 nm) required to achieve metaldehyde degradation was equal for UV/TiO2
and UV/H2O2 in the absence of alkalinity and organics. The addition of CaCO3 and NOM
surrogates increased the UV dose required to achieve metaldehyde removal via UV/TiO2 but not
that required for UV/H2O2 treatment. This demonstrated that UV/TiO2 was more likely to be
negatively impacted by the presence of ROS scavengers than UV/H2O2.
Another UV/H2O2 study showed that approximately 3,000 mJ/cm2 of UV light was required to
reduce the THMfp of a Canadian surface water matrix from 238 g/L to 54 g/L (77%) at an
H2O2 dose of 23 mg/L (Toor and Mohseni, 2007). This is well below the UV dose that was
required to achieve a comparable reduction in THMfp from OTW water using NB 700 (~13,000
mJ/cm2) in the current study, indicating that even in a best-case scenario, the UV dose required
to reduce the DBPfp of surface water via UV/TiO2 is unlikely to be comparable to that required
to reduce it via UV/H2O2. It should, however, be noted that Toor and Mohseni did not observe
any significant removal of THM precursors at a fluence of 3,000 mJ/cm2 at a lower H2O2 dose (4
mg/L). Also, their experiments made use of a low pressure UV lamp (max irradiance at 254 nm).
TiO2 can be activated by lower energy wavelengths of up to approximately 380-385 nm and as
such has the potential to be more energy efficient even while requiring a larger UV dose.
An alternative way to compare the efficiency of different treatment systems is to calculate the
power required to remove a given amount of a contaminant.
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒(𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑚3⁄ ) =
𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 (𝑘𝑊) × 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 (ℎ)
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 (𝑚3) (7.5)
In this study, the use of UV dose as a parameter hides the main advantage of using UVA LEDs --
the fact that they are far more energy efficient than standard UV germicidal lamps or high
intensity UVA lamps. For example, the study by Autin et al. (2013) took place in a bench-scale
UVC collimated beam apparatus containing four 30 W lamps. This was used to treat a 250 mL
sample and the irradiance at the surface of the sample was 2.23 mW/cm2, thus a UV dose of
3,000 mJ/cm2 corresponded to 22.3 minutes of irradiation and a power per volume of 480
209
kWh/m3. A dose of 3,000 mJ/cm2 in the UVA LED reactor used in the current study corresponds
to an irradiation time of 10.2 minutes and 54 kWh/m3. The UVA LEDs used in the current study
cannot be used for UV/H2O2 because they only emit light at 365 nm, which is not energetic
enough to drive the formation of OH radicals from H2O2.
Figure 7.9 shows the degradation of THM precursors in OTB and OTW water by NB 700 as a
function of time, UV dose, and power per volume.
Figure 7.9 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water via photocatalysis by 0.25 g/L
of NB 700 irradiated with UVA LEDs (365 nm) as a function of irradiation
time (min), UV dose (J/cm2), and power per treated volume (kWh/m3)
7.3.7 Correlation Between Methylene Blue Degradation, NOM Degradation, and DBPfp
Methylene blue is quickly degraded by TiO2 photocatalysis and as such is often used as a
surrogate parameter for other organic compounds that are more difficult to analyze. Our previous
work (Gora and Andrews, 2015) explored the relationship between methylene blue degradation
and the reduction of DOC and UV254, the two most common DBPfp surrogates used in the
drinking water industry, for P25 and four LENs and found a strong, positive, and significant (p <
0.05) correlation between methylene blue degradation and UV254 and a more modest but still
significant one between methylene blue degradation and DOC. This was also observed in the
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 20 40 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
OTB
OTW
11.8 18.60
18 360 54
UV Dose (J/cm2)
Power (kWh/m3)
5.8
210
current study. As shown in Table 7.5, the Pearson correlation coefficients between methylene
blue degradation and DOC degradation ranged from 0.74 for NB 700 in OTW water to 0.97 for
NB 550 in OTB water. The correlation between methylene blue degradation and UV254 removal
was much stronger than that with DOC for all three materials, with Pearson correlation
coefficients ranging from 0.91 for NB 700 in OTW water to 0.99 for NB 550 in OTB water.
Table 7.5 Pearson correlation coefficients comparing the degradation of DOC, UV254,
and DBP precursors by three TiO2 nanomaterials in two source waters. Bold
values are significant at the 95% confidence level.
OTB OTW
P25 NB 550 NB 700 P25 NB 550 NB 700
DOC 0.77 0.95 0.74 0.79 0.82 0.77
UV254 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.94 0.97 0.90
THMfp -0.07 -0.97 -0.64 0.32 -0.45 0.50
HAAfp 0.03 -0.16 -0.33 0.60 -0.09 0.52
DOC and UV254 removal are widely used to predict reductions in THMfp because they are
simple, inexpensive surrogate parameters that have been correlated to DBPfp in conventional
water treatment systems (Edzwald et al., 1985). Based on the results obtained in our previous
work (Gora and Andrews, 2015) and in this study, it was hypothesized that it would also be
possible to predict THMfp and HAAfp based on methylene blue degradation. The methylene
blue and DBPfp data presented in the earlier sections of this paper (Section 7.3.3 and Section
7.3.5) clearly demonstrate that methylene blue degradation was not a good predictor of the
effects of the different nanomaterials on DBPfp in either water source because both THMfp and
HAAfp invariably increased relative to the raw water at short irradiation times for all three
materials. This was further confirmed by the general lack of significant correlation between
methylene blue degradation and DBP degradation as shown in Table 7.5. This finding has
important implications for researchers evaluating the safety and effectiveness of potential new
photocatalytic materials for drinking water. Specifically, these results suggest that dyes and other
surrogate compounds are not adequate indicators of a material’s ability to improve the overall
safety of drinking water.
211
DOC removal was significantly correlated to THMfp and HAAfp reduction in the tests
conducted with P25 and NB 700 in OTW water, indicating that in this source water DOC was an
acceptable surrogate for THMfp and HAAfp changes related to the photocatalytic degradation of
NOM by these highly photoactive TiO2 nanomaterials (see Section 7.6 – supplementary
material). DOC was not significantly correlated to THMfp or HAAfp reduction in any of the
other experiments. UV254 was significantly correlated to HAAfp reduction by P25 and NB 700
in the OTW water and to THMfp reduction by NB 700 in OTW water. The lack of a consistent
relationship between the reduction of THMfp and HAAfp and the removal of common NOM
surrogates underscores the fact that that the removal of simple indicator parameters cannot
always be used to predict the removal or reduction of complex parameters such as DBPfp.
Summary and Conclusions
Two TiO2 LENs were characterized based on size, surface characteristics, and crystal structure
and compared to standard commercial P25 TiO2 nanomaterials in terms of their ability to
degrade disinfection byproduct precursors in natural water. The filterability of the three materials
were also evaluated. Both LENs were more quickly removed from purified water and natural
water via filtration than commercial P25 nanoparticles, likely because their larger size prevented
them from becoming stuck in the filter pores.
Although all three materials reduced DOC and UV254 even at short irradiation times, the
THMfp and HAAfp of the treated water initially increased upon irradiation with UVA LED light
irrespective of the material or water source used. The increase in THMfp usually peaked after 5
to 15 minutes of irradiation (UV dose of 1.5 to 2.9 J/cm2, power per volume of 4.5 to 13.5
kWh/m3) and decreased as irradiation time was increased beyond this point. After 60 minutes of
irradiation (corresponding to 17.6 J/cm2 or 54 kWh/m3), one of the LENs, NB 700, removed
more than 90% of the THMfp and HAAfp from one of the water sources. The types of DBP
precursors present in the treated water changed over time as the original NOM compounds were
photocatalytically degraded from the larger, more aromatic precursors of DBPs such as TCM and
TCAA, to smaller, less aromatic precursors of DBPs such as BDCM and DCAA.
212
The EEO required to degrade DOC and THM precursors varied by material and water source and
in some cases was comparable to EEO values for UV/H2O2 reported by others. The EEO results
suggest that a system incorporating NB 700 and UVA LED irradiation may be as energy
efficient as UV/H2O2 in some water matrices, though this should be confirmed in parallel
experiments under a wider range of experimental conditions.
DOC and UV254 removals were not always well correlated to THMfp and HAAfp removal,
possibly due to complications arising from the breakdown of parent NOM compounds into
intermediate compounds that were themselves DBP precursors, particularly at shorter irradiation
times. The results of this study should serve as a caution to researchers looking to quickly
evaluate the photocatalytic properties of novel TiO2 materials to determine whether they can be
incorporated into drinking water treatment processes.
Throughout this study, the characteristics of the water matrix had important effects on the
removal of DBP precursors via degradation and adsorption by the TiO2 nanomaterials. This
finding highlights the need for comprehensive and site-specific evaluation of new engineered
nanomaterials and other advanced oxidation processes ahead of their implementation for
drinking water treatment.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Kennedy Santos, Jim Wang, and
Chuqiao (Kaya) Yuan in the laboratory.
213
References
Abdullah, M., Low, G.K.C., and Matthews, R.W. 1990. Effects of common inorganic anions on
rates of photocatalytic oxidation of organic carbon over illuminated titanium dioxide, Journal of
Physical Chemistry, 94, 6820-6825
Ali, S., Granbohm, H., Ge, Y., and Singh, V.K. 2016. Crystal structure and photocatalytic
properties of titanate nanotubes prepared by chemical processing and subsequent annealing,
Journal of Materials Science, 51, 7322-7335
Autin, O., Hart, J., Jarvis, P., MacAdam, J., Parsons, S.A., Jefferson, B. (2013) The impact of
background organic matter and alkalinity on the degradation of the pesticide metaldehyde by two
advanced oxidation processes: UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2, Water Research, 47, 2041-2049
Bavykin, D.V. and Walsh, F.C. 2010. Titanate and Titania Nanotubes: Synthesis, RSC
Publishing
Bolton, J.R. and Linden, K.G. (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose)
determination in bench-scale UV experiments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129, 209-
215
Bond, T., Goslan, E.H., Jefferson, B., Roddick, F., Fan, L., Parsons, S.A. 2009. Chemical and
biological oxidation of NOM surrogates and effect on HAA formation, Water Research, 43,
2615-2622
Butler, E.C. and Davis, A.P. 1993. Photocatalytic oxidation in aqueous titanium dioxide
suspensions: the influence of dissolved transition metals, Journal of Photochemistry and
Photobiology A: Chemistry, 70, 273-283
Chen, H.Y., Zahraa, O., and Bouchy, M. 1997. Inhibition of the adsorption and photocatalytic
degradation of an organic contaminant in an aqueous suspension of TiO2 by inorganic ions,
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 108, 37-44
Chen, D. and Ray, A. K. 2001. Removal of toxic metal ions from wastewater by semiconductor
photocatalysis, Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 1561-1570
214
Gora, S. and Andrews, S. 2017. Adsorption of natural organic matter and disinfection byproduct
precursors from surface water onto TiO2 nanoparticles: pH effects, isotherm modelling and
implications for using TiO2 for drinking water treatment, Chemosphere, 174, 363-370
Edzwald, J.K., Becker, W.C., and Wattier, K.L. 1985. Surrogate parameters for monitoring
organic matter and THM precursors, Journal AWWA, 77 (4), 122-132
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. 2014. Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, 249-257
Franch, M.I., Ayllón, J.A., Peral, J., and Domènech, X. 2005. Enhanced photocatalytic
degradation of maleic acid by Fe(III) adsorption onto the TiO2 surface, Catalysis Today, 101,
245-252
French, R. A., Jacobson, A.R., Kim, B., Isley, S.L., Penn, R.L., and Baveye, P.C. 2009. Influence
of ionic strength, pH, and cation valence on aggregation kinetics of titanium dioxide
nanoparticles, Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 1354-1359
Gora, S.L. and Andrews, S.A. 2015, Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene
Blue Dye and Natural Organic Matter by Engineered Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials, 6th
International Water Association (IWA) Specialist Conference on Natural Organic Matter in
Water, Malmö, Sweden
Hotze, E.M., Phenrat, T., and Lowry, G.V. 2010, Nanoparticle aggregation: Challenges to
understanding transport and reactivity, Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 1909-1924
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. 1999. Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), 1307-1311
Kent, F., Montreuil, K., Brookman, R., Sanderson, R., Dahn, J., and Gagnon, G. 2011.
Photocatalytic oxidation of DBP precursors using UV with suspended and fixed TiO2, Water
Research, 45, 6173-6180
215
Kitis, M., Karanfil, T., Wigton, A., Kilduff, J.E. 2002. Probing reactivity of dissolved organic
matter for disinfection by-product formation using XAD-8 resin adsorption and ultrafiltration
fractionation, Water Research, 36, 3834-3848
Klinger, M. and Jäger, A.. Crystallographic Tool Box (CrysTBox): automated tools for
transmission electron microscopists and crystallographers. Journal of Applied Crystallography,
48 (6), 2015. doi:10.1107/S1600576715017252.
Krasner, S. 2009. The formation and control of emerging disinfection by-products of health
concern, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 367, 4077-4095
Li, L., Sillanpää, M., and Risto, M. 2016. Influences of water properties on the aggregation and
deposition of engineered titanium dioxide nanoparticles in natural waters, Environmental
Pollution, 291, 132-138
Liang, L. and Singer, P.C. 2003. Factors influencing the formation and relative distribution of
haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes in drinking water, Environmental Science and Technology,
37, 2920-2928
Liao, C-H, Kang, S-F, and Wu, F-A 2001. Hydroxyl radical scavenging role of chloride and
bicarbonate ions in the H2O2/UV process, Chemosphere, 44, 1193-1200
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R., 2008. TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C.W.K., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., and Amal, R. 2010. Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research, 44, 2525-2532
Liu S. et al. TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption and effective
photocatalytic regeneration, Chemical Engineering Science, 105, 46-52 (2014)
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. 2013. Comparison on aggregation and sedimentation
of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of pH, ionic
216
strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering
Aspects, 434, 319-328
Loosli, F., Vitorazi, L., Berret, J-F, and Stoll, S. 2015. Towards a better understanding on
agglomeration mechanisms and thermodynamic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles interacting with
natural organic matter, Water Research, 80, 139-148
Mills, A. 2012, An overview of the methylene blue ISO test for assessing the activities of
photocatalytic films, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 128, 144-149
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E., and Schlautman, M. 2014. Preferential sorption of some natural
organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Influence of pH and ionic strength,
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 8833-8844
Ng, M. et al. Highly adsorptive and regenerative magnetic TiO2 for natural organic matter
(NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering Journal, 246, 196-203 (2014)
Ohtani, B., Prieto-Mahaney, O.O., Li, D., and Abe, R. 2010. What is Degussa (Evonik) P25?
Crystalline composition analysis, reconstruction from isolated pure particles and photocatalytic
activity test, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 216, 179-182
Philippe, K., Hans, C., MacAdam, J., Jefferson, B., Hart, J., and Parsons, S. 2010. Photocatalytic
oxidation, GAC, and biotreatment combinations: An alternative to the coagulation of hydrophilic
rich waters?, Environmental Technology, 31 (13), 1423-1434
Qamar, M., Yoon, C.R., Oh, H.J., Lee, N.H., Park, K., Kim, D.H., Lee, K., Lee, W.J., and Kim,
S.J. 2008. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanotubes obtained from titanium dioxide,
Catalysis Today, 131, 3-14
Summers, R.S., Hooper, S.M., Shukairy, H.M., Solarik, G., Owen, D., 1996. Assessing DBP
yield: Uniform formation conditions, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 88 (6),
80-93
Sun, D.D. and Lee, P.F. 2012. TiO2 microsphere for the removal of humic acid from water:
Complex adsorption mechanisms, Separation and Purification Technology, 91, 30-37
217
Thio, B.J.T., Zhou, D., and Keller, A. 2011. Influence of natural organic matter on the
aggregation and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Journal of Hazardous Materials,
189, 556-563
Toor, R. and Mohseni, M.. 2007. UV-H2O2 based AOP and its integration with biological
activated carbon treatment for DBP reduction in drinking water, Chemosphere, 66, 2087-2095
Wong, C.L., Tan, Y.N., and Mohamed, A.R. 2011. A review on the formation of titania nanotube
photocatalysts by hydrothermal treatment, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1669-
1680
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L 2004. Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 241, 173-183
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Westerhoff, P., and Crittenden, J. 2009. Impact of natural organic matter
and divalent cations on the stability of aqueous nanoparticles, Water Research, 43, 4249-4257
Zhang, X., Pan, J.H., Du, A.J., Fu, W., Sun, D.D., and Leckie, J.O. (2009). Combination of one-
dimensional TiO2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment,
Water Research, 43, 1179-1186
Zheng, D., Andrews, R.C., Andrews, S.A., Taylor-Edmonds, L. 2015. Effects of coagulation on
the removal of natural organic matter, genotoxicity, and precursors to halogenated furanones,
Water Research 70, 118-129
218
Supplementary Material for Chapter 7
Table 7.S.1 NOM adsorption normalized to available surface area
Parameter Units OTB OTW
P25 NB 550 NB 700 P25 NB 550 NB 700
MB mg MB/m2 0.01 0.03 0.00
DOC mg DOC/m2 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.08
UV254
0.0027 0.0013 0.0021 0.0032 0.0025 0.0043
THMfp g THMfp/m2 1.22 1.81 1.41 6.74 2.93 3.58
HAAfp g HAAfp/m2 0.86 0.55 0.00 0.32 2.30 2.50
219
Removal of NOM and Disinfection Byproducts from Drinking Water Using Regenerable Nanoscale Engineered TiO2 Adsorbents
Abstract
Two linear engineered TiO2 nanomaterials (LENs) were synthesized via a simple hydrothermal
method and evaluated as potential regenerable adsorbents for the removal of natural organic
matter (NOM), including disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors from raw surface water
obtained from two Canadian drinking water treatment plants. The temperature employed in the
final heating step of the synthesis procedure was varied to produce two linear nanomaterials, NB
550 and NB 700. The nanomaterials had similar dimensions but differed in terms of surface
characteristics, surface area, and crystal structure. Unlike the commercial TiO2 nanoparticles,
both LENs were easily removed from the treated water via settling or filtration. The LENs
removed similar amounts of an indicator dye (25% to 30%) but differed in terms of their ability
to remove DBP precursors. NB 550 reduced the trihalomethane (THM) formation potential of
both water sources by up to 40% while NB 700 reduced it by 25% in one water source and 40%
in the other. The adsorption of DOC, UV254, THM precursors, and HAA precursors by
commercial nanoparticles and the LENs fit a modified Freundlich adsorption isotherm model.
When the two new nanomaterials were regenerated via exposure to UVA light, subsequent dye
removal experiments showed no significant reduction in the amount of dye adsorbed over five
regeneration cycles. Regeneration was also successful when the nanomaterials were used to
remove DBP precursors. In most cases, the loss in NOM absorption efficacy was less than 35%
after five regeneration cycles. This loss in adsorption efficacy occurred more quickly for NB
550, the less photoactive of the two materials, and was strongly affected by water source,
suggesting that differences in the amount and type of NOM adsorbed to the photocatalyst and/or
some components of the matrix (e.g. iron, turbidity, alkalinity) may have interfered with
regeneration.
220
Introduction
Adsorption is a well established water treatment process used to remove natural organic matter
(NOM), including disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors, from drinking water. DBPs are
formed when DBP precursor compounds in the drinking water matrix are exposed to oxidants
such as chlorine during the disinfection step of the overall drinking water treatment process.
Some DBPs are suspected carcinogens and the removal of their precursors ahead of the
disinfection step is an important goal of modern water treatment processes. Existing adsorbents
such as powdered activated carbon (PAC) and granular activated carbon (GAC) are effective for
DBP precursor removal and widely adopted but difficult to regenerate, resulting in the eventual
need for media replacement. Other treatment strategies such as coagulation and flocculation rely
on single use aluminum and ferric salts to destabilize and remove NOM and DBP precursors via
adsorption and precipitation. In large scale water treatment systems, the spent coagulation
chemicals, usually referred to as residuals, are dewatered onsite and then disposed of in landfills.
In smaller systems, the residuals might be released directly to the environment or directed to the
wastewater collection system.
Although most research on titanium dioxide (TiO2) has focused on its use in advanced oxidation
processes (AOPs), it has both adsorptive and oxidative abilities. As with other AOPs, the
degradation of complex organic molecules via TiO2 photocatalysis is a multistep process and full
mineralization may not be achieved within an acceptable treatment time frame. Not only is this
undesirable from a treatment standpoint, but under certain conditions it may result in the
formation of dangerous intermediate products, including highly reactive DBP precursors (Liu et
al., 2010; Gora and Andrews, 2017). This risk can be avoided by instead removing contaminants
via adsorption to TiO2, separating the used TiO2 from the treated water, regenerating the
materials via photocatalysis, then recycling the regenerated TiO2 back into the main treatment
tank. This two-step process would rely exclusively on adsorption for contaminant removal from
the water, thus avoiding the formation of undesirable byproducts during the treatment step.
Numerous researchers have explored the adsorption of NOM to TiO2 nanoparticles, but most of
these studies were conducted in a contaminant transport context. Liu et al. (2014), Ng et al.
(2014), and our own research group (Gora and Andrews, 2017) have demonstrated that NOM
adsorption may be appropriate for drinking water treatment. It is well established that large and
221
aromatic NOM compounds are preferentially removed (Hyung and Kim, 2008; Erhayem and
Sohn, 2014; Gora and Andrews, 2017) and that the effects of the water matrix on NOM
adsorption to TiO2 are complex. Water matrix properties such as pH, ionic strength, the presence
of divalent ions such as calcium, NOM concentration and type, and the presence of other
interferents can increase or decrease the amount of adsorption achieved by modifying the surface
properties of TiO2, competing for adsorption sites, or by encouraging agglomeration, thus
reducing the overall surface area available for adsorption.
The pH of the water matrix has a strong effect on the surface charge of the nanoparticles and the
resulting adsorption of NOM. Adsorption is increased at pH values below the isoelectric point
(IEP) of the TiO2 nanomaterial (pH 6.5 for P25 nanoparticles) and above the pKa of the
contaminant (approximately pH 2 to pH 4 for NOM) due to charge interactions (Mwaanga et al.,
2014; Erhayem and Sohn, 2014; Gora and Andrews, 2017). pH also has an effect on
agglomeration and thus on available surface area because charge effects between nanoparticles
are minimized when the pH of the matrix is near the IEP, resulting in greater agglomeration
(Hotze et al., 2010). Many researchers have observed that the presence of ions, in particular
divalent ions such as calcium, also encourages greater agglomeration of TiO2 nanomaterials (Liu
et al., 2013), likely because the presence of ions diminishes the overall repulsive forces between
individual nanoparticles, allowing attractive van der Waals forces to dominate (Hotze et al.,
2010). However, calcium ions can also promote NOM adsorption via bridging (Liu et al., 2013;
Sun and Lee., 2010). NOM itself has also been shown to have a strong impact on nanomaterial
agglomeration and suspension stability (Zhang et al., 2009; Hotze et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2013;
Erhayem et al., 2014; Loosli et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2013), but the effects appear to be specific to
NOM concentration, NOM type, and the properties of the nanomaterial in question. For example,
Zhou et al. (2013) observed that 10 mg/L of Suwannee River NOM enhanced the stability of
some nanomaterial suspensions but reduced that of others while Erhayem and Sohn (2014)
observed that NOM concentrations ranging from 10 to 20 mg/L destabilized P25 nanoparticle
suspensions but higher concentrations of NOM restabilized them. Finally, compounds such as
phosphate, nitrate, and carbonate are known to interfere with NOM adsorption to TiO2 and may
compete with DBP precursors for adsorption sites (Chen et al., 1997; Erhayem and Sohn, 2014).
Based on detailed adsorption studies some researchers have hypothesized that the impacts of
ionic strength and pH on NOM adsorption by TiO2 are related to effects of these parameters on
222
NOM shape, conformation, and subsequent behaviour rather than direct effects on the adsorption
process (Hyung and Kim, 2008; Sun and Lee, 2012). NOM compounds can become more tightly
coiled under low pH or high ionic strength conditions, resulting in smaller individual molecule
size and less overall demand for the available surface area of the TiO2 nanomaterial (Hyung and
Kim, 2008). Sun and Lee (2012) suggested that calcium ions encouraged charge neutralization
and flocculation of NOM ahead of adsorption, leading to better overall removal due to reduced
charge repulsion between NOM and TiO2.
The key to making this process work is the development of a regenerable TiO2 material with a
high adsorption capacity that can be removed from the treated water quickly. Degussa / Evonik
P25 Aeroxide nanoparticles, the standard commercial TiO2 nanoparticles used in this and many
other studies, are spherical, have a diameter of approximately 21 nm, and consist of
approximately 80% anatase and 15 to 20% rutile TiO2, with the remainder made up of
amorphous TiO2 (Ohtani et al., 2010). The small size of these particles makes them difficult to
remove using the standard clarification methods used in drinking water treatment plants (e.g.
sedimentation, media filtration, membrane filtration). Many larger TiO2 nanomaterials, some
with complex geometries, have been synthesized by materials scientists in the past three decades.
The simplest of these are the tubular linear nanomaterials first described by Kasuga et al. (1999).
Other researchers, including Yuan and Su (2004), have since modified Kasuga et al.’s original
method to produce linear nanomaterials with different length to width ratios, crystalline
structure, and surface characteristics, including nanobelts, nanofibers, and nanowires. In this
study, two types of belt-like linear nanomaterials were synthesized using Kasuga’s method
modified based on some of the findings of Yuan and Su. The resulting materials were evaluated
for NOM adsorption, regenerability, and ease of removal from water via filtration and settling.
Methods and Materials
8.2.1 Materials
8.2.1.1 Chemicals
Degussa P25 Aeroxide TiO2 nanoparticles and Acid Orange 24 dye (AO24) was obtained from
Sigma Aldrich. AO24 is a sulfonated double azo dye with a molecular weight of 448 g/mol and a
223
peak absorbance at 430 nm that is readily decolourized via photocatalysis. The pKa of AO24 has
not been established but other azo dyes have pKa ranging from pH 10 to pH 11 (Perez-Urquiza
and Beltran, 2001). It has been used in other TiO2 photocatalysis studies as a dosimeter for
microorganisms (Bandala et al., 2011). Preliminary unpublished data from our laboratory
suggested that P25 nanoparticles and LENs adsorbed AO24 at similar rates as they adsorbed
NOM, thus making AO24 a simple and useful NOM surrogate for the initial evaluation of novel
regenerable TiO2-based adsorbents.
8.2.2 Raw Water Quality
Unchlorinated raw water was collected from the influents of two Canadian water treatment
plants (WTP). The Peterborough WTP is supplied by the Otonabee River (OTB) while the
Britannia WTP in Ottawa is supplied by the Ottawa River (OTW). Average values for a number
of parameters specific to DBP formation, adsorption, nanomaterial agglomeration, and
regeneration are summarized in Table 8.1.
The two water sources differed primarily in terms of NOM character and ionic composition. The
OTW water had higher average DOC, UV254, and SUVA values than the OTB water, indicating
that former contained more aromatic NOM and, most likely, a higher concentration of DBP
precursors (Pifer and Fairey, 2014; Zheng et al., 2015). NOM has been shown to stabilize
nanoparticle suspensions by preventing agglomeration and settling (Liu et al., 2013) suggesting
that the nanomaterial suspensions made in OTW water might be less likely to agglomerate and
thus more conducive to adsorption and less likely to settle out quickly. The OTW water also
contains higher concentrations of iron and copper than the OTB water. Iron is readily adsorbed to
the surface of TiO2 (Chen and Ray, 2001) and might be expected to compete with NOM and
DBP precursors for adsorption sites. Iron and copper have been shown to promote faster
degradation of organic contaminants in TiO2 photocatalytic systems at certain pH values (Butler
and Davis, 1993), which may have implications for regeneration.
224
Table 8.1 Summary of raw water quality
Parameter Units Otonabee River Ottawa River
DOC1 mg/L 4.3 ± 0.3 5.6 ± 0.4
UV2541 1/cm 0.097 ± 0.005 0.183 ± 0.017
SUVA1 m/mg.L 2.3 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.3
pH1 8.0 ± 0.2 7.1 ± 0.2
Turbidity2 NTU 0.6 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 1.0
Alkalinity1 mg/L as CaCO3 85 ± 1 27 ± 1
Hardness2 mg/L as CaCO3 95 ± 11 30 ± 6
Calcium2 mg/L 32.8 ± 3.7 8.3 ± 1.5
Magnesium2 mg/L 3.2 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.4
Sodium2 mg/L 6.5 ± 0.8 3.4 ± 0.8
Chloride2 mg/L 11.5 ± 1.3 3.3 ± 0.9
Conductivity2 S/cm 214 ± 19 81 ± 13
Copper g/L 0.7 ± 0.1 27 ± 10
Iron2 g/L 19 ± 9 217 ± 42
1Average and standard deviation of samples analyzed in DWRG laboratory
2Average and standard deviation of values obtained from Ontario Drinking Water Surveillance Program 2010-2012
In contrast, the OTB water had higher alkalinity (a measure of carbonate ion content), hardness
(a measure of divalent cation content), and conductivity (a measure of overall ionic content) than
the OTW water. Higher ionic content is associated with a decrease in the repulsive forces that
maintain the stability of colloid or nanoparticle suspensions (Hotze et al., 2010). When the
repulsive forces are depressed, the nanoparticles begin to agglomerate due to van der Waals
forces. Agglomeration reduces the surface area available for adsorption and photocatalytic
reaction and also encourages settling. Calcium ions contribute to the overall ionic strength of the
water, but also encourages greater NOM adsorption to TiO2, possibly through a bridging
mechanism (Sun and Lee, 2012; Erhayem and Sohn, 2014, Liu et al., 2013). In this experiment,
it was expected that the high ionic content of the OTB water would encourage settling and
interfere with adsorption by inducing the individual particles to agglomerate but conversely that
its high level of calcium might encourage more NOM adsorption.
225
8.2.3 Synthesis and Characterization of Engineered Nanomaterials
Two LENs were synthesized using a simple hydrothermal method pioneered by Kasuga et al.
(1999) and since adapted by many others including Yuan and Su (2004), Qamar et al. (2008),
Zheng et al. (2010), Liu et al. (2013) and Ali et al. (2015). Briefly, P25 nanoparticles were mixed
with 10 M NaOH, placed in a Teflon lined reactor, and heated to 240oC for 24 hours. The
resulting material was repeatedly rinsed with MilliQ water and then immersed in 0.1 M HCl for
one hour before being rinsed with another 1.2 L of MilliQ water. The material was dried
overnight, crushed into a fine powder, then heated to 550oC or 700oC for 4 hours. The finished
product was then immersed in MilliQ water, sonicated for five minutes, and then allowed to
settle out for 24 hours. The MilliQ water and unsettled TiO2 was discarded and the process was
repeated with a settling time of 3 hours. The final product was dried and stored at 20oC.
NB 550 and NB 700 were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) selected
area electron diffraction (SAED), zeta potential at different pH values to identify the isoelectric
point, and N2 adsorption isotherms. TEM and SAED observation was conducted at the Canadian
Centre for Electron Microscopy (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) on a JEOL 2010F TEM/STEM.
TEM images were processed using Gatan Microscopy Suite: Digial MicrographTM and SAED
and FFT images were indexed using CrysTBox – diffractGUI (Klinger and Jäger, 2015). A
Quantachrome AUTOSORB-1 was used to determine the N2 adsorption isotherms of the two
materials and their surface areas were determined by applying Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)
adsorption method on N2 adsorption isotherms in a relative pressure range of 0.05 to 0.25. The
isoelectric points (IEP) of the LENs were determined by measuring their zeta potential at
different pH values using a Horiba Scientific Nanopartica SZ-100 Nanoparticle Analyzer and
designating the pH at which the zeta potential was zero as the IEP.
8.2.4 Adsorption Experiments
The time required to reach adsorption equilibrium and the effect of increasing TiO2 dose on the
removal of AO24 dye, DOC, UV254, THMfp, and HAAfp by P25 and the two LENs were
investigated in a series of adsorption experiments. In all cases, mixing was provided by an end
over end box mixer.
226
In the AO24 adsorption time to equilibrium experiments 25 mL of a 10 mg/L solution of AO24
was added to a 40 mL amber vial and dosed with 0.5 g/L of TiO2 and mixed in the dark for 5, 10,
15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes. After mixing, the samples were filtered through a 0.45 m PES filter
to remove the TiO2. The AO24 adsorption isotherm tests were conducted at AO24 concentrations
ranging from 5 mg/L to 500 mg/L and a TiO2 dose of 1 g/L. The adsorption isotherm samples
were mixed for 30 minutes in the dark and separation was achieved via centrifugation to avoid
potential interactions between the PES filters and the different concentrations of AO24 in the
samples. All AO24 adsorption experiments were conducted in duplicate.
The time required to reach equilibrium between the TiO2 nanomaterials and NOM was
determined by dosing duplicate 75 mL of OTB or OTW water with 0.5 g/L of TiO2 and mixing
the samples for times ranging from 2.5 minutes to 4 hours. The treated samples were filtered
through a 0.45 m PES filter and analyzed for DOC and UV254. Quadruplicate 150 mL
adsorption isotherm samples were prepared such that one replicate could be used for chlorine
demand while the remainder were analyzed for DOC, UV254, THMfp, and HAAfp. The samples
were dosed with TiO2 at concentrations ranging from 0.1 g/L to 1.5 g/L and mixed for 3 hours in
the dark after which the TiO2 was removed via filtration.
8.2.5 Regeneration Experiments
Regeneration experiments were conducted to determine whether the two LENs could be reused
multiple times to remove AO24 and DBP precursor surrogates. In the AO24 tests, duplicate vials
containing 25 mL of 10 mg/L dye solution was dosed with 0.5 g/L of NB 550 or NB 700 and
mixed end over end in a box mixer. After 30 minutes the TiO2 was removed from the samples
via filtration and resuspended in 25 mL of millQ purified water. The new suspensions were
mixed with a stir plate and stir bar and exposed to UVA light (365 nm) with an average
irradiance of 4.9 mW/cm2 for one hour. The regenerated LENs were removed from the purified
water via filtration and then resuspended in a fresh volume of AO24 solution and mixed for 30
minutes in the box mixer. This process was repeated five times for each LEN. The same
regeneration process was used to evaluate whether the LENs could be reused to remove NOM as
quantified by UV254, which is a well established surrogate parameter for DBP precursors (Chen
and Westerhoff, 2010, Pifer and Fairey, 2014, Zheng et al., 2015).
227
8.2.6 Filtration and Settling Tests
The filterability of solutions containing the three nanomaterials was determined using the time to
filter test described in Standard Method 2710 H (APHA, 2012). In this method, a defined volume
of water or sludge is filtered through a standard laboratory filtration apparatus equipped with a
0.45 m laboratory membrane filter at a vacuum pressure of 15 mmHg (2 kPa). The time
required for the water in the sample to pass through the filter is recorded and normalized to the
time required to filter an equal volume of purified water under the same conditions. The resulting
parameter is referred to as the filtration index. A high filtration index implies that the sample is
resistant to filtration whereas a filtration index close to 1 indicates that the solution does not
present a major barrier to filtration. Although the time to filter test is not able to accurately
predict the behavior of full-scale filtration processes (e.g. media filtration, membrane filtration)
but it does provide a simple quantitative point of comparison between the different materials and
water sources. In this study, 1 g/L suspensions of TiO2 were prepared in the two river water
samples. The suspensions were sonicated for five minutes and then mixed in the box mixer for
one hour before testing. The time required to filter a 100 mL of each suspension through a 0.45
m PES filter was determined and normalized to the time required to filter 100 mL of MilliQ
water. Raw river water controls were also filtered and all filtration experiments were conducted
in triplicate.
Settling tests were conducted in the two surface water matrices at a TiO2 dose of 1 g/L. Other
researchers, including Thio et al. (2011), Liu et al. (2013), and Erhayem and Sohn (2014), have
explored the sedimentation behavior of TiO2 nanomaterials, though these investigations have
generally been conducted in a contaminant transport context. Usually, a water sample containing
the nanomaterial is placed in a turbidimeter or UV-Vis spectrophotometer and readings are taken
periodically to determine the rate of settling over time. The dose of TiO2 used in this study
resulted in turbidity and UV-Vis signals well above the operating ranges of the instruments
available in our laboratory, As a result, it was necessary to adopt an alternative methodology.
400 mL of water was dosed with 1 g/L of TiO2, sonicated for five minutes, and then mixed in the
box mixer. After one hour, the water was distributed into six tall 60 mL vials and the remaining
volume was reserved as a control. 30 mL aliquots were removed after 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60
minutes and diluted to one tenth their original concentration. The diluted samples were analyzed
using a HACH turbidimeter. The settling tests were conducted in duplicate.
228
8.2.7 Analysis of AO24, DOC, UV Absorbance, and DBP Formation Potential
The concentration of AO24 was quantified by measuring the absorbance of the sample at 430 nm
using an Agilent UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content of the
raw and treated river water samples was determined using an O.I. Analytical Aurora 1030W
TOC analyzer operating in persulfate oxidation model and their UV absorption at 254 nm
(UV254) was analyzed on an Agilent 8453 UV-Vis analyzer.
The chlorine demand and DBP formation potential (DBPfp) of the raw and treated river water
samples were assessed at uniform formation conditions (UFC) as described by Summers et al.
(1996). The THMs and HAAs formed through chlorination were extracted according to Standard
Method 6232 B and Standard Method 6251 B (APHA, 2005) and analyzed using an Agilent
7890B GC-ECD. The treated methylene blue samples were centrifuged to remove the TiO2
nanomaterials and then analyzed for absorbance at 665 nm to determine the concentration of
methylene blue remaining in solution. All NOM removal experiments were conducted in
quadruplicate with one replicate being used for chlorine demand and three being used for DBPfp
determination.
8.2.8 Isotherm Modeling and Other Statistical Analyses
The adsorption datasets were evaluated using one-way ANOVA to elucidate the effects of time
and TiO2 concentration on the extent of AO24 and NOM adsorption by the three TiO2
nanomaterials. Tukey’s pairwise comparison method was used to calculate confidence intervals
on the means at each time and/or concentration point. ANOVA and Dunnett’s method were also
used to evaluate the effects of regeneration on the removal of AO24 and NOM by the two LENs
as well as the results of the filtration tests.
The AO24 adsorption data obtained in MilliQ water was fitted to the linearized Freundlich
isotherm model while the DOC, UV254, THMfp, and HAAfp datasets from the experiments
conducted with the real water matrices were fit to a linearized modified version of the Freundlich
isotherm that is commonly used for NOM adsorption studies (Summers and Roberts, 1988).
𝑞 = 𝐾𝐹𝑀(𝐶𝐷⁄ )
1𝑛⁄
(8.1)
229
This model, which explicitly accounts for adsorbent dose, is commonly used in cases where it is
difficult to vary the initial concentration of the adsorbate and thus adsorbent dose is the changing
variable. Previous work by our research group has demonstrated that it is also appropriate for the
modeling of NOM removal by TiO2 nanoparticles (Gora and Andrews, 2017). Linear regression
was used to determine KF or KFM and 1/n as well as the fit of the linearized isotherm models and
the associated confidence intervals (95%) have been reported all adsorption parameters. The fit
of the resulting two-parameter non-linear adsorption model to the data obtained in the study was
evaluated using Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD), which is calculated as shown
in Equation 8.2 (Kumar et al., 2008):
𝑀𝑃𝑆𝐷 = 100 √1
𝑛−𝑝∑ (
𝑞𝑒,𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠−𝑞𝑒,𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐
𝑞𝑒,𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠)2
𝑛𝑖=1 (8.2)
All statistical tests were conducted at the 95% confidence level.
Results and Discussion
8.3.1 Characterization of Engineered Nanomaterials
TEM imaging revealed that both NB 550 and NB 700 were rectangular and belt-like with widths
ranging from 25 to 200 nm and lengths ranging from 100 nm to 10 m (Figure .81). The two
materials had distinctive surface morphologies. NB 550 appeared to be covered in pores or
protuberances whereas NB 700 was smooth but appeared segmented. The LENs also differed
from one another and from P25 nanoparticles in terms of their specific surface areas,
crystallinity, and isoelectric points (IEP). At 29.9 m2/g, NB 550 had a greater surface area than
NB 700, which had a specific surface area of 18.3 m2/g. Both LENs had smaller specific surface
areas than P25 (57.4 m2/g). Commercial P25 nanoparticles contain approximately 75% anatase
and 25% rutile, a combination that is widely held to be conducive to high photocatalytic activity.
In contrast, the results of SAED and TEM analysis indicated that NB 550 contained both anatase
and TiO2(B), a relatively inert form of TiO2 whereas NB 700 consisted entirely of anatase.
Previous studies by our group and other have determined that P25 has an IEP of approximately
6.5 (Gora and Andrews, 2017; Mwaanga et al., 2014), so it is likely that it was electrostatically
230
neutral in all four matrices employed in this study. The IEPs of both LENs fell between pH 4 and
pH 5 as shown in Figure 8.S.1 of the supplemental material section (Section 8.6). Other
researchers have observed that the point of zero charge, which is analogous to the IEP, of TiO2
nanomaterials decreases with increasing particle size (Zhou et al., 2013), so this result was not
unexpected. It implies that both materials were electrostatically neutral in the MilliQ and 10
mg/L AO24 matrices, both of which had pH ranging from 5 to 6, but negatively charged at the
ambient pH of the river water samples, which ranged from 7.1 ± 0.2 for the OTW water to 8.0 ±
0.2 for the OTB water.
Figure 8.1 TEM images of (A) NB 550 and (B) NB 700
8.3.2 Acid Orange 24 Adsorption to TiO2
8.3.2.1 Time to Equilibrium
The results of the experiments conducted to determine the time required to reach equilibrium
between AO24 and the three TiO2 nanomaterials are shown in Figure 8.S.2 in Section 8.6
(supplementary material). Most adsorption studies assume that the true equilibrium between
adsorbent and adsorbate is not reached for many hours or even days, but in this study adsorption
occurred quickly in all cases and there was no statistical difference in removal after 5 minutes of
adsorption. This was declared the point of effective equilibrium and all subsequent AO24
experiments were conducted with a 30 minute adsorption period to ensure that the treatment had
proceeded well beyond the point of effective equilibrium. In this experiment and in all
A B
231
subsequent AO24 experiments the P25 nanoparticles had a higher adsorption capacity for AO24
than NB 550 and NB 700, removing 43 ± 3% of the AO24 from the control vs. 32 ± 2% for NB
550 and 34 ± 3% for NB 700.
8.3.2.2 AO24 Adsorption Isotherms
The adsorption isotherm results were fitted to the linearized form of the Freundlich isotherm.
The results of the analysis are presented in Table 8.2 and in Figure 8.2. The Freundlich isotherm
model was developed empirically and is often able to model systems that do not conform to the
assumptions of the Langmuir isotherm model, namely monolayer adsorption, a homogeneous
adsorbent surface, and no interaction between adsorbed molecules.
Table 8.2 Isotherm parameters for the adsorption of AO24 by P25 and two LENs
Parameters Material
P25 NB 550 NB 700
KF1 2.67 ± 0.82 0.62 ± 0.19 0.53 ± 0.36
KF/SA2 0.047 ± 0.014 0.021 ± 0.006 0.028 ± 0.019
1/n 0.63 ± 0.09 0.83 ± 0.08 0.78 ± 0.16
R2 95% 97% 87%
MPSD 25% 22% 47%
1(mg/g)/(mg/L)1-n
2(mg/m2)/(mg/L)1-n
The good fit of the lines in Figure 8.2 and the high R2 values in Table 8.2 indicate that the
Freundlich model was a good fit for the P25 and NB 550 datasets and adequately described the
adsorption of AO24 to NB 700. The slope parameter, 1/n, was similar, but not equal, for all three
materials, suggesting that their KF values can be compared to one another, but cautiously. The KF
values of NB 550 and NB 700 were statistically equal to one another, indicating that they had
similar AO24 adsorption capacities while the KF of P25 was over four times larger than those of
the LENs, reflecting its higher adsorption capacity for AO24. When the KF values were
normalized to the surface areas of the different materials the P25 was only twice as effective as
the LENs, indicating that the improved removal of the former over the latter was to some extent
a function of differences in surface area (P25 = 57 m2/g; NB 550 30 m2/g; NB 700 18 m2/g).
232
Figure 8.2 AO24 adsorption data fitted to the Freundlich isotherm model
8.3.2.3 Nanomaterial Regeneration After AO24 Adsorption
The results of the regeneration experiments indicate that there was no statistical decrease (95%
confidence level) in the amount of AO24 adsorbed by the LENs over five regeneration cycles
(Figure 8.3). The only exception was a small but statistically significant drop in the amount of
dye adsorbed by NB 700 after the fourth regeneration cycle, which, given the improved dye
removal observed after the fifth regeneration cycle, was likely related to experimental error
rather than an actual reduction in adsorption capacity. As well, the results in Figure 8.3 suggest
that despite the statistical findings, there may in fact have been some reduction in NB 550’s
ability to adsorb AO24 after the third regeneration cycle. The statistical tests were rerun at the
90% confidence level to minimize the chance that the null hypothesis of no change was being
accepted erroneously (Type II error – see Appendix I), but the results remained the same.
Although five regeneration cycles represents only a fraction of the number regeneration cycles
that would likely be required should this technology be adopted in real water and wastewater
treatment installations, it is in line with other proof of concept studies (Liu et al., 2014; Ng et al.,
2015) and is a promising indication that the nanomaterials developed in this study are potentially
applicable as regenerable adsorbents.
1
10
100
1 10 100
log q
e
log Ce
P25 NB 550 NB 700
233
Figure 8.3 AO24 adsorption by virgin and regenerated NB 550 and NB 700. All samples
were prepared in duplicate and error bars represent the 95% confidence
interval on the mean. Legend numbers correspond to the number of
regeneration cycles.
8.3.3 NOM Adsorption to TiO2 Nanomaterials
8.3.3.1 Time to Equilibrium
The time required to reach an effective equilibrium between TiO2 and NOM (measured as DOC
and UV254) was determined for all three TiO2 nanomaterials in both water matrices (OTB and
OTW). The results of these experiments are shown in Figure 8.S.3 in Section 8.6 –
supplementary material. Tukey’s Method for multiple comparisons was used to establish the
time at which the consecutive samples were no longer significantly different from one another at
the 95% confidence level. In almost all cases, there was no significant change in the DOC or
UV254 of the treated samples after 15 minutes, indicating that NOM adsorption to the TiO2
surface occurred quickly. The removal of DOC from the OTW water did not stabilize until
between 90 and 120 minutes. The adsorption of aromatic NOM (measured by UV254) from this
0
2
4
6
8
10
NB 550 NB 700
Ma
ss o
f A
O2
4 A
dso
rbed
to
LE
Ns
(mg
AO
24
/gT
iO2)
Regeneration Cycle
0
1
2
3
4
5
234
water stabilized after ten minutes for all three materials, suggesting that the variable DOC results
were related to slower interactions between TiO2 and non-aromatic NOM. Based on these results
the NOM adsorption isotherm experiments were performed using a three hour adsorption period.
8.3.3.2 Adsorption of DOC and UV254
As illustrated in Figure 8.4, P25 adsorbed more DOC from both water sources than NB 550,
which itself adsorbed more than NB 700. The difference in the mass of DOC adsorbed by the
two LENs was more pronounced than that observed with AO24, particularly in the OTW water.
For example, at a TiO2 dose of 1.5 g/L, NB 550 removed 30 ± 1% of the DOC from the OTW
water but NB 700 only removed 15 ± 1%. At 30 m2/g, the specific surface area of NB 550 is
nearly twice that of NB 700 (18 m2/g). Given that the two materials have similar charge
characteristics, it seems likely that surface area was the most important factor influencing the
amount of DOC adsorbed to the TiO2 surface. In addition, under these same conditions P25,
which has a specific surface area of 57 m2/g, removed 37 ± 1% of the DOC in the raw OTW
water, further supporting the hypothesis that surface area played an important role in the
adsorption of DOC from this water source. This relationship also held true in the experiments
conducted with OTB water, the results of which are also shown in Figure 8.4.
235
Figure 8.4 Adsorption of DOC from Otonabee River water (OTB) and Ottawa River
water (OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs. Error bars represent the
95% confidence interval on the mean.
The removal of UV254 by the three materials (Figure 8.5) followed similar trends as DOC
removal. At a dose of 1.5 g/L P25 removed 54 ±3 % of the UV254 from the OTB water and 62 ±
5% of the UV254 from the OTW water and NB550 removed 38 ± 5 % of the UV254 from the
OTB water and 49 ± 4% from the OTW water. The OTW water contained more NOM than the
OTB water (5.6 ± 0.4 mg/L vs. 4.3 ± 0.3 mg/L) and this NOM was more aromatic in character
(SUVA of 3.3 ± 0.3 L/mg.m vs. 2.3 ± 0.2 L/mg.m). Research by others has demonstrated that
NOM adsorption increases at higher NOM concentrations (Mwaanga et al., 2014; Erhayem and
Sohn, 2014; Kim and Shon, 2007) and that larger, more aromatic NOM is preferentially
adsorbed by P25 nanoparticles (Erhayem and Sohn, 2014), so this result was not surprising. The
removal of UV254 from the OTB water by NB 700 was similar to its removal from OTW by this
nanomaterial – it removed 30 ± 1% from the former and 25 ± 2 %both of them, suggesting that
NOM adsorption by NB 700 was not as strongly influenced by the amount or type of NOM
present in the water.
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
DO
C (
mg
/L)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
236
Figure 8.5 Adsorption of UV254 from Otonabee River water (OTB) and Ottawa River
water (OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs nanomaterials. Error bars
represent the 95% confidence interval on the mean.
8.3.3.3 Reduction of THMfp and HAAfp via Adsorption of DBP Precursors
The main reason why NOM is removed from drinking water ahead of chlorination is to prevent
the formation of DBPs during the final disinfection step of the overall drinking water treatment
system. Not all NOM compounds are DBP precursors, so although the DOC and UV254 removal
results presented in Section 8.3.3.2 are promising, it was important to prove that the LENs were
specifically capable of adsorbing DBP precursors. As shown in Figure 8.6, all three of the TiO2
nanomaterials adsorbed significant amounts of the precursors of THMs and HAAs, the most
widely regulated DBPs in North America and around the world. At the highest TiO2 dose (1.5
g/L), P25 reduced the THMfp of the OTB water by 48 ± 2 % and that of the OTW water by 61 ±
6%. NB 700 also worked more effectively in the OTW water than in the OTB water, reducing
the THMfp of the former by 38 ± 3% and that of the latter by 27 ± 5%. NB 550 was equally
effective in both water matrices, reducing the THMfp of the OTB water by 37 ± 4% and that of
the OTW water by 43 ± 7%.
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
UV
25
4 (
1/c
m)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
237
Figure 8.6 Adsorption of THM precursors from Otonabee River water (OTB) and
Ottawa River water (OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs. Error bars
represent the 95% confidence interval on the mean.
The three nanomaterials were also able to adsorb significant amounts of HAA precursors from
the two water matrices as shown in Figure 8.7. The HAAfp results were, as a rule, more variable
than the THMfp results, reflecting the increased complexity of the HAA extraction and
derivatization methods. This made it more difficult to identify and quantify trends based on
material type or water matrix. Nonetheless, it was apparent that NB 550 consistently had a
greater affinity for HAA precursors than NB 700 did, removing 51 ± 13% from the OTB water
and 47 ± 13% from the OTW water. NB 700 removed only 24 ± 2% from the OTB water and 31
± 2% from the OTW water.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
238
Figure 8.7 Adsorption of HAA precursors from Otonabee River water (OTB) and
Ottawa River water (OTW) by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs. Error bars
represent the 95% confidence interval on the mean.
8.3.3.4 Isotherm Modeling
The DOC, UV254, THMfp, and HAAfp datasets discussed in Section 8.3.3.2 and 8.3.3.3 were
fitted to a modified version of the Freundlich isotherm first introduced by Summers and Roberts
(1988) and since employed by numerous other researchers exploring NOM adsorption to
activated carbon (e.g. Karanfil and Kitis, 1999, Li et al., 2002) and TiO2 (Erhayem and Sohn,
2014). The adsorption isotherms are provided in Figure 8.8 (DOC), Figure 8.9 (THMfp), and
Figure 8.S.4 (UV254) and Figure 8.S.5 (HAAfp) in Section 8.6 (supplementary material) and the
isotherm parameters are presented in Table 8.3.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.5 1 1.5
HA
Afp
(
g/L
)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
239
Figure 8.8 DOC adsorption data sets from experiments conducted in (A) Otonabee
River (OTB) water and (B) Ottawa River (OTW) water fitted to a modified
Freundlich isotherm model
0.1
1
10
1 10 100
q (
mg
DO
C/g
TiO
2)
C/D (mg DOC/g TiO2)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
0.1
1
10
1 10 100
q (
mg D
OC
/g T
iO2)
C/D (mg DOC/g TiO2)
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
A
B
240
Table 8.3 Modified Freundlich model isotherm parameters for the removal of DOC,
UV254, THM precursors, and HAA precursors from Otonabee River (OTB)
and Ottawa River (OTW) water by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs
Parameter Water Material KFM1 KFM/SA2 1/n R2 MPSD
DOC OTB P25 0.67 ± 0.15 0.012 ± 0.003 0.55 ± 0.11 88% 25%
NB 550 0.61 ± 0.13 0.020 ± 0.004 0.41 ± 0.09 84% 20%
NB 700 0.44 ± 0.04 0.024 ± 0.002 0.49 ± 0.04 97% 9%
OTW P25 0.90 ± 0.08 0.016 ± 0.001 0.55 ± 0.04 98% 9%
NB 550 0.59 ± 0.20 0.020 ± 0.007 0.38 ± 0.15 70% 22%
NB 700 0.34 ± 0.09 0.019 ± 0.005 0.40 ± 0.11 79% 17%
UV254 OTB P25 0.20 ± 0.04 0.004 ± 0.001 0.47 ± 0.08 89% 23%
NB 550 0.15 ± 0.06 0.005 ± 0.002 0.60 ± 0.16 83% 27%
NB 700 0.06 ± 0.01 0.003 ± 0.000 0.37 ± 0.05 94% 9%
OTW P25 0.25 ± 0.04 0.004 ± 0.001 0.38 ± 0.08 89% 15%
NB 550 0.17 ± 0.03 0.006 ± 0.001 0.40 ± 0.09 83% 23%
NB 700 0.09 ± 0.02 0.005 ± 0.001 0.41 ± 0.15 70% 31%
THMfp OTB P25 2.88 ± 1.98 0.051 ± 0.035 0.68 ± 0.13 93% 20%
NB 550 2.76 ± 2.26 0.092 ± 0.075 0.60 ± 0.12 91% 26%
NB 700 2.20 ± 4.21 0.122 ± 0.234 0.58 ± 0.26 74% 40%
OTW P25 22.5 ± 13.21 0.394 ± 0.232 0.34 ± 0.09 87% 58%
NB 550 11.9 ± 25.8 0.399 ± 0.861 0.36 ± 0.25 53% 44%
NB 700 4.45 ± 4.30 0.247 ± 0.239 0.56 ± 0.14 89% 45%
HAAfp OTB P25 0.53 ± 0.42 0.009 ± 0.007 0.87 ± 0.17 95% 26%
NB 550 1.55 ± 1.07 0.052 ± 0.036 0.73 ± 0.15 92% 26%
NB 700 0.72 ± 0.82 0.040 ± 0.045 0.72 ± 0.25 87% 23%
OTW P25 8.43 ± 9.23 0.148 ± 0.162 0.33 ± 0.20 63% 35%
NB 550 12.91 ± 9.68 0.430 ± 0.323 0.34 ± 0.13 76% 25%
NB 700 1.53 ± 0.87 0.085 ± 0.049 0.66 ± 0.11 96% 15%
1(mg DOC/g TiO2)1-n, (UV254/g TiO2)1-n, (ug THMfp/g TiO2)1-n, (g HAAfp/g TiO2)1-n
2(mg DOC/m2 TiO2)1-n, (UV254/ m2 TiO2)1-n, (ug THMfp/ m2 TiO2)1-n, (g HAAfp/ m2 TiO2)1-n
241
As shown in Table 8.3, the DOC slope parameters (1/n) were statistically equal at the 95%
confidence level for all three materials in both water matrices, indicating that their adsorption
capacities (KFM values) can be compared to one another. The adsorption capacities of the
nanomaterials as estimated from their DOC isotherms indicate that P25 and NB 550 had
statistically equal adsorption capacities for DOC in the OTB water matrix and that P25 had a
greater capacity for DOC adsorption than the two LENs in the OTW water matrix, though this
was less apparent once the KFM values were normalized to surface area. P25’s KFM value was
larger in the OTW water than in the OTB water (KF,OTW = 0.90, KF,OTB = 0.67), indicating that
either the NOM in the OTW water was more amenable to adsorption, likely due to its
hydrophobic nature, or that the OTW matrix was less likely to inhibit adsorption by P25 for other
reasons. For example, the high ion content of the OTB matrix may have induced the P25
nanoparticles to agglomerate more than they did in the OTW water (Liu et al., 2013), thus
reducing the total TiO2 surface area available for adsorption in the OTB experiments compared
to the OTW experiments. NB 550’s KFM values were higher than those of NB 700 in both water
matrices. It should be noted, however, that the adsorption of DOC to NB 550 was not a good fit
to the linearized model, particularly in the OTW water matrix (R2 = 70%), and the full model
developed from the linearized isotherm was a relatively poor fit to the data (MPSD = 22%), so
the KFM values reported for NB 550 are unlikely to be as reliable as those reported for P25 and
NB 700.
The UV254 trends (Figure S.8.4) were, for the most part, similar to the DOC trends. The 1/n
values obtained in the experiments conducted with OTW were statistically equal to one another
(95% confidence level) and as such their KFM values can be compared to one another. P25
showed a higher adsorption capacity for aromatic NOM than the other two materials in the OTW
water matrix. This preference was less apparent when the KFM values were normalized to surface
area, indicating that P25’s higher adsorption capacity was likely a function of its higher surface
area. The relative UV254 adsorption capacities of the nanomaterials from the OTB experiments
were more difficult to compare because 1/n was not constant, however, the results do suggest
that P25 and NB 550 had a statistically equal capacity for aromatic NOM in this water matrix
and that both were superior to NB 700.
242
Figure 8.9 THMfp adsorption data sets from experiments conducted in (A) Otonabee
River (OTB) water and (B) Ottawa River (OTW) water fitted to a modified
Freundlich isotherm model
The THMfp and HAAfp datasets did not fit the modified Freundlich model as readily as the
DOC and UV254 datasets. Considering the higher variability in these parameters owing to the
more complex preparation methods required for the samples, however, the adsorption of DBP
10
100
1000
10 100 1000 10000
q (
g T
HM
fp/g
TiO
2)
C/D (g THMfp/g TiO2)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
10
100
1000
10 100 1000 10000
q (
g T
HM
fp/g
TiO
2)
C/D (g THMfp/g TiO2)
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
B
A
243
precursors to the three TiO2 nanomaterials did provide a reasonable fit to the modified
Freundlich model in many cases, as shown in Table 8.3. For example, the R2 of the linearized
modified Freundlich model was above 90% for both THMfp and HAAfp reduction by P25 and
NB 550 in the OTB water. The 1/n values for P25 and NB 550 in OTB water were statistically
indistinguishable, and the KFM and KFM/SA values for these datasets indicate that the DBP
precursor adsorption capacity of NB 550 was equal to that of P25 in OTB water. A similar trend
was apparent when the TiO2 nanomaterials were used to adsorb HAA precursors from the OTB
water.
The terms THMfp and HAAfp usually refer to the propensity of a water sample to form a variety
of THMs (4) and HAAs (9) when chlorinated under standard conditions. In this study, only two
THMs, trichloromethane (TCM) and bromodichloromethane (BDCM), and two HAAs,
dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCAA), were formed when the raw and
treated water samples were chlorinated. As shown in Figure 8.S.8 in the supplementary material
(Section 8.6), the ratio of TCM to BDCM formed upon chlorination was unchanged by the
adsorption treatment irrespective of the dose or type of TiO2 nanomaterial added to the water.
This indicates that none of the materials preferentially adsorbed TCM or BDCM precursors. In
contrast, the ratio of DCAA to TCAA formed upon chlorination increased when P25 was used as
an adsorbent (Figure 8.S.9), suggesting that the commercial nanoparticles were more likely to
adsorb TCAA precursors than DCAA precursors. The former are more hydrophobic than the
latter, so this finding further supports the hypothesis that P25 nanoparticles preferentially adsorb
hydrophobic NOM, as suggested by the DOC and UV254 results presented earlier (Figure 8.4,
Figure 8.5, Table 8.3).
Overall, the results of the adsorption isotherm analysis indicate that the modified Freundlich
model was appropriate for most of the matrix/material combinations tested in this study, but
there was no clear trend suggesting that one material or matrix provided an inherently better fit
than any of the others. Should the LENs be adopted for NOM removal from drinking water,
more detailed adsorption studies would prove helpful in elucidating the mechanisms driving the
adsorption of DOC, aromatic NOM (measured as UV254 absorption), and DBP precursors in
different matrices as well as the influences of different water matrix characteristics on the fit of
the model.
244
8.3.4 Regeneration of Engineered Nanomaterials After NOM Adsorption
The regenerability of the LENs is a key factor that will determine whether they can realistically
be employed for drinking water treatment. The amount of aromatic NOM (i.e. NOM measured
by UV254) adsorbed to the virgin and regenerated LENs in the two water matrices are shown in
Figure 8.10 and the UV254 of the water treated by the virgin and regenerated LENs is shown in
Figure 8.S.7 in the supplementary material. There was no statistical difference at the 95%
confidence level in the amount of NOM adsorbed by NB 700 for the OTB water matrix after five
regenerations. However, there was statistically significant loss in the amount of NOM adsorbed
by NB 550 from 0.048 ± 0.015 cm-1/gTiO2 to 0.025 ± 0.015 cm-1/gTiO2 after four regeneration
cycles when it was used to treat OTB water and an earlier and more substantial loss the amount
of NOM adsorbed by both LENs in the tests conducted with OTW water. For example, in the
OTW experiments the amount of NOM adsorbed by NB 550 decreased from 0.098 ± 0.009 cm-
1/gTiO2 TiO2 to 0.081 ± 0.009 cm-1/gTiO2 after the first regeneration and eventually to 0.046 ±
0.009 cm-1/gTiO2 after five regeneration cycles, which represents a 53% overall reduction in
adsorption. The poorer regenerability of NB 550, was likely due to its lower photoactivity
compared to NB 700 as described in Section 8.3.1.
Organic loading rates likely also impacted the regeneration efficacy and reuseability of the LENs
under the chosen regeneration conditions. Although both LENs removed a similar percentage of
DOC and UV254 from the water, the loading of NOM on the nanomaterials (NOM/g TiO2) was
higher when they were used to treat OTW water than when they were used to treat the OTB
water. For example, the fresh NB 550 was loaded with 0.048 ± 0.008 1/cm per gram of TiO2
after being suspended in the OTB water but it adsorbed 0.098 ± 0.004 1/cm per gram of TiO2 in
the OTW water. It is therefore possible that a longer period of irradiation would result in better
regeneration of the LENs after use in OTW water. The mechanisms underlying that adsorption
may also have been different. Thio et al. (2011) and Liu et al. (2013) hypothesized that calcium
ions could act as ionic bridges between NOM and the TiO2 surface, bypassing some of the
repulsive forces that would otherwise keep the two apart. In this study, calcium ions were more
plentiful in the OTB water than in the OTW water, and it may be that the initial adsorption
occurred via different mechanisms, some of which might be reversible in the regeneration matrix
(MilliQ water) or more likely to lead to NOM degradation upon irradiation.
245
Figure 8.10 Adsorption of aromatic NOM (UV254 absorbing NOM) by virgin and
regenerated NB 550 and NB 700. Error bars represent the 95% confidence
interval on the mean and legend numbers correspond to the number of
regeneration cycles.
Other factors that may have impacted regeneration include catalyst fouling by different
components of the natural water matrices or the formation and subsequent adsorption of
recalcitrant intermediates as a result the photocatalytic oxidation of adsorbed NOM during the
regeneration process. The information gathered in this study was insufficient to confirm or deny
either of these possibilities.
Despite the gradual decline in the amount of NOM adsorbed to the LENs that was observed in
some cases, these results are promising and confirm that the two nanomaterials can be
regenerated and reused multiple times for NOM removal from natural water matrices. The
regenerability of the LENs should, however, be confirmed at different TiO2 doses and in other
water matrices before the materials are employed in a real drinking water treatment process.
Adjustments to the regeneration procedure, including longer regeneration time, changes in the
pH or other characteristics of the water used for regeneration, and using different concentrations
of TiO2 during regeneration may further improve the results.
0
0.025
0.05
0.075
0.1
0.125
0.15
NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
NO
M A
dso
rbed
(1
/cm
/g T
iO2)
0
1
2
3
4
5
246
8.3.5 Removal of Nanomaterials from Treated Water
8.3.5.1 Filtration
The filtration indexes of the different TiO2 suspensions (Figure 8.11) illustrate the superior
filterability of LENs when compared to commercial P25 nanoparticles. A two-way ANOVA
with interactions was conducted on the dataset and it was determined that both material type and
water source had significant impacts on the filterability of the TiO2 suspensions. In the OTW
experiments, the filtration index of the P25 nanoparticles was approximately 6 to 8 times higher
than those of the LENs and in the OTB experiments it was 4 to 5 times higher. The improved
filterability of the LENs compared to the P25 nanoparticles is similar to what was observed by
Zhang et al. (2009) in a study that looked at the removal of LENs and nanoparticles from water
using a bench-scale membrane unit. They noted slower fouling rates with LENs than with
nanoparticles and hypothesized that this was likely due to differences in the deposition of the
materials on the surface of the membrane and within the membrane pores. In both cases, they
observed the formation of cake-like fouling on the surface of the membrane, which gradually
reduced the rate of water passage through the filter. The nanoparticles, however, were also
deposited within the membrane pores, which greatly increased the overall resistance to filtration.
As shown in Figure 8.11, P25 was more readily removed from the OTB water than from the
OTW water. The presence of ions, especially calcium, has been linked to increased
agglomeration and settling of P25 nanoparticles by numerous researchers (Hotze et al., 2010; Liu
et al., 2013; Thio et al., 2011), and the OTB water contained more calcium (32.8 ± 3.7 mg/L vs.
8.3 ± 1.5 mg/L) and other ions (conductivity = 214 ± 19 s/cm vs. 81 ± 13 S/cm) than the OTW
water. Increased agglomeration may have reduced the extent of P25 nanoparticle deposition in
the membrane pores and thus improved the overall filterability of the suspension.
247
Figure 8.11 Filtration indexes of raw water and three TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in
MilliQ water at pH 6 and pH 8 and two raw surface water samples
The filterability of the LENs was not impacted by the water matrix, indicating that they were
removed via size exclusion irrespective of the extent of agglomeration that may or may not have
taken place due to the pH of the water or the presence of ions or NOM. The water matrix did
have significant impacts on the filterability of the LENs relative to the raw water. For example,
the filterability indexes of the NB 550 and NB 700 suspensions made in OTB water matrices
were 3.41 ± 0.03 and 2.67 ± 0.02, respectively, which are both significantly higher than that of
the raw OTB water, which was essentially equal to that of the MilliQ water at 1.03 ± 0.01. In
contrast, the filtration index of the raw OTW water was 6.38 ± 0.52, well above that of the raw
OTB sample and significantly higher than the suspensions of NB 550 and NB 700 made in OTW
water (3.32 ± 0.13 and 2.55 ± 0.19). The OTW water contained more turbidity (3.3 ± 1.0 NTU
vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 NTU) and aromatic NOM (SUVA = 3.3 ± 0.3 L/mg.m vs. 2.3 ± 0.2 L/mg.m) than
the MilliQ and OTB water samples, which may explain its increased resistance to filtration even
in the absence of TiO2. Turbidity and aromatic NOM can foul membranes via cake formation but
also through the deposition of particles within the membrane pores and the adsorption of NOM
to the membrane surface and within the pores, leading to pore constriction as described
previously (Zhang et al., 2009). When TiO2 was added to the OTW water, the resistance to
0
5
10
15
20
25
Raw Water P25 NB 550 NB 700
Fil
tra
tio
n I
nd
ex
OTB
OTW
248
filtration decreased, possibly because the particulate matter and NOM in the raw water became
adsorbed to the TiO2 surface or enmeshed in the nanomaterial agglomerates, reducing the extent
of pore constriction.
In a full-scale membrane filtration process the filters would be periodically backwashed to
remove foulants, and the findings of this study suggest that a full-scale membrane filtration unit
would require more frequent backwashing if TiO2 was added to the water. The amount of
backwashing might be less with the LENs than with commercial P25 nanoparticles. Full-scale
membrane filters preceded by coagulation or powdered activated carbon also require more
frequent backwashing than those filtering unmodified raw water. Although these results suggest
that the LENs would be much easier to remove from treated water via filtration than P25
nanoparticles, they cannot be used to accurately predict the extent of fouling and flow reduction
that would occur in a full-scale media or membrane filter, however, and additional studies should
be conducted with flow through bench-scale membrane filters to track fouling and flow
reduction over time.
8.3.5.2 Sedimentation
Although filtration is the simplest and most intuitive way to remove nanomaterials from water,
other common separation processes used in water treatment plant, including sedimentation
(settling), might also be appropriate under certain conditions. The results of sedimentation
experiments conducted for this study, shown in Figure 8.12, hint at the complex interactions
occurring between the different nanomaterials and the components of the water matrices in
which they were originally suspended.
249
Figure 8.12 Percent removal of turbidity via sedimentation for three TiO2 nanomaterials
suspended in two raw surface water samples
Contrary to what was expected there was no obvious relationship between nanomaterial particle
size and the extent of settling, and in both cases, P25 settled more quickly than the two LENs.
This counterintuitive result, which is nonetheless similar to observations made by Liu et al.
(2013) in their study on the aggregation mechanisms of nanoparticles and linear nanomaterials, is
likely a function of numerous interrelated phenomena including the destabilizing effects of
calcium and other ions, particularly in the OTB water matrix, the stabilizing effect of NOM in
both water matrices, the surface charge of the different materials at the ambient pH of the two
water matrices, and the propensity of each material to form agglomerates of different sizes and
densities based on their shapes and sizes.
As described by Deloid et al. (2014) and discussed in detail in Appendix H, the effective density
of nanomaterial agglomerates is often well below the material density of TiO2 (4.26 g/cm3) and it
may be that the agglomerates formed by the P25 nanoparticles were smaller but denser than
those formed by the LENs. The measurement of effective nanoparticle agglomerate density was
beyond the scope of this study (see Appendix H), but it seems possible that the spherical P25
nanoparticles would be able to form tighter, denser agglomerates than the linear and irregularly
sized LENs. The Sterling equations (Appendix H) were used to estimate the effective densities of
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
P25 NB 550 NB 700
Tu
rbid
ity
Rem
ov
al
(30
min
)
OTB
OTW
250
the three materials in the different water matrices based on the agglomerate size distributions in
Figure H.2 (Appendix H). When these values were used to predict settling time with Stokes’
Law the resulting estimates were closer to the settling rates observed in the experiments (Table
H.2, Appendix H), indicating that the assumptions made during the calculations were incorrect
and/or that the nanomaterials in this study did not exhibit Type I settling behavior and their
settling velocity could not be described by Stokes’ Law.
The two natural water matrices employed in his study differed mainly in terms of ionic strength,
calcium content, and NOM content and character. As shown in Table 8.1, the conductivity of the
OTB water was nearly three times that of the OTW water. The rate of settling of the P25
nanoparticles was greater in OTB water, indicating that ion content likely had a strong impact on
the stability of P25 in solution at this concentration of TiO2. The presence of ions in the water
destabilizes particle suspensions by reducing the size of the electrical double layer that surrounds
the individual particles. The zeta potential of the materials, which is an indicator of the size of
the electrical double layer, was measured in both water sources, and as shown in Figure 8.13,
was more negative in the OTW water matrix than in the OTB water matrix for all three materials.
A more negative zeta potential implies a more stable suspension, so this result confirms that the
repulsive forces that usually prevent agglomeration were weakened by the contents of the OTB
matrix.
Figure 8.13 Zeta potential of P25 nanoparticles and two LENs in two natural water
matrices
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Raw Water P25 NB 550 NB 700
Zet
a P
ote
nti
al (m
V)
OTB
OTW
251
It was less clear exactly what role NOM may have played in the stabilization or destabilization of
the nanomaterials in the two natural water matrices, but it seems likely that it contributed to the
increased stability of NB 550 and NB 700 suspensions in OTW water. Liu et al. (2013) explored
the effects of commercially available Suwannee River NOM (SRNOM) on the settling of P25
nanoparticles and LENs similar, though not identical, to those used in this project. They found
that increasing the concentration of SRNOM from 0 to 10 mg/L decreased the size of the LEN
agglomerates and slowed their settling considerably. This effect was less apparent for TiO2
nanoparticles. Based on their analysis of the DVLO profiles of their nanomaterials under
different water quality conditions they attributed the decreases in LEN agglomeration and
settling in the presence of NOM to the formation of an energy barrier due to steric hindrance, as
has also been observed by other researchers (Domingos et al., 2009; Thio et al., 2011). This
energy barrier was decreased in the presence of calcium ions and was not observed for spherical
nanoparticles. Although the LENs employed by Liu et al. differed from those in this study in
terms of crystal phase structure and surface area, the trends that they observed match those
observed in this project and their hypotheses with respect to the effects of NOM and calcium on
the stability of nanomaterials in surface water may also explain the findings of this study.
pH can also have a strong effect on agglomeration and subsequent settling but the ambient pH of
the two natural water matrices was similar, so it is unlikely to explain the observations of this
study. Both of the natural water matrices had ambient pH values between 7 and 8, which is well
above the IEPs of all three nanomaterials, the nanomaterials would hold an overall negative
charge and the resulting repulsive forces between individual particles may have helped to
maintain the stability of the suspensions. The effects of the water matrices on the stability of the
different nanomaterials in this study were undoubtedly complex, and that very complexity will
likely discourage the use of settling as a separation mechanism for TiO2 from drinking water.
252
Conclusions
This study successfully demonstrated the application of two regenerable nanoscale linear
engineered TiO2 adsorbents (LENs) for the removal of an indicator dye and disinfection
byproduct precursors from two natural drinking water matrices. Both LENs were more easily
removed from the water via filtration than commercial P25 TiO2 nanoparticles. An alternative
separation mechanism, sedimentation (settling) was found to be strongly influenced by the water
matrix used. The influences of nanomaterial properties such as surface area, charge, and
photoactivity were elucidated and it was determined that higher surface area was correlated to
better adsorption of disinfection byproduct precursors and precursor surrogates while higher
photoactivity promoted more effective regeneration of the materials under UVA light. The two
LENs were less effective for the adsorption of DOC, UV254, and DBP precursors than standard
P25 nanoparticles, likely due to both surface area effects and charge effects as well as
interactions with the two water matrices used in this study. The removal of DOC and UV254 was
a good fit to a modified Freundlich adsorption isotherm model but this model was less
appropriate for the adsorption of DBP precursors. The adsorption of DBP precursors by the two
LENs was significant but modest (27% to 51%). Further modification of the materials
themselves or of the bulk matrix may be required if this technology is to be implemented
exclusively for DBP control in a drinking water treatment plant. The underlying concept of a
two-step treatment system built on a photocatalytically regenerable adsorbent that is easy to
remove from the water after treatment remains valid, however, and these materials may prove to
be highly effective for the removal of other contaminants of concern from drinking water and
other aqueous matrices upon further testing and development.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Kaya Yuan, Kennedy Santos, and Katie Dritsas for their
assistance in the laboratory, Jim Wang for training on the various analytical instruments
employed throughout the study, Alireza Mahdavi for the use of the Mastersizer 3000 particle
sizer, and Robert Liang for his assistance developing the bench-scale regeneration apparatus and
arranging some of the nanomaterial characterization tests.
253
References
Abdullah, M., Low, G.K.C., and Matthews, R.W. 1990. Effects of common inorganic anions on
rates of photocatalytic oxidation of organic carbon over illuminated titanium dioxide, Journal of
Physical Chemistry, 94, 6820-6825
Ali, S., Granbohm, H., Ge, Y., and Singh, V.K. 2016. Crystal structure and photocatalytic
properties of titanate nanotubes prepared by chemical processing and subsequent annealing,
Journal of Materials Science, 51, 7322-7335
American Public Health Association, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 21st ed., Washington D.C., APHA
Bavykin, D.V. and Walsh, F.C. 2010. Titanate and Titania Nanotubes: Synthesis, RSC
Publishing
Bandala, E., Gonzalez, L., de la Hoz, F., Pelaez, M.A., Dionysiou, D.D., Dunlop, P.S.M., Byrne,
J.A., Sanchez, J.L., 2011. Application of azo dyes and dosimetric indicators for enhanced
photocatalytic solar disinfection (ENPHOSODIS), Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology
A: Chemistry, 218, 185-191
Bennett, S.W., Zhou, D., Mielke, R., and Keller, A.A. 2012. Photoinduced disaggregation of
TiO2 nanoparticles enables transdermal penetration, PLOS ONE, 7 (11), e48719
Butler, E.C. and Davis, A.P. 1993. Photocatalytic oxidation in aqueous titanium dioxide
suspensions: the influence of dissolved transition metals, Journal of Photochemistry and
Photobiology A: Chemistry, 70, 273-283
Chen, H.Y., Zahraa, O., and Bouchy, M. 1997. Inhibition of the adsorption and photocatalytic
degradation of an organic contaminant in an aqueous suspension of TiO2 by inorganic ions,
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 108, 37-44
Chen, D. and Ray, A. K. 2001. Removal of toxic metal ions from wastewater by semiconductor
photocatalysis, Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 1561-1570
254
Daneshvar, N., Salari, D., Niaei, A., Rasoulifard, M.H., Khataee, A.R. 2005. Immobilization of
TiO2 nanopowder on glass beads for the photocatalytic decolorization of an azo dye C.I. Direct
Red 23, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 40, 1605-1617
Erhayem, M., 2013. Effect of naturally occurring organic matter (NOOM) type and source on
NOOM adsorption onto titanium dioxide nanoparticles under varying environmental conditions,
Thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, USA
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. 2014. Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, 249-257
Franch, M.I., Ayllón, J.A., Peral, J., and Domènech, X. 2005. Enhanced photocatalytic
degradation of maleic acid by Fe(III) adsorption onto the TiO2 surface, Catalysis Today, 101,
245-252
French, R. A., Jacobson, A.R., Kim, B., Isley, S.L., Penn, R.L., and Baveye, P.C. 2009. Influence
of ionic strength, pH, and cation valence on aggregation kinetics of titanium dioxide
nanoparticles, Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 1354-1359
Hotze, E.M., Phenrat, T., and Lowry, G.V. 2010, Nanoparticle aggregation: Challenges to
understanding transport and reactivity, Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 1909-1924
Huang, X., Leal, M., Li, Q., 2008. Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2 photocatalytic
oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research, 42, 1142-1150
Hyung, H., Kim, J-H, 2008. Natural organic matter (NOM) adsorption to multi-walled carbon
nanotubes: Effect of NOM characteristics and water quality parameters, Environmental Science
and Technology, 42, 4416-4421
Karanfil, T., Kitis, M., Kilduff, J.E., Wigton, A., 1999. Role of granular activated carbon surface
chemistry on the adsorption of organic compounds 2, Environmental Science and Technology,
33, 3225-3233
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. 1999. Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), 1307-1311
255
Kim, S-H and Shon, H.K., 2007. Adsorption characterization for multi-component organic
matters by titanium oxide (TiO2) in wastewater, Separation Science and Technology, 42, 1775-
1792
Klinger, M. and Jäger, A. 2015. Crystallographic Tool Box (CrysTBox): automated tools for
transmission electron microscopists and crystallographers. Journal of Applied Crystallography,
48 (6), doi:10.1107/S1600576715017252.
Kumar, K.V., Porkodi, K., and Rocha, F. 2008. Isotherms and thermodynamics by linear and
non-linear regression analysis for the sorption of methylene blue onto activated carbon:
Comparison of various error functions, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151, 794-804
Li, F., Yuasa, A., Ebie, K., Azuma, Y., Hagishita, T., Matsui, Y., 2002. Factors affecting the
adsorption capacity of dissolved organic matter onto activated carbon: Modified isotherm
analysis, Water Research, 36, 4994-4604
Li, L., Sillanpää, M., and Risto, M. 2016. Influences of water properties on the aggregation and
deposition of engineered titanium dioxide nanoparticles in natural waters, Environmental
Pollution, 291, 132-138
Liang, L. and Singer, P.C. 2003. Factors influencing the formation and relative distribution of
haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes in drinking water, Environmental Science and Technology,
37, 2920-2928
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R., 2008. TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C.W.K., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., and Amal, R. 2010. Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research, 44, 2525-2532
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. 2013. Comparison on aggregation and sedimentation
of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of pH, ionic
256
strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering
Aspects, 434, 319-328
S. Liu, M. Lim, R. Amal, 2014. TiO2-coated natural zeolite: Rapid humic acid adsorption and
effective photocatalytic regeneration, Chemical Engineering Science 105, 46-52
Loosli, F., Vitorazi, L., Berret, J-F, and Stoll, S. 2015. Towards a better understanding on
agglomeration mechanisms and thermodynamic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles interacting with
natural organic matter, Water Research, 80, 139-148
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E., and Schlautman, M. 2014. Preferential sorption of some natural
organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Influence of pH and ionic strength,
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 8833-8844
Ng, M., Kho, E.T., Liu, S., Lim, M., Amal, R., 2014. Highly adsorptive and regenerative
magnetic TiO2 for natural organic matter (NOM) removal in water, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 246, 196-203
Perez Urquiza, M. and Beltran, J.L. 2001. Determination of the dissociation constants of
sulfonated azo dyes by capillary zone electrophoresis and spectrophotometry methods, Journal
of Chromatography A, 917, 331-336
Pifer, A.D. and Fairey,J.L. 2014, Suitability of organic matter surrogates to predict
trihalomethane formation in drinking water sources, Environmental Engineering Science, 31,
117-126
Qamar, M., Yoon, C.R., Oh, H.J., Lee, N.H., Park, K., Kim, D.H., Lee, K., Lee, W.J., and Kim,
S.J. 2008. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanotubes obtained from titanium dioxide,
Catalysis Today, 131, 3-14
Qi, S. Schideman, L.C., 2008. An overall isotherm for activated carbon adsorption of dissolved
organic matter in water, Water Research, 42, 3353-3360
Shahbeig, H., Bagheri, N., Ghorbanian, S., Hallajisani, A., Poorkarimi, S., 2013. A new
adsorption isotherm model of aqueous solutions on granular activated carbon, World Journal of
Modelling and Simulation, 9, 243-254
257
Shi, H., Magaye, R., Castranova, V., and Zhao, J., 2013. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: A
review of current toxicological data, Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 10:15
Summers, R. and Roberts, P., 1988. Activated Carbon Adsorption of Humic Substances:
Heterodisperse Mixtures and Desorption, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 122, 367-381
Summers, R.S., Hooper, S.M., Shukairy, H.M., Solarik, G., Owen, D., 1996. Assessing DBP
yield: Uniform formation conditions, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 88 (6),
80-93
Sun, D.D. and Lee, P.F. 2012. TiO2 microsphere for the removal of humic acid from water:
Complex adsorption mechanisms, Separation and Purification Technology, 91, 30-37
Thio, B.J.T., Zhou, D., and Keller, A. 2011. Influence of natural organic matter on the
aggregation and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Journal of Hazardous Materials,
189, 556-563
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L 2004. Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 241, 173-183
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Westerhoff, P., and Crittenden, J. 2009. Impact of natural organic matter
and divalent cations on the stability of aqueous nanoparticles, Water Research, 43, 4249-4257
Zhang, X., Pan, J.H., Du, A.J., Fu, W., Sun, D.D., and Leckie, J.O. (2009). Combination of one-
dimensional TiO2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment,
Water Research, 43, 1179-1186
Zheng, D., Andrews, R.C., Andrews, S.A., Taylor-Edmonds, L. 2015. Effects of coagulation on
the removal of natural organic matter, genotoxicity, and precursors to halogenated furanones,
Water Research 70, 118-129
Zheng, Z., Liu, H., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Waclawik, E.R., and Zhu, H., 2010. Structure and
contribution to photocatalytic activity of the interfaces in nanofibers with mixed anatase and
TiO2(B) phases, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 316, 75-82
258
Zhou, C., Bashirzadeh, Y., Bernadowski, T.A., Zhang, X. 2016. UV light-induced aggregation of
titania submicron particles, Micromachines, 7, 203, doi: 10.3390/mi7110203
Zhou, D., Ji, Z., Jiang, X., Dunphy, D.R., Brinker, J., Keller, A.A. 2013. Influence of material
properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration, PLOS ONE, 8 (11), e81239
259
Supplementary Material for Chapter 8
Figure 8.S.1 Zeta potential as a function of pH for two TiO2 LENs
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zet
a P
ote
nti
al (m
V)
pH
550-P 700-P
260
Figure 8.S.2 Time series data for AO24 removal by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs
Figure 8.S.3 Time series data for DOC removal by P25 nanoparticles and two LENs from
Otonabee River (OTB) and Ottawa River water (OTW)
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 60 120 180 240
DO
C (
mg/L
)
Adsorption Time (min)
P25-OTB 550-OTB 700-OTB
P25-OTW 550-OTW 700-OTW
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
AO
24
(m
g/L
)
Time (min)
P25 NB 550 NB 700
261
Figure 8.S.4 UV254 isotherms in (A) Otonabee River (OTB) water and (B) Ottawa River
(OTW) water
0.01
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
log
qA
(cm
-1/g
TiO
2)
log A/D (cm-1/g TiO2)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
0.01
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
log q
A (
cm-1
/g T
iO2)
log A/D (cm-1/g TiO2)
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
B
A
262
Figure 8.S.5 HAAfp isotherms in Otonabee River (OTB) water and Ottawa River (OTW)
water
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
q (
ug
HA
Afp
/g T
iO2)
C/D (ug HAAfp/g TiO2)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000 10000
q (
ug H
AA
fp/g
TiO
2)
C/D (ug HAAfp/g TiO2)
P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
B
A
263
Figure 8.S.6 Concentration of AO24 in water treated with virgin and regenerated LENs
Figure 8.S.7 UV254 of OTB and OTW water treated with virgin and regenerated LENs
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
NB 550 NB 700
Co
nce
ntr
ati
on
of
Aci
d O
ra
ng
e
(mg
/L)
Regeneration Cycle
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
UV
254 (
1/c
m)
0
1
2
3
4
5
264
Figure 8.S.8 Ratio of TCM to BDCM in surface water treated with increasing doses of
TiO2
Figure 8.S.9 Ratio of DCAA to TCAA in surface water treated with increasing doses of
TiO2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
TC
M:B
DC
M
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
DC
AA
:TC
AA
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
P25 - OTB NB 550 - OTB NB 700 - OTB P25 - OTW NB 550 - OTW NB 700 - OTW
265
Summary, Conclusions, Engineering Significance, and Implications of Research
The goal of this research was to lay the groundwork for the eventual development of a TiO2-
based drinking water treatment system. The three main challenges that prevent the use of TiO2
for drinking water treatment are:
1. How do we provide light of the appropriate wavelength (<385 nm) and intensity in a
reliable and energy efficient manner?
2. How do we avoid the formation of potentially dangerous intermediate compounds?
3. How do we remove the photocatalyst from the water after treatment?
The following sections summarize the findings of the studies undertaken to address these
challenges, the main conclusions that can be draw from them, their engineering significance, and
implications for future research.
Summary of Findings
The first of the three challenges identified above (i.e. provide light of the appropriate irradiance
and wavelength) was addressed early in the project when a decision was made to use UVA LEDs
as the irradiation source. This decision was based on initial experimental findings, a thorough
literature review, and the increased availability and cost competitiveness of UVA LEDs on the
market. Possible solutions to the two remaining challenges were developed experimentally based
on the specific objectives identified in Section 1.2:
1. Explore the use of standard TiO2 nanoparticles for NOM and DBP precursor removal via
adsorption and photocatalytic degradation.
Preliminary experiments indicated that commercial P25 nanoparticles were able to remove DBP
precursor surrogates such as DOC and UV254 from both synthetic and real water matrices
(Chapter 4). The extent of adsorption and rate of photocatalytic degradation of NOM were both
found to be lower in real water matrices than in a synthetic river water matrix containing
Suwannee River NOM isolate obtained from the International Humic Substances Society. The
266
preliminary experiments also established appropriate ranges for TiO2 dosing, irradiation time,
and other experimental parameters for NOM removal via adsorption and photocatalysis.
A more detailed study was developed based on the preliminary findings and is described in
Chapter 5 of this document. Photocatalytic treatment of Otonabee River water with 0.25 g/L of
P25 nanoparticles increased the THMfp of the water by 88% after 15 minutes of irradiation. This
was followed by a gradual decrease in THMfp with increasing irradiation time but after 60
minutes of irradiation the THMfp of the water was only 10% below that of the untreated water.
During adsorption, aromatic NOM (as measured by UV254), was preferentially removed over
non-aromatic NOM and the efficiency of NOM adsorption to TiO2 varied by water source. TiO2
nanoparticles preferentially adsorbed larger NOM molecules including the biopolymers and
humic substances LC-OCD fractions. pH was shown to have a strong impact on the removal of
NOM, including DBP precursors, from surface water by TiO2 nanoparticles. Specifically, more
adsorption occurred at low pH than at higher pH. This is similar to results presented by
researchers studying NOM adsorption to TiO2 in non-treatment contexts (Mwaanga et al., 2014).
The poorer adsorption observed at pH 6 and pH 8 may be related to both agglomeration and
charge repulsion at higher pH, with the former dominating at pH 6 and the latter at pH 8.
A modified version of the Freundlich isotherm model provided an excellent fit to the DOC data
gathered in this study. The resulting isotherm parameters were within but at the low end of the
range usually observed during NOM adsorption to GAC and carbon nanomaterials, indicating
that, particularly at neutral pH, the TiO2 nanoparticles were less effective than the adsorbents
currently used in drinking water plants. The THMfp and HAAfp datasets were also fitted to the
modified Freundlich model, with generally positive results. The results presented in Chapter 5
show that TiO2 adsorption is a viable way to remove NOM and DBP precursors from drinking
water and that this removal can be modeled using simple isotherm models.
267
2. Develop engineered nanomaterials that are easy to remove from the water via
conventional water treatment clarification processes but retain the adsorptive and
photocatalytic properties of standard TiO2 nanoparticles.
Three sets, or generations, of linear engineered TiO2 nanomaterials (LENs) were synthesized
over the course of this project using variations on a simple hydrothermal synthesis method
originally developed by Kasuga et al. (1999) and later modified by Yuan and Su (2004) and
others (see Appendix A). The first generation of LENs, which is described in Chapter 4, was
based directly on the findings of Yuan and Su (2004). This generation of LENs included
nanotubes, nanobelts, and nanowires created by varying the alkaline precursor solution (NaOH
vs. KOH), the hydrothermal temperature (TH), and the final calcination temperature (TC) of the
synthesis procedure. SEM imaging and XRD analysis suggested that these materials differed
from one another mainly in terms of size and length to width ratio, though they also had different
degrees of reactivity towards indicator dyes (methylene blue and Acid Orange 24) and NOM.
The second generation LENs were variations of the nanobelt and nanotube materials and differed
from one another and from industry standard nanoparticles in terms of size, BET surface area,
and other physical and chemical characteristics. The second generation LENs varied
substantially in terms of their ability to degrade methylene blue dye and as well as their ability to
adsorb and degrade DBP precursor surrogates such as DOC and UV254. The variation was
related to surface area, charge, propensity to agglomerate, crystal phase, and the presence of
defects within the crystal structure. The adsorption and degradation rates were particularly
influenced by the surface area and crystallinity of the nanomaterials. The second generation
LENs settled out of MilliQ water at natural pH (5 to 6) much more quickly than standard P25
nanoparticles.
A subset of the second generation of LENs was selected for further characterization and
evaluation. This final generation of LENs, NB 550 and NB 700, were subjected to an additional
rinsing step and manufactured in sufficient quantity to conduct larger scale DBP removal
experiments. The third generation LENs were both approximately 50 to 100 nm in diameter and
1 to 10 m long but differed in terms of crystallinity, surface area, and surface appearance. They
both settled out of MilliQ water at natural pH (5 to 6) quickly and presented less of a barrier to
filtration relative to commercial P25 nanoparticles.
268
3. Evaluate the use of the linear engineered nanomaterials for DBP precursor removal from
real water matrices via photocatalytic degradation.
The third generation LENs were compared to standard commercial P25 TiO2 nanomaterials in
terms of their ability to degrade disinfection byproduct precursors in two natural surface water
matrices obtained from water treatment plants in Ontario. The filterability and settleability of the
three materials in these water matrices were also evaluated. The results of this study are provided
in Chapter 7 of this thesis. Although all three materials reduced DOC and UV254 even at short
irradiation times, the THMfp and HAAfp of the treated water initially increased upon irradiation
with UVA LED light irrespective of the material or water source used. This is similar to results
published by Liu et al. (2008), Huang et al. (2008), and Gerrity et al. (2009), though all of these
researchers restricted their research to commercial P25 nanoparticles. In this study, the increase
in THMfp usually peaked with 15 minutes of irradiation and decreased as irradiation time was
increased beyond this time. After 60 minutes one of the LENs, NB 700, removed more than 90%
of the THMfp and HAAfp from the Ottawa River water. DBPfp reduction was more modest in
the Otonabee River water matrix, likely because this water source contained ionic species
capable of scavenging reactive oxygen species and/or inducing the nanomaterials to agglomerate,
reducing the surface area available for reaction. DOC and UV254 removal by the LENs was
reasonably well correlated to methylene blue degradation but THMfp and HAAfp removals were
not.
4. Evaluate the use of the linear engineered nanomaterials for DBP precursor removal from
real water matrices via adsorption.
The third generation LENs were also evaluated as two regenerable nanoscale adsorbents. Their
ability to remove an indicator dye and disinfection byproduct precursors from two natural
drinking water sources was assessed using adsorption isotherm experiments. The two LENs were
less effective for the adsorption of DOC, UV254, and DBP precursors than standard P25
nanoparticles, likely due to both surface area effects and charge effects as well as interactions
with the two water matrices used in this study. The removal of these parameters by P25
nanoparticles and by one of the LENs (NB 700) was a good fit to a modified Freundlich
269
adsorption isotherm model but this model did not adequately describe the adsorption of DOC by
the other LEN, NB 550. It was hypothesized that this was due to the distinct surface properties of
NB 550, however, more work is required to confirm that this is the case and to establish which
isotherm model, if any, can be used to describe the adsorption of NOM to this LEN. The
influences of nanomaterial properties such as surface area, charge, and photoactivity were
elucidated and it was determined that higher surface area was correlated to better adsorption
while higher photoactivity promoted more effective regeneration of the materials under UVA
light.
Overall Conclusions
9.2.1 TiO2 Removes Disinfection Byproduct Precursors via Adsorption and Degradation
The findings of this project confirm that DBP precursors can be removed by TiO2 via adsorption
and broken down by TiO2 via photocatalysis. Both commercial P25 nanoparticles and lab
synthesized LENs were able to remove significant amounts of NOM via photocatalysis at TiO2
doses ranging from 0.1 g/L to 0.5 g/L and via adsorption at doses ranging from 0.1 g/L to 1.5
g/L. The adsorption capacity of each nanomaterial was impacted by its available surface area –
materials with higher specific surface areas such as P25 nanoparticles or NB 550, one of the third
generation LENs, adsorbed more NOM than those with lower specific surface areas. It was also
affected by the surface charges of the nanomaterial and the NOM. The more photoactive
materials (e.g. NB 700) were most effective for NOM and DBP precursor degradation.
Throughout this study, the characteristics of the water matrix had important effects on the
removal of DBP precursors via degradation and adsorption by the various the TiO2
nanomaterials. Degradation proceeded more slowly in the water matrix that contained higher
levels of ions, in particular bicarbonate (alkalinity) and calcium, possibly because some of these
ions can act as ROS scavengers but also perhaps because higher concentrations of ions can
compress the electrical double layer that surrounds the nanoparticles, encouraging agglomeration
and an overall reduction in the surface area available for reaction (Liu et al., 2013). This finding
indicates that a photocatalysis-based single step TiO2 treatment process will not be appropriate
270
for all communities and highlights the need for comprehensive and site-specific evaluation of
new engineered nanomaterials and other advanced oxidation processes ahead of their
implementation for drinking water treatment.
9.2.2 Material Synthesis Conditions Determine the NOM Adsorption and Degradation Behaviour of LENs
A total of nine LENs were synthesized over the course of this project. Two of these, NB 550 and
NB 700, were eventually chosen as the best candidates for possible integration into a novel water
treatment process, however, the process of developing the materials also yielded many
interesting findings. The temperature applied during the hydrothermal step (TH) governed the
size of the resulting LENs and indirectly impacted their surface area. The temperature used for
calcination (TC) determined the crystallinity of the LENs and also indirectly impacted their
surface area. Crystallinity (the types and proportion of anatase, rutile, and other TiO2 crystal
phases present in the material) was the main determinant of photocatalytic activity while the
amount of available surface area was found to govern adsorptive behavior. These findings, as
well as those of others (see Appendix A) provide a road map towards the development of new
adsorptive, photocatalytically active, and easily removable LENs for drinking water treatment.
9.2.3 Filtration is the Most Practical Option for Nanomaterial Removal
LENs were more easily removed from purified water and natural water via filtration than
commercial P25 nanoparticles under all of the conditions studied, likely because their larger size
prevented them from becoming deposited or enmeshed in the filter pores. They were also, for the
most part, easier to remove via settling, though this was more apparent in purified water and one
of the two natural surface water matrices. P25’s resistance to filtration was water matrix specific,
possibly because the different water matrices encouraged the formation of different size P25
agglomerates, some of which were small enough to cause pore constriction and others that were
large enough to be fully excluded from the pores. The LENs presented the same low resistance to
filtration in all of the water matrices examined, suggesting that the LENs were large enough to
be removed irrespective of the degree of agglomeration.
In contrast, sedimentation rates were matrix specific for all three nanomaterials. It was
hypothesized that the size and shape of the different materials and their interactions with various
271
components of the water matrices affected the size and effective density of the agglomerates
formed by each of the nanomaterials. This in turn determined how quickly the nanomaterials
would settle out of the water. For example, the presence of calcium has been linked to increased
agglomeration due to electrical double layer (EDL) compression (Liu et al., 2013) and indeed, all
three nanomaterials settled quickly in this water matrix. EDL compression was confirmed using
zeta potential measurements. The materials, particularly the LENs, settled poorly in the OTW
water matrix, which contained high levels of NOM and low levels of ions. Other researchers
have hypothesized that steric repulsion can prevent the agglomeration of NOM coated
nanomaterials (Thio et al., 2011), and this may also have occurred in this study. Attempts were
made to model settling behaviour using Stokes’ Law and the Sterling equations for the
calculation of effective agglomerate density together with particle size distribution data obtained
at a lower TiO2 dose (see Appendix H). Overall, the sedimentation results indicate that settling
would not be an ideal removal mechanism for LENs in high throughput applications such as
drinking water treatment because it is slow, matrix dependent, and difficult to model or optimize
without access to information such as agglomerate size and effective density.
Engineering Significance of Findings
The results presented in this thesis essentially serve as preliminary proof of concept for two
TiO2- based water treatment processes (see Appendix E for conceptual schematics). Of these, the
two-step adsorption and regeneration process with membrane separation is the most likely
candidate for further development, though more work is required to confirm that the processes
will be able to remove other contaminants besides dyes and DBP precursors and that they will
function in a bench-scale flow through configuration and, eventually, at pilot and full-scale.
One of the important practical findings of this study was that further modification of the
materials themselves or of the bulk matrix may be required if this technology is to be
implemented as the primary DBP control strategy in a drinking water treatment system. The
underlying concept of a two-step treatment process built on a photocatalytically regenerable
adsorbent that is easy to remove from the water after treatment remains valid, however, and these
materials may prove to be highly effective for the removal of other contaminants of concern
from drinking water.
272
Given the potential negative impacts of TiO2 nanomaterials on human and environmental health,
it is imperative that any novel process employing such materials for water or wastewater
treatment ensure the complete removal of the materials from the treated water before it is sent to
the drinking water distribution system or returned to the environment. The LENs synthesized in
this study fall within the size range of dangerous “fibrous dusts” as defined by the World Health
Organization (diameter < 3 m, aspect ratio > 3:1) and, in some cases, the size range of
“respirable fibres” as defined by the United States Centres for Disease Control (length > 5 m,
diameter ≤ 1.3 m), and as such may present a human health hazard when they are not
suspended in water (WHO, 1999; CDC, 2006). As a result, if a LEN-based treatment system is
implemented, personal safety equipment will need to be provided to prevent operators from
being exposed to potentially toxic levels of LENs via inhalation in the treatment plant.
Implications for Future Research
The main findings of this study are promising and suggest that a LEN-based two-step adsorption
and photocatalytic regeneration process (Figure E.2 in Appendix E) may one day evolve into a
feasible option for drinking water treatment. More research is required to optimize and scale-up
the LEN synthesis procedure, to explore additional niches in the water and wastewater industry
where such a system might be appropriate, to design and test the adsorption and regeneration
reactors, and to confirm that the LENs can in fact be integrated with membrane separation in a
safe and cost effective manner. A framework for the research required to develop a prototype of
the proposed treatment process is provided in Figure 9.1.
The cost analysis presented in Appendix F suggests that the cost of the materials is the most
important factor driving the overall cost of the proposed treatment process. This is, to some
extent, simply a function of the quality of the costing information available at this time. The
pricing used to estimate material costs in this project was obtained from a company, Novarials,
that specializes in lab grade nanomaterials for research institutions. Their prices may not be
representative of the entire current or future market for these types of materials. Nonetheless,
based on the cost estimates, the optimization and scaling up of the nanomaterial synthesis
procedure should be a special priority in any future research project as it will determine the
273
overall affordability of the resulting system. This will likely involve additional optimization of
the synthesis process to reduce energy requirements for the process and of the nanomaterials
themselves to increase their surface area and photoactivity and thus improve their adsorptivity
and regnerability.
Figure 9.1 Framework for the development of a prototype of a two-step adsorption and
photocatalytic process for drinking water treatment
The proposed treatment system may be appropriate for other applications, including other
drinking water treatment applications. For example, Fotiou et al. (2015) showed that TiO2 can
remove MC-LR, a cyanotoxin, via photocatalysis and, to a lesser extent, adsorption. Their
experiments were conducted at relatively low doses of TiO2, and it might be possible to adsorb
greater amounts of MC-LR at higher doses. In theory, the proposed treatment process may also
work well as a polishing step for the removal of DBP precursors that are recalcitrant to removal
via conventional coagulation-based treatment. These alternative applications may pivot the focus
274
of the project in another direction or simply expand the suite of applications that can be
addressed by the proposed treatment process.
The experiments in this project were all conducted in batch mode, but water treatment systems
work in a dynamic flow through mode. Additional work will need to be done to determine the
proper design parameters for the adsorption and regeneration reactors. For example, the current
concept calls for a closed, serpentine reactor studded with UVA LEDs for the regeneration step.
The size of the channels and the flow rate through the reactor will determine the degree of
hydrodynamic mixing as well as the amount of contact between the UVA light and the LENs.
Additional chemical inputs may also prove to be helpful to encourage better adsorption (e.g. pH
depression) or to aid in the regeneration process.
Finally, based on the results of this project, membrane filtration appears to be the most feasible
option for material separation after adsorption and regeneration. The most appropriate type of
membrane and the fouling effects of the nanomaterials on that chosen membrane will need to be
determined to ensure that the process can be operated over a long period of time.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2006) Occupational Exposure to
Refractory Ceramic Fibers, Criteria for a Recommended Standard, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication
No. 2006-123
Erhayem, M. and Sohn, M. (2014) Stability studies for titanium dioxide nanoparticles upon
adsorption of Suwannee River humic and fulvic acids and natural organic matter, Science of the
Total Environment, 468-469, pp. 249-257
Fotiou, T., Triantis, T.M., Kaloudis, T., Hiskia, A., 2015. Evaluation of the photocatalytic
activity of TiO2 based catalysts for the degradation and mineralization of cyanobacterial toxins
and water off-odor compounds under UV-A, solar, and visible light, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 261, 17-26
275
Gerrity, D., Mayer, B., Ryu, H., Crittenden, J., and Abbaszadegan, M. (2009) A comparison of
pilot-scale photocatalysis and enhanced coagulation for disinfection byproduct mitigation, Water
Research, 43, pp. 1597-1610
Huang, X., Leal, M., and Li, Q. (2008) Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2
photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research,
pp. 1142-1150
Kasuga, T., Hiramatsu, M., Hoson, A., Sekino, T., and Niihara, K. (1999) Titania nanotubes
prepared by chemical processing, Advanced Materials, 11 (15), pp. 1307-1311
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R. (2008A) TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Korshin, G., and Amal, R. (2010) Multi-
wavelength spectroscopic and chromatography study on the photocatalytic oxidation of natural
organic matter, Water Research, 44, pp. 2525-2532
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. (2013) Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects, 434, pp 319-328
Mwaanga, P., Carraway, E.R., and Schlautman, M.A. (2014) Preferential sorption of some
natural organic matter fractions to titanium dioxide nanoparticles: influence of pH and ionic
strength, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, pp. 8833-8844
Thio, B.J.R., Zhou, D., Keller, A. (2011) Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation
and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 556-563
World Health Organization (1999) Hazard prevention and control in the work environment,
WHO/SDE/OEH/99.14, Geneva
Yuan, Z-Y and Su B-L (2004) Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibres, and nanowires, Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 241, pp. 173-183
276
Appendix A: Effects of Synthesis Conditions on LEN Characteristics
Table A.1 Summary of LEN synthesis studies
Reference Precursors
Synthesis
Temp (oC) and
Time
Calcination
Temp (oC)
and Time
Length (nm) Width
(nm)
Surface
Area
(m2/g)
Crystal Phase (s) Band Gap
Energy (eV) Other
Kasuga et al.
(1999)
n.s., 10 mM NaOH 110 / 20 h -- 100 8 257
246
“Four coordinate Ti-
O”
Anatase
n.s.
n.s.
Sample C1
Sample D1
Yuan and Su
(2004)
Anatase, 10 M
NaOH
P25, 10 M NaOH
Anatase and P25, 4
– 25 M KOH
100 / 1-2 days
150 / 1-2 days
200 / 1-2 days
220 / 1-2 days
220 / 1-2 days
220 / 1-2 days
90 / 1-2 days
140 / 1-2 days
140 / 1-2 days
200 / 1-2 days
130 – 240 / 1-2
days
--
--
--
--
540 / 2h
700 / 2h
--
--
540 / 2 h
--
--
400 / 2.5 h
600 / 2.5 h
700 / 2.5 h
1000 / 2.5 h
10 – 100+
10 – 100+
10 – 100+
100 – 1000+
100 – 1000+
100 – 1000+
10 – 100+
10 – 100+
50
10 – 100+
1000 – 10000
1000 – 10000
1000 – 10000
1000 – 10000
1000 – 10000
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
50 – 300
50 - 300
50 - 300
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
5 – 10
5 – 10
5 – 10
5 – 10
5 – 10
130
210
100
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
50
325
n.s.
150
250 – 320
250 – 320
250 – 320
250 – 320
250 – 320
Anatase / trititanate
Anatase / trititanate
Anatase / trititanate
H2Ti5O11H2O
TiO2(B)
Anatase
Anatase / trititanate
Anatase / trititanate
n.s.
Anatase / trititanate
n.s.
K2Ti8O17
K2Ti8O17 / anatase
K2Ti6O13 / anatase
K2Ti6O13 / rutile
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
30% yield
85% yield
Nanoribbon
Nanoribbon
Nanoribbon
Nanotube
Nanotube
Nanorod
Nanotube
Nanowire
Nanowire
Nanowire
Nanowire
Nanowire
Qamar et al.
(2008)
TiOCl2, 10 M NaOH 150 / 48 h --
300 / 2 h
500 / 2 h
700 / 2 h
900 / 2 h
100+
100+
100+
--
100 – 500
6 – 10
6 – 10
6 – 10
--
50 – 200
329
252
109
33
4.2
Trititanate
Trititanate / anatase
Anatase
Anatase / rutile
Rutile / hexatitanate
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
Small grains
277
1Samples C and D refer to samples that have been subjected to different washing regimes after the ion exchange step (C = less washing, D = more
washing)
n.s. = not specified
Reference Precursors
Synthesis
Temp (oC) and
Time
Calcination
Temp (oC)
and Time
Length (nm) Width
(nm)
Surface
Area
(m2/g)
Crystal Phase (s) Band Gap
Energy (eV) Other
Bavykin et al.
(2010)
Anatase NaOH and
KOH
100 / 48 h --
400 / 24 h
n.s n.s. 250
180
Titanate
TiO2(B)
n.s.
n.s.
Ali et al. (2016) Antase 10 M NaOH 110 / 21 h --
300 / 3 h
400 / 3 h
500 / 3 h
600 / 3 h
700 / 3 h
60 – 100+
60 – 100+
60 – 100+
60 – 100+
60 – 100+
60 – 100+
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
8 – 10
157
117
74
53
38
21
Trititanate / anatase
Trititanate / anatase
Trititanate / anatase
Trititanate / anatase
Hexatitanate / anatase
Hexatitanate / anatase
3.13
3.10
3.09
3.08
3.07
3.06
Liu et al. (2013) P25 10 M NaOH 130 / 72 h -- 100+ 8 262 Trititanate n.s. IEP = 3.5
Zheng et al.
(2010)
Anatase 10 M
NaOH
180 / 48 h 300 / 4 h
400 / 4 h
500 / 4 h
550 / 4 h
600 / 4 h
650 / 4 h
700 / 4 h
1000+
1000+
1000+
1000+
1000+
1000+
1000+
100 – 200
100 – 200
100 – 200
100 – 200
100 – 200
100 – 200
100 - 200
26
25
25
23
20
18
16
TiO2 (B)
TiO2 (B)
TiO2 (B)
TiO2 (B) / anatase
TiO2 (B) / anatase
TiO2 (B) / anatase
Anatase
3.041
3.046
3.054
3.091
3.183
3.185
3.186
Optimal
Seo et al. (2009) P25 10 M NaOH 160 / 24 h
200 / 24 h
230 / 24 h
600 / 1 h
600 / 1 h
600 / 1 h
n.s.
1000+
1000+
n.s.
50
50
76
23
23
Anatase
Anatase / H2Ti3O7
Anatase / H2Ti3O7
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
Optimal
Zhang et al.
(2009)
P25 10 M KOH
P25 10 M NaOH
180 / 48 h
180 / 48 h
600 / n.s.
600 / n.s.
100+
1000+
10
20-100
77
37
Anatase
Anatase
n.s.
n.s.
278
Table A.2 Summary of the effects of LEN synthesis conditions on LEN characteristics
Parameter Alkaline Solution Hydrothermal Temperature (TH) Calcination Temperature (TC)
Size/Shape NaOH: Length and width determined
by TH
KOH: Increased length, decreased
width relative to NaOH materials
Lower TH results in smaller nanotube
or nanorod structures
Higher TH results in larger nanobelts
or nanoribbon structures
Minimal independent effect
High TC can result in
sintering/breakdown of some LENs
formed at lower TH
Surface Area NaOH: Lower, affected by TH and TC
KOH: High relative to NaOH
materials
Highest surface area obtained
between TH of 120oC and 180oC
Lower surface area at higher and
lower TH values
Increasing TC results in decreased
surface area
Crystal Phase NaOH: Na-based titanates at some TC
values
KOH: K-based titanates at some TC
values
Minimal effect before calcination
TH can affect the crystal structure
formed after calcination in some
cases
TC is the main driver of crystal structure
TC = 300 oC – 500 oC = titanates
TC = 500 oC – 700 oC = mixed phase
(anatase + TiO2(B) or titanates)
TC = 700 oC – 900 oC = anatase
TC > 900 oC = rutile
Reactivity Unknown TH can affect the crystal structure
formed after calcination and thus the
overall reactivity
Anatase and mixed phase
anatase/TiO2(B), formed at TCs ranging
from 500oC to 900oC, are the most
reactive forms of TiO2
279
Parameter Alkaline Solution Hydrothermal Temperature (TH) Calcination Temperature (TC)
Band Gap Unknown Unknown Effect is dependent on the structure of
the materials formed during
hydrothermal synthesis step
For nanobelts: Increased TC results in
increased band gap energy
For nanotubes/nanorods: Increased TC
results in lower band gap energy
Other Hydrothermal time can affect the
extent of reaction
Calcination time can affect conversion
Extent of washing after ion exchange
can impact crystal phases, especially at
TCs ranging from 300oC to 700oC
280
Appendix B: Matrix Impacts on Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of NOM by TiO2
Table B.1 Matrix effects on NOM adsorption onto TiO2 surface
Parameter Known Effects on Adsorption Source
pH Increased adsorption of NOM onto P25 at low pH Mwaanga et al.
(2014); Erhayem and
Sohn (2014); Valencia
et al. (2012); Patsios
et al. (2012)
Alkalinity More bicarbonate results in less adsorption
Adsorbs to TiO2 and may compete with NOM for
adsorption sites
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Chen et al. (1997)1
Ionic strength Higher ionic strength (ionic strength =
concentration of NaNO3 added to solution) leads to
greater adsorption of NOM onto P25
Higher ionic strength results in more adsorption
Higher ionic strength encourages agglomeration
and subsequent loss of available surface area
Mwaanga et al. (2014)
Erhayem and Sohn,
(2014)
Liu et al. (2013),
Hotze et al. (2010),
Thio et al. (2011)
Concentration of NOM Higher initial NOM concentration results in greater
NOM adsorption
Mwaanga et al.
(2014), Erhayem and
Sohn, (2014), Kim
and Shon (2007)
Type of NOM Humic substances / aromatic compounds are more
readily adsorbed than other NOM
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Calcium Calcium increases the extent of NOM adsorption
onto TiO2
The presence of calcium ions reduces the
electrostatic repulsion between TiO2 and NOM
Calcium makes NOM more hydrophobic, thus
increasing adsorption.
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Sun et al. (2012), Liu
et al. (2013)
Sun et al. (2012)
281
Parameter Known Effects of Adsorption Sources
Magnesium Increased magnesium results in increased NOM
adsorption
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Sodium Minimal change observed Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Potassium Minimal change observed Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Phosphate More phosphate results in less NOM adsorption
Adsorbs to TiO2 and may compete with NOM for
adsorption sites
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Chen et al. (1997)1
Nitrate More nitrate results in less NOM adsorption
Adsorbs to TiO2 and may compete with NOM for
adsorption sites
NaNO3 was added to water to increase ionic
strength and seems to have increased the amount of
NOM adsorbed to P25
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Chen et al. (1997)1
Mwaanga et al. (2014)
Sulphate Adsorbs to TiO2 and may compete with NOM for
adsorption sites
Chen et al. (1997)1
Chloride Minimal change observed
Adsorbs to TiO2 and may compete with NOM for
adsorption sites
Erhayem and Sohn
(2014)
Chen et al. (1997)1
Iron Iron (Fe(III)) is adsorbed by TiO2 and may compete
with NOM for adsorption sites
Chen and Ray (2001),
Luck (2007)
Manganese Manganese is adsorbed by TiO2 and may compete
with NOM for adsorption sites
Luck (2007)
1Authors note that results may be pH-specific
282
Table B.2 Matrix effects on the photocatalytic degradation of NOM by TiO2
Parameter Known Effects on Degradation Source
pH Greater degradation at higher pH
Degradation is better at pH 5.5 than pH 3.5 or
pH 7
Liu et al. (2008B)
Patsios et al. (2012)
Alkalinity Decreases degradation by scavenging OH
radicals
Carbonate/bicarbonate ion reduced overall
degradation rate of model pollutant
Decreases degradation by encouraging
agglomeration/reducing available surface area
Liao et al. (2001)
Chen et al. (1997)1
Autin et al. (2013)
Ionic Strength Higher ionic strength leads to greater
agglomeration, which reduces overall available
surface area
Liu et al. (2013), Thio et
al. (2011), Hotze et al.
(2010)
Concentration of NOM Faster removal at lower NOM concentrations,
possibly due to greater contribution of
adsorption to overall removal at lower
concentrations
Better removal at higher NOM concentrations
Huang et al. (2008)
Patsios et al. (2012)
Type of NOM Large and aromatic NOM compounds are
targeted for degradation
Liu et al., (2008A), Liu et
al. (2010), Huang et al.
(2008)
Phosphate Phosphate reduced the photocatalytic
degradation rate of a model pollutant
Phosphate adsorbed to the TiO2 surface
preventing the adsorption and degradation of
NOM
Chen et al. (1997)1, Burns
et al. (1999)
Abdullah et al., 1990
283
Parameter Known Effects on Degradation Source
Nitrate Nitrate had a modest inhibitory effect on the
photocatalytic degradation rate of a model
pollutant
Chen et al. (1997)1, Burns
et al. (1999)
Chloride Chloride is an OH radical scavenger and as
such may reduce the extent of NOM
degradation during photocatalysis
Chloride ion reduced overall degradation rate
of model pollutant
Liao et al. (2001)
Chen et al. (1997)1, Burns
et al. (1999)
Copper Increased degradation of model compound
observed in the presence of Cu(II) at low
concentrations at pH 3
Butler and Davis (1993)
Iron Increased rate of degradation for model
compound observed in the presence of low
concentrations of Fe(III) at pH 3
Decreased rate of degradation for model
compound observed in the presence of high
concentrations of Fe(III) due to competitive
surface reactions and/or increased water
opacity
Inhibition of degradation of model compound
due to catalyst fouling by iron
Butler and Davis (1993)
Butler and Davis (1993)
Burns et al. (1999)
Manganese Inhibition of degradation of model compound
due to catalyst fouling by manganese
Burns et al. (1999)
1Authors note that results may be pH-specific
284
Appendix C: Calibration Curves
This appendix contains a representative set of calibration curves for:
Methylene blue dye (concentration vs. absorbance)
Acid Orange 24 dye (concentration vs. absorbance)
Total organic carbon (concentration vs. area count)
Four THMs (response ratio vs. area count)
Nine HAAs (response ratio vs. area count)
TiO2 dose vs. turbidity
TiO2 dose vs. UV-Vis absorbance at 375 nm
Figure C.1 Representative calibration curve for methylene blue dye
y = 0.1871x + 0.0136
R² = 0.9982
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ab
sorb
an
ce a
t 66
5 n
m (
1/c
m)
Concentration of Methylene Blue (mg/L)
285
Figure C.2 Representative calibration curve for Acid Orange 24
Figure C.3 Representative calibration curve for TOC
y = 0.021x + 0.0009
R² = 0.9974
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ab
sorb
an
ce a
t 4
40
nm
(1
/cm
)
Concentration of Acid Orange 24 (mg/L)
y = 4169.8x + 706.51
R² = 0.9991
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Are
a C
ou
nt
DOC (mg/L)
286
Figure C.4 Calibration curves for four THMs (Summer 2016)
Table C.1 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (THMs)
THM Species Slope Intercept R2
TCM 0.596 -0.075 0.988
BDCM 2.830 0.157 0.996
CDBM 3.202 -0.273 0.995
TBM 1.376 -0.244 0.989
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Res
po
nse
Ra
tio
Concentration : IS
TCM
BDCM
CDBM
TBM
287
Figure C.5 Calibration for nine HAA species (Summer 2016)
Table C.2 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (HAAs)
HAA Species Slope Intercept R2
MCAA 130.9 -0.045 0.999
MBAA 942.1 -0.720 0.992
DCAA 1051.9 0.048 0.999
TCAA 4305.1 -1.821 0.999
BCAA 2815.5 -0.284 0.998
DBAA 3462.0 0.932 0.990
BDCAA 4341.5 -5.392 0.993
CDBAA 2949.6 -3.289 0.994
TBAA 2031.2 -2.374 0.992
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
Res
po
nse
Ra
tio
Concentration : IS
MCAA
MBAA
DCAA
TCAA
BCAA
DBAA
BDCAA
CDBAA
TBAA
288
Figure C.6 Calibration curves for P25 and LENs vs. turbidity
Table C.3 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (TiO2 vs. turbidity)
Nanomaterial Slope Intercept R2
P25 4.84 15.2 0.996
130/550 4.85 -41.5 0.976
130/700 3.91 -75.7 0.949
240/550 4.84 -22.5 0.994
240/700 11.9 37.9 0.998
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Tu
rbid
ity
(N
TU
)
TiO2 (mg/L)
P25
130/550
130/700
240/550
240/700
289
Figure C.7 Calibration curves for P25 and LENs vs. UV absorbance at 375 nm
Table C.4 Parameters and fits of calibration curves (TiO2 vs. UV375)
Nanomaterial Slope Intercept R2
P25 0.0241 0.0156 0.999
130/550 0.0106 0.0002 0.997
130/700 0.0037 0.0088 0.987
240/550 0.0172 0.0631 0.987
240/700 0.0143 0.0050 0.964
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 50 100 150 200 250
UV
Ab
sorb
an
ce a
t 3
75
nm
TiO2 Dose (mg/L)
P25
130/550
130-700
240/550
240/700
290
Figure C.8 Calibration curves for HTPA vs. fluorescence (Ex: 315 nm, Em: 425 nm)
y = 119.37x + 5.0928
R² = 0.9995
0
200
400
600
800
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Res
pon
se
HTPA (uM)
291
Appendix D: Quality Control
Figure D.1 Quality control results for batches of second generation LENs
Figure D.2 Quality control results for batches of third generation LENs
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 2 3 4
Dec
olo
uriz
ati
on
of
Met
hy
len
e B
lue
Batch
130/550 130/700 240/550 240/700
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Dec
olo
uri
zati
on
of
Met
hyle
ne
Blu
e D
ye
Batch
NB 550 NB 700
292
Figure D.3 Quality control chart for TOC/DOC
2
2.25
2.5
2.75
3
3.25
3.5
3.75
4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
DO
C (
mg/L
)
Running Standard #
293
Figure D.4 QC chart for TCM Figure D.5 QC chart for BDCM
Figure D.6 QC chart for DCAA Figure D.7 QC chart for TCAA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 5 10 15 20
TC
M (
ug
/L)
Standard #
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 5 10 15 20
BD
CM
(u
g/L
)
Standard #
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 5 10 15 20
TC
AA
(u
g/L
)
Standard #
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 5 10 15 20
DC
AA
(u
g/L
)
Standard #
294
Appendix E: Proposed TiO2-based Treatment Systems
Figure E.1 Single step photocatalytic system with membrane filtration for separation
295
Figure E.2 Two-step adsorption and regeneration system with membrane filtration for separation
296
Figure E.3 Two-step adsorption and regeneration system with sedimentation for separation
297
Appendix F: Cost Comparison of Proposed TiO2-based Treatment Systems to Existing Water Treatment Processes
Preliminary cost analyses were conducted for the two conceptual TiO2-based treatment processes
that were developed through this research. The potential energy and materials costs associated
with the single step photocatalytic treatment process discussed in Chapter 7 and shown in Figure
E.1 are described first while those associated with the two-step adsorption and regeneration
treatment process discussed in Chapter 8 and shown in Figure E.2 are explored later in this
appendix. The two proposed treatment concepts are compared to existing processes that are
currently used for water treatment in Canada and the implications of the costing analysis are
discussed briefly at the end.
Single Step Photocatalytic Treatment Process
Description
The single step photocatalytic treatment process, which was developed through the experiments
described in Chapter 7 of this document, is shown in Figure E.1. It resembles existing
commercial treatment options (e.g. Photo-CAT by Purifics, London, ON) but, unlike these
options, it makes use of highly photoactive and easily removable TiO2 LENs instead of
commercial nanoparticles. The system is conceptually simple and has the potential to be
relatively low energy and sustainable, which may make it particularly attractive for small and
remote drinking water systems, including those serving many Indigenous communities in
Canada. Health Canada defines small water systems as those serving between 501 and 5,000
users (Health Canada, 2013). Small communities often possess lower economic and operational
capacity than larger ones and the water treatment systems in these communities sometimes
employ minimal or non-traditional treatment processes (e.g. chlorination only), which can
increase the risk of DBP formation (CBCL Limited, 2011; Guilherme and Rodriguez, 2014)
and/or microbiological outbreaks (Murphy et al., 2016). Small systems are also often located in
rural and remote areas, which can increase the cost of shipping of equipment and chemicals to
the plant (Health Canada, 2013). The single step treatment system proposed in this project could
298
potentially provide concurrent disinfection/pathogen removal through photocatalytic degradation
and size exclusion, characteristics that are especially attractive for small and remote water
treatment systems. The results of this project (see Chapter 7) suggest that the single step
treatment option will only be appropriate for water sources with low alkalinity, however, more
work is required to determine the exact relationship between alkalinity and treatability within a
short time frame (< 60 min).
Costing
Capital Costs
At this stage of development, it is difficult to develop accurate capital cost estimates because
many important components of the proposed system have yet to be developed. The single step
treatment process is more likely to be applied at small scale and its capital costs will need to be
competitive with existing small system options for NOM and pathogen removal. Order of
magnitude costing for recent small water treatment projects in Canada are provided in Table F.1.
Population estimates were prepared by dividing the rated flow rate by 483 L/day/capita
(Statistics Canada, 2011) and rounding to the nearest 10.
Table F.1 Recent capital costs for small water treatment systems in Canada
Application Location Flow
Rate
Estimated
Population Cost Cost/m3
Reverse Osmosis Northern Ontario 0.4 MLD 750 $200,000 $667
GAC / Pressure Filtration Northern Ontario 0.4 MLD 750 $125,000 $417
Coagulation / Flocculation Northern Ontario 0.4 MLD 750 $500,000 $1,667
Dissolved Air Flotation Nova Scotia 0.9 MLD 2,000 $500,000 $584
Dissolved Air Flotation Nova Scotia 0.9 MLD 2,000 $925,000 $271
Media Filter / Nanofiltration Nova Scotia 5.8 MLD 12,000 $1,500,000 $974
Media Filter / Nanofiltration Nova Scotia 5.8 MLD 12,000 $1,250,000 $218
Sources: 1Azzeh, J., personal communication, May 2, 2017; 2Chaulk, M., personal communication, May
16, 2017
299
Materials Costs
Since the beginning of this project, research and industry grade TiO2 LENs have started to
become commercially available. These products are sold in amorphous or powdered form and
may require further processing (e.g. calcination) to tailor them to specific applications. Unit costs
for a selection of commercially available products are provided in Table F.2.
Table F.2 Cost of commercially available TiO2 LENs
Vendor Grade Unit Cost (CAD/kg) Description
Novarials Research $427,000 Length = 10 m
Width = 10 nm
Novarials Industrial $40,000 Length = 5 m
Width = 100 nm
Sigma Research $600,000 Width = 25 nm
Assuming that the industrial grade LENs from Novarials are capable of degrading DBP
precursors as effectively as NB 700 (i.e. 90% removal in 60 minutes) at a dose of 0.25 g/L, the
cost of materials would be $9.90 / L. This price is exhorbitant, however, if the single step
treatment option were to be developed further, the LEN synthesis process would need to be
scaled up to manufacture enough LENs to build commercially viable systems. Scale-up should
eventually reduce the unit cost of the material. It should be kept in mind that, unlike other water
treatment chemicals, the LENs are potentially reuseable.
Energy Costs
Assumptions in Table F.3 were used to develop the cost curve shown in Figure F.1.
Table F.3 Assumptions for energy cost analysis – single step treatment process
Parameter Value Units Source
LED Power Rating 2.4 W UVA LED specifications (LED ENGIN)
TiO2 Dose 0.25 g/L Chapter 7
Membrane Energy Costs 96.5 $/MLD Statistics Canada (2011)
Energy Cost 0.154 $/kWh Ontario Energy Board (2017)
300
The costs presented here may overestimate the amount of energy required to run the system
because they were developed based on the bench-scale batch experimental set-up used for the
experiments. As described in Appendix G, with this configuration the light penetration into the
samples was essentially limited to the top layer of water. The flow through reactor depicted in
Figure E.1 is serpentine and studded with LEDs. Depending on the width of the channel, the
amount of light penetration into the sample might be higher than that achieved in this project.
This could substantially reduce the amount of power required for the irradiation step because
each individual nanoparticle would be exposed to a greater amount off incident light and thus the
time required to achieve the dose of light required to drive the photocatalytic oxidation of DBP
precursors would be shorter.
Figure F.1 Estimated annual energy cost for the single step treatment process option as
a function of plant capacity
Other O&M Costs
Other O&M costs such as labour, maintenance, safety equipment, replacement parts, and waste
treatment and disposal are beyond the scope of this project. The proposed single tank system
may, however, have some advantages over existing treatment options in these categories. For
example, although it operates in a different way than coagulation/flocculation, the proposed
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
$10,000,000
$100,000,000
100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000
An
nu
al
En
ergy C
ost
s ($
)
Plant Capacity (L/day)
Total Cost
Irradiation
Separation
301
single tank system fulfills the same DBP precursor role as this technology. Unlike
coagulation/flocculation, however, the proposed system is expected to create few, if any,
residuals that will require further processing and/or disposal. It may also prove to be safer than
some existing oxidation-based systems such as ozonation.
Total O&M Cost
The total O&M cost was calculated as the sum of the estimated material and energy costs.
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑀𝑎𝑡 + 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 (𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛) + 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 (𝑆𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛)
The total O&M cost of the single tank system would be approximately $10/L under the
assumptions used in this analysis. This is much higher than the cost of existing water treatment
systems for NOM removal, however, unlike these systems, the material costs for the single tank
option can be minimized by reusing the LENs many times. Figure F.2 shows how many times
the LENs would need to be reused for the single step option to be competitive with existing
water treatment options as a standalone system in terms of O&M costs. The O&M estimates for
existing treatment systems were developed using costing curves in Cost Estimating Manual for
Water Treatment Facilities (McGivney and Kawamura, 2008) and adjusted for inflation (2008-
2017). Note that the technology is likely to become more competitive at smaller scales and in
remote communities, where energy and shipping costs make up a larger proportion of the total
cost of operating a water treatment system. Additionally, if the system were to be used as a
polishing step as opposed to a standalone system, it may be possible to lower the dose of TiO2
and/or the irradiation time. Finally, as mentioned earlier (Materials Cost), were this option to be
pursued, the LEN synthesis process would need to be scaled up to industrial levels, and this
would likely substantially reduce the cost of the material.
302
Figure F.2 Number of reuses required for the single tank system to be competitive with
existing water treatment systems as a standalone option
Markets
In general, the proposed single step process is only appropriate for low alkalinity waters with
high NOM levels where the reduction of DBPfp is a priority. Many regions of Canada, including
parts of northern and eastern Ontario, the Maritime provinces, Newfoundland and Labrador,
coastal British Columbia, eastern Manitoba, and various parts of Quebec use surface water
sources that meet these criteria (Statistics Canada, 2011). One market where the single step
treatment process might be competitive is at the very small scale. These systems, which produce
between 100 and 1,000 L of water each day, provide water for consumptive uses for small
populations or full water services for residences or institutional facilities in areas where
municipal water is not available for consumptive or non-consumptive uses (e.g. nursing stations).
For example, for nearly a decade the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has been
sponsoring the design and construction of 1,000 L/day potable water units in many rural and
remote communities in the province. The preliminary energy costs for the single step treatment
process option presented in Figure E.1 are comparable to the initial O&M cost estimates for
these units (Miller et al., 2009; Chaulk and Picco, 2010). The simplicity, minimal chemical
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03
# R
euse
s
Flow Rate (MLD)
Conventional Treatment Conventional + Ozone + GAC DAF UF / NF RO
303
requirements, and overall safety of the proposed system as well as the potential provision of
concurrent NOM removal and disinfection would be particularly attractive in these applications.
Alternative Markets
Alternative markets for a small scale, closed loop system capable of mineralizing organic
contaminants might include oil and gas, food production, military, mining, and groundwater
remediation.
Two-step Adsorption and Regeneration Process
Description
The two-step adsorption and regeneration process developed in Chapter 8 of this thesis and
depicted in Figure E.2 in Appendix E represents a potential way to safely incorporate TiO2 into a
drinking water treatment process. As conceived in this project, in this process the adsorbent
LENs would be added to the raw water and mixed in a serpentine flow through reactor to allow
organic contaminants such as DBP precursors to adsorb on the TiO2 surface. The LENs would
then be removed from the treated water via membrane filtration, resuspended in clean water, and
sent through a second serpentine flow through reactor. The second flow through reactor would
be equipped with UVA LEDs that would provide sufficient irradiation to degrade the organics
adsorbed to the LENs. The LENs would then be recaptured in a second membrane separation
step and recycled to the beginning of the process.
Comparison to Existing Water Treatment Processes
Strictly in terms of NOM reduction levels, adsorption and photocatalytic degradation by TiO2
appear to have similar effects on NOM removal as enhanced coagulation. That is, in the absence
of particulate matter, TiO2 adsorption and photocatalytic degradation are able to remove a
sizeable proportion of the dissolved NOM present in the water. Also, enhanced coagulation
targets the aromatic, UV254-absorbing NOM that is commonly associated with trihalomethane
304
(THM) formation (Edzwald et al., 1985; Pifer and Fairey, 2014) but has only limited effects on
other NOM compounds, some of which can also react with disinfectants to yield organic
disinfection byproducts (Hua and Reckhow, 2007). This is also true of TiO2 adsorption and
photocatalysis, both of which target large and aromatic NOM compounds (Liu et al., 2008;
Huang et al., 2008).
That said, conceptually, the TiO2 adsorption and regeneration process (a.k.a. two-step process)
developed over the course of this project and depicted in Figure E.2 more strongly resembles
powdered activated carbon (PAC). Like in the proposed two-step treatment process, PAC is
applied to water as a powder to form a suspension. Organic contaminants become adsorbed to
the surface of the PAC and the loaded adsorbent is removed from the water via conventional or
membrane filtration (Pirbazari et al., 1992; Crittenden et al., 2012). PAC is most commonly used
for the removal of taste and odour compounds and other trace organics and in many cases is only
applied periodically as required. It is single use and must be disposed of after use.
Costing
Capital Costs
Capital costing, which includes design, construction, equipment costs, are beyond the scope of
this project, however, as with the single step treatment system, the cost of the two-step
adsorption and regeneration process will need to be cost competitive with existing treatment
NOM/pathogen removal technologies if it is to be adopted as a standalone process (see Table
F.1). Should the system instead be employed as a post-coagulation polishing step, it will need to
be cost competitive with existing polishing options such as activated carbon. For example, recent
estimates made as part of a water treatment plan upgrade project in the Southern Ontario treating
900 MLD pegged the cost of a new PAC delivery system (including materials) at $2 million, or
$2.20/m3 (Shen, personal communication, May 2, 2017).
Materials Costs
If the two-step treatment process is to be used in standalone mode for NOM removal it must be
able to be competitive with existing options. Adham et al. (1991) prepared formal isotherms
305
measuring the removal of NOM as a target contaminant from natural water using PAC (rather
than NOM as an interferent in the adsorption of other species). They used a variety of PACs to
remove NOM from groundwater with an initial TOC of 2.8 mg/L, which is lower than that used
in this project. No information about NOM character (e.g. UV254, SUVA, etc.) was provided.
Nonetheless, the Freundlich isotherm parameters from the Adham study were used to estimate
the dose of TiO2 required to remove 30% of the DOC from the OTB and OTW matrices and in
both cases, the required dose was approximately 0.05 g/L (50 mg/L).
Table F.4 Assumptions for material cost analysis – two-step treatment process
Parameter Value Units Source
Adsorption Dose 1.5 g/L Chapter 8
Adsorption Time 30 min Assumed
Regen Dose 1.5 g/L Assumed
Regen Time 60 min Chapter 8
Regen Cycles Unlimited
Percent Removal of DOC 30 % Chapter 8 (NB 550 in OTW)
KF PAC 20.8 Adham et al., 1991
1/n PAC 0.8 Adham et al., 1991
PAC Cost 0.55 USD/lb Wiesner et al., 1994
PAC Cost Adjusted for Inflation 0.90 USD/lb Calculated
USD/CAD Conversion 1.37 CAD/USD May 12, 2017
Even with the generous and unrealistic assumption that the LENs are infinitely regenerable for at
least one year, the materials cost of the LENs was found to be five orders of magnitude greater
than that of PAC for the same degree of NOM removal. As shown in figures F.3 and F.4 below,
this high cost is a function of both the concentration of TiO2 required as well as the unit cost of
the materials, which was assumed to be $40,000/kg based on the price of industrial grade TiO2
LENs from Novarials (Table F.2). The latter parameter had a stronger effect on final materials
cost than the former. The assumed unit cost is very high, and it is unlikely that any LEN-based
treatment process will be feasible until it drops below $40/kg or the nanomaterials/the
regeneration procedure is optimized such that the LENs are indeed reuseable over a long period
of time.
306
Figure F.3 Effects of TiO2 LEN dose and plant capacity on estimated energy costs
Figure F.4 Effects of TiO2 LEN unit cost and plant capacity on estimated annual
materials cost
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
$10,000,000
$100,000,000
100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000
An
nu
al
Ma
teri
als
Co
st (
$)
Capacity (L/day)
0.5 g/L 1 g/L 1.5 g/L
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
$10,000,000
$100,000,000
100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000
An
nu
al
Mate
rials
Cost
($)
Capacity (L/day)
$40/kg $400/kg $4,000/kg $40,000/kg
307
Energy
The energy required to regenerate the LENs after use and separate them after treatment was
estimated using the following assumptions:
Table F.5 Assumptions for energy cost analysis – two-step process
Parameter Value Units Source
LED Power Rating 2.7 W UVA LED specifications (LED ENGIN)
Regeneration Frequency 12 per day Assumed
Membrane Energy Costs 96.5 $/MLD Statistics Canada (2011)
Energy Cost 0.154 $/kWh Ontario Energy Board (2017)
With these assumptions, the energy cost associated with irradiation during regeneration and the
two membrane separation steps is approximately $0.02/L. Energy use associate with PAC is
expected to be minimal.
Other O&M Costs
Other O&M costs such as labour, maintenance, safety equipment, replacement parts, and waste
treatment and disposal are beyond the scope of this project. The proposed single tank system
may, however, have some advantages over existing treatment options in these categories. For
example, it would create less waste than comparable NOM removal technologies such as
coagulation/flocculation or PAC. At the small and very small scale, the fact that it may
potentially provide concurrent reduction of other contaminants of interest (e.g. pathogens,
metals) may minimize the additional process steps required to achieve clean and safe drinking
water along with their accompanying O&M costs.
Total O&M Cost
The total O&M cost was calculated as the sum of the estimated material and energy costs.
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑀𝑎𝑡 + 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 (𝐼𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛) + 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 (𝑆𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛)
The total O&M cost of the proposed two-step treatment process was determined to be
approximately $3.73/L, well above that of PAC, which is fractions of a cent per litre. The high
cost of the LENs also resulted in a high overall O&M cost for the proposed two-step treatment
308
process relative to that of existing treatment processes such as conventional treatment (with and
without ozone), DAF, and various membrane filtration options that are used for NOM removal at
either the large (conventional etc.), small (DAF, UF-NF), or very small scale (RO). The
estimated O&M costs for these existing systems are presented in Figure F.6 as a function of
system capacity (calculated according to equations in McGivney and Kawamura, 2008 and
adjusted for inflation between 2008 and 2017). The proposed two-step system is only
competitive with these processes at the very small scale. Should the cost of the materials come
down thanks to scale-up and/or automation of the synthesis process, the per litre cost of the
proposed two-step system will come down and the system may be competitive with existing
systems or as an addition to existing systems.
Figure F.5 O&M costs as a function of plant capacity for existing water treatment
processes used for NOM removal at large or small scale
Markets
Assuming that the materials and/or regeneration procedure can be optimized such that the
materials become more reuseable and that the overall cost of the materials will come down as a
result of scale-up, the most likely drinking water markets for the proposed two-step treatment
process are as an add on to municipal treatment systems to remove DBP precursors that are
$0.01
$0.10
$1.00
$10.00
$100.00
$1,000.00
$10,000.00
1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08 1.E+09
$/m
3
Capacity (L/day)
Conventional Conventional + Ozone DAF UF + NF RO
309
recalcitrant to coagulation or as a treatment process for the removal of taste and odour
compounds and cyanotoxins, which have been shown to be removable by TiO2 (Fotiou et al.
2015). Alternatively, the proposed system might work as a standalone option for small and
remote communities where shipping costs are prohibitive and a simple, self-contained system
that can potentially remove pathogens and other contaminants along with DBP precursors would
be an attractive option.
Summary
The analysis presented here suggests that the treatment concepts that have been developed
through this project are not currently cost competitive with existing treatment options with the
possible exception of very small systems in remote areas. Alternatively, one or both systems may
be appropriate as polishing processes following conventional treatment for the removal of
recalcitrant DBP precursors or other organic contaminants of concern (e.g. T&O compounds,
cyanotoxins).
The two-step treatment process is more novel than the single step treatment process and thus
more likely to be patentable and/or less likely to overlap with the intellectual property of existing
equipment manufacturers or other researchers. Should research continue into the two-step
treatment process, the results of this preliminary cost analysis suggest that research resources are
best allocated to the following:
1. Finding a niche
a. Removal of taste and odour compounds and cyanotoxins
b. Removal of DBP precursors not removed by coagulation or other conventional
processes
c. Removal of target contaminants in alternative markets (e.g. groundwater
remediation, oil and gas, etc.)
2. Improving performance
a. Matrix adjustments to improve adsorption (e.g. pH depression)
b. Optimization of regeneration procedure
310
c. Reconsider use of second generation LENs with higher surface area (e.g. NB
130/550) to improve adsorption
3. Scale-up
a. Scale-up and/or automation of nanomaterial synthesis procedure
b. Development of bench-scale flow through prototype
References
Adham, S.S., Snoeyink, V.L., Clark, M.M., Bersillon, J-L (1991) Predicting and verifying
organics removal by PAC in an ultrafiltration system, Journal of the American Water Works
Association, 83, 12, 81-91
CBCL Limited (2011) Study on characteristics and removal of natural organic matter in drinking
water systems in Newfoundland and Labrador, prepared for the Government of Newfoundland
and Labrador, Department of Environment and Conservation, Water Management Division,
Chaulk, M. and Picco, B. (2010) Drinking Water Safety Initiative, Clean and Safe Drinking
Water Workshop 2010, Gander, NL
Chowdhury, Z.K., Summers, R.S., Westerhoff, G.P., Leto, B.J., Nowack, K.O., and Corwin, C.J.
(2013) Activated Carbon: Solutions for Improving Water Quality, Passantino, L.B. (Ed.),
Denver, USA, American Water Works Association
Crittenden, J., Trussell, R., Hand, D., Howe, K., and Tchobanoglous (2012) MWH’s Water
Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA
Edzwald, J.K., Becker, W.C., and Wattier, K.L. (1985) Surrogate parameters for monitoring
organic matter and THM precursors, Journal AWWA, 77 (4), pp. 122-132
Fotiou, T., Triantis, T.M., Kaloudis, T., Hiskia, A., 2015. Evaluation of the photocatalytic
activity of TiO2 based catalysts for the degradation and mineralization of cyanobacterial toxins
and water off-odor compounds under UV-A, solar, and visible light, Chemical Engineering
Journal, 261, 17-26
311
Guilherme, S. and Rodriguez, M.J. (2014) Occurrence of regulated and non-regulated
disinfection byproducts in small drinking water systems, Chemosphere, 117, 425-532
Health Canada (2013) Guidance for Providing Safe Drinking Water in Areas of Federal
Jurisdiction – Version 2, Pub. Number 130373
Hua, G. and Reckhow, D.A. (2007) Characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors based
on hydrophobicity and molecular size, Environmental Science and Technology, 41 (9), pp. 3309-
3315
Huang, X., Leal, M., and Li, Q. (2008) Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2
photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes, Water Research,
pp. 1142-1150
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Chiang, K., Drikas, M., and Amal, R. (2008) Removal of
humic acid using TiO2 photocatalytic process – Fractionation and molecular weight
characterisation studies, Chemosphere, 72, pp. 263-271
McGivney, W.T. and Kawamura, S. (2008) Cost Estimating Manual for Water Treatment
Facilities, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA
Miller, P., Keefe, F., Kendall, A., Stead, T., Caines, B. (2009) Operation and maintenance of
potable water dispensing units (PWDUs): Small town perspectives from NL, Clean and Safe
Drinking Water Workshop 2009, Gander, NL
Murphy, H.M, Thomas, M.K., Medeiros, D.T., McFayden, S., Pintar, K.D. (2016) Estimating the
number of cases of acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) associated with Canadian municipal
drinking water systems, Epidemiology and Infection, 144 (7), 1355-1370
Ontario Energy Board (2017) Electricity Rates, Accessed May 12, 2017:
https://www.oeb.ca/rates-and-your-bill/electricity-rates
Pifer, A.D. and Fairey, J.L. (2014) Suitability of organic matter surrogates to predict
trihalomethane formation in drinking water sources, Environmental Engineering Science, 31 (3),
pp. 117-126
312
Pirbazari, M., Badriyha, B., Ravindran, V. (1992) MF-PAC for treating waters contaminated
with natural and synthetic organics, Journal of the American Water Works Association, 84, 12,
95-103
Statistics Canada (2011) Survey of Drinking Water Plants, Catalogue no. 16-403-X, Accessed
May 12, 2017: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-403-x/16-403-x2013001-eng.pdf
Wiesner, M.R., Hackney, J., Sethi, S., Jacangelo, J.G., and Laine, J-M (1994) Cost estimates for
membrane filtration and conventional treatment, Journal of the American Water Works
Association, 33-41
313
Appendix G: Irradiance Considerations
A spreadsheet developed by Bolton and Linden (2003) was used to calculate the average
irradiance at the surface of the sample assuming that the reactor had a diameter of 6.5 cm, the
volume of the sample was 50 mL, and the distance from the light to the surface of the sample
was 13.7 cm. The spreadsheet, which was originally developed to calculate the time required to
achieve a defined germicidal UV dose, is also able to calculate the average UV dose delivered
throughout the volume of the sample, however, this function does not translate directly to
photocatalytic systems. For one thing, even relatively low doses of TiO2 obscure the passage of
light through the sample due to a combination of absorbance by the material (which can lead to
photoactivation) and light scattering. At the TiO2 doses used in this project (0.1 g/L, 0.25 g/L,
0.5 g/L, and 1 g/L) almost all of the light that enters the sample is absorbed or scattered by the
nanomaterials, resulting in a low average irradiance through the volume of the sample (Figure
G.1).
Figure G.2 shows the average irradiance through different volumes of sample as calculated using
the Bolton spreadsheet at different P25 TiO2 nanoparticle doses in MilliQ distilled water. The
depth of the sample refers to the distance from the top of the sample to the designated value.
Note that these values do not represent the irradiance in different “slices” of the sample because
the existing spreadsheet is not set up to do this. Rather, this graph shows the average irradiance
in the top 1 cm of the sample vs. the average irradiance in different volumes of sample in the
designated reactor. The spreadsheet, which was designed for disinfection applications rather than
photocatalytic reactor design, also fails to distinguish between absorption and light scattering.
Nonetheless, the semi-quantitative results presented in Figure G.2 do indicate that UVA light is
unlikely to have penetrated deeply into the sample, particularly at the higher TiO2 doses used in
this project, and that the majority of photoactivation and photocatalysis occurred within the top
layer(s) of the sample. The samples were constantly and completely mixed throughout the
experiments to minimize the likelihood of stratification through their depth, so in theory,
individual nanoparticles would have been cycled through this top layer regularly..
314
Figure G.1 Absorbance at 365 nm and average irradiance through the volume of the
sample for 50 mL samples of distilled water dosed with varying
concentrations of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles
Figure G.2 Average irradiance through different volumes of sample at different doses of
P25 TiO2 nanoparticles in MilliQ distilled water
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Av
era
ge
Irra
dia
nce
Th
rou
gh
Sa
mp
le
(mW
/cm
2)
Ab
sorb
an
ce a
t 3
65
nm
(cm
-1)
TiO2 Dose (g/L)
Absorbance at 365 nm Average Irradiance
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 0.5 1 1.5
Av
era
ge
Irra
dia
nce
Th
rou
gh
Sam
ple
(mW
/cm
2)
Depth (cm)
0 g/L
0.005 g/L
0.05 g/L
0.1 g/L
0.25 g/L
0.5 g/L
1 g/L
315
The Bolton spreadsheet calculates a value called the Petri Factor (PF) to account for variation in
the irradiance reaching the surface of the sample. In ideal collimated beam systems, the PF
would equal 1, indicating that the same amount of light is hitting the sample at all points across
its surface. In reality, the irradiance is likely to be highest at the centre of the collimated beam
and to drop off at the outer edges of the beam. The irradiance of the UVA LEDs used in this
study was measured at various points within the collimated beam as shown in tables G.1 through
G.3. These values were averaged and inputted into the Bolton spreadsheet and used to calculate
the average irradiance at the surface of the sample and throughout its volume.
Table G.1 Irradiance of LED 1
LED 1
x y Irradiance (mW/cm2) x y Irradiance (mW/cm2)
0 -3.0 3.8 -3.0 0 4.1
0 -2.0 4.4 -2.0 0 4.7
0 -1.0 5.8 -1.0 0 5.1
0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0 6.5
0 1.0 5.0 1.0 0 5.1
0 2.0 4.4 2.0 0 4.2
0 3.0 3.7 3.0 0 3.5
Table G.2 Irradiance of LED 2
LED 2
x y Irradiance (mW/cm2) x y Irradiance (mW/cm2)
0 -3.0 4.5 -3.0 0 4.4
0 -2.0 5.2 -2.0 0 4.8
0 -1.0 6.1 -1.0 0 6.3
0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0 6.5
0 1.0 7.2 1.0 0 6.5
0 2.0 5.4 2.0 0 5.3
0 3.0 4.9 3.0 0 4.7
316
Table G.3 Irradiance of LED 3
LED 3
x y Irradiance (mW/cm2) x y Irradiance (mW/cm2)
0 -3.0 4.1 -3.0 0 3.4
0 -2.0 5.2 -2.0 0 4.4
0 -1.0 7.3 -1.0 0 6.1
0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0 6.6
0 1.0 5.9 1.0 0 6.2
0 2.0 5.3 2.0 0 4.7
0 3.0 5 3.0 0 4.5
References
Bolton, J.R. and Linden, K.G. (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose)
determination in bench-scale UV experiments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129, 209-
215
317
Appendix H: Sedimentation Analysis
Please note that the discussion in this appendix was originally limited to the settling results from
Chapter 8 of this document. The equations and concepts provided here have since been applied
to the settling results presented in Chapter 6 and Chapter 7.
Stokes’ Law
Stokes’ Law is commonly used to model the settling of discrete particles through a liquid
medium. For a hard spherical particle, Stokes’ Law can be simplified to:
𝑣𝑠 =𝑔(𝜌𝑝−𝜌𝑤)𝑑𝑝
2
18𝜇 (H.1)
Where vs is the terminal settling velocity of the particle (m/s), g is the acceleration due to gravity
(9.81 m/s2), ρp is the density of the particle (kg/m3), ρw is the density of the water (kg/m3), dp is
the diameter of the particle (m), and is the viscosity of the water (kg/m.s).
Commercial P25 nanoparticles are spherical in shape, but the LENs synthesized for this study
are, by definition, not. Liu et al. (2013) observed that the agglomerates formed by their LENs
were roughly spherical in shape. If it is assumed that the LENs in this project behaved similarly,
it is possible to compare the behavior of all three nanomaterials using Stokes’ Law. Assuming
that the hydraulic radius of P25 is 10 nm, that the hydraulic radius of the LENs is 1,000 nm, that
all of the nanomaterials were of the same density (ρTiO2 = 4.26 g/cm3), that all of the tests were
conducted at 20oC, and that all of the particles settled independently (i.e. Type I settling) the
Stokes’ equation yields the following values for settling velocity and time required to settle 70
mm (as per the experimental set-up for the high TiO2 dose settling experiments described in
Section 3.4.4.2 and Section 8.2.6).
318
Table H.1 Settling time required for P25 and two LENs in MilliQ water
Parameter P25 NB 550 NB 700
Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) 10 1000 1000
Settling velocity (m/s) 7.1E-10 7.10E-06 7.10E-06
Settling time (h) 27,400 2.74 2.74
The results indicate that under the stated assumptions, the average P25 nanoparticle would
require over 25,000 hours to settle out of solution and an average LEN particle would require
2.74 hours to settle. This does not match the behavior of the nanomaterials in this project,
indicating that at least one of our assumptions was incorrect.
Nanoparticle Agglomeration
TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration in aqueous media has been studied in depth by many
researchers including Liu et al. (2013), Thio et al. (2011), Zhou et al. (2013), and based on their
studies and the results of the preliminary settling analysis, it seems inevitable that the
nanoparticles and LENs used in this study agglomerated to some extent. Figure H.1 shows the
effect of particle/agglomerate size on the time required to settle 70 mm calculated using the same
assumptions listed above.
Figure H.1 Effect of particle/agglomerate size on time required to settle
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Tim
e to
Set
tle
(h)
Agglomerate Diameter (nm)
319
The majority of the nanoparticles and LENs in this study settled the required distance within one
hour, so based on the results presented in Figure H.1 it’s likely that in most cases, the
particles/agglomerates were between 1,000 nm and 10,000 nm (1 to 10 m) in diameter. In some
cases (e.g. OTB water experiments) the majority of settling occurred within five minutes,
indicating that under these conditions the particles/agglomerates were either larger or had greater
effective densities. Particle size characterization was conducted using equipment in Professor
Siegel’s laboratory in the Department of Civil Engineering, however, these experiments were
conducted at concentrations well below those used in the adsorption and degradation
experiments (0.03 to 0.05 g/L TiO2) because the student in charge of the instrument had
calibrated it to measure his own, more dilute samples and was unwilling to change the settings to
better suit my samples. The results, shown in Figure H.2 below, are nonetheless illuminating.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
Per
cen
tage o
f P
art
icle
s
Diameter (um)
MQ
OTB
OTW
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
Per
cen
tag
e o
f P
art
icle
s
Diameter (um)
MQ
OTB
OTW
B
A
320
Figure H.2 Particle size distributions for P25 nanoparticles (A), NB 550 (B), and NB 700
(C) in MilliQ water (natural pH) and two natural water matrices.
The results of the particle sizing tests cannot be used directly to predict the behavior of the P25
nanoparticles or the LENs at the concentrations used in the experiments in this project (0.1 g/L,
0.25 g/L, 1 g/L). Also, the DLS method itself is underlain by numerous assumptions and only
measures particles within the 0.1 m to 1,000 m range. Even so, the results in Figure H.2
suggest the following:
1. Agglomeration did indeed occur to some extent in all cases.
2. The particle size distributions of the LENs are wider than that of the P25 nanoparticles,
indicating that the assumption of uniformly sized particles/agglomerates is incorrect.
3. Water matrix had a more modest effect on the particle size distribution than nanomaterial
type did.
4. The agglomerates formed at approximately 0.05 g/L TiO2 had diameters between 1 and
100 m, but the majority were between 1 and 10 m as predicted in the analysis
presented earlier (Figure H.1).
5. The agglomerates formed by P25 were always smaller than those formed by the LENs.
6. NB 550 formed the largest agglomerates on average and the most variably sized
agglomerates overall.
7. The agglomerates formed in the OTB water were, in some cases, smaller than those
formed in the MilliQ water (natural pH) or the OTW water.
Taken together, these trends suggest that particle size alone is not an adequate predictor of
sedimentation efficacy. Other researchers (Deloid, et al., 2014) have noted that the effective
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
Per
cen
tag
e o
f P
art
icle
s
Diameter (um)
MQ
OTB
OTW
C
321
density of nanoparticulate agglomerates can differ substantially from the density of the material
because the agglomerate contains entrapped media (in our case water and naturally occurring
particulate matter) as well as nanoparticles. Liu et al. (2013) reported the density of their TiO2
LENs as 1.2 g/cm3, which is well below TiO2’s material density, which is 4.26 g/cm3. They did
not describe how they determined this value, however, given that it differs substantially from the
material density, it seems likely that this value represents the effective density of the
agglomerates rather than that of the individual LEN particles. The time required to settle 70 mm
as a function of both agglomerate size and density (1.1 g/cm3 to 4.26 g/cm3) is shown in Figure
H.3.
Figure H.3 Time required to settle as a function of particle/agglomerate size and
particle/agglomerate density
The effective agglomerate density can be predicted using the Sterling equations if the
hydrodynamic diameters of the nanoparticle and the agglomerate are known.
𝜀𝑎 = 1 − (𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑔
𝑑𝑚𝑎𝑡)𝐷𝐹−3
(H.2)
𝜌𝑒 = (1 − 𝜀𝑎)𝜌𝑝 − 𝜀𝑎𝜌𝑤 (H.3)
Where εa is the porosity of the agglomerate, which is a function of the diameter of the
agglomerate (dagg), that of the material (dmat) and the fractal dimension constant (DF), which is a
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Hou
rs R
equ
ired
to S
ettl
e
Agglomerate Density (g/cm3)
10 nm
100 nm
1000 nm
10,000 nm
100,000 nm
322
indicator of the shape and the total volume of the agglomerate. Spherical agglomerates have a
DF of 3 while less uniform agglomerates have DF values ranging from 1 to 3 (Sterling et al.,
2005). ρe is the effective density of the agglomerate, ρp is the density of the individual
nanoparticle, and ρw is the density of the water.
These equations were applied to the particle distribution data (d10, d50, and d90 values under
each condition tested) to predict the amount of time required for 10%, 50%, and 90% of each of
the materials to settle out of the different water matrices assuming spherical particles and
agglomerates, LEN nanoparticle diameters of 2 m, and a DF of 2.3 as was used by Deloid et al.
(2014). The results are presented alongside the actual times required to achieve this degree of
removal in Table H.2.
Table H.2 Predicted and actual time required to remove 10%, 50%, and 90% of TiO2
from various water matrices
Test Predicted (min) Actual (min)
10% 50% 90% 10% 50% 90%
P25-MQ 908 2891 9733 -- -- --
P25-OTB 685 2107 7814 0.5 2 30
P25-OTW 769 3831 34710 5 15 90
550-MQ 5 48 590 0.5 1 60
550-OTB 5 48 442 0.5 6 60
550-OTW 4 50 645 4 -- --
700-MQ 12 69 411 0.5 3.5 60
700-OTB 14 76 464 2.5 8 60
700-OTW 15 95 607 5 -- --
The predicted settling time was sensitive to the DF value applied, and this was likely one of the
main reasons for the discrepancy between the predicted and actual results. The three materials
used in this project had differing configurations (spherical vs. linear) and two LENs were
heterogeneous in terms of both particle size and agglomerate size as shown in the TEMs
presented in Section 8.3.1 and the particle size distributions in Figure H.2. As a result, it is quite
likely that they had different agglomerate shapes and as such should have been assigned different
323
DF values, however, in the absence of agglomerate imaging it was difficult to determine the
shape of the agglomerates.
Sedimentation was not the main focus of this project and the results shown here are not
sufficiently detailed to fully model the settling of P25 nanoparticles or the two lab synthesized
LENs in the MilliQ, OTB, and OTW water matrices. Accurate hydrodynamic diameter
measurements at different TiO2 doses would greatly improve the accuracy of the results and aid
in the eventual design of a sedimentation reactor, but more detailed particle characterization may
be required to more fully describe the shape of the agglomerates formed by the three materials
under different water quality conditions to properly characterize the porosity of the agglomerates
and their resulting effective density. Deloid et al. (2014) proposed a (relatively) simpler method
for the determination of effective agglomerate density, but it requires access to an analytical
ultracentrifuge, a specialized piece of equipment commonly used for biochemical applications
that is not available in DWRG laboratory. Should this equipment become available, it may be
possible to determine the effective density of the materials without particle characterization.
Even with this information, however, it may prove challenging to accurately model the settling
behavior of the nanoparticles and LENs as they may not, in fact, follow the assumptions of Type
1 settling.
Settling Trends
Although settling trends were not explored in depth in this study, the settling trends over time in
the real and purified water matrices do suggest that settling behaviour was complex and the
dominant type of settling may have changed over time (Figure H.4 and H.5). In the OTW water,
the LENs settled in a slow but steady manner, suggesting Type I settling (discrete particle
settling). In contrast, the settling behaviour of all three materials in the OTB water matrix was
characterized by large initial drop in turbidity followed by slower, more gradual settling after
approximately 15 minutes. A similar trend was apparent for P25 in OTW water. This more
complex settling pattern suggests that the particles, or more correctly, agglomerates, were not of
uniform size in these suspensions.
324
Figure H.4 Percent removal of turbidity over time via settling in real water matrices
Effect of pH on Filtration and Settling of Nanomaterials in Purified (MilliQ)
Water
Control filterability and sedimentation experiments were run with 1 g/L suspensions of P25 and
the two third generation LENs in MilliQ water at its natural pH (5.5-6) and with the pH adjusted
to 8. The results of the tests run at the natural pH of MilliQ water matched those conducted under
similar conditions with the second generation LENs (Chapter 6) but those from the experiments
run at pH 8 were unexpected.
As shown in Figure H.5, in MilliQ water at natural pH (5.5 to 6), the filtration index of P25 (61.7
± 1.4) was over 60 times greater than that of MilliQ water alone (1) and approximately 25 and 30
times greater than that of suspensions of NB 550 (2.5 ± 0.0) and NB 700 (2.1 ± 0.0), respectively.
-100%
-90%
-80%
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60R
emo
va
l o
f T
urb
idit
y
Settling Time (min)
P25 - OTB
NB 550 - OTB
NB 700 - OTB
P25 - OTW
NB 550 - OTW
NB 700 - OTW
325
Figure H.5 Filtration indexes of raw water and three TiO2 nanomaterials suspended in
MilliQ water at pH 6 and pH 8 and two raw surface water samples
When the pH of the water was adjusted to pH 8 using HCl and/or NaOH, the filterability of the
P25 suspension was reduced to 18.0 ± 0.6, indicating greater filterability, but those of the two
LENs were unaffected. A short experiment was run to determine whether this was caused by
experimental error, specifically error related to pH changes over the course of the test. The
results are shown in Table H.3.
Table H.3 Effects of nanomaterial addition, time, and pH adjustment on the pH of
MilliQ water
Condition P25 NB 550 NB 700
Initial pH 5.94 5.94 5.94
After TiO2 Addition 5.1 6.13 6.1
Adjusted pH 7.9 8.06 8.38
Final pH 6.7 6.63 6.65
The results in Table H.3 confirm that the improved removability of the nanoparticles in MilliQ
water adjusted to pH 8 relative to MilliQ water at its natural pH was likely a function of
experimental conditions. For example, the addition of P25 nanoparticles to MilliQ water, which
lacks buffering capacity, depressed the pH of the water from approximately 6 to 5.1, which is
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Raw Water P25 NB 550 NB 700
Fil
tra
tio
n I
nd
ex
MQ - pH 6
MQ - pH 8
326
well below the material’s IEP. This may have led to decreased agglomeration due to repulsive
charges between the individual nanoparticles and thus increased resistance to filtration. The pH 8
samples also experienced pH depression but in this case due interactions between the unbuffered
MilliQ water and the atmosphere. As a result, the pH “8” tests actually took place at pH 6.7,
which is very close to P25’s IEP (6.5). This is the point where the nanoparticles would be most
likely to agglomerate and thus least likely to clog the pores of the membrane filter. The
experiments were conducted in unbuffered MilliQ water because increased ionic strength has
been linked to increased agglomeration (Hotze et al., 2010) and sedimentation (Erhayem and
Sohn, 2014).
The pH of the water also had strong and sometimes unexpected effects on the sedimentation
efficiency of the nanomaterials. The P25 suspension made in MilliQ water at natural pH (5.5 to
6) remained stable throughout the hour-long test (0% turbidity removal) but the NB 550 and NB
700 suspensions made in MilliQ water settled out quickly (Figure H.6). The turbidity of the LEN
suspensions in MilliQ water decreased by approximately 70% after only five minutes and by
approximately 88% after 60 minutes. This is similar to results for the second generation LENs as
presented in Chapter 6 of this document. P25 settled much more effectively at pH “8” than at pH
“6”, because these matrices in fact had pHs of 6.7 and 5.1, respectively, and P25 agglomeration
is most likely to occur near its IEP (6.5). This does not explain the effects of pH on settling by
NB 550 and NB 700 in MilliQ water. The two materials have similar IEPs (see Figure 8.S.1) and
size and shape characteristics but the settling of NB 550 was strongly impacted by the pH of the
water while that of NB 700 was not. The actual pH of the water was similar in the two NB 550
tests (6.13 vs. 6.63), indicating that this was unlikely to be the cause of the hindered settling
during the pH “8” tests.
327
Figure H.6 Percent removal of turbidity from suspensions made with TiO2
nanomaterials in MilliQ water at pH 6 and pH 8
The individual LEN particles were much larger than the individual P25 nanoparticles (Section
8.3.1), but this size difference does not fully explain the improved removal of the former relative
to the latter. There is some evidence that LENs with higher surface areas are more resistant to
agglomeration than those with smaller surface areas (Zhou et al., 2013), but the reported effects
are small and it is more likely that experimental factors impacted the settling of NB 550.
References
Crittenden, J., Trussell, R., Hand, D., Howe, K., and Tchobanoglous (2012) MWH’s Water
Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ
Deloid, G., Cohen, J.M., Darrah, T., Derk, R., Rojanasakul, L., Pyrgiotakis, G., Wohlleben, W.,
Demokritou, P. (2014) Estimating the effective density of engineered nanomaterials for in vitro
dosimetry, Nature Communications, 5, 3514 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4514
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
P25 NB 550 NB 700
Tu
rbid
ity
Rem
ov
al
(30
min
)
MQ - pH 6
MQ - pH 8
0%
328
Hotze, E.M., Phenrat, T., and Lowry, G.V. (2010) Nanoparticle aggregation: Challenges to
understanding transport and reactivity in the environment, Journal of Environmental Quality, 39,
1909-1924, doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0462
Liu, W., Sun, W., Borthwick, A., and Ni, J. (2013) Comparison on aggregation and
sedimentation of titanium dioxide titanate nanotubes and titanate nanotubes-TiO2: Influence of
pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects, 434, pp 319-328
Sterling, M.C., Bonner, J.S., Ernest, A.N.S., Page, C.A., Autenrieth, R.L. (2005) Application of
fractal flocculation and vertical transport model to aquatic sol-sediment systems, Water
Research, 39, 1818-1830
Thio, B.J.R., Zhou, D., Keller, A. (2011) Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation
and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 556-563
Zhou, D., Ji, Z., Jiang, X., Dunphy, D.R., Brinker, J., Keller, A.A. (2013) Influence of material
properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration, PLOS One, 8, 11, e81239, doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0081239
329
Appendix I: Statistical Analysis of Regeneration Results
The regeneration results were originally analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s and
Dunnett’s methods for comparison of means at the 95% confidence level, which is widely used
as a default confidence level in many fields of science. The statistical tests were then repeated at
the 90% confidence level to minimize the size of the confidence interval and lessen chance of
making a Type II error (i.e. accepting the null hypothesis of no difference between means when a
difference does exist). The results of all of these tests are summarized in Table I.1 and Table I.2.
Table I.1 Statistical analysis of regeneration data – AO24 experiments
Material Regen Mean Confidence
Interval
Tukey's
Grouping
Dunnett's
Grouping
95% 90% 95% 90% 95% 90%
NB 550 0 8.96 1.76 1.40 A A A A
1 8.82 1.76 1.40 A A A A
2 8.95 1.76 1.40 A A A A
3 8.05 1.76 1.40 A A A A
4 8.10 1.76 1.40 A A A A
5 8.07 1.76 1.40 A A A A
NB 700 0 7.67 0.72 0.57 ABC AB A A
1 8.02 0.71 0.57 A A A A
2 7.94 0.71 0.57 AB A A A
3 7.57 0.71 0.57 ABC ABC A A
4 6.90 0.71 0.57 BC BC B B
5 7.19 0.72 0.57 C C A A
Tukey’s Method compares the various means to one another to determine whether differences
exist between consecutive treatment levels whereas Dunnett’s Method compares the means at
different treatment levels to that of a control. At both confidence levels both methods suggested
that there was no significant change in NB 550’s ability to remove AO24 dye after multiple
regenerations. The NB 700 results were more variable at both confidence levels, but it should be
noted that in all cases, the CIs for NB 700 were tighter than those for NB 550 because the
individual measurements were closer to one another for the former than for the latter.
Nonetheless, at both confidence levels the confidence interval of the mean removal of AO24
after five regeneration cycles overlapped with that of the mean removal of AO24 by the virgin
330
material, indicating that the regeneration was effective and that the materials were resuseable at
least six times for this application.
Table I.2 Statistical analysis of regeneration data – NOM (UV254) experiments
Water
Type Material Regen Mean
Confidence
Interval
Tukey's
Grouping
Dunnett's
Grouping
95% 90% 95% 90% 95% 90%
OTB NB 550` 0 0.048 0.015 0.006 A A A A
1 0.036 0.022 0.009 AB AB A A
2 0.041 0.015 0.006 AB ABC A A
3 0.033 0.015 0.006 AB ABC A B
4 0.025 0.015 0.006 B BC B B
5 0.032 0.015 0.006 AB C B B
OTB NB 700 0 0.046 0.013 0.005 A A A A
1 0.042 0.013 0.005 A A A A
2 0.046 0.013 0.005 A A A A
3 0.038 0.013 0.005 A A A A
4 0.039 0.013 0.005 A A A A
5 0.040 0.013 0.005 A A A A
OTW NB 550 0 0.098 0.009 0.003 A A A A
1 0.081 0.009 0.003 B B B B
2 0.082 0.009 0.003 B B B B
3 0.065 0.009 0.003 C C B B
4 0.065 0.009 0.003 C C B B
5 0.046 0.009 0.003 D D B B
OTW NB 700 0 0.103 0.022 0.009 AB A A A
1 0.101 0.022 0.009 AB AB A A
2 0.109 0.022 0.009 A ABC A A
3 0.085 0.022 0.009 ABC BCD A A
4 0.073 0.022 0.009 C CD B B
5 0.079 0.022 0.009 BC D B B
The overall trends, namely that regeneration was more effective in the OTB experiments than in
the OTW experiments (hinting at the existence of some inhibitory component in the OTW water
matrix) and that NB 700 was more readily regenerated than NB 550, were the same irrespective
of the confidence level used for the analysis.
331
Appendix J: Evaluating and Modeling System Performance
Comparison of LEN Performance
Reaction Time and Rate
In chapters 6 and 7 of this thesis, the various lab synthesized LENs were compared based on
their ability to degrade methylene blue, DBP precursor surrogates (DOC, UV254), and DBP
precursors (THMfp, HAAfp). An example of this is provided in Figure J.1, which shows the
removal of total THMfp by NB 700, one of the third generation LENs, from Otonabee River
(OTB) water and Ottawa River (OTW) water.
Figure J.1 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water matrices via photocatalysis by
NB 700
In many, though not all, cases, the photocatalytic degradation of substrate followed an apparent
first order reaction rate model. As a result, the actual point of comparison between the materials
in most cases was the first order reaction rate constant (k), which was determined by plotting log
(C/Co) vs. log t and taking solving for k.
𝑟 = −𝑘𝐶 (J.1)
log(𝐶) = −𝑘𝑡 + log (𝐶𝑜) (J.2)
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 20 40 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Irradiation Time (min)
OTB
OTW
332
In general, it was not possible to calculate a first order reaction rate constant for THMfp and
HAAfp because these parameters increased at short irradiation times (< 15 min) and, usually,
decreased thereafter. In two cases, however, it was possible to calculate k: P25 in OTW water
and NB 700 in OTW water.
Rate constants are not the only, or necessarily the best, way to compare photocatalytic materials
and systems to one another or to other treatment processes. Many other parameters have been
developed to better characterize and compare the effectiveness and efficiency of these systems.
A selection of these is presented in the sections that follow.
Electrical Energy per Order
The electrical energy per order (EEO) concept is currently listed as a “figure of merit” for the
evaluation of advanced oxidation processes by IUPAC. Collins et al. (2016) define EEO as:
“…the electrical energy in kilowatt hours (kWh) required to bring about the degradation
of a contaminant C by one order of magnitude in 1 m3 of contaminated water or air.”
The EEO of a given process can be calculated using Equation J.3, where P is the power
dissipated by the treatment process (kW), V is the volume of water treated in the experiment (L),
Ci is the original concentration of the contaminant, Cf is the final concentration of the
contaminant, and t is the time required to achieve Cf (min).
𝐸𝐸𝑂 =1000 𝑃 𝑡
𝑉 log (𝐶𝑖𝐶𝑓)
(J.3)
For batch experiments, the EEO should be calculated from the electrical energy dose (EED),
which is the electrical energy consumed per unit volume and can be calculated as follows:
𝐸𝐸𝐷 =1000𝑃𝑡
60𝑉 (J.4)
𝐸𝐸𝑂 =𝐸𝐸𝐷
log (𝐶𝑖𝐶𝑓)
(J.5)
333
In this study, the EEO values calculated using Equation J.2 were equal to that calculated using
equations J.4 and J.5.
The EEO concept is useful for comparing different types of light-driven systems and processes.
For example, Collins and Bolton (2016) compared EEOs for methylene blue degradation to show
that UV/H2O2 was far more efficient than UV/TiO2 for dye decolourization (EEOUVH2O2 = 0.63
kWh/order/m3 vs. EEOUVTiO2 = 16.4 kWh/order/m3). The EEO for UV/TiO2 reported by Collins
et al. is lower than those calculated for P25 and the various LENs in the current study (see Table
J.1). It should be noted, however, that the authors used a much lower starting concentration of
methylene blue (0.32 mg/L), did not report the experimental conditions (UV source, UV
irradiance, H2O2 or TiO2 dose, etc.), and that the papers they drew the data from are not
accessible through the University of Toronto library system.
Table J.1 EEO values provided by Collins and Bolton (2016) for methylene blue
degradation by UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 and EEO values for the degradation
of methylene blue by P25 and second and third generation LENs irradiated
by UVA LEDs
Process Dose Lamp Type Lamp Power Average Irradiance EEO
g/L W mW/cm2 kWh/order/m3
UV/H2O21 --2 UV3 --2 --2 0.63
UV/TiO21 --2 UV3 --2 --2 16.4
Light Only -- UVA LED 2.7 4.9 1,121
P25 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 42
NB 130/550 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 95
NB 130//700 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 81
NB 240/550 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 133
NB 240/700 0.1 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 69
P25 0.25 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 36
NB 550 0.25 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 71
NB 700 0.25 UVA LED 2.7 4.9 21
1From Collins and Bolton (2016)
2Not reported
3Power (W) not specified
334
A more detailed (and accessible) study by Yen and Yen (2015) explored the use of UV/H2O2 for
DOC and THMfp removal from a synthetic water matrix made with commercial humic acids.
Their experiments were conducted using a 9 W low pressure UV lamp (maximum irradiance at
254 nm) and three doses of H2O2. EEO values for the removal of DOC and THMfp by P25 and
the third generation LENs are compared to those reported by Yen and Yen (2015) for UV/H2O2
treatment in Figure J.2. Note that in the current study it was only possible to calculate EEO
values for THMfp removal under two conditions, OTW water with P25 and OTW water with NB
700, because these were the only conditions under which first order degradation kinetics were
observed.
Figure J.2 Comparison of EEOs for DOC and THM precursor degradation by
UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 with P25 and third generation LENs
From the graph, it is apparent that under these experimental conditions, UV/H2O2 was more
efficient for DOC and THMfp removal in almost all cases. The EEO values for DOC and
THMfp removal by NB 700 in OTW water were, however, comparable to those UV/H2O2
treatment with 10 mg/L of H2O2, indicating that under some conditions, UV/TiO2 may prove to
be competitive with UV/H2O2. This should be confirmed by comparing the two processes in the
same water matrices.
Some of the limitations of the EEO concept include the fact that it’s based on the total energy
required to run the treatment system rather than the dose of light added to the system, making it
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
DOC THMfp
EE
O (
kW
h/o
rder
/m3)
UV/H2O2 - 10 mg/L
UV/H2O2 - 25 mg/L
UV/H2O2 - 50 mg/L
UV/TiO2 - P25 - OTB
UV/TiO2 - P25 - OTW
UV/TiO2 - NB 550 - OTB
UV/TiO2 - NB 550 - OTW
UV/TiO2 - NB 700 - OTB
UV/TiO2 - NB 700 - OTW
335
system/experimental setup specific, and that it assumes first order degradation kinetics. It also
ignores the effect of adsorption, which, as has been shown in chapters 5 and 8 of this study, can
account for a substantial proportion of overall removal of DBP precursors and precursor
surrogates in TiO2-based treatment systems.
Power per Volume
An alternative way to compare the efficiency of different treatment systems is to calculate the
power required to remove a given amount of a contaminant.
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒(𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑚3⁄ ) =
𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 (𝑘𝑊) × 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 (ℎ)
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 (𝑚3) (J.6)
Like the EEO value, power per volume is based on total system energy demand rather than
incident light and is therefore system specific. In this study, the system power rating was simply
the power required to run one UVA LED and the volume treated was 50 mL. Power per volume
can be used to calculate the amount of power required to meet a set goal or it can be used as an
alternative to time on the x-axis as shown in Figure J.3.
Figure J.3 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water matrices via photocatalysis
with NB 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 20 40 60
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
Power (kWh/m3)
OTB
OTW
336
This method of comparison doesn’t require first order kinetics – though these were assumed for
the analysis presented here in order to determine the amount of power required to remove 90% of
each of the parameters of interest as well as that required to bring the THMfp and HAAfp of the
water to the guideline values recommended in the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water
Quality (Health Canada, 2017).
Gerrity et al. (2009) evaluated the use of the Photocat UV/TiO2-based treatment system by
Purifics (London, ON) for DOC and THMfp removal from two Arizona water sources, the Salt
River and the Central Arizona Project Canal (CAP) and presented their results as a function of
power required per cubic meter of water treated (kWh/m3). The two water sources had pH values
of approximately 8 and alkalinity between 100 as 150 mg/L as CaCO3. The Salt River contained
more DOC than the CAP (6.7 to 7.4 mg/L vs. 4.8 to 5.7 mg/L) and the SUVA values of the two
water matrices (1.5 to 1.7 L/mg.m vs. 0.8 to 1 L/mg.m) indicate that the NOM in the Salt River
was more aromatic than that in the CAP. The THMfp of the two water sources was evaluated at
10oC and 28oC, however, only the latter conditions were used for the second stage of the
experiments, which is the stage of interest for the comparison shown below. The THMfp of the
raw Salt River water ranged from 146 to 165 g/L while that of the CAP ranged from 83 to 95
g/L. Therefore, both of the tested water matrices were more similar to the OTB water matrix
than the OTW water matrix, though they both contained less aromatic NOM and had lower
THMfps than both water matrices used in the current study. The power required to achieve 90%
removal of DOC and THMfp as well as that required to achieve the GCDWQ guideline value of
100 g/L of THMs using the Photocat unit and in the experiments conducted for this thesis using
the third generation LENs (see Chapter 7) are compared in Figure J.4 Note that THMfp removal
power requirements were only determined for P25 and NB 700 in OTW water because these are
the only experiments where first order degradation kinetics were observed.
337
Figure J.4 Power required to remove 90% of DOC and THMfp from different water
matrices using UV/TiO2-based treatment processes
The DOC results indicate that, with the exception of the experiments conducted with NB 550,
the bench-scale batch UV/TiO2 treatment setup used in the current study was more energy
efficient than the Photocat system, though this conclusion comes with numerous caveats. For
one, the two studies employed different water matrices. The findings presented in Chapter 7 of
this thesis and earlier results presented by other researchers (Liu et al., 2008) clearly show that
the characteristics of the water matrix, specifically alkalinity, calcium, and NOM type and
concentration, have a strong effect on the photocatalytic degradation of NOM by UV/TiO2. Also,
the number of items included in the overall power demand value for each system was different –
the Photocat system is a flow through pilot-scale installation that includes irradiation (75 W
lamps), pumping, an air compressor, and a control system whereas the power demand value used
to calculate the power requirements for the bench-scale batch experiments included only the
power required to run the UVA-LED, which was 2.7 W/LED. On the other hand, there are
reasons why the bench-scale batch experiments run in the DWRG lab were in fact more energy
efficient. Most notably, NB 700 has been shown to be more photoactive than P25, thus, it
requires less irradiation to accomplish the same amount of degradation. Also, the bench-scale
apparatus uses energy efficient LEDs rather than standard UVA lamps.
The THMfp removal trends were similar in that less power was required to remove THM
precursors from the OTW water using P25 and NB 700 in the batch bench-scale set-up used in
0
100
200
300
400
500
Po
wer
(k
Wh
/m3)
DOC (90%)
THMfp (90%)
THMfp (GCDWQ)
338
this study than was required to remove THM precursors from the Salt River and CAP water
matrices using the flow-through Photocat system. As with DOC, the apparent superior efficiency
of the bench-scale bench system was likely related to numerous experimental and practical
factors, however, the particularly low power requirements associated with NB 700 suggests that
this nanomaterial may prove to be a more energy efficient option than P25 in a single stage
photocatalytic UV/TiO2 treatment system.
Interestingly, Gerrity et al. (2009) observed similar changes in THM species present in water as a
function of time as were observed in this study (see Section 7.3.5 in Chapter 7). That is, there
was an initial increase in both TCMfp and BDCMfp at short treatment times that was followed
by a gradual decrease in the TCMfp accompanied by an increase in BDCMfp and finally an
overall decrease in the formation of all THM species at extended treatment times. The authors of
the study did not provide any hypotheses as to why this may have occurred, but based on the
findings of other researchers cited in the current project (Liu et al., 2008; Toor and Mohseni,
2007; etc.) it seems likely that the photocatalytic treatment degraded larger compounds into
smaller ones that were more reactive with chlorine and that further treatment degraded these
compounds into even smaller ones that reacted more readily with the larger bromine atom.
Notes:
1. The power required to reduce DOC and THMfp was integrated into the cost analysis for
the proposed single step treatment system presented in Appendix E.
2. The power required to remove 90% of a contaminant from the water should be equal to
its EEO value. The discrepancies between the EEO values and the power required to
remove 90% of any given parameter in this analysis are related to the fact that the Cf for
the EEO value was the actual measured concentration of the parameter observed in
samples treated for 60 minutes whereas the C90 used to calculate the power usage rate
was predicted based on the first order reaction rate constant calculated for each parameter
under different experimental conditions.
339
Cost per Volume
In real world applications and projects, the energy efficiency of different water treatment systems
is often expressed in terms of cost per volume:
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 ($/𝑚3) = 𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑅𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 (𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑚3) × 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 ($ 𝑘𝑊ℎ)⁄⁄ (J.7)
This approach is usually based on the energy requirements of the full treatment system or
process rather than simply the amount of incident light. This is helpful in some ways because it
allows system designers to compare very different treatment options to one another in a holistic
way and also to create site specific cost estimates that can be used by system owners and
operators to choose between different full-scale treatment options. These very advantages,
however, can be drawbacks when the goal is to compare research results from different countries
or jurisdictions that have different currency or energy costs or when comparing bench, pilot, and
full-scale systems, which have differing levels of complexity. For example, in this analysis the
cost of power was assumed to be $0.157/kWh, which was the on-peak cost of energy in Ontario
in May 2017 when this thesis was being written, however, the price has since dropped to
$0.132/kWh (July 17, 2017). Power costs and payment schemes in other Canadian jurisdictions
vary in terms of magnitude and complexity, further complicating the analysis.
Table J.2 shows the approximate cost to reduce the THMfp and HAAfp of the OTW water
matrix by 90% or to GCDWQ guideline levels using P25 and NB 700. The estimates are in
Canadian dollars.
Table J.2 Cost to reduce the THMfp and HAAfp of OTW water via photocatalysis with
P25 and NB 700
Nanomaterial THMfp HAAfp
90% Guideline (100 g/L) 90% Guideline (80 g/L)
P25 $15.70 / m3 $6.27 / m3 $12.85 / m3 $1.57 / m3
NB 700 $7.07 / m3 $3.67 / m3 $8.83 / m3 $ 0.93 / m3
The data in Table J.2 clearly shows that a system employing NB 700 would cost less in terms of
energy than one employing P25. Although not quantified here, NB 700 is also easier to remove
from the water than P25 via filtration (see Section 8.3.5.1 in Chapter 8), which may mean that
the cost of removing the materials via membrane filtration may also be lower. These results can
340
also be used to compare the cost of THMfp reduction using different treatment processes. For
example, Yen and Yen (2015) estimated that removing 90% of the THMfp from their synthetic
water matrix using 10 mg/L H2O2 and a 9 W lamp would cost $1.65/m3 (USD), which translates
to $2.22 CAD/m3 (USD/CAD conversion from June 9, 2017). This is less than the cost of using
P25 or NB 700 to remove THM precursors from OTW water but does not account for the
reuseability of the TiO2 nanomaterials or the fact that the OTW water matrix is more complex
than the synthetic water matrix.
Appendix H includes a detailed cost analysis of the proposed single and two-step treatment
processes that have been proposed based on the results of this project. The proposed systems are
compared to existing water treatment options for NOM removal in terms of energy and materials
costs.
UV Dose / Fluence
Another way to track the progress of photocatalytic treatment processes is based on the UV dose,
or fluence, applied to the sample. Ideally, the UV dose would be calculated based on the incident
light throughout the sample, however, as described in Appendix G of this thesis, in the current
study it is unlikely that the UVA LED light applied to the samples penetrated deeply into them.
As a result, it was assumed that the UV dose could be calculated based on the average irradiance
at the surface of the sample. This was calculated to be 4.9 mW/cm2 using a spreadsheet prepared
by Bolton and Linden (2003) as described in Appendix G. This value was multiplied by the
elapsed time (s) to determine the UV dose or fluence (mJ/cm2) at the surface of the sample as
shown in Equation J.8.
UV Dose (mJ/cm2) = Irradiance (mW 𝑐𝑚2⁄ ) × Time (min) × 60 (s 𝑚𝑖𝑛⁄ ) (J.8)
Figure J.5 shows the effect of photocatalysis with NB 700 on the THMfp of OTB and OTW
water as a function of UV dose.
341
Figure J.5 Reduction of THMfp in OTB and OTW water via photocatalysis with NB
700 as a function of UV dose (fluence)
UV dose is less specific to experimental set-up than time or power/volume and as a result can
more easily be compared to the results of other researchers. It can also be a useful parameter
when comparing different light-based water treatment processes. For example, Autin et al.
(2013) demonstrated that the UV dose (254 nm) required to achieve metaldehyde degradation
was equal for UV/TiO2 and UV/H2O2 in the absence of alkalinity and organics. The addition of
CaCO3 and NOM surrogates increased the UV dose required to achieve metaldehyde removal
via UV/TiO2 but not that required for UV/H2O2 treatment. This demonstrated that UV/TiO2 was
more likely to be negatively impacted by the presence of ROS scavengers than UV/H2O2.
Another UV/H2O2 study showed that approximately 3,000 mJ/cm2 of UV light was required to
reduce the THMfp of a Canadian surface water matrix from 238 g/L to 54 g/L (77%) at an
H2O2 dose of 23 mg/L (Toor and Mohseni, 2007). This is well below the UV dose that was
required to achieve a comparable reduction in THMfp from OTW water using NB 700 (~13,000
mJ/cm2) in the current study, indicating that even in a best-case scenario, the UV dose required
to reduce the DBPfp of surface water via UV/TiO2 is unlikely to be comparable to that required
to reduce it via UV/H2O2. It should, however, be noted that Toor and Mohseni did not observe
any significant removal of THM precursors at a fluence of 3,000 mJ/cm2 at a lower H2O2 dose (4
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
TH
Mfp
(
g/L
)
UV Dose (mJ/cm2)
OTB
OTW
342
mg/L). Also, their experiments made use of a low pressure UV lamp (max irradiance at 254 nm)
but TiO2 can be activated by lower energy wavelengths of up to approximately 380-385 nm.
UV dose only accounts for irradiation-based portion of treatment and therefore may not
accurately reflect the overall cost of different processes. More importantly, however, UV dose
can be a less desirable parameter when comparing photolytic systems that require or employ
different wavelengths, and thus lamps with different energy ratings. In this study, the use of UV
dose as a parameter hides the main advantage of using UVA LEDs -- the fact that they are far
more energy efficient than standard UV germicidal lamps or high intensity UVA lamps. For
example, the study by Autin et al. (2013) took place in a bench-scale UVC collimated beam
apparatus containing four 30 W lamps. This was used to treat a 250 mL sample and the
irradiance at the surface of the sample was 2.23 mW/cm2, thus a fluence of 3,000 mJ/cm2
corresponded to 22.3 minutes of irradiation and a power per volume of 480 kWh/m3. A dose of
3,000 mJ/cm2 in the UVA-LED reactor used in the current study corresponds to an irradiation
time of 10.2 minutes and 54 kWh/m3. The UVA-LEDs used in the reactor cannot be used for
UV/H2O2 process because they only emit light at 365 nm, which is not energetic enough to drive
the formation of OH radicals from H2O2.
Quantum Yield
Quantum yield, also referred to in some publications as quantum efficiency, is the ratio of
chemical products formed (i.e. reaction events) to the number of photons absorbed (Ollis et al.,
2013) and in photocatalytic systems it gives a measure of the efficiency of electron positive hole
utilization (Ohtani, 2010). The quantum yield () is, theoretically, the rate of disappearance of
the substrate (dC/dt) divided by the number of photons absorbed (Ia) as shown in Equation J.9.
Φ =𝑑𝐶
𝑑𝑡⁄
𝐼𝑎 (J.9)
This apparently simple parameter has numerous underlying assumptions, most notably that each
absorbed photon results in a measurable reaction event and that the reaction occurs in a single
electron exchange step. As described by Ohtani (2010), these assumptions are not appropriate for
photocatalytic systems. The adsorption of a photon by a TiO2 particle liberates an electron and a
343
positive electron hole. In most cases, the two recombine without reacting with water, oxygen, or
any other chemical species. When recombination doesn’t occur, the two can react in numerous
ways, some of which may result in the formation of oxidative species capable of participating in
a measurable reaction event. Also, many desirable oxidation reactions (e.g. the degradation of
DBP precursors) are multi-electron, multi-step reactions.
The determination of Ia can also present challenges because TiO2 nanoparticles both absorb and
scatter light. The number of photons absorbed, rather than scattered, can be determined by
measuring the diffuse reflectance, which describes the proportion of the total incident photons
that are scattered vs. those absorbed, using a UV Vis spectrophotometer equipped with an
integrating sphere. Even when the ratio of scattered to absorbed photons is known, however, it is
only possible to determine apparent quantum efficiencies (Kisch and Bahnemann, 2015) and the
apparent quantum efficiency (also known as the photonic efficiency) are more commonly used to
characterize light utilization in photocatalytic systems.
Finally, many target contaminants, including DBP precursors and indicator dyes such as
methylene blue, also absorb light. As shown in Figure J.6, the methylene blue and OTB and
OTW water matrices had transmittances of nearly 100% at 365 nm, the wavelength emitted by
the UVA LEDs used in the current study, so absorption and scattering of incident light by the
target contaminants in this study was likely negligible, however, in general the fact that target
contaminants can themselves absorb and scatter light further complicates the calculation and
validity of quantum efficiency in many systems.
344
Figure J.6 Transmittance of light through 10 mg/L methylene blue solution and the two
raw water matrices used in this project
Photonic Efficiency
The complexity of quantifying light absorption by photocatalysts has led to many researchers
choosing to characterize their systems based on photonic efficiency () rather than quantum
efficiency. Photonic efficiency is essentially the same as quantum efficiency, however, it is
calculated based on the amount of light hitting the photocatalyst rather than the amount of light
absorbed.
𝜉 =𝑑𝐶
𝑑𝑡⁄
𝐼𝑖 (J.10)
Where dC/dt is the rate of degradation of the target substrate and Ii is the incident light reaching
each nanoparticle. Ii can be difficult to determine because TiO2 nanomaterials can both absorb
and scatter light and different nanomaterials may behave differently in this regard. The photonic
efficiency equation implicitly assumes that all samples absorb the same proportion of the total
incident photons (Kisch and Bahnemann, 2015), an unlikely situation in experiments using
multiple types and doses of TiO2 nanomaterials (see Figure J.7).
0
20
40
60
80
100
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
(%
)
Wavelength (nm)
Methylene Blue (10 mg/L) OTB OTW
345
Figure J.7 Absorbance of UV and visible light by 0.05 g/L and 0.1 g/L of P25
nanoparticles and 0.1 g/L of NB 550 and NB 700 suspended in MilliQ water
As described in Appendix G of this thesis, at the TiO2 doses used in this study light penetration
into the sample was likely minimal. It should therefore be possible to assume that all, or at least
the majority, of the photocatalytic activity in the experiment is taking place at the surface of the
sample and may approximate a thin film.
Mills (2012) described the use of photonic efficiency calculated from methylene blue
degradation to compare the performance of photocatalytic films using Equation J.11.
𝜉𝑀𝐵 =𝑑𝐶𝑀𝐵
𝑑𝑡⁄
𝐼𝑖 (J.11)
Where dCMB/dt has units of molecules/cm2/s and Ii has units of photons/cm2/s. Equation J.11 was
used to calculate the photonic efficiencies of P25 (6.0%), NB 550 (1.5%), and NB 700 (6.3%).
This trend is in line with other measures of photoactivity used in the current study, which have
consistently indicated that NB 700 is more photoactive than P25 and NB 550. The implication of
this is that a system employing NB 700 would likely be more energy efficient than one
employing P25 or NB 550. These photonic efficiency values predicted in the current study are
higher than by Mills (< 0.1%) but this might be a function of the experimental setup in the
current study, which employs a stronger lamp and a higher initial concentration of methylene
blue. Also, unlike the systems described by Mills, where the TiO2 nanoparticles are affixed to a
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Ab
sorb
an
ce (
1/c
m)
Wavelength (nm)
P25 (0.05 g/L) P25 (0.1 g/L) NB 550 NB 700
346
solid support, the batch reactors used in the current study contained completely mixed
suspensions of TiO2. As a result, the actual amount of surface area of TiO2 available for reaction
was likely greater than would be available on an immobilized film. Finally, the constant mixing
of the samples in the current study likely resulted in a regular cycling of the nanomaterials from
the surface of the sample to deeper within its volume, and consequently, a constant
replenishment of nanomaterials at the surface of the sample.
Indeed, a recent study employing batch reactors and a different dye (Maxilon Blue) reported
photonic efficiencies for anatase TiO2 nanoparticles were within the same order of magnitude as
those obtained in the current study (Alrobayi et al., 2017). They employed the following
equations to determine a “relative” photonic efficiency based on the irradiance at the surface of
their completely mixed batch samples:
𝜉 =𝑅 × 𝑉
𝐼𝑜 × 𝐴 (J.12)
Where R is the rate of the first order degradation reaction (mg/L/min), V is the volume of the
batch sample (L), A is the irradiated area (cm2), and Io can be calculated from Equation J.13:
𝐼𝑜 =𝐼 × 𝜆
𝑁𝑎× ℎ × 𝑐 (J.13)
In Equation J.13, I is the irradiance at the surface of the sample (mW/cm2), is the wavelength
of the incident light (m), Na is Avogadro’s number, h is the Planck constant, and c is the speed of
light in space (m/s). The relative photonic efficiencies for P25 (5.6%), NB 550 (1.5%), and NB
700 (6.0%) calculated using equations J.12 and J.13 were within 0.4% of the photonic
efficiencies calculated using Equation J.11, indicating that both mathematical approaches yield
similar results and trends.
Although the relative photonic efficiencies reported for anatase nanoparticles by Alrobayi et al.
(2017) were generally between 2 and 6%, most of their experiments employed higher doses of
TiO2 and irradiances than the current study. The relative photonic efficiency reported by
Alrobayi et al. at a TiO2 dose of 0.25 g/L, an irradiance of 5 mW/cm2, and pH of 6.55 (~ 1%)
was lower than those reported for the predominantly anatase NB 700 LEN in the current study.
This is likely due to differences in the experimental set-up, which include different batch
volumes, mixing rates, light type and intensity, and indicator dye, among others.
347
Reaction Pathways
The methods of comparison described above are relatively simple and widely used in the
scientific literature, however, they do not distinguish between the various oxidative processes
occurring in photocatalytic systems and are usually specific to the experimental apparatus and
conditions used by the researchers. The rate at which a given contaminant is oxidized in a
photocatalytic system is a function of:
Direct photolysis
Photocatalytic degradation by electron holes on the surface of the particle
Photocatalytic degradation by OH radicals adsorbed to the surface of the particle
Photocatalytic degradation by other ROS adsorbed to the surface of the particle
The amount of the contaminant adsorbed to the particle (coverage) will also affect the rate of
degradation.
In theory, it is possible to isolate and quantify each of these pathways to better understand the
behavior of the photocatalytic system as described in Section 2.2.2 of Chapter 2 of this thesis. In
the future, it would be interesting to apply some of these methods to determine whether different
photocatalytic materials are more likely to produce different degradation pathways. For example,
in this study, NB 700 had the lowest surface area but the highest overall reactivity, but, beyond
the fact that it contains a higher proportion of anatase than the other nanomaterials used in this
study, the specific reasons for its excellent performance remained unclear and/or speculative
until preliminary ·OH radical formation tests were conducted in June and July of 2017. The
results of this testing showed that the pure anatase LENs (NB 130/700 and NB 240/700)
produced far more ·OH radicals than the mixed phase LENs (NB 130/550 and NB 240/550) did.
As discussed in Chapter 6 of this document, there was a clear linear relationship between the
rates of ·OH radical production and NOM degradation rates, especially when the latter were
normalized to the available surface area. This suggests that these normalized degradation rates
were a good predictor of the amount of NOM degradation occurring as a result of ·OH radical-
mediated reactions. Any additional degradation must have taken place as a result of reactions
mediated by other ROS (e.g. superoxide radical) or photogenerated holes on the surface of the
photocatalyst. Additional testing is required to confirm which of these processes dominated for
each of the nanomaterials used in this study.
348
Modeling the Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Contaminants
The focus of this project was the development, characterization, and proof-of-concept
application of novel linear engineered nanomaterials for the removal of disinfection byproduct
precursors from real surface water matrices. The results were analyzed to determine adsorption
time and isotherms as well as apparent reaction kinetics and efforts were made to explain the
findings based on the characteristics of the nanomaterials and water matrices employed. In depth
modeling of the adsorption and degradation of DBP precursors by the nanomaterials was outside
the scope of the current project, but would be a worthwhile direction to pursue in the future.
Research groups from numerous fields have attempted to develop models that can account for
the many different processes taking place in aqueous photocatalytic systems. Malato et al. (2009)
proposed a simple method based on three main processes:
Photoactivation: 𝑇𝑖𝑂2 + ℎ𝑣𝑘𝑓→ 𝑒− + ℎ+ (J.14)
Recombination: 𝑒− + ℎ+𝑘𝑟→ 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 (J.15)
Oxidation of reactant: ℎ+(𝑜𝑟 ∙ 𝑂𝐻) + 𝑅 𝑘𝑜→ 𝑅1 (J.16)
The researchers extended this to include the effect of irradiation intensity and dissolved oxygen
concentration. The model was later applied by Loeb (2013) in an effort to predict the steady state
formation rate of hydroxyl radicals.
The model proposed by Malato et al. does not, however, account for adsorption effects or the
effects of inhibitory species such as ROS scavengers and competitive adsorbates. A recent paper
by Brame et al. (2015) proposed a complex model for the degradation of organic contaminants
by UV/TiO2 processes. The model, which assumes that adsorption occurs according to the
Langmuir Hinshelwood model, that adsorption capacity (i.e. KA) is independent of irradiation,
that the concentration of ROS in the bulk solution and at the surface is at steady state, and that
degradation reactions take place according to a bi-molecular second order reaction between ROS
and the target contaminant. Brame et al. (2015) assumed that degradation could occur at the
surface or within the bulk water matrix:
349
𝑑𝐶𝐴
𝑑𝑡= −𝑘𝐴𝐶𝑅𝑂𝑆,𝐵𝐶𝐴 −
𝑘𝐴𝐶𝑅𝑂𝑆,𝑆𝐾𝐴𝐶𝐴
1+𝐾𝐴𝐶𝐴 (J.17)
Where dCA/dt is the overall rate of degradation of contaminant A, kA is the degradation rate
constant, KA is the adsorption constant, CROS,B is the concentration of ROS in the bulk water
matrix and CROS,S is the concentration of ROS at the surface.
Through many steps and various assumptions, many of them well supported, Brame et al.
developed a model that accounts for:
ROS mediated degradation in the bulk solution
Adsorption interactions
Degradation of contaminants at the TiO2 surface by adsorbed ROS and photo-generated
holes (combined for simplicity)
Decrease in degradation due to ROS scavengers
Decrease in degradation due to competitive adsorption
Decrease in degradation due to absorption of light by water matrix components (light
attenuation)
The final model proposed by Brame et al. (2015) reads as follows:
𝑑𝐶𝑎
𝑑𝑡=
−𝑃𝑅𝑂𝑆,0
1+𝑘𝑁𝐶𝑁(𝐹+𝐾𝑁𝑆)
𝑘𝐴𝐶𝐴(𝐹+𝐾𝐴𝑆)
10−𝜇ℓ𝐶𝑁 (J.18)
Where PROS is the rate of ROS production, PROS,O is the rate of ROS production in the absence of
any other light absorbing species (light attenuation), 10-lCN is a multiplier to account for light
attenuation, and CN, kN, and KN refer to the concentration, reaction rate constant, and adsorption
constant for inhibitory compound N. The terms F and S are defined as follows (D is the diffusion
coefficient of ROS in the bulk medium):
𝐹 = 1
1+𝑘𝐴𝐶𝐴+𝑘𝑁𝐶𝑁
𝐷
(J.19)
𝑆 =1
1+𝐾𝐴𝐶𝐴+𝐾𝑁𝐶𝑁 (J.20)
The full derivation of the Brame et al. model has been omitted from this document in the interest
of simplicity. The thoroughness of the model is impressive, however, its application to a specific
350
system is no small feat. An extensive array of experiments must be conducted to accurately
calculate the reaction rate and adsorption constants for the target contaminant and the various
inhibitory compounds that may be present in the water matrix. These experiments were well
outside the scope of the current project, however, it may be a useful starting point for future
projects.
A Model to Predict Energy Requirements
As was alluded to earlier in this appendix, it is difficult to compare the results of the current
project to those reported by other AOP researchers, particularly in terms of energy usage,
because the reaction rates observed in each study are a function of the experimental set-up used.
The only way to avoid this would be to directly link the overall degradation rate of the target
contaminant to the number of photons that hit the nanoparticle and result in the formation of
useful oxidative species. As described previously, this is not a simple proposition because of the
numerous oxidative species formed in photocatalytic systems, the importance of adsorption to
the overall degradation process, and the various ROS scavengers, adsorption competitors, and
other interfering constituents that occur in natural water matrices. A simplified model showing
some of the important factors that need to be taken into account is provided in Figure J.8. Please
note that the overall observed degradation rate as defined in this model is the sum of the
following:
A: Apparent degradation rate via hydroxyl-radical-mediated reactions
B: Apparent degradation rate via direct electron-hole-mediated reactions
C: Apparent degradation rate via superoxide-mediated reactions
The simplified model in Figure J.8 does not account for the following:
Nanoparticle agglomeration and subsequent effects on available surface area
The complex and interrelated nature of the reactions between electrons, electron holes,
oxygen, and water molecules that give rise to the various ROS
ROS other than hydroxyl and superoxide radicals
Formation of secondary radicals within the bulk water matrix
351
Figure J.8 Simplified model describing the degradation of an organic contaminant via TiO2 photocatalysis
352
References
Alrobayi, E.M., Algubili, A.M., Aljeboree, A.M., Alkaim, A.F., Hussein, F.H. (2017)
Investigation of photocatalytic removal and photonic efficiency of maxilon blue dye GRL in the
presence of TiO2 nanoparticles, Particulate Science and Technology, 35 (1), 14-20
Autin, O., Hart, J., Jarvis, P., MacAdam, J., Parsons, S.A., Jefferson, B. (2013) The impact of
background organic matter and alkalinity on the degradation of the pesticide metaldehyde by two
advanced oxidation processes: UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2, Water Research, 47, 2041-2049
Bolton, J.R. and Linden, K.G. (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose)
determination in bench-scale UV experiments, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129, 209-
215
Bolton, J.R. and Cotton, C.A. (2008) Ultraviolet Disinfection Handbook, American Water Works
Association, Colorado, USA
Brame, J., Long, M., Li, Q., Alvarez, P. (2015) Inhibitory effect of natural organic matter or
other background constituents on photocatalytic advanced oxidation processes: Mechanistic
model development and validation, Water Research, 84, 362-371
Collins, J. and Bolton, J.R. (2016) The Advanced Oxidation Handbook, American Water Works
Association, Denver, CO
Gerrity, D., Mayer, B., Ryu, H., Crittenden, J., and Abbaszadegan, M. (2009) A comparison of
pilot-scale photocatalysis and enhanced coagulation for disinfection byproduct mitigation, Water
Research, 43, pp. 1597-1610
Health Canada (2017) Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality – Summary Table,
Water and Air Quality Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health
Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
Kisch, H. and Bahnemann, D. (2015) Best practice in photocatalysis: Comparing rates or
apparent quantum yields? The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 6, 1907-1910
353
Liu, S., Lim, M., Fabris, R., Chow, C., Drikas, M., Amal, R. (2008A) TiO2 photocatalysis of
natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation
potential, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 6218-6223
Loeb, S. (2013) Nanostructured Photocatalysis for Water Purification, MASc Thesis, University
of Toronto
Malato, S., Fernandez-Ibanez, P., Maldonado, M.I., Blanco, J., and Gernjak, W. (2009)
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends,
Catalysis Today, 147, 1-59
Mills, A. (2012), An overview of the methylene blue ISO test for assessing the activities of
photocatalytic films, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 128, pp. 144-149
Ohtani, B. (2010) Photocatalysis A to Z, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C:
Photochemistry Reviews, 11, 157-178
Ollis, D. (2013) Photocatalytic treatment of water: Irradiance influences, in: Photocatalysis and
Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent Applications, Ed. Pichat, P., Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH and Co.
Toor, R. and Mohseni, M. (2007) UV-H2O2 based AOP and its integration with biological
activated carbon treatment for DBP reduction in drinking water, Chemosphere, 66, pp. 2087-
2095
Yen, H.Y. and Yen, L. S. (2015) Reducing THMfp by H2O2/UV oxidation for humic acid of
small molecular weight, Environmental Technology, 36 (4), 417-423