development control unit meting no 34

32
Development Control Unit Meting No 34 23 October 2019 at 11am Hunter's Hill Council

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jan-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Development Control Unit Meting

No 34 23 October 2019 at 11am

Hunter 's H i l l Counc i l

ORDER OF BUSINESS

Attendance, Apologies,

Declarations of Interests

1 Confirmation of Minutes

2 Development Applications

Item Page 3

HUNTER'S HILL COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL UNIT

23 October 2019

INDEX

1 – CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

1 Confirmation of Minutes of Development Control Unit 33 held 16 October 2019

2 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

2.1 37 Alexandra Street, Hunters Hill 1

3 - PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 23 October 2019

Minutes of the Development Control Unit held on 16 October 2019. This is page 1

COMMENCEMENT

The meeting opened at approximately 11.00am.

LIST OF ATTENDEES

Steve Kourepis Director, Development & Regulatory Services (Chair)

Kerry Smith Senior Development Officer

Shahram Zadgan Development Assessment Officer

Josephine Petitto Administration Officer

Joshua Zuffrey Trainee Administration Officer

APOLOGIES

No apologies were received.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

No declarations of interest

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

RECOMMENDATION

The Minutes of Development Control Unit of previous Meeting DCU 032 held on 25 September 2019 were read and accepted.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

2.1 11:00 - 15 MAYFIELD AVENUE, WOOLWICH

PROCEEDINGS IN BRIEF

Joe Vescio – Applicant Alan Kempster – Architect Ms Cheong - Owner Mr and Mrs Garnett - 13 Mayfield Avenue Ms Pagliaro - 9 Mayfield Avenue Mr Scott Barwick – Town planner on behalf of 13 Mayfield Avenue

RECOMMENDATION

The matter was deferred for a site inspection to take place in two weeks on Wednesday 30 October at 11am.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 23 October 2019

Minutes of the Development Control Unit held on 16 October 2019. This is page 2

2.2 11:30 AM - 6 PASSY AVENUE, HUNTERS HILL

PROCEEDINGS IN BRIEF

ATTENDEE

Scott Gandy – Applicant

DETERMINATION

A. That the development application No.2019/1009 for the carrying out of

partial demolition and alterations and additions including the demolition of the rear of the dwelling, new garage, removal of three trees, single car garage, swimming pool and front fence be granted a “Deferred commencement” consent pursuant to Section 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 in respect of No.6 Passy Avenue, Hunters Hill.

The development consent as contained in Schedule 2 shall not operate (nor be issued) until such time as the matters contained in Schedule 1 are finalised to the satisfaction of Council. Schedule 1 1. A Landscape Plan shall be prepared and submitted to Council for

assessment. The Landscape Plan should be prepared by a Landscape Architect/Horticulturalist (Australian Qualifications Framework Level 5). The Landscape Plan should include the following:

Site boundaries and dimensions surveyed.

North point and scale.

Existing and proposed levels.

Location of all proposed and existing planting delineating existing trees to be retained, removed or transplanted. Trees within 4m of the site boundary should also be accurately plotted.

A detailed planting schedule including species by botanical and common names, quantities, container sizes and estimated size at maturity.

Details of planting procedures.

Details of earthworks including mounding, retaining walls, and planter boxes with details of existing and proposed finished heights for all elements (top and bottom of walls, garden beds, soil levels before and after the landscaping works)and being submitted to Council with three sets of hard copies and the USB electronic details prior to the release of stamped approved plans.

2. The proposed two storey additions at the south western corner of the

dwelling being redesigned so as to be setback a minimum of 1.5 metres from the southern boundary as required under clause 3.3.3 of DCP 2013 and being submitted to Council with three sets of hard copies and the USB electronic details prior to the release of stamped approved plans.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 23 October 2019

Minutes of the Development Control Unit held on 16 October 2019. This is page 3

3. The proposed pool pump enclosure being suitably resited away from the

northern boundary of the site for the protection of the amenity of the residents of the adjoining premises to the north and being submitted to Council with three sets of hard copies and the USB electronic details prior to the release of stamped approved plans.

Schedule 2

B. That Development Application No. 2019/1009 for the carrying out of

partial demolition and alterations and additions including the demolition of the rear of the dwelling, new garage, removal of three trees, single car garage, swimming pool and front fence at No.6 Passy Avenue, Hunters Hill, be approved, subject to the following conditions

Drawing Number Drawn By Plan Dated

Council Date

d

Proposed Site/Landscape Area Calculation Dwg. No.03 STG 5

House Plans by Design 4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Proposed Ground Floor Dwg. No.05 STG 5

4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Proposed First Floor Plan Dwg. No. 07 STG 5

4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Proposed Elevations Dwg. No.10 STG 5

4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Proposed Elevations Dwg. 11 STG 5

4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Sections Dwg. No.12 STG 5

4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Schedule of Colours & Materials

Undated 19

Feb 2019

Details of compliance with BASIX Cert. A317415_03 4 Aug 2019 6

Aug 2019

Special Conditions Part A No.8. Prior to the issuing of an Occupation Certificate, the

applicant must meet the full cost for Council or Council approved contractor to repair/replace any damaged sections of Council’s footpath, kerb & gutter, nature strip etc. which are due to building works being carried out at the subject site. This includes the removal of cement slurry from Council’s footpath and roadway.

Part A No.9. The applicant shall note that all external work carried out on

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 23 October 2019

Minutes of the Development Control Unit held on 16 October 2019. This is page 4

Council property shall be in accordance with Council’s Guidelines and Specifications for “Driveways and Footpaths”.

PCW Tree Protection

Tree No/ Location Species TPZ (m)

Tree 1 Sapium sebiferum 2m

Tree 2 Platanus x hybrid 7.2m

Tree 3 Quercus robur 3.6m

Tree 4 Camellia sp. 2m

Tree 7 Liquidambar styraciflua 8.4m

Tree 8 Syagrus romanzoffiana 2m

Tree 9 Archontophoenix alexandrae 2m

Tree 10 Glochidion ferdinandi 7.2m

Tree 12 Liriodendron tulipifera, 5.4m

Tree 13 Glochidion ferdinandi 6m

Tree 14 Brachychiton acerifolius, 4.2m

Tree 15 Brachychiton acerifolius, 2m

Tree 16 Acer negundo 7.2m

Tree 17 Plumeria rubra 2m

Tree 18 Camellia sp. 2m

Tree 20 Celtis sp. 2m

The trees listed above in (a) shall be retained and protected in accordance with the Arboricultural Impact Appraisal and Method Statement (prepared by Naturally Trees, dated 21 June 2019, date stamped 8 July 2019) The following works are excluded from within the TPZ, unless otherwise stated. * Grade alterations

* Soil cultivation, disturbance or compaction

* Stockpiling, storage, disposal or mixing of materials

* Refuelling of machinery or vehicles

* Washing of machinery or vehicles

* Pedestrian access or vehicular access

* Siting of offices, sheds or temporary services

* Any action that has the potential to impact the tree’s health and structural condition

PCC Construction Methodology Driveway

(a) All works within the TPZ of the Tree 7 Liquidambar styraciflua and Tree 10 Glochidion ferdinandi shall be under the supervision of the Project Arborist.

(b) The driveway shall be designed above grade within the

tree’s TPZ, on a no-fines sub-base. The driveway material

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 23 October 2019

Minutes of the Development Control Unit held on 16 October 2019. This is page 5

should be a porous paver, or similar, to allow for water infiltration.

(c) No excavations shall occur within the Structural Root Zone

or Tree Protection Zone of Tree 7 Liquidambar styraciflua and Tree 10 Glochidion ferdinandi.

Standard Conditions: GEN0 GEN1 GEN3 GEN5 GEN6 GEN7 GEN20 GEN21 PCC0 PCC1($619.00) PCC2($3,072.00) PCC3($2,600.00) PCC4($2,816.00) PCC5 ($11,768.00) PCC11 PCC12 (A317415_03 dated 4 August 2019) PCC13 PCC16 PCC17 PCC18 PCC20 PCC21 PCC40 PCC41 PCC54 PCC55 PCW0 PCW1 PCW2 PCW3 PCW4 PCW5 PCW6 PCW14 PCW17 CSI0 CSI1 CSI3 CSI7 DEM0 DEM1 DEM3 DEM4 DEM5 DEM6 DEM7 DEM8 DEM9 DEM10 DEM11 CON0 CON1 CON2 CON3 CON5 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 CON11 CON12 CON13 CON14 CON17 CON18 CON19 CON20 CON21 CON23 CON41 CON42 CON43 CON44 CON45 CON47 CON50 (specified trees to be removed) CON51 CON52 CON53 CON54 CON55 CON56 CON57 CON58 CON59 CON60 CON61 CON62 POC0 POC1 POC2 POC3 (A317415_03 dated 4 August 2019) POC4 POC7 POC8 POC10 POC13 POC14 POC25 POC28 POC75.

The meeting closed at approximately 11.40AM.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 1

ITEM NO : 2.1

SUBJECT : 37 ALEXANDRA STREET, HUNTERS HILL

STRATEGIC OUTCOME : MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER AND AMENITY OF HUNTERS HILL

ACTION : ALL BUILDING WORK COMPLIES WITH COUNCIL REGULATIONS

REPORTING OFFICER : KERRY SMITH

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO

2019-1068

PROPOSAL USE OF GROUND FLOOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF A PATISSERIE AND BOULANGERIE/CAFE

APPLICANT DAVID ALLISON

OWNER JMR CRANE PTY LTD

DATE LODGED 27 JUNE 2019

Ref:437569

INTRODUCTION 1. SUMMARY Reasons for Report The proposal resulted in three (3) submissions being received in response to the neighbour notification process. REPORT Issues

On-street parking

Noise emission

Waste collection

Business conflicts Submissions Three (3) submissions were received. Recommendation

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 2

The application is recommended for approval for reasons that it is acceptable having regard to:

1. It is permissible under the zoning 2. It complies with the relevant planning objectives contained in Hunters Hill

Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013

3. It will not have adverse effects on the amenity of adjoining properties.

2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL It is proposed to use the ground floor of the subject premises (Building ‘A’) for the purpose of a patisserie/boulangerie/bakery/café. The ground floor of the building will be used for food preparation, wash basin and dishwasher, refrigerator, service, coffee machine and food display. A table for twelve(12) patrons will be installed within the building An area of 55.3sqm in front of the building will be used for non-permanent external seating with umbrellas for twenty four (24) customers as well as the installation of planter boxes. Four (4) persons will be employed in conjunction with this use and the hours of operation will be between 6.00am and 4.00pm daily. Signs will be provided on the upper level of the ground floor windows along with menu boards mounted flush on the building. The flagpole will be removed from the front of the building. The DA form states that there will be one (1) off-street car parking space and one (1) loading space 3. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND LOCALITY The premises are known as No.37 Alexandra Street, Hunters Hill and are legally described as Lot 1 in DP 924009. The site is located on the southern side between Ferry Street and Ellesmere Avenue. It has an area of 1050sqm with a frontage of 38.8 metres to Alexandra Street and 51.0 metres to Ferry Street. The subject portion of this building was last used as a retail gift shop. The subject building is the north western two storey structure on the overall site with the other two free-standing buildings being the two storey ‘Garibaldi Inn’ at the Ferry Street intersection and the southernmost building being a later two storey retail/commercial building. A total of sixteen (16) car parking spaces are provided overall at basement level.

4. PROPERTY HISTORY

No relevant DA or building history. The first floor of this building was recently approved for the purpose of a pilates studio.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 3

No relevant DA or building history. The first floor of this building was recently approved for the purpose of a pilates studio 5. STATUTORY CONTROLS Relevant Statutory Instruments Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 Local Environmental Plan 2012 Zone: Neighbourhood Centre B1 Conservation Area: Yes River Front Area: No SREP (Sydney Harbour Catchment 2005): No Development Control Plan 2013: Yes Listed Heritage item: Yes Contributory Building: No Vicinity of Heritage Item: Yes 6. POLICY CONTROLS Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013 7. REFERRALS 7.1 External Approval Bodies The applicant approached the NSW Office of Environment & Heritage resulting in a letter dated 19 June 2019 from the Heritage Division giving an exemption from the need for separate approval as Integrated development under the Heritage Act 1977. 7.2 Health & Building The application was referred to Council’s Environmental Health and Building Surveyor who advised by memo that there are no health and building objections subject to compliance with standard conditions as set out below. 7.3 Heritage As stated within the body of the report, the property is a heritage item and/or is in a conservation area under Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012. The proposal was referred to Council’s Heritage Advisor who provided the following comments: Heritage Status: State Heritage register Item 00135, Local Item No 1, Within Hunters Hill Conservation Area C1 (“The Peninsula”); Heritage Items within the vicinity include 33,35,39,54 Alexandra Street.

Proposal: Internal fit-out changes and use of first floor of Building A as a Pilates Studio.

Statement of Heritage Impact: by Modern Heritage Matters- O.K.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 4

Comments: the proposed works and use are to a building on the site of the Garibaldi that was erected as part of the 1980s development of the site. There will therefore be no impact on significant fabric, on the setting of the Garibaldi itself, nor on the Conservation Area, and heritage items within the vicinity. Recommendation: Approval. The application was not forwarded to the Conservation Advisory Panel as no external building works were proposed. 7.4 Works & Services The application was referred to Council’s Design and Development Engineer who raised no engineering objections to the proposal. 7.5 Parks & Landscape The application was referred to Council’s Tree Consultants who advised by memo that there are no landscaping requirements for this proposal. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDER S.79C The relevant matters for consideration under section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are assessed under the following headings. 9. STATE INSTRUMENTS / LEGISLATION 9.1 State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) Not applicable. 9.2 Regional Environmental Plans (REPs) – Deemed SEPPs Not applicable. 9.3 Other Legislation Not Applicable. 10. HUNTERS HILL LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN 2012 10.1 Aims and Objectives of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Zone The proposal is permissible with consent under Zone Neighbourhood Centre B1 and complies with the relevant statutory controls of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012. 10.2 Statutory Compliance Table Not applicable as no building works are involved.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 5

10.3 Site Area Requirements The proposal complies with these requirements. 10.4 Residential flat buildings and low-rise multi-unit housing-density and garden area controls Not Applicable. 10.5 Height of Buildings Not Applicable. 10.6 Landscaped Area Not Applicable. 10.7 Subdivision Lot Size Not Applicable. 10.8 Floor Space Ratio No change proposed. 10.9 Street Frontage Not Applicable 10.10 Dual Occupancy Not Applicable 10.11 Foreshore Building Lines Not Applicable 10.12 River Front Area Not Applicable. . 10.13 Other Special Clauses / Development Standards Not Applicable. 11. DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO STATUTORY CONTROLS No relevant draft amendments pertaining to this application.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 6

12. DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLANS (DCPs) 12.1 Compliance Table Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013 (DCP) Not applicable as no building works are involved. Planning Policy – All Development The proposal complies with the relevant objectives, design parameters and preferred design elements under Parts 2 and 3 of Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013. Heritage Conservation Areas The proposal complies with the relevant objectives under Part 2 of Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013. River Front Area Not Applicable. Height No change proposed. Front, Side & Rear Setbacks Not Applicable. Landscaped Area Not Applicable Solar Access No change proposed. Privacy No change proposed. Views Not Applicable. Car Parking With no change to the off-street parking/loading facilities for the site, it is considered that the existing facilities on the site are deemed reasonable in the circumstances for this change of use of part of the existing building from a gift shop to a bakery type café. There is therefore considered to be ample on-street parking available around this commercially used locality which will cope with the likely demands of this use and not create an amenity problem for the nearby residents and commercial premises around the site.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 7

Garages & Carports No change proposed to the existing basement level off-street parking and loading facilities for the subject premises Fences No change proposed. 12.2 Other DCPs, Codes and Policies Not applicable

13. THE LIKELY IMPACTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT The proposal is considered not to unreasonably impact upon the amenity of the adjoining properties or the Alexandra Street or the Ferry Street streetscapes. As stated within the body of the report, the proposal would be reasonable for this change of use of this part of the commercial building. It does not breach any development standards under LEP 2012 relative to the use proposed on a section of the dwelling last used as an estate agency. Further, the propose use is permissible with Council’s consent within the Neighbourhood Centre B1 zoned area. It is considered that the proposed change of use gives compliance to the objectives set under Part 2 of LEP 2012 for this zoned area. Which includes the maximization of levels of business activity along street frontages and to provide a range of small scale business uses that serve the needs of people who live and work in the surrounding neighbourhood. There would be no undue impact upon the natural and built environment within the vicinity of the subject site as a result of the proposed works relative to traffic generation, the emission of noise or otherwise. Furthermore, there would be no undue social and economic impacts to the locality as a result of the proposed development and subject to compliance with the conditions of consent.

On balance, it is considered that the development which involves additions and alterations to the existing dwelling house will have minimal amenity impacts on the residents of the adjoining and nearby properties. It is therefore considered reasonable for approval in this instance subject to conditions as set out in the recommendation.

14. SUBMISSIONS The proposed development was notified in accordance with Council’s Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013 for a period of fourteen (14) days commencing on the 19 July 2019. Within the specified time period three (3) submissions were received. Copies of the submissions are attached to the report.

NOTIFICATION REQUIRED YES

NUMBER NOTIFIED 32

SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED Name & Address of Respondents

SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS

Rev. Michael Armstrong Anglican Parish of Hunters Hill 2 Ambrose Street HUNTERS HILL

Car parking is becoming an increasing issue, particularly on Ambrose Street

We are also conscious there is no crossing in the area – increases the risk of incidents

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 8

Our concern and our desire , to see a greater mix of businesses in this area noting that there are already three café/restaurants in that immediate area, all of whom inform us that they are struggling to continue in business

We wish to see Council have a policy that ensures diversity of retailers, which in turn ensures longevity

John Garofolo(Ottimo 35 Alexandra Street HUNTERS HILL

This is a bad idea as we are in a peninsula with more than enough sites to purchase a coffee and food from various restaurants including the Woolwich Pier hotel.

It is my belief an additional café will only end with one of the existing shops or the new one closing their doors

Sarah Offen 2 Foss Street HUNTERS HILL

We know from experience that noise from the location behind the proposed site is funnelled directly through our property on Foss Street

Citing 16 car parking spaces available on-site is surely fanciful for the development. Similarly fanciful is the idea that this business will encourage pedestrian activity and use of public transport

We would like to see a condition of approval for this development and existing businesses to ensure that staff, patrons and service vehicles do not park in Foss Street nor use it as a shortcut

We suggest that all service vehicles be required to use for deliveries, collections etc either Alexandra Street or the driveway into the basement on Ferry Street. To facilitate this, it would be reasonable to create a loading zone on Alexandra Street to service the proposed and existing businesses in this location. Currently, the No Standing zone at the top of Foss Street is often used for this purpose

The existing business in this location did not generate food and bottle waste

The proposed 6am opening hour 7 days a week further means that enforced conditions need to be in place to ensure that general business noise and noise from traffic, parking and patrons do not interfere with the rights of neighbouring residents to the peaceful enjoyment of the property

The main issues of concern outlining the objections are discussed below:

Car parking is becoming an increasing issue, particularly on Ambrose Street

Comment: It is considered that on-street parking generally around this locality provides adequately for the locality’s demand and a refusal on this basis could not be reasonably substantiated. It is also considered that but is not to a point where the situation has become critical to warrant parking restrictions to be imposed which would only transfer the problem to locations further removed from the subject site. This latter situation would be a matter to be separately referred to Council’s Traffic Committee with proper evidence to back up such a claim.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 9

We are also conscious there is no crossing in the area – increases the risk of incidents

Comment: This is a matter separate from this particular application. However, any person may make an approach to Council’s traffic committee with sufficient evidence to have this traffic control matter reviewed.

Our concern and our desire, to see a greater mix of businesses in this area noting that there are already three café/restaurants in that immediate area, all of whom inform us that they are struggling to continue in business

Comment: This is not a legal head of consideration for Council subject to the implementation of the land use table of LEP 2012 to ensure that generally uses that are deemed prohibited are not approved. Strictly this is a matter between the land owner and a prospective tenant.

We wish to see Council have a policy that ensures diversity of retailers, which in turn ensures longevity

Comment: At this stage, the control for use of buildings on the site effectively rests with the landowner and the commercial market forces. Council is not in a position to control land usage apart from the land use table of LEP 2012.

This is a bad idea as we are in a peninsula with more than enough sites to purchase a coffee and food from various restaurants including the Woolwich Pier hotel

Comments: See comments above relating to this issue raised.

It is my belief an additional café will only end with one of the existing shops or the new one closing their doors

Comment: The viability or otherwise of this and other uses of the business locality is not one of Council’s legal responsibility.

We know from experience that noise from the location behind the proposed site is funnelled directly through our property on Foss Street

Comment: There will always be noise emitted from some commercial uses of building that will have some detrimental effect on the amenity of nearby residents. In this case, there are conditions set out in the recommendation to minimise the effects of such noise emission.

Citing 16 car parking spaces available on-site is surely fanciful for the development. Similarly fanciful is the idea that this business will encourage pedestrian activity and use of public transport

Comment: The existing situation of inadequate off street parking facilities that has been in place in this commercially zoned area for many years in relation to off street parking is one that if used for a refusal by Council would be unlikely to be supported under appeal to the Land & Environment Court.

We would like to see a condition of approval for this development and existing businesses to ensure that staff, patrons and service vehicles do not park in Foss Street nor use it as a shortcut

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 10

Comment: This suggestion while appreciated by Council would not be one as a condition that could be enforced and hence would not be recommended ass part of this approval.

We suggest that all service vehicles be required to use for deliveries, collections etc either Alexandra Street or the driveway into the basement on Ferry Street. To facilitate this, it would be reasonable to create a loading zone on Alexandra Street to service the proposed and existing businesses in this location. Currently, the No Standing zone at the top of Foss Street is often used for this purpose

Comment: A condition has been included in the recommendation to this effect as requested by the local resident.

The existing business in this location did not generate food and bottle waste Comment: The generation of waste is not a head of consideration for Council. However, there is a condition in the recommendation relating to waste management.

The proposed 6am opening hour 7 days a week further means that enforced conditions need to be in place to ensure that general business noise and noise from traffic, parking and patrons do not interfere with the rights of neighbouring residents to the peaceful enjoyment of the property

Comment: Matters that Council has reasonable control over and direct responsibility for are set out in the recommendation as special and standard conditions. CONCLUSION The proposal is considered not to unreasonably impact upon the amenity of the adjoining properties or the Alexandra Street or Ferry Street streetscapes. The proposed development is considered suitable from a heritage point of view resulting in support from Council’s Heritage Adviser. There would be no undue impact upon the natural and built environment within the vicinity of the subject site as a result of the proposed change of use. Furthermore, there would be no undue social and economic impacts to the locality as a result of the proposed development and subject to compliance with the conditions of consent.

FINANCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT There is no direct financial impact on Council’s adopted budget as a result of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT There is no direct environmental impact on Council arising from Council consideration of this matter. SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT There is no direct social impact on Council arising from Council consideration of this matter. RISK ASSESSMENT

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 11

There are no direct or indirect risks impacting on Council arising from consideration of this matter. HUNTERS HILL 2028 This matter relates to ensuring that heritage and conservation of the area is respected, preserved and enhanced including the preservation of the character, views to and from the Municipality, and the preservation of the tree canopy. RECOMMENDATION

That Development Application No.20191068 for the use of the ground floor of

‘Building A’ and the open area at the front thereof for the purpose of a

patisserie/boulangerie/café at No.37 Alexandra Street, Hunters Hill, be approved,

subject to the following conditions:

Part A Site Specific Conditions:

1. The hours of operation being restricted to between the hours of 6.00am and 4.00pm daily.

2. The number of employees being restricted to not more than four (4) persons working on the premises at any time.

3. The submission of a separate development application for the erection of any advertising structure.

4. One off street car parking space and one loading space being provided in the basement area for the exclusive right of this development approval and such facilities being used for that purpose.

5. Waste management involving collection of glass not taking place on or near the site before 7.00am daily.

Conditions:

Drawing Number Drawn By Plan Dated Council Dated

Site analysis / Location Plan Dwg. No.37_AHH_A.02 Issue A

O’Brien Design & Drafting

24 Jun 2019

28 Jun 2019

Floor Plan – Existing / Demolition Dwg.No.37_AHH_A.03 Issue A

24 Jun 2019

28 Jun 2019

Floor Plan Proposed Dwg. No37_AHH_A.04 Issue A

24 Jun 2019

28 Jun 2019

Elevations External Dwg. 37_AHH_A.07 Issue A

24 Jun 2019

28 Jun 2019

Elevations Internal Dwg. 37_AHH_A.08 Issue A

24 Jun 2019

28 Jun 2019

Standard Conditions

GEN0 GEN1 GEN3 GEN5 GEN6 GEN7 GEN20 GEN22 PCC0 PCC1($297.50) PCC2($1,200.00) PCC3($1,100.00) PCC4($409.00) PCW0 PCW1 PCW2 PCW3 PCW4 PCW5 CSI0 CSI5 CON0 CON1

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Page 12

CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON7 CON9 CON31 CON72 CON73 CON78 CON79 CON82 CON87 CON97 CON98 POC0 POC1 POC2 POC13 POC15 POC18 POC19 POC43 POC44 POC49 POC52 (36 patrons) ATTACHMENTS

1. Locality map 2. Plans 3. Submissions

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 1 Page 13

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 2 Page 14

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 2 Page 15

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 2 Page 16

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 2 Page 17

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 2 Page 18

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 2 Page 19

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 3 Page 20

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 3 Page 21

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 3 Page 22

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 3 Page 23

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 23 October 2019

Item 2.1 Attachment 3 Page 24