development of a lightweight car body, using sandwich-...

29
Development of a lightweight car body, using sandwich- design Michael Kriescher, Simon Brückmann, Gundolf Kopp German Aerospace Center, Stuttgart, Germany Research field: Lightweight and Hybrid Design Methods 14.04.2014

Upload: lybao

Post on 30-Jan-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Development of a lightweight car body, using sandwich-

design

Michael Kriescher, Simon Brückmann, Gundolf Kopp

German Aerospace Center, Stuttgart, Germany

Research field: Lightweight and Hybrid

Design Methods

14.04.2014

• Introduction of the institute of vehicle concepts

• State of the art and goals for the development

• Development of the passenger compartment

• Mechanical properties of sandwich structures

• Development of the front structure

• Current state of the project and further proceeding

Index

www.DLR.de • Chart 2

DLR – Overview

DLR's mission:

• exploration of the Earth and the solar system

• research aimed at protecting the environment

• development of environmentally-friendly technologies

to promote mobility, communication and security.

7.700 employee are working at 32 research institutes and

facilities in n 9 locations and 7 branch offices.

SPACE AERONAUTICS TRANSPORT ENERGY

SECURITY

www.DLR.de • Chart 3

The departments of the Institute for Vehicle Concepts

Alternative energy

conversion

Vehicle energy

concepts

Lightweight and hybrid

construction

Vehicle systems and

technology assessment

1 2 3 4

Innovative vehicle concepts for road and rail

FK designs and demonstrates innovations for the vehicle concepts and technologies of future

compliant transport systems

www.DLR.de • Chart 4

• Introduction of the institute of vehicle concepts

• State of the art and goals for the development

• Development of the passenger compartment

• Mechanical properties of sandwich structures

• Development of the front structure

• Current state of the project and further proceeding

Index

www.DLR.de • Chart 6

Car body design variants

• Steel-shell design, e.g. VW Golf:

• Comparatively high weight

• Large number of parts with complex shape (ca. 200-300)

• Very low production costs at very high lot numbers

(approx. 1 million/year)

• Aluminium-extrusions, e.g. Lotus Elise:

• Low weight due to low density of aluminium

• Simple parts, but relatively large number of parts

• Monocoque-design, e.g. Lamborghini Aventador:

• Fiber reinforced materials -> Very low weight, very low

number of parts

• Very high material and processing costs, difficult behaviour

during side impact and missuse cases

• Light weight car body of the DLR: „Metal-Monocoque“-design:

• Very low weight, low part number

• Conventional materials, frequent use of sandwich parts

www.DLR.de • Chart 7

Metal-monocoque car body: Development targets / objectives

• Very low weight (86 kg)

• Low part number due to high functional integration: approx. 50 parts

per car body at close-to-series production of approx. 50 000 car

bodies per year

• Use of metallic materials with foam cores -> comparatively low costs

for materials and processing

• High damage tolerance due to the high ductility of the metallic shells

• Good passive safety due to new design approaches and deformation

mechanisms

www.DLR.de • Chart 8

Sandwich-Lightweight Design

Overview Project Content – Development Levels

Basic materials

Sandwich

structures

Component

Assembly

Vehicle structure

www.DLR.de • Chart 9

• Introduction of the institute of vehicle concepts

• State of the art and goals for the development

• Development of the passenger compartment

• Mechanical properties of sandwich structures

• Development of the front structure

• Current state of the project and further proceeding

Index

www.DLR.de • Chart 10

Dynamic Testing of a foam filled hybrid beam

• Weight-specific energy absorption is

three times higher, compared to a

hollow beam

• Dynamic testing results in a slightly

higher force level

www.DLR.de • Chart 11

A-ring shaped structure should lead to an even better distribution of plastic strain

Absorption of crash energy through elong-ation of material

Stabilisation of the cross section Application:

Ring-shaped frame of a lightweight vehicle concept (metal-monocoque structure)

Development of a ring-shaped frame for a lightweight

car body

www.DLR.de • Chart 12

Crash Simulation

• Intrusion and deceleration are similar to the state of the art

• Material models must be evaluated

www.DLR.de • Chart 13

Euro-NCAP polecrash

www.DLR.de • Chart 14

End of part 1

www.DLR.de • Chart 15

• Introduction of the institute of vehicle concepts

• State of the art and goals for the development

• Development of the passenger compartment

• Mechanical properties of sandwich structures

• Development of the front structure

• Current state of the project and further proceeding

Index

www.DLR.de • Chart 16

Schematic procedure

Analysis of polymer foams under

pressure loading

Determination of material

parameters in uniaxial

compression

Analytical calculation of failure

behavior of sandwich elements

Transfer of stress-strain curves in

FEM

Preparation of failure-mode-maps

Compression testing with

sandwich elements to validate

failure behavior

Material parameters

Matching between simulation and

real material tests

Core Material Sandwich

Simulation

www.DLR.de • Chart 17

Compression Tests on Polyurethane

Foams

Density 30 kg/m³ Density 300 kg/m³

After testing

High elastic behavior Brittle behavior

www.DLR.de • Chart 18

Failure-Mode-Maps

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300

Ke

rnd

icke

[m

m]

Kerndichte [kg/m³]

Kombi=Schub

Knittern=Kombi

Knittern=Schub

Knittern

Schubbeulen

Eulerknicken und

Kernscheren

Global = shear

Wrinkling = global

Wrinkling = shear

Core density [kg/m³]

Co

re t

hic

kn

ess [

mm

]

Wrinkling

Bulging (shear)

Euler buckling and

shear failure of core

material

www.DLR.de • Chart 19

Global crippling Shear failure of core material Wrinkling

Sandwich Elements in In-plane

Load Case

Stand Februar 2013

www.DLR.de • Chart 20

Tests on Planar Sandwich Elements

• Symmetric wrinkling with holes and horizontal cuttings in both layers

• Asymmetric wrinkling with vertical cuttings and various wave lengths in

the layers

Instability of load transferring path between the not cutted sections of

the layers

www.DLR.de • Chart 21

• Box structure

• Cross structure

Application Examples

Tests on Structural Components

Stand Februar 2013

www.DLR.de • Chart 22

• Introduction of the institute of vehicle concepts

• State of the art and goals for the development

• Development of the passenger compartment

• Mechanical properties of sandwich structures

• Development of the front structure

• Current state of the project and further proceeding

Index

www.DLR.de • Chart 23

Front Structure

General Information

www.DLR.de • Chart 24

Front Structure

Static Tests

www.DLR.de • Chart 25

Testing of components: Sandwich front structure

- Weight of the front structure: 12 kg

- Integration of various functions in one part:

- Loads from the chassis

- Support for various drive-train

components

- Energy absorption in frontal crash

load cases

- Relatively uniform force-deformation-curve

- Regular folding of the aluminium layers

www.DLR.de • Chart 27

• Introduction of the institute of vehicle concepts

• State of the art and goals for the development

• Development of the passenger compartment

• Mechanical properties of sandwich structures

• Development of the front structure

• Current state of the project and further proceeding

Index

www.DLR.de • Chart 28

State of the project

• First car body demonstrator has been built

• Crash test of a component (front structure) has been performed

• First estimate for the manufacturing cost of a car body: 570 €

www.DLR.de • Chart 29

Further proceeding

• Crash test of other components

• Crash test of the entire car body on the DLR‘s crash test facility

• Build-up of a rolling prototype

• Development of the technology for series production

www.DLR.de • Chart 30

Thank you for your attention!