development of core public health indicators for decision making. the paho’s experience carlos...

Development of Core Public Health Indicators for Decision Making. The

PAHO’s Experience

Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Special Advisor, Forum for Public Health in

the Americas, PAHO/WHO

Development of Core Public Health Indicators for Decision Making. The

PAHO’s Experience

Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Special Advisor, Forum for Public Health in

the Americas, PAHO/WHO

“Health & Biomedical Data & Metadata”. Panel 7.1 Atibaia, SP. Brazil. May 9, 2007

“Health & Biomedical Data & Metadata”. Panel 7.1 Atibaia, SP. Brazil. May 9, 2007

Forum for Public Health in the Americas. Forum for Public Health in the Americas.

RCHDI: BackgroundRCHDI: Background• The Regional Core Health Data Initiative was launched in 1995

• Core Health Data is a minimum set of data and indicators required to characterize the health situation of the Region, Sub-Regions and individual countries

• The set involves 117 core indicators, disaggregated into 401 basic data /country

• This minimum set of core indicators allows the monitoring of specific public health goals in the Region of the Americas.

• Special emphasis given to track the inequalities in health and the monitoring of the Millennium Development Goals

• The Regional Core Health Data Initiative was launched in 1995

• Core Health Data is a minimum set of data and indicators required to characterize the health situation of the Region, Sub-Regions and individual countries

• The set involves 117 core indicators, disaggregated into 401 basic data /country

• This minimum set of core indicators allows the monitoring of specific public health goals in the Region of the Americas.

• Special emphasis given to track the inequalities in health and the monitoring of the Millennium Development Goals


Goals of the Core Health Data/Country Profile Initiative

Goals of the Core Health Data/Country Profile Initiative

• To orient better health strategic policies• To facilitate priority setting in the health sector• To improve the evaluation of technical cooperation in each

of the countries and programs• To assist the countries in developing investment strategies

or special programs for more effective health polices and services

• To facilitate the mobilization of financial resources.• To orient research priorities• To periodically produce reports on health trends in each

country and the Region as a whole

• To orient better health strategic policies• To facilitate priority setting in the health sector• To improve the evaluation of technical cooperation in each

of the countries and programs• To assist the countries in developing investment strategies

or special programs for more effective health polices and services

• To facilitate the mobilization of financial resources.• To orient research priorities• To periodically produce reports on health trends in each

country and the Region as a whole


Development Assumptions Development Assumptions

• An open access and Web-based application and graphical interface was the best solution to handle the system outputs and its distribution in the Americas.

• The multi-tier client/server model was the best architecture to put together all the components of the Core Health Data System and to implement the communication platform with the other PAHO Health Technical Information Systems.

• The Internet infrastructure in the Member States was predicted to be improved over the next years.

• The system could be adapted for subregional or/and subnational levels in some of the countries.

• An open access and Web-based application and graphical interface was the best solution to handle the system outputs and its distribution in the Americas.

• The multi-tier client/server model was the best architecture to put together all the components of the Core Health Data System and to implement the communication platform with the other PAHO Health Technical Information Systems.

• The Internet infrastructure in the Member States was predicted to be improved over the next years.

• The system could be adapted for subregional or/and subnational levels in some of the countries.


ContentsContents

• Data/Information Types

The 117 indicators selected are grouped into the following subjects areas:

• Demographic (10)• Socioeconomic (10)• Mortality (31)• Morbidity and Risk Factors (30)• Resources/Services/Coverage (36)

– The values, when pertinent, are desegregated by sex and age group.

• Data/Information Types

The 117 indicators selected are grouped into the following subjects areas:

• Demographic (10)• Socioeconomic (10)• Mortality (31)• Morbidity and Risk Factors (30)• Resources/Services/Coverage (36)

– The values, when pertinent, are desegregated by sex and age group.


Core Health Data Information System Multi-dimensional Table Generator (Tabulator)

Core Health Data Information System Multi-dimensional Table Generator (Tabulator)

Dimensions• Time. Years• Indicator. Dissagregation• Space/Geo. Country/Subregion

Dimensions• Time. Years• Indicator. Dissagregation• Space/Geo. Country/Subregion


• Specific objectives– Establish sets of consistent, updated, accessible basic data– Articulate institutions for strengthening data and its review– Implement mechanisms to improve information production– Promote consensus on concepts and methods for data use– Promote exchange with other information subsystems– Contribute to the study un explored aspects or of known relevance for the

understanding of the health profiles

• Products– Information system available via Internet– Country brochure (published since 1997), with a central topic since 2000 (infant

mortality, violence, the elderly)– Support to Health situation rooms (different levels)– Other publications on concepts and applications

• Institutions involved– Several agencies of the Ministry of Health, IBGE, FUNASA, IPEA, CONASSEMS,

ABRASCO, Public health schools of USP, FIOCRUZ, PAHO, others

• Specific objectives– Establish sets of consistent, updated, accessible basic data– Articulate institutions for strengthening data and its review– Implement mechanisms to improve information production– Promote consensus on concepts and methods for data use– Promote exchange with other information subsystems– Contribute to the study un explored aspects or of known relevance for the

understanding of the health profiles

• Products– Information system available via Internet– Country brochure (published since 1997), with a central topic since 2000 (infant

mortality, violence, the elderly)– Support to Health situation rooms (different levels)– Other publications on concepts and applications

• Institutions involved– Several agencies of the Ministry of Health, IBGE, FUNASA, IPEA, CONASSEMS,

ABRASCO, Public health schools of USP, FIOCRUZ, PAHO, others

RIPSA. Inter-agential Network in Health Information. Brazil

RIPSA. Inter-agential Network in Health Information. Brazil


RIPSA: Basic Indicators Internet System

RIPSA: Basic Indicators Internet System


Core Health Information: New Paradigm of information as an Essential Public Good

Core Health Information: New Paradigm of information as an Essential Public Good

– Information and Health Situation Analysis as the First Essential Public Health Function.

– Health Information for planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health policies and programs at the local level.

– Distributions and not only national averages. Level of Aggregation of information and effective use of health information and vital statistics.

– Integrated open networks of health and socio-economic information. Assessment and monitoring of health inequalities and health impact assessment.

– Information and Health Situation Analysis as the First Essential Public Health Function.

– Health Information for planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health policies and programs at the local level.

– Distributions and not only national averages. Level of Aggregation of information and effective use of health information and vital statistics.

– Integrated open networks of health and socio-economic information. Assessment and monitoring of health inequalities and health impact assessment.


Results of the 2005 survey to evaluate the impact of the RCDI in 37 countries. Core Data Products

Results of the 2005 survey to evaluate the impact of the RCDI in 37 countries. Core Data Products

24

5

14

1

7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

brochure,three-page

leaf lets,and other

similarprints

compactdisc (CD)and otherelectronicformats

w ebpages informationsystems

(tablegenerator

on thew eb)

others

Res

pons

es b

y C

ount

ries

(n)

24

5

14

1

7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

brochure,three-page

leaf lets,and other

similarprints

compactdisc (CD)and otherelectronicformats

w ebpages informationsystems

(tablegenerator

on thew eb)

others

Res

pons

es b

y C

ount

ries

(n)

Which Core Data Products are periodically updated and distributed?


Specific open-access outputs of the Regional Core Health Data InitiativeSpecific open-access outputs of the Regional Core Health Data Initiative

• Annual Regional brochure “Health Situation in the Americas: Basic Indicators”

• Integrated Health Information System• Glossary and Technical Notes for each

Indicator• Atlas of Basic Indicators• Country Health Profiles• Web-based RCHDI Information Platform

• Annual Regional brochure “Health Situation in the Americas: Basic Indicators”

• Integrated Health Information System• Glossary and Technical Notes for each

Indicator• Atlas of Basic Indicators• Country Health Profiles• Web-based RCHDI Information Platform


Suggested mechanisms and operational instruments for improving

RCHDI

Suggested mechanisms and operational instruments for improving

RCHDI– Interagency Working Group (technical coordination)

– Interdisciplinary technical committees (methodological-operational analysis and validation procedures )

– Indicators management committees (data production and coordination for open access)

– Technical Secretariat (process definition, proposals and follow-up)

– Indicators Matrix and Technical Sheets for analyses

– Common data and indicators database and open interoperable information systems

– Interagency Working Group (technical coordination)

– Interdisciplinary technical committees (methodological-operational analysis and validation procedures )

– Indicators management committees (data production and coordination for open access)

– Technical Secretariat (process definition, proposals and follow-up)

– Indicators Matrix and Technical Sheets for analyses

– Common data and indicators database and open interoperable information systems


Results of the 2005 survey to evaluate the impact of the RCHDI in 37 countries. Challenges and Recommendations

Results of the 2005 survey to evaluate the impact of the RCHDI in 37 countries. Challenges and Recommendations

• Challenges for implementing and maintaining RCDI:• Lack of sufficient trained human resources• Limited access to some information or health data• Limited political support and financing in some countries• Need for more use and analysis

• Recommendations to improve RCDI by countries:• Improving flow of information between countries and PAHO/WHO

offices and headquarters (change of flow paradigm)• Greater promotion and open dissemination of information in the

Ministry of Health, other health and academic groups, public• Reduce the political restrictions for sharing timely information

• Challenges for implementing and maintaining RCDI:• Lack of sufficient trained human resources• Limited access to some information or health data• Limited political support and financing in some countries• Need for more use and analysis

• Recommendations to improve RCDI by countries:• Improving flow of information between countries and PAHO/WHO

offices and headquarters (change of flow paradigm)• Greater promotion and open dissemination of information in the

Ministry of Health, other health and academic groups, public• Reduce the political restrictions for sharing timely information


Thanks!How to contact us:

Thanks!How to contact us:

Forum for Public Health in the AmericasPan American Health Organization

525 23rd. St., NWWashington, DC 20037

Tel (202) 974-3327Fax: (202) 974-3641

Email: [email protected]

development of core public health indicators for decision making. the paho’s experience carlos...

Documents

health information

health sectorto

effective health

health trends

health situation

core health data system

minimum set of data

data usepromote exchange