diana boland rebekah gerard philip dixon may 2013
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Context Based Grammar Instruction vs.
Traditional Grammar Instruction:
Application of Grammar Concepts in Writing and Attitude towards Learning
Grammar Diana BolandRebekah Gerard
Philip DixonMay 2013
![Page 2: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Research Question
What are the effects of intervention strategies using grammar in context on student attitudes and performance?
Introduction
![Page 3: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Hypothesis
When students receive grammar in context instruction, writing scores on the IB rubric’s language criteria section will improve, and as a result of understanding how to apply their grammar lessons in their writing, student attitudes about grammar and writing will also improve.
![Page 4: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Our students are not applying grammar concepts in their written work.
Our students, whether in 8th, 9th, or 12th grade, are making the same consistent errors in their writing despite traditional grammar instruction.
Why is this Important?
![Page 5: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
If students were better able to integrate their grammar learning into their writing, teachers would be able to better execute vertical instruction.
When students are able to proficiently apply English grammar concepts to their writing, they are better able to illustrate deeper level critical thinking and analysis.
Why is this Important?
![Page 6: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Ganjabi, Mahyar. (2011). Grammar instruction and error correction: a matter of Iranian students’ beliefs. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 1285-1308.
In order for students to use grammar successfully in their writing, teachers need to have a deep understanding of how students’ attitudes impact their learning.
Review of Literature
![Page 7: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hadley, Alice Omaggio. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston: Thomson Higher Education.
A basic assumption underlying cognitive methodology [is] that meaningful learning [is] essential to language acquisition and that conscious knowledge of grammar [is] important.
Students must first find a real purpose to written and oral discourse. Once this is established, learning grammar will not only become important, but purposeful which will break down the mental barriers our students associate with learning grammar mechanics.
Review of Literature
![Page 8: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Nunan, David. (1998). Teaching grammar in context. ELT Journal. 55/2, 101-109.
Grammar in context is the process of teaching students how to meaningfully use grammar conventions in various forms of discourse.
It is all too frequent that courses and teachers do not make the connection between how the use of proper grammatical form results in clear and successful communication.
Teaching grammar in context works because meaning becomes clear to students. They are able to see a real life application of grammar. It is a tool that facilitates clear discourse.
Review of Literature
![Page 9: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Weaver, Constance. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Porthsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook Publishers.
Weaver, Constance. (1996). Teaching grammar in the context of writing. The English Journal, 85(7), 15-24.
We found that as early as 1936 the need to teach grammar in context was recognized by the Curriculum Commission of the National Council of Teachers of English
Teaching grammar, in the context of writing works better than teaching grammar as a formal system, if our aim is for students to use grammar more effectively and conventionally in their writing.
Using a cognitive constructivist approach to education, rather than a behaviorist learning theory, creates individualized instruction that motivates learners and responds to student needs
We ultimately referenced to Weaver’s general guidelines for the teaching of grammar. These include strategies such as: engaging students in regular and frequent writing activities, emersion in literature, and teaching relevant grammatical conventions within the context of students’ writing.
Review of Literature
![Page 10: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The research of Weaver, Nunan, and Hadley confirm that teaching grammar in the context of writing is more effective than the traditional approach to language mechanics. Students who are taught writing and grammar mechanics in context will retain the knowledge longer and be able to more effectively communicate their ideas in written discourse.
Summary
![Page 11: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A convenience sample using a static group pre/post test design measured students’ application and proficiency of grammar concepts in writing. The control group and the experimental group are the same.
A post test design was used to assess differences in student attitude under each condition.
Research Design
![Page 12: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Using grammar in context grammar instruction to teach grammar instead of traditional text book based grammar instruction in 8th, 9th, and 12th grade English Language Arts. It is a static group design, so students acted as both the control group and the experimental group.
Intervention
![Page 13: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
171 Colegio Americano de Quito students 49 eighth grade English Language Arts
students X ninth grade English Language Arts
students X twelfth grade English Language Arts
students 15 English Language Arts classes of mixed
abilities
Sample
![Page 14: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Traditional Grammar instruction was given and students’ writing was evaluated using the appropriate IB writing rubrics for pre and post tests.
Grammar in context instruction was given and students’ writing was evaluated using the appropriate IB writing rubrics for pre and post tests.
Grammar Attitudes likert scale was given along with both posttests.
Instrumentation and Data Collection
![Page 15: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Researcher bias
Instrumentation
Threats to Validity
![Page 16: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The two-tailed t test showed no significant change in student attitudes after receiving traditional grammar instruction or grammar in context instruction ( t = 1.6619, df = 170, P = 0.984)
Results: Attitude
![Page 17: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Group Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context
Instruction
Mean 31.05 31.71
SD 5.23 5.80
8th, 9th and 12th grade attitude
![Page 18: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Grammar Attitudes 8th, 9th, 12th Graders30.6
30.8
31
31.2
31.4
31.6
31.8
TraditionalIn Context
Student Attitude
![Page 19: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context
Instruction
Mean 32.10 31.78
SD 4.62 5.63
Means and Standard Deviations of 8th Grade for Attitude
![Page 20: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
31.6
31.65
31.7
31.75
31.8
31.85
31.9
31.95
32
32.05
32.1
32.15
TraditionalIn Context
8th grade Attitude
![Page 21: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context Instruction
Mean 29.47 30.54
SD 6.11 5.44
Means and Standard Deviations of 9th Grade for Attitude
![Page 22: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
28.8
29
29.2
29.4
29.6
29.8
30
30.2
30.4
30.6
30.8
TraditionalIn Context
9th grade attitude
![Page 23: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context
Instruction
Mean 31.79 32.94
SD 4.60 6.04
Means and Standard Deviations of 12th Grade for Attitude
![Page 24: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
31.2
31.4
31.6
31.8
32
32.2
32.4
32.6
32.8
33
33.2
TraditionalIn Context
12th grade attitude
![Page 25: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
A two-tailed t test result showed a statistically significant difference when comparing student scores after receiving traditional grammar instruction compared to grammar in context instruction (t = 3.0988, df = 170, P = 0.0023).
Results: Traditional Instruction vs. Grammar in Context: 8th, 9th and 12th grade
![Page 26: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context
Instruction
Mean .21 .68
SD 1.05 1.24
Results: 8th, 9th and 12th grade Traditional Instruction vs. Grammar in Context
![Page 27: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Combined Change Score
Combined 8th, 9th and 12th grade Change Score
![Page 28: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pre TestPost Test
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction
Pre/Post Test Scores for 8th, 9th, 12th
![Page 29: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context
Instruction
Mean .63 .69
SD 1.24 1.47
Means and Standard Deviations of 8th Group Gains looking at Traditional and Grammar in Context Instruction
![Page 30: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction0.6
0.61
0.62
0.63
0.64
0.65
0.66
0.67
0.68
0.69
0.7
Change Score
8th Grade Change Score
![Page 31: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pre TestPost Test
8th Grade Pre/Post Test Scores
![Page 32: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context
Instruction
Mean .20 .98
SD .80 1.14
Means and Standard Deviations of 9th Group Gains looking at Traditional and Grammar in Context Instruction
![Page 33: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Change Score
9th Grade Change Score
![Page 34: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Pre TestPost Test
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction
Pre/Post Test Scores for 9th grade
![Page 35: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Group Traditional
Instruction
Grammar in
Context
Instruction
Mean -0.11 .38
SD 1.00 1.07
Means and Standard Deviations of 12th Grade Performance Scores during Traditional and Grammar in Context Instruction
![Page 36: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Change Score
Traditional Instruction Grammar in Context Instruction
12th Grade Change Score
![Page 37: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Control Experimental2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
2.75
2.8
2.85
2.9
2.95
Pre TestPost Test
12th Grade Pre/Post Test Scores
![Page 38: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
While the impact on student attitudes towards grammar instruction were not impacted in a statistically significant way, the change scores reflected in student work illustrate the effectiveness of grammar in context instruction.
Discussion
![Page 39: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
We will present a vertical action plan to our English Department based on the philosophy of grammar in context instruction. Our study will provide model lessons, model strategies, and a basis for implementing a secondary wide grammar instruction revolution.
Action
![Page 40: Diana Boland Rebekah Gerard Philip Dixon May 2013](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062720/56649efc5503460f94c0fff2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Ganjabi, Mahyar. (2011). Grammar instruction and error correction: a matter of Iranian students’ beliefs. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 1285-1308.
Hadley, Alice Omaggio. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston: Thomson Higher Education.
Nunan, David. (1998). Teaching grammar in context. ELT Journal. 55/2,
101-109.
Weaver, Constance. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Porthsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook Publishers.
Weaver, Constance. (1996). Teaching grammar in the context of
writing. The English Journal, 85(7), 15-24.
References