diapositiva 1 - agricultural research council · diapositiva 1 author: maurizio petrozziello...
TRANSCRIPT
03/12/2019 1
South African & Italian Wine Research Innovations
CURRENT STATUS FUTURE PROSPECTS
Winemaking: State-of-the-Art Winery –Innovations in winemaking technologies,
processes, products
Winemaking technologies, processes, products: present situation and prospects in Italy
Antonella Bosso
CREA-VE Asti
03/12/2019 203/12/2019 2
The present communication deals with oenologicalpractices and products that match the main lines ofdevelopment (axes) established in the OIV Strategic plan2020-2024, in agreement with the objectives for theSustainable Development Goals (SDG) fixed by the Agenda2030 of the United Nations:
➢Mitigation of CC
➢Adaptation to CC
➢Environmental sustainability
➢Quality
Preface
03/12/2019 303/12/2019 3
Improvement of environmental performances in oenology:
a) Implementation of new winemaking processes aimedat reducing the use of inputs (additives, adjuvants)
b) Promotion of circular economy through the re-use ofwastes and the management of by-products
Protection of natural resources:
a) Reduction of the use of non-renewable resources andwater
b) Protection of biodiversity in the vineyard (increasingtypologies of wines from different cultivars)
Mitigation of CC
03/12/2019 403/12/2019 4
A. Reduction of the use of sulphites
- At present, a safe product with all the oenological features of sulphurdioxide (SO2) has not yet been identified
- Therefore, the reduction of the use of SO2 is achievable through thecombination of different practices and/or oenological products
- A collection of guidelines is in preparation at OIV
A1. Aims of the research:
- Identification of a new product as effective as SO2 and without its sideeffects
- Deepening knowledge on the oenological practices for the control ofmicrobial development (antimicrobial effect of SO2)
- Deepening knowledge on the factors involved in the wines oxidationprocess and on the oenological products able to slowdown/stop thisprocess (antioxidant and antioxidase effect of SO2)
Reduction of inputs
03/12/2019 503/12/2019 5
Factors involved in the oxidation process
tannins
SO2
metalsmetals
metalsGSH
SO2
Fenton’s reaction
These factors can influence thewine oxygen consumption rate.Normally they speed up the oxygenconsumption rate.Nevertheless, it does not necessarymean that they protect the winesagainst oxidation, as SO2 does.
03/12/2019 6
Oxygen consumption rate
➢ Oxygen consumption related to the presence and amount of SO2 and copper
➢ higher SO2, faster O2
consumption
➢ Copper (catalyzer) increased the rate of oxygen consumption, particularly during the first days
Model solution
03/12/2019 7
Wine oxygen consumption rate
➢ The higher the SO2 content, the faster the oxygen consumption➢ The oxygen consumption rate increased in the presence of GSH➢ High content of SO2 + GSH = faster oxygen consumption➢ The higher the oxygen content at bottling, the faster its consumption →
wine aging is influenced by bottling conditions.
Sample Free SO2
(mg/L)
GSH
(mg/L)
O2 (ppm)
o 20 0 3.3
so 60 0 3.3
(1) 20 0 1.3
s 60 0 1.3
og 20 20 3.3
sog 60 20 3.3
g 20 20 1.3
sg 60 20 1.3
The studied factors:
Wine
03/12/2019 8
Effect on color
Model solutions
03/12/2019 903/12/2019 9
A. Study on some factors involved in the oxidation process
Aim• Studying the protective effect of GSH and tannins
compared to SO2 on the oxidative evolution ofmodel solutions and bottled wines in the presenceof different levels of oxygen (different bottlingconditions)
• Studying the effect of SO2 and transition metals onthe oxidative kinetics and the role of GSH in theFenton reaction in order to reduce the dose of SO2
in wines
03/12/2019 10
Influence on wines sensory descriptors
+SO2 samples = less colored, with more intense notes related to freshness and less intense notes related to oxidation
03/12/2019 11
Results
A significant effect of GSH was observed only for the descriptors pineapple(more intense for –GSH sample) and licorice (more intense for +GSH sample).
No significant effect of tannins was observed on any descriptor.
03/12/2019 1203/12/2019 12
Literature reports antioxidant activity of tannins in wine, related to different properties:
➢ presence of -OH groups in orto position which are oxidized to quinonescausing the consumption of dissolved oxygen (Pascual et al., 2017; Vignault etal., 2018);
➢ ability to scavenge peroxyl radicals (Magalhães et al.,2014);➢ chelating effect on iron (II) and consequent prevention of oxidative evolution
mediated by Fenton-based reactions (Perez,Wei, & Guo, 2009).
B. Study of the antioxidant properties of oenological tannins
OIV Research Grant 2016 - Silvia MottaComparison between tannins of different types and botanical origin:
evaluation of antioxidant and anti-radical properties
03/12/2019 13
Total polyphenols
content (GAE)
Ferric Reducing
Capacity (FRAP)
Antiradical power
(DPPH)
Redox properties
Total polyphenols (LSV1200 mV)
Redox properties
Easily oxidizable polyphenols
(LSV600 mV)
Oxygen
Consumption Rate
Ellagitannins Gallotannins Condensed tannins
OIV Research Grant 2016 Silvia Motta
Comparison between tannins of different botanical origin
➢ Differences between tannins for the O2 consumption trend
➢ Tannins with different botanicalorigin had different antioxydantproperties
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
9,0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
Dis
solv
ed o
xyge
n (m
g/L)
Days
Control Ellagic tannins Gallic tannins Condensed tannins
03/12/2019 1403/12/2019 14
2A. Evaluation of the possibility to reduce the use of SO2 insome winemaking processes through the combination ofsome oenological practices and products.Assessment of the impact of these winemaking protocolson wine quality.
• A divulgation program on the reduction of the SO2 contentin wines was recently started in our Research Centre(INNOWINE Project)
• 5 private wineries are involved
• The project includes theoretical lessons on oenologicalpractices and products to reduce the SO2 use duringwinemaking
Transfer of knowledge in the cellars
03/12/2019 1503/12/2019 15
The 5 wineries chose a winemaking process, or a single phase of it, toreduce the doses of SO2 on large scale;
a) White winemaking, for the Cortese cultivar (still wine)
b) Red winemaking, for the Barbera cultivar (still wine)
c) Complete production cycle of Asti secco (sparkling dry wine fromMoscato bianco cultivar)
d) Storage phase of the Moscato bianco must for the production ofAsti spumante (sparkling sweet wine from Moscato biancocultivar)
e) Shelf-life of Asti secco wines with different storage conditions andadditives
INNOWINE Project
03/12/2019 1603/12/2019 16
The winemaking protocols consist in a combination of recentlyauthorized technologies, older techniques, and oenologicalproducts aimed at verifying on large scale the feasibility toobtain quality wines without or with very low content ofsulphur dioxide
The products obtained during these experiments will becompared with the wines produced according to thetraditional protocols of the wineries, and containing sulphites.The comparisons will concern the chemical and sensorycharacteristics and the evaluation of the shelf-life of the wines
INNOWINE Project
03/12/2019 1703/12/2019 17
Protection from oxidation
• Storage on lees (exploitation of the property of lees to consume oxygen during the first months after the end of the AF)
• Addition of inactive yeasts to protect wine from oxidation
• Batonnages with limited exposure to air and rackings under inert gases
• Use of membrane contactors before bottling to reduce the dissolved oxygen
• Bottling under inert gases
Prevention of ML fermentation
• Addition of products (chitosan..) to control ML bacteria development in white wines
• Filtration before bottling
Practices to reduce the concentration of compounds that combine SO2 (for instance acetaldehyde)
• No addition of SO2 to musts (with healthy grapes)
• Addition of thiamine
• Use of yeast strains selected for being low SO2 producers
Oenological practices and products employed
INNOWINE Project
03/12/2019 1803/12/2019 18
B. Application of physical means, in particular membrane techniques, for:
• Tartaric stabilisation (instead of additives),
• Adjustment of acidity and pH (instead of adjuvants),
• Reduction of the concentration of certain organic acids (instead of adjuvants, only fortartaric acid).
Membrane techniques:
• Tartaric stabilization by electrodialysis (OENO 1/93). A physical method for the
extraction of ions under the action of an electric field, with membranes permeable only toanions on one side, and membranes permeable only to cations on the other side.
• Acidification by electromembrane treatment (bipolar membrane: electrodialysis)(OENO 361/2010). A physical method for ionic extraction under the action of an electricfield with membranes permeable only to cations on one side, and bipolar membranes onthe other side.
• De-acidification using an electromembrane process (OENO 484-2012). A physicalmethod of ionic extraction under the action of an electric field with membranespermeable only to anions on one side and bipolar membranes on the other.
Reduction of inputs (authorized processes)
03/12/2019 1903/12/2019 19
Resolution OIV-OENO 594A-2019 adopted in 2019 by the 17th General Assemblyof OIV: Reduction of indigenous microorganisms in grapes and musts bydiscontinuous high pressure processes (high hydrostatic pressure – HHP).
The process consists in the reduction of indigenous organisms in grapes andmusts by discontinuous high pressure processes, with pressures higher than 150MPa (1500 bar).
The elimination of yeasts in grapes and musts requires pressure levels of 200-400MPa, while the elimination of bacterial cells requires pressure levels of 500-600MPa. The treatment time range is 2-10 minutes.
OBJECTIVES:
- Reducing the microbial load of indigenous microorganisms, especially yeasts.
- Reducing SO2 levels generally used in winemaking,
- Enhancing maceration in red winemaking.
Reduction of inputs (new practices)
• DT adiabatic compression 2-3°C/100 Mpa
• It does not affect the covalentbonds of molecules
Physical methods
03/12/2019 2003/12/2019 20
Resolution OENO 616-2019 adopted in 2019 by the 17th General Assembly of OIV:Treatment of crushed grapes with ultrasound to promote the extraction of theircomponents. The objective of this practice is notably to obtain musts with a higherconcentration of phenolic compounds and other grape components, while reducing themaceration time compared to a traditional process.
Objectives:
• reduction of winemaking costs
• < use of pectolytic enzymes
• < use of sulphur dioxide
• sustainable technology
Reduction of inputs (new practices)
High power (2500 W) and low frequency (28 kHz) with a power density of 8 W/cm2.
Physical methods
03/12/2019 2103/12/2019 21
A. Studies on the management and properties of some oenological by-products
Promote circular economy
a) Polyphenolic characterisationof extracts from skins andseeds from grapes andfermented pomace.
Skins Seeds
03/12/2019 2203/12/2019 22
Grapes pomacethe by-products
03/12/2019 2303/12/2019 23
b) Comparison betweendifferent extractionmethods of polyphenolsfrom skins and seedsderived from fermentedand unfermented pomace.
Promote circular economy
03/12/2019 2403/12/2019 24
NAT4More Project
c. Study of the possible use of polyphenolic extracts as antioxidants in foodindustry and for pharmaceutical and medical purposes.
The objective of NAT4MORE isthe devolopment of innovative bioactive surfaces(smart biomaterials) for bone contact applications(orthopaedic and dentalimplants), able to modulate the local host response to implantation for physiologicalhealing and recovery, withoutinfection.
03/12/2019 2503/12/2019 25
Protocol of extraction of polyphenols from by-products. NAT4More Project
Extraction:• w/v ratio 1:6• Solvent H2O/ethanol 50:50 • Extraction on rocked shaker
(2 hours)
Concentrated extract
Evaporationunder vacuum
Whole/skins/seedsflour
centrifuge
03/12/2019 2603/12/2019 26
Reducing of the use of non-renewable resources
A. Reduction of heating coststhrough the co-inoculation ofML bacteria during AF. Studieson the effect of co-inoculationon wines composition andquality.
Some resultsThe ML fermentation began within 5days in the co-inoculated trials and1 day after post-AF bacterialinoculation.MLF was completed after 15 days inthe co-inoculated wines (before theend of AF) and after 35 days in thetrials inoculated after AF.MLF was not completed in non-inoculated wines (10-15% of malicacid consumed at day 70).
03/12/2019 2703/12/2019 27
No significant interactions were noticed between the factors«inoculation time» and «yeast» for the acidic composition
The yeast did not interfere with MLF when presentsimultaneously with bacteria, nor compromised post-AF MLF
when colonizing the wine before bacteria
Influence of co-inoculation on wine composition
03/12/2019 28
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
red-violet
violet-rose
licorice
cherry
berries-blackberries
herbaceousacidity
bitter
softness
body
balance
Effect of bacteria
SEQ Control COI
aa
b
a bb
bb
a
abb
a
baab
bb
a
Influence of co-inoculation on the sensory profile
• No differences were observedfor the colour.
• Regarding the olfactorydescriptors, COI thesis wasdifferent from SEQ and Control due to the statistically higherliquorice note and the averagly higher fruity notes.
• Regarding the taste descriptors, MLF caused a significant decrease of acidityand an increase of balance and softness. No differences wereobserved between COI and SEQ theses.
03/12/2019 2903/12/2019 29
Reduction of the cooling costs for the tartaric stabilization of wines andpreservation of the quality of red wines (preservation of color and polyphenols)by using stabilizing additives.
Studies on the oenological properties of potassium polyaspartate, and otheradditives (carboxymethylcellulose, mannoproteins and metatartaric acids).
Reduction of the use of non-renewable resources
STABIWINE Project: “USE OF BIOPOLYMERS FOR SUSTAINABLE STABILIZATION OF QUALITY WINES” Funded by UE - FP7-SME program. Duration: 3 years (2012 – 2015)
Polymer of aspartic acid salifiedwith potassium. Potassiumpolyaspartate (KPA) is synthesized by thermal polymerization of L-aspartic acid. The polymer is negativelycharged at wine pH.
03/12/2019 3003/12/2019 30
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
03/12/2019 3103/12/2019 31
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
03/12/2019 3203/12/2019 32
Results of the mini-contact test: Dc (mS/cm)
Results of the cold test: DH2T (g/L)
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
03/12/2019 3303/12/2019 33
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
03/12/2019 3403/12/2019 34
Results of the mini-contact test: Dc (mS/cm)
Results of the cold test: DH2T (g/L)
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
03/12/2019 3503/12/2019 35
• KPA has a good stabilizingeffect against tartaricprecipitation in wines
• KPA is easy to use, and stableover time (aging for 1 year)
• No interaction with colour of white and red wines wasobserved. After the additionand during aging no differencein anthocyanins and polyphenols content wasobserved compared to the wines without the additive
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Control PASP3 PASP-K PASP5 PASP10 MTA
DH
2T
(g/L
)
Asp 1.6 mg/L
Asp5.1 mg/L Asp
3.3 mg/L
Asp 3.9 mg/L
Asp4.3 mg/L
n.d.
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
Wines after 1 year of aging
03/12/2019 3603/12/2019 36
• The appearance of turbidity inred wines soon after theaddition was observed in rarecases
• A preliminary treatment withbentonite prevented theappearance of turbidity afterthe addition of KPA
• The filtration at bottling (0.45mm) did not cause any loss ofstabilizing properties
• No influence of KPA on winefilterability was observed
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Turb
idit
y (N
TU)
48 hours after the addition after 1 year of bottle aging
Cold test
Potassium polyaspartate for wine stabilization
03/12/2019 3703/12/2019 37
Adaptation of the winemaking process to the variation ofgrapes and musts composition caused by CC in order topreserve the characteristics of the wines due to the cultivar oforigin.
The main effects of CC on musts and wines compositionconcern:
• Sugar/alchol content, that increases with warming.
• Acidity/pH, that respectively decreases and increases withwarming.
• Varietal aromas and polyphenolic composition.
Adaptation to CC
03/12/2019 3803/12/2019 38
Reduction of sugar content
a) Reduction of the sugar content in musts through membrane coupling (OENO450B-2012).
Process that consists in extracting the sugar from musts with membrane coupling:microfiltration or ultrafiltration combined with nanofiltration or inverted osmosis.
Clarified mustUltrafiltration
Ultrafiltered must(Permeate)
Retentate from UF(Macromolecoles) Nanofiltration
Retentate from NFSugar concentrate
Permeate UF(with a low sugar content)
Must with a reducedsugar content
Some physical techniques have been authorized by EU:
03/12/2019 3903/12/2019 39
b) Dealcoholization of wines by partial vacuum evaporation, membranetechniques and distillation (OENO 394B-2012).
The alcohol content can be reduced by a maximum of 20%. The minimum alcoholicstrength by volume must comply with the definition of wine.
A study was performed at CREA-VE concerning the comparison between vacuumdistillation (D) and membrane contactor (MC). The aim was to verify the influence of thetwo techniques on wine composition.
Correction of the alcoholic content in wines
03/12/2019 4003/12/2019 40
Influence on wine physicochemical composition
Rosato
Pelaverga
Barbera
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
35,0
40,0
45,0
50,0
Teste CM DISV
Total extract (g/L)
The dealcoholized fractions areconcentrated. The 2 techniques aresignificantly different from one anotherfor the final concentration. According tothe extract values the concentration was:
• 9% for MC
• 54% (6 times higher) for D
The pH dropped after dealcoholization(-0.10 unities in Barbera and Rosato and-0.15 unities in Pelaverga).
The fractions dealcoholized with D andMC techniques had similar pH values forall the 3 wines.
Rosato
Pelaverga
Barbera
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
Teste CM DISV
pH
03/12/2019 4103/12/2019 41
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Eth
ano
l (m
L)
Sample number
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
7,00
8,00
0 5 10 15 20 25
mg
sample number
Isoamyl acetate
To the first group of volatile compounds belong:isoamyl acetate, that was completely absent already in the fourth fraction, then also ethylesanoate, ethyloctanoate, hexylacetate.
Trend of the losses of ethanolduring vacuum distillation
Influence on volatile compounds
03/12/2019 4203/12/2019 42
0,00
50,00
100,00
150,00
200,00
250,00
0 5 10 15 20 25
mg
sample number
Etil lactate
The second group includes the moleculeswhose loss trends were perfectly linear:ethyl lactate (figure), diethyl succinate, benzylic alcohol, -phenylethanol, hexanoic, octanoic and decanoic acids, etc.
The third group includes the moleculeswhose losses showed a logarithmic trend:isobutanol, isoamyl alcohol, n-butanol, n-hexanol (figure), cis-3-hexenol, phenylethylacetate.
0,00
10,00
20,00
30,00
40,00
50,00
60,00
70,00
80,00
90,00
100,00
0 5 10 15 20 25
mg
sample number
n-hexanol
Influence on volatile compounds
03/12/2019 4303/12/2019 43
• Implementation of new practices, or modification of alreadyexisting ones, with particular attention to environmentalsustainability and consumers safety.
• Implementation of new oenological practices to improve winequality: improvement of the sensory characteristics andpleasantness, production of more identifiable wines, prolongationof shelf-life.
• Implementation of new enological practices to enhance in thewines the varietal characteristics of the grape cultivar of origin.
• Oenological practices to reduce the use of potentially allergenicadditives (SO2) or to remove contaminants (ochratoxin A, ethylphenols, ..).
Enrivonmental substainability, consumer safetyand wines quality
03/12/2019 4403/12/2019 44
Varietal enology
The effect of two different pressingconditions - under air or nitrogen - onthe composition of the pressed mustsof four white grape cultivars wasstudied:
• Moscato bianco, from 3 locations
• Manzoni bianco, from 3 locations
• Cortese, from 2 locations
• Arneis, from 1 location
The aim was to compare the twotechniques with grapes with differentchemical composition, in order toidentify the most suitable techniqueto the compositional characteristics ofeach cultivar (varietal enology).
03/12/2019 4503/12/2019 45
Some results
The GSH and HCTA concentration andHCTA/GSH ratio depend on the cultivars.The highest GSH concentrations were found inArneis and Manzoni bianco.Differences between vintages were alsoobserved, but the ranking order of the cultivarswas the same, regardless of the vintage.The hyperoxidation technique resulted moreinteresting for Moscato bianco cultivar.
HCTA/GSH ratios
03/12/2019 4603/12/2019 46
The future perspective of the research is to perform studies onoenological practices and products, on rapid and not destructiveanalytical methods and on the application of informatic tools toimprove the monitoring of the winemaking process.
Future perspectives. Precision Oenology
QUALSHELL Project was presented toPiedmont Region under the «EuropeanAgricultural Fund of Rural Development»programme (EAFRD 2014-2020 – Misure16: Cooperation – PSR 16.1.1: Costitution,management and functioning of EIP-AGRIOperational Groups (Action 1) and Supportto the action of EIP-AGRI OperationalGroups (Action 2).The QUALSHELL Project will start in 2020vintage.
03/12/2019 4703/12/2019 47
The QUALSHELL Project
QualShelL Quality and Shelf-Life of the wines.Implementation of procedures for the evaluation of grapes quality and for processmonitoring.Project leader: CREA-VE – AstiOther participants: UNITO, INRIM; a cooperative winery (Terre del Barolo), nine small-medium wineries, an Association of Agricultural producers (Confagricoltura), an IT company(ERInformatica) and a consulting firm (Vassallo-Delfino & P.).
Preface The improvement of wines quality depends on the rationalisation of the use ofresources (precision oenology), on the reduction of the use of inputs, on the improvementof technical traceability through easy process indicators and on the capacity to adaptwinemaking practices to the characteristics of the grapes (varietal enology).
Expected results1. Development of rapid non-destructive methods for measuring the polyphenolic
composition of grapes, capable of predicting their quality and directing winemakingtechniques;
2. Development of rapid non-destructive analytical methods for monitoring wine duringstorage in tanks or barrels.