different countries – different trends? the situation of natural refrigerants by
DESCRIPTION
Different countries – different trends? The situation of natural refrigerants by. Carbon Equivalent Refrigerant Levy – the Australian Experience. Stefan S. Jensen B. Sc. Eng. FIEAust, CPEng, NPER, F.AIRAH Managing Director Scantec Refrigeration Technologies Brisbane, Australia. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Different countries – different trends?
The situation of natural refrigerants
by
Carbon Equivalent Refrigerant Levy – the Australian Experience
Stefan S. Jensen B. Sc. Eng. FIEAust, CPEng, NPER, F.AIRAH
Managing Director
Scantec Refrigeration TechnologiesBrisbane, Australia
Nuremberg, 10 October 2012
Future HFC costs
R134a levy: 1.3*23 = $29.90/kg
Substance GWP Non-carbon Price Import
Levy
Equivalent Carbon Price Component
Total Levy
$ $ $
HFC134A 1300 0.17 29.90 30.07
R404A 3260 0.17 74.98 75.15
R407C 1526 0.17 35.10 35.26
Source: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Future HFC costs
AUD 1.00 ≈ EUR 0.80
20 June 2012Source:
List Price Example:
• Clean Energy Future Plan released 10 July 2011
• The objectives of the plan are to cut pollution and drive investment in lower polluting industries
• Will apply to all six Kyoto gases:• Carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons,
perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride
• Fixed price period from July 2012 to June 2015
Clean Energy Future Plan
Source: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
• Market based system from July 2015 with the exception of synthetic greenhouse gases
• Household assistance
• Programs to assist industry transition and improved energy efficiency (CTIP, LCA)
Clean Energy Future Plan (cont’d)
Source: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Clean Energy Future Plan (cont’d)• Levy applies to SGG’s listed under the
Kyoto Protocol from 1 July 2012
• Levy applied through Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas legislation
• The levy encourages:• increased recycling of synthetic greenhouse gases
• improved servicing of existing equipment to reduce leakage
• a switch to purpose-designed equipment using lower GWP gases, only where this is appropriate and meets relevant safety standards and legislative requirements
• innovation by manufacturers
Source: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Clean Energy Future Plan (cont’d)• Applies to all imports and manufacture
of HFCs, PFCs and SF6
• Applies to import of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in equipment
• Exemptions where impracticable or for medical, veterinary or WHS reasons
• Inhalers exempted
• Imported foam products exempted with review over next 12 months
• Provision for refunds for SGG exportsSource: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water,
Population and Communities
Proposed Destruction Program
• Incentives will be provided for destruction of waste SGGs and ozone depleting substances, recovered at end of life
• Payment will be made after verification of destruction of the gas
• Program will be developed in consultation with industry
• Program will start 1 July 2013
Clean Energy Future Plan (cont’d)
Source: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
The “working” bank40,100 metric tons contained in 37,000,000 devices
Source: Peter Brodribb; Refrigerant Levy Panel “Working Bank”. What are the options?”
The “working” bank
Source: Peter Brodribb; Refrigerant Levy Panel “Working Bank”. What are the options?”
Initial Industry Reaction• Not enough time for industry to adjust• Lack of information• Safety issues caused by shift to low GWP fluids• Security issues due to more gas theft• Potential for perverse outcomes• Cash flow problems• Increased warranty risks• Skills shortages • Counterfeit hydrocarbon based refrigerants• Panic buying of refrigerants• Recycling of contaminated refrigerants• Increases in incidents of fraud and smuggling• Skills based licensing needs• Need for new standards
Source: AIRAH Industry Summit March 2012
Initial Industry Reaction cont’d• Lack of Government understanding of industry
issues• Lack of evaluation framework for emissions
reductions achieved• Lack of articulation of Government objectives• No clear path for funding assistance• Lack of access to trusted information for industry• Lack of enforcement of current SGG legislation• Slow development of new regulations• Lack of skilled trainers and equipment for NR’s
ETCETCETC
Initial Industry Reaction cont’d
NO
EXCEPT PERHAPS IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE A MANUFACTURER OF HIGH
GWP REFRIGERANTS!
SO IS IT ALL BAD?
First Step – Stop the Leaks
Source: Expert Group, Peter Brodribb and Michael McCann ‘Refrigerant Emissions in Australia, Sources, Causes and Remedies, 2010
Sources of leaks as identified by survey of technicians and contracting businesses
Next Step – Transition
NH3 HFCTotal engine room shaft power, kW 114.2 264.2Total annual operating costs excl. maintenance $133,120 $212,369Approx. refrigeration plant capital cost, k$ 775 500Simple pay-back for Δ investment, years 4.7 -Technical plant life, years 20-25 10-15
~55 m
EXAMPLE 1
EXAMPLE 2
AFTER
BEFORE
Two Water Cooled R717 Water Chillers, 1200 kW
Two Air Cooled R22 Water Chillers for Office Air Conditioning, 1200 kW
Annual Energy Saving 500 MWh
Next Step – Transition
AFTER
BEFORE
EXAMPLE 3 Central R717 Water Ethanol Cooling Plant, 6000 kW
Four Water Cooled R134A Ethanol Chillers for Process Cooling, 6000 kW
Annual reduction from 40% to <30%
Next Step – Transition
QUESTIONS?
Can we do it? Yes, we can.