different potential systematic uncertainties involved in 210 pb dating method begy r.-cs. 1,2,...
TRANSCRIPT
Different potential systematic uncertainties involved in 210Pb dating method
Begy R.-Cs.1,2 , Reizer E. 1, Forray F.-L. 3, Simon H. 1, Gabor A.-I. 1,2,
This work is financially supported by PN-II-RU-TE-2012-3-0351 project
1Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, 30 Fântânele Street, 400294, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; 2INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, ICIA Cluj-Napoca, Romania3Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Geology, M. Koganiceanu Street nr.1 , Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
About us• Nuclear spectrometry laboratory from “Babes-
Bolyai” University (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering)
• Team: Begy R.-Cs.(Phd. head), Simon H. (Phd stud.), Reizer E.(Msc. Stud.), Vasilache D. (Phd stud.), Kelemen Sz. (Res. asist)
• Facilities: two HpGe gamma spectrometer (GEM and GMX type) 8 alpha chamber with 900 mm2 PIPS detector, scintillations cell for Rn and Ra measurements etc.
• Task: Pb-210 dating(Starts in 2005 for first time in Romania (in our laboratory)) and Monitoring of Environmental radioactivity (NORM, TENORM)
Aims of this studyFor Pb-210 dating
Determination of Pb-210• Alpha spectrometry (chemical preparation)
• Gamma spectrometry
To analyze the effect of the undisolved (insoluble) materials especially for silicates found in the sediments Estimate the uncertainty caused by the silicatesImproved the chemical separation process
To analyze the variation of the mass attenuation in sediment layers (compared with IAEA reference material)Establish a correction for the self attenuation effect
Study AreaName Location Type
1.Buhăescu 47°35’18,52″N 24°38’ 35,56″E GLACIAL
2.Știol 47°35’ 08,97″N 24°48’ 59,50″E GLACIAL
3.Muced 47°34’26,63″N 24°32’41,64″E GLACIAL
4.Saint Anna 46°07’66″É 25°53’14,52″K VOLCANIC
5.Iacob 45° 07' 49,30'' N 29° 23' 38.80'' DELTAIC
Alpha spectrometry• The total 210Pb can be determine by measuring its daughter
isotope 210Po ( one of the most precise method)is generally based on various acids leachings procedures.
EPA -David N.Edgington, 1975
Leaching with mineral acids, partial digestion
without HF
Wojciech Tylmann, 2013Rolf Aalto, 2012Begy et al. 2015
digestion totality of sediment samples using HF
Negative effect •their difficult decontaminations
• their costly prices• Most time consuming
• (1 week)
• quick contamination of teflon disches
Negative effect
Positive effect
Positive effect
Lose of Po-210
Less time consuming (max 1
day)
Getting the total amount of Po from
sample
1.
2.
Just HCl and H2 O2
Materials and Methods 1 (EPA -David N.Edgington, 1975)
• Application of the first method, and the residual was digested in Teflon dishes in presents of HF, HNO3 until total dissolution.
• Total activity represent the activity measured in first and second step together
• Chemical processes was yielded by adding Po-209 as tracer
• Measurements with PIPS detector alpha-spectrometric system
• Total time consumption is 1 day
Control of measurements
1.Results of Leaching with mineral acids, partial digestion without HF
Știol Buhăescu Muced Iacob St Anne Total Activity of
sed. (Bq/kg) 57260 2727400 33029 20030 16120
Activity of silicate content
(Bq/kg)915 (16%)
22618 (9%) - 609
(30%) 787(45%)
Undissolved silicate content
(mass) 25% 36% - 48% 22%
The uncertainty of the value are represented in 2σ confidence interval
Activity of 226Ra 55460%
76533% - 202
33%50464%
2. Total digestion of sediment samples using HF (Wojciech Tylmann, 2013 Rolf Aalto, 2012
Begy et al. 2015)Activity in residuals (Bq/kg)
UDL UDL - UDL UDL
Teflon dish contamination
%20 46 - 35 22
Improvement for avoid the using of Teflon:The sample is place first in a single use plastic glass with 2.5 ml HF and 3 ml of HNO3 for two days. After, 2 ml of 0.8 mol boric acid is added and replaced in Erlenmeyer glasses with 10 ml of HNO3 and placed on a hot plate at 90 ˚C .Evaporation at almost dryness 10ml HNO3 Evaporation 10 ml HCl Evaporation 10 ml HCl EvaporationAdding H2O2 and three times distilled WaterDeposition on a Stainless Steel disc at 0.4-0.9 pH fixed with HCl on 82 ˚C
UDL – Under Detection Limit that in our case is 3 mBq
Mineralogy of the residuals 1• The samples mineral composition were identified using powder X-ray diffraction
(XRD) analysis with a Bruker D8 Advance powder diffractometer using Bragg-Brentano geometry.
• The samples from Muced, Buhăescu and Știol Lakes contain quartz with undulatory extinction typical for metamorphic rocks. Besides quartz, muscovite and feldspar where identified by x-ray diffraction Other minerals identified by polarised optical microscopy, besides those identified by x-ray diffraction, are amphiboles and chlorite.
• Sediments accumulated in St. Anna Lake consist of minerals originated for the alteration of volcanic rocks (dacite). The dominant minerals identified by X-ray diffraction are feldspar and quartz The quartz is of non-undulatory type, typical for magmatic rocks. Small quantities of amphibole, pyroxene, biotite where identified by polarised optical microscopy.
• Jacob lake samples have predominantly quartz with undulatory extinction,
muscovite, and rare feldspars, pyroxene and amphiboles.
Mineralogy of the residuals 2
Power X-ray diffraction patterns for sediments from Buhaiescu Lake, St. Anna Lake. Identified minerals are: MS-muscovite, Pl-plagioclase and Qtz-quartz
Resulted UncertaintiesLakes Știol Buhăescu Muced Iacob St Anne
Effect of silicates to 210Pb dating
method
Difference in
Ages(y)%
2,05 (max 8,6)
-1,03(max 8,3) - -5,9
(max 21)-11
(max 17)
Difference in
Dates%
0,78(max 4,5)
0,54(max 3,4) - 0,2
(max 3,11)0,45
(max 1,3)
uncertainties in 210Pb dating method (%)
7 12 - 5 19
uncertainties in 210Pb dating method with
silicates effect
19% 20% - 26% 36%
Gamma spectrometry• The main problem is regarding to the matrix effect,
the self attenuation in the sample
• Three possibilities:– Computing software for self attenuation corrections
(monte-carlo simulation)– Analytical techniques for density correction (empirical
equations)– Simple determination of the self attenuation coefficient
and recalculate the peak intensity (very important in relative method )Unfortunately it must to be apply for each analyzed sediment layer
Self attenuation coefficient in sediment column
yI apabsabsprobgeom det
rR
xarctggeom 2
1
4
1
xabsprob
me
Empirical approach
xgeom
mexryI 2det
det2rya mb
xbh
geom exaI 0
5
223344
32
242412424
6
1
222
2
111
4
1
b
bhhbhbhbe
rR
b
hbhbe
rRb
hbeI
bh
hbhb
Correction by recalculation the peak intensity trough mass attenuation correction
Before Correction After Correction
Conclusions• Leaching with just mineral acids (HCl and H2O2) can result residue of
22-48% depending on the origin of the sediments
• The remaining activity of 210Pb(210Po) in the undisolved material can vary in the range of 9-45%
• The remaining residual activity found in sediments which have predominantly quartz or are originating from volcanic rocks
• Second digestion procedure was developed, in this case the residue was negligible and the remaining activity was under the detection limit
• The highest uncertainty is produced in case of volcanic rocks, total error can reach 30%
• In gamma spectrometric measurements the matrix effect is very important to correct, the simplest way being with the determination of the mass attenuation coefficient for each sediment layer
Thank you for attention
This work is financially supported by PN-II-RU-TE-2012-3-0351 project, Radionuclides as tracers of the anthropic influence on the Danube Delta sedimentary processes National project, initiated by the Romanian Guverment