digital morphology and eqa michelle brereton, john burthem, keith hyde

44
Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde. Manchester Royal Infirmary. www.manlab.co.uk UK NEQAS(H) www.ukneqas-haem.org.uk (H)

Upload: nasya

Post on 27-Jan-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

(H). Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde. Manchester Royal Infirmary. www.manlab.co.uk UK NEQAS(H) www.ukneqas-haem.org.uk. (H). Digital Morphology Imaging Aim of Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Digital Morphology and EQA

Michelle Brereton, John Burthem,

Keith Hyde.

Manchester Royal Infirmary.

www.manlab.co.uk

UK NEQAS(H) www.ukneqas-haem.org.uk

(H)

Page 2: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Digital Morphology Imaging

Aim of ProjectTo assess the emerging role of digital imaging and web-based technology in morphological education,

EQA and CPD

NEQAS participant driven – questionnaire feedback

(H)

Page 3: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

United Kingdom External Quality Assessment Service

Haematology - UK NEQAS (H) Morphology Scheme

Started in 1968 – updated in 1979• >500 participant centres UK (80 non UK labs)• 8 surveys per year - 2 cases per survey. • Age, Sex, Hb and WBC.• Choose 5 morphological features – offer a diagnosis.• Glass slides via post.

(H)

Page 4: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

United Kingdom External Quality Assessment Service

Haematology - UK NEQAS (H) Morphology Scheme

Returns and Reports via post:• Histogram of morphological features (coded)• List of 5 most commonly reported features• Brief case history / medical features/ additional

laboratory results• Diagnosis and Expert opinion

(H)

Page 5: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde
Page 6: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Web Based Morphology Exercises

2001• 2 cases from previous surveys.• 5 digital images on each case.• Participants view via web site.• Limited response n = 30

(H)

Page 7: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Digital Image 2001

More Images per case.

Improve picture quality.

(H)

Page 8: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Web Based Morphology Exercises

20031. Survey Report:

A single case, 12 images with expert opinion and consensus results.

2. Pilot exercise:

Educational element, participant involvement.

(Response n = 128)

(H)

Page 9: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Feature 3119 giant platelet3 megakaryocyte fragment

Tutorial: Slide 4

Page 10: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Feature 8101 megakaryocytic fragment15 giant platelet4 smear cell

Tutorial: Slide 4

Page 11: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Feature 6

67/128 acanthocyte

40/128 echinocyte

11/128 spherocyte

Tutorial: Slide 4

Page 12: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Priorities for 2004 (1)

Survey Report - Multiple Images with Expert Opinion: via Web

• Archive / education record• Images from each survey with results and

feedback• Image Library of NEQAS surveys since

2002• Moving to CPD

(H)

Page 13: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

 

                   

                   

                   

                   

                   

                   

                   

                   

                   

 

                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                             

www.manlab.co.uk

Image Library.

Page 14: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Priorities for 2004 (2)

Electronic slide• Develop larger field of view• Maintain resolution• Use computer software to change field of view• Precious material• All see the same cells

(H)

Page 15: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Photograph single “high power” images

Page 16: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Take multiple “overlapping” fields

Page 17: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Computer software matches fields

Page 18: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde
Page 19: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

And “stitches” a composite image

Page 20: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Assemble many fields to make image larger….

Page 21: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

And larger…….

Page 22: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Etc…..

Page 23: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

While still retainingdetails that can beviewed at high power

Page 24: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde
Page 25: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Stitched “digital slide” 2001

www.manlab.co.ukDepartment of Morphology

Page 26: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

“stitched” digital slide for 2004

www.ukneqas-haem.org.uk

www.manlab.co.uk morphology

Page 27: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Exercise for 2004

4 cases from previous surveys• Participants not informed that images were actual

surveys.• Cases chosen were 0001BF2 (HbSS), 0002BF1 (Bcell

PLL),0403BF1 (CGL) and 0403PA1 (malaria)• 40 images “stitched” per case• Images presented with same basic information given

with standard surveys (age, sex, WBC, Hb).• Participants asked to give 5 comments per case

Result sheets and questionnaire returned to UK NEQAS(H)

(H)

Page 28: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

166 returned completed coded morphology forms.

162 also completed questionnaire

(H)

Response

Page 29: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Was the image of adequate size to allow an opinion?

(H)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1(SS) 2(PLL) 4(CGL) 5(MP)

YES

NO

Page 30: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Rate the Exercise

(H)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Comparisonwith survey

Follow up teaching

1

2

3

4

5

Page 31: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

(H)

Download time

CPD

Comparison to glass

Follow-up

Archive

Teaching aid

“Rare” Image

2.7

3.5

3.8

4.1

4.2

4.6

4.6

Rate the Exercise (overview)

Poor ExcellentOK

Page 32: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

(H)

The cases:

0403BF1 (CGL)0001BF2 (HbSS)

0002BF1 (Bcell PLL) 0403PA1 (P.Ovale)

Page 33: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

0403BF1 (CGL)

(H)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

glass slide

electronic

Page 34: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

0403BF1 (CGL)

(H)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

glass slide

electronic

Page 35: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

0001BF2 (HbSS)

(H)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

glass slide

electronic

**

**

Responses: Sickle disorder: 84% HA: 4% Splenectomy: 5%

Page 36: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

0002BF1 (Bcell PLL)

(H)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Survey

Image

Diagnosis virtual: CLL (33); LPD (26) PLL (25) lymphoma (11) AL (9) CMML (2) viral (2)

**

**

**

Page 37: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

(H)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

glass slide electronic

vivaxovalemalariaefalciparum

**

0403PA1 (P.Ovale)

Page 38: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Summary

Digital Imaging for Morphology in EQA

• Participant Driven from digital web exercises.• ???s with survey feedback and expert opinion.

(H)

Page 39: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Future developments

Page 40: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde
Page 41: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

UK NEQAS (H)

EQA and Education

Continuing Professional Development

• Participant Driven from digital web exercises.• Image Library - Multiple images with survey

feedback and expert opinion.• UK NEQAS registered with IBMS executive for

CPD scheme 2005.• Individuals, rather than centres, react to images

of morphology.

(H)

Page 42: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

UK NEQAS (H)

CPD Scheme – Pilot via Web

• Participant centres asked to nominate and register an individual.

• View selected surveys via the web.• Comment on images and provide reflective

notes.• Return reports to UK NEQAS.• 250 participants currently registered for phased

trial.• First 50 start18th April 2005.

(H)

Page 43: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

UK NEQAS (H)

CPD Pilot – Process

• Register with UK NEQAS(H) nationally• 2 CPD points for registration• 1 point per case reviewed• Accumulate 18 points per year• Complete Reflective Form, Specific to Pilot.• CPD credits awarded by UK NEQAS(H).

(H)

Page 44: Digital Morphology and EQA Michelle Brereton, John Burthem, Keith Hyde

Acknowledgements

Manchester Royal Infirmary www.manlab.co.uk John Ardern. Michelle Brereton. John Burthem. Lois Hickman. Claire Hutchinson. Keith Hyde.

Manchester Metropolitan and Salford Universities.Len Seal. Andrew Serrant. Emma Wells.

UK NEQAS (H) www.ukneqas-haem.org.uk Paul McTaggart. Barbara De La Salle. John Parker-Williams.

Participants of the NEQAS morphology scheme.

(H)