dil warranties and contract
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
1/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
SYNOPSISthursday
Remedies for Breach ofContracts and Warranties
SUMBITTED BY:-
AJAY KUMARSINGHANASUYA SARKAR
PABITRA MOHAN SAMAL
DILBHADURYADAV
SUMBITTED TO: SHYNO SUSANPHILIP
RAJA GUPTA
PROF. GOPAL KRISHNA RITESH JHA
RICHA SINHABHARGAVI
C.PURNIMA
ASISH
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
2/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Remedies for breach of contracts
In case of breach of contract, the aggrieved party has the following
remedies:
1.Suit for specific performance
2.Suit for injunction
3.Suit for damages, forthe loss sustained
4.Quantum Meruit
1 .Su
it for specific performance:By specific,the court, directs the party committing the breach of
Contracts to perform and promise to the terms ofthe contracts. Specific
Performance ofthe contract can be granted underthe Specific Relief Act,
1877.
2. Suit for injunction:
An injunction is an order ofthe court directing a personto do or refrain
From doing some act, which is the subject, matter ofthe contract and
Which a party undertakes to do ornotto do. The power ofthe courtto
grant injunction is discretionary and may be granted for a temporary or an
indefinite period. An injunction is therefore, used as a means of enforcing
a contract or a promise or forbidding the party from committing a breach.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
3/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
3. Suit for damages, for the loss sustained:
In case of a breach of contract, injured party can claim damages forthe
Loss caused by breach of contract.
Damages are given by way of restitution as a monetary compensation
To the injured party. The aggreived party can recover the actual loss
caused
To him bythe breach of contract and notthe exemplary or unusual
Damages. Exemplary or remote damages can be recovered in case of a
Breach of promise of marriage where the Court have regard to the feelings
Ofthe aggrieved party. The injured party as placed inthe same financial
Position as he would have been in, ifthe contract had been performed.
Damages are thus given by way of compensation forthe loss suffered bythe plaintiff and not forthe purpose of punishing the defendant ofthe
Breach.
4. Quantum Meruit:
Quantum meruit means as much as earned or deserved or as much as is
merited.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
4/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Types of Monitory Damages:
1. Compensatory damages
2. Consequential Damages
3. Nominal Damages
4. Liquidated Damages
1.Compensatory Damages:y Award of money intended to compensate a non-breaching party for
the loss ofthe bargain.
y They place the non-breaching party inthe same position as ifthe
contract had been fully performed by restoring the benefit of the
bargain.
y The amount ofthat will be awarded for breach of contract depends
on:
The type of contract involved, and
Which party breached the contract.
y Special types of contracts:
Sale of Goods
Construction Contracts
Employment contracts
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
5/33
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
6/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Provide an incentive to enter into contracts.
3.Nominal Damages:
Damages awarded whenthe non-breaching party sues the
breaching party eventhough no financial loss has resulted
from the breach.
Usually awarded in a small amount such as $1.
Cases involving nominal damages are usually brought on
principle.
Mitigation of Damages: dil bahadur yadav
A non-breaching party is under a legal dutyto avoid or reduce
damages caused by a breach of contract.
The extent of mitigation depends onthe type contract involved.
Enforcement of Remedies: dil bahadur yadav
Ifthe breaching party refuses to paythe court ordered judgment,
the court may issue.
Writ of Attachment
Writ of Garnishment
Writ of Attachment
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
7/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Orders the sheriff to
Seize property inthe possession ofthe breaching partythat
he or she owns, and
To sell the property at auctionto satisfythe judgment.
Writ of Garnishment
Orders that
Wages, bank accounts, or other property ofthe breaching
partythat is inthe hands ofthird parties be paid overto the
non-breaching partyto satisfythe judgment.
RULES FOR ASCERTAINING DAMAGES: dilbahadur
yadav
Rule-1: when a contract has been broken,the party who suffers
by such breach is entitled to receive from the party who has broken
the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him
thereby, which naturally arose inthe usual course ofthings from such
breach or which the parties knew, whenthey made then contractto
be likelyto result from the breach of it.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
8/33
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
9/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
In making an award of damages, the court has two major
considerations:
1. Remoteness for what consequences ofthe breach is the defendant
Legally responsible?
2.The measure of damages the principles upon which the loss or
damage is evaluated or quantified in monetaryterms.
The second consideration is quite distinct from the first, and can be
Decided bythe court only afterthe first has been determined.
Remoteness of loss:
The rule governing remoteness of loss in contract was established in
Hadley v Baxendale. The court established the principle that where one
party is in breach of contract,the other should receive damages which can
fairly and reasonably be considered to arise naturally from the breach ofcontract itself (inthe normal course ofthings), or which may reasonably
be assumed to have been withinthe contemplation ofthe parties atthe
time they made the contract as being the probable result of a breach.
Thus,there are two types of loss for which damages may be recovered:
1. what arises naturally; and
2. whatthe parties could foresee whenthe contract was made as the likely
result of breach.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
10/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
As a consequence ofthe first limb ofthe rule in Hadley v Baxendale,the
party in breach is deemed to expectthe normal consequences ofthe
breach, whether he actually expected them ornot.
Underthe second limb ofthe rule,the party in breach can only be held
liable for abnormal consequences where he has actual knowledge thatthe
abnormal consequences might follow or where he reasonably oughtto
know thatthe abnormal consequences might follow Victoria Laundry v
NewmanIndustries.
The measure (or quantum) of damages:
In assessing the amount of damages payable,the courts use the
following principles:
y The amount of damages is to compensate the claimant for his loss
notto punish the defendant.
y Damages are compensatory not restitutionary.
The most usual basis of compensatory damages is to putthe innocent party
into the same financial position he would have been in had the contract
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
11/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
been properly performed. This is sometimes called the expectation loss
basis. In Victoria Laundry v NewmanIndustries, for example, Victoria
Laundry were claiming forthe profits they would have made had the
boiler been installed onthe contractually agreed date.
Sometimes a claimant may preferto frame his claim inthe alternative on
the reliance loss basis and thereby recover expenses incurred in
anticipation of performance and wasted as a result ofthe breach Anglia
Television v Reed.
In a contract forthe sale of goods,the statutory (Sale of Goods Act 1979)
measure of damages is the difference betweenthe market price atthe date
ofthe breach and the contract price, so that onlynominal damages will be
awarded to a claimant buyer or claimant seller ifthe price atthe date ofbreach was respectively less or more thanthe contract price.
In fixing the amount of damages,the courts will usually deductthe tax (if
any) which would have been payable bythe claimant ifthe contract had
not been broken. Thus if damages are awarded for loss of earnings,they
will normally be by reference to net,not gross, pay. Difficulty in assessing
the amount of damages does not preventthe injured party from receiving
them: Chaplin v Hicks.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
12/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
In general, damages are not awarded fornon-pecuniary loss such as
mental distress and loss of enjoyment. Exceptionally, however, damages
are awarded for such losses where the contracts purpose is to promote
happiness or enjoyment, as is the situation with contracts for holidays
Jarvis v Swan Tours. The innocent party musttake reasonable steps to
mitigate (minimize) his loss, for example, bytrying to find an alternative
method of performance ofthe contract: Brace v Calder.
Liquidated damages clauses and penalty clauses:
If a contract includes a provisionthat, on a breach of contract, damages of
ascertain amount or calculable at a certain rate will be payable,the courts
will normally acceptthe relevant figure as a measure of damages. Such
clauses are called liquidated damages clauses.
The courts will uphold a liquidated damages clause even ifthat means that
The injured party receives less (or more as the case may be)than his actual
loss arising onthe breach. This is because the clause setting outthe
damages constitutes one ofthe agreed contractual terms Cellulose
Acetate Silk Co Ltd Widnes Foundry Ltd.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
13/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
However, a court will ignore a figure for damages put in a contract if it is
Classed as a penalty clause that is, a sum which is not a genuine pre-
estimate ofthe expected loss on breach.
This could be the case where:
1.The prescribed sum is extravagant in comparison with the maximum
loss that could follow from a breach.
2.The contract provides for payment of a certain sum but a larger sum
is stipulated to be payable on a breach.
3.The same sum is fixed as being payable for several breaches which
would be likelyto cause varying amounts of damage.
All ofthe above cases would be regarded as penalties, eventhough the
clause might be described inthe contract as a liquidated damages clause.
The court will not enforce payment of a penalty, and ifthe contract is
broken onlythe actual loss suffered may be recovered (Ford Motor Co
(England) Ltd v Armstrong).
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
14/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Equitable remedies: Pabitra
Specific performance
This is an order ofthe court requiring performance of a positive
contractual obligation.
Specific performance is not available inthe following circumstances:
Damages provide an adequate remedy.
Where the order could cause undue hardship.
Where the contract is of such a nature that constant supervision by
the court would be required, e.g. Ryan v Mutual Tontine Association.
Where an order of specific performance would be possible against
one partyto the contract, butnotthe other.
Where the party seeking the order has acted unfairly or
unconscionably. He is barred bythe maxim He who comes to
Equity must come with clean hands.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
15/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Where the order is not sought promptlythe claimant will be barred by
the maxims Delay defeats the Equities and Equity assists the
vigilant butnotthe indolent.
In general the court will only grant specific performance where it would
be just and equitable to do so.
Injunction:
An injunction is an order ofthe court requiring a personto perform a
negative obligation.
Injunctions fall into two broad categories:
Prohibitory injunction, which is an orderthat something mustnot be done.
Mandatory injunction, which is an orderthat something must be done, for
example to pull down a wall which has been erected in breach of contract.
Like specific performance it is an equitable remedy and the court exercises
Its discretion according to the same principles as with specific
performance, e.g.Page One Records Ltd v Britton and Warner Brothers v
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
16/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Nelson.
CASE STUDY OF BREACH OF CONTRACTS:
Mrs Bryne was sacked as a human resources director of a drug
company in January 2001, two months before giving birth. She had
complained that male directors were paid more than female directors in
the company. This was based on the fact that on promotion from human
resources managerto director she had expected a pay rise in line with the
other four directors. In fact, she was awarded a pay increase that brought
her salaryto Rs.52, 500.
All of the other directors, who were men, were earning more than
Rs.60,000 each. One such director,the finance director, had been given a
36.8% pay rise when he became a director, which meantthat his pay was
Rs.65, 000. Mrs. Bryne sent a memo to her boss highlighting the
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
17/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
differences and was told that she wanted too much too soon and that she
should have ignored what other people were earning.
The Claim:
Mrs. Bryne brought her claim for breach of contract and for sexual
discrimination because her boss made a comment that all women who
were of child-bearing age should be sterilized. She was sacked after
sending the memo and only giventhree months notice ratherthanthe six
months to which she was entitled under her contract. This resulted in her
not being able to claim for unfair dismissal.
At the Tribunal:
Another employee confirmed the bosss comment about female
sterilization, adding that she was told that if she wanted to progress in her
career with the company it was best never to get pregnant. When Mrs.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
18/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Bryne was recruited, the recruitment consultant was asked to find out
whether she intended to start a family ornot. She told the tribunal that she
was shocked to be asked this question, which is not something that should
be asked during the recruitment process or at all by an employer. The
recruitment consultanttold herthat if she brought up the subject of having
children, she should reassure her future employers that she was not
planning on running off and having millions of babies.
The tribunal found that the way in which she had been dismissed after
sending her boss the email about her salary did constitute unfair dismissal.
This was because she would have been entitled to claim damages if she
had been giventhe notice period that was contracted. The boss in question
stated that he liked to crackjokes and to make the working environment
less serious. He did however state that he realized that the quip he had
made inthis instance had been severely off-key. He told the tribunal that
he regretted making the remark, and said that it was so grotesque that it
could not actually be his opinion.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
19/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
The Tribunal's Findings:
Mrs. Brynes sexual discrimination claim was dismissed at the
employmenttribunal. The tribunal chairman said that the comment made
by the boss was just part of the humour that was used in the
pharmaceutical industry, and that it did not constitute the bosss view or
that of the company. Mrs. Bryne was awarded damages for successfully
proving breach of contract.
Although Mrs. Brynes sexual discrimination claim failed, she did receive
an award of damages forthe breach of contract by her employer.
Breach of Contract - Supplying Food to AllergySufferer:
A Sikh couple wentto a wedding party held in August 2003. Mr.
Bhamra, a research chemist, and his wife had travelled from Birmingham
to Forest Gate in Londonto the Sikh wedding atthe Ramgarhia Temple.
Mr. Bhamra was allergic to eggs, and knew of his allergy. Egg allergies
only affect 0.1% of the population, but as Sikhs do not eat eggs he
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
20/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
considered that any of the food he would have eaten was safe. Eggs are
strictly forbidden at Sikh temples, and the caterer knew this.
The Extra Food:
Unfortunately, more people attended the wedding than had been expected,
and as the guests swelled to over five hundred in number, the caterer
realised that he was going to have to bring in extra food. The caterer, who
was also a Sikh, sent out for extra supplies from external sources. One of
the dishes supplied was ras malai, which is a dessert made of sugary
balls of paneer soaked in clotted cream. The recipe forthe dessertthat was
supplied, afterthe food beganto run short, contained eggs.
The Allergic Reaction:
Mr. Bhamra ate some of the ras malai, and had an allergic reaction.
Although he had been prescribed adrenalin pens inthe event of a reaction,
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
21/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
he had not broughtthem with him to the wedding. He collapsed, fell into a
coma and was admitted to hospital where he died three days later. He was
fortynine years old. The case was brought onthe basis ofnegligence:
y that the caterer knew that no one would have expected any of the
food would have contained eggs
y that as the caterer he should have knownthat if he used external food
suppliers some recipes for ras malai contained eggs
The County Court Case:
The caterer who had supplied the ras malai denied that he had used
another supplierto supply extra food. The court of appeal, however, found
that he had done exactlythis. The court also found that as a caterer he was
aware that some recipes for ras malai contained eggs, but that it was not
necessary for him to have issued warnings to the wedding guests because
so few of the population suffer from the allergy. Some Sikh sects are
vehemently against the consumption of meat and eggs, although they do
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
22/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
eat milk, butter and cheese. The allergy sufferer had therefore been
entitled to feel that there would not be any eggs in the food that was
supplied atthe wedding.
The Court of Appeal Case:
The court of appeal upheld the original judgment at Oxford County Court,
which was that the caterer was ordered to pay damages in the sum of
Rs.415,000 for negligently supplying food that contained eggs. As the
caterer had appealed and because of the delay in time from the original
incidentto the court of appeal hearing, interest was awarded inthe sum of
Rs.35, 000.
Caterers, and others supplying services and goods to the public, have a
duty of care to those that consume their products. This case highlights
what can go wrong whenthat duty of care is not properly observed.
Breach of Warranty:
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
23/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
A Warranty is basically a guarantee given bythe sellerthat a product is
reliable and free from known defects and thatthe seller will, without
charge, repair or replace defective parts within a giventime limit and
under certain conditions.
Abreach of warranty occurs whenthe promise is broken, i.e., a product is
defective ornot as should be expected by a reasonable buyer.
In business and legal transactions, a warranty is an assurance by one party
to the other partythat certain facts or conditions are true or will happen ;
the other party is permitted to rely onthat assurance and seek some type
of remedy if it is nottrue or followed.
A warranty may be express or implied.
Express warranty:
Anexpress warranty is a guarantee from the seller of a productthat
specifies the extentto which the quality or performance ofthe product
that specifies the extentto which the quality or performance ofthe
product is assured and states the conditions under which the product can
be returned, replaced or repaired. It is often given inthe form of a
specific, written warranty document. For example, an advertisement
describing a product is often full of express warranties; the product must
substantially conform to what is advertised. A warranty may also applyto
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
24/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
services that are sold. For example, an automobile repair shop may
guarantee its repair for a period of 90 days.
The misuse of famous trademark may also create an express warranty,the
violation of which is called passing off ; the source and quality ofthe
goods is misrepresented.
Implied Warranty:Ashish
Animplied warranty is one that arises from the nature ofthe transactions,
and the inherent understanding bythe buyer, ratherthan from the express
disclaimed byname, orthe sale is identified with the phrase as is or
with all faults.
For example, a fruitthat looks and smells good but has hidden defects
would violate the implied warranty of merchantability if its quality does
not meetthe standards for such fruit as passes ordinarily in the trade.
The warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is implied when a buyer
relies uponthe sellerto selectthe goods to fit a specific request. For
example,this warranty is violated when a buyer asks a mechanic to
provide snow tires and receives tires that are unsafe to use in snow.
Lifetime warranty: Ashish
A lifetime warranty is usually a guarantee onthe lifetime ofthe product in
the market ratherthanthe lifetime ofthe consumer. Ifthe product has
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
25/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
been discontinued and is no longer available inthe market,the warranty
may last a limited period longer.
For example,the Cisco Limited Lifetime Warranty currently lasts for five
years afterthe product has been discontinued.
Second-hand product warranty:
Second-hand productincludes the products that have already been used by
an end user or consumers. The importance ofthe used or second handproduct market as a fraction ofthe total market has been increasing since
the beginning ofthe 21st century. The sale ofnew product oftentied to a
trade-in, resulting in a market for second hand products.
For instance, in France, used car unit sales increased from 4.7 millionto
5.4 million between 1990 to 2005, atthe same time as new car sales
declined from 2.3 millionto 2.07 million units.
A warranty is violated whenthe promise is broken; when goods are not as
should be expected, atthe time the sale occurs, whether ornotthe defect isapparent. The seller should honourthe warranty by making a timely
refund or a replacement. The sale starts the time underthe statute of
limitations for starting a court complaint for breach of warranty ifthe
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
26/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
seller refuses to honourthe warranty. This period is often overlooked
where there is an extended warranty in which a seller or manufacturer
contracts to provide the additional service of replacing or repairing goods
that fail withinthe extended period. However, ifthe goods were defective
atthe time of sale, and the relevant statute of limitations has not expired,
and then existence or duration of any extended warranty is secondary:
there was a breach of a primary warranty for which the seller may be
liable.
For example, a consumer buys an item that was discovered to be broken or
missing pieces before it was eventaken out ofthe package. This is a
defective product and can be returned to the seller for refund or
replacement, regardless of whatthe sellers returns policy might state,
even ifthe problem wasn't discovered until afterthe extended warrantyexpired. Similarly, ifthe product fails prematurely, it may have been
defective when it was sold and could then be returned for a refund or
replacement. Ifthe seller dishonors the warranty,then a contract claim
can be started in court.
Remedies Of The Buyer
Action for Converting or Detaining Goods:
Where the property in the goods has passed to the buyer and the
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
27/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
sellerwrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the goods, the buyer may
maintain any action allowed by law to the owner of goods of similar kind
when wrongfully converted or withheld.
Action for Failing to Deliver Goods :
Where the property in the goods has not passed to the buyer, and the
seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the goods, the buyer
may maintain an action against the seller for damages for non delivery.
The measure of damages is the loss directly and naturally resulting in
the ordinary course of events, from the seller's breach of contract.
Where there is an available market for the goods in question, the
measure of damages, in the absence of special circumstances showing
proximate damages of a greater amount, is the difference between the
contract price and the market or current price of the goods at the time
or times when they ought to have been delivered, or, if no time was
fixed, then at the time of the refusal to deliver.
Specific Performance:
Where the seller has broken a contract to deliver specific or
ascertained goods, a court having the powers of a court of equity may,
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
28/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
if it thinks fit, on the application of the buyer, by its judgment or decree
direct that the contract shall be performed specifically, without giving
the seller the option of retaining the goods on payment of damages.
The judgment or decree may be unconditional, or upon such terms and
conditions as to damages, payment of the priceand otherwise, as to
the court may seem just.
Interest and Special Damages:
Nothing in this act shall affect the right of the buyer or the seller to
recover interest or special damages in any case where by law interest or
special damages may be recoverable, or to recover money paid where the
consideration for the payment of it has failed.
Implied Conditions and Warranties:
In accordance with various provisions of the Sale of Good
Act, conditions and warranties may be implied in a contract of sale.
Where any right, duty or liability would arise under a contract of sale by
implication of law, it may be negative or varied by express agreement or
by the course of dealing between the parties, or by usage, if the usage be
such as to bind both parties to the contract. The Sale of Goods Act provide
In a contract of sale, unless the circumstances of the contract are such as
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
29/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
to show a different intention, there is:
(a) an implied condition on the part of the sellerthat in the case of a
sale he has a right to sell the goods, and that in the case of an
agreement to sell he will have a right to sell the goods at the time
when the property is to pass;(b) an implied warranty that the buyershall have and enjoy quiet
possession of the goods; and
(c) an implied warranty that me goods shall be free from any charge or
encumbrance in favour of any third party, not declared or known to
the buyer before or at the time when the contract is made.
The rule stated in accordance with the better opinion prevailing prior
to the passing of the statute namely, that by a contract of sale the seller
impliedly undertakes that he has or in the case of an agreement to sell,that he will have a right to sell the goods, unless the circumstances are
such as to show that the seller is transferring only such property as he may
have in the goods. There is usually no implied undertaking, for instance,
where the seller is selling in a special character, such as a mortgagee or
pledgee, or a sheriff under an execution.
The distinction between the condition as to title and the warranty of quiet
possession is similar to that between a covenant for title and one for quiet
enjoyment. The former is an assurance by the grantor that he has the very
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
30/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
estate in quantity and quality which he purports to convey; the latter is an
assurance to the grantee against consequences of a defective title and of
any disturbance thereupon. Thus if the title is defective, the buyer may,
under the Sale of Goods Act, reject the goods, but if he has accepted them
and is afterwards disturbed, he has his remedy by action forbreach of
warranty. In the United States the similar section of the Uniform Sales Act
contains the following additional provision:
Litigation: A Last Resort
The Civil Procedure Rules came into force in April 1999 and govern the way in
which civil litigation is carried out in this country. The rules have been amended
and developed overthe years and there are now approximately fifty amendments. In
April 2006, an amendment was made to the effect that litigation always had to be
regarded as a weapon of last resort. This means that both parties should make
serious efforts to tryto settle the dispute before lodging proceedings.
What if I Just go Ahead and Lodge Proceedings?
Failure to be able to demonstrate efforts to avoid litigation can have catastrophic
consequences financially. This is why there are pre-action protocols that are in
place for various types of litigation such as judicial review, professional negligence
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
31/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
and housing repair claims against landlords. Even if your ty pe of claim is not
governed by one of the pre-action protocols,you are expected to follow a similar
procedure in any event.
ThePre-Action Protocols
The pre-action protocols are designed to encourage the early exchange of
information about the claim, so that both sides have an opportunity to avoid
litigation through settlement. If litigation then becomes unavoidable,you and the
other side have exchanged information so thatthe claim can be managed efficiently
once it reaches court.
How to Comply with thePre-Action Protocols
You should try to negotiate first, and if that fails, sending a pre-action letter. The
pre-action letter sets out what is in dispute, whatyou want done, and the timescale
within which you want it completed. You should then give the other side a
reasonable period within which to respond (usually fourteen days.)Ifthe response
you receive is unsatisfactory, oryou receive no response at all,thenyou can lodge
proceedings.
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
32/33
Remedies For Breach of Contracts and Warranties
Failing to Try to Settle the Claim Before Litigation
Ifthe other side askyou to mediate with them, or make whatthe court later deems
to be a reasonable settlement, and you decline you can be penalized on costs. The
general rule in civil claims is that costs follow the event i.e. the loser pays the
other sides costs. If, however,you have acted unreasonably innot agreeing to go to
mediation or arbitration, the court will more often thannot penalize you when it
comes to costs. Of course,you dont have to enter into alternative dispute resolution
unless you want to you cant be forced into it but to fail to consider it as an
option could have devastating consequences later on.
Ifyour breach of contract claim has gotto a stage at which you have tried to resolve
it using other methods and have either reached stalemate, orthe other side is acting
unreasonably, then you are probably at the point at which you can lodge
proceedings. A general rule to remember, ifyou are acting as a litigant in person, is
neverto fill out a claim form and send itto the court in a fit of rage. You may regret
it later on!
-
8/8/2019 Dil Warranties and Contract
33/33