direct simulation of subgrain dislocation structures srinivasan m. sivakumar and michael ortiz

1
DIRECT SIMULATION OF SUBGRAIN DISLOCATION STRUCTURES DIRECT SIMULATION OF SUBGRAIN DISLOCATION STRUCTURES Srinivasan M. Sivakumar and Michael Ortiz Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PATCHY SLIP Asaro (1983) EQUAL CHANNEL ANGULAR EXTRUSION EQUAL CHANNEL ANGULAR EXTRUSION Process ofshearing R oute A :( =0 o ) R oute B : =90 o R oute C : =180 o R oute B C and B A =90 o or =270 o (R einsertion angles) Form ation of-B2 & -A 2 leaves Form ation of-B2-A 2 subleaves Form ation of-A 2& -C5 leaves Reduction oflam ellarsizes upon furtherdeform ation LAMELLAR STRUCTURES (Cu) (Lee, et al. 2002) LARGE DEFORMATION SINGLE CRYSTAL PLASTICITY STRONG LATENT HARDENING – SINGLE SLIP PLASTICITY SEQUENTIAL LAMINATION CONSTRUCTION MIMICS THE LAMELLAR DISLOCATION STRUCTURES OBSERVED RANK-ONE CONVEXIFICATION ALGORITHM NON-LOCAL EFFECTS USING DISLOCATION DENSITY TENSOR KEY APPLICATIONS: ALL SEVERE PLASTIC DEFORMN. PROCESSES (SPD) EXAMPLE: ECAE Thanks to: Caltech’s ASCI ASAP Center C.Tome and I. Beyerlein (LANL) Matt Fago (Caltech) Lydia Suarez (Caltech) and Marta Kahl (Caltech) FCC – AL-CU ALLOY Shear strain=200% CALCULATIONS FOR = 90 0 ECAE - SINGLE PASS SINGLE CRYSTAL RESULTS (for a particular random orientation) POLYCRYSTAL RESULTS EVOLUTION OF CALCULATED POLE FIGURES EXPERIMENTAL MULTIPLE LENGTH SCALE SEPARATIONS AN APPLICATION AN APPLICATION (ECAE) ELASTIC PLASTIC WORK OF DEFORMATION & with INFINITE LATENT HARDENING SEQUENTIAL LAMINATES SEQUENTIAL LAMINATION - RANK-1 CONVEXIFICATION KOHN, 1991 REGIONS OF SINGLE SLIP AUBRY & ORTIZ, 2003 INCREMENTAL VARIATIONAL SCHEME RADOVITZKY & ORTIZ, 1999 CRITERION FOR BRANCHING: COMPATIBILITY INTERFACES EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS X 1 X 2 x 1 x 2 Die Exit Shear Plane Die Entry Reinsert ion CONFIGURATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM (AN A POSTERIORI ESTIMATON OF SIZES) ESTIMATED : CALCULATED:

Upload: feoras

Post on 13-Feb-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Reinsertion. X 2. Die Entry. x 2. INCREMENTAL VARIATIONAL SCHEME. ELASTIC. PLASTIC. WORK OF DEFORMATION. x 1. RADOVITZKY & ORTIZ, 1999. . REGIONS OF SINGLE SLIP. Shear Plane. X 1. &. with. INFINITE LATENT HARDENING. AUBRY & ORTIZ, 2003. Die Exit. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DIRECT SIMULATION OF SUBGRAIN DISLOCATION STRUCTURES Srinivasan M. Sivakumar  and  Michael Ortiz

DIRECT SIMULATION OF SUBGRAIN DISLOCATION STRUCTURESDIRECT SIMULATION OF SUBGRAIN DISLOCATION STRUCTURES Srinivasan M. Sivakumar and Michael Ortiz

Graduate Aeronautical LaboratoriesCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

PATCHY SLIP Asaro (1983)

EQUAL CHANNEL ANGULAR EXTRUSIONEQUAL CHANNEL ANGULAR EXTRUSION

Process of shearing

• Route A : (=0o)• Route B : =90o

• Route C : =180o

• Route BC and BA –=90o or =270o

(Reinsertion angles)

Formation of -B2 & -A2 leaves

Formation of -B2-A2 subleaves

Formation of -A2&-C5 leaves

Reduction of lamellar sizes upon further deformation

LAMELLAR STRUCTURES (Cu)(Lee, et al. 2002)

• LARGE DEFORMATION SINGLE CRYSTAL PLASTICITY• STRONG LATENT HARDENING – SINGLE SLIP PLASTICITY• SEQUENTIAL LAMINATION CONSTRUCTION MIMICS THE

LAMELLAR DISLOCATION STRUCTURES OBSERVED• RANK-ONE CONVEXIFICATION ALGORITHM • NON-LOCAL EFFECTS USING DISLOCATION DENSITY TENSOR• KEY APPLICATIONS:

ALL SEVERE PLASTIC DEFORMN. PROCESSES (SPD) EXAMPLE: ECAE

Thanks to:Caltech’s ASCI ASAP CenterC.Tome and I. Beyerlein (LANL)Matt Fago (Caltech)Lydia Suarez (Caltech) and Marta Kahl (Caltech)

FCC – AL-CU ALLOY Shear strain=200%

CALCULATIONS FOR = 900 ECAE - SINGLE PASS

SINGLE CRYSTAL RESULTS (for a particular random orientation)

POLYCRYSTAL RESULTS

EVOLUTION OF CALCULATED POLE FIGURES EXPERIMENTAL

MULTIPLE LENGTH SCALE SEPARATIONS

AN APPLICATIONAN APPLICATION

(ECAE)

ELASTIC PLASTICWORK OF DEFORMATION

&

with

INFINITE LATENT HARDENING

SEQUENTIAL LAMINATESSEQUENTIAL LAMINATION - RANK-1

CONVEXIFICATION

KOHN, 1991

REGIONS OF

SINGLE SLIP

AUBRY & ORTIZ, 2003

INCREMENTAL VARIATIONAL

SCHEME

RADOVITZKY &ORTIZ, 1999

CRITERION FOR BRANCHING:

COMPATIBILITY

INTERFACES

EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS

X1

X2

x1

x2

Die Exit

Shear Plane

Die Entry

Reinsertion

CONFIGURATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM

(AN A POSTERIORI ESTIMATON OF SIZES)

ESTIMATED:

CALCULATED: