direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (crassostrea virginica) health and abundance...

19
Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-896-8626 [email protected]

Upload: teagan-hulley

Post on 19-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica)

health and abundance

Melanie L. Parker and William S. ArnoldFWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute

100 Eighth Avenue SESt. Petersburg, FL 33701

[email protected]

Page 2: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District

Water Flow in Florida

Page 3: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)

• CERP implemented as a means of reinitiating natural freshwater flow to both coasts of south Florida

• Monitoring component of CERP addresses impacts of changed FW flow on the flora and fauna

• Eastern oyster chosen as a target species for CERP

Page 4: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Study Sites

• IMPACTED SITES

St. Lucie Estuary

Loxahatchee River

Lake Worth Lagoon

Biscayne Bay

• CONTROL SITES

Tampa Bay

Mosquito Lagoon

Sebastian River

Page 5: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Mosquito Lagoon

• Pristine environment

• Located within Canaveral National Seashore

• Few anthropogenic or freshwater inputs

Page 6: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Mosquito Lagoon Stations

1

3

2

Page 7: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie Estuary

• Urban environment

• Increasing levels of development, industry and agriculture

• Flood control canals and drainage ditches

Page 8: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie Estuary

• Exposed to altered patterns of water quantity and quality– excess wet season

flows– insufficient dry

season flows– extreme salinity

fluctuations– High sediment and

pollutant inputs

Page 9: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie Stations

North

South

Central

1

1

1

2

2

2

3

3

3

Page 10: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Salinity Patterns Mosquito Lagoon

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-North

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-South

Date

Jan 2005 Mar 2005 May 2005 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 Nov 2005 Jan 2006 Mar 2006 May 2006 Jul 2006 Sep 2006 Nov 2006

Salinity

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-Central

0

10

20

30

40

50

Page 11: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Juvenile Recruitment

• Monthly sampling

• 3 replicate spat arrays at each station

• Count live oysters on underside of each strung shell

Page 12: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Juvenile Recruitment

St. Lucie-South

DateJan 2005 Mar 2005 May 2005 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 Nov 2005 Jan 2006 Mar 2006 May 2006 Jul 2006 Sep 2006 Nov 2006

Mean Spat/Shell

0

5

10

15

20

Salinity

0

10

20

30

40

50

Mosquito Lagoon

0

5

10

15

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-North

0

5

10

15

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

St. Lucie-Central

0

5

10

15

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

Spat/ShellSalinity

Page 13: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Abundance and Distribution

• Twice per year

• 10 replicate 1-m2 quadrats at each station

• Count total live and dead oysters

• Measure SH of 50 live oysters

Page 14: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Abundance and Distribution

Site

ML SL-N SL-C SL-S

Mean SH (mm)0

20

40

60

80

100

ML SL-N SL-C SL-S

Salinity0

10

20

30

40

50

ML SL-N SL-C SL-S

Mean LiveOysters/m

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

Winter 2005Summer 2005Spring 2006Fall 2006

Page 15: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)

• Monthly sampling

• Collect and dissect 15 oysters from each site

• Process gill and mantle tissues with RFTM

• Parasite density ranked with Mackin scale

Page 16: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

St. Lucie-Central

DateJan 2005 Mar 2005 May 2005 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 Nov 2005 Jan 2006 Mar 2006 May 2006 Jul 2006 Sep 2006 Nov 2006

0

20

40

60

80

100

Infection Intensity

0

1

2

3

4

5

Percent Infected and Salinity

0

10

20

30

40

50

% Infected

Infection IntensitySalinity

Mosquito Lagoon

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

No oysters collected fromJuly 2005 through April 2006

Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)

Page 17: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Summary

Mosquito Lagoon St. Lucie estuary

Mean Max Min Mean Max Min

Salinity 33.6 42.4 26.1 11.1 29.5 0.20

Mean S.D. % Mean S.D. %

Recruitment 1.35 2.52 0.28 1.10

Density 43.0 53.3 96.2 144.4

Shell Height 53.0 26.3 28.4 8.7

Dermo 0.43 0.71 46 0.05 0.25 9

Page 18: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Conclusions

• The prevalence and intensity of dermo infection is greater at the high salinity Mosquito Lagoon site than at the more variable salinity St. Lucie site

• Nevertheless, oysters in Mosquito Lagoon exhibit higher recruitment rates and less variable adult populations relative to the St. Lucie estuary

• The indirect (negative) effects of salinity appear to exceed the direct effects of dermo on oyster health and abundance in east coast Florida waters

• In FLORIDA SOUTHEAST COAST ESTUARIES,it may be premature to conduct oyster reef rebuilding operations until freshwater entering those estuaries is properly managed

Page 19: Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife

Questions?