discounting and compounding - city university …€¦ · ppt file · web view ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Lecture: Valuing Companies andInvestment Projects
This version 11/9/2001. Includes WORD tables
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
2
TOPICS
Basic Ideas
Compounding/Terminal Value
Discounted Present Value DPV \ Discounted Cash Flow DCF
Investment ( Project) Appraisal, Internal Rate Of Return,
Valuation Of The Firm: Enterprise Vale and Equity
~ choice of discount rate
~ valuation in practice: EBITD, Depreciation, FCF etc.
Complementary Valuation Techniques: EP, EVA,APV
Self Study: Other Investment Appraisal Methods
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
3
READING
Investments:Spot and Derivative Markets, K.Cuthbertson and D.Nitzsche
Chapter 3Discounted Present Value DPV \ Discounted Cash Flow DCF
Internal Rate Of Return, IRR
Investment ( Project) Appraisal
Valuation Of The Firm And The Firm’s Equity (Incl. Continuing Value).
Valuation In Practice: EBITD, Depreciaiton, FCF etc
Other Investment Appraisal Methods
Chapter 11Economic Profit, Economic Value Added, Adjusted Present Value
P. 342-346.
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
4
BASIC IDEAS
Compounding/Terminal ValueDiscounted Present Value DPV
Discounted Cash Flow DCF Internal Rate of Return
Investment/ Project Appraisal
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
5
Compounding/ Terminal Value
Assume zero inflation+cash flows known with certainty
Vo = value today ($1000), r = interest rate (0.10)
Value in 1,2 years time
V1 = (1.1) 1000 = $1100
V2 = (1.1) 1100 = (1.1) 2 1000 = $1210
Terminal Value after n-years: Vn = Ao (1 + r)n
We could ‘move all payments forward’ to time n=10 years and then add them - but we do not do this
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
6
Discounting
‘Bring all payments back’ to t=0 and then add.
Value today of V2 = $1210 payable in 2 yrs ?
DPV =
Hence “ DPV of $1210 is $1000”
Which means that $1000 today is equivalent to $ 1210 payable in 2-years
“Discount Factor” d2 =
Vr2
2 21121011( ) ( . )
11 2( )r
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
7
Discounted Present Value (DPV)
What is value today of stream of payments - usually called ‘Cash Flows’, assuming a constant discount factor? :
DPV = = d1 V1 + d2 V2 + ..
r = ‘discount rate’
d = “discount factor” < 1
Discounting, puts all future future cash flows on to a ‘common cash flows on to a ‘common time’ at t=0 - so they can then be “added up”.time’ at t=0 - so they can then be “added up”.
Vr
Vr
1 221 1( ) ( )
...
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
8
Operating Cash Flows, (ie. revenues less operating costs, less taxes) V1 = $1100, and V2 = $1210
Then DPV(of ‘cash flows’ at r =10%) = $2000
Suppose Capital Cost (Investment Expenditure), KC = $2000
Net Present Value (NPV): NPV = DPV - KC
RULE: If DPV > KC then invest in project
OR If NPV > 0 then invest in project
Our project is just ‘on the margin’ since NPV = 0 when r=10%
Investment (Project) Appraisal:Decision Criteria
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
9
r=5
NPV
r= loan rate or discount rate
NPV=145
r=10
If r <10% then you would invest in the projectIf r > 10% you would NOT invest in the projectNPV=0
NPV (for given CFs) and the cost of borrowing, r
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
10
Businessmen think in terms the rate of return on the projectWhat is the rate of return (on capital investment of $2000) ?
It is the rate of return which gives NPV = 0 Hence the IRR is the ‘break-even’ discount rate and IRR = 0.10 (10%)
IRR INVESTMENT DECISION RULE
Invest in project if : IRR > cost of borrowing, r
Internal Rate Of Return (IRR)
02000)1(
1210)1(
11002
IRRIRR
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
11
If NPV = 0 OR, IRR = cost of borrowing then this implies
-the CF from the project will just pay off all the annual interest payments on the loan + the principal amount borrowed from the bank
Note: Internal funds are not ‘free’
Intuitively what do NPV and IRR rules mean ?
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
12
KC=2000 (borrowed at r=10%), CF are V1=1100 , V2=1210
Year 1 Year 2
LoanOutstanding
2200 =2000(1.1)
1210 = 1100 ( 1.1 )
NetReceipts 1100 1210AmountOwed 1100 0
Payoff all interest and principal if NPV=0 or IRR = 10% ?
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
Intuitively what do NPV and IRR rules mean ?
13
Valuation of the Firm:
Enterprise Value and Equity Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
14
General CaseGeneral Case
VV00 = FCF = FCF11 / (1+r) + FCF / (1+r) + FCF22 / ((1+r) / ((1+r)22 + …… + ……
FCF= Free Cash FlowsFCF= Free Cash Flows
1) Sum to infinity and FCF is constant:1) Sum to infinity and FCF is constant:
VV00 = FCF / r = FCF / r
2) Sum to infinity and FCF grows at rate of g % p.a. 2) Sum to infinity and FCF grows at rate of g % p.a. (g=0.05 )(g=0.05 )
VV00 = FCF = FCF11 / ( r - g) / ( r - g)
Two Useful Math Results
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
15
Enterprise DCFEnterprise DCF
In practice investment costs occur every year so:In practice investment costs occur every year so:
V(whole firm) = DPV ( Free Cash Flows, FCF)V(whole firm) = DPV ( Free Cash Flows, FCF)
FCF = (Operating ‘cash flows’ - Gross investment) FCF = (Operating ‘cash flows’ - Gross investment) each yearyear
Value of EquityValue of Equity
V(Equity) = V(whole firm) - V(Debt outstanding)V(Equity) = V(whole firm) - V(Debt outstanding)
‘‘Fair value for one share’ = V(Equity) / N Fair value for one share’ = V(Equity) / N
N = no. of shares outstanding (+ ‘minority interests’)N = no. of shares outstanding (+ ‘minority interests’)
‘Enterprise Value’ and ‘Equity Value’
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
16
In an In an efficient marketefficient market the price of the the price of the share(s) should equal ‘fair value’share(s) should equal ‘fair value’
We will learn how to value corporate We will learn how to value corporate debt, in later lecturesdebt, in later lectures
‘Enterprise Value’ and Equity Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
17
The DPV of ALL the firm’s future cash flows is The DPV of ALL the firm’s future cash flows is often ‘split’ into two (or more) planning horizons:often ‘split’ into two (or more) planning horizons:
‘‘ENTERPRISE DCF’ENTERPRISE DCF’
= DPV of FCF in years 1-5 = DPV of FCF in years 1-5
+ DPV of ‘Continuing Value’ after year-5+ DPV of ‘Continuing Value’ after year-5
‘Valuing the ‘Firm’ :Continuing Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
18
Special Case A:
i) the discount rate is constant in each year
ii) Cash flows, FCF are constant in each year and persist ‘for ever’ (ie. perpetuity) then
CV = FCF/ r
This is often used to calculate ‘continuing value’, CV.
‘Valuing the ‘Firm’ :Continuing Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
19
eg. Project has
V5 =100 in year-5,6,7 etc., and r=0.10 then
Continuing value CV (at t=5) = 100 / 0.10 = 1,000
and
DPV (at t=0) of the CV = 1000/ (1+r)5 = 621
‘Valuing the ‘Firm’ :Continuing Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
20
Special Case B:
If
i) the discount rate is constant in each year
and
ii)FCF’s grow at a constant rate each year, say after year-5 then
CV (at t=5) = FCF5 (1+g) / ( r - g) for r>g
‘Valuing the ‘Firm’ :Continuing Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
21
Project has FCF=100 in year-5
FCF grows at rate g=0.03 (3%) and r = 0.10
Then:
Continuing value CV (at t=5)
= 100 (1.03) / (0.10 - 0.03)= 1471
DPV( at t=0) of the CV = 1471/ (1+r)5 = 913
Notes:
CV is very sensitive to the choices made for FCF5, R and g.
CV can be a large & dominates DPV of the cash flows over years 1-5.
‘Valuing the ‘Firm’ :Continuing Value
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
22
Suppose
Value of firm using DPV of FCF’s is
Enterprise DCF = DPV (FCF 1-5yrs) + DPV (of CV)
= 679 + 621 = 1,300
Suppose: All equity financed firm N = 1000 shares and P= $1
Market Value (Capitalisation) = $1000
Hence the shares are undervalued by 30%
Possible purchase or takeover target (by ‘arbs’)
Company Valuation: M&A
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
23
If NPV of the project > 0 (discounted using RS)
Implies the managers are ‘adding value’ for shareholders (which exceeds the return they could earn from investing their money in other hamburger firms).
This is value based management or ‘creating shareholder value’.
Shareholder Value (All equity financed firm)
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
25
Note: ‘All equity’ financed = ‘unlevered firm’ - ie. no debt
Discount rate should reflect ‘business risk’ of the project.
Assume project is ‘scale enhancing’ (eg. more hamburger outlets for McDonalds)
Hence, has same ‘business risk’ as the firm as a whole.
Simple method
Use the average (historic) return on equity, RS (e.g. 15%) for this (hamburger) firm as the discount rate
This assumes the observed return on equity correctly reflects the payment for risk, that shareholders require from this hamburger company.
Discount Rate: All equity financed firm
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
26
If the project being considered by MacDonalds is to build hotels, then we would use the average stock market return in “hotel sector” (20%pa. say)
- as this reflects the “required return on equity capital” for the shareholders in that sector.
- see CAPM / SML / APT later, where we provide more sophisticated methods for choosing the appropriate equity discount rate.
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
Discount Rate: All equity financed firm
27
Levered firm = financed by mix of debt and equity Assume debt-equity ratio will remain broadly unchanged after the
new project is completed.
Then discount FCF using:
(‘After tax’)Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC, WACC = (1-z) RS + z RB (1-t)
z = B / V = propn of debt(bonds) , (1-z) = S / V V=market value of firm = S+B ‘weights’, z, sum to 1.
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
Discount Rate: levered firm
28
S = market value of outstanding equity ( = N x stock price)
B = market value of outstanding debt (ie. bonds issued and bank loans)
RS = average return on equity in hamburger industry
RB = interest rate (yield to maturity) on say 10-year corp. AA-rated bonds(If hamburger company is rated AA by S&Poor’s)
t = corporate tax rate
Note: Market value (‘cap’) of the firm V = S +B
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
Discount Rate: levered firm
29
Assume firm is part-equity financed and part-debt financed
Then the ‘intrinsic value’ of the firm is the DPV of its future cash flows from all of its current and future investment projects, discounted using WACC
Managers can only increase the value of the firm by1) investing in projects with ‘high’ FCFs2) reducing the WACC
‘(2)’ is the so-called capital structure question - can managers change the mix of debt and equity financing to lower the overall WACC? - assuming FCF is unchanged - see Modigliani-Miller later
Can Managers Increase the Value of the Firm?
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
30
1) Key practical method is to use “sensitivity” or “scenario” analysis.
Sensitivity - ‘one at a time’1) What is NPV if revenues are much higher/lower ? 2) What is the NPV if the discount rate is 1% higher?Scenario:3) What is the NPV if both (1) and (2) apply. - scenario analysis(Monte Carlo simulation is a sophisticated way of doing this)
Can “include” probabilities in (1) and hence calculate EXPECTED NPV and its standard deviation.
What about (business) risk in DCF ?
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
31
2) Can use decision trees - particularly useful where there are strategic options in the investment decision
-eg. Suppose you can abandon the project and sell the ‘plant’ for $10m if demand turns out to be ‘low’ in year-2. On the other hand if demand is ‘high’ then you will continue production in year-2.
This affects the NPV of the project compared with the ‘normal case’ where you assume you do not abandon
In fact the ‘correct’ way to evaluate these strategic options is (not surprisingly) to use ‘real options theory’, but this cannot be done here !
What about (business) risk in DCF ?
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
33
ACCOUNTING NIGHTMARES
Earnings before interest, tax and depreciation,EBITD
EBITD = R - C = Sales Revenues - Operating Costs (Labour+Materials)
Free Cash Flow FCF= (R - C - T) - Inv(gross) - Increase in WC + (Net Non-Op. Inc)
Valuing a Company: ‘Cash is King’
Calculating ‘Free Cash Flow’ in Practice
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
34
Now the Accountants ‘Mess it About’ Published ‘Earnings’ or ‘profit’ are usually presented after a deduction for
depreciation: These would be ‘earnings before interest and tax’ EBIT
So, EBIT = EBITD - D = (R-C) - D
Hence, to get FCF ‘add back’ depreciation and deduct taxes:FCF =(EBIT - T) + D - Inv(gross) - Increase in WC +(N.N.Op.Inc)
Also, you often ‘see’ (in the UK):
Net Op. Profit (Less Taxes) NOPLAT = EBIT - T = R-C-D-T
Valuing a Company: ‘Cash is King’
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
35
Valuing a Company
CASH IS KING
Table 3.7 : CAPITAL ACCOUNT
Year-0
Year-1
Year-2
Year-3
Year-4
Year-5
1. Capital Cost, KC 1,0002. Depreciation(1.)
(= KC – SV)/n200 200 200 200 200
3. AccumulatedDepreciation(=”sum ofdepreciation”)
200 400 600 800 1,000
4. Year End Book Value(= 4 – 3)
1,000 800 600 400 200 0
5. Working Capital, WC 0 400 500 600 500 2006. Total Book Value
(= 4 + 5)1,000 1,200 1,100 1,000 700 200
7. Change in WorkingCapital,. WC(= WCt – WCt-1)
400 100 100 (100) (300)
Notes: 1. Total capital cost is KC = $1,000. Scrap value SV = 0 at n=5 years.Hence D = (KC – SV)/5 = 200 per year (straight line depreciation).
2. ( . ) indicates a negative number
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
36
Valuing a Company
Table 3.8 : DEPRECIATION AND TAX
Year-1
Year-2
Year-3
Year-4
Year-5
1. Sales revenue, R 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,0002. Labour + Materials
Cost, C600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800
3. EBITD(1.) (= 1 – 2) 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
4. Depreciation, D 200 200 200 200 2005. Earnings after
Depreciation,= R – C – D (= 3 – 4)
200 400 600 800 1,000
6. Tax(2.)
= 0.30(R – C – D)60 120 180 240 300
ote : 1. EBITD = earnings before interest, tax and depreciation. Accounting profits (before tax)reported in the ‘income-expenditure’ (or ‘profit-loss’) account would be (EBITD – D).
2. Corporate tax rate is assumed to be t = 0.30 (30%).
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
37
Table 3.9 : CALCULATING FREE CASH FLOW
Year-1
Year-2
Year-3
Year-4
Year-5
1. Sales revenue(1.), R 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,0002. Labour + Material Cost(1.) 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,8003. Earnings before Interest,
Tax and Depreciation,EBITD(= 1 – 2)
400 600 800 1,000 1,200
4. Tax(1.), T 60 120 180 240 3005. After Tax Operating Cash
Flow(= 3 – 4)
340 480 620 760 900
6.Increase in WorkingCapital(2.), WC
400 100 100 (100) (300)
7. Capital Cost, KC (GrossInvestment Expenditure)(3.)
600 400 0 0 0
8. Operating Cash Flow (after tax)(= 5 – 6 – 7)
(660) (20) 520 860 1,200
9. Cash flow from Non-operating assets(6)
50 0 0 100 0
10.
After tax Interest Incomefrom Assets
10 15 20 15 10
11.
Decrease (Increase) inMarketable Securities
0 (10) 20 15 (10)
12.
Free Cash Flow(4.), FCF(= 8 + 9 + 10 + 11)
(600) (15) 560 990 1,200
Note : 1. Figures are from table 3.8.2. An increase in working capital is a cash outflow. Figures are from
table 3.7 (row 7).3. These are the actual cash expenditures on investment in each year
and they sum to the total capital cost KC (in table 3.7).4 Cash flow available to investors (ie. debt holders and equity
holders). Note that some forecasts of FCF might exclude items 9and 10.
5 ( . ) indicates a negative number6 e.g. sale of a subsidiary,
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
38
Valuing a Company
Table 3.10 : USE OF FREE CASH FLOW OF THE FIRM
Year-1
Year-2
Year-3
Year-4
Year-5
1. Free Cash Flow(table 3.9, row 12)
-600 -15 560 990 1,200
FINANCING (USE OF FREE CASH FLOWS)2. Interest Paid to Debtholders 30 30 30 30 303. Dividends Paid 100 105 110 115 1204. Change in Share Capital
+ = repurchases(..) = new issues
100 100 100 100 100
5. Change in Net DebtOutstanding+ = decrease,(.. ) = increase
(830) (250) 320 745 950
Total Financing(= 2 + 3 + 4 +5)
-600 -15 560 990 1,200
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
39
Complementary Valuation Techniques:
Economic Profit, EP
Economic Value Added, EVA
Adjusted Present Value, APV
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
40
EP and EVA are equivalent to ‘Enterprise DCF’ if the calculationsare done consistently -ie. before the accountants get at the figures
ECONOMIC PROFIT (McKinsey and Co)
EP = ( ROC - WACC) x Capital Stock, K
where Return on Capital, ROC = ‘Profit’ / K
If ROC > WACC then the managers chosen investment projects are earning a rate of return in excess of WACC and therefore, the investment projects are ‘Adding value’.
Economic Profit
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
41
ECONOMIC PROFIT (Example)
Profit = 150, K = 1000 hence ROC = 15% p.a. Let WACC = 10% p.a.
EP = (15% - 10%) 1000 = $50 p.a.
Your current stock of capital is being used in such a way as to generate $50 p.a. even after allowing for an annual ‘dollar capital charge’ of $100 p.a.
Economic Profit
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
42
EVA= ‘Profit’ - ‘Capital Charge’ = 150 - (10%)1000 = $50 p.a.
where ‘Capital charge’ = WACC x ‘Adjusted Capital’, K
EVA is equivalent to EP if we measure ‘profit’ and ‘capital’ in the same way, for both techniques.
eg. do we ‘add back’ to ‘capital’ past R&D expenditures on the grounds that this outlay increased ‘knowledge’ which is an ‘asset’
Economic Value Added, EVA
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
43
You can compare different firms’ performance on EP and EVA in any one year (or over several years).
The ‘plus’, compared to using say just ‘profits’ or ROC is that EP and EVA assess ‘profit’ in relation to ‘the cost of capital’.
Value of the firm (at t=0 ) using EP or EVA
= (Net) Capital Stock at t=0, K0
+ DPV ( of EP or EVA p.a., ~ WACC as discount rate)
EP and EVA
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
44
Simple proof that ‘Enterprise DCF’ and EP or EVA are equivalent:
Assume K0 = 1000 (no depreciation), ROC = 15%, ‘Profit’ = 150 (perpetuity)
1) ‘Enterprise DCF = ‘Profit’ / WACC = 150/0.10 = $1500
2) EP or EVA: EP = (15% - 10%) 1000 = $50 p.a.
3) V(firm) = K0 + EP / WACC = 1000 + 50 / 0.10 = $1500
SELF STUDYComplementary Valuation Techniques:
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
45
EVA Capital,K ROC WACC
General Electric 2515 51,017 17.7 12.7General Motors -3527 94,268 5.9 9.7Johnson & Johnson 1327 15,603 21.8 13.3
A positive return on capital of 5.9% for GM is ‘not enough’ if you have a WACC of 9.7%
- it results in a negative EVA (or EP)
Source: Fortune Mag 10th Nov 97.
Complementary Valuation Techniques: ROC, EVA and EP
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
46
When using ‘Enterprise DCF’ we discounted the FCF using ‘after tax’ WACC
Our measure of FCF did not contain any ’tax offsets/shields’ on (debt) interest payments (the only tax offsets we considered were on depreciation).
This was because these ‘tax offsets’ are taken care of in the denominator, the WACC, which is reduces the cost of debt to Rb(1-t).
APV and Enterprise DCF give the same value for the firm if consistent measures of the cost of equity and debt are used. This is a difficult area which we cannot pursue here but note that
APV = FCF discounted as if firm is all-equity + DPV of ‘tax offsets’ See Copeland, T. Koller, T and Murrin, J. Valuation (J. Wiley) for the best practical
account of this and other valuation issues.
Adjusted Present Value, APV(Not Examinable)
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
48
1) SOME PATHOLOGICAL CASES ~ COMPLICATIONS WITH IRR !
2) OTHER METHODS USED IN INVESTMENT APPRAISAL
(These are of minor importance but you should be aware of these issues)
SELF STUDY
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
49
Table 2: ‘DIFFERENT CASH FLOW PROFILES
Project A (-100, 130)Project B (100, - 130)Project C (-100, 230, - 132)
-------------------------------------------------------------Project A ~ ‘normal’Project B ~ ‘Rolling Stone’s Concert’Project C ~ ‘Open cast mining’
-------------------------------------------------------------IRR gives wrong decision for B and CNPV gives correct decision for A,B,CANSWER: Use NPV !
Complications: Mainly with IRR !
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
50
Mutually exclusive projects(eg. garage or hamburger joint on one site, BUT NOT BOTH)
- use NPV not IRR criterion(afficionados could use the incremental-IRR criterion ! )
Capital Constraint (ie. not enough funds for all projects with NPV>0)- rank projects by the ‘profitability index’, PI where:
PI = ( NPV / Capital Cost) = “bang per buck”
Choose those projects with largest PI values until you exhaust your funds.
Complications: Mainly with IRR !
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
51
Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4
FV -1000 500 500 700 0d 1.0 0.8696 0.7561 0.4972 -
PV -1000 435 378 348 -
Note: NPV = 161
1) Payback Period = 2 years2) Discounted Payback = 2-3 years
Investment Appraisal: Alternative Methods
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche
52
Either
Ignores cash flows after payback period (eg. never invest in ‘Dolly the sheep’)
OR
Ignores time value of money
Deficiencies: Alternative Methods
Copyright K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche