discovering environmental and social justice · mbak atyaka laksmitarukmi for the friendship i...
TRANSCRIPT
DISCOVERING ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
IN AMITAV GHOSH’S SEA OF POPPIES
A Thesis
Presented As Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
to Obtain the Magister Humaniora (M.Hum) in English Language Studies
By:
Anna Anganita Theresia Latumeten
156332035
THE GRADUATE PROGRAM OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2017
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
APPROVAL
A THESIS
DISCOVERING ENYTRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
IN AMITAY GHOSH'S SEA OF POPPIES
Patrisius Mutiara Andalas" S.J.. S.S., S.T.D.Thesis Advisor Yogyakarta, Novemb er l, 2011
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
THESIS DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE
}ISCOYERING ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
IN A]VIITAV GIIOSHOS,S'EH OF POPPTES
by
Anna Anganita Theresia Latumeten
Student Number: l5$32A35
Defendetl before the T'hesis Committee
antl Declared Acceptatrle
TIIESIS COMMITTEE
Chairperson : Paui*s Sarrvoto, Ph.D
Secretary : Dra. Novita Ilewi, M.S., M,A (Hcns.). Ph.D
Members 1. Sri Mulvani Ph.D
Yogyakarta, Novemb er 2$, 2017
ate Prograin Director
University
=Ro 1)-J{,
Budi Subanar, SJ.
ii
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
This is to certiff that all the ideas, phrases, and sentences, unless otherwise stated,
are the ideas, phrases, and sentences of the thesis writer. The writer understands
the full consequences including degree cancellation if she took somebody else's
ideas, phrases, or sentences, without proper reference.
Yogyakarta, Novernb er l, 2017
A
L\"^'A{' t/', )_-_-__Anna Anganita Theresia Latumeten
iii
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
LEMBAR PERI\IYATAAN PERSETUJUAN ,
PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIATI T]NTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma:
Nama : Anna Anganita Theresia Latumeten
NIM :156332035
Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan
Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul:
DISCOVERING EI\IVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL JUSTICEI{
IN AMITAV GIIOSH'S SEA OF POPPIES
beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian saya memberikan
kepada Perpusatakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan,
mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan
data, mendistribusikan secara terbatas, dan mernpublikasikannya di internet atau
media lain untuk kepentingan akadernis tanpa perlu memintaizin dari saya
maupun memberikan royalti kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya
sebagai penulis.
Dernikian pernyataanini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.
Dibuat di Yogyakarta
Pada Tanggal 1 Novernber 2017
Yang menyatakan
I/)',^/,'e'h'1'L '
Anna Anganita Theresia Latumeten
lv
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I would like to thank Jesus Christ for all of His blessing. I give
my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Patrisius Mutiara Andalas, S.J., S.S., S.T.D. for
his constructive insight, help, and correction. I thank my lecturers in English
Language Studies, Paulus Sarwoto, Ph.D and Dra. Novita Dewi, M.S., M.A.
(Hons), Ph.D for the insightful class discussions.
I also thank family; my parents H. Carl G. Latumeten and Tormaida E.
Sitanggang, and my brothers Ducke Cristie Elias Latumeten and Denny Fladymier
Kennedy Latumeten for their utmost support. I would like to thank my friends
from ELS, especially from B Class of 2015. I also would like to thank my friends
from Literature stream; mbak Sophia, mbak Angel, mbak Sabrina, mbak Ludmila,
and Wibi. My special gratitude goes to Febby Winda Pelupessy, Jeanne Arini
Ratna Suwanto, Wanda Rizky Kinanty, Maria Consolacion Regala Catap,
Marschall Eirence Metekohy, Yosafat Barona Valentino, Flavianus Batan, and
mbak Atyaka Laksmitarukmi for the friendship I cherish so much. Lastly, I would
like to thank the academic staff of ELS for their helping hands.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL ........................................................................................................... i
THESIS DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE ........................................................... ii
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ................................................................... iii
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN ................................................... iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. v
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................... vi
ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................ viii
ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................ ix
CHAPTER I .......................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1
A. Backround of the Study ............................................................................ 1
B. Problem Formulation ................................................................................ 8
C. Significance of the Study ......................................................................... 9
D. Chapters Outline ..................................................................................... 10
CHAPTER II ....................................................................................................... 11
LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................. 11
A. Review of Related Studies ..................................................................... 11
B. Review of Related Theory ...................................................................... 29
CHAPTER III ..................................................................................................... 46
THE EFFECT OF COLONIZATION ON THE NATURE AND THE PEOPLE
IN GHOSH‘S SEA OF POPPIES ..................................................................... 46
A. The Effect of Colonization on the Nature .............................................. 46
B. The Effect of Colonization on the People .............................................. 56
CHAPTER IV ...................................................................................................... 65
RESISTANCE AS A MEANS TO DISCOVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL
AND SOCIAL JUSTICE IN GHOSH‘S SEA OF POPPIES ........................... 65
A. The Early Resistance .............................................................................. 65
B. Migration and Resistance ....................................................................... 69
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
CHAPTER V ....................................................................................................... 85
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................. 85
A. Significance and Achievement ............................................................... 87
B. Relevance ............................................................................................... 92
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 95
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
ABSTRACT
Latumeten, Anna Anganita Theresia. 2017. Discovering Environmental and
Social Justice in Amitav Ghosh’s Sea of Poppies. Yogyakarta: The Graduate
Program in English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma Univeristy.
This thesis explores the effect of colonization on the nature and indigenous
people, as well as to explore how the effect of colonization is resisted as a means
to discover the environmental and social justice. This thesis examines a novel
entitled Sea of Poppies (2008) that is written by Indian writer Amitav Ghosh. In
raising this topic, it is expected that this thesis is able to take part in the rising
awareness of environmental and social justice.
This thesis uses postcolonial ecocriticism as the main theory to help in
analyzing the text. The debate of the need to bring the issue of postcolonialism
and ecocriticism, the relationship between human and the nature in the colonial
setting, along with the discussion of resistance in search for environmental and
social justice, are brought together in seeing the environmental and social issues
raised by the novel.
There is an apparent shift in nature‘s role for the indigenous population.
Nature and indigenous people previously have a harmonious relationship before
the arrival of the colonial. The settlement of the colonial brings about impacts to
India in two ways: the exploitation of their nature and the exploitation of
indigenous population. Resistance comes as a reaction of the double forms of
exploitation.
Keyword: postcolonial ecocriticism, resistance, environmental justice, social
justice
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
ABSTRAK
Latumeten, Anna Anganita Theresia. 2017. Discovering Environmental and
Social Justice in Amitav Ghosh’s Sea of Poppies. Yogyakarta: Program Pasca
Sarjana Kajian Bahasa Inggris Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Tesis ini membahas tentang efek kolonalisasi terhadap alam dan orang-
orang pribumi, dan juga membahas tentang resistensi sebagai usaha untuk
menemukan environmental justice dan keadilan sosial. Tesis ini membahas novel
berjudul Sea of Poppies (2008) yang ditulis oleh penulis India bernama Amitav
Ghosh. Dengan mengangkat topik ini, tesis ini dapat mengambil bagian dalam
menumbuhkan kepekaan terhadap environmental justice dan keadilan sosial.
Analisa teks ini menggunakan postkolonial ekokritik sebagai teori utama.
Perdebatan antara masalah postkolonial dan ekoritik, hubungan manusia dan alam
didalam setting kolonial, dan diskusi mengenai resistensi untuk mencapai
environmental justice dan keadilan sosial, digunakan untuk melihat masalah
lingkungan dan masalah sosial yang ditemukan didalam novel.
Ada perubahan peran alam yang terlihat sangat jelas didalam hidup
masyarakat pribumi. Sebelum penjajah tiba, masyarakat pribumi dan alam
memiliki hubungan yang harmonis. Ada dua pengaruh yang terjadi akibat
pendudukan penjajahan di India, yaitu eksploitasi alam dan eksploitasi masyarakat
pribumi. Resistensi muncul sebagai reaksi dari eksploitasi akibat penjajahan ini.
Keyword: postkolonial ekokritik, resistensi, environmental justice, keadilan sosial
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Backround of the Study
In the age of the environmental crises, attention has been given to the
problems exist in our nature. We live under the alert that the earth‘s life support
system is in danger. Our world today faces serious environmental problems, such
as: the destruction of the ozone, air pollution, toxic waste, the extinction of animal
and plant species, and more. Our ignorance to these problems may result to such
catastrophic future of the earth. We cannot deny the fact that now our earth is
suffering. It affects both human and non-human species, namely plants and
animals. Ironically, humans are the cause of these environmental problems. By
taking control of and mistreating the nature, human beings are responsible for the
greatest destruction of this planet.
As we can see these days, green campaigns have been held frequently as
an effort to save the nature that is not-so-green anymore. Through the power of
the media, for example the internet, people have been trying to take part in raising
people‘s awareness in the importance of taking care of our Mother Earth. Various
efforts are being actively pursued to raise people‘s awareness. Literature is also
one of the ways to be included among these efforts. Literature has been taking
part to raise people‘s awareness of the existing problems in the environment faced
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
by the earth today. By involving environmental awareness into the writing, writers
can use literature to urge people to save the environment.
Environmental crisis is a global issue; it is affecting everyone. The birth of
ecocriticism as a reaction to the global environmental crisis has given the platform
to rethink about human and nature relationship in literature. In its early
development, ecocriticism only paid particular interest in Romantic poetry to see
how the earth is perceived. This shows how earth is finally given a place in the
literary study. The earth functions not merely as the setting for literary works, but
also as the important character in works of literature. Unlike in the early days of
ecocriticism development, nature writing these days is not only dominated by the
Western i.e. Romantic poetry. The awareness of environmental crisis being a
global threat has invited writers from different background to voice their take on
the crisis through their writings. This includes writers from Asia or Africa; the
writers who are from within the English studies are seen as the Third World
writers.
Amitav Ghosh is one of the writers who includes environmental concern
in his works. One of the works of this Indian writer that has ecological concern in
it is Sea of Poppies (2008). Ghosh‘s novels are usually rich in history, considering
the author‘s roots in journalism and academic writing.1 Sea of Poppies takes the
nineteenth-century opium poppy cultivation as the settings. The diversity of
characters in this novel mirrors the time of British colonialism time in India. It
1 John C. Hawley, Contemporary Indian Writers in English: Amitav Ghosh (New Delhi:
Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd., 2005), 1.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
also captures the colonial history of the East by the West. This novel is divided
into three parts; ‗Land‘, ‗River‘, and ‗Sea‘, showing the natural setting shown in
the novel.
Sea of Poppies portrays human‘s abusive treatment to nature as the root of
environmental crisis which has become the concern of green literature. In the
novel, there is an obvious hierarchy that placed human as superior compared to
the non-human nature. Ghosh uses the opium cultivation in India as the setting to
help the reader see how nature is exploited for the benefit of British government‘s
opium trade with China.
Sea of Poppies tells us a story of different people of different background
during British colonialism in India. There is Deeti, a woman from northern Bihar.
Deeti is peasant who makes a living from the cultivation of opium poppy. She is
married to a former sepoy2 who is also an afeemkhor
3, named Hukam Singh.
Hukam Singh works in the Ghazipur Opium Factory, which is the biggest opium
factory in India operated under British East India Company. On his day to day
routine of going to work, Hukam Singh is transported to Ghazipur by a man from
the untouchable caste, named Kalua.
In the beginning of the novel, Deeti is given a ‗sight‘ by the Ganga River
about the Ibis, a ship that will change her life forever. It is also the very same day
when Ibis first make its way into the Ganga after its eleven months journey from
Baltimore. On board of this ship, there is Zachary Reid—who is a son of a slave
2 Indian soldier
3 Opium addict
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
from Baltimore with her white master, and a group of lascars led by Serang Ali.
The Ibis is brought to India to serve its new master—Benjamin Burnham of
Burnham Bros, as an opium carrying vessel.
Later on, Deeti, who is occupied with the lateness of her poppy crop,
receives a message that her husband passed out during his job in the factory. With
the help of Kalua, Deeti and her daughter Kabutri make their way to the town of
Ghazipur in Kalua‘s oxcart. On the way to the factory, Deeti cannot help but
notice how the other peasants appear to have the same problems as her. The
harvest for poppy sap is unusually late for them that season. Deeti notices how
this has caused the more people to suffer because they barely have anything on
their dinner table to feed their family. The road to the factory is filled not only by
people trying to earn money; it is also taken over by the contaminated air. The
factory has created such an unhealthy environment in its surroundings. As she
proceeds to the factory, Deeti notices how inhumane the working condition in the
factory is.
Deeti soon finds herself in a difficult situation when her husband died.
Deeti parts with her only child Kabutri when her husband‘s family forces her to
die as a sati. On the day of her husband‘s funeral, Deeti is rescued by Kalua. On
their escape, Deeti and Kalua then decide to run away together to a place
unknown by any of their family to start a life together. This is how they both sign
up to be indentured labors to be sent to Mauritius. Soon on the board of the ship to
Mauritius, Deeti and Kalua acquaint themselves with different people from
different background.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
The one who also on the run, Paulette Lambert; she is a French orphan
from a long line of family of botanists. Paulette decides to leave Benjamin
Burnham and his family who take care of her after the death of her father.
Paulette‘s escape is motivated by Mr. Burnham‘s offensive acts towards her and
the prospect of marrying a man from Calcutta‘s white society for the so called
good ‗status‘. Her fluency in speaking in Hindi makes her undetectable when she
gets on the board of Ibis disguising as an indigenous woman. One of the closest
people to Paulette on the ship is Jodu, a native who signs himself up as a lascar.
Paulette and Jodu grows up together inseparably like siblings. Since the death of
her mother, Jodu‘s late mother took Paulette into her care as her own daughter.
Driven by a really different circumstance with the other migrants to-be,
there is Neel Rattan Halder. Born ‗royalty‘, Neel Halder is a man from a respected
high caste in Indian society. Neel Halder is to be transported as a convict to
Mauritius, to serve his seven years sentence in British jail in Mauritius. Neel
Halder is arrested by British authority because of debt problem with Benjamin
Burnham. Neel Halder is not the only convict to be transported to Mauritius. He
soon finds himself learns to be in the company of a half Chinese opium addict
named Ah Fatt.
Despite of the differences in their past lives, these people are brought
together in the same ship with the same fate waits for them. These characters get
along together with the ship and the status of being immigrants bound them
together. They face their new life of being ship siblings, anticipating of what life
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
is going to be after leaving their homeland in a journey of uncertainty. This theme
of journey on the ship marks an important event of Indian diaspora.
Sea of Poppies provides a significant example of the history of Indian
diaspora to all over the places in the world. Indian migrants, during this colonial
time, were being sent to various places under British colony to be labored as
slaves in British‘s plantations. In Sea of Poppies, for example, we witness how the
characters are on board of the journey to be transported to Mauritius, where
British plantations have waited for them to serve as coolies.
Other than migration as a reason of Indian diaspora, Sea of Poppies also
highlights some of the most important history of British colonial in India. One of
them is the imposition of opium cultivation of opium poppy upon the native
peasants. With British having an exclusive monopoly on India‘s opium
production, the new cultivation system is forced to the farmers in India. The
colony forces the cultivation of the cash crop poppy to gain as much profit as
possible. This causes the oppression on the locals and their land. The practice of
poppy monoculture has caused a serious damage to India‘s ecosystem, and its
people‘s lives too.
In Ghosh‘s works, theme related to colonialism or the environment is often
found. He has written several works of fiction, they are: The Circle of Reason
(1986), The Shadow Lines (1988), The Calcutta Chromosome (1995), The Glass
Palace (2000), The Hungry Tide (2004), Sea Of Poppies (2008), River of Smoke
(2011), and Flood of Fire (2015). His famous works of non-fiction includes In an
Antique Land (2002), The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
Unthinkable (2016), and some more other. For instance, the novel The Glass
Palace talks about British invasion to Burma. There is also The Hungry Tide,
which is said to be the novel which speaks the most about the environment—it
revolves around the river dolphin and Bengal tiger preservation issue.
As previously mentioned, Sea of Poppies reflects Ghosh‘s take in
environmental concern as well. In Sea of Poppies, Ghosh uses Bengal as one of
the setting of the story. Ghosh was born in Bengal, an area which he described as
―a vast delta where thousands of creeks and rivers flow into each other to from a
landscape that is mapped upon a grid of interlocking waterways. It is a landscape
of ambiguity where there are no clear lines between river and sea, earth and water,
island and mainland.‖4
Natural landscape plays an important part in Ghosh‘s writings. The
portrayal of Bengal‘s natural landscape appears not only in his fictions, but it also
appears in his non-fiction writings. In 2004, Ghosh published an essay on his
concern about the plan of the development of the tourism complex in Sundarbans,
West Bengal. ―Folly in the Sundarbans‖ notes Ghosh‘s view on the Sahara India
Pariwar‘s project of hotels and cottages in Sundarbans that costs almost 115
million US dollars.5 Through his essay, Ghosh shows his concern to the Bengal‘s
nature. His essay shows that the development of tourism complex in Bengal will
cause an enormous damage on the nature. In fact, it may even be disastrous. For
4 Amitav Ghosh, ―Confluence and Crossroads: Europe and the Fate of the Earth,‖ Accessed
29 Nov 2016. <http://www.amitavghosh.com/essays/ConfluenceandCrossroads.html> 5 Amitav Ghosh, ―Folly in the Sundarbans,‖ Accessed 29 Nov 2016.
<http://www.amitavghosh.com/essays/folly.html>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
instance, in the essay, he mentions that the construction of a floating hotel will
result to a huge quantity of sewage and waste into the surrounding waters. This
will cause serious threats to the populations of crabs and fish that live in the water.
His novel The Hungry Tide is also set in Bengal. Sea of Poppies, then, will be
another example of Ghosh‘s take of Bengal‘s natural ecosystem through fiction
writing.
As previously mentioned, the setting of the Opium War is important in this
writing because it shows how India‘s nature is exploited for the sake of the opium
trade. Initially in the 1880s, opium in India was planted in small plots of land. The
cultivation of opium poppy was meant to produce high quality latex and morphine
as an average content in Indian drugs.6 Sea of Poppies gives an image of how the
cultivation of opium poppy develops under British East India Company. Through
a close reading of his works, Ghosh‘s take about this event in Indian history
should be revealed.
B. Problem Formulation
British‘s colonization in India marked the exploitation of India‘s land and
its people. The arrival of colonial settlers in the middle of India‘s native society
has brought changes, not only to Indian indigenous society but also to the fertile
land of India. Ghosh appears to show a strong voice about the issue of
6 Arieh Levy and Judith Milo, ―Genetics and Breeding of Papaver somniferum‖ in Poppy: The
Genus Papaver, ed. Jenõ Bernáth (Amsterdam: OPA, 1998), 97.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
monoculture poppy cultivation that has transformed Indian‘s nature and society
not for the better, but for the worse.
Ghosh crafts Sea of Poppies to be the reflection of human‘s abuse to its
non-human counterpart—the nature. Through this novel, Ghosh brings human and
nature relationship in the dialogue of history of colonization. Being trapped under
the torture of the exploitation of nature and colonial exploitation, the indigenous
land and people of India are forced to face the injustice under British ruthless
treatment upon them. In search of a possible positive alternative on the colonizer‘s
exploitative act, resistance is the only possible option. Seeing the issues portrayed
in Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies, the following questions are raised:
1. How does colonization affect nature and indigenous people in Amitav
Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies?
2. How does Amitav Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies portray resistance as a means to
discover environmental and social justice?
The theoretical framework that is used to help the problems raised in this
thesis is postolonial ecocriticism. The focus of the theory used is those which are
related to the dialogue of the nature in the colonial or postcolonial settings, the
effects of colonization to human and nature relationship, and about the resistance
that relates to achieving environmental and social justice.
C. Significance of the Study
This study is conducted in hope that readers can have a particular
perspective in reading Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies, especially concerning in the
discussion of the nature. With Asian readers, Indonesian in particular, this study
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
may offer an insight on how Asian literature contributes to the talk of postcolonial
ecocriticism especially on the similarity of history of how colonialism became a
justification for the colonizer to exploit the indigenous land. This study is also
hoped to be beneficial in the middle of the talk about environmental and social
justice, which usually goes together in the dialogue of environmental crisis and
the effort to raise awareness about it.
D. Chapters Outline
The first chapter of this thesis includes the background of the study,
research questions, the significance of the study, and the scope of the study. The
second chapter presents the literature review in which the previous studies on
Ghosh‘s works are being discussed, followed by the theoretical framework used in
the study. The theoretical framework is divided into three different parts. The first
part talks about the dialogue of ecocriticism and postcolonialism. The second part
talks about human and nature relationship in the middle of colonial setting.
Finally, the third part talks about resistance with its relation to achieve
environmental and social justice. The next two chapters, the third and the forth
chapter, present the answer to the research questions, respectively. Each question
is worth one chapter of discussion. Therefore, the third chapter discusses how
colonialism effect on the nature and people is reflected in Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies.
The fourth chapter discusses how the resistance is reflected in Ghosh‘s Sea of
Poppies as a way to discover environmental and social justice. The findings in
chapter three and four are concluded in chapter five. The final part of this thesis is
bibliography.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
The previous chapter has explained that this thesis discusses Ghosh‘s work
entitled Sea of Poppies through the perspective of postcolonial ecocriticism. This
chapter presents review of related studies which focuses on how Ghosh‘s works
have been studied before, and the review of related theory that is used to help to
answer the problems raised in the previous chapter.
A. Review of Related Studies
This section discusses several previous studies on Amitav Ghosh‘s works.
Several articles discussing Ghosh‘s works are reviewed to see the existing debates
within the works of Ghosh. By reviewing the existing studies, this thesis should
be able to find its place within the discussion of Ghosh and his works.
The first article is by Nazia Hasan which focuses on Ghosh‘s work entitled
The Glass Palace. Hasan suggested that this works offer the theme of the
environment and its protection. The attention is particularly given to the depiction
of South East Asia‘s wilderness exploitation in the mid-nineteenth century
because of the march of colonization.7
7 Nazia Hasan, ―Tracing the Strong Green Streaks in the Novels of Amitav Ghosh: An Eco-
critical Reading.‖ Indian Literature, 57.1 (2013): 182. Web. 10 Jan 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/43856755>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
This novel shows how colonization becomes a way to dominate indentured
laborers from Malay and Tamil and also the magnificent natural resources from
Burma‘s land. The Glass Palace shows how the earth and the human laborers are
treated as money-making machines. As an effect from how the nature is abused,
nature fights back by becoming barren. The example in this book is shown by
how the rubber trees, do not respond to either manure or fertilizers.8 Hasan adds
that the sudden arrival of the ―enlightened‖ British colony, who claims to be
educated, has drained Burmese nature for one single purpose, which is money.9
Through The Glass Palace, Ghosh seems to highlight the effect of colonialism in
Burma to the locals and their nature. Both the locals and the nature are being
treated as money-making machines to serve the needs of the colony. The
exploitation of Burma‘s locals, the indentured laborers from Malay and Tamil,
and also Burma‘s nature is justified through colonization.
The colony in Burma, as seen in The Glass Palace, appears not only
interested in Burma‘s rubber trees, but also its oil. The novel shows how the
foreigners, consisting of white men from France, England and America take over
the oil wells in Burma and leave the ecosystem around it damaged. Hasan
highlights this issue as Ghosh‘s critics on human‘s cruelty over the nature for the
sake of their personal gain, or to fulfill their insatiable greed.10
It speaks to the
idea that man‘s selfishness has robbed the nature and its resources without
8 N. Hasan, p.183
9 N. Hasan, p.184
10 N. Hasan, p.188
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
considering about the nature‘s sustainability. The novel seems to be a critique on
how human completely take the nature for granted, even damaging it to gain as
much profit as possible.
Additionally, Hasan mentions Ghosh‘s other works to show the author‘s
concern on the ecology. One of them is The Hungry Tide which is claimed to
contain a strong ecological theme. In The Hungry Tide, Ghosh shows the
relationship between the environment and humanity as he speaks for the Bengal
tiger population and the life of the Sunderbans refugees. The Hungry Tide takes
Ghosh‘s perspective on the conservation of the Bengal tigers that costs the life of
these poor refuges. Ghosh insists that as much as it is necessary for the
international conservation projects or organizations to focus on the animal
preservation, it is important to remember that there are poor local settlers whose
lives are also important. Both human and animal can coexist in a balanced
relationship.11
The Hungry Tide shows that Ghosh also concerns on the animals as
the part of the ecosystem. The sustainability of earth‘s natural ecosystem depends
on how human and the non-human lives together.
Other work that is also reviewed by Hasan that contains an ecological
perspective is River of Smoke. Hasan lists several themes related to the ecology
that can be found in River of Smoke, including the role of nature in human‘s
everyday life. It emphasizes on how humanity relies a lot on the nature and its
11 N. Hasan, p.185
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
resources. Those resources are, in fact, blessings that are bestowed upon human.12
Hasan‘s view on Ghosh‘s novels suggests that Ghosh‘s writings show strong
concern on the ecology. It appears that Ghosh uses his works to remind the
readers about the serious consequences of human abusing the nature. Also,
speaking on the behalf of the non-human, Ghosh stresses on the importance on
having a more positive and non-oppressive relationship between human and its
non-human counterpart.
Hasan‘s article contributes in helping to see how Ghosh‘s presents the
issue of ecology and its protection in his novels. Considering that human and
nature‘s relationship is the basic of any green reading, Hasan‘s opinion on
Ghosh‘s The Glass Palace and his commentary on Ghosh‘s other novels needs to
be taken into account. Hasan gives an insight of Ghosh‘s position in the debate of
the importance of protecting the nature. This thesis, too, aims to give a layer in
this discussion. The conversation of how human and nature relate to each other in
Sea of Poppies with the setting of opium poppy cultivation in colonial India
should reveal Ghosh‘s view on the nature, its problems, and its protection. More
specifically, Hasan‘s article supports this thesis‘ take on how the colonized land,
India, is taken for granted for the colonizer‘s need. Hasan‘s article also supports
the fact how the colonialism has scarred the colonized land without considering its
sustainability. Including Hasan‘s perspective in the reading of Sea of Poppies
12 N. Hasan, p.190
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
should help to see how Ghosh suggests the importance of human to have a non-
oppressive relationship, especially with the nature.
Ghosh‘s writings seem to have a connection with today‘s happenings.
Hasan mentions briefly in the article of how Ghosh‘s The Glass Palace hints to
the today‘s Oil imperialism. The work itself is a critic on human‘s cruelty over the
nature; how human colonize ―oil in Middle East, sugar, cotton, and silk in Africa
or poppy and indigo in India.‖13
Furthermore, Kanika Batra claims on how
Ghosh‘s works, although they mostly tell about a particular event or history in the
past, display present days concerns. Batra‘s reading on Ghosh‘s concerns on how
the so-called space development has transformed the natural environment. Batra‘s
perspective relies on the comparison between today‘s Ghuangzhou to nineteenth
century Canton—the setting of Ghosh‘s River of Smoke.14
This reading mostly
focuses on Canton/Ghuangzhou‘s urban ecosystem.
There is something worth noting from the article. Batra opposes the claim
of the untouched landscape which came with the arrival of the Europeans in the
eighteenth century Canton. The arrival of the Europeans in Canton caused many
of the citizens, those of the poor people, to lose their living space because of the
transformation of the agricultural space into residential area.15
Batra also mentions
13 N. Hasan, p.188
14 Kanika Batra, ―City Botany: Reading Urban Ecologies in China through Amitav Ghosh‘s
River of Smoke.‖ Narrative, 21.3 (2013): 323, 324. Web. 7 Sep 2017.
<https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2013.0015> 15
Batra notes that this occurs not only in old Canton, but also in modern Ghuangzhou, where
the housing project in Guangzhou is considered damaging the green area and threatening the city‘s
biodiversity.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
that Ghosh‘s River of Smoke may reveal only a little on the issue of environmental
concern, but it still touches on the topic of people‘s relationship with their
surrounding environment especially in the dialogue of land expropriation.16
The
consequence of the transformation is none other than dispossession, how property
or land owners are deprived of their rights for real estate development.
Batra may not touch much on the human and the non-human relationship,
but the article reveals Ghosh‘s view related to space and the dispossessed. River of
Smoke reveals the discussion of the space in the environment, and it is important
to see that there is a price to pay in the face of development. In this case, the many
of the underprivileged, poor people in Canton are those who experience the
dispossession. The idea of the untouched, pure landscape is presumably a
justification for the Europeans to tame the land, recreating the space into their
concept of the ideal urban ecology. Batra‘s article supports this thesis‘ take on
how the so-called development brought by the colonization has caused the
transformation of the natural environment. Including Batra‘s perspective in the
reading of Sea of Poppies should help to see how India‘s natural environment is
transformed for a rather different reason, which is opium cultivation.
The next article by S. Alexander and P. Saravanan gives a particular
attention to Ghosh‘s The Hungry Tide. The novel is Ghosh‘s take on the matter of
ecology and the threats faced by the ecosystem. Ghosh talks about human and
nature relationship by strongly engaging the theme of ecology through his writing
16 K. Batra, p.326
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
and using it as a medium for science and humanity to meet. This article argues
how Ghosh‘s The Hungry Tide reveals the fact how ecosystem conservation
becomes a way for disguising human‘s political agenda. The conservation may
have saved the life of the animals, but it has violently driven the settlers of the
conservation area out of their locale.17
Almost similar to Batra, Ghosh also
mentions about how certain underprivileged people experiencing dispossession.
Through The Hungry Tide, Ghosh brings the different layers of people and
cultures that inhabited Sunderbans. Alexander and Saravanan focus on the issue
related to the conservation of Sunderban‘s nature. Ghosh presents Sunderban‘s
nature with its sandbars, mangrove, forests, rivers, creeks and channels.18
In the
novel, Ghosh evaluates the First World‘s ecologist‘s obsession of the wilderness.
Ghosh emphasizes the importance of saving the animal as well as the common
people that inhabited the land, in which both human and animal are equally as
important in the talk of preserving the balance of the nature.19
Ghosh presents the
importance of the balance in the environment, and aims to use the novel to raise
the awareness of the natural changes that are caused by science and technology.
Ghosh brings out human and animal relationship in literature through the
importance of a balanced human and animal relationship on earth within an
17 S. Alexander and P. Saravanan, ―The Quintessence of Ecology in Amitav Ghosh‘s The
Hungry Tide.‖ Literary Quest, 1.11 (2015): 60. Web. 10 Jan 2017.
<http://www.literaryquest.org/articleview.php?id=167> 18
S. Alexander and P. Saravanan, p.63 19
S. Alexander and P. Saravanan, p.65
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
endangered ecosystem.20
It appears that Alexander and Saravanan‘s reading on
The Hungry Tide also concludes in the essential idea of balance in the nature.
Alexander and Saravanan seems to correspond with Batra, both studies
represent how Ghosh perceives the obsession of the untouched nature, or the
wilderness. Ghosh seems to be against the idea of a pure, untouched ecosystem by
challenging it the in the context of urban development or conservation program.
Furthermore, similar to Hasan, Alexander and Saravanan‘s study seems to urge on
the importance of human and nature‘s coexistence. These studies on Ghosh which
revolve in the theme of ecology may be involved to support the reading of nature
in Sea of Poppies. From these different studies, it can be seen how Ghosh serves
various topics in reading the ecology; be it about the dispossessed, human‘s
superiority on the nature, and more. Alexander and Saravanan‘s study support this
thesis‘ take on the idea of a balanced nature which depends on human and
nature‘s coexistence. These different perspectives within the theme of ecology in
the works of Ghosh are to be considered in my reading of Sea of Poppies,
especially to support the findings.
Ghosh does not only concern on the theme of ecology in his writing. One
of the themes that appears in Sea of Poppies is diaspora. Another article, by
Rudrani Gangopadhyay, focuses on the issue of indentured immigration as the
cause of the Indian diaspora spreading all over the world. Gangopadhyay
highlights two important events of history in the novel, which are: the opium trade
20 S. Alexander and P. Saravanan, p.66
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
and the transport of Indian immigrants to British plantation in Mauritius, Fiji, or
Trinidad. The theme of journey through immigration makes a comeback in Sea of
Poppies after Ghosh‘s previous novel The Circle of Reason, The Glass Palace,
and The Hungry Tide. The theme of journey is also usually used by Ghosh to talk
about the theme of colonial history in most of his works.21
Gangopadhyay gives attention to all of the characters in Sea of Poppies
and looks at their reason to pursue a journey on board of the Ibis. These people
altogether experience diaspora and create their own history though their various
social and cultural backgrounds.22
This reminds of how people on the Ibis speak
variety of languages because they come from different social and cultural
background.
Languages spoken on board of the Ibis are various, including Bhojpuri,
Bengali, Laskari, Hindusthani, and English. The languages barriers are solved by
the birth of the hybrid language as the consequence of having different languages
spoken in a single place. The hybridization does not only happen to the language
on board, but also happens to the culture as a result or the characteristic of
diaspora.23
Gangopadhyay compares Sea of Poppies to Rushdie‘s Midnight
Children to explain diversity of language used by Ghosh‘s characters in the novel,
making it one of the special features of the novel itself. Gangopadhyay also
21 Rudrani Gangopadhyay, ―Finding Oneself On Board the Ibis in Amitav Ghosh‘s Sea of
Poppies.‖ Woman Studies Quarterly, 42.1&2 (2017): 56-57. Web. 21 Jul 2017.
<https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2017.0012> 22
R. Gangopadhyay, p.60 23
R. Gangopadhyay, p.61
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
focuses on the phrases used in the narrative. Unlike Rushdie who chooses
consistency of English in the writing, Ghosh blends different languages into his
writing to show the divisions of his characters‘ backgrounds.24
However, this
division of background and languages soon proves to unite the different
characters, tying them together in the context of diaspora.
The study concludes how the shared experiences between different people
through diaspora results in the possibility of language, music, and culture
hybridity. In Sea of Poppies, people of different race and social class come
together on board of the ship for different reasons. Through the journey on the
Ibis, Gangopadhyay notes how Ghosh‘s characters are able to find their voice and
recreate their history in the context of migration and diaspora.25
The hybridity of
language, music, and culture is an important characteristic in talking about
diaspora phenomenon.
In line with the theme of diaspora, a study by Nandini C. Sen also focuses
on how diaspora becomes a motive that dominates Sea of Poppies. Sen notes that
diasporic phenomenon is one of Ghosh‘s favorite motives in his writings. For
instance, Ghosh uses it in his previous novel entitled The Shadow Lines where he
talks about the issue of border crossing.26
As a matter of fact, border crossing also
24 R. Gangopadhyay, p.62
25 R. Gangopadhyay, p.63
26 Nandini C. Sen, ―The Creation of Diaspora and its Historical Significance: A Study of
Amitav Ghosh‘s ‗Sea of Poppies‘.‖ Diaspora Studies, 5.2 (2012): 198. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://search.proquest.com/docview/1563752458?accountid=13771>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
appears in Sea of Poppies, which is marked by the characters coming altogether
into Ibis, the boat of pilgrims.
The study includes the talk of gender and diaspora in Sea of Poppies. Sen
raises a question on the role of women in diaspora; whether they are empowered
or victimized. By looking at characters like Paulette and Deeti, Sen concludes that
women have significant role in Sea of Poppies. Deeti and Paulette, along with the
other women like Ratna, Heeru and Sarju are depicted as brave women as they
make the decision to leave their homeland. Paulette, especially, leaves her
prominent status as a memsahib in Calcutta‘s white society.27
In the middle of
displacement, Ghosh portrays women as people who are able to make life
changing decision. This is considered impossible to be done in the middle of a
patriarchal society. Here, women‘s role is empowered.
Sen also highlights how diaspora affected caste system in Sea of Poppies.
Caste system, or varnashram in India, is an important concept that is related to
one‘s identity. In the context of diaspora, there is a tendency for the caste structure
to collapse. Sen mentions one of the reasons why caste structure does not work in
diaspora context is because ―caste group could not exist due the lack of local
caste-based authorities‖. The other reason is because the immigrants are
dominated by people of lower caste.28
By sailing on board of the pilgrim ship like
Ibis, immigrants who are portrayed by the characters in Sea of Poppies are freed
from the caste system that controls their identity.
27 N. C. Sen, p.200
28 N. C. Sen, p.201
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
Sea of Poppies reflects how Indian indentured workers being shipped to
various European colonies to work in plantations. Indentured workers are called
by the name ‗girmitiyas‘ which comes from the mispronounced of the word
‗permit‘ into ‗girmit‘ by non-English-speaking Indians. The contract for the
indentured workers usually lasts for five years and it is renewable for another five
years, with girmitiyas earning eight rupees per month.29
This is also what happens
in Sea of Poppies. The immigrants boarding on the Ibis leave their homeland with
no certainty of how much money will they make out of indentured labor, but they
sure know that there is no fancy life waits for them across the sea.
Sen also adds one of the most important topics in the study of diaspora is
the oral narrative. In the case of Indian diaspora, the immigrants may be illiterate,
but they have a vast knowledge on popular songs, sayings and folklore. Sen shows
how in Sea of Poppies, the immigrants uses their knowledge on songs, sayings
and folklores not only as a connection to their old life in their homeland, but also
as a foundation in creating their new culture.30
The immigrants who come from
different background teach each other about their songs, sayings, and folklores.
This is relates to the hybridity of language as previously mentioned in
Gangopadhyay‘s study.
Both articles by Gangopadhyay and Sen focus on a similar theme, which is
diaspora. These two articles approach diaspora from the motives of the journey to
the birth of the hybrid languages as a result of shared experiences. The experience
29 N. C. Sen, p.203
30 N. C. Sen, p.204
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
of border crossing is something familiar to postcolonial study. Seeing diaspora
becomes one of the main themes in Sea of Poppies, it is safe to say that Ghosh
also pays a special attention into the theme of border crossing. These studies by
Gangopadhyay and Sen provide some insight about the experience of the journey
and how it affects the people—their languages, castes, roles, etc. In this thesis‘
later chapter, a particular attention is also given to the experience of border
crossing. More specifically, the attention is given to migration, more specifically
the phenomenon of crossing the Black Water. Sea of Poppies presents us a fact
that a journey beyond the Black Water is actually unimaginable for some of the
characters, since it is forbidden by their religion. However, as the migrants find
themselves on board of the Ibis, there is another sense of discovery that goes
beyond the discovery of hybrid language. To some, however, it represents
resistance and the discovery of justice. Both studies by Gangopadhyay and Sen
support this thesis‘ take on the diaspora phenomenon. Sen‘s study in particular
supports how the rapid change in caste structure influences the life of the
characters in Sea of Poppies. The theme of diaspora in the novel works as the way
how caste or social structure is challenged in search of justice.
To add after the discussions of ecology and diaspora, another different
point of view also fills in the studies of Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies. In an article
about Sea of Poppies by Ravi Ahuja, there is a prominent discussion of hierarchy
studied from the point of view of Indian lascars. Ahuja puts special interest in
Jodu, one of the characters in Sea of Poppies, to show the experience of the
seamen in the nineteenth century sailing ship. Ahuja highlights how the term
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
―lascar‖ which originated from the Persian word ―lashkar‖ has its meaning shifted
because of colonialism. Originally, ―lashkar‖ means ―an armed formation‖ or
more generally refers to ―men under military command‖. However, colonialism
has shifted the term ―lascar‖ into a racial category that distinguishes Indian
seamen to European ones. The shift of meaning of the word ―lascar‖ is similar to
what happened to the word ―coolie‖ that means ―workers‖, in which it is shifted
into a racial category that separates ―Asians‖ to ―whites‖.31
The separation of
racial categories between Indian and European ship crews indicates the existence
of racial hierarchy in the deck, where the status of the non-European seamen
serves as the inferior compared to the European ones.
In the article, Ahuja compares Ghosh‘s fictional character with the actual
lascar of British Steam Navigation Company‘s SS Gandhara in the 1930, named
Sona Miah. He argues that the fictional character Jodu, and Sona Miah of SS
Gandhara are both identified as lascars. Both Jodu and Sona Miah are of those
lascars who become the victims of oppression by the European seamen they
working with. The oppression comes in the form of inhumane working and living
condition on the ship. The oppression, too, was the cause of high frequency of
lascar suicides in the 1900s.32
By comparing Ghosh‘s fictional character and Sona
Miah, Ahuja aims to show how both lascars are no different than prisoners being
confined in the ship. Ahuja adds, even though Ghosh does not explore more on
31 Ravi Ahuja, ―Capital at Sea, Shaitan Below Decks? A Note on Global Narratives, Narrow
Spaces, and the Limits of Experience.‖ History of the Present, 2.1 (2012): 78. Web. 18 Oct 2016.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/historypresent.2.1.0078> 32
R. Ahuja, p.79
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
the painful experience of the lascars confinement, Ghosh still shows how the
lascars are treated unfairly under the ship‘s racial hierarchy. One of the examples
Ahuja takes from the novel is when Jodu is threatened to be killed by the crew for
defying a British mate.33
This adds to another perspective on reading Ghosh‘s Sea
of Poppies. Being a lascar is used as a racial category that justifies the oppression
of characters like Jodu as a weaker subject in the dialogue of European seamen
versus Asian lascars.
The next article by K.M. Chandar also mentions his take on the issue of
hierarchy. While Ahuja sets Jodu as his main focus, Chandar sets his in Neel
Halder. Chandar mentions how in most of Ghosh‘s novels, he repeatedly uses the
theme of voyage on the sea of the river as the main theme.
Ghosh‘s writings are characterized with the appearance of sub-texts that
mark different time and space, but are connected through a similar theme of
journey. In addition, Ghosh provides his writing with rich history and cultural
anthropology, which is considered as the strength in his writings.34
To Chandar,
Sea of Poppies is considered as the most ambitious novel by Ghosh. If Ghosh‘s
previous novels like In An Antique Land and The Glass Palace use two subtexts,
in the Sea of Poppies, Ghosh creates and joins up to four deliberate subtexts.
33 R. Ahuja, p.81
34 K.M. Chandar, ―Journey to the Antique Land of Poppies: Voyage as Discovery in Amitav
Ghosh‘s ―Sea of Poppies‖.‖ Indian Literature, 54.4 (2010): 181. Web. 18 Oct 2016.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/23346723>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
These four subtexts are all linked with another bounding themes; the poppy,
specifically South Asia to China poppy trade as the main theme.35
Chandar particularly focuses on one of the sub-texts in the novel that tells
the story about the land-owning Raja, Neel Halder. Neel Halder is a character who
represents one of the landlords who are tied to the East India Company. In the
early years of its establishment, the East India Company‘s major resources came
from the Bengal opium trade route. In the novel, Ghosh shows how the landlords
are connected into East India Company and the opium trade for the sake of
financial gain.36
However, good luck does not always stay in the Raja‘s side.
British representative arrests him under the accusation of forgery. Neel Halder is
sentenced seven years of imprisonment in British prison in Mauritius. Neel Halder
is forced to leave his glamorous life as a land-owning king to live as a prisoner.
Chandar highlights how Ghosh shows the drastic changes in Neel Halder‘s
life as the landowner is prepared to enter the prison. There is a display of British
prison system when Neel Halder is examined and marked as a prisoner. It includes
physical abuse and humiliation.37
The forms of this physical abuse and
humiliation are: being brutally stripped of one‘s clothes, being called by such
filthy names, one‘s body being marked by tattoo, etc.
On being transported to the Mauritius through a voyage, Neel Halder finds
himself discover a tender human relationship between him and a fellow convict,
35 K.M. Chandar, p.181
36 K.M. Chandar, p.183
37 K.M. Chandar, p.185
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
Ahfatt. Neel Halder grows extremely close to this half-Chinese opium addict. The
guards in the prison, in fact, have tried everything to break the bond between the
two, but it only grows even stronger. Later in the novel, the relationship between
Neel Halder and Ahfatt are being put to the test again by the Second-in-Command
in Ibis ship. It is marked as the peak of Neel Halder‘s humiliation when both he
and Ahfatt are being told to urinate on one another for the Captain‘s
entertainment. 38
However, Neel Halder and Ahfatt possess such strong
relationship. The effort to mess with these two different people of two different
social statuses is useless. Since both characters have become criminals according
to the British law, they both arrive in the situation where their identity and social
status is no longer significant.
The shift of one‘s identity and social status is one of the themes offered by
Ghosh through Sea of Poppies. The sub-texts in the novel overlap and create a
unique story of journey, identity, and hierarchy. Chandar‘s article presents an
interesting reading on Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies. It focuses mainly on one character,
Neel Halder. It presents how Neel Halder being one of the examples of the
character whose life undergoes an overturn because of the caste stripping.
Hierarchy and identity are two inseparable themes which also appear in
Sea of Poppies. Chandar and Ahuja‘s perspectives provide an additional insight
about some of the characters. However, there is diversity on the discussion of
identity of the characters in the novel, especially when it is combined with the
38 K.M. Chandar, p.188
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
additional dialogue of colonial setting. Even so, these studies have shown how
Ghosh contrasts the relationship between the privileged and the underprivileged.
Previously, in the conversation of ecology in Ghosh‘s writing, human‘s
oppressive tendency over the nature is revealed. It appears that in the context of
one human to another, there is also a tendency of oppressing the weaker ones. The
involvement of power play between one person and another, combined with how
it related to human and nature relationship, is to be the stepping stone on the
reading of Sea of Poppies. The studies by Chandar and Ahuja are used to support
this thesis‘ take on how racial and social status differences are used to oppress the
weaker or the marginalized. It appears that Ghosh wants to challenge the
oppression towards the weak because of differences in race and social status
through Sea of Poppies.
By looking at the previous studies conducted on Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies,
it can be concluded that the studies are somehow still focus on the hierarchy of the
different social classes in the novel and also diaspora, and the ‗green‘ reading
revolves human‘s superiority over the nature. The existing studies are used to
support this thesis‘ findings. This thesis offers a different take on reading Ghosh‘s
work. Sea of Poppies will be seen from the point of view of postcolonial
ecocriticism with a particular focus on looking at human and non-human
relationship with the particular focus on the colonial setting, more specifically on
how human and the non-human relationship is situated within the context of caste-
based Indian society and within the setting of colonialism. This thesis also offers
to see how migration is seen as a form of resistance in search of environmental of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
social justice, as well as seeing to what extent justice is achieved through the
resistance effort.
B. Review of Related Theory
Several studies on Ghosh‘s novel that has been conducted by the other
researchers have been discussed in the previous section in order to find an
available space to be filled by this thesis. This section focuses on the theory that is
used in analyzing the novel to answer the research questions. This section is
divided into three parts. The need of bringing together the issue of
postcolonialism and ecocriticism is to be explored first. The following part is to
talk about the relationship of human and nature in postcolonial context. The topic
of resistance, environmental justice, and social justice altogether in the context of
postcolonial ecocriticism is to be explored in the final part.
1. On Bringing Together Postcolonialism and Ecocriticism
In bringing together both ecocriticism and postcolonialism, it is important
to see how both disciplines are related and influenced one another. In literary
studies over the last decades, postcolonialism has occupied an important part in
literary studies. Ecocriticism also has become more popular due to the rising of
global environmental awareness. However, in the beginning of its development,
ecocriticism barely engaged the dialogue of postcolonialism in its investigation.
In the Introduction to The Ecocriticism Reader, Cheryl Glotfelty mentions
that ecocriticism appeared because of the ignorance of today‘s most important
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
issue, namely the global environmental crisis.39
Glotfelty states that major
publications in literature until the twentieth century have been focusing on the
issue of class, race, and gender, but none on the earth. Literary publications barely
reflected that the earth‘s life support is under pressure and in need of human‘s
attention.40
The earth is in the face of serious threats and it calls for everyone‘s
attention, including the participation from literary study.
The recent happenings related to the earth and its problems have put a
pressure on the literary study to give a response. Glotfelty also mentions that prior
to the publication of The Ecocriticism Reader, still, ―there have been no journals,
no jargon, no jobs, no professional societies or discussion groups, and no
conferences on literature and the environment‖. Meanwhile, other disciplines in
humanities like history, philosophy, law, sociology, and religion have shown their
concern on the environment.41
However, several studies focusing on the
environment and its issues has appeared under different names, such as:
―American studies, regionalism, pastoralism, the frontier, human ecology, science
and literature, nature in literature, landscape in literature, etc.‖42
These studies
aims to create an environmental-based approach to literature, even though mostly
still focus on the issue of wilderness. This shows that, even though appearing in
39 Cheryll Glotfelty, Introduction to The Ecocriticism Reader, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and
Harold Fromm (Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press, 1996), xv. 40
C. Glotfelty, p.xvi 41
C. Glotfelty, p.xvi 42
C. Glotfelty, p.xvii
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
different names, literature studies has shown its concern to also ‗go green‘ and
follow the steps of the other disciplines in humanities.
Somewhere by mid-eighties to early nineties, ecocriticism was born. By
Glotfelty it is simply defined as ―the study of the relationship between literature
and the physical environment,‖ it takes earth as the center of its approach, similar
to how feminism and Marxism take gender issue and economic class as their
focuses, respectively.43
The most typical questions raised by ecocritics and
ecocricitism theorists, as noted by Glotfelty, involve around the representation of
nature, the role of the physical setting, ecological wisdom voiced in the literature,
humankind and natural world‘s relationship, changes in wilderness, etc.44
It
appears that ecocriticism becomes a line that connects human, literature, and the
actual physical world, or the nature.
Ecocriticism fundamentally believes that human culture and their physical
world are connected. Both human culture and the physical world affect one
another. The notion of the ‗world‘ in ecocriticism is expanded into the real
ecosphere, which differentiate this literary theory with the other theories in
examining the relationship between the writer, the text, and the world.45
To add,
Greg Garrard simply mentions that the widest way to describe ecocriticism is the
43 C. Glotfelty, p.xviii
44 C. Glotfelty, p.xix
45 C. Glotfelty, p.xvi
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
way it studies ―the relationship of the human and non-human, throughout human
cultural history and entailing critical analysis in of the term ‗human‘ itself.‖46
However, in the middle of its booming, Rob Nixon notices how
ecocriticism, as a representation of literature and environmental studies, only
revolves around the works of American critics. These critics, according to Nixon,
appear to have the same tendency. To quote Nixon:
Yet these authors tended to canonize the same self-selecting
genealogy of American writers, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry
David Thoreau, John Muir, Aldo Leopold, Edward Abbey, Annie
Dillard, Terry Tempest Williams, Wendell Berry and Gary
Snyder.47
Nixon mentions how he appreciates these big names as people of influence,
however he regrets the fact that ecocriticism only speaks from within a single
nation. He also adds on how there is a similarity of dominating pattern even in
―environmental literary anthologies, college course web sites, and special journal
issues on ecocriticism.‖48
Ecocriticism seems to develop as an exclusive branch of
American studies, including the names of prominent American authors.
Nixon‘s sentiment is confirmed by Garrard who mentions that in its early
development, ecocriticism exclusively paid its attention to Romantic poetry,
wilderness narrative and nature writing. Only in the following years of its
development, ecocriticism then expanded its focus. Garrard mentions that after the
last few years of its emergence, then ASLE turned ecocriticism‘s object of study
46 Greg Garrard, Ecocriticism (New York: Routledge, 2004), 5.
47 Rob Nixon, ―Environmentalism and Postcolonialism‖ in Ecocriticism: The Essential
Reader, ed. Ken Hiltner (New York: Routledge, 2015), 196. 48
R. Nixon, p.196
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
into a more general ones, including studies of popular scientific writing, film, TV,
art, architecture and other cultural artefacts such as theme parks, zoos and
shopping malls.49
Ecocriticism seems to have a specific interest especially in the
idea of wilderness, before it expanded its reach into a more familiar object of
study.
Glotfelty, too, states that the canon texts for environmental literary
criticism include books like Aldo Leopold‘s A Sand Country Almanac, and
Edward Abbey‘s Desert Solitaire. This fact strengthens the idea that ecocriticism
itself ―has been predominantly a white movement‖.50
However, Glotfelty adds a
hopeful future for ecocriticism, in which it will be able to move across its
boundaries of American literature. This means, ecocriticism will open itself to be
a ―multi-ethnic movement when stronger connections are made between the
environment and issues of social justice, and when a diversity of voices are
encouraged to contribute to the discussion‖.51
This possibility of opening the field
of ecocriticism to diverse range of voices shows a possible space for fields like
postcolonialism to enter into dialogue with ecocriticism.
In line with ecocriticism‘s ambition of wanting to include diverse voices
into the field, and the sentiment of the field being too American-centered, Nixon
brings the case of Nigerian writer and activist, Ken Saro-Wiwa to highlight his
arguments. It bothers Nixon how writers like Saro-Wiwa, who clearly revealed
49 G. Garrard, p.4
50 C. Glotfelty, p.xxv
51 C. Glotfelty, p.xxv
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
the struggle for social and environmental justice, does not have a place in the
middle of the so-called canon for ecocriticism. Someone like Saro-Wiwa, would
find his works being criticized under the scope of African writer whose work is
more suitable to be analyzed from the perspective of postcolonialism instead of
ecocriticism.52
To this dilemma, then, Nixon declares it is possible to bring
together the issue of ecocriticism and postcolonialism.
Seeing the concern of both theories on a quick glance, ecocriticism and
postcolonialism happen to oppose one another. Most environmentalists happen to
be silent when it comes to postcolonial theory and literature, and vice versa.
Postcolonial critics happen to be just as silent when it comes to environmental
literature.53
This shows how both fields appear to be mutually silent of each
other‘s concerns. In bringing together both fields, Graham Huggan and Helen
Tiffin also add that the other problem lies on the difficulty of the definition of
both fields. Huggan and Tiffin seem to support Nixon by declaring that both
postcolonialism and ecocriticism are ―notoriously difficult to define‖.54
Therefore, owning no place in neither of the field, it is no surprise that cases like
Saro-Wiwa become an anomaly.
For instance, postcolonial critic‘s commitment to the issue of hybridity
does not seem to match ecocritic‘s preservation of purity—the idea of the virgin
52 R. Nixon, p.197
53 R. Nixon, p.196
54 Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin, Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals,
Environment. (New York: Routledge, 2010), 3.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
wilderness and the ―uncorrupted‖ place.55
Nixon also adds that postcolonial critics
are uncomfortable with the idea of purity. Environmental writing tends to remove
the history of the colonized land through the image of the conquest of the empty
land. This mostly appears in wilderness writings.56
Wilderness writings are, in
fact, obsessed with the idea of seeing nature as a place that is pure,
uncontaminated by human‘s civilization.57
The history of the colonized land
becomes a problem when the conquest of the so-called wilderness has established
the land and its native settlers as objects to be owned, preserved, or patronized.
The colonized are denied the ownership of their land and its legacies.58
Next, postcolonial critic‘s concern with displacement does not seem to
match ecocritic‘s priority to place. Here, Nixon highlights the autobiographical
differences between postcolonial critics and ecocritics. Postcolonial critics are
those who happen to have crossed national boundaries through the experience of
displacement. Meanwhile, Nixon notes that prominent writers and critics of
environmentalism are ―mono-nationals with a deep-rooted experiential and
imaginative commitment to a particular American locale.‖59
To place both fields
together is problematic when ecocriticism suggests purity and returning home to
nature as the solution of problems and crisis in the environment, while the idea of
home, for postcolonialism and its displacement, is a place that is not locatable.
55 R. Nixon, p.197
56 R. Nixon, p.198
57 G. Garrard, p.59
58 R. Nixon, p.198
59 R. Nixon, p. 198
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
Also, postcolonialism and its concern on the cosmopolitanism and
transnationalism appear not to match ecocriticism‘s tendency of being a
nationalistic field. Nixon points out how the texts that are considered as the canon
in ecocriticism are developed within a national context, which is a national
American framework.60
The important question to be asked is, then, how to
situate the context of ecocritic‘s particular national framework to go beyond its
boundaries in order for it to be transnational. This, adds Nixon, demands
ecocriticism to move beyond its idea of ‗place‘, and this requires ecocrticism to
rethink about ‗place‘ within the dialogue of colonial and postcolonial—a nature of
environmental also cultural degradation.61
Finally, postcolonialism pays a special attention to history, something
which seems to be overlooked by ecocriticism. In talking about history,
particularly, postcolonialism is specifically interested in reimagining the history of
the marginalized, also history from the below and the border. In its pursuit of a
timeless nature, however, Nixon recognizes how ecocriticism appears to discard
the history. For example, in American natural history, the life of the colonized
people is repressed because of the obsession to the myth of the empty lands.62
However, bringing together postcolonialism and ecocriticim is something
that needs to be done. Integrating environmental issues into the discussion of
60 R. Nixon, p.197
61 R. Nixon, p.200
62 R. Nixon, p.197
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
postcolonial literatures and vice versa is a way to bridge both fields.63
The issue
with the environment, in fact, is something everyone can relate to.
Environmentalism should not only be a Western luxury, and ecocriticism should
not only be dominated by the white. Only by this way, then the voice of people
like Saro-Wiwa and other postcolonial writers who have a say in environment
issues can gain a place in the middle of the so-called ‗green‘ literature canon.64
By bringing together both postcolonialism and ecocriticism, it should
answer to the ambition of ecocriticism to engage diversity of voice into its
discussion. The consequence of this is the way we see how is this diversity of
voice contributes in defining ecocriticism and its commitment to human and
nature‘s relationship as a whole. It is important, then, to see how the relationship
between human and nature in postcolonial or colonial context is, and how does it
differ to the human and nature relationship we have come to see through
mainstream ecocriticism.
2. On Human and Nature Relationship
As previously mentioned, the relationship between human and nature is
the main focus of ecocriticism. Speaking in line with the concern of the
environmental crisis, human and nature relationship become the attention of
ecocriticism for it is the main reason of the crisis in the environment. From the
perspective of ecocriticism, human and nature relationship becomes a problematic
63 R. Nixon, p.203
64 R. Nixon, p.204
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
one when the former appears to dominate the latter. This section will explore this
notion, more particularly how it is discussed in the dialogue with colonialism.
In talking about human and nature relationship with its relation to
ecological crisis, historian Lynn White, Jr. notes that the existing of ecological
crisis is the result of human‘s culture, especially technology and science.
Technology and science, by White is characterized as being Occidental, it belongs
to the Western. Western technology and science owe its success from the past
sciences, for instance, the great Middle Age Islamic scientists and their discovery
in fields like medicine, optics, mathematics, etc. It was through Latin translations
of Arabic and Greek scientific works, the foundation of Western technology and
science development was made possible.65
With consistency, the West
continuously expands its technology and science in developing power machinery,
labor-saving devices, and automation. The effort to develop the so-called modern
technology, however, tends to ignore the fact that it treats the earth in a ruthless
way.66
The way how human treats the land ruthlessly for the sake of developing
the technology and science—for example through plowing, harvesting, chopping
trees, butchering, etc.—has established an important separation between human
and the nature itself. Human and nature are two different things, with the former
65 Lynn White, Jr., ―The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis‖ in The Ecocriticism Reader:
Landmarks in Literary Ecology, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm (Athens, GA: The
University of Georgia Press, 1996), 6. 66
L. White, p.8
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
being the master of the latter.67
Having the dominant power over the nature,
anthropocentrism has become human‘s impulse to conquer, violate and exploit the
nature. White mentions that Christianity‘s victory over paganism caused the
greatest revolution in human‘s culture. Christianity has contributed in the creation
of duality between human and the non-human. It also, according to White, insists
in the notion that nature‘s exploitation for human‘s benefit is God‘s will.
Christianity has taken over pagan animism and changed the way nature is seen. It
changed pagan animism beliefs that spirit exists in natural objects.68
White also
adds that these days, however, science and technology has developed even further
from Christian attitude of human and nature relationship. Human is seen to be
nature‘s superior, and taking it for granted is considered natural.
White‘s argument is also supported by Christopher Manes who claims that
the established human and nature relationship has caused nature to be silent.
Human is the only creature granted the monopoly of being the speaking subject.
Manes also highlights the culture of animism that contrasts the existing belief
about human and nature relationship. The belief that the spirit that lives in the
natural world, within the animals, plants, or stones, and river were replaced.69
According to Manes, the silence of the nature has opened a chance of exploitation
67 L. White, p.8
68 L. White, p.10
69 Christopher Manes, ―Nature and Silence‖ in The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in
Literary Ecology, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm (Athens, GA: The University of
Georgia Press, 1996), 15.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
by human. This ethic of exploitation has flourished and rooted among human.
Nature exploitation is, in fact, the reason of today‘s ecological crisis.
Human‘s relationship to nature has been said to be dominating. Human has
been well known for taking the nature for granted and using the nature to serve
whatever human need is. Technological superiority of the West also, then,
encouraged them to take over the nature in small countries—to conquer and
colonize these countries.70
Human and nature relationship, however, is formed
rather differently in the colonial setting.
In introducing postcolonial ecocriticism and talking about nature and
human, Graham Huggan and Helen Tiffin begin by including the matter of racism
and speciesism into the field‘s discussion. In the case of non-human; animals, for
instance, the separation between human and its non-human counterpart has
allowed human to dominate the weaker—the animals. In colonial circumstances,
the indigenous population is labeled and treated as the animalized human. The
natives are given the quality of being similar to the human ‗other‘, even the non-
human. Colonization, then, becomes the setting where anthropocentrism and
racism take place. By seeing the colonized land and people as weaker counterpart,
the colony‘s oppression to the colonize land is connected to the oppression of its
people.71
With the colony seeing the colonized land and its people as open to be
oppressed, the exploitation of the land surely too will be connected to the
70 L. White, Jr., p.7
71 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.4
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
exploitation of the people. The justification of this exploitation of the colonized
land is based on the colony‘s perception of the indigenous land being a spaced
that is unused or underused. The exploitation of the colonized people is also based
on the colony‘s perception of the indigenous people being primitive and
uncivilized.72
Huggan and Tiffin state that the exploitation in colonial setting is a place
where human has taken the nature for granted, with the domination of human in
the form of anthropocentrism relates to imperialism. The analysis, in this case,
speaks about the power abuse of human over nature, with the aim of seeking for
not only environmental justice, but also, social justice and economic justice.73
Huggan and Tiffin also add that this goal of wanting to protect the rights of the
abused nature and people is an effort for the liberation of the oppressed. This
effort should take into account the history of the natural and social world of the
oppressed.74
Colonialism has shifted nature for the colonized population through the
abuse of power. By using the colonial power, the colony used the so-called idea of
development as a way to utilize and civilize the indigenous land and people,
respectively.75
This way, the colony enforces the idea of how is the proper model
of civilization, which includes naturalizing anthropocentrism in it. Colonialism
shifted the idea of the colonized about the way nature is supposed to be treated
72 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.4
73 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.11
74 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.14
75 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.9
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
through the use of power. Huggan and Tiffin quotes Saro-Wiwa and the case of
Ogoni people and their land as an example. For these people, nature did not only
provide for their everyday life, but it was sacred and related intimately to their
community. Unfortunately, the so-called development brought by the abuse of
power changed this.76
To liberate the colonized society from this way of thinking
means to liberate their land from the abuse, too. Hence, one of postcolonial
ecocriticism‘s commitments suggest that social justice for the colonized can only
be fulfilled when environmental justice is achieved as well.
Huggan and Tiffin also emphasize to look within the idea of entitlement
and how this is related to human and nature relationship in the colonial setting.
Speaking of entitlement means to talk about the sense of ownership. With the
colony having the monopoly of the power, the indigenous people are forced to
face the experience of dispossession and loss, with the consequence of the
devastation of their pastoral.77
With the arrival of the colonial settlers, the
indigenous people are stripped of their rights with their own land. The colony
takes over the land to show how it is supposed to be used ‗properly‘. Huggan and
Tiffin mention that the experience of displacement, either legally claimed or
emotionally experienced, should be explored in seeing between fellow human
relationship and human and nature relationship.78
76 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.43
77 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.85
78 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.121
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
3. On Resistance, Environmental Justice, and Social Justice
Seeing how the dominating power works in the dialogue of postcolonial
ecocriticism, Huggan and Tiffin state that ―there is no social justice without
environmental justice‖.79
By looking at the case of Saro-Wiwa, Huggan and
Tiffin, too, highlight the fact at a conclusion that the history of the colonial
oppression and environmental oppression go hand in hand. Colonialism affects
not only the population of the indigenous people, but also their land and their
natural resources. Therefore, the attempt to put an end to the oppression on the
people and the land should go hand in hand as well.
Christa Grewe-Volpp seems to have a mutual sentiment to Huggan and
Tiffin in the subject of justice in postcolonial ecocrticism context. Grewe-Volpp
emphasizes the need to take a look within the Third-World to add a new
perspective into environmentalism and its concern on social and environmental
issues. The urge to see from within the Third-World context is claimed to be a
proper way to see environmental and social justice from the perspective of the
indigenous eyes, no through western‘s eyes. By doing so, it is possible to see how
colonialism has changed the way land is perceived and used. After all, Grewe-
Volpp adds that ―the colonized subject cannot be seen separately from the effects
of his or her colonized environment.‖80
79 G. Huggan and H. Tiffin, p.35
80 Christa Grewe-Volpp, ―No Environmental Justice Without Social Justice: A Green
Postcolonialist Reading of Paul Marshal‘s The Chosen Place, the Timeless People‖ in Literature,
Ecology, Ethics: Recent Trends in Ecocriticism, eds. Timo Muller and Michael Sauter
(Heidelberg: Universitatverlag, 2012), 228.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
To see from within the perspective of the indigenous people, as mentioned
by Grewe-Volpp, means to see the colonized subject‘s own take on the history of
their land and the people. This, too, means to see how domination and resistance
are embodied in the indigenous community. Through transplantation, slavery,
colonialism and imperialism, the colonized subjects are forced to crush their idea
of the land. They are forced to accept Western‘s perception of how land is
supposed to be valued. Colonization becomes Western‘s tool to shape the
colonized perception on how to value and use their own land. The perception
imported by the colony to the colonized is, of course, very exploitative.81
In the place where colonialism happens to exploit both the nature and the
people, it is important to see the resistance as a means to find out in what way a
positive alternative is possible for the environment and its inhabitants.82
It can be
seen how colonial exploitation has granted the colony the control of people and
their lands. This complete control of the colony has caused silence as a sign of
powerlessness.83
Grewe-Volpp mentions that to fight against the exploitation,
colonial subjects need to speak and act against it. This becomes a way to resist
both colonial and environmental exploitation that has entered the body and the
mind of these poor and oppressed people.
Grewe-Volpp adds that the possibilities of resistance are in the form of
rejecting development as a way to resist the dominating power, it also includes to
81 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.229
82 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.230
83 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.232
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
―mistrust in the idea of western development‖. Grewe-Volpp also mentions that
the concept of development, as suggested by Escobar, is a way for the First-World
countries to take control of the social, economy, and the physical of the
‗enderdeveloped‘ Third-World countries.84
Development here becomes an
instrument of dominating and suppressing the non-Western countries, therefore it
needs to be fought against. The form of fighting against or resisting the notion of
development, as suggested by Grewe-Volpp, might come in the form of ―refusing
this development projects, even sabotaging them.‖85
However, achieving social and environmental justice by resisting does not
necessarily mean to return to the pristine condition of the environment just like
from the very beginning. It is impossible for the land and the colonized subject to
return to its ‗original‘ condition after being scarred by the dominating colony.
Grewe-Volpp suggests that the most possible way of a radical change to achieve
justice is by working on a new relationship that is more balanced in all aspects;
environmentally, politically, economically, and culturally. This relationship needs
to overcome the existence of hierarchy that comes from the imperial power
structure. By liberating the nature and the dispossessed from the hierarchal system
and its abusive way, the improvement for the nature and people is possible—with
the possibility for how ecology is to be shaped is left open.86
84 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.233
85 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.235
86 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.235
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
CHAPTER III
THE EFFECT OF COLONIZATION ON THE NATURE AND THE
PEOPLE IN GHOSH’S SEA OF POPPIES
In the previous chapter, some studies on Ghosh‘s works have been
reviewed along with the postcolonial ecocriticism theory to answer the research
questions. This section focuses on the analysis of the effect of the colonization on
the nature and people in Amitav Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies. The analysis works to
see how human and nature is related to one another in the scene of colonial India.
This section is divided into two parts; the effect of colonization on the nature, and
the effect of the colonization on the people to see how the practice of British
colonization in India has affected the indigenous people and their land.
A. The Effect of Colonization on the Nature
Nature plays an important role for the characters in Sea of Poppies.
Through one of the characters, Deeti, Ghosh shows how humans rely on the
nature. In the novel, Deeti is described as a native woman who lived on the suburb
of Ghazipur. Making a living out of poppy farming, Deeti possesses an
environmental consciousness for being directly involved with the nature. Her
relationship with nature allows her to notice the difference that happens when East
India Company takes over India for opium cultivation. Being presented as the
native in the novel, Deeti shows how nature plays a significant role in the life of
the indigenous people.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
The significance of nature in human‘s life can be seen from how nature
provides everything that is needed to survive. In her everyday life, for example,
Deeti and her family go to the Ganga River to bathe. This shows how Deeti‘s
everyday need of water is fulfilled by the Ganga:
…Now, her mind turned to her shrine room again: with the hour of
the noontime puja drawing close, it was time to go to the river for a
bath. After massaging poppy-seed oil into Kabutri‘s hair and her
own, Deeti draped her spare sari over her shoulder and led her
daughter towards the water, across the field.87
As a poppy farmer, Deeti indeed makes a living from the nature. Nature
works as a day to day working place for her. For being able to only plant poppies,
Deeti still makes the most out of it by making use of the poppies to fulfill her own
daily needs. From the previous quotation, it can be seen how she and her
daughter, Kabutri, use the poppy seeds oil to be massaged on their hair. This is not
the only example of how the poppies are being used regularly in Deeti‘s daily life.
In fact, Deeti also uses the poppy seeds in her cooking. For example, she uses the
seeds in cooking alu-posth88
, which is a dish made of potatoes cooked in poppy-
seed paste. (SOP, 7)
Even during her escape with Kalua, Deeti also feels how nature provides
for her. They both manage to survive by the help of the nature. This following
quotation shows how by being close to the Ganga, Deeti and Kalua are saved
from being hungry or thirsty despite having no money at all.
87 Ghosh, Amitav. Sea of Poppies. (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2008), p.7. From
this onwards, Sea of Poppies is to be abbreviated as SOP with pagination only. 88
Also spelled as aloo posto.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
…Every evening Kalua would light a fire and Deeti would knead
and cook a sufficient number of rotis to see them through the day.
With the Ganga close at hand, they had so far lacked for neither
food nor water.(SOP,189)
Other than helping Deeti in sustaining her life by providing food and water
in need, nature also holds a place in Deeti‘s spiritual life. It can be seen from how
Deeti shows her respect and gratitude to the nature that provides for her. To give
thanks to the nature, Deeti pours out the water and the offering to the Ganga River
and to the holy city of Benares89
, which is shown in the following quotation:
…Turning in the direction of Benares, in the west, Deeti hoisted
her daughter aloft, to pour out a handful of water as a tribute to the
holy city. Along with the offering, a leaf flowed out of the child‘s
cupped palms. They turned to watch as the river carried it
downstream towards the ghats of Ghazipur. (SOP,7)
After expressing her thankfulness to the nature by giving the offering to the holy
river and the holy city, Deeti fills her pitcher with the water from the river to be
placed in her puja90
room, where she will also give flowers and offerings to the
deities (SOP, 8). In India, flower offerings during the worship are done to delight
the deities in hope that they will bestow prosperity to the family.
Not only that nature fulfills Deeti‘s daily needs and becomes a part of her
spiritual life, it is also nature who gives Deeti a ‗sight‘ about her future. In the
beginning of the novel, it is the Ganga who gives Deeti the ‗sight‘ about the Ibis,
the ship that will change her life forever. This next quotation shows how the
89 Also known as Varanasi, one of the holy cities in India.
90 Prayer
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
nature bestows signs about the future upon Deeti by giving her a vision to her
through the contact with the sacred waters.
In time, among the legions who came to regard the Ibis as their
ancestor, it was accepted that it was the river itself that had granted
Deeti the vision: that the image of the Ibis had been transported
upstream, like an electric current, the moment the vessel made
contact with the sacred waters. This would mean that it happened
in the second week of March 1838, for that was when the Ibis
dropped anchor off Ganga-Sagar Island, where the holy river
debouches into the Bay of Bengal. (SOP,10)
The previous quotations show how Deeti lives harmoniously with the
nature. They also represent the idea of human and nature having a symbiotic
relationship to one another. Since Deeti and her family rely so much on the nature,
it is not surprising to see how changes that affect the nature will also affect their
lives. As mentioned previously, being directly involved with the nature has caused
Deeti to possess an environmental consciousness. Deeti is included in those who
are aware and notices about the changes that happen to the nature.
Sea of Poppies presents us an image of how British colonization in India
affected the nature, and natives like Deeti are of those who are forced to accept
the changes in the environment that also influence a numerous changes in her
daily life. Sea of Poppies presents the fact that in the late 18th
century, British has
established a monopoly over opium production in India. By then, British has
forced a new cultivation system to Indian‘s nature and natives. To gain as huge
profit as possible, British forces the natives to plant poppies and fulfill British‘s
high demand of opium. Colonialism in India has changed the way poppies are
produced in India, it can be seen in the following quotation:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
When Deeti was her daughter‘s age, things were different: poppies
had been a luxury then, grown in small clusters between the fields
that bore the main winter crops—wheat, masoor dal and
vegetables. Her mother would send some of her poppy seeds to the
oil-press, and the rest she would keep for the house, some for
replanting, and some to cook with meat and vegetables. As for the
sap, it was sieved of impurities and left to dry, until the sun turned
it into hard abkari afeem; at that time, no one thought of producing
the wet, treacly chandu that was made and packaged in the English
factory, to be sent across the sea in boats. (SOP,28)
From the previous quotation it can be from Deeti‘s point of view that the arrival
of British colony has changed the way poppies are cultivated in India. Deeti
witnesses how at first poppies were planted alongside the main winter crops like
wheat, masoor dal91
, and vegetables. However, Deeti cannot find those winter
crops anymore because the cultivation system is different already; farmers only
plant poppies instead of those usual main crops. The start of production of poppies
in a large scale to be sent into the opium factory and to be exported outside India
happens when British arrived and imposed the new cultivation system. Poppies
are no longer a luxury because it is being planted all year in a massive amount as
well.
Since poppies are planted in a large amount to fulfill British demands of
opium production, poppies have taken over the land all across India. This
cultivation of poppies has changed the way the land is used. The enormous scale
of poppy cultivation is, indeed, a form of abuse to the land itself. With the colony
taking over the land and the natives, growing opium becomes a form of land
91 Lentil
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
exploitation. From one places to another, it is difficult to find other type of crops
being planted other than the poppies.
It happened at the end of winter, in a year when the poppies were
strangely slow to shed their petals: for mile after mile, from
Benares onwards, the Ganga seemed to be flowing between twin
glaciers, both its banks being blanketed by thick drifts of white
petalled flowers. It was as if the snows of the high Himalayas had
descended on the plains to await the arrival of Holi and its
springtime profusion of colour. (SOP, 3)
The quotation shows how poppies take over the fertile land by the Ganga River all
the way from Benares to Deeti‘s village in the Northern Bihar, which is located in
the outskirts of the town of Ghazipur. The poppies do not only take over Deeti‘s
village, but they also cover the surroundings of Deeti‘s childhood home near the
Karamnasa River. Deeti notices how the landscape near the river has a great deal
of change since her childhood, and she finds only the remnants of the harvest
alongside the fertile riverbank. (SOP,188)
Deeti notices how the colonization has transformed the landscape. As
someone who is close to nature, Deeti finds herself agitated over the loss of
greenery in her surroundings. She longs for the presence of the vegetable and
grain in the middle of the massive flowers takeover, which can be seen in:
…The landscape on the rivers‘ shores had changed a great deal
since Deeti‘s childhood and looking around now, it seemed to her
that the Karamnasa‘s influence had spilled over its banks,
spreading its blight far beyond the lands that drew upon its waters:
the opium harvest having been recently completed, the plants had
been left to wither in the fields, so that the countryside was
blanketed with the parched remnants. Except for the foliage of a
few mango and jackfruit trees, nowhere was anything green to
relieve the eye. This, she knew, was what her own fields looked
like, and were she at home today, she would have been asking
herself what she would eat in the months ahead: where the
vegetables? The grains? (SOP,188)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
The landscape, as shown in the quotation, is filled with the remnants of the poppy
harvest. Deeti cannot help but feeling upset over the fact that the environment has
lost its green color. For Deeti, being able to see the greenery in her environment
brings such sense of relief. Unfortunately, seasonal crops are no longer planted in
order to gain as much poppy harvest as possible. In this case, winter crops like
vegetables and grains are nowhere to be found. The cultivation of poppies in a
massive amount has created an obvious problem which is the loss of nature‘s
biodiversity.
Since the poppies monoculture is forced, it has resulted in various
problems on the environment. Previously, it can be seen the nature has lost its
biodiversity with the land being taken over entirely by the poppies. Another
apparent result of this practice is its effect to the soil. On the long run,
monoculture may result in the damage of the soil. The damage may be seen in
how the valuable soil nutrients deplete over time since the poppies monoculture
requires the cultivation of poppies over a large area for years. Biodiversity is
needed by the soil to maintain the nutrients to keep it fertile. Since the farmers in
the novel do not plant the seasonal crops anymore, there is no crop rotation effort
to restore the nutrients that are found in the soil. The most obvious effect can be
seen in how Deeti along with some other farmers are experiencing late harvest,
which is possibly caused by the lack of available soil nutrients. The late harvest
has caused uneasiness for Deeti and her neighbors who also work as poppy
farmers. (SOP, 3)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
In addition, it appears that the poppies monoculture also affect the animal
population in various ways. The enormous amount of poppies in the field is
shown to have pacified the animals, as shown in:
…As her steps lengthened, she saw that on some nearby fields, the
crop was well in advance of her own: some of her neighbours had
already nicked their pods and the white ooze of the sap could be
seen congealing around the parallel incisions of the nukha. The
sweet, heady odour of the bleeding pods had drawn swarms of
insects, and the air was buzzing with bees, grasshoppers and
wasps; many would get stuck in the ooze and tomorrow, when the
sap turned colour, their bodies would merge into the black gum,
becoming a welcome addition to the weight of the harvest. The sap
seemed to have a pacifying effect even on the butterflies, which
flapped their wings in oddly erratic patterns, as though they could
not remember how to fly. (SOP, 27)
In the previous quotation, it is Deeti again who notices how the smell of the poppy
sap affects the insects like bees, grasshoppers, wasps and butterflies. The smell of
the sap does not only pacify these insects, but it also potentially kills them.
Sea of Poppies also presents the negative effect of British colonization on
India‘s nature through the depiction of the opium factory. The opium factory in
Ghazipur as shown in the novel is the actual portrayal of Ghazipur Opium Factory
that was established by East India Company, and it is the biggest and the oldest
opium factory in the country. On her way to pick her sick husband up from work,
Deeti witnesses how the opium factory has caused negative effects to its
surroundings.
Although the Sudder Opium Factory was indisputably large and
well-guarded, there was nothing about its exterior to suggest to an
onlooker that it was among the most precious jewels in Queen
Victoria‘s crown. On the contrary, a miasma of lethargy seemed
always to hang over the factory‘s surroundings. (SOP, 89)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
Despite of the huge profit British has gained from the opium production, the
quotation shows how the factory cannot be considered as a place of luxury or so.
On the other hand, the factory has caused ‗a miasma of lethargy‘, showing how
the factory has caused dullnesss and produced an awful smell to its surroundings.
On her way to the factory in Kalua‘s oxen cart, Deeti and Kabutri suffer
because of the opium-filled air. The waste of the factory in the form of fog takes
over the fresh air of the city. The polluted air gives a terrible effect not only to
humans, but also to the animals. Deeti, Kabutri, Kalua, including Kalua‘s oxen
and everyone nearby the factory cannot help but sneeze because of the air
pollution.
As Kalua‘s cart rolled on, towards the factory‘s main compound,
Deeti and Kabutri began to sneeze; soon, Kalua and the oxen were
sniffling too, for they had now drawn abreast of the godowns
where farmers came to dispose of their ‗poppy trash‘—leaves,
stalks, and roots, all of which were used in the packaging of the
drug. Ground up for storage, these remains produced a fine dust
that hung in the air like a fog of snuff. Rare was the passer-by who
could brave this mist without exploding into a paroxysm of sneezes
and sniffles—and yet it was a miracle, plain to behold, that the
coolies pounding the trash were no more affected by the dust than
were their young English overseers. (SOP, 89)
The condition within the opium factory itself is worse. The smell of the
raw opium fills the factory, mixed with the unpleasant smell of human‘s sweat as
a result of being confined in hot and closed spaces. Deeti, who makes her first
visit to the opium factory, is overwhelmed by condition of the factory that she has
breathing difficulty and finds herself almost faint.
…The air inside was hot and fetid, like that of a closed kitchen,
except that the smell was not of spices and oil, but of liquid opium,
mixed with the dull stench of sweat—a reek so powerful that she
had to pinch her nose to keep herself from gagging…not till she
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
was through the door did she allow herself to breathe freely again,:
now as she was trying to cleanse her lungs of the odour of raw,
churned opium, she heard someone say: Bhauji? Are you alright?
The voice proved to be that of their relative and it was all she could
do not to collapse on him. (SOP, 92)
The waste of the opium factory does not only pollute the air, but it also
contaminates the Ganga River, and it affects the animals in the environment. For
instance, Deeti notices how the factory‘s effluence is badly affecting the
population of monkeys near the factory. After consuming the contaminated water
from the Ganga River, the monkeys seem to mimic an opium addict; those
monkeys lose their excitement and are stupefied by the factory‘s waste.
…The monkeys that lived around it, for instance: Deeti pointed a
few of these out to Kabutri as the ox-cart trundled towards the
walls. Unlike others of their kind they never came down from the
trees it was to lap at the open sewers that drained the factory‘s
effluents; after having sated their cravings, they would climb back
into the branches to resume their stupefied scrutiny of the Ganga
and its currents. (SOP, 89)
To add, the broken earthenware pots that are scattered around the rivers
also cause the pollution to the Ganga water. The pots, which are used to contain
raw opium, seem to contaminate the population of the fish. The population of the
aquatic animal is under the influence of the raw opium remnants, which can be
seen in:
…This stretch of riverbank was unlike any other, for the ghats
around the Carcanna were shored up with thousands of broken
earthenware gharas—the round-bottomed vessels in which raw
opium was brought to the factory. The belief was widespread that
fish were more easily caught after they had nibbled at the shards,
and as a result the bank was always crowded with fishermen.
(SOP, 90)
The effect of the monoculture in the poppy cultivation system which is
imposed by British to India‘s nature also affects the life of the indigenous people.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
Through the cultivation of the cash crop in a huge amount, British have exploited
both the nature and the indigenous population. The following section will
elaborate in what way the indigenous people are exploited in line with the nature
exploitation.
B. The Effect of Colonization on the People
The exploitation of both the nature and the indigenous people in Ghosh‘s
Sea of Poppies go hand in hand. The forced perspective from the colony that
changes the nature of course will change the life of the people as well. The
indigenous people in the novel suffer under both colonial and environmental
exploitations.
In Sea of Poppies, during British colonialism, the exploitation of the
nature and its resources occurs simultaneously with the exploitation of the
indigenous people. Colonization has shifted both the ecosystem of India and also
the life of the indigenous people. In the novel, people like Deeti and her family
become those who struggle under the colonial exploitation.
It has been explained previously that before the arrival of the British
colony in India, poppies were such a luxury for the indigenous people like Deeti,
and were planted in a small amount only to fit the needs of a household to be used
for specific purposes as well. The beginning of the new cultivation system that is
imposed by the British to the nature marks the beginning of the exploitation of the
indigenous people at the same time.
The exploitation of the nature goes hand in hand with the exploitation of
the nature. In cultivating the opium poppy in a large scale, the colony does not
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
only oppress the nature, but they also oppress the indigenous people. Being
abused by the colony to only cultivate poppies has caused complications in the
life of the Indian natives. The indigenous people struggle to face the rapid changes
that are caused by the colonialism that affects not only their natural ecosystem,
but also their everyday lives.
As previously mentioned, one of the changes in the environment is how
poppies are planted in a large scale for a whole year. To make sure the indigenous
people are fulfilling the colony‘s high demand of the opium production, farmers
are forced not to plant their usual seasonal crops but to plant the poppies instead.
Contracts are set prior to the opium cultivation and they are to be signed by the
farmers, so these farmers are to work under the colony to produce as much opium
as possible, it is shown in:
…She had only to look around to know that here, as in the village
she had left, everyone‘s land was in hock to the agents of the
opium factory: every farmer had been served with a contract, the
fulfilling of which left them with no option but to strew their land
with poppies. And now, with the harvest over and little grain at
home, they would have to plunge still deeper into debt to feed their
families. It was as if the poppy had become the carrier of
Karamnasa‘s malign taint. (SOP, 188)
Deeti is one of the farmers that have no other choice but to plant her fields
with the poppies. She is also bounded with the enforced contract, just like the
other farmers. These farmers, as shown in the quotation, cannot even sustain
themselves with the little grain they own, because they have been denied the
rights to plant the traditional crops that they need.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
In addition, there is a reason why the farmers only planted a small amount
of poppies in the middle of the traditional crops. The cultivation of poppies
requires extra care, as shown in:
In the old days, farmers would keep a little of their home-made
opium for their families, to be used during illnesses, or at harvests
and weddings; the rest they would sell to the local nobility, or to
pykari merchants from Patna. Back then, a few clumps of poppy
were enough to provide for a household‘s needs, leaving a little
over, to be sold: no one was inclined to plant more because all the
work it took to grow poppies—fifteen fences and bunds to be built;
purchases of manure and constant watering; and after all that, the
frenzy of the harvest, each bulb having to be individually nicked,
drained and scraped. Such punishment was bearable when you had
a patch or two of poppies—but what sane person would want to
multiply these labours when there were better, more useful crops to
grow, like wheat, dal, vegetables? (SOP, 28)
As previously shown in the quotation, growing poppies takes a tremendous effort
from the farmer, from making sure the availability manure and water, to the extra
care during harvest. This is why in the past, farmers only planted poppies in a
little patch of land to be used only during illnesses, harvests, or weddings.
In harvesting the poppy sap, the timing must be precise as well. The
lateness in harvesting only causes the extra care in growing the poppies becomes
useless. Harvest needs to be done efficiently or else the farmers will not gain
anything from the harvest, for the remnants of the poppies are not valuable for the
opium factory.
…The timing had to be exactly right because the priceless sap
flowed only for a brief period in the plant‘s span of life: a day or
two this way of that, and the pods were of no more value than the
blossoms of a weed. (SOP, 5)
Considering all the care and effort in growing and harvesting the poppies,
it is reasonable why in the past the indigenous farmers only plant a little poppy
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
alongside with the other crops. With British colony forcing the farmers to
cultivate poppies in a huge amount, imagine the amount of effort it takes to grow
the flowers. This is another form of how the natives are oppressed. In other words,
planting poppies becomes a torture for these people.
The abuse towards the indigenous population does not stop on giving the
extra care on the poppies cultivation, but it proceeds to how they are forced to sell
their harvest to the factory. Opium is the exclusive monopoly of the British colony
under the East India Company. This means, people like Deeti are not entitled of
the fortune brought by the poppies she has harvested. Their harvest is directly
brought to the factory in earthenware gharas92
where each detail of the opium
production has been specifically planned by the East India Company‘s directors in
London.
…Hukam Singh had told Deeti that the measure of every
ingredient was precisely laid down by the Company‘s directors in
faraway London: each package of opium was to consist of exactly
one seer and seven-and a half chittacks of the drug, the ball being
wrapped in five chittacks of poppy-leaf rotis, half of fine grade and
half coarse, the whole being moistened with no more and no less
than five chittacks of lewah. (SOP, 95)
The previous quotation shows how people like Deeti and her husband
Hukam Singh, who are a farmer and an opium factory worker, respectively, have
no control over opium and its production. This is because everything has been
arranged by the people in East Indian Company. Farmers like Deeti, especially,
are only obliged to hand their harvest over to the factory on a monthly basis where
92 Pots
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
it is to be weighed and graded into either chandee (fine) or ganta (coarse). (SOP,
90)
As reflected in the novel, British colony in India is sustained by the
monopoly of the opium production. The monopoly only gives advantages to the
British merchants, which in the novel is represented by Benjamin Burnham. To
Burnham, the exploitation of the nature through the colonization is a benefit
granted from British to India, it can be seen in:
‗For the simple reason, Reid,‘ said Mr Burnham patiently, ‗that
British rule in India could not be sustained without opium – that is
all there is to it, and let us not pretend otherwise… Do you imagine
that British rule would be possible in this impoverished land if it
were not for this source of wealth? And if we reflect on the
benefits that British rule has conferred upon India, does it not
follow that opium is this land‘s greatest blessing? Does it not
follow that it is our God-given duty to confer these benefits upon
others?‘ (SOP, 113)
In his talk with Zachary Reid, Benjamin Burnham bluntly states his opinion on
the exploitation of India‘s nature and indigenous population. In Burnham‘s
perspective, British have successfully made use of opium, India‘s only source of
wealth. According to Burnham, British rule has properly helped to utilize opium
for human‘s benefit, and without it India is just an impoverished land.
However, it is obvious that the exclusive monopoly of the opium only
benefits British. Opium as British‘s source of wealth has caused a widespread
poverty and hunger to the indigenous people. The cultivation of a cash crop like
poppy makes it impossible for the people to survive. Many of the farmers are
forced to leave their villages in search for a better job, but it somehow useless and
they are still living in poverty and hunger, as shown in:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
…The town was thronged with hundreds of other impoverished
transients, many of whom were willing to sweat themselves half to
death for a few handfuls of rice. Many of these people had been
driven from their villages by the flood of flowers that had washed
over the countryside: lands that once provided sustenance were
now swamped by the rising tide of poppies; food was so hard to
come by that people were glad to lick the leaves in which offerings
were made at temples or sip the starchy water from a pot in which
rice had been boiled. (SOP, 198)
These people, including characters like Deeti too, are the victim of British
opium monopoly. Not only that these people are forced to sign a contract, they are
also given cash advances along with the contract. The cash advances should be
returned with their earnings from the harvest.
Come the cold weather, the English sahibs would allow little else
to be planted; their agents would go from home to home, forcing
cash advances on the farmers, making them sign asámi contracts. It
was impossible to say no to them: if you refused they would leave
their silver hidden in your house, or throw it through a window. It
was no use telling the white magistrate that you hadn‘t accepted
the money and your thumbprint was forged: he earned
commissions on the opium and would never let you off. And, at the
end of it, your earnings would come to no more than three-and-a-
half-sicca rupees, just about enough to pay off your advance. (SOP,
28)
However, not even the earning from the harvest is enough for the farmers.
The previous quotation shows the farmer‘s earning is too small it can only cover
the advance. These farmers have no other choice but to start another season of
poppy cultivation with a new round of debt. The loan for the farmers, too, has a
huge interest, as shown in:
…She gave in and agreed to place the impression of her thumb on
the seth‘s account book in exchange for six months‘ worth of
wheat, oil and gurh. Only as she was leaving did it occur to her to
ask how much she owed and what the interest was. The seth‘s
answers took her breath away: his rates were such that her debt
would double every six months; in a few years, all the land would
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
be forfeit. Better to eat weeds than to take such a loan: she tried to
return the goods but it was too late. (SOP, 152)
The debts system and its huge interest are the reasons why a lot of the farmers
lose their lands and leave the countryside. The farmers eventually end up with no
money and no land to work on. In some cases, a lot of people choose to leave the
country and become indentured labors. Ratna and Champa are those people that
Deeti meets on the Ibis that choose to leave instead of living in starvation.
As for stories, there was no end to them: two of the women, Ratna
and Champa, were sisters, married to a pair of brothers whose
lands were contracted to the opium factory and could no longer
support them; rather than starve, they have decided to indenture
themselves together—whatever happened in the future, they would
at least have the consolation of a shared fate. (SOP, 237)
The opium factory displays not only the trace of natural exploitation, but
also human exploitation. Not only that the factory is established by the British,
Ghazipur Opium Factory is also exclusively managed by the British. The
superintendent of the factory is a senior official of the East India Company, and
the other important positions such as overseers, accountants, storekeepers, and
chemists in the factory are also occupied by the British. These people order
several hundred of Indian workers for the Company‘s benefit. (SOP, 88)
On her visit to the opium factory to pick her sick husband up, Deeti does
not only discover the horrible condition of the opium factory‘s surrounding, but
she also witnesses how the employees of the factory are working under such an
inhumane condition. The working condition for the workers in factory is so
horrible; the factory is polluted by the opium, and in some rooms the temperature
is cool, almost wintry, while in some other places, the temperature is too hot.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
There are not enough lights in the factory, and there is not enough space either
since there are a lot of workers placed in the same room at the same time.
As the result of an awful working condition, a lot of workers in the factory
are in an awful health condition as well. Seeing the workers and their working
condition in the factory seems to trigger Deeti‘s pity to them. These workers
happen to be badly affected by the drugs they work on, and some of them become
ill since they are made to do such work like sinking themselves in the opium filled
tanks. These people start to look like a living dead in Deeti‘s eyes.
…When her eyes had grown more accustomed to the gloom, she
discovered the secret of those circling torsos: they were bare-
bodied men, sunk waist-deep in tanks of opium, tramping round
and round so often to sludge. Their eyes were vacant, glazed, and
yet somehow they managed to keep moving, as slow as ants in
honey, tramping, treading. When they could move no more, they
say on the edges of the tanks, stirring the dark ooze only with their
feet. These seated men had more the look of ghouls than any living
thing she had ever seen: their eyes glowed red in the dark and they
appeared completely naked, their loincloths—if indeed they had
any—being so steeped in the drug as to be indistinguishable from
their skin. (SOP, 92)
To add the way the workers are oppressed, they do not only work in such
an inhumane condition, but they also are tormented by the British overseers who
watch their every move. White overseers patrol every place, they are armed with
tools like metal scoops, glass ladles, and long-handled rakes, and are ready to
punish the workers (SOP, 93). For these workers, there is no room even for minor
mistakes. Deeti witnesses how the workers in the opium factory carefully treat the
ball of opium as if their lives are depended on it. The horror breaks when one of
the workers drops the opium ball, and he receives caning from the overseer as a
consequence of his mistake.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
…How could they throw so accurately with one hand, while
holding on with the other—and that too at a height where the
slightest slip would mean certain death? The sureness of their grip
seemed amazing to Deeti, until suddenly one of them did indeed
drop a ball sending it crashing to the floor, where it burst open,
splattering its gummy contents everywhere. Instantly the offender
was set upon by cane-wielding overseers and his howls and shrieks
went echoing through the vast, chilly chamber. (SOP, 94)
However, for being able to work with the colony, the landlords in India are
gaining advantages from the opium cultivation. These landlords who are from the
high caste in India‘s society gain profits from the association they make with the
colony.
… Little did they know of the perils of the consignment trade and
how the risks were borne by those who provided the capital. Year
after year, with British and American traders growing even more
skilled in evading Chinese laws, the market for opium expanded,
and the Raja and his associates made handsome profits on their
investments. (SOP, 84)
Unlike the low caste farmers, the landlords are able to gain huge profits from their
association with British Colony. However, this is not something that lasts for
long, considering what happens to Raja Neel Halder. How the relationship of the
colony and zemindary in Neel Halder‘s case will be explored more in the
following chapter.
In the frame of colonization, the exploitation of the nature and the people
happen simultaneously. The indigenous people are the living proof of how
anthropocentrism in colonial frame goes beyond human and nature relationship,
but there is also the ‗other‘ human that are oppressed for the Colony‘s benefit.
Resistance is needed as the form of fighting back against both forms of
exploitations. Resistance may offer an available possibility to fight against the
injustice caused by the colonizer‘s exploitative attitude.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
CHAPTER IV
RESISTANCE AS A MEANS TO DISCOVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL
AND SOCIAL JUSTICE IN GHOSH’S SEA OF POPPIES
In the previous chapter, the effect of colonization towards India‘s nature
and indigenous people has been discussed as a means to see how human and
nature relate to one another in colonial settings. The findings show how both the
nature and the people experience exploitation and injustice caused by the
colonization. This section is to see how resistance works as the way to react
against the nature and human exploitation.
A. The Early Resistance
The early resistance refers to the small attempts done by the indigenous
population to fight, protest, and raise their voice against the injustice that
oppresses them and their nature. Ghosh presents how British completely takes
control of the people and the land in India. The native only has a small option to
fight back, since they are almost powerless in the presence of their oppressors.
In Deeti‘s case, there is an urge to fight against the long term and vast
amount of opium poppy cultivation. To her, such practice is a punishment that
needs to be fought against. As a farmer, she knows that the normal amount of
poppy to be planted is only a patch or two of poppies, and it is to be planted
alongside main crops like wheat, dal, or vegetables.
…Such punishment was bearable when you had a patch or two of
poppies – but what sane person would want to multiply these
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
labours when there were better, more useful crops to grow, like
wheat, dal, vegetables? (SOP, 28)
The amount of poppies which has taken over the land seems insane and
overwhelming to Deeti. She voices the concern of her kind, the peasants, who
think that they are in need of other crops instead of just poppies. Deeti reflects
someone who Grewe-Volpp will identify as a colonized subject who is seen to
have his/her ideas of the land being crushed by the colonization93
. By having her
own perception on how to value and use the land, Deeti expresses her thoughts
against the exploitative perception of the colony.
However, British has made it impossible for the locals, especially the
farmers, to fight against them. The local farmers have no option but to obey since
they are bounded by the contracts that they have signed. For people like Deeti, of
course they will prefer to plant main seasonal crops to sustain their lives instead of
planting cash crops like the poppies. For people who refuse to plant poppies for
the East India Company, British will frame the farmers or their family by leaving
silvers in the farmer‘s houses. In the end, these farmers have no option but to be
placed in jail or to be transported outside India to be made into slaves.
…It was impossible to say no to them: if you refused they would
leave their silver hidden in your house, or throw it through a
window. It was no use telling the white magistrate that you hadn‘t
accepted the money and your thumbprint was forged: he earned
commissions on the opium and would never let you off. (SOP, 92)
The way how British colony forces the locals and frames them to gain a complete
control over their property and even their life shows how colonial exploitation has
93 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.229
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
granted the colony the control of the people and their lands. The unavailability of
access of the indigenous people to speak on the behalf of their lives is what
Grewe-Volpp considers as the indigenous people‘s silence as a sign of
powerlessness.94
The fact that the farmers‘ harvest is valued cheaply by British gains protest
from the indigenous people. For the farmers, especially, it is unfair that they are
forced not plant crops to sustain their life while their effort is cheaply prized.
Deeti as the representative of the farmers raises a protest against the little amount
money she accepts for her labor. It upsets Deeti that her harvest for a whole
season is only worth a little, that there is only small possibility for her to feed her
family with the money she earns from selling the raw opium.
…But a rude surprise was waiting at the Carcanna: after her gharas
of opium had been weighed, counted and tested, Deeti was shown
the account book for Hukam Singh‘s plot of land. It turned out that
at the start of the season, her husband had taken a much larger
advance than she had thought: now, the meagre proceeds were
barely enough to cover his debt. She looked disbelievingly at the
discoloured coins that were laid before her: Aho so ka karwat? she
cried. Just six dams for the whole harvest? It‘s not enough to feed a
child, let alone a family. (SOP, 152)
Deeti is not the only one to make such protest. The other farmers are also
against such unfair treatment. The phenomenon where the indigenous people
speak against or protest against the colonial domination is the way how resistance
is embodied in within the community.95
Protests can be heard in the opium factory
when the harvest is weighed. Most farmers end up being angry at how cheap the
94 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.232
95 C. Grewe-Volpp, p.229
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
factory values the farmer‘s hard work. Complaints and quarrels are unavoidable,
yet there is no room for these peasants to express their objection against this
injustice. To protest means to get beaten by the landlords. Also, these farmers still
have to accept the consequence that they are to start a new season of poppy
cultivation by a bigger burden of debt.
…Nearby, held back by a line of lathi-carrying peons, stood the
farmers whose vessels were being weighed; alternatively tense and
angry, cringing and resigned, they were waiting to find out if their
harvests for the year had fulfilled their contracts—if not, they
would have to start the next year with a still greater load of debt.
Deeti watched as a peon carried a slip of paper to a farmer and was
rebuffed with a howl of protest: all over the hall, she noticed, there
were quarrels and altercations breaking out, with farmers shouting
at serishtas, and landlord berating their tenants. (SOP, 92)
Farmers have done effort such as protesting against their landlords or the
factory. Unfortunately, it does not affect the system that has been forced by
British. In other words, protests do not stop British from exploiting India‘s nature
and indigenous people. Some farmers choose to sell their land to avoid living in
hunger (SOP, 152). In some other cases, when protests do not work, the other
option that the farmers can do is to leave their homeland as the only available
choice left. For instance, this is what happens to Ratna and Champa, two sisters
that choose the option of crossing the terrifying prospect of crossing the Black
Water, rather than staying and serving the colony in poverty and hunger.
As for stories there was no end to them: two of the women, Ratna
and Champa, were sisters, married to a pair of brothers whose
lands were contracted to the opium factory and could no longer
support them; rather than starve, they had decided to indenture
themselves together – whatever happened in the future, they would
at least have the consolation of a shared fate. (SOP, 237)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
To emphasize, there is only a little possibility available for the people to
speak or act against the colony. In some cases, protesting against the injustice
does not always mean well for the indigenous people. The only available left for
the natives are to leave their homeland as a way to put an end to their oppressed
lives.
B. Migration and Resistance
When there is no space left for justice, crossing the Black Water to leave
as a way to resist the exploitation caused by the authoritarian colonialism. Ghosh
presents the theme journey crossing the Black Water as a theme which bonds
between one character and another. To look at it closely, in choosing migration,
the characters are faced with the uncertainty of how they life would be afterwards.
Despite the uncertainty, there is still an urge to sail across the sea as a statement to
fight against the injustice. Losing one‘s caste after migrating and crossing the
Black Water is a consequence, but also the point where the social justice is
achieved, and so is the environmental justice. The Ibis gives birth to a new
‗society‘ where everyone lives in balance, there is no unfair treatment, and
nobody oppresses anybody.
As previously mentioned, people like Deeti have attempted to do all they
can to protest or to voice against the injustice that oppresses their lives. Through
characters like Deeti, Ghosh aims to show how resistance is portrayed as a
reaction against the exploitation of India‘s nature and indigenous population.
Deeti is created by Ghosh as a character that is victimized by the opium—being
drugged by her husband‘s family in her wedding night, having an opium addict
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
husband, and living in poverty because of the cultivation of opium poppy. Her
entire life has revolved around opium that Deeti herself comes to realize the
power opium has in controlling people.
As for Deeti, the more she ministered the drug, the more she came
to respect its potency: how frail a creature was a human being, to
be tamed by such tiny doses of this substance! She saw now why
the factory in Ghazipur was so diligently patrolled by the sahibs
and their sepoys – for a little bit of this gum could give her such
power over the life, the character, the very soul of this elderly
woman, then with more of it at her disposal, why should she not be
able to seize kingdoms and control multitudes? And surely this
could not be the only such substance upon the earth? (SOP, 37)
Deeti discovers the power of the opium as a means to control people when
she uses the substance to gradually drug her mother-in-law. She understands, then,
how human being is such a weak creature compared to the opium. By deciding to
leave her family and her old life behind, and detaching herself from the opium,
Deeti has released herself from all of the strong forces that keep her oppressed.
Ghosh aims to show how by choosing to run and live with Kalua, Deeti has
resisted against the domination that keeps bounding her. Deeti has decided that
she is no longer to be oppressed by her husband‘s family and East India
Company.
In addition, there is something so interesting about how Ghosh creates
Deeti and Kalua to end as one and another‘s company, especially in considering
the two characters‘ caste differences. How Deeti supposedly treats Kalua can be
seen in the following quotation:
…he was of the leather-workers‘ caste and Hukam Singh, as a
high-caste Rajput, believed that the sight of his face would bode ill
for the day ahead…Deeti, too, was careful to keep her face covered
in the driver‘s presence: it was only when she went back inside, to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
wake Kabutri, her six-year-old daughter, that she allowed the
ghungta of her sari to slip off her head. (SOP, 4)
Kalua‘s caste is Chamar, which is considered as the untouchables. It is
believed that only a sight of Kalua‘s face alone is able to bring bad luck. Deeti,
too, needs to be careful in showing her face to the oxen-cart driver, which is why
she is required to her face hidden behind her ghungta96
in the presence of Kalua.
Even so, Kalua still helps Deeti from being forced to be a sati by her husband‘s
family. Kalua himself is someone who is wounded by the people of high caste. In
one occasion, three gamble-loving landowners force Kalua to do an act of
bestiality just to get back at him for their defeat in a gamble. Deeti witnesses this
discreetly, and she helps to clean Kalua when it is impossible for him to do it by
himself because he is injured. The fact that Deeti is not allowed to touch Kalua
because of their caste differences does not stop Deeti to help Kalua. The feeling of
gratitude drives Kalua to save Deeti from the fire that will burn her and her
husband‘s bodies together. Through Kalua and Deeti, Ghosh wants to show that
despite of the rigid caste differences and the rules that forbid these two characters,
a balanced relationship between one human to another is possible be achieved. In
a caste-bound society that always disadvantages the untouchable ones, it is Kalua
who helps Deeti to put an end to the injustice she faces in her old life.
Deeti finds the prospect upon running away with Kalua to be exciting. To
leave the life that once oppressed her create an immense joy within herself. It is
96 Veil
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
like she is given a chance to relive a new life with Kalua, a man from the
untouchable caste that has rescued her.
… Even then she did not feel herself to be living in the same sense
as before: a curious feeling, of joy mixed with resignation, crept
into her heart, for it was as if she really had died and been
delivered betimes in rebirth, to her next life: she had shed the body
of the old Deeti, with the burden of its karma; she had paid the
price her stars had demanded of her, and was free now to create a
new destiny as she willed, with whom she chose – and she knew
that it was with Kalua that this life would be lived, until another
death claimed the body that he had torn from the flames. (SOP,
175)
As a way to complete Deeti and Kalua‘s life transformation, Ghosh
presents them with new names; Aditi and Madhu, respectively (SOP, 229). Both
introduced themselves as a couple of Chamars. To completely free themselves
from their old life, both are agree to sign up as migrants. They are to be sent as
labors across the sea to Mareech, or Mauritius. Deeti is frightened of the outlook
on leaving to a completely strange land. It is a widespread tale that Mareech is a
land inhabited by demons and beasts; this causes uneasiness in Deeti‘s heart
(SOP, 201). In addition, the worst part of leaving their homeland and crossing the
Black Water is losing their caste. This, too, causes such discomfort to Deeti, as
seen in:
She tried to imagine what it would be like to be in their place, to
know that you were forever an outcaste; to know that you would
never again enter your father‘s house; that you would never throw
your arms around your mother; never eat a meal with your sisters
and brothers; never feel the cleansing touch of the Ganga. And to
know also that for the rest of your days you would eke out a living
on some wild, demon-plagues island? (SOP, 71)
As seen in the previous quotation, to lose one‘s caste, as mentioned, means
to lose one‘s relationship with one‘s family. The event in which Deeti loses the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
ties with her family represents a lot more. Deeti experiences the dispossession and
loss. By cutting the ties, she has lost not only her family, but also the rights to her
belongings or properties. This also causes complication in Deeti‘s identity in
India‘s society as well. It seems that it will be impossible to Deeti to return to her
homeland with her being casteless. To Huggan and Tiffin, dispossession and loss
are something that occurs innately to the indigenous people because of the arrival
of the colonial settlers.97
Even though the prospects of crossing Black Water and
losing one‘s caste are terrifying to Deeti, she and Kalua decide that it is the only
option for them to do. Ghosh shows how Deeti has the luxury to rebirth and
reshape her new life as she leaves her old life that is controlled by the rising tide
of opium poppy. Ghosh wants to show that in Deeti‘s case, the willingness to give
up one‘s caste shows a sense of liberation. Through Deeti, Ghosh shows how his
character dares to put an end to the injustice that oppresses her, even though it
costs her tremendous changes by doing so—saying farewell to her homeland is
one thing, and saying farewell to her daughter is another. However, it is not only
Deeti makes such choice. The other migrants, too, have their reasons why they
make the decision to leave, and mostly, these migrants have the same reason as
Deeti. Instead of living in hunger and poverty, and being constantly oppressed by
the colony that takes over their homeland, the prospect of leaving—although
scary—is still promising.
97 Huggan and Tiffin, p.45
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
Paulette also is included among the people on board of the Ibis. Ghosh
presents Paulette as French orphan who was born and raised in India. Paulette‘s
mother died when she gave birth to her. Paulette grows up inseparable with Jodu,
in the care of Jodu‘s mother due to Paulette‘s mother‘s death. Paulette and Jodu
practically grow up as siblings in Royal Botanical Gardens, Calcutta. Paulette‘s
late father dedicated his life to work as a botanist in Royal Botanical Gardens.
Being intimately close to Jodu‘s mother from the moment she opens her
eyes as a baby, Paulette develops a special bond with native Indian like Jodu and
his mother. Jodu‘s mother, too, loves and takes care of Paulette like her own
daughter, domesticating her feminine French name by calling her ‗Putli‘—which
means ‗doll‘ (SOP, 65)—and later will be used by Paulette when she disguised
herself as a native Indian woman.
In a way, Paulette is unique because:
…the first language she learnt was Bengali, and the first solid food
she ate was a rice-and-dal kichiri cooked by Jodu‘s mother. In the
matter of clothing she far preferred saris to pinafores –for shoes
she had no patience at all, choosing, rather, to roam the Gardens in
bare feet, like Jodu… for Jodu and his mother were not the only
ones to be cut off from their own kind; Paulette and her father were
perhaps even more so. Rarely, if ever, did white men or women
visit their bungalow, and the Lamberts took no part in the busy
whirl of Calcutta‘s English society. (SOP, 65)
As shown in the quotation, Paulette‘s first language is Bengali since she is raised
by Jodu‘s mother. She prefers Indian food, clothing, and manner than living like
common white people living in India. Growing up, Paulette admits herself to be
more a Bengali than French. Paulette finds herself experiencing uncertainty about
her own self-identity.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
In addition, Paulette‘s habits are also strengthened with the fact that the
Lamberts do not involve themselves with the ‗white‘ society in India, as seen in
the previous quotation. To Jodu, Paulette and her father are always ―at odds with
the other white sahibs‖ (SOP, 66). Paulette and her father have their reasons for
not involving themselves with the ‗white‘ community in India
Obviously, there is an apparent contrast in the lives of both the colony and
the colonized in India. The life of the indigenous people in India has been
explained in the previous chapter. Meanwhile, the white merchants in India
inhabit the verdant area of Calcutta, which is located in the bank of the Hooghly
River. In contrast with the way native Indian lives, the white community in India
takes over the suburban area with their luxurious estates.
Just beyond the boundaries of Calcutta, to the west of the dockside
neigborhoods of Kidderpore and Metia Bruz, lay a length of gently
sloping bank that overlooked a wide sweep of the Hooghly River:
this was the verdant suburb of Garden Reach, where the leading
merchants of Calcutta had their country estates. (SOP, 97)
These merchants live in enormous mansions which are modeled variedly
according to their owner‘s taste. Each luxurious mansion shows the wealth owned
by their occupants.
…The mansions that graced these estates were as varied as the
owners‘ tastes would allow, some being modeled on the great
manors of England and France, while others evoked the temples of
classical Greece and Rome. The grounds of the estates were
extensive enough to provide each mansion with a surrounding
park, and these were, if anything, even more varied in design than
the houses they enclosed—for the malis who tended the gardens,
no less than the owner themselves, vied to outdo each other in the
fancifulness of their plantings… (SOP, 97)
However, of all the merchants living in the bank of Hooghly in Calcutta, it
is Benjamin Burnham who is considered to bear the largest fortune of them all,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76
judged by his estates. Not only that Burnham owns the best looking garden in the
neighborhood, his estates also offer the best view of the river‘s traffic. It is rather
everyone‘s agreement that his wealth is second to no one nearby.
…But it was not by these extravagant extensions that the values of
the properties were judged; it was rather by the view that each
manse commanded—for a patch of garden, no matter how pretty,
could not be held to materially affect the owner‘s prospects, while
to be able to keep an eye on the comings-and-goings on the river
had an obvious and direct bearing on the fortunes of all who were
dependent on that traffic. By this criterion it was generally
acknowledged that the estate of Benjamin Brightwell Burnham was
second to none… (SOP, 97)
In the case of the Lamberts, Paulette and her father do not live the way the
people of the white community in India live. They choose to live in the
consolation of their bungalow in Royal Botanical Gardens with Jodu and her
mother. According to Paulette, her father refuses to live ―like most other
Europeans in the city.‖ (SOP, 132)
…Paulette‘s eyes misted over at the thought of those childhood
years, when she and her father had lived with Jodu and Tantima, as
though their bungalow were an island of innocence in sea of
corruption. (SOP, 134)
To Paulette and her father, living in the middle of the European society in India is
similar to living in the middle of a corrupted society. Mr. Lambert‘s sole propose
of coming to India is to work on his botany manuscript, not to take part on the
exploitation of India with the other white people. Lambert seems to be against the
way the fellow white people in the city treating the indigenous land and people.
Technically, skin color-wise, Paulette and her father are assumed the role of the
colonizer. However, their intimate relationship with the nature and the indigenous
people like Jodu and his mother complicates this situation. Mr. Lambert, too,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
seems to oppose the idea of him and his daughter becoming a colonialist. By
doing so, Paulette and her father seems to reflect what Albert Memmi considers as
challenging the colonizer‘s very own existence by having the colonizers who
actually rejects the idea of colonization itself.98
To Mr. Lambert, the use of the
term ‗corruption‘ also probably refers to how the invasion of the European has
corrupted the physical environment of India as well. Paulette and her father, along
with Jodu and his mother stay within the innocence of their bungalow. Choosing
not to get along with the fellow Europeans can be considered as a means of
resistance itself. On the final days of his life, Paulette‘s father still does not want
Paulette to be associated with the European in India. He is against the
environmental and human exploitation as a means to make a living. Mr. Lambert,
on his visit to Baboo Nob Kissin, speaks on the behalf of the locals as a white
sahib who is not interested in the exploitation of the nature.
…a child of Nature, that is what she is, my daughter Paulette…She
has had n teacher other than myself, in the innocent tranquility of
the Botanical Gardens. She has had no teacher other than myself,
and has never worshipped at any altar except that of Nature; the
trees have been her Scripture and the Earth her Revelation. She has
not known anything but Love, Equality and Freedom: I have raised
her to revel in that state of liberty that is Nature itself. If she
remains here, in the colonies, most particularly in a city like this,
where Europe hides its shame and its greed, all that awaits her is
degradation: the whites of this town will tear her apart, like
vultures and foxes, fighting over a corpse. (SOP, 134)
Upon the death of Mr. Lambert, Mr. and Mr. Burnham take Paulette into
their care. By being Paulette‘s benefactor, Mr. and Mrs. Burnham have rescued
98
Albert Memmi, The Colonizer and the Colonized (London: The Orion Press, Inc., 1974), 65.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78
Paulette from living in Alipore where a poorhouse for destitute Eurasians and
white minors is located (SOP, 126). However, Paulette wishes to run away from
Burnham‘s mansion after witnessing her benefactor, Mr. Burnham behaving
disturbingly in their private lessons of Scriptures (SOP, 293).
There is an irony in how Ghosh places Paulette in the care of Benjamin
Burnham and his family. Being educated by her botanist father, and having a long
line of botanists in the family, Paulette seems to be the most ecocentric among the
characters in Sea of Poppies. Yet, after her father‘s death, Paulette finds herself in
the care of the most anthropocentric character in the novel.
Choosing to disengage herself from the association with Mr. Burnham is
Paulette‘s way to keep herself as a figure that is raised by the tranquility of
Botanical Gardens. To leave from Burnham‘s mansion in Calcutta and disguise
herself as a native Indian with her fluent Bengali are ways in which she refuses to
be corrupted by the fellow white people or the Europeans. Through Paulette‘s
camouflage among the soon-to-be indentured labors, Ghosh shows how a
European like Paulette can also live together with the low caste peasants. Paulette
has lived with the principle of equality among one and another, which is taught by
her father. Leaving the Burnhams, and the white community in India means
refusing to be corrupted with her principle. Paulette believes in equality in
between nature and people, also one people to another regardless of race
differences. As she leaves India with the people on the Ibis, Paulette—without
shaking—declares her fearlessness:
…On a boat of pilgrims, no one can lose caste and everyone is the
same: it‘s like taking a boat to the temple of Jagannath, in Puri.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
From now on, and forever afterwards, we will all be ship-siblings –
jaházbhais and jaházbaens – to each other. There‘ll be no
differences between us. (SOP, 348)
Ghosh also presents resistance through the character Neel. Neel is also
included in crossing the Black Water on the Ibis and also becomes an example of
a person who loses his caste. Neel Rattan Halder is the zemindar of one of the
oldest and most noted landowning family. Even though the Halders are not
Brahmins, this family religious background is orthodox Hindu and is ―zealous in
the observance of the upper-class taboos and in following the usages of their
class‖ (SOP, 39). To the Halders, the practice of caste and its rigid rules are
something of significant matter. For this reason too, as the Raja or Rashkali
zemindary, Neel‘s marriage is arranged to a daughter of another prominent
landowning family (SOP, 40). Rashkali zemindary is very strict when it comes to
caste.
Being the aristocrats among the society, a Raja and his family usually
accept a great deal of advantages that cannot be owned by just anyone. One of the
advantages is, of course, a tremendous wealth. Neel‘s father is also included
among the Rajas who use the wealth and the social status for his own benefit.
Neel‘s father even does not hesitate to use his power in the society to take
advantage of his own people. However, unlike his father or any previous Raja
before him, Neel is different. He owns a different style of living.
It was true that Neel‘s own style of living was, for a scion of the
Halder family, almost frugal: he managed to get by with a single
two-horse carriage and made do with a modest wing of the family
mansion. Much less a voluptuary than his father, he has no mistress
other than Elokeshi – but on her, he lavished his affections without
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
stint, his relationship with his wife never progressed beyond the
conventional performance on his husbandly duties. (SOP, 44)
The quotation shows one of the examples of how Neel lives differently to his
father. For a Raja, Neel lives a frugal life. He refuses to have numerous of
mistresses like his late father did. Neel prevents himself from spending the
zemindary‘s wealth for the similar reasons like his late father. He lives modestly
and he does not keep hoards of mistresses other than Elokeshi.
In addition, Neel does not befriend Benjamin Burnham. To him, it is the
worst mistake that his father has done. The association with Burnham is what
causes the whole Rashkali zemindary to be in a serious financial danger. In the
early settlement of East India Company in India, British gained the access to the
indigenous society through the connection to the zemindars, since the Rajas are
considered the respected people, being the owners of the lands with number of
peasants as their dependants or workers.
The wealth owned by the zemindary, in the novel, is seen from how the
Raja makes his handsome profits by the association with the British colony. By
investing in British merchants, the relationship between British and the zemindars
is proved to be mutually beneficial. For the sake of wealth, the people of high
caste appear to give the access to the colony to the land and the people of India. In
Neel‘s case, before his father‘s death, he even told Neel to invest more on
Benjamin Burnham. The investment on Burnham Bros. will be retuned doubled
the amount.
…It was only in the final days of his life that the old zemindar
informed his son that the family‘s financial survival depended on
their dealings with Mr Benjamin Burnham; the more they invested
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
81
with him the better, for their silver would come back doubled in
value. (SOP, 85)
It is ironic how the high caste society is somehow the reason why the exploitation
of nature and the exploitation of indigenous people in India are made possible. It
seems like Ghosh wants to show the hypocrisy from within the indigenous society
itself. Of course, the one who feels the most impact by this situation is the low
caste peasants. Not only they are oppressed because of the caste-based system,
they are also oppressed because of the settlement of the colony that is made
possible by the respected people from within their own society.
However, in Neel‘s case, the investment in Mr. Burnham does not go as it
is expected. Neel‘s late father ends up leaving an enormous amount of debt before
his death. To settle this debt, Mr. Burnham confronted Neel to give his estates.
Considering the amount of people relies on his estate, Neel resists giving his
property because the Rashkali land belongs not only to him, but also to his
ancestors and his dependants.
Since Neel refuses to hand his land to Burnham, Neel is faced with a trial
where English law is enforced upon him as a native Indian. Neel is the victim of
injustice in his own homeland despite being the person of a high caste and highly
respected in the society. Even someone like Neel cannot avoid himself from being
dispossessed. In the face of the colony, Neel is stripped of the right of his own
land. This shows how in the middle of the colonial setting, the experience of
people being deprived of their right is indeed happen, be it legally claimed or
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
82
emotionally experienced.99
In the face of his own trial, Neel witnesses how the
British has taken control over the nobility like himself. It is as if British has
become the ‗new Brahmin‘.
…In the course of his trial it had become almost laughably obvious
to Neel that in this system of justice it was the English themselves
– Mr Burnham and his ilk – who were exempt from the law as it
applied to others: it was they who had become the world‘s new
Brahmins. (SOP, 234)
The court, then, sentenced Neel of seven years imprisonment in Mauritius.
Neel finds himself experiences the displacement as he is forced to be transported
into the Mauritius. This is what brings him on board of the Ibis to cross the Black
Water on a journey of punishment. In case of Neel, Ghosh shows how even
people of high caste is powerless in the face of the colony. Through the fall of
Neel, Ghosh shows how British has taken a complete control over all layers of the
society in India, that there‘s no power left over their land for the natives.
Furthermore, the way in which Neel refuses to let his whole zemindary
being taken by Burnham and his company is his way to show his resistance. From
the beginning, Neel has chosen not to be involved further as he already has with
Burnham. Unlike his father, as a Raja, Neel refuses to follow his father‘s way of
life. He chooses not to take advantages of his own people and determines to take
care of his land, especially considering that hundreds of people technically live
under his protection. As a consequence, Neel is stripped off of his caste when he
is to be sent away across the sea on board of the Ibis. In the company of Ahfatt, a
99 Huggan and Tiffin, p.121
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
83
half-Chinese opium who shares the same fate as Neel as transported convict, Neel
learns to live without caste boundaries. The peak of Neel‘s liberation is seen as he
and Ahfatt managed to console each other in a selfless and delicate relationship
without caste restriction. It shows how a balanced relationship between one
human and another should be
…Gradually he became aware that there was an arm around his
shoulder, holding him steady, as if in consolation: in this embrace
there was more intimacy than he had ever known before, even with
Elokeshi, and when a voice sounded in his ear, it was as if it were
coming from within himself: ‗My name Lei Leong Fatt,‘ it said.
‗People call me Ah Fatt. Ah Fatt your friend.‘ (SOP, 335)
Through Neel and Ahfatt‘s relationship, Ghosh wants to resist the idea of caste-
based system which has created injustice among one people to another. Justice is
achieved when balance is there.
The findings in this chapter show that resistance appears as a means to
discover the environmental and social justice. Colonialism has stripped the
indigenous people off of their rights on their own land. The connection to their
nature is severed, broken, and scarred by the nature and human exploitation.
Environmental justice is nowhere to be found. In addition, colonial settlers who
assume themselves to be more powerful over the indigenous community has
damaged the life of the natives as well. In seeking for justice by fighting against
colonial domination, the indigenous people also attempt to seek justice for their
land. These attempts of achieving justice go hand in hand. Even though British
made it almost impossible for the indigenous people to sound their protest, the
attitude to fight back against the injustice still can be seen. By fighting, protesting,
and raising their voice against the injustice that oppresses them and their land, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
84
natives show their effort to achieve what they deserve. The efforts that are
pursued to resist the colonial domination are seen by protesting to the landlords,
protesting to the opium factory, and sounding an opinion against the practice of
monoculture.
When there is no space left for justice, migration through crossing the
Black Water to leave India is the only way left to fight against the exploitation
caused by the authoritarian British colony. The similarity of journey experience
on the Ibis is what brought the people together as a form of resistance against the
injustice they experience in their own homeland. Ghosh shows that a balanced
relationship is possible to be achieved even if it costs the natives to leave their
homeland. Balanced relationship where no strong counterpart oppresses the weak
one, it is the ideal depiction of environmental and social justice. Even though, in
the end of the story, the nature cannot return to its pristine condition, the
possibility of having a balanced and harmonious relationship somewhere is left
open. Considering that the characters in the novel migrate to serve as workers in
British plantations, there is always a possibility of this balanced and harmonious
relationship is, again, disturbed by the inequality of power. However, the most
important thing to note is that even in a short amount of time, through the social
status changes the characters experience by migrating on board of the Ibis, they
have discovered justice where no caste or race differences matters.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
85
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
The previous chapters attempt to answer the research questions raised in
the first chapter. The third and fourth chapter answer to the research questions
number one and two, respectively. This chapter, the last chapter, offers the
conclusion to summarize the previous chapters.
This thesis analyzes the effect of the colonization on the environment and
the indigenous people. Somewhere in between the colonial upheaval, injustice
happened in the form of nature and human exploitation. To regain the balance
between nature and people that has been scarred by the colonialism, resistance is
needed.
The analysis of this thesis is divided into two problems formulation. The
first is the analysis of the effect of colonialism on the nature and the people. The
second is the analysis of resistance as a means to discover the environmental and
social justice. The novel used in this investigation is Sea of Poppies (2008) by
Indian writer Amitav Ghosh. The topic raised by this novel is relevant to the
current environmental and social justice.
This thesis responds to the matter of environmental crisis as a serious
threat for the global society. Ironically, the environmental crisis is caused by none
other than by human. Human‘s oppressive attitude towards the nature has long
been a threat for earth‘s life support system. The commitment for literature to be
involved in raising awareness to save the environment is taken seriously. A work
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
86
of literature that shows commitment to voice the condition of the nature is chosen
to voice the consequence of human and nature problematic relationship.
Sea of Poppies offers Ghosh‘s interesting take in the intersection between
colonialism and environmentalism in relation with human and nature relationship,
with an additional concern on justice. The setting used in this novel is the
nineteenth-century British opium monopoly in India. This novel brings the image
of India being taken over by British colonialism. The characters in this novel are
diverse, which capture the different layers of the society in colonial India.
The arrival of the colony has disrupted the tranquility of nature. Human‘s
abusive relationship with nature is reflected in Sea of Poppies through colonial
exploitation and the exploitation of the nature. The arrival of the colony has
created havoc in the relationship between the nature and human. As a natural
reaction of the colonial consequences, the attitude of fighting back is attempted by
the characters in the novel to gain a balanced relationship between human and
nature.
This thesis aims to present a particular perspective in reading Ghosh‘s Sea
of Poppies. The discussion is aimed to speak for the exploited nature and
indigenous society in the face of a colonial oppression. Sea of Poppies provides
the insight from within the colonized land and people about how colonization
becomes the justification to exploit the land and human in a large scale for a long
period of time.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
87
A. Significance and Achievement
This study uses postcolonial ecocriticism as the framework of the analysis.
Some previous studies that examine Ghosh‘s writings have been reviewed to help
the analysis of Sea of Poppies. Studies that are conducted on Ghosh‘s Sea of
Poppies still focus on the theme of hierarchy and the social classes found within
the novel. Looking from the perspective of the environmental themes, the studies
on Ghosh‘s works that have been conducted still speak around the issue of the
importance of the nature, and also the relationship between human, animal and
their environment. This thesis pursues a different perspective for Ghosh‘s Sea of
Poppies. Postcolonial ecocriticism is used to give a particular issue on looking at
human and the non-human nature relationship in the colonial setting. Postcolonial
ecocriticism, too, is used to see how resistance is portrayed in the novel as an
effort to discover environmental and social justice.
As separated fields, both ecocriticism and postcolonialism has different
commitments towards the issues both fields bring in the study of literature.
However, mainstream ecocriticism alone is considered not ‗enough‘ to talk about
the environmental issue that occurs in the land where colonialism once took place.
Mainstream ecocriticism appears to be obsessed with the idea of a pure
environment, something that simply does not exist in the ex-colonial environment
where the land and people are deeply scarred by the colonial experience.
Therefore, mainstream ecocriticism alone is not enough to uncover the conflict
within the society that is reflected in Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies. Traditionally, the
works of Indian author like Ghosh would be placed within the scope of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
88
postcolonial literature rather than the environmental literature. However, being
categorized as a postcolonial writer, does not mean Ghosh has nothing to say
about the issue of environment. Therefore, by bringing together the issue of
postcolonialism and ecocriticism through under postcolonial ecocriticism, is
considered more effective to response to the readings of books like Ghosh‘s.
The commitment to find out the effect of human and nature relationship is
also one of postcolonial ecocriticism‘s attentions. Human and nature relationship
that tends to be abusive from the human‘s side is claimed to be the long cause of
the existing environmental crisis. For a long time, human has dominated the
nature, taking it for granted in the name of human‘s mastery over the nature. This
notion, as noted by Huggan and Tiffin, becomes even more complex in the middle
of colonial settings. With the colony being the strongest power in the colonized
land, the colonial oppression appears through double consciousness: the
oppression of the indigenous land and people. The colony‘s justification of this
double consciousness of exploitation is based on the perception that the
indigenous land and people are being underused and uncivilized, respectively.
Colonial setting is a place where anthropocentrism has moved beyond human and
nature relationship because it relates to colonialism or imperialism where the
oppression over the weaker colonized people is naturalized.
With the dispossession of environmental and social justice through
colonial exploitation, Grewe-Volpp suggests that resistance is an obvious
reaction. This relates to the other postcolonial ecocriticism‘s claim which is ―there
is no social justice without environmental justice‖. As previously mentioned about
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
89
human and nature relationship in colonial setting, the colonial and environmental
oppression go hand in hand. Therefore, the effort to put an end to one side of the
oppression should liberate the other one as well. The resistance can manifest in a
lot of ways, as long as it shows the indigenous people determination to speak and
act against colonial and environmental exploitation. Achieving social and
environmental justice by resisting does not always mean to return to the
environment‘s pristine condition pre-colonial time. What is being sought is the
creation of a change in terms of human and nature relationship that is more
balanced in all aspect.
The first analysis of this thesis focuses on the effect of the colonization on
the nature and the people in Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies. The effect of the
colonization mirrors the consequence of human and nature relationship in the
dialogue with colonialism. The effect on the people here refers to the native
Indian characters in the book that are directly affected by the colonialism.
Nature plays an important role in Sea of Poppies. Deeti, one of the
characters relies a lot on the nature. Deeti, the characters who portrays the
peasants, depends on the nature because she makes a living out of poppy farming.
Therefore, nature is day to day working place for her. In addition, she also
depends on the nature in her everyday life. For instance, the need of food, drink,
and bathing is supplied by nature. Nature does not only play a huge role in Deeti‘s
life by providing for her, but it also becomes a part of her spiritual life. It was
nature that gives her the sight of the Ibis, a ship that will change her life forever.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
90
Through Deeti, Ghosh wants to show how before the colonialism, nature and
people live together in a harmonious symbiotic relationship.
The nature and the indigenous people of India are affected by colonialism
when it comes into the picture. Since the establishment of British exclusive
monopoly of opium in India by the late 18th
century, British colony has imposed
monoculture poppies cultivation to raise the opium production in India. Poppies
take over the land in India, and farmers are no longer planting crops that are used
to sustain their lives because of British‘s unstoppable greed in opium cultivation.
The cultivation of poppies in India is aimed to serve British and their demands
only. Since the landscape has lost its ―green‖, a lot of changes happen to the
environment that is ruled by flowers. Nature has lost biodiversity for being taken
entirely by the poppy cultivation. Numerous populations of animals are affected,
by it too. The presence of opium factory in the middle of the environment, too,
has caused serious damage in the ecosystem.
The exploitation of the nature goes altogether with the exploitation of the
indigenous people. In the colonial setting, both ethics of exploitation works hand
in hand. The exploitation of the nature through colonization has several impacts to
the people in the book. The impacts include starvation and poverty. The
indigenous people are forced to struggle under the complication of the cultivation
of the cash crop poppy flowers. Prior to the cultivation of poppies, the peasants
are forced to sign a contract and they are provided with cash advancement to
agree to cultivate none other than poppies to serve the British. The application of
the debt system on the indigenous people by the British is turned out to be the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
91
most oppressive, because not only that British has a complete control over the
people, they also secretly have the power to dispossess the peasants of their
belonging when they do not meet the factory‘s monthly demand of opium.
The second part of the analysis is aimed to see how resistance is portrayed
as a means to discover the environmental and social justice. In need of justice,
there is a form of resistance found in the story. Even though British made it
almost impossible for the indigenous people to sound their protest, there is still an
attitude of fighting back. The indigenous people have shown the way they fight,
protest, and raise their voice against the injustice that oppresses them and their
land. Protesting to the landlords, protesting to the opium factory, and sounding an
opinion against the practice of monoculture, are the way early resistance is
formed.
When there is no space left for justice, migration by crossing the Black
Water to leave their terribly scarred homeland is the only way left to fight against
the exploitation caused by the authoritarian colonialism. The similarity of journey
on the Ibis is what brought the people together as a form of resistance against the
injustice on their homeland and fellow natives. Deeti, whose life has been
controlled by the opium is given a brand new chance, a rebirth. In choosing to run
away with Kalua, Ghosh shows that Deeti has resisted against the oppression that
bounds her life. Paulette is included in the list of people who resist too. Paulette‘s
closeness to the nature and the culture of India has caused her to refuse being in
between the white society of Calcutta who makes a living out of colonizing the
others. By choosing not to associate herself with the ‗whites‘, Paulette shows his
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
92
strong belief in the equality among human and nature, also one human to another.
Ghosh shows that a balanced relationship is possible to be achieved. Balanced
relationship where no strong counterpart oppresses the weak one is the ideal
depiction of environmental and social justice. For instance, Ghosh shows how the
relationship of the high caste Neel Halder and the ‗filthy‘ opium addict foreigner
Ahfatt evolves throughout the book. There is no better example to show a
balanced relationship other than through this example.
In Sea of Poppies, we see that it is impossible to return to the pristine
condition of the nature. Being deeply affected by the colonialism has changed the
nature and the colonized community into an irreversible situation. Justice is
earned on the Ibis where no one oppresses anyone. The relationship between one
people to his or her surrounding is in a harmony. Through migration, a journey of
crossing the Black Water where caste-bound society is disestablished, people find
a balance between them and their nature, also with the fellow migrants.
B. Relevance
The problems that are raised in this thesis have contributed to different
issues that are related to today‘s environmental and social issues. Ghosh‘s Sea of
Poppies is indeed set in the in the colonial India, but that does not necessarily
mean that this book is not relevant to today‘s problems.
First of all, Sea of Poppies takes a strong position in talking about the
relationship between human and nature. The novel reveals that in whatever the
case is, a dominating, exploitative relationship between human and nature will
affect very negatively. In whatever the case is—colonization or not—taking the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
93
nature for granted is not right. Human and nature should, all in all, live in a
balanced and healthy relationship. This speaks to today‘s environmental crisis
where the earth is now taking serious consequences from human‘s doing. Raising
awareness of creating a more balanced relationship is needed. Ethic of
exploitation towards the nature and its non-human inhabitants, including animals
and plants, needs to stop.
Sea of Poppies, too, shows an issue related to the environment that is
rarely seen in other literary works. Sea of Poppies especially takes the issue of
monoculture cultivation as one of its important theme. Particularly in Indonesia,
monoculture cultivation is now a very alarming issue. This speaks to palm oil
monoculture controversy in some places in Indonesia, more specifically in
Borneo. The large scale cultivation of palm oil in Borneo has endangered and
devastated the rain forest ecosystem. It is also linked to human rights abuses of
the local workers by massive international companies.100
Monoculture cultivation,
without a doubt, gives a huge profit, especially when it is manifested in the
cultivation of cash crops. However, the most important thing to remember is, a
long term and vast scale of monoculture has a really serious risk. The biggest
threat of it is the death of biodiversity. In some cases and some places,
monoculture is still practiced because of the prospect of gaining as much profit as
100 Jocelyn C. Zuckerman, ―The Palm Oil Effect‖, 5 Sep 2017. Accessed 26 Nov 2017.
Available from Vogue. < https://www.vogue.com/projects/13535833/palm-oil-controversy-
beauty-products-ingredient-sourcing-deforestation-climate-change/>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
94
possible. Then again, what we must remember is that the earth needs biodiversity
to survive.
The other issue that is raised by Sea of Poppies is the matter of justice.
Both environmental justice and social justice are two important matters. By not
oppressing the nature and promoting a more balanced life between human and
nature, also with fellow human, a more positive light of the human to human and
human to nature relationship is possible to be achieved. The exploitation of the
nature or human exploitation of any kind are supposed to be put to end.
Finally, this thesis is hoped to be able to offer a contribution to the talk of
human and nature relationship in the dialogue of ecocriticism and
postcolonialism. The relationship between human and nature in any kind of
setting is open for interpretation and investigation. Therefore, more contribution
should be made by the future literary researchers in developing this matter, to
enrich not only postcolonial ecocriticism field, but also literary studies in general.
In addition, Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies is still opened to more interpretation.
Therefore, a postcolonial reading or even a feminist reading on the novel is
encouraged for future researchers.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
95
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahuja, Ravi. ―Capital at Sea, Shaitan Below Decks? A Note on Global Narratives,
Narrow Spaces, and the Limits of Experience.‖ History of the Present 2.1
(2012): 78-85. Web. 18 Oct 2016.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/historypresent.2.1.0078>
Alexander, S. and P. Saravanan. ―The Quintessence of Ecology in Amitav
Ghosh‘s The Hungry Tide‖ Literary Quest 1.11 (2015): 60-67. Web. 10
Jan 2017. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/43856755>
Banerjee, Mita. ―Ecocriticism and Postcolonial Studies.‖ In Handbook of
Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology, ed. Hubert Zapf. Berlin: De Gruyter,
2016. Print.
Batra, Kanika. ―City Botany: Reading Urban Ecologies in China through Amitav
Ghosh‘s River of Smoke.‖ Narrative 21.3 (2013): 322-332. Web. 7 Sept
2017. <https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2013.0015>
Baumgarten, Murray. ―Love and Figure/Ground: Reading Amitav Ghosh‘s Sea of
Poppies.‖ Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas
12.2 (2014): 375-387. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://muse.jhu.edu/article/547251>
Buell, Lawrence. ―Ecocriticism: Some Emerging Trends.‖ Qui Parle 19.2 (2011):
87-115. Web. 15 Jan 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0087>
______. ―Toxic Discourse.‖ Critical Inquiry 24.3 (1998): 639-665. Web. 29 Nov
2016. <http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.curent.terms-of-
use#LAA>
Burton, Antoinette. ―Amitav Ghosh‘s World Histories from Below.‖ History of
the Present 2.1 (2012): 71-77. Web. 18 Oct 2016.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/historypresent.2.1.0071>
Caste, Colonialism and a ‗Sea of Poppies‘. NPR, 9 Nov 2008. Web. Accessed 7
Sept 2017.
<https://search.proquest.com/docview/190107818?accountid=13771>
Chandar, K.M. ―Journey to the Antique Land of Poppies: Voyage as Discovery in
Amitav Ghosh‘s ―Sea of Poppies‖.‖ Indian Literature 54.4 (2010): 181-
192. Web. 18 Oct 2016. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/23346723>
Cilano, Cara and Elizabeth DeLoughrey. ―Against Authenticity: Global
Knowledges and Postcolonial Ecocriticism.‖ Interdisciplinary Studies in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
96
Literature and Environment 14.1 (2007): 71-87. Web. 16 Aug 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/44086558>
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth and George B. Handley. Introduction to Postcolonial
Ecologies: Literature of the Environment, eds. Elizabeth DeLoughrey and
George B. Handley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
Farooqui, Amar. ―Colonialism and Competing Addictions: Morphine Content as
Historical Factor.‖ Social Scientist 32.5/6 (2004): 21-32. Web. 4 Aug
2017. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3517991>
Fletcher, Lisa. ―Reading the Postcolonial Island in Amitav Ghosh‘s The Hungry
Tide.‖ Island Studies Journal 6.1 (2011): 3-16. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266369339>
Gangopadhyay, Rudrani. ―Finding Oneself On Board the Ibis in Amitav Ghosh‘s
Sea of Poppies.‖ WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly 45.1&2 (2017): 55-64.
Web. 21 Jul 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2017.0012>
Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.
Ghosh, Amitav. ―Confluence and Crossroads: Europe and the Fate of the Earth‖.
Web. Accessed 29 Nov 2016.
<http://www.amitavghosh.com/essays/ConfluenceandCrossroads.html>
______. ―Folly in the Sundarbans‖. Web. Accessed 29 Nov 2016.
<http://www.amitavghosh.com/essays/folly.html>
______. ―Of Fanas and Forecastles: The Indian Ocean and Some Lost Language
of The Age of Sail.‖ Economic and Political Weekly 43-25 (2008): 56-62.
Web. 18 Oct 2016. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40277589>
______. Sea of Poppies. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008. Print.
______. The Glass Palace. New York: Penguin Books Ltd, 2000. Print.
Glotfelty, Cheryll. Introduction to The Ecocriticism Reader, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty
and Harold Fromm. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press, 1996.
Print.
Grewe-Volpp, Christa. ―No Environmental Justice Without Social Justice: A
Green Postcolonialist Reading of Paul Marshal‘s The Chosen Place, the
Timeless People.‖ In Literature, Ecology, Ethics: Recent Trends in
Ecocriticism, eds. Timo Muller and Michael Sauter. Heidelberg:
Universitatverlag, 2012. Print.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
97
Hasan, Nazia. ―Tracing the Strong Green Streaks in the Novels of Amitav Ghosh:
An Eco-critical Reading‖ Indian Literature 57.4 (2013): 182-193. Web.
10 Jan 2017. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/43856755>
Hawley, John C. Contemporary Indian Writer in English: Amitav Ghosh. New
Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd., 2005. PDF.
Heise, Ursula K. ―Ecocriticism and the Transnational Turn in American Studies.‖
American Literary History 20.1 (2008): 381-404. Web. 16 Aug 2017.
<https://muse.jhu.edu/article/233018>
Hofmeyr, Isabel. ―Universalizing the Indian Ocean.‖ PMLA 125.3 (2010): 721-
729. Web. 18 Oct 2016. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25704470>
Huggan, Graham. ―Postcolonial ecocriticism and the limits of Green
Romanticism.‖ Journal of Postcolonial Writing 45.1 (2009): 3-14. Web.
16 Aug 2017. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1744985080263636465>
Huggan, Graham and Helen Tiffin. ―Green Postcolonialism.‖ Interventions 9.1
(2007): 1-11. Web. 16 Aug 2017.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698010601173783>
______. Postcolonial Ecocrticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. New York:
Routledge, 2010. Print.
Huttunen, Tuomas. ―Ethics, Language, and the Writing of Amitav Ghosh.‖ Cross
/ Cultures 117 (2009): 335-384, 399. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://search.proquest.com/docview/757010969?accountid=13771>
Jones, Stephanie. ―A Novel Genre: Polylingualism and Magical Realism in
Amitav Ghosh‘s ―The Circle of Reason‖.‖ Bulletin of the School of
Oriental and African Studies 66.3 (2003): 431-441. Web. 10 Jan 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/4146104>
Levy, Arieh and Judith Milo. ―Genetics and Breeding of Papaver somniferum.‖ In
Poppy: The Genus Papaver, ed. Jenõ Bernáth. Amsterdam: OPA, 1998.
PDF.
Manes, Christopher. ―Nature and Silence.‖ In The Ecocriticism Reader, ed.
Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens, GA: The University of
Georgia Press, 1996. Print.
Markovits, Claude. ―The Political Economy of OpiumSmuggling in Early
Nineteeth Century India: Leakage or Resistance?‖ Modern Asian Studies
43.1 (2009): 89-111. Web. 4 Aug 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/20488703>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
Memmi, Albert. The Colonizer and the Colonized. London: The Orion Press, Inc.,
1974. PDF.
Mukherjee, Upamanyu Pablo. Postcolonial Environments: Nature, Culture, and
the Contemporary Indian Novel in English. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2010. Print.
Murphy, Patrick D. ―Community Resilience and the Cosmopolitan Role in the
Environmental Challenge-Response Novels of Ghosh, Grace, and Sinha.‖
Comparative Literature Studies 50.1 (2013): 148-168. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://muse.jhu.edu/article/502094>
Nayar, Pramod K. ―The Postcolonial Uncanny: The Politics of Dispossession in
Amitav Ghosh‘s ―The Hungry Tide‖.‖ College Literature 37.4 (2010): 88-
119. Web. 10 Jan 2017. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/27917766>
Nixon, Rob. ―Environmentalism and Postcolonialism.‖ In Ecocriticism: The
Essential Reader, ed. Ken Hiltner. New York: Routledge, 2015. Print.
Pati, Madhusmita and Kailash Nath. ―COULD DISPLACED MARGINALS CO-
EXIST WITH HUNGRY TIGERS? A LYOTARDIAN READING OF
AMITAV GHOSH‘S THE HUNGRY TIDE.‖ International Journal of
Arts and Sciences 5.6 (2012): 641-654. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://search.proquest.com/docview/1373193097?accountid=13771>
Principles of Environmental Justice. Web. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
<https://www.ejnet.org/ej/principles.html>
Reed, T. V. ―Toxic Colonialism, Environmental Justice, and Native Resistance in
Silko‘s Almanac of the Dead‖ MELUS 34.2 (2009): 25-42. Web. 10 Jan
2017. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3876660>
Richards, John F. ―Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission
of 1895.‖ Modern Asian Studies 36.2 (2002): 375-420. Web. 4 Aug 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/3876660>
Roos, Bonnie and Alex Hunt. ―Systems and Secrecy: Postcolonial Ecocriticism
and Ghosh‘s The Calcutta Chromosome.‖ In The Cambridge Companion
to Literature and the Environment, ed. Louise Wrestling. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2014. PDF.
Saumini, P. ―Subaltern Consciousness in Amitav Ghosh‘s Sea of Poppies.‖ The
Dawn Journal 4.1 (2015): 1109-1114. Web. 18 Oct 2016.
<http://thedawnjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/10-Saumini.P.pdf>
Shinn, Christopher A. ―On Machines and Mosquitoes: Neuroscience, Bodies, and
Cyborgs in Amitav Ghosh‘s ―The Calcutta Chromosome‖.‖ MELUS 33.4
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
(2008): 145-166. Web. 10 Jan 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/20343511>
Sen, Nandini C. ―The Creation of Diaspora and its Historical Significance: A
Study of Amitav Ghosh‘s ‗Sea of Poppies‘.‖ Diaspora Studies 5.2 (2012):
197-214. Web. 7 Sept 2017.
<https://search.proquest.com/docview/1563752458?accountid=13771>
Steinwand, Jonathan. ―What the Whales Would Tell Us: Cetacean
Communication in Novels by WIti Ihimaera, Linda Hogan, Zakes Mda,
and Amitav Ghosh.‖ In Postcolonial Ecologies: Literature of the
Environment, eds. Elizabeth DeLoughrey and George B. Handley. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
Su, John J. ―Amitav Ghosh and the Aesthetic Turn in Postcolonial Studies.‖
Journal of Modern Literature 34.3 (2011): 65-86. Web. 11 Feb 2017.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jmodelite.34.3.65>
White Jr., Lynn. ―The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.‖ In The
Ecocriticism Reader, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens,
GA: The University of Georgia Press, 1996. Print.
Zuckerman, Jocelyn C. ―The Palm Oil Effect‖. Vogue, 5 Sep 2017. Web.
Accessed 26 Nov 2017.
<https://www.vogue.com/projects/13535833/palm-oil-controversy-beauty-
products-ingredient-sourcing-deforestation-climate-change/>
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI