discovery rate & burn rate

12
Discovery rate & burn rate logistical problems” inhibit discoveries Initially techno/economic eventually geological These quickly end exponential growth! Discovery rate peaks, is FLAT, then declines Peak signals urgent need to find new supply/fuel Predicts future extraction peak (Hubbert peak)

Upload: aliya

Post on 24-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Discovery rate & burn rate. “ logistical problems ” inhibit discoveries Initially techno/economic eventually geological These quickly end exponential growth ! Discovery rate p e a k s , is FLAT, then d e c l i n e s Peak signals urgent need to find new supply/fuel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Discovery rate & burn rate

Discovery rate & burn rate“logistical problems” inhibit discoveries

Initially techno/economiceventually geological

These quickly end exponential growth!

Discovery rate peaks, is FLAT, then declines

Peak signals urgent need to find new supply/fuelPredicts future extraction peak (Hubbert peak)

Extraction peak signals imminent crisis

Page 2: Discovery rate & burn rate

Energy System Transitions

Coal & oil persist

NG lags, but less so now with “tight” gas

1977

Decarbonizing trend

Page 3: Discovery rate & burn rate

OvershootEcology concept: carrying capacity (CC) =

sustainable population of regionBelow CC : pop. can increase sustainablyExceed CC : eventually pop. (& CC) decreasesFraction of CC : ecological footprint (how many

“Earths” needed to support humanity at our level? www.ecologicalfootprint.com

CC can increase if exploit new resourcesWood → coal → oil → uranium, world pop. in

1650 (0.6 billion) → 1900 (1.6 b) → 2010 (6.9 b)But waste from new resources can reduce CC

Page 4: Discovery rate & burn rate

Outcome depends entirely on the specific dynamics of growth Patterns are …

Page 5: Discovery rate & burn rate

Attaining / Overshooting CC

Growth has momentum, sails past limitsWhich outcome depends on strength &

timing of feedbacks that counter growthWhat feedbacks would stop growth?

Initial concerns were of chemical pollutants

“Star trek” Planetary

Page 6: Discovery rate & burn rate

Discovering chemical pollutantsLA smog from automobiles 1943

catalytic converter 1975London UK smog from coal heating Dec 1952, killed

12,000 peopleSilent Spring (R. Carson) 1962

DDT over-used, banned 1972Santa Barbara, CA oil spill 1969Global climate change mid-1970sLove Canal, Buffalo NY 1978Ozone hole 1985

CFC phase-out started 1987, stalledChernobyl (& Three-mile Island) nuke accidents 1986 (79)

Global warming & CO2 (W. McKibben 1989)

Page 7: Discovery rate & burn rate

Oil -- Late 1950’sGovt studies : review oil supplies

US oil diminished to win World War 2USSR (Siberia): significant oil, mostly untappedOther countries will industrialize like USGM & Ford pushed internal combustion engine,

bought & dismantled electric trolley systems to force cities to buses

Resources for the Future (Rockefeller Found.) infinite atomic power = infinite economic powerHarrison Brown: will deliver unlimited resourcesRapid expansion of nuclear power 1965-1973Handled electricity but not US transportation

Page 8: Discovery rate & burn rate

1960sHardin: Tragedy of the CommonsEhrlichs: The Population BombPimentel & Odum: quantified energy inputs in

agriculture, Green Revolution is unsustainable 1970: US oil extraction

peaked/declined1971 industry advisors recommended either no

environmental restrictions or importsFacing hostile nation from Vietnam @ re-

election, Nixon (Kissinger) chose the easier routeNow 40 yrs later and $4.6+1 trillion poorer

Page 9: Discovery rate & burn rate

Late 1960sClub of Rome Businessmen: how does pop. growth modify CC via

pollution & resource exhaustion?Topics ignored by economistsWhat impact on food, environment?

Solicited MIT computer study 1970-2To stimulate discussion: Limits of Growth 1972

Backlash from “growth community” bankers/economists“Oil shocks” shortly thereafter lent apparent support

Pres. Carter warned of exp. Growth & ME control of US Lost re-election to Pres. Reagan even after “Carter Doctrine”

Most assumed LoG was invalidated after ME supply was restored (big US oil imports & ME militarization including Israeli nuclear weapons)

Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.

State of Union address Jan 1980

Page 10: Discovery rate & burn rate

Feedback loops

Start of Systems DynamicsModel exponential & linear interactionsRediscovered overshoot dynamics evident in animal populations

Page 11: Discovery rate & burn rate

Obviously,highly simplified!

Page 12: Discovery rate & burn rate

Evolving studies of Limits of Growth

Note: LoG has been completely dismissed by mainstream (1980 Ehrlich/Simon commodities price bet)

World3-03 (1991, 2003)no distinction between different energy forms or

regions -> worldwide collapse evident by ~2030New World (2009)… let’s run it!

distinguishes renewable / depleting energy forms -> transition to new forms only as old are overwhelmed by constraints (oil soon, NR+coal much later)