discussion force vibration abos

Upload: hidayatullah-putra

Post on 03-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    1/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    RESULT

    Experiment Position Value Damper Distance,b (mm)

    1 Open 0

    2 Open 150

    3 Closed 150

    4 Closed 550

    Experiment 1: For no damper, b= 0 (Open)

    Data Recorded:

    Mass beam = 1.68 kg.

    Mass unbalance = 0.772 kg.

    Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.

    a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.

    k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.

    SAMPLE CALCULATION:

    1) Angular natural frequency,

    ()() ()

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    2/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    2) Natural frequency,

    ()()

    ()

    3) Period,

    ()()

    ()()

    4) Unbalanced Force,F0

    F0 = mass unbalance x a x = 0.772 x 0.65 x 67.962

    = 2.318 KN

    5) For

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    3/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Frequency, fAmplitudes, x,

    (mm)

    2.0 0.0 12.566 5.41 0.0

    3.0 0.0 18.85 3.05 0.0

    4.0 0.0 25.133 2.70 0.0

    5.0 0.05 31.416 2.16 0.065

    6.0 0.05 37.699 1.80 0.065

    7.0 0.075 43.982 1.55 0.097

    8.0 0.15 50.265 1.35 0.194

    8.1 0.2 50.894 1.33 0.259

    8.2 0.2 51.522 1.32 0.259

    8.3 0.3 52.150 1.30 0.388

    8.4 0.4 52.779 1.29 0.517

    8.5 0.4 53.407 1.27 0.517

    8.6 0.65 54.035 1.26 0.841

    8.7 1.05 54.664 1.24 1.358

    8.8 1.45 55.292 1.23 1.876

    8.9 1.2 55.920 1.22 1.552

    9.0 0.8 56.549 1.20 1.035

    10.0 0.25 62.832 1.08 0.323

    11.0 0.15 69.115 0.98 0.194

    12.0 0.1 75.398 0.90 0.129

    13.0 0.05 81.681 0.83 0.065

    14.0 0.05 87.965 0.77 0.065

    Table 4.1.1.1: Data for Experiment 1

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    4/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Experiment 2: For damper, b= 150mm (Open)

    Data Recorded:

    Mass beam = 1.68 kg.

    Mass unbalance = 0.772 kg.

    Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.

    a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.

    Damper constant, d = 5 Ns/m.

    k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.

    1) Moment of Inertia, I0

    ()()

    2) Degree of damping, D

    ()()()()

    3) Damped Oscillation,

    () ( )

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    5/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Frequency, fAmplitudes, x,

    (mm)

    2.0 0.0 12.566 5.41 0.0

    3.0 0.0 18.85 3.05 0.0

    4.0 0.0 25.133 2.70 0.0

    5.0 0.0 31.416 2.16 0.0

    6.0 0.0 37.699 1.80 0.0

    7.0 0.0 43.982 1.55 0.0

    8.0 0.05 50.265 1.35 0.065

    8.1 0.05 50.894 1.33 0.065

    8.2 0.05 51.522 1.32 0.065

    8.3 0.1 52.150 1.30 0.129

    8.4 0.1 52.779 1.29 0.129

    8.5 0.1 53.407 1.27 0.129

    8.6 0.1 54.035 1.26 0.129

    8.7 0.1 54.664 1.24 0.129

    8.8 0.1 55.292 1.23 0.129

    8.9 0.1 55.92 1.22 0.129

    9.0 0.15 56.549 1.20 0.194

    10.0 0.15 62.832 1.08 0.194

    11.0 0.15 69.115 0.98 0.194

    12.0 0.15 75.398 0.90 0.194

    13.0 0.15 81.681 0.83 0.194

    14.0 0.15 87.965 0.77 0.194

    Table 4.1.2: Data for experiment 2

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    6/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Experiment 3: For damper, b= 150mm (Closed)

    Data Recorded:

    Mass beam = 1.68 kg.

    Mass unbalance = 0.772 kg.

    Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.

    a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.

    Damper constant, d = 15 Ns/m.

    k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.

    1) Degree of damping, D

    ()()()()

    2) Damped Oscillation, () ( )

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    7/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Frequency, fAmplitudes, x,

    (mm)

    2.0 0.0 12.566 5.41 0.0

    3.0 0.0 18.85 3.05 0.0

    4.0 0.0 25.133 2.70 0.0

    5.0 0.0 31.416 2.16 0.0

    6.0 0.0 37.699 1.80 0.0

    7.0 0.0 43.982 1.55 0.0

    8.0 0.0 50.265 1.35 0.0

    8.1 0.0 50.894 1.33 0.0

    8.2 0.0 51.522 1.32 0.0

    8.3 0.0 52.150 1.30 0.0

    8.4 0.0 52.779 1.29 0.0

    8.5 0.0 53.407 1.27 0.0

    8.6 0.0 54.035 1.26 0.0

    8.7 0.0 54.664 1.24 0.0

    8.8 0.0 55.292 1.23 0.0

    8.9 0.0 55.92 1.22 0.0

    9.0 0.0 56.549 1.20 0.0

    10.0 0.15 62.832 1.08 0.194

    11.0 0.15 69.115 0.98 0.194

    12.0 0.1 75.398 0.90 0.129

    13.0 0.1 81.681 0.83 0.129

    14.0 0.1 87.965 0.77 0.129

    Table 4.1.3: Data for experiment 3

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    8/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Experiment 4: For damper, b= 550mm (Closed)

    Data Recorded:

    Mass beam = 1.68 kg.

    Mass unbalance = 0.772 kg.

    Beam, L = 700 mm @ 0.7 m.

    a = 650 mm @ 0.65 m.

    Damper constant, d = 15 Ns/m.

    k = 3.0N/mm @ 3000M/m.

    1) Degree of damping, D

    ()()()()

    2) Damped Oscillation, () ( )

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    9/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Frequency, fAmplitudes, x,

    (mm)

    2.0 0.0 12.566 5.37 0.0

    3.0 0.0 18.85 3.46 0.0

    4.0 0.0 25.133 2.68 0.0

    5.0 0.0 31.416 2.15 0.0

    6.0 0.0 37.699 1.79 0.0

    7.0 0.0 43.982 1.53 0.0

    8.0 0.0 50.265 1.34 0.0

    8.1 0.0 50.894 1.33 0.0

    8.2 0.0 51.522 1.31 0.0

    8.3 0.0 52.150 1.29 0.0

    8.4 0.0 52.779 1.28 0.0

    8.5 0.0 53.407 1.26 0.0

    8.6 0.0 54.035 1.25 0.0

    8.7 0.0 54.664 1.23 0.0

    8.8 0.0 55.292 1.22 0.0

    8.9 0.0 55.92 1.21 0.0

    9.0 0.0 56.549 1.19 0.0

    10.0 0.0 62.832 1.07 0.0

    11.0 0.05 69.115 0.98 0.065

    12.0 0.05 75.398 0.89 0.065

    13.0 0.05 81.681 0.83 0.065

    14.0 0.05 87.965 0.77 0.065

    Table 4.1.4: Data for experiment 4

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    10/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    Figure 4.1: Graph versus

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    11/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    DISCUSSION:

    Based on the graph that has been plotted, it approve that the damper is

    reducing the vibration period and amplitude. The distance of the lever arm b is also

    effected the vibration as the distance of the damper came closer to beam, the

    vibration that cause by the exciter has been hugely reduced. Most of the experiment,

    the oscillation will occur when the frequency reached 4 Hz.

    The plot of the result almost gets the same wave between them, which is get

    high amplitude between 7 until 9 of frequency. The higher amplitude that we get is

    from experiment 1 which is without damper. But the result is totally changed when we

    do the experiment 2, 3, and 4 with damper. The value of amplitude is hugely

    reduced. In case to compare the result between different positions of needle valve,

    the amplitude of open needle valve is higher compare with close needle valve like we

    did in experiment 2 and 3.In experiment 4 using close needle valve, we get to

    minimize the value of amplitude with increasing the value of distance lever arm b.

    That is the comparison between experiment 3 and 4.

    The result maybe not so accurate because of several reasons.

    The marker (ball pen) is not 100% suit with its holder at mechanical

    recorder. This apparatus should have its own marker to get theaccurate data.

    The control unit is being control manually by human.

    The graph paper not smoothly rotates. These mechanical disadvantagehopes can be minimizing in the future for us to get a better result.

  • 7/29/2019 Discussion Force Vibration Abos

    12/12

    MOHD AIDIL MUNIR BIN KHIDER 2009617152

    CONCLUSION:

    In conclusion, the objective of all this four experiment is achieved. The

    resonances can be seen in different damping condition and different length. In order

    to reduce the errors, some consideration has to be taken to improve the experiment.

    In my opinion, this universal vibration system should its own marker (constant) to

    record the data in order to get more accurate result. Therefore, it will reduce all the

    errors from occur. Lastly, during taking the data make sure the equipment is been

    setting like in lab sheet before start the experiment.

    REFERENCE

    1) Vector Mechanical for Engineering DYNAMICS), Mc Graw Hill 8th Edition.

    2) Vector Dynamics and Vibration, A. R. Zamri, UiTM

    3) Acoustics, waves and oscillations, by S. N. Sen (Professor.)

    4) Waves And Oscillations, R N Chaudhuri 2001

    5) http://personal.cityu.edu.hk/~bsapplec/theoryof.htm

    6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibration

    7) http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Vibrations/Free_Vibrations.html