discussion points, eu-russia institutional aspects andrei v belyi ceurus, university of tartu,...
TRANSCRIPT
Discussion points, EU-Russia institutional aspects
Andrei V BelyiCEURUS, University of Tartu, EstoniaCEPMLP, University of Dundee, UK
EU-Russia interdependence
• Increasing trade volumes• Mutual vulnerabilities to international
markets (i.e. Eurozone crisis, internationalization of gas markets)
• Best practice transfer (energy efficiency and renewable energy promotion)
Positive interdependence:
• Mostly covering gas markets, following gas transit conflict and third energy package adoption
• Competition for Ukraine especially since EnCT accession
• Controversies surrounding the Energy Charter
Negative interdependence:
Ground for cooperationAnd institutional development
Ground for ‘de-institutionalization’Increased political risks
Institutional responses: gas
Energy Charter
Still the most overarching legal
framework
But how to make it accepted by RF and
other producing states?
EU-Russia Energy
Dialogue
Political discourses are dominating over expert cooperation
Gas Advisory Council focuses on ‘technical’
discussion, but political trust needed
Facing gas markets
EU to force markets even where the
competition does not have a ground?
Russia to rely over inefficient Gazprom?
EU • Main concern:
Gazprom’s export monopoly and price indexation
• Integration of Ukraine into EnCT also to reinforce transit security
RF• ECT is not
acceptable if transit issues are not clarified (incl dispute settlement); REIO clause is the key barrier
• EU markets bring new uncertainties in capacity markets
Main political concerns:
Going beyond negative interdependence ?
EU • More flexible
position on REIO ?
• Less rigid attitude towards EnCT?
RF• Need to face
market realities (i.e. oil indexation is outdated)
• Export monopoly: barrier and not a solution for the energy sector modernization?
Concluding remarks
Institutional responses are insufficient because negative interdependence prevails in gas
EU’s market development brings new uncertainties for post-command economies, incling EnCT; REIO clause in ECT rather complicates the multilateralism
Russia’s reliance on outdated institutional structures increases a distrust
Is positive interdependence matter of long term political will?