discussions held on 28 - karnataka€¦ · it was noted that nldc had already advised blocking of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1
Discussions held on 28th May 2014 on the observations of KSEB on different SPS Schemes implemented post synchronization in WR & SR.
SPS 1 & 3:
It was explained that proposed load relief from the states could not be solely
based on their demand. Usage of ISTS network was also a very important
parameter. Though demand met could be lower, relative usage of ISTS network
in meeting this demand was also to be borne in mind. Another aspect in viewing
the same would be the ISGS allocation /allocation from Talcher-II station of NTPC
and total import ratios of SR beneficiaries.
It was therefore agreed that the existing scheme of load relief be retained. The
matter would be reexamined after commissioning of second circuit of 765 kV
Raichur-Sholapur link and experience post commissioning of the same.
To minimize repeated inconvenience to the same set of consumer on account of
SPS operation, it was suggested that states could come out with suitable schemes
for round robin/rotational load shedding. This would help ensure equitable
sharing of effects of SPS operation.
SRLDC observed that efficacy of the rotational load shedding needed to be
studied in real time operation. Hence, parallel operation for a couple of instances
so as to ascertain actual relief and validation would need to be done before any
migration to the new scheme. Further, there should not be any time delay in
obtaining the load relief. KPTCL informed that the maximum time limit to obtain
the relief would be less than 1000 milli second.
![Page 3: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2
It was noted that the number of SPS operations in Southern Region had reduced
of late.
SPS 2:
It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme.
SPS 3:
The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at Hyderabad on 18th
January 2014. In that Meeting, the need for SPS operation in Southern Region to
meet eventuality of loss of import due to tripping of 765 kV line had already been
discussed and agreed.
POWERGRID was requested to expedite commissioning of this proposed SPS in
the interest of system security.
SPS 4
It was observed that SR Grid was presently connected with WR Grid through
single 765 kv line. Hence, all loads in SR were equally sensitive to the flow on 765
kV Raichur-Sholapur line. As regards load aspect, the same has already been
covered under SPS 1 & 3.
SPS 5 & 6
It was agreed that the matter regarding appropriate load shedding in
Maharashtra system would be taken up with NLDC and WRPC for necessary
compliance.
![Page 4: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
3
SPS 7
After discussions, it was felt that for flow exceeding 1,500 MW from SR to NEW
Grid, need for 765 kV line tripping may need examination. It was felt that NLDC
could be requested to carry out necessary studies to further examine this
suggestion.Ability of SR Grid to absorb the jerk of sudden loss of export of power
greater than 1,500MW could also be referred to NLDC.
SPS 8 & 9
It was explained by SRLDC that choice of loads had already been made
appropriately. The loads had been identified on the downstreamportion of the
lines so as to give proper relief.
KPTCL and APTRANSCO confirmed the above.
SPS 10
It was clarified by SRLDC that signal 3 had been devised on account of the
extended mode of operation of HVDC.(2500 MW for 10 hrs a day)Earlier, there
was uncovered load of about 500 MW not covered in any load relief scheme. This
was expected to be absorbed by the SR Grid since there was no interconnected
AC link with NEW Grid. However, after commissioning of 765 kV line, any pole
outage would result in increased power flow on the AC inter connection. Hence,
the two conditions had been concatenated. In case the same was not done,
there could be operation of other SPS schemes on account of higher flow through
Raichur-Sholapur line and upstream line.
SPS 11
It was noted that separate loads for Kudankulam SPS had already been identified.
![Page 5: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
4
Other
Constituents desired that a comprehensive list of SPS Schemes along with the
operating logics be made available to them, since number of modifications had
been proposed/ implemented.
***********
![Page 6: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Discussions held on 28 - Karnataka€¦ · It was noted that NLDC had already advised blocking of this scheme. SPS 3: The matter had been discussed in the Special Meeting held at](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042113/5e8fd1ae55232a5169532bbb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)