dissecting the phenotypes of dravet syndrome by gene deletion · dissecting the phenotypes of...
TRANSCRIPT
Dissecting the phenotypes of Dravet syndromeby gene deletion
Moran Rubinstein,� Sung Han,� Chao Tai,� Ruth E. Westenbroek, Avery Hunker,Todd Scheuer and William A. Catterall
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Neurological and psychiatric syndromes often have multiple disease traits, yet it is unknown how such multi-faceted deficits arise
from single mutations. Haploinsufficiency of the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1 causes Dravet syndrome, an intractable
childhood-onset epilepsy with hyperactivity, cognitive deficit, autistic-like behaviours, and premature death. Deletion of Nav1.1
channels selectively impairs excitability of GABAergic interneurons. We studied mice having selective deletion of Nav1.1 in
parvalbumin- or somatostatin-expressing interneurons. In brain slices, these deletions cause increased threshold for action potential
generation, impaired action potential firing in trains, and reduced amplification of postsynaptic potentials in those interneurons.
Selective deletion of Nav1.1 in parvalbumin- or somatostatin-expressing interneurons increases susceptibility to thermally-induced
seizures, which are strikingly prolonged when Nav1.1 is deleted in both interneuron types. Mice with global haploinsufficiency of
Nav1.1 display autistic-like behaviours, hyperactivity and cognitive impairment. Haploinsufficiency of Nav1.1 in parvalbumin-
expressing interneurons causes autistic-like behaviours, but not hyperactivity, whereas haploinsufficiency in somatostatin-express-
ing interneurons causes hyperactivity without autistic-like behaviours. Heterozygous deletion in both interneuron types is required
to impair long-term spatial memory in context-dependent fear conditioning, without affecting short-term spatial learning or
memory. Thus, the multi-faceted phenotypes of Dravet syndrome can be genetically dissected, revealing synergy in causing epilepsy,
premature death and deficits in long-term spatial memory, but interneuron-specific effects on hyperactivity and autistic-like be-
haviours. These results show that multiple disease traits can arise from similar functional deficits in specific interneuron types.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7280
Correspondence to: William A. Catterall,
Department of Pharmacology,
Box 357280 University of Washington Seattle,
WA 98195-7280,
USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: Dravet syndrome; sodium channel; Nav1.1; interneurons; parvalbumin; somatostatin
Abbreviations: EPSC/P = excitatory postsynaptic current/potential; IPSC = inhibitory postsynaptic currents; PV = parvalbumin;SST = somatostatin
IntroductionVoltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels regulate neuronal ex-
citability by initiation and propagation of action potentials
and amplification of subthreshold synaptic events.
Heterozygous truncation mutations and other severe loss-
of-function mutations in the SCN1A gene, which encodes
the pore-forming subunit of Nav1.1 sodium channels, cause
doi:10.1093/brain/awv142 BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2219
Received November 4, 2014. Revised March 17, 2015. Accepted April 4, 2015. Advance Access publication May 27, 2015
� The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please email: [email protected]
Dravet syndrome (also called severe myoclonic epilepsy of
infancy), a rare genetically dominant, intractable convulsive
disorder. Dravet syndrome symptoms begin during the first
year of life, with seizures often associated with fever, and
progress to prolonged refractory seizures and frequent epi-
sodes of status epilepticus. During and after the second year
of life, patients develop psychomotor delay, ataxia, cogni-
tive impairment, and social interaction deficits (Genton
et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011).
Studies of mouse genetic models demonstrated that
Dravet syndrome is caused by disinhibition due to reduced
excitability of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons without a
corresponding change in the activity of excitatory neurons
(Yu et al., 2006; Ogiwara et al., 2007, 2013; Cheah et al.,
2012; Dutton et al., 2012; Kalume et al., 2013; Rubinstein
et al., 2014; Tai et al., 2014). Moreover, specific heterozy-
gous deletion of Nav1.1 in forebrain GABAergic inter-
neurons leads to seizures, premature death (Cheah et al.,
2012; Kalume et al., 2013; Ogiwara et al., 2013), cognitive
deficits, and autistic features (Han et al., 2012), similar to
those in patients with Dravet syndrome.
Parvalbumin (PV, encoded by PVALB)-expressing and
somatostatin (SST)-expressing interneurons account for a
large fraction of total interneurons. For instance, in layer
V of the cerebral cortex these two classes include 480% of
total interneurons (Rudy et al., 2011). Previous studies sug-
gested that dysfunction of PV interneurons might contrib-
ute to seizures and premature death in Dravet syndrome.
Deletion of both Nav1.1 alleles in PV-expressing neurons, a
more severe genetic ablation than Dravet syndrome, caused
seizures and premature death (Ogiwara et al., 2013). In
addition, heterozygous deletion of Nav1.1 in PPP1R2-
expressing interneurons, which include forebrain PV-
expressing interneurons but also interneurons positive for
reelin (RELN) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) (Belforte et al.,2010), also increased sensitivity to chemically-induced seiz-
ures (Dutton et al., 2012).
Here we investigated the specific contributions of PV- and
SST-expressing interneurons to the physiological and behav-
ioural consequences of Dravet syndrome using mice with
selective heterozygous and homozygous deletion of Nav1.1
in PV-expressing interneurons, SST-expressing interneurons,
or both. Our results demonstrate that haploinsufficiency of
Nav1.1 in either PV-expressing or SST-expressing inter-
neurons results in reduced excitability of these interneuron
types, spontaneous epileptic cortical discharge patterns with-
out convulsions, consistent with absence or partial seizures,
and increased sensitivity to thermally-induced seizures.
Moreover, deletion in both of these interneuron types
increased the susceptibility and severity of thermally-induced
seizures and the frequency of premature death synergistic-
ally. In contrast, contributions to behavioural deficits in
Dravet syndrome segregated by interneuron type. Reduced
excitability of PV-expressing neurons caused autistic-like
social interaction deficits, whereas impaired excitability of
SST-expressing neurons resulted in hyperactivity. Deletion
in both PV and SST interneurons impaired long-term spatial
memory in context-dependent fear conditioning, but was not
sufficient to recapitulate the full extent of the cognitive im-
pairment observed in Dravet syndrome mice. Our results
dissect the differential contributions of interneuron subtypes
to the complex phenotypes of Dravet syndrome. These data
reveal that impairment of different classes of interneurons is
responsible for distinct aspects of the Dravet syndrome
phenotype, and suggest that cellular deficits in different
classes of interneurons may underlie multi-faceted disease
traits in complex genetic syndromes.
Materials and methodsFor thermal induction of seizures and electrophysiology, weused male and female mice aged 21–24 days (postnatal Day21 age group) or 32–37 days (postnatal Day 35 age group).Behavioural tests were performed on males aged 2–6 months.For EEG recording, fine silver wire EEG electrodes were im-planted under ketamine/xylazine (130/8.8 mg/kg) anaesthesia(Kalume et al., 2013). EEG recordings were collected in con-scious mice using a low impedance head-stage connected toRZ2D bioamp processor (Tucker Davis Technologies) sampledat 6 kHz. EEG signals were processed off-line with a 0–70 Hzlowpass filter. Brain slices were prepared and electrophysiolo-gical studies were carried out as described (Rubinstein et al.,2014; Tai et al., 2014). Thermal induction of seizures wasperformed as described (Oakley et al., 2009, 2013). Theopen field test, the three chamber social interaction test,Barnes circular maze, novel object recognition and Y-mazespontaneous alteration test were performed as described(Han et al., 2012). Our experimental techniques are describedin detail in the Supplementary material.
Results
Impairment of excitability of PV- andSST-expressing cortical interneuronsby selective deletion of Nav1.1channels
Layer V pyramidal cells are the principal output neurons of
the cerebral cortex, and their activity is tightly controlled by
layer V PV-expressing, fast-spiking interneurons and SST-
expressing Martinotti cells (Rudy et al., 2011).
Electrophysiological recordings in cortical slices from mice
with global deletion of Nav1.1 demonstrated reduced excit-
ability of both PV-expressing and SST-expressing inter-
neurons (Tai et al., 2014). Similar recordings were made
here to assess the degree of functional haploinsufficiency of
Nav1.1 upon specific Cre-dependent deletion. Cre expression
in Scn1a+ / + (wild-type) and Scn1afl/ + (Dravet syndrome,
DS) was monitored by the tdTomato reporter, and record-
ings were made from the most brightly labelled cells.
Haploinsufficiency of Nav1.1 in PV-expressing interneur-
ons (PVCre, Scn1afl/ + , termed PV-DS) or SST-expressing
interneurons (SSTCre, Scn1afl/ + , termed SST-DS) resulted
2220 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
in increased threshold for action potential generation
(Fig. 1A and B) and higher rheobase (Fig. 1C). In addition,
both the number and frequency of action potentials fired in
response to incremental steps of depolarizing current
injection were reduced by deletion of Nav1.1 in either cell
type (Fig. 1D–G and Supplementary Fig. 1). Layer V inter-
neurons in PV-DS and SST-DS mice also exhibited
increased failure of action potential firing in response to
Figure 1 Deletion of Nav1.1 results in reduced excitability in layer V cortical interneurons. (A) Examples of action potentials
recorded in PV- and SST-expressing layer V cortical interneurons. Scn1a + / + are depicted in black. (B and C) Threshold (B) and rheobase for
action potentials (C) in cortical PV (blue) and SST (yellow) neurons. Action potentials were evoked by 10 ms depolarizing current injection. (D–
G) Firing of cortical neurons with selective deletion of Nav1.1 in response to 1-s long depolarizing current injection at the indicated intensities.
(D) Sample traces of whole-cell current-clamp recordings of PV-expressing neurons in response to injection of 240 pA current. (E) Average
number of action potentials in response to 1 s depolarizing current injection at the indicated intensity (n = 15–19). (F) Sample traces of whole-cell
current-clamp recordings of SST-expressing neurons in response to injection of 160 pA current (n = 15–17). (G) Average number of action
potentials in response to 1 s depolarizing current injection at the indicated intensity. (H–K) Failure rates for action potential generation in cortical
neurons with selective deletion of Nav1.1. Per cent failure of action potentials in PV (H and I) and SST (J and K) interneurons. A train of 100
pulses, each 10 ms long at the minimal current required to trigger action potentials, was given at the indicated frequencies. Sample traces for 100
pulses at 10 Hz are shown (H and J) n = 15–17. Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t-test. *P5 0.05, **P5 0.01, ***P5 0.001.
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2221
short repetitive stimulation at frequencies ranging from 5 to
50 Hz (Fig. 1H–K).
These results reveal a common deficit in electrical excit-
ability of these two classes of interneurons, as reflected in
their increased threshold and rheobase for action potential
firing and failures of action potential firing during trains.
The functional impairments observed here are similar or
identical in magnitude to the deficits previously recorded
in mice with Nav1.1 channels deleted globally (Tai et al.,
2014), demonstrating that the Cre-Lox method has been
fully effective in creating functional haploinsufficiency of
Nav1.1 channels in both of these cell types. In addition,
the similar impairment indicates that network changes
caused by loss of Nav1.1 channels in excitatory neurons
and other classes of interneurons in our global knockout
mice do not substantially alter the functional cellular def-
icits beyond those caused by cell-autonomous heterozygous
deletion of Nav1.1 in these PV- and SST-expressing
interneurons.
Spontaneous synaptic activity ofcortical interneurons
As a measure of the impact of deletion of Nav1.1 channels
on the function of neural circuits, we examined the effects of
PV-DS and SST-DS mutations on spontaneous, action poten-
tial-driven, excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activity re-
corded from layer V pyramidal neurons. Deletion of
Nav1.1 in PV-expressing neurons led to reduction in spon-
taneous inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) frequency
Figure 2 Deletion of Nav1.1 in PV neurons, but not in SST neurons, alters the excitation/inhibition balance. Spontaneous IPSC
and spontaneous EPSC were recorded in layer V pyramidal neurons from mice with specific deletion of Nav1.1 in PV or SST mice. (A–D) PV-DS
mice. Example traces of spontaneous IPSC (A) and cumulative histogram of inter-event intervals (B, P = 0.05, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) with
mean values � SEM (inset) of spontaneous IPSC frequency. Spontaneous IPSC amplitude was 35.9 � 3.1 pA in PVCre Scn1a + / + and 36 � 3.4 pA in
PVCre Scn1afl/ + , P = 0.49. n = 21–24. Example traces of spontaneous EPSC (C) and cumulative histogram of interevent intervals (D, P = 0.038,
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) with means � SEM (inset) of sEPSC frequency. Spontaneous EPSC amplitude was 25.3 � 1 pA in PVCre Scn1a + / + and
26.7 � 2.2 pA in PVCre Scn1afl/ + , P = 0.28, n = 19–20. (E–H) SST-DS mice. Example traces of spontaneous IPSC (E) and cumulative histogram of
interevent intervals (F) with means � SEM (inset) of spontaneous IPSC frequency. Spontaneous IPSC amplitude was 39.5 � 5.3 pA in SSTCre
Scn1a + / + and 39.4 � 3 pA in SSTCre Scn1afl/ + , P = 0.48. n = 25. Example traces of spontaneous EPSC (G) and cumulative histogram of interevent
intervals (H) with means � SEM (inset) of spontaneous EPSC frequency. Spontaneous EPSC amplitude was 28 � 1.4 pA in SSTCre Scn1a + / + and
27.9 � 1.3 pA in and SSTCre Scn1afl/ + , P = 0.37, n = 19–21. Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t-test. *P5 0.05, **P5 0.01.
2222 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
with no alteration in the spontaneous IPSC amplitudes
(Fig. 2A and B). Associated with this reduction in inhibitory
synaptic neurotransmission, we observed a significant en-
hancement in spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic current
(EPSC) frequency with no change in amplitude (Fig. 2C
and D). These results indicate that the cortical network in
layer V is hyperexcitable and hyperactive in PV-DS mice. In
contrast to the results with PV-DS mice, the frequencies of
spontaneous IPSCs and spontaneous EPSCs were not chan-
ged in neurons from SST-DS mice (Fig. 2E–H), probably
because they make synapses on the distal dendrites far
from our recordings in cell bodies (see ‘Discussion’ section).
Deficits of excitability and synapticamplification in hippocampalinterneurons
Interneurons in the hippocampus also express PV and SST,
and were shown to be involved in seizure generation in
Dravet syndrome (Liautard et al., 2013). As a complement
to our studies of cortical interneurons, we tested the func-
tional consequence of selective deletion of Nav1.1 in CA1
horizontal stratum oriens lacunosum-moleculare (O-LM)
cells. O-LM cells are critical for regulation of action poten-
tial firing of CA1 pyramidal cells and thereby exert import-
ant inhibitory control of circuit function and prevent
epilepsy (Maccaferri and McBain, 1995; Pouille and
Scanziani, 2004; Coulter et al., 2011). These cells represent
a distinct subtype of interneurons that express both SST
and PV (Maccaferri et al., 2000; Ferraguti et al., 2004),
and their excitability was shown to be reduced in Dravet
syndrome mice with global deletion of Nav1.1 (Rubinstein
et al., 2014). Similar recordings were made here in mice
expressing Cre recombinase in both PV-expressing and
SST-expressing interneurons (PV&SST). Recordings were
made from the brightly labelled horizontal tdTomato-ex-
pressing cells, and all of the cells displayed the characteris-
tic sag and firing pattern of O-LM cells (Supplementary
Fig. 2A) (Maccaferri and McBain, 1996; Zemankovics
et al., 2010). Similar to cortical interneurons, haploinsuffi-
ciency of Nav1.1 (PV&SST-DS) resulted in increased
threshold and rheobase for action potential firing
(Fig. 3A–C) and reduced number of action potentials in
prolonged depolarizations (Supplementary Fig. 2B), demon-
strating the importance of Nav1.1 in excitability of OL-M
cells.
To test the effects of selective deletion of Nav1.1 on
evoked synaptic activity, a stimulating electrode was
placed in the alveus to activate the axons of CA1 pyramidal
cells antidromically (Maccaferri and McBain, 1995; Pouille
and Scanziani, 2004), and the stimulation intensity was set
to produce a firing probability of 50% during trains of
stimuli (i.e. five action potentials out of 10 stimuli delivered
to the alveus at 1 Hz). This protocol effectively normalized
for changes in intrinsic excitability (Rubinstein et al.,
2014). The threshold for synaptically evoked action
potentials in PV&SST-DS interneurons was �7 mV more
depolarized (Fig. 3D and E), and accordingly the near-
threshold evoked excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP)
amplitude was increased (Fig. 3G). Sodium currents com-
bine to enhance and amplify the response to subthreshold
synaptic inputs (Carter et al., 2012), and deletion of Nav1.1
resulted in a marked shortening of the EPSP half-width
(Fig. 3F and H), which was accompanied by reduction in
the time integral of depolarization during the EPSP (Fig.
3I). Associated with the larger and shorter EPSPs, the la-
tency to spike generation and the spike jitter were signifi-
cantly reduced (Fig. 3D and Supplementary Fig. 2C and D).
Together, these data demonstrate that selective deletion
of Nav1.1 hampers the excitability of multiple types of
interneurons in both the cerebral cortex and the hippocam-
pus. This reduced excitability in both brain regions recap-
itulates the cellular effects observed previously in Dravet
syndrome mice with global deletion of Nav1.1
(Rubinstein et al., 2014; Tai et al., 2014), confirming ef-
fective reduction of Nav1.1 currents in these classes of
interneurons upon Cre expression.
Seizures in mice with selectivedeletion of Nav1.1 channels inPV-expressing interneurons
Loss-of-function mutations in SCN1A are associated with a
range of epilepsies, all involving infantile onset of febrile
seizures that proceed beyond childhood. With global
Dravet syndrome mice, seizures can be induced by mild
elevation of core body temperature late in the third week
of life (Oakley et al., 2009), providing a natural patho-
physiological stimulus for measurement of seizure suscepti-
bility. Therefore, we tested mice with selective deletion of
Nav1.1 for their susceptibility to thermally-induced seizures
at two different ages, postnatal Day 21, the age at which
Dravet syndrome mice with global Nav1.1 deletion first
experience spontaneous seizures (Yu et al., 2006; Oakley
et al., 2009), and postnatal Day 35 following the period of
most intense spontaneous seizures (Kalume et al., 2013).
Body core temperature was increased up to 42�C, and
none of the Scn1a + / + mice tested experienced seizures in
this temperature range. PV-DS mice did not have thermally-
induced seizures at postnatal Day 21 (Fig. 4A); however,
seizures could be evoked in 50% of PV-DS mice at post-
natal Day 35 (Fig. 4B). Previous studies report that ad-
equate Cre expression in this mouse line is restricted to
neurons with the strongest PV expression (Madisen et al.,
2010; Ogiwara et al., 2013). Therefore, we also tested mice
that were heterozygous for deletion of Scn1a but homozy-
gous for expression of PV-Cre (PVCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ + ). In
these mice, the expression of Cre protein is potentially
2-fold higher, and therefore Scn1a deletion should be
achieved in PV neurons with lower activation of the PV
promoter. Indeed, homozygous expression of PV-Cre
increased the number of Cre-expressing cells by �25%
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2223
(Supplementary Fig. 3). PV-DS mice with homozygous Cre
expression were already sensitive to thermal induction of
seizures at postnatal Day 21 (Fig. 4D, blue). Moreover, at
postnatal Day 35, all the tested PVCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ + mice
had thermally-induced seizures (Fig. 4E, blue), and their
seizures were longer compared to PVCre, Scn1afl/ + mice
(Fig. 4C, F, blue; 19.3 � 3 s and 135.2 � 18.7 s in PVCre,
Scn1afl/ + and PVCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ + , respectively, P50.01).
Figure 3 Deletion of Nav1.1 results in reduced excitability of CA1 stratum oriens hippocampal interneurons. (A–C) Action
potentials evoked by direct depolarization of cell body via the patch pipette. (A) Examples of action potentials. (B and C) Threshold (B) and
rheobase (C) of action potentials, n = 7. (D–G) Properties of synaptically evoked action potentials and near-threshold EPSPs in stratum oriens
neurons. Stimulating electrode was placed in the alveus and the stimulation strength was set to produce firing probability of 50% during trains of
10 stimuli at 1 Hz. Representative action potentials (D) and mean values � SEM for threshold for action potential generation (E). (F–I)
Parameters for near-threshold EPSPs. Examples of EPSPs (F). Mean values � SEM for EPSP amplitude (G), duration (H) and time integral (I),
n = 7–9. To control for changes in properties of voltage-dependent currents activated by EPSPs of different amplitude, we examined the duration
of EPSPs with similar amplitude. These were also of shorter duration in PV&SST-DS (Supplementary Fig. 2E and F), indicating that loss of Nav1.1
currents, and not voltage-dependent changes in the kinetics of the EPSP due to its higher amplitude, cause reduced amplification. Statistical
analysis was done using Student’s t-test. **P5 0.01, ***P5 0.001.
2224 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
Figure 4 Epileptic phenotype of mice with deletion of Nav1.1 in PV- and SST-expressing interneurons. (A–C) Epileptic phenotypes
of mice with heterozygous expression of Cre. (A–B) Percentage of mice remaining free of behavioural seizures (SZ) at the indicated body core
temperatures at postnatal Day 21 (P21, A) and postnatal Day 35 (P35, B). Selective deletion of Nav1.1 in PV-expressing neuron (blue, n = 10), SST-
expressing neurons (yellow, n = 8), or combined deletion of Nav1.1 in both PV and SST expressing neurons (green, n = 17). (C) Mean
values � SEM for seizure duration at postnatal Day 35. (D–F) Epileptic phenotypes of mice with homozygous expression of PV Cre. Mean
values � SEM for the percentage of mice remaining free of behavioural seizures (SZ) at the indicated body core temperatures at postnatal Day 21
(D) and postnatal Day 35 (E). (F) Mean values � SEM for seizure duration at postnatal Day 35. Statistical analysis was done using one-way
ANOVA, **P5 0.01. PVCre/Cre-DS, n = 9, SSTCre/Cre-DS, n = 5, PVCre/Cre&SST-DS, n = 8. The epileptic phenotype SSTCre, Scn1afl/ + was indistin-
guishable from that of SSTCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ + (P4 0.05). Similarly the phenotype of PVCre/Cre, SSTCre, Scn1afl/ + was indistinguishable from that of
PVCre/Cre, SSTCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ + (n = 4 for each) and these data were pooled. Scn1a + / + mice of either genotype do not have seizures at the tested
temperatures (n = 3–7 for each genotype). (G–I) Examples of EEG recordings from cortical lead depicting a spontaneous electrographic seizure in
PVCre/Cre-DS (G), SSTCre-DS (H) and PVCre/Cre&SST-DS (I).
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2225
Thus, we observed a gene-dosage effect in the epileptic
phenotypes of PV-DS mice. Heterozygous deletion of
Nav1.1 in some PV interneurons is sufficient to cause ther-
mally-induced seizures, and increasing the number of
affected PV interneurons by homozygous expression of
PV-Cre leads to earlier onset of temperature induced seiz-
ures and longer duration of seizures. We did not observe
any spontaneous convulsive seizures in PVCre/Cre-DS mice
during routine handling or continuous home cage video
recordings between postnatal Days 22–26 (n = 5), the
period of most intense and frequent spontaneous seizures
in mice with global deletion of Nav1.1 (Kalume et al.,
2013). In contrast, video-EEG recordings of PVCre/Cre,
Scn1afl/ + revealed brief (5 s) bilateral abnormal cortical dis-
charge pattern that was associated with a short pause of
behaviour without convulsions, consistent with absence or
partial seizures (Fig. 4G). Together, these results
demonstrate that deletion of Nav1.1 only in PV neurons
is sufficient to cause mild spontaneous seizures and ther-
mally-induced generalized tonic-clonic seizures, but not
premature death.
Seizures in mice with selectivedeletion of Nav1.1 channels inSST-expressing interneurons
Loss of function of Nav1.1 in SST neurons was also suffi-
cient to induce thermal seizures at postnatal Day 35 but
not at postnatal Day 21 (Fig. 4A–C). Cre expression under
the SST promoter is highly efficient (Taniguchi et al.,
2011), and mice with homozygous expression of Cre
(SSTCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ + ) were indistinguishable from mice ex-
pressing only one allele of SST-Cre (SSTCre, Scn1afl/ + )
(Fig. 4A–F). Video-EEG recordings revealed brief episodes
of abnormal cortical discharge patterns that were not asso-
ciated with convulsions (Fig. 4H). No premature death or
convulsive seizures were observed during routine handling
or continuous home cage video recordings from postnatal
Days 22–26 (n = 3).
Together, these results demonstrate that deletion of Nav1.1
only in SST neurons is sufficient to cause susceptibility to
thermally-induced generalized tonic-clonic seizures as well as
mild spontaneous seizures, but not premature death.
Synergistic seizure susceptibility andseverity with combined deletion ofNav1.1 in PV and SST interneurons
As PV-expressing and SST-expressing neurons both con-
tributed to epilepsy in Dravet syndrome, we wondered
whether deletion of Nav1.1 in both types of interneurons
would have synergistic effects. Although PV-DS and SST-
DS mice were not susceptible to thermally-induced seizures
at postnatal Day 21, 88% of PV&SST-DS mice (15/17) had
thermally-induced seizures (Fig. 4A). Moreover, at postna-
tal Day 35, seizure duration in PV&SST-DS mice was
�6-fold longer than in PV-DS mice and �3-fold longer
than in SST-DS mice (Fig. 4C). In addition, while deletion
of Nav1.1 in PV or SST alone did not cause increased mor-
tality, we did observe occasional premature deaths in
PV&SST-DS mice (93% survival at 3 months). As observed
in PV-DS mice, homozygous expression of PV-Cre in PVCre/
Cre&SST-DS mice increased the sensitivity to thermally-
induced seizures (Fig. 4D and E) as well as seizure duration
(Fig. 4F). Thus, heterozygous deletion of Nav1.1 simultan-
eously in both types of interneurons results in earlier onset
of seizure susceptibility and longer duration of thermally-
induced seizures, and those effects are greater than additive
in several respects. Nevertheless, similar to PV-DS and
SST-DS, no spontaneous convulsive seizures were observed
in PVCre/Cre&SST-DS mice during routine handling or con-
tinuous home cage video recordings between postnatal
Days 22 and 26 (n = 4); however, EEG recordings of
PVCre/Cre&SST-DS revealed abnormal cortical discharge
patterns that were not associated with observable convul-
sions (Fig. 4I).
Epileptic phenotype of mice withhomozygous deletion of Scn1a
Mice with homozygous deletion of Scn1a have severe
ataxia, frequent seizures and all die by postnatal Day 14
(Yu et al., 2006; Kalume et al., 2007; Ogiwara et al.,
2007). Homozygous deletion of Scn1a in PV-expressing
neurons (PVCre, Scn1afl/fl) resulted in severe ataxia, spon-
taneous convulsive seizures, high sensitivity to thermally-
induced seizures, and frequent premature death, with only
40% survival at 3 months of age (Fig. 5A–C). Thus, the
degree of loss of Nav1.1 function in PV-expressing neurons
has dramatic effects on the epileptic phenotype. In contrast,
the epileptic phenotype of mice with complete deletion of
Scn1a in SST-expressing neurons (SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl) was
similar to SST-DS mice. These mice had seizures at high
temperature (Fig. 5A and B) and no premature death was
observed (Fig. 5C). Mice with complete deletion of Nav1.1
in both PV and SST interneurons (PVCre, SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl)
exhibited ataxia, frequent spontaneous convulsive
seizures, and thermally induced seizures at low
temperatures (Fig. 5A and B). Moreover, spontaneous
death was frequent (Fig. 5C). These results with homozy-
gous deletion of Nav1.1 in PV&SST-DS mice support the
conclusion that deletion in both PV- and SST-expressing
neurons has synergistic effects on epilepsy and premature
death.
Specific effect of deletion of Nav1.1 inSST-expressing interneurons onhyperactivity
Our previous results show that Dravet syndrome mice with
global deletion of Scn1a display behavioural traits that are
found in patients with Dravet syndrome, including
2226 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
hyperactivity, autistic-like social interaction deficits, and
cognitive impairments (Han et al., 2012). Moreover,
while floxed Scn1a + / + mice were indistinguishable from
wild-type mice, Scn1afl/ + mice with specific heterozygous
deletion of Nav1.1 in forebrain interneurons displayed all
Dravet syndrome-associated behavioural deficits (Han
et al., 2012). However, which types of interneurons are
responsible for these behavioural phenotypes is not
known. To answer this question, we performed behavioural
tests with PV-DS, SST-DS, and PV&SST-DS mice, focusing
on behaviours that we have previously shown to be altered
in Dravet syndrome mice. As a first step, we measured the
total distance moved during 10 min in the open field test to
examine general locomotor activity in a novel environment.
PV-DS mice displayed normal locomotor activity (Fig. 6A).
However, SST-DS mice (Fig. 6B) and PV&SST-DS mice
(Fig. 6C) travelled significantly longer distances. These
data indicate that deficit of excitability in SST-expressing
interneurons contributes to hyperactivity in Dravet syn-
drome mice, whereas impairment of excitability in PV-
expressing interneurons does not.
Specific effect of deletion of Nav1.1in PV-expressing interneurons onautistic-like behaviours
We tested the social behaviour of these mice with the three-
chamber test of social interaction. In this test, mice are
placed in the central compartment of a three-chambered
plexiglass box and allowed to interact with an object (a
small empty cage) in one side chamber or with a stranger
mouse (in an identical small cage) in the other side chamber.
Scn1a+ / + mice spent �2-fold more time interacting with a
stranger mouse than with the empty cage (Fig. 7A and B). In
contrast, PV-DS mice displayed a social interaction deficit
and exhibited no preference for interaction with a stranger
mouse compared to the empty cage (Fig. 7A and B). No
social deficit was apparent for SST-DS mice, which displayed
a strong preference for interaction with the stranger mouse
(Fig. 7C and D). The double Cre-expressing PV&SST-DS
mice recapitulated the autistic-like social deficits of the PV-
DS mice (Fig. 7E and F). These data provide evidence that
reduced electrical excitability in PV-expressing interneurons
contributes specifically to social interaction deficits in Dravet
syndrome, but impairment of excitability of SST-expressing
interneurons does not.
Effect of deletion of Nav1.1 in PV- andSST-expressing interneurons onspatial learning and memory
Cognitive impairment is characteristic in patients with
Dravet syndrome. Similarly, Dravet syndrome mice with
global or specific heterozygous deletion of Scn1a in fore-
brain interneurons, have deficits in short-term and long-
term context-dependent fear conditioning and in spa-
tial memory (Han et al., 2012). In contrast, PV-DS,
Figure 5 Epileptic phenotype of mice with selective dele-
tion of both alleles encoding Nav1.1. (A–C) Epileptic pheno-
types of Scn1afl/fl mice. (A) Percentage of mice remaining free of
behavioural seizures (SZ) at the indicated body core temperatures
at postnatal Day 21. (B) Means values � SEM for the temperature of
seizure induction. (C) Survival plots for PVCre, Scn1afl/fl mice
(n = 22, blue), SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl mice (n = 15, yellow) and PVCre,
SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl mice (n = 8, green). Statistical analysis was done
using one-way ANOVA. *P5 0.05.
Figure 6 Selective deletion of Nav1.1 in SST-expressing
neurons causes hyperactivity. Distance moved in the open field
test for PV (A, n = 8), SST (B, n = 6), and PV&SST mice (C, n = 10).
The behaviour of SSTCre and SSTCre/Cre mice was indistinguishable in
all the tests performed and the data were pooled together.
Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t-test. *P5 0.05.
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2227
PVCre/Cre-DS, SST-DS and PV&SST-DS mice did not dem-
onstrate deficits in context-dependent fear-conditioning. All
of these mice displayed robust freezing behaviour when they
returned to the fearful spatial context of a foot shock 30 min
and 24 h later (Fig. 8A–C). In contrast, PVCre/Cre&SST-DS
mice demonstrated normal freezing behaviour immediately
following a foot shock and 30 min later, but their freezing
behaviour was significantly reduced after 24 h. These results
indicate that simultaneous deletion of Nav1.1 in both PV-
and SST-expressing neurons causes impairment of long-term
context-dependent fear memory (Fig. 8D).
We further assessed spatial learning in the absence of a
fear stimulus using the Barnes circular maze. PVCre/
Cre&SST-DS and littermate controls were trained three
times per day for four consecutive days to find a specific
target hole. In contrast to mice with global deletion Scn1a
(Han et al., 2012), PVCre/Cre&SST-DS mice were able to
improve their performance, and their latency to reach the
target hole decreased with training similar to littermate
controls (Fig. 8E). During the probe trial on the fifth day,
both groups of mice remembered the spatial location of the
target hole (Fig. 8F). Thus, deletion of Nav1.1 in PV and
SST neurons does not recapitulate the spatial learning def-
icit observed in Dravet syndrome mice (Han et al., 2012).
To further examine short-term memory and working
memory, we tested PVCre/Cre&SST-DS in novel object rec-
ognition and spontaneous alteration in the Y-maze. PVCre/
Cre&SST-DS performance was similar to that of littermate
controls in both tests (Fig. 8G–I), indicating that loss func-
tion of Nav1.1 in PV and SST neurons does not impair
short-term working memory. Altogether, while simultan-
eous deletion of Nav1.1 in PV and SST expressing neurons
can affect long-term fear memory, other class(es) of inter-
neurons are involved in causing more severe short-term
memory impairment and spatial learning deficits observed
in mice with global deletion of Nav1.1.
Dissecting behavioural phenotypes inDravet syndrome
Taken together, our behavioural data demonstrate that im-
pairment of excitability in different subtypes of inter-
neurons is differentially involved in the distinct
behavioural deficits that we have observed in Dravet syn-
drome mice. These results reveal how a single gene muta-
tion can result in multi-faceted neurophysiological and
behavioural traits in a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome.
Hyperactivity, impaired social interactions, and cognitive
impairment are all characteristics of children with Dravet
syndrome (Genton et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011). Therefore,
it is conceivable that these traits in patients with Dravet
syndrome may also involve impaired excitability of differ-
ent classes of interneurons. Dissection of these phenotypes
of Dravet syndrome by specific gene deletion in mice is
considered further below.
DiscussionLoss-of-function mutations in Nav1.1 cause Dravet syn-
drome in mice by selective impairment of excitability in
GABAergic interneurons without detectable effects on exci-
tatory neurons (Yu et al., 2006; Ogiwara et al., 2007;
Cheah et al., 2012; Dutton et al., 2012; Tai et al., 2014).
PV interneurons preferentially form synapses at the periso-
matic region of their target cells, thereby controlling neur-
onal activity and spike output, whereas SST-expressing
interneurons preferentially contact the distal dendrites,
which allow them to efficiently control the impact of syn-
aptic inputs near these sites (Klausberger and Somogyi,
2008; Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013). The complementary
and coordinated functions of these two types of inter-
neurons provide versatile and powerful control of the ac-
tivity in neuronal circuits. However, it is not known how
Figure 7 Selective deletion of Nav1.1 in PV-expressing
neurons causes social deficit. Three-chamber test of social
interaction for PV (A and B, n = 8–9), SST (C and D, n = 11–14) and
PV&SST (E and F, n = 6–7) mice. Time in each chamber (A, C and
E) and total interaction time (B, D and F): O = object (an empty
small mouse cage); C = centre; M = mouse (a stranger mouse in an
identical small cage). Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t-
test., *P5 0.05, **P5 0.01, ***P5 0.001.
2228 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
impaired electrical excitability in these two classes of inter-
neurons would contribute to the multi-faceted neurological
and behavioural phenotypes in Dravet syndrome. Here we
show that Nav1.1 is important for normal synaptic boost-
ing and action potential firing of both PV- and SST-
expressing interneurons and that reduced excitability of
these major classes of interneurons contributes synergistic-
ally to the epilepsy and differentially to the behavioural
deficits associated with Dravet syndrome.
Deletion of Nav1.1 in pyramidalneurons does not cause Dravetsyndrome phenotypes
Previous studies have shown that global haploinsufficiency
of Nav1.1 channels has no detectable effect on sodium
currents or action potential firing in pyramidal neurons in
hippocampus or cerebral cortex (Yu et al., 2006; Ogiwara
et al., 2007; Rubinstein et al., 2014; Tai et al., 2014).
Selective deletion of Nav1.1 channels in forebrain
GABAergic interneurons fully reproduces the complex epi-
lepsy and behavioural phenotypes of Dravet syndrome in
these mice (Cheah et al., 2012; Ogiwara et al., 2013).
Moreover, selective deletion of Nav1.1 channels in excita-
tory neurons does not cause the disease traits of Dravet
syndrome and can actually oppose the lethal effects of
the disease by reducing the frequency of premature death
(Dutton et al., 2012; Ogiwara et al., 2013). Thus, in mouse
genetic models of Scn1a deletion, which reproduce all of
the complex facets of Dravet syndrome, no evidence has
emerged that alteration of excitability of pyramidal neurons
contributes to causing disease phenotypes.
Figure 8 Cognitive phenotype of mice with selective deletion of Nav1.1. Context-dependent fear conditioning test in PVCre (A, n = 16-
19 for Scn1a + / + and Scn1afl/ + , respectively), SST (B, n = 10), PV&SST mice (C, n = 10) and PVCre/Cre&SST mice (D, n = 7–9). Freezing behaviour
of PVCre (n = 6–9) were indistinguishable from that of PVCre/Cre (n = 10) and these data were pooled in A. Basal = freezing time (%) during
exploration of a cage containing an electrical grid as a floor and markings for identification; training = freezing time (%) during presentation of a
0.6 mA, 2 s long foot shock; 30 min = freezing time (%) upon return to the same cage after 30 min but without shock; 24 h = freezing time (%) upon
return to the same cage after 24 h but without shock. (E) In the Barnes circular maze, both PVCre/Cre&SST-DS mice and littermate controls
decreased their latency to the target hole similarly over the 4-day repeated training trials. (F) Latency to the target hole during the probe trial on
the fifth day (n = 6 for each genotype). (G) In the novel object recognition test PVCre/Cre&SST-DS mice and littermate controls had normal
recognition memory for a preconditioned object (F = familiar), which was presented 2 min before the test, and spent more time with the novel
object (N = novel). (H) The normalized ratio of time spent with the familiar object divided by time spent with the novel object (n = 10–11 for
each genotype). (I) Y-maze task: spontaneous alternation behaviour during a 10-min session (n = 5 for each genotype). Statistical analysis was done
using Student’s t-test. *P5 0.05, **P5 0.01.
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2229
Deletion of Nav1.1 in PV-expressingneurons results in reducedexcitability, seizures andautistic-like behaviour
In contrast to the lack of effect in pyramidal neurons, de-
letion of Nav1.1 in PV-expressing interneurons in cortical
layer V resulted in reduced excitability due to increased
threshold and rheobase, reduced number and frequency
of action potentials, and inability to sustain firing during
trains of depolarizations (Fig. 1). These deficits are similar
to the loss of excitability observed in mice with global de-
letion of Nav1.1 (Tai et al., 2014). Moreover, deletion of
Nav1.1 selectively in PV neurons was sufficient to increase
the excitation/inhibition ratio (Fig. 2), as observed previ-
ously in Dravet syndrome mice (Han et al., 2012).
Together, our physiological recordings confirmed that Cre
expression in PV interneurons results in reduced function of
Nav1.1, and the reduced excitability of PV interneurons in
PV-DS mice is comparable to the functional deficits
observed in Dravet syndrome mice.
These deficits in excitability at the cellular level were suf-
ficient to cause thermally-induced seizures in PVCre, Scn1afl/+
mice (heterozygous expression of Cre and Scn1a) (Fig. 4).
Homozygous expression of Cre in PVCre/Cre, Scn1afl/ +
mice resulted in brief spontaneous non-convulsive seizures,
and increased the sensitivity to thermally-induced general-
ized tonic-clonic seizures. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures
could be evoked as early as postnatal Day 21, and their
duration was longer at postnatal Day 35 (Fig. 4). These
results demonstrate the contribution of PV interneurons
to epilepsy in Dravet syndrome (Fig. 4). Although hetero-
zygous deletion of Nav1.1 is the relevant genetic ablation in
patients with Dravet syndrome, and mice with homozygous
global deletion of Nav1.1 do not survive beyond postnatal
Day 14 (Yu et al., 2006; Ogiwara et al., 2007), we also
tested the epileptic phenotype in mice with cell-specific
homozygous deletion of Scn1a. Similar to previous findings
(Ogiwara et al., 2013), PVCre, Scn1afl/fl mice had increased
mortality and experienced seizures at or slightly above
normal body temperature (Fig. 5). Thus, selective deletion
of Nav1.1 in PV neurons demonstrated gene dosage effects
that exacerbated the epileptic phenotype in two ways: by
increasing the number of cells in which Scn1a gene is
deleted via homozygous expression of Cre in PVCre/Cre
mice and by increasing the loss of excitability via deletion
of both alleles in Scn1afl/fl mice.
Unlike other generalized epilepsy disorders, patients with
Dravet syndrome have autism-spectrum behaviours (Li
et al., 2011). Reduction in the number of PV neurons
was observed in multiple mouse models of autism spectrum
disorders (Gogolla et al., 2009). Strikingly here, PV-DS
mice showed reduced social interaction in the three-
chamber test (Fig. 7), similar to globally deleted Dravet
syndrome mice (Han et al., 2012). PV-DS mice were not
hyperactive (Fig. 6) and performed similarly to control
animals in context-dependent fear conditioning, indicating
normal spatial learning and memory in this experimental
paradigm (Fig. 8). Altogether, our experiments provide a
clear dissection of the complex phenotypes of Dravet syn-
drome and show that dysfunction of PV-expressing inter-
neurons due to loss of Nav1.1 is sufficient to cause epilepsy
and social interaction deficit, but not hyperactivity or loss
of context-dependent fear memory.
Deletion of Nav1.1 in SST-expressingneurons results in seizures andhyperactivity
We tested two types of SST-positive neurons: cortical layer
V Martinotti cells, which express SST (Silberberg and
Markram, 2007), and hippocampal horizontal O-LM
cells, which express both SST and PV (Maccaferri et al.,
2000; Ferraguti et al., 2004). Deletion of Nav1.1 in either
type of SST-expressing neuron resulted in increased thresh-
old and rheobase for action potential firing (Figs 1 and 3).
Moreover, SST-DS neurons failed to sustain firing during
prolonged depolarizations (Fig. 1F and G, and
Supplementary Fig. 2B) and trains of action potentials
(Fig. 1J and K). In the hippocampus, SST-DS interneurons
had higher threshold for synaptically evoked action poten-
tials and shorter duration of near threshold EPSPs (Fig. 3).
Together, these data demonstrate the importance of Nav1.1
in setting the threshold and initiation of action potentials in
multiple types of interneurons (Rubinstein et al., 2014; Tai
et al., 2014), and confirm loss of function of Nav1.1 on
SST-Cre expression. Like PV-DS mice, SST-DS mice had
mild spontaneous seizures and were also susceptible to
thermal induction of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (Fig.
4). However, thermally-induced seizures occurred at high
temperatures with both heterozygous and homozygous de-
letion of Nav1.1, and no premature death was observed
(Fig. 5). Thus, heterozygous deletion of Nav1.1 channels
only in SST-expressing neurons produced a mild epileptic
phenotype.
In layer V of the cerebral cortex, SST-expressing
Martinotti cells are increasingly recruited by sustained
high-frequency stimulation and provide frequency-depend-
ent disynaptic inhibition to pyramidal cells (Silberberg and
Markram, 2007). This local inhibitory circuit is disrupted
in Dravet syndrome mice (Tai et al., 2014). However, this
feedback circuit would not be expected to be active under
basal conditions of electrical activity because an intense
burst of action potentials is required to produce inhibition
(Silberberg and Markram, 2007). Moreover, SST-express-
ing neurons also target PV interneurons (Letzkus et al.,
2011; Pfeffer et al., 2013), and reduction in their excitabil-
ity might have opposing effects in small circuits. In agree-
ment with these characteristics, we found that the
excitation/inhibition balance of spontaneous excitatory
and inhibitory synaptic activity recorded at the cell body
of pyramidal neurons was unchanged in SST-DS cortical
2230 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
slices (Fig. 2E–H). It may be that stronger stimuli, such as
higher temperatures, are needed to reveal the effects of
reduced synaptic inhibition in SST-DS mice.
Hyperactivity is a well-documented behavioural charac-
teristic in children with Dravet syndrome (Li et al., 2011)
and in Dravet syndrome mice (Han et al., 2012; Ito et al.,
2012). We found that SST-DS mice were hyperactive in an
open field test (Fig. 6). However, SST-DS mice did not
show any deficit in social interaction in the three-chamber
test (Fig. 7) or in the context-dependent fear-conditioning
test (Fig. 8). Taken together, our results with SST-DS mice
further dissect the phenotypes of Dravet syndrome by
showing that Nav1.1 is important for normal function of
SST neurons and that specific loss of excitability of these
neurons contributes to epilepsy and hyperactivity but not to
autistic-like behaviours or deficit in spatial learning and
memory as assessed in the context-dependent fear condi-
tioning test.
Synergistic effects of deletion ofNav1.1 in PV- and SST-expressingneurons on epilepsy and prematuredeath
Activity in neuronal circuits is tightly regulated by different
subtypes of inhibitory interneurons (Klausberger and
Somogyi, 2008; Wolff et al., 2014). PV-expressing, fast-
spiking interneurons and SST-expressing Martinotti cells
have complementary roles in providing inhibitory synaptic
input at the cell bodies and basal dendrites versus the distal
dendrites of layer V pyramidal cells, respectively. Our re-
sults show that reduced excitability of both PV and SST
interneurons contributes to Dravet syndrome, and further
that deletion of Nav1.1 in both types of interneurons sim-
ultaneously results in more severe epilepsy. PV&SST-DS
mice were sensitive to thermally-induced seizures at post-
natal Day 21, when PV-DS or SST-DS mice were seizure-
free (Fig. 4A). At postnatal Day 35, when all the genotypes
had thermally-induced seizures, the seizures in PV&SST-DS
mice were much longer in duration (Fig. 4C and F).
Moreover, some PV&SST-DS mice died prematurely,
whereas we did not observe any premature death in PV-
DS mice with heterozygous or homozygous expression of
PV-Cre or in SST-DS mice. Comparison of homozygous
Scn1afl/fl mice also demonstrated synergistic effects.
Thermally-induced seizures of PVCre, SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl
mice occurred at lower temperatures compared to either
PVCre, Scn1afl/fl or SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl (Fig. 5B), and all
PVCre, SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl mice died, whereas 40% of PVCre,
Scn1afl/fl survived at 3 months of age, and no mortality was
observed in SSTCre, Scn1afl/fl mice (Fig. 5C). The synergy
observed for deletion of Nav1.1 channels in PV- and SST-
expressing interneurons in epilepsy and premature death
may reflect the synergistic effects of impairing their two
complementary forms of inhibition in the cell body/
proximal dendritic versus distal dendritic compartments
of cortical pyramidal neurons.
Differential effects of deletion inPV- and SST-expressing interneuronson behaviour
Dysfunction of interneurons, and the resulting excitation/
inhibition imbalance are involved in the aetiology of many
neurological and psychiatric syndromes such as epilepsy,
autism and schizophrenia. However, it is unclear how spe-
cific interneuron deficits contribute to pathophysiology of
the complex behavioural phenotypes (Marin, 2012). Our
experiments provide a clear dissection of the roles of PV-
expressing versus SST-expressing interneurons in causing
hyperexcitability and autistic-like phenotypes in Dravet
syndrome mice. SST-DS mice are hyperactive, whereas
PV-DS mice are not. PV-DS mice show autistic-like behav-
iours, whereas SST-DS mice do not. Behavioural tests with
PV&SST-DS mice showed reduced social interaction that
was similar to PV-DS and hyperactivity that was similar
to SST-DS (Figs 6 and 7). These results suggest that the
effects of deletion of Nav1.1 channels in PV-DS mice are
truly primary in causing autistic-like phenotypes, and fur-
ther deletion in SST-expressing interneurons has no add-
itional effect on that phenotype. Similarly, it seems that
deletion of Nav1.1 channels in SST-DS mice is truly pri-
mary in causing hyperactivity and further deletion in PV-
expressing interneurons has no additional effect on that
phenotype, even in the sensitized background of SST-DS
mice.
In contrast, while PV- and SST-DS mice had normal
freezing behaviour in the context-dependent fear condition-
ing test, PVCre/Cre&SST-DS mice had reduced freezing after
24 h, demonstrating synergistic effects of PV and SST in
impairment of long-term fear-related spatial memory (Fig.
8D). Interestingly, it was recently shown that memory re-
trieval circuits change with time (Do-Monte et al., 2015),
so it is possible that normal firing of other classes of inter-
neurons is sufficient for retrieval of fearful memory early
after the event, while function of PV and SST interneurons
is essential for retrieval at later time points. In this context,
it was surprising that PVCre/Cre&SST-Dravet syndrome mice
did not have a deficit in spatial learning in the Barnes maze,
as indicated by their ability to improve their performance
each day and to respond normally in the probe trial (Fig.
8E and F). It is conceivable that repeated training each day
for 4 days is sufficient to overcome the deficit in long-term
memory.
Contribution of other interneuronsto Dravet syndrome
The data presented here clearly dissect the roles of PV- and
SST-expressing interneurons in Dravet syndrome and its
associated comorbidities. However, mice with deletion of
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2231
Nav1.1 in all forebrain interneurons recapitulated all the
epileptic symptoms (Yu et al., 2006; Oakley et al., 2009,
2013; Kalume et al., 2013), hyperactivity, reduced sociabil-
ity and cognitive deficits (Cheah et al., 2012; Han et al.,
2012). In contrast, not all of these symptoms were observed
in comparable severity in PV&SST-DS mice. The epileptic
phenotype of PV&SST-DS mice is mild compared to global
or interneuron-specific deletion of Nav1.1 (Yu et al., 2006;
Ogiwara et al., 2007; Oakley et al., 2009; Cheah et al.,
2012; Kalume et al., 2013) because they did not have spon-
taneous generalized tonic-clonic seizures, their thermally-
induced generalized tonic-clonic seizures occurred at
higher temperatures, and premature death was infrequent.
Moreover, while long-term memory in the context-depend-
ent fear conditioning test was impaired (Fig. 8), short-term
fear memory and spatial learning in the Barnes maze were
preserved, indicating less severe cognitive impairment com-
pared to Dravet syndrome mice.
These results show that the severe deficit in spatial learn-
ing and memory in Dravet syndrome mice requires add-
itional deletion of Nav1.1 channels in interneurons other
than those that express PV and SST. Future studies of add-
itional classes of interneurons by specific deletion of Nav1.1
channels using the Cre-Lox method may give further in-
sights into the complete set of interneurons in which
Nav1.1 channels must be deleted to fully replicate Dravet
syndrome.
Complex behavioural deficits inneuropsychiatric disease
Beyond their direct implications for Dravet syndrome, our
results provide the first example, to our knowledge, of dis-
section of complex epileptic and behavioural phenotypes by
gene deletion in single classes of interneurons in any neuro-
psychiatric disease. Because complex combinations of
phenotypes are common in neuropsychiatric syndromes
(Marin, 2012), this study may provide a precedent for
other, more widespread disorders by showing that a
single genetic mutation, which causes a common deficit at
the cellular level in most or all interneurons, can neverthe-
less cause complex disease outcomes through the differen-
tial physiological and behavioural impacts of deficits in
specific classes of interneurons. Such ‘interneuronopathies’
may be a common source of complexity in both genetic and
idiopathic forms of neuropsychiatric disease.
FundingResearch reported in this publication was supported by the
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of
the National Institutes of Health under award number R01
NS25704 and by a research grant from the Simons
Foundation Autism Research Initiative. The content is
solely the responsibility of the authors and does not
necessarily represent the official views of the National
Institutes of Health or the Simons Foundation.
Supplementary materialSupplementary material is available at Brain online.
ReferencesBelforte JE, Zsiros V, Sklar ER, Jiang Z, Yu G, Li Y, et al. Postnatal
NMDA receptor ablation in corticolimbic interneurons confers
schizophrenia-like phenotypes. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 76–83.
Carter BC, Giessel AJ, Sabatini BL, Bean BP. Transient sodium current
at subthreshold voltages: activation by EPSP waveforms. Neuron
2012; 75: 1081–93.
Cheah CS, Yu FH, Westenbroek RE, Kalume FK, Oakley JC, Potter
GB, et al. Specific deletion of NaV1.1 sodium channels in inhibitory
interneurons causes seizures and premature death in a mouse model
of Dravet syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 14646–51.Coulter DA, Yue C, Ang CW, Weissinger F, Goldberg E, Hsu F-C,
et al. Hippocampal microcircuit dynamics probed using optical ima-
ging approaches. J Physiol 2011; 589: 1893–903.
Do-Monte FH, Quinones-Laracuente K, Quirk GJ. A temporal shift in
the circuits mediating retrieval of fear memory. Nature 2015; 519:
460–3.
Dutton SB, Makinson CD, Papale LA, Shankar A, Balakrishnan B,
Nakazawa K, et al. Preferential inactivation of Scn1a in parvalbu-
min interneurons increases seizure susceptibility. Neurobiol Dis
2012; 49C: 211–20.Ferraguti F, Cobden P, Pollard M, Cope D, Shigemoto R, Watanabe
M, et al. Immunolocalization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1�
(mGluR1�) in distinct classes of interneuron in the CA1 region of
the rat hippocampus. Hippocampus 2004; 14: 193–215.
Genton P, Velizarova R, Dravet C. Dravet syndrome: the long-term
outcome. Epilepsia 2011; 52 (Suppl 2): 44–9.
Gogolla N, Leblanc JJ, Quast KB, Sudhof TC, Fagiolini M, Hensch
TK. Common circuit defect of excitatory-inhibitory balance in
mouse models of autism. J Neurodev Disord 2009; 1: 172–81.Han S, Tai C, Westenbroek RE, Yu FH, Cheah CS, Potter GB, et al.
Autistic-like behaviour in Scn1a + /- mice and rescue by enhanced
GABA-mediated neurotransmission. Nature 2012; 489: 385–90.
Harris KD, Mrsic-Flogel TD. Cortical connectivity and sensory coding.
Nature 2013; 503: 51–8.
Ito S, Ogiwara I, Yamada K, Miyamoto H, Hensch TK, Osawa M,
et al. Mouse with NaV1.1 haploinsufficiency, a model for Dravet
syndrome, exhibits lowered sociability and learning impairment.
Neurobiol Dis 2012; 49C: 29–40.Kalume F, Westenbroek RE, Cheah CS, Yu FH, Oakley JC, Scheuer T,
et al. Sudden unexpected death in a mouse model of Dravet syn-
drome. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 1798–808.
Kalume F, Yu FH, Westenbroek RE, Scheuer T, Catterall WA.
Reduced sodium current in Purkinje neurons from NaV1.1 mutant
mice: implications for ataxia in severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy.
J Neurosci 2007; 27: 11065–74.
Klausberger T, Somogyi P. Neuronal diversity and temporal dy-
namics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science 2008;
321: 53–7.Letzkus JJ, Wolff SB, Meyer EM, Tovote P, Courtin J, Herry C, et al.
A disinhibitory microcircuit for associative fear learning in the audi-
tory cortex. Nature 2011; 480: 331–5.
Li BM, Liu XR, Yi YH, Deng YH, Su T, Zou X, et al. Autism in
Dravet syndrome: prevalence, features, and relationship to the clin-
ical characteristics of epilepsy and mental retardation. Epilepsy
Behav 2011; 21: 291–5.
2232 | BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 M. Rubinstein et al.
Liautard C, Scalmani P, Carriero G, de Curtis M, Franceschetti S,Mantegazza M. Hippocampal hyperexcitability and specific epilepti-
form activity in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Epilepsia 2013;
54: 1251–61.
Maccaferri G, McBain CJ. Passive propagation of LTD to stratum oriens-alveus inhibitory neurons modulates the temporoammonic input to the
hippocampal CA1 region. Neuron 1995; 15: 137–45.
Maccaferri G, McBain CJ. The hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih)
and its contribution to pacemaker activity in rat CA1 hippocampalstratum oriens-alveus interneurones. J Physiol 1996; 497 (Pt 1):
119–30.
Maccaferri G, Roberts JD, Szucs P, Cottingham CA, Somogyi P. Cellsurface domain specific postsynaptic currents evoked by identified
GABAergic neurones in rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol 2000;
524(Pt 1): 91–116.
Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H,et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characteriza-
tion system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13:
133–40.
Marin O. Interneuron dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Nat RevNeurosci 2012; 13: 107–20.
Oakley JC, Cho AR, Cheah CS, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Synergistic
GABA-enhancing therapy against seizures in a mouse model of
Dravet syndrome. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013; 345: 215–24.Oakley JC, Kalume F, Yu FH, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Temperature-
and age-dependent seizures in a mouse model of severe myo-
clonic epilepsy in infancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:3994–9.
Ogiwara I, Iwasato T, Miyamoto H, Iwata R, Yamagata T, Mazaki E,
et al. NaV1.1 haploinsufficiency in excitatory neurons ameliorates
seizure-associated sudden death in a mouse model of Dravet syn-drome. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22: 4784–804.
Ogiwara I, Miyamoto H, Morita N, Atapour N, Mazaki E, Inoue I,
et al. Nav1.1 localizes to axons of parvalbumin-positive inhibitory
interneurons: a circuit basis for epileptic seizures in mice carrying anScn1a gene mutation. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 5903–14.
Pfeffer CK, Xue M, He M, Huang ZJ, Scanziani M. Inhibition of
inhibition in visual cortex: the logic of connections between molecu-
larly distinct interneurons. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16: 1068–76.Pouille F, Scanziani M. Routing of spike series by dynamic circuits in
the hippocampus. Nature 2004; 429: 717–23.
Rubinstein M, Westenbroek RE, Yu FH, Jones CJ, Scheuer T,
Catterall WA. Genetic background modulates impaired excitabilityof inhibitory neurons in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome.
Neurobiol Dis 2014; 73C: 106–17.
Rudy B, Fishell G, Lee S, Hjerling-Leffler J. Three groups of inter-neurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neu-
rons. Dev Neurobiol 2011; 71: 45–61.
Silberberg G, Markram H. Disynaptic inhibition between neocortical pyr-
amidal cells mediated by Martinotti cells. Neuron 2007; 53: 735–46.Tai C, Abe Y, Westenbroek RE, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Impaired
excitability of somatostatin- and parvalbumin-expressing cortical
interneurons in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: E3139–48.Taniguchi H, He M, Wu P, Kim S, Paik R, Sugino K, et al. A resource
of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in
cerebral cortex. Neuron 2011; 71: 995–1013.
Wolff SB, Grundemann J, Tovote P, Krabbe S, Jacobson GA, MullerC, et al. Amygdala interneuron subtypes control fear learning
through disinhibition. Nature 2014; 509: 453–8.
Yu FH, Mantegazza M, Westenbroek RE, Robbins CA, Kalume F,Burton KA, et al. Reduced sodium current in GABAergic inter-
neurons in a mouse model of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy.
Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1142–9.
Zemankovics R, Kali S, Paulsen O, Freund TF, Hajos N. Differencesin subthreshold resonance of hippocampal pyramidal cells and inter-
neurons: the role of h-current and passive membrane characteristics.
J Physiol 2010; 588 (Pt 12): 2109–32.
Dissecting Dravet syndrome phenotypes BRAIN 2015: 138; 2219–2233 | 2233