district performance report2009

68
District Performance Report April 20, 2009 Dr. Patrick Harrigan Assistant Superintendent for Research, Assessment and Special Services Administrative Interns: Kathy Levy Valerie Geiler

Upload: e-robertson

Post on 19-May-2015

508 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: District Performance Report2009

District Performance Report

April 20, 2009

Dr. Patrick HarriganAssistant Superintendent for Research,

Assessment and Special Services

Administrative Interns:

Kathy LevyValerie Geiler

Page 2: District Performance Report2009

District Profile 2007-2008

Enrollment K-12: 10,142 Free-Reduced Lunch: 8% Limited English Proficient: 2% Special Education: 13.5% Racial/Ethnic Origin

American Indian/Alaskan Native: <1% Black or African American: 13% Hispanic or Latino: 5% Asian/Pacific Islander: 11% White: 71% Multiracial: <1%

Annual Attendance Rate: 95%

Page 3: District Performance Report2009

District Accountability

English-Language Arts: Good StandingMathematics: Good StandingScience: Good StandingGraduation Rate: Good StandingAll Half Hollow Hills Schools achieved a

rating of Good Standing for accountability purposes on Federal and State Measures.

Highest Status

Granted

Page 4: District Performance Report2009

State Assessments English Language Arts Grades 3-8 (4,841 Students Tested) Mathematics Grades 3-8 (4,853 Students Tested) Science grades 4 & 8 (1,247 Students Tested) English HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested) Mathematics HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested)

Page 5: District Performance Report2009

12,61312,613State Assessments were prepared for

administered, taken, graded, and reported to the Regional Information Center for Accountability purposes.

Sunil John, Lori

VanStry, MIS

Total State Assessments…

Page 6: District Performance Report2009

English / Language-ArtsAccountability

Page 7: District Performance Report2009

ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index

188

146

177 173192 190

158 165

131 128 129 125 128 131123 128

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Per

form

ance

Inde

x

Group Size

AMO

Page 8: District Performance Report2009

181194 190 196 197 195

182

127 127 127 127 127 127 127

50

100

150

200

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels

NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

Page 9: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-3

District Summary ELA Grade 3

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

t of T

ota

l Po

pu

latio

n

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Increased Level-

4

Page 10: District Performance Report2009

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-3

93%

55%

86% 95% 94%

53%

84%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/PacificIslander

White Lim English EcoDisadvantagedStudent Groups

Perc

enta

ge L

evel

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 3

Page 11: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-4

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Per

cen

t o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 12: District Performance Report2009

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-4

90%

55%

79% 81%88% 93%

60%69%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/PacificIslander

White Lim English EcoDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Perc

enta

ge L

evel

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 4

Page 13: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-5

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Per

cen

t o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 14: District Performance Report2009

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-5

92%

55%

86%74%

96% 93%

50%

75%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/PacificIslander

White Lim English EcoDisadvantagedStudent Groups

Perc

enta

ge L

evel

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 5

Page 15: District Performance Report2009

ELA Grades 6-8 Performance Levels

186 186

130 130

50

100

150

200

Candlewood West Hollow

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

Page 16: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-6

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f To

tal P

op

ula

tion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 17: District Performance Report2009

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-6

86%

41%

78%

56%

91% 88%

17%

52%

0%

10%20%

30%

40%50%

60%

70%

80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif icIslander

White Limited English Econ.Disadvantaged

Subgroups

Perc

enta

ge of

Leve

l 3 an

d Abo

ve

Grade 6

Page 18: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-7

District Summary ELA 7

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Per

cent

age

of T

otal

Pop

ulat

ion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Increased Proficienc

y

Page 19: District Performance Report2009

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-7

91%

62%

79%85%

92% 93%

43%

82%

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%60%

70%80%

90%100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif icIslander

White Limited English Econ.Disadvantaged

Subgroups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vel 3

and

Abov

e

Grade 7

Page 20: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-8

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Levels

Perc

ent

of

Tota

l Popula

tion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 21: District Performance Report2009

ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-8

81%

23%

57%

69%

91%84%

54%

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%60%

70%80%

90%100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif icIslander

White Limited English Econ.Disadvantaged

Subgroups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vel 3

and

Abov

e

Grade 8

Page 22: District Performance Report2009

ELA by Gender / Grade Level

95%92% 92%

88%93% 91% 89%

83%

94%88%

84%78%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cen

tag

e L

evel

3 a

nd

Ab

ove

Female

Male

Page 23: District Performance Report2009

Secondary English Performance Index

Secondary English Performance Index

191183

175

195 194

178

150 152160

154150156155161

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

All Students AmericanIndian

Hispanic White EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e I

nd

ex

Good News from SED

Page 24: District Performance Report2009

97 96 95

5967

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing

Distinction

NY STATE REGENTS ENGLISH

85% or Better

Page 25: District Performance Report2009

MathematicsAccountability

Page 26: District Performance Report2009

Math 3-8 Performance Index

Math Performance Index - 2008

194

164

185 183198 196

187177

100 97 98 94 97 10092 97

0

50

100

150

200

All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacif icIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Perf

orm

ance

Inde

x

Page 27: District Performance Report2009

Math Performance Grades 3-5

189199 197 200 199 199 192

96 96 96 96 96 96 96

50

100

150

200

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Page 28: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-3

G rade 3 Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4

L eve l

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l P

op

ula

tio

n

D IS TR IC T 05-06 D IS TR IC T 06-07 D IS TR IC T 07-08

Page 29: District Performance Report2009

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-3

99%

87%96%

100% 100% 99%94%

98%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited English EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lev

els

3 an

d Ab

ove

Grade 3

Page 30: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-4

Grade 4 Math

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4Level

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 31: District Performance Report2009

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-4

96%

73%

86%

97% 97%

87%81%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White LimitedEnglish

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Per

cent

age

of L

evel

s 3

and

Abo

ve

Grade 4

Page 32: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-5

Grade 5 Math

0%

20%

40%

60%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Level

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08Level-

4!

Page 33: District Performance Report2009

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-5

97%

77%

93%100% 98%

75%

86%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited English EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Student Groups

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lev

els

3 an

d Ab

ove

Grade 5

Page 34: District Performance Report2009

Math Performance Grades 6-8

193 192

99 99

50

100

150

200

Candlewood West Hollow

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Page 35: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-6

6th G rade Math

0%

20%

40%

60%

L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

D IS TR IC T 05-06 D IS TR IC T 06-07 D IS TR IC T 07-08

Page 36: District Performance Report2009

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-6

91%

53%

84%

68%

98% 93%

57%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

Student Groups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vels

3 an

d Abo

ve

Grade 6

Page 37: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-7

Grade 7 Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

t o

f T

ota

l Po

pu

lati

on

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Level-4!

Page 38: District Performance Report2009

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-7

95%

71%

89% 89% 100% 96%

75%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

Student Groups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vels 3

an

d Abo

ve

Grade 7

Page 39: District Performance Report2009

Historical Comparison Grade-8

Grade 8 Math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f To

tal P

op

ula

tion

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 40: District Performance Report2009

Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-8

92%

60%

75%88% 97% 95%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

Student Groups

Perce

ntage

of Le

vels

3 and

Ab

ove

Grade 8

Page 41: District Performance Report2009

Math by Gender / Grade Level

99% 99%96% 95% 96% 97%

93%90%

97%94% 95%

90%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cen

tag

e L

evel

3 a

nd

Ab

ove

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Grade Level

Female

Male

Page 42: District Performance Report2009

Secondary Math Performance Index

Secondary Math Performance Index

192

155

183 180194 195

178

155 150144 148

154146149

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

All Students AmericanIndian

Hispanic White EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Per

form

ance

Ind

ex

Page 43: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS A

94 95 94

78

5752

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 44: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS B

95 92 89

5246 47

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 45: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS Integrated Algebra

96

46

0102030405060708090

100

Passing Distinction

First Year

Page 46: District Performance Report2009

Science Accountability

Page 47: District Performance Report2009

Science Elementary and Intermediate Performance Index

178188 184

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

196 198 198192

0

50

100

150

200

All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacif icIslander

White Limited EnglishProficient

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Perfo

rman

ce In

dex

Page 48: District Performance Report2009

Science Grade-4

190200 197 200 200 200 191

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

50

100

150

200

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Page 49: District Performance Report2009

Science Grade-8

195 196

100 100

50

100

150

200

Candlewood West Hollow

Performance

Index

School Performance AMO

Page 50: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT

98 97 96

69

50 49

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 51: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS EARTH SCIENCE

93 90 92

5849

55

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 52: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTSCHEMISTRY

91 87 91

3227

45

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 53: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTSPHYSICS

97 98

83

56 59

45

010

2030

405060

7080

90100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 54: District Performance Report2009

Social Studies Results

Page 55: District Performance Report2009

NYS 5TH GRADE SOCIAL STUDIES

1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1%

32%

42%

32%

66%

55%

66%

0%

20%

40%

60%

PE

RC

EN

TAG

E

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

Page 56: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

9590 90

6254 58

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 57: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS U.S. HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT

98 97 95

8171

76

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 58: District Performance Report2009

Foreign Language Results

Page 59: District Performance Report2009

SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY

100 98 100

0102030405060708090

100

French Italian Spanish

Passing

Page 60: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS FRENCH

100 100 100

88 9286

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 61: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS ITALIAN

100 100 100

8088 86

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 62: District Performance Report2009

NY STATE REGENTS SPANISH

99 99 99

74 76 74

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 63: District Performance Report2009

Spanish RegentsStudents with Disabilities

10095 92

4454

33

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Passing Distinction

Page 64: District Performance Report2009

Graduation RateAccountability

Page 65: District Performance Report2009

Graduation Rate by Percentage

92

70

86 83 85

55 55 55 55 55 55 55

9496

0

20

40

60

80

100

All Stu

dents

Disab

led

Amer

ican

India

nBla

ck

Hispan

ic

Asian

or P

acific

Isla

nder

White

Limite

d Eng

lish P

rofic

ient

Econom

ical

ly D

isad

vanta

ged

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e In

de

x

IEP Diplomas and 5-year graduates are not considered graduates

Page 66: District Performance Report2009

High School Completers

93 94 97

66 66 67

0102030405060708090

100

2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

Regents Diploma Regents with Advanced Designation

Change in formula

Page 67: District Performance Report2009

Post-Secondary Plans

4-year College 2-year College Other Post-secondary

Military Employment Adult Services

Other Known Plans

94%2 or 4 year

College

Page 68: District Performance Report2009

The End!