diurnal patterns in_bird_species_composition[1][1]
TRANSCRIPT
Armando Madrigal
Tzyyyuan Huang
Andrew Tran
Joel Galvan
Marine Bio. Prof.Sepulveda
Hypothesis
Our null hypothesis is that there is no diurnal shift in bird species composition at a specific location.
In other words, is there a difference between the species of birds at noon and night?
Data Collection & Methods We tested our hypothesis with the help of binoculars
and Mac’s Field Guide to California Coastal Birds.
Data Collection & Methods Cont’D We chose to observe the different bird species at two
different times in the day. One at noon and the other at dusk.
We took photos quietly and counted how many birds there were in a single species.
We also took photos through our binoculars.
We recorded the temperature and weather.
We walked all the way from the pier to the harbor, until we found the perfect location; mouth of the river.
Rationale
We chose this site because it was located at the end of the San Luis Rey River and very close to an open ocean.
The mouth of the river is a haven for freshwater marsh and sandy beach birds to loaf and be undisturbed by humans.
This specific beach habitat provides shorebirds to drink, bathe, and serve as a nesting colony for some birds.
Observations, Noon California Gull-large population
Western Gull-large population
American Scoot- couple
Herring Gull-few
Mallard- only one we saw
Brown Pelican- large population. Flying in formation
Observations, Dusk
Western Gull-
Sabine’s Gull-
Herring Gull-
Sooty Shearwater-open ocean
Conclusion
Our null hypothesis is refuted because we did observe a diurnal shift in bird species composition.