division of bicycle and pedestrian transportation updates · 5/17/2013 · ncampo conference may...
TRANSCRIPT
Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Updates
Lauren Blackburn, Director NCAMPO Conference
May 17, 2013
1
Administration and Finance
Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation
Policy and Planning
Technical Oversight
and Programs
• Municipal Plans
• Regional Plans
• Coordination with other units to scope projects
• Coordination with AASHTO, MUTCD, etc
• Manage Enhancement Bicycle projects in STIP
• Safe Routes to School
• Access to Transit
• Complete Streets
• Coordination with other state agencies
2
3
Assists communities with development of comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian plans
• In 2012, awarded $365,200 to 12 cities and towns across N.C • 110 municipal plans complete, 24 in development, 10 additional awardees
• Average grant is $25,000 – to be increased in 2014
• Grant funding provided on cost-reimbursement basis
• Small town bike/pedestrian combined plan option
Municipal Planning Grant Program
Grant Programs Match Criteria Municipal Population DOT Funding Local Match Less than 2000 90% 10% Less than 10,000 80% 20% 10,000-50,000 70% 30% 50,000-100,000 60% 40% Over 100,000 50% 50%
4
Regional and County Bicycle Planning Grant Program
Assists MPOs, RPOs and Councils of Government with development of regional (4+ county regions) bicycle plans • Average grant is $205,022 • 1 completed plan to date, 7 in development • To begin 10% local cost-share in 2014 • To add county bicycle plan option in 2014
6
Resource Coordination 2012-2013 Statewide Plan for Walking and Cycling in North Carolina (Walk Bike NC) • Involves multi-agency and private funding • Identifying action steps for improved coordination
Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety in the through educational safety messaging and enforcement targeting drivers and pedestrians
• FY 12-14 comprehensive pilot focus on Triangle • Limited outreach through Outer Banks in 2013
SRTS: “Let’s Go NC” Bicycling and Walking Curriculum
• Design of “In the Class” curriculum materials
• Video and exercises
SRTS: Active Routes to School Partnership
Partnership Structure
PAN insert words and graphic here.
• 1 full-time Project Manager • 1 part-time Fiscal Coordinator • 10 full-time Regional Coordinators • Excludes Wake and Mecklenburg Counties
Jay A. Bennett, PE, NCDOT – Roadway Design, [email protected]
• January – December 2013: 24, two-day training sessions statewide • Training to cover process for designing complete streets • Call for projects with divisions – case studies ready by end of year
Complete Streets Program
Traffic Counts • 2013- secure funding and
finalize scope of work
• 2014- purchase counters, identify locations, initiate counts
• 2015- robust counts, evaluation
GIS Data Collection • 2013- pilot data collection in
Uhwarries region
• 2014- conduct statewide GIS data collection • 2015 – map information
Crash Data – GIS Information
17
Pre-Construction
Construction
Agreement Project Initiation
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION PROJECT WORKFLOW PROCESS
Project Programming
Invite Highway Division input into project scoping and
cost estimates
Highway divisions and local governments to manage agreements
Apply pre-construction funds
consistently for design services
Local governments retain consultants for construction management
Project Delivery Improvements
18
P3.0
Project Submittals – Strategic Prioritization
Proposed Projects Post 2013: More, smaller projects – Good fit! Greenways/Off-Road Facilities= 52.5% of construction funding Sidewalks, Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements = 47.5% of construction funding
Typical Projects Pre-2013: Fewer, larger projects Greenways/Off-Road Paved Facilities = 90% of construction funding Sidewalks/Pedestrian improvements = 8% of construction funding Shoulder Enhancements = 2% of construction funding
19
P3.0
Transportation Alternatives Program
How should we prioritize projects? • Public involvement requirement • Competitive selection process in consultation
with or administered by NCDOT • Consider SPOT 3.0 draft prioritization as
default
MPO and RPOs to take lead on competitive process
20
P3.0
Transportation Alternatives Program 200,000 + MPO Allocation 4,908,539$ RecipientAsheville 314,942$ FBRMPOCharlotte 1,324,733$ MUMPOConcord 241,138$ CRMPODurham 390,077$ DCHCMPOFayetteville 348,197$ FAMPOGreensboro 349,911$ GUAMPOHickory 238,124$ GHMPOMyrtle Beach 22,757$ MBMPORaleigh 993,020$ CAMPOWilmington 246,835$ WMPOWinston-Salem 438,805$ WSUMPO5,000-200,000 Allocation 2,005,086$ remaining MPOs0-5,000 Allocation 3,787,044$ RPOsStatewide Allocation 5,350,335$ all MPOs and RPOsFlex Transfer 5,350,335$ NCDOTTOTAL 21,401,338$
How should we select projects? • NCDOT is project administrator but not
an eligible recipient • Must follow population funding
requirements • All projects subject to 20% local match
Consider division or MPO/RPO distribution (= $200,000-300,000 per MPO/RPO)