dkt 064 decl of hansen re jnt mtn for prelim approval

Upload: merle-payne

Post on 24-Feb-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Dkt 064 Decl of Hansen Re Jnt Mtn for Prelim Approval

    1/5

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Duniyo Hussein, et al., on behalf of herselfand all others similarly situated, and the Rule23 Class,

    Plaintiffs,

    DECLARATION OF

    v. ADAM W. HANSEN

    Capital Building Services Group, Inc.,

    Defendant.________________________________________________________________________

    I, Adam W. Hansen, hereby declare the following:

    1. I am one of Plaintiffs Counsel in the above-captioned matter.

    2. I submit this declaration in support of the Parties Joint Motion for

    Preliminary Approval of the Proposed Class Action Settlement.

    3.

    With mediation pending, the parties entered into a private agreement to

    defer mailing the court-approved notice and toll the claims of all class members until

    after mediation.

    4. Because the discussions produced a settlement, Plaintiffs counsel did not

    send conditional certification notice to the class.

    5.

    The Parties have engaged in limited discovery.

    6. In anticipation of mediation, Capital produced all payroll and timekeeping

    data for all members of the class.

    Court File No. 15-CV-02498(SRN/BRT)

    CASE 0:15-cv-02498-SRN-BRT Document 64 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 5

  • 7/24/2019 Dkt 064 Decl of Hansen Re Jnt Mtn for Prelim Approval

    2/5

    2

    7. In addition, the parties agreed on a methodology whereby both parties

    could ask questions of the other parties in order to clarify points of dispute.

    8. During the period of discovery, for example, Defendant provided detailed

    information on the nature of its timekeeping and payroll data, where the data resides, and

    who may access or change the data.

    9. Defendant also provided discovery on Defendants policies related to

    payment, travel time, meal breaks, timekeeping, and providing access to paystubs.

    10. Last, Defendant produced detailed financial information relating to

    Capitals assets, liabilities, debts, accounts, and contractual relationships.

    11. The Parties agreed to defer further discovery and associated disputes in

    favor of settlement.

    12.

    In pursuing claims at issue in the Action, and in evaluating the merits of the

    settlement, Class Counsel have (1) reviewed thousands of pages of data and documents,

    (2) conducted over a dozen witness interviews, (3) held meetings and conferences

    between representatives of the Parties, (4) researched federal and Minnesota law, (5)

    investigated facts regarding the Class Members claims, (6) gathered declarations, (7)

    researched and investigated potential defenses to Plaintiffs claims, and (8) analyzed the

    damages incurred by the Class.

    13.

    On December 11, 2015, the Parties participated in a full-day mediation

    session conducted by the Honorable Arthur Boylan (Ret.).

    14.

    Following the mediation, the parties continued negotiating over a variety of

    sensitive monetary and non-monetary terms.

    CASE 0:15-cv-02498-SRN-BRT Document 64 Filed 02/16/16 Page 2 of 5

  • 7/24/2019 Dkt 064 Decl of Hansen Re Jnt Mtn for Prelim Approval

    3/5

    3

    15. On January 22, 2016, as a result of these arms length negotiations, the

    Parties agreed to the settlement.

    16. The Parties have worked diligently to resolve numerous issues regarding

    settlement. The Parties believe they are fully and adequately informed of all facts

    necessary to evaluate the case for settlement.

    17. Capital has provided the names, addresses, and last four digits of the social

    security number for all class members.

    18. The Parties have drafted a Class Notice which will be distributed by

    Plaintiffs, through the law firm of Nichols Kaster, PLLP and its attorneys, who through

    the instant Motion request to be appointed Class Counsel and Settlement Administrator in

    this case.

    19.

    Capitals Records identified 650 individuals who met the class definition.

    20. Each of the Named Plaintiffs has diligently participated in this case

    including answering undergoing detailed interviews, producing documents, and

    participating in a length mediation processand has assisted his or her attorneys in the

    drafting of the Complaint and prosecution of this litigation.

    21. Further, the Named Plaintiffs have no known conflicts of interest that

    would compromise their representation of the class in their best interest.

    22.

    Nichols Kaster, PLLP started in 1974, and presently employs twenty-six

    attorneys, as well as twelve additional staff and contract attorneys, and has been

    representing employees almost exclusively for 16 years. A large portion of Nichols

    CASE 0:15-cv-02498-SRN-BRT Document 64 Filed 02/16/16 Page 3 of 5

  • 7/24/2019 Dkt 064 Decl of Hansen Re Jnt Mtn for Prelim Approval

    4/5

    4

    Kasters practice is concentrated on representing employees in wage-and-hour class and

    collective actions.

    23. The firm is currently lead or co-counsel in approximately 84 class or

    collective actions in state and federal courts across the country.

    24. Paul Lukas is a partner with Nichols Kaster and an experienced

    employment litigator who has been practicing law for twenty-one years. Mr. Lukas has

    authored numerous articles, participated in numerous legal seminars and conventions on

    employment and trial practice issues, and is a frequent lecturer on current employment

    related topics.

    25. I am an Associate at Nichols Kaster. After graduating from the University

    of Minnesota Law School, I clerked for the Minnesota Supreme Court and the United

    States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. I joined Nichols Kaster in 2011, and since

    then my practice has focused almost exclusively on the representation of employees in

    high-impact individual and class litigation.

    26. Carl Engstrom is an associate at Nichols Kaster. Mr. Engstroms practice is

    focused exclusively on class-action litigation devoted to protecting workers lost wages

    and benefits.

    27. At this time, the Parties are unaware of any opposition to this settlement.

    28.

    Here, either method justifies the award. Plaintiffs counsels current lodestar

    exceeds $141,666.66.

    29.

    At present, Plaintiffs counsel has expended approximately $7,800 in

    litigation costs.

    CASE 0:15-cv-02498-SRN-BRT Document 64 Filed 02/16/16 Page 4 of 5

  • 7/24/2019 Dkt 064 Decl of Hansen Re Jnt Mtn for Prelim Approval

    5/5

    5

    30. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Parties Executed

    Settlement Agreement with Exhibits A and B.

    Dated: February 16, 2016 NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP

    s/Adam W. Hansen________________Adam W. Hansen, MN Bar No. 0391704

    CASE 0:15-cv-02498-SRN-BRT Document 64 Filed 02/16/16 Page 5 of 5