dmaic process illustration
DESCRIPTION
DMAICTRANSCRIPT
Six Sigma Overview
DEFINEStep 0: Project Selection
MEASURE Step 1. Select CTQ Characteristics
Step 2. Define Performance Standards
Step 3. Measurement Systems Analysis
ANALYZE
Step 4. Establish Process Capability
Step 5. Define Performance Objectives
Step 6. Identify Variation Sources
IMPROVEStep 7. Screen Potential Causes
Step 8. Discover Variable Relationships
Step 9. Establishing Operating Tolerances
CONTROLStep 10 Define and Validate the Measurement System on Xs
Step 11. Determine Process Capability
Step 12. Implement Process Control
The Practical Problem
The Statistical Problem
The Practical Solution
The Statistical Solution
The 12 Steps
Six Sigma Overview
Step 0: Defining our project...
g GE Electromaterials 10 Step Project Review Process
Selection PhaseSelection Phase 6 sigma owner6 sigma owner Decision MakerDecision Maker Information/ CriteriaInformation/ Criteria OutcomesOutcomes
1) Define Customer Needs
2) PrioritizeInitiatives
3) Define FunctionalArea of Focus
4) Key ProcessIdentification
6) Define SimpleProblem Statement
7) Identify MacroCTQs
8) Macro CTQFlowdown
9) Business Approval ofProject
5) Define Cost ofFailure/ FinancialImpact
Dashboard/FGI Survey Results
Business Quality Initiatives
Business Level CTQs
Business Level CTQ Flowdown
Impact of process on Business levelCTQs
Process Level CTQs
Process Level CTQ Flowdown
Correlation of project impact to Business Level CTQs
Plastics Measurements Guidelines
10) Kick-off Business Approval of Project
EMD’s 10-step process
Produc Quality vs Goal100% 100.00%
93.00%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
June July Aug Sep
Pro
d Q
ual
%
Prod Qual
Goal
0
25
60 75
90
On-Time Shipment
100
Now
Goal
Communications
0
25
60 75
90
Product Quality
100Now Goal
g GE Electromaterials Altron Dashboard
0
25
60 75
90
Documentation
100
Now Goal
0
25
60 75
90
Packaging
100Now Goal
On-Time Shipment Trend Documentation Trend Packaging Trend Product Quality Trend
Fail
Pass
Key
On-time( +5,0)
GETEK®Pre-preg
GETEK®M/L
Vacuum
Quantity
Meet Spec
Prepeg Test Dates
Color
Consistency•Thickness•Copper•Stamping•Diametric
Correct Mat’l
Certs (CSC)
Labels
Customer
Service
• Response Time• Confirmation by 3:00pm
• Responsiveness
39%
Aug 1997
36 59
19 24
17 35
59
59
59
1
0
0
59
59
0
0
59
59
0
0
59
59
0
4
98.5%
100%
Issue Resolution
Corrective Actions (CAR)Process Owner Status
1. On-Time Delivery 2. Labels
NoonanFerguson
In ProcessIn Process
Tech
Service
93%
OTS vs Goal
29% 33.00%39.00%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
June July Aug Sep
OTS
%
OTS
Goal
Documentation vs Goal100%
92.00%
98.50%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
June July Aug Sep
Doc
umen
tati
on %
Document
Goal
Packaging vs Goal100%
92.00%
100.00%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
June July Aug Sep
Pac
kagi
ng %
Packaging
Goal
Customer Dashboards
Cost of Failure
Team Selection & Timing
g GE Electromaterials Six Sigma
Project Contract1. The Project titled _______________________________ has been approved as a ( BB / GB ) Project.
The Black Belt assigned to this project is __________________________.
The Green Belt (if applicable) is ________________________.
The MBB is _____________________.
2. The initial Project completion date is set at ________________________.
3. The Black Belt is required to updated QPID to the initial level and coordinate with the MBB to update all further steps.
4. This project will be updated bi-weekly at the Six Sigma Project Review. The Black Belt is responsible for coordinatingteam efforts and educating the team on the process steps, as the projects evolves.
5. If any blockers are identified in the process, the following steps should be taken, in order:
a. Notify Black Belt: BB addresses situation with blocker.b. Notify MBB: MBB addresses situation with the blocker.c. Notify Staff at Six Sigma Project Review.
6. Other:
Green Belt Black Belt MBB Champion GM
Project Contract
Step 0: Project Selection
Six Sigma Overview
Step 1: Deciding where we start ...
Impo
rtan
ce
CTQ’s
Paperwork 1
Fa
bIn
terp
etat
ion
5 5
337878 8585
9
Sche
dulin
g
Ord
eren
try
23 3334 1114 5213 5213 42
Totals
Size Issues
Product IssuesQtyStampPackaging
Sp
ecia
lity
Pa
ckag
ing
Sh
ip
U
pdat
ing
Cps
/S
ales
Rep
3 321 111 119 111 119 62
30 88 47
9612349696
942545
112112
War
ehou
se/
Cut
Cen
ter
x xx
x x
xx x
x
QFD
ProductManager:
CTQs
Easy Readability Accuracy Complete Adhesiveness
Professional Bar Codes
U/LRequirements
Link to otherPaperwork on
Box
Variable ('Y'): Customer Satisfaction with Label
Font SizePlain EnglishData ArrangementLabel SizeText DirectionGE LogoNot Hand WrittenColor of Label/Text
Paper Matches ContentsQuantityLabel Matches All Other PaperworkCustomer Data CorrectLink to OrderInventoryComplete Required Fields
General Info: CustomerSpecific:EMD:
-Lot & Skid #-Req #SHIPPING:-Case # /Weight-Package SizePRODUCT:-Grade/Clad/Thick-Plain English/Cert- QTY /Size /Grain
Part NumberP/O NumberCust NameLocationCert/SpecDate (Ship)Due Date
Packing to Customer ShelfLife of the Sticker >1 yrReplaceability
GE LogoLaser QualityHQ infoColorsSize and SpacingBenchmark Competit ionMarketing Appeal
(R.W. Salter)
Customer/industry standardItems to be Bar Coded - shop movement/shipping - customer infoStandard Format - size/unobscured/qualityLink to GEMMSLink to Test Data:Futuristic/Cert
Min # of piecesLocation of LabelsConsistencyCompare with competitors
GETEK SalesTeam:CTQs
Easy Readability Accuracy Complete Adhesiveness
Professional Bar CodesU/L
Requirements
Link to otherPaperwork on
Box
Variable ('Y'): Customer Satisfaction with Label
Font SizePlain EnglishArrangement ofDataLabel SizeGE Logo: Relationto DataNot Hand Written
Paper Matches ContentsQuantityLabel Matches All Other PaperworkCustomer Data CorrectLink to OrderInventoryComplete Required Fields
General Info: CustomerSpecific:Skid #
Req # /Item Date /Case # /Weight Package Size Grade /Clad /Thick Plain English /Cert QTY /Size /GrainWarehouse Locator
Part NumberP/O Number/ItemCustomer NameLocationCert/SpecDate (Ship)Due DateManufacturing
Packing to CustomerShelf
Life of the Sticker >1yr
Replaceability
Flatness of Package
GE LogoLaser QualityHQ info (address/phone)Black/WhiteOverall Size and SpacingBenchmark Competition
3 of 9 Standard - customer/industry standardItems to be Bar Coded - shop movement/shipping - customer infoStandard Format - size/unobscured/qualityLink to Test Data - Futuristic/Cert
Minimize the # of pieces
Location of Labels
Consistency
Compare to competitors
Registered Trademark-GETEK-GEPEG
Shop Floor/Transportation:
CTQs
Easy Readability Accuracy Complete
Professional Bar CodesLink to other
Paperwork onBox
Variable ('Y'): Customer Satisfaction with Label
Font SizeLabel SizeGE Logo: Relationto DataNot Hand WrittenSpacing for QTY (able to change)
Data Accuracy from Customer ServiceShould have Packer/FCO fill out Packing LabelBar Code from Shop OrderRouting InformationInformation flow from Line to Label process
EMD: - Lot # /Skid # /Oper - Req # /ItemSHIPPING: - Date /Case # /Weight - Package SizePRODUCT: - Grade /Clad /Thick - Plain English /Cert - QTY /Size /Grain
GE LogoLaser QualityHQ info (address/phone)Overall Size and SpacingBenchmark Competition
Customer standardItems to be Bar Coded - shop movement/order - customer info/CPSStandard Format - size/unobscured/qualityLink to Test Data - Futuristic/Cert
Minimize the # of pieces
Location of Labels
Consistency
Compare to competitors
PhotocircuitsGlen Cove:
CTQs
Easy Readability Accuracy Complete Adhesiveness
Professional Bar CodesLink to other
Paperwork onBox
Variable ('Y'): Customer Satisfaction with Label
Font SizePlain EnglishArrangement of DataLabel SizeNot Hand Written
Paper Matches ContentsQuantityLabel Matches All Other PaperworkCustomer Data CorrectLink to OrderInventoryComplete Required Fields
General Info: CustomerSpecific:Skid #
Req # /Item Date /Case # /Weight Package Size Grade /Clad /Thick Plain English /Cert QTY /Size /GrainWarehouse Locator
Part NumberP/O Number/ItemCustomer NameLocationCert/Spec
Packing to CustomerShelf
Life of the Sticker >1yr
GE LogoLaser QualityBlack/WhiteOverall Size and SpacingBenchmark Competition
3 of 9 StandardItems to be Bar Coded - customer info - not on labelStandard Format - size/unobscured/qualityLink to Test Data - Futuristic/Cert
Location of Labels
Consistency
Compare to competitors
CTQ Flowdown
Example - Ice Maker
GE PlasticsF.M.E.A.Form
Elim. need foradjustment
Design heaterfor more evendistribution
Redesign crimpor proc. check
Redesign sys.foreffic. ice release
Customer educ.;Change detectionmethod
560
60
160
120
14
7
3
4
4
1
Water valveadjustment setincorrectly
Freezer settingtoo high
Lead wires notcrimped properly
Coil burned out
Customer abuse
10
10
10
10
7
ProcessStep/PartNumber
PotentialFailure Mode
PotentialFailure Effects
SEV
PotentialCauses
OCC
CurrentControls
DET
RPN
ActionsRecommended
Dispensermust function50,000 cyclesbefore failure
Cam & geariced up
Broken motor
Feeler arm bent
No ice
No ice
Continuous ice
8
2
4
3
2
Visual inspect
Visual inspect
FMEA
Notan
interrogation!!
Step 1. Select CTQ Characteristics
Six Sigma Overview
Step 2: What is a defect...
RECEIVE ORDER
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
IS THERE INV.IN WAREHOUSE
CUT THERE
YES
PULL FROMWHSE
CUT AT SERV. CENTER
NOSEND TO MANU.TO CUT AT COSH
DO WE HAVEMATERIAL
CUT IN COSHOCTON
GIVE COMMIT DATE
NO
CUSTOMER SERVICE/ORDER ENTRY MANUFACTURING
DO WEHAVETREATEDMAT’L
PRESS, FAB
NOIS THERECLOTH?
GIVE RECOMMIT DATE
NO
NO
GET CLOTH, TREAT, PRESS,FAB
YES
IS THERETREATERTIME
YES
TREAT, PRESS,FAB
DOESTHIS ORDERTAKE PRIORITY
YES
TREAT, PRESS,FAB
NOPUT IN SCHEDULE,TREAT, PRESS, FAB
2ND (RE-) RECOMMITDATE GIVEN
IF WE HAVE ANY ISSUES IN FAB PREVENTING HITTING GOAL, SUCH AS;“HOT ORDERS”, DOWNTIME, LOW PRODUCTION, OT, OR BAD SCHEDULES,THEN A 3RD RE-RE-RECOMMIT DATE MAY BE GIVEN
Process Mapping
L100 Worksheet - Sigma Scorecard for Attributes Confidence Limits (alpha= 0.95 )
on DPMO on Sigma
CTQ D U OP TOP DPU DPO DPMO Yield Shift Sigma L.T. Z-value lower upper lower upper
carbon Black 2 100 1 100 0.020 0.020 20,000 98.00% 1.50 3.55 2.05 2,431 70,384 2.97 4.32
example 2 34 59 1 59 0.576 0.576 576,271 42.37% 1.50 0.00 -0.19 440,672 703,950 0.00 0.00
example 3 1 213 1 213 0.005 0.005 4,695 99.53% 1.50 4.10 2.60 119 25,879 3.45 5.18
example 4 22 289 1 289 0.076 0.076 76,125 92.39% 1.50 2.93 1.43 48,320 112,987 2.71 3.16
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aTotals 59 n/a n/a 661 n/a 0.089 89,259 91.07% 1.50 2.85 1.35 68641.3 113627 2.71 2.99
L100 / L2 Spreadsheet
ZST
Def
inin
g D
efec
ts,
Opp
ortu
nitie
s, U
nits
Pa
rt #
Pa
pe
rwo
rk
QT
Y
Da
tes
no
t CP
S
BO
M
Ba
r co
de
Pra
eg
itze
r
US
Cir
cuits
LA
Wa
reh
ou
se
HIS
CO
Tre
nd
Pyc
on EC
D
Pe
ave
y
We
sta
k
Pa
rlin
He
wle
tt P
ack
ard
Win
on
ics
Litt
on
PC
C
Pa
m E
ng
Altr
on
Cir
cuitw
ise
Ph
oto
circ
uits
Me
rix
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pareto of Defects
Step 2. Define Performance Standards
Six Sigma Overview
Step 3: Is the measurement real...Gage Repeatability & Reproducibility Analysis:
Standard GRR (Long Form) NOTE: The defaults of the following worksheet are intended for 3 Oper, 3 Trials and 10 Samples (Parts).This worksheet is also flexible to less number of Oper, Trials and SamplesMake sure you use the appropriate constants (D4, K1 and K2), if you use less number of trials or samples.
Operator A B CSample # Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Range Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Range Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Range
1 5.70 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.75 5.75 5.75 0.00 5.75 5.75 5.75 0.002 4.20 4.20 4.20 0.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 0.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 0.003 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.004 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.005 1.80 1.80 1.80 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.006 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.007 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.008 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.009 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Totals 17.60 17.60 17.60 0.00 17.75 17.75 17.75 0.00 17.75 17.75 17.75 0.00Daily Ave. 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22Daily Std. 1.81 1.81 1.81 0.00 1.82 1.82 1.82 0.00 1.82 1.82 1.82 0.00Final Ave. Xa 2.20 Ra 0.00 Xb 2.22 Rb 0.00 Xc 2.22 Rc 0.00
Ra 0.00 # Trials D4 (R) x (D4) = UCLr Max X 2.22Rb 0.00 2 3.27 UCLr = 0.00 Min X 2.20Rc 0.00 3 2.58 X Diff 0.02
Sum 0.00 Mean 2.21R 0.00 UCL LCL Stdev 1.71
Tolerance 0.25 -0.25
Measurement Analysis % Tolerance Analysis
Repeatability - Equipment Variability (E.V.) Trials 2 3 % E.V. = 100((E.V.)/(Tolerance))E.V. = (R) x (K1) K1 4.56 3.05 % E.V. = 0.00E.V. = 0.00
Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (A.V.) Trials 2 3 % A.V. = 100((A.V.)/(Tolerance))A.V. = ((Xdiff * k2)^2 - ((E.V.)^2/(n x f)))^.5 K2 3.65 2.70 % A.V. = 10.12
A.V. = 0.05 n = number of parts 8f = number of trials 3
Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) % R & R = 100((R&R)/(Tolerance)R & R = ((E.V)^2 + (A.V.)^2))^.5 % R & R = 10.12
R & R = 0.05
GageR & R of 10.12%
Fully Acceptable Measurement System for the measurement ofdowntime.
Identifying if how we measure downtime is accurate!
gEMD
STAT Simulator
(2 and t tests)created by:M.Shoen Davis, Erik W. Ferguson & Patrick M. Noonan
Fill boxes with dataThe boxes have solution
Gage R & R
Other Statistics
if Gage R & R > 30%or
fails other testsFIX THE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
Misc:Tolerance:Reported by:Date of study:Gage name:
3
2
1
21
Xbar Chart by Operator
Sam
ple
Mea
n
X=1.875
3.0SL=2.815
-3.0SL=0.9347
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
21
R Chart by Operator
Sam
ple
Ran
ge
R=0.5000
3.0SL=1.634
-3.0SL=0.000
352351
2.5
2.0
1.5
Part
OperatorOperator*Part Interaction
Ave
rage
12
21
3
2
1
Oper
Response BY Operator
352351
3
2
1
Part
Response BY Part
%Total Var%Study Var
Part-to-PartReprodRepeatGage R&R
100908070605040302010
0
Components of Variation
Per
cent
Gage R&R (Xbar/R) for Data
Step 3. Measurement Systems Analysis
Six Sigma Overview
Days to Replenish
2124 25
28
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
May Jun Jul Aug* Avg Days to replenish based on 21 day "pipeline"
Day
s Days
GOAL
Days to Replenish
2124 25
28
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
May Jun Jul Aug* Avg Days to replenish based on 21 day "pipeline"
Day
s Days
GOAL
Step 4: What is the best @ status quo...
403020100
1.0
0.5
0.0
I and MR Chart
Observ.
X=0.5221
3.0SL=0.9827
-3.0SL=0.06155
0.60.50.40.30.20.10.0
R=0.1732
3.0SL=0.5658
-3.0SL=0.000
10
1.410300.48970
Potential (ST) CapabilityProcess Tolerance
Specifications
III
III
10
1.041240.00299
Actual (LT) CapabilityProcess Tolerance
Specifications
III
III
Mean
StDev
Z.USL
Z.LSL
Z.Bench
Z.Shift
P.USL
P.LSL
P.Total
Yield
PPM
Cp
Cpk
Pp
Ppk
LTST
Capability Indices
Data Source:Time Span:Data Trace:
0.92
0.96
3893.15
99.6107
0.003893
0.001187
0.002706
-2.33299
2.66120
3.03888
2.78146
0.17181
0.52211
1.04
1.09
371378
62.8622
0.371378
0.000000
0.371378
-2.33299
0.32821
6.23593
0.32821
0.15234
0.95000
Report 2: Process Capability for % opt
0.750.700.650.600.550.500.450.400.35
Lower SpecLower Spec
s
Mean-3s
Mean+3s
Mean
n
k
LSL
USL
Targ
Cpm
Cpk
CPL
CPU
Cp
Short-Term Capability
125000
13641
*
*
12.50
1.36
*
*
Obs
PPM<LSL Exp
Obs
PPM>USL Exp
Obs
%<LSL Exp
Obs
%>USL Exp
0.049482
0.460783
0.757676
0.609229
16.0
*
0.5
*
0.9
*
0.74
0.74
*
*
Line 7 Cpk
Cp Cpk Ppk
May Jun Jul Aug0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% O
TD
May Jun Jul Aug
OTD to Dynacircuits (Direct)
Hisco
Coshocton
May Jun Jul Aug0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% O
TD
May Jun Jul Aug
OTD to Dynacircuits (Direct)
Hisco
Coshocton
May Jun Jul Aug
15.00
24.98
8.10
23.30
7.70
21.45
7.15
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
# o
f Tu
rns
May Jun Jul Aug
Inventory Turns Total Turns
Annualized
May Jun Jul Aug
15.00
24.98
8.10
23.30
7.70
21.45
7.15
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
# o
f Tu
rns
May Jun Jul Aug
Inventory Turns Total Turns
Annualized
Run ChartsHistogramsBox PlotsControl Charts
Step 4. Establish Process Capability
Six Sigma Overview
EMD Simulator Ho:
Proportion Probability Ha:
OBSERVED PROPORTIONfactor complaints Pounds chi-2 data
obs White 62.000 10.000 2.880expected 50.000
obs Black 33.000 8.000 1.225expected 40.000
obs Red 3.000 1.000 0.800expected 5.000
obs Yellow 2.000 1.000 1.800 # of rows 4 D.F. 3expected 5.000 # of columns 1
obs 0.000 Alpha Value 0.1expected 0.000
obs 0.000 Critical Value 6.251expected 0.000 Computed Chi 6.705
TOTALS 100.000 20.000 6.705 Acceptablity Reject Ho
Step 5: Who is the best and why...
Prepreg
• Actual Size sample• Our lot #’s• Their PO#• In cardboard on top of each skid• Our Lot# and CofC on each sample
CardboardCarrier forSample
763211-22Y
Handwritten LOT #
Certificate of Conformance/ Test Results
Certificate of Compliance Attached to the CardboardTape on 3 edges to make an envelopeshrink-wrap or plastic wrap around sample carrier
Benchmark- Allied Signal/Polyclad
Laminate
• 11x11 sample per lot• Our lot #’s• Their PO#• In a box, first off the truck, all samples for the 38 skids on the truck• Our Lot# and CofC on each sample• No More than 2 Lots per box
11 x 11sample of laminate
762203-11Y
Handwritten LOT #
Certificate of ConformanceTest Report
Certificate of Compliance + test results taped to the sample
Benchmark the Competition
Benchmark Outside Market
EMD One Sample ------ One Tailed Test Simulator1) Describe
Ho:Ha:
2) Confidence Level 95 Calculated alpha level 0.05
3) # of tails 1 Alpha level 0.1
4) Enter Standard Value of comparison 70
5) Enter sample data1 60 6) Compute 8) Critical t-value 1.7958842 66 AVG 78.173 70 Std Dev 12.73 9) Acceptability reject Ho4 74 Sample Size 12.005 66 D.F. 11.00
6 807 92 7) Compute t-value8 100 2.22
9 9510 8011 7012 851314
Hypothesis Testing:Chi-Square, t-testF-test
What is the Objective?
Material LoadingTransfer/
Align TableTransfer/Shear 1
Transfer/Inspection 1
Transfer/Inspection 2
Packing
Line-7 in DFT Environment
Operators move where demand is needed (if Material Loading is required, operator shifts); Resources added for slip sheet requirement
= staffed position= additional position for cut piece or slip sheet
= KANBAN (material)
PSO
RFO RFO RFO RFO(RFO)
Available Maint Support
ProcessContinuous Operation During Scheduled Work DayStart-up Optimized: Using Multiple OperatorsChange-over: Immediate Change from Part to PartOperators “Float” from Position Based on NeedAdditional Resources added Based on DemandCycle-time Reduced to Queue Time at Shear 1
GAPMachine Stops for Breaks & Material LoadingOperator Start-up in SequenceShut-down for Change in End Item Part/PaperworkOperators Rotate PositionsAdditional Resources added Based on Cut-SizeCycle-time at Through-put Time+ Down Time
Loader"B"
Loader"A"
AlignTable
Shear1
Set-up
Shear#1
Shear1
Transfer
Shear#2
SCRAP
SCRAP
Line 7:Cut Piece Flow
#3
PANEL
conveyor
Inspectpoint
#1
wheel
Inspectpoint
#2
conveyorStacker
paperwork
#1
#5
#2
#4
packs
LoaderMat'l
helps
Empties Scrap #1 & #2
doespaperwork
operatespanel
Establishing our goals to run cut-piece and full size
Loader"B"
Loader"A"
AlignTable
Shear1
Set-up
Shear#1
Shear1
Transfer
Shear#2
SCRAP
SCRAP
Inspec tionTrans fer
FG
FG
SCRAP
Line 7 Full Size Flow
#2
#3
#4Float
#1
PANEL
OperatePanel
Inspection #1
Inspect/Slip SheetEmpty Shear 2 Scrap
Inspect/Slip SheetEmpty Shear 1 Scrap
RotatesLoader
Mat'l
EmptiesFG Scrap
paperwork
doespaperwork
Step 5. Define Performance Objectives
Six Sigma Overview
Manpower
Material
Measurement Machine
MethodEnvironment
Raw GlassInventoryErrors
• Lack of audit trail- non-lot specific at work centers
• Barcode not working
• Computer Availability•Wrong input QTY based on measure
• Supervision (audit)
• ownership of defect material• PD/BOM ownership
• Data entry procedures• material movement procedures
• operators do not input• input errors
• Supervision (knowledge)
• tie from error to cause• top-down communication
• Report total transactions• Scrap report
• BOM incorrect• Large workstation size (DOCK)
• Operator timely input• Metering of Acetone
• QC/Obsolete Material in inventory• Large W/O size
• Supervision (routine)• UOM (phantoms)
PFD #4WASTE TREATMENT OPERATION
POLYMERMIX/HOLDTANK
LAMELLASETTLINGSECTION
INPUTSECTION
FLOCCULATIONSECTION
WESTLAGOON
EASTLAGOON
SANDFILTER
CLEANWATERTANK
POTW
WASTEWATER
SLUDGETO LANDFILL
LAMELLA
PFD# 3MANUFACTURE of the INSULATING MATERIAL
AIR CLASSIFIER
FURNACE
BAGHOUSEMINERALUNLOAD
DI WATERQUENCH
DI WATER
GRINDER
INSULATINGMATERIALPRODUCTION
SHIP TOCUSTOMERS
SLURRYPREPARATION
WASTEGENERATION
WASTEGENERATION
WASTEGENERATION
PREPAREROLLS
HCl NaOH
Identified the select few
Step 6: Why aren’t we there yet...
Process Map VariationFishbone Diagram
ANOVA
Regression
Analysis
GAPAnalysis
Step 6. Identify Variation Sources
Six Sigma Overview
Step 7: What variables influence the gap...
Screening DOEs
Step 7. Screen Potential Causes
Six Sigma Overview
Step 8: Finding the best settings...
Optimization EquationOptimization DOEs
Step 8. Discover Variable Relationships
Six Sigma Overview
Step 9: Putting tolerances on knobs...
Defining the rules of the game!
Putting the boundarys around our “x’s”
Step 9. Establishing Operating Tolerances
Six Sigma Overview
Step 10: Double check the measurement...
Gage Repeatability & Reproducibility Analysis:Standard GRR (Long Form) NOTE: The defaults of the following worksheet are intended for 3 Oper, 3 Trials and 10 Samples (Parts).This worksheet is also flexible to less number of Oper, Trials and SamplesMake sure you use the appropriate constants (D4, K1 and K2), if you use less number of trials or samples.
Operator A B CSample # Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Range Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Range Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Range
1 5.70 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.75 5.75 5.75 0.00 5.75 5.75 5.75 0.002 4.20 4.20 4.20 0.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 0.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 0.003 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.004 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.005 1.80 1.80 1.80 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.006 1.60 1.60 1.60 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.007 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.008 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.009 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Totals 17.60 17.60 17.60 0.00 17.75 17.75 17.75 0.00 17.75 17.75 17.75 0.00
Daily Ave. 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22Daily Std. 1.81 1.81 1.81 0.00 1.82 1.82 1.82 0.00 1.82 1.82 1.82 0.00Final Ave. Xa 2.20 Ra 0.00 Xb 2.22 Rb 0.00 Xc 2.22 Rc 0.00
Ra 0.00 # Trials D4 (R) x (D4) = UCLr Max X 2.22Rb 0.00 2 3.27 UCLr = 0.00 Min X 2.20Rc 0.00 3 2.58 X Diff 0.02
Sum 0.00 Mean 2.21R 0.00 UCL LCL Stdev 1.71
Tolerance 0.25 -0.25
Measurement Analysis % Tolerance Analysis
Repeatability - Equipment Variability (E.V.) Trials 2 3 % E.V. = 100((E.V.)/(Tolerance))E.V. = (R) x (K1) K1 4.56 3.05 % E.V. = 0.00E.V. = 0.00
Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (A.V.) Trials 2 3 % A.V. = 100((A.V.)/(Tolerance))A.V. = ((Xdiff * k2)^2 - ((E.V.)^2/(n x f)))^.5 K2 3.65 2.70 % A.V. = 10.12
A.V. = 0.05 n = number of parts 8f = number of trials 3
Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) % R & R = 100((R&R)/(Tolerance)R & R = ((E.V)^2 + (A.V.)^2))^.5 % R & R = 10.12
R & R = 0.05
GageR & R of 10.12%
Fully Acceptable Measurement System for the measurement ofdowntime.
Identifying if how we measure downtime is accurate!
Gage R & R on the X’s
Misc:Tolerance:Reported by:Date of study:Gage name:
3
2
1
21
Xbar Chart by Operator
Sam
ple
Mea
n
X=1.875
3.0SL=2.815
-3.0SL=0.9347
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
21
R Chart by Operator
Sam
ple
Ran
ge
R=0.5000
3.0SL=1.634
-3.0SL=0.000
352351
2.5
2.0
1.5
Part
OperatorOperator*Part Interaction
Ave
rage
12
21
3
2
1
Oper
Response BY Operator
352351
3
2
1
Part
Response BY Part
%Total Var%Study Var
Part-to-PartReprodRepeatGage R&R
100908070605040302010
0
Components of Variation
Per
cent
Gage R&R (Xbar/R) for Data
Step 10 Define and Validate the Measurement System on Xs
Six Sigma Overview
Step 11: Finding our new “best”...
403020100
1.0
0.5
0.0
I and MR Chart
Observ.
X=0.5221
3.0SL=0.9827
-3.0SL=0.06155
0.60.50.40.30.20.10.0
R=0.1732
3.0SL=0.5658
-3.0SL=0.000
10
1.410300.48970
Potential (ST) CapabilityProcess Tolerance
Specifications
III
III
10
1.041240.00299
Actual (LT) CapabilityProcess Tolerance
Specifications
III
III
Mean
StDev
Z.USL
Z.LSL
Z.Bench
Z.Shift
P.USL
P.LSL
P.Total
Yield
PPM
Cp
Cpk
Pp
Ppk
LTST
Capability Indices
Data Source:Time Span:Data Trace:
0.92
0.96
3893.15
99.6107
0.003893
0.001187
0.002706
-2.33299
2.66120
3.03888
2.78146
0.17181
0.52211
1.04
1.09
371378
62.8622
0.371378
0.000000
0.371378
-2.33299
0.32821
6.23593
0.32821
0.15234
0.95000
Report 2: Process Capability for % opt
0.750.700.650.600.550.500.450.400.35
Lower SpecLower Spec
s
Mean-3s
Mean+3s
Mean
n
k
LSL
USL
Targ
Cpm
Cpk
CPL
CPU
Cp
Short-Term Capability
125000
13641
*
*
12.50
1.36
*
*
Obs
PPM<LSL Exp
Obs
PPM>USL Exp
Obs
%<LSL Exp
Obs
%>USL Exp
0.049482
0.460783
0.757676
0.609229
16.0
*
0.5
*
0.9
*
0.74
0.74
*
*
Line 7 Cpk
Cp Cpk
Step 11. Determine Process Capability
Six Sigma Overview
Step 12: Locking down the changes...
ReceiveOrder
Cut @ServiceCenter
Yes
No
Cut @ServiceCenter
Cut FromDrop-off
Yes
No
Cut fromDrop-off
PerfectYield
Yes
No
Cut on FABLine
100%Pattern
Yes
No
Cut on FABLine
YieldLoss Paid
for
Yes
No
YieldLoss< 1%
No
Yes
Cut on FABLine
Cut on FABLine: Notify
Finance/Spreadsheet
Mfg MgrApproval
Yes
Cut on FABLine
No
NotifyCustomerService
Cut fromQC-40
Yes
Cut on FABLine: Ensure
Coded forScrap Loss
No
Cut on FABLine
UsableDrop
No
Yes
Send Drop toServiceCenter/
Prime Mat'lInventory
Salvage
g GE Electromaterials FABRICATION YIELDStep 12: Implement Process Controls
Controls Implemented to Maintain Level1) Business decision to be made by the Champion (Manufacturing
Manager) for any order which CPV will be greater than 1%
2) All loads that have a QC-40 (Dispositioned) are coded at scheduling toensure appropriate financial category for loss
3) All orders that customer is known to pay for the yield loss are removed from the CPV equation (GETEK is biggest pay-off)
4) All orders are tested for patterning regardless of cutting history
5) Implemented weekly Manufacturing Dashboard to ensure process maintains in control.
A IM C
Final CPV Process
Defined Process ChecksGE Electromaterials
Manufacturing 2Q est
Cut Piece Variance (July 97)
Manufacturing Dashboard
30
15
0 -10
-20
Cut Piece Var
$ MFW 28
-30
Now
Goal
2Q by FW in $M
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Action ItemsItem Owner Timing $ (%) Impact Status/IssuesRecapture QC loss D. Gonzalez/J. Lee Monthly $14,308 MTD Pending EOW CloseGETEK Credit J.Lee/T.King Weekly $15,825 QTD Pending EOM BookingRecapture CPV Paid D.A.G./J. Lee Monthly $13,916 MTD Pending EOM Bookingby Cust.
150
100
50 0
-100
Cut Piece Var
(Gross) $ M
July
-175
Now
Goal
MAJOR ISSUES$ 1,421 NON-PATTERNABLE THIN
M/L$ 10,157 GETEK CPV FW28$ 15,825 GETEK credit: JUNE$ 8,372 PAID BY CUST.$ 6,640 QC MAT’L USED$12,331 SALVAGE DROPS USED
2Q Goal:$448M$403Mstretch
A IM C
$ -36,326 = -1.2%
$-10,286 =-.4%
FY97 by Month (NET) in $M
-300
-200
-100
0
100
Jan
Mar
May Ju
l
Sep
No
v
Actual
Goal
ADJUSTED
QTD $-36,326J UL= -36K AUG= SEP=
e
Internal Dashboard Created
ISO9000 Documentation
Audit Plan
Step 12. Implement Process Control