doc.: ieee 802.11-07/2082r2 submission july 2007 neeraj k. sharma, intel corporationslide 1 tgt july...

40
July 2007 Neera j K. Sharm Slide 1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2 Submission TGT July 2007 San Francisco Meeting Slides Date: 2007-07-16 N am e C om pany A ddress Phone em ail N eerajK .Sharm a Intel Corporation 2111 N E 25 th Avn., H illsboro, O R 97124 503-712-7458 neeraj.k.sharma@intel .com Authors:

Upload: eugene-norton

Post on 04-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

TGT July 2007 San Francisco Meeting SlidesDate: 2007-07-16

Name Company Address Phone email

Neeraj K. Sharma Intel Corporation

2111 NE 25th Avn., Hillsboro, OR 97124

503-712-7458 [email protected]

Authors:

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Welcome to TGT Evaluation of 802.11

Wireless Performance

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Highlights of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards

– Participants have a duty to tell the IEEE if they know (based on personal awareness) of potentially Essential Patent Claims they or their employer own

– Participants are encouraged to tell the IEEE if they know of potentially Essential Patent Claims owned by others

• This encouragement is particularly strong as the third party may not be a participant in the standards process– Working Group required to request assurance– Early assurance is encouraged– Terms of assurance shall be either:

• Reasonable and nondiscriminatory, with or without monetary compensation; or,• A statement of non-assertion of patent rights

– Assurances• Shall be provided on the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved LOA form• May optionally include not-to-exceed rates, terms, and conditions• Shall not be circumvented through sale or transfer of patents• Shall be brought to the attention of any future assignees or transferees• Shall apply to Affiliates unless explicitly excluded• Are irrevocable once submitted and accepted• Shall be supplemented if Submitter becomes aware of other potential Essential Patent Claims

– A “Blanket Letter of Assurance” may be provided at the option of the patent holder– A patent holder has no duty to perform a patent search– Full policy available at http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

6.2 Policy

IEEE standards may be drafted in terms that include the use of Essential Patent Claims. If the IEEE receives notice that a [Proposed] IEEE Standard may require the use of a potential Essential Patent Claim, the IEEE shall request licensing assurance, on the IEEE Standards Board approved Letter of Assurance form, from the patent holder or patent applicant. The IEEE shall request this assurance without coercion.

The Submitter of the Letter of Assurance may, after Reasonable and Good Faith Inquiry, indicate it is not aware of any Patent Claims that the Submitter may own, control, or have the ability to license that might be or become Essential Patent Claims. If the patent holder or patent applicant provides an assurance, it should do so as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided prior to the Standards Board’s approval of the standard. This assurance shall be provided prior to a reaffirmation if the IEEE receives notice of a potential Essential Patent Claim after the standard’s approval or a prior reaffirmation. An asserted potential Essential Patent Claim for which an assurance cannot be obtained (e.g., a Letter of Assurance is not provided or the Letter of Assurance indicates that assurance is not being provided) shall be referred to the Patent Committee.

A Letter of Assurance shall be either:

a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the Submitter without conditions will not enforce any present or future Essential Patent Claims against any person or entity making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, distributing, or implementing a compliant implementation of the standard; or

b) A statement that a license for a compliant implementation of the standard will be made available to an unrestricted number of applicants on a worldwide basis without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination. At its sole option, the Submitter may provide with its assurance any of the following: (i) a not-to-exceed license fee or rate commitment, (ii) a sample license agreement, or (iii) one or more material licensing terms.

IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Copies of an Accepted LOA may be provided to the working group, but shall not be discussed, at any standards working group meeting.

The Submitter and all Affiliates (other than those Affiliates excluded in a Letter of Assurance) shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights in any Essential Patent Claims that are the subject of such Letter of Assurance that they hold, control, or have the ability to license with the intent of circumventing or negating any of the representations and commitments made in such Letter of Assurance.

The Submitter of a Letter of Assurance shall agree (a) to provide notice of a Letter of Assurance either through a Statement of Encumbrance or by binding any assignee or transferee to the terms of such Letter of Assurance; and (b) to require its assignee or transferee to (i) agree to similarly provide such notice and (ii) to bind its assignees or transferees to agree to provide such notice as described in (a) and (b).

This assurance shall apply to the Submitter and its Affiliates except those Affiliates the Submitter specifically excludes on the relevant Letter of Assurance.

If, after providing a Letter of Assurance to the IEEE, the Submitter becomes aware of additional Patent Claim(s) not already covered by an existing Letter of Assurance that are owned, controlled, or licensable by the Submitter that may be or become Essential Patent Claim(s) for the same IEEE Standard but are not the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, then such Submitter shall submit a Letter of Assurance stating its position regarding enforcement or licensing of such Patent Claims. For the purposes of this commitment, the Submitter is deemed to be aware if any of the following individuals who are from, employed by, or otherwise represent the Submitter have personal knowledge of additional potential Essential Patent Claims, owned or controlled by the Submitter, related to a [Proposed] IEEE Standard and not already the subject of a previously submitted Letter of Assurance: (a) past or present participants in the development of the [Proposed] IEEE Standard, or (b) the individual executing the previously submitted Letter of Assurance.

IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

The assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal.

The IEEE is not responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those Patent Claims, or for determining whether any licensing terms or conditions are reasonable or non-discriminatory.

Nothing in this policy shall be interpreted as giving rise to a duty to conduct a patent search. No license is implied by the submission of a Letter of Assurance.

In order for IEEE’s patent policy to function efficiently, individuals participating in the standards development process: (a) shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware and that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents; and (b) should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance.

IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

CALL FOR ESSENTIAL PATENTS BY CHAIR

Are there any patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that the participant believes may be essential for the use of that standard?

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings

• All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.

• Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.

• Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.

– Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.

• Technical considerations remain primary focus

• Don’t discuss fixing product prices, allocation of customers, or dividing sales markets.

• Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.

• Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object.

---------------------------------------------------------------

If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at [email protected] or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html

See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

IEEE 802 and 802.11 Policies and Procedures

• IEEE CODE OF ETHICS

• IEEE-STANDARDS ASSOCIATION (IEEE-SA) AFFILATION FAQ

• IEEE-SA ANTITRUST AND COMPETITION POLICY

• IEEE-SA LETTER OF ASSURANCE (LOA) FORM

• IEEE-SA STANDARDS BOARD PATENT COMMITTEE (PATCOM) INFORMATION

• IEEE-SA PATENT POLICY

• IEEE-SA PATENT FAQ

• IEEE 802 LAN/MAN STANDARDS COMMITTEE POLICIES & PROCEDURES

• IEEE 802.11 WORKING GROUP POLICIES & PROCEDURES

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Proposed Agenda for San Francisco Meeting1. Call to Order2. Appoint secretary3. Policies and procedures

– CALL FOR ESSENTIAL PATENTS BY CHAIR

4. Approve Agenda5. Approve minutes

– May 2007 Montreal Meeting – 11-07-0798-01-000t– May 31, 2007 Teleconference – 11-07-1993-00-000t– June 14, 2007 Teleconference – 11-07-2001-00-000t– June 28, 2007 Teleconference – 11-07-2075-00-000t– July 12, 2007 Teleconference – 11-07-2118-00-000t

6. Chair’s comments – Welcome, Status, Review Objectives7. Call for presentations resolving comments

1. “Annex B Comment resolution,” Dennis W., 11-07/2188r1 (45min, Tues AM2)2. “LB 101 Comment Resolution Proposal Section 4” Fadh P., 11-07/2205r0 (1hour, Wed AM1)3. “Proposal for resolving comments on LB 101,” Neeraj S., 11-07/2120r1 (1hour, Tue PM2)4. “Section 3 (Definitions) LB 101 Comment Resolution” Marc E., 11-07/2216r0 (45min, Wed AM1)5. “Comment resolution for CID 419,” Marc E., 11-07/2234r0 (10min, Thurs AM1)6. “Comment resolution addressing LOS definition,” Marc E., 11-07/2230r0 (10min, Thurs AM1)7. “LB 101 Proposal for comment resolution Section 4,” Mark K. /Dalton V., 11-07/2226r0 (30min, Thurs AM1)8. “LB 101 comment resolution proposal for Clause 4,” Uriel L., 11-07/2253r0 (30 min, Thurs AM1)

8. Editor’s report9. Motion to accept proposed resolutions in comment spreadsheet

• 11-07-0659-09-000t-LB101-Comment-Resolution.xls

10. Comment resolution11. New Business

• Telecons• Ad-hoc meeting• TGT Standards Process Milestones

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Attendance Reminder

• Attendance recording: – http://newton/– Must register before logging attendance– Must log attendance during each 2 hour session

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Be Aware…

• The conference center is accessible to the public• Do not leave your laptop or personal items

unattended in meeting rooms• You must be wearing your badge while attending

the meetings

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Public Document Server

• You can access the Server via your Browser at:https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents

• Instructions can be found in document:11-07-0767-00-0000-the-new-ieee-802.11-document-system.ppt

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Meeting Schedule for week

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday

8:00 – 10:00 TGT TGT

BREAK

10:30 – 12:30 TGT

LUNCH

1:30 – 3:30 TGT

BREAK

4:00 – 6:00 TGT

DINNER

7:30 – 9:30

TGT Ad Hoc 8:00 – 11:00

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

July Meeting Objectives

• Comment resolution

• Hear presentations

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Progress Since Montreal Meeting

• Four telecons held– Resolved 22 technical comments

• Latest comment resolution spreadsheet: 11-07/0659r9– Includes the comments resolved during the July 12th, 2007 telecon

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Process for Resolving Comments

• Follow the same process we have used in telecons– Discuss the comment (limit the discussion to 10 minutes)

– If there is consensus, we will mark the CID as “Accept, Decline, or Counter (provide resolution text).” Otherwise defer the comment

– Before the end of the session, we will affirm the resolutions

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

START

Review each non-duplicate comment

Invite TG to draft resolution

Yes there a resolution?

Vote on each resolution

No

Yes

Is there more than one resolution

NoIs there any objection?

NoAdd comment to group for future motion (within

a session)

Yes

Vote on motion to accept proposed resolution

Yes

Did one of the resolutions pass (>=75% votes)

Yes

Comment Resolved

No Defer the comment until later

Comment Resolution Process 1 (from Montreal meeting)

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

START

Review each non-duplicate unresolved comment

Fail

No

Pass

Comment resolvedRemove from

list of unresolvedcomments

- Post document withresolution text on server

- Add CID to bucketYes

Place commentback into list of

unresolved comments

Craft resolution with proposed text

Straw pollResults > 75%

Straw Poll: Do you supportproposed solution?

Motion to accept CIDs in

bucket

No

Comment Resolution Process 2 (from Montreal meeting)

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 1

• Move to re-confirm (Motions # 1 & 2, Doc: 0658r2) decisions made at the May 2007 TGT meeting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada

• Moved/Seconded: Marc E./Dennis W.

• Y/N/A: 4/0/3

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 2

• Move to accept the proposal in 11-07-2188-r1-000t as resolution to CIDs 1670, 1692, 1597, 1099, 1354, 967, 29, 1355, and 1708.

• Moved/Seconded: Dennis Ward/Joe Repice

• Y/N/A: 9/0/1

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 3

• Move to accept the proposed comment resolutions in 11-07-2216-01-000t for CIDs: 1133, 1657, 1658, 1667, 1668, 92, 1659, 286, 93, 1207, 94, 419, 1132, 1136, 95, 97, 1662, 420, 1133, 1137, 96, 1139, 110, 111, 116, 1140, 1143, 1141, 1144, 1147, 104, 1146, and 51.

• Moved/Seconded: Mark E./Larry Green

• Y/N/A: 7/0/1

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Straw Poll # 1

• Would you like to revert the proposed resolution for CID 1145 in 11-07-2230-r0-000t.– Yes (as is)

– No (delete the last sentence)

• Yes/No = 5/2

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Straw Poll # 2

• Those is in favor of the following definition of NLOS channel as a comment resolution to CID 419 in doc 11-07/2234r0:– Version 1: Y/N = 10/0

– Version 2: Y/N = 4/0

– Version 3: Y/N = 0/7

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Straw Poll # 3

• Is Clause 4 an acceptable place to include the discussion on Precision and Accuracy?– Y/N = 12/0

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 4

• Move to accept the proposed comment resolutions in 11-07-0659-09-000t-LB101-Comment-Resolution.xls for CIDs: 1400, 1149, 31, 197, 198, 491, 1687, 1152, 1025, 299, 311, 131, 468, 1409, 423, 1402, 424, 1403, 134, 141, 1678, and 1679.

• Moved/Seconded: Marc E./Dalton V.

• Y/N/A: 8/0/2

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 5

• Move to accept the proposed comment resolutions in 11-07-2120-02-000t (Proposal for resolving comments on LB 101) for CIDs: 133, 1683, 943, 1174, 494, 944, 344, 326, 1169, 327, and 1171.

• Moved/Seconded: Marc Emmelmann/Craig Warren

• Y/N/A: 6/0/6

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 6

• Move to accept the proposed comment resolutions in 11-07-2230-00-000t (LB 101 resolution of comments addressing LOS channel definition) for CIDs: 1145, 103, and 1664.

• Moved/Seconded: Marc Emmelmann/Dennis Ward

• Y/N/A: 7/0/3

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 7

• Move to accept the proposed comment resolutions in 11-07-2234-01-000t (LB 101 comment resolution NLOS channel definition) for CID: 419.

• Moved/Seconded: Marc Emmelmann/Craig Warren

• Y/N/A: 6/0/2

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 30

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Straw Poll # 4

• Who is in favor of:– Weekly 1 hour Teleconferences: count = 4

– Biweekly 1.5 hours Teleconferences: count = 1

– Biweekly 1 hour Teleconferences: count = 8

Teleconferences on Thursday’s 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm ET

Result: Bi-weekly 1 hour supported

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 31

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Motion # 8

• Move to empower TGT to have bi-weekly teleconferences starting 8/2/2007 at 12pm ET for 1 hour till September meeting

• Moved/Seconded: Dalton V./Marc E.

• Y/N/A: 7/0/0

• Motion: Passes

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 32

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

TGT Telecons between now and September

• Telecons opportunities: bi-weekly

• Dates: bi-weekly: 8/2/07, 8/16/07, 8/30/07, and 9/13/07

• Time:– Scheduled for 1 hour – Thursday’s 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm USA ET

• First telecon: 8/2/07

• Purpose: Resolving comments from LB 101 and hearing comment resolution proposals

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 33

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Straw Poll # 5

• Are you in favor of holding a IEEE 802.11 TGT ad-hoc meeting between the July 2007 session and September 2007 session?

• Yes/No = 1/5

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 34

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

TGT Standards Process Milestones

• Next major milestone – 1st Recirculation

2007

2008

1st LB

1st Recirc

REVCOM approvalWG/SEC approval

1st SB SB Recirc

We are here

JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDecJanJan FebFeb MarMar Apr Apr MayMay JunJun

2009

2nd Recirc

JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDecJanJan FebFeb MarMar Apr Apr MayMay JunJun

JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDecJanJan FebFeb MarMar Apr Apr MayMay JunJun

3rd Recirc

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 35

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Backup Information

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 36

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

A Brief TGT History

• Study Group formed – 1st meeting January 2004 (Vancouver)

• PAR approved August 2004

• Task Group formed – 1st meeting September 2004 (Berlin)

• Guidelines for proposals agreed – March 2005 (Atlanta)

• First accepted proposal – May 2005 (Cairns)

• Many accepted proposals have followed

• Started Issues List – September 2005 (Garden Grove)

• Internal Review conducted June-July 2006

• First LB started after March 2007 meeting (Orlando)

• Passed first LB (75.81%) and received 1885 comments. Comment resolution started in May 2007 meeting (Montreal)

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 37

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

TGT Approved Document List

• 11-04/1553r2, “Guidelines for TGT Formal Metric and Methodology Proposals”

• 11-05/912r3, “TGT Process Document”

• 11-06/872r25, “Compiled Comments from Internal Review” (latest version of comment resolution spreadsheet)

• 11-07/0659r8, “LB101 Comment Resolution”

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 38

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

Email Reflector

• 802.11 reflectors: [email protected]• Requires 802.11 membership to send to it• Getting on the reflectors

– http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reflector.html• 802.11 rules require all TG communication to be through reflector

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 39

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

References for 802.11 Newcomers (1 of 2)

• Web site:– http://ieee802.org/11/

• You can access the Document Server via your Browser at:– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents

• Instructions can be found in document:– 11-07-0767-00-0000-the-new-ieee-802.11-document-system.ppt

July 2007

Neeraj K. Sharma, Intel Corporation

Slide 40

doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2082r2

Submission

References for 802.11 Newcomers (2 of 2)

• Document numbering scheme– WG-YY-NNNN-RR-gggg-English-document-title.ext

• WG = 802 working group number, e.g. “11” as in 802.11

• YY = two digits of year

• NNNN = document number

• RR = document revision number

• gggg = 802.11 group to which the document pertains

– Example:• 11-06-0049-02-000t-jan-2006-waikoloa-meeting-slides.ppt