doc.: ieee 802.11-08/0752r0 submission july 2008 bruce kraemer (marvell); darwin engwer...
TRANSCRIPT
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT-Advanced Opening Report
Date: 2008-07-12
Authors:
Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Ln
Santa Clara, CA 95054
+1-321-427-4098
Darwin Engwer Nortel Networks
4655 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara CA 95054
+1-408-495-2588
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Updates since May
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
One Page Summary• Most of Circular letter components completed in Dubai
– IMT.TECH contents/numbers finalized
– IMT.EVAL contents/numbers finalized
– Circular letter structure finalized
• Work to perform final cleanup and formatting will continue in correspondence
• Circular letter contents to be completed in WP5D Seoul, Korea October 8-15– Workshop Tuesday October 7
• WP5D Reports require approval by SG5 in November 10,11
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT-ADV ScheduleDubai
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT-Advanced RIT development process
Jan 2008 Jul 2008
Jan 2009 Nov 2009
Jan 2009 Jul 2010
Jan 2009 Nov 2010
Jan 2009 Jan 2010
Jan 2009 Nov 2009
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Meeting Report Documents• Updated WP5D workplan was 5D-97 now TEMP-81
• Workshop draft plan 5D-185
• Activity Reports:
• 53 Services Aspects
• 96 Spectrum Aspects
• 94 AH-Circular Letter
• 81 & 53 + Attachment Chapter 2 - ITU-R WP 5D Structure and Workplan Meeting Report of Services WG
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Submission Related Documents
• 89 (Rev 1)Draft New Report on Requirements related to technical system performance for IMT-Advanced Radio interface(s) [IMT.TECH]
• 90 (Rev 1)Draft New Report [Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced]
• 87 (Rev 1)Compliance template for Services
• 88 (Rev 1)Compliance template for technical performance
• 93 (Rev 1)Technology description template
• 78 (Rev 1)Draft new Report [IMT.REST] requirements, evaluation criteria, and submission templates for the development of IMT‑Advanced
• 86 (Rev 1) IMT-ADV/2 – Submission and evaluation process and consensus building
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Candidate RIT Info
• IMT.TECH highlights
• IMT.EVAL highlights
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Supported Test Environments
• At least 1 required to propose candidate
• At least 3 required to enter final standardization phase.
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Service Type Examples - Titles onlyFrom M.1822
• Messaging• Voice telephony• Push-to-talk/Push-to-X• High-quality video telephony• Video conference• Internet browsing• Interactive gaming• File transfer/download• Multimedia• e-Education• Consultation • Remote collaboration
• Mobile commerce• Mobile broadcasting/multicasting• Machine-to-machine• Remote sensor• Remote bio-monitoring• Personal environment service• ITS-enabled services• Emergency calling• Public alerting• Number portability• Priority service• Lawful intercept• Location-based services
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT- Advanced IMT.TECH - Radio Requirements
• 4.1 Cell Spectral Efficiency - Table 1
• 4.2 Peak Spectral Efficiency– 15 b/s/Hz downlink
– 6.75 b/s/Hz uplink
• 4.3 Bandwidth– At least 3, Scalable up to and including 40 MHz
• 4.4 Cell Edge User Spectral Efficiency – Table 2
• 4.5.1 Control Plane Latency – <100ms
• 4.5.2 User Plane Latency– <10 ms
• 4.6 Mobility up to 350 km/h - Table 3, Table 4
• 4.7 Handover – Table 5
• 4.8 VOIP Capacity – Table 6
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Test environment ** Downlink (b/s/Hz/cell)
Uplink (b/s/Hz/cell)
Indoor 3 2.25
Microcellular 2.6 1.80
Base coverage urban 2.2 1.4
High speed 1.1 0.7
IMT.TECH - 4.1 Cell Spectral EfficiencyTABLE 1
Cell Spectral Efficiency
Cell[1] spectral efficiency () is defined as the aggregate throughput of all users (the number of correctly received bits, i.e. the number of bits contained in the SDUs delivered to Layer 3, over a certain period of time) divided by the channel bandwidth divided by the number of cells. The cell spectral efficiency is measured in b/s/Hz/cell. [1] A cell is equivalent to a sector, e.g. a 3-sector site has 3 cells.
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Test environment* * Downlink (b/s/Hz) Uplink (b/s/Hz)
Indoor 0.1 0.07
Microcellular 0.075 0.05
Base coverage urban 0.06 0.03
High speed 0.04 0.015
IMT.TECH - 4.4 Cell edge user spectral efficiency TABLE 2
Cell Edge User Spectral Efficiency
The (normalized) user throughput is defined as the average user throughput (i.e., the number of correctly received bits by users, i.e. the number of bits contained in the SDU delivered to Layer 3, over a certain period of time, divided by the channel bandwidth and is measured in b/s/Hz. The cell edge user spectral efficiency is defined as 5% point of CDF of the normalized user throughput. Table 2 lists the cell edge user spectral efficiency requirements for various test environments.
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
• IMT.TECH - 4.2 Peak spectral efficiency
• The peak spectral efficiency is the highest theoretical data rate (normalised by bandwidth), which is the received data bits assuming error-free conditions assignable to a single mobile station, when all available radio resources for the corresponding link direction are utilised (that is excluding radio resources that are used for physical layer synchronisation, reference signals or pilots, guard bands and guard times).
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Bits/s/Hz Speed (km/h)
Indoor 1.0 10
Microcellular 0.75 30
Base Coverage Urban
0.55 120
High Speed 0.25 350
IMT.TECH - 4.6 Mobility TABLE 3
Traffic Channel Link Data Rates
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Test environments*
Indoor Microcellular Base coverage urban
High speed
Mobility classes supported
Stationary, pedestrian
Stationary, pedestrian,
Vehicular (up to 30 km/h)
Stationary, pedestrian, vehicular
High speed vehicular, vehicular
IMT.TECH - 4.6 Mobility TABLE 4
Mobility Classes
The following classes of mobility are defined:– Stationary: 0 km/h– Pedestrian: > 0 km/h to 10 km/h– Vehicular: 10 to 120 km/h– High speed vehicular: 120 to 350 km/h
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Handover TypeInterruption Time
(ms)
Intra-Frequency 27.5
Inter-Frequency
– within a spectrum band– between spectrum bands
4060
IMT.TECH - 4.7 HandoverTABLE 5
Handover Interruption Times
The handover interruption time is defined as the time duration during which a user terminal cannot exchange user plane packets with any base station. The handover interruption time includes the time required to execute any radio access network procedure, radio resource control signalling protocol, or other message exchanges between the user equipment and the radio access network, as applicable to the candidate RIT or SRIT. For the purposes of determining handover interruption time, interactions with the core network (i.e, network entities beyond the radio access network) are assumed to occur in zero time. It is also assumed that all necessary attributes of the target channel (that is, downlink synchronisation is achieved and uplink access procedures, if applicable, are successfully completed) are known at initiation of the handover from the serving channel to the target channel.
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Test environment** Min VoIP capacity (Active users/sector/MHz)
Indoor 50
Microcellular 40
Base coverage urban 40
High speed 30
IMT.TECH - 4.8 Voip CapacityTABLE 6
VoIP Capacity
VoIP capacity was derived assuming a 12.2 kbps codec with a 50% activity factor such that the percentage of users in outage is less than 2% where a user is defined to have experienced a voice outage if less than 98% of the VoIP packets have been delivered successfully to the user within a one way radio access delay bound of 50 ms.
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 19
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT-ADV Evaluation (Temp 90)ITU-R IMT-ADV/3 Report Contents• Section 4 - ITU-R Reference documents• Section 5 - Describes the evaluation guidelines.• Section 6 - Lists the criteria chosen for evaluating the RITs. (Table 6-1)• Section 7 - Outlines the procedures and evaluation methodology for evaluating the criteria.• Section 8 - Defines the tests environments and selected deployment scenarios for evaluation.• Section 9 - Describes a channel model approach for the evaluation.• Section 10 - Channel Model Technical references.
• Technical Guidance Annexes:• Annex 1: Test environments and reference channel models• Annex 2: Traffic models• Annex 3: Link budget template
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT.EVAL Section 6 Characteristics for Evaluation Table 6-1 Evaluation methods and configurations
Characteristic for EvaluationMethod Evaluation methodology /
configurations
Cell spectral efficiency Simulation (system level) Section 7.1.1; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-5
Peak spectral efficiency Analytical Section 7.3.1; Table 8-3
Bandwidth Inspection Section 7.4.1
Cell edge user spectral efficiency
Simulation (system level) Section 7.1.2; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-5
Control plane latency Analytical Section 7.3.2; Table 8-2
User plane latency Analytical Section 7.3.3; Table 8-2
Mobility Simulation (system and link level)
Section 7.2; Table 8-2 and 8-7
Intra- and inter-frequency handover interruption time
Analytical Section 7.3.4; Table 8-2
Inter-system handover Inspection Section 7.4.3
VoIP Capacity Simulation (system level) Section 7.1.3; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-6
Deployment possible in at least one of the identified IMT bands
Inspection Section 7.4.2
Channel bandwidth scalability Inspection Section 7.4.1
Support for a wide range of services
Inspection Section 7.4.4
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 21
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
IMT.EVAL Section 8 Test Environments & Evaluation ConfigurationsTable 8-2 Baseline evaluation and configuration parameters
Deployment scenario for the evaluation process
Urban macro-cell
Urban micro-cell
Indoor hotspot Rural macro-cell
Suburban macro-cell
Base Station (BS) antenna height
25 m, above rooftop
10 m, below rooftop
6 m, mounted on ceiling
35 m, above rooftop
35 m, above rooftop
Number of BS antenna elements[1]
Up to 8 rxUp to 8 tx
Up to 8 rxUp to 8 tx
Up to 8 rxUp to 8 tx
Up to 8 rxUp to 8 tx
Up to 8 rxUp to 8 tx
Total BS TX power at antenna feedpoint
46dBm for 10MHz, 49dBm for 20MHz
41 dBm for 10MHz, 44 dBm for 20MHz
24dBm for 40 MHz, 21 dBm for 20 MHz
46dBm for 10MHz, 49dBm for 20MHz
46dBm for 10MHz, 49dBm for 20MHz
User Terminal (UT) power class
24dBm 24dBm 21dBm 24dBm 24dBm
UT antenna system (see the footnote)1
Up to 2 txUp to 2 rx
Up to 2 txUp to 2 rx
Up to 2 txUp to 2 rx
Up to 2 txUp to 2 rx
Up to 2 txUp to 2 rx
Minimum distance between UT and serving cell[2]
>= 25 meters >= 10 meters >= 3 meters >= 35 meters >= 35 meters
Carrier Frequency (CF) for evaluation (representative of IMT bands)
2GHz 2.5 GHz 3.4 GHz 800 MHz Same as Urban macro-cell
Outdoor to Indoor building penetration loss
N.A. see Annex 1 Table A1-1
N.A. N.A. 20 dB
Outdoor to in-car penetration loss
9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)
N.A. N.A. 9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)
9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
• Other Info
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Seoul, Korea Workshop
• Objectives of the workshop– to provide common understanding of the process for IMT-Advanced
standardization including technical requirements and evaluation guidelines. In particular, it will enable those not directly involved with the Circular Letter works to understand procedures better.
– to observe current and future development aspects of IMT-Advanced Radio Interface technology by development parties
– to exchange the views among possible proponents for consensus building of the possible candidate IMT-Advanced RITS
– to share IMT-Advanced market and regulatory aspects for the introduction of the IMT-Advance
– to promote more participation from developing countries into the WP5D activities,
Ref: TEMP/82E coordinator Dr K. J. Wee
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 24
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Seoul, Korea Workshop
• Expected Agenda Topics of the workshop– Procedure and requirements of IMT-Advanced standardization
– Possible Candidate IMT-Advanced RITs
– Market and Regulatory Aspects
– Needs of Developing Countries
Ref: TEMP/82E coordinator Dr K. J. Wee
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 25
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
WP5D Meeting Schedule
GROUP No. START STOP PLACE
WP 5D 1 28 Jan-08 1 Feb-08 Geneva
WP 5D 2 24 Jun-08 1 Jul-08 UAE
WP 5D 3 08-Oct-08 15-Oct-08 Korea
WP 5D 4 11 Feb-09 18 Feb-09 [India]
WP 5D 5 10 Jun-09 17 Jun-09 [Germany]
WP 5D 6 14 Oct-09 21 Oct-09 [China]
WP 5D 7 17 Feb-10 24 Feb-10 [TBD]
WP 5D 8 9 Jun-10 16 Jun-10 [TBD]
WP 5D 9 13 Oct-10 20 Oct-10 [TBD]
WP 5D 10 16 Feb-11 23 Feb-11 [TBD]
WP 5D 11 15 Jun-11 22 Jun-11 [TBD]
WP 5D 12 12 Oct-11 19 Oct-11 [TBD]
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 26
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
SG5 Meeting Schedule
GROUP No. START STOP PLACE
SG5 10 Nov-08 11 Nov-08 Geneva
July 2008
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Slide 27
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission
Study Group 5 ChairsMr. A. HASHIMOTO Chairman, Study Group 5Japan - NTT DoCoMo, Inc.Wireless Technology Standardization DeptMr. T.K.A. ALEGE Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Nigeria - Department of State ServicesMr. A. CHANDRA Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5India - Ministry of Communications & ITMr. J.M. COSTA Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Acting Chairman, Working Party 5ACanada - Nortel Networks Mr. T. EWERS Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Acting Chairman, Working Party 5BGermany - Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, GasTelekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen
Mr. C. GLASS Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Acting Chairman, Working Party 5CUS - Department of Commerce – NTIA Mr. A. JAMIESON Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Added Value Applications Ltd.New ZealandMr. A. KLYUCHAREV Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Russian Federation - General Radio Frequency CentreMme L. SOUSSI Vice-Présidente, Commission d'études 5Tunisia - Agence Nationale des FréquencesMr. L. SUN Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5China - Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Mr. K.-J. WEE Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5Korea - Ministry of Information and CommunicationRadio Research Laboratory