doc.: ieee 802.22-05-0100-00-0000 submission november 2005 ashish pandharipande, saitslide 1...
DESCRIPTION
doc.: IEEE Submission November 2005 Ashish Pandharipande, SAITSlide 3 Abstract This document provides technology solutions to meet functional requirements of an IEEE based WRAN system. Keeping in view the unique requirements imposed on WRANs to operate while avoiding interference to licensed incumbents and coexistence among WRANs, we propose an OFDM(A) solution in conjunction with a set of MAC protocols, and provide distributed sensing and interference management solutions.TRANSCRIPT
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Technology Proposal IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2005-11-07
Name Company Address Phone email Ashish Pandharipande Samsung Advanced
Institute of Technology SAIT, P.O. Box 111, Suwon 440-600, Korea
+82 010-6335-7784 [email protected]
Jae-Myung Kim Inha University Electrical Engineering Department, Inha University, Korea
David Mazzarese Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Dong Suwon P.O. BOX 105, 416, Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do Korea 442-600
+82 10 3279 5210 [email protected]
Baowei Ji Samsung Telecommunications America
1301 E. Lookout Dr. Richardson, TX 75082
+1 972-761-7167 [email protected]
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.22. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.22.
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair Carl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.22 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at [email protected].>
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Contributors
Section Organization Contributors Email
1. WRAN sensing Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)
Ashish Pandharipande, Duckdong Hwang
[email protected], [email protected]
2. Interference management Samsung Electronics Ltd. David Mazzarese [email protected]
3. WRAN MAC SAIT-Inha University Sang-Jo Yoo, Ashish Pandharipande
4. WRAN PHY Inha University Jaehak Chung, Jae-Myung Kim
[email protected], [email protected]
5. Misc MAC-PHY issues Samsung Telecom America Baowei Ji [email protected]
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Abstract
This document provides technology solutions to meet functional requirements of an IEEE 802.22 based WRAN system. Keeping in view the unique requirements imposed on WRANs to operate while avoiding interference to licensed incumbents and coexistence among WRANs, we propose an OFDM(A) solution in conjunction with a set of MAC protocols, and provide distributed sensing and interference management solutions.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
WRAN Proposal Overview• Sensing
– Local detection algorithms– Information fusion in distributed sensing– Interference avoidance to licensed incumbents– Coexistence among WRANs
• MAC– Frame structure definitions– Sensing management– Initialization procedures– Connection management and QoS support– Dynamic frequency change– Inter-WRAN communication, coexistence and resource sharing
• Physical Layer– OFDM(A) air interface– Support for single channel TDD/Multi-channel FDD and TDD– Adaptive modulation and coding modes for variable data rate support– Multiple antenna technology at BS
Sensing
PHY
MAC
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Overview of WRAN Basic Architecture• Wireless Regional Area Network (WRAN)
– Point-Multipoint structure– Unlicensed operation over VHF-UHF spectrum range– Large service coverage (> 30 Kms)– Operation under interference avoidance to licensed services such as TV
broadcasting– Coexistence among unlicensed systems WRAN BS
Customer Premise Equipment (CPE)
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
1. WRAN sensing
• Solutions to address requirements in the following sections of the FRD– General requirements of Sections 5, 14 and 15
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Sensing and associated modules at WRAN BS
TV usage database
Sensinginformation
module
SG forPart 74 devices
Dynamic map of Spectrum usage
Interference management
module
WRAN radio resource
allocation
WRANcoexistence
Licensed deviceprotection
Regional WRAN information base
Inter-WRAN resource sharing
module
Local WRAN information base
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Overview of WRAN distributed sensing• WRAN BS has to determine
– Whether a signal is present or not in a given TV channel– Binary hypothesis testing (signal present or signal absent) problem– If yes, which ones
• WRAN BS relies on a central sensing decision unit (CSDU) to make global decision on channel occupancy– Distributed local detection by CPEs followed by detection information fusion
at CSDU to enhance reliability of sensing• Signal types to be considered
– Licensed incumbents• TV signals• Part 74 device signals
– Unlicensed systems• WRAN• Others?
• Different interference management solutions apply depending on which signals are detected
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Distributed sensing overview
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Local detection problem formulation• Local detection performed at each CPE• Signal detection
– Signal x(k), that is transmitted over channel h(k), to be detected in presence of AWGN n(k)
• h(k) is the impulse response of channel between Tx and CPE Rx
0
1
[signal absent hypothesis] : ( ) ( ) [signal present hypothesis] : ( ) ( )* ( ) ( )
H x k n kH x k h k s k n k
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Cyclostationarity based signal detection• Signal x(k) is cyclostationary with period P if
• Cyclic autocorrelation and cyclic power spectrum density
• Various forms of detectors can be derived from cyclic power spectrum density
*( , ) [ ( ) ( )] ( , )x xR n k E x n x k R n P k P
( ) * 21( ) lim [ ( ) ].[ ( ) ] and ( ) ( )2 1
Nj n k j n j fk
x x xN n N k
R k x n k e x n e S f R k eN
Sliding N-pt FFT
x(n) Correlate and average sum
Feature detector
/ 2 1 / 2 12 ( ) / *
/ 2 / 2
1( , ) ( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )2 2
s
t
N Mj f n p f
T x T Tp N m M
mfs mfsX n f x n p e S n f X n f X n fMN N N
Signal attributes–Power–Modulation–Symbol frequency
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Proposed local detection algorithm
• Detection based on cyclostationary properties exhibited by large class of signals (eg., PSK, QAM, VSB, OFDM, CDMA, …)
• Basic mode of detection algorithm– Energy detection– Used in high SNR regimes for pilot/carrier/signature detection type schemes
• Enhanced mode of detection algorithm– Feature detection– Used in low SNR regimes– Especially useful during initialization procedures where BS is looking for an
empty channel in low SNR conditions
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Advantages of cyclostationary detection• Cyclic spectrum domain a richer domain for signal analysis than
conventional power spectrum• Robust to noise
– Stationary noise exhibits no cyclic correlations
• Better detector performance even in low SNR regions• Signal classification ability
– Different signals have different cycle frequencies and exhibit distinct spectral characteristics
• Can be used as an energy detector in alpha = 0 mode– Flexibility of operation
0
2 0 0
*
( ), 0, signal absent
| ( ) | ( ) ( ), 0, signal present( ) 0, 0, signal absent
( ) ( )2 2
n
s n
x
s
S f
H f S f S fS f
H f H f S
=
( ), 0, signal presentf
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Feedback of sensing result and fusion rules • Option 1: Data fusion
– Each sensing element makes raw observations but does not make a decision as to whether a signal is present or not
– It processes the raw observations and sends the processed information to the CSDU. For eg., each CPE may feed back quantized values of energy when in energy detector mode
– At the CSDU, the sensing reports from the Q reporting CPEs is fused using the decision:
• Thresholds chosen so as to meet a pre-specified probability of false-alarm
• Option 2: Decision fusion– Each sensing element makes raw observations, processes these observations and makes a
detection decision as to whether a signal is present or not– It then sends the decision bit Di (1/0) to the CSDU
– At the CSDU, the individual decisions Di are fused into a final decision based on the following rule:
• Parameters chosen so as to meet a pre-specified probability of false-alarm
1 0
1
Declare signal present ( ) if ; else declare Q
i g
i
H E T H
1 0
1
Declare signal present ( ) if ; else declare Q
i g
i
H D T H
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Detecting other WRANs
• Unique ID/spectral signature
• Regional WRAN information base– Attractive for its support for inter-WRAN communication
• Feature detection– Easy to detect OFDM signal with known symbol rate using cyclostationary
methods
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Dynamic map of collated sensing reports from CPEs
CPE IDs CPE location
CPE sensing and classification and classification report *[Characteristics of signals detected]
Power of signal type
1
Spectrum occupancy of signal
type 1
Power of signal type
2
Spectrum occupancy of signal
type 2
…
Channel number
k
Data fusion case; *In case of WRANs, report also WRAN ID
CPE IDs CPE location
CPE sensing report [Characteristics of signals detected]
Power of signal type
1
Spectrum occupancy of signal
type 1
Power of signal type
2
Spectrum occupancy of signal
type 2
…
Channel number
k+1
.
.
.
.
.
.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Spectrum usage map
Information fusion ofdistributed sensing results
Sensing measurements TV usage database
Signal classification and footprint characteristics
Licensed incumbents Other WRANs Other licensed exempt
Channel N-1 ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
Channel N • type of incumbent• spatial footprint• spectral footprint
• BS ID• spatial footprint• spectral footprint
• BS ID• spatial footprint• spectral footprint
Channel N+1 ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.22-yy/xxxxr0
Submission
Local WRAN information base
WRAN BS ID
BS location
CPE IDs
CPE location
CPE DL CPE UL QoS and resource allocation information
SNR Service requirement
CPE MCS
CPE Tx power
…
• Information base contains current resource allocation of CPEs associated to the WRAN
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 19
doc.: IEEE 802.22-yy/xxxxr0
Submission
Regional WRAN information base
Operator ID WRAN BS ID
WRAN BS location
Currently occupied spectrum
occupancy
Spectrum resources
available for sharing
Other parameters to facilitate inter-
WRAN resource sharing
…
• Information base contains WRAN information that can be accessed by other WRANs for facilitating coexistence and resource sharing
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
2. WRAN maximum transmit power constraint for interference management and coexistence
• Solutions to address requirements in the following sections of the FRD– Requirements of Sections 15.1.1.5, 15.1.6 and 15.2 (Coexistence and
interference-mitigation)• 15.1.1.5. Algorithms for Avoidance of Interference to Incumbents• 15.1.6. Maximum Power for WRAN CPEs to Avoid Interference to TV Operation• 15.2. WRAN Systems Coexistence/Sharing
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 21
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Place of proposed interference management module in the system
Database
Sensing measurementsSet of minimum
constraints for QoS scheduler
optimization
Radio m
apFootprints of
incumbent and
coexisting WR
AN
s
QoS
scheduling & resource allocation (R
RM
):• in opportunistic spectrum
access channels• in dedicated channels (for coexistence)
Module that computes the
constraints relative to
coexistence
Module that computes the
constraints relative to the protection of incumbents
Interference management module
Constraints from WRANs negotiation outcome
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Joint maximum power constraint rule in constraint areas
NTSC TV transmitterin Channel N
P = 0P = 0
CPECPE
150 m
P = 0P = 0
P = 0P = 0
P < 4WP < 4W
dmin
4.7 km
d
Grade B
P = 4W if aloneLimit of service provision whenever channel N is occupied by TV operation by this TV station
P = 0P = 0
WRAN BS
P < 4WP < 4W
Joint maximum power constraint rule in this
constraint area
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Justification of 150 m margin• Calculations show that [2]
A CPE transmitting at 4W with TV operation on channel N should be:• At least 10 m away from noise-protected contour co-channel to DTV operation• At least 150 m away from noise-protected contour on N-1 of DTV operation• At least 44 m away from noise-protected contour on N+1 of DTV operation• At least 4.7 km away from Grade B contour co-channel to NTSC operation• At least 44 m away from Grade B contour on N-1 of NTSC operation• At least 31 m away from Grade B contour on N+1 of NTSC operation
• Thus a 150 m margin beyond the Grade B/noise-protected contours can be given to take care of all but 1 constraints, and would only affect a marginal number of potential WRAN customers.
• An additional margin can be given if needed based on accuracy of distributed sensing measurements, and to take care of outage due to fading.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 24
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Step by step process for the determination of the interference protection constraints
Spectrum usage map
Table 2 of max powers for all CPEs on all TV bands
List of areas where simultaneous transmissions are criticalList of CPEs in these areas and density of constraint area
Computation of maximum transmit power control rules for the CPEs in each constraint area
Possible set of rules:• dedicated channels to some CPEs (respectively to WRANs)• power control rule as a function of density of CPEs (per constraint area per TV band) below the critical density threshold where communication is not possible or channels cannot be shared by CPEs.• simultaneous scheduling constraints by groups of CPEs within a WRAN
Table 1 of max powers for each CPE on all TV bands Using flowchart #1 and EIRP information
Negotiation between WRANs:• sharing of density and area information• result of negotiation:
• dedicated channels (operating and backup)• shared channels
Power density of other unlicensed users in each constraint area
Distance/location informationIncumbent presence information
Distance and area information
First layer of individual maximum transmit power constraints
Second layer of individual maximum transmit power constraints
Third layer of maximum transmit power constraints
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 25
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Maximum power constraint for a single CPE operation (out-of-band emission mask is assumed to meet the functional requirement 15.1.7 [1])
Table 1 (example)
1st layer of maximum power constraint
2nd layer of maximum power constraint
All values assume a 6 MHz bandwidth used by the CPE. They need to be scaled down later to the bandwidth actually used by the CPE within a TV band.
TV band 7
TV band 6
TV band 5
TV band 4
TV band 3
TV band 2
TV band 1
TV band
CPE operation on
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
1No TV
Outside grade BDistance
EIRP(+5)
EIRP(+4)
EIRP(+3)
EIRP(+2)
Not allowed(adjacent band)
Not allowed
Not allowed(adjacent band)
2TV
Inside grade B
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
3No TV
Outside grade BDistance
4 W
4 W
4 W@ 150 m DTV@ 31 m NTSC
4 W @ 10 m DTV@ 4.7 km NTSC
4 W@ 150 m DTV@ 44 m NTSC
4 W
4 W
4TV
Outside grade BDistance
4 WNot allowed4 W4 W
4 WNot allowed(adjacent band)
4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-2)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-3)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-4)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-5)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-6)4 W4 W
8No TV
7TV
Inside grade B
6No TV
Outside grade BDistance
5No TV
Inside grade B
TV band 7
TV band 6
TV band 5
TV band 4
TV band 3
TV band 2
TV band 1
TV band
CPE operation on
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
1No TV
Outside grade BDistance
EIRP(+5)
EIRP(+4)
EIRP(+3)
EIRP(+2)
Not allowed(adjacent band)
Not allowed
Not allowed(adjacent band)
2TV
Inside grade B
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
4 W
3No TV
Outside grade BDistance
4 W
4 W
4 W@ 150 m DTV@ 31 m NTSC
4 W @ 10 m DTV@ 4.7 km NTSC
4 W@ 150 m DTV@ 44 m NTSC
4 W
4 W
4TV
Outside grade BDistance
4 WNot allowed4 W4 W
4 WNot allowed(adjacent band)
4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-2)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-3)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-4)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-5)4 W4 W
4 WEIRP(-6)4 W4 W
8No TV
7TV
Inside grade B
6No TV
Outside grade BDistance
5No TV
Inside grade B
CPE Operation not allowed
CPE max transmit power = min{ EIRP(+2), EIRP(-3), 4W }
CPE max transmit power = min{ EIRP(+3), EIRP(-2), 4W }
CPE Operation not allowed
CPE Operation not allowed
CPE Operation not allowed
CPE Operation not allowed
To Table 2
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 26
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Table 2 (example)
Joint power constraint rule applies whenever CPEs share the same frequency band.
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 7
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 6
xEIRP(+3)EIRP(+3)TV band 5
xEIRP(-3) or power control if not alone(Outside grade B operation at distance d2)
EIRP(-3) or power control if not alone(Outside grade B operation at distance d1)
TV band 4
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 3
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 2
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 1
CPE #3Area #2
CPE #2Contraint Area #1
CPE #1Constraint Area #1
CPE
CPE operation on
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 7
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 6
xEIRP(+3)EIRP(+3)TV band 5
xEIRP(-3) or power control if not alone(Outside grade B operation at distance d2)
EIRP(-3) or power control if not alone(Outside grade B operation at distance d1)
TV band 4
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 3
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 2
xNot allowedNot allowedTV band 1
CPE #3Area #2
CPE #2Contraint Area #1
CPE #1Constraint Area #1
CPE
CPE operation on
Individual or joint maximum power constraint rule might be required
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 27
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Flowchart to determine the first layer of maximum transmit power constraints fill one cell of Table 1
For one given CPE, determine the constraints on all bands incurred by
possible TV operation on band NTV
operation in band
N?
No Yes
CPE in grade B
contour + 150 m?
Distance > 4.7 km?
Max power = 4W
NoYes
Max power = 4W
No Yes
Distance > d_min?
limit max transmit power as a function of
distance
no transmission on channel N
No Yes
DTV or NTSC?
start
CPE in noise-
protected contour +
150 m?
No Yes
• add to list of disallowed bands: N-1, N, N+1• set max power constraint from EIRP(DTV) on other bands
Max power = 4W
Update Table 1
NTSCDTV
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 28
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Simple description of the power rule• A single transmitting CPE induces power at TV receiver:
Where d is the distance of the CPE to the Grade B contour, and a is the path loss exponent. Let n be the density of CPEs in a local area (a few km2).
• Multiple transmitting CPEs: effective path loss exponent is decreasedMaximum transmit power rule:
Power at the nearest TV receiver:
ar tP Pd-=
( ), ar t
CPE constraintareaP P n d d-
Î= å
( ),t tP P n d=
One rule can address interference to incumbent from same and coexisting WRANs given the knowledge of the density of CPEs of all WRANs within a constraint area.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 29
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3. WRAN MAC
• Solutions to address requirements in the following sections of the FRD– General requirements of Sections 5, 14 and 15
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 30
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
MAC Proposals• 802.22 WRAN unique MAC frame structure and messages
– SystemInfo (to carry sensing related information)– BS Communication sub-channel (to provide a ranging and bandwidth
request channel between WRAN base stations)– Modified UL, DL MAP– Additional management message
• BS – CPEs & BS – BS MAC procedures– WRAN initialization and channel sensing– Channel acquisition broadcasting– Sensing reporting– Dynamic frequency selection– Connection management– Inter-WRAN base station management
• Resource partitioning• Dynamic resource renting
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 31
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Basic PHY Architecture (Duplexing)
F2 - Frequency bandF1 - Frequency band
F1 - Frequency bandF1 - Frequency band
Uplink Downlink
TDD
FDD
MAP
Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink Uplink DownlinkF1
F1 MAP MAP
MAP
Uplink Uplink UplinkF1
F1 MAP MAP
Downlink Downlink Downlink
Time
F2
TDD
FDD
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 32
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Physical frame structureSymbol
Sub-channelPrembles
FCH
Syste
mIn
fo.
DL-M
AP
UL-M
AP
DL Burst # UL Burst #
Symbol
Sub-channel< Up-link >< Down-link >
Cont
rol
Sym
bol
BS C
omm
unica
tion
Sub-
chan
nel
• SystemInfo (in every MAC frame) in BS downlink frame– This portion is used to carry some sensing related information to CPEs/other WRANs– It is also used by BS to send sensing management messages to CPEs or other BSs
• BS communication sub-channel – BS may set BS communication sub-channel periodically; Need not appear in every MAC frame– BS communication sub-channel is used for inter-base station communication– Base station that wants to share some frequency bands must send a request message without collision
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 33
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
MAC Frame Structure (Definition of New Portion)
• SystemInfo (in every MAC frame) in BS downlink frame
• Some important fields– CurrentBandList: includes the
currently used bands by the BS– CandidateBandList: includes the
bands that can be used in the case that currently used bands are not available any more
– Sensing Information: includes some commands for CPE sensing
• Quiet time, …
(BandMoveACK)
(Option : ToCPE)
SystemInfo (General) SystemInfoLength
CurrentBandList (Option) CandidateBandList
(Option : ToBS) ToBSType (ResourcePartitionResponse)
(ResourceRentingResponse) (ResourceAllocation) (ResourceCollectionResponse)
(ResourceReturningResponse) ToCPEType (BandChange)
Sensing Information
(ResourceAdvertisement)
(ResourceCollectionACK)
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 34
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
MAC Management Message
• Additional message type– SensingReport– BandMoveRequest– BandChangeACK (1:1 case)– ResourcePartitionRequest– ResourceRentingRequest– ResourceRentingACK– ResourceAllocationACK– ResourceCollectionRequest– ResourceCollectionResponseACK– ResourceReturningRequest– ResourceReturningACK
Generic MAC Header ManagementMessage Type Management Message Payload CRC(Optional)
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 35
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.1 WRAN Initialization (Option 1)
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 36
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.1 WRAN Initialization (Option 2)• Initialization of WRAN system not simple
– BS consults TV usage database and regional WRAN information base to find potentially empty channels
– BS performs sensing over these channels to check if they are indeed empty– Before using these channels, BS has to get sensing reports from CPEs to enhance channel
occupancy figure– BS broadcasts a “sensing request signal” on channels found empty by it – On receiving sensing request signal on a particular channel, CPEs perform sensing and send a
channel report signal if it finds channel is empty
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 37
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.2 Channel Acquisition Broadcasting• BS broadcasts a special carrier pattern after it acquires a
channel (every time)– We may use PHY pilots– Easy to detect CR WRAN BS signals by CPEs (simple frequency
scanning)– Let the other BSs know that the channel is already acquired by a
certain CR WRAN BS– Use special carrier signature (each BS may have different signature)
6 MHz 6 MHz
TV in use CR WRAN in use
Acquisitionbroadcasting
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 38
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.3 Sensing reports when CPEs detect interference• BS performs sensing via collation of detection results from CPEs• Periodic sensing by BS
– BS periodically senses current used bands and other available bands– BS periodically broadcasts some candidate bands with CandidateBandList in
SystemInfo portion• Periodic sensing by CPEs
– BS can request sensing requests to CPEs (periodic, not every frame)• Sensing Information in SystemInfo includes some commands for CPE sensing • If CPE receives the sensing request, it checks whether the current bands and some other
requested bands are available or not• CPE responds with Sensing Report
– Sensing Report = {empty/occupied, (if occupied) licensed incumbent/other WRAN, …}Sensing request (in Sensing Information)Sensing Report
Sensing Information
Sensing Report Sensing Report
Down Frame
UP Frame
Sensing Information
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 39
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
State transition diagram for sending CPE sensing reportPeriodic Sensing
Report Start
Random selection of CDMA code
Send the CDMA code with UL
ranging subchannel
Wait for CDMA_Allocation
_IE in UL-MAP
Timeout Tx UL-MAP with CDMA_Allocation_IE
Start Timer Tx
Random BackoffSend sensing report with the allocated data
burst
Done
ReceiveSensing information
.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 40
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.4 Frequency Changing by BS• BS should move to new empty bands if a primary system
appears– BS starts frequency sensing. – Before it actually moves to new bands, it should broadcast its frequency
changing to CPEs.• Need a new message (use SystemInfo portion)
– BandChange message– Include up and/or down frequency changing, new frequency info, ….
– CPEs reply with Sensing Report message immediately.• CPE checks (senses) whether the new frequency band is empty or not.• If the new band was already occupied, then it sends a Sensing Report to BS
(with the current up-link band) – BS should wait a sufficient time before it moves.
• Sensing Report may includes– Available Band list (if it has)
• Sensing Report is sent– Piggybacking on the data burst – Request a channel for sensing report (use CDMA codes)
BandChange
Sensing Report Signal from the new band
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 41
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• State transition diagram of frequency changing – BS, CPEStart frequency
sensing
Exist new empty band?
Wait for CPE’s Reply(Sensing Report)
Sudden Death Resolution Procedure
Re-initialization
Broadcast BandChange
Timeout T1
Start Timer T1Yes
No
Sensing Report
SensingReportSuccess/Abort?
Abort
Success
BandChangeCount is MAX?
Need increase Power?(<Max)Increase Power
Yes
Yes
No
No
BandChangeCount+=1
Retry
Wait BandChange
ReceiveBandChange
New frequency band is empty?
SendSensingReport
(Success)
Re-initialization
SendSensingReport
(Abort)
No
Yes
Tiimeout
Attempt to MAX Trial count?
Rendombackoff
No
Yes
Sudden Death Resolution Procedure
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 42
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• Frequency changing failure happens when – CPE does not receive BandChange message – BS did not receive Sensing Report message during the DFS procedure
• Impossible for some CPEs to decode the WRAN BS’s message – if the signal strength from the primary system that suddenly appeared is quite strong
• Sudden death procedure deals with such problems– There will be two possibilities
• First: BS could not recognize the primary system and continuously uses the current bands or BS couldn’t receive the sensing report from CPE during DFS
• Second: BS recognized the primary system appearance. BS will move to new bands (the CPE could not hear BandChange message from BS)
– For both cases, CPEs should search all frequency bands to find out the BS.
WRAN
TV Tx
WRANTV Tx
Frequency Change
3.5 Sudden Death Resolution Procedure
CPE
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 43
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
– For the first case, if BS is serving with several bands and the CPE is served with one of the bands of BS, then (FDD case example)
• BS maintains a service table for each CPE– CPE={uplink band, downlink band}
• When the CPE cannot hear BS signal with the current band, it moves to one of the other downlink bands of BS and tries to connect to BS
– After the CPE got a synch with the new band, it sends BandMove message to BS.– BandMove (down2) is sent with the up link band indicated in down2 (in this
example, up2).– BandMoveACK message is sent by BS with the new downlink band (down2)– If CPE cannot receive the BandMoveACK within the given time, it tries to hear
different downlink band.• To do that, BS should broadcast its CurrentBandList in SystemInfo of all
its downlink bands
frequencyup1 up2down1 down2 down3
CPEUplink band problem can be easily detected by BS. BS handles this (e.g., BandChange).
CPE={up1, down1}
CPE={up2, down2}
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 44
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
– If CPE fails to synchronize to BS with all current down link bands in the previous CurrentBandList, it may mean that BS changed its service bands into entirely new bands.
• CPE should search all frequency bands until it finds out the BS.
– To reduce this searching effort by CPEs, BS periodically broadcasts some candidate bands to move (BS periodically performs spectrum sensing)
• Candidate bands are not used now, but if BS cannot use the current bands, then it will try to move to the candidate bands first.
• CandidateBandList message is included in SystemInfo portion.• When CPE entirely lost the connection with the BS, then it first searches the BS from the
candidate bands.
frequencyup1 up2down1 down2 down3
CPE
up1
Pre-amble
FCH
UL-MAP
DL - Burst DL - BurstDL - Burst
System Info
DL- MAP
DL - Burst
DL – Burst DL – Burst DL - Burst
MAC frame of down1
CurrentBandList ={down1,down2,down3, up1, up2, up3}
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 45
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• State transition diagram of CPE (sudden death resolution)Detect Sudden
Death
Sync the downlink band in
CurrentBandList
Can be available another downlink band
in CurrentBandList?
Random selection of CDMA code
Send the CDMA code with UL
ranging subchannel
Timeout TxUL-MAP with
CDMA_Allocation_IE
Start Timer Tx
Random Backoff
Attempt to MAX Trial count?
Send BandMove with the allocated
Data Burst
Yes
Exist available band in CandidateBandList?
Search all frequency bands
No
Sync the downlink band in
CandidateBandList
Is band allocated?
Re-initialization?Or Done
Yes
Yes
Wait for CDMA_Allocation
_IE in UL-MAP
Is MAP Information available in the CandiateBand?
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Wait for BandMoveACK
Start Timer Tx Timeout Tx Allocation ACK Re-initialization
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 46
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.6 Resource Partition Request by other BSs• Network environment
– Multiple WRAN service providers (Base Stations) may need to share available resources• One BS (prior BS) already acquired TV channels, and if other BSs cannot
secure the required resource (additional TV bands are not available)– Other BSs can request a resource partition to the prior BS
• Using a special sub-channel or slot of the prior BS’s UP link• Resource partition ratio between different BSs is outside of this proposal
(pre-determined)
DownlinkRPREQ(Uplink)
Prior BS
RPREP(Downlink)
New BS
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 47
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• MAC frame structure for resource partition request– For OFDMA PHY: define BS Communication Sub-channel– BS Communication Sub-channel does not appear in every frame,
• BS communication sub-channel appearance and symbol length is defined in UL-MAP
• BS communication sub-channel appears periodically but not in every frame
DL - BurstDL –
BurstDL – Burst
DL - BurstDL- MAP
DL - Burst
DL - Burst
DL - BurstUL-
MAP
FCH
Ranging Subchannel
UL- Burst
UL- Burst
UL- Burst
UL- Burst
UL- Burst
Prea
mbl
e
OFDMA symbol number
Subc
hann
el lo
gica
l num
ber
System Info
BSCommunication_IEBSCommunication Sub-
channel
Downlink Uplink
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 48
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
– Each BSs should be able to send the resource partition requests to the prior BS without (or little) collisions
– And, the resource partition requests sent by other BSs should be treated with higher priority than ranging or bandwidth requests sent by CPEs of the prior BS
• BS Communication Sub-Channel (OFDMA case)B
S C
omm
unic
atio
nSu
bCha
nnel
Ranging and BW requests from CPEs of the prior BS
Prior BS UP LinkOFDM symbol
sub-channelnumber
Each BS selects one of possible CDMA
codes; because the number of BSs is
small, there will be little collisions
UL-Burst
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 49
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• State transition diagram of resource partition request – Other BSs
Wait for BSCommunication
Domain
UL-MAP with BSCommunicat
ion_IE
Selection of CDMA codes(128)
Resource PartitionRequest
Start Timer T3
Wait Resource PartitionResponse
Timeout T3
Wait for BSCommunication
Domain
Resource PartitionResponse
Resource Partition
SendRanging Code
Wait for CDMA_Allocation_IE
in UL-MAP
UL-MAP with CDMA_Allocatio
n_IE
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 50
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Prior BS
Send UL-MAP without BSCommunication_IE
[Time to send next map]Send UL-MAP containing BSCommunication_IE
[Receive CDMA code]Send UL-MAP containing CDMA_Allocation_IE
[Receive RPREQ]Send RPREP
[Time to send next map]Send UL-MAP
New BS
Wait
Confirm whether BSCommunication_IE exists
Transmit randomly selected CDMA code in BSCommunication Sub-Channel
Send RPREQ
UL- MAP
UL- MAP
UL- MAP
RPREP
UL- MAP
CDMA code
RPREQ
• Message flows of resource partition request
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 51
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
3.7 Dynamic Resource Renting Procedure• One regional area, multiple BSs share available resources
– Resource partition ratio between BSs is usually fixed based on agreement• Example : BS1 (50%), BS2(50%)
• However– The number of subscribers of each service provider may be different– The total traffic volume of each BS is also different and time varying
• Dynamic resource renting procedure between BSs1) Offeror broadcasts its unused resource in terms of (subchannels and time
slots in a frame)2) Renter requests its desired resource and duration3) Offeror broadcast its allocation4) Renter sends an ACK5) Renter may return the borrowed resource before the rental time ends6) Offeror may collect the resource before the rental time ends
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 52
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• Resource definition for rent: Resource Advertisement message in SystemInfo portion – OFDMA case: (sub-channels, symbol number (time))
• Rent request by other BSs– Use offeror BS’s UP link channel
• OFDMA case: BS communication sub-channel
FCH
UL-MAP
DL - Burst DL - Burst
DL - Burst
System Info
DL- MAP
DL - Burst
DL – Burst(resource for renting)
DL – Burst(resource for
renting)
DL - Burst
Resource AdvertisementMAC message
(format and syntax)To be determined
Offeror Down Link Offeror UP Link
Renter BS sends a CDMA code with offeror’s UL ranging subchannel to be allocated for resource
BS
Com
mun
icat
ion
SubC
hann
el
UL-BURST
UL-BURST
UL-BURST
UL-BURST
UL-BURST
UL-BURST
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 53
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• Renting Procedure
• Collecting Procedure
• Returning procedure
ResourceAdvertisement
Offeror
Renter
Resource Renting Request
ResourceRenting Response
Resource Renting ACK
Offeror DL(SystemInfo)
Offeror UL
Offeror
Renter
ResourceCollection Request
Resource Collection Response
ResourceCollection Response ACK
ResourceCollection ACK
Renter ULRenter DL(SystemInfo)
Resource AdvertisementResource Renting Request
Resource Renting ResponseResource Renting ACK
Resource Collection RequestResource Collection Response
Resource Collection Response ACKResource Collection ACK
To be determined
Offeror
Renter
ResourceReturning Request
ResourceReturning Response
ResourceReturning ACK
Offeror DL(SystemInfo)
Offeror ULResource Returning
RequestResource Returning
ResponseResource Returning ACK
To be determined
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 54
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• For communication between WRAN BSs – When a BS sends its messages using other WRAN BS’s uplink
channel, the BS should request other BS’s up link resource first– Example scenario
• BS1 periodically (need not in every frame) broadcasts the appearance of BS Communication sub-Channel and its position in UL-MAP with BS1’s downlink
• If BS2 wants to send a message to BS1, BS2 decodes BS1’s UL-MAP to see if the next up link channel of BS1 BS Communication sub-channel is available
• BS2 sends a CDMA code in BS Communication sub-channel of BS1’s up link
• BS1 allocates up link resource to BS2 with UL-MAP• BS2 sends a message for the dynamic resource renting procedure
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 55
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
4. WRAN PHY
• Solutions to address requirements in the following sections of the FRD– General requirements of Sections 5, 8 and 10
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 56
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Overview of OFDMA• A variation on OFDM• Multiple access is realized by providing each user with a fraction
of the available number of subcarriers• OFDMA avoids the relatively large guard bands necessary in
FDMA to separate different users
TX#4TX#3
TX#2
TX#6
TX#5
TX#1
Time
Freq
uenc
y bi
n
2468
1012141618202224262830
00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 57
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
System parameters
• Basic parameters– FFT Size : 1024, 2048, 4096– Coding : Convolutional Turbo Codes– Modulation : QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM– Channel BW : 6, 7, 8 MHz (TV band)– Operation Channel : Single or Multi Channel– Duplexing Mode : Full duplex FDD and TDD system
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 58
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
WRAN physical layer parameters# of subcarrier 1 K mode 2 K mode 4 K mode
Subcarrier spacing(KHz)
6MHz 5.860 2.930 1.464
7MHz 6.863 3.418 1.7090
8MHz 7.813 3.906 1.9531
Effective Subcarrier864
(null carrier : left 80, right 79,DC 1)
1728(null carrier : left 160,right 159,
DC 1)
3408(null carrier : left 343, right
344, DC 1)
FFT duration
(s)
6MHz 170.66 341.33 682.66
7MHz 145.71 292.57 585.14
8MHz 127.99 256.01 512.00
Duration of GI (s)
6Mhz 35.165 60.164 35.165 60.164 35.165 60.164
7Mhz 35.145 60.04 35.145 60.04 35.145 60.04
8Mhz 35.122 60.245 35.122 60.245 35.122 60.245
Symbol Duration
(s)
6MHz 204.792 230.67 375.463 401.33 716.793 742.66
7MHz 180.86 205.75 327.71 352.61 620.285 645.18
8MHz 163.11 188.235 291.13 316.255 547.122 572.245
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 59
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
TDD• TDD parameter define(6MHz case)
Parameter Value
Duplex TDD
Multiple Access OFDMA
System Bandwidth 6 MHz
Sampling frequency 6 MHz
1K mode 2K mode 4K mode
Number of used tones 864 out of 1,024 1728 out of 2,048 3,456 out of 4,096
Number of data tones 768 1536 3,072
Number of pilot tones 96 192 384
Tone spacing 5.859375 kHz 2.9296875 kHz 1.46484375 kHz
Signal bandwidth 5.0625 MHz 5.0654 MHz 4.9921875 MHz
FFT duration 170.67 μs 341.33 μs 682.66 μs
Cyclic prefix time 35.165 μs 60.1642 μs 35.165 μs 60.1642 μs 35.165 μs 60.1642 μs
OFDMA symbol time 204.792 μs 230.67 μs 375.463 μs 401.33 μs 716.793 μs 742.66 μs
TDD frame length 4 ms 5 ms 6 ms 4 ms 5 ms 6 ms 4 ms 5 ms 6 ms
Number of symbols in a frame 19 24 29 10 13 15 5 6 8
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 60
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
TDD• TDD Time duration parameter (6MHz case)
Frame structure (ref: duty ratio 1:1 / 2:1 / 3:1)
1K mode 2K mode 4K mode
DL UL DL UL DL UL
Timeduration
Tx duration (TTrans)
4ms1.843/2.253
/2.662 ms
1.638/1.228/
0.819 ms- - - -
5ms2.252/3.072
/3.481 ms
2.252/3.891
/4.301ms
2.252/-/-
2.252.778/-/-
- -
6ms
2.867/3.891/4.301
ms
2.662/1.638/1.229
ms
3.003/3.755/4.130
ms
2.628/1.877/1.502
ms
2.867/3.584
ms
2.150/1.434
Ms
TDD Gap time (Tguard)
4ms 518.536 μs(288.90+129.63) - -
5ms 494.58 μs(370.9+123.64)
494.44 μs(370.83+123.61) -
6ms470.616μs
(TTG + RTG = 353.025μs + 117.675 μs)
368.055μs(TTG + RTG =
273.000μs + 92.000 μs)
982.449 μs(TTG + RTG =
736.500μs + 245.500 μs)
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 61
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
TDD Frame Structure
Frame #1 Frame #2 Frame #n● ● ● ●
QTSuper Frame #n● ● ● ● Super Frame #1
Preamb
le
FCH / Broadcast
MSGDL PHY PDU (SS#1- SS#n) TTG
initial Ranging
BW reques
t
UL PHY PDU(SS#1-SS#n) OFDMA StructureRTG
DL
MAP
UL
MAP
TTG
BIN
AMC SSTMST TTG
Cluster
RTG
Syst
em in
fo
Band 0
Band 1
Band 2
Band 3
Band B-1
Band B-2
...
...
...
...
...
...
Prea
mbl
e
...............
...
...
...AMC Tile
FCH
RTG
ControlSymbol
TileBIN
... ...
Down Link Up Link
BS c
omm
unic
atio
n
QT
Super Frame #2QT Super Frame #1
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 62
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
FDD• 1K /2K / 4K mode FDD parameter define
Parameter 1K 2K 4K
Duplex FDD
Multiple Access OFDMA
System Bandwidth 6MHz
Sampling frequency 6MHz
Number of used tones 864 of 1,024 1728 out of 2,048 3408 out of 4,096
Number of data tones 768 1536 3024
Number of pilot tones 96 192 384
Tone spacing 5.859375KHz 2.9296875 kHz 1.46484375 kHz
Signal bandwidth 5.0625MHz 5.0654 MHz 4.9921875 MHz
Basic OFDMA symbol time 170.67 μs 341.33 μs 682.66 μs
Cyclic prefix time 34.134 μs 34.133 μs 34.133 μs
OFDMA symbol time 202.804 μs 375.463 μs 716.793μs
TDD frame length 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 ms 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 ms 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 ms
Number of symbols in a frame
14 / 19 / 24 / 29 7 / 10 / 13 / 15 4 / 5 / 6 / 8
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 63
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
FDD Frame Structure
Down Link Frame Structure
UP Link Frame Structure
Super Frame #1
Frame #1 Frame #2 Frame #n● ● ● ●
QTSuper Frame #m● ● ● ● Super Frame #1
3ms ~ 6ms
Preamble FCH / Broadcast MSG DL PHY PDU (SS#1- SS#n)
PUSC
Cluster
Band 0
Band 1
Band 2
Band 3
Band B-1
Band B-2
Prea
mbl
e
BIN
MST SST
............
...
...
...............
...
...
...
FCH
DL
MAP
UL
MAPSysInfo.
QT
QT Super Frame #2
ContentionSlot for initial
Rangin BW
requestUL PHY PDU(SS#1-SS#n) OFDMA Structure
Frame #1 Frame #2 Frame #n● ● ● ●
QTSuper Frame #n● ● ● ● Super Frame #1
AMC Tile
ControlSymbol
TileBIN
...
............
BS
com
mun
icat
ion
Super Frame #2
QT
Super Frame #1QT
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 64
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
System Capacity• TDD / FDD capacity comparison• Whole Frame Capacity• 1 frame duration – TDD : 6ms / FDD : 3ms, single symbol transmission case unit : Mbps
FFT Size 1K 2K
ModulationDL UL DL UL
TDD FDD TDD FDD TDD FDD TDD FDD
Q P S K
1 / 2 3.242077
3.750146
3.525086
3.750146
3.461697
4.090949
3.854812
4.090949
2 / 3 4.322769
5.000195
4.700115
5.000195
4.615596
5.454599
5.139749
5.454599
3 / 4 4.863116 5.62522 5.28763 5.62522 5.19254
66.13642
45.78221
86.13642
4
7 / 8 5.673635
6.562756
6.168901
6.562756 6.05797 7.15916
16.74592
17.15916
1
16QAM
1 / 2 6.484154
7.500293
7.050173
7.500293
6.923394
8.181898
7.709624
8.181898
2 / 3 8.645539
10.00039 9.40023 10.0003
99.23119
2 10.9092 10.2795 10.9092
3 / 4 9.726231
11.25044
10.57526
11.25044
10.38509
12.27285
11.56444
12.27285
7 / 8 11.34727
13.12551 12.3378 13.1255
112.1159
414.3183
213.4918
414.3183
2
64QAM
1 / 2 9.726231
11.25044
10.57526
11.25044
10.38509
12.27285
11.56444
12.27285
2 / 3 12.96831
15.00059
14.10035
15.00059
13.84679 16.3638 15.4192
5 16.3638
3 / 4 14.58935
16.87566
15.86289
16.87566
15.57764
18.40927
17.34665
18.40927
7 / 8 17.0209 19.68827 18.5067 19.6882
718.1739
121.4774
820.2377
621.4774
8
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 65
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5. Other considerations on WRAN PHY and MAC
• Solutions to address requirements in the following sections of the FRD– General requirements of Sections 5 and 15.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 66
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.1. WRAN Pilot
• Relevant sections of the Functional Requirements Document [1]
5.5.1: The base station SHALL serve as a radio resource supervisor and controller for its “cell,” including all associated CPEs and/or optional repeaters, if implemented, in its cell. A Master/Slave relationship between the base station and the CPEs SHALL be established whereby all the RF characteristics of the CPEs are remotely controlled by the base station.
• The proposal of including RACH channel ID guarantees the reliability of Channel Sensing and Initialization described in Section 3.1 in this document.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 67
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
WRAN Pilot
• Pilot definition (in terms of function)– Frequency synchronization (sync LO)– Cell timing synchronization (sync timing)– WRAN ID and BS ID (cell identification)– RACH ID (UL transmission, mandatory for FDD, optional for
TDD)
• For a fresh-started CPE to be able to start the first transmission, the BS must include in its pilot the information of the channel ID of the reverse access channel (RACH).
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 68
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.2. Smart antenna for sensing, cell searching, packet transmitting and
receiving, and soft combining.• Relevant sections of the Functional Requirements Document [1]
– 5: The base station radio SHALL be P-MP, capable of radiating its downstream signal (forward) toward the CPEs with an omni-directional, a shaped sector, or optionally an adaptive array (spatial reuse) antenna achieving broad azimuthal beam width to serve a number of prospective subscribers.
– 15.1.1.7: The base station and the CPEs SHALL sense licensed transmissions using an omni-directional antenna with a gain of 0 dBi or greater (where all losses between the antenna and the input to the receiver are included) in any azimuthal direction and polarization.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 69
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
• Sensing: omni, 0dBi
• Cell searching: Beamforming (one beam, but space-sweeping), highest gain:
• Packet transmitting and receiving: Beamforming (one fixed beam), highest gain
• Soft combining: Beamforming (multiple beams), highest gain
BS
BS
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 70
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.3. Spectrum Classification at BS
• Relevant sections of the Functional Requirements Document [1] 15.1.4: The system SHALL provide a way to populate a table of
channels that characterizes channel availability – such as disallowed, occupied, available, available at reduced power , etc., and to update that table at any time. The base station, and optionally the CPEs, SHOULD maintain a "list" of backup channel(s) in case a new incumbent is detected and a channel has to be quickly vacated. The exact scheme can be left to the proposers, as different approaches could be suggested to address this issue.
• The proposal of spectrum classification at BS make it smoother and more reliable of the Frequency Changing described in Section 3.4 in this document.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 71
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Spectrum Classification (State transitions)
Active SetCandidate SetObserving SetDisallowed Set
C/I < S1 C/I < S2 Needed
C/I > S1
C/I > S2
C/I > S1
C/I > S1Frequency Changing
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 72
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.4. WRAN Coexistence (Spectrum Etiquette)
• Relevant sections of the Functional Requirements Document [1] 15.2.1: Systems SHALL have means to coordinate with each other to
facilitate sharing, coexistence, and interference mitigation amongst neighbors.
• The proposal of spectrum etiquette is for inter-WRAN coexistence. It is an alternative of the Dynamic Resource Renting Procedure described in Section 3.7 in this document.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 73
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Spectrum Etiquette (Definitions)• We are proposing a distributed interference-management scheme. Hence,
the central sector/cell and neighbor sectors/cells are relative concept. If there is no sectorization, one central cell has 6 neighbor cells. The scheme is illustrated using a 6-sector per cell scenario.
• Fusable, ID := the frequencies that won’t interfere incumbent uses.• Fused, ID := the frequencies that the central sector has picked up. This could
include some backup frequencies.• Fpool := the frequencies that are usable and are not used by neighbor cells :=
Fusable, ID \ (Fused,n1 U Fused,n2 U Fused,n3)• Flocal := Fpool \ {Fusable,n1 U Fusable, n2 U Fusable, n3}
• Notes: – symbols U, ∩, and \ mean union, intersection, and exclude. – ID means the sector ID. Neighbor sectors are further denoted as n1, n2, and n3.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 74
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Spectrum Etiquette (Procedure)1. The central sector decides its Fusable, and Fpool.2. The central sector picks up frequencies from the Fpool according to
the following etiquette principles.i. Try to the frequencies that won’t be used by neighbor cells at all. In
other words, use first the frequencies in Flocal
ii. If the central sector is satisfied, go to Step 3. Otherwise, try to pick up frequencies from the rest of Fpool with the consideration of avoid using the frequencies that will affect a single neighbor cell most. For example, Use first the frequencies that are not shared by more than one neighbor cells, then other frequencies that may affect more and more neighbor cells.
iii. If the central sector is satisfied, go to Step 3. Otherwise, go back to Step 1 and try later. (an optional step can be taken here is trying to ask help from neighbor cells so they could release some frequencies.)
3. If needed, update neighbor cells of its Fusable, and Fused. Go back to Step 1.
Note: the procedure can be done periodically, or can be triggered by a certain predefined events.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 75
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Example
N3: 1,4,8
N2: 1,5,6
N1: 1,2,3
1,3,4,6,7
Neighbor 1 Neighbor 2 Neighbor 3 Central
Fusable 1,2,3 1,5,6 1,4,8 1,3,4,6,7
Fused 2 5 8
Fpool 1,3,4,6,7
1st Selection 7
2nd Selection 4 (randomly from 3,4,6)
Final Selection 3 (randomly from 3,,6)
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 76
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.5. Coexistence with other LE systems (Contention-Based Protocol)
• Relevant sections of the Functional Requirements Document [1] 15: Furthermore, these protocols SHALL also include means to allow
coexistence among multiple WRAN systems and with other license-exempt systems in these bands for fair and efficient use of the spectrum.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 77
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
DL Contention-Based Coexistence with LE Devices (Call Flow)
CPE Primary BS
Detect LE devices
Normal data transmitting
Data transmitting in contention manner
Contention needed
Contention
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 78
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
UL Contention-Based Coexistence with LE Devices (Call Flow)
CPE Primary BS
Detect LE devices
Contention needed
Normal data transmitting
Contend with LE at the next TXOP
Data transmitting in contention manner
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 79
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.6. Soft Combining
• While it is not required in FRD, Soft Combing does have the following advantages:– Extend coverage: Multiple BSs work together and support edge
CPEs– Reduce interference: Neither BSs nor CPE needs to increase
power in order to support a certain data rate.– It is very possible for OFDM-based WRAN given the fixed P-MP
topology.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 80
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Soft-combining Call Flow (DL)
CPE Primary BS Supportive BS
SC Req. (S-BS ID)SC Req.
Ranging
SC Accepted
Data
Data
Data
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 81
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Soft-combining Call Flow (UL)
CPE Primary BS Supportive BS
SC Req. (S-BS ID)SC Req.
Ranging
SC Accepted
DataData
Data Extraction
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 82
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
5.7. Flexible CPE Operation Modes
• This is not a scheduling issue, rather an issue on system flexibility.
• CPEs of different categories can satisfy different customers. For example, SME and SOHO customers may want to pay for more expensive CPEs than a regular home owner would do.
• We propose the procedure for supporting various categories of CPEs. For example,
– CPEs with various bandwidth: 1.25 MHz, 2.5 MHz, 5 MHz, 6 MHz or 20 MHz. – CPEs with different service level agreements.
• BS perspective: there are several groups of CPEs, each with a certain bandwidth.
• CPE perspective: multiple channels are available from BS
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 83
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
Procedures• Initial acquisition
– CPE send the request of bandwidth and service level agreement.– BS assigns the CPE a bandwidth based on the SLA and
availability of system resources.• CPE scans other spectrum under the direction of BS, reports back
channel condition information (CQI) and the request for channel change.
• If it is beneficial for the CPE and other users, BS confirms the center frequency that user should tune into, based on the CQI feedback, user profile, and SLA.
• CPE may repeat Steps 2 and 3 occasionally, e.g., when the link conditions in the current channel deteriorates.
• Besides the request from CPE, BS may inform CPE to tune into a different channel for load balancing or other purposes (e.g., strategic sensing).
• Dependent on other users’ profile and the SLAs, BS may reserve a certain frequencies for higher priorities applications and for users with higher privilege.
November 2005
Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT
Slide 84
doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0100-00-0000
Submission
References
• [1] Functional Requirements for the 802.22 WRAN Standard, doc.: IEEE 802.22-05/0007r46 .
• [2] WRAN Reference Model, doc.: IEEE 802.22-04/0002r12.