doc.:ieee 802.11-09/0536r0 submission may 11th, 2009 slide 1 obss issue in 802.11ac authors: date:...

8
May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: N am e A ffiliations A ddress Phone em ail Yasushi Takatori NTT 1-1 H irkarinooka,Yokosuka-shi, Kanagaw a,Japan,239-0847 +81 46 859 8596 [email protected] Kentaro N ishim ori NTT 1-1 H irkarinooka,Yokosuka-shi, Kanagaw a,Japan,239-0847 +81 46 859 8266 N ishim ori.kentaro@ lab.ntt.co.jp Shouichi Kitazaw a ATR 2-2-2 H ikaridai,S eika-cho,K yoto, Japan,619-0288 +81 774 95 1565 [email protected] Date: 2009-05-11

Upload: daniela-lindsey

Post on 04-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 1

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

OBSS issue in 802.11ac

Authors:

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Yasushi Takatori NTT 1-1 Hirkarinooka, Yokosuka-shi,

Kanagawa, Japan, 239-0847 +81 46 859 8596 [email protected]

Kentaro Nishimori NTT 1-1 Hirkarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 239-0847

+81 46 859 8266 [email protected]

Shouichi Kitazawa ATR 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Kyoto, Japan, 619-0288

+81 774 95 1565 [email protected]

Date: 2009-05-11

Page 2: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 2

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

Introduction

• More than 1 GBps throughput with multiple STAs and more than 500Mbps throughput for each STA are required in 11ac.

• Following new technologies are likely to be used

– Higher order MIMO (> 4x4)

– Spatial Division Multiple Access (SDMA) with more than 4 AP antennas

– Larger Bandwidth (80 MHz mode)

– Multi frequency channel • Use multiple 20 MHz channels across multiple users.

• Increase in the number of APs / STAs is expected.

Page 3: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 3

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

BackgroundGiga-bit wired network is proliferating. Giga-bit wireless access is very attractive for both the very high data rate services such as IP-TV.Efficient aggregation function is attractive for low data rate services also such as VoIP services.

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

1975 1985 1995 2005 2015Year

Thr

ough

put (

Mbp

s)

Ethernet

1Base-T

10Base-T

100Base-T

1000Base-T

10GBase-T

USB

WPANUSB1.0

USB1.1

USB2.0

USB3.0

802.11

802.11b

802.11a

802.11n

802.11ac

WLAN

11ac is expected to cover from low data rate services to very high data rate services.

Further increase in the throughput might be expected.

Page 4: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 4

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

Proliferation of WLANs

APAPAP

APAP

AP

AP

APAP

AP

AP

AP

802.11ac AP

Large increase in the number of APs / STAs is expected.

Page 5: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 5

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission5

80MHz mode

Over size MIMO

SDMA/OFDMA

Others

Number of available channels in 5GHz band

20MHz mode

40MHz mode

80MHz mode

Frequency band allocation in Japan

5470 5510 5550 5590 5630 5670 5725[MHz]

5150 5190 5230 5270 5310 5350[MHz]5250

5710

Only 4 channels can be used for 80MHz mode while 9 / 19 channels are available for 40 / 20 MHz mode.

Page 6: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 6

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

OBSS in 802.11ac

OBSS scenario is more likely to happen in 11ac compared to 11n due to limited . We think addressing OBSS issue in TGac is important because it

highly relates to the spatial domain control.

Example: Excessive NAV setting might affect throughput in the adjacent BSS.

AP1

STA11

AP2

STA21 STA22

Overlapped BSS

BSS1 BSS2

IEEE802.11acIEEE802.11a/n/ac

Page 7: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 7

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

Possible Simulation Scenario

• Example of Evaluation Conditions– Number of APs = 2

• Case 0: AP1:11n, AP2:11n• Case 1: AP1:11ac, AP2: 11n• Case 2: AP1: 11ac, AP2: 11ac

– Location of APs: T.B.D.– Location of STAs: T.B.D.– Traffic from AP to STAs: T.B.D.– Traffic from STAs to AP: T.B.D.– Channel model type applied : T.B.D.

• Possible Requirements– Case 1 and Case2:

• Throughput at each AP must be equal to or higher than that of case 0.

We think OBSS situation should be included in “Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology. ”

AP1

STA11

AP2

STA21 STA22

Overlapped BSS

BSS1 BSS2

IEEE802.11acIEEE802.11a/n/ac

Page 8: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in 802.11ac Authors: Date: 2009-05-11

May 11th, 2009

Slide 8

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0536r0

Submission

Conclusions

• Large number of APs / STAs is expected in 802.11ac.

• OBSS is more likely to happen in 802.11ac compared to 802.11n.

• We propose addressing for OBSS issue in TGac. We also suggest the following functional requirement.

“802.11ac shall maintain or increase throughput of each BSS in OBSS when some of 802.11a/n BSSs are replaced by 802.11ac BSSs.”