documenting and quantifying return on investment
DESCRIPTION
Documenting and Quantifying Return on Investment. Tuesday, October 30, 2012 Brian Rawson, Texas Education Agency Kurt Kiefer, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Neal Gibson, Arkansas Department of Education. Overview. Approaches to ROI Arkansas Texas Wisconsin - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SLDS Webinar
1Documenting and Quantifying Return on InvestmentTuesday, October 30, 2012
Brian Rawson, Texas Education AgencyKurt Kiefer, Wisconsin Department of Public InstructionNeal Gibson, Arkansas Department of Education2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceApproaches to ROIArkansasTexasWisconsinQuestions & AnswersOverview22012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference2Arkansass Return on Investment32012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference4
arc.arkansas.gov2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference5
Duplicate Enrollment2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference6
quicklooks.arkansas.gov2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference
7Economic Success Measures2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference8
UAMS Neonatal Research2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference9
Improvement Plan Software2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference10
Legislature Reports2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceTexas Student Data System ROI A balanced approach to benefits realization11
2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceQuantitative vs Qualitative ROI12Post-Implementation Review of Business OutcomesActual results of 4 quantitative and qualitative factors that were anticipated in the business case:Statutory fulfillmentStrategic alignmentAgency impact analysisFinancial analysisBusiness justificationProject planningSolicitation and contractingProject implementationBenefits realization
Texas Project Delivery Framework (statutory)Business CaseComparative information between business solution cost and project benefits, based on a business case analysis process2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceM = MandateS = Value to stateC = Value to customersI = Investment valueR = Risk
Return on Investment Value to the State (ROIv)13ROIv =M + S + C + I 2R2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceStatewide vs Local ROI14Current SIS Annual CostsPotential SIS Cloud-based CostsSIS application baseAnnual subscriptionVendor adaptation Annual hosting Hardware/software One-time installation Facilities & internetInternet serviceTraining/sustainabilityTraining/sustainabilitySupportStaffingEX: State-sponsored Student Information System (SSIS)TCO Tool helps LEAs compare costs of current SIS against prices for SSIS contracts
2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceSummary15
Balanced approach to ROIQuantitative ROI satisfies fiduciary responsibilityQualitative factors ensure comprehensive perspectiveStatewide focus satisfies fundersLocal focus satisfies local control needs
2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceWisconsins Return on Investment 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceQuantifiable Cost Savings
Data Collection$30M+ per year currently
Software LicensingReduced by 25 to 50%, ~$4.5M per year
Wisconsin 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceWisconsin is uniquely organized for this sort of solution as a large collection of relatively small districts
Wisconsin 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceTechnology scales well1,000 vs. 1,000,000 students same system, similar effort and labor
Technology advances enablebandwidth, cloud, SaaS
Wisconsin 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceEliminates repeated tasks every district performs:Procurement and negotiating contractsNetwork OperationsInstalling and managing serversDatabase and Application ManagementInstalling and updating that softwareFixing bugsDocumenting changesUpdating training information
Wisconsin 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceEliminates repeated tasks every district performs:Data integration with external agenciesImmunizations via the state registryFederal lunch program status via direct certificationTranscripts to WI colleges and universities
Wisconsin 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceProvides not easily quantifiable benefits:Equity all get the same featuresImproved data quality from common sourceElectronic records for mobile students, eliminates cumulative folder"Big data" for EWS, RtI, other researchEliminates trainingFacilitates implementation of specific data events, i.e., statewide surveys
Wisconsin 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceQuestions & Answers 2012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice ConferenceContact information:Brian Rawson, [email protected] Kiefer, [email protected] Gibson, [email protected] Jeff Sellers, [email protected]
For more information on Return on Investment:Traveling Through Time: The Forum Guide to Longitudinal Data Systems Book II: Planning and Developing an LDS: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011804
Contacts & Additional Resources252012 SLDS P-20W Best Practice Conference