dod architecture tools 5 january 2012 dodaf team
TRANSCRIPT
DoD Architecture Tools
5 January 2012
DoDAF Team
2
Outline
• Levels of Conformance• Tool types
– Primary Functionality– Principal Application– Type of Architecture– Analytics Supported
• Tool Voluntary Participation List on DoDAF-DM2 WG site
3
Four levels of conformance with DoDAF-DM2
• Level 1 -- Conceptually conformant
• Level 2 -- Logically conformant
• Level 3 -- Physically conformant
• Level 4 -- Semantically conformant
4
Four levels of conformance with DoDAF-DM2
• Level 1 -- Conceptually conformant
– Uses DoDAF terms and aliases (from DM2 CDM) to categorize its concepts
– DoDAF views (AV-1 thru DIV-3) have correct information according to “monster matrix”). For example:
An OV-2 with radios would be non-conformant
An OV-4 with Tank parts would be non-conformant
Fit-For-Purpose (FFP) would have to be conformant with whatever the FFP model creator(s) specified, e.g., a “xV-1" view for which the creator(s) specified the model as Services mapping to Capabilities should have Services and Capabilities and the relationship but shouldn't have unrelated info
5
Four levels of conformance with DoDAF-DM2
• Level 2 -- Logically conformant – Level 1 + adheres to terms and relationships from DM2 LDM
and aliases
• Level 3 -- Physically conformant – Level 2 + expressed as DoDAF – DM2 PES that can be
consumed by others
• Level 4 -- Semantically conformant – Level 3 + IDEAS semantics are correct
6
Tool CategoriesModel Development
Does your tool support development, authoring, etc. of architectural descriptions?
Repository / IntegrationDoes you tool support repositing of multiple architectural descriptions or data and does it support integration of independently-developed architectural descriptions?
Analysis / M&SDoes you tool support analysis of architectural descriptions? Does your tool support execution or simulation based on architectural descriptions?Is you
Architectures Is your tool principally oriented towards architectures?
System Engineering Is your tool principally oriented towards systems engineering?
Core ProcessIs your tool principally oriented towards any of DoD's 6 core processes as defined in the Core Process Legend?
Enterprise Architecture
DoD Enterprise ArchitectureReference Model
Reference ArchitectureCapability ArchitectureSegment ArchitectureSolution Architecture
Component Architecture
Measures of Performance (MOP)Does your tool compute MOP's such as system throughput, target tracking accuracy, weapon probability of kill, etc.
Measures of Effectiveness (MOE)
Does you tool compute MOE's such as battle attrition ratios, customer satisfaction level, etc.
VerficationDoes you tool have mechanisms to make sure the architectural description was built right, e.g., consistent, complete.
ValidationDoes you tool support validation that the right architecture is-being / was-built, e.g., requirements or reference model traceability tools.
Primary Functionality
Of the DoD architecture types defined in the Architecture Types Legend, which ones does your tool support development or analysis of? Is your tool stronger in any particular types?
Principal Application
Type of Architecture
Analytics Supported
7
Voluntary Participation Tools List
Mo
del
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Rep
osi
tory
/ In
teg
rati
on
An
alys
is /
M&
S
Lev
el 1
(C
on
cep
tual
)
Lev
el 2
(L
og
ical
)
Lev
el 3
(P
hys
ical
)
Lev
el 4
(S
eman
tic)
Abacus Avolution x
Accept 360 Acceptsoftware x
Adaptive EA Manager Adaptive x
Altova Enterprise Suite Altova x
Architecture Engine Rividium x x
ARIS Software AG x
Artisan Atego x
ASG-Rochade ASG Software Solutions x
BiZZdesign Architect BiZZdesign
CDTM
CORE ViTech x x
Corporate Modeler Casewise x
Cradle 3SL x
DAMIR
DARS
Data Enabled Enterprise Modeler (DE2M)
Pragmatica Innovations x x x
DISR
DITPR
DSE
EA Webmodeler Aglinese x
Enterprise Architect Sparx x
DoDAF Conformance Level Plans (Date)
Tool Name Vendor
Primary Functionality
8
Voluntary Participation Tools List
Mo
del
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Rep
osi
tory
/ In
teg
rati
on
An
alys
is /
M&
S
Lev
el 1
(C
on
cep
tual
)
Lev
el 2
(L
og
ical
)
Lev
el 3
(P
hys
ical
)
Lev
el 4
(S
eman
tic)
Enterprise Elements Enterprise Elements x
Envision VIP Future Tech Systems
eSMARTLMCO (formerly STASYS)
x
EVA Netmodeler Promis x x
GTG Tool
inteGREAT Enterprise eDevTECH x
InterChange Trident Systems x
iServer orbussoftware x x
IT Portfolio Manager Adaptive x
JCPAT-E
JOPES FAS x x
JSAS
Magic Draw No Magic x
MAP Suite Intelligile Corporation x
MDWorkbench Sodius x
MEGA Suite for DoDAF Mega x
Metastorm ProVision Metastorm x
Naval Simulation System - 4 Aces METRON x
NetViz CA x
OPNET OPNET x
DoDAF Conformance Level Plans (Date)
Tool Name Vendor
Primary Functionality
9
Voluntary Participation Tools List
Mo
del
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Rep
osi
tory
/ In
teg
rati
on
An
alys
is /
M&
S
Lev
el 1
(C
on
cep
tual
)
Lev
el 2
(L
og
ical
)
Lev
el 3
(P
hys
ical
)
Lev
el 4
(S
eman
tic)
PBO180 Eagle Optimization x
planningIT alfabet x
PowerDesigner Sybase x x
QEA (QualiWare Enterprise Architecture)
QualiWare x x
R2EAsults In2itive x
Rational System Architect IBM x
Rhapsody IBM x
Risk and Decision Analysis Palisade x
Salamander MOOD Salamander x
Select Solution FactorySelect Business Solutions
x
SimonTool Simon Labs x
SimProcess CACI x
SNAP-IT Synapps Corp x
System Architecture Management Utility (SAMU)
Atoll Technologies x x
Troux Standards Troux Technologies x
UDEF Explorer Knotion Consulting x
Visible Advantage Visible x
DoDAF Conformance Level Plans (Date)
Tool Name Vendor
Primary Functionality
10
Sources for Tools Usage in DoD
• DARS AV-1’s– Required by DTM 08-93 and CJCSI 6212.01E– Field for tools used– Free text field, often not filled
• ISP Database– ~200 ISP’s submitted to JCS in past two years– DoDAF Team in-process of procedure to gain
database access for further analysis
11
600 AV-1s in DARS
Number of DARS-Registered Architectures by Vendor
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
AARMS
AMCAT Arch
Tool
Aris
Cameo
EA CRIS
IBM Rational Rose
IBM Rational Sy
stem Arch
IBM Rhaposd
y
IBM Telelog
ic SA
JACAE T
eam Cen
ter
Metasto
rm Pro
vision
MS Acce
ss
MS Office
MS Visi
o
NoMagic M
agic Draw
Popkin SA
Pro Sigh
tSp
arxTro
ux
Vtech CORE
Series1
Next Steps
• Describe the four conformance levels into DoDAF 2.03
• Continue maintenance and publication of voluntary tools database– Refine the tool categorizations based on inputs from
community
• Continue analysis of tools usage in DoD
12
13
Questions?