doe stanford site office office of science u.s. department of energy 1 u.s. department of energy’s...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
DOE Stanford Site Office 1
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Department of Energy’sOffice of Science
OECM Limited-External Independent Reviewof the
Linac Coherent Light Source
Hanley LeeFederal Project Director
DOE Stanford Site OfficeOctober 9, 2007
DOE Stanford Site Office 2
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Outline
Purpose of the review Project Overview Impacts of FY2007 continuing resolution
and funding shortfall Revised cost and schedule baseline Risk and Contingency management Conclusion
DOE Stanford Site Office 3
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Purpose of Review
EIR based on the limited lines of inquiry Evaluate and validate the project’s revised cost and
schedule baseline• There is no change in the mission and technical performance
Recommend to OECM the reasonableness of the revised cost and schedule baseline
DOE Stanford Site Office 4
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Project Organization
Under Secretary for ScienceRaymond Orbach
Acquisition Executive
Office of Basic Energy SciencesPatricia Dehmer, Director
Thomas Brown, Program Manager
Stanford Site OfficePaul Golan, Manager
Hanley Lee, FPD
Stanford Linear Accelerator CenterPersis Drell, Acting Director
John Galayda, Project Director
DOE Stanford Site Office 5
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Project Overview
1.1 Management, Global Controls
1.2 Injector1.3 Linac
Near Experiment Hall
FarExperimentHall
CLO Building
1.1 Management, Global Controls
1.2 Injector1.3 Linac
1.4 Undulator
Near Experiment Hall
FarExperimentHall
1.5 X-Ray Transport/Optics/Diagnostics
1.9 Conventional Facilities
1.6 X-Ray Endstation Systems
DOE Stanford Site Office 6
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Project Overview - continued
LCLS Mission• Research and development center for x-ray free electron laser (XFEL)
physics in the hard x-ray regime; and• Provide a facility for the application of XFEL radiation to experimental
science To achieve the mission, LCLS scope was defined to build a free
electron laser. The scope remains unchanged in the revised cost and schedule baseline.
Project is 54% complete as of July 2007• Civil construction contract is 37% complete• Overall TEC is 58% complete
Project performance prior to FY07 was good (PARS criteria)
DOE Stanford Site Office 7
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
FY2007 Continuing Resolution Impacts
LCLS TEC Cost and Schedule Variances
(35,000)
(30,000)
(25,000)
(20,000)
(15,000)
(10,000)
(5,000)
0
5,000A
YK
$
SV
CV
Project performance degraded rapidly due to the CR and funding shortfall1. Re-directed resources to evaluate impacts, re-plan activities, and prepare revised
baseline – the costs for these efforts are non-recoverable.2. Delayed undulator and controls activities and procurements until March 2007.3. FY2007 funding shortfall cannot be restored until FY2009; re-plan Photon system
activities which delays project completion to July 2010.4. Reporting against the current baseline causes sharp decline in performance.
DOE Stanford Site Office 8
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Revised Cost and Schedule Baseline
DOE Stanford Site Office 9
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Risk and Contingency Management
Risk Management Process• Mature process in place used to manage project risks• Project mitigates risks (through various measures including VE)
without compromising the LCLS mission and technical performance• Updated monthly• Provides the basis for cost contingency
Contingency Management• Bottoms up development by project staff based on risks• Centrally managed between LCLS Project Director and Federal
Project Director• Thresholds are defined in the Project Execution Plan
DOE Stanford Site Office 10
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Conclusion
Revised cost and schedule baseline completed with adequate cost contingency and schedule float
Project mission remains unchanged LCLS mission will be achieved with the revised baseline Project management systems and processes exists and
working well Revised baseline is ready for validation